WEBVTT - Does Tiffany Still Have Fans? | MiniPod

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Native Lampod is a production of iHeart Radio and partnership

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>with Resent Choice Media. Welcome, Welcome, Welcome, Welcome, all right, everyone,

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>welcome home. This is our mini pod for this week.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh Tip. Every week yields her time for listener questions,

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>and we still end up getting a pile up because

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you guys take us in so many different directions. It

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>really is like family talking true to form, Nick, you

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>not our mute true toiform. We always end up down

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>some other roads, so we don't always get to those questions.

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna use this mini pod to get to some

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of those questions today.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's roll.

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:37.599
<v Speaker 3>The first one, hey, Native Pod people disappoint is to Tiffany.

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 4>I think you're really unfair to Abby on the show.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 3>I watch the show every night, and you act as

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 3>if Abby doesn't push back on these people saying this

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 3>wild stuff is conservative. She does it every night. She

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 3>jumps in their ass all the time. I think you're

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 3>really unfair you take you know.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 4>I think you really need to give her.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Some more respect on how she conducts herself and how

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:05.559
<v Speaker 3>she handles that show.

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 4>She's one person with six people for the people talking

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 4>over each other and all that stuff.

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 3>And she makes a point to point out when people

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>are lying. In addition, I think you know you keep

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 3>saying that the media doesn't do this, doesn't do that.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 4>That's false because the media.

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Has talked about the Fentanyls not coming through Venezuela's coming

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 3>through Mexico. They point out The New York Times, CNN,

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 3>other outlets have done this.

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 4>I get your criticism and a lot of it.

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 3>You're right because you know it's about the ratings and

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 3>getting the arguments going. But I also think that your

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 3>hyper your your criticism is a little off sometimes, and

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 3>you should you should be really you should you really

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 3>should chill out when it comes to talking about Abby

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>because I think you're really off based on that one.

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, Thanks, you're mad about Abby.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely love Abby, and I think that I think that

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 2>she takes criticism and constructive criticism better than most people.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 2>She hears it all. But I also think, just to

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of answer answer buddy question, I think Tiffany got

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>smoked for us all. I don't think it's an uneven smoke.

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I think she has soak for the co host on

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>this show, me and Angela and Andrew. I think she

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 2>has smoked for Abby when it's and I think that

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 2>that is why you that Tiffany Cross posse that you

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 2>got to come up with a name for them appreciate

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>you because you're it's not disrespectful. I do want to

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>chill on that, but I do think that your criticism

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>comes from a place of trying to move journalism further

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>in what you perceive that notion to be and a

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 2>common good, And so I don't think it. I don't

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 2>think and I can't speak for Abby either, but I

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 2>don't think anybody believes it comes from a bad place.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 2>A lot of times people just be hating, and I

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>don't ever think people say Tiffany Cross is a hater.

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 2>So I just wanted to start there. And you may

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 2>have a totally different perspective. You may say, Tiffany that

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I am a hater. It should be my slot x

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 2>I Z. I don't know what you're about to say,

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 2>but that's just how I felt about it.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>No, thank you for jumping in, and I'll be brief.

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I just want to be clear that I don't recall

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>saying something on this show, specifically that Abby relatives to

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone else is problematic. My criticisms have typically been about

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the networks at large, of which Abby is a representative.

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>My criticism has also not been to her pushback on

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>people who are on the platform. My criticism is having

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the people on the platform. I don't know when it

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>became journalism to seed our platforms to white supremacists. Furthermore,

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sorry because I know you sent us questions before,

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so I don't remember your name. But I think if

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>your position is no, the media has for sure met

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this moment, and you feel like they are covering all

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the stories with the proper context, and you may be

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>consuming things I don't. That is a place where we

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>probably disagree. I could go through incite over the past

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty years where I think the media has failed us significantly,

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>But I don't have to do that because I wrote

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a whole book about it. There are three hundred pages

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that you can read. If you are curious about specific

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>examples of how the media fails, you can google the book.

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>But it's say it louder. But I will continue to

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>be a constant critic of the media, and I would

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>dispute your perspective that I'm disrespectful to Abby. None of

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>us are beyond reproach, even your criticisms of me, I

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>welcome them and thank you for your feedback on how

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you perceive it. But again, I think if your position

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is the media has met this moment and that my

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>criticisms are misplaced, I disagree and leave you to that opinion,

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>but happy to take the next question. Hi Yah.

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 5>So first I just want to say to if I

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 5>love you in my head, my bff, I think that

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 5>the conversation you guys are having regarding Pop the Balloon.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 2>It's just very hilarious. I absolutely agree.

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 5>With u tivity. I think that it's not loving. It

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 5>reminds me of Joning. And I used to always tell

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 5>my family, who were the biggest Joners, about how Jonan

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 5>I believe it came from slavery.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 4>You know how we believe everything.

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Comes from slavery.

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 5>And the reason why I believe that is because I

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 5>believe that they, you know, used to Joan in order

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 5>to toughen us up so that way we could deal

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 5>with the daily traumas that we were dealing with. So

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 5>that's my spill on you know, why not the Jonah.

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 5>I think the same thing applies to Pop the Balloon.

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 5>I just don't think that it's a loving activity. I

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 5>think there's way better ways for us to use our

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 5>time and fight the programming. That's all I wanted to say.

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 6>Guys, have a good one.

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome home, Welcome home, and thank you for sending that in.

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And when Angela goes on the show, she's gonna use

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to elevate a very important issue to our community.

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>And I do I actually want to let you comment

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>on this to Angela because we've talked about like black culture,

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know how we talk to each other, all

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.119
<v Speaker 1>of us, you know, Bacari, we talked about this as well,

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and I do think it is our culture. We were

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in Texas and we were pulling into a restaurant that

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of looked like a gas station and we were

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>just talking about the way that we like basically jone

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>on each other, jone on everything, and so when we

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>were pulling in, we were like, this is whole gas

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>station as a restaurant, Like we do this all the time. Yes,

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it is part of our culture. I also

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's a part of our trauma. And I just

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>don't always find it entertaining when we do it amongst

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>ourselves and our good spirit. But I don't find insulting

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>each other entertaining all the time, not when it's like

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>harsh or from a negative place. But I'm sure y'all

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>have thoughts on all of it too.

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I I had it was a mechanism for me

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 2>to survive. I mean, I went to I went to

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 2>high school when I was twelve. I had a big head,

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 2>I was skinny, I didn't dress the right way because

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I was coming from private school. And boy, they gave

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 2>me hell when I walked through those doors. And so yeah,

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 2>I used to tell people they mama was so fat.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 2>When they jumped in the sky, she got stuck, right,

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that.

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 4>Was just.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 2>That was just that was I had to I had to.

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I had to cope, and and you know, it's it was.

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 2>It was a way to But you also realized that

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the people who were really good at it, though, Tiffany,

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>it was a whit, it was a skill, and a

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of those people either they were really bad it

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 2>ended up in a different path, or some of them

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 2>became you know, lawyers that we all know or politicians

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>that we all know. Because I know, I know Andrew

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 2>ken Jones is really dry. It is really it's really

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>subtle it's subtle.

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>You walk away.

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Damn I'm bleeding.

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know. Yeah, but you know, I it

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>takes discipline because I definitely have that skill, like I

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>have an acid tongue and I got something sharp ready

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to go all the time, and it takes discipline to

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>be to take a breath, you know, to I mean,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I think delayed gratification is a part of maturity. So

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't need every insult doesn't deserve my response. So

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I do, you know, like, you know, let me

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>breathe and let you have that when I've been on

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>many sets, many times where you know, I just have

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to say, I let the audience you know, perceive it

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the way they will because I'm not gonna engage in that.

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't always win that battle with myself. Sometimes I do,

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, match energy and let something fly out my

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>mouth that I wish. I don't know if that was

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the best way to handle that, but I do. Just

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>because you told that fat joke, I do want to say.

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I did see a few comments who were offended, and

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I would speak for myself and felt like when I

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>was saying bacari, have you ever dated a woman who

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>looked like she could cook, and people were offended by that,

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were like, what's up with the fat shaming?

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Like we don't really find that funny? And I didn't

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>even perceive it that way. But it's not up to me.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>If somebody else took offense to something I said and

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't trying some people, if you offend it, I'm like, yeah,

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm meant to offend you. But on that I didn't

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>even realize that I was making fun of people who

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>are overweight. I don't consider myself skinny by any means,

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>so I just want to acknowledge like I saw that.

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Can y'all too help me with something please? Yeah, because

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't see it either sometimes. But what this new culture?

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I think sometimes I have trouble navigating it and other

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 2>people do too, because sometimes what comes out of my

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 2>mouth is just what is in my head, and it

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 2>ain't like a I'm not trying to condemn anybody from

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 2>my heart, because there's enough about me to be condemned

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 2>when I walk through the door. But like, when is

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 2>it okay to laugh? I mean, or how do we

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>judge the laugh? Or when do we say it's okay

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 2>to laugh? Or like when can we be jovial or

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 2>when can we say stuff in jest? Or is it

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 2>that we can only do it in certain environments? Because respectfully,

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know the rules anymore, and I don't

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 2>know if I'm the only one who feels that way.

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel that way. Yeah, I think if it's at

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>someone's offense or expense rather and they're offended by it,

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I do question sometimes so I am intentional if I

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>said something and I'm meant it to be offensive, you know,

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>if I cause somebody a white supremacist and they offended

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>by it, like, well, tough, I meant it to be

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that way.

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know.

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm navigating because something else. I'm gonna navigate this carefully.

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:29.719
<v Speaker 1>There is also a lot around gender that I'm navigating.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>My friends have kids who you know, are of a

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>different generation, and if I say he and the person

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't identify as he, like, I get pummeled by these

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty somethings you know, or like that is not blool,

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, And it's like, give me a little grace

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>because I'm learning it doesn't cost me anything to address

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you as how you want to be addressed. But give

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>me a little grace. I'm trying to navigate this space.

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>So I hear you, Bakari. I mean, I definitely think

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm misstep and I definitely think I've stepped in it

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>and said things that are offensive to someone. My typical

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>attitude is if I offended you, and it wasn't my

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>intention to just apologize and try to course correct. So

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm trying. I think we're all trying

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to figure it out as we got.

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 2>The worst mouth of us all, and I want to

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.599
<v Speaker 2>hear her response to that, how you navigate with you?

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I got the worst of what the bad mouth, he said,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I have the worst mouth. I don't know that that's

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>true always, but I don't know. I think you know

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>what I think. I grew up I was very very

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>close to my dad's dad, to Gramps, and I grew

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>up playing Domino's with my dad and Gramps, and so

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I learned to be quick witted with them, you know,

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>just in game plan. And then both of my grandfathers

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>were like consummate jokers, and I really I didn't even

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:48.719
<v Speaker 1>like my mom's dad. I was like this dude, I

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>don't like him. He always teased me about something. But

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I really don't think I developed thick skin until after

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the sixth grade. We had a whole podcast about it.

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So I won't relitigate that, but I will say it

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.719
<v Speaker 1>was a means of survival and it was a defense mechanism.

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>But also it was funny like we, I mean, we

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>used to we joked about is you know somebody sneakers?

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know what you got on today? Or

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>did you get dressed in the dark, or like you know,

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it just I mean, that's what we do.

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Is it at somebody's expense? Sure? But also when is

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>that acceptable? And I do think we spend a lot

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of time nowadays deepening into cancel culture in ways that

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>are not healthy. Like you're constantly walking around on eggshells,

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to the point where you may have a thought you're

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>afraid to express, and because you're afraid to express the thing,

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't get to grow, because you know what I'm saying,

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Like there's something about that where you know you're so

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>filtered and so concerned about making sure you don't offend

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that you don't give yourself permission to grow. So I

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>do like the idea when you said tip about giving grace,

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>please give us grace, because I'm definitely confused about all

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of the aspects of gender that exist now not being

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, not being binary, and how you want to

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be referred to. It's the pronouns will be, he, she, they, them,

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to do all of them. And I'm

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to expect So are you telling me all

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of them are okay? I'm supposed to know in which sentence,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>which one to use. That is very confusing. I'm not

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>doing it. I'll just call you your name. Hopefully you're fine

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with that today, and even that sometimes changes. So that

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is stressful and frustrating because I do want to get

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it right, but you know, what can we do? Got

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep.

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 7>Trying, Pace pace Pace.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 8>Shout out to the Native Land Pod family, thank you

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 8>for welcoming us all home. This is Jim from thirty

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 8>three to content has been on fire recently and we're

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 8>loving the content. How you take a kid the community,

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 8>We really appreciate it. My question is for Tiffany made

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 8>a various points on last week's excellent show about folks

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 8>expanding their news diet and consuming different forms of media

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 8>so you could get a wide array of perspectives on

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 8>topics that you may be interested in, and I'm curious

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 8>to you personally. Where do you go for your daily

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 8>downloads of news, national news, where do you go for

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 8>your downloads of international news? And what else might you

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 8>be reading leisurely. That's something that folks might want to

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 8>hear about.

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 7>I love that.

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for the question. So I am still a

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Times reader. I talk a lot of shit about The Times,

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>but I do read the Times. I think their political

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>coverage is often garbage, but their global coverage is actually

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>really good. When you read the business section, the technology section,

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it often spans the globe. I love it. There's also Reuters,

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they have great global news ap NPR. Al Jazeera has

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>great coverage in terms of print media. In terms of

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>what I watch BBC also Al Jazeera if you have

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the app on your smart TV. Al Jazeera does great coverage.

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Frontline does amazing coverage. I would. I mean, I'm just

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it concerns me so much when people are getting their

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>news off social media. I just want to push back

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>on that a little bit, because often it's something that's clipped,

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not the full context, it's and your own the

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>algorithm is feeding you something and so very often people

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>will see something for thirty seconds or spend you know,

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes reading something and think that they have a

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>wide scope of understanding, and it just ain't it. I've

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>heard people talk about things that are happening on a

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>global scale that they would have more understanding and context,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that they made a habit of consuming these things lately,

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and I've even done that. I have read something and

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>tried to rush through it and said something that didn't

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>make sense or that other people will tell me like

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you were way off base on that, or you you know,

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>here's another perspective that you didn't have. So I would

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>just encouraged having a very wide diet. Oh in the Atlantic,

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>How can I forget the Atlantic? The Atlantic is definitely

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the Atlantic. The New Yorker and the Economists, those are

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>great for think pieces, but also just really quickly. I

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>am also on the email list for almost every think tank,

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>so every time there's new data, new research that comes out,

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I get that as well. So sometimes it doesn't even

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>make they get no coverage. He doesn't even make the press,

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm sure to read it. Okay, I know you

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of questions so quick.

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 2>The only the only misstatement I want to correct is

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 2>that Philip Lewis on Twitter is a phenomenal follow. Yes,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 2>and he he gets real news from all over the place.

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 2>But I hope my guy listens to and and and

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 2>subscribe to his local newspaper. I'm a big fan of

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.119
<v Speaker 2>local journalism. I think the stories that we hear from journalism,

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 2>from local journalists are are the best, not not. Your

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 2>local news is okay, like the TV news, but I'm

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 2>really talking about your print papers, because your print papers

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 2>usually have seasoned reporters that can dive in depth on

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 2>stories that move your community and your culture. Unfortunately, we're

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 2>starting to see too much mainstream influence on our local

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>news stations TV news stations, which drives me crazy. And

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the last thing is I mean, if you want to

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 2>get the best news you possibly can, you should tune

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>in the seeing it.

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>They didn't pay for that, damn bad.

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't care if I pay you or not.

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>This is not this is not your podcast, this is

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>n LP. They gotta pay for that. They got a

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>new digital platform with a new digital budget. I'll cut

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that in right out of here.

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 5>Next question, Hi, my name is a real from the Bronx.

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 6>This message is for Tiffany. Yoah, Tiffany, let me tell

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 6>you something. I love your sister, but let me tell

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 6>you something. Sometimes you cannot be like I think you

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 6>are so sensitive.

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Let me tell you something.

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 6>You cannot debate only people that you think is that

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 6>your ever you understand, because sometimes the people that you

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 6>think is not at your lever is the people that

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 6>other people is listening to and getting their information from.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 6>So I would suggest that y'all looking to getting other

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 6>people with different mind frame on your platform, because at

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 6>the end of the day, those are the people that

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 6>you have a lot of people out here listening to.

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.239
<v Speaker 6>So I would say, open the mind and open it

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 6>to different you know people.

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you Aurel for that question. I'm glad

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we got that question actually, because I think we all

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>disagree on this, and I respectfully disagree with Orel. So

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what he means by on my level

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because I don't.

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've ever said I want to date

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>someone or debate some on Freudian slip. I don't think

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I've ever said I wanted to I don't want to

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>debate them on my level. I don't even know what

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that means. But what I have said is I think

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the example I gave if we have a disagreement on

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>school choice, you know, you may feel one way, I

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>may feel another. Sure, if there is a desire for

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>me to debate there, okay, great, let's have that. But

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>if your position is rooted in my oppression or rooted

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in a lack of humanity, for me, I do not

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>owe my time or my space to that person, not

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>even in service to you or l respectfully, I don't

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>think that is a valuable use of time. I would

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>never dream to tell somebody else who they should debate

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and who they should have on their platform, or how

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>they should use their time. I'm saying for me, I

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>don't choose to do that. I don't choose to sit

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.479
<v Speaker 1>across from a white supremacist and debate my humanity. I

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>think that is part of the erosion of our society

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that has led us to this space of giving the

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>microphone to people who haven't earned it and considering hate

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>speech of policy position. That's just not something I want

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to do. But I want to be really clear, I

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you mean by on my level, because

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure people have debated me and I wasn't quote

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>unquote on their level. In this week's podcast, we had

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Ellie mistaal so you had Ellie, Angela and Bakari talking

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>about things that quite frankly, I'm trying to follow, but

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>some of it went over my head. If they said, well,

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't weigh in because it's not on your level,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that. I don't think that's a healthy exchange either.

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed listening and learning, so yeah, I don't. I

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>don't look at like if you're not on my level

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 1>that we can't debate. But I invite you, Rrella, if

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you feel that way that strongly, I invite you by

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>all means debate people the white supremacists who are around their

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>plentful and always looking for somebody to debate. But no, sir,

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's a good use of my time.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But I do thank you for the question. And I

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>would also push back on this idea of me being sensitive.

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>You don't know me or real I don't think I'm.

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 2>You ain't sensitive you except when it comes to dogs.

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 2>But let me plan a seed for a conversation that

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to have with both the all as we

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 2>go forward because I think what Oriel was trying to say,

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think that you all get this more often

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 2>than not, is that there is a perception that Angela

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Rai and Tiffany Cross can be intimidating because of how

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 2>beautiful they are and how intellectual they are and the

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 2>fact that they stand in it and know it. And so

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 2>how do you navigate that or how do you deal

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 2>with people who feel intimidated when they're in your presence,

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 2>particularly as a black woman. Maybe that's another.

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Pot You don't get that from morel that didn't get

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that from a real I will say, I think it's

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>amazing that we got three very different things from what

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Aroh was saying. I took from that the conversation around

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Budden's podcast and the idea about intellectualism. The part

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that I think or maybe didn't hear is that you're

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>intellectually curious. You don't consider yourself an intellectual. I believe

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>he was saying he considers you an intellectual. And if

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you're an intellectual, and these other people who have opinions

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and are driving culture and driving conversation and have large

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>platforms are not considered intellectual. But you won't have an

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>exchange change with them. Where does that leave the culture?

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is a conversation we need to

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to have. Tiff has never said those conversations shouldn't happen.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>She said that's not her particular ministry. And we've you know,

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>bifurcated whose ministry it is on the show. So, Arel,

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope you'll continue listening and continuing to challenge us.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Keep sitting in your ideas, your questions, your thoughts. We

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>love all of them. Make sure as they do it. Oh,

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna finish this one point. Is they gonna

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>say on Joe Budden's podcast, not too much on Tiff though. Okay,

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's all good. She's not sensitive. She can, of course,

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>she can be the cheese standing alone, and she could

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:37.959
<v Speaker 1>definitely hold her own. But I just want to make

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>sure we don't engage in apollo. So we appreciate the

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>love and encouragement to Tiff, appreciate the challenge, and we

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the opportunity to give her the Florida respond go ahead, tip, Yeah,

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I thank you. We should have let you respond first,

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>because I did not get that from what he was

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>saying at all. So my bad brother around all three

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of us definitely took something different. So to that point,

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>now I understand better what you were saying. Of my

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>apology for misunderstanding your point. So again I would push

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>back on that. I have never said I would not

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>debate someone on my level. The point I was making

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>around the Joe Budden podcast, using them as an example,

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is if you are insulting me for my intellect, I'm

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>saying I cannot fill a cup that's already full. So

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>if I'm telling you something and you're not receptive, you're

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>not interested in what I have to say, and you're

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>being insulting, which I have had those type of exchanges

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>with people, I'm saying that is not a conversation I

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>choose to participate in. Again, I don't litigate what somebody

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>else should participate in. I'm saying for me, if someone says, no,

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you should come on here and talk to us, my

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>response is simply and respectfully, get somebody else to do it.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not for me, but I'm happy to go into

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>spaces that speak to the culture. I don't believe speaking

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to the culture. I think that's something that I would

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>say white liberals do or black people who don't have

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a more what I would call an more authentic black

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>ex experience. Tavis Smiley said that what did he say

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest problems with Black America was crack cocaine and

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the IVY League. And I never really understood what he

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>meant by that until I started working with a bunch

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 1>of black people who went to an IVY League. And

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>they think appealing to black people and the black culture

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is appealing to the lowest common denominator, the most ignorant

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>among us. And I don't believe that. I think there's

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>somebody who should go in those spaces and preach the

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>gospel and help inform just like people help inform me

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>every single day. There are many things I don't know.

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>You could feel what I know in a thimble. There

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>are so many things I don't know. But I definitely

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>don't choose to to go in certain spaces that I

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>feel are disrespectful. I mean I could, I could go on,

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>but I won't put myself in an environment that I

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>deem disrespectful to me personally, or disrespectful to women, or

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:59.719
<v Speaker 1>disrespectful to black people or the culture. Sorry, fund were

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you have three different takes, three completely different takes, but

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the importance of having, you know, diversity of voices

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and thought on your pod, So we appreciate you all

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>for sharing your diversity of thoughts and opinions on our pod.

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll make sure that we urge you a roll to

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>go back and listen to the shows We've talked about

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this ad nauseum, so we encourage you to go listen

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>to some of those shows. Thank you all for tuning

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 1>into this mini pod. It was an ass Tiffany, so

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>let's name it accordingly. We will talk to you all soon.

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the holidays. We'll be back with you next week.

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome home, y'all, Love y'all, Welcome home.

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Native Lampod is a production of iHeart Radio and partnership

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>with Reison Choice Media. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.