WEBVTT - Full Episode - Both Parties Showing Cracks After Government Shutdown + How Democrats Can Win In Appalachia

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you hate hangovers, We'll say goodbye to hangovers. Out

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of Office gives you the social buzz without the next

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>day regret. Their best selling out of Office gummies were

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood,

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five different strengths, you

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>can tailor the dose to fit your vibe, from a

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>gentle one point five milligram micro dose to their newest

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>fifteen milligram gummy for a more elevated experience. Their THHC

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.159
<v Speaker 1>beverages and gummies are a modern, mindful alternative to a

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>glass of wine or a cocktail. And I'll tell you this,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I've given up booze. I don't like the hangovers. I

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a wellness brand that

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>believes feeling good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in delicious HEMP derived THHD and CBD products, all designed

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>to boost your mood and simply help you unwine so

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>if you struggle to switch off at night, Soul also

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>has a variety of products specifically designed to just simply

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>help you get a better night's sleep, including their top

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>selling Sleepy gummies. It's a fan favorite for deep restorative sleep.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So bring on the good vibes and treat yourself to

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Soul today. Right now, Soul is offering my audience thirty

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>percent off your entire order, So go to gtsold dot

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>com use the promo code toodcast. Don't forget that code.

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>That's getsold dot Com promo code toodcast for thirty percent off.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello there, Happy Wednesday. Welcome to another.

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Episode of the Chuck Podcast.

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Were give you a quick rundown of what we have today.

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I have a new candidate for you to take a

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to. It's a first time candidate for office named

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Joel Willett. He's running in Kentucky for the US Senate.

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>He is a former essentially career national security person, worked

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in the intelligence community and sort of gotten decided to

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>get involved in politics, and within a couple of days

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of that, lost his security clearance via the political purge

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that was orchestrated by the current head of the department,

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsea Gabbart, and the whole

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of the the political retribution aspect of the Trump

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>administration sort of going after the intelligence community and anybody

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that he believes somehow that that was involved in surfacing

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the concerns of the intelligence community about how certain unfriendly

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>nations to the United States seem to have access to

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump's inner circle. He obviously still is angry about that.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 1>But what's interesting about Joe Willett is that he's not,

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in some ways not a typical candidate for office, and

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I think and has an interesting background that will seem

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>quite familiar to people who read the book. He'll billiology

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>by jd Vance for what it's worth. But what was

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>really helpful I had conversation after the deal was done

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in the shutdown was to hear how a Senate candidate

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was responding to the shutdown, and just about like every

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>other Senate candidate, he was pretty negative on the deal,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>while he wasn't personally trashing Chuck Schumer the way other

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Senate candidates seem to be wanting to flex their anti

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Schumer muscles, as you've seen in so many Democratic primaries

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>just in the last twenty four hours. I think he

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>does give voice to at least I think he's a

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>good example of explaining who the voters, the candidates think

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that are running for office in primaries think they're talking to.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's I think probably the best way to understand

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the initial reaction by those that are running for office,

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>those that are running in Democratic primaries, those that want

0:03:55.840 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to be leaders within the Democratic Party, versus they have

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>reacted the way they've reacted.

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, you are what's your electorate, you know,

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you tell me you're electorate, and I'll tell you your

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>position on the shutdown, right. And if you're electorate, if

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it's an electorate where you're more worried about the general

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the swing voter, you were probably on the side of

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to do a pause in the shutdown.

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you were somebody who's got to worry more

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>about a primary voter, then you were going to be

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>emphatic against cutting this steel. And I think the reaction

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is a reminder that this was not about healthcare, right.

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 2>This was about.

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Taking on finally confronting Trump on something right, and the party.

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party hadn't done any decent confrontation.

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 2>Really.

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>A few governors had in trying to fight back on

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>National Guard efforts and things like that, but there hadn't

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>been a real showdown between the party and Trump, and

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown provided that and politically in the last forty days,

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it energized the base of the Democratic Party and they

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>felt good about that energy and it because the elections

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>went well last week. It can it seemed to provide

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the confirmation you know, a sort of form of confirmation bias. Hey,

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this shutdown seems to be working. Look at how well

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>our candidates did. Why give up this this idea now

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>when at the end of the day, you know, you know,

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>things can turn quickly if you're not careful. And already

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>some polling a surfaced about how as this shutdown was

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>impacting more and more Americans, blame was starting to get

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>shared more and more between both parties. Yes, Republicans were

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>taking the run of the blame. Yes, Mike Johnson and

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump were actually making it easier for Democrats to

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>politically win the shutdown by their own maneuvers and their

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>own decision making there. But ultimately, as I've stated in

0:05:58.000 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a few other places that I've spoken in the last

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hours, there is a large chunk of voters

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in the middle who don't pay attention to day to

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>day massinations, but that will pay attention when the proverbial

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>government toilet is clogged, you know, and not being able

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to travel around Thanksgiving at a time when we have

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>almost no choice but to use their airplanes in order

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to get where we want to get in a short

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>weekend was a way that you were suddenly going to

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>start impacting people that don't normally pay attention to the

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>day to day machinations, and that actually can become long

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>term more politically damaging than anything you think is going

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for you in the short term. So that's my basic

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>way to explain the situation we're in.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:44.919
<v Speaker 1>What's funny here is leave it to the Democrats that

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>come across. As you know, they're essentially divided over tactics.

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>They're not divided over any issue. They all believe in

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this healthcare issue. They all believe Trump needs to be confronted.

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>They all believe they've got to shift their messaging to

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 1>cost of living issues. Right, So this is a party

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that is fighting over tactics. You know, do they have

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the right leaders? They probably don't. Just changing leaders change

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the debate on tactics. I don't know if it really does,

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>but I will say this, once you have lost the

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>trust of the people you're trying to lead, you probably

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>ought to leave, right, you know. And and the best

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>thing for the party would be if Chuck Schumer went

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>out on his own, not forcing more groups to come

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>out calling for his resignation and all this stuff. But ultimately,

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it changes. You know, you're still

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>going to have a leader that's got to be thinking about, Hey,

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>there's the base wants one thing, but you still got

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to swing voters if you actually want to

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>win enough seats to actually be in charge of governing something.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think that tension would exist whether it was Schumer,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>whether Brian Schatz is there, whether it's Chris Murphy, whether

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's Amy Klobashar, whether it's Patty Murray. Right, we could

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>come up, you know, And I think if you know,

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those moments where if Schumer just

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>decided in the next week to sort of you know what,

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, you know, I'm not wanted here, I'll take

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a step back. My gut is Patty Murray would replace him,

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>because she'd be seen as a quote unquote caretaker majority leader.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>She's at this point the senior most member of the

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Senate, and nobody would cross her right, and she

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>really has the respect of sort of all wings of

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the party. I think she'd be seeing the original mom

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and tennis shoes, you know, as she ran as a

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of a populist candidate of her day in nineteen

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>ninety two when she first came on the national scene.

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think she would be seen as somebody that would

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>would be less of a public face for the party.

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And in some ways, I think many senators wouldn't mind

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that and would likely embrace that. But let's be realistic,

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you may not see any change in the short term.

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>To me.

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>The you know, while it's easy to cover this tactical

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>split inside the Democratic Party because it's sort of easy

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to do. It's easy to create a cable news segment

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on it. It's easy to find people to criticize, you know,

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of an easy debate to have. It's not

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>really that big of a divide because it's not over

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>some sort of fundamental ideology ideological disagreement, you know, where

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for instance, like things with Mamdani, those are fundamental ideological

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>disagreements about you know, how involved government should be in

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the economy. That's that's that's a larger divide that I

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think doesn't really get dealt with in the Democratic Party

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>until the presidential primaries take shape. But I'd tell you,

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>even as everybody's focused on the dem divide here, don't

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>take your eye off the ball of a growing Republican divide.

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that is coming. I think that right now,

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Republican elected official in Congress, you should

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to figure out what do I do when

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the leader of the party is not accepting reality. And

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's inability to accept the reality that this economy

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>sucks for a lot of his supporters is going to

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>cause a much bigger problem for the Republican Party than

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>anything the Democratic Party is going through at the moment,

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>because ultimately, because they're in the minority and because they're

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>in the opposition, you know, I mean, they're going to

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>have a unity of message, They're going to have a

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>unity of focus. They may disagree on how to deal

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>with Trump in the moment, but they're not going to

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>disagree on how to court the voters in twenty twenty six.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a divide that I think that is not the

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>case on the Republican side of the aisle. As this

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>economy weakens for those without money and essentially with those

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>about real savings. And that's what we're seeing here right.

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a This is the very definition of a

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>trickle down economy where Donald Trump is hoping that the bang,

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the stock market success is going to somehow trickle down

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and help everybody else. There's not a lot of evidence

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that that ever works. You can just go back one

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>hundred years and see how that worked out. The last

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>time we sort of tried to put together an economy

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>where government and big business fused itself together like it

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>did in the early parts of the industrial and the

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Industrial Age.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 2>That didn't end well.

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>We got a great depression, and then finally government decided,

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the people decided, hey, they wanted government. They wanted more

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>guard rails on big business, more guardrails on the economy

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>than what we had at the time. And I have

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 1>a feeling we're going to end up in a similar

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>situation where we're going to have a downturn caused by

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing, this fusion of big tech and government,

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is going to awake awoke in a bunch

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of people who are going to want more guardrails put

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>on our economy, necessarily leaving capitalism, but something more akin

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to what the two Roosevelts fought for, both Teddy and

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Franklin in their very different ways. But I did get

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions on the shutdown, so I decided

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that before we get to the interview that I would

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>answer all the shutdown related q and as in this

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>part of the podcast, we'll have our individual will it

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>then I'll do my top five list this week. It's

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>where I the top five Senate seats most likely to flip.

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>It's let's just say the top five has changed. Just

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>like in college football, what the top five was at

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of October is a lot different than what

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the top five is at the beginning of November. So

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>goes my list of top five most likely most vulnerable

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Senate seats in twenty twenty six. But before we get

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to all that, and I'll do some q and as

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>on other topics that were not shut down related. So

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll begin with this. This comes from Tim, and he asks,

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't I understand why the Democrats are being blamed

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>for the shutdown. If the Speaker will not convene the House,

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>how can the Dems vote against it? Also, if the

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Republicans control the House, why can't they just.

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Vote to pass it.

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I think too many times that reporter. Too many times

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>reporters assume that people know the cause of the most

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>basic facts about an issue, or maybe this was reported

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the shutdown, so they don't need

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to reiterate those facts. I think it has helpful to

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>remind people periodically of those basic facts. Thanks Tim, Tim,

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right. This is a pet peeve of mine.

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I talk about this to new journalists or those folks

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in journalism school where I remind people because I learned

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this from interacting with viewers during my time at Meet

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the Press. Is how often a viewer, particularly a first

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>generation American, would come up to me and say that

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they watch Meet the Press to sort of understand how

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the American government works. And every time I would get

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a response like that, it would remind me that, hey,

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we're in the education business first. That's first and foremost

0:13:55.720 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>what a journalist is. They're educating the public. We shouldn't

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>forget that. And you know, I had a viewer one time,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it was somebody on social media one time

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>respond you know, somebody was lamenting the fact that people

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that there were nine members of the Supreme Court,

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>or how all that worked? Somebody said how often do

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you put it in your stories? And I thought, you know,

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that person's right. We sometimes don't reiterate basic facts about

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>government because we go through this well, people already know that,

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>or the people that are paying attention to this story

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>are already going to know those things. And you're like, well,

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>what about the Joe Demaje. You know, there was a

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>great saying by Joe Demaggio. He used to say he

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>played hard every game because he thought that there might

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>be somebody in the stands who was coming to see

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>him for the very first time. And guess what, there's

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody reading your story. There's somebody listening to my podcast,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>there's somebody you know, reading your commentary.

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 2>For the very first time.

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>And if they don't understand it, they're not going to

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to read you again, right, or they may not be

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>as they may not follow the topic you're trying to

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>get them to follow because you didn't help them understand

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>how it works. So I look, I believe in this,

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I look at my college football writers. They

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time explaining how the college.

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Football playoff works.

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So college football fans all know how the college football

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>playoff works. But it's not because they went out to

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>look forward. It's because the new stories and the news

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>commentators and ESPN in particular constantly wants to remind people

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>how it works. Now they have an incentive, they're trying

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to make a bigger deal out of it. Well, we

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>ought to take that same premise there. So you're asking

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>why did the Democrats get Why should the Democrats get

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>blames to their shutdown? Well, it was technically Democrats that

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>withheld just enough votes where the Continuing Resolution to keep

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the government open couldn't pass the Senate. Now, in the House,

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Mike Johnson got a party line vote and he passed

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the continuing Resolution and in the House, so what they

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>did is he passed that bill and then they want

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to This is a case where the House wanted to

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>jam the Senate and they didn't want to. And his

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>thesis was, I'm not even going to come. I'm not

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>going to convene the House until the Senate deals with

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the bill that we gave them. And we gave them

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a bill to keep the government open. It's up to

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>them to get that bill passed. So this is the

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>whole the House passed its version. So no, you're right,

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the House didn't didn't convene while the government was shut down.

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But what Johnson's thesis was they didn't need to because

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>there was no legislation. Now, why else did he keep

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>him out, Well, because he didn't want his members, you know,

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>board showing up on cable TV saying things that would

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>cause them political pain.

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Et cetera, et cetera.

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>But it was also a tactic, and this is something

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that happens. You know, there's there's always a joke in

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Congress that you know that the real divide in Congress

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is not Democrats versus Republicans, it's the House versus the Senate.

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, the House was essentially jamming the

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Senate and jamming John Thune. So it was up to

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>John Thune, who had fifty three Republican senators, actually fifty two,

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>because Rand Paul indicated he was going to vote against

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this deal, he had to go find eight Democrats. So

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, this is why in theory, because it

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>needed sixty votes when Democrats withheld their votes, unless the

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are willing to get rid of the filibuster, which

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>was something Donald Trump talked about then the only way

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the government could get reopened is if eight Democrats joined

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty two Republicans to reopen the government. So I think

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what you're right about is every time that the story

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>was reported that would not be explained at the top.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a bad habit professional journalists, particularly

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Washington journalists, have come. I always say that a lot

0:17:54.920 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of times Washington reports for Washington or producers produced segments

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>for producers, they don't think about sort of are we

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>educating somebody who's tuning in for the very first time?

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, in that sense, I think that's something

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that we all need to do better on. In this way,

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I love the podcast format where I can feel like

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I don't have some sort of time constraint

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>where I have to take a shortcut on something because

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the main thing I need to convey needs a certain

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>amount of time to explain, and I don't want to

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>take away from that by having to explain the basics

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and yet not explaining the basics all the time is

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>what makes politics inaccessible to people. And I've always said

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>my real goal, and I've had this goal ever since

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I entered journalism is, and political journalism is. I love politics,

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and my job is to explain it in such a

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>way that it's more accessible to people. You know, there

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>there was another person who used to go out of

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>his way to talk about the Gang of five hundred

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and maybe politics inaccessible and would claim that politics was

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>an exclusive club and only those in the know understood it. Yeah,

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>there's people that want politics to be that way, so

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that way they are not subject to what the actual

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>democracy wants, small d democracy wants, and so in that sense,

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm a populous when it comes to information, and I

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>think we need to make politics more accessible, more understandable,

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>so more people understand how much it's impacting their lives.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope that helped you as to understand why in

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>this case democrats had skin in the gament.

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 2>There's a reason.

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Results matter more than promises, just like there's a reason.

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan is America's largest injury law firm. For

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty five years, they've recovered twenty five billion

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars for more than half a million clients. It includes

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>cases where insurance companies offered next to nothing, just hoping

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to get away with paying as little as possible. And

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact, in Pennsylvania,

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>one client was awarded twenty six million dollars, which was

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a staggering forty times the amount that the insurance company

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>originally offered. That original offer six hundred and fifty thousand

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars twenty six million, six hundred and fifty thousand dollars.

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So with more than one thousand lawyers across the country,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they know how to deliver for everyday people. If you're injured,

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you need a lawyer, You need somebody to get your back.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Check out for the People dot com, Slash podcast or

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Dow Pound Law Pound five to two nine law on your

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>cell phone. And remember all law firms are not the same.

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>So check out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>unless they win. All right, next question comes from Brian

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in New England. Right, So, I can't help but notice

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 1>all of the liberal political commentators seem to think they

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>have lost the shutdown fight. Likewise, all of the conservative

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>political commentators believe they somehow won the shutdown fight, assuming

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>no last minute silliness by Senator Ran Paul. Yet all

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of the more moderate political commentator seemed to paint a

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>vast different picture as to who won and lost, and

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>most seem to think Democrats got most out of the shutdown.

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So this brings up a good question, how do you

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>win a shutdown fight? How do you know who won

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown fight? Can you even win a shutdown fight?

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Or is it really just a lose lose lose for

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved? Or at the end of the day, is

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>who won or lost?

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 2>A shutdown?

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>All just vibes and fuzzy feelings anyway? To me, it

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of feels like the old whose line is at

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>any way?

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 2>TV? Show?

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Everything is made up and the points don't seem to matter. Well,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>look this is you know, if you really want to

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>wind me up. The entire shutdown process is a manufactured

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>political circus. The idea that the most important government on

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the face of the earth.

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Has a.

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Has a bug in it that allows for parts of

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>the government to just simply shut down when there is

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>a political dispute over funding levels is got to be

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the dumber things anybody does. The idea that

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just think that the legal interpretations and

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I went through this for those of you that wanted

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to go off, you know, I am, but let me

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.199
<v Speaker 1>just tell you, I am furious that there is not

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a single effing member of Congress in the center of

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the House that is rallying around the idea that we

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>need to prevent shutdowns from ever happening again. It is

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>absurd that we are hiring people to be air traffic

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>controllers and part of the process is, hey, you know,

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>every couple of years there's going to be a political

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>fight and you're not going to get paid for about

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a month or two. Are you okay with that? What

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of circus are we running here? I mean, that's

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>just you know, deciding to run to intentionally create a

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>shit show government. It's stupid, it's unnecessary, and it shouldn't be.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>It's dumb, it's it's and it all. The only people

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that benefit from a shutdown are elected officials who are

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:00.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to make a name for themselves. You asked who

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>wins in a shutdown? Individuals win, No party wins. Nobody

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>likes the result of the shutdown at the end of

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the day, everybody collectively hates the process of it, right,

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But the winners are individuals. You know, Ted Cruz, you know,

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So take the twenty thirteen shutdown. Republicans quote unquote are

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>seen as having lost that shutdown, right, because politically they did.

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>If it wasn't for the shutdown, Republicans would have won

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a governor seat in Virginia that year, and instead Democrats

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>won the governor seat. So you could look at just

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of the tactics and say up, Republicans lost and

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz was unpayable. Yet Ted Cruz built a political following.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz was trying to run for president in twenty

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and build a national following. So it worked for

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz. And that's who the shutdowns are for. They're

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>for partisan actors, pure and simple, to try to make

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a name for themselves. That's so the only people that

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>have ever come outquote unquote ahead. Right, it becomes about

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>who can raise the most money off of the silliness

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>of the shutdown. And I'm sorry, I just think the

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 1>idea that it's a practice that is somehow allowed and

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the only the only reason to have it is to

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to bring more attention to a

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>funding dispute. Guess what, perhaps we shouldn't put three hundred

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million people in the crosshairs of a of

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a political disagreement over funding levels. That seems like a

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>waste of a superpower's time. It actually makes us more

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable as a nation on national security. It is certainly

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>a huge sign of weakness. And again there's you know,

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>so a responsible democracy and a responsible government wouldn't put

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>put us in a situation where we can just easily

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of people decide that the government is

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>just going to close its doors. And then, of course

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we've exempted so many aspects of the shutdown that if

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the initial idea of the shutdown was to you know,

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be so painful that everybody wouldn't

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>want it to be be for more than a day

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 1>or two. But when you take away you know, when

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you decide, well, social security isn't going to be a

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>part of it, and we'll exempt military pay, and we'll

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>exempt this, and we'll exempt that, then it becomes easier

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to do the political theater. So I have to say, I,

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>as a as a voter who would like to have

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>less dysfunction in our politics, am sorry that there's not

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a single elected member of Congress Democratic Republican currently advocating

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a no shutdowns bill. They've existed in the past. Where

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are they now where are they today? Instead, everybody wants

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to perform for the frickin' basis of each party because

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>of how stupidly we've gerrymandered everything and our partisan primaries,

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>all of those things, right, we have all of our

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>incentive struck or for politicians to only pay attention to

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the base. And it's just so the people that hate

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>this shutdown stuff the most are the ones that aren't

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>partisan activists. And it doesn't seem like there's a single

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 1>person in the in Congress that represents the constituency that

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't want the goddamn toilet clogged purposely, and instead

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this is what we have. So I don't know if

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I answer your question right, I don't think anybody won

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown fight. And if you're wondering to me, you know,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it is one of those where the only time anybody

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>gains from it is if they're trying to if it's

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody individually trying to build their own following for some

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of national political purpose, you know. And the best

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>example of that Ted Cruise twenty thirteen. He shut down

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I was seen as a loser, but actually gave Ted

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Cruise a constituency, all right, next question comes from Kenny

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.439
<v Speaker 1>from Long Islanding Rights. My question for you about the

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>deal that seems to have been struck. It seemed to

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>me that the Democrats traded their leverage for a campaign

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Republicans will not have to take the tough vote,

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but will inevitably vote down the Obamacare subsidies. And that's

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. Snap resumes, payments resumed, no one gets fired.

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>But all that is the standard course of events for

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of a shutdown. The only thing Senator Schumer

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>seems to have extracted here is a tough vote. Am

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I reading this correctly? If so, why on earth would

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>he have fought this hard and held out this long

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>only to give up and walk away with nothing to

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>show for it. Lastly, I agree and disagree with your

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>assessment about President Trump entering this lame duck era. I

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>agree that's the biggest takeaway for the shutdown resolution. To me, though,

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not because of the defiance. It's because they negotiated

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a solution without them in the Senate. At least, the

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>President disengaged and made it easy for this to play out,

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately Senator thoonstruck the deal. I love the new

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>format and I feel as though I'm learning so much

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>more about the inside game when it comes to politics.

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for the scoop, all right, Kenny. I appreciate

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the construction constructive critique there on that front. It's interesting.

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess I could word it, you know, and again

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I would word it differently. I don't think there's a

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>cave here. I think there is. I think Warnock said it.

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>He said, if you're going to say that the Democratic

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Party seems to care about those on snap benefits more

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>than the Republican Party cares about then I think he said,

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>guilty is charged, right, that that's not a And I

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>think if you're you know, again, a better leader and

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a better communicator would not have would not have signaled

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:33.479
<v Speaker 1>that this is over, would signal it.

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 2>You know what.

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we've we've gotten more people aware of this

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>healthcare issue. We're sorry that the president wants to irresponsibly

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>punish people that have nothing and weaponize the FAA and

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>all of this, and so we're not going to let

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>him do that. So we're going to take a pause

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in this over the next two months. We're going to

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>make sure people can travel for the holidays and come January,

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>there's another vote to reopen the government and there's Obamacare subsidies. Okay,

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think they gave away any leverage. I

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>think they still have leverage in January to essentially shut

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>down government again if they want to, if these Obamacare

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>subsidies don't get passed for a year. I think I

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>think that there's going to be a majority of the

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>US House that votes for these Obamacare subsidies. Not a

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>majority of Republicans, but a majority of the House. I

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>think you will see somewhere between thirty and forty Republicans

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>who do this. I think you will see ten to

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen Senate Republicans wanting to be for this. So I

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to happen. I think the results of

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, I think the biggest impact on the

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>healthcare subsidies was the twenty five election results. The fact

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that it was a romp, the fact that cost the

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>living issues and Democrats didn't even have the healthcare issue

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>yet and it was working for them. We already know

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>how well healthcare works as an opposition issue when you're

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>messing with it. We just saw it in twenty eighteen.

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>That benefited the Democrats and back in twenty ten when

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it benefited the Republicans. Anytime you mess with the status

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>quo of healthcare, the party messing with the status quo

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>gets punished, and in this case that's going to be

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>now the Republicans. And so I guess I don't accept

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the premise that they got rid of.

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Any of their leverage.

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is why I could argue, this

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is why Schumer should go, because he's a terrible communicator

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and he couldn't communicate.

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 2>That they won.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>They won if you want him, you know, and he's

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>trying now. But he just doesn't have credibility with anybody anymore.

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like, like I said, I keep comparing Schumer to

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Pete Carroll and Bill Belichick. They used to have credibility

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>with the players they coached. Now they don't anymore.

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 2>That happens.

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It happens in every walk of life. It happens to

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>political leaders all the time. Time there's a moment when they

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have uber leverage over the entire party, and there's moments

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>where nobody will listen to them.

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 2>George W.

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Bush had so much influence over his party for a

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>period of time until he had no influence over his

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>party for a period of time. Right, it is political

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>capital is elusive. When you have it, you better spend

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it because if you try to save it, it'll disappear.

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So I guess I'm not I think they could have

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>communicated this in such a way where they could have

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>been seen as the adult in the room and not

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>giving up their fight on healthcare, because technically they've given

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>themselves opportunities before the State of the Union in February

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to make this a showdown vote one more time. All right,

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>last question comes from David Crowder, and then we'll get

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to the interview with Joe Willett. I like your work

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in thoughtfulness. Thank you saw your podcast at sam First

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Info and Jay Jones came out in mid October. Virginia

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>begins early voting mid September. You get my point. Second,

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown argument pre pandemic. Some twelve millions participated in

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the bill. Their subsidies remain with premium increases. It's not

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. The big deal is the twelve million

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>who enrolled post pandemic who did not qualify financially for

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic for subsidies they lose the subsidies. Is that

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>disconnect worth shutting down the government.

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Seems like some form of a subsidy could be agreed upon. Finally,

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the tax breaks that were scheduled to expire were extended.

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>The differences the subsidies weren't scheduled to expire. It's all crap, David.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>You've summarized the poor legislative process quite well, right. You

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>know the fact that we have such a dysfunctional way

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that we make laws now, and we have such distrust

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of the two parties that they there's always a weird

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>poison pills in different ways.

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>The subsidies, they can't you know. Did Democrats want those

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>subsidies in perpetuity?

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 2>They did?

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Could they not get enough votes to get them without

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>putting some sort of time stamp on it. They couldn't

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>dinal with the tax cut, right, they couldn't. Trump couldn't

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>get it permanent, so instead he had an expiration date

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on it, hoping that the expiration would serve as a

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>fear of a tax hike and then that somehow would

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>get people to renew them. The Bush tax cuts work

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>this way, right, these ten year increments. We do this

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of funny business accounting when it comes to the

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>impact on the deficit with these funny numbers with the

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Congressional Budget Office and these estimates that are all that

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>are all just sort of make assumptions that nobody can

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>assume when it comes to the actual state of the economy.

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>But we make these deficit projections in such a way

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that it encourages these sort of false expiration dates. Right,

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>some will have them, some will don't. They're usually time

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to make it politically difficult to somehow not extend the deadline,

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's on a on a tax rate, or whether

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>it's on a subsidy or whatever it is. So you know,

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 1>this goes to the this is what you get when

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you when you don't have a functioning committee process in Congress.

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And not to get really dorky here, but essentially when

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we totally polarized the US Houses, which which really began

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of late eighties, early nineties, right, and you know,

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 1>there's those on the right blame Jim Right and the Democrats,

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>those on the left blame Newt Gingridge and the Republicans.

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I think sort of there was there was

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly power plays that Jim Right made that new Gingridge

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>then emulated and took to took to an took even

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>further that ultimately destroyed the committee process and the destruction

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of the congressional committee process both in the House and

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. Is why we get such poorly written legislation

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>which used, so I think eloquently pointed out with the

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>way you worded your question, the fact that the question

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>was a bit confusing. I don't put on you, I

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>put on Congress because this is how they legislate now,

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>with these sort of weird expiration dates. It's all designed

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to create sort of political poison, almost almost like these

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of delayed bombs that suddenly explode and you have

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 1>no choice but to continue a policy that maybe you

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 1>were never in favor of. You know, Obama didn't want to.

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Obama ran on getting rid of the Bush tax cuts.

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Turns out he couldn't get rid of them because of

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>what kind of impact it would have had on a

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>number of people seeing their tax bills go up, and

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>he didn't want to politically put himself in that situation.

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>He had made a pledge not to raise taxes on

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>anybody over I think it was four hundred thousand dollars.

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>So the new line that they drew on that. So ultimately,

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, someday we're going to have a Speaker of

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the House and a Senate Majority leader that actually wants

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to make the legislative branch great again. But until that

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>time comes, we're going to continue to have this poor,

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>horribly dysfunctional legislative process that we've now seen that for

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>many of you feels like the normal way Congress works,

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 1>because trust me, this was not the intent. How Congress

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>has worked the last thirty years is not the way

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that Congress was intended to work in the previous two

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty years. All right, So with that, there's

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>all the shutdown, Q and a's that I got. We're

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 1>going to take a pause when we come back, meet

0:36:56.520 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a candidate for Kentucky Senate, basically somebody who I think

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>was a political independent who chose to pick a side.

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Here's motivation, how he did it. I'm always intrigued by

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 1>first time candidates because I think they come they literally

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>come at things with a fresh set of eyes, and

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's always important to hear what a fresh

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 1>set of eyes has to say about the current political system.

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 2>So with that, we'll take a break.

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>See on the other side. This episode of the Chuck

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Podcast is brought to you by Wildgrain. Wild Grain is

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the first Bake from Frozen subscription box for arteasonal breads,

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:40.359
<v Speaker 1>seasonal pastries, and fresh pastas, plus all items conveniently bake

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty five minutes or less. Unlike many store bought options,

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Wild Grain uses simple ingredients you can pronounce and a

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>slow fermentation process that can be easier on your belly

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and richer in nutrients and antioxidants. Wildgrain's boxes are fully customizable.

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>They're constantly adding seasonal and limited timing products for you

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy. In addition to their classic box, they now

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>feature a gluten free box and a plant based box.

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I checked out the gluten free box, and let me

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you they have a gluten.

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Free sourdough bread. It is.

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>We got two loads of it and we've done one

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>loaf already. It's a cranberry and almond sourdough bread. It's

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>like the best raisin bread you've ever had, except it's

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>not raisin. It's great. You're gonna love this. You know,

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 1>it's hit or miss if you mess around in the

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:28.240
<v Speaker 1>gluten free bread world.

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 2>This is a hit.

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, I was impressed, so look for a limited time,

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>wild grain is offering our listeners thirty dollars off your

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>first box plus free croissants in every box. When you

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 1>go to wildgrain dot com slash podcast to start your subscription,

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>follow these instructions. Free croissants in every box, thirty dollars

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>off your first box when you go to wildgrain dot

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>com slash toodcast that's wildgrain dot com slash toodcast, or

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>simply use the promo code toodcast at check out. Always

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>use the code, get the discount. I'm telling you it's excellent, excellent, right.

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, joining me now is a.

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could argue a new politician to the scene.

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>His name's Joel Willett. He's running for the US Senate

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in Kentucky.

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 2>He got on my radar.

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of out of nowhere. Where Telsea Gabbert took

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>away a whole bunch of people's national security clearances, even

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.879
<v Speaker 1>folks who were had served in the intelligence community were

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in the private sector but still had some, you know,

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>some clearances because that is a normal thing we've done

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in our government for decades.

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And there appeared to be some sort of connection. The

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>minute mister Willett agreed to think about running for office,

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly it seemed as if the government decided to give

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>him another headline in some ways. I think they may

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>have even given him an assistance with getting more attention

0:39:56.040 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>in some ways for his candidacy. But he's all so,

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we want to highlight interesting first time candidates

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>who are not coming from sort of a typical place,

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>hard left, hard right, things like that, and Joe Willett

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>got on my radar and he agreed to sit down.

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Mister Willett, nice to meet you. Yeah, thank you, Chuck.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:18.319
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with how you got into service. Look,

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 1>we're taping just before Veterans Day. You're a veteran. I'm

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a huge advocate. That feels as if that the people

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 1>best equipped to what I call to I'm looking for

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>more pastors for patriotism in this country that I think

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the military community and the intelligence community, where you have

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to be Team America before your Team Red or Team

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Blue is probably as good of a place to find

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 1>these pastors for patriotism as you can find. But tell

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 1>me how you got what got you into service?

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I love that term. Atn't heard it before, so

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably going to steal. Well, I'm using it over

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 2>and over.

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm obviously a little proud of it, so I'm going

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to use it, probably too much.

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 2>But you know, well, my grandmother took me to church

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 2>every weekend growing up and was heavily involved with my

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 2>church for a long time, so it resonates. So yeah,

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 2>thank you for the opportunity to tell my story. I

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:15.240
<v Speaker 2>am Joel Willett running for the US and in Kentucky.

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Your listeners can catch all the parts of the story

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 2>at joelfer Kentucky dot com if I missed something here.

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 2>But I grew up in Louisville, Kentucky, and my path

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:27.760
<v Speaker 2>to service was perhaps common in some ways and uncommon

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 2>in others. My dad was a Union iron worker. He

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 2>was a Golden Gloves boxer. My mom worked in hospitals

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 2>taking care of people. But we had some Kentucky struggles

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 2>growing up. The lights didn't always come on when I

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 2>got home from school. I learned, you know, early in

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 2>my adolescence that both of my parents were struggling with

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 2>addictions to opioids, and I would eventually lose my father

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to a fenteral overdose in twenty nineteen. It wasn't just

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 2>my family, it was you know, tens of thousands of

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Kentucky families over the past couple of decades. But I

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 2>was one of the lucky ones because I had incredible

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 2>grandparents on both sides of my family. I had my

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 2>grandmother's church, but I also had the institutions of this

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 2>country public education, our military, our civil service, some of

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 2>these things that I believed to be some of the

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 2>greatest tools for achievement and economic mobility in the world.

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 2>And when the attacks of nine to eleven happened, I

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 2>was a senior in high school and a few months

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 2>after that, after months of begging my mom to sign

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 2>the paperwork, she relented and did and I joined the

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 2>Army National Guard when I was seventeen years old, and

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I served in the Military Police Corps. I was able

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 2>to graduate from the University of Louisville and from the

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 2>University of Kentucky, and that launched a career. Once I

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 2>left the Army in the intelligence community, I spent some

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:42.320
<v Speaker 2>time with the FBI working on canterterrorism and then was

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 2>recruited into the Central Intelligence Agency into the Director to Operations,

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:49.760
<v Speaker 2>where I represented this country here at home and abroad

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 2>in the Balkans, Baltic, Southeast Asia, Western European capitals. I

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 2>speak Russian. Do without what you will, and you know,

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 2>finished my last year in government in the White House

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Situation Room as a nonpartisan civil servant, there to provide

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 2>intelligence and crisis management support to the president who was

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 2>then President Obama and Vice President Biden. There to serve

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the presidency, not the president, and the true spirit of

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 2>our civil service. I left government twenty fifteen in part

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 2>to be able to take care of a lot of

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:22.800
<v Speaker 2>my family that remained in Kentucky. Went into the private

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 2>sector have since been running businesses that have put hundreds

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 2>of people to work every day. So, Chuck, I truly

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 2>got to live my American dream and have been living

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:35.839
<v Speaker 2>that life as a private citizen for for some time now,

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's been increasingly hard to set on the sidelines

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 2>and watch working families across this country, working families like

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 2>the one that I grew up in, getting steamrolled by

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 2>a political and economic system that I think continues to

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 2>treat them as acceptable losses. So, as you said, I

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:53.359
<v Speaker 2>started exploring a run for the Senate. This administration found

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 2>out about it, and as it is wont to do.

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:59.399
<v Speaker 2>Began trying to act revenge on people, no matter how

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 2>long they'd or no matter what they had served, but

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 2>because they had said mean things about Donald Trump, and

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:08.759
<v Speaker 2>we're thinking about standing up against some of what we're

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 2>saying today, and they revoked a security clearance, and you know,

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:15.280
<v Speaker 2>came after me the way they've come after so many others.

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:19.959
<v Speaker 2>What made your democrat? Why'd you pick a party? Yeah?

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>When did you pick a party? Do you remember when

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you've said, you know what I think? I am a

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrat and this is why I'm doing it. What give

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 1>me your reasoning for?

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? It was a it was a long, maybe a

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 2>short evolution out of being a conservative, which is, you know,

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:39.879
<v Speaker 2>I would freely admit to holding some conservative views as

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:42.760
<v Speaker 2>a as an interested teenager or even in high school.

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 2>But my journey away from that came, perhaps shockingly to

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 2>some people, through military service. The military exposed me to

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 2>people from all walks of life, nationalities, sexual orientations, all

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 2>of that, and I began seeing, you know, what I

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 2>have since come to believe is, you know, this source

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 2>of strength in our military and in our country, which

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 2>is the diversity that we have. But it was also

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 2>seeing the lies of the Iraq War. I, you know,

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I could see something very different than what the George W.

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Bush administration was saying publicly, you know, about this status

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 2>or the state of our military, our readiness to fight

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 2>such a war. And then you know, we we we

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 2>later come to learn that much of the rationale for

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 2>going to war in Iraq was a house of cards,

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 2>and I continue to see that, you know, some twenty

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 2>years later, as one of the most disastrous foreign policy

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 2>decisions we've made, certainly in my lifetime. So that began,

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, a period of reassessment for me away from

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 2>you know, what was the Republican Party or conservative viewpoints.

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 2>And I would say that the journey into being you know,

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 2>a Democrat is something that happened much later. I you know,

0:45:57.960 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure somebody will fact check me on this, but

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 2>if my memory serves me, the first time I registered

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 2>as a Democrat to vote was in twenty sixteen, and

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 2>it was in response to what I saw as the

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 2>clear and present danger of Donald Trump. And I have

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 2>been proudly a Democrat since that time because that is

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:18.400
<v Speaker 2>the party that I see standing up for a strong America,

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 2>for an America that works for everybody and not just

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 2>the wealthiest.

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:25.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, hearing your story, talking about your personal story,

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:28.320
<v Speaker 1>your parents struggles with opoioid's, the tragedy of your father,

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the strength of your grandparents, I'm sure I'm not the

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:35.360
<v Speaker 1>only person who they start to think. I wonder what

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he thought of Hillbill the book Hillbilly Elegy by a

0:46:39.239 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 1>gentleman by the name of jd Vance. Some people may

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 1>recognize him as the current Vice President, and some people

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 1>may wonder if the same person wrote that book. And

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll set that aside. I'm curious what you made of

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that book and how much of what jd Vance shared

0:46:57.800 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>in that book resonated with you.

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I first became aware of that book in twenty

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 2>nineteen when I lost my father, and then, you know,

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:09.439
<v Speaker 2>an attempt to process my own emotions around that, because Chuck,

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 2>it was, you know, one of the most debilitating things

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:13.799
<v Speaker 2>that had ever happened to me, because no matter how

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 2>long I had expected that phone call, nothing really prepares

0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 2>you for it. And I would say, my life for

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 2>six years has been a project and trying to understand

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:24.919
<v Speaker 2>how this country could you know, create my life, which

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I see as a truly uniquely American life, coming from

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Valley Station, Kentucky to the halls of the West Wing

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:35.800
<v Speaker 2>in twelve years to leadership and business. If my life

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 2>is uniquely American, so too was my father's death. Because

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 2>people do not die from fentonyl overdoses in a statistically

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 2>significant way in other parts of the world, yet it's

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:45.319
<v Speaker 2>the leading cause of death, I believe, in the United

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 2>States for people ages eighteen to forty four. So I

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 2>became aware of hillbili elogy during that time. And I

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 2>would say there are a lot of similarities between my

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 2>story in JD. Vance's. My heart aches for you know,

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the life that he described, you know, living growing up,

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 2>and so much of it resonates with me. And I

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 2>understand that, you know, he similarly felt a need to

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 2>serve his country. And you know, I will have to

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:14.920
<v Speaker 2>transition now to say that there are major differences between

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:17.480
<v Speaker 2>my story and JD. Vance's, and that being that I

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't turn into a giant asshole at the end of it.

0:48:23.040 --> 0:48:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Boy, I didn't see that landing. I didn't see the

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:29.520
<v Speaker 1>plate landing that abruptly. That was quite we may have crashed.

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 2>It a little bit.

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say I had one of

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>those landings yesterday actually, while flying back from Miami, where

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it was the first I think a runway that he

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't used to using it.

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:39.840
<v Speaker 2>It was like boa, like we all hit the ground

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:42.320
<v Speaker 2>and road. Whoa. That was an early morning flight, so

0:48:42.320 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 2>it woke me up. No.

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, it is very hard to square jd Vance,

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the author jd Vance, the conservative pundit of twenty sixteen,

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 1>right right with the person that ended up in the

0:49:00.400 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 1>United States Senate, you know, sort of making a what

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 1>appears to be a political deal, right, And look, that's yeah.

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I've always slightly hesitant on motive, in assuming motive, because

0:49:12.560 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 1>none of us can crawl inside anybody's head right on motive.

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>But he just looks from the outside. O. This stuff

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't doesn't compute. But what does compute, frankly, is the

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:27.399
<v Speaker 1>fact that these so many of these stories exist and

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 1>why politicians have had a hard time figuring out how

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to use government to fix this.

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about that.

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I would assume for you, if you get elected

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that a priority is going to be Okay, how do

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:44.839
<v Speaker 1>we deal with it? I mean, take the issue of fentyl.

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>You got a president who's manufacturing, is using the fentyl crisis,

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:53.359
<v Speaker 1>which is real, and ascribing it to the Venezuelans, which

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to do with this, right, and getting us

0:49:56.200 --> 0:50:00.480
<v Speaker 1>potentially to screw up yet another Latin American country with

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 1>interventions that will only cost us cause this country problems

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for decades to come, and our distrust in that region

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 1>of the country. And it's like, how many times do

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we have to screw up our relationships with Latin America

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 1>with this? But what is you know, you've it sounds like,

0:50:20.680 --> 0:50:23.840
<v Speaker 1>for the last six years in particular, you've really wanted

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to understand both the struggles people have with ventanyl, how

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it gets into this country. What should we be doing

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>differently to stop ventanyl from getting into this country? And

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 1>is it possible? You know, are we trying to like

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:40.359
<v Speaker 1>stop the weather right?

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:50:40.680 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Is this impossible? And instead we've got to go about

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this another way.

0:50:47.440 --> 0:50:50.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we certainly have to go about it

0:50:50.880 --> 0:50:53.640
<v Speaker 2>in a different way than we've attacked this problem or

0:50:53.680 --> 0:50:56.440
<v Speaker 2>any other of the drug crises that we've had in

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 2>this country over the years. But you know, let me

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:02.959
<v Speaker 2>start with kind of the supply side of this, where

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 2>we you know, that's where Donald Trump's conversation around it

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 2>seems to end. And unfortunately for many Americans, he's not

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:15.320
<v Speaker 2>the only president that has stopped the conversation. There. We

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 2>talk about, you know, a drug war, and usually what

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 2>we mean there is attacking the supply and where the

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:24.360
<v Speaker 2>stuff is coming from. Yes, we have to secure our borders.

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes we have to go after and chase to the

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:30.319
<v Speaker 2>ends of the earth the supply of this stuff, whether

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 2>we find it in a factory in Beijing or whether

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 2>we find it being pushed from boardrooms in some of

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the largest companies and richest families in this country. And

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, we've had many, many Kentuckians lose a father

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:48.359
<v Speaker 2>or a brother because of unregulated capitalism and doctors who

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:52.319
<v Speaker 2>had very perverse incentives to continue pushing highly addictive opioids

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 2>and poison into our community. So I think we've we've

0:51:55.160 --> 0:51:58.240
<v Speaker 2>got to pursue the supply of this in many different directions.

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:03.280
<v Speaker 2>We've made some progress on that, but it's the demand

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:07.400
<v Speaker 2>side of it. Why are people turning to these drugs?

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Why do people want to use them? And I think

0:52:09.960 --> 0:52:12.560
<v Speaker 2>it is that that we need to that there is

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 2>so much more that this country could do. When I

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:18.520
<v Speaker 2>talk to, you know, friends in Europe about, you know,

0:52:18.680 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 2>what's going on with drugs and addiction here, and they're like,

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 2>wait a minute. Drug addicts, you know, they often not

0:52:26.280 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 2>because they're terrible people, but because they're literally out of

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:32.960
<v Speaker 2>their minds while using do some destructive things, whether they

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 2>steal or are a public nuisance or wrecked cars and

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:38.920
<v Speaker 2>all these things. These are stories that are just so

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 2>vividly remembered in my life and in my family's life,

0:52:43.120 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 2>and European friends are like, wait, you send those people

0:52:45.719 --> 0:52:48.719
<v Speaker 2>to jail. Why don't you send them to the hospital,

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:52.120
<v Speaker 2>because it sounds like that's probably what they need. In Kentucky,

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 2>we've had three years of declining overdose deaths from syntheticopioids.

0:52:57.160 --> 0:53:00.719
<v Speaker 2>We've got down to like fourteen hundred and ten this

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:03.320
<v Speaker 2>past year. A lot of that progress was made because

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 2>we invested heavily in this state and medicaid expansion, and

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:11.440
<v Speaker 2>it was access to medicaid that paid for treatment, that

0:53:11.520 --> 0:53:16.719
<v Speaker 2>helped people, paid for some NARCAN community awareness, and also

0:53:16.760 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 2>paid for treatment for addicts. And I do think that

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:23.720
<v Speaker 2>is just something we have to invest more in because

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:27.560
<v Speaker 2>we want people to have good lives and good opportunity

0:53:27.600 --> 0:53:32.360
<v Speaker 2>in this country. And you know, young men especially account

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:35.240
<v Speaker 2>for I think eighty percent of what we call deaths

0:53:35.280 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 2>of despair, which are deaths from overdoses of some form

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 2>or another or from suicide. And I think this can

0:53:42.600 --> 0:53:45.440
<v Speaker 2>all be tied back to people who see their prospects demming,

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 2>who see that no matter how hard they work, they're

0:53:48.040 --> 0:53:51.640
<v Speaker 2>not going to be able to get ahead. And that's

0:53:51.640 --> 0:53:54.399
<v Speaker 2>something that has to change. And I think that once

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 2>we have a sane economic policy in this country for

0:53:57.200 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the working class upon whose backs all of this prospects

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 2>already was built, only then we be able to truly

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 2>address these problems with addiction.

0:54:06.040 --> 0:54:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So when you think about the things that could have

0:54:09.960 --> 0:54:13.719
<v Speaker 1>helped your father, you know, what's what's an intervention that

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we're doing now? I mean, you know, I lost my

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:23.360
<v Speaker 1>father at sixteen. I'm sorry alcoholism and hepatitis C in

0:54:23.400 --> 0:54:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the late eighties when we didn't have a pill to

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:26.839
<v Speaker 1>take to sol hepatitis CE.

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 2>You just died.

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:31.719
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I've got it's always one of for me,

0:54:31.800 --> 0:54:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the what if is, oh, my goodness, if you just

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 1>lived ten years longer than there'd have been a cure

0:54:35.719 --> 0:54:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and he would have survived. When you think about the

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:42.400
<v Speaker 1>things that we're doing now, if they had been available

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 1>even ten years ago, do you think your father.

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Would still be alive? Well, I know that as a

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 2>civil servant, you know, living on an okay salary, but

0:54:52.080 --> 0:54:54.719
<v Speaker 2>in a very expensive city in Washington, d C. It

0:54:54.840 --> 0:54:58.840
<v Speaker 2>was very tough to get access to resources. And so

0:54:59.080 --> 0:55:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I always say, you know, we confronted my father and

0:55:02.080 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 2>checked him into you know, dollar Store Rehab and Elizabethtown, Kentucky.

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:09.239
<v Speaker 2>You know it was there were professionals there were doing

0:55:09.280 --> 0:55:11.040
<v Speaker 2>the best they can, but it wasn't the most well

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 2>resourced facility, and a lot of desperate people showed up there.

0:55:14.520 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 2>But even that bought us some valuable years with my dad.

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:20.839
<v Speaker 2>He was able to see his granddaughter, you know, grow up.

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:23.759
<v Speaker 2>In his best moments, you know, in my in my

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 2>recollection were always when he was a heavily involved father.

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:30.560
<v Speaker 2>And it was as my you know, my life and

0:55:30.600 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 2>his started going in very different directions when I was

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:35.560
<v Speaker 2>a teenager. And this is because you know, there was

0:55:35.600 --> 0:55:38.080
<v Speaker 2>a free fall that happens in this country. You know,

0:55:38.440 --> 0:55:41.279
<v Speaker 2>you you grow up, you have some roof over your

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 2>head or some access to basics, you get good public education.

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 2>You've got some opportunities if you make just even marginally

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 2>okay choices in this country. And my dad's path, you know,

0:55:51.680 --> 0:55:53.840
<v Speaker 2>wound through a union and I got him jobs that

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 2>were relatively you know, well paying when he could work.

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:57.839
<v Speaker 2>But you know, obviously there were mornings in the union

0:55:57.840 --> 0:56:01.160
<v Speaker 2>hall where he didn't have work and the earlier mid nineties,

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:03.839
<v Speaker 2>but it was it was you know, surgeries and things

0:56:03.840 --> 0:56:06.200
<v Speaker 2>like that that started to get these pain pills into

0:56:06.200 --> 0:56:09.399
<v Speaker 2>his system. And then as his economic prospects dimmed, those

0:56:09.520 --> 0:56:11.360
<v Speaker 2>that became a way to medicate away some of what

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:13.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure was existential pain for him. I was going

0:56:13.560 --> 0:56:15.200
<v Speaker 2>to provide for his family. I was going to provide

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:17.880
<v Speaker 2>for his kids, for son and his daughter, my sister.

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:21.359
<v Speaker 2>So to answer your question specifically, yeah, we are doing

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:24.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot more today. There's a lot more awareness about

0:56:24.080 --> 0:56:28.040
<v Speaker 2>it than there was before. This is an uncomfortable thing

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:30.520
<v Speaker 2>to talk about, is I'm sure it has been for you,

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:33.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, opening up and and it takes Look, you're

0:56:33.800 --> 0:56:34.719
<v Speaker 2>never going to get over it.

0:56:34.960 --> 0:56:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I want My wife and I both

0:56:37.400 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>lost parents at different times of our life, and we

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:43.040
<v Speaker 1>always say, you know, the thing, the thing that you

0:56:43.120 --> 0:56:45.560
<v Speaker 1>learn when you lose somebody like that. No matter when

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:48.759
<v Speaker 1>you lose it, it doesn't matter. It's always painful in it.

0:56:49.080 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You never get over it. You just sort of you

0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:54.080
<v Speaker 1>live with it, right, Right, That's what we did. You

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>just learn to live with it, and then you wonder,

0:56:55.960 --> 0:56:57.480
<v Speaker 1>what can how do you learn from it?

0:56:57.560 --> 0:56:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:56:57.800 --> 0:56:59.600
<v Speaker 1>How do you how do you try to try to

0:56:59.719 --> 0:57:03.840
<v Speaker 1>try to move on? You know, you brought up Medicaid.

0:57:04.080 --> 0:57:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean you feel your I take it your concern

0:57:06.239 --> 0:57:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that these Medicaid cuts are just going to make it

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that much harder. You know, do you feel like Kentucky

0:57:11.280 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 1>needs more facilities that do rehab or they have enough facilities,

0:57:16.280 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 1>they need more resources to staff those facilities.

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it's both, and I'll just zoom out to

0:57:23.000 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 2>healthcare large. We need more doctors, we need more health

0:57:27.600 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 2>care facilities. Uh. This administration passed an unconscionable four trillion

0:57:32.040 --> 0:57:35.240
<v Speaker 2>dollar tax cut to put money back in the pockets

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:37.920
<v Speaker 2>of the already ultra wealthy, like the ten billionaires that

0:57:37.960 --> 0:57:40.800
<v Speaker 2>serve in Donald Trump's cabinet. I'm fond of saying those

0:57:40.800 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 2>billionaires are not like the average Kentucky voter. They do

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:46.640
<v Speaker 2>not like the average Kentucky voter. And they paid for

0:57:46.720 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 2>all of this by taking money out of healthcare programs

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:53.360
<v Speaker 2>that as as our governor has been front and center

0:57:54.200 --> 0:57:56.880
<v Speaker 2>in the press sounding the alarm about this. These cuts

0:57:56.920 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 2>put thirty five rule hospitals pills in this state under

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:04.600
<v Speaker 2>threat of closure for people, you know, to lose access

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 2>to that healthcare. Even people who maintain health insurance through

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 2>their employers are going to have to drive farther, wait longer.

0:58:11.640 --> 0:58:14.240
<v Speaker 2>These communities are going to lose you know, one of

0:58:14.280 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 2>the largest employers in their communities. So yeah, we have

0:58:18.520 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 2>a shortage of health care access in the state of

0:58:21.840 --> 0:58:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Kentucky and in many parts around the country. And I

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 2>think Republicans in this administration have shown just play in

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:33.720
<v Speaker 2>simply in recent months that they do not care. So

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:36.360
<v Speaker 2>I do think that we need to increase the supply

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:38.440
<v Speaker 2>of health care. We need to invest in more of

0:58:38.440 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 2>what people actually need, and in Kentucky that does mean

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:47.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, more access to addiction treatment and overdose prevention.

0:58:48.080 --> 0:58:50.040
<v Speaker 2>But again, I think the root causes of all this

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 2>happened way earlier in life, and I would again tie

0:58:53.320 --> 0:58:59.120
<v Speaker 2>it to increasing inequality and dimming prospects for working.

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Families having good life insurance is incredibly important. I know

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:08.000
<v Speaker 1>from personal experience. I was sixteen when my father passed away.

0:59:08.040 --> 0:59:10.440
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the best shape. My mother single mother, now widow, myself

0:59:14.960 --> 0:59:16.720
<v Speaker 1>sixteen trying to figure out how am I going to

0:59:16.760 --> 0:59:19.919
<v Speaker 1>pay for college and lo and behold, my dad had

0:59:20.000 --> 0:59:23.160
<v Speaker 1>one life insurance policy that we found wasn't a lot,

0:59:23.520 --> 0:59:26.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was important at the time, and it's why

0:59:26.360 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I was able to go to college. Little did he

0:59:29.640 --> 0:59:32.440
<v Speaker 1>know how important that would be in that moment.

0:59:33.200 --> 0:59:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, guess what.

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:36.680
<v Speaker 1>That's why I am here to tell you about Etho's life.

0:59:37.120 --> 0:59:39.480
<v Speaker 1>They can provide you with peace of mind knowing your

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 1>family is protected even if the worst comes to pass.

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Ethos is an online platform that makes getting life insurance

0:59:46.440 --> 0:59:49.560
<v Speaker 1>fast and easy, all designed to protect your family's future

0:59:49.600 --> 0:59:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process, and it's

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:57.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam require you

0:59:57.520 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 1>just answer a few health questions online. You can get

0:59:59.920 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a quote in as little as ten minutes, and you

1:00:01.800 --> 1:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>can get same day coverage without ever leaving your home.

1:00:06.200 --> 1:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>You can get up to three million dollars in coverage

1:00:08.120 --> 1:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and some policies start as low as two dollars a

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>day that would be billed monthly. As of March twenty

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number one no

1:00:16.640 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect your family

1:00:21.560 --> 1:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free quotedt Ethos

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chuck. So again that's Ethos dot com

1:00:29.400 --> 1:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>slash chuck. Application times may vary and the rates themselves

1:00:33.840 --> 1:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>may vary as well, but trust me, life insurance is

1:00:36.800 --> 1:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>something you should really think about, especially if you've got

1:00:39.760 --> 1:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a growing family.

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:44.840
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk.

1:00:45.160 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting, I know that the next and

1:00:49.640 --> 1:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>perhaps you know, the fear of AI displacement for sort

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of middle class white collar workers is now you know,

1:00:58.040 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>there's like a whole new group of folks that are

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>learning what blue collar workers were worrying about during audit

1:01:04.680 --> 1:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the rise of the initial rise of automation and robotics

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>right plus the global the global trade system in the

1:01:11.960 --> 1:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>nineties and in the early odds, and that created this displacement.

1:01:18.600 --> 1:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Now we've got AI displacement's going to hit another chunk

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of workers. This attempt to bring manufacturing back. Frankly, doesn't

1:01:26.120 --> 1:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>involve many individuals, right, It is more of a robotics

1:01:30.240 --> 1:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and automated situation. So, you know, how do we You know,

1:01:35.440 --> 1:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we can't go backwards. We're not going to force companies

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to use humans if it's cheaper to do an automated thing, Right,

1:01:43.640 --> 1:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>That's just not how capitalism works. But what's what should

1:01:47.760 --> 1:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we you know, what what is what are the jobs

1:01:51.160 --> 1:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in the next twenty years that we ought to be

1:01:53.160 --> 1:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to get our communities prepared for, get our public

1:01:58.440 --> 1:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>education system geared towards you know, because I think about

1:02:02.960 --> 1:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>think about the last thirty years, and we thought all

1:02:05.040 --> 1:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of our kids needed to learn to code, right, And

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it turns out whatever coding you've learned, it doesn't matter anymore.

1:02:10.840 --> 1:02:11.680
<v Speaker 2>AI is going to do it.

1:02:12.440 --> 1:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And so I can tell you this as a parent.

1:02:15.520 --> 1:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You're petrified my kids. You know, my kid's going to

1:02:19.720 --> 1:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have a future and what does that look like? It

1:02:22.280 --> 1:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you have younger kids, both of mine are

1:02:24.360 --> 1:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in college. What do you think about is the jobs

1:02:28.920 --> 1:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of the future and how should government be thinking about it?

1:02:32.400 --> 1:02:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for the record, my son is sixteen and this

1:02:35.480 --> 1:02:37.880
<v Speaker 2>is obviously a very uh.

1:02:37.760 --> 1:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you're right. At the moment conversation. Yes, I have

1:02:41.880 --> 1:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a freshman. I have a senior in college and a

1:02:43.520 --> 1:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>freshman in college.

1:02:44.360 --> 1:02:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, yeah, good stuff. So look, we've always had

1:02:49.840 --> 1:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, America is the innovation engine of the world.

1:02:52.640 --> 1:02:56.720
<v Speaker 2>We have always innovated and with every wave of you know,

1:02:56.800 --> 1:03:00.000
<v Speaker 2>innovation from you know, the industrial age too, you know,

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the assembly line, to even modern management theory and efficiency

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:07.840
<v Speaker 2>in factories and in business, there's there's always been displacement

1:03:08.160 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 2>and we've always found, uh, you know, ways to innovate

1:03:12.320 --> 1:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>even around that, and people have always found, you know,

1:03:15.240 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 2>new ways to to to to labor and to work.

1:03:19.920 --> 1:03:23.120
<v Speaker 2>And I think there is some really, there are some

1:03:23.200 --> 1:03:25.320
<v Speaker 2>reasons to believe. And I'm someone who has spent a

1:03:25.360 --> 1:03:27.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of time, you know, running a technology company. Over

1:03:27.960 --> 1:03:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the past couple of years, I've had the chance to uh,

1:03:30.200 --> 1:03:33.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, I when I lost my security clearance, some

1:03:33.760 --> 1:03:37.960
<v Speaker 2>of the you know, the most strident and well known

1:03:38.040 --> 1:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>right wing trolls on Twitter told me that I should

1:03:41.400 --> 1:03:43.960
<v Speaker 2>learn to code. I'm like, yeah, thanks, I did that

1:03:44.000 --> 1:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>six years ago. You know already did that. So I

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 2>say that only to say that I've you know, spent

1:03:50.800 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time uh playing around experimenting with and

1:03:55.520 --> 1:03:58.800
<v Speaker 2>understanding AI tools and you know their implications in the workplace.

1:03:58.880 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I I am less bullish about the immediate, you know,

1:04:04.320 --> 1:04:06.760
<v Speaker 2>wide scale impacts of this because there are a lot

1:04:06.760 --> 1:04:09.320
<v Speaker 2>of implementation issues. There are a lot of data quality issues,

1:04:09.360 --> 1:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>hallucination issues, and all these sorts of things that I

1:04:12.200 --> 1:04:14.439
<v Speaker 2>think even companies who have made a decision to lay

1:04:14.440 --> 1:04:16.520
<v Speaker 2>off and displaced workers thinking they're going to be replaced

1:04:16.520 --> 1:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>with AI, are going to see and relatively short order

1:04:20.040 --> 1:04:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that that it is not the panacea that they might

1:04:22.080 --> 1:04:25.240
<v Speaker 2>think it is. Even still, I do accept the premise

1:04:25.280 --> 1:04:27.800
<v Speaker 2>that we are going to have some massive changes in

1:04:27.800 --> 1:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the economy, uh and in the jobs that are available

1:04:30.480 --> 1:04:32.720
<v Speaker 2>to people. And I think that there are there are

1:04:32.880 --> 1:04:35.040
<v Speaker 2>two things we need to wrestle with. Is one like, Okay,

1:04:35.040 --> 1:04:40.040
<v Speaker 2>if a business finds a more efficient way to do something, well, great,

1:04:40.080 --> 1:04:42.360
<v Speaker 2>they're going to have more profits. But now we're going

1:04:42.400 --> 1:04:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to have more people on snap benefits. Now we're going

1:04:44.760 --> 1:04:47.680
<v Speaker 2>to have more people, you know, needing Medicaid because they

1:04:47.680 --> 1:04:49.960
<v Speaker 2>don't have healthcare. Because you know, all this activity in

1:04:49.960 --> 1:04:52.720
<v Speaker 2>the economy has to come from somewhere. It has to come,

1:04:52.840 --> 1:04:55.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, from from consumers. Buying things. And what I'm

1:04:55.360 --> 1:04:58.840
<v Speaker 2>increasingly worried about is just that that the broad consumer

1:04:58.920 --> 1:05:01.400
<v Speaker 2>base in this economy is just going to be completely

1:05:01.480 --> 1:05:04.000
<v Speaker 2>left behind because the wealthy have enough at the top

1:05:04.040 --> 1:05:07.520
<v Speaker 2>to continue pumping money into these businesses and these experiments

1:05:07.560 --> 1:05:09.480
<v Speaker 2>and buying really expensive things.

1:05:09.840 --> 1:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Now we're seeing it right now, where the high end

1:05:12.720 --> 1:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>consumer market is doing just fine. Yeah, but middle and

1:05:16.720 --> 1:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>long people are pulling back. People are saving money. And

1:05:19.920 --> 1:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like this income and equality line is gap is

1:05:23.640 --> 1:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>just getting bigger and bigger.

1:05:26.000 --> 1:05:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so tax policy is I think the number

1:05:30.200 --> 1:05:33.480
<v Speaker 2>one thing that can address this. You don't have a

1:05:33.520 --> 1:05:37.400
<v Speaker 2>situation where, you know, the America's first billionaire he died

1:05:37.440 --> 1:05:40.720
<v Speaker 2>a billionaire, John Rockefeller, in nineteen thirty seven. Bill Gates

1:05:41.640 --> 1:05:45.120
<v Speaker 2>fifty years later became the fifteenth billionaire, and thirty eight

1:05:45.200 --> 1:05:48.400
<v Speaker 2>years since then, we now have seven hundred and fifty, right,

1:05:48.760 --> 1:05:51.760
<v Speaker 2>and you know, all of the gains in the economy

1:05:51.800 --> 1:05:53.880
<v Speaker 2>since the early nineties or like fifty two percent of

1:05:53.880 --> 1:05:56.160
<v Speaker 2>them have been captured by the top one percent. So

1:05:56.560 --> 1:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>there has to be a reckoning with this growing inequality.

1:06:00.200 --> 1:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>It's in moral but to anywhere in the world in

1:06:02.920 --> 1:06:05.600
<v Speaker 2>history where you see fascism grow. It does so in

1:06:05.640 --> 1:06:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the fertile fields of wealth inequality, and people get desperate.

1:06:09.640 --> 1:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>They turn to strong men who say I alone can

1:06:11.920 --> 1:06:12.280
<v Speaker 2>fix it.

1:06:12.400 --> 1:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, No, I mean, I look at I talked about

1:06:14.680 --> 1:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the fall of Turkey in Venezuela all the time to

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>former democracies. I guess you could take Turkey is slightly

1:06:23.520 --> 1:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>higher on the democracy rating scale than Venezuela is, but

1:06:27.240 --> 1:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a right Erwan and Hugo havez before Maduro, but Ugo

1:06:32.560 --> 1:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>shaves who sort of started this revolution. Both of them

1:06:35.280 --> 1:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>used frustration in poor communities to go after the so

1:06:40.080 --> 1:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>called elites, right in Istanbul or Caracas. I mean, look,

1:06:44.240 --> 1:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I assume this is your experience overseas that this is

1:06:48.200 --> 1:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a pattern here right where they when there's a

1:06:51.840 --> 1:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>belief when the gap between rich and poor gets so big,

1:06:55.320 --> 1:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you can weaponize the poor against the elites and the

1:06:58.360 --> 1:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>pitchforks will come. But democracy leaves.

1:07:02.640 --> 1:07:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's replaced with corruption and crony capitalism every

1:07:07.240 --> 1:07:11.920
<v Speaker 2>timepocrisy of some sort. Yeah, yeah, absolutely, So we do

1:07:12.000 --> 1:07:14.040
<v Speaker 2>have to reckon with our tax policy that that I

1:07:14.040 --> 1:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>think has concentrated wealth at the top, that you know

1:07:17.160 --> 1:07:18.520
<v Speaker 2>is certainly what does that look like.

1:07:18.680 --> 1:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Because I've heard this before and the frankly, you know

1:07:21.760 --> 1:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we you know, this is what we did one hundred

1:07:24.120 --> 1:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago when we had all these robber barons. We

1:07:26.960 --> 1:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>passed the Amendment on the income tax. That was not

1:07:29.120 --> 1:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>about taxing Americans. That was about tax making sure the

1:07:32.760 --> 1:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>rich paid something back to this country that they were

1:07:36.520 --> 1:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>taking from it. And that's when property taxes became mainstream

1:07:42.040 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>was back then? So what what is what is today's answer?

1:07:46.320 --> 1:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Because I agree that tax policy is probably the that's

1:07:49.000 --> 1:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what a small d democracy should do, and that sort

1:07:52.160 --> 1:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism with guardrails.

1:07:54.840 --> 1:07:56.920
<v Speaker 2>What what what large.

1:07:56.680 --> 1:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Areas are you thinking when it comes to comes to

1:08:00.240 --> 1:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>tax policy and trying to close the income inequality gap

1:08:03.960 --> 1:08:05.919
<v Speaker 1>without it coming across this redistribution.

1:08:06.080 --> 1:08:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, there's that fine line there, right, sure. Well, one

1:08:12.120 --> 1:08:15.280
<v Speaker 2>easy answer is something that that Ronald Reagan actually did

1:08:15.480 --> 1:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>and then in the late part of his second term,

1:08:18.040 --> 1:08:23.000
<v Speaker 2>which is ensure that capital gains, you know, gains from

1:08:23.040 --> 1:08:26.799
<v Speaker 2>investment were taxed at the same rate as your labor.

1:08:26.880 --> 1:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I see no reason why people working forty sixty hours

1:08:30.880 --> 1:08:34.519
<v Speaker 2>a week and are subject to payroll taxes, and you know,

1:08:34.560 --> 1:08:36.680
<v Speaker 2>even if they don't make enough money to actually be

1:08:36.720 --> 1:08:39.479
<v Speaker 2>subject to income taxes. They're paying a lot into to

1:08:39.600 --> 1:08:43.120
<v Speaker 2>FIKA and into payroll taxes. And even in the you know,

1:08:43.240 --> 1:08:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Reagan years, they found a way to say, hey, no,

1:08:45.040 --> 1:08:47.280
<v Speaker 2>we're going to make sure that Okay, if you're if

1:08:47.320 --> 1:08:50.040
<v Speaker 2>you're just putting money, you're making money off of money,

1:08:50.520 --> 1:08:52.320
<v Speaker 2>well that's going to be taxed in the same way

1:08:52.479 --> 1:08:54.720
<v Speaker 2>that making money off of you know, your labor or

1:08:54.720 --> 1:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>breaking your knees, you know, welding iron together and setting iron.

1:08:59.080 --> 1:09:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Is that we're going to tax the same And that

1:09:00.720 --> 1:09:03.640
<v Speaker 2>actually happened in this country for two years until George H. W.

1:09:03.720 --> 1:09:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Bush undid that policy. And I don't remember if it

1:09:06.040 --> 1:09:07.880
<v Speaker 2>was eighty eight or ninety, but one of those years

1:09:07.960 --> 1:09:10.640
<v Speaker 2>check up on me. I think that that is a

1:09:10.680 --> 1:09:13.160
<v Speaker 2>fairly easy place to start. And then the second thing,

1:09:13.280 --> 1:09:16.160
<v Speaker 2>you know that we just have to deal with or

1:09:16.360 --> 1:09:20.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, the strategies that the ultra wealthy use to

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:24.960
<v Speaker 2>live off of their unrealized gains. You know, people will say,

1:09:25.000 --> 1:09:27.799
<v Speaker 2>if if I have stock and it appreciates in value,

1:09:27.840 --> 1:09:29.680
<v Speaker 2>but I haven't sold the stock, I didn't actually make

1:09:29.720 --> 1:09:33.840
<v Speaker 2>any money. That's true, except that you also collateralized that

1:09:33.920 --> 1:09:35.840
<v Speaker 2>stock and borrowed a lot of money from banks to

1:09:35.880 --> 1:09:38.000
<v Speaker 2>be able to live off of you know, you you

1:09:38.360 --> 1:09:42.479
<v Speaker 2>accessed some value from that appreciation and that gain, and

1:09:42.520 --> 1:09:45.200
<v Speaker 2>so I think even a simple policy like removing this

1:09:45.280 --> 1:09:50.400
<v Speaker 2>by borrowde wealth preservations strategy that wealthy people use could

1:09:50.400 --> 1:09:55.640
<v Speaker 2>also go some way in curing or making this a

1:09:55.720 --> 1:10:01.200
<v Speaker 2>more equitable system. Basically, if you if you obtain cash

1:10:01.240 --> 1:10:03.960
<v Speaker 2>flow from those unrealized gains in any way, at that point,

1:10:04.000 --> 1:10:05.479
<v Speaker 2>it would be subject to tax. So these are kind

1:10:05.520 --> 1:10:07.639
<v Speaker 2>of simple things. I think there's a lot of other

1:10:07.640 --> 1:10:11.879
<v Speaker 2>complicated things that I'm sure academics and tax policy experts

1:10:12.320 --> 1:10:15.519
<v Speaker 2>have a spectrum of disagreement about. But I think, you know,

1:10:15.520 --> 1:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>to your last point about redistribution, this is where Democrats

1:10:18.360 --> 1:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>often get in trouble because everybody sees that, oh, well,

1:10:20.760 --> 1:10:23.519
<v Speaker 2>we're going to tax, we're going to tax everybody more,

1:10:24.400 --> 1:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, hard working people, and then we're just going

1:10:26.320 --> 1:10:28.479
<v Speaker 2>to do handouts to people who don't want to work.

1:10:28.880 --> 1:10:31.880
<v Speaker 2>And this is just silliness, right. I believe that that's

1:10:31.920 --> 1:10:34.519
<v Speaker 2>a myth for the most part, that most people receiving

1:10:35.080 --> 1:10:37.439
<v Speaker 2>whether they're snap benefits or medicaid or whatever, actually do

1:10:37.479 --> 1:10:39.760
<v Speaker 2>want to work. And I think forty million people on

1:10:39.760 --> 1:10:42.000
<v Speaker 2>snap benefits, fifteen million of them do work full time.

1:10:42.000 --> 1:10:46.040
<v Speaker 2>They don't make enough to actually be able to afford groceries.

1:10:46.080 --> 1:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>So I think we got to do away with some

1:10:48.200 --> 1:10:50.879
<v Speaker 2>of those myths about the working poor in this country.

1:10:51.479 --> 1:10:55.720
<v Speaker 2>But separately, rather than handing people you know, money to

1:10:55.800 --> 1:10:58.280
<v Speaker 2>go buy things, we as a country need to invest

1:10:58.360 --> 1:11:01.439
<v Speaker 2>some of those proceeds into building more. We don't have

1:11:01.680 --> 1:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>enough high quality education in this country. We have an

1:11:04.960 --> 1:11:08.479
<v Speaker 2>energy grid that is increasingly falling behind for the demands

1:11:08.479 --> 1:11:10.439
<v Speaker 2>that are going to be placed on it by an

1:11:10.439 --> 1:11:14.479
<v Speaker 2>ai centric economy. We don't have enough hospitals and doctors,

1:11:14.520 --> 1:11:16.360
<v Speaker 2>as I alluded to earlier. We need to invest in

1:11:16.600 --> 1:11:18.920
<v Speaker 2>all of these things heavily and infrastructure in this country.

1:11:20.200 --> 1:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>No, and it it does seem though that there is

1:11:22.760 --> 1:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a collective agreement on that. And yet you've seen this.

1:11:27.280 --> 1:11:30.799
<v Speaker 1>This Congress doesn't function very well at the moment because

1:11:30.800 --> 1:11:33.759
<v Speaker 1>we're in this you know, we're in this like forever

1:11:33.840 --> 1:11:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Cold War between red and blue.

1:11:37.040 --> 1:11:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it is very dysfunctional. And even when you

1:11:41.120 --> 1:11:44.200
<v Speaker 2>can have consensus, or even when you have you know,

1:11:44.360 --> 1:11:48.599
<v Speaker 2>broad agreement on issues, you know, progress remains elusive, and

1:11:48.680 --> 1:11:51.439
<v Speaker 2>I believe that it is just that this system has

1:11:51.479 --> 1:11:55.120
<v Speaker 2>been captured by the political and economic elites that are

1:11:55.240 --> 1:11:58.960
<v Speaker 2>entrenched interests. We have campaigns, you know, bought and paid for,

1:11:59.080 --> 1:12:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk invests to forty something million dollars in getting

1:12:03.960 --> 1:12:08.280
<v Speaker 2>President Trump reelected, and all of these parties you know,

1:12:08.320 --> 1:12:10.120
<v Speaker 2>are looking out for their own interests and they are

1:12:10.160 --> 1:12:13.120
<v Speaker 2>the ones you know, funding politics. And we have tried

1:12:13.400 --> 1:12:17.679
<v Speaker 2>to have grassroots campaigns over the you know, the past decade,

1:12:17.760 --> 1:12:20.680
<v Speaker 2>but these relentless text messages and emails and candidates like

1:12:20.720 --> 1:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>myself have to send two people who already probably don't

1:12:24.400 --> 1:12:27.280
<v Speaker 2>make much and know, chip in five bucks to save democracy,

1:12:27.320 --> 1:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>and then a lot of that just goes back to,

1:12:29.320 --> 1:12:33.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, paying for campaign consultants and all. It's absolutely

1:12:33.040 --> 1:12:37.599
<v Speaker 2>fundraiser makes the money. Yeah, it's absolute nonsense. And I

1:12:37.640 --> 1:12:41.519
<v Speaker 2>think that that, you know, we have to start electing

1:12:41.520 --> 1:12:45.200
<v Speaker 2>people to the Senate who understand the struggles of the

1:12:45.240 --> 1:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>working poor in this country. We talk about how much

1:12:49.080 --> 1:12:52.479
<v Speaker 2>representation matters, you know, especially as Democrats, and we mean

1:12:52.520 --> 1:12:54.439
<v Speaker 2>that in a variety of different ways, but one way

1:12:54.439 --> 1:12:57.479
<v Speaker 2>in which we don't explicitly talk about it is do

1:12:57.600 --> 1:12:59.960
<v Speaker 2>poor people see themselves in any of the people that

1:13:00.080 --> 1:13:03.160
<v Speaker 2>are elected to represent them, And I would say that

1:13:03.200 --> 1:13:07.320
<v Speaker 2>they do not, because you know, many people who seek

1:13:07.360 --> 1:13:10.920
<v Speaker 2>office year after year, cycle after cycle and win or lose.

1:13:12.080 --> 1:13:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think they have much in common with

1:13:13.760 --> 1:13:16.640
<v Speaker 2>the people who who they are trying to represent. And

1:13:16.680 --> 1:13:18.439
<v Speaker 2>I think that that representation matters a lot.

1:13:19.120 --> 1:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So And I'm not like asking you to throw shade

1:13:23.120 --> 1:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at at potential primary opponents, but I may already have.

1:13:27.560 --> 1:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>It's sorry, why did why does Andy Basheer succeed? And

1:13:30.600 --> 1:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>why did an Amy McGrath fail in twenty twenty?

1:13:34.720 --> 1:13:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean there's there are a lot of you know,

1:13:37.680 --> 1:13:41.000
<v Speaker 2>contributing factors, and you know why you should ask a

1:13:41.120 --> 1:13:43.960
<v Speaker 2>me what her assessment of that race is. I'm sure

1:13:43.960 --> 1:13:46.320
<v Speaker 2>that she should all the money in the world, all

1:13:46.400 --> 1:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>that money in the world.

1:13:47.360 --> 1:13:49.479
<v Speaker 1>This was not a she didn't. This was not a

1:13:49.520 --> 1:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>financial issue. So this became a you know, the you know,

1:13:55.479 --> 1:13:58.479
<v Speaker 1>an old marketing slogan was that the dog that doesn't

1:13:58.520 --> 1:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>matter how much money you throw behind the dog food.

1:14:00.439 --> 1:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>If the dog won't eat the dog food, you know

1:14:03.160 --> 1:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to work. Why didn't it work?

1:14:06.680 --> 1:14:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Again, she would probably be much more you know,

1:14:10.000 --> 1:14:12.559
<v Speaker 2>qualified to share an assessment with you on that. I

1:14:12.600 --> 1:14:15.559
<v Speaker 2>will say Amy McGrath. McGrath has an incredible life story.

1:14:15.600 --> 1:14:17.519
<v Speaker 2>She's a patriot that you know, has served her country

1:14:17.560 --> 1:14:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and she she's been in this fight. I think my

1:14:21.080 --> 1:14:25.439
<v Speaker 2>assessment is that in a place like Kentucky, it's a

1:14:25.439 --> 1:14:29.800
<v Speaker 2>state that has been you know, that has put its

1:14:29.800 --> 1:14:32.400
<v Speaker 2>faith in its trust in Donald Trump. You know, three

1:14:32.439 --> 1:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>three times three three elections in a row, and it

1:14:36.040 --> 1:14:39.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, voters here believed the promises that he made

1:14:39.080 --> 1:14:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and believed that he was going to be looking out

1:14:41.960 --> 1:14:45.320
<v Speaker 2>for them. And when when Democrats don't actually offer an

1:14:45.320 --> 1:14:48.559
<v Speaker 2>alternative vision, when they when they sometimes speak in ways

1:14:48.560 --> 1:14:51.559
<v Speaker 2>that sound just kind of Republican but just a little

1:14:51.640 --> 1:14:54.320
<v Speaker 2>less republican, I don't think voters can really tell the difference.

1:14:54.360 --> 1:14:56.400
<v Speaker 2>And so if you got people on the fence, they're

1:14:56.400 --> 1:14:59.160
<v Speaker 2>going to just vote for the Republican. Uh and Andy,

1:14:59.200 --> 1:15:01.840
<v Speaker 2>butsheer didn't you know, do that. This is a governor

1:15:01.880 --> 1:15:04.120
<v Speaker 2>who led with his values in both of his campaigns.

1:15:04.120 --> 1:15:06.320
<v Speaker 2>He didn't shy away from talking about hard things, but

1:15:06.360 --> 1:15:11.719
<v Speaker 2>he explained his choices, his decisions and reasons for different

1:15:11.760 --> 1:15:13.760
<v Speaker 2>things and decisions he would make and policies he would

1:15:13.760 --> 1:15:16.960
<v Speaker 2>advocate for. And even people who disagreed with Andy Bushier

1:15:17.360 --> 1:15:19.360
<v Speaker 2>said that they trusted him and they thought that he

1:15:19.360 --> 1:15:21.800
<v Speaker 2>would look out for them. And then he has shown up.

1:15:22.360 --> 1:15:25.080
<v Speaker 2>We've had fourteen natural disasters or something declared in the

1:15:25.080 --> 1:15:27.960
<v Speaker 2>state of Kentucky over the past couple of years or

1:15:28.200 --> 1:15:30.519
<v Speaker 2>during his administration. This isn't a guy who hides in

1:15:30.560 --> 1:15:33.920
<v Speaker 2>the governor's mansion. He's been out, He's been present with people,

1:15:33.960 --> 1:15:36.479
<v Speaker 2>and I think that even when they disagree with them,

1:15:37.280 --> 1:15:40.479
<v Speaker 2>are in, you know, marginal things, that he has their

1:15:40.520 --> 1:15:43.240
<v Speaker 2>back on the major things. So I think that that's

1:15:43.280 --> 1:15:44.240
<v Speaker 2>probably the big difference.

1:15:44.600 --> 1:15:46.439
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is the best way to win

1:15:46.840 --> 1:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>win over somebody who voted for Donald Trump in twenty

1:15:49.120 --> 1:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to vote for Joel Willett in twenty twenty six.

1:15:53.120 --> 1:15:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would just ask those voters do they see

1:15:57.360 --> 1:16:00.400
<v Speaker 2>more of themselves in Joel Willett or in Donald Trump.

1:16:00.760 --> 1:16:04.519
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump's net worth has increased three billion dollars according

1:16:04.560 --> 1:16:07.479
<v Speaker 2>to the most recent estimates since January twentieth. How's your

1:16:07.520 --> 1:16:11.679
<v Speaker 2>bottom line doing? Kentucky? Wages are stagnant, costs are up.

1:16:12.080 --> 1:16:15.479
<v Speaker 2>You can't afford groceries. They're actively trying to take your

1:16:15.520 --> 1:16:18.200
<v Speaker 2>health care. This man went to the Supreme Court this

1:16:18.320 --> 1:16:21.960
<v Speaker 2>week to try to get permission to not give people

1:16:22.040 --> 1:16:25.559
<v Speaker 2>money to buying groceries. And this administration made sure that

1:16:25.640 --> 1:16:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Republicans in the Senate couldn't negotiate a deal with Democrats

1:16:29.720 --> 1:16:32.479
<v Speaker 2>so that Americans wouldn't be faced with this unconscionable choice

1:16:32.520 --> 1:16:35.839
<v Speaker 2>between being able to afford groceries or seeing a doctor

1:16:36.160 --> 1:16:39.040
<v Speaker 2>when they get sick. And I would just ask voters

1:16:39.040 --> 1:16:42.559
<v Speaker 2>to keep asking themselves why that is. Do you believe

1:16:42.600 --> 1:16:45.439
<v Speaker 2>that this man has your back? And I think there

1:16:45.520 --> 1:16:48.840
<v Speaker 2>is ample evidence at this point between his ballrooms, his

1:16:49.000 --> 1:16:52.280
<v Speaker 2>own increase in his wealth, and these other policies he

1:16:52.360 --> 1:16:54.320
<v Speaker 2>does not definitely.

1:16:53.920 --> 1:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Has a gilded age feeling to it. Doesn't it like, yeah,

1:16:57.520 --> 1:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>let them cake whatever you want to, whatever cliche you

1:17:00.240 --> 1:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>want to pick it.

1:17:01.000 --> 1:17:06.599
<v Speaker 2>It feels it like you're just like, yeah, the pictures

1:17:06.600 --> 1:17:07.200
<v Speaker 2>are jarring.

1:17:14.680 --> 1:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Well it leads me, and look, this is by the

1:17:17.840 --> 1:17:20.519
<v Speaker 1>time this airs, the shutdown is over, it's behind us.

1:17:20.520 --> 1:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're in the we're taping when they're in the

1:17:22.320 --> 1:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>middle of it ending. And I'm one of those who

1:17:26.680 --> 1:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>are empathetic to I get I understand the rationale on

1:17:29.920 --> 1:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>both sides of this argument inside the Democratic Party. One

1:17:34.120 --> 1:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that says, hey, they're squirming, why give up now? The

1:17:37.840 --> 1:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>other that says, he's he's taking away snap benefits, he's

1:17:43.000 --> 1:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>putting the travel system under duress. Somebody's got to be

1:17:51.040 --> 1:17:53.599
<v Speaker 1>the adult in the room here. And oh, by the way,

1:17:53.720 --> 1:17:56.519
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying if the whole point of this was

1:17:56.560 --> 1:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to bring more attention to healthcare, that's been a mission accomplished,

1:18:02.200 --> 1:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and then now the burden is on them to either

1:18:04.760 --> 1:18:07.519
<v Speaker 1>deal with this or watch out. In twenty twenty six,

1:18:07.600 --> 1:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>this becomes certainly a populist issue. So obviously you could

1:18:11.960 --> 1:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>see I can argue one side of this. I understand

1:18:13.960 --> 1:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the other that, hey, the shutdown's gone politically really well

1:18:17.400 --> 1:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrats, and Trump has made all sorts of

1:18:20.680 --> 1:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>mistakes like advocating to not pay snap benefits even when

1:18:24.400 --> 1:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a judge says to do it, and the Speaker of

1:18:26.800 --> 1:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the House is abdicated responsibility, right Like, I can I

1:18:30.400 --> 1:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>get the arguments and I couldn't I hear both of them.

1:18:35.800 --> 1:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Where do you fall on this argument? And I'm mindful

1:18:39.280 --> 1:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that you're in a Democratic primary in the moment.

1:18:42.160 --> 1:18:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I'm not someone who is going to ever

1:18:46.000 --> 1:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>play hide the ball with the people that I want

1:18:48.240 --> 1:18:49.920
<v Speaker 2>to vote for me and the people that I want

1:18:49.960 --> 1:18:55.320
<v Speaker 2>to represent. So in that spirit, I believe that the

1:18:55.360 --> 1:18:57.920
<v Speaker 2>deal that was just struck is a betrayal of working

1:18:57.960 --> 1:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>families in this country. And I'm absolutely disgusted by this

1:19:03.360 --> 1:19:07.400
<v Speaker 2>choice with the with the eight Democrats who who broke

1:19:07.520 --> 1:19:10.360
<v Speaker 2>pretty angry about this, I am very fired up, Chuck.

1:19:10.400 --> 1:19:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I went to bed mad and angry last night. I

1:19:13.439 --> 1:19:17.200
<v Speaker 2>woke up this morning, uh, the same exact way. And

1:19:17.240 --> 1:19:20.519
<v Speaker 2>while yes, there are you know arguments there, I you know,

1:19:20.520 --> 1:19:23.360
<v Speaker 2>we're fond of, you know, saying in sports, and when

1:19:23.360 --> 1:19:25.720
<v Speaker 2>we're trying to encourage people to to you know, get

1:19:25.760 --> 1:19:28.160
<v Speaker 2>in there and and fight and play a game, we say, well, hey,

1:19:28.160 --> 1:19:30.400
<v Speaker 2>you can't win if you don't play. But I want

1:19:30.400 --> 1:19:33.519
<v Speaker 2>to quote my favorite, probably one of my favorite TV

1:19:33.640 --> 1:19:35.880
<v Speaker 2>series of all times, The Wire, And I'm sure this

1:19:36.000 --> 1:19:39.240
<v Speaker 2>was a David Simon line, but one of the characters

1:19:39.280 --> 1:19:43.040
<v Speaker 2>told the police chief, you can't lose if you don't play,

1:19:43.600 --> 1:19:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and that is I think some of the energy Democrats

1:19:46.080 --> 1:19:49.160
<v Speaker 2>needed here. If the Republicans wanted the government open, they

1:19:49.200 --> 1:19:51.680
<v Speaker 2>found ways to force through the you know, the big

1:19:51.720 --> 1:19:55.920
<v Speaker 2>bullshit bill back in July. They did that right with

1:19:55.920 --> 1:19:59.960
<v Speaker 2>with UH without getting the support that you know, they

1:20:00.080 --> 1:20:03.080
<v Speaker 2>they wanted from Democrats. They could have funded and reopened

1:20:03.080 --> 1:20:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the government the same way. Not sure there would have

1:20:04.800 --> 1:20:07.360
<v Speaker 2>been some procedural issues and delays and things like that.

1:20:07.400 --> 1:20:09.240
<v Speaker 2>They could have gotten it done if they wanted to.

1:20:09.360 --> 1:20:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Democrats did not need to go support this. And yes,

1:20:12.920 --> 1:20:18.120
<v Speaker 2>it is terrible to watch people potentially lose their SNAP

1:20:18.200 --> 1:20:20.240
<v Speaker 2>or food stamp benefits. I was on food stamps as

1:20:20.280 --> 1:20:22.680
<v Speaker 2>a kid. I know what that's like. You know, when

1:20:22.720 --> 1:20:24.360
<v Speaker 2>my parents had to make decisions between being able to

1:20:24.360 --> 1:20:26.599
<v Speaker 2>afford groceries or putting gas in the car to get

1:20:26.600 --> 1:20:28.280
<v Speaker 2>to a job so they could make money to buy

1:20:28.520 --> 1:20:31.400
<v Speaker 2>more food. I get that personally, But it is not

1:20:31.520 --> 1:20:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Democrats that have made those choices. It was not Democrats

1:20:34.479 --> 1:20:38.559
<v Speaker 2>going to the Supreme Court to try to get permission

1:20:38.600 --> 1:20:42.200
<v Speaker 2>to not pay SNAP benefits. That was Donald Trump. That

1:20:42.280 --> 1:20:46.479
<v Speaker 2>was Republican enablers in Congress. Democrats had a very radical

1:20:46.520 --> 1:20:50.000
<v Speaker 2>idea throughout this shutdown. Maybe in the most prosperous country

1:20:50.040 --> 1:20:54.040
<v Speaker 2>on earth, with thirty trillion dollars in GDP, we can

1:20:54.400 --> 1:20:57.479
<v Speaker 2>have a country where people can afford groceries and be

1:20:57.520 --> 1:20:59.519
<v Speaker 2>able to see a doctor if you get sick. That

1:20:59.600 --> 1:21:01.840
<v Speaker 2>seemed like a pretty noble fight to me. And I

1:21:01.840 --> 1:21:04.679
<v Speaker 2>don't understand, you know, when we've had millions of voters

1:21:04.680 --> 1:21:07.320
<v Speaker 2>across this country in Virginia and New Jersey, in California

1:21:07.360 --> 1:21:11.559
<v Speaker 2>and New York show up just this week, right, you know,

1:21:11.560 --> 1:21:15.000
<v Speaker 2>over the past seven days, rather to support a party

1:21:15.040 --> 1:21:17.960
<v Speaker 2>that it's a fighting for them, to just immediately turn

1:21:17.960 --> 1:21:18.400
<v Speaker 2>it out.

1:21:18.200 --> 1:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>To say why, why do you assume the fight's over?

1:21:20.120 --> 1:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a temporary opening, you know. I

1:21:23.160 --> 1:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>could if you made me have to message it on

1:21:26.760 --> 1:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of on your I would say something like, look,

1:21:30.120 --> 1:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna we're not going to make people have

1:21:33.120 --> 1:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to ration food because this administration is going to do it.

1:21:37.800 --> 1:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to keep fighting for healthcare and come January,

1:21:40.920 --> 1:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>if they don't do this, we're shutting this place down again.

1:21:43.880 --> 1:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And what's wrong? What is wrong with that strategy because

1:21:49.080 --> 1:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you do sort of try to strike I could argue

1:21:51.439 --> 1:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that it strikes the balance between you know, helping in

1:21:55.600 --> 1:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the immediate term, and again I think, look, we're playing

1:22:00.360 --> 1:22:02.679
<v Speaker 1>with fire with what's going on with their traffic control

1:22:02.760 --> 1:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and not paying these folks and and all of this stuff.

1:22:05.280 --> 1:22:07.160
<v Speaker 2>And I take it we had a we had a

1:22:07.200 --> 1:22:09.400
<v Speaker 2>crash here, and we don't.

1:22:09.200 --> 1:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Know that had what's that impacted by? Right, And we

1:22:12.680 --> 1:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>can't say for sure, but we know we've put these

1:22:15.240 --> 1:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>people under duress, meaning they've got to work with a

1:22:17.720 --> 1:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>promise to be paid right, which I've never met the

1:22:22.439 --> 1:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>landlord that said that, Hey, I'm going to post date

1:22:25.040 --> 1:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this check just you know, I just don't know when

1:22:27.240 --> 1:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to get to post date it. Do you

1:22:30.720 --> 1:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>not accept the premise that there's time to fight keep

1:22:33.360 --> 1:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>fighting for this in two months?

1:22:37.640 --> 1:22:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I think when you look at the eight Democrats who

1:22:40.880 --> 1:22:45.240
<v Speaker 2>voted for this, it sort of betrays the parties thinking

1:22:45.320 --> 1:22:48.000
<v Speaker 2>that they don't really buy this premise either. None of

1:22:48.040 --> 1:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>those people are facing reelection next cycle. To my knowledge,

1:22:51.760 --> 1:22:54.720
<v Speaker 2>find me one person who wants to run on this

1:22:54.800 --> 1:22:57.679
<v Speaker 2>compromise right now next cycle. I don't think you find

1:22:57.760 --> 1:22:58.880
<v Speaker 2>that Democrat anyway.

1:22:58.880 --> 1:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>What's the run on the compromise? The question is whether

1:23:02.320 --> 1:23:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you're running. You know, you get to keep running on healthcare?

1:23:04.760 --> 1:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I would argue you do, oh.

1:23:06.720 --> 1:23:10.599
<v Speaker 2>Sure, because but the problem is you've got tens of

1:23:10.600 --> 1:23:13.679
<v Speaker 2>millions of Americans who are absolutely now going to see

1:23:13.680 --> 1:23:16.800
<v Speaker 2>premium increases or they're going to go without health care.

1:23:16.800 --> 1:23:18.920
<v Speaker 2>That is now a fact that is going to happen.

1:23:19.320 --> 1:23:21.479
<v Speaker 2>And you know a lot of people are like, oh,

1:23:21.560 --> 1:23:23.400
<v Speaker 2>do you trust Republicans that they're actually going to give

1:23:23.400 --> 1:23:25.400
<v Speaker 2>you a vote on this or whatever. It's like, Okay,

1:23:26.000 --> 1:23:29.280
<v Speaker 2>I think you know. Fune has been very public that

1:23:29.320 --> 1:23:30.559
<v Speaker 2>there is going to be a vote and it's going

1:23:30.600 --> 1:23:32.120
<v Speaker 2>to happen on such and such date and all that.

1:23:32.160 --> 1:23:33.160
<v Speaker 2>So take them out the where there's going to be

1:23:33.200 --> 1:23:34.880
<v Speaker 2>a vote. What is that going to accomplish? Do you

1:23:34.920 --> 1:23:41.480
<v Speaker 2>think magically Republicans are going to extend these enhanced subsidies.

1:23:41.680 --> 1:23:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I think would be enough because I think they're petrified

1:23:44.400 --> 1:23:47.599
<v Speaker 2>of this. I think they're absolutely petrified of the impact

1:23:47.640 --> 1:23:50.000
<v Speaker 2>com mess. I think they look at for a way out. Yeah,

1:23:50.040 --> 1:23:53.320
<v Speaker 2>well right, And so I don't have that level of

1:23:53.360 --> 1:23:56.240
<v Speaker 2>faith right now because they are beholden to Donald Trump.

1:23:56.560 --> 1:23:59.840
<v Speaker 2>And this is a man who found his affordability in

1:23:59.840 --> 1:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>the rative for a maximum of five hours one night

1:24:03.360 --> 1:24:05.640
<v Speaker 2>before he the next day said don't talk to me

1:24:05.680 --> 1:24:09.200
<v Speaker 2>about affordability. I mean they are going to do whatever

1:24:09.320 --> 1:24:11.880
<v Speaker 2>he says, and until he's out there saying the personation

1:24:12.000 --> 1:24:14.960
<v Speaker 2>is noted there, Joel, I see that. It's incredible. Check

1:24:16.160 --> 1:24:20.000
<v Speaker 2>you know you got to keep that up. What more?

1:24:20.120 --> 1:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it just?

1:24:20.760 --> 1:24:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Or do you have others that you're pretty good at? Oh? Well,

1:24:23.479 --> 1:24:27.840
<v Speaker 2>we'll save those for future episodes. My wife hates my impersonations,

1:24:27.840 --> 1:24:30.759
<v Speaker 2>by the way. Oh she's got to be the biggest

1:24:30.760 --> 1:24:32.800
<v Speaker 2>fat She can't do that to you. I just want

1:24:32.800 --> 1:24:33.479
<v Speaker 2>to discourage it.

1:24:33.800 --> 1:24:36.479
<v Speaker 3>And I've got a shared brown impersonation that I've always

1:24:36.520 --> 1:24:39.559
<v Speaker 3>been really proud of ground to be a I just need,

1:24:39.600 --> 1:24:41.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, with the men and the working men and wave.

1:24:41.520 --> 1:24:44.559
<v Speaker 3>You know, you gotta you gotta have the dignity of work.

1:24:44.400 --> 1:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>There, Joel. That that is very good and quick aside.

1:24:48.080 --> 1:24:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I was I was able to uh see Carl Rove

1:24:52.920 --> 1:24:58.880
<v Speaker 2>and Paul Lagala do a fireside chat last last fall,

1:24:59.439 --> 1:25:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and I mean, Carl Rove hasn't uh, you know, an

1:25:03.080 --> 1:25:06.200
<v Speaker 2>incredible impersonation Donald Trump and an even better one of

1:25:06.439 --> 1:25:09.120
<v Speaker 2>George W. Bush, the president that that he serves so firstly,

1:25:09.439 --> 1:25:12.599
<v Speaker 2>and Paul Lagalla busted into a Bill Clinton, uh that

1:25:12.760 --> 1:25:15.720
<v Speaker 2>would deceive anyone. And I just thought that was very

1:25:15.760 --> 1:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>impressive that the presidents that they had served, that they

1:25:17.760 --> 1:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>had just kind of embodied their voice so realistically.

1:25:20.520 --> 1:25:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Well, it makes you wonder did they embody their voice

1:25:22.640 --> 1:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>or did the do the presidents embody the voices of

1:25:25.240 --> 1:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>their chief strategists? Yeah, you know who's pulling this strength now,

1:25:28.640 --> 1:25:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm kidding. I'm kidding on that front. So I take

1:25:34.479 --> 1:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it that if there's no deal on healthcare, you'd say,

1:25:37.080 --> 1:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you think that this that these that shut down the

1:25:40.040 --> 1:25:43.400
<v Speaker 1>government in January again, right, Yeah.

1:25:43.240 --> 1:25:45.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't see what choice. I mean, look, I say

1:25:45.880 --> 1:25:48.200
<v Speaker 2>this as a civil servant, and and and perhaps I

1:25:48.439 --> 1:25:54.000
<v Speaker 2>should you know, lead with uh my, you know, I

1:25:54.080 --> 1:25:56.759
<v Speaker 2>understand I've lived through shutdowns. I had I was always

1:25:56.800 --> 1:26:00.360
<v Speaker 2>a you know, a an essential implay all you doing

1:26:00.360 --> 1:26:03.479
<v Speaker 2>government shutdowns and had you know, pay at risk and

1:26:03.840 --> 1:26:07.160
<v Speaker 2>got paid. Yeah, it always came back. But even if

1:26:07.160 --> 1:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>there was like a you know, a temporary you know,

1:26:10.280 --> 1:26:13.000
<v Speaker 2>bulip in it, you you're you're not getting paid that

1:26:13.080 --> 1:26:15.800
<v Speaker 2>much anyways, right, and you you continue to show up

1:26:15.840 --> 1:26:17.559
<v Speaker 2>and it's it's work that you care about. But ultimately,

1:26:17.560 --> 1:26:19.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, you've got to be able to afford things.

1:26:19.439 --> 1:26:22.880
<v Speaker 2>And I don't want to use public servants as a

1:26:22.880 --> 1:26:25.479
<v Speaker 2>as a political football in that way. But we cannot

1:26:25.520 --> 1:26:28.840
<v Speaker 2>be the only party that cares about that one. One

1:26:28.920 --> 1:26:31.360
<v Speaker 2>side of the spectrum right now is letting Donald Trump

1:26:31.439 --> 1:26:34.160
<v Speaker 2>just run rough shot over the entire federal government, dismantling

1:26:34.160 --> 1:26:37.639
<v Speaker 2>the civil servants, civil service that we fought so hard

1:26:37.680 --> 1:26:40.040
<v Speaker 2>to build in an a political way in this country.

1:26:40.120 --> 1:26:42.639
<v Speaker 2>And uh, you know, so I get Tim Kane when

1:26:42.720 --> 1:26:45.600
<v Speaker 2>when he's trying to support federal workers, but you know

1:26:45.680 --> 1:26:48.599
<v Speaker 2>the same is true from our corner. And so I

1:26:48.640 --> 1:26:51.320
<v Speaker 2>do think this is uh, we we have to keep fighting.

1:26:51.320 --> 1:26:55.439
<v Speaker 2>But like Democrats have to read the room the do

1:26:55.439 --> 1:27:01.120
<v Speaker 2>you think Schumer should resign as party leader? H I

1:27:01.120 --> 1:27:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that there are very valid and open questions

1:27:04.160 --> 1:27:06.880
<v Speaker 2>about that. I want I don't know Chuck Schumer. I've

1:27:06.920 --> 1:27:11.880
<v Speaker 2>not met with Chuck Schumer. You know, I get that

1:27:12.200 --> 1:27:15.639
<v Speaker 2>you know there is a lot going on behind the scenes,

1:27:15.680 --> 1:27:17.880
<v Speaker 2>and you know, for a party that is out of power,

1:27:18.439 --> 1:27:22.519
<v Speaker 2>and so you know that's that's not something I'm prepared

1:27:22.560 --> 1:27:24.720
<v Speaker 2>to say, as we said here, but it is an

1:27:24.720 --> 1:27:25.719
<v Speaker 2>open question. In my mind.

1:27:26.960 --> 1:27:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't sound like somebody, if you won, you would support

1:27:29.520 --> 1:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>keeping Chuck Schumer as a leader.

1:27:30.880 --> 1:27:33.880
<v Speaker 2>If you had a vote, it would be a difficult

1:27:33.960 --> 1:27:35.479
<v Speaker 2>vote for me to take today. I will say that

1:27:36.920 --> 1:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>before I let you go.

1:27:37.800 --> 1:27:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious, you know. I just interviewed Governor Basheer

1:27:42.040 --> 1:27:44.559
<v Speaker 1>earlier this weekend. It's on a new sphere, which is

1:27:45.080 --> 1:27:49.799
<v Speaker 1>another sort of independent media outlet, and he said something interesting.

1:27:49.840 --> 1:27:55.439
<v Speaker 2>I said, you know. I said, he was talking about tariffs.

1:27:56.240 --> 1:27:59.559
<v Speaker 1>And this is a case where Andy Basheer, Mitch McConnell,

1:27:59.600 --> 1:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and Ran all are all on the same page.

1:28:01.120 --> 1:28:02.200
<v Speaker 2>And he basically said.

1:28:02.040 --> 1:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>If all three of us are agreeing on something, maybe

1:28:04.360 --> 1:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>there's something there.

1:28:05.760 --> 1:28:08.240
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of Rand Paul? And I say

1:28:08.320 --> 1:28:10.799
<v Speaker 2>this because if you win, that's.

1:28:10.600 --> 1:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>A senator, you know, the States senators, you know, no

1:28:13.880 --> 1:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>matter even if you're from different parties, at times you

1:28:15.720 --> 1:28:16.479
<v Speaker 1>need to work together.

1:28:16.840 --> 1:28:17.720
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of him?

1:28:17.760 --> 1:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And what do you make of his attempts at seeking

1:28:20.320 --> 1:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of distance from from Trump World in

1:28:22.800 --> 1:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a way that we haven't seen in the past.

1:28:26.080 --> 1:28:31.679
<v Speaker 2>I Ran Paul is an idiosyncratic senator to say the least.

1:28:31.720 --> 1:28:36.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, his views will sometimes overlap in very weird

1:28:36.200 --> 1:28:39.240
<v Speaker 2>or align, you know, in very strange and unexpected ways.

1:28:39.280 --> 1:28:42.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a weird ven diagram, isn't it it very much

1:28:43.080 --> 1:28:44.840
<v Speaker 2>is I mean? But we have this in Kentucky with

1:28:44.880 --> 1:28:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Massey as well. You've got liberals across the state

1:28:47.880 --> 1:28:53.320
<v Speaker 2>celebrating Thomas Massey's willingness to stand up, you know, for

1:28:53.880 --> 1:28:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the release of the Epstein files, which, by the way,

1:28:56.080 --> 1:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>this issue is not going to go away either. Those

1:28:59.040 --> 1:29:01.599
<v Speaker 2>finals I believe will see the light of day. They

1:29:01.640 --> 1:29:04.920
<v Speaker 2>have to. Voters are demanding it. But you make a

1:29:04.960 --> 1:29:07.800
<v Speaker 2>broader point just about you know how we have to

1:29:07.840 --> 1:29:11.479
<v Speaker 2>work together. No one senator can promise to get anything

1:29:11.640 --> 1:29:14.200
<v Speaker 2>done on their own. You have to build relationships. You

1:29:14.280 --> 1:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>have to be able to work across the aisle. And

1:29:16.439 --> 1:29:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not somebody who presents just to be some above

1:29:19.000 --> 1:29:21.479
<v Speaker 2>it all centrist. I am not, and I, like I said,

1:29:21.520 --> 1:29:23.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll always tell voters you know where I stand on things,

1:29:23.920 --> 1:29:25.640
<v Speaker 2>and my mind is made up on something. I'm not

1:29:25.680 --> 1:29:28.240
<v Speaker 2>going to hide from you what I believe about it.

1:29:28.760 --> 1:29:32.320
<v Speaker 2>But that doesn't absolve me, or any senator or any

1:29:32.439 --> 1:29:37.040
<v Speaker 2>congressman of a responsibility to represent all the people in

1:29:37.080 --> 1:29:39.680
<v Speaker 2>our states, because it is inevitable in a state like

1:29:39.760 --> 1:29:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Kentucky if I win, you know, there are going to

1:29:43.200 --> 1:29:45.479
<v Speaker 2>be lots of people here who did not vote for me,

1:29:45.680 --> 1:29:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and they deserve a voice and they deserve representation as well.

1:29:49.760 --> 1:29:52.160
<v Speaker 2>The problem that we have right now in this country

1:29:52.439 --> 1:29:57.240
<v Speaker 2>is that, you know, you can have seventy five million

1:29:57.280 --> 1:30:02.400
<v Speaker 2>people vote for Kamala Harris and marginally more millions vote

1:30:02.439 --> 1:30:05.160
<v Speaker 2>for Trump, and they pretend that the score was one

1:30:05.240 --> 1:30:07.559
<v Speaker 2>hundred to nothing, I know, and that all the other

1:30:07.600 --> 1:30:09.599
<v Speaker 2>people didn't exist. You don't, you didn't win.

1:30:09.680 --> 1:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Actually not what our founders intended. They assumed it was

1:30:12.240 --> 1:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be a messy compromise constantly.

1:30:15.520 --> 1:30:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so you know, we have to be able

1:30:18.360 --> 1:30:20.200
<v Speaker 2>to do that. So, you know, I would I would

1:30:20.680 --> 1:30:23.840
<v Speaker 2>work with you know which who would then be the

1:30:23.880 --> 1:30:26.599
<v Speaker 2>senior Senator from the state of Kentucky to take care

1:30:26.600 --> 1:30:29.320
<v Speaker 2>of working families in this state. They deserve a voice,

1:30:29.320 --> 1:30:34.880
<v Speaker 2>they deserve representation, and we need solutions minded politicians. And

1:30:34.920 --> 1:30:35.960
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly what I would be.

1:30:36.720 --> 1:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Outside of Kentucky. Who's the US Senator that so far

1:30:39.960 --> 1:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you've been the most impressed with.

1:30:43.600 --> 1:30:46.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, It's funny, somebody asked me, asked me that

1:30:46.800 --> 1:30:48.360
<v Speaker 2>question a few weeks so, not who I was most

1:30:48.360 --> 1:30:50.320
<v Speaker 2>impressed with. I was able to say a few, But

1:30:50.920 --> 1:30:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna. I'm going to continue to give Chris Murphy props.

1:30:55.200 --> 1:30:58.679
<v Speaker 2>I have appreciated, you know, he's been a very level

1:30:58.720 --> 1:31:04.639
<v Speaker 2>headed senator. He speaks passionately about you know, a lot

1:31:04.640 --> 1:31:07.519
<v Speaker 2>of issues, but you know, particularly he's someone you know,

1:31:07.560 --> 1:31:10.240
<v Speaker 2>I talked about, you know, my dad dying a uniquely

1:31:10.240 --> 1:31:13.360
<v Speaker 2>American death from finandol. Well, there's another uniquely American death,

1:31:13.800 --> 1:31:17.800
<v Speaker 2>and that's to get killed atra elementary school. And you know,

1:31:17.920 --> 1:31:20.759
<v Speaker 2>when you've got senators, you know, who are completely owned

1:31:21.960 --> 1:31:24.120
<v Speaker 2>by the NRA that that aren't even looking out for

1:31:24.160 --> 1:31:27.760
<v Speaker 2>response responsible gun owners anymore. You know, I've just been

1:31:27.760 --> 1:31:29.840
<v Speaker 2>impressed with, you know, his leadership on that issue and

1:31:30.080 --> 1:31:32.439
<v Speaker 2>other things, and somebody who I think is intelligent, whose

1:31:32.439 --> 1:31:36.080
<v Speaker 2>heart's in the right place. And yeah, so I admire it,

1:31:36.200 --> 1:31:37.000
<v Speaker 2>admire that guy.

1:31:37.240 --> 1:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And I take it that Governor Bursheer is your pick

1:31:40.200 --> 1:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>for president in twenty twenty eight because you got you're

1:31:42.360 --> 1:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be a home state guy.

1:31:43.760 --> 1:31:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Is he is he running? Is he running? I don't know.

1:31:46.880 --> 1:31:47.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's.

1:31:47.560 --> 1:31:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:31:47.880 --> 1:31:48.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he said.

1:31:48.720 --> 1:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look at you doing doing a little bit of

1:31:51.240 --> 1:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>blocking and tackling that.

1:31:52.600 --> 1:31:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, look at twenty twenty six. Right, yeah,

1:31:55.560 --> 1:31:57.559
<v Speaker 2>of course, but and that does have to be our folks.

1:31:57.600 --> 1:32:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I will tell you this. I do not believe, and

1:32:02.600 --> 1:32:04.720
<v Speaker 2>I know Gavin Newsom has been very public in saying this.

1:32:04.800 --> 1:32:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I've been saying it privately for months, that this administration

1:32:07.600 --> 1:32:10.360
<v Speaker 2>intends to have free and fair elections in twenty twenty eight.

1:32:10.439 --> 1:32:13.559
<v Speaker 2>And so if your listeners care at all about our

1:32:14.160 --> 1:32:17.240
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and fifty year experiment with democracy here or

1:32:17.280 --> 1:32:20.360
<v Speaker 2>liberal democracy in America, it is imperative that we turn

1:32:20.360 --> 1:32:23.000
<v Speaker 2>out in massive numbers in twenty twenty six. I believe

1:32:23.000 --> 1:32:26.400
<v Speaker 2>it's one of our last chances to provide accountability for

1:32:26.439 --> 1:32:30.519
<v Speaker 2>this administration and to ensure that Americans have a free

1:32:30.560 --> 1:32:32.519
<v Speaker 2>and fair choice, whether that be for Andy Basheer or

1:32:32.560 --> 1:32:34.320
<v Speaker 2>anyone else in twenty twenty eight. So I don't think

1:32:34.320 --> 1:32:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the stakes could be any higher. And I will say

1:32:36.240 --> 1:32:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Andy Basheer has been an incredible governor of this state,

1:32:40.040 --> 1:32:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and he's shown it path to victory here for Democrats

1:32:42.320 --> 1:32:44.559
<v Speaker 2>who want to lead with their values to respect him

1:32:44.600 --> 1:32:44.880
<v Speaker 2>for that.

1:32:45.680 --> 1:32:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Let me get chatting here on this. Because you worked

1:32:47.680 --> 1:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in the intelligence community, and I've been working with some

1:32:50.000 --> 1:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>people former members of the intelligence community on an exercise

1:32:53.880 --> 1:32:56.559
<v Speaker 1>on trust and media. And it's not just about media

1:32:56.640 --> 1:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and journalists. It's more about the information ecosystem and what

1:33:01.160 --> 1:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>happens if you have bad intelligence. Like I'm working with

1:33:04.200 --> 1:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>people who are nervous that the information you know, we

1:33:07.479 --> 1:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>already know there's a lot of misinformation and disinformation out there,

1:33:11.680 --> 1:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and that if we don't figure out clean ways to

1:33:14.960 --> 1:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>get information, then we're going to make terrible national security decisions.

1:33:18.600 --> 1:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Like how bad is the flow of intelligence these days?

1:33:22.840 --> 1:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you is it in considering sort of how much

1:33:27.240 --> 1:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we've alienated some of our key allies, you know, in

1:33:30.400 --> 1:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the in the world of the Five Eyes, all the

1:33:32.400 --> 1:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>English language allies of ours that I get the impression

1:33:37.560 --> 1:33:40.519
<v Speaker 1>that there's either concern that, you know, we've got too

1:33:40.520 --> 1:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>many leaks in our system or all of our stuff.

1:33:43.439 --> 1:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>There's one country in particular that gets access to intelligence

1:33:47.120 --> 1:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>without telling them what what is? What do you feel

1:33:49.880 --> 1:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>like is the state of America, the American the intelligence

1:33:54.000 --> 1:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that are are the intelligence community is getting these days?

1:34:00.120 --> 1:34:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I appreciate that question more than you know, and

1:34:04.040 --> 1:34:06.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, would would love to have an extended conversation

1:34:06.520 --> 1:34:08.920
<v Speaker 2>about it, because I think that there are a lot

1:34:08.960 --> 1:34:13.680
<v Speaker 2>of different forces that are polluting the information environment and

1:34:13.760 --> 1:34:17.280
<v Speaker 2>leading to very poor information hygiene, not just in you know,

1:34:17.400 --> 1:34:21.760
<v Speaker 2>our federal government with policymakers, but with our kids, and

1:34:21.800 --> 1:34:25.560
<v Speaker 2>with with school age kids and people in university and

1:34:25.720 --> 1:34:29.639
<v Speaker 2>and everything else. I would just turn to Russia as

1:34:29.640 --> 1:34:32.920
<v Speaker 2>an example of this. During COVID, you may recall some

1:34:32.960 --> 1:34:36.360
<v Speaker 2>of these images of Vladimir Putin setting at the end

1:34:36.400 --> 1:34:38.400
<v Speaker 2>of a you know, a thirty foot table and an

1:34:38.439 --> 1:34:41.439
<v Speaker 2>advisor you know, at the other end, and I, you know,

1:34:41.479 --> 1:34:44.760
<v Speaker 2>equipped at the time that he had entered the late

1:34:44.840 --> 1:34:49.120
<v Speaker 2>stage Howard Hughes phase of his government, his governing.

1:34:49.400 --> 1:34:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Have you noticed his nails are suddenly super long?

1:34:51.640 --> 1:34:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, no, right yet? Yeah, well, when he grows a beard,

1:34:54.360 --> 1:34:59.400
<v Speaker 2>we'll know that the transformation leaden beard. Yeah, yeah, but

1:34:59.640 --> 1:35:04.840
<v Speaker 2>it is it is an isolated autocrat who behaves the

1:35:04.840 --> 1:35:07.559
<v Speaker 2>way that he did during COVID, who also then makes

1:35:07.560 --> 1:35:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the decision to invade Ukraine. And when you listen to

1:35:11.120 --> 1:35:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Vladimir Putins speak about, you know, his reasons for invading Ukraine. Yes,

1:35:14.880 --> 1:35:19.680
<v Speaker 2>he has this sort of imperialistic worldview about Russia and

1:35:19.760 --> 1:35:21.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, glory of Russia and all these sorts of things.

1:35:21.960 --> 1:35:25.240
<v Speaker 2>But he also routinely just says things that are untrue,

1:35:25.960 --> 1:35:28.760
<v Speaker 2>and you don't know if that's propaganda. I believe at

1:35:28.760 --> 1:35:32.280
<v Speaker 2>this point that Vladimir Putin's information environment has become massively

1:35:32.280 --> 1:35:40.800
<v Speaker 2>polluted because everybody in the Siliviki and the intelligence community

1:35:40.800 --> 1:35:43.000
<v Speaker 2>in Russia has figured out that like, this is what

1:35:43.040 --> 1:35:45.120
<v Speaker 2>this man believes, this is what this man wants to hear,

1:35:45.200 --> 1:35:48.280
<v Speaker 2>and that's what they tell him, and he's manipulated in

1:35:48.320 --> 1:35:52.599
<v Speaker 2>those ways. So there are very real examples of the

1:35:52.640 --> 1:35:56.720
<v Speaker 2>consequences of that type of government that we see with

1:35:56.880 --> 1:35:59.439
<v Speaker 2>Russia and the atrocities that are being committed in Ukraine.

1:36:00.120 --> 1:36:03.479
<v Speaker 2>So let's go from Russia to the US intelligence community,

1:36:03.520 --> 1:36:07.479
<v Speaker 2>and then I'll just finish my response with kids. My

1:36:07.560 --> 1:36:09.599
<v Speaker 2>security clearance was revoked, as we talked about it at

1:36:09.640 --> 1:36:11.960
<v Speaker 2>the top of the show, and it was revoked because

1:36:12.000 --> 1:36:14.080
<v Speaker 2>I said something mean about Donald Trump six years ago,

1:36:14.120 --> 1:36:15.839
<v Speaker 2>and because they found out I was going to exercise

1:36:15.840 --> 1:36:19.439
<v Speaker 2>political speech by potentially, you know, by considering a run

1:36:19.479 --> 1:36:20.360
<v Speaker 2>for the US Senate.

1:36:20.320 --> 1:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Just astablishing something you said six years ago. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah,

1:36:23.960 --> 1:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what they us. I mean, that is just like

1:36:26.120 --> 1:36:28.800
<v Speaker 1>thought police stuff. That's write out all the while. Yeah,

1:36:28.880 --> 1:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it truly is.

1:36:30.200 --> 1:36:32.360
<v Speaker 2>And uh, you know it was right wing Twitter that

1:36:32.439 --> 1:36:34.880
<v Speaker 2>started that dug up some of this and started attacking me,

1:36:35.000 --> 1:36:38.360
<v Speaker 2>And then I guess right wing Twitter runs our intelligence community.

1:36:38.400 --> 1:36:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Now it's a very dangerous thing. Or a loomer the

1:36:40.920 --> 1:36:45.080
<v Speaker 2>CIA chief apparently, Yeah, exactly, And so what do I

1:36:45.080 --> 1:36:47.320
<v Speaker 2>think the follow on effects of something like what happened

1:36:47.320 --> 1:36:49.160
<v Speaker 2>to me? But it is since I mean James Comy

1:36:49.200 --> 1:36:53.040
<v Speaker 2>being indicted and other people who were actively serving in

1:36:53.080 --> 1:36:57.840
<v Speaker 2>the CIA being walked out by security because they ended

1:36:57.920 --> 1:37:00.519
<v Speaker 2>up on some list that nobody knows how well. So

1:37:00.760 --> 1:37:04.719
<v Speaker 2>this is going to and perhaps already has a massive

1:37:04.800 --> 1:37:07.200
<v Speaker 2>chilling effect throughout our federal government. And it's not just

1:37:07.240 --> 1:37:09.519
<v Speaker 2>the intelligence community. I mean Donald Trump went to war

1:37:09.560 --> 1:37:12.679
<v Speaker 2>with a weather forecast during his first administration. We might

1:37:12.720 --> 1:37:15.439
<v Speaker 2>recall where he modified the course of a map rather

1:37:15.479 --> 1:37:18.000
<v Speaker 2>than just saying, you know, I accidentally added an extra

1:37:18.040 --> 1:37:20.920
<v Speaker 2>state in my comment. Right, So, up and down the

1:37:20.920 --> 1:37:23.040
<v Speaker 2>civil service, you have people who know that if they

1:37:23.080 --> 1:37:26.160
<v Speaker 2>speak truth to power like they're supposed to, they're just

1:37:26.200 --> 1:37:28.400
<v Speaker 2>going to be out a job. And so that is

1:37:28.479 --> 1:37:32.679
<v Speaker 2>dangerous for national security. It's dangerous for domestic security to

1:37:32.680 --> 1:37:35.519
<v Speaker 2>not have expertise in the civil service, and.

1:37:35.479 --> 1:37:38.040
<v Speaker 1>What would you do if you're in that situation? You

1:37:38.040 --> 1:37:42.479
<v Speaker 1>know you have the So literally a week before the

1:37:42.520 --> 1:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>head of Southern Command decided to resign rather than carry

1:37:45.320 --> 1:37:47.599
<v Speaker 1>out these orders on these on these Venezuela on these

1:37:47.600 --> 1:37:51.320
<v Speaker 1>boats outside of the coast of Venezuela. I'd ask Jim Stavertez,

1:37:51.360 --> 1:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>former NATA supremat like commander, former head of Southern Command.

1:37:54.400 --> 1:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, what happens if you get an order you're

1:37:56.240 --> 1:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>not on our pcent?

1:37:57.000 --> 1:38:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Sure is legal? Right? We know we know that. You

1:38:01.040 --> 1:38:03.439
<v Speaker 2>know if if you follow an illegal order, you're going

1:38:03.479 --> 1:38:05.760
<v Speaker 2>to be held accountable to right. We have made that

1:38:05.840 --> 1:38:07.360
<v Speaker 2>clear in our in our law.

1:38:07.840 --> 1:38:10.280
<v Speaker 1>And he goes, well, you would, he goes, I'd probably

1:38:10.320 --> 1:38:13.080
<v Speaker 1>resign and not go public about why I resign.

1:38:13.120 --> 1:38:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I'd simply resign.

1:38:14.479 --> 1:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Let others And you know, there's there's this sort of

1:38:18.080 --> 1:38:21.479
<v Speaker 1>there's always that that sort of a would you if

1:38:21.520 --> 1:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>you were in a similar situation, would you simply resign?

1:38:24.680 --> 1:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Would you resign with a bullhorn or do you try

1:38:27.240 --> 1:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to keep working within the system Because it feels like

1:38:29.400 --> 1:38:31.479
<v Speaker 1>there's no there's no perfect answer here.

1:38:32.560 --> 1:38:36.000
<v Speaker 2>There is not, and I just want your listeners and

1:38:36.080 --> 1:38:39.160
<v Speaker 2>American voters at large to understand that the admirals and

1:38:39.200 --> 1:38:42.839
<v Speaker 2>the generals and the private first classes, they're the privates

1:38:42.840 --> 1:38:45.800
<v Speaker 2>first class. They're not coming to save you. If you

1:38:45.840 --> 1:38:48.639
<v Speaker 2>think there is some massive resistance that's going to build

1:38:48.720 --> 1:38:51.280
<v Speaker 2>up in this way, you are mistaken. And it's because

1:38:51.320 --> 1:38:55.200
<v Speaker 2>these are gut wrenching decisions that have extreme amounts of

1:38:55.240 --> 1:38:56.840
<v Speaker 2>personal consequence to you.

1:38:56.920 --> 1:38:59.439
<v Speaker 1>The culture it tells you, look, if you've got an issue,

1:38:59.479 --> 1:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>then you go ahead and resign, but you need to

1:39:02.120 --> 1:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>do it on your terms, right, Yeah.

1:39:03.720 --> 1:39:07.320
<v Speaker 2>And civil servants have an obligation I think, to resign

1:39:07.560 --> 1:39:10.200
<v Speaker 2>rather than you know, carry out those things. Whether they

1:39:10.200 --> 1:39:12.439
<v Speaker 2>speak about it at public or not would depend on like, well,

1:39:12.479 --> 1:39:14.240
<v Speaker 2>this is a super classified thing. What can I say?

1:39:14.640 --> 1:39:18.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's whistleblower things. We have ostensibly protections in

1:39:18.400 --> 1:39:19.280
<v Speaker 2>this country.

1:39:18.960 --> 1:39:21.719
<v Speaker 1>For that, but you're still all of those inspectors general,

1:39:21.800 --> 1:39:25.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's not even clear who you would report violations.

1:39:24.720 --> 1:39:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Of the constitution to. Yeah, exactly. In the military, you

1:39:27.680 --> 1:39:29.880
<v Speaker 2>don't have the luxury of always just being able to resign,

1:39:29.960 --> 1:39:31.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, admirals and generals and those sorts of things,

1:39:31.880 --> 1:39:35.520
<v Speaker 2>or at various stages of their you know, contractual commitments

1:39:35.560 --> 1:39:38.800
<v Speaker 2>to the country, but they can you know, resign and

1:39:39.120 --> 1:39:39.800
<v Speaker 2>make a show of it.

1:39:39.800 --> 1:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Look, the fact that the head of Southern camp and

1:39:41.520 --> 1:39:43.439
<v Speaker 1>resign should have been a much bigger deal with the

1:39:43.439 --> 1:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>American public.

1:39:44.479 --> 1:39:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I don't think we.

1:39:45.840 --> 1:39:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that whatever's left of legacy media made

1:39:48.320 --> 1:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a big enough deal about it.

1:39:49.760 --> 1:39:53.519
<v Speaker 2>No, And the Defense Intelligence Agency, who you know, the

1:39:53.880 --> 1:39:57.439
<v Speaker 2>director there also gone because of you know, questioning the

1:39:57.479 --> 1:40:01.559
<v Speaker 2>efficacy of the military strikes that we on Iran. So

1:40:01.760 --> 1:40:03.439
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of a lot of things there,

1:40:03.479 --> 1:40:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and there are a lot of problems. But I do

1:40:05.800 --> 1:40:08.160
<v Speaker 2>think that, you know, you do have obligations to not

1:40:08.200 --> 1:40:11.000
<v Speaker 2>carry out lawful orders. And it's easy for me to

1:40:11.000 --> 1:40:12.960
<v Speaker 2>say from the cheap seats over here at the stage

1:40:12.960 --> 1:40:16.240
<v Speaker 2>of my life, I only, you know, hope that I

1:40:16.280 --> 1:40:18.280
<v Speaker 2>would have had the courage of putting the same situation

1:40:18.400 --> 1:40:20.439
<v Speaker 2>that i'm that I am asking other people to exhibit

1:40:20.479 --> 1:40:20.760
<v Speaker 2>a day.

1:40:22.439 --> 1:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe Willett, it's been a pleasure to get to know you.

1:40:25.320 --> 1:40:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I sort of you come at this with a with

1:40:28.880 --> 1:40:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a style that that is very appealing to me, I hope.

1:40:31.760 --> 1:40:34.800
<v Speaker 1>But in that you seem like you think this stuff through.

1:40:35.200 --> 1:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>It seems like you think before you speak. There's not

1:40:38.080 --> 1:40:39.679
<v Speaker 1>many politicians that do that these days.

1:40:40.080 --> 1:40:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I try. Chuck's been watching you for years. You know,

1:40:43.800 --> 1:40:45.800
<v Speaker 2>I've only probably yelled at you through the television a

1:40:45.800 --> 1:40:49.559
<v Speaker 2>few times, but you know, really appreciate you having me

1:40:49.600 --> 1:40:51.599
<v Speaker 2>on and for having a thoughtful conversation. I am.

1:40:51.760 --> 1:40:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I am a as I say. It's like, I'm as

1:40:55.800 --> 1:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>long as you're not yelling at me the whole time.

1:40:58.240 --> 1:41:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I didn't. Yeah, and my campaign, and my campaign will

1:41:03.760 --> 1:41:05.160
<v Speaker 2>fire me if I don't remind people to go to

1:41:05.240 --> 1:41:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Joelferkentucky dot com if you're at all interested in supporting

1:41:09.200 --> 1:41:09.559
<v Speaker 2>this camp.

1:41:09.880 --> 1:41:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Are you concerned that the big money people in DC

1:41:13.400 --> 1:41:15.800
<v Speaker 1>won't invest in Kentucky because of what happened in twenty

1:41:15.800 --> 1:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty with all that money.

1:41:17.520 --> 1:41:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'm very concerned about that. You know, we invested

1:41:22.200 --> 1:41:24.519
<v Speaker 2>on you know, ninety four million dollars in the in

1:41:24.560 --> 1:41:28.439
<v Speaker 2>the race here and got results worse than we'd ever

1:41:28.800 --> 1:41:32.439
<v Speaker 2>gotten before, and I think that is on people's mind spot.

1:41:32.560 --> 1:41:35.360
<v Speaker 2>There's an important difference here now. Andy Basheer has shown

1:41:35.360 --> 1:41:37.920
<v Speaker 2>this path to victory, and we just have to have

1:41:37.960 --> 1:41:39.240
<v Speaker 2>the right candidate walk down that.

1:41:39.200 --> 1:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Path, Joe Willett, We'll be watching your primary, that's for sure.

1:41:44.240 --> 1:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I know fairly early, right may right.

1:41:46.520 --> 1:41:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, leave me soon that is that is six months

1:41:50.600 --> 1:41:53.360
<v Speaker 2>are going to fly by, so be safe for the trail.

1:41:53.760 --> 1:42:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Chack, have you got it well?

1:42:01.800 --> 1:42:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoyed that conversation with Joe Willett. I

1:42:04.439 --> 1:42:08.479
<v Speaker 1>know I'll be following his candidacy to see see how

1:42:08.520 --> 1:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that all works out. So, speaking of the Senate, it

1:42:11.080 --> 1:42:13.879
<v Speaker 1>is that time I said every month I would update

1:42:14.040 --> 1:42:22.800
<v Speaker 1>my top five, top five, top top top five, just

1:42:22.840 --> 1:42:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a reminder in October and the way I do this

1:42:26.320 --> 1:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and my ranks have been doing this since I wrote

1:42:28.640 --> 1:42:31.559
<v Speaker 1>a column called on the Trail back during my National

1:42:31.680 --> 1:42:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Journal dot com outline days, which was I like to

1:42:35.400 --> 1:42:39.280
<v Speaker 1>order these races are most likely to flip parties, so

1:42:39.800 --> 1:42:42.760
<v Speaker 1>not in the toss up Lean ar Lean d category,

1:42:42.800 --> 1:42:46.320
<v Speaker 1>but most likely to flip to least likely to flip. Obviously,

1:42:46.360 --> 1:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>by keeping it to five, you know all of them

1:42:48.960 --> 1:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to be somewhat competitive races that crack the

1:42:51.600 --> 1:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>top five.

1:42:52.400 --> 1:42:54.080
<v Speaker 2>So to remind you, the last.

1:42:53.800 --> 1:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Time my top five was North Carolina one, Georgia two,

1:42:57.439 --> 1:43:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Michigan three, Main four, New Hampshire five.

1:43:00.479 --> 1:43:02.160
<v Speaker 2>So the idea was I.

1:43:02.120 --> 1:43:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Had the assumption was the open seat in North Carolina

1:43:07.640 --> 1:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>with the big recruit there. North Carolina, Georgia's the Democratic

1:43:10.840 --> 1:43:13.360
<v Speaker 1>health seat of John Ossoff. Michigan, of course, the open

1:43:13.400 --> 1:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>seat Gary Peters Democrat is vacating. Maine is Susan Collins.

1:43:17.800 --> 1:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire is the Gene Shaheen seat that she is vacating,

1:43:23.160 --> 1:43:27.639
<v Speaker 1>a Democratic seat there. So look my new top five.

1:43:27.680 --> 1:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, number one hasn't changed. The most likely

1:43:32.280 --> 1:43:36.280
<v Speaker 1>seat to flip is North Carolina. It is an open seat.

1:43:36.320 --> 1:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>It is the one open seat, you know, one of

1:43:39.040 --> 1:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>two open seats in the big seven battleground states. Right,

1:43:42.240 --> 1:43:45.519
<v Speaker 1>The big seven battleground states are Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina,

1:43:45.600 --> 1:43:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Nevada in sort of the sun Belt, and Wisconsin, Michigan,

1:43:49.760 --> 1:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and Pennsylvania. And so when you look at the competitive

1:43:53.920 --> 1:43:57.479
<v Speaker 1>Senate map these days, there's actually, you know, the last

1:43:57.520 --> 1:44:00.519
<v Speaker 1>two cycles, they all seven of those states. We had,

1:44:00.600 --> 1:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I think two cycles in a row. We either had

1:44:02.240 --> 1:44:04.479
<v Speaker 1>seven for seven or six of the seven with Senate

1:44:04.520 --> 1:44:07.320
<v Speaker 1>seats this time, right, we'd have nothing in Arizona, nothing

1:44:07.360 --> 1:44:10.479
<v Speaker 1>in Nevada, there's one seat in Georgia, one seat in

1:44:10.479 --> 1:44:14.519
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, nothing in Pennsylvania, nothing in Wisconsin, and one

1:44:14.520 --> 1:44:17.280
<v Speaker 1>seat in Michigan. So it is the presidential battlegrounds. This

1:44:17.320 --> 1:44:20.720
<v Speaker 1>happens to be the one cycle where we have the

1:44:20.760 --> 1:44:23.760
<v Speaker 1>fewest amount of Senate seats in the presidential battlegrounds. But

1:44:23.760 --> 1:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you still have to put you know, I

1:44:26.120 --> 1:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>think what I learned from the twenty twenty five elections,

1:44:30.640 --> 1:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and again history being a guide. Every time we've seen

1:44:35.760 --> 1:44:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a route like this by one party, we have seen

1:44:40.360 --> 1:44:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that continue in the following even numbered year. I am

1:44:45.120 --> 1:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>looking for the time. I mean, twenty thirteen is one

1:44:48.360 --> 1:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of the few exceptions where Democrats did well in the

1:44:51.000 --> 1:44:54.720
<v Speaker 1>off off year, but that did not translate to twenty fourteen,

1:44:55.280 --> 1:44:57.760
<v Speaker 1>which was not a good year for Democrats in there

1:44:57.760 --> 1:45:00.559
<v Speaker 1>and again right there was there's a HEAs in twenty

1:45:00.560 --> 1:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>thirteen is the exception to every single one of these

1:45:02.960 --> 1:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>trend lines we've been talking about with New Jersey and Virginia,

1:45:06.240 --> 1:45:09.840
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And you know, certain things I think that

1:45:09.960 --> 1:45:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I took away from the off off years. One, Democrats

1:45:13.640 --> 1:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>are ready to vote, and you know, the sheer raw

1:45:17.360 --> 1:45:20.720
<v Speaker 1>number of votes that the Democratic candidate got in New

1:45:20.760 --> 1:45:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Jersey versus the Republican candidate continues to blow me away.

1:45:23.680 --> 1:45:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the single most important statistic that you

1:45:27.000 --> 1:45:29.920
<v Speaker 1>need to understand coming out of these off off year elections.

1:45:30.200 --> 1:45:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:45:30.640 --> 1:45:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Jack Chittarelli, the Republican nominee for governor, actually got one

1:45:33.800 --> 1:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand more votes than he received in twenty twenty one.

1:45:37.200 --> 1:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty one, that vote total was good enough

1:45:40.080 --> 1:45:43.479
<v Speaker 1>to only lose by three percentage points. In twenty twenty five,

1:45:43.760 --> 1:45:47.800
<v Speaker 1>where he got more votes, he loses by thirteen percentage points.

1:45:48.280 --> 1:45:51.519
<v Speaker 1>The Democratic candidate Mikey Cheryl got four hundred thousand more

1:45:51.640 --> 1:45:54.719
<v Speaker 1>votes than Phil Murphy got in twenty twenty one. Okay,

1:45:55.520 --> 1:45:58.559
<v Speaker 1>that tells you a whole bunch of Democrats who didn't

1:45:58.600 --> 1:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>bother to show up in twenty one decided to show

1:46:01.200 --> 1:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>up in twenty five. I don't think I had anything

1:46:04.120 --> 1:46:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to do with Mikey Cheryl and Jeck Chodarelly, and everything

1:46:07.400 --> 1:46:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to do with the larger national environment. By the way,

1:46:11.400 --> 1:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>we got that result on Tuesday. If you recall the

1:46:14.760 --> 1:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>NBC News poll that came out two days earlier that

1:46:17.200 --> 1:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I am a big believer of because I trust those

1:46:19.120 --> 1:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>two pollsters. They had a generic ballot lead for the

1:46:21.640 --> 1:46:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats of eight points. It was the largest lead that

1:46:23.720 --> 1:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrats had going back to twenty seventeen. Twenty eighteen cycle,

1:46:26.960 --> 1:46:30.519
<v Speaker 1>another pretty good cycle for Democrats. So I throw all

1:46:30.520 --> 1:46:32.599
<v Speaker 1>that in there in that my new top five list

1:46:32.800 --> 1:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is skewed a bit towards the Democrats. So number one

1:46:37.960 --> 1:46:41.599
<v Speaker 1>hasn't changed. That's North Carolina. It's not going to change.

1:46:41.720 --> 1:46:43.960
<v Speaker 1>But my number two has. I had Georgia's the second

1:46:44.040 --> 1:46:47.040
<v Speaker 1>most vulnerable seat. After seeing what we saw with those

1:46:47.120 --> 1:46:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Public Service Commission races where there was no money spent

1:46:49.720 --> 1:46:53.639
<v Speaker 1>and Democrats just generically won by a lot, you've got

1:46:54.640 --> 1:46:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a growing divisive Republican primary. I highlighted an add a

1:46:59.800 --> 1:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of podcasts ago where Derek Dooley, the son of

1:47:02.640 --> 1:47:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Vince Dooley, the former football coach of the Bulldogs, that

1:47:05.680 --> 1:47:08.599
<v Speaker 1>the super pack of Brian Kemp, the sitting governor, was

1:47:09.920 --> 1:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>running an ad that sort of lumped in the two

1:47:11.720 --> 1:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Republican congressmen in the primary and osof as all responsible

1:47:15.920 --> 1:47:18.439
<v Speaker 1>for the shutdown. So you now know what kind of

1:47:18.560 --> 1:47:21.200
<v Speaker 1>campaign Dooley is going to run as the outsider, the

1:47:21.200 --> 1:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>anti Washington crowd. I think it's a smart place to

1:47:24.400 --> 1:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>position himself at this point. Though, if Dooley is the nominee,

1:47:30.200 --> 1:47:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Osoff's in bigger trouble. But if Dooley is

1:47:32.840 --> 1:47:35.519
<v Speaker 1>not the nominee, and so far he's still the third

1:47:35.560 --> 1:47:39.439
<v Speaker 1>place candidate, I think Osoff is a bit safer than

1:47:39.880 --> 1:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I preps. Look, he's still in the top five, but

1:47:42.040 --> 1:47:46.639
<v Speaker 1>he is not number two most vulnerable. I think now

1:47:46.680 --> 1:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to put in the second most vulnerable.

1:47:48.240 --> 1:47:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Susan Collins.

1:47:49.840 --> 1:47:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I do move Susan Collins up into the second slot there.

1:47:54.320 --> 1:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I think when you see what the Democratic turnouts was

1:47:58.080 --> 1:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Northeast in general, you see the fact that

1:48:03.160 --> 1:48:06.759
<v Speaker 1>in some ways the strength of the oyster farmer Graham Platner,

1:48:06.800 --> 1:48:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that his support is holding and it's not

1:48:12.280 --> 1:48:14.760
<v Speaker 1>hurting the Democrats. The fact that Jay Jones got through

1:48:14.760 --> 1:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>what he got through in Virginia, I think is only

1:48:18.200 --> 1:48:22.439
<v Speaker 1>going to serve to reassure Platner on there. The anti

1:48:22.520 --> 1:48:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Schumer vibe, the anti establishment vibe, seems to be much

1:48:25.439 --> 1:48:28.920
<v Speaker 1>stronger than the anti character vibe inside the Democratic Party

1:48:29.000 --> 1:48:33.439
<v Speaker 1>right now. And you know Collins is going to be

1:48:33.479 --> 1:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>defending a bunch of status quo stuff it is. You know,

1:48:37.520 --> 1:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>do I think if Janet Mills is the Democratic nominee,

1:48:40.439 --> 1:48:44.519
<v Speaker 1>Collins has a better chance of winning. I do, believe

1:48:44.560 --> 1:48:46.479
<v Speaker 1>it or not, but I still think it's going to

1:48:46.479 --> 1:48:48.439
<v Speaker 1>be it's going to be a hard time being an

1:48:48.439 --> 1:48:52.840
<v Speaker 1>incumbent Republican running in twenty twenty six with this likely

1:48:52.880 --> 1:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>economy that we're staring at and the way Donald Trump

1:48:57.080 --> 1:49:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is positioning the party's brand right, And while Susan Collins

1:49:02.439 --> 1:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is never going to be mistaken for a Trump Republican,

1:49:05.280 --> 1:49:07.920
<v Speaker 1>she's still going to have to carry around some of

1:49:07.960 --> 1:49:10.559
<v Speaker 1>that baggage, some of that baggage on tariffs, some of

1:49:10.560 --> 1:49:13.519
<v Speaker 1>that baggage on health. I mean, she's probably going to

1:49:13.520 --> 1:49:16.240
<v Speaker 1>be the loan Republican, you know, one of now she

1:49:16.280 --> 1:49:18.559
<v Speaker 1>won't be the loan Republicans. She's going to be one

1:49:18.600 --> 1:49:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of the lead Republicans trying to get these Obamacare subsidies extended,

1:49:22.560 --> 1:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>because if they do not get extended, she's done. She's

1:49:26.320 --> 1:49:30.559
<v Speaker 1>completely done. Which is why I am bullish that you

1:49:30.600 --> 1:49:33.720
<v Speaker 1>will see a one year extension at a minimum of

1:49:33.760 --> 1:49:37.439
<v Speaker 1>these Obamacare subsidies, because I think there is no senator

1:49:37.760 --> 1:49:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that would be more vulnerable to a decision not to

1:49:40.320 --> 1:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>do that than Susan Collins. So number one is North Carolina.

1:49:44.920 --> 1:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Number two is main Number three I am going to

1:49:51.000 --> 1:49:53.960
<v Speaker 1>put Georgia. I still think that there is certainly, you

1:49:54.000 --> 1:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>know it is it is a even state. We've still

1:49:58.920 --> 1:50:02.879
<v Speaker 1>not seen, you know, a demo until these psc elections.

1:50:02.880 --> 1:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>We hadn't see a Democrat went a down ballot statewide

1:50:06.479 --> 1:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>contest in Georgia going back more than ten years. But

1:50:12.080 --> 1:50:15.479
<v Speaker 1>the entire political environment in Georgia. I mean, if Georgia

1:50:15.560 --> 1:50:19.719
<v Speaker 1>is indeed you know, I've been vacillating, was Georgia anti

1:50:19.760 --> 1:50:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Trump state or is Georgia simply a swing state that

1:50:23.600 --> 1:50:27.240
<v Speaker 1>demographics have been shifting over time? And I think there's

1:50:27.280 --> 1:50:30.120
<v Speaker 1>now more and more evidence that this is a This

1:50:30.200 --> 1:50:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is a realignment in Georgia. This is the growth of

1:50:32.880 --> 1:50:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta suburbs, This is all of those things that

1:50:35.800 --> 1:50:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this is less about. And it may be what we're

1:50:40.400 --> 1:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the Atlanta metro areas. What we saw in

1:50:43.640 --> 1:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>northern Virginia that went from being an important pocket of

1:50:47.120 --> 1:50:51.439
<v Speaker 1>voters for Virginia Democrats to becoming the most dominant feature

1:50:52.080 --> 1:50:54.639
<v Speaker 1>of the state and of the politics of the state.

1:50:55.240 --> 1:50:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think we're starting to starting to see more

1:50:57.280 --> 1:50:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and more of that in Georgia. But I'm still going

1:50:59.160 --> 1:51:02.599
<v Speaker 1>to put it. I'm still going to put it right

1:51:02.640 --> 1:51:09.559
<v Speaker 1>now in the third slot because because of the fact

1:51:09.600 --> 1:51:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that this time Osof isn't going to have be running

1:51:12.840 --> 1:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>with Rafael Warnock or a presidential campaign, right, He's got

1:51:16.160 --> 1:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to do this entire turnout operation on his own.

1:51:20.960 --> 1:51:21.240
<v Speaker 2>There.

1:51:22.240 --> 1:51:27.439
<v Speaker 1>So North Carolina one Main three, Georgia Main two, Georgia three,

1:51:28.160 --> 1:51:30.479
<v Speaker 1>number four on the less, I'm gonna put Michigan, so

1:51:30.560 --> 1:51:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it drops down a slot because I've jumped started Maine there.

1:51:35.520 --> 1:51:41.439
<v Speaker 1>And look, I do think Mike Rodgers is he went

1:51:41.479 --> 1:51:45.000
<v Speaker 1>down a weird road. He decided to claim that somehow

1:51:45.080 --> 1:51:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty four election was rigged, that it or

1:51:48.280 --> 1:51:52.160
<v Speaker 1>he's implying he's opening the door to some conspiracy theories

1:51:52.200 --> 1:51:56.280
<v Speaker 1>as to why he lost in twenty twenty four. Boy,

1:51:56.320 --> 1:51:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a long way away from the Mike Rogers I

1:51:58.439 --> 1:52:02.600
<v Speaker 1>first started covering when he was in It's going to

1:52:02.680 --> 1:52:05.960
<v Speaker 1>come as a surprise, I given that he doesn't really

1:52:05.960 --> 1:52:08.880
<v Speaker 1>have any serious primary opposition, the fact that he's going

1:52:08.920 --> 1:52:12.120
<v Speaker 1>down this sort of Trump grievance road on his twenty

1:52:12.160 --> 1:52:15.280
<v Speaker 1>four election is a bit of a head scratcher. Doesn't

1:52:15.360 --> 1:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>seem as if he needs to be catering to that

1:52:17.240 --> 1:52:21.360
<v Speaker 1>primary voter that enthusiastically. So perhaps he really believes this,

1:52:21.479 --> 1:52:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps he's going down this rabbit hole. I don't think

1:52:24.439 --> 1:52:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that's good politics for him, but you know, he's still

1:52:30.160 --> 1:52:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the reason I still give him and why I think

1:52:33.040 --> 1:52:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Michigan could be very competitive is We're going to have

1:52:35.200 --> 1:52:39.879
<v Speaker 1>a very messy Democratic primary. Who knows who gets elected?

1:52:39.920 --> 1:52:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that the super progressive that gets elected is that

1:52:42.000 --> 1:52:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the outsider and lsied is the progressive. McMorrow is the

1:52:48.360 --> 1:52:52.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of outsider. Stevens is the establishment candidate. They've all

1:52:52.720 --> 1:52:56.719
<v Speaker 1>scrambled to be anti Schumer now, even Stevens on that front.

1:52:56.800 --> 1:52:59.879
<v Speaker 1>So that primary could get messy, and it's an August primary,

1:53:01.120 --> 1:53:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and it means that rogers Is should be in a

1:53:03.840 --> 1:53:07.400
<v Speaker 1>strong position. But I am I do think that's a

1:53:07.439 --> 1:53:10.479
<v Speaker 1>loser to go down the conspiracy road in a swing

1:53:10.520 --> 1:53:12.920
<v Speaker 1>state like Michigan. And then I'm putting a new seat

1:53:12.960 --> 1:53:15.040
<v Speaker 1>at number five. I had New Hampshire in the top

1:53:15.080 --> 1:53:17.240
<v Speaker 1>five before. No longer am I putting New Hampshire there

1:53:17.360 --> 1:53:20.360
<v Speaker 1>because I think the political environment indicates that it's more

1:53:20.439 --> 1:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>likely another Republican health seat is going to fall before

1:53:23.120 --> 1:53:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a Democratic health seat. And look, I think Johnson new

1:53:25.760 --> 1:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is a much stronger candidate than Scott Brown potentially in

1:53:29.120 --> 1:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>an open seat. But if the wind is blowing left,

1:53:33.720 --> 1:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire goes with the wind right, you know you

1:53:36.720 --> 1:53:38.799
<v Speaker 1>can still get elected as a Republican in New Hampshire,

1:53:38.840 --> 1:53:41.360
<v Speaker 1>which it needs to be in a either even or

1:53:41.400 --> 1:53:44.320
<v Speaker 1>good Republican year. I don't know if this is a

1:53:44.360 --> 1:53:47.920
<v Speaker 1>winnable race for any Republican Chris or Johnson unhu. If

1:53:47.920 --> 1:53:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the wind is blowing as strongly for the Democrats in

1:53:51.000 --> 1:53:53.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty six as it was blowing for the Democrats in

1:53:53.840 --> 1:53:57.280
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey and in Virginia in twenty five, I can

1:53:57.360 --> 1:54:02.840
<v Speaker 1>just tell you that it knew it. The odds are

1:54:03.080 --> 1:54:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it's going to look more more like a blue state

1:54:08.240 --> 1:54:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in an environment like this than it will a swing state.

1:54:11.720 --> 1:54:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So my new number five is Shared Brown and Ohio.

1:54:16.200 --> 1:54:19.800
<v Speaker 1>John Houstad is the appointed elected senator there. He's been

1:54:19.840 --> 1:54:22.720
<v Speaker 1>doing quite well in some of his union endorsements and

1:54:22.840 --> 1:54:26.000
<v Speaker 1>getting a few union endorsements at Shared Brown, and when

1:54:26.000 --> 1:54:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he was an incumbent senator would get but if you

1:54:31.280 --> 1:54:34.520
<v Speaker 1>just shift, if you believe the electorate in general is

1:54:34.520 --> 1:54:36.400
<v Speaker 1>just going to be five points better across the board

1:54:36.440 --> 1:54:39.960
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats, like it was in Virginia, that basically makes

1:54:39.960 --> 1:54:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Ohio a coin flip. And what we learned about Shared

1:54:43.800 --> 1:54:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Brown in twenty four is he can run three to

1:54:46.720 --> 1:54:51.080
<v Speaker 1>five points ahead of the Democratic of the generic Democratic number.

1:54:51.600 --> 1:54:54.360
<v Speaker 1>He can't run it eight or nine points ahead of

1:54:54.400 --> 1:54:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a Democratic presidential candidate. He's running in a midterm years.

1:54:59.280 --> 1:55:01.640
<v Speaker 1>He has had more success running in midterm years than

1:55:01.680 --> 1:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he has in presidential years. And he did win once

1:55:06.080 --> 1:55:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in a presidential year in twenty twelve, but he had

1:55:08.920 --> 1:55:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that Obama had a lot of wind at his back,

1:55:11.480 --> 1:55:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and that was quite helpful to him. In twenty eighteen,

1:55:14.400 --> 1:55:19.400
<v Speaker 1>he was able to win in a Trump year thanks to,

1:55:20.720 --> 1:55:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, a combination of a week Republican opponent, but

1:55:24.320 --> 1:55:27.760
<v Speaker 1>also just again it was a good Democratic year.

1:55:28.280 --> 1:55:30.120
<v Speaker 2>So at this point I.

1:55:30.040 --> 1:55:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Put Ohio there, And this means three of the five

1:55:32.720 --> 1:55:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in my five most vulnerable are Republican held seats. So

1:55:36.320 --> 1:55:40.120
<v Speaker 1>if Democrats sweep the five hold for Georgian Michigan and

1:55:40.120 --> 1:55:43.280
<v Speaker 1>flip North Carolina, Maine, in New Hampshire, they are only

1:55:43.320 --> 1:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>one seat away from the majority. That's where this top

1:55:46.160 --> 1:55:49.360
<v Speaker 1>five list sits right now. That's this is why if

1:55:49.400 --> 1:55:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to mess around on the political betting markets,

1:55:55.280 --> 1:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the best early bets to make right now,

1:55:57.080 --> 1:55:59.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's a sheriff stock, and then you could sell

1:55:59.320 --> 1:56:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that share before the results actually happen. Because if Democrats

1:56:03.560 --> 1:56:06.600
<v Speaker 1>succeed in good candidate recruits in Alaska, a good candidate

1:56:06.680 --> 1:56:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas, you may see them get six or seven

1:56:10.960 --> 1:56:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Republican held seats in the competitive category.

1:56:13.760 --> 1:56:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Will they win them all?

1:56:14.600 --> 1:56:19.640
<v Speaker 1>No, But if they can put Texas, Iowa, Alaska, Kansas, Nebraska,

1:56:19.720 --> 1:56:22.720
<v Speaker 1>they can put three of those five in play in

1:56:22.720 --> 1:56:25.160
<v Speaker 1>addition to the three that I think they already now

1:56:25.160 --> 1:56:28.839
<v Speaker 1>have a either even or slightly better chance at flipping.

1:56:31.080 --> 1:56:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You you suddenly have.

1:56:32.880 --> 1:56:35.760
<v Speaker 2>A path to the Senate majority. There you go.

1:56:35.880 --> 1:56:41.040
<v Speaker 1>The top five list this week. North Carolina, Maine, Georgia, Michigan,

1:56:41.320 --> 1:56:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Ohio the five Senate states most likely to flip this month.

1:56:45.840 --> 1:56:56.240
<v Speaker 1>As far as the Chuck todcast is concerned, All right,

1:56:56.280 --> 1:57:02.200
<v Speaker 1>let's take a couple more questions, ask Chuck. None of

1:57:02.200 --> 1:57:05.240
<v Speaker 1>these will be shut down and related. This one comes

1:57:05.280 --> 1:57:08.920
<v Speaker 1>from a third generation Navy vet John B from Saint Louis,

1:57:08.960 --> 1:57:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and he writes, Hey, thanks for responding to my question

1:57:10.920 --> 1:57:13.920
<v Speaker 1>about the atomic bowl. All right, so it's not a

1:57:13.960 --> 1:57:16.320
<v Speaker 1>first time long time, but at least a second time

1:57:16.360 --> 1:57:18.200
<v Speaker 1>long time. I'm a World War Two in Cold War

1:57:18.280 --> 1:57:20.360
<v Speaker 1>history buff and I think it's crucial to keep conversations

1:57:20.360 --> 1:57:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about those times alive in our modern discourse. We live

1:57:22.880 --> 1:57:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in the shadow of those events. I'm wondering how America

1:57:25.080 --> 1:57:27.320
<v Speaker 1>might have been different during the past fifty years if

1:57:27.320 --> 1:57:29.320
<v Speaker 1>we had not ended the draft falling Vietnam. I think

1:57:29.320 --> 1:57:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we could expand that to include national service in general. Thought, John,

1:57:32.840 --> 1:57:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you are scratching an itch that I'm constantly dealing with.

1:57:36.920 --> 1:57:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, I think not having national service.

1:57:42.160 --> 1:57:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I think national service could be a huge advancement of

1:57:47.400 --> 1:57:55.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to depolarize America, right, getting people, getting American citizens

1:57:55.840 --> 1:57:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to believe that they have to that part of your

1:57:59.280 --> 1:58:02.879
<v Speaker 1>citizenship is to give a little bit to this country

1:58:02.920 --> 1:58:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and service. And it doesn't have to be in the military.

1:58:05.240 --> 1:58:07.880
<v Speaker 1>It can be a variety of ways you can give.

1:58:07.960 --> 1:58:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It could be working, you know, in home health care

1:58:10.480 --> 1:58:13.600
<v Speaker 1>for an elderly parent without a close knit family. It

1:58:13.640 --> 1:58:17.200
<v Speaker 1>could be cleaning up rivers and streams. It could be

1:58:17.320 --> 1:58:23.080
<v Speaker 1>teaching in underserved communities that need more school teachers. It

1:58:23.120 --> 1:58:27.160
<v Speaker 1>could simply be tutoring, or it could be military service.

1:58:27.560 --> 1:58:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I think anything.

1:58:28.600 --> 1:58:29.280
<v Speaker 2>It's why I.

1:58:29.200 --> 1:58:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Think that in general, you know, I'm speaking on Veterans

1:58:32.240 --> 1:58:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Day here. In general, I'm a big advocate of bringing

1:58:35.240 --> 1:58:39.200
<v Speaker 1>as many veterans as you can into the workforce, into

1:58:39.240 --> 1:58:44.040
<v Speaker 1>any sort of culture because most military veterans, the experience

1:58:44.200 --> 1:58:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of being in the military exposed them to people that

1:58:47.880 --> 1:58:51.480
<v Speaker 1>grew up differently than them, people that worshiped different faiths

1:58:51.520 --> 1:58:54.400
<v Speaker 1>than they did, but they all learn how to have

1:58:54.440 --> 1:58:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a common mission and buy in some ways wearing the

1:58:56.680 --> 1:59:00.280
<v Speaker 1>same uniform. They realize when you wear the same uniform

1:59:00.680 --> 1:59:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you bleed the same red blood, that hey, they're really

1:59:03.680 --> 1:59:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the differences really are are all surface. They're not They're

1:59:09.600 --> 1:59:12.840
<v Speaker 1>not very deep at all. So not to sort of

1:59:13.240 --> 1:59:15.200
<v Speaker 1>try to like, you know, but for the good old

1:59:15.280 --> 1:59:20.960
<v Speaker 1>days kind of mindset, I'm a I'm a huge advocate

1:59:21.000 --> 1:59:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of national service, and I think it could be a again,

1:59:25.360 --> 1:59:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, whether it's a way to pay

1:59:27.320 --> 1:59:30.200
<v Speaker 1>for college. There's all sorts of ways that you create

1:59:30.280 --> 1:59:32.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of for every year of national you know, maybe

1:59:32.360 --> 1:59:34.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody has to do one, and every extra year you

1:59:34.320 --> 1:59:36.160
<v Speaker 1>give you get that much more off of your tuition.

1:59:36.760 --> 1:59:38.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think there's a lot of ways, you know,

1:59:38.840 --> 1:59:40.520
<v Speaker 1>or to trade school, whatever you wanted to do it.

1:59:41.480 --> 1:59:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Anything that we could do to sort of get Americans

1:59:45.280 --> 1:59:47.800
<v Speaker 1>from different walks of life to have to have to

1:59:47.840 --> 1:59:51.360
<v Speaker 1>give back for a period of time only strengthens the

1:59:51.400 --> 1:59:53.160
<v Speaker 1>fabric of this country.

1:59:54.280 --> 1:59:57.280
<v Speaker 2>So I'm a huge advocate, all right.

1:59:57.400 --> 1:59:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from Chase little Rock, Rockansas and response

1:59:59.760 --> 2:00:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to your uestion about staying on the thirteenth floor in

2:00:01.600 --> 2:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>game day, if a black cat crossed my path while

2:00:04.320 --> 2:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I walked under a ladder on the way out of

2:00:05.800 --> 2:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>my thirteenth floor hotel room in Fayetteville, I wouldn't have

2:00:08.480 --> 2:00:11.120
<v Speaker 1>batted an eye. This razorback football season has already used

2:00:11.200 --> 2:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>up every ounce of luck in the entire state. Bobby

2:00:13.320 --> 2:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Petrino's come back to or hit all the wrong notes,

2:00:15.480 --> 2:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, Faydeville needs a total due over new coach,

2:00:18.160 --> 2:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>new schemes.

2:00:18.680 --> 2:00:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I knew everything.

2:00:19.640 --> 2:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So at the college football job market heating up, which

2:00:21.720 --> 2:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>openings do you think are the most tempting and who's

2:00:23.920 --> 2:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>got the chops or luck to fill them go hogs eventually. Well, look,

2:00:32.280 --> 2:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Florida is always the It's one of those

2:00:36.040 --> 2:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that you think it should be a bigger power than

2:00:37.920 --> 2:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>it is. Irony is that the history of Florida football

2:00:40.920 --> 2:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is actually quite mediocre.

2:00:43.880 --> 2:00:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Right.

2:00:44.080 --> 2:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>They've really only had two brief periods of success, one

2:00:48.080 --> 2:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>with Steve Spurrier, one with urban Meyer and Tim Tebow,

2:00:50.880 --> 2:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>which really probably have to talk more of Tim Tebow

2:00:53.040 --> 2:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>than urban Meyer. And they've been mediocre or port and

2:00:58.240 --> 2:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>every other you know, at any other period. In theory,

2:01:03.280 --> 2:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it should be a great job to have. In theory,

2:01:06.960 --> 2:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it should be a place that you could become a powerhouse.

2:01:10.560 --> 2:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be a cesspool of micromanagers, right. It's

2:01:14.160 --> 2:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of like you know what Auburn is. It's like,

2:01:16.480 --> 2:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it has all the ingredients, but it's impossible

2:01:18.880 --> 2:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to succeed because the boosters are always going to get

2:01:21.480 --> 2:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in your way. It just trusts me from experienced mind me.

2:01:25.400 --> 2:01:27.120
<v Speaker 2>So on paper, it's Florida.

2:01:28.040 --> 2:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I'm a huge I think Arkansas is

2:01:30.960 --> 2:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a hidden I think Faetteville is a is a is

2:01:34.040 --> 2:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a hidden gem in the South. I think it's one

2:01:36.760 --> 2:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of the it's you know it's it's going to be

2:01:39.960 --> 2:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the next Austin or Nashville. I think it's a great

2:01:42.760 --> 2:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>place to live. I think that somebody is going to

2:01:46.280 --> 2:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>crack that code. And when you have Tyson Chicken money

2:01:49.280 --> 2:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and Walmart money, the the you know, if the if

2:01:54.800 --> 2:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the university athletic program will invest in football, Arkansas could

2:01:59.600 --> 2:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>be a great job. It is not clear they want

2:02:01.920 --> 2:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to invest in football as much as they do basketball

2:02:04.000 --> 2:02:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and baseball. That seems to be the be the biggest

2:02:06.840 --> 2:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>problem there. I do think the Penn State job is

2:02:11.800 --> 2:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>actually quite appealing to because there's such a loyal fan base.

2:02:16.600 --> 2:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>You I actually think even though Franklin, you know, think

2:02:19.400 --> 2:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>about how long he survived without succeeding at the tippy

2:02:23.200 --> 2:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>tippy top, which means fan base has actually a lot

2:02:25.960 --> 2:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>more patience than it gets credit for. So that would

2:02:29.680 --> 2:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>be a good one that I think you could see

2:02:32.920 --> 2:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>quick success at and sustained success that and be in

2:02:39.080 --> 2:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a community that would be pretty comforting. I mean you

2:02:42.680 --> 2:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>could turn you could definitely turn Happy Valley into Tuscaloosa

2:02:47.040 --> 2:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and have a Nick Saban like run there. And that's

2:02:49.360 --> 2:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>probably the way I look at it. Where could you

2:02:50.880 --> 2:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>have a Nick Saban like run where you might go

2:02:52.760 --> 2:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a decade and just be so dominant. I think Fills

2:02:55.680 --> 2:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a place to do that. I think I think a

2:02:58.880 --> 2:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Happy Valley is a place to that. I'm less convinced

2:03:01.640 --> 2:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you can do that in Gainesville, and I don't you know.

2:03:06.240 --> 2:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I think history shows you it's pretty difficult to do.

2:03:08.800 --> 2:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if Virginia Tech it can be

2:03:11.760 --> 2:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>on that highest level right now. I don't know if

2:03:14.440 --> 2:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>they have the financial backing to do that.

2:03:19.720 --> 2:03:20.360
<v Speaker 2>On that front.

2:03:20.800 --> 2:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna take one more question here. This

2:03:25.120 --> 2:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>comes from john S and Millie Waukee. Of course, everything

2:03:28.640 --> 2:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I've learned about socialist mayors came from Wayne's World, the movie,

2:03:33.160 --> 2:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and Alice Cooper.

2:03:35.320 --> 2:03:36.000
<v Speaker 2>But I digress.

2:03:36.080 --> 2:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Diehard listener here, just finish your podcast with rich Tawe.

2:03:38.680 --> 2:03:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating.

2:03:39.240 --> 2:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>You answered my past question about voters in Ozaki and

2:03:42.360 --> 2:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Sheboygan County's voting anti woman richest focus group confirmed my

2:03:45.480 --> 2:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>hunch some voters dislike Trump, but voter form anyway likely

2:03:48.560 --> 2:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>because of Harris. Have your thoughts on this changed at all,

2:03:50.880 --> 2:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>even if the polling doesn't pick it up. Look, I

2:03:54.360 --> 2:03:56.839
<v Speaker 1>think it's pretty clear there was a group of voters

2:03:57.240 --> 2:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know that Harris couldn't appeal to that. I

2:04:04.360 --> 2:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>guess what you're you know the better the question is

2:04:08.520 --> 2:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that that Joe Biden did appeal to in twenty twenty. Yes,

2:04:15.440 --> 2:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But I also think it's pretty clear, you know. I

2:04:19.560 --> 2:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's a fair question about about whether it is hard.

2:04:24.080 --> 2:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think I think race is less of

2:04:26.880 --> 2:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>an issue. I think gender was more of an issue.

2:04:32.160 --> 2:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's hard to disaggregate it because you had a

2:04:38.000 --> 2:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>poor economic environment. She was defending the history of sitting

2:04:42.640 --> 2:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>vice presidents trying to succeed unpopular presidents is pretty stark, right,

2:04:49.880 --> 2:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Hubert Humphrey couldn't win with LBJ, but he

2:04:55.160 --> 2:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>came awfully close, and neither could she. So it is

2:04:59.280 --> 2:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's hard to find isolate the specific voter itself.

2:05:03.600 --> 2:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>You hear it in there, but you'd have a better

2:05:09.480 --> 2:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>argument if she lost with a better economic record. And

2:05:13.640 --> 2:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's.

2:05:15.000 --> 2:05:17.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, it is. I still think there's a.

2:05:17.840 --> 2:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Little bit of choose your own adventure on this that

2:05:20.120 --> 2:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you can. You certainly hear it in there, and you

2:05:23.320 --> 2:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly hear it in those focus groups, and Rich sort

2:05:25.360 --> 2:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of described it. It is a hurdle, but I don't

2:05:31.920 --> 2:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's a brick wall, but it becomes a brick

2:05:38.920 --> 2:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>wall if you know, there's like this massive economic downturn, right,

2:05:43.480 --> 2:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>if a whole bunch of other stuff are going, it's

2:05:45.760 --> 2:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of it is a factor.

2:05:47.520 --> 2:05:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Not the factor.

2:05:50.080 --> 2:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>On this front. So I think that that. I mean,

2:05:57.040 --> 2:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>if we were seeing women struggle to win governorship in

2:06:00.200 --> 2:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>these swing states, I'd be I would be more persuaded.

2:06:06.440 --> 2:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we look look at the state of Michigan.

2:06:11.840 --> 2:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>It's elected, you know to two term women governors in

2:06:15.520 --> 2:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years, uh in, Jennifer Grant Holme and

2:06:19.520 --> 2:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Gretchen Wetber, but they didn't support Kamala Harris.

2:06:23.280 --> 2:06:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Was that, you know?

2:06:24.400 --> 2:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that it. I think you can't

2:06:30.520 --> 2:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>dismiss it as a factor, but I will. I am

2:06:34.320 --> 2:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>still going to dismiss it.

2:06:35.280 --> 2:06:38.240
<v Speaker 2>As the factor, if that's fair, all right.

2:06:38.760 --> 2:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna leave that there because guess what. I'll

2:06:41.640 --> 2:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>be back in twenty four hours with another episode of

2:06:43.520 --> 2:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the Check podcast until we upload again.