WEBVTT - Breonna Taylor Was Not Murdered 0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:15.600 You are entering the freedom huge the attack on Catholic 0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:21.279 Amy Coney Barrett from Democrats, Hunter Biden's questionable activities in 0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.560 a new Senate report, footage from Kenosha comes out to 0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:29.040 bolster the self defense claim Rittenhouse, the Brianna Taylor announcement 0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:33.320 about police coming out later today, and Trump Band's critical 0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.360 race theory. This is the Buck Sexon Show, where the 0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.680 mission or mission is to decode what really matters with 0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:47.640 passionable intelligence. Make no mistake, you're a great American Again, 0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:58.080 the Buck Sexon Show begins analyst, he's a great guy. No, welcome, 0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.639 friends to the Buck Sexton Show, and honor and privilege 0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.640 to have you here with me. As always fired up 0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.400 here for the election season, getting ready to see where 0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.800 all of this goes. And I am a little surprised. 0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.200 I'm gonna be honest with you that at a time 0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:19.400 when there's a to call it a heated election would 0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.760 be quite an understatement, and to call it an acrimonious 0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:29.600 Supreme Court battle would also be an understatement. But there's 0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:36.480 a relative pause here in the main narrative from the left. 0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.800 I think that perhaps, and I've been saying this all along, 0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:44.200 that my expectation is that they will say completely unhinged, 0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.080 insane things. Let's recall it was not long ago they 0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:51.760 were accusing the you know, the grown up equivalent of 0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:56.520 an altar boy of Brett Cavanaugh, that they were accusing 0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:01.120 him of being a serial gang rapist from high school. 0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.640 And they will say anything to try to stop Amy 0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:10.960 Coney Barrett. The problem is their usual attacks, even if 0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.160 they lie, I think they've recognized they're going to have 0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.440 to get really creative with their evil. They're they're going 0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.440 to have to extend themselves, get a little bit to 0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:27.120 outside their comfort zone with the usual sexist racist. I mean, 0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:31.120 they could call Amy Coney Barrett a sexist, but I 0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.680 think we all recognize that wouldn't really work all that well. 0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.680 You know, they could claim that she had, you know, 0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.919 sexually assaulted somebody in high school or college without any 0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:48.880 evidence or any underlying, believable, credible story whatsoever. But that 0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.040 probably would also be a bad idea. So what are 0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.720 they turning to here and what is this really all about? 0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:03.119 They're having to go after her Catholicism. Comparing the possible 0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:08.720 elevation of Coney Barrett to the Supreme Chord as a 0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.240 chapter in a real life version of the Handmaid's Tale. 0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.800 I'm pretty sure that the Handmaid's Tale they got the 0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:20.480 whole reference. Isn't it in the Gospel of Luke that 0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.120 Mary says I'm to be a handmaid of the Lord 0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:27.639 when she is told that she will give birth to Jesus. Anyway, 0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.280 the Handmaid's Tale, that's what they're telling us. It would 0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:35.320 be if we had the elevation of any Coney Barrett 0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:41.800 to this Supreme Court seat, and they have the votes. 0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.200 The Republicans have the votes, So the narrative so far 0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.120 hasn't worked. They're trying to come up with something. I 0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:54.280 don't know if they really believe that defaming a Catholic 0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.680 for her faith, I mean, for just being a mainstream 0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:02.240 believing Catholic defaming one is a good idea right before 0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.920 the election, although I will say Catholics who in majority 0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:10.400 vote Democrat have largely turned into a you know, for 0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.560 a lot of Catholics, I should say their Catholicism is 0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.400 something more akin to being in the rotary club. You know, 0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.840 it's a little bit more like like a community organizer 0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.760 group where you go twice a year and you know, 0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.279 you tell people you're Catholic, but you don't really believe it, 0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.920 like you don't believe any of that stuff. And there 0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:30.839 are a lot a lot of those Catholics are going 0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.560 to vote Democrat. A lot of those Catholics are going 0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.320 to be fine with all of this because they don't 0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.599 take offense to the slandering of their faith, because it's 0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.480 really more of a of a cultural and social tradition 0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:43.920 for them. But maybe it's gonna back far on them. 0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.400 I can't tell you that. I can't know in advance. 0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.680 I somebody who was raised Roman Catholic and went to 0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.720 Jesuit school and studied for years in school the Scripture 0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.640 and the New Testament. I'm amazed at how many Catholics 0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.440 think that the Democrats are the ones that really represent 0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.080 their ideals. But nonetheless, that's what ends up, That's what 0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.520 ends up happening. That's the new reality that we all 0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:15.680 live in here. So they're going to try the process moves, 0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.599 They're going to try to just do what they can 0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.600 to prevent this from happening. As I've said, here's Chuck 0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.520 Schumer saying that they're going to use tools to delay this. 0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.920 Play twelve. Do you believe that you have tactical options 0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.480 to slow them down. Yes, A, we have tactical options 0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.719 to slow them down. We will use every tool in 0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.920 the tool kit. Now, admittedly McConnell has changed things to 0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.520 change the rules, so we have fewer tools and they're 0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.320 less sharp, but every tool we have we will use. 0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.800 I mean, what are they going to do. They're going 0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.920 to try to prevent access to the building. I think 0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.760 that's a very a very likely pathway here. You know, 0:05:55.800 --> 0:06:00.240 the activists, the Democrat stormtroopers, they're they're the ones it'll 0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.600 make sure that people can't actually show up and vote 0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:10.320 on this. They're going to say, well that this is 0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.560 a terrible day for women's rights. Isn't an amazing The 0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:20.560 Democrats argue consistently that the elevation of an eminently qualified 0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:24.400 mother of seven to the Supreme Court is somehow a 0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:32.480 loss for women. Yes, modern feminism has done so much 0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:37.680 for women, hasn't It negated huge parts of who they 0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:42.960 are and undermined motherhood. But anyway, I mean, that's that's 0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:44.920 not new. We've been saying that for a long time. 0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.360 I only wish that people would wake up to this reality. 0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.520 They really, they really want to force as many women 0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.799 as possible. And look, women should be allowed to choose 0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.560 whatever their destiny. If they don't, if they don't want 0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:56.520 to get married enough kids, great, you're allowed to do that, 0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.919 of course. And if you want to be a person 0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.480 who's only chasing a that's fine. But a lot of 0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.160 women that I know have been pressured into being little 0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.039 cubicle warriors, you know, trying to make partner at the 0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.480 at the you know, the city law firm or something, 0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.360 and they're miserable. They're absolutely miserable because they don't have 0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:15.840 time to have a family, they don't have time to 0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.080 raise kids. They're doing these things. But if you even 0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.480 say that out loud, people shout at you. Oh, you're 0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.320 like one of the bad people in the Handmaid's Tale. 0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.000 Or this is the same way that the left has. 0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:32.160 They have a few cultural cultural analogies that they like 0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.360 to make, or that they have a few cultural references 0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.880 that will come up constantly in politics. They love Harry 0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.880 Potter and they love The Handmaid's Tale. Those are the 0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.120 two things. I don't know other people like Harry Potter too, 0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:46.200 but they're the liberals need to read another book. But 0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.840 I think that they're going to do everything that they 0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.160 can to frighten people around Amy Coney Barrett, and it's 0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.680 not gonna work, but it does create a frenzied state 0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.560 of mind for the Democrat base, so that then they're 0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.880 more willing to do the insane things that Chuck Schumer 0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:06.880 can't say out loud, can't tell people they're going to 0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.000 do or they should do, but he is hoping that 0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.800 they will, and then they're just going to say things 0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:20.480 that are obviously factually wrong. I mean, here's CNN's Allison Camarada, 0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.200 for example, making a claim that anybody with a passing 0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:29.040 familiarity with our legal system and the constitution would know 0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.480 is not really an accurate statement. Play three. I think 0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.960 one of the interesting discussions about abortion is that the 0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.480 country is generally divided, I mean almost split right in 0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.240 half about how they view it. However, in the latest 0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:46.559 Gallop polls, twenty percent of the country, Oh, I should say, 0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.560 only twenty percent of the country wants to outlaw it. Okay, 0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.080 So you can feel differently about the different nuances of it, 0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.760 but only twenty percent wants to outlaw it. And that's ultimately, 0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.640 you know, obviously, what would happen if Roe versus Wade, 0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.600 we're done way with and so it's just interesting. I mean, 0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.920 obviously we're seguing into a political stance here, but if 0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:10.640 the country does, you know, would support the direction that 0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.240 this is going in. She left out that eighty percent 0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.440 of the country believes that third term abortion should be illegal, 0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.240 or maybe it's seventy some odd percent now, but huge 0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.560 majority of the country thinks that third term abortion should 0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.800 be illegal. Europe, which is a very progressive place, Europe, 0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.600 has restrictions on abortion. Most eurowe depends on the European country, 0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.000 but there are European countries where, you know, the first 0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:37.320 trimester you're allowed to but beyond that they say that 0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.600 this you know, the science, this is the European argument. 0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.839 I mean, the real argument is life at conception, but 0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.240 the European argument in these states would be that pain 0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.000 and consciousness because of the development of the fetus has 0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.800 reached a stage where four months in and this is 0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.360 a baby. Obviously Democrats won't admit that, No, it's not 0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.559 a baby, it's something else. It's just a clump of 0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.320 cells that's growing that looks a lot like a human 0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.240 that has a heart and a brain. But what she 0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.040 says about how it would obviously be outlawed is obviously untrue. 0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.120 There would be some states that outlawed. There would be 0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:14.160 some places that don't want abortion to happen, but there'd 0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.520 be other states. It would become a states issue, which 0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:20.240 makes a whole lot more sense than the Roe v. 0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.760 Wade decision. And then you'd have places where there was 0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.200 this practice going on, you'd have other places where there wasn't. 0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.240 Federal funding would probably have to change. You wouldn't have 0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:32.480 federal funding for clinics that do abortion. So I mean, 0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.800 it would be a huge victory for the pro life movement, obviously, 0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.480 no question about that. But it wouldn't be illegal everywhere. 0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.560 But they're just going to say things like it would 0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:44.360 be illegal well where where specifically? And I think that 0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.720 you know, California and the morality, for example, in New 0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.240 York and California of its abortion practices would feel very 0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.840 different to a lot of the residents if they couldn't 0:10:53.920 --> 0:11:01.640 force Texas and Alabama and Wyoming to also have abortion right, 0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:03.520 if they couldn't force these other states to do it 0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:07.679 under federal law. So there's also that there's the creeping 0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.040 fear of, oh my gosh, what if people can actually 0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.240 stop and think about what has been going on and 0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.760 who has been supporting this, and how grotesque and immoral 0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:17.600 it is. But this is the most they can do. 0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:19.720 It's really all about Row. I mean, the people that 0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.880 say Amy Coney Barrett is such a setback for women 0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:26.120 and that they're all terrified about her more than anything else. 0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.840 It's Roe v. Wade, which is now a plank in 0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.960 the Democrat Party. It's really essential to the Democrat ethos 0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.040 in a way where I don't think that they can 0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.360 handle the prospect of not having that horrible Supreme Court 0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:43.000 decision in place. I think it emotionally damages and drains 0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.280 them just to think about it. But they haven't come 0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.920 up yet with the Amy Coney Barrett destruction routine. They 0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.040 haven't shown us their hand. I'm wondering what it will be. 0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.600 Perhaps it will just be process. They'll be Catholic bashing, 0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.480 they'll be anti women stuff, of course, But maybe it 0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.600 really is just they're pulling the fire alarms in Congress 0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.199 and forming human chains at the front door and hoping 0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:10.280 that does it. You're in the freedom mind. This is 0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:18.400 the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Justice Ruth Vader Gigsburg lived 0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.000 an inspiring life. She paved the way for women in 0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.560 the law, and America warns the passing of the true 0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.800 public servant. The Constitution of the United States provides that 0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:31.840 the President shall appoint judges to the Supreme Court. And 0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.600 before the week is out, after we honor the life 0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:39.160 and memory of Justice Ginsburg, President Donald Trump will do 0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:44.240 just that. This Saturday, President Donald Trump will nominate another 0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.880 principled conservative, a woman, to the Supreme Court of the 0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.360 United States. And after the United States Senate fulfills their 0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.680 duty to advise and consent, we're going to fill that seat. 0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.120 They're going to fill the seat, folks. I gotta say, 0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:04.560 I'm pleased that the Republicans really never missed a moment. 0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:06.720 I think there are a couple of things that come 0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:12.120 together on this one. One is that by filling, by 0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.840 filling the seat, they are likely more likely to keep 0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.319 their seats. So this is one of those great moments 0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:26.400 where political self interest coincides with the supposed policy preferences 0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:32.360 of the Republican Party, right with the obligation to voters 0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.000 that the Republican Party has. So what's best for our 0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.640 Republican politicians is also best for the people. Who voted 0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.320 for them. Look at that. It's amazing how that comes together. 0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.760 That's that's very encouraging. It. It does not seem at 0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:52.520 all to me like there's going to be some wavering 0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.120 on the part of Republicans and mccollins and Murkowski they 0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.360 can duck out and you know, this may be this 0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.000 may be an instance, this may be a sort of 0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.480 kumstance where you say, well, let's let them do that, 0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.040 or I should say, not not be too hard on 0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.360 punishing them, because we'd rather have Colins and Murkowski than 0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.280 a Democrat, and they don't want to lose reelection, so 0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:15.480 they're taking this more moderate path. But you just remember 0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.120 you can't trust them though, so they're going to be 0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.880 Republicans you can't really count on. It's better than a Democrat, 0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:24.680 but not not much. Mid Romney. I was very hard 0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.920 on him in the first twenty four hours when well, 0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:28.880 to be fair, there was an announcement that came out 0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.280 from someone close to Romney. According to the media, I 0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.120 think they tried to set the narrative beforehand. I think 0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.960 something was going on here because there was an announcement 0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:39.960 that said that mid Romney was not going to vote 0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:44.000 on a Supreme Court nominee until after the election, or 0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:45.840 you know, would not think that was appropriate. And then 0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:48.920 the Romney camp, such as it is, said no, no, no, 0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:53.800 that's not true. So something something happened there for sure. 0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.040 But that was why I initially thought Romney was going 0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.760 to make Benedict Arnold look like a team player. Turns 0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:03.280 out even Romney seems like he's going to hold the 0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:07.280 line play for I think there's some perception on the 0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.120 part of some writers and others that, to you, what 0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:14.000 happened with Merrick Garland was unfair. I don't agree with that. 0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.640 I don't know whether you think it was a good 0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.920 decision or not, but it wasn't unfair because it was 0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.240 consistent with history, it was consistent with precedent, it was 0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:26.520 consistent with the Constitution. So the idea that the Merrick 0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.440 Garland decision was unfair and therefore it has to be 0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.320 made up by doing something which also wouldn't make a 0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.120 lot of sense, which is saying to President Trump, you 0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.960 can't get your nominee either. That just doesn't follow for 0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:42.680 me that Garland decision was consistent with history. The decision 0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.240 to proceed with the new nominee is also consistent with 0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:49.960 history and precedent. And that's where I come out. Yeah, 0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:54.600 my friends, mid Romney's correct. Here. Look at this, the 0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.560 Americ Garland thing. Not the same situation, folks, Not the 0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:02.240 same deal. It's very straightforward. There's no reason that they 0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.680 can try to pretend. And sorry, Democrats, elections have consequences. 0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.560 The one thing Obama said, the one quote from Obama 0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.360 that I gotta say, is useful and true. So what 0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:15.320 is one of our maximus on this show. We give 0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.080 credit where it's due, and we're giving credit to Mit 0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.920 on this one so far, and we're gonna give credit 0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.760 to even Barack Obama for elections got consequences. Yes, it 0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.640 is obvious, but it is true. So I think that 0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.200 we are going to go forward here and the Libs, 0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:36.160 I will say, watching them squirm over this one. They're 0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.520 just so upset about this. Oh my gosh, they're gonna 0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.120 have a conservative Supreme Court and it's not even gonna 0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.360 be that conservative. You see here, here's the problem. And 0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:46.560 I want to I want to say this before we 0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.320 start making fun of more silly Libs. Because of what 0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:55.760 a conservative's judicial philosophy is. We don't get as much 0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.800 perceived or actual political value out of a Supreme Court. 0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.920 We don't want a super legislature of the Supreme Court. 0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.600 That's not what I'm advocating for. That's not what those 0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.159 of you listening to this show want. Maybe some of 0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:13.960 you want that, but I mean, generally speaking, that's not 0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:18.640 what we want, because all we're asking for is that 0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.000 there are judges who understand the law and apply the 0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:26.600 law based upon what it says and what the intent 0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:32.320 of the Constitution has written with its amendments. Is not 0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.840 that they have something they prefer and then they shoehorn 0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:42.760 that into a dishonest, pseudo legal framework to give people 0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:47.400 the policy outcome that they prefer. That's legislation, that's not 0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.440 the judicial the judicial realm. And that's why I think, 0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.680 you know, as conservatives, it's not like we're gonna get 0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.920 We're gonna get a Supreme Court that says, Okay, you're 0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.879 gonna have universal concealed carry across the country in every jurisdiction, 0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.879 which I think we should have. But and you're gonna 0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.320 you know that they're gonna have a flat tax only 0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.400 of fifteen percent, and we're gonna you know, that would 0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:16.119 be great, that would be great, but it's not gonna happen, right, 0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:20.879 we don't. We don't have a conservative Supreme Court is 0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:25.560 not a magic wand for conservative policies. So so liberals 0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.520 should really chill out a little bit about this. But 0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.320 the problem is a liberal leading Supreme Court is a 0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:36.840 magic wand for their desired outcomes and policies. So they're 0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:38.840 losing that. It's like a kid that's take having his 0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.280 favorite toy taken away. They're look, I want it back. 0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:47.800 They're so sad about this. Too bad. Elections have consequences, 0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:52.280 too bad. But that's the key difference you're gonna see here. 0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.000 So in the on the one hand, I want to 0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.879 tell all the Democrats and liberals out there just calm down. Okay, 0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:58.960 the world's not gonna end. It's actually gonna be a 0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.159 better place. But they won't like it as much. But 0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.000 the law will be the law. That's all we want. 0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.200 We want the law to be fair and applied evenly 0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:11.080 and equally and morally, not to have it be some 0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:17.840 scam to make Chuck and Nancy happy. Thanks for listening 0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.280 to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on 0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.680 Apple podcasts. The iHeart radio app or wherever you get 0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.960 your podcasts. So Rebublicans are committed to forcing a conservative 0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.359 justice onto the court forty two days before the election, 0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.200 someone who could destroy the Affordable Care Act and overturn 0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:39.280 Row and strike down carbon pollution legislation the Democrats might 0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.119 pass in the future, then you just have to make 0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.840 those Republicans pay the political price, every single cent of it, 0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:48.000 because every single vote makes a difference for what the 0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.800 universe of the possible is going to be going forward. 0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.399 And that counts for election night and whether the election 0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.400 night is close and they try to steal it through 0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.000 the courts and the Supreme Court justice they just confirmed, 0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.639 and that pertains to whether the Democrats can add justice 0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:04.639 as to the Supreme Court at the election, or grant 0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.760 statehood to DC in Puerto Rico, adding new senators, or 0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:12.800 anything else. All of those discussions depend upon maximizing the 0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:16.280 short term political price over the next forty days so 0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.000 that it can pay off one term. That should be 0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.840 the plan. No one can lose sight of that. I 0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.080 just love listening to the Libs panic over this stuff. 0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:28.040 It's really enjoyable. I just want to make a montage 0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:31.720 of Libs in a frenzy around how they think America 0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:36.240 is over because we don't have Ruth Bader Ginsburg anymore 0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.480 to hold up the far left agenda in the Supreme Court. 0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.640 It's not true. It's gonna be okay. America is gonna 0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.880 be okay, folks, despite what they may be saying. But 0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.399 they often transition immediately into telling us what they really believe, 0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.680 which is that they just they need more power so 0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:56.840 that they can use power against the other side. They 0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.520 will in the same sentence, they'll they'll in the same breath. 0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:04.119 It feels like, say that Republicans don't respect norms, so 0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.159 give us more power so we can destroy all the 0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:11.560 norms like a like a child that's, you know, gotten 0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.639 a little sand in his eye from somebody playing with 0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.679 a toy near them in the sandbox. The liberal response is, 0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:18.679 now they're going to run over there and and bash 0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.480 the kid on the head with their little plastic pail 0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.479 right there. They want to they want to escalate, so 0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.240 they claim outrage at the initial minor. It's not even 0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.240 an infraction, but we'll call it an infraction. They're they're 0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:36.320 what they're doing, what the Republicans are doing is one 0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:42.240 hundred percent legitimate legal within the rules. You know, that's it. 0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.960 I mean, if somebody were to claim after a Super 0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:50.160 Bowl that, hey, we missed that we missed that final 0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.760 field goal because they tried to they ice the kicker 0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.720 with a time out beforehand. That's not fair, that doesn't count. 0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.240 People would laugh at them, right, they'd say, no, those 0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:05.280 are the rules, right, those are the rules. This is 0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:09.359 about having an adult perception, an adult view of life, 0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.400 and liberalism is a refuge for a lot of people 0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.960 from that. They think that there's some some emotional safe 0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.000 space that they create through these left wing echo chambers 0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.680 of the media and Hollywood and academia, where they don't 0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.960 have to grapple with what is a reality that they 0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:27.119 find uncomfortable. They'll just negate it. They'll come up with 0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.760 narratives that pretend that what has happened has not happened. 0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:34.200 Oh okay, that those aren't really the rules, that there's 0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:38.840 some price that has to be paid by Republicans for 0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.800 all that. It's nonsense. It's done. Say, look, if they 0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.320 want to advocate for more power for the left, of course, 0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.160 that is politics, that is the very very heart of 0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.119 our system. Fine, go for it. But to pretend that 0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.760 there's some grave injustice that has been done here. No, 0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.040 what's really happened is we've lifted up the rock of 0:22:58.080 --> 0:22:59.960 our system and looked underneath and seen a lot of 0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:06.120 kind of creepy, crawley, unsettling stuff about our judicial system, 0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.400 which the liberals have weaponized and used to their advantage 0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:14.360 for political purposes for decades. I'm conservative, sit around. I mean, 0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.480 I have to sit here and say in a Rov. 0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:22.159 Wade is bad law. It is an indefensibly dishonest application 0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.280 of the law and a Supreme Court precedent with massive 0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:29.320 implications for the country. And we just sit here and 0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.440 you know, okay, hopefully one day we'll overturn go through, 0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.440 we go through the system. And that's just one of many, 0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.040 many examples. I mean, I want to take it all 0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.440 the way back to Wickard v. Filburn, where they're saying, effectively, 0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.440 commerce of any kind has to be interstate commerce because 0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:50.840 even intrastate commerce affects interstate commerce, and therefore you can 0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:57.000 regulate all commerce at a federal level. That's the decision 0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.160 that has been the many headed hydra of judicial will 0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:04.479 overreach for now going on one hundred years. I mean, 0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.560 it goes back to World War two era, I believe. 0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.639 So that's a terrible decision, But that's another one that 0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.760 needs These are things that need to be revisited, right, 0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.200