WEBVTT - U.S. Is An Importer, Not Exporter, Sec. Ross Says

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Jay Leye. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>investment and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Ready.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Please to say, a friend of this program and an

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>old friend of mine, Danny Blanche Flack enjoyed us now

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Dartmouth College, professor of Economics and former member of the

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>MPC at the Bank of England. Danny, your thoughts as

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>we switched from seven to to six three at the

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>b o E. Well that's really quite a surprise. So

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're Andy Haldane, you have to explain to me

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and to other connentators why last month and the month

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>before you voted against a rate rise and since then

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the data of all worth, every piece of data that exists,

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>has got worse. So the question simply is did you

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>make a mistake then are you making a mistake now?

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Of both um, the answer clearly is that the economy

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>is flowing. Industrial production figures got a pretty bad no

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>way it grows at all, Brexit them having a major

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>impact on investment so I'm haven't had chance. That's obviously

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a decision has just can't. But this is completely astonishing.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>And how you to possibly vote for a rate wise

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>in these circumstances seems to me to be a major puzzle.

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Um And I asked this question, and I'm happy for

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>anybody to call in and tell me. Tell me any

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>data in the real world that actually sustains a claim

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that you should raise rates. There is none well, especially

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Indian Kingdom at the moment, Danniel. For our

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>listeners that might not be familiar with the members of

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the Monetary Politicy Committee at the Bank of England, the

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>two individuals that have been hiking or at least voting

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>for great hike at the b O A Michael Saunders

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>formerly of City Group, Ian McCafferty. These are the hawks

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Bank of England. We expect those two to

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>pop up. Andy Haldane is not just the chief economist, Danny,

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>He's been the chief due what's going on there when

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>he wandered he made a very strange, strange speech the

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>other day which had really nothing to do with Monty policy.

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm finding it pretty hard to understand. I mean,

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>especially because of the bank failures in its forecast, to

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>forecast wage growth, to forecast productivity. I'm trying to find

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>where it says the reason that he voted for this rise,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm really afraid I'm struggling to see it. Um.

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe others can see, but I don't quite understand

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>why he's changed his position. Um. I think it's a

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty embarrassing change because there's the question that everybody should

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>ask him. Blasfere would like to ask you a single question,

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>what data in the world A has been there and

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>B has changed since he voted against one a month ago,

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is there is none. Just to bring

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>got to jump in. Danny gotta say good morning to

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>my car anchor, Tom Kane. I'm good money to you, Tom.

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>The Bank of England, the consensus is that they slow

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>down in the first quarter is temporary. That it's temporary. David,

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you've pushed against us to great criticism. The conservators love

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to go after you because you're doom and gloom and

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no economic growth for a spot spout. There wasn't

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>even in the United States or substantial economic growth. But

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we are not seeing the blanche flower industry wages go up,

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and and I'm fascinated the United Kingdom, how you raise

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>raids into flat or even negative real wages. Does that

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>ever happen in monetary theory. No, So we've just kind

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of studied on it. The real wages today in the

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>UK are six and a half percent below what they

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>were in two thousand and eight, and the study has

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>been done showing this is the worst performance of real

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>wages in two hundred ten years of which we have data.

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So so basically the I've just found the paragraph it's

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a wing and a prayer. Um, everything's really bad. But honestly, boss, honestly, honestly, honestly,

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going to get better. It was erratic as due

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to the weather, it's due to who knows what sounds like,

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>sounds like review, you know it's going to get better

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>from ver erratic. Sorry, So let's make this a little

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>bit more broader, Danny, that just seems to be willingness

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a month central bankers right now to get away from

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>emergency policy settings. Let's be clear, they're at about fifty

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>basis points at the Bank of England. The ECB is

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a negative forty basis points. Quite clearly, we don't have

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>an economic situation that warrants an emergency policy setting on

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a global basis, Danny, So what are they doing and

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you think has really made them maybe a

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit more nervous about the future. Well, I don't know.

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm reading this through. They say, we're they don't

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>think there are benefits of waiting for additional information. That

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>seems I mean, I think the obvious argument is that

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>bankers want rates to be higher. They obviously realized that

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>at some point they're they're going to need to cut

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>them again. But this is this is this is the

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>economics of making up things as you go along, and

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you raise rates and that's gonna because you worry about

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a recession. But by raising rates, you cause the recession.

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's the reality. Um. I mean, if

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you if you look at what they said, there is

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>absolutely nothing in what they say. They say, honestly, it's

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>all going to get better, And we don't believe anything

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in the real world. We just know that things are

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>fine and we can raise rates. Well that's just gibberish.

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Nothing in the data whatsoever to sustain that. Quickly here, professor,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got to move on to important topics. But what

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the catalyst for central banks to cave in

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>given this difficult data? How do they how do they

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>get there and safe face? Well, obviously I think you're

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>asking the wrong person. I mean, it has to be

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>based on a forecast. It has to be that as

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>unemployment moves to the lower everything in the past is

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>going to generate for you wage growth and that's inflation.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And you care about information, so you want to get

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>your risk out here. Okay, first, but they've been saying

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that for the last ten years. We haven't seen any

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of that. It's complete misunderstanding of the labor market. Papers

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>says exactly that. So I just think this is you know,

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>these people are just very pulsing because they've they're stuck

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties seventies. No, no, FIFA is stuck in

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>the nine seventies. And now for our global audience, we

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>go to the important topic of the game. Professor Blanche Flower,

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>would you explain why Gareth Bale is not playing for

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom in the World Cup. I mean, Wales

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>can't even score against the Republic of Ireland, they're thrown out.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't England have a better chance against Germany and belgiumir

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of days if Gareth Bale was playing

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for them and not this this view of the nineties

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 1>seventies of Wales or Scotland, the two Brits on this

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>cool We'll find it extremely hard to explain why all

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>four countries played together in the Olympics but in soccer

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't. So clearly having a bigger pool to pull

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>from is better. But England ly speech tunis yet my

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>team ain't there, just like the America. I want to

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ask a really important question and it's going to give

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Tom a little bit of an insight to the competitive

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>nature of the United Kingdom. Um does the Welsh Danny

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Blanche Flyer support England when they play Panama this weekend? Uh? Well,

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Cardig didn't. Do you hear the hesitation? Hesitations are? Do

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you hear that? You love how that works? The rest

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of the world thinks we're friends. This is not how

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it works. Are you really going to root for Panama

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this weekend? Professor, No, I can't watch it. I just

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot. You know, folks, your work in here,

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'll tell you I just learned a lot about

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.679
<v Speaker 1>this disunited I'm so competitive, Professor Blanche Flower goal away,

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. He's with Darkness College and ever John,

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I am learning so much about this idiocy. Isn't it ridiculous?

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Said Everyone outside the UK looks in and thinks it's

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a United Kingdom. I mean, when it comes to sport,

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't be more at this united And am I

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>right if he said correctly that in the Olympics you're

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>all in it together, but not Yeah, team g B,

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>team Great Britain. But when it comes to when it

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>comes to football, Michael Barr didn't know this until like

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a week ago. Ferrell, that's like the Olympics for the US,

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>We're all in until it comes to Vane just David

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Blanche Flower pause. He will not support English? Can we go?

0:08:45.440 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg headline, Flower, thank you. We need to draw your

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>attention to Forbes magazine a number of days ago with

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a lengthy article on how Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>has trying to extricate himself from his investments as he

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>joined the Trump administration. Now in conversation with our David Weston,

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>here is Secretary Ross Bloomberg Television. As we talked with

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the man at the center of the United States trade policy.

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross coming to us today from

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Select USA Investment Summit in Washington. Thank you very much,

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Mr Secretary for being with us, well, thank you for

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>having me. H. We all have been focusing in part

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>on what the central bankers have been saying over the

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>ECB meetings in Europe, and I'm sure you have been

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>as well. And j Pal, the Fed chair, actually talked

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>yesterday about the extent to which he's seeing businesses really

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at the trade tensions, frictions, even perhaps incipient war.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Listen to what he had to say. I'm sure you

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>know what it was, but listen to what he had

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to say. We have a very wide, wide range of

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>context in the business world in the United States and

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and as we talk to them, uh,

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>they continually and increasingly expressed concern over trade developments. Those

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>concerns seem to be rising for the first time. We're

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>hearing about decisions to postpone investment, postpone hiring so much

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a secondary You heard what he had to say. He

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.599
<v Speaker 1>is seeing really postponement of decisions to invest. One of

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that's been a priority for this administration. Are

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you seeing that now? I'm here at select USA, which

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is our big annual foreign direct Investment conference. We have

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>over three thousand delegates here from sixties six foreign countries,

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and they are all here because they're interested in increasing

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>their investment in the United States. And I believe over

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of days we will have some very

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>big announcements to make about new transactions that these folks

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>are entering into. So I don't think that that's true

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that there's some big change. I think the media have

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>been very negative on the Trump administration. They pick out

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>some little companies somewhere, then they say, oh, my goodness, uh,

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this guy is having troubles, and they extrapolate that into

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole country. Okay, fair enough, Mr. Second, Let's take

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>one that's not a little company. Let's take Daimler, which

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is a big company that this this morning said because

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>of the issues with China, they're taking down their profitiment

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and that, as you probably know, the stock price went

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>down and took the stock six sounded round with it

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and actually took SMP futures with that with it. That's

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>not a small company, sir, No, it's not. But I

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>don't hear what we've done that hurt them. Well, what

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it is is the position in position by China of

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>tariffs in response to what we've done on exporting SUVs

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>from South Carolina to China, and that was in direct

0:11:54.920 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>response to the actions we've taken, oh the Retalia and short. Well,

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>naturally there's going to be some retaliation by the foreign company,

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but countries and they will try to pick out politically

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>sensitive areas to deal with. But at the end of

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the day, we are a net importer, not a net exporter.

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And that means a very fundamental truth. Take China, they

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>sell us around a half a billion, half a trillion

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year of goods. We only sell them around

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty billion. That means once they put tariffs,

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if it went that far on the whole hundred and fifty,

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>they have nothing more that they can do. We could

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>go theoretically all the way up to the five hundred.

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>That's not a very easy game for them to play.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's similar ratios with the other countries. That's what

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>President Trump means when he says that if it really

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>does get to be a big war, we have many

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>more bullets than any of these other countries right when

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes to tariffs, But there are other ways obviously

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of hurting imports non tariff barriers. And in the last

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>stambout of China, actually what they specifically said was quantitative

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and qualitative so that terrifs are not the only way

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that they can retaliate. No, it's true, and it's nor

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are they the only way that we can retaliate. The

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>truth is that China, Europe, a lot of other big

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>countries have been using non tariff trade barriers for a

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>long long time. They put on weird standards that it's

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>impossible for American products to meet. They put in all

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>sorts of elaborate and non science based restrictions. For example,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these countries keep complaining, oh, we can import

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>US beef because of mad cow disease. Well, do you

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think mad cow disease is really rampant in the US?

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I have been heard a report a bit in years. Similarly,

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>some countries say, well, we can't import your chickens because

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of asion flew. Whence the last time you heard a

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.239
<v Speaker 1>case of asion flew in the United States. It's all nonsense.

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>The truth is that they've been very protectionists. We have

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>been very close to free market, and now that we're

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to defend ourselves against their bad practices, they're screaming

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and yelling. Well, they've been spoiled for many, many years

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and that game is over. And Mr Second, I really

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's no one who knows about the situation who

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>would deny that China has been protectionists in all sorts

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of different ways. I don't think anyone would take issue

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>with that in the media or otherwise. At the same time,

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens when there's a tension between on the one hand,

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>growth and jobs, which was what the President's first order

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of business was tension between that on the one hand,

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and getting fairness and reciprocity. If you have to choose

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>between the two, which you either have less trade and

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>less growth and have it be fairer and more reciprocal, well,

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to be fairer and more reciprocal. Reciprocity is

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>an important keynote to our trade policy. The question is

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>how do you get there? And the only way we're

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get foreign countries to lower their inordinate barriers is

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>by making it more painful for them to continue those

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>practices than to get rid of them. That's what this

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is all about. This is about an endgame that really

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is free, fair and reciprocal trade. It's not about trying

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to make money out of tariffs. So that's not really

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the endgame here at all. But we need something to

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>induce changes in their behavior, and it's already happening and

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>seal and aluminum. Once we put our tariffs on, suddenly

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you're up is taking safeguard measures all over the place

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to protect their border. They weren't doing that before we

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>put the tariffs on. Japan had never had a trade

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>enforcement group in matting their big government agency. Now they

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have the twenty person trade enforcement group. We're going to

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>fix the problem of protectionism around the world, and we're

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>going to fix it by making it more painful for

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>those countries to do bad practices than to do the

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>right thing, which is to lower the trade barriers and

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>lower their tower and once againistrict. I don't think anyone

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>would quibble with that as a goal, a laudatory goal.

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>The question is, though, how much pain are we willing

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to suffer in order to get that done? Because the

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>pain goes both ways, and for example, Deutsche Bank is

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>out with estimates that in fact, a trade war actually

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>could take three tents off of GDP growth. If you

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>knew today that that was the price you had to pay,

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>would be willing to pay it in order to get

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to reciprocal trade. Well, it's very hard to make an

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 1>omelet if you don't break some eggs, and so we

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>really have to. We have no choice but to change

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the way that these other Benese can in countries using

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>unfair trade practices against us. We have to do it.

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>It's unfortunate that it wasn't done at an earlier point

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in time. Would have been a lot simpler, a lot easier,

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and a lot less painful. But it's really important that

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>we do it because we're talking about our future and

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that is more important than the growth goal, because, I mean,

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans came up with the President put forward a

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>tax plan that really was growing GDP nicely. Are you

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>getting a fair amount of that back in order to

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>get to the reciprocal world that you want? But we

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. And uh, we think that you will

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to see very strong employment. The biggest problem most

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>American companies have now is finding enough qualified labor to

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>do the expansions that they're putting forward. That's why you're

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing all of these apprenticeship programs, all of these joint

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>programs with local community colleges. Finding workers is the biggest

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>problem right now for American industry, not anything else. Because

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we've cut the regulations, released those shackles. We've cut both

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>individual and corporate taxes, making America a wonderful destination for

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>foreign investment and direct US And that's why we have

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>here at Select USA Summit, well but three thousand attendees.

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>We have sixties six countries represented here. That's fifteen more

0:18:56.359 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>countries than we had a year ago. We have Cabinet

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 1>secretaries here, We've got fourteen ambassadors, US ambassadors to foreign countries.

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a real turnout, and we will be making

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>some announcements about new foreign direct investment into the US.

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>That's the real world, not the whiners who have criticized

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>every single thing that the President has done. They said

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he'd never get a tax bill through, Well he did.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Then they said, well, it won't do any good for

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the economy, that will only help rich people. Well, unemployment

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is that record lows um corporate enthusiasm, corporate optimism relatively

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>all time highs, small business optimism, low unemployment overall, very

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:55.719
<v Speaker 1>low unemployment for women, very low unemployment for African Americans,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>very low unemployment for Hispanics. So anybody with thinks the

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>economy is being wrecked simply doesn't know what they're talking about. No, Joe,

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 1>please only us understanding. I was not suggesting all the

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>economy is being wrecked. The question is is there a

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>price being paid? Let me ask a specific question that's

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>come up in the trade context, and that is the

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>ZTE situation. I know that we're negotiations last night up

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>in Capitol Hill. Do you believe that there would be

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a compromise that will allow ZT to continue to do

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>business the United States? Well, there may very well be.

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>The President and Secretary Minuchtion and I met with a

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Republican congressional leaders yesterday and that was one

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>of the many topics that we covered. I think the

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:43.239
<v Speaker 1>important thing is to modify z TES behavior from what

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>it was before. We have now taken over two billion

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars and finds out of them. For the first time ever,

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we've had the ability to implant into a country company

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>that had violated sanctions our code of our Code of

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Export Control and we have unfettered access to the company

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>in order to monitor it. If there are any further violations,

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we will shut them down just as we did before,

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and we have the power to do that. Okay. Finally,

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Mssion Secretary, there's been this issue about short selling some

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>shares in a shipping company. I don't want to go

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>into the details of that. Frankly, I'm not sure I

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>fully understand them, but you've certainly had to talk about

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>them plenty. I have a more general question. Many of

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>us were surprised in fact that senior government officials are

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>involved in short selling or derivatives of any sort. For example,

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>here at Blueboard, we're not allowed to do that. In retrospect,

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>given what you've been put through, would it be a

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>better policy or rule to just say senior government officials

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:48.479
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be engaged in things like short selling at all. Now,

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this is not what you would call a typical short sale.

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>What happened some shares in one company we're not physically

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>in my possession, and there was a whole process I

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>had to go through to get them into possession so

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I could sell them. I had begun selling those shares

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the ones that I did have possession of months before.

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So when I learned about the new shares, wanted to

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>close out that holding. What happened to be a company

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>called Navigator, And it was when the shares were delivered

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to me my own shares, I used them to substitute.

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>So there was no profit or loss on the so

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>called short sale. It was simply a means of implementing

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a transaction, and then I had no gain or loss

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>by change in the market. Please understand, there was nothing

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in my question. It's just anything improper had been done

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>or anything that gotten gains, nothing like that. I'm actually

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>asking a more basic question, sort of a concession to

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the shortness of life as it were. I mean, I'm

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>sure it wasn't pleasant for you to even have to

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>explain all this, wouldn't it just be better just have

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a simple rule that said, senior gard officials don't participate

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in thing like short telling. Well, this is not a

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>typical short sale. A typical short sale is you borrowed

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>stock that you do not own. You sell the borrowed stock,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>putting up collateral for it, and then when the stock

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>goes down, you cover it and make a profit. That

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>simply is not what happened here. I do think that

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that kind of short sale is not a good thing

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>for government officials to do. But this is simply a

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>technical means of complying with the delivery rules of the

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>New York stock exchanged. I didn't gain or lose regardless

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of what the stock did after I entered into the transaction,

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>whereas in a short sale, if the stock went down,

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>I would profit. If the stock went up, I would lose.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>My situation was one where I was totally indifferent as

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>to the subsequent price of the stock and us it

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>happens the stock is now at a higher level than

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it was when I sold it. Anyway, Okay, fair enough,

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I do understand. I really want to thank

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you for taking a time, Mr Secretary. I know you

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>want to get back to your investment summit there in Washington.

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:17.959
<v Speaker 1>It's good if you to spend time with this, as

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Wilber Ross, US Commerce Secretary. Well from David Weston with

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of Commerce and now joining us from Vienna

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>gentleman who has been a great supporter of the program.

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Is classic, the Commanding Heights and the original the prize.

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>In a way underestimated, and I urge all of you

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to dive into it, the quest energy security and the

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>remaking of all of this. Daniel Jurgen joins us right now.

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Dr You're wonderful to have you with us with ol

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Peck in Vienna and to take a title of one

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of your chapters in the quest. Is there a breaking

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of the bargain at OPEC? Are the pressures so great

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>in the cartel that that cartel bargain will be broken? No?

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I mean the feeling. I think

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the sense here is that it's been expanded. And the

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>phrase that people are using we've used as the Vienna

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Alliance because the key factor is that this isn't just

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the old band of OPEC, but it's also Russia in

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>particular and other non Opeque countries that came together, you know,

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>after the price collapse, to stabilize the price and get

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>invested going. What's interesting that the tom tom just to

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>say please is interesting. I was reflecting with that one

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest beneficiaries of this has been, uh, the

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 1>United States in terms of the recovery of the do

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>bestic us oil industry. What is the fair price of

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a barrel of oil right now, Well, I think that's

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a for thousands of years almost philosophers have been arguing

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>about that, at least thousands of pages according to the books. Yes,

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think you know what one was hearing here,

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, as the people saying it was sort of

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty five to seventy was described by a couple of

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>people as the fairway that would uh assure sufficient investment

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and without impact on uh, you know, the overall economy

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>in fact, acting as a stimulus to what an interesting

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that came out is you know how much manufacturing

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>companies around the world uh depend upon the market, the

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>energy markets for their equipment. So you know, I you know,

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>probably at another time could be another fair way. But

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you can remember before the oil price collapsed in it

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>was set a under dollars a barrel was good for

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>consumers and producers. So it's a those goal posts shift, Okay.

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>One of the things shifting, Dr Jurgen is the immigration

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>debate in Germany and of course the immediacy of the

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>cultural and immigration debate in America. You're commanding heights maybe

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>does not take on immigration in our history of immigration directly,

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 1>but it permeates all of your classic book, The Commanding Heights.

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jurgen on the newness of this immigration debate or

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is it something that we're simply revisiting across our history. Well,

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly be imperious. There was a Chinese Exclusion Act

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>a century ago, um, but for the most part in

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century it was open. It was very much

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>open borders. Um. But obviously, you know now it's such

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a divisive issue in the United States and in Germany.

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge problem for Angelo and Merkel. Within that

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is the spirit of capitalism, which is you need population

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to make capitalism go. Would we be a better company

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>was simply more immigrants allowing for greater population growth. Well,

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I think economists certainly say that that, Uh, one of

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the strengths of the US economy is immigration, and that

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 1>increases the overall productivity of the economy. And you know,

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you can see and I mean we're you know, we're

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in a period now we're labored in many many markets

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>are very tight. Let's see, dar Daniel, you're gonna thank

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you so much from Vienna today in the OPEC meetings.

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And I really can't say enough about his latest The

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>quest really a wonderful book on the changes going on

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in some of which he's widely predicted within h the

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>global economies. This is the interview of the day for

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Global Wall Street. No not about the trading errant Deutsche Bank.

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Sinali Basik for this. This is brilliant, brilliant

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.719
<v Speaker 1>work by mckenze Group on the state of corporate bonds.

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Susan Lunn joins us now with Mackenzie on this exceptionally

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>important fifty page reports. Susan congratulations on advancing Reinhardt and

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>rogue Off and that they said this time is different

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in all the focuses on government debt and instead we

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>should look at private debt. And there's households on that,

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>but there's corporate debt which just builds and builds. Are

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we reducing two thousand five and two thousand and six.

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having in me. Well, it's true that

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>corporate debt or debt of non financial companies has grown

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>almost as much as government debt since the Financial crisis,

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's not been a lot of attention paid to this.

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>So in this report we looked specifically at what's happening

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in the corporate bond markets. Which is that they've really

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>taken off. As banks have retrenched, companies have turned to

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>bond and they've tripled in size. We actually think this

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is a welcome diversification, but there are definitely signs of risk,

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:32.719
<v Speaker 1>and already defaults on corporate debt obligations are above thirty

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>year average, and you think they could rise further. You've

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>got folks, As always with mackenzie, the charts are stunning.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>There's the U S, there's Western Europe, and then there's

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what I'm gonna call Susan. The mystery of China, other

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>developing economies and other advanced economies. Is there a transparency

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>out there that was not there in two thousand six

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>or is too much of your bar chart a mystery? Well,

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.719
<v Speaker 1>there is more transparency. This is why economists like myself

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>have long said that bond markets are a good alternative

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to bank loan because their priced in the market. Credit

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>ating agencies are out there raiding the bond, so there

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is more transparency. But as you noted, the growth has

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>been in the United States, but also in Europe. In

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>China has been staggering. So their corporate bond market went

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>from virtually nothing ten years ago to two trillion dollars,

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the largest in the world today, and other

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets have been able to issue bonds as well.

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't say this enough, folks. Susan Lund

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>with us A Mackenzie Group, and the title of the

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>story of this essay is let me get it up here,

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>hold on, I just lost it. Rising corporate debt parallel

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>or promise And basically, Susan, every single executive on every

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>single airline should be reading this thing. What Let me

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>ask an open question, what in your thirties six page

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>report is a number one message to chief financial officers

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>burdened with the idea of should we do the next trunch?

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Should we do the next issuance? Yeah, the big messages

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that look, the market has probably crested, so it's tripled

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in size, but now we've got rising interest rates. And

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the analysis we've done in this report looks at how

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>many companies have issued debt and in fact they're in

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a risky position to repay, and so we're likely to

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>see some phone out in the market. Now. Long term,

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of potentials for further correct but short term

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we would expect defaults to continue to rise. And now

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Fox folks want surveillance with Tom Keane, Pim Fox and

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>John Farrell where we get nerdy with you with Susan

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Lun of Mackensee Group. Okay, Susan, here's the reality, with

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a major shout out to David Goldman and his his

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>classic work at Bank of America. If there's a trunch

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>or a of issuances of a given nation or housing

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>bond or corporate bond, everybody focuses on the garbage, which

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>gets bad and gets worse. But the real problem is

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the senior quality loans that are priced at ninety eight

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>or nineties six, and they moved down in crisis to

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>are we in that same position again where the real

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>risk is not the junk that's identified as junk, but

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the real risk is quality senior corporate paper that could

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>see a price decline of equality down to eighty seven.

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that where the real risk is. That's one of

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the two big risks so UM and our analysis we

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>find up of an overall corporate bonds and they do

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>west or now triple b according to SMP, so it's

0:33:55.440 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just one notch above junk. So the average credit quality

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of the investment great issuers that you're pointing out has

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>slowly gone down in this era of ultru low interest rates,

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and so economic shocks maybe from trade from other factors,

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>could actually push those companies now down below the box.

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the high yield bonds already are

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>at record size is twillion dollars outstanding. You've got a

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>chart on e M that's just stunning Exhibit ten for

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>those you keeping score at home, and the delta here

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on share of issuers at high risk of default for Brazil, China,

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 1>India is it's a jump condition over everybody else. When

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you see EM currency depreciation against strong dollar, can you

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>overlay that with your debt study into some form of crisis,

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>some form of reducts of well, definitely they're going to

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 1>be losses in EM debt. So as we've shown, roughly

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of issuers in Brazil and China um have

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:10.240
<v Speaker 1>evena over interest payments of less than one and a half.

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Sorry for being so wonky, but those of you who

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>understand interest coverage, it means that they can basically finance

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>their debt today, but they've got very little cushion. So

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>if their finances go south or if their currencies depreciate. Uh,

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they're in a lot of trouble. And that's today, that's

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>before you know, the FED started raising interest rates. So

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing rates head up and it means a lot

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of these companies are not going to be able to

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>afford this as debt matures. One of the things we

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 1>documented this report is that over the next five years

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have somewhere between one point six trillion

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and two trillion dollars each year these corporate bonds come

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and do, and you'll have to rewrite the report because

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of Fox Disney Comcast from your distance and with great

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>respect for mckensey group, their goal is not to model

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 1>out the latest hot transaction. But how do you respond,

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Susan Lunnon when you see lex and the f T.

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was one or two bids ago at

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>seventeen times ibata and I don't know where that number

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is now with the latest Disney the Disney um uh offer.

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know we're out of twenty times IBATA on

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a given m and a transaction. Does that denote silly

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>season for mckensey Group. Well, look, there's a lot of

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>pressure in the market. I don't want to predict the

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 1>next crisis. The one thing I will say that gives

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>me some ability to sleep at night over corporate debt. Please,

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you have not. I don't think this is two thousand

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and eight all over again, because in the mortgage crisis,

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>those assets were securitized and then created into cdeos and

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>CDEO squared, So there was a lot of assets built

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 1>upon the underlying mortgage. You don't see that in the

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>corporate bond market. So yes, some in the sters are

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:05.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna face mosses. Companies may be forced into bankruptcy. It'll

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>be a real test for China. But I don't see

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the systemic risk and the interlinkages that you saw ten

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Susan Lun Congratulations to you and Richard Dobbs

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of McKenzie Global Institute. Folks. I'll put

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this out on Twitter Twitter and early sell it over

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of days. Rising Corporate Debt Parallel Promise

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty six brilliant page is well charted by McKinsey and Company.

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Just a tour to force on the state of our

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>private debt. And this is said with great respect for

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the classic Ryan Heart and Roga. Thanks for listening to

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You can

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.280
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio