WEBVTT - Environmentalists Ahead in Pipeline Litigation

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday, a federal appeals court in Virginia throughout a permit

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline to cross two national forests,

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>including the Appalachian Trail, and criticize the U. S. Forest

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Service for granting a permit. But on the same day,

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a federal appeals court in d C seemed poised to

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>reject environmentalist arguments that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>wrong when it granted a permit for a gas pipeline

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>expansion project in northeastern Pennsylvania. There's a lot of litigation

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>across the country over pipelines with environmentalists trying a shotgun approach?

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Are they winning? Here to tell us, as Brandon Barnes

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence senior litigation analyst who knows all there is

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to know about pipeline litigation, So Brandon, tell us first

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>about this shotgun approach and whether it's a deliberate strategy

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that environmentalists have agreed to. Well, I think if you

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>take a look at how things have developed over the

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>last two three years in terms of the amount of

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>litigation that's been filed and the various venues that it's

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>being filed in, coupled with the nuanced approach to each

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.559
<v Speaker 1>one of these. These are highly technical arguments being filed

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>by environmentalist It seems obvious that there's a new scattershot approach.

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>We're going to file a lawsuit in a number of

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>different courts, We're going to use a number of different

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>permits as our fodder, and we'll find a way to win.

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>It certainly increased the chances that one of those grabs

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the attention of a court and they stop a pipeline

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>or a project or something. And it's working. And so

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a case of success begetting success.

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about where it worked first. So in the

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic Coast pipeline. With that the fourth Circuit and Richmond

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>criticized the Forest Service for abdicating its responsibility to preserve

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>national forest resources, and they quoted Dr Seuss in doing so.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I like that. They said, the Forest Services trusted to

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues.

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So tell us what that was about. Well, this court

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>has on three occasions come back at Atlantic Coast through

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the permitting of various federal agencies and stop the project.

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And so this is just sort of the tail end

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of that process. Uh, this by itself, isn't that material.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>We're only talking about twenty one miles of pipeline. But

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>if you couple that with the two other permits that

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>span a larger amount of construction and other areas in

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia and Virginia and potentially North Carolina, this is

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a real problem for this project. It's really causing a

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of delays here. So are courts in certain states

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>or federal courts in certain areas more inclined to side

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>with environmentalists or is it just a case by case basis.

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would have said no. You know, I'm

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer. I believe in the sanctity of of these

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>courts and and the judges. But the trend, at least

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>from my perspective, is that this fourth Circuit is certainly

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>finding some common ground with the arguments that the environmentalists

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>are putting forward. I don't think the d C Circuit

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>necessarily has gone that far, but they definitely have had

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>some decisions that are new and and potentially open up

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>new avenues for these opponents. So is the recent DC

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>case an anomaly then? I I don't think so, only

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's just another facet of this sort of shotgun

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of touch, let's try and challenge. And you're talking about

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the Ryan project with Morgan, you know, relatively small, hundred

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven three million dollar project, but it's important for

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the expansion of that that line in that system. That

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>was another way of challenging the potential for that project

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to go through that could if it had been successful,

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>or if it could be successful because that's been decided

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>flow through to much bigger projects. So when you talk

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>about the bigger picture, our environmentalists ahead or the builders.

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>These days, the environmentals are far ahead. The in the

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>last two years is the delays that have mounted on

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>these projects is incredible. They're incredible. It's if you look

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>at the two Thousteen period for pipeline projects, the average

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>time for them to get federal certification and then start

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>building was under four hundred days. It was it was

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>less than a year. But in seventeen period that is

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>jacked up over six hundred days. And so you're talking

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>about more than a half a year edition in a

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty short amount of time. And a lot of that

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is due to the regulatory pressures at the state level

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and in the courts. So how much money is that

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>costing if you know generally, well, it's that's actually a

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>difficult question to answer because a lot of these projects

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of once they're done, you don't really see the

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>companies coming out and tell you what the cost was

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>or or the it's an incremental change over time. But

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>we took a look at a bunch of the bigger

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>pipelines that recently have been changing their cost estimates because

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of these delays. And if you look at the average

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>on a quarter by quarter basis, if they delay by

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a quarter, it's about a hundred seventy million dollars. So

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is that stopping any new pipelines? Yes, yes, I think.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's where we get into a little bit more

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of a of a geographical situation. So New York has

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in the last three years done a very good job

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of stopping projects from being built. Look at Constitution Pipeline,

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>look at Northern Access. They have found a lot of

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>difficult to getting through and some of these projects probably

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>won't get built as a result. But and that sort

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of started to extend to other states. You see that

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey with Penn East and some of the other project.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Virginia's change their permitting scheme midstream for a lot of

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>these projects and adding delay after delay, and it's it's

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's death by a thousand cuts, and sometimes it's

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>a complete stop. Are there states where it's easier the

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>permitting process is easier, easier, or at least more efficient.

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>We know that looking at the process. So if we

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>took a look at the time period after the federal

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 1>government says yes it's okay you can build, all right,

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>yes it's okay you can do this project, and take

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that time to the end where they're allowed to start building,

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that's usually the most sensitive time period for the states

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to kind of intervene and use their permitting process to

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>slow things down. That time period if you're going through

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Ohio and Texas is far shorter less than sixty days

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>typically on average, then if you're going through New York,

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>which is more than two hundred days. So the difference

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is substantial, and I think projects know that. If you

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>look at where new projects are being proposed, there's only

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>one project that's been proposed through New York since January.

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in who is bringing these lawsuits? We say environmentalists.

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Are they national environmental groups? Are they local environmental groups?

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Is there any thread. Traditionally you would have said, Okay,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>these are this is a very local Pipelines are local.

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Pipeline issues are local. It's not in my backyard or

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>nimby issue. But since I think Keystone, certainly after Dakota

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Acts s you had a much stronger environmental movement from

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the national groups, Sierra Club, Environmental Defense Fund, UM. They're

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>all taking advantage of the success that they've had in

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the courts or at the local state agency level, and

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're just spreading that across to all

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>sorts of other projects. It's a fascinating area. Actually, thanks

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>so much, Brandon. That's Brandon Barnes. He it's Bloomberg Intelligence

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>senior litigation analyst.