WEBVTT - Byepocalype Edition 0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.880 Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio. 0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.799 Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio, 0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.040 your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and 0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:22.319 advice Now leagues dot com. Here's your host. It is 0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:26.000 a bipocalyps edition of Fantasy Football Weekly on Paul Geargey 0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:30.160 and Coast. Today are Scott Fish and Brian Johnson Guillotine 0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.960 Leagues dot Com. Hello guys, Hello charge. I love this week. 0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.320 You love I love every bit about this It is 0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.360 forcing tons of tons of us to do more research. 0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.600 It's getting owners really really active and involved in their leagues. 0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:49.760 And it's less prep for the show too. We got 0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:51.960 more time that we love that we can dive a 0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.280 little bit more deeply. We're going to identify a ton 0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.000 of replacement players, not just in our take a Chance 0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.800 of the segment coming up next segment, which we always do, 0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.360 give you the nine players that you can pick up, 0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.800 but scattered throughout all of our breakdowns of all the games, 0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.240 you're going to hear names of players that are going 0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.320 to get starting grades that normally would not. We'll talk 0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.680 about those guys as we go through the show. We 0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.400 will also give you the answers to three tough questions 0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.800 and provide premature speculation about players you'll want to pick 0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.080 up this week that everybody else will be trying to 0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.840 pick up next week. We break down every game Fantasy 0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.800 style with letter grades and all the players who matter. 0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.679 We begin Scott Fish with the Carolina Panthers at the Giants. 0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.560 At the end of last week's game, the Panthers said 0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.880 they were going to try to run the ball more. 0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:45.560 We're gonna see a Cuba Hubbard lad game plan. I 0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.840 think we might. And part of it is because Sam 0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.160 McDonald's been bad. He's you know what, he hasn't been 0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.520 that good outside of his rush scene. Honestly, I've talked 0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.680 about this all year. He looks at his first read 0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.000 and he forces into double coverage and it's it was 0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.360 working out just this season, and now teams are just 0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.760 intercepting him when he does that, or it coincides with 0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:11.880 the Dan Arnold trade, which is my theory that he's 0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.200 on the bench. He's no longer startable now that he's 0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.520 not running touchdowns in every week. That's that's just what happens. 0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:19.560 D J. Moore. Im is still going to give an 0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.760 a grade too, though, because he just peppers him with targets. 0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.160 How can you not with that the tunnel vision that 0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.680 Donald has form averaging over ten targets per game, five 0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.200 plus catches in every game, seventy plus yards in every game. Uh, 0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.639 and even if he's triple covered, he's going to target him. 0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.560 So that that you love that volume. I'm putting Robbie 0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.720 Anderson on the bench. You have to back to back 0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.840 horrible games for Robbie Anderson. He has twenty nine targets 0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.400 in the LASS three games and he has done nothing 0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.720 with them except for one last ditch effort touchdown at 0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.760 the end of one game. That's all a bunch of drops. Yeah, 0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.440 it's it's been. It's a bad run for Robbie. It's 0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.400 kind of surprising. Concerned that was the connection from the Jets, 0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.640 like that was the one good thing about the Jets 0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:04.959 a couple of years ago, was that connection. I was 0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:09.240 optimistic going into the season Robby Anderson would be helpful anything, 0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.400 but so are the Panthers when they paid them again 0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:16.720 a good point guaranteed money. Y. Yeah, I don't have 0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.200 any of the other wide receivers. Terrace Marshal is out, 0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.120 but you're not going You're not gonna start shy or anything. 0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.120 Um on the running game. It's it's really all Howard 0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.760 is what it is. And it's a B grade here. Uh, 0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.560 he'll be startable as long as McCaffrey's out seventeen plus 0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.080 touches and back to back games. All other backs behind 0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.760 Chuba Hubbard have had five total touches in the last 0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.480 two games. It's just all him. He gets all the work, 0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.080 so I have a B grade on him. The Giants 0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.400 have allowed the fourth most combo yards to backs, along 0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:50.440 with six touchdowns in six games. Uh. The four backs 0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.960 that have touched the ball seventeen times against the Giants, 0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.560 their average stat line is add ten yards in a score. 0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.080 You could almost talk me into an A on that. 0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:05.000 You almost could, especially during the bipocalypse. No, let's go 0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.520 over to the other side. I have Daniel Jones on 0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.880 the bench. Everybody is injured for him, and he's had 0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:16.080 backed back really really low yardage games with no touchdowns 0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.600 and a bunch of turnovers. You gotta put him on 0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.839 the bench still, Uh, Sterling Shepherd, I had an A 0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:26.039 grade on him. He popped up on Friday with an injury. Uh, 0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:27.960 it sounds like he's still going to be good to 0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.839 go um, so much like More on the other side, 0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.240 Shepherd is, Jones is woobie, despite the fact nobody on 0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:40.520 this show knows but Mr mom Man, it's a security blanket. 0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.279 Ten plus targets again last week. That is ten plus 0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.120 targets in four of his last five fold games with Jones. 0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.840 In every one of those five games, Shepherd had seven 0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.279 plus catches and seventy five plus yards. He just gets 0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.840 he just gets the ball. Uh. Slayton Uh, Slayton is 0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.560 uh the only guy really, it's it's tone Tone, He's out. No. 0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.880 On the other side, Slaton like the other wide receiver. Sorry, 0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:06.680 Slaton is the only other guy, and you him on 0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.080 the bench because Tony's out. Goladay is likely out. Pettis 0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.400 got eleven targets last last week, but I am not 0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.320 going to trust that he didn't even catch half of them. 0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:20.080 So um, and it's a top twelve d against wide receivers. 0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.039 I have Ingram on the bench. Also. I can understand 0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:24.880 if you need to start him in in in a 0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.840 week like this, but he's only averaging five targets per 0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.720 game over the last four and well, he is averaging 0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:32.680 five targets per game over the last four. But he's 0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.440 only had one game over twenty seven yards, so he's 0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.640 not He's just not getting the yardage or the scores 0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.160 to match it. By the way, speaking of bad contracts, 0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.360 Kyle Rudolph eight million dollars, he scored a touchdown last week. 0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:45.400 That was a million dollar touchdown. That's right so far 0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:49.359 it is right. Now. Yeah, you're saying David Gettleman is 0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:53.960 not good at job. I would never say that. It 0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.000 looks like he won that oh b J trade though. 0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:02.240 Over to the running game, Davante Booker a C grade on. Yes, 0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.840 Dalvin Cook and Ezekiel Elliott tore up the Panthers, but 0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.599 there I like Booker here, Okay, their top ranked against 0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.040 top ranked, there's top ranked against the position. Other than 0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.600 those two games, I will say they've been bad since 0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.440 they lost Shack Thompson. They have. And you know it's 0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.119 vault when when the back gets volume, that back gets paid. 0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.799 And only Zeke and Dalvin Cook had more than thirteen 0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.360 series against against the Panthers, and I see, I see 0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.440 a volume game coming for Yeah. Actually, I'm gonna move 0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.240 it to a be because since Jack Thompson left, the 0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:39.080 Panthers are allowing five points seven yards per carry. That's 0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.800 a lot. That's a ton. I think that is a 0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.120 B thanky, So we got to move that to a B. 0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.279 You know what. That's all I need to say on that. 0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.160 That's he's going to get all the volume. He's gonna 0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:52.200 get all the pass catching work. The Washington offense disappointed 0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.280 badly last week against the worst defense in the league, 0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.479 Kansas City. Now they go to the Packers. Do you 0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:02.520 see a rebound coming from Hailer Heinik. I did Washington 0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:04.760 Radio this week and they were talking about Benjing Heinike 0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.240 for Kyle Allen. It's come to this that that kind 0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:08.920 of talk is already out there. What do you think 0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.640 this week? Brian? No, they gotta give Heiney one more chance, 0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.960 and I will give him a c um. Technically not 0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.720 a homecoming game for Heineke, as he's from Georgia, but 0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:24.400 apparently he grew up idolizing Brett Farve, just replaying all 0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.600 the great Brett Farve moments in his backyard at lambeau Field. 0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.320 So he gets to play at lambeau Field. So I'm 0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.880 giving Heinek is he here? He will be missing two 0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.000 starters on the old line Brandon Schurf and Sam Cosmi, 0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.280 but I think Heineke can clause away to at least 0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.880 two fifty passing yards to passing touchdowns in this game. 0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.560 I like the matchup for Terry McLaurin. Gonna give him 0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.560 a B. The Packers are without their top corner Jr. Alexander. 0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.160 They are allowing more than a touchdown per game to 0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.600 the wide receiver position. The very comparable Deante Johnson and 0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:56.520 Jamaar Chase both had big games against the Packers and 0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.080 the football team should be playing from behind in this one. 0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.240 So I like McLaurin with a B. U certainly has 0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:05.440 a a upside in most matchups. Diane Brown and Adam 0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:10.600 Humphries for the other wide receivers. I'm Tannama last week. 0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.960 He heard a lot of people asked me last week, 0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.800 me being one um. Dianne Brown did have six targets 0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.520 last week, which is encouraging. But I got both on 0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.040 the bench and this one, even though it is a 0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.800 somewhat promising matchup. They're both on the bench, but Ricky 0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.720 Seals Jones, tight end for football team, is not on 0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.600 the bench. Gonna give him a B. Has been very 0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.880 active over the last two weeks. He's totaled more targets 0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.480 in the last two games than Logan Thomas totaled in 0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.920 his first three games of the season. Uh seals. Jones 0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.360 also at the has the most red zone targets for 0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.880 Washington on the year already and over the last three weeks. 0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.400 The Packards are top twelve in the most catches and 0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.280 yards surrender to opposing tight end, So a strong b 0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.079 for R. S. J. And lastly, the running back situation 0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.839 for Washington. Antonio Gibson looks like he will play with 0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.600 the shin injury, and I'm hoping he does because this 0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.319 is a spike game. Frantonio Gibson. The Packers selected A. J. 0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.600 Dillon with the sixty second overall pick at running back 0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.240 last year, Gibson went sixty six, four round picks later. 0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.400 He wants to show Green Bay they made the wrong choice. 0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.000 But not a great matchup. Green Bay allowing just seventy 0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.000 two rushing yards unless than a rushing touchdown per game 0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.120 to running backs. They've been far more generous through the air, 0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.000 and that's why I like J. D. Mckissic almost a 0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.199 little more. Can give him a see though, because I 0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.560 can't give him a plus right charge just to see 0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.959 for mckissic. Green Bay top ten and most receptions allowed 0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.400 to running backs, and again the game script should favor mkissic, 0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.880 who is the clear top pass catching back on this team, 0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.319 even when Gibson is healthy. Jared Patterson would be interesting 0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:45.920 if Gibson was a surprise and active. It's not looking 0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:47.839 like it'll be that way, but we might talk a 0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.079 little more Jared Patterson later in the show. Over to 0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.960 green Bay pretty quick. It's pretty straightforward. Um, you're gonna 0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.160 give I'm going to give Aaron Jones an A even 0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.959 if they don't get David Baktiari back left tackle for 0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.080 the Packers, but he could big his return to be 0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.640 a big boon for Aaron Jones. Um. Now, it's interesting 0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:09.280 researching this game. Uh, for the points that Washington has 0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.440 allowed to running backs because they played Quardrell Patterson, who 0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.520 is viewed as a running back by some sites. Doesn't 0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.800 matter how you interpret the stats, You're gonna start Aaron 0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.520 Jones without a doubt, gonna give him an A. And 0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.960 I'm gonna give a j. Dillon a C for the 0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.679 super needy three straight games. Um with double digit touchdowns 0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:27.560 for A J. Dillon, and if Green Bay gains a 0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.640 big lead, we could see a heavy dose of A J. 0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:34.199 Dillon Davante Adams easy a football team allowing two four 0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.920 yards per game to wide receivers, Adams averaging one yards 0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.800 per game over his last five uh A for Adams 0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.280 and Alan Lazard are gonna give him a cee Marquees 0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.240 Valdez scandaling uh still on I R and Lazar should 0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.120 start opposite Adams in a in a solid matchup. I'm 0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.760 starting Lazard and a guy team league, so go ahead 0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.520 and join me. UH and Robert Tonyan basically his last year, 0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.160 I believe it saying that for a month. I'm gonna 0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.240 give him one last chance. Here he gets this. See 0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.559 Washington allowing nearly six catches and seventy yards per game 0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.840 to opposing tight ends. They've also yielded the second most 0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.000 red zone targets to the position. So a C for 0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.880 Robert Tonyan. But if he doesn't get it done, he's cuttable. 0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:14.520 After this week. It's already caught him in all my 0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.440 most for me, the most disappointing player in fantasy football. 0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.319 That's not related. We knew the touchdowns would regressed. We 0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.280 didn't think everything exactly. You know, if you'd told me, 0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.200 you know, eleven touchdowns are gonna turn down to seven. Okay, 0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:32.200 but I'm still gonna get five catches forty fifty yards 0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.120 a game. Now we're getting two catches for twenty yards 0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.560 a game and no scores. And of course I must 0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.840 mention a. Ron Rodgers gets an A Washington about top 0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.600 five in almost everything allowed to quarterback, bottom five, top 0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.439 five in terms of the most allowed, but yes A 0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:53.200 for Rogers. Bengels take on the Ravens in a game 0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.640 in which the Ravens are are under Jim Harbor are 0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.760 like five hundred against the Bengals of all things, go figure, 0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.319 and in this one, I think that I think Cincinnati 0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.080 probably ends up winning. Let's let's start here, guys. Have 0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:05.640 we got to a point that I can just say 0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.319 Jamaar Chase is an obvious automatic, aight, and not even 0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.280 have to give any rationale going forward. I mean, I 0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:13.640 just think we're there now, So I'm not going to 0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:15.640 burn more time on that, because you're gonna start him 0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.160 no matter what. So let's move on. Joe Burrow gets 0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:20.600 a B grade. He's one of only two quarterbacks who 0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.079 has thrown multiple touchdowns in every game. It's just him 0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:27.000 and Patrick Mahomes, that's it. Ravens masterful in shutting down 0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:32.400 Justin Herbert last week, but Derek Carr, Patrick Mahomes, and 0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.840 Carson Wentz the three weeks before that average three yards 0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.880 and two point three touchdowns. So I I don't believe 0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.040 the Ravens really are a shutdown defense like they showed 0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.720 last week. We'll go with the longer history here that 0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.040 says they can be beaten. Chase and Tie Higgins will 0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:49.680 talking about a second or better than any of the 0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.680 Ravens cornerbacks are going to try to stop them, including 0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.200 the best cornerback, Marlon Humphreys. Let's go to te Higgins. 0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.000 Baltimore secondary solid, but Higgins matches up on the outside 0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.000 against Anthony Averett and that is a plus matchup. He's 0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.080 played okay, but he's surrendering one. But he's surrounding four 0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.800 yards in a score in the last two weeks, so 0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.959 I think we can get some yardage here. And Higgins 0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.199 has been languishing a bit with everything Chase is doing, 0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.600 but this is a plus matchup and he is startable 0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.120 with a C grade um I know he hasn't been 0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.120 great lately, but we're going to give him one more chance. 0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:28.160 Speaking of not great lately, Tyler Boyd, I can't I 0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.520 can't start him right now until we get very, very 0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.920 plus matchups in the slot. This is not one of them. 0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.199 He's on the bench and he's droppable in many formats. 0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.200 The other receiver that gets a starting grade, and I'd 0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.280 like to call your attention. In fact, you know what 0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:46.040 that's gonna be our our sound. Would we have players 0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.280 who aren't and take a chance on me that you 0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.080 can still go pick up off the waiver wire and 0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.960 start in the bipocalypse. It'll be this oddball right there. 0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.199 All right, I'm just gonna work at the single cow bell. 0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:02.280 C j Uzoma. Uh Ravens have allowed the fourth most 0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.839 tight end yards, the fourth most tight end touchdowns, and 0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.680 the most tight end receptions. And he's been active lately, 0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.200 and he scored three touchdowns in the last three games. 0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:14.040 C j Uzoma also startable with the C grade. Let's 0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.439 go over to the Baltimore side. You notice start Lamar Jackson. 0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.800 Cincinnati's defense has allowed three hundred four yards passing yards 0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:24.000 per game to non rookie passers, and if you exclude 0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.360 the lines last week, that number jumps to three thirty 0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.240 eight yards per game UM. Jackson's passing is still not 0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:34.160 flawless UM, but nevertheless the rushing end passing combined makes 0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:36.479 him an easy a start here, and he's got favorable 0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.680 matchups for his many receivers who will talk about now, 0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.200 including Marquis Brown, another eight grade. Brown scored three times 0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.360 against Cincinnati in last year's meetings. He's scored five times 0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.560 already and as a monster game for him if he 0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.440 lines up on the right side against Trey Waynes, who 0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.440 missed all of last year missed the first few games 0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.680 of this year. He's come back for two games played, 0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.720 and Trey Waynes is giving up a perfect passer rating 0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:03.960 in his coverage A grade for Marcis Brown. We've got 0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:08.240 a C grade on Rashad Bateman. Bamon will be the 0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.600 starter with Sammy Watkins out for this game. He got 0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.080 thrown into the fire last week with forty five snaps 0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.400 in his first NFL game. They targeted him six times 0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.720 in that debut game. Bateman overwhelmingly ran from the left 0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.720 side of the field, which puts him on to Adobe Awuzier. 0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.720 The best of the Bengals cornerbacks. Not saying a lot, 0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.520 but at least he's a middle of the pack cornerback. 0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.560 I've got a C grade on Rashad Bateman, who you 0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.080 could start if you were in a pinch. Uh Mark 0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.560 Andrews with an A graded tight end. Over the last 0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.560 three weeks, Andrews leads all tight ends and targets receptions 0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.160 and yards. In that same time frame, the Bengals have 0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.000 allowed the eleventh most receptions and yards to tight ends, 0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:50.200 and last week, the stylistically comparable t J. Hockenson total 0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:54.520 eight catches for seventy four yards on eleven targets against 0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.440 Cincinnati last week. So now let's go to the running 0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.640 backs for the Ravens. Do we have to? Well, you 0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:07.440 may need to because now conveniently Ladavius Murray has been 0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.120 ruled out of this game, so we have at least 0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.160 a little bit of clarity there. Lavy On Bell and 0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.920 Devonte Freeman will get most of the work, but Tyson 0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.400 Williams will likely be active for this game, and if 0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.400 you're in a serious pinch, you could start him. All 0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:27.040 three guys are potentially startable. But let me mention the 0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.760 Bengals run defense is shockingly competent. They're giving up three 0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:35.960 point eight yards per carry. No back with less than 0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:41.880 eighteen touches against Cincinnati has scored or topped even thirty yards. 0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.400 That's it. So only because it's by apocalypse. I've got 0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.520 sea grades on Bell Freeman and if you're in a 0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:53.040 really deep deep spot, Tyson Williams on just the presumption 0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:54.840 that he'll get some carries here. But I don't love 0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:56.480 him in this match. I think Freeman is the one 0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.880 that looked best personally. I thought Freeman looked better than 0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.400 for sure, but I thought Williams looked better than any 0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.200 of these guys. And the smattering of work that they 0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.679 gave him. Mrs assignments can't pass block. It's it's trouble. 0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.399 It can be trouble. If only they had a quarterback 0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.439 who could run away from pressure, then maybe you know 0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.359 you could get Tyson Williams on the field. When we 0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.320 come back, take a chance on me. We're gonna give 0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.640 you nine more players that you can start put into 0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.440 your lineup help you out in the bipocalypse. Find out 0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.760 who they are when we return to Fantasy Football Weekly. 0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.840 Take a chance on me. Nine players not normally in 0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:01.040 your starting lineup. Find out who they are. As we 0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.159 go through some of the players you can pick up 0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.840 off the waiver wire, hopefully in this the Bipocalypse, we 0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.480 begin at the quarterback position and Scott Fish who you got? 0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:16.119 Let me turn on my bike every every week? Every week. Uh, 0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.040 it's it's a running bit now. I need to do 0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.440 it every week to keep it up. I have met. 0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:26.399 Ryan has multiple touchdowns in four straight, averaging two yards 0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.840 and two and a half touchdowns per game since Week one. 0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:34.440 Gets the ninth worst team against quarterbacks in the Dolphins, 0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.360 who may be missing their top two cornerbacks once again. 0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.360 That team is allowing three yards and two point two 0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.399 touchdowns per game. They've also allowed three hundred plus and 0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.359 or multiple scores in all their games this year. An 0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.200 I fell into the trap of writing off Matt Ryan 0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.879 after his terrible Week one. He's basically he's basically like 0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.920 a quarterback ten Since then, I did the same. Very good. 0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.160 Let's just go to you, Brian, you take a chance 0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.640 at me quarterback. I got to uh tongue go vloa 0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.560 at home against the same Falcons. The Falcons shutdown Daniel 0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.439 Jones and Zack Wilson a big whip for them. But 0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.879 Jalen Hurts, Tom Brady, Taylor, heind he all went off 0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.960 against Atlanta. I'm putting two in the ladder between those 0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.360 two quarterbacks, even with the trade rumors swirling around to uh, 0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.760 I think he plays a little angry this week, like 0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:21.680 I take, I would take a little fire from and 0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.840 he did last I thought he looked and the Falcons 0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.760 real Quick also ranked bottom ten and sack ran sack 0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.080 rates and only second worst quarterback hit rate, and three 0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.040 of the five quarterbacks they had faced ran for at 0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.560 least forty yards. Only Tom Brady and Zach Wilson did not. 0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.880 So I like Tua this week, might take a chance 0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.119 to me. Quarterback is Jamis Winston taking on Seattle. You 0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.800 guys think you have bad secondaries, I'll give you a 0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.320 Seattle for mine. Winston has been a boom or bust quarterback, 0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.879 but in his three boom games, he's averaging three point 0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.800 seven touchdown passes. I would take three point seven touchdown 0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:01.000 passes from my bye week quarterback, Tamis Winston this week, Um, 0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.480 Seattle hasn't really contained any pastor this year. They're giving 0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.520 up three hundred six yards in almost two passing touchdowns 0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.600 per game. I love matchups around him, including and we'll 0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:12.240 talk about this more and we get to the matchup 0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.680 Marcus Callaway, even his tight ends. He's got some options 0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.280 in the passing game here, Mark Jamis Winston might take 0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.359 a chance at me quarterback. Let's go to the running 0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:22.919 back position, Scott, who do you have? I'm going with 0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:27.480 roumandr Stevenson. I was very, very very happy last week's 0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.919 seeing him take all of Brandon Bolden's receiving work except 0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.760 for the league I started Brandon Bolden get in that one, 0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.399 but I liked it for Rumandre Stevenson because that means 0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.879 and Damian Harrison's getting none. He has one target in 0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:42.719 the last two weeks. Yeah, he did. He does, and 0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:46.320 that's that's that's part. That's not his game. So he's 0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.360 got a Jets team that have been torched by pass catching, 0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.160 allowing the fifth most receiving yards to tow back. So 0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.520 I think with those cast catching and some carries, maybe 0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.720 a ten plus touch effort in a week like this. 0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.200 I kind of like Stevenson this week makes some sense. 0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.000 Brandon Bollman may not even play in the game. Yeah, 0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.919 that'll be fine, fine with us. Uh, Brian, you take 0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.359 a chance of me running back? I got lots of Vegas. 0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.199 Is Kenyan Drake at home versus the Eagles, who have 0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.200 been very generous to opposing running backs, allowing the fifth 0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.200 most rush yards per game with an eight yard rusher 0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.720 and each of their last four games to go along 0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.159 without five running back touchdowns. Philly has also yielded the 0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.479 fifth most targets to opposing running backs. Now, I know 0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.760 Josh Jacobs is the lead back, but he is so 0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.560