WEBVTT - Weirdhouse Cinema: Troll 2

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Weird House Cinema. I'm Rob Lamb.

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe McCormick, and today we're going to be

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 3>talking about the ultimate classic of modern B movies, Troll two.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 3>This has got to be the one, right, Like, even

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 3>if you rarely watch B movies, you might have seen

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>this one.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. This is one of the titans of bad film,

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 2>of B films, and it's one where on one hand,

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>some listeners might say, Hey, this is only the second

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.319
<v Speaker 2>episode of Weird House Cinema. I can't believe you're doing

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Troll two already, But really the reality is we had

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to go ahead and do Troll too. Otherwise listeners would

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>be asking for it, they would be demanding it, and

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 2>we had You know, this is just the hospitable thing

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to do, and we don't piss on hospitality on this show.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I do want to add a quick note some of

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 2>if you were probably listening to this and you're like,

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 2>what is Weird House Cinema. What is going on? This

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 2>is a science and culture podcast. Why are you talking

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 2>about beef, be movies and weird films? Well, this is

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 2>something we're trying. This is something we just kicked off.

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.639
<v Speaker 2>Joe and I have been talking about doing a weird

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 2>movie standalone podcast for a while. We were looking at

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 2>other options, and it was decided, partially by us, partially

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 2>by powers on High, that we would do this as

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 2>a little extra episode that airs on Fridays. I don't

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>think they're going to let us publish it at midnight,

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 2>because I don't think that would be good business. But

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 2>you can think of it as the midnight offering from

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, the principalities and powers to create it must come

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 3>out in the daytime, but you can still enjoy it

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 3>in the daytime. Watch the movie at night and then

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 3>listen in the day.

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or you can skip it. If weird films aren't

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 2>your thing, just skip it and you can watch our

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>core episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, which are

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 2>still going to come out Tuesdays and Thursdays.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 3>I think it's good to get into try too early

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 3>in the lifetime of this series because Troll two is

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 3>a nuclear weapon of thematic theft. It brings all of

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 3>the themes mainly meat and vegetables are the themes of

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Troll two. In fact, just before we started recording, we

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 3>were talking about that obnoxious mid twenty tens bacon craze

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 3>where suddenly there was just ironic bacon on everything. You know,

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 3>there would be like a there's a website called the

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Art of the Mustache that has a logo with a

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 3>guy in a top hat in a monocle, and they

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 3>sell bacon flavored whiskey. And I don't know where all

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>that came from, but I strongly suspect the pork industry.

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And one place that it did not take root though,

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 2>is definitely the town of nil Bog. Nil Bog is

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 2>the setting for the movie Troll two, and this is

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 2>where the goblins live Nilbog. Of course his goblins spelled backwards.

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 2>This is a strange town of some we're in America.

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 2>We get kind of a Utah feel from this. Yeah,

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 2>And it's here that we find an American family on

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 2>vacation running a foul of goblins and an ancient witch

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>who uses stone hinge magic in order to turn people

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:21.679
<v Speaker 2>into like vegetable goo so that vegetarian goblins can eat them.

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I would say that is the plot in a nutshell,

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 3>it's that there are vegetarian goblins who eat people, but

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 3>they have to turn them from meat into vegetarian green

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 3>jello before they can eat them, and they worship Stonehenge.

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, let's just go ahead and listen to

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of the audio from the original trailer.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 4>Good lad, I'm sorry we had a small miss out.

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Here are the Keyes here.

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 4>A nice stay in Millmond.

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>You in our city.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 2>You're telling the same story, Josh. Goddles don't exist, Gossins

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 2>don't exist.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 3>And remember thereating good boy, didn't we kids us to

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 3>like your first love?

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Ice cream? Delicious?

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 2>And so this is you know, we're talking about what

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 2>makes a good weird film or a good bad film,

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, the kind of film we want to talk

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 2>about on the show. And really this does have everything.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 2>It has a weird plot, it has weird performances, it

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 2>has it has like just weird choices in how they're

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 2>going to try and tell this story. It just it

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 2>just brings it all. And at the same time, it's

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 2>an exceedingly watchable film, Like there's never a dull moment

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 2>in Troll Too.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 3>It's impossible to be bored while watching Troll two. Yeah,

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 3>this is the kind of movie that also it's not

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 3>just entertaining. It sucks people in. It's like a magnet

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 3>if you put it on in a house and people

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 3>are doing things in other rooms that people will come

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>from the other rooms to the troll too. They come

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 3>from all over to kneel at the foot of stone Hinge.

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 3>And it's It's also got a kind of cultural sensibility

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 3>that exists basically nowhere else because it's part very much

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 3>italianissimo bad horror. You know, it's very Italian, but it's

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 3>also very utah and so we were calling it last

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 3>night Utalian.

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's that's a good way of looking yeh.

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Because the filmmakers themselves, most of the crew were Italian.

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Then the actors are all American and a lot of

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 2>them are just very local, non actor American. Now, this

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 2>film came out in nineteen ninety, so I want to

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 2>set the stage a little bit here. You don't really

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>need to understand what was going on politically or culturally

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 2>in the world for the most part to understand Troll two.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>But Troll two is definitely what I refer to as

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 2>a Gromlin film. Okay, so it's one of the many,

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 2>many films about small, mischievous monsters to come out in

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 2>the wake of nineteen eighty four's Grimlins. So I think

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 2>if you've ever walked, if you ever walked around a

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 2>video rental store, you know what I'm talking about. Because

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 2>we didn't just have Grimlins and then eventually Grimlins too.

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 2>You had Goolies, you had critters, you had hobgoblins, you

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 2>had Munchies, and you had these troll films.

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know about Munchies. I had to look it up.

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 3>It looks gross, it looks yeah, nasty.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 2>So Troll two is marketed as a sequel to the

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.559
<v Speaker 2>Gromlin film Troll, which came out in nineteen eighty six,

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>which has nothing to do with Troll too. Troll was

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 2>a Charles Band production, and of course Charles Band is

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 2>a notable maker of weird films. I think we'll definitely

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 2>come back to Charles Band on these episodes in the future.

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 3>I think he made the puppet Master movies, didn't he.

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 2>He did one thing with Charles Band to keep in mind,

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 2>without small creatures. He does like small creatures, but he

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 2>was more serious early on in his career, and I

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 2>think he kind of found a niche later on is

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:47.239
<v Speaker 2>making sort of intentionally bad films to a certain extent,

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, certainly once you get into like Evil Bong

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 2>and the Gingerbread film. What it was a Ginger Dead

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I can't remember.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Off hand the ginger dead man that was him.

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 2>He did some sort of gingerbread man evil creature thing. Yeah,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 2>But before that was Puppet Masters, and then before even

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 2>that were some films that I hope we'll get back

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 2>to on this show. But Patrol from nineteen eighty six

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 2>was definitely an attempt to cash in on the Grimlin craze.

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 2>It starred the wonderful Michael Moriarty is Harry Potter senior, Yes,

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>firmly establishing Harry Potter as a fictional character prior to

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 2>the Harry Potter books. Atreyu himself, Noah Hathaway was Harry

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Potter Junior in that film. And you also had Julia,

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Luis Dreyfus and Sonny Bono showing up as various in

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>various roles. But it was not there's no connection here

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>between Troll one and Troll two. Troll two is an

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Italian production from shock Master Joe Diamatto. That's the producer.

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 3>And this is actually something that was pretty common for

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Italian films at the times, like a lot of Italian

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 3>horror movies would be marketed as a sequel to an

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 3>existing movie, even though they had nothing to do with

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 3>it whatsoever. So, for example, the Italian movie Zombie was

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 3>marketed as a sequel to Dona the Dead even though

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 3>it was not made by George Romero, had nothing to

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 3>do with Dona the Dead, it just wasn't related. And

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 3>there are other movies by Claudio Fergosso, the director of

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Troll two, that were marketed as movies in an existing franchise.

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 3>So example, they were marketed as like a movie in

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 3>the Texas Chainsaw Massacre franchise, even though they weren't.

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 2>Right, and in that case the film in question being

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 2>night Killer, it was so Texas Chainsaw Masaker had a

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 2>different title in Italy and then it's the sequel to that.

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 2>So it's not instantly recognizable to a lot of Western

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 2>film fans that this would be marketed as a sequel

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 2>to Texas Chainsaw Masaker.

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in Italy, Texas Chainsaw was non a pre or

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how to pronounce it, non a prete

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 3>de la puerta, I think, which means like, do not

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 3>open that door.

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Ah, well, that's great. I love a good don't film.

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, let's talk about some of the people

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 2>of note here. So really one of one of the

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 2>main two people to focus on is the director himself,

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Claudio Fergasso born in nineteen fifty one, still very much

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>alive as of this recording and still making films, I believe.

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 2>While Troll two is probably his most well known film

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 2>in the US, he's had quite a long career in

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the Italian film world, with some of his pictures shooting

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 2>in the United States. He has thirty director credits forty

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 2>screenwriting credits, including such notable entries as Monster Dog starring

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 2>Alice Cooper and then Shocking Dark, which was a Bruno

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Mattei directed knockoff of Aliens and Terminator, and it's kind

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 2>of infamous in its own right for being just a

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:51.239
<v Speaker 2>blatant knockoff.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Well mainly from what I'm understand, I haven't seen that one.

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 3>The box art is just the cover of Terminator. I

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 3>mean it's just, yeah, straight out James Cameron's Terminator, A

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 3>slight like a traced version of it.

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Pretty much.

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 3>But the movie is more a ripoff of Aliens, isn't it.

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, Like I was watching some clips from it,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 2>and it's clearly like, let's go make Aliens, guys, let's

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 2>do it, but with a much cheaper budget.

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, Aliens was a prolifically ripped off filmy. Like Aliens

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 3>has more copycats than maybe any other movie I can

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 3>think of. It really spawned the space marine genre, which

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 3>was everywhere in the eighties and nineties.

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it's been ripped off at every level too.

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 2>It's been ripped off at the shocking dark level. But

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 2>also just so many films would not exist, Like they're clearly,

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, feeding on that same energy, they're tapping into

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 2>that same vein.

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 3>But now so a lot of the directors, writer directors,

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 3>AU tours who create horror movies, you might be, I

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 3>don't know, you might be tempted to kind of just

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 3>call them hacks, like they're just phoning in some work.

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 3>They're pointing the camera at things, they're telling the actors

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 3>what to say, and then they get on with it.

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 3>I get the feeling from at least Troll two that

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Fragaso very much sees himself as an artist, and he

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 3>is in there in the movie.

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, absolutely. So for instance, two of the names

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 2>already mentioned Joe Diamatto and Bruno Mattei. So Joe Diamatto,

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I really have enjoyed some of his films, but he

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 2>was very much a in the business of titillation, like

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 2>what can I do violently or erotically on the screen

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 2>that will we'll bring viewers in. And then Bruno and

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Fragoso points this out as well in interviews, like Bruno

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 2>was very much like, let's make some money, let's get

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 2>let's make some money. Let's go do a predator movie.

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing. Let's I'm gonna make aliens, write me a

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 2>script for aliens. We'll call it shocking Dark, you know,

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Like that was very much the vibe. But for Gaso,

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the things that's fascinating about him

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 2>is that he, yeah, he did seem to think of

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 2>himself as as this like legitimate autour. You know, that

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 2>he had had something to say in these films, and

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>that can be vital to having like a really successful

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 2>weird film or just a really amusing B film because

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 2>somebody cares. I think we've said We've pointed out this

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 2>out before. To really enjoy a well, any film, but

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 2>especially a B movie, somebody has to be serious about it.

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 2>There's got to be an actor in there, or an

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 2>FX person, a cinematographer. Somebody's got to be serious about

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 2>saying something with this film.

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 3>With Troll two, you really get the feeling that for Gosso,

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 3>this is not just a plot device. He really means

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 3>it when he says that evil can only be defeated

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 3>by the power of goodness and by processed meat, like

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 3>he really thinks that.

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because we do have to drive home that just

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 2>because you have ideas and just because you have something

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 2>you want to say, it doesn't mean you're capable of

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 2>creating interesting cinema. It doesn't mean you're capable of actually

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 2>pushing those ideas through to the finished product. It doesn't

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 2>mean that those ideas are going to survive the budgetary

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 2>constraints or the you know or you know, your your

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 2>limited ability to you know, to cast professional actors in

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the role, et cetera. But still you can often see

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 2>that the effort is there in the finished product, like

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 2>at some point somebody cared and I should point out

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 2>that Fragasso seems he seems pretty open about this in

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 2>recent interviews I've seen with him, where he's like, yeah,

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 2>I really you know, I I I really thought I was,

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, as a serious filmmaker when I was making

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 2>a Control Too or or or night Killer or whatever

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>the case may be. And I think he's kind of

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 2>like sees like, oh, yeah, maybe I maybe I should

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>have listened a little more to Bruno when he was

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 2>telling me, No, you're making a horror movie, you're making

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>a slasher movie, you're making a monster movie. Just go

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 2>out and make it. But you know, he wanted to

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 2>inject this this art or in this and or this

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 2>commentary on what he was doing.

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 3>You get a sense of art artistic ego also in

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 3>his work, in the very best classical sense, like a

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 3>John Milton kind of ego, the person who believes that

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 3>his message is very important and he's the only one

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 3>who can say it.

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Now, of course these are not these films are

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 2>not just Fragaso's voice. Also there's the voice of his

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 2>co screenwriter and I believe partner, Rosella Drudi. Now. Drudi

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 2>was born in nineteen sixty three. Frequent collaborator with her

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 2>husband and seemed to share his ambition for exploring social

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 2>commentary and psychology in their films. As John O'Brien pointed

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 2>out in a recent piece for sci Fi Wire, she

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 2>described Troll two as a quote ferocious analysis of today's society.

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's definitely about today's society where where you

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 3>can't get any eggs at the store because the guy

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 3>there says black and he only gives you unrefrigerated milk.

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just sitting there on the shelf, that nil bog milk.

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 3>It's definitely about today's society where when you move into

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 3>a new neighborhood, they bring you a cheesecake, but it's

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 3>made with wild nettles that turn your body into green jello. Definitely,

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 3>it points out how in society today you can take

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 3>a month off of work by just calling your boss

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 3>the night before and saying, Hey, I'm going to be

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 3>gone for a month. Can you take care of that

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 3>business for me?

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 2>So basically Troll two is just wall to wall wonderful

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 2>little dialogue exchanges between characters who are supposed to be human, or,

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 2>at least in the case of the nil Boggians, they're

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:48.239
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be goblins pretending to be humans. But everybody

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>says things that no human has ever said, that no

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 2>human would ever say, things that just don't sound like

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>authentic human dialogue. Like it seems as if the entire

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 2>movie is actually populated by goblins trying to pass themselves

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 2>off as human beings.

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 3>I want to come back to this point about the

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 3>lack of verisimilitude later on, because I think that is

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 3>the defining esthetic feature of the movie, and we should

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 3>explore that in a bit.

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, let's go ahead and go through the rest of

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the cast. For what it's worth here, we have to

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 2>mention Michael Paul Stevenson, who plays the boy Joshua Waits, notably,

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.479
<v Speaker 2>but mostly in terms of troll Too, for making the

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and nine documentary Best Worst Movie, which is

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>an exploration of what this film is and where it

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>came from. But he's also directed other things. He directed

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the twenty seventeen Bob Odenkirk movie Girlfriend's Day.

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 3>I saw a Best Worst Movie at a screening here

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 3>in Atlanta at a local theater, and George Hardy, the

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 3>actor who plays the father and the family in trol Too,

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 3>was there to answer questions at the screening. It was

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 3>really special.

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 2>The dentist with the linebacker's job that plays the dad.

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yes, well I think so. Here's another thing about

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Troll two, and we should describe the plot in more

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 3>detail in a minute here, But so it is about

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 3>a family who goes to this goblin infested town. The family,

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 3>I think is clearly supposed to be modeled on the

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 3>family from Poltergeist, because we just recently watched Poltergeist, and

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I would be shocked if in casting George Hardy they

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 3>weren't trying to go for Craig T.

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 4>Nelson.

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. He is kind of like a you know, bottom

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 2>basement Craig T. Nelson. Yeah, yeah, and definitely he's great

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 2>in it as well. But a couple of the real

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 2>standout performances for me are from, you know, from other characters.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 2>For instance, there's an actor by the name of Deborah

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Reid who plays the witch Credence leonor Gilgod in this

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 2>particular movie, and this is this is pretty much her

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 2>only acting role, but she just acts her heart and

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 2>face off in every scene. Like you get the impression

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 2>that Fragaso was just saying, like, I like what you're doing.

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 2>But go ahead and do it like fifty times what

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 2>you're doing now, just more, Just give me more of that.

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 4>He's like, it's just like.

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 3>George Lucas, a faster, louder, more intense.

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes. But she, but she takes it to heart.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Credence slays in this movie. She is so good she is.

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 3>It's it's a very melodramatic community theater type performance. But

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 3>she's the kind of actor who you would see in

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 3>an amateur community theater production. But she would be the

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 3>standout actor, head and shoulders above everybody else in that Like,

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 3>you wouldn't be able to stop talking about her after

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 3>it was over.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I would say that it is perhaps one of the

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 2>most memorable overacting jobs of all time. Yeah, it's and

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 2>it's almost not overacting because it fits in this film perfectly,

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Like it's it's not like everybody else is doing like

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 2>a real refined and professional time and she's just hamming

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 2>it up. No, I mean, this is the perfect place

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 2>for this level of hamminess.

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Uh huh, Now what about I know you wanted to

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 3>talk about the guy who runs the general store in Nilbog,

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 3>who the guy who's like, we don't have any bacon

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 3>her eggs here, that's oh in the coffee. No coffee,

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 3>it's the devil's drink. But we do have shelves and

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 3>shelves of unrefrigerated milk and what looks like jars of

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 3>pink teeth is all I could say.

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure what that's supposed to be.

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, they didn't get to that one. Maybe there's

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>a cutscene, but but no. This guy playing the drug

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 2>store owner is Don Packard. This is his only screen

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 2>role outside of you know, showing up in the documentary.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 2>But man, he comes off as a legitimately creepy and

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 2>intense character in a way that really makes me think

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 2>this guy missed his calling as a B movie heavy

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 2>because he has this kind of like carved from granite face.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 2>He looks like he should be like just an old

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 2>cowboy sitting in the back of a gunsmoke episode.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he could have been a Michael Ironside of his generation,

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 3>but not quite.

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh it's said he's his generation's Don Packard. But you know,

0:20:53.720 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 2>it's a memorable performance. A lot of the other actors

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 2>in the film were, of course, just straight up locals,

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 2>and many of them didn't work beyond this picture. But

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 2>there is an interesting bit of one interesting person from

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the crew, Laura Gimser, an actor who starred in numerous

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Immanuel movies, which were erotic pictures of the day. Sometimes

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 2>she was credited as Emmanuel, or she'd be playing the

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Emmanuel character. She was the costume designer on troll Too,

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 2>and reportedly she was the only crew member who spoke

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>both Italian and English well enough to communicate with the actors,

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 2>So she was the communicative bridge between the filmmakers and

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 2>the crew and the cast.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 3>She was the human babblefish that made this artistic production possible. Yes, well,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 3>that makes sense because a lot of the dialogue in

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 3>this movie feels like when you take a sentence and

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 3>you run it through Google Translate several times to different languages.

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, apparently. Fragaso was very It was very firm

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 2>on the idea that the script should be used verbatim.

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 2>So there was gonna be no ad libbing, no taking

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the dialogue and putting it in a form that would

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 2>come out naturally through your mouth. No, it needed to

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 2>stay in the original form. And therefore you have these

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 2>just strangely structured sentences and sometimes just strangely expressed thoughts.

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, maybe we should run through the plot a little bit,

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 3>just to say what happens in the film point by point. Okay,

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 3>so the So the movie starts with an apparent fairy

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 3>tale scene. You've got a guy who looks like Jack

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 3>in the beanstalk. He's got on the elf hat, and

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 3>he's wandering through the forest and he comes across a

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 3>girl who offers him some green goo. I guess it

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 3>looks like toothpaste, kind of like aim brand or whatever

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 3>it is that has that really verdant green.

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 2>It's so green that it looks like virtually nothing you

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 2>would consume. It's like too green to be bad. Absinthe,

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 2>toothpaste or candy.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, she offers this to him. And then we

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 3>realized that this is a story being told to a

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 3>child by an old man, and the old man is

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Grandpa Seth, and the child is Joshua, the main kid

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 3>in the movie. And as Grandpa Seth narrates the story,

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 3>I would love to see what book he was reading

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 3>out of, because he talks about like when this girl

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 3>kneels down to feed Jack the goo, he says that

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 3>she was a lovely girl with huge eyes. The color

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 3>of the sea, which brought to mind like Homeric scholarship

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 3>questions about like what color is the sea? What does

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 3>the wine dark sea mean? I'm not sure what that

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 3>was supposed to be there, But she has lots of

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 3>freckles drawn onto her face with a sharpie. They just

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 3>took a marker and dotted her cheeks. And then she

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 3>feeds him the stuff and he starts bleeding green all

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 3>over the place, and then the the goblins eat him,

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 3>and then the end of Grandpa's story is just like, yes,

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 3>they ate him. That's just what happened, and that's there's

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 3>no happiness or redemption at all. It's just a fairy

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 3>tale where the guy gets eaten and that's it.

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 2>But it's pretty great because we've introduced the magic. We've

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 2>introduced the monsters and introduced the rules for how they function.

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 2>You know, they don't eat meat, they eat vegetables, but

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>they use magic to turn people into vegetables so that

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 2>they can eat them.

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, I think that's all pretty well established early on.

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 3>But I just have to say a couple of other

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 3>things about this opening scene. So one thing we find

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 3>out is that Grandpa Seth, who's telling the story, to

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Joshua he's a ghost, and he vanishes as soon as

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 3>the mom appears in the room. And it becomes clear

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 3>that Joshua has been repeatedly hallucinating his dead grandfather and

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 3>he's not supposed to be hallucinating him anymore.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 4>The parents are like, you've.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Got to stop, and she says to him, I think

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 3>the line is, Grandpa Seth is in all our hearts,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 3>but you must banish him from your mind, like send

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 3>him to the realm of dust and ghosts.

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I love this because this is a case where someone

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 2>could have made a firm case to Forgaso and said, look,

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 2>you got two movies here, why don't you do the

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 2>dead Grandpa ghost movie and maybe they can fight, you know,

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 2>killer REDNECKX or something. But then you've got this supernatural

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 2>troll thing that's another movie. But for Gaso's like, no,

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 2>this is one movie. We're going to do both of

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 2>these crazy elements in one film.

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 3>One of the things I love. I mean, the movie

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 3>fails at verisimilitude at essentially every level, but I love

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 3>Joshua's Bedroom because I noticed for the first time watching

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 3>it this time. Actually, I can't remember if I've said

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 3>this already, but this is a movie I watched probably

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 3>fifty times when I was in college and then didn't

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 3>watch for about a decade, and so coming back to

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 3>it was like one of those dreams where you wander

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 3>through your childhood home, going from room to room and

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 3>it's been a long time, but it's very familiar, but

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 3>you also notice things anew. And one of the things

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 3>I noticed this time was in Joshua's bedroom, he has

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 3>merch from essentially every baseball team. I'm not a real

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 3>sports fan, but I thought usually you would have your

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 3>team or your couple of teams, and they're the ones

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 3>you're fans of, and you've got their kind of stuff.

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 3>But Joshua apparently has like flags and merch for his

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 3>seventeen top baseball teams.

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 2>This one kind of feels like a case where you

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 2>have you have filmmakers who know what it's like to

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 2>be a movie fan, maybe don't know what it's like

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 2>to be, especially an American sports fan, and you just

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of roughly translate one into the other, you know,

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 2>like if I were trying to figure out as a teenager,

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 2>like what it's like to be a fan of sports,

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 2>so it'd be like oh, I guess you do. Yeah,

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 2>you just get a bunch of posters like and everywhere

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 2>in my room that I have a music or a

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 2>movie poster. I would just replace that with some sort

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>of sport poster.

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's possible. I'm just wrong about this. Sports fans,

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 3>let us know. I mean, do you have merch for

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 3>your twentieth favorite baseball team?

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 4>I'd be curious.

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 3>But what we find out is the family is about

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 3>to go on vacation for a month to this town

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 3>called Nilbog to trade houses with some people from the town.

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 3>They're going to come stay in their house, and they're

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 3>just telling everybody the night before they leave that they're

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 3>going to be gone for a month. So the dad

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 3>appears to be on the phone with his boss or

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 3>his workplace or something's like, yeah, we'll be gone for

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 3>a month. Yeah, it's called Nilbog. Can you take care

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 3>of that for me. The daughter Holly is telling her

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 3>boyfriend that night that she's about to be gone for

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 3>a month, and it's like, one of the many ways

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 3>in which there's very lack of verisimilitude in this movie

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 3>is that the characters are as if they just started

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 3>existing when the movie began, and there's no attempt to

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 3>create a through line that they had lives before the

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 3>camera started rolling.

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 2>I will say that the basic plot here, the whole

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 2>switching houses for a month, than it almost makes more

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 2>sense in twenty twenty than it could have possibly made

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 2>sense in nineteen ninety. You know, like if you already

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 2>had a coworker today and they're gonna be like, oh, yeah,

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be switching houses with some friends for

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 2>a month. Yeah, you know, so you know, just there'll

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 2>be a different background on my zoom call. You'd be like,

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 2>all right, that makes sense. That makes us much sense

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 2>as anything this year.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, right, Yeah, if you're a digital worker. I don't

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 3>think George Hardy in this movie is supposed to be

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 3>a digital worker. I mean, for all I know, he's

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be a dentist like the actor actually was.

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, So they travel to this country, and again

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 3>the family is very much the family.

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 4>From Poltergeist Craig T. Nelson.

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.719
<v Speaker 3>The kids are kind of fighting, They drive ten miles

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 3>per hour on the freeway. That's pretty fun, and Joshua

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 3>keeps hallucinating encounters with Grandpa Seth, who's warning them not

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 3>to go to Nilbag because he says it's a kingdom

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 3>of evil where the goblins rule.

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the great things about Grandpa throughout this film

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 2>is that he has and I have difficulty figuring out

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 2>at times whether this was intentional. There's almost a Grandpa

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Simpson level of clumsiness to his ghostly presence, you know.

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yes, very Yeah.

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's one part where he's trying to appear in

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 3>a mirror like Bloody Mary to contact Joshua, but he

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 3>gets the wrong room in the house and he accidentally

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 3>appears in Holly's mirror and she screams and freaks out.

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Like five minutes of the film are devoted to this

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 3>mix up. They're really kind of padding it out there.

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know if that's an inept choice or

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 2>really a genius choice. I don't know. It works within

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 2>the context control too, it absolutely works.

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So they get to the town. Also arriving at

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the town because I guess you've got to fill out

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 3>the cast. This is a thing that often happens in

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 3>horror movies. You'll notice that, you know, somewhere toward the

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 3>middle of the first act, it starts getting populated with

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 3>seemingly unimportant characters, and you're like, why are all these

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 3>people suddenly appearing in the movie. It's because, well, this

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 3>is a horror film, and you just randos to get

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 3>murdered as the film progresses, like you've got to fill

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 3>out the kill list basically, And so that is mainly

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 3>done in this movie by having Holly's boyfriend Elliott and

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 3>his three weird friends show up in a camper van

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 3>or an RV I guess, and they're just hanging out

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 3>in the town too, and so you know what's going

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 3>to happen to these buddies here.

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're just pure fodder.

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 3>But in all of the scenes where the goblins attack

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the humans, they all pretty much have the same progression,

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 3>which is the human is given something to eat or drink,

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 3>and then they eat or drink it and that turns

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 3>them into the green goop or turns them into a

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 3>plant somehow, and then the goblins eat or otherwise attack them.

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the main threat becomes this, and this is

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 2>something that joshua Is is woken up to before the

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 2>rest of the family. You will be tricked into eating

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 2>something at some point that will transform your entire family

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 2>into vegetables and then the trolls will eat them.

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, and probably famously this is dealt with it a

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 3>scene where the family arrives at the house where they're

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be staying for a month, and out on

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 3>the table has laid a bountiful feast of disgusting looking

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 3>plato food that looks like it was made out of

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 3>like mud and sticks by a child, and sometimes with

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 3>toothpaste and green paint. And they're like, delicious, look what

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 3>they've prepared for us. And they all sit down to eat,

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 3>and so Grandpa Seth says, Joshua has to find a

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 3>way to stop them from eating. And this is I

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 3>would say this is one of the most famous scenes

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 3>in the movie. He says, you know, since I am Chronos,

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 3>the Wizard of Time, I'm just gonna stop time for

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 3>thirty seconds to give you time to figure that out.

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 3>But if Grandpa Seth has the power to stop time,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 3>you'd think that would be useful throughout the movie. Instead,

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 3>he only does it once.

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 2>What I kind of love about this is that it

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 2>makes the audience think it's kind of like a werewolf

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 2>break right, where yes, the director is saying, all right, audience,

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 2>how would you stop your family from eating the tainted food.

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Right, what would you do?

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 2>And of course he does the most ridiculous thing possible,

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 2>but in a way. But this is like, again the

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 2>brilliance of this film, because only Fragaso would choose to

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>have the child use this moment to jump up on

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the table and pee urinate on all of the food,

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 2>thus tainting it further and preventing the family from eating it.

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 3>We're thankfully spared seeing that actually happen. There's a cutaway

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 3>and then you see them scraping the food out and

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 3>the father it's a tasteful movie, has quite tasteful, and

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 3>the father is chewing Joshua out. He says like, you

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 3>can't piss on hospitality. I won't allow it.

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, and he shames them. He is he like

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 2>he's messing with his belt after he takes him up,

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 2>but he's like, what are you doing? He's like, I'm

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 2>tightening my bel to notch because of the coming hunger paints.

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 3>So one thing about this is I was like, I

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 3>know there has got to be a good monster science

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 3>tie in, and I found one. Are you ready for

0:32:58.360 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 3>some monster science?

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it?

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So surely there is evidence of some kind of

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 3>animal joshua that pees on food in order to get

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 3>people not to eat it. And you know what, I

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 3>didn't find exactly that, but I found something pretty close.

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I found a paper from the Canadian Journal of Zoology

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 3>by Fred H. Harrington called Urine marking at food and

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Caches and Captive Coyotes. So the study was done in

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 3>captive coyotes Canus latrans. And as always, it's worth noting

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 3>that animals sometimes behave differently in captivity than they do

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 3>under natural condition, so it's possible the behaviors described here

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be as common in the wild. But either way,

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Harrington notes that often when captive coyotes are observed during feeding,

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 3>they will just sometimes urinate on food. They'll just pee

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 3>on food piles or on quote, individual food items that

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 3>had been carried and dropped some distance from the pile.

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 3>And also sometimes when a food item was stolen from

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 3>one coyote taken by another, sometimes the animal would pee

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 3>on it. So why would you pee on food piles

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 3>and food items?

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 4>You might be assuming something.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 3>You might guess, well, okay, these are canines basically sort

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>of dogs, so you might assume they are making a

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 3>claim of possession. Right, this food is mine. Now I'm

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 3>going to pee on it, so that you understand. But

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.280
<v Speaker 3>this does not appear to be the case, Harrington writes,

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 3>quote marking of food did not reserve it for the

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 3>marking animal. Others usually ignored the urine mark and ate

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 3>the item, which is kind of gross but okay, So

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 3>in that case, what purpose does it serve?

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 3>One observation was that this behavior of peeing on a

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 3>food item specifically increased a lot during the breeding season,

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 3>so it's possible it played some role in quote the

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 3>expression of dominance in intrast sexual rivalries, So like, if

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 3>there are rivalries between the males or between the females,

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 3>they might be expressing dominance by peeing on their food.

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 3>That sounds kind of weird, like if you were doing

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 3>some kind of office politics thing and you just like pede

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 3>on your TV dinner in front of the person you're

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 3>trying to impress. But you know, canines are different. But

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 3>there's another kind of food peeing, and specifically, this was

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the peeing that occurred at food caches, so places where

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 3>food was hidden or stored.

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Quote.

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Urin marking never occurred when food was cashed and rarely

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 3>occurred while the cash still contained food. However, once the

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 3>cash was emptied, urin marking usually occurred. Thus, at caches,

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 3>urin marking evidently serves as a book keeping role, indicating

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 3>that the caches are no longer worth investigating, although food

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 3>odors might still linger, which I thought was really interesting. So,

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 3>like you pee on a food storage site, apparently as

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 3>a note to self and possibly as a note to

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 3>others as well.

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 4>Nothing to eat here, move along.

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, don't expend the energy of getting in here, because

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 2>it's all the food has been to.

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 3>Right, And the same patterns of your in marking at

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 3>cash is have been observed in wolves and red foxes

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 3>as well, and it's been documented in previous studies that

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 3>this actually increases foraging efficiency. The dogs and other canines

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 3>waste less time foraging for food when they mark emptied caches.

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 3>It prevents you from wasting time trying to dig up

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 3>food places where food had.

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Been buried before, but isn't there anymore.

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.919
<v Speaker 3>So anyway, there's a kind of canine Joshua thing going

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 3>on here, right, So if they had been coyotes, maybe

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 3>he would have peed all over the table and then

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 3>the family just would have been like, huh, I guess

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 3>there's no food here, got to move on.

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And of course there was apparently no other food

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 2>in the house, because this is what you do when

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 2>you go to like an airbnb, right, you bring no

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 2>food of your own, and you immediately start eating whatever

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 2>food was in the refrigerator when you'd got there, or

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 2>on the table in the case of this film.

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 3>But it's all just chunky milk that's in the fridge

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 3>like everywhere in town.

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 2>You know. As long as we're talking monster science here,

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 2>let's talk a bit about the monsters in this film,

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the goblins themselves. Okay, so these are clearly little people

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 2>actors in a horrific mix of costumes. Some of the

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 2>costumes are really almost kind of convincing, except maybe in

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the eyes. Others look a little more hastily thrown together.

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 2>But all in all, I find that they are like

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 2>equal parts terrifying, like legitimately terrifying, because you're seeing people

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 2>in strange like fur costumes running at you with spears,

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 2>and then at the same time they're just completely goofy,

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 2>like they're just completely like it looks like someone left

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 2>an ewot costume out in the rain for a month.

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I would say that the monster costumes in this

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 3>film are cheap and bad, but they're actually scary because

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 3>they're so cheap and bad. They don't code as monsters.

0:37:55.480 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 3>They code as like people in deranged costume coming at you.

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. Yeah, and I think it works. I don't know

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 2>if it works in the same the way that the

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 2>filmmakers intended, but there are plenty of scenes where they're

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 2>like running down the hallways or you know, running through

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 2>the woods. They're standing menacingly in the woods, and it works.

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Now again, the most notable thing about the monsters here

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 2>is that they must transform their animal prey into vegetation

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 2>in order to consume them, and of course they do

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 2>this via potions and magic. Now, to a certain extent,

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 2>this makes perfect sense because in our food chain, there

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 2>are plants that gain energy from the sun, and then

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 2>animals that consume the converted energy in those plants, and

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 2>then there are predators that consume those herbivores. So it's

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of an inverted treatment of how this works that

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 2>we see in the town of Nilbog, for example. Just

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 2>one example to sort of put all this in context,

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 2>consider what leaf cutter ants do they harvest leaf clippings,

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 2>but they don't eat the leaf clippings. They use the

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 2>leaf clipping to grow a specific ant, domesticated fungus that

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 2>they use as their primary food source. It's not a

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 2>magical transformation from one biological kingdom to another, but it

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 2>is an energy transformation. So in a way, that's what

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing happen here with the goblins. You know, they're like, oh, well,

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.399
<v Speaker 2>we don't eat the people. We turn the people into

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 2>something we can eat. And that's a lot like what

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 2>we see with the leaf cutter ants, just without the magic.

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:28.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, in a way, you're relying on the digestion

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 3>and energy storage faculties of a different species to do

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 3>some of your digesting externally for you when you're a

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 3>leaf cutter ant like that, Like if you were to

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 3>just eat the plant matter directly, you wouldn't be able

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 3>to get as much energy out of it as you

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:49.320
<v Speaker 3>can get by growing some fungus.

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, I can't remember. Do we find out how they're

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 2>making the tainted food and the millbog milk, Like is

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.879
<v Speaker 2>that goblin milk from goblin teats or is that some

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of are they getting the goblin drippings from the

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 2>people that have been turned into green mush.

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:09.240
<v Speaker 3>This is the real nil bogology question, and I don't

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 3>know the answer. I don't think they ever show that

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:15.240
<v Speaker 3>in the movie. I mean sense that it's all magic.

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 3>And there's one thing that's cool about this movie that

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 3>it has in common with Halloween three Season of the Witch. Yes,

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 3>both movies rely on the magic of the Stone Hinge

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 3>magic Stone. So in Halloween three Season of the Witch,

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Dan O'Herlihy, the old man from RoboCop, steals one of

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 3>the rocks, one of the bluestones from Stonehinge, and then

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 3>turns that into magic microchips that turn your head into crickets.

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 3>In this movie, Credence. Credence has part of Stone Hinge

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 3>in her house and there's light and fog that comes.

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 4>Out of it.

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:52.720
<v Speaker 3>It's never explained how she got this. Part of Stone

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Hinge was just there, and that seems to be the

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:58.240
<v Speaker 3>source of her power from what I can tell.

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, maybe you use the stone. She traveled

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 2>through the Stone through time, and there's an actual link

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 2>between the world of the Outlander books and the world

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 2>of troll too. I'm gonna I'm gonna have to explore

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 2>that on my own time, I think, but I think

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 2>there might be a connection.

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Kilt Lifter four returned to Nilbog.

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 2>This movie, like we said, you know, it seems to

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:32.800
<v Speaker 2>have a message. It had some sort of intent anyway,

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and going by what the film makers have to say

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 2>about it, a certain amount of the deep thinking here

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 2>seems to have revolved around the idea of vegetarianism as

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 2>something that, if not in itself bad, is, is thrust

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 2>upon us that it poses a danger or a threat

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:57.280
<v Speaker 2>to people because we find ourselves thrust into a story

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:00.800
<v Speaker 2>where the monsters are all vegetarians, and then the weird

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 2>people in the weird town, you know, are all also

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 2>very much opposed to the consumption of dairy or meat

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:08.280
<v Speaker 2>and coffee for some reason.

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, regarding the coffee, I think there is some pretty

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 3>strong Latter Day Saint influence on this film, or at

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 3>least presence within the film in the cast. But I

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 3>would say, maybe you're selling short the critique of vegetarianism here.

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.280
<v Speaker 3>I think this presents vegetarianism as a satanic cult.

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, because I mean there are scenes in the

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 2>film where it's it's a little more vague as as

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 2>to how we're supposed to take it, But there are

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 2>plenty of scenes where Troll two is pushing vegetarianism as

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 2>being this like violent transformation into plant matter, that there's

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 2>this communal coltish pressure to drink nil bog milk to

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, change become one of us. So you know

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 2>that in these places the film certainly reeks of an

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 2>entirely hyperbolic reaction to vegetarianism and veganism that I think

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:04.279
<v Speaker 2>most of us are somewhat familiar with. You know, the

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:06.839
<v Speaker 2>sort of fear that your uncle might spout about how

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the liberals are going to force everyone to become vegans

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 2>and the government is going to take your stake night

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 2>away from you, to take away that sort of thing.

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 3>They'll they'll take your hamburgers, they'll and and specifically, I

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.320
<v Speaker 3>would say that to the extent this movie has a message,

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 3>it's trying to take away the implied moral authority of

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 3>vegetarianism or veganism. It assumes that someone who just eats

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 3>plants thinks that they're better than you and is show it,

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 3>and the movie is showing you that no, actually they're

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 3>the real murderers.

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like eating plants is murder. Let me show

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 2>you how it works. It involves magic in months now,

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't think we have time to really

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:50.399
<v Speaker 2>go into depth on this particular topic, but there are

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 2>some very solid health and environmental arguments for at least

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 2>cutting back on the consumption of meat and dairy without

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 2>even getting into moral arguments. At the same time, one

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 2>does have to realize that vegetarian and vegan food products

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 2>are not necessarily flawless choices. For example, just as far

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 2>as milk substitutes go, you have to take into account

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the water usage and the crop location. As such, they

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 2>are strong arguments for say, oat milk as being a

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 2>better choice than say, almond milk, and a lot of

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:18.320
<v Speaker 2>that has to do with how much water is consumed.

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 2>You also have to take into account like deforestation, habitat

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 2>loss whenever you're talking about crops being grown. But this

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 2>is of course also the case with dairy cows. For

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 2>cow milk, you have to take into account the land, juice,

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the water use, and methane emissions from the cows themselves.

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 2>It takes roughly four square kilometers of land to produce

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 2>just one glass of cow's milk, and that again that

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 2>land use means potential deforestation and habitat loss. And on

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 2>top of that, the cows are probably eating soy or

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 2>oats as well, which puts an additional land strain on

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 2>their milk. Less land use is required meanwhile, to produce

0:44:57.520 --> 0:44:59.959
<v Speaker 2>milk from the same soy and oats. For a plant

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 2>based milk, each glass of dairy milk contributes half a

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 2>kilogram of greenhouse gas emissions, and that's compared to point

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:11.879
<v Speaker 2>one two point two kilograms with plant based milks. Now,

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 2>I was looking over all these stats and then I

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:16.880
<v Speaker 2>started thinking, well, what about nilbog milk. We have no

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:20.919
<v Speaker 2>idea how to crunch the numbers on how environmentally sound

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 2>nilbog milk is.

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 4>There are scientists on both sides.

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, back to the idea of this film basically

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 2>being about hating on vegetarians or vegans, I decided to

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:35.799
<v Speaker 2>look into it just a little bit and I found

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:38.919
<v Speaker 2>a wonderful article on The Conversation from twenty eighteen by

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Kate Stewart and Matthew Cole titled Vegans Why they Inspire

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:47.439
<v Speaker 2>fear and loathing among meat eaters. And this is an

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 2>informative read I recommend it to everybody. But here's just

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 2>some of the highlights. So first they point out that

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 2>has been going on for a while, but that a

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of the old stereotypes about vegans are not applicable

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 2>anymore because it's simply more or widespread. So all of

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:06.240
<v Speaker 2>these quote angry, militant, self denying, sentimental, fatty or joyless

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 2>unquote stereotypes, they don't really zing like they used to.

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like you get a sense of that

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 2>when you watch older television. If you find like a

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 2>nice vegan or vegetarian jab on saying an old episode

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 2>of The Simpsons or even Futurama, you're like, oh, well,

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:23.800
<v Speaker 2>that that doesn't really feel as authentic today as maybe

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:26.799
<v Speaker 2>it arguably was. You know, twenty years ago, was.

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 4>The Simpsons jabbing at vegetarians. I remembered Lisa becoming one.

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 2>She did, But well, I guess I mainly there's a

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Futurama episode where there's an annoying vegan character that shows up,

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 2>and he's the one I mostly think of because it

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:43.880
<v Speaker 2>is like just an outrageous stereotype of like an angry

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 2>vegeta vegan who wants to you know who wants to

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:50.879
<v Speaker 2>convert everyone around him, and of course they have him

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 2>eaten by a lion at the end, like there's some

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 2>sort of perverse joy in seeing the vegan consumed by

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:57.320
<v Speaker 2>the animal.

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, of course, I mean a vegan vegetarian can be annoyed,

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 3>just like anybody can be annoying.

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, yes, you know, yeah, everybody.

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Should be eaten by lions. That's what I'm really saying.

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:12.320
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's a pretty common feature of human

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 3>psychology that people who abstain from what's perceived as hedonic

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 3>activity are often vilified and disdained by the people who

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 3>engage in that same activity. And this is true for

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 3>not just meat. It's true for like everything that's perceived

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:33.720
<v Speaker 3>as like some kind of pleasurable consumption or activity, like drugs, alcohol, sex,

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 3>unhealthy food, trashy TV, with any of that stuff, if

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 3>you encounter somebody who says none for me, thanks, it

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 3>can kind of trigger a discomfort and defensiveness in the

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 3>people who are having some of whatever it is. Because

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 3>like if you think of the scene at a party,

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, whether it's an episode of Mad Men, or

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 3>you know, kids at college or whatever. If somebody tries

0:47:56.800 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 3>to refuse a drink that's not usually people don't usually

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 3>react to that in just a neutral way, like if

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 3>they had turned down a glass of water, you react like, oh,

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 3>come on, have one, or you say like, oh, now

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the vibe is off.

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 4>You made it weird.

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:16.319
<v Speaker 3>Like there's a discomfort people have when when others in

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 3>their social circle are not engaging in all of the

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 3>same hedonic activities that they are, And naturally, I think

0:48:23.040 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 3>this comes from a place of insecurity, like the presence

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 3>of a person who abstains from something is a natural

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 3>social signal that makes you wonder if maybe you should

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 3>be abstaining as well, And then it kind of makes

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 3>you feel bad and makes you feel like, well, now

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking about consuming this more than I wanted to

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 3>be thinking about it in this moment. And so the

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:47.480
<v Speaker 3>reaction is hostility and sometimes attempts at ostracism, like oh,

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 3>you think you're just so perfect, don't you.

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I guess a lot of this is unavoidable

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:54.879
<v Speaker 2>just by the you know, the fact that we are

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:58.320
<v Speaker 2>social animals and we pick up all these cues. And

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 2>this paper backs up most of what you just said. Here,

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 2>for instance, they point out quote the exchange is arguably

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 2>emblematic of the contemporary plague of entitled anger that toxifies

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 2>public discourse whenever entitlement is challenged. However politely so. Some

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 2>of the other key points they make. They say, part

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:20.400
<v Speaker 2>of this does seem to be unresolved. Guilt as vegan

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:23.319
<v Speaker 2>lifestyles may be seen as implying a failure to act

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:25.320
<v Speaker 2>on a moral issue. Again, Oh you think you're so

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 2>great what you're turning down meat? You're saying I should

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 2>turn it down too, That I should feel guilty about

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 2>eating this meat, etc. On top of that, it can

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 2>be interpreted as an affront to freedom of choice for

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:43.440
<v Speaker 2>some weird reason, even though they are actually engaging in choice.

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:46.399
<v Speaker 2>It's not a choice if everybody has to eat steak, right.

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 2>And then, on top of that quote, food practices are

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 2>socially powerful markers of social and cultural identity, making actual

0:49:54.800 --> 0:50:00.480
<v Speaker 2>or implied criticism of them personally and hurtfully felt. For instance,

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 2>they give the example that meat often this is less

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 2>most more social than cultural, I guess, but about how

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:12.719
<v Speaker 2>meat eating is often linked to masculine identity, and therefore

0:50:13.360 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 2>it could be seen as a threat to one's masculinity

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:19.960
<v Speaker 2>or some other you know, way of some other like

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:23.400
<v Speaker 2>cultural critique. They're turning down meat. Meat is important to me,

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 2>therefore they are turning down me.

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's weird that I know exactly what you're

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:30.439
<v Speaker 3>saying here, and I agree that there can be this

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 3>feeling that your freedom is being challenged even when somebody

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 3>has not told you not to do something and not

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let alone that they don't have any power

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:42.760
<v Speaker 3>to prevent you from doing it, but haven't even told

0:50:42.800 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 3>you not to do it or suggested you shouldn't do it.

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's because sometimes when you do something

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 3>without thinking about doing it, even being asked to think

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 3>about the fact that you're doing it is perceived as

0:50:57.480 --> 0:50:59.800
<v Speaker 3>a challenge to your freedom to do it. And I

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 3>think I think that's where the abstinence of someone else

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:05.320
<v Speaker 3>comes in. Like, even if someone else abstains from whatever

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 3>it is, meat or alcohol or whatever, even if they're

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 3>not commenting on your behavior, the fact that you notice

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:15.239
<v Speaker 3>them abstaining makes you think about what you're doing when

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 3>you weren't thinking about it before. And it doesn't feel

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:18.920
<v Speaker 3>good to do that.

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like, oh, I'm meeting me, Okay, I guess

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm a monster. I guess I'm a literal monster that

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 2>catches tourists and eats them with magic. And so you

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:31.839
<v Speaker 2>want to turn that on its head and you want

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 2>to create a scenario in which the opposite is true. Yeah.

0:51:34.640 --> 0:51:37.359
<v Speaker 3>No, you're the monster. You're the one who's turning people

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:37.879
<v Speaker 3>into jello.

0:51:38.320 --> 0:51:40.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So it's one of those things where with Troll two,

0:51:41.880 --> 0:51:44.880
<v Speaker 2>it is on one hand, it's ridiculous, this seems like

0:51:45.080 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 2>just a ridiculous, hyperbolic thrust of your artistic expression. But

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:53.480
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, like this is clearly like this

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 2>is a real cultural energy, Like this is a thing

0:51:55.960 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 2>that people feel, even if they're not like truly rationalizing

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 2>the thought. Maybe it's more subconscious in many cases, but

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 2>you know this, this is a true human reaction. So

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:08.400
<v Speaker 2>in a way, they've kind of pushed through that, and

0:52:08.440 --> 0:52:12.480
<v Speaker 2>they've dared to make the film that that makes these accusations.

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:14.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then we should say in the end, the

0:52:14.880 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 3>way that they defeat the Witch and the Goblins is

0:52:17.719 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 3>by eating a double decker baloney sandwich while putting a

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 3>hand on the stonehinge magic stone.

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which which is within the context of the film

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:30.319
<v Speaker 2>perfect just a perfect narrative choice. But it also just

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 2>again reeks of this whole, like, oh, eating steak is bad.

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Watch me eat some steak. Oh I'm going to eat

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:36.920
<v Speaker 2>steaks so hard.

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 3>It's like the sword and the Stone, but with instead

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 3>of a sword, it's like, you know, a mulsified meat product.

0:52:43.840 --> 0:52:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean it would be the ultimate you know,

0:52:47.600 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 2>just straight up baloney.

0:52:48.760 --> 0:52:51.959
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it is funny that baloney is sort of used

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:55.919
<v Speaker 3>as the ultimate meat. It's it's not just any meat.

0:52:56.040 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 3>It's like the mediest meat you could have. And I

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:01.760
<v Speaker 3>think maybe that's because it is the most processed form

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.800
<v Speaker 3>of meat, Like it is ground to a finer consistency

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 3>than any other meat on Earth, and thus it's the

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 3>most meaty. Like it's inherently identifying the consumption of meat

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 3>with industrial processes for production of food.

0:53:14.880 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is like the the the ultimate like anti

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:22.800
<v Speaker 2>druidic food product. It's like the perfect thing to overturn stonehenge.

0:53:22.360 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Wey to hell with nature. Food should not look like

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 3>the shape it originally in habits. But so, there's one

0:53:30.040 --> 0:53:31.919
<v Speaker 3>last thing I wanted to talk about before we wrap

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:34.399
<v Speaker 3>up our discussion of Troll two, which is the idea

0:53:34.400 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 3>of verisimilitude in film. This has come up a couple

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:41.280
<v Speaker 3>of times already. But one of the things everybody notices

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 3>about troll Too, probably its most salient aesthetic feature, is

0:53:45.239 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 3>the overwhelming anti verisimilitude in the dialogue. Almost every time

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:54.400
<v Speaker 3>a character says a line, your brain just raises a

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 3>flag that says, uh uh not how people talk. And

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:02.760
<v Speaker 3>so I'm trying to think of the best examples. One

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 3>is when Joshua says to his dad while they're standing

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 3>there being observed by a bunch of the creepy people.

0:54:08.920 --> 0:54:09.440
<v Speaker 4>In the town.

0:54:10.000 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 3>Joshua says, there are goblins, monstrous beings. There's, of course

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 3>the line about Grandpa Seth is in all our hearts,

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:25.359
<v Speaker 3>but you must banish him from your mind. You know,

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:27.359
<v Speaker 3>the will be gone for a month. Can you take

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 3>care of that business for me? And this made me

0:54:30.640 --> 0:54:32.239
<v Speaker 3>think about a couple of things. I'm sure both of

0:54:32.239 --> 0:54:34.479
<v Speaker 3>these questions will come up again and again in Weird

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 3>House cinema, because anti vera similitude is one of the

0:54:37.680 --> 0:54:41.400
<v Speaker 3>most common and interesting and enjoyable features in bad movies.

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:46.239
<v Speaker 3>But first of all, why is it? Why is what

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:50.400
<v Speaker 3>we call vera similitude a desirable characteristic in fiction? To

0:54:50.440 --> 0:54:54.880
<v Speaker 3>begin with, so vera similitude is, of course, you know,

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 3>the feeling of realism, the feeling of life likeness in

0:54:58.239 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 3>a book or in a movie. You know it seems

0:55:01.520 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 3>true to life. Why is that desirable to begin with?

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:07.440
<v Speaker 3>And then the second thing is what actually causes the

0:55:07.440 --> 0:55:11.080
<v Speaker 3>feeling of verisimilitude in a film? As to why it's

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 3>a desirable characteristic, I mean, there are a couple of answers,

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 3>first of which is verisimilitude is a mental lubricant, right

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:22.279
<v Speaker 3>like it helps you stay immersed in the story and

0:55:22.400 --> 0:55:27.600
<v Speaker 3>avoid unnecessary metacognition where you start remembering that you're sitting

0:55:27.600 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 3>there watching a movie and thinking about it as a

0:55:30.040 --> 0:55:36.320
<v Speaker 3>created piece of media. Anti verisimilitude automatically and immediately causes

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:41.000
<v Speaker 3>that metacognition. Every time there's a line that thuds as unreal,

0:55:41.120 --> 0:55:44.160
<v Speaker 3>like that you can't be in the story anymore because

0:55:44.160 --> 0:55:46.120
<v Speaker 3>you're like, oh, wait a minute, I'm watching a movie.

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:48.120
<v Speaker 2>One of the weird things about this, though I don't

0:55:48.160 --> 0:55:51.680
<v Speaker 2>know if you've had this experience, is that, in a way,

0:55:51.520 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the experience of watching a film like this, like Troll two,

0:55:56.360 --> 0:56:01.439
<v Speaker 2>is akin to watching a production of a William Shakespeare play.

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, because nobody in our immediate world speaks like

0:56:05.719 --> 0:56:07.799
<v Speaker 2>a Shakespeare play. For that matter, you can point to

0:56:07.880 --> 0:56:11.960
<v Speaker 2>other examples where this still holds up from contemporary authors,

0:56:11.960 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 2>like nobody actually speaks like a David Mammott play. You know,

0:56:15.520 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 2>but but but we're drawn into it. But on the

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:20.319
<v Speaker 2>on the on the on the other hand, it can

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 2>throw you out of it at times if you stop

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:25.759
<v Speaker 2>to realize, oh, nobody talks like this. I don't talk

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:27.719
<v Speaker 2>like this. People around me don't talk like this. I

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:30.160
<v Speaker 2>don't eavesdrop conversations of this nature.

0:56:30.239 --> 0:56:32.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, this actually cuts ahead to the other question I

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:35.320
<v Speaker 3>wanted to answer, what causes something to feel realistic? Because

0:56:35.560 --> 0:56:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you, and I'd actually go farther than

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 3>you just did. It's not just Shakespeare or David Mammott,

0:56:40.480 --> 0:56:44.439
<v Speaker 3>I would say flatly. Almost no movies have what could

0:56:44.560 --> 0:56:48.000
<v Speaker 3>actually be called realistic dialogue, if you're going to be

0:56:48.000 --> 0:56:51.440
<v Speaker 3>technical about it, because almost no movie has dialogue that

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:55.440
<v Speaker 3>sounds the way people really talk in life. And usually

0:56:55.480 --> 0:56:57.719
<v Speaker 3>you wouldn't want a movie to sound that way because

0:56:57.760 --> 0:57:00.920
<v Speaker 3>it would be boring, It would be really teed and

0:57:01.040 --> 0:57:04.680
<v Speaker 3>hard to understand, and narratively inefficient. It would not move

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:08.280
<v Speaker 3>the plot along. And yet when we listen to characters

0:57:08.280 --> 0:57:10.600
<v Speaker 3>in a movie talk to each other, there is a

0:57:10.680 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 3>quality that we automatically look out for, and we intuitively

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:17.880
<v Speaker 3>think of this quality as realism or vera similitude. But

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:20.920
<v Speaker 3>that's not exactly what it is, right, So what is

0:57:21.040 --> 0:57:24.640
<v Speaker 3>that quality and what is that quality that when it's

0:57:24.760 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 3>violated we feel like, oh, people.

0:57:26.600 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 4>Don't talk like this.

0:57:28.800 --> 0:57:30.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know the full answer to that question, but

0:57:30.680 --> 0:57:33.720
<v Speaker 3>I think part of it has to do with a

0:57:33.840 --> 0:57:37.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of flowing narrative logic, where one idea or statement

0:57:38.360 --> 0:57:42.200
<v Speaker 3>feels like it logically proceeds into the next one, even

0:57:42.240 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 3>though that's not how people would actually have a conversation

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 3>in real life. Usually, a lot of the dialogue in

0:57:49.360 --> 0:57:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the movies that causes this feeling of anti verisimilitude or

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:57.800
<v Speaker 3>feels very unreal has this quality of constantly stopping, or

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:01.800
<v Speaker 3>where the conversation is just ring and you are you

0:58:01.840 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 3>are repeatedly feeling this thud of an inappropriate maneuver in

0:58:06.320 --> 0:58:07.160
<v Speaker 3>the conversation.

0:58:07.640 --> 0:58:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Does that make sense?

0:58:09.200 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, it makes sense. You know that. It also

0:58:13.760 --> 0:58:17.520
<v Speaker 2>drives home I think why sometimes the most memorable moment

0:58:17.640 --> 0:58:22.240
<v Speaker 2>in a movie is when another character is telling a story. Yeah,

0:58:22.760 --> 0:58:26.280
<v Speaker 2>two examples come to mind from kind of related but

0:58:26.640 --> 0:58:29.800
<v Speaker 2>ultimately very different films. One, of course is quint and Jaws,

0:58:30.640 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 2>but the other is Palpatine in Revenge of the Sith

0:58:35.000 --> 0:58:37.160
<v Speaker 2>is a scene where he tells a story to Anakin,

0:58:37.400 --> 0:58:39.480
<v Speaker 2>And both of those are tremendous scenes.

0:58:39.400 --> 0:58:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Best scene in the prequels in my view.

0:58:41.440 --> 0:58:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, these are both like terrific scenes that have their

0:58:45.080 --> 0:58:48.000
<v Speaker 2>own kind of inner reality. You know, you could you

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:50.480
<v Speaker 2>could take either one outside of the rest of the

0:58:50.480 --> 0:58:52.280
<v Speaker 2>film and it would still make sense. It would still

0:58:52.400 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 2>be entirely self contained, and it is entirely narrative and

0:58:57.600 --> 0:59:00.800
<v Speaker 2>structured in a way that we just letely consume it.

0:59:01.120 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Can I learn to have this power not from a vegetarian?

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:09.760
<v Speaker 2>And of course Quinn is eaten by a shark, so

0:59:09.840 --> 0:59:10.800
<v Speaker 2>it's perfect as well.

0:59:10.960 --> 0:59:12.880
<v Speaker 3>This is also something we could come back to in

0:59:13.280 --> 0:59:14.760
<v Speaker 3>future Weird House episodes.

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:16.200
<v Speaker 4>But I was thinking about.

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:20.720
<v Speaker 3>The comparison between how verisimilitude is used in analyzing fiction

0:59:20.960 --> 0:59:24.960
<v Speaker 3>versus verisimilitude in science, where the term has played an

0:59:25.000 --> 0:59:28.160
<v Speaker 3>important role in the history of science and philosophy of science,

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:31.160
<v Speaker 3>and like trying to come up with ideas about what

0:59:31.400 --> 0:59:35.640
<v Speaker 3>makes a scientific theory a good one. The basic problem is,

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:38.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, we generally presume that the dominant theories in

0:59:39.000 --> 0:59:43.959
<v Speaker 3>the sciences tend over time to advance toward increasing truthiness

0:59:44.040 --> 0:59:47.240
<v Speaker 3>or verisimilitude. You know, they get a better and better

0:59:47.320 --> 0:59:50.600
<v Speaker 3>description of life in the world as it really is.

0:59:50.880 --> 0:59:54.280
<v Speaker 3>But and this was a point discussed by the philosopher

0:59:54.280 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 3>of science Carl Popper, all scientific theories are, in the

0:59:57.920 --> 1:00:04.120
<v Speaker 3>strictest understanding falls they're never perfect explanations of reality. The

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:07.760
<v Speaker 3>understanding is that their attempts to get closer and closer

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 3>to accurately explaining and predicting the world. But you could

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:15.560
<v Speaker 3>ask questions like what criteria would actually decide whether a

1:00:15.600 --> 1:00:19.760
<v Speaker 3>theory is more truth like or has more verisimilitude than another?

1:00:20.200 --> 1:00:24.160
<v Speaker 3>For example, does it matter how much a theory explains

1:00:24.560 --> 1:00:27.600
<v Speaker 3>or does it matter more how accurately it explains what

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:30.400
<v Speaker 3>it does? You know, if a theory is like ninety

1:00:30.480 --> 1:00:34.120
<v Speaker 3>percent accurate but explains a lot of things, is that

1:00:34.240 --> 1:00:37.720
<v Speaker 3>better or worse than a theory that's ninety five percent

1:00:37.840 --> 1:00:39.840
<v Speaker 3>accurate but explains a lot less.

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Hm, that's a good point. I mean, I guess it

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:47.600
<v Speaker 2>to compare it to dialogue in a film, like as

1:00:47.600 --> 1:00:50.040
<v Speaker 2>a viewer, you want that dialogue to tell you what's

1:00:50.040 --> 1:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>happening and what will happen. That's kind of what the

1:00:52.000 --> 1:00:57.160
<v Speaker 2>dialogue's doing. Right, here's a dialogue scene. It's about establishing

1:00:57.240 --> 1:01:00.280
<v Speaker 2>the threat of the goblins or whatever. But on the

1:01:00.320 --> 1:01:06.080
<v Speaker 2>other hand, you don't want it to be so blatantly explanatory.

1:01:06.200 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's a careful balance you have to you

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:10.240
<v Speaker 2>have to strike.

1:01:10.640 --> 1:01:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I mean that's actually one of the one

1:01:12.600 --> 1:01:15.360
<v Speaker 3>of my favorite types of bad dialogue in movies is

1:01:15.680 --> 1:01:19.560
<v Speaker 3>the kind that is just obviously to fill the audience

1:01:19.640 --> 1:01:22.440
<v Speaker 3>in about something, and this is something the characters would

1:01:22.440 --> 1:01:24.040
<v Speaker 3>never need to say to each other.

1:01:24.440 --> 1:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh. There's a tremendous scene of this to a certain

1:01:27.080 --> 1:01:31.120
<v Speaker 2>extent intro too, where the woman is transforming into the

1:01:31.160 --> 1:01:33.680
<v Speaker 2>plant who has been transformed by the witch's potion. The

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:36.520
<v Speaker 2>goblins are eating her, and then you have the kid

1:01:36.560 --> 1:01:39.800
<v Speaker 2>down there who's staring up and he says they're eating her,

1:01:40.320 --> 1:01:41.760
<v Speaker 2>and then they're going to eat me.

1:01:42.400 --> 1:01:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, oh, oh my god.

1:01:45.680 --> 1:01:47.479
<v Speaker 2>And there's a fly in his head the whole time.

1:01:47.600 --> 1:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>It's also so weird and authentically twenty twenty. But yeah,

1:01:52.720 --> 1:01:55.080
<v Speaker 2>it's just it's like, of course you're going to be

1:01:55.080 --> 1:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>eating next, that's implied, but he says it too. And

1:01:58.640 --> 1:02:00.760
<v Speaker 2>that's one of the wonderful things this film.

1:02:00.960 --> 1:02:03.479
<v Speaker 3>I imagine this must have been a really buggy set

1:02:03.520 --> 1:02:06.320
<v Speaker 3>because people get covered in green goop, and I imagine

1:02:06.360 --> 1:02:09.400
<v Speaker 3>that goop was very sweet and sticky whatever it was. Yeah,

1:02:09.440 --> 1:02:11.800
<v Speaker 3>there must have been flies all over the place.

1:02:13.320 --> 1:02:13.520
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:02:13.560 --> 1:02:17.800
<v Speaker 3>There's another great piece of dialogue like that in the

1:02:18.160 --> 1:02:21.200
<v Speaker 3>very first scene where the mother sits down on Joshua's

1:02:21.200 --> 1:02:23.880
<v Speaker 3>bed to explain to him that he must banish Grandpa

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Seth from his mind. She says, I think, she says,

1:02:29.480 --> 1:02:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Grandpa Seth meant a lot to us. He meant a

1:02:31.920 --> 1:02:34.680
<v Speaker 3>lot to you, to your sister, to your father, and

1:02:34.800 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>to me his daughter.

1:02:39.160 --> 1:02:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's great.

1:02:40.480 --> 1:02:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Should we wrap up there?

1:02:42.080 --> 1:02:45.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess we should. Yeah, let's say. What else to

1:02:45.760 --> 1:02:49.800
<v Speaker 2>point out here? I will say that I mentioned Night Killer,

1:02:49.840 --> 1:02:54.840
<v Speaker 2>which also came out in nineteen ninety. It's a slazier film. Yeah,

1:02:54.880 --> 1:02:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I gotta say sexualized Slasherville.

1:02:56.920 --> 1:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I tried to watch that one, and the scenes the

1:02:59.360 --> 1:03:02.760
<v Speaker 3>good scene are really funny, even like on the troll

1:03:02.800 --> 1:03:05.720
<v Speaker 3>two level, Like there's a scene of a dance choreography

1:03:05.800 --> 1:03:08.720
<v Speaker 3>rehearsal at the beginning. That's just exquisite. But also that

1:03:08.760 --> 1:03:12.080
<v Speaker 3>movie is gross. I would not recommend it at all.

1:03:12.400 --> 1:03:15.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's a deeper cut, not for everybody. It's

1:03:15.440 --> 1:03:18.560
<v Speaker 2>not near as fun as Troll too. Troll two is

1:03:19.240 --> 1:03:23.000
<v Speaker 2>for the children, and I mean, well, don't take me

1:03:23.040 --> 1:03:24.880
<v Speaker 2>to the bank on that, but it's I feel like

1:03:24.920 --> 1:03:25.360
<v Speaker 2>it's more.

1:03:25.320 --> 1:03:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Creative before you show it to your children. But yeah,

1:03:28.080 --> 1:03:29.520
<v Speaker 4>certainly more than Night Killer.

1:03:29.960 --> 1:03:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, night Killer is not for most people, but it's

1:03:32.600 --> 1:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>out there as well. And you know that Fragatso has

1:03:35.960 --> 1:03:41.200
<v Speaker 2>an entire filmography that's worth exploring as well. We mentioned

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Best Worst Movie as a documentary worth checking out about

1:03:44.960 --> 1:03:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the making of Troll two and sort of the the

1:03:48.280 --> 1:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>culture of its acceptance by cult film fans. I also

1:03:53.440 --> 1:03:56.200
<v Speaker 2>want to point out that there's an excellent episode of

1:03:56.640 --> 1:04:01.120
<v Speaker 2>CBC's Ideas, which is a radio show podcast. They did

1:04:01.160 --> 1:04:05.160
<v Speaker 2>an episode on cult films titled the Cult Movie Cannon,

1:04:05.560 --> 1:04:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and they discuss like what makes a cult film? Why

1:04:08.200 --> 1:04:10.280
<v Speaker 2>do we keep coming back to them? And they mentioned

1:04:10.280 --> 1:04:13.240
<v Speaker 2>several films, but there is a segment on Troll two

1:04:13.880 --> 1:04:14.680
<v Speaker 2>that is notable.

1:04:14.720 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh cool, You've sent me that to check out before,

1:04:17.600 --> 1:04:19.520
<v Speaker 3>and I apologize that I never got around to it.

1:04:19.560 --> 1:04:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Now I feel bad. Well, I have to go back

1:04:21.160 --> 1:04:22.080
<v Speaker 3>and listen to that now.

1:04:22.320 --> 1:04:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. They talk about Repo Man, they talk about The

1:04:24.400 --> 1:04:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Last Dragon. It's a fun, fun listen. They also interview

1:04:29.480 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 2>some experts on bad movies and cult films.

1:04:33.640 --> 1:04:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh wait, there's one more I have to mention before

1:04:35.880 --> 1:04:38.840
<v Speaker 3>we quit, because it's one that's not really worth watching

1:04:38.880 --> 1:04:41.560
<v Speaker 3>in full because it's pretty boring on its own, but

1:04:41.920 --> 1:04:43.840
<v Speaker 3>it's a good one to sort of put on and

1:04:43.920 --> 1:04:47.080
<v Speaker 3>catch a snip of here and there. And it's called

1:04:47.280 --> 1:04:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Robo War. This was not directed by Claudio for Grosso.

1:04:50.600 --> 1:04:52.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it was written by him.

1:04:52.080 --> 1:04:54.040
<v Speaker 2>And they're directed by Bruno.

1:04:54.160 --> 1:04:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, Yeah, And this one is a just blatant

1:04:58.800 --> 1:05:01.880
<v Speaker 3>ripoff of Predator. Came out a year or two after Predator,

1:05:02.400 --> 1:05:05.600
<v Speaker 3>and it has the guy who plays blast Hard Cheese

1:05:05.600 --> 1:05:09.200
<v Speaker 3>in Space Mutiny Red Brown. Yes, he's playing the Arnold

1:05:09.200 --> 1:05:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Schwarzenegger role, and the Predator in it is this cyborg.

1:05:13.320 --> 1:05:16.040
<v Speaker 3>So if you watch the movie with the Google auto

1:05:16.160 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>generated subtitles on it's on YouTube, and you get it

1:05:19.640 --> 1:05:22.600
<v Speaker 3>to come up with the subtitles. The robot is sort

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:25.720
<v Speaker 3>of mumbling in all of its scenes where it's stalking people,

1:05:25.760 --> 1:05:29.880
<v Speaker 3>and it keeps saying what YouTube thinks is greasy target

1:05:30.000 --> 1:05:33.240
<v Speaker 3>center And that phrase is in my head forever.

1:05:33.040 --> 1:05:35.240
<v Speaker 2>The target center. That should have been the title.

1:05:35.520 --> 1:05:36.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that's it from me.

1:05:37.920 --> 1:05:39.840
<v Speaker 2>All Right, we're gonna go ahead and close out this

1:05:39.880 --> 1:05:43.320
<v Speaker 2>episode of Weird House Cinema. But in the meantime, we'd

1:05:43.320 --> 1:05:45.520
<v Speaker 2>love to hear from everybody. Do you think this is

1:05:45.560 --> 1:05:49.960
<v Speaker 2>a wise use of our time? Do you have problems

1:05:50.280 --> 1:05:52.520
<v Speaker 2>with all of this? Let us know about that. But

1:05:52.640 --> 1:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>even more of the point, what other weird films should

1:05:56.080 --> 1:05:59.200
<v Speaker 2>we consider for the future, not only bad films, you know,

1:05:59.280 --> 1:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>not only be movies, but just films that have some

1:06:02.400 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 2>element of weirdness to them. What would you like to

1:06:05.120 --> 1:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>hear us discuss on the show. Let us know. In

1:06:09.000 --> 1:06:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the meantime, if you want to listen to episodes of

1:06:11.800 --> 1:06:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind, which again come out every

1:06:13.920 --> 1:06:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday and Thursday, and maybe you want to listen to

1:06:16.760 --> 1:06:19.760
<v Speaker 2>the occasional episode of Weird House Cinema on Fridays, well

1:06:19.800 --> 1:06:22.760
<v Speaker 2>you can find Stuff to Blow your Mind wherever you

1:06:22.760 --> 1:06:25.160
<v Speaker 2>get your podcast. That is the show. That is the feed.

1:06:25.560 --> 1:06:28.880
<v Speaker 2>That is the podcast feed in which you find this show.

1:06:28.880 --> 1:06:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer Seth

1:06:31.880 --> 1:06:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Nicholas Johnson. If you'd like to get in touch with

1:06:34.280 --> 1:06:36.400
<v Speaker 3>us with feedback on this episode or any other, to

1:06:36.400 --> 1:06:39.080
<v Speaker 3>suggest topic for the future, just to say hello, you

1:06:39.080 --> 1:06:41.800
<v Speaker 3>can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your

1:06:41.840 --> 1:06:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

1:06:49.440 --> 1:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

1:06:52.480 --> 1:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

1:06:55.440 --> 1:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.