1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,840 Speaker 1: The brain is massively complex, so how have people tried 2 00:00:09,880 --> 00:00:13,320 Speaker 1: to crack its mysteries? And what does this always have 3 00:00:13,400 --> 00:00:17,160 Speaker 1: to do with the latest technologies that are available, And 4 00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:20,320 Speaker 1: what does the history of neuroscience have to do with 5 00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:31,040 Speaker 1: feeling bumps on someone's skull? Electricity, Frankenstein, animatronics, telegraphs, telephone exchanges, computers, LMS, 6 00:00:31,280 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 1: and the next metaphor that we're going to use to 7 00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:42,200 Speaker 1: try to capture the brain's magic. Welcome to Inner Cosmos 8 00:00:42,200 --> 00:00:45,240 Speaker 1: with me David Eagelman. I'm a neuroscientist and an author 9 00:00:45,280 --> 00:00:48,560 Speaker 1: at Stanford, and in these episodes we seek to understand 10 00:00:48,680 --> 00:00:51,280 Speaker 1: why and how our lives look the way they do. 11 00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:13,399 Speaker 1: If you reach out and you wrap your hand around 12 00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:16,520 Speaker 1: your coffee cup and then bring it up to your lips, 13 00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:21,039 Speaker 1: that all seems pretty effortless. But what's driving that motor 14 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:27,040 Speaker 1: action is a massive, invisible puppeteer living inside your skull, 15 00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:31,920 Speaker 1: an organ made of tens of billions of very active 16 00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:36,080 Speaker 1: cells called neurons, each one of which is firing off 17 00:01:36,360 --> 00:01:40,560 Speaker 1: tiny electrical pulses tens or hundreds of times every second, 18 00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:44,920 Speaker 1: and each of which is exchanging messages with thousands of 19 00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 1: other neurons. And somehow from this vast electrical storm, you 20 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:54,160 Speaker 1: get your hand moving, and you get your perception of 21 00:01:54,240 --> 00:01:58,680 Speaker 1: the tattooed barista in a rolled up flannel pulling espresso 22 00:01:58,800 --> 00:02:02,560 Speaker 1: shots and their of students hunched over laptops, and the 23 00:02:02,760 --> 00:02:06,680 Speaker 1: scent of dark roast and cinnamon. And you get your 24 00:02:06,760 --> 00:02:10,320 Speaker 1: memory of your name and your first kiss and what 25 00:02:10,440 --> 00:02:15,000 Speaker 1: you had for breakfast. And generally, from this lightning storm 26 00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:20,000 Speaker 1: of activity in the brain emerges the shimmering. 27 00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:22,640 Speaker 2: Something that we call you. 28 00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:27,480 Speaker 1: Now, we humans have been trying to understand this wrinkled 29 00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:31,399 Speaker 1: three pounds of jelly for a long time, because it's 30 00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:35,160 Speaker 1: been obvious that this is where all the action is. 31 00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:38,800 Speaker 1: Why is it obvious that is all happening in the brain. Well, 32 00:02:38,880 --> 00:02:42,880 Speaker 1: if you lose your leg, or your kidney or an eyeball, 33 00:02:42,919 --> 00:02:45,400 Speaker 1: those are all terrible events, but you. 34 00:02:45,919 --> 00:02:48,800 Speaker 2: Are still the same. But if you damage even a 35 00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:54,400 Speaker 2: very small chunk of brain tissue, that can change you entirely. 36 00:02:54,440 --> 00:02:59,040 Speaker 1: It changes your personality, or your decision making or your thoughts. 37 00:02:59,040 --> 00:03:02,880 Speaker 1: It changes who you are. So that led people to 38 00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:08,120 Speaker 1: realize slowly that somehow all the action of your behaviors 39 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:12,840 Speaker 1: and your conscious experience is all tied to these three 40 00:03:12,960 --> 00:03:16,920 Speaker 1: pounds of tissue. So that sounds good, but it's really 41 00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:20,600 Speaker 1: hard to crack the mystery of how this thing works. 42 00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:23,919 Speaker 1: And that's for two main reasons. First, all the action 43 00:03:24,080 --> 00:03:27,640 Speaker 1: going on is microscopic. When you look at it, you 44 00:03:27,680 --> 00:03:31,120 Speaker 1: can't see anything. It just looks like a big, wrinkly 45 00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:35,880 Speaker 1: thing with the consistency of mashed potatoes. You'll often hear 46 00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:39,040 Speaker 1: me and others say that this is the most complex 47 00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:42,800 Speaker 1: thing we've ever discovered on our planet, but that is 48 00:03:42,840 --> 00:03:47,160 Speaker 1: a modern revelation. There's nothing obvious about that statement when 49 00:03:47,160 --> 00:03:50,200 Speaker 1: you look at the brain, and in fact, ancient cultures 50 00:03:50,280 --> 00:03:53,040 Speaker 1: used to throw out the brain at autopsy and be 51 00:03:53,160 --> 00:03:56,560 Speaker 1: much more interested in other organs. So the brain's doing 52 00:03:56,680 --> 00:03:59,160 Speaker 1: all kinds of things, but you can't see that. The 53 00:03:59,240 --> 00:04:02,880 Speaker 1: second challenge is that the brain is locked up tightly 54 00:04:03,040 --> 00:04:07,000 Speaker 1: inside the skull. It makes sense that it's well protected 55 00:04:07,040 --> 00:04:10,960 Speaker 1: as very delicate stuff, but that has made it especially 56 00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:15,320 Speaker 1: hard to study. So what's happened is that people have 57 00:04:15,400 --> 00:04:19,560 Speaker 1: been trying to decipher this very complicated puzzle for a 58 00:04:19,600 --> 00:04:23,520 Speaker 1: long time, and the history of neuroscience is, in a 59 00:04:23,560 --> 00:04:28,680 Speaker 1: way the history of human self regard. Each generation peers 60 00:04:28,680 --> 00:04:33,880 Speaker 1: into the darkness and sees its own technology reflected back. 61 00:04:34,279 --> 00:04:37,960 Speaker 1: So in the seventeenth century, when hydraulics were the cutting 62 00:04:38,040 --> 00:04:41,560 Speaker 1: edge of technology, the brain was imagined as a network 63 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:42,920 Speaker 1: of pipes and valves. 64 00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:46,320 Speaker 2: Thoughts and sensations flowed like. 65 00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:51,560 Speaker 1: Water, propelled by animal spirits that coursed through hollow nerves. 66 00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:57,040 Speaker 1: Then in the eighteenth century, as electricity captured the imagination, 67 00:04:57,120 --> 00:05:01,400 Speaker 1: the brain became a battery. It became a generator of sparks. 68 00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:06,279 Speaker 1: By the nineteenth century it was a telegraph system, with 69 00:05:06,480 --> 00:05:11,160 Speaker 1: messages darting along wires and transmitting coded signals from one 70 00:05:11,360 --> 00:05:12,440 Speaker 1: station to another. 71 00:05:12,640 --> 00:05:14,080 Speaker 2: And then as we moved into. 72 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:18,960 Speaker 1: The twentieth century with advancing technology, the metaphor shifted again. 73 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:21,800 Speaker 2: The brain became a telephone. 74 00:05:21,320 --> 00:05:26,880 Speaker 1: Exchange, and then an electronic circuit and eventually a digital computer. 75 00:05:27,800 --> 00:05:32,320 Speaker 1: Now the cool thing is that each metaphor brought new insights. 76 00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:36,839 Speaker 1: So hydraulics inspired experiments on fluid pressure in the brain, 77 00:05:37,160 --> 00:05:42,240 Speaker 1: and telegraphs shaped the search for nerve conduction, and the 78 00:05:42,279 --> 00:05:44,719 Speaker 1: computer age fueled the rise. 79 00:05:44,480 --> 00:05:45,799 Speaker 2: Of neural network models. 80 00:05:46,360 --> 00:05:52,200 Speaker 1: But each metaphor also carries its blind spots. We become 81 00:05:52,279 --> 00:05:56,359 Speaker 1: experts at seeing the brain through the lens of the 82 00:05:56,440 --> 00:06:01,880 Speaker 1: day's technology, and sometimes we mistake the map for the territory. 83 00:06:02,640 --> 00:06:06,240 Speaker 1: So nowadays we've got great tools. We have fMRI scanners 84 00:06:06,240 --> 00:06:10,600 Speaker 1: that can track activity millimeter by millimeter. We have optogenetics 85 00:06:10,600 --> 00:06:13,760 Speaker 1: that can tickle neurons on or off with light. We 86 00:06:13,839 --> 00:06:18,320 Speaker 1: have genetic tools to clip out sections or even single letters. 87 00:06:18,760 --> 00:06:24,320 Speaker 1: And yet the deepest mysteries of the brain still remain, 88 00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:28,040 Speaker 1: and they're still stubborn. How does a three pound lump 89 00:06:28,120 --> 00:06:35,160 Speaker 1: of biological tissue generate the first person experience of being alive? 90 00:06:36,279 --> 00:06:41,479 Speaker 1: How does matter become mind? And how do all the 91 00:06:41,520 --> 00:06:46,080 Speaker 1: technology metaphors that we use today blind us to some 92 00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:48,960 Speaker 1: of the details. So that's why today I called up 93 00:06:49,240 --> 00:06:54,080 Speaker 1: Matthew Cobb. He's an evolutionary neurobiologist who studies smell and 94 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:57,800 Speaker 1: memory at the University of Manchester, and he's also a 95 00:06:57,880 --> 00:07:03,240 Speaker 1: historian who has spent decades tracing the shifting stories that 96 00:07:03,279 --> 00:07:06,320 Speaker 1: we tell about the brain. He wrote a great book 97 00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:09,800 Speaker 1: called The Idea of the Brain, and this is a 98 00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:14,320 Speaker 1: fascinating history of neuroscience because it's not just a list 99 00:07:14,320 --> 00:07:18,800 Speaker 1: of events, but instead it explores how science and culture 100 00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:24,880 Speaker 1: and technology all braided together to shape our ideas and 101 00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:28,000 Speaker 1: how time and again we've been certain that we were 102 00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:31,120 Speaker 1: on the brink of a full explanation, only to discover 103 00:07:31,280 --> 00:07:35,520 Speaker 1: that the brain is more complex than we imagined. You 104 00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:39,320 Speaker 1: can't read this book without getting a deep appreciation for 105 00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:42,040 Speaker 1: the centuries of labor that. 106 00:07:41,960 --> 00:07:44,320 Speaker 2: It took to get us to the modern day picture. 107 00:07:44,960 --> 00:07:49,040 Speaker 1: The history of neuroscience is about hundreds or thousands of 108 00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:54,160 Speaker 1: people making small contributions, and presumably each person could never 109 00:07:54,280 --> 00:07:58,920 Speaker 1: know how seminole the contribution was. They were just providing 110 00:07:59,360 --> 00:08:02,720 Speaker 1: one puzzle piece that would end up clicking together with 111 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:06,760 Speaker 1: other pieces in the future, but it's always impossible to see. 112 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:10,240 Speaker 1: So the key is that in the end, the story 113 00:08:10,280 --> 00:08:12,800 Speaker 1: of the brain is also the story of us. It's 114 00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:16,360 Speaker 1: our technology, is what we understand at any point in history, 115 00:08:16,880 --> 00:08:20,840 Speaker 1: and of course our relentless drive to understand the organ 116 00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:24,680 Speaker 1: that is doing the understanding. So here's my conversation with 117 00:08:24,720 --> 00:08:32,320 Speaker 1: Matthew Cobb. Okay, so, Matthew, I'm a giant fan of 118 00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:35,760 Speaker 1: your book, The Idea of the Brain. I thought it 119 00:08:35,800 --> 00:08:38,959 Speaker 1: was extraordinary because it's not just a history of neuroscience 120 00:08:39,000 --> 00:08:41,760 Speaker 1: that is, it includes that, but much more importantly, it's 121 00:08:41,800 --> 00:08:44,480 Speaker 1: a history of how to think about the brain, how 122 00:08:44,480 --> 00:08:46,040 Speaker 1: people have thought about it. 123 00:08:46,400 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 2: And one of your main points in the book. 124 00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:53,319 Speaker 1: Is that we always draw on our technology as a metaphor. 125 00:08:53,679 --> 00:08:57,560 Speaker 1: So science is not just an accumulation of facts, but 126 00:08:57,640 --> 00:09:00,760 Speaker 1: instead we frame things in particular ways depending on what's 127 00:09:00,760 --> 00:09:01,600 Speaker 1: going on around us. 128 00:09:01,960 --> 00:09:03,400 Speaker 2: So let's start there this. 129 00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:06,520 Speaker 3: Issue that you've just described a metaphor, of the metaphors 130 00:09:06,559 --> 00:09:09,720 Speaker 3: that we use, and how that changes over time. That 131 00:09:09,760 --> 00:09:13,240 Speaker 3: actually gives a frame to the book and makes the history, 132 00:09:13,280 --> 00:09:15,840 Speaker 3: which otherwise might be a bit dull, actually much more 133 00:09:15,880 --> 00:09:21,280 Speaker 3: interesting and enables you to think about how people could 134 00:09:21,360 --> 00:09:24,240 Speaker 3: think the way they didn't, why they couldn't see anything different, 135 00:09:24,240 --> 00:09:26,240 Speaker 3: Because that's always the problem with history, right, I mean, 136 00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:29,000 Speaker 3: it looks so obvious to us, you know how why 137 00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:31,920 Speaker 3: on earth didn't people realize that the brain is the 138 00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:32,520 Speaker 3: center of thought? 139 00:09:32,559 --> 00:09:35,600 Speaker 4: Why do they think it was the heart? And one 140 00:09:35,640 --> 00:09:37,160 Speaker 4: of the rules. 141 00:09:36,880 --> 00:09:39,320 Speaker 3: I think about history, in particular the history of science, 142 00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:42,439 Speaker 3: is that you're not allowed to think that people in 143 00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:45,280 Speaker 3: the past were stupid because they were amazingly smart. 144 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:47,120 Speaker 4: They just didn't know as much as we know. And 145 00:09:47,160 --> 00:09:47,800 Speaker 4: we only know. 146 00:09:47,800 --> 00:09:49,800 Speaker 3: That most of us because we've read it or we've 147 00:09:49,800 --> 00:09:53,120 Speaker 3: been taught it in class. Relatively few people have actually 148 00:09:53,120 --> 00:09:56,440 Speaker 3: made great breakthroughs that have changed how we think about 149 00:09:56,440 --> 00:09:59,360 Speaker 3: the world. So when you've got these people who are very, 150 00:09:59,440 --> 00:10:02,600 Speaker 3: very clever but can't see something, that the task is 151 00:10:02,640 --> 00:10:05,200 Speaker 3: to try and put yourselves in their heads and say, well, 152 00:10:05,400 --> 00:10:07,360 Speaker 3: what is it they don't understand And it can't just 153 00:10:07,360 --> 00:10:10,040 Speaker 3: be the answer, you know, they didn't understand that nothing 154 00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:12,920 Speaker 3: goes faster than light or whatever. You've got to think about, well, 155 00:10:12,920 --> 00:10:15,840 Speaker 3: what is it the framework that they're living in the 156 00:10:15,880 --> 00:10:19,000 Speaker 3: world they're living in. Trying and put yourselves in their shoes, 157 00:10:19,679 --> 00:10:22,600 Speaker 3: and then it all starts to become clearer. And it also, 158 00:10:22,679 --> 00:10:26,280 Speaker 3: I think for the reader, both the lay reader and 159 00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:30,040 Speaker 3: for scientists becomes much more interesting because then you can 160 00:10:30,520 --> 00:10:34,559 Speaker 3: start to say not only about now, but also about 161 00:10:34,600 --> 00:10:37,840 Speaker 3: the future, about what might be coming and why we 162 00:10:37,880 --> 00:10:39,840 Speaker 3: can't understand certain things at the moment. 163 00:10:40,120 --> 00:10:40,320 Speaker 4: You know. 164 00:10:40,400 --> 00:10:42,360 Speaker 1: One of the things that was quite stunning for me 165 00:10:43,000 --> 00:10:46,640 Speaker 1: is I, like, you, have spent my whole career in neuroscience, 166 00:10:46,679 --> 00:10:50,120 Speaker 1: but it was difficult for me to envision what it 167 00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:52,760 Speaker 1: would have been like to live in neuroscience in an 168 00:10:52,800 --> 00:10:55,440 Speaker 1: era where we didn't know something. So for example, the 169 00:10:55,440 --> 00:10:58,760 Speaker 1: discovery of the action potential. This is where a neuron 170 00:10:59,120 --> 00:11:02,960 Speaker 1: has a spike there, zips down the axon and carries 171 00:11:03,160 --> 00:11:06,760 Speaker 1: signals rapidly in this way. I grew up just taking 172 00:11:07,360 --> 00:11:09,560 Speaker 1: for granted that that's what neurons do. 173 00:11:10,200 --> 00:11:10,280 Speaker 4: That. 174 00:11:10,480 --> 00:11:15,600 Speaker 1: Of course, the brain uses electricity in this sense. But 175 00:11:15,920 --> 00:11:18,040 Speaker 1: you know, you had a whole chapter about electricity and 176 00:11:18,040 --> 00:11:21,240 Speaker 1: how people discovered that that was going on with the brain. 177 00:11:21,360 --> 00:11:22,439 Speaker 2: Give us a sense of that. 178 00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:26,240 Speaker 4: Well, it all began, I guess it began in America 179 00:11:26,280 --> 00:11:26,680 Speaker 4: really with. 180 00:11:28,320 --> 00:11:33,120 Speaker 3: The ability to Franklin to actually bring electricity down very 181 00:11:33,200 --> 00:11:36,240 Speaker 3: dangerous experiments as everybody knows, with kites and keys and 182 00:11:36,280 --> 00:11:38,920 Speaker 3: that kind of thing. But in the eighteenth century people 183 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:42,439 Speaker 3: began to be able to store electricity. They could produce 184 00:11:42,520 --> 00:11:45,720 Speaker 3: it in the form of static electricity. So they'd get 185 00:11:46,040 --> 00:11:49,480 Speaker 3: some amber or any kind of resin and you know, 186 00:11:49,640 --> 00:11:51,360 Speaker 3: just like you, you know, maybe you do. 187 00:11:51,360 --> 00:11:51,880 Speaker 4: This for your kid. 188 00:11:51,920 --> 00:11:53,319 Speaker 3: So you know when you were a kid, your dad 189 00:11:53,320 --> 00:11:55,160 Speaker 3: would do this. You get a balloon, you rub it 190 00:11:55,160 --> 00:11:57,640 Speaker 3: on his jump and he stick it on the wall. Amazing, right, 191 00:11:57,760 --> 00:12:02,439 Speaker 3: that static electricity you can actually generate by putting say 192 00:12:02,640 --> 00:12:05,880 Speaker 3: some wool onto a resin wheel. That you spin round 193 00:12:06,720 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 3: and they would do These people would do these kind 194 00:12:09,640 --> 00:12:12,440 Speaker 3: of party tricks. They were called electricians, right, and they 195 00:12:12,480 --> 00:12:14,920 Speaker 3: would go into your fancy house and they would they 196 00:12:14,920 --> 00:12:17,800 Speaker 3: would do like one of these shows was called the 197 00:12:18,160 --> 00:12:22,920 Speaker 3: Feathered Boy, and they'd get some hapless child and winch 198 00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:26,000 Speaker 3: him up to the ceiling and then they'd charge him 199 00:12:26,040 --> 00:12:29,360 Speaker 3: up with electricity using this amber and cloth, and then 200 00:12:29,400 --> 00:12:31,880 Speaker 3: they'd throw a load of feathers in the air and 201 00:12:31,920 --> 00:12:33,800 Speaker 3: of course they'd all stick on it. So they could 202 00:12:33,800 --> 00:12:37,520 Speaker 3: do stuff like this. And also people were thinking about 203 00:12:37,720 --> 00:12:41,600 Speaker 3: actually using a very primitive form of electroshock therapy. So 204 00:12:42,120 --> 00:12:44,920 Speaker 3: these electricians, when you could generate it, they would travel 205 00:12:44,960 --> 00:12:50,920 Speaker 3: around the countryside, you know, itinerant electricians, so too particularly 206 00:12:50,960 --> 00:12:57,400 Speaker 3: significant figures. So John Wesley, the founder of Methodism, and Maha, 207 00:12:57,480 --> 00:13:01,360 Speaker 3: the French revolutionary, were both itinerant electricians in the UK 208 00:13:01,480 --> 00:13:02,400 Speaker 3: in the eighteenth century. 209 00:13:02,440 --> 00:13:04,240 Speaker 4: Wandering around. Somebody say I'm. 210 00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:06,599 Speaker 3: Feeling really miserable and terrible, and he said, well, just 211 00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:08,640 Speaker 3: hold on to this, and then they'd wind it up 212 00:13:08,679 --> 00:13:11,960 Speaker 3: and bang, you get an electric shark. So scientists knew 213 00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:15,080 Speaker 3: that electricity was doing something, but that didn't mean to 214 00:13:15,120 --> 00:13:18,160 Speaker 3: say that it was how bodies worked, and it became 215 00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:22,600 Speaker 3: increasingly complex as people were able to actually store electricity 216 00:13:22,760 --> 00:13:25,280 Speaker 3: through something called a lidon jar. You'd actually put it 217 00:13:25,320 --> 00:13:28,760 Speaker 3: into a generate this electricity and it would then stay. 218 00:13:28,840 --> 00:13:32,079 Speaker 3: But what happened it was then suddenly discharge if you 219 00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:34,199 Speaker 3: touched it, like touching a cow fence. 220 00:13:34,280 --> 00:13:36,440 Speaker 4: Right, you know, you know you've been touched. 221 00:13:36,640 --> 00:13:40,800 Speaker 3: And so when French scientists didn't experiment with this, he 222 00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:45,120 Speaker 3: got four hundred monks, which is they're all holding hands, 223 00:13:45,480 --> 00:13:47,200 Speaker 3: and at one end he got one of these big 224 00:13:47,280 --> 00:13:49,760 Speaker 3: jars full of electricity and he made the monk touch it, 225 00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:51,880 Speaker 3: and then he watched us that they all jumped up 226 00:13:51,880 --> 00:13:55,240 Speaker 3: as if the chargers down this line of monks must 227 00:13:55,240 --> 00:13:58,240 Speaker 3: have been about whatever eight hundred meters more thousand meters 228 00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:01,600 Speaker 3: kilometer along a monk. And then finally they were able 229 00:14:01,640 --> 00:14:05,359 Speaker 3: to use They were showing that even they're doing experiments 230 00:14:05,360 --> 00:14:08,360 Speaker 3: on animals, like in particular frogs, and they'd noticed that 231 00:14:08,600 --> 00:14:12,600 Speaker 3: if you stimulated a frog nerve on attached to a leg, 232 00:14:12,640 --> 00:14:16,080 Speaker 3: then their muscle would contract. Now this didn't show you 233 00:14:16,400 --> 00:14:18,280 Speaker 3: what was going on, because you know if you put 234 00:14:18,320 --> 00:14:21,000 Speaker 3: acid on a nerve then that it will also contract 235 00:14:21,040 --> 00:14:23,840 Speaker 3: so maybe electricy was just an irritant, or maybe it 236 00:14:23,880 --> 00:14:25,960 Speaker 3: was actually in bodies right, And this was. 237 00:14:25,920 --> 00:14:26,680 Speaker 4: A big argument. 238 00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:29,240 Speaker 3: One of the things that people stuid was electric fish, 239 00:14:29,280 --> 00:14:33,800 Speaker 3: so the electric eel. And they found this structure that 240 00:14:34,040 --> 00:14:37,160 Speaker 3: was produced as shock and at the beginning of the 241 00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:41,920 Speaker 3: nineteenth century chap called vaulta hence vault. He decided he'd 242 00:14:41,960 --> 00:14:44,960 Speaker 3: do a bit of biomimicry. He said, okay, well they've 243 00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:48,600 Speaker 3: got this electric organ. Maybe I can use that electric organ. 244 00:14:48,640 --> 00:14:50,680 Speaker 3: I think I can mimic the structure of this which 245 00:14:50,720 --> 00:14:55,280 Speaker 3: had kind of layers and produce an electric current. And 246 00:14:55,320 --> 00:14:57,680 Speaker 3: so he did created what he called a pile, which 247 00:14:57,760 --> 00:15:00,600 Speaker 3: was layers of zinc and cardboard with los of acid 248 00:15:00,640 --> 00:15:03,240 Speaker 3: around them. And it was because it was a black 249 00:15:03,320 --> 00:15:07,400 Speaker 3: pile of pennies. And this would then produce electricity, but 250 00:15:07,480 --> 00:15:08,720 Speaker 3: at a constant rate. 251 00:15:09,240 --> 00:15:11,160 Speaker 4: Now in English we now call this a battery. 252 00:15:11,400 --> 00:15:15,360 Speaker 3: So you've now got this continuous release of electricity. And 253 00:15:15,400 --> 00:15:18,600 Speaker 3: then you can see, well, actually we can stimulate if 254 00:15:18,600 --> 00:15:22,640 Speaker 3: we put these electrodes onto and they did very horrible 255 00:15:22,720 --> 00:15:26,280 Speaker 3: experiments on animals, dead animals. You know, you could then 256 00:15:26,320 --> 00:15:28,160 Speaker 3: make it if you put electrodes on either side of 257 00:15:28,480 --> 00:15:31,040 Speaker 3: a cow's head, then its mouth would start to move, 258 00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:34,080 Speaker 3: and its eyes would roll in its sockets. And in 259 00:15:34,120 --> 00:15:38,600 Speaker 3: one particularly awful experiment in London, then a criminal who 260 00:15:38,880 --> 00:15:41,520 Speaker 3: killed his wife and child and had been hanged was 261 00:15:41,600 --> 00:15:44,800 Speaker 3: immediately taken down from the gallows as soon as he 262 00:15:44,880 --> 00:15:47,560 Speaker 3: was dead, taken into a small room with about twelve 263 00:15:47,840 --> 00:15:53,120 Speaker 3: learned gentleman and this experiment was done on his dead body, 264 00:15:53,160 --> 00:15:55,200 Speaker 3: and of course he would then, you know, his arms 265 00:15:55,200 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 3: started flailing about and all the rest of it. 266 00:15:58,920 --> 00:16:02,440 Speaker 4: That these experiments convinced. 267 00:16:02,000 --> 00:16:05,200 Speaker 3: People that there was electricity in nerves, that it wasn't 268 00:16:05,240 --> 00:16:07,160 Speaker 3: just an irritant, that it was actually some kind of 269 00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:09,200 Speaker 3: organizing principle. 270 00:16:10,200 --> 00:16:12,240 Speaker 1: And by the way, this is starting to be one 271 00:16:12,240 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 1: of the origins of Mary Shelley's frankenstn. 272 00:16:14,720 --> 00:16:18,120 Speaker 3: It's not known, but she did regularly go to something 273 00:16:18,160 --> 00:16:21,760 Speaker 3: called the Royal Institution in London, which is still there, 274 00:16:21,920 --> 00:16:26,360 Speaker 3: amazing lecture theater where science is communicated to the public, 275 00:16:26,400 --> 00:16:29,880 Speaker 3: and various British scientists spoke there, and at the beginning 276 00:16:30,040 --> 00:16:34,720 Speaker 3: in about eighteen fourteen, there were a series of demonstrations 277 00:16:34,760 --> 00:16:38,760 Speaker 3: of this power of electricity to animate dead bodies on 278 00:16:38,960 --> 00:16:40,920 Speaker 3: sheep's heads and so on. You can go to the 279 00:16:40,920 --> 00:16:42,840 Speaker 3: theater and see it. I mean, it was a huge, 280 00:16:43,040 --> 00:16:46,960 Speaker 3: huge thing. And we don't know that Mary Godwin went, 281 00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:48,960 Speaker 3: but it's pretty likely she did. And then a couple 282 00:16:49,000 --> 00:16:51,280 Speaker 3: of years later, when she was whatever sixteen, she ran 283 00:16:51,320 --> 00:16:56,120 Speaker 3: off with Shelley and they went on honeymoon. So they 284 00:16:56,120 --> 00:16:58,520 Speaker 3: sat around in Morote ghost stories and she wrote Frankistan. 285 00:17:13,880 --> 00:17:18,160 Speaker 1: One of the fascinations that I enjoyed with reading your 286 00:17:18,400 --> 00:17:23,600 Speaker 1: book was all these things that we learned from biology 287 00:17:24,040 --> 00:17:27,040 Speaker 1: that have created new technologies, like looking at the electric 288 00:17:27,119 --> 00:17:30,840 Speaker 1: eel and the invention of the battery that fade away. 289 00:17:30,920 --> 00:17:34,119 Speaker 1: Now we have a gajillion times more batteries on our 290 00:17:34,160 --> 00:17:37,320 Speaker 1: planet than we have electric eels, but we have forgotten 291 00:17:37,640 --> 00:17:40,080 Speaker 1: where that came from, that biomimicry. So what I really 292 00:17:40,119 --> 00:17:42,239 Speaker 1: loved is the way you tie these things together. So 293 00:17:42,560 --> 00:17:47,240 Speaker 1: tell us about phrenology, the pseudoscience of phrenology that was popular, 294 00:17:47,240 --> 00:17:50,920 Speaker 1: and how you think this actually contributed in a positive 295 00:17:50,960 --> 00:17:53,120 Speaker 1: way to how we think about neuroscience and modern times, 296 00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:54,760 Speaker 1: even though phrenology itself was incorrect. 297 00:17:54,920 --> 00:17:57,119 Speaker 3: If you want to have an argument with a neuroscientist, 298 00:17:57,200 --> 00:18:01,560 Speaker 3: your studies the human brain in particular go groups them together. 299 00:18:01,680 --> 00:18:06,119 Speaker 3: Say is function localized? Is there part of our brain 300 00:18:06,520 --> 00:18:09,960 Speaker 3: that is devoted to doing a particular thing and that 301 00:18:10,080 --> 00:18:12,720 Speaker 3: if you remove it you can't do that thing? 302 00:18:12,920 --> 00:18:13,160 Speaker 4: Right? 303 00:18:13,320 --> 00:18:17,600 Speaker 3: The answer is kind of yes, and no. Man is complicated, right. 304 00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:21,160 Speaker 3: But in the nineteenth century it tormented people a great deal, 305 00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:25,479 Speaker 3: partly because of the influence of French philosophy, and that 306 00:18:25,560 --> 00:18:28,480 Speaker 3: the identification of the brain and the mind caused a 307 00:18:28,560 --> 00:18:33,080 Speaker 3: huge problem because Descartes, who was for the French, the 308 00:18:33,119 --> 00:18:37,879 Speaker 3: philosopher and no need for any other. He insisted that 309 00:18:37,880 --> 00:18:41,560 Speaker 3: the mind was a united structure and therefore the brain 310 00:18:41,640 --> 00:18:43,280 Speaker 3: must be as well. And if you look at the brain, 311 00:18:43,440 --> 00:18:46,159 Speaker 3: it appears identical on either half, got two halves, and 312 00:18:46,200 --> 00:18:50,120 Speaker 3: they look pretty symmetrical. So the French were very convinced 313 00:18:50,119 --> 00:18:53,560 Speaker 3: that there was no localization of function. And yet there 314 00:18:53,600 --> 00:18:57,600 Speaker 3: was this popular idea of phrenology, which is, you know, 315 00:18:57,920 --> 00:19:00,919 Speaker 3: kind of grew up in the late eighteenth cent and 316 00:19:01,080 --> 00:19:03,480 Speaker 3: was basically a version of oh, I don't like the 317 00:19:03,520 --> 00:19:05,840 Speaker 3: look of his face, his eyes are too close together, 318 00:19:05,960 --> 00:19:08,920 Speaker 3: or whatever, you know, version you he's got big ears, 319 00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:11,320 Speaker 3: or whatever. Way of looking at somebody's face and not 320 00:19:11,440 --> 00:19:13,840 Speaker 3: liking them and thinking that they're not shifty or whatever. 321 00:19:14,040 --> 00:19:17,880 Speaker 3: This was then theorized in all sorts of ways by 322 00:19:18,480 --> 00:19:21,399 Speaker 3: various thinkers who argued that by feeling the outside of 323 00:19:21,440 --> 00:19:24,280 Speaker 3: your head skull, you could tell the shape of your 324 00:19:24,280 --> 00:19:26,719 Speaker 3: brain and the lumps on your head, because we've all 325 00:19:26,760 --> 00:19:32,200 Speaker 3: got lumps. They reveal the existence of organs and sections 326 00:19:32,200 --> 00:19:34,040 Speaker 3: of the brain that are doing particular things. 327 00:19:34,520 --> 00:19:36,480 Speaker 4: But rather than say, as. 328 00:19:36,320 --> 00:19:38,800 Speaker 3: You know, you might say, well they're devoted to speech 329 00:19:38,960 --> 00:19:43,200 Speaker 3: or you know, impulsiveness or vision, they were all about 330 00:19:43,280 --> 00:19:48,879 Speaker 3: moral virtues and you know, being goodness and so basically 331 00:19:48,880 --> 00:19:52,359 Speaker 3: it's like astrology, you know. And people would go and 332 00:19:52,400 --> 00:19:54,480 Speaker 3: it was incredibly popular in the nineteenth century, and the 333 00:19:54,520 --> 00:19:57,040 Speaker 3: scientists got really really cross about it because they said, look, 334 00:19:57,200 --> 00:19:57,760 Speaker 3: you know, your. 335 00:19:57,600 --> 00:19:58,680 Speaker 4: Skull's really thick. 336 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:01,560 Speaker 3: You may have a big lump on your head, but 337 00:20:01,640 --> 00:20:05,199 Speaker 3: there's no lump corresponding lump underneath your brain. So this 338 00:20:05,320 --> 00:20:08,920 Speaker 3: is just rubbish. So this went on until the late 339 00:20:09,119 --> 00:20:13,240 Speaker 3: the early twentieth century. So this is pseudoscience, and despite 340 00:20:13,240 --> 00:20:17,879 Speaker 3: it being widely not accepted, but you know, ordinary people, 341 00:20:18,080 --> 00:20:20,600 Speaker 3: ordinary people from Queen Victoria to Carl Marx all thought 342 00:20:20,600 --> 00:20:21,600 Speaker 3: it was very interesting. 343 00:20:21,840 --> 00:20:23,679 Speaker 4: You know, there was nothing in it. It was complete, 344 00:20:23,800 --> 00:20:24,520 Speaker 4: not of rubbish. 345 00:20:24,600 --> 00:20:27,919 Speaker 3: But what it's got in there is this suggestion that 346 00:20:28,000 --> 00:20:31,920 Speaker 3: maybe there is localization of function. And this is eventually 347 00:20:32,200 --> 00:20:36,840 Speaker 3: resolved in about eighteen sixty when a French scientist called 348 00:20:36,840 --> 00:20:41,480 Speaker 3: Broker was studying the brains of patients who who'd have 349 00:20:41,680 --> 00:20:43,960 Speaker 3: strokes and have lost the power of speech, and he 350 00:20:44,040 --> 00:20:47,920 Speaker 3: found that consistently when he did the dissections, the front 351 00:20:48,040 --> 00:20:52,320 Speaker 3: left and area of the brain was damaged in these 352 00:20:52,359 --> 00:20:54,399 Speaker 3: patients who had lost the power of speech. Patients who 353 00:20:54,520 --> 00:20:56,679 Speaker 3: died and hadn't lost the power of speech did not 354 00:20:56,680 --> 00:20:58,240 Speaker 3: have those leeches legiance. 355 00:20:58,320 --> 00:20:59,760 Speaker 4: And he was really unhappy. 356 00:20:59,440 --> 00:21:02,399 Speaker 3: About this because he was French and this could not 357 00:21:02,520 --> 00:21:04,919 Speaker 3: be and yeah, I mean having I don't know if 358 00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:07,000 Speaker 3: this has happened to you, David, but you know, sometimes 359 00:21:07,000 --> 00:21:08,960 Speaker 3: you collect data and it. 360 00:21:09,040 --> 00:21:10,359 Speaker 4: Just pushes you into a corner. 361 00:21:10,440 --> 00:21:11,960 Speaker 3: You don't want to go to that corner because you 362 00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:14,159 Speaker 3: don't think that's the way it is. But the data 363 00:21:14,320 --> 00:21:16,119 Speaker 3: just in the end you've got no option. You're just 364 00:21:16,119 --> 00:21:17,480 Speaker 3: going to say, well, that's the way it is, this 365 00:21:17,560 --> 00:21:20,520 Speaker 3: is what happens. And poor old Broker had to say 366 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:24,200 Speaker 3: and shock the French establishment by saying there is localization 367 00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:27,040 Speaker 3: of function. Of course, you can't see anything with the eye, 368 00:21:27,240 --> 00:21:29,159 Speaker 3: the naked eye for this front left hand side of 369 00:21:29,160 --> 00:21:30,840 Speaker 3: the brain. And then a couple and if you saw 370 00:21:30,840 --> 00:21:33,320 Speaker 3: this was a couple of years ago, quite astonishing paper 371 00:21:34,400 --> 00:21:37,840 Speaker 3: was produced between a group of neuroscientists were doing fMRI 372 00:21:38,119 --> 00:21:42,560 Speaker 3: scans and a woman in her thirties was a secretary 373 00:21:42,560 --> 00:21:45,840 Speaker 3: who had a college degree, who wrote to them. She 374 00:21:45,880 --> 00:21:47,920 Speaker 3: saw an advert, you know, saying we're looking for people 375 00:21:47,960 --> 00:21:49,840 Speaker 3: to have brain scanned. She said, I've been told there's 376 00:21:49,880 --> 00:21:52,360 Speaker 3: something interesting about my brain. And they said, okay, yeah, 377 00:21:52,400 --> 00:21:55,719 Speaker 3: come on in. They stuck her in the scanner and 378 00:21:55,760 --> 00:21:58,280 Speaker 3: the left hand brain side of her brain is completely empty. 379 00:21:58,280 --> 00:22:04,800 Speaker 3: There's nothing, there's a hemisphere completely and she has done 380 00:22:04,960 --> 00:22:08,520 Speaker 3: this ever since birth, and yet she can speak perfectly normally. 381 00:22:08,880 --> 00:22:11,199 Speaker 4: You would not know if you didn't use a scan out, 382 00:22:11,240 --> 00:22:12,040 Speaker 4: you'd have no idea. 383 00:22:13,880 --> 00:22:16,920 Speaker 1: I wrote about this in my book Live Wired. And 384 00:22:17,000 --> 00:22:18,680 Speaker 1: you know, you see the same thing. When a child 385 00:22:18,760 --> 00:22:21,920 Speaker 1: gets a hemisphere ectomy, they get half of their brain removed, 386 00:22:21,960 --> 00:22:24,600 Speaker 1: let's say, because of an intractable epilepsy. 387 00:22:25,119 --> 00:22:26,240 Speaker 2: Turns out they're fine. 388 00:22:26,920 --> 00:22:28,840 Speaker 1: And this is because the left and right sides of 389 00:22:28,880 --> 00:22:31,480 Speaker 1: the brain are sort of carbon copies of each other. 390 00:22:31,480 --> 00:22:34,200 Speaker 1: They're redundant for the most part, and so you can 391 00:22:34,240 --> 00:22:37,639 Speaker 1: take one out and the remaining hemisphere just rewires the 392 00:22:37,680 --> 00:22:40,440 Speaker 1: real estate to drive the boat as it needs. 393 00:22:40,240 --> 00:22:42,280 Speaker 4: To as long as you're very young. So it's a 394 00:22:42,320 --> 00:22:43,320 Speaker 4: plasticity thing, right. 395 00:22:45,440 --> 00:22:49,560 Speaker 1: They don't do hemispherectomies after about the age of eight typically, Yeah, yeah. 396 00:22:49,280 --> 00:22:51,919 Speaker 3: So, And there are examples of people who have had 397 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:56,119 Speaker 3: unbelievable bad damage from strokes who then recovered their function 398 00:22:56,200 --> 00:22:59,760 Speaker 3: completely her adults. But as I'm always very careful to 399 00:22:59,800 --> 00:23:02,199 Speaker 3: say when I explain this to people, is this is 400 00:23:02,320 --> 00:23:04,680 Speaker 3: very rare and in general strokes are pretty bad news. 401 00:23:04,840 --> 00:23:07,439 Speaker 1: What's fascinating about that is sometimes somebody will get a 402 00:23:07,440 --> 00:23:10,840 Speaker 1: stroke on their left side that impacts Broker's area, let's say, 403 00:23:10,920 --> 00:23:13,720 Speaker 1: and they lose the ability to speak, maybe they get 404 00:23:13,720 --> 00:23:16,000 Speaker 1: a lesion of Wernikey's area, or they you know, they 405 00:23:16,040 --> 00:23:17,159 Speaker 1: lose the ability. 406 00:23:16,800 --> 00:23:20,880 Speaker 2: To produce language correctly, they have flu into phasia. 407 00:23:20,920 --> 00:23:25,480 Speaker 1: Okay, what happens is then they recover and people think, well, great, 408 00:23:25,560 --> 00:23:28,920 Speaker 1: somehow that has you know, they have repaired that part 409 00:23:28,920 --> 00:23:31,520 Speaker 1: of the brain. But what's in fact happened is it's 410 00:23:31,680 --> 00:23:34,280 Speaker 1: just moved over to the other hemisphere and now they're 411 00:23:34,280 --> 00:23:37,199 Speaker 1: taking care of language in their right hemisphere. And the 412 00:23:37,240 --> 00:23:39,760 Speaker 1: way this was discovered this was, you know, fifty years ago, 413 00:23:40,359 --> 00:23:43,239 Speaker 1: is then this poor person would let's say, have a 414 00:23:43,280 --> 00:23:46,520 Speaker 1: stroke on their right side and they would lose language again. 415 00:23:47,200 --> 00:23:50,240 Speaker 1: And so what this demonstrates is the massive plasticity the 416 00:23:50,320 --> 00:23:53,679 Speaker 1: ability to move stuff around to other territories on the 417 00:23:53,920 --> 00:23:54,720 Speaker 1: on the brain. 418 00:23:54,720 --> 00:23:58,480 Speaker 4: Which also shows us why the answer is it localized? 419 00:23:58,520 --> 00:24:01,720 Speaker 4: Man is is weird? So yes and no. 420 00:24:02,080 --> 00:24:04,720 Speaker 1: This is the difficulty that neuroscience has always faced with 421 00:24:04,880 --> 00:24:08,840 Speaker 1: the question about localization because sometimes, you know, if a 422 00:24:08,920 --> 00:24:12,720 Speaker 1: bomb drops on the runway of an airport, you'll notice 423 00:24:12,720 --> 00:24:15,760 Speaker 1: that all the planes stop, but you didn't hit the 424 00:24:15,960 --> 00:24:18,880 Speaker 1: airport itself, just the runway. And this is of course 425 00:24:18,960 --> 00:24:22,520 Speaker 1: what always happens with the brain. When we see brain 426 00:24:22,600 --> 00:24:26,600 Speaker 1: damage and some function stops. We don't know if that's 427 00:24:26,680 --> 00:24:30,000 Speaker 1: because that area was the function or just part of 428 00:24:30,040 --> 00:24:33,160 Speaker 1: this larger network that has to be there for things 429 00:24:33,200 --> 00:24:34,880 Speaker 1: to work for the planes to take off. 430 00:24:35,640 --> 00:24:39,000 Speaker 3: I mean, it's a very interesting philosophical and methodological problem 431 00:24:39,040 --> 00:24:44,000 Speaker 3: which people have been arguing about for decades, since since 432 00:24:44,040 --> 00:24:47,000 Speaker 3: the beginning of the twentieth century. And now, of course 433 00:24:47,040 --> 00:24:49,359 Speaker 3: we've got genetics, which does exactly the same thing. Or 434 00:24:49,400 --> 00:24:52,320 Speaker 3: I knocked out this gene it's the gene for X. Well, 435 00:24:52,720 --> 00:24:55,600 Speaker 3: very very occasionally it's the gene for X. But generally 436 00:24:55,680 --> 00:24:58,720 Speaker 3: you've just pulled apart a component, some bit of the 437 00:24:58,760 --> 00:25:01,720 Speaker 3: whole complicated network, and the whole thing falls apart, you know, 438 00:25:01,920 --> 00:25:03,479 Speaker 3: And it's very difficult to know when this is going 439 00:25:03,520 --> 00:25:06,119 Speaker 3: to happen. So analogies of things like bicycle wheels, you 440 00:25:06,160 --> 00:25:08,199 Speaker 3: take a spoke out, you take a spoke out, and 441 00:25:08,240 --> 00:25:10,320 Speaker 3: then eventually the wheel is going to collapse, but you 442 00:25:10,359 --> 00:25:12,760 Speaker 3: can't it's very difficult to predict when. And it doesn't 443 00:25:12,840 --> 00:25:15,760 Speaker 3: necessarily matter which order you take the spokes out or whatever. 444 00:25:15,920 --> 00:25:19,720 Speaker 3: So this is very hard and it's part of the 445 00:25:19,760 --> 00:25:22,080 Speaker 3: problem is it's easy for scientists to get excited about 446 00:25:22,080 --> 00:25:24,560 Speaker 3: this thing. I've got this tool, and it's easy for 447 00:25:24,600 --> 00:25:28,119 Speaker 3: the public to understand because it makes perfect sense. But 448 00:25:28,480 --> 00:25:30,439 Speaker 3: to get back to your starting point, to get to 449 00:25:30,480 --> 00:25:34,480 Speaker 3: the metaphor, if you ask the average person street you know, 450 00:25:34,560 --> 00:25:36,479 Speaker 3: what is the brain like a computer? 451 00:25:36,600 --> 00:25:39,040 Speaker 4: They go, yeah, well sure, but here's the thing. 452 00:25:39,160 --> 00:25:42,280 Speaker 3: You know, You've just explained that you know, strokes or whatever, 453 00:25:42,320 --> 00:25:45,520 Speaker 3: you can recover various elements from a function from them. 454 00:25:45,520 --> 00:25:48,760 Speaker 3: But if I take out the microphone from this computer, 455 00:25:48,880 --> 00:25:50,920 Speaker 3: you just won't hear me. There's no other part of it. 456 00:25:50,960 --> 00:25:52,320 Speaker 3: Is going to rewire it and go okay, well ill 457 00:25:52,359 --> 00:25:53,960 Speaker 3: use the camera instead. I mean, we're done. 458 00:25:54,400 --> 00:25:56,080 Speaker 4: There will be no more podcast. 459 00:25:56,560 --> 00:26:00,199 Speaker 3: And so that that fixity in a machine and the 460 00:26:00,240 --> 00:26:05,080 Speaker 3: flexibility of anything organic, but in particular the brain, that 461 00:26:05,200 --> 00:26:07,760 Speaker 3: just shows they are a different order of thing. 462 00:26:08,119 --> 00:26:09,640 Speaker 1: So, by the way, I want to return to this 463 00:26:09,720 --> 00:26:13,399 Speaker 1: issue about the metaphor of the brain as a computer, 464 00:26:13,480 --> 00:26:16,119 Speaker 1: because you pointed out something surprising in the book that 465 00:26:16,280 --> 00:26:19,399 Speaker 1: people were thinking about this the other way for a while. 466 00:26:19,480 --> 00:26:22,920 Speaker 1: When von Neuman was developing the computer tell us about that. 467 00:26:23,240 --> 00:26:25,760 Speaker 3: We all say the brain is like a computer. But 468 00:26:26,520 --> 00:26:29,840 Speaker 3: when the first computers, like we all use now, the 469 00:26:29,880 --> 00:26:32,840 Speaker 3: one with as you said, von Neumann architecture, when that 470 00:26:33,040 --> 00:26:35,360 Speaker 3: was being developed, what von Neuman said he was going 471 00:26:35,400 --> 00:26:37,200 Speaker 3: to do, and this is his pitch to the US 472 00:26:37,320 --> 00:26:40,080 Speaker 3: government in nineteen forty five to get the vast sums 473 00:26:40,080 --> 00:26:42,600 Speaker 3: of money to build this thing. Why did he she said, 474 00:26:42,600 --> 00:26:44,080 Speaker 3: I'm going to build you a computer and it's going 475 00:26:44,119 --> 00:26:46,080 Speaker 3: to be a computer like the brain. 476 00:26:46,280 --> 00:26:48,760 Speaker 4: And why do I say that? Because I know how 477 00:26:48,800 --> 00:26:49,800 Speaker 4: the brain's wired up. 478 00:26:49,880 --> 00:26:53,480 Speaker 3: How do I know that because two years earlier to 479 00:26:53,920 --> 00:26:57,399 Speaker 3: researchers McCullough, CA and Pits have published a paper on logic. 480 00:26:57,440 --> 00:26:59,760 Speaker 4: It was called the Imminent Logic of the Nervous System 481 00:27:00,080 --> 00:27:03,080 Speaker 4: in which they said, look the way the brain is wider. 482 00:27:03,200 --> 00:27:04,760 Speaker 4: All the nervous systems are wired up. 483 00:27:05,119 --> 00:27:07,959 Speaker 3: You've got things called synapses, which are where one neuron 484 00:27:08,040 --> 00:27:10,560 Speaker 3: sends a message on to another, and you can have 485 00:27:10,600 --> 00:27:11,600 Speaker 3: a straightforward relay. 486 00:27:11,800 --> 00:27:12,880 Speaker 4: That's not very interesting. 487 00:27:13,040 --> 00:27:16,320 Speaker 3: What gets interesting is if you've got some conditionality about 488 00:27:16,359 --> 00:27:19,879 Speaker 3: You could have a two neurons coming in and the 489 00:27:20,920 --> 00:27:25,840 Speaker 3: onward neuron will fire if both of them are inputs 490 00:27:25,840 --> 00:27:29,679 Speaker 3: are firing, or if one but not the other, and 491 00:27:29,720 --> 00:27:35,679 Speaker 3: these basic logical structures, if and then and not. Anybody 492 00:27:35,680 --> 00:27:38,600 Speaker 3: who's done any logic or any programming says, wait a minute, 493 00:27:38,680 --> 00:27:42,400 Speaker 3: I recognize that. And that's what McCulloch said, right, This 494 00:27:42,440 --> 00:27:45,159 Speaker 3: is astonishing. This is how nervous systems are wired up. 495 00:27:45,240 --> 00:27:47,879 Speaker 3: I'm going to build a computer like that now. I mean, 496 00:27:47,920 --> 00:27:51,360 Speaker 3: it's not true. Nervous systems are not wired up like that. 497 00:27:51,720 --> 00:27:55,119 Speaker 3: I mean, but it was a brilliant idea, and the 498 00:27:55,160 --> 00:27:58,800 Speaker 3: idea of that there's this logical structure that enabled our 499 00:27:58,840 --> 00:28:01,600 Speaker 3: brains or any brain function should produce an outcome to 500 00:28:01,640 --> 00:28:02,639 Speaker 3: process information. 501 00:28:03,280 --> 00:28:05,000 Speaker 4: And that's what von Neuman did. 502 00:28:05,080 --> 00:28:08,200 Speaker 3: That architecture is hardwired into the computers that I'm using 503 00:28:08,240 --> 00:28:09,800 Speaker 3: that you're all over the world. 504 00:28:09,920 --> 00:28:11,679 Speaker 4: Every computer in the world uses that. 505 00:28:12,040 --> 00:28:15,400 Speaker 3: Because he thought that mccullor ca and Pits had hit 506 00:28:15,440 --> 00:28:18,040 Speaker 3: on while they had hit on something, but it wasn't 507 00:28:18,080 --> 00:28:19,480 Speaker 3: particularly about neuroscience. 508 00:28:19,680 --> 00:28:22,960 Speaker 1: So let me step back for a second, because this idea, 509 00:28:23,160 --> 00:28:26,400 Speaker 1: this relationship between brains and computers, this is what we're 510 00:28:26,440 --> 00:28:28,760 Speaker 1: all very used to. But give us a sense of 511 00:28:28,800 --> 00:28:31,360 Speaker 1: the metaphors that people had used previously. 512 00:28:31,680 --> 00:28:35,280 Speaker 3: The ancient Greeks, I mean, they thought about either many 513 00:28:35,320 --> 00:28:39,800 Speaker 3: thought about something called numa pneuma. When you read this 514 00:28:40,040 --> 00:28:42,360 Speaker 3: ancient Greek stuff and you think, what is this? 515 00:28:42,600 --> 00:28:43,160 Speaker 4: Is it air? 516 00:28:43,520 --> 00:28:44,120 Speaker 2: Is it wind? 517 00:28:44,400 --> 00:28:48,040 Speaker 3: So there's this aerial phenomenon which they thought was what 518 00:28:48,280 --> 00:28:50,440 Speaker 3: was going on, but they didn't, I mean, and that 519 00:28:50,600 --> 00:28:53,960 Speaker 3: because you know, wind technology is the height of their technology. 520 00:28:54,040 --> 00:28:56,360 Speaker 4: That's what they had, you know, that's what powered ships 521 00:28:56,400 --> 00:28:57,000 Speaker 4: and so on. 522 00:28:57,320 --> 00:29:01,560 Speaker 3: Then The real breakthrough, I think came with Descartes, who 523 00:29:02,160 --> 00:29:06,479 Speaker 3: was in a Parisian park in the sixteen twenties wandering 524 00:29:06,520 --> 00:29:09,640 Speaker 3: around and they had a load of animatronics that these 525 00:29:09,680 --> 00:29:13,520 Speaker 3: statues which all work by hydraulics, which was pretty damn 526 00:29:13,600 --> 00:29:16,280 Speaker 3: cool and better in some respects and clockwork at the time. 527 00:29:17,000 --> 00:29:20,320 Speaker 4: And you know, you'd have a Hercules who would biff 528 00:29:21,120 --> 00:29:22,960 Speaker 4: a dragon on the head with a great being. 529 00:29:23,000 --> 00:29:24,960 Speaker 3: He had a club and he biffed this dragon. You know, 530 00:29:25,280 --> 00:29:28,040 Speaker 3: you go to a theme park and it was basically that. 531 00:29:28,240 --> 00:29:30,400 Speaker 3: But you know, I mean, just like you see old 532 00:29:30,480 --> 00:29:32,560 Speaker 3: CGI today and it looks crap. Mean, this would have 533 00:29:32,600 --> 00:29:34,800 Speaker 3: looked awful, but at the time it was amazing. And 534 00:29:34,960 --> 00:29:37,720 Speaker 3: the key thing is that descar I mean, he didn't 535 00:29:37,720 --> 00:29:39,520 Speaker 3: think they were alive, but he thought, wait a minute, 536 00:29:39,840 --> 00:29:42,960 Speaker 3: maybe that's how our bodies and our nervous systems work. 537 00:29:43,000 --> 00:29:45,400 Speaker 3: And he said, look, he's got this very famous drawing 538 00:29:45,440 --> 00:29:48,160 Speaker 3: of this big kind of man baby touching a fire 539 00:29:48,800 --> 00:29:51,520 Speaker 3: and he says, look, there's some kind of pressure from 540 00:29:51,560 --> 00:29:52,680 Speaker 3: when you touch flane. 541 00:29:52,800 --> 00:29:54,040 Speaker 4: The pressure goes up into the. 542 00:29:54,040 --> 00:29:59,080 Speaker 3: Brain and then it bounces back it reflects, hence eventually 543 00:29:59,280 --> 00:30:02,719 Speaker 3: reflex it bounces back and causes you to pull away 544 00:30:03,320 --> 00:30:03,960 Speaker 3: from the fire. 545 00:30:04,400 --> 00:30:07,720 Speaker 4: Now very quickly people tried to do experiments to see 546 00:30:07,720 --> 00:30:09,640 Speaker 4: whether this was the case. I mean, he constructed a 547 00:30:09,640 --> 00:30:10,480 Speaker 4: whole theory about it. 548 00:30:11,920 --> 00:30:14,880 Speaker 3: By within twenty thirty years and seventeenth century, people had 549 00:30:15,800 --> 00:30:18,880 Speaker 3: done fairly simple things like, you know, chopped a frog's 550 00:30:19,000 --> 00:30:22,480 Speaker 3: nerve and no liquid came spurting out, so it didn't 551 00:30:22,520 --> 00:30:25,320 Speaker 3: look like it was under some kind of hydraulic pressure. 552 00:30:25,560 --> 00:30:28,120 Speaker 3: People thought of other things. Maybe they thought it was 553 00:30:28,320 --> 00:30:31,680 Speaker 3: like a vibration. There's something going down the nerve. If 554 00:30:31,720 --> 00:30:33,560 Speaker 3: you hit a plank at one end, you can feel 555 00:30:33,560 --> 00:30:36,600 Speaker 3: the vibration at the other, which's pretty smart, but there's 556 00:30:36,640 --> 00:30:38,680 Speaker 3: not much you can do about it, and thinking about, 557 00:30:38,720 --> 00:30:40,560 Speaker 3: you know, a load of vibrating planks in your head 558 00:30:40,600 --> 00:30:42,120 Speaker 3: doesn't really help you much. 559 00:30:42,560 --> 00:30:47,800 Speaker 4: So even descartes idea wasn't really usable, but that was 560 00:30:47,960 --> 00:30:49,160 Speaker 4: kind of how it was thought. 561 00:30:49,240 --> 00:30:53,120 Speaker 3: And then with electricity, the big breakthrough wasn't just that 562 00:30:53,200 --> 00:30:58,000 Speaker 3: electricity is what's in this weird chemical way in neurons, 563 00:30:58,160 --> 00:31:01,200 Speaker 3: But as soon as that was applied in the shape 564 00:31:01,240 --> 00:31:06,560 Speaker 3: of the telegraph system, then people immediately drew an analogy 565 00:31:06,760 --> 00:31:10,400 Speaker 3: both ways. They said look, here's there are maps the 566 00:31:10,520 --> 00:31:14,560 Speaker 3: telegraph system in the UK in the eighteen forties with 567 00:31:14,880 --> 00:31:17,800 Speaker 3: all the telegraph wires which were all running along railway 568 00:31:17,840 --> 00:31:21,960 Speaker 3: linees course, going down to London. And what people said 569 00:31:22,080 --> 00:31:26,600 Speaker 3: is London is like the brain of the country and 570 00:31:26,760 --> 00:31:28,240 Speaker 3: it receives information. 571 00:31:28,480 --> 00:31:29,440 Speaker 4: This is a word they use. 572 00:31:29,480 --> 00:31:32,640 Speaker 3: It's information from the provinces and it can also send 573 00:31:32,720 --> 00:31:37,040 Speaker 3: instructions out and tell bits of the body politic what 574 00:31:37,240 --> 00:31:39,400 Speaker 3: to do. And hey, we look at the nervous system, 575 00:31:39,400 --> 00:31:42,120 Speaker 3: because they had fabulous dissections of the human nervous system. 576 00:31:42,160 --> 00:31:44,800 Speaker 3: It's all going up into the brain and motor uron's 577 00:31:44,840 --> 00:31:47,840 Speaker 3: coming down, et cetera. So this parallel was now we've 578 00:31:47,840 --> 00:31:50,360 Speaker 3: gone from water that don't really make much sense or 579 00:31:50,480 --> 00:31:55,240 Speaker 3: something electric. Now we've got a real communication metaphor of 580 00:31:55,840 --> 00:32:00,400 Speaker 3: the telegraph system. And this chap called Alfred Smith, he 581 00:32:01,000 --> 00:32:03,680 Speaker 3: was absolutely convinced that literally this was what was going 582 00:32:03,760 --> 00:32:07,160 Speaker 3: on inside the nervous system. And he even invented the 583 00:32:07,280 --> 00:32:11,360 Speaker 3: facts or a kind of telegraph, the photo. 584 00:32:11,600 --> 00:32:12,440 Speaker 4: He said, if you could get. 585 00:32:12,320 --> 00:32:14,520 Speaker 3: A photo electric cell and send a man image down 586 00:32:14,560 --> 00:32:16,800 Speaker 3: a telegraph, why you could should be able to reproduce 587 00:32:16,840 --> 00:32:18,640 Speaker 3: it at the other end. So you'd actually get and 588 00:32:18,720 --> 00:32:20,480 Speaker 3: that's what's going on in your eyes, he said, going 589 00:32:20,520 --> 00:32:23,440 Speaker 3: into your brain. And he drew these amazing diagrams which 590 00:32:23,440 --> 00:32:25,320 Speaker 3: and I show them to computation neuroscientists. 591 00:32:25,320 --> 00:32:28,120 Speaker 4: They get so excited because it looks like a primitive 592 00:32:28,240 --> 00:32:31,080 Speaker 4: version of you know, the large language models that. 593 00:32:31,440 --> 00:32:35,479 Speaker 3: Everybody's excited about these days, all these crisscross interactions. I mean, 594 00:32:35,520 --> 00:32:37,480 Speaker 3: I've tried to make head and tail of what he 595 00:32:37,560 --> 00:32:39,800 Speaker 3: was getting at, and I think he was basically bonkers. 596 00:32:39,840 --> 00:32:43,760 Speaker 3: And he hads to have looked. It looks it looks familiar, 597 00:32:43,960 --> 00:32:47,080 Speaker 3: but it was actually insane. He made it, made a 598 00:32:47,160 --> 00:32:50,320 Speaker 3: model of the brain out of brass, these strange bits 599 00:32:50,360 --> 00:32:52,920 Speaker 3: of brass that he shows in his drawings, and you 600 00:32:53,040 --> 00:32:54,720 Speaker 3: look at it and think, I don't you know what 601 00:32:54,840 --> 00:32:58,720 Speaker 3: could this do? How could this process information in any 602 00:32:58,800 --> 00:33:01,520 Speaker 3: meaningful way? And there so you know, we got electricity. 603 00:33:01,600 --> 00:33:04,720 Speaker 3: And then in the eighteen eighties you've got the problem 604 00:33:04,760 --> 00:33:07,720 Speaker 3: about telegraph wise is it's just the static. They don't change, 605 00:33:08,000 --> 00:33:10,320 Speaker 3: whereas we know that the brain has to respond to 606 00:33:10,360 --> 00:33:12,800 Speaker 3: all sorts of different signals. And then the big change 607 00:33:13,320 --> 00:33:17,520 Speaker 3: was the advent of the telephone and the telephone exchange 608 00:33:17,640 --> 00:33:19,800 Speaker 3: because younger listeners. 609 00:33:19,440 --> 00:33:21,280 Speaker 4: Will have no idea what one of these is. 610 00:33:21,360 --> 00:33:25,280 Speaker 3: There's there's something called a telephone exchange where what would 611 00:33:25,320 --> 00:33:28,000 Speaker 3: happen is you pick up your phone. You can see 612 00:33:28,000 --> 00:33:30,520 Speaker 3: this in old silent movies on YouTube. You pick up 613 00:33:30,560 --> 00:33:33,760 Speaker 3: your phone and there's a telephone operator who was normally 614 00:33:33,840 --> 00:33:36,800 Speaker 3: a woman in the exchange, and she would a light 615 00:33:36,880 --> 00:33:38,360 Speaker 3: would come on saying you picked up your phone. 616 00:33:38,400 --> 00:33:41,760 Speaker 4: She would connect a wire to your light, and you would. 617 00:33:41,560 --> 00:33:44,280 Speaker 3: Then ask for a particular number, and she would then 618 00:33:44,360 --> 00:33:47,240 Speaker 3: connect the other end of that wire to that number. 619 00:33:47,960 --> 00:33:50,880 Speaker 3: So you've got this flexibility. It's a switchboard, and I 620 00:33:50,960 --> 00:33:52,920 Speaker 3: mean it's not bad. I mean it is in a 621 00:33:53,000 --> 00:33:56,240 Speaker 3: way because you're rerouting information. There's nothing permanent, there's no 622 00:33:56,400 --> 00:34:00,520 Speaker 3: fixed connections that can all be flexible. And that carries 623 00:34:00,600 --> 00:34:05,320 Speaker 3: on into the First World War, and that's where ideas 624 00:34:05,320 --> 00:34:10,680 Speaker 3: about information start to appear. Before this is mathematized, people 625 00:34:10,840 --> 00:34:13,319 Speaker 3: started to use the word information. In particular chap called 626 00:34:13,440 --> 00:34:17,080 Speaker 3: Edgar Adrian, who's beloved of electrophysiologists, but unknown to most people. 627 00:34:17,320 --> 00:34:19,759 Speaker 3: He won the Nobel Prize. Two of his students won 628 00:34:19,800 --> 00:34:22,680 Speaker 3: the Nobel Prize. He was the president of the Royal Society. 629 00:34:22,719 --> 00:34:24,759 Speaker 3: He was the vice chancellor of Cambridge University. I mean 630 00:34:24,800 --> 00:34:28,600 Speaker 3: you could not get greater accolades than that. And now 631 00:34:29,000 --> 00:34:31,480 Speaker 3: nobody knows who he is apart from the students at 632 00:34:31,480 --> 00:34:34,160 Speaker 3: the University of Lesdoo got an Adrian building. Anyway, he 633 00:34:34,280 --> 00:34:38,160 Speaker 3: writes these popular science books and he tries to show 634 00:34:38,719 --> 00:34:42,080 Speaker 3: to explain to people what's happening. His first person to 635 00:34:42,120 --> 00:34:44,760 Speaker 3: record from a single neuron, to record a single spike. 636 00:34:44,840 --> 00:34:47,759 Speaker 3: You can see it going down there as you described it. 637 00:34:48,280 --> 00:34:52,120 Speaker 3: And he also shows a spike is either on or off. 638 00:34:52,200 --> 00:34:54,560 Speaker 3: You either have it or you don't, so it's all 639 00:34:54,719 --> 00:34:58,520 Speaker 3: or none, as it said. What the nervous system does 640 00:34:58,640 --> 00:35:02,520 Speaker 3: with the information of spikes is to actually group them together. 641 00:35:03,360 --> 00:35:06,080 Speaker 3: And it's an in the code as he called it. 642 00:35:06,160 --> 00:35:09,440 Speaker 3: He talked about codes in nervous systems, so are codes 643 00:35:09,520 --> 00:35:12,360 Speaker 3: carrying information. And he has this lovely diagram of a 644 00:35:12,960 --> 00:35:15,360 Speaker 3: again another poor old frog. It's the end of a 645 00:35:15,600 --> 00:35:18,640 Speaker 3: stretch a neuron which is attached to a stretch receptor. 646 00:35:18,719 --> 00:35:21,239 Speaker 3: It's a stretch receptor attached to a muscle, and he 647 00:35:21,320 --> 00:35:24,000 Speaker 3: puts increasing weights on it. And as he puts more 648 00:35:24,000 --> 00:35:27,120 Speaker 3: and more weights, the cell stretches and you get more 649 00:35:27,320 --> 00:35:30,920 Speaker 3: and more spikes, so it's still it's digital in the 650 00:35:31,000 --> 00:35:34,279 Speaker 3: sense it's all or nothing each of those spikes. But 651 00:35:34,440 --> 00:35:37,640 Speaker 3: what the nervous system is seeing is not zeros and ones. 652 00:35:38,040 --> 00:35:41,480 Speaker 3: It's seeing an intensity code and a frequency code. How 653 00:35:41,520 --> 00:35:44,399 Speaker 3: many spikes have there been a second perhaps even how 654 00:35:44,480 --> 00:35:46,319 Speaker 3: they organized within a unit time. 655 00:35:46,400 --> 00:35:48,960 Speaker 4: These are all stuff that people are still very interested in. 656 00:35:49,400 --> 00:35:52,560 Speaker 3: So then when you finally get the computer all the 657 00:35:52,960 --> 00:35:56,120 Speaker 3: in the mid late forties, early fifties, it all kinds 658 00:35:56,120 --> 00:35:57,040 Speaker 3: of starts to make sense. 659 00:35:57,120 --> 00:36:02,000 Speaker 4: Yes, and this is where we this is part of 660 00:36:02,120 --> 00:36:05,160 Speaker 4: my You know, we haven't gone any further, right, I 661 00:36:05,239 --> 00:36:23,120 Speaker 4: don't think, so let me ask you this. 662 00:36:23,760 --> 00:36:26,040 Speaker 2: When I read your book, I was curious your opinion 663 00:36:26,120 --> 00:36:26,279 Speaker 2: on this. 664 00:36:26,440 --> 00:36:30,200 Speaker 1: So you published this in twenty twenty, and since that time, 665 00:36:30,719 --> 00:36:34,960 Speaker 1: we've had this explosion with the transformer architecture and large 666 00:36:35,040 --> 00:36:38,359 Speaker 1: language models, which have changed the game a little bit, 667 00:36:38,440 --> 00:36:40,359 Speaker 1: by which I mean, I think this is probably true 668 00:36:40,400 --> 00:36:44,800 Speaker 1: for both of us. You know, our whole career in neuroscience, 669 00:36:44,880 --> 00:36:48,279 Speaker 1: we always looked at AI and sort of snickered at 670 00:36:48,320 --> 00:36:50,160 Speaker 1: the idea that it was going to be anything as 671 00:36:50,200 --> 00:36:52,719 Speaker 1: good as the brain, And then suddenly just a few 672 00:36:52,800 --> 00:36:56,320 Speaker 1: years ago, it's got quite extraordinary, and so I'm curious 673 00:36:56,400 --> 00:36:59,839 Speaker 1: how you think that changes the metaphors that we're using now. 674 00:37:00,239 --> 00:37:02,759 Speaker 1: And I think we would probably agree that there's never 675 00:37:02,880 --> 00:37:04,720 Speaker 1: going to be a perfect metaphor. 676 00:37:05,760 --> 00:37:08,440 Speaker 2: But how do you think LM's change the way we're 677 00:37:08,480 --> 00:37:09,200 Speaker 2: talking about things? 678 00:37:09,440 --> 00:37:11,480 Speaker 4: Well, honestly, how they can help? How do they work? 679 00:37:12,280 --> 00:37:13,040 Speaker 2: Well, they don't know. 680 00:37:13,800 --> 00:37:16,600 Speaker 4: Yeah, so if you have Jeffrey Hinton, how does it work? 681 00:37:16,680 --> 00:37:18,040 Speaker 4: He goes, I don't know. 682 00:37:18,600 --> 00:37:20,719 Speaker 2: So this is a really interesting thing though. 683 00:37:20,840 --> 00:37:25,520 Speaker 1: So for example, you and I both are interested in, 684 00:37:25,640 --> 00:37:29,640 Speaker 1: let's say Eve Martyr's work where she tries to describe 685 00:37:29,760 --> 00:37:30,280 Speaker 1: the lobster. 686 00:37:31,160 --> 00:37:32,200 Speaker 4: The example I give. 687 00:37:32,080 --> 00:37:34,800 Speaker 1: You great, Okay, great, so well here, why don't you 688 00:37:34,800 --> 00:37:36,520 Speaker 1: go ahead and give it about Eve Martyr. But the 689 00:37:36,600 --> 00:37:39,400 Speaker 1: point I want to make is that the questions that 690 00:37:39,640 --> 00:37:43,640 Speaker 1: remain about what's happening in neuroscience, we have the same 691 00:37:43,760 --> 00:37:46,120 Speaker 1: explainability crisis with lllm's. 692 00:37:46,360 --> 00:37:47,799 Speaker 2: So they're not distinguished in that way. 693 00:37:48,360 --> 00:37:52,800 Speaker 3: No, indeed, absolutely right, But rather it's so the example 694 00:37:52,880 --> 00:37:54,960 Speaker 3: in the Eve martt so, yes, it's the lobster's stomach. 695 00:37:55,080 --> 00:37:56,839 Speaker 3: She has spent a whole less a very smart woman 696 00:37:56,880 --> 00:38:00,680 Speaker 3: spent her whole academic career studying the thirteen years that 697 00:38:01,200 --> 00:38:04,719 Speaker 3: make up the system that controls them the activity of 698 00:38:04,719 --> 00:38:07,200 Speaker 3: the lobster's stomach, and the lobster's stomach has to grind 699 00:38:07,280 --> 00:38:09,520 Speaker 3: up its food a bit like a gizzard in a chicken, 700 00:38:10,000 --> 00:38:13,160 Speaker 3: and it's got two rhythms, two ways of doing this, 701 00:38:13,320 --> 00:38:15,879 Speaker 3: and this is controlled by the neurons. And she knows 702 00:38:16,080 --> 00:38:20,560 Speaker 3: everything about those neurons. She knows the genes that are expressed, 703 00:38:20,640 --> 00:38:24,400 Speaker 3: she knows all about the neurotransmitters, the neural hormones that 704 00:38:24,520 --> 00:38:27,440 Speaker 3: they bathe in that kind of modulate the way that 705 00:38:27,560 --> 00:38:30,840 Speaker 3: it all activates. But at the moment, she cannot explain, 706 00:38:31,000 --> 00:38:34,000 Speaker 3: using the tools we've had up to now, why those 707 00:38:34,080 --> 00:38:37,880 Speaker 3: thirty neurons produce those two rhythms and not others, because 708 00:38:37,960 --> 00:38:40,000 Speaker 3: according to the models, they should be able to do 709 00:38:40,080 --> 00:38:44,479 Speaker 3: other things, but they don't. And she can't predict, either 710 00:38:44,840 --> 00:38:47,360 Speaker 3: experimentally or with a model, or by a conjunction of 711 00:38:47,360 --> 00:38:49,479 Speaker 3: the two, what will happen if she is to alter 712 00:38:49,520 --> 00:38:52,279 Speaker 3: the activity of one of those components. So, yeah, I mean, 713 00:38:52,320 --> 00:38:54,680 Speaker 3: I take your point. This is, you know, we've got 714 00:38:54,760 --> 00:38:59,960 Speaker 3: two completely inexplicable things we don't understand what's going on 715 00:39:00,200 --> 00:39:03,280 Speaker 3: in the LLLM. But that's partly because the way it's built. 716 00:39:03,400 --> 00:39:06,239 Speaker 1: It feels like the LM should be so straightforward to 717 00:39:06,320 --> 00:39:09,279 Speaker 1: understand in the sense that we've put it in there. 718 00:39:09,360 --> 00:39:11,680 Speaker 1: It's a cartoon model of the brain in the sense 719 00:39:11,680 --> 00:39:14,400 Speaker 1: that it's just units and connections between the units. And 720 00:39:14,960 --> 00:39:18,440 Speaker 1: what this illustrates, I think is once things reach some 721 00:39:18,640 --> 00:39:22,080 Speaker 1: level of complexity, it's not clear that we have the 722 00:39:22,200 --> 00:39:26,480 Speaker 1: correct metaphors or the correct tools and science to capture 723 00:39:26,520 --> 00:39:27,120 Speaker 1: it in some way. 724 00:39:27,320 --> 00:39:27,520 Speaker 4: Yeah. 725 00:39:27,600 --> 00:39:30,640 Speaker 3: I mean, like everybody, I'm amazed by what the LLMS 726 00:39:30,719 --> 00:39:35,880 Speaker 3: can do. But I mean today, may this will all 727 00:39:35,960 --> 00:39:38,360 Speaker 3: be old news by the time this is released. But 728 00:39:38,560 --> 00:39:41,000 Speaker 3: today the big thing is chut GPT fives come out 729 00:39:41,480 --> 00:39:44,239 Speaker 3: and it still doesn't know how many bees there are 730 00:39:44,280 --> 00:39:47,400 Speaker 3: in blueberry, right, And it gets very indignant and insists 731 00:39:47,440 --> 00:39:50,080 Speaker 3: that there are three because the capital letter counts for two, 732 00:39:50,320 --> 00:39:53,359 Speaker 3: or because the bee in the middle for berry counts 733 00:39:53,400 --> 00:39:53,640 Speaker 3: for two. 734 00:39:53,680 --> 00:39:55,360 Speaker 4: I mean, you know, so people are arguing with it, 735 00:39:55,560 --> 00:39:57,160 Speaker 4: and this thing sounds real. 736 00:39:57,400 --> 00:39:59,719 Speaker 3: It sounds that it knows what it's talking about, you know, 737 00:40:00,200 --> 00:40:04,000 Speaker 3: So it's that's very confident. 738 00:40:04,120 --> 00:40:07,280 Speaker 1: Here's what seems clear though, is that they are intelligent 739 00:40:07,400 --> 00:40:11,320 Speaker 1: in a different way, as in, they get some simple 740 00:40:11,400 --> 00:40:14,680 Speaker 1: things wrong, but they also do quite extraordinary other things 741 00:40:14,760 --> 00:40:15,680 Speaker 1: that we're no good at. 742 00:40:16,160 --> 00:40:19,960 Speaker 2: So it's like we've invented a species that it is 743 00:40:20,040 --> 00:40:21,239 Speaker 2: just a bit different from us. 744 00:40:21,440 --> 00:40:24,600 Speaker 4: So that is that true? I mean, you know you 745 00:40:24,680 --> 00:40:26,759 Speaker 4: can why is it intelligent? 746 00:40:26,800 --> 00:40:28,759 Speaker 3: I mean you've got any Any machine that you have 747 00:40:29,760 --> 00:40:32,400 Speaker 3: enables you to do things that you can't do yourself. 748 00:40:32,480 --> 00:40:35,080 Speaker 3: I mean, draw a straight line, right, I can draw 749 00:40:35,160 --> 00:40:37,400 Speaker 3: straight line on my computer in a way that I 750 00:40:37,480 --> 00:40:40,680 Speaker 3: can't with my hand and a pencil, and I can 751 00:40:40,719 --> 00:40:42,360 Speaker 3: do it better with a pencil than I can with 752 00:40:42,680 --> 00:40:43,040 Speaker 3: a rock. 753 00:40:43,719 --> 00:40:44,080 Speaker 2: That's right. 754 00:40:44,160 --> 00:40:46,560 Speaker 1: But I think the surprise has been for us the 755 00:40:46,680 --> 00:40:49,600 Speaker 1: way that it can put ideas together in ways that 756 00:40:49,880 --> 00:40:53,800 Speaker 1: had seemed just a few years ago like some magical 757 00:40:53,920 --> 00:40:55,360 Speaker 1: thing that only humans could do. 758 00:40:55,560 --> 00:40:58,080 Speaker 2: Writing a pair of you can ask you look, Jimmy. 759 00:40:57,880 --> 00:41:00,640 Speaker 1: A shakespeareance on it, where you know, poke Kiemon meets 760 00:41:00,680 --> 00:41:02,880 Speaker 1: Godzilla on the surface of Mars, and it does it 761 00:41:03,000 --> 00:41:08,080 Speaker 1: instantly and extraordinarily, And these sorts of things we would 762 00:41:08,120 --> 00:41:08,360 Speaker 1: not have. 763 00:41:08,440 --> 00:41:10,040 Speaker 2: Expected even just a few years ago. 764 00:41:10,480 --> 00:41:12,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, and we probably would have expected they'd know how 765 00:41:12,480 --> 00:41:13,879 Speaker 3: many bays they were in blue booth. 766 00:41:14,000 --> 00:41:16,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, so it's doing something. 767 00:41:16,680 --> 00:41:19,959 Speaker 1: But here's my question for you, is the metaphor has 768 00:41:20,320 --> 00:41:23,239 Speaker 1: changed a bit just the last few years from von 769 00:41:23,320 --> 00:41:28,200 Speaker 1: Neumann computers to having these large language models. That change 770 00:41:28,239 --> 00:41:31,120 Speaker 1: a little bit the way we think about what might 771 00:41:31,239 --> 00:41:33,440 Speaker 1: be happening in the brain, whether or not it's correct 772 00:41:33,920 --> 00:41:35,120 Speaker 1: that that's what's happening in the brain. 773 00:41:35,280 --> 00:41:38,560 Speaker 2: For young people who are growing up right now thinking. 774 00:41:38,320 --> 00:41:41,400 Speaker 1: About large language models and thinking about the brain, the 775 00:41:41,560 --> 00:41:44,560 Speaker 1: metaphors are going to carry over in terms of Okay, 776 00:41:44,600 --> 00:41:47,399 Speaker 1: what if you just have a giant network with lots 777 00:41:47,440 --> 00:41:50,800 Speaker 1: of connections and you can pay attention in the network 778 00:41:51,160 --> 00:41:55,800 Speaker 1: to certain words. That's going to be the next crop 779 00:41:55,880 --> 00:41:58,680 Speaker 1: of scientists are all going to draw on that metaphor. 780 00:41:58,920 --> 00:42:01,480 Speaker 4: I mean, in a way we've been here for a 781 00:42:01,560 --> 00:42:01,920 Speaker 4: long time. 782 00:42:02,040 --> 00:42:05,399 Speaker 3: Francis Crick, as everybody knows, co discover the double heading 783 00:42:05,400 --> 00:42:08,080 Speaker 3: structure of the DNA in nineteen fifty three with Jim 784 00:42:08,120 --> 00:42:10,160 Speaker 3: Watson on the basis of work that been done by 785 00:42:10,520 --> 00:42:13,879 Speaker 3: Maurice Wilkins and Russell and Franklin, and then he worked 786 00:42:13,920 --> 00:42:16,880 Speaker 3: in molecular genetics and then in the mid seventies he 787 00:42:16,960 --> 00:42:20,480 Speaker 3: decides he's going to move into neuroscience, and then I'm 788 00:42:20,560 --> 00:42:25,680 Speaker 3: working on the book, and always in every chapter except 789 00:42:25,719 --> 00:42:30,120 Speaker 3: the chapter on neurotransmitters, Crick popped up. And he wasn't 790 00:42:30,200 --> 00:42:32,440 Speaker 3: just popping up as you know, to somebody who was 791 00:42:32,520 --> 00:42:36,640 Speaker 3: on the fringes. He was actually driving ideas and thinking 792 00:42:36,920 --> 00:42:39,560 Speaker 3: and so on. In particular I was particularly impressed by 793 00:42:40,239 --> 00:42:44,719 Speaker 3: was his embracing of something that was called parallel distributed programming, 794 00:42:45,280 --> 00:42:50,359 Speaker 3: which was developed by Jeffrey Hinton and others in San 795 00:42:50,400 --> 00:42:54,400 Speaker 3: Diego and around San Diego in California in the mid eighties, 796 00:42:54,520 --> 00:42:57,120 Speaker 3: which is the ancestor of today's LMS. 797 00:42:57,360 --> 00:42:58,880 Speaker 4: He knew John Hotfield and hot. 798 00:42:58,760 --> 00:43:01,840 Speaker 3: Field and Hint of just won the Nobel Prize in 799 00:43:01,920 --> 00:43:06,080 Speaker 3: Physics last year for their work on these neural networks 800 00:43:06,400 --> 00:43:09,000 Speaker 3: and all the rest of it. And people were amazed 801 00:43:09,040 --> 00:43:11,480 Speaker 3: by what these very very primitive neural networks could do. 802 00:43:11,600 --> 00:43:14,480 Speaker 3: Because there'd been something called the AI winter from the 803 00:43:14,520 --> 00:43:17,720 Speaker 3: excitement of the nineteen fifties. In the nineteen sixties and seventies, 804 00:43:17,760 --> 00:43:19,839 Speaker 3: people thought, actually, this isn't just isn't going to work, 805 00:43:20,000 --> 00:43:20,719 Speaker 3: and you. 806 00:43:20,719 --> 00:43:23,680 Speaker 4: Know, no funding FREEI was a disaster. 807 00:43:24,040 --> 00:43:26,799 Speaker 3: And then these tiny little programs were developed which could 808 00:43:26,800 --> 00:43:30,800 Speaker 3: do things like learn the past tense is of English verbs, 809 00:43:31,120 --> 00:43:31,440 Speaker 3: and they. 810 00:43:31,360 --> 00:43:33,000 Speaker 4: Would make mistakes like a human child. 811 00:43:33,040 --> 00:43:36,720 Speaker 3: That's so even if you told that told the computer 812 00:43:36,840 --> 00:43:40,719 Speaker 3: that the past participle of go is went, it would 813 00:43:40,800 --> 00:43:43,560 Speaker 3: say God, just like child. That's you know, so it's 814 00:43:43,640 --> 00:43:51,040 Speaker 3: generalizing the e the most frequently accounted version, even though 815 00:43:51,239 --> 00:43:54,680 Speaker 3: it's been told differently. So that got people are very excited, 816 00:43:54,800 --> 00:43:58,040 Speaker 3: and Crick throughout this period was very impressed by these things, 817 00:43:58,080 --> 00:44:02,680 Speaker 3: but he was continually arguing people saying, look, your models 818 00:44:02,920 --> 00:44:06,240 Speaker 3: are amazing, but as models of the brain, they've. 819 00:44:06,080 --> 00:44:07,560 Speaker 4: Got to be biologically relevant. 820 00:44:07,560 --> 00:44:10,600 Speaker 3: They've got to be structured've got to have an organization, 821 00:44:11,280 --> 00:44:13,600 Speaker 3: and that is similar to what's going on in the brain, 822 00:44:13,640 --> 00:44:16,200 Speaker 3: which we didn't have much idea about. And if it 823 00:44:16,360 --> 00:44:19,920 Speaker 3: relies upon, in particular, something called back propagation, which is 824 00:44:19,960 --> 00:44:22,480 Speaker 3: where the signal comes back and goes up through the 825 00:44:22,560 --> 00:44:28,120 Speaker 3: same connections in these computer programs, these connections equipment of neurons, 826 00:44:28,120 --> 00:44:30,640 Speaker 3: and there isn't any backprop you know, it doesn't work 827 00:44:30,680 --> 00:44:32,160 Speaker 3: that way. And yes, you know work arounds, but that's 828 00:44:32,200 --> 00:44:34,440 Speaker 3: not the way it works. He got very irate with 829 00:44:35,000 --> 00:44:38,279 Speaker 3: his erstwhile colleagues and friends because of that, And that's 830 00:44:38,680 --> 00:44:41,160 Speaker 3: clearly right. You know, if you want to understand the 831 00:44:41,239 --> 00:44:46,000 Speaker 3: human brain rather than perhaps you know, understand the eerie 832 00:44:46,320 --> 00:44:50,080 Speaker 3: alien intelligence, if you want to stand human consciousness, then 833 00:44:50,160 --> 00:44:51,719 Speaker 3: you've got to keep that in mind, I think, and 834 00:44:51,840 --> 00:44:55,000 Speaker 3: crit was right about that. So until we need to 835 00:44:55,120 --> 00:44:57,480 Speaker 3: know how they're doing what they're doing, I think for 836 00:44:57,560 --> 00:45:00,840 Speaker 3: it to be a really useful model. 837 00:45:01,680 --> 00:45:02,879 Speaker 2: So okay, a couple of things. 838 00:45:02,960 --> 00:45:06,960 Speaker 1: First, I still assert that the lms are going to 839 00:45:07,280 --> 00:45:10,239 Speaker 1: change our metaphors the way that people of the next 840 00:45:10,280 --> 00:45:14,440 Speaker 1: generation talk about the brain, correctly or incorrectly. 841 00:45:14,520 --> 00:45:16,640 Speaker 2: It's going to change the way they talk about it. 842 00:45:16,760 --> 00:45:20,759 Speaker 1: And and of course there's a history back to you know, 843 00:45:20,880 --> 00:45:24,759 Speaker 1: parallel distributed computation and well before that as well. But 844 00:45:25,160 --> 00:45:27,400 Speaker 1: but there are step changes, and I think we've just 845 00:45:27,480 --> 00:45:30,120 Speaker 1: experienced one. So that's that's my assertion. 846 00:45:30,200 --> 00:45:31,719 Speaker 4: I was just wondering, if you know, I mean, you 847 00:45:32,080 --> 00:45:34,279 Speaker 4: may well be right. You know, I can't. I I 848 00:45:34,840 --> 00:45:38,160 Speaker 4: it'd be very interesting to see, and I just want 849 00:45:38,200 --> 00:45:39,120 Speaker 4: a bit more meat on it. 850 00:45:40,320 --> 00:45:42,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, it may it may be that it 851 00:45:42,560 --> 00:45:45,600 Speaker 1: just requires some years before we see what that what 852 00:45:45,719 --> 00:45:48,040 Speaker 1: that meat looks like on the book. Yeah, let me 853 00:45:48,160 --> 00:45:51,040 Speaker 1: jump to another topic that I was that I loved 854 00:45:51,080 --> 00:45:53,640 Speaker 1: reading about in your book. One of the things that 855 00:45:53,719 --> 00:45:56,239 Speaker 1: I talk about on this podcast, probably more than anything else, 856 00:45:56,360 --> 00:45:59,160 Speaker 1: is this concept of the internal model. In other words, 857 00:45:59,239 --> 00:46:01,719 Speaker 1: your brain is locked in silence and darkness and it's 858 00:46:01,840 --> 00:46:03,960 Speaker 1: making a model of the outside world. And it does 859 00:46:04,040 --> 00:46:06,960 Speaker 1: this eventually so it can better predict what's going to 860 00:46:07,600 --> 00:46:11,000 Speaker 1: happen next. And the thing that I hadn't quite clocked 861 00:46:11,040 --> 00:46:14,000 Speaker 1: until I read your book is that, at least the 862 00:46:14,040 --> 00:46:15,719 Speaker 1: way that you put it, it's sort of correct me 863 00:46:15,760 --> 00:46:19,760 Speaker 1: if I'm wrong here. It started with the young Craike 864 00:46:20,160 --> 00:46:24,479 Speaker 1: in England who wrote a paper, and then other people 865 00:46:24,560 --> 00:46:26,239 Speaker 1: picked up on this idea. Give us, give us that 866 00:46:26,320 --> 00:46:27,720 Speaker 1: story about the internal model. 867 00:46:28,440 --> 00:46:31,400 Speaker 3: It really goes back to Helmholtz, who's the guy who 868 00:46:31,400 --> 00:46:36,479 Speaker 3: discovers the all or nothing action potential. What Helmholtz said 869 00:46:37,120 --> 00:46:41,080 Speaker 3: is that because there's a big argument about ah, is 870 00:46:41,160 --> 00:46:45,879 Speaker 3: the activity in say, your optic nerve, is it qualitatively 871 00:46:46,000 --> 00:46:50,640 Speaker 3: different from the activity in your auditory nerve? And what 872 00:46:51,000 --> 00:46:54,759 Speaker 3: Helmholtz said, it's all the same. It's just activity. And 873 00:46:54,920 --> 00:46:57,960 Speaker 3: the difference is is what your brain makes of that signal. 874 00:46:58,400 --> 00:47:01,759 Speaker 3: And what he says is that the brain gets stimulated 875 00:47:01,880 --> 00:47:05,440 Speaker 3: and then it makes an inference about what that means, 876 00:47:05,560 --> 00:47:07,680 Speaker 3: about what that is, and you can you can see 877 00:47:07,719 --> 00:47:10,239 Speaker 3: this really easily, but don't do it very hard. The 878 00:47:10,360 --> 00:47:14,000 Speaker 3: pressure eyeballs. Shut your eyes, pressure eyeballs, and you see colors, 879 00:47:14,960 --> 00:47:17,680 Speaker 3: but there is no light. What is happening is those 880 00:47:17,760 --> 00:47:21,080 Speaker 3: neurons are being activated by pressure and they're sending a 881 00:47:21,120 --> 00:47:23,480 Speaker 3: signal to the brain and the brain, hey, I optic 882 00:47:23,640 --> 00:47:26,560 Speaker 3: nerve it must be light, so you see light now. 883 00:47:26,840 --> 00:47:30,520 Speaker 3: Craig who was a psychologist in Cambridge, he wrote he 884 00:47:30,560 --> 00:47:32,600 Speaker 3: wrote this little paper where he said, well, basically, what 885 00:47:32,719 --> 00:47:36,440 Speaker 3: the brain must be doing is constructing this model of 886 00:47:36,640 --> 00:47:40,120 Speaker 3: the outside world of things that it can affect, and 887 00:47:40,239 --> 00:47:44,000 Speaker 3: it's trying to work out what the best things to do, 888 00:47:44,280 --> 00:47:47,719 Speaker 3: how can modulate this outside was so effect Therefore the 889 00:47:47,800 --> 00:47:51,560 Speaker 3: input that it receives in order to achieve whatever ends 890 00:47:51,840 --> 00:47:53,000 Speaker 3: it may be interested in me. 891 00:47:53,080 --> 00:47:53,759 Speaker 4: They're eating you know. 892 00:47:54,000 --> 00:47:58,200 Speaker 3: I'm hungry. I'm right, my body's hungry. Therefore I need 893 00:47:58,280 --> 00:48:00,680 Speaker 3: to find some food, so I've got to looking for it. 894 00:48:00,800 --> 00:48:04,360 Speaker 3: And then the model that the key idea is that 895 00:48:04,440 --> 00:48:07,680 Speaker 3: he's got this suggestion as you say that there's a model, 896 00:48:07,680 --> 00:48:12,000 Speaker 3: a representation of some kind of the outside world, and 897 00:48:12,600 --> 00:48:14,719 Speaker 3: the way you can affect it is both things. It's 898 00:48:14,760 --> 00:48:18,759 Speaker 3: not just a static photo, but it's also a set 899 00:48:18,800 --> 00:48:22,960 Speaker 3: of potential alterations, and you can you can predict, Okay, 900 00:48:23,040 --> 00:48:24,759 Speaker 3: if I go to the shop, I will be able 901 00:48:24,800 --> 00:48:28,040 Speaker 3: to get a cream bun and I will satisfy my hunger. 902 00:48:28,280 --> 00:48:31,440 Speaker 3: If I go to the bookshop, I will not be 903 00:48:31,480 --> 00:48:33,040 Speaker 3: able to buy a cream, but you know, I can 904 00:48:33,080 --> 00:48:35,239 Speaker 3: get a book. But that's not that satisfy a different 905 00:48:35,320 --> 00:48:36,719 Speaker 3: kind of hunger? Is it the same kind of hunger? 906 00:48:36,840 --> 00:48:37,640 Speaker 2: Noe and so on? 907 00:48:38,239 --> 00:48:43,440 Speaker 3: So that model, I mean, is really quite astonishingly powerful, 908 00:48:43,480 --> 00:48:46,920 Speaker 3: the idea that there's this representation at such a complex 909 00:48:47,040 --> 00:48:50,120 Speaker 3: level of the outside world and of our ways of 910 00:48:50,200 --> 00:48:52,080 Speaker 3: altering it that's been developed. 911 00:48:52,120 --> 00:48:54,520 Speaker 4: And I mean, he was working, like many people. He 912 00:48:54,640 --> 00:48:57,080 Speaker 4: was working in the war, and he was working on how. 913 00:48:58,600 --> 00:49:02,800 Speaker 3: People could cope of work in the dark on chips 914 00:49:02,880 --> 00:49:05,240 Speaker 3: and so on, and how they'd be able to predict 915 00:49:05,320 --> 00:49:07,200 Speaker 3: a movement of enemy Aircraft's all. 916 00:49:07,239 --> 00:49:09,800 Speaker 4: This was kind of classic thing that scientists were involved 917 00:49:09,800 --> 00:49:09,920 Speaker 4: in it. 918 00:49:09,960 --> 00:49:12,239 Speaker 3: And in his meantime he was thinking about, well, what 919 00:49:12,600 --> 00:49:15,160 Speaker 3: does it all mean in terms of how the brain 920 00:49:15,280 --> 00:49:18,839 Speaker 3: might function. So this little paper, and there's another one 921 00:49:18,880 --> 00:49:21,640 Speaker 3: as well that he wrote, is astonishing the influential. 922 00:49:21,800 --> 00:49:23,319 Speaker 1: You say in the book that it's going to take 923 00:49:23,400 --> 00:49:26,040 Speaker 1: us a long time to even understand very basic things. 924 00:49:26,160 --> 00:49:29,640 Speaker 1: For example, there are a lot of connectome projects which 925 00:49:29,760 --> 00:49:32,799 Speaker 1: look at, hey, where are all the cells and the connections. 926 00:49:32,840 --> 00:49:35,759 Speaker 1: And let's say a maggot brain, a very tiny little brain. 927 00:49:35,960 --> 00:49:38,480 Speaker 1: You know, what if we understood every single bit of 928 00:49:38,560 --> 00:49:41,360 Speaker 1: the wiring diagram here and yet, as we know, that 929 00:49:41,680 --> 00:49:45,000 Speaker 1: hasn't really unpacked the answer for us. 930 00:49:45,120 --> 00:49:47,240 Speaker 2: And so what do you see coming. 931 00:49:47,080 --> 00:49:47,760 Speaker 1: Down the line? 932 00:49:48,400 --> 00:49:52,719 Speaker 2: How, given this whole enormous, beautiful history that you've written 933 00:49:52,800 --> 00:49:55,320 Speaker 2: of the field of neuroscience, what do you see in 934 00:49:55,400 --> 00:49:56,000 Speaker 2: the future. 935 00:49:56,280 --> 00:50:00,080 Speaker 3: But what we're lacking is is ideas, ways of and 936 00:50:00,120 --> 00:50:01,680 Speaker 3: maybe this is where the llms are going to do 937 00:50:01,719 --> 00:50:03,920 Speaker 3: it without even telling us what the damn ideas are. 938 00:50:04,200 --> 00:50:06,880 Speaker 3: You know, we'll be able to put all the data in, 939 00:50:07,320 --> 00:50:11,760 Speaker 3: put all the connectomic data. I'm sure if eve Marda 940 00:50:11,920 --> 00:50:14,880 Speaker 3: is not doing this, she really should check it in 941 00:50:15,400 --> 00:50:17,520 Speaker 3: see what the AIS makes of it all. I think 942 00:50:17,560 --> 00:50:21,320 Speaker 3: we need more ideas about very concrete things, not about 943 00:50:21,440 --> 00:50:24,759 Speaker 3: how conscious, what consciousness is, or how it emerges. I 944 00:50:24,840 --> 00:50:27,080 Speaker 3: think we need more data on that so we can 945 00:50:27,080 --> 00:50:29,560 Speaker 3: actually agree what we're studying. I guess the other thing 946 00:50:29,640 --> 00:50:34,279 Speaker 3: that maybe you know, it's a negative thing to come 947 00:50:34,360 --> 00:50:36,200 Speaker 3: back to Crick. You know, what he was focused on 948 00:50:36,440 --> 00:50:39,719 Speaker 3: with Christophe Copp for the last twenty years was finding 949 00:50:39,760 --> 00:50:44,280 Speaker 3: the neural correlates of consciousness or of retention of visual awareness. 950 00:50:45,400 --> 00:50:49,680 Speaker 3: And we've done that in that we can actually record 951 00:50:49,800 --> 00:50:54,720 Speaker 3: from you know, people's brains, patients who are very kindly 952 00:50:54,800 --> 00:50:58,359 Speaker 3: given up there allowing people to poke around in their 953 00:50:58,400 --> 00:51:02,319 Speaker 3: brain while they're having an operation, and you can identify 954 00:51:02,440 --> 00:51:04,680 Speaker 3: people have now even been able to reconstruct things that 955 00:51:04,800 --> 00:51:08,280 Speaker 3: they have they have seen using the activity that's recorded. 956 00:51:09,239 --> 00:51:13,280 Speaker 3: So it actually got some of the things that Crick wanted. 957 00:51:13,680 --> 00:51:17,360 Speaker 3: And yet it's still not it's not it. There's something 958 00:51:17,560 --> 00:51:21,560 Speaker 3: still lacking. And maybe I mean the argument of the 959 00:51:21,600 --> 00:51:23,640 Speaker 3: book would be it's going to be the next step 960 00:51:23,680 --> 00:51:26,359 Speaker 3: in technology, and your argument that just being well, yeah, 961 00:51:26,400 --> 00:51:29,520 Speaker 3: we've got that here, Well. 962 00:51:29,480 --> 00:51:31,239 Speaker 4: Let's see maybe that's it, or maybe it's going to 963 00:51:31,280 --> 00:51:32,279 Speaker 4: be something further on. 964 00:51:32,800 --> 00:51:35,759 Speaker 2: Oh, surely it'll be something further on. And by the way. 965 00:51:35,840 --> 00:51:38,960 Speaker 1: One of your arguments is that are metaphors. While they 966 00:51:39,040 --> 00:51:43,360 Speaker 1: can be helpful, they also always constrain absolutely absolutely. 967 00:51:42,960 --> 00:51:45,600 Speaker 3: Can't you know, they're they're I had this cute phrase, 968 00:51:45,680 --> 00:51:48,320 Speaker 3: they're they're they're their frame, their frame. But a frame 969 00:51:48,480 --> 00:51:51,120 Speaker 3: is not just you know, helping you put things on. 970 00:51:51,280 --> 00:51:53,919 Speaker 3: It also limits you can't see outside of the frame. 971 00:51:54,000 --> 00:51:57,120 Speaker 3: And that's that's why things look obvious in the past, 972 00:51:57,160 --> 00:51:59,320 Speaker 3: because we can see the things that they can't. And 973 00:51:59,480 --> 00:52:01,960 Speaker 3: that's why people sometimes think people in the past were stupid. 974 00:52:01,960 --> 00:52:03,800 Speaker 3: But they're not very clever. They're just limited and so 975 00:52:04,120 --> 00:52:07,359 Speaker 3: to we. And this is when scientists, I mean, you've 976 00:52:07,400 --> 00:52:09,160 Speaker 3: been very kind, you've read the book, you've thought about 977 00:52:09,200 --> 00:52:11,040 Speaker 3: a lot. But when you just chat to people and 978 00:52:11,080 --> 00:52:13,719 Speaker 3: they had the unwritten God, that's amazing. And then they said, well, 979 00:52:13,760 --> 00:52:16,319 Speaker 3: what's the next big thing going to be into which 980 00:52:16,360 --> 00:52:18,040 Speaker 3: I say, well, you know, if I knew that, I 981 00:52:18,080 --> 00:52:18,719 Speaker 3: wouldn't tell you. 982 00:52:18,800 --> 00:52:22,120 Speaker 4: I'd be very rich living on my island somewhere. I 983 00:52:22,200 --> 00:52:22,880 Speaker 4: had no idea. 984 00:52:23,120 --> 00:52:26,759 Speaker 3: But it's going to come and it But I mean, 985 00:52:26,840 --> 00:52:29,440 Speaker 3: maybe you're right, I mean I'm maybe I'm not sufficiently 986 00:52:29,520 --> 00:52:32,640 Speaker 3: tuned into the world in particular of kind of human 987 00:52:32,719 --> 00:52:36,799 Speaker 3: euroscience and human brain studies to see that the excitement 988 00:52:36,880 --> 00:52:41,400 Speaker 3: of the parallels with the with the llms maybe changing 989 00:52:41,520 --> 00:52:45,400 Speaker 3: how people are thinking things. But certainly up until twenty twenty, 990 00:52:45,480 --> 00:52:47,719 Speaker 3: which is when the book was finished twenty nineteen, there 991 00:52:47,800 --> 00:52:51,160 Speaker 3: was very much in the tens or whatever we call it, 992 00:52:51,200 --> 00:52:53,360 Speaker 3: the teens, there's very much a sense of stagnation. I 993 00:52:53,400 --> 00:52:55,840 Speaker 3: mean vast amounts of data which were people are drowning in. 994 00:52:56,560 --> 00:52:59,239 Speaker 3: But also and then, what what are we going to 995 00:52:59,280 --> 00:53:02,960 Speaker 3: do now this kind of uncertainty? Maybe that's being resolved. 996 00:53:03,239 --> 00:53:06,400 Speaker 1: Well, I think in your language it would just be 997 00:53:06,719 --> 00:53:09,880 Speaker 1: another frame given to us by the technology things that 998 00:53:10,040 --> 00:53:10,960 Speaker 1: we can't say beyond that. 999 00:53:11,680 --> 00:53:14,160 Speaker 4: But do you think that's happening? Is that a shift 1000 00:53:14,280 --> 00:53:15,840 Speaker 4: in the human. 1001 00:53:17,080 --> 00:53:19,120 Speaker 2: Community for two reasons though. 1002 00:53:19,280 --> 00:53:21,879 Speaker 1: One is looking at llms and saying, wow, that's quite 1003 00:53:21,880 --> 00:53:25,400 Speaker 1: extraordinary what they can produce. The other thing is just 1004 00:53:25,520 --> 00:53:27,800 Speaker 1: being able to use these as a tool to apply 1005 00:53:28,040 --> 00:53:31,040 Speaker 1: them to the massive data sets that we have shored 1006 00:53:31,120 --> 00:53:34,080 Speaker 1: up already and be able to say, oh, here are 1007 00:53:34,120 --> 00:53:37,200 Speaker 1: patterns of the data that we would never have seen ourselves. 1008 00:53:41,719 --> 00:53:45,640 Speaker 1: That was my interview with Matthew Cobb, neuroscientist and author 1009 00:53:45,800 --> 00:53:49,920 Speaker 1: of the idea of the brain. So the central lesson 1010 00:53:50,040 --> 00:53:53,120 Speaker 1: that surfaces in his book is that we draw our 1011 00:53:53,239 --> 00:53:58,279 Speaker 1: metaphors from the technology that exists around us at the time, 1012 00:53:59,000 --> 00:54:02,719 Speaker 1: and as we invent new technologies that gives us new 1013 00:54:02,840 --> 00:54:06,840 Speaker 1: insight into how the brain might be functioning. But also 1014 00:54:07,640 --> 00:54:12,799 Speaker 1: metaphors can limit They are frames that can block out 1015 00:54:12,960 --> 00:54:16,440 Speaker 1: what we're able to see. This shows us something about 1016 00:54:16,680 --> 00:54:19,960 Speaker 1: how science works. Despite everything that we learn in school, 1017 00:54:20,120 --> 00:54:24,120 Speaker 1: science is not just the accumulation of facts, but instead 1018 00:54:24,680 --> 00:54:29,520 Speaker 1: a grasping with our language towards something trying to get 1019 00:54:29,680 --> 00:54:33,760 Speaker 1: more effective metaphors. When we look back at the history 1020 00:54:33,800 --> 00:54:37,200 Speaker 1: of brain science, it's easy to fall into the trap 1021 00:54:37,320 --> 00:54:40,880 Speaker 1: of feeling like the present is the pinnacle that we 1022 00:54:41,000 --> 00:54:44,160 Speaker 1: finally arrived at the right way of thinking about this. 1023 00:54:45,000 --> 00:54:49,360 Speaker 1: We smile at the hydraulic brain of the sixteen hundreds, 1024 00:54:49,480 --> 00:54:53,719 Speaker 1: the clockwork brain of the Enlightenment, the telegraph brain of 1025 00:54:53,760 --> 00:54:58,280 Speaker 1: the eighteen hundreds, the telephone exchange of the late nineteenth century. 1026 00:54:58,719 --> 00:55:03,520 Speaker 1: They seem like charming relics from a simpler time, but 1027 00:55:03,719 --> 00:55:08,200 Speaker 1: each of those metaphors were stepping stones for our thinking. 1028 00:55:08,920 --> 00:55:12,320 Speaker 1: They framed the kind of experiments that people built. The 1029 00:55:12,760 --> 00:55:15,920 Speaker 1: data that they noticed, the questions that they thought it 1030 00:55:16,000 --> 00:55:20,520 Speaker 1: was even possible to ask. Every metaphor illuminated one part 1031 00:55:20,600 --> 00:55:24,520 Speaker 1: of the landscape, even while it left the rest in shadow, 1032 00:55:25,280 --> 00:55:29,279 Speaker 1: and that shadow is still with us. For my whole career, 1033 00:55:29,360 --> 00:55:33,160 Speaker 1: the metaphor of choice was the digital computer, the brain 1034 00:55:33,440 --> 00:55:37,880 Speaker 1: as hardware and software as an information processing device with 1035 00:55:37,960 --> 00:55:41,359 Speaker 1: inputs and outputs and circuits, and that idea has given 1036 00:55:41,440 --> 00:55:46,160 Speaker 1: us extraordinary advances like artificial neural networks and brain machine 1037 00:55:46,200 --> 00:55:52,520 Speaker 1: interfaces and entire fields of computational neuroscience. But it also 1038 00:55:53,160 --> 00:55:56,080 Speaker 1: narrows our vision. And in my book live Wired, I 1039 00:55:56,120 --> 00:55:59,640 Speaker 1: wrote that everything we think about in Silicon Valley is 1040 00:56:00,280 --> 00:56:03,279 Speaker 1: trim and efficient hardware with a layer of software on top. 1041 00:56:03,560 --> 00:56:06,520 Speaker 1: But the brain is clearly so much more than that. 1042 00:56:07,200 --> 00:56:10,759 Speaker 1: That's why I use the term livewear to make this 1043 00:56:10,960 --> 00:56:16,120 Speaker 1: distinction clear. It's a system that is constantly reconfiguring its 1044 00:56:16,160 --> 00:56:20,800 Speaker 1: own circuitry based on experiences. In other words, what flows 1045 00:56:21,040 --> 00:56:24,320 Speaker 1: through the network changes the network. Now we're all watching 1046 00:56:24,880 --> 00:56:29,520 Speaker 1: artificial neural networks like the Transformer architecture, which has changed 1047 00:56:29,560 --> 00:56:33,560 Speaker 1: our world, and those certainly seem to capture something a 1048 00:56:33,640 --> 00:56:37,279 Speaker 1: bit better. But whatever we use and whatever we come 1049 00:56:37,400 --> 00:56:42,319 Speaker 1: up with to make these distinctions. Will our descendants see 1050 00:56:42,719 --> 00:56:49,360 Speaker 1: our metaphors as limiting, just another product of our technological moment. 1051 00:56:49,960 --> 00:56:50,960 Speaker 2: Of course they will. 1052 00:56:51,480 --> 00:56:55,480 Speaker 1: For all we know, there may never be a final metaphor, 1053 00:56:55,640 --> 00:56:58,759 Speaker 1: no single model that captures it all. The brain has 1054 00:56:58,880 --> 00:57:04,800 Speaker 1: its own idio syncratic, massive complexity, and strangeness, making it 1055 00:57:05,360 --> 00:57:09,600 Speaker 1: not quite like a telegraph network, not quite like your laptop, 1056 00:57:10,200 --> 00:57:13,319 Speaker 1: not quite the same as an LLM. We might never 1057 00:57:13,440 --> 00:57:17,080 Speaker 1: have a metaphor that feels complete, because, as they say, 1058 00:57:17,200 --> 00:57:21,080 Speaker 1: the map is never the same as the territory. But 1059 00:57:21,800 --> 00:57:26,800 Speaker 1: the pursuit continues to compel us because every era's metaphor, 1060 00:57:27,000 --> 00:57:32,080 Speaker 1: although it's flawed, still moves us forward. The hydraulic brain 1061 00:57:32,200 --> 00:57:37,200 Speaker 1: led to experiments on fluid pressure. The telegraph brain inspired 1062 00:57:37,240 --> 00:57:41,960 Speaker 1: the search for nerve conduction speeds. The computer brain pushed 1063 00:57:42,040 --> 00:57:45,520 Speaker 1: us into the era of big data and AI. Our 1064 00:57:45,760 --> 00:57:50,240 Speaker 1: past models were all part of the process. So I'm 1065 00:57:50,280 --> 00:57:53,680 Speaker 1: left with two feelings, humility in the face of the 1066 00:57:53,800 --> 00:57:58,280 Speaker 1: unknown and excitement about what's next. Somewhere out there in 1067 00:57:58,400 --> 00:58:02,200 Speaker 1: the midst of the future, there is a technology or 1068 00:58:02,400 --> 00:58:07,000 Speaker 1: an idea that's going to give us a fresh lens 1069 00:58:07,240 --> 00:58:11,160 Speaker 1: one that we can't yet imagine, and with it a 1070 00:58:11,440 --> 00:58:15,520 Speaker 1: new way of asking the oldest question in neuroscience, how 1071 00:58:16,120 --> 00:58:20,160 Speaker 1: does matter give rise to mind? So as you go 1072 00:58:20,240 --> 00:58:24,120 Speaker 1: about your day hearing and seeing and remembering and imagining, 1073 00:58:24,560 --> 00:58:29,000 Speaker 1: consider this, the thing doing all that work is also 1074 00:58:29,160 --> 00:58:34,280 Speaker 1: the thing asking the questions about its own functioning. Despite 1075 00:58:34,480 --> 00:58:37,600 Speaker 1: all that we've learned, it is still, in many ways 1076 00:58:38,160 --> 00:58:41,880 Speaker 1: an undiscovered country, and every day we take a step 1077 00:58:42,040 --> 00:58:51,080 Speaker 1: deeper into that uncharted land. Go to eagleman dot com 1078 00:58:51,200 --> 00:58:54,600 Speaker 1: slash podcast for more information and to find further reading. 1079 00:58:55,200 --> 00:58:58,360 Speaker 1: Join the weekly discussions on my substack, and check out 1080 00:58:58,400 --> 00:58:59,440 Speaker 1: and subscribe to Inner. 1081 00:58:59,360 --> 00:59:01,520 Speaker 2: Cosmos on YouTube for videos. 1082 00:59:01,200 --> 00:59:05,160 Speaker 1: Of each episode and to leave comments until next time. 1083 00:59:05,440 --> 00:59:08,240 Speaker 1: I'm David Eagleman, and this is Inner Cosmos.