1 00:00:01,840 --> 00:00:05,039 Speaker 1: Everyone. This is Bobby Sylvester, the Fantasy Pros Football Podcast. 2 00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:07,320 Speaker 1: We're gonna get into our DFS picks for the week 3 00:00:07,360 --> 00:00:09,600 Speaker 1: in just a minute, but before we begin, we have 4 00:00:09,640 --> 00:00:13,039 Speaker 1: a quick message from today's sponsor. Do you play daily Fantasy? 5 00:00:13,200 --> 00:00:16,119 Speaker 1: If so, you should check out draft. On Draft you 6 00:00:16,160 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: do simple snake drafts, just like the ones you do 7 00:00:18,079 --> 00:00:20,200 Speaker 1: at the beginning of your season long leagues. You can 8 00:00:20,239 --> 00:00:22,800 Speaker 1: do draft whenever you want. They only take they last 9 00:00:22,840 --> 00:00:24,360 Speaker 1: for just one week. They only take a couple of 10 00:00:24,360 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 1: minutes to complete. On Draft, you can play for free 11 00:00:27,800 --> 00:00:30,120 Speaker 1: or play for real money. And get this, your chances 12 00:00:30,160 --> 00:00:32,800 Speaker 1: of winning on draft or almost two hundred percent better 13 00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:35,800 Speaker 1: than your chance of winning playing salary cap daily Fantasy. 14 00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:37,920 Speaker 1: I have the Draft app on my phone and just 15 00:00:38,080 --> 00:00:40,839 Speaker 1: an eight person draft. I got Spencer Where, I had 16 00:00:40,880 --> 00:00:42,880 Speaker 1: the eighth pick in the first round, but I'm happy 17 00:00:42,880 --> 00:00:45,240 Speaker 1: with that. I got Where and Christine Michael back to back. 18 00:00:45,440 --> 00:00:47,320 Speaker 1: I'm going to do another one right after the show. 19 00:00:47,360 --> 00:00:50,320 Speaker 1: Go ahead and join me. Download draft app now this 20 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:52,760 Speaker 1: Search Draft in the app store and it'll come up first. 21 00:00:53,040 --> 00:00:55,240 Speaker 1: Be sure to enter the promo code Fantasy Pros when 22 00:00:55,280 --> 00:00:57,640 Speaker 1: you download, and you'll get a one hundred percent bonus 23 00:00:57,640 --> 00:01:00,480 Speaker 1: when you deposit again. Search Draft in the app store 24 00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:02,960 Speaker 1: and be sure to enter the promo code. Fantasy Pros 25 00:01:22,520 --> 00:01:25,759 Speaker 1: Welcome back to the Fantasy Prose Football Podcast. I'm your host, 26 00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:28,480 Speaker 1: Bobby Silvester, and by my side is always this producer 27 00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:31,840 Speaker 1: JP Gale. It's the weekend and that means DFS to 28 00:01:31,959 --> 00:01:34,640 Speaker 1: talk about this weekend slate is Jared Cord of Fantasy 29 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:38,640 Speaker 1: Crunchers dot Com. Hey, Jared, how's it going, Bobby, Jared's 30 00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:42,240 Speaker 1: going really well. By the way, guys, Jared can be 31 00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:45,280 Speaker 1: found on Twitter at Jared's Got Moxie and my wife 32 00:01:45,360 --> 00:01:46,880 Speaker 1: was kind of poking fun at me today because I 33 00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:49,320 Speaker 1: just joined Twitter when the podcast started, so I've only 34 00:01:49,360 --> 00:01:51,960 Speaker 1: got a couple hundred followers. If you guys want to 35 00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:55,080 Speaker 1: follow me, I'm at Bobby Fantasy Pro and I just 36 00:01:55,160 --> 00:01:57,640 Speaker 1: shoot out and start to say answers rapid fire, So 37 00:01:58,040 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 1: tune in for that. Ask your own. I'll be glad. 38 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 1: Answerm to Jaron. Last week, I was telling everyone on 39 00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:07,000 Speaker 1: the show to go trade for CJ Anderson because of 40 00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:10,600 Speaker 1: his outcoming schedules. Cake, I followed my own advice. I 41 00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:13,720 Speaker 1: dealt Odell Beckham for him. And I got Alan Robbinson, 42 00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:16,800 Speaker 1: needless to say, kick him myself right now. I really 43 00:02:16,880 --> 00:02:20,040 Speaker 1: hope everyone else ignored that portion of my advice. Oh yeah, well, 44 00:02:20,080 --> 00:02:23,000 Speaker 1: that's just bad luck. I'm not sure how you how 45 00:02:23,080 --> 00:02:25,600 Speaker 1: you can project that like that's just pure and utter 46 00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:28,840 Speaker 1: bad luck. So tough, tough luck there. But hopefully the 47 00:02:29,280 --> 00:02:31,720 Speaker 1: owners that did trade for CJ. Anderson found a way 48 00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:33,679 Speaker 1: to get Booker in as well. That's right. Yeah, I 49 00:02:33,720 --> 00:02:35,120 Speaker 1: think Booker is going to be great the rest of 50 00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:37,280 Speaker 1: the season. We'll see how it goes, especially this weekend. 51 00:02:37,960 --> 00:02:39,840 Speaker 1: We're gonna get into this, but I think he's a 52 00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:42,840 Speaker 1: great DFS play. I think he's real good for season 53 00:02:42,919 --> 00:02:45,560 Speaker 1: long leagues and he's one of those guys that you 54 00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:48,680 Speaker 1: could add mid season he helps you win a championship. Yeah, totally. 55 00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:50,120 Speaker 1: I think he's going to be one of the highest 56 00:02:50,160 --> 00:02:52,519 Speaker 1: owned guys on the slate this week. And that's fairly 57 00:02:53,000 --> 00:02:55,359 Speaker 1: fairly straightforward to say at this point, I think, and 58 00:02:55,440 --> 00:02:58,120 Speaker 1: fairly obvious as a chalk play. But that doesn't mean 59 00:02:58,200 --> 00:02:59,960 Speaker 1: you should you should shy away because I think he's 60 00:03:00,040 --> 00:03:03,720 Speaker 1: in a great spot to produce. So Jared was wrong 61 00:03:03,720 --> 00:03:06,000 Speaker 1: about c J. Anderson, but might be affest advice last 62 00:03:06,040 --> 00:03:08,440 Speaker 1: week on this show, it was really good after a 63 00:03:08,600 --> 00:03:11,160 Speaker 1: terrible Week six, and I'm feeling pretty good about my 64 00:03:11,320 --> 00:03:13,799 Speaker 1: week eight lineups. You ready to get into it? Yeah, 65 00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:15,359 Speaker 1: let's do it. Got tons of picks here, I want 66 00:03:15,360 --> 00:03:17,280 Speaker 1: to dive in. Awesome. All right, let's start of the 67 00:03:17,360 --> 00:03:20,119 Speaker 1: quarterback position. To me, we're gonna start right to the top. 68 00:03:20,400 --> 00:03:23,280 Speaker 1: To me, there isn't much that really separates Tom Brady, 69 00:03:23,360 --> 00:03:26,040 Speaker 1: Aaron Rodgers, Matt Ryan at the top this week. I'm 70 00:03:26,040 --> 00:03:28,120 Speaker 1: not sure anyone else is in that range. What do 71 00:03:28,160 --> 00:03:30,120 Speaker 1: you think are you spending up on quarterback? And if so, 72 00:03:30,280 --> 00:03:33,000 Speaker 1: which these guys are you taking? Yeah? So, I mean 73 00:03:33,120 --> 00:03:35,680 Speaker 1: I I do play a lot of GPPs, and I 74 00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:37,880 Speaker 1: don't expect this week to be much different. I'm a 75 00:03:37,920 --> 00:03:41,200 Speaker 1: big multi entry guy, so I'll have I'll have exposure 76 00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:43,400 Speaker 1: to too, maybe close to half a dozen guys, and 77 00:03:43,720 --> 00:03:46,680 Speaker 1: all three of these these players, Tom Bradier and Rodgers, 78 00:03:46,760 --> 00:03:49,320 Speaker 1: Matt Ryan are in my consideration set at this point. Again, 79 00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:52,320 Speaker 1: it's it's Thursday night. It's always difficult too to say 80 00:03:52,360 --> 00:03:54,280 Speaker 1: that you're going to lock and load everything ahead, you know, 81 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:58,040 Speaker 1: almost three days ahead. But here are the three different 82 00:03:58,280 --> 00:04:00,760 Speaker 1: three different reasons and kind of different ration else. You know, 83 00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:02,720 Speaker 1: I kind of make the case for each of them 84 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:06,200 Speaker 1: in Brady's sake. UM, I actually think of the three, 85 00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:08,440 Speaker 1: he's going to be the lowest owed and and that 86 00:04:08,640 --> 00:04:11,080 Speaker 1: for me is one of the biggest benefits and and 87 00:04:11,440 --> 00:04:13,520 Speaker 1: one of the things that I always try to look 88 00:04:13,600 --> 00:04:15,680 Speaker 1: for when I think about who I want to target 89 00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:19,240 Speaker 1: UM as a Buffalo Bills fan. I have had the 90 00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:23,240 Speaker 1: pleasure and and displeasure of watching Tom Brady um for 91 00:04:23,640 --> 00:04:25,760 Speaker 1: for a number of years. But I had to look 92 00:04:25,839 --> 00:04:27,800 Speaker 1: up a couple of stats because I know that he's 93 00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:31,840 Speaker 1: been an absolute Bill destroyer over the course of his career. 94 00:04:32,360 --> 00:04:34,040 Speaker 1: Here are some numbers that kind of jumped off the 95 00:04:34,080 --> 00:04:43,520 Speaker 1: page to me. Twenty eight games, twenty five wins. What, Yeah, 96 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:46,200 Speaker 1: I know it's been it's been tough, but they've just 97 00:04:46,240 --> 00:04:48,960 Speaker 1: made all those three wins that much more glorious. UM. 98 00:04:49,360 --> 00:04:52,840 Speaker 1: A sixty four percent completion rate, sixty two touchdowns in 99 00:04:52,839 --> 00:04:54,560 Speaker 1: those twenty eight games are pretty good number. They're so 100 00:04:54,680 --> 00:04:57,720 Speaker 1: well over. Yeah, it's it's it's quite a bit. And 101 00:04:57,800 --> 00:04:59,640 Speaker 1: then when you kind of look at, you know, who 102 00:04:59,680 --> 00:05:02,800 Speaker 1: else you want to pair him with? M Gronkowski absolutely 103 00:05:02,880 --> 00:05:05,280 Speaker 1: destroys the Bills as well. He's had a touchdown on 104 00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:07,440 Speaker 1: average in every game he's played against them. That's that's 105 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:09,279 Speaker 1: ten and ten actually the most that he's had against 106 00:05:09,279 --> 00:05:12,880 Speaker 1: any opponent for his career. So I think both those 107 00:05:12,880 --> 00:05:15,040 Speaker 1: guys make for a great stack. Gronk is going to 108 00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:18,760 Speaker 1: be pretty popular, um, but I think Brady, after a 109 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:20,680 Speaker 1: bit of a bit of a letdown week, is going 110 00:05:20,720 --> 00:05:24,160 Speaker 1: to have some ownership depression. So I love him there 111 00:05:24,200 --> 00:05:27,360 Speaker 1: and I'd say I think that he's honestly between the three, 112 00:05:27,360 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 1: he'd be the one that I'd want to roster the most. 113 00:05:30,680 --> 00:05:33,360 Speaker 1: Rogers I think is really interesting. This should be a 114 00:05:33,360 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 1: shootout and sing with Ryan and Frankly, I like Ryan 115 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:39,160 Speaker 1: just a little bit more than Rogers. And we'll get 116 00:05:39,200 --> 00:05:40,760 Speaker 1: a little bit more into this a little bit later, 117 00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:43,720 Speaker 1: but I think Ryan could have a similar type of 118 00:05:43,760 --> 00:05:46,200 Speaker 1: situation to to Brady, and that you know, he was 119 00:05:46,279 --> 00:05:48,880 Speaker 1: the top chalk play last week and he didn't really 120 00:05:48,920 --> 00:05:51,400 Speaker 1: come through as much as as much as so many 121 00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:54,479 Speaker 1: people expected him too. So after getting burned, that recency 122 00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:57,080 Speaker 1: bias and from a negative standpoint in this case, always 123 00:05:57,680 --> 00:06:00,480 Speaker 1: takes ownership level down. So I still think that he's 124 00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:02,720 Speaker 1: worth staying on. And you know, you never want to 125 00:06:02,720 --> 00:06:04,640 Speaker 1: have too short of a too long of a memory 126 00:06:04,920 --> 00:06:08,799 Speaker 1: in NFL dfs. So I think all three are perfectly viable, 127 00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:10,880 Speaker 1: and if you are gonna gonna play them, you need 128 00:06:10,960 --> 00:06:13,080 Speaker 1: to stack because there's some really, really attractive stacks for 129 00:06:13,160 --> 00:06:15,800 Speaker 1: all three of those guys. Yeah, yeah, I absolutely agree. 130 00:06:15,839 --> 00:06:18,920 Speaker 1: I love the Gronk Brady stack. However, of these three, 131 00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:22,000 Speaker 1: he's my number three guy just because I mean, I 132 00:06:22,040 --> 00:06:23,600 Speaker 1: guess this is why his ownership is going to be 133 00:06:23,640 --> 00:06:25,280 Speaker 1: lower than the other team. We still have Brady at 134 00:06:25,279 --> 00:06:28,000 Speaker 1: about ten eleven percent. You can see all our projected 135 00:06:28,040 --> 00:06:31,760 Speaker 1: ownership if you go to the NFL Tools Now it's 136 00:06:31,760 --> 00:06:34,320 Speaker 1: a paid feature, but it's extremely helpful if you're building 137 00:06:34,320 --> 00:06:36,840 Speaker 1: a lot of GPP lineups. And we have Tom Brady 138 00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:39,880 Speaker 1: as the number four highest owned player this week, I'm sorry, 139 00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:42,480 Speaker 1: highest on quarterback this week, and Aaron Rodgers is the 140 00:06:42,520 --> 00:06:45,000 Speaker 1: first because the recency bias. But he's also the favorite 141 00:06:45,040 --> 00:06:48,159 Speaker 1: I like, and that's because he you know, he gets 142 00:06:48,200 --> 00:06:50,880 Speaker 1: the extra rest he's going up against a worst defense. 143 00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:53,080 Speaker 1: I know green Bay started off real slow, but they've 144 00:06:53,120 --> 00:06:55,560 Speaker 1: got a little healthier and I think their secondary is 145 00:06:55,600 --> 00:06:57,880 Speaker 1: better than the Falcon secondary, even though the Falcons have 146 00:06:58,040 --> 00:07:01,000 Speaker 1: Quinn coaching their team, who's a second very genius, right, 147 00:07:01,880 --> 00:07:04,520 Speaker 1: But I like Aaron Rodgers. I like his weapons better. 148 00:07:04,880 --> 00:07:06,720 Speaker 1: I think he's the best quarterback this week. But I 149 00:07:06,839 --> 00:07:10,120 Speaker 1: will say Andrew Luck is sitting there ride outside the 150 00:07:10,200 --> 00:07:12,880 Speaker 1: top three, and if you look at his price compared 151 00:07:12,920 --> 00:07:16,320 Speaker 1: to the others on DraftKings, it's quite a bit lower 152 00:07:16,360 --> 00:07:19,119 Speaker 1: than than Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers. Now, Matt Ryan's cheaper, 153 00:07:19,640 --> 00:07:22,880 Speaker 1: but on fan duel, Andrew Luck is seventy nine hundred 154 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:25,160 Speaker 1: and all the others are at least eighty five hundreds. 155 00:07:25,200 --> 00:07:27,800 Speaker 1: So if you're looking for kind of a contrarian play 156 00:07:27,800 --> 00:07:30,560 Speaker 1: there at the top, I'm not sure that Andrew Luck's 157 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:32,480 Speaker 1: going to be more than five six percent own, just 158 00:07:32,560 --> 00:07:36,720 Speaker 1: because Brady, Ryan Rodgers all pretty good matchups, and Andrew 159 00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:39,760 Speaker 1: Luck hasn't been quite as good as them. I know 160 00:07:39,880 --> 00:07:42,240 Speaker 1: last week he had a real nice week, but you 161 00:07:42,320 --> 00:07:44,440 Speaker 1: know he's also getting Donte Moncrief back. So I like 162 00:07:44,560 --> 00:07:46,640 Speaker 1: Andrew Luck this week too. Yeah, I think I think. 163 00:07:46,920 --> 00:07:48,440 Speaker 1: I think that's a nice call out. And I actually 164 00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:50,480 Speaker 1: had him noted in my notes to talk about it 165 00:07:50,480 --> 00:07:52,400 Speaker 1: a little bit later, But I'm glad that you brought 166 00:07:52,480 --> 00:07:54,960 Speaker 1: him out because I honestly think that you know that 167 00:07:55,320 --> 00:07:57,559 Speaker 1: he can be grouped right in there with Brady Rogers 168 00:07:57,600 --> 00:07:59,800 Speaker 1: and Ryan and frankly, I'd probably rather roster him than 169 00:07:59,800 --> 00:08:03,000 Speaker 1: a Rogers just just this week, to be honest with you. 170 00:08:03,120 --> 00:08:05,760 Speaker 1: But between between the four of them, I think that 171 00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:07,560 Speaker 1: at least one of them is going to end up 172 00:08:08,360 --> 00:08:12,520 Speaker 1: as a very profitable and very successful play in DFS 173 00:08:12,560 --> 00:08:15,240 Speaker 1: this week. Now, if we're talking about cash games, we're 174 00:08:15,240 --> 00:08:18,800 Speaker 1: obviously looking for value, right I've talked about how Andrew Luck. 175 00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:20,200 Speaker 1: I think he's a pretty good value, but there's some 176 00:08:20,280 --> 00:08:23,000 Speaker 1: cheaper guys that are real good value values. I want 177 00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:25,360 Speaker 1: to start with Jamis Winston, who I've been hyping up 178 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:27,920 Speaker 1: on pretty much every episode for the past three weeks. 179 00:08:27,960 --> 00:08:29,520 Speaker 1: And I'm sorry, I'm sure you guys are getting sick 180 00:08:29,520 --> 00:08:31,720 Speaker 1: of hearing it. But this is where the schedules drank 181 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:35,760 Speaker 1: kicks in. He gets Oakland at home. Oakland's been dreadful 182 00:08:35,760 --> 00:08:38,959 Speaker 1: against the pass. You know it's it's a home game 183 00:08:39,040 --> 00:08:41,560 Speaker 1: in Tampa Bay. Oakland's traveling all the way across the country. 184 00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:44,199 Speaker 1: They're playing early in the morning for the West Coast. 185 00:08:44,840 --> 00:08:47,600 Speaker 1: I think Jamis starts his rest of the season tear 186 00:08:47,880 --> 00:08:51,160 Speaker 1: right here and at his value seventy four hundred on Fandel, 187 00:08:51,480 --> 00:08:54,120 Speaker 1: I love him as the top value play of the week. Look, 188 00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:56,760 Speaker 1: I know he's hard to trust because he's had some 189 00:08:56,840 --> 00:08:59,280 Speaker 1: stinkers in there, but he's also had some huge games. 190 00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:02,080 Speaker 1: So I'm going with James this weekend. How about you? Yeah, 191 00:09:02,320 --> 00:09:04,360 Speaker 1: he's the guy I actually had noted here as well. 192 00:09:04,760 --> 00:09:06,680 Speaker 1: And look at the draft Kings price at fifty seven 193 00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:09,839 Speaker 1: hundred bucks. That's an absolute parts, It's an absolute bargain. 194 00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:12,720 Speaker 1: It's no, it'll be no, no wonder why he's going 195 00:09:12,760 --> 00:09:15,480 Speaker 1: to be super popular, especially on DK this weekend. And 196 00:09:15,600 --> 00:09:17,840 Speaker 1: my partner's Jeff and Brad actually covered this on our 197 00:09:18,200 --> 00:09:20,880 Speaker 1: week eate podcast last night as well, so I'm glad 198 00:09:20,920 --> 00:09:23,959 Speaker 1: we're on the same page there. Um. I expect I 199 00:09:24,040 --> 00:09:26,160 Speaker 1: expect that to be a very close, high scoring game, 200 00:09:26,280 --> 00:09:29,000 Speaker 1: and honestly I think that Jamis Winston, Mike Evans, Combo, 201 00:09:29,559 --> 00:09:31,880 Speaker 1: Chalky once again, but should be highly productive in a 202 00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:34,679 Speaker 1: great game. So I'm all over it. How do you 203 00:09:34,679 --> 00:09:37,040 Speaker 1: feel about Alex Smith? Our formula has him? Is that 204 00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:40,640 Speaker 1: the best value of all the quarterbacks? M I'm looking 205 00:09:40,679 --> 00:09:43,079 Speaker 1: at him sixty eight hundred, and he's at Indianapolis and 206 00:09:43,160 --> 00:09:46,839 Speaker 1: Indianapolis's secondaries not as terrible as everyone thought it was 207 00:09:46,880 --> 00:09:48,679 Speaker 1: going to be, but it's still pretty bad, right, I 208 00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:50,199 Speaker 1: mean they're going to have to be throwing the ball 209 00:09:50,200 --> 00:09:53,680 Speaker 1: to keep up. Yeah, I mean their secondary is really 210 00:09:54,200 --> 00:09:57,360 Speaker 1: really challenged, honestly. I mean, well, it's not only their secondary, 211 00:09:57,360 --> 00:10:00,360 Speaker 1: their whole defense. Quite honestly, I think that that they're 212 00:10:00,480 --> 00:10:02,640 Speaker 1: right for the picking. The only thing with me is 213 00:10:02,679 --> 00:10:06,839 Speaker 1: that I'd much rather attack thee the Indie defense with 214 00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:10,240 Speaker 1: Spencer Wear, just based on how this team plays football. Um, 215 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:12,199 Speaker 1: I have a feeling that they're really going to continue 216 00:10:12,200 --> 00:10:14,040 Speaker 1: to pound the ground with Wear, and I think he's 217 00:10:14,080 --> 00:10:17,120 Speaker 1: looking at a twenty five plus touch day, so I'm 218 00:10:17,200 --> 00:10:19,559 Speaker 1: looking at that. But but if Indy can stay and 219 00:10:19,640 --> 00:10:23,079 Speaker 1: keep it close, Alex Smith could have some work to 220 00:10:23,160 --> 00:10:25,079 Speaker 1: do in the in the second half, and when he 221 00:10:25,160 --> 00:10:27,840 Speaker 1: airs it out, you're looking at You're definitely looking at 222 00:10:27,920 --> 00:10:29,800 Speaker 1: him not only dumping it off to Wear and throwing 223 00:10:29,840 --> 00:10:31,520 Speaker 1: some screens and all that good stuff, but also to 224 00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:34,120 Speaker 1: Macklin and Kelsey, he does have some good weapons. He's 225 00:10:34,160 --> 00:10:35,920 Speaker 1: just not really a pass first guy, right, So I 226 00:10:35,960 --> 00:10:38,360 Speaker 1: always I always try a little bit carefully with my 227 00:10:38,480 --> 00:10:41,439 Speaker 1: expectations for him. That being said, if you're talking about 228 00:10:41,440 --> 00:10:43,640 Speaker 1: trying to find the best dollar for dollar value play 229 00:10:43,720 --> 00:10:47,360 Speaker 1: for cash games on fan Duel, to have to give 230 00:10:47,440 --> 00:10:49,800 Speaker 1: you some props on that, because I do think Alex 231 00:10:49,800 --> 00:10:52,679 Speaker 1: Smith is fine for that. I actually have him running 232 00:10:52,720 --> 00:10:54,679 Speaker 1: this week as my QB two in one of my 233 00:10:54,760 --> 00:10:57,480 Speaker 1: season long leagues, so I have no issue playing him 234 00:10:57,520 --> 00:10:59,199 Speaker 1: there again more as a cash game play. But the 235 00:10:59,280 --> 00:11:02,439 Speaker 1: ceiling just isn't there. Now. I feel like this question 236 00:11:02,559 --> 00:11:04,040 Speaker 1: is a lot harder because you know, we've got the 237 00:11:04,080 --> 00:11:06,640 Speaker 1: six teams on buy, but every week there's one of 238 00:11:06,679 --> 00:11:09,480 Speaker 1: these guys that ends up in the million dollar lineup. Um, 239 00:11:09,679 --> 00:11:11,839 Speaker 1: you know someone, if you're playing GPP and you want 240 00:11:11,840 --> 00:11:15,000 Speaker 1: to hit a home run, who's a mid range quarterback 241 00:11:15,600 --> 00:11:17,839 Speaker 1: that might be contur and that's the best bet to 242 00:11:18,040 --> 00:11:20,960 Speaker 1: end up in the million dollar lineup. Well, the mid 243 00:11:21,120 --> 00:11:24,080 Speaker 1: range one is is a is a tough, a tough 244 00:11:24,160 --> 00:11:26,520 Speaker 1: kind of area to go. Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me 245 00:11:26,640 --> 00:11:29,040 Speaker 1: if if guys from that the Tampa Bay Oakland game 246 00:11:29,120 --> 00:11:31,079 Speaker 1: end up there, like Winston or Dave or Derek Carr, 247 00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:33,240 Speaker 1: who I really like as well. But I'm gonna go 248 00:11:33,400 --> 00:11:35,079 Speaker 1: a little bit off them off the board and be 249 00:11:35,080 --> 00:11:37,800 Speaker 1: a little crazy um here, and I'm gonna say a 250 00:11:37,840 --> 00:11:39,880 Speaker 1: guy that I actually remember when I was looking at 251 00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:42,520 Speaker 1: the slate the first time it was announced UM for 252 00:11:42,720 --> 00:11:44,760 Speaker 1: four week eight on the weekend, and the guy that 253 00:11:44,880 --> 00:11:47,720 Speaker 1: jumped off the page from me on DraftKings is actually 254 00:11:48,160 --> 00:11:52,839 Speaker 1: Trevor Semion. Oh I know, well, I mean it's it's 255 00:11:52,880 --> 00:11:54,719 Speaker 1: totally a shot in the dark. And honestly, inn in 256 00:11:54,800 --> 00:11:59,280 Speaker 1: a format like the million dollar um the million dollar Contest, 257 00:11:59,480 --> 00:12:02,120 Speaker 1: you you need to take you need to take some shots. 258 00:12:02,240 --> 00:12:04,400 Speaker 1: And I know that he didn't have a huge week 259 00:12:04,520 --> 00:12:07,480 Speaker 1: necessarily against San Diego when they played a couple of 260 00:12:07,520 --> 00:12:10,840 Speaker 1: games ago, but he's only fifty one hundred dollars on DraftKings. 261 00:12:11,600 --> 00:12:14,280 Speaker 1: The matchup against the Chargers is fantastic. It's it's not 262 00:12:14,400 --> 00:12:16,240 Speaker 1: really going to be a huge high scoring game, like 263 00:12:16,280 --> 00:12:18,760 Speaker 1: I think Vegas has it for only about forty three 264 00:12:18,880 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 1: forty five points, but they're projected for over twenty four 265 00:12:22,360 --> 00:12:24,679 Speaker 1: and so you know, I really don't think that he's 266 00:12:24,679 --> 00:12:27,439 Speaker 1: going to even have close to five percent ownership. And 267 00:12:27,760 --> 00:12:30,600 Speaker 1: there's plenty of there's plenty of appeal here with guys 268 00:12:30,679 --> 00:12:33,360 Speaker 1: like that he compare you compare with like Booker Thomas 269 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:36,680 Speaker 1: and or Immanuel Sanders. I would probably rotate them frankly, 270 00:12:36,840 --> 00:12:40,199 Speaker 1: you know, with with multiple different angles, but I think 271 00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:43,199 Speaker 1: that the matchup there could net you around twenty to 272 00:12:43,280 --> 00:12:45,160 Speaker 1: twenty five points at the end of the day, which 273 00:12:45,200 --> 00:12:47,600 Speaker 1: would be a great return on value, especially if he can, 274 00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:49,640 Speaker 1: you know, connect a couple more times in the end 275 00:12:49,720 --> 00:12:51,480 Speaker 1: zone than just the one TD he's seen the last 276 00:12:51,520 --> 00:12:54,559 Speaker 1: few games, he's shown that he can be an effective 277 00:12:54,640 --> 00:12:57,360 Speaker 1: quarterback in the league, and honestly, I think this is 278 00:12:57,360 --> 00:13:01,040 Speaker 1: a tremendous game and situation for him to put up 279 00:13:01,080 --> 00:13:04,400 Speaker 1: some big numbers. So this is really a very low 280 00:13:04,480 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: owned play that does have plenty of risk, But there's 281 00:13:07,800 --> 00:13:09,839 Speaker 1: there's quite a few weapons there. We're talking about a 282 00:13:09,920 --> 00:13:12,959 Speaker 1: terrible secondary for San Diego. That's an absolute mess. I 283 00:13:13,040 --> 00:13:15,280 Speaker 1: just have no idea how they're how they've constructed their 284 00:13:15,280 --> 00:13:17,400 Speaker 1: team the way they have, but I want to exploit it, 285 00:13:17,480 --> 00:13:19,319 Speaker 1: and frankly, I think that you need you need to 286 00:13:19,360 --> 00:13:21,760 Speaker 1: give that some consideration because the value is just so good. 287 00:13:22,400 --> 00:13:25,880 Speaker 1: The weapons he has, they're real nice and CG Anderson's gone. 288 00:13:26,040 --> 00:13:28,280 Speaker 1: They shut down the Broncos running game two weeks ago 289 00:13:28,280 --> 00:13:31,800 Speaker 1: when they played him and made Trevor Simeon past fifty times. 290 00:13:32,840 --> 00:13:34,760 Speaker 1: I know that's not what the Broncos wanted to do, 291 00:13:34,920 --> 00:13:37,120 Speaker 1: but if that's what the Chargers game plan is, to 292 00:13:37,160 --> 00:13:39,640 Speaker 1: get them to pass, and he throws fifty times, if 293 00:13:39,720 --> 00:13:43,719 Speaker 1: even throws forty times against that Charger secondary, Jason Verrett's gone. Now. 294 00:13:44,480 --> 00:13:46,480 Speaker 1: I like him a lot. All he needs is twenty points. 295 00:13:46,800 --> 00:13:48,959 Speaker 1: We've seen him do that earlier this season. He put 296 00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:52,199 Speaker 1: up twenty nine points against Cincinnati, who's a much better 297 00:13:52,280 --> 00:13:54,920 Speaker 1: defense than San Diego is, so I could absolutely see 298 00:13:55,000 --> 00:13:57,360 Speaker 1: that happening. Now, that's not my pick. My pick is 299 00:13:58,040 --> 00:14:00,439 Speaker 1: is Ryan Fitzpatrick. In look, it's it's see to pick 300 00:14:00,440 --> 00:14:02,079 Speaker 1: on the Browns. But there's a reason that there. It's 301 00:14:02,080 --> 00:14:05,319 Speaker 1: a cliche pick. It's because the Browns are horrible, right U, 302 00:14:05,600 --> 00:14:09,439 Speaker 1: Ryan Fitzpacker Fitzpatrick, He's got Brandon Marshall, he's got Quincy 303 00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:12,080 Speaker 1: and Unwa. I really like Robbie Anderson as a sleeper 304 00:14:12,160 --> 00:14:14,280 Speaker 1: this week. I could see any of those three guys 305 00:14:14,360 --> 00:14:17,880 Speaker 1: completely going off because the Browns are so bad. Um, 306 00:14:18,200 --> 00:14:21,360 Speaker 1: we've seen Ryan Fitzpatrick put up three, four, even five 307 00:14:21,480 --> 00:14:24,520 Speaker 1: touchdowns in a game before, so you know, if it's 308 00:14:24,520 --> 00:14:26,400 Speaker 1: going to happen, I think this is the week against 309 00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:29,480 Speaker 1: against the Browns. Yeah, he's on my radar. Two. I 310 00:14:29,520 --> 00:14:31,040 Speaker 1: didn't mention him here just because I think he's going 311 00:14:31,080 --> 00:14:32,840 Speaker 1: to be a little bit more popular. And and then 312 00:14:32,920 --> 00:14:34,400 Speaker 1: then a guy like Semion. I just wanted to give 313 00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:36,680 Speaker 1: a little airtime to to a guy that I think 314 00:14:36,800 --> 00:14:39,320 Speaker 1: is is definitely a crazy shot in the dark, don't 315 00:14:39,320 --> 00:14:41,320 Speaker 1: get me wrong, but but again, you gotta look, you 316 00:14:41,360 --> 00:14:43,240 Speaker 1: gotta get a little weird in this kind of format 317 00:14:43,280 --> 00:14:45,440 Speaker 1: when you have you know, so many people in so 318 00:14:45,480 --> 00:14:48,320 Speaker 1: many entries. It's you know, hundreds of thousands, right, So, um, 319 00:14:48,480 --> 00:14:50,160 Speaker 1: I like both those guys to be lower owned, but 320 00:14:50,320 --> 00:14:52,920 Speaker 1: to be even lower owned. Honestly, Semion's going to be 321 00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:55,200 Speaker 1: off the radar for most So I'm glad we both 322 00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:57,240 Speaker 1: were able to cover some key guys that that should 323 00:14:57,320 --> 00:15:01,800 Speaker 1: have um some pretty productive days quick. Yeah, yeah, definitely. 324 00:15:02,080 --> 00:15:04,880 Speaker 1: If you want to go more contrarian, I like Josh 325 00:15:05,000 --> 00:15:07,800 Speaker 1: mccollwn this week. He gets the Jets. I know, I 326 00:15:07,920 --> 00:15:10,440 Speaker 1: just went the opposite direction, but the Jets secondary is 327 00:15:10,480 --> 00:15:13,320 Speaker 1: horrible too. And look, I know Josh mccollen's nursing an injury. 328 00:15:13,560 --> 00:15:15,920 Speaker 1: He might not play, so obviously watch his injury status. 329 00:15:16,000 --> 00:15:18,680 Speaker 1: But if he goes, he's good enough to throw the ball, right. 330 00:15:19,400 --> 00:15:21,760 Speaker 1: They've got some weapons there. Trrell Prior is not bad 331 00:15:22,040 --> 00:15:23,640 Speaker 1: and he can throw the ball to Duke Johnson and 332 00:15:23,960 --> 00:15:26,000 Speaker 1: really Josh McCollen, it doesn't matter who he's thrown too. 333 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:27,840 Speaker 1: He's going to sling the ball over the yard and 334 00:15:27,960 --> 00:15:30,320 Speaker 1: at his price point, once again, he only needs to 335 00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:33,320 Speaker 1: score about twenty points to make value, and he's done 336 00:15:33,320 --> 00:15:35,920 Speaker 1: that so many times in his career, so you know 337 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:39,440 Speaker 1: he's probably gonna be one percent owned if if that yeah, 338 00:15:39,960 --> 00:15:41,880 Speaker 1: so And honestly, I think I think a guy And 339 00:15:41,960 --> 00:15:43,480 Speaker 1: we'll get into the tight ends a little bit later. 340 00:15:43,520 --> 00:15:45,840 Speaker 1: But Gary Barnage has got to be so happy that 341 00:15:45,920 --> 00:15:49,720 Speaker 1: he's coming back. And honestly, he's been very, very productive 342 00:15:49,720 --> 00:15:51,800 Speaker 1: all the year. It's just been missing the touchdowns and 343 00:15:51,920 --> 00:15:53,800 Speaker 1: I think he could make for a great little stock 344 00:15:53,840 --> 00:15:56,640 Speaker 1: combo and maybe even including Tarrell Prior as well. But 345 00:15:57,000 --> 00:15:59,240 Speaker 1: but it's good to see McCown coming back. They needed 346 00:15:59,320 --> 00:16:02,600 Speaker 1: him um as sad as that sounds to really make 347 00:16:02,640 --> 00:16:05,080 Speaker 1: a recovery um, in order to kind of have a 348 00:16:05,120 --> 00:16:07,520 Speaker 1: bit of a positive outlook there. Just quickly before we 349 00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:11,840 Speaker 1: go off of off of QB's, I was thinking about this, 350 00:16:12,120 --> 00:16:14,800 Speaker 1: you know, just before we came on, and we talk 351 00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:20,160 Speaker 1: a lot about guys like Ryan and Rogers. Um this week, 352 00:16:20,240 --> 00:16:22,000 Speaker 1: I think I think Breeze has to be in play, 353 00:16:22,040 --> 00:16:25,480 Speaker 1: even even though it's it's against Seattle, But I feel 354 00:16:25,480 --> 00:16:28,160 Speaker 1: like Cam Newton is totally off of the radar, right, 355 00:16:28,240 --> 00:16:31,440 Speaker 1: He's off my radar. Yeah, And and I mean, I 356 00:16:31,520 --> 00:16:34,200 Speaker 1: mean I really like Brady, I like Rogers, we like Ryan. 357 00:16:34,960 --> 00:16:36,880 Speaker 1: You know, we just we talked about all those guys already. 358 00:16:37,440 --> 00:16:41,640 Speaker 1: But Cam Newton seventy four hundred bucks on on DraftKings, Um, 359 00:16:41,720 --> 00:16:45,440 Speaker 1: let me just quickly look up his price on FanDuel. Yeah, 360 00:16:45,520 --> 00:16:47,400 Speaker 1: I mean, and that's and that's high, right, and there's 361 00:16:47,400 --> 00:16:50,600 Speaker 1: there's definitely some reason reasons to believe in why he's 362 00:16:50,640 --> 00:16:52,400 Speaker 1: going to be lower own but I mean, I mean, sorry, 363 00:16:52,440 --> 00:16:54,720 Speaker 1: why he shouldn't be owned a ton. But you know, 364 00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:56,880 Speaker 1: Brady's a little bit higher. Breeze is only three hundred 365 00:16:56,880 --> 00:16:59,360 Speaker 1: dollars less. Like there there, he will probably get passed 366 00:16:59,440 --> 00:17:01,880 Speaker 1: up because he's still over that eight thousand dollars mark, 367 00:17:01,920 --> 00:17:03,320 Speaker 1: but he is a little bit better value than he 368 00:17:03,400 --> 00:17:06,440 Speaker 1: had been previously. I understand this is a tough matchup, 369 00:17:06,520 --> 00:17:08,480 Speaker 1: but he is at home. I have a feeling they're 370 00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:11,200 Speaker 1: gonna be playing from behind a good chunk of this. 371 00:17:11,400 --> 00:17:13,560 Speaker 1: I know that there are actually three point favorites right now, 372 00:17:13,600 --> 00:17:16,480 Speaker 1: which doesn't really make sense to me. But are we 373 00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:20,720 Speaker 1: missing potentially, you know, at thirty plus kind of kind 374 00:17:20,760 --> 00:17:24,040 Speaker 1: of potential here with with his you know, with that 375 00:17:24,160 --> 00:17:25,960 Speaker 1: as a play that that could end up you know, 376 00:17:26,080 --> 00:17:28,000 Speaker 1: netting three hundred, three undred and fifty yards, two to 377 00:17:28,040 --> 00:17:30,440 Speaker 1: three touchdowns, maybe another one on the on the ground, 378 00:17:30,520 --> 00:17:32,560 Speaker 1: that that could ultimately be a really low owned play 379 00:17:32,640 --> 00:17:35,119 Speaker 1: and on both sites, Like I don't know, I just 380 00:17:35,160 --> 00:17:37,119 Speaker 1: don't want to completely ignore him. I don't want to 381 00:17:37,160 --> 00:17:38,639 Speaker 1: ignore him. I feel like that's something we need to 382 00:17:38,800 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 1: we need to consider. Especially all the value is good. 383 00:17:40,920 --> 00:17:43,360 Speaker 1: We've seen him tear up good defenses before it can happen. 384 00:17:43,480 --> 00:17:46,680 Speaker 1: Now it has happened this season. He's played Minnesota, who's 385 00:17:46,680 --> 00:17:49,720 Speaker 1: probably the best defense in the league. Sixteen fan duel points. 386 00:17:49,760 --> 00:17:51,520 Speaker 1: He didn't get a passing touchdown, but he got one 387 00:17:51,520 --> 00:17:53,159 Speaker 1: on the ground, and he also got one on the 388 00:17:53,200 --> 00:17:56,359 Speaker 1: ground against Denver. Now, if you're going to compare Minnesota, Denver, 389 00:17:56,480 --> 00:17:59,880 Speaker 1: and Seattle, I'd put Seattle number three behind behind both 390 00:18:00,040 --> 00:18:03,480 Speaker 1: those defenses. Now, in order to get value on fan duel, 391 00:18:03,800 --> 00:18:07,639 Speaker 1: he needs twenty five points GPP value. So that's you know, 392 00:18:07,720 --> 00:18:10,280 Speaker 1: you can win having Cam Newton in your quarterback if 393 00:18:10,320 --> 00:18:12,680 Speaker 1: he gets as your quarterback, if he gets twenty five points. 394 00:18:12,920 --> 00:18:15,199 Speaker 1: He had twenty two against Denver. So if he did 395 00:18:15,280 --> 00:18:16,800 Speaker 1: that against Denver and it was a bad game one 396 00:18:16,880 --> 00:18:20,240 Speaker 1: hundred and ninety four yards, one touchdown, he can definitely 397 00:18:20,280 --> 00:18:22,400 Speaker 1: do it against Seattle. Now, I'm not going to bank 398 00:18:22,440 --> 00:18:25,680 Speaker 1: on it for cash games, but GPP, that's a great call. 399 00:18:25,800 --> 00:18:29,239 Speaker 1: There's there's a good percentage there. Yeah, I think so too. 400 00:18:29,359 --> 00:18:31,239 Speaker 1: And I mean he's by far the cheapest he's been 401 00:18:31,280 --> 00:18:34,199 Speaker 1: all season. You know, he's a thousand dollars less than 402 00:18:34,240 --> 00:18:36,360 Speaker 1: he was two weeks ago. Right, That's that's a big 403 00:18:36,520 --> 00:18:38,280 Speaker 1: that's a big turn actually on FANDO when you look 404 00:18:38,320 --> 00:18:41,960 Speaker 1: at it, and to your point, when he did when 405 00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:44,440 Speaker 1: he did only have one hundred ninety four passing yards 406 00:18:44,480 --> 00:18:46,520 Speaker 1: and he had one touchdown, but you know, the the 407 00:18:46,680 --> 00:18:48,600 Speaker 1: additional work that he was able to do with his legs. 408 00:18:48,760 --> 00:18:51,600 Speaker 1: Going eleven for fifty four on the ground really brings 409 00:18:51,640 --> 00:18:53,520 Speaker 1: that floor up right, so it takes you down, It 410 00:18:53,600 --> 00:18:55,640 Speaker 1: takes you up to twenty two point excuse me, point 411 00:18:55,640 --> 00:18:57,920 Speaker 1: two points? Got the hiccups here? Um last week though 412 00:18:57,960 --> 00:19:00,720 Speaker 1: he had he had twenty eight points against against the Saints. 413 00:19:00,720 --> 00:19:02,840 Speaker 1: Obviously that was sorry, not last week two weeks ago. 414 00:19:02,840 --> 00:19:05,879 Speaker 1: They're gonna buye. But but a very productive game there 415 00:19:05,920 --> 00:19:07,600 Speaker 1: where he went for over three hundred through the air 416 00:19:07,680 --> 00:19:09,800 Speaker 1: and two touchdowns and and I don't know, I just 417 00:19:09,880 --> 00:19:12,640 Speaker 1: think the value is just very, very intriguing. And if 418 00:19:12,680 --> 00:19:14,560 Speaker 1: you stack him with a guy like Benjamin or Olson, 419 00:19:14,800 --> 00:19:16,280 Speaker 1: I have a feeling that those guys are going to 420 00:19:16,320 --> 00:19:18,800 Speaker 1: be a little bit less on the radar this week, 421 00:19:18,880 --> 00:19:21,320 Speaker 1: and I just wouldn't want our listeners to miss out 422 00:19:21,359 --> 00:19:25,760 Speaker 1: on that. So food for thought. Jared, It's this blows 423 00:19:25,880 --> 00:19:29,919 Speaker 1: my mind because I never understood why yawns were contagious. 424 00:19:30,440 --> 00:19:33,040 Speaker 1: But I'm almost wondering are hiccups contagious too? When you 425 00:19:33,119 --> 00:19:35,399 Speaker 1: said you had the hiccups, I was hiccupping. I've had 426 00:19:35,440 --> 00:19:38,280 Speaker 1: the hiccups through this whole show. What is going on? 427 00:19:38,720 --> 00:19:40,399 Speaker 1: Even hiding it pretty good? I don't know, but I mean, 428 00:19:40,400 --> 00:19:41,600 Speaker 1: I tell you, you and I seem to be on 429 00:19:41,840 --> 00:19:45,840 Speaker 1: the same page to day, so nothing surprises me. What 430 00:19:45,960 --> 00:19:50,440 Speaker 1: we always seem to have some some good jibs. So it's, uh, yeah, 431 00:19:51,359 --> 00:19:54,000 Speaker 1: you know, it does funny things, all right. Jared over 432 00:19:54,040 --> 00:19:56,560 Speaker 1: to running back and C. G Anderson's out. We already 433 00:19:56,600 --> 00:19:59,239 Speaker 1: talked about this. So DeVante Booker steps in, he's going 434 00:19:59,280 --> 00:20:01,320 Speaker 1: to be about thirty five percent. Oh, that's what our 435 00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:04,280 Speaker 1: projections are saying. And I know that sounds ridiculous, but man, 436 00:20:04,359 --> 00:20:07,800 Speaker 1: at this price point, holping you not playing against the Chargers. 437 00:20:07,840 --> 00:20:10,200 Speaker 1: Are you fading him? Are you chalking him in there? Well, 438 00:20:10,240 --> 00:20:14,119 Speaker 1: I mean I think on both sides he's a tremendous value. 439 00:20:14,200 --> 00:20:17,159 Speaker 1: There's there's really no, in my opinion, argument that can 440 00:20:17,240 --> 00:20:19,399 Speaker 1: be made to fade him in cash games on both sites. 441 00:20:19,680 --> 00:20:21,560 Speaker 1: I think he's a must play. You can absolutely make 442 00:20:21,600 --> 00:20:23,800 Speaker 1: the argument to fade a guy in GPPs any day 443 00:20:23,840 --> 00:20:26,480 Speaker 1: of the week. You know, anytime that there's a chalk 444 00:20:26,560 --> 00:20:30,920 Speaker 1: option going the other direction is one way to get 445 00:20:31,080 --> 00:20:33,600 Speaker 1: a potential light up on your competition. And that's just 446 00:20:34,080 --> 00:20:36,720 Speaker 1: that's basic DFS there. And so I'm not going to 447 00:20:36,800 --> 00:20:38,640 Speaker 1: be going all in on him because to your point 448 00:20:38,760 --> 00:20:40,679 Speaker 1: that you mentioned before, san Diego did a good job 449 00:20:40,760 --> 00:20:43,359 Speaker 1: shutting him down, and I do think that that Sammy 450 00:20:43,480 --> 00:20:44,600 Speaker 1: is going to have a good day through the air. 451 00:20:45,000 --> 00:20:47,000 Speaker 1: That being said, I mean, you don't want to go 452 00:20:47,119 --> 00:20:50,520 Speaker 1: naked on Booker in my opinion this week, and so 453 00:20:51,480 --> 00:20:54,000 Speaker 1: he's absolutely the guy you need to own in season long. 454 00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:56,680 Speaker 1: I'm playing him this week in DFS for cash games 455 00:20:57,320 --> 00:20:59,600 Speaker 1: and in GPPs. I think he's worthy of, you know, 456 00:21:00,040 --> 00:21:02,320 Speaker 1: least thirty to forty percent of your exposure. But but 457 00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:04,880 Speaker 1: to your point again on on ownership, like I think 458 00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:07,240 Speaker 1: that we're looking at forty to fifty percent in GPPs 459 00:21:07,960 --> 00:21:10,840 Speaker 1: this week just based on how freaking chaps on both sides, 460 00:21:10,920 --> 00:21:13,880 Speaker 1: so enjoy it while it lasts. He's definitely a top 461 00:21:13,960 --> 00:21:17,280 Speaker 1: ten matchup play too. But hey, I mean, you know, 462 00:21:17,440 --> 00:21:19,760 Speaker 1: it's uh, you know, fading the chalk. Like I said, 463 00:21:19,760 --> 00:21:23,240 Speaker 1: it's never a bad strategy. So I'm gonna be going 464 00:21:23,320 --> 00:21:25,960 Speaker 1: kind of halfway in between that that kind of question 465 00:21:26,040 --> 00:21:29,160 Speaker 1: on that one. Play him in cash, play him in GPPs, 466 00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:32,000 Speaker 1: but not completely. I'm going for the gold. I'm playing 467 00:21:32,080 --> 00:21:35,000 Speaker 1: him in every single lineup, Jared, I think you can 468 00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:36,600 Speaker 1: make that argument too, though, Right, if you if you 469 00:21:36,720 --> 00:21:38,960 Speaker 1: think he's going to get you know, seventy five eighty 470 00:21:39,000 --> 00:21:41,040 Speaker 1: yards in a score, or at least something in that, 471 00:21:41,240 --> 00:21:43,520 Speaker 1: in that realm, then then you can honestly just lock 472 00:21:43,600 --> 00:21:46,159 Speaker 1: him in and just worry about your lower end plays elsewhere, 473 00:21:46,400 --> 00:21:49,600 Speaker 1: lower own plays. Excuse me. Also, I completely get that too. 474 00:21:49,640 --> 00:21:51,359 Speaker 1: I tend to spread it around a little bit more, 475 00:21:51,800 --> 00:21:54,400 Speaker 1: never going all in on someone, but but I completely 476 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:56,240 Speaker 1: understand it. It's it's a little bit more ballsy, but 477 00:21:56,480 --> 00:21:58,480 Speaker 1: but hey, it could easily work out. I've done this 478 00:21:58,640 --> 00:22:01,399 Speaker 1: twice so far this season. First time was Julio Jones 479 00:22:01,440 --> 00:22:05,480 Speaker 1: against Carolina, and ma'am, was a beautiful three hundred yards. 480 00:22:05,520 --> 00:22:08,680 Speaker 1: Everyone remembers that, right the same On that one, you 481 00:22:08,720 --> 00:22:10,960 Speaker 1: must have just been dancing up and down the streets. 482 00:22:11,800 --> 00:22:16,320 Speaker 1: I don't really remember. It was just pure bliss. You 483 00:22:16,440 --> 00:22:21,200 Speaker 1: blocked out. Yeah, yeah, the second player. I don't remember 484 00:22:21,240 --> 00:22:22,960 Speaker 1: who it was because it didn't go well, So I 485 00:22:23,040 --> 00:22:24,760 Speaker 1: just chose it to cancel it out of my memory. 486 00:22:24,800 --> 00:22:26,880 Speaker 1: So we'll see what happens here with Booker this week. 487 00:22:27,000 --> 00:22:29,439 Speaker 1: But I'm feeling good about it. Look, I'm looking at 488 00:22:29,480 --> 00:22:32,320 Speaker 1: my GPP value chart and in order to make GPP 489 00:22:32,520 --> 00:22:36,240 Speaker 1: value all he needs to do eighteen points and look, 490 00:22:36,280 --> 00:22:38,399 Speaker 1: eighteen points. It's tough to come by. There's probably a 491 00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:41,600 Speaker 1: you know, twenty five thirty percent chance that he hits that, 492 00:22:42,600 --> 00:22:45,600 Speaker 1: but most players, when they're sitting at eight to fifteen percent, 493 00:22:46,160 --> 00:22:49,879 Speaker 1: twenty five to thirty percent is a crazy good, crazy 494 00:22:49,920 --> 00:22:52,560 Speaker 1: good odds. So I'm taking that he needs two touchdowns 495 00:22:52,600 --> 00:22:55,280 Speaker 1: in fifty nine yards or a touchdown in a hundred 496 00:22:55,280 --> 00:22:59,280 Speaker 1: and nineteen. Man, I really like Booker against the Chargers. 497 00:22:59,400 --> 00:23:02,119 Speaker 1: He's gonna get the ball a ton because their backup 498 00:23:02,200 --> 00:23:04,560 Speaker 1: really doesn't have any NFL experience, So he might get 499 00:23:04,600 --> 00:23:06,520 Speaker 1: three or four touches. But I want to be shocked 500 00:23:06,560 --> 00:23:08,880 Speaker 1: at Booker gets twenty five to thirty touches this week 501 00:23:08,880 --> 00:23:12,240 Speaker 1: against the Chargers, depending on game flow. I completely agree. 502 00:23:13,600 --> 00:23:16,119 Speaker 1: All right, David Johnson, Is he still the top running 503 00:23:16,160 --> 00:23:19,000 Speaker 1: back this week even against Carolina? Yeah? I think he 504 00:23:19,080 --> 00:23:21,360 Speaker 1: has to be. Honestly, that role that he's got, three 505 00:23:21,440 --> 00:23:24,000 Speaker 1: down role, always always playing the goal line, doing a 506 00:23:24,080 --> 00:23:27,320 Speaker 1: great job of punching the ball in. If DeMarco Murray 507 00:23:27,400 --> 00:23:29,920 Speaker 1: wasn't playing on Thursday night, honestly, I think that he'd 508 00:23:29,960 --> 00:23:33,320 Speaker 1: have some pretty stuff competition for that spot. But if 509 00:23:33,359 --> 00:23:36,480 Speaker 1: you're looking for for a guy to own in cash games, 510 00:23:36,600 --> 00:23:38,879 Speaker 1: maybe to pair with Booker as your top very safe 511 00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:41,640 Speaker 1: bankbill option, I think David Johnson has to be that guy. 512 00:23:42,040 --> 00:23:43,720 Speaker 1: There are a number of other ones that I really 513 00:23:44,200 --> 00:23:46,240 Speaker 1: like a lot, and I'll be sprinkling them into my 514 00:23:46,320 --> 00:23:49,880 Speaker 1: GPP rotation, like Spencery where Christine Michael and Ezekiel Elliott, 515 00:23:50,520 --> 00:23:52,600 Speaker 1: as well as well as some other guys. I'm sure 516 00:23:52,600 --> 00:23:55,080 Speaker 1: we'll get to you in a moment, but I think 517 00:23:55,119 --> 00:23:57,440 Speaker 1: if you needed to to ask me point blank, who's 518 00:23:57,440 --> 00:23:59,199 Speaker 1: the one guy that you would start, if you had 519 00:23:59,200 --> 00:24:01,480 Speaker 1: to start anyone this week, it would be David Johnson. 520 00:24:02,840 --> 00:24:06,280 Speaker 1: Of all the names you mentioned, Zeke Spencer, where Christine Michael, 521 00:24:07,400 --> 00:24:10,080 Speaker 1: I'm least fond of David Johnson. Look, I know this 522 00:24:10,160 --> 00:24:12,560 Speaker 1: Carolina defense has been horrible, but they've still got some 523 00:24:12,840 --> 00:24:15,919 Speaker 1: real players up front. And I know David Johnson can 524 00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:18,960 Speaker 1: score against anybody, but so can Ezekiel Elliott. And look, 525 00:24:18,960 --> 00:24:21,479 Speaker 1: I'm afraid of this Eagles defense. They've just been crushing 526 00:24:21,560 --> 00:24:24,520 Speaker 1: teams they have, but with that offensive line Dallas As 527 00:24:24,880 --> 00:24:26,879 Speaker 1: I really trust Zeke I have moves my number one 528 00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:29,480 Speaker 1: running back this week, and then Spencer Where at his price, 529 00:24:29,520 --> 00:24:32,880 Speaker 1: he's still down at seventy four hundred against the Colts defense. 530 00:24:33,520 --> 00:24:35,639 Speaker 1: Looks like Jamal Charles is probably gonna miss this week. 531 00:24:35,680 --> 00:24:38,399 Speaker 1: Pay attention to that injury status. But Spencer Where against 532 00:24:38,440 --> 00:24:41,439 Speaker 1: the Colts getting twenty to twenty five carries at seventy 533 00:24:41,480 --> 00:24:45,080 Speaker 1: four hundred dollars. Yes, please, I'm taking that. I'm putting 534 00:24:45,160 --> 00:24:46,600 Speaker 1: him in most of my lineups this week. And then 535 00:24:46,680 --> 00:24:49,480 Speaker 1: Christine Michael against New Orleans. We know everything about New 536 00:24:49,640 --> 00:24:52,240 Speaker 1: Orleans and Russell Wilson's hurt. I mean, he's got some 537 00:24:52,359 --> 00:24:55,080 Speaker 1: problems going on. So they're gonna feed Michael the ball 538 00:24:55,400 --> 00:24:57,800 Speaker 1: until New Orleans stops him, which is probably gonna be never. 539 00:24:57,920 --> 00:25:00,119 Speaker 1: So don't be surprised if Christine Michaels the number one 540 00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:02,359 Speaker 1: running back this week with one hundred and fifty yards 541 00:25:02,400 --> 00:25:05,440 Speaker 1: and two touchdowns, it could be a great week for him. Yeah, 542 00:25:05,520 --> 00:25:07,320 Speaker 1: fair enough. I mean I just I kind of just 543 00:25:07,440 --> 00:25:10,479 Speaker 1: look at, you know, the way that the offense has 544 00:25:10,520 --> 00:25:12,960 Speaker 1: been running through David Johnson, and it's only been continuing 545 00:25:13,040 --> 00:25:14,439 Speaker 1: to kind of go that way, and which is why 546 00:25:14,480 --> 00:25:16,520 Speaker 1: I'd say, I just feel like he has such a 547 00:25:16,560 --> 00:25:20,360 Speaker 1: tremendous floor, and honestly, I think the prices this week 548 00:25:20,840 --> 00:25:22,600 Speaker 1: for a bunch of other values are going to make 549 00:25:22,680 --> 00:25:24,880 Speaker 1: them very accessible. So that's why I said yes there. 550 00:25:24,960 --> 00:25:27,159 Speaker 1: But I'm glad we do see eye to eye that 551 00:25:27,280 --> 00:25:29,600 Speaker 1: the three other names that I mentioned are are absolutely 552 00:25:29,680 --> 00:25:33,000 Speaker 1: top options because they're they're they're the ones that I 553 00:25:33,080 --> 00:25:35,359 Speaker 1: honestly want to have rotated in with guys like Johnson 554 00:25:35,440 --> 00:25:37,360 Speaker 1: and Booker. You know, those are probably my top five 555 00:25:37,440 --> 00:25:40,399 Speaker 1: plays at running back this week. A couple others are 556 00:25:40,640 --> 00:25:43,480 Speaker 1: in play as well, but those guys are are looking 557 00:25:43,680 --> 00:25:46,040 Speaker 1: excellent for many different reasons, and you covered most of them, 558 00:25:46,080 --> 00:25:48,639 Speaker 1: so I'll leave it there. After those four, it's a 559 00:25:48,680 --> 00:25:50,639 Speaker 1: pretty steep drop off in my opinion. I mean, I 560 00:25:50,880 --> 00:25:53,159 Speaker 1: know you mentioned Lamar Miller and he's been getting a 561 00:25:53,160 --> 00:25:56,040 Speaker 1: ton of carries, but against Detroit, I just think Houston's 562 00:25:56,080 --> 00:25:57,879 Speaker 1: probably gonna have to be passing the ball more than 563 00:25:57,960 --> 00:25:59,800 Speaker 1: they want to, and so Miller is not going to 564 00:25:59,840 --> 00:26:03,119 Speaker 1: get the same volume as he tippically does. Interested him. 565 00:26:03,119 --> 00:26:06,040 Speaker 1: He's also a little banged up, yeah exactly. Yeah, he's questionable, 566 00:26:06,080 --> 00:26:08,920 Speaker 1: so we might not even play. Probably will, But you know, 567 00:26:09,040 --> 00:26:11,320 Speaker 1: those are the four guys and look, if you're gonna 568 00:26:11,320 --> 00:26:14,760 Speaker 1: play David Johnson, I don't have any problem with that. 569 00:26:14,960 --> 00:26:17,320 Speaker 1: There's a reason we haven't rejected as a highest M 570 00:26:17,400 --> 00:26:20,479 Speaker 1: running back. It's because people make wise decisions with their 571 00:26:20,520 --> 00:26:22,320 Speaker 1: money and they think he's a good play. People are 572 00:26:22,359 --> 00:26:24,240 Speaker 1: gonna play David Johnson. He's a good play. I just 573 00:26:24,320 --> 00:26:25,880 Speaker 1: like the other guys a little bit more this week. 574 00:26:28,200 --> 00:26:29,960 Speaker 1: All right, where do you stand on time Montgomery and 575 00:26:30,040 --> 00:26:32,680 Speaker 1: j Quiz Rodgers. Are there any others in this price 576 00:26:32,760 --> 00:26:35,720 Speaker 1: that ringe you like? Yeah? So I guess you're looking 577 00:26:35,720 --> 00:26:37,560 Speaker 1: at FanDuel at this point if we're still talking running 578 00:26:37,560 --> 00:26:40,199 Speaker 1: back to Montgomery, because that's the one weird thing, right, 579 00:26:40,280 --> 00:26:44,160 Speaker 1: FanDuel continued to do weird stuff. They moved, They moved Montgomery, 580 00:26:44,160 --> 00:26:47,119 Speaker 1: and I think they're like, basically the only one in 581 00:26:47,240 --> 00:26:49,600 Speaker 1: the league that moved him from wide receiver to running back. 582 00:26:49,760 --> 00:26:51,680 Speaker 1: So that makes them a lot less attractive to me 583 00:26:51,760 --> 00:26:55,479 Speaker 1: on FanDuel, especially for cash games. But Jack Quiz Rogers 584 00:26:55,560 --> 00:26:57,919 Speaker 1: continues to be someone that I think has plenty of appeal, 585 00:26:58,560 --> 00:27:02,240 Speaker 1: particularly for for GPPs. I think his price tag, his 586 00:27:02,320 --> 00:27:05,919 Speaker 1: price tag is still very good. Um, I'd considered Montgomery 587 00:27:06,040 --> 00:27:08,520 Speaker 1: on on DraftKings actually the price is very solid, and 588 00:27:08,560 --> 00:27:10,880 Speaker 1: he's a wide receiver there, so I actually think he's 589 00:27:10,880 --> 00:27:13,320 Speaker 1: one of the better values at the wide receiver spot. UM. 590 00:27:13,640 --> 00:27:16,960 Speaker 1: I think they're both in play. Honestly, Montgomery is one 591 00:27:17,000 --> 00:27:18,600 Speaker 1: of is probably going to be, you know, one of 592 00:27:18,640 --> 00:27:20,960 Speaker 1: my wide receivers on on draft Kings, like we just said, 593 00:27:21,280 --> 00:27:24,040 Speaker 1: and Rogers is absolutely in my in my GPP rotation 594 00:27:24,080 --> 00:27:27,440 Speaker 1: on Vanduels, so UM, I have plenty of plenty of 595 00:27:27,520 --> 00:27:30,119 Speaker 1: intrigue on both them. And honestly, we were talking about 596 00:27:30,520 --> 00:27:34,439 Speaker 1: Jameis Winston with UM with potentially with Mike Evans as 597 00:27:34,520 --> 00:27:36,840 Speaker 1: a very chalky stack. I think you can get away 598 00:27:36,840 --> 00:27:39,399 Speaker 1: with Chickquis Rogers in there as a three men show. Honestly, 599 00:27:39,480 --> 00:27:41,959 Speaker 1: I think the only thing that's been holding holding Jack 600 00:27:42,040 --> 00:27:44,440 Speaker 1: Quiz back from from being like a truly elite play 601 00:27:44,480 --> 00:27:46,280 Speaker 1: the last few weeks has been the fact he hasn't 602 00:27:46,280 --> 00:27:48,800 Speaker 1: found the end zone. But the guy's getting touches, he's 603 00:27:48,800 --> 00:27:51,920 Speaker 1: being very productive, he just hasn't found paider. And and 604 00:27:52,040 --> 00:27:54,440 Speaker 1: when that, when that tide does turn, and I find 605 00:27:54,520 --> 00:27:57,080 Speaker 1: touchdown so hard to project, and I mean, and they're 606 00:27:57,119 --> 00:27:59,800 Speaker 1: they're very very they're quite variable, so that that isn't 607 00:27:59,840 --> 00:28:03,240 Speaker 1: just me that feels that way. When that happens, those 608 00:28:03,280 --> 00:28:06,120 Speaker 1: that are sticking with him and getting that value out 609 00:28:06,119 --> 00:28:08,400 Speaker 1: of it are going to be very happy and would 610 00:28:08,440 --> 00:28:10,000 Speaker 1: not chock me at all. In a high scoring game 611 00:28:10,040 --> 00:28:12,719 Speaker 1: this week to see him do that, Yeah, he's going 612 00:28:12,760 --> 00:28:14,840 Speaker 1: to find the endzone eventually. It's probably going to be 613 00:28:15,000 --> 00:28:17,879 Speaker 1: this week against Oakland where to mention their defense, it 614 00:28:18,040 --> 00:28:20,880 Speaker 1: is so bad and they've been running the offense there him. Look, 615 00:28:20,960 --> 00:28:25,680 Speaker 1: I love Jamis Winston, but they've been trusting Chris Rogers 616 00:28:26,200 --> 00:28:27,960 Speaker 1: to run the ball a ton. It's probably not going 617 00:28:28,040 --> 00:28:29,680 Speaker 1: to change this week. I but he gets twenty twenty 618 00:28:29,720 --> 00:28:33,280 Speaker 1: five carries again. And don't forget before Doug Martin and 619 00:28:33,359 --> 00:28:35,560 Speaker 1: Charles Himps was hurt. He was the third down back 620 00:28:35,760 --> 00:28:38,280 Speaker 1: because he's really good at receiving the ball out of 621 00:28:38,280 --> 00:28:40,840 Speaker 1: the backfield. That's his specialty. So in a game where 622 00:28:40,840 --> 00:28:43,360 Speaker 1: they're probably gonna be passing quite a bit, Chiz Rogers 623 00:28:43,400 --> 00:28:46,840 Speaker 1: could nap himself five six, seven receptions and in PPR 624 00:28:46,960 --> 00:28:50,640 Speaker 1: DraftKings Man, that is going to be an absolute steal. Yeah, 625 00:28:50,720 --> 00:28:53,080 Speaker 1: And I always just really had struggled to understand why 626 00:28:53,200 --> 00:28:56,320 Speaker 1: he didn't get his fair chance in Atlanta. I mean, 627 00:28:56,640 --> 00:28:59,160 Speaker 1: you know, he's not really a special talent by any means, 628 00:28:59,280 --> 00:29:02,320 Speaker 1: but I don't think DeVonta Freeman is either. For whatever reason, 629 00:29:02,360 --> 00:29:04,400 Speaker 1: they just seemed to give him a shot, you know, 630 00:29:04,680 --> 00:29:08,760 Speaker 1: and with this new regime regime, and they didn't seem 631 00:29:08,800 --> 00:29:12,200 Speaker 1: to do that with with Rogers. So I feel like 632 00:29:12,320 --> 00:29:13,880 Speaker 1: he's the diamond in the rough play of the year 633 00:29:13,960 --> 00:29:16,840 Speaker 1: so far, just kind of like completely off the board 634 00:29:16,880 --> 00:29:19,960 Speaker 1: into into really tremendous relevancy. Um, if you're really trying 635 00:29:20,000 --> 00:29:21,320 Speaker 1: to look for it for a guy like that, and 636 00:29:21,960 --> 00:29:25,600 Speaker 1: and like we're saying, um, great matchup, great situation. If 637 00:29:25,640 --> 00:29:28,040 Speaker 1: he finds the end zone, the guy should get twenty 638 00:29:28,080 --> 00:29:30,800 Speaker 1: to twenty five touches. And he's been so effective. He's 639 00:29:30,800 --> 00:29:32,680 Speaker 1: looked really good. I've actually watched a bunch because I've 640 00:29:32,680 --> 00:29:35,200 Speaker 1: been owning so much Winston and Evans recently that I've 641 00:29:35,240 --> 00:29:38,520 Speaker 1: been forcing myself to watch those games. But um, he 642 00:29:38,680 --> 00:29:40,520 Speaker 1: looks very good. And honestly, when a guy passes the 643 00:29:40,560 --> 00:29:42,280 Speaker 1: eye test, you need to tip your cap and get 644 00:29:42,360 --> 00:29:45,640 Speaker 1: him active. You know. I mentioned that he did it 645 00:29:45,640 --> 00:29:49,360 Speaker 1: against a bad defense. He did beat San Francisco pretty bad, 646 00:29:49,440 --> 00:29:52,680 Speaker 1: but the earlier defense was at Carolina. That's not a 647 00:29:52,760 --> 00:29:57,560 Speaker 1: cake Walkum, their secondary is bad, but their front seven is. Man, 648 00:29:57,840 --> 00:29:59,920 Speaker 1: it is really good. Now the next couple of weeks, 649 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:03,480 Speaker 1: he's got Atlanta Chicago. He could keep this street going. 650 00:30:03,520 --> 00:30:05,120 Speaker 1: And then Doug Martin comes back. And what do you 651 00:30:05,160 --> 00:30:07,440 Speaker 1: do when a guys run for one hundred yards five 652 00:30:07,520 --> 00:30:09,680 Speaker 1: straight weeks. I mean, that's probably not going to happen, 653 00:30:09,720 --> 00:30:12,080 Speaker 1: but there's a chance there, right, Yeah, and then it 654 00:30:12,120 --> 00:30:14,479 Speaker 1: turns into a fantasy nightmare, right when you have both 655 00:30:14,560 --> 00:30:16,840 Speaker 1: those guys that are going to end up getting what 656 00:30:16,920 --> 00:30:20,000 Speaker 1: twelve to fifteen touches each potentially or plus or minus twenty. 657 00:30:21,480 --> 00:30:23,080 Speaker 1: So this is the week to play him because there's 658 00:30:23,080 --> 00:30:25,160 Speaker 1: a good chance that that Martin does come back next week. 659 00:30:25,200 --> 00:30:27,200 Speaker 1: And so I think if you want to give him 660 00:30:27,240 --> 00:30:29,800 Speaker 1: some love, you got to do it now. Jared, who's 661 00:30:29,800 --> 00:30:32,200 Speaker 1: a running back that no one's talking about that you think, 662 00:30:33,240 --> 00:30:34,959 Speaker 1: you know, could could end up maybe being the top 663 00:30:35,120 --> 00:30:36,840 Speaker 1: running back this week? We see it happen every once 664 00:30:36,880 --> 00:30:38,840 Speaker 1: in a while. Who could it be? Well, I kind 665 00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:40,840 Speaker 1: of alluded to it before, but I think that you 666 00:30:40,920 --> 00:30:45,240 Speaker 1: need to think about DeVonta Freeman, especially with the fact 667 00:30:45,320 --> 00:30:47,960 Speaker 1: that it looks like Keevin Coleman is going to be 668 00:30:48,040 --> 00:30:50,800 Speaker 1: missing this game. Um, I don't think anyone's going to 669 00:30:50,840 --> 00:30:52,960 Speaker 1: be on him on DraftKings at sixty five hundred, that's 670 00:30:53,000 --> 00:30:56,800 Speaker 1: that's quite expensive for him on that site, but for 671 00:30:56,880 --> 00:31:00,080 Speaker 1: only four hundred dollars more on fan Duel six in 672 00:31:00,080 --> 00:31:03,880 Speaker 1: a hundred bucks in total, he's a fantastic price. Likely 673 00:31:03,920 --> 00:31:05,480 Speaker 1: to be the every down back here or at least 674 00:31:05,480 --> 00:31:07,840 Speaker 1: seeing eighty to ninety percent of those snaps and uh 675 00:31:08,200 --> 00:31:09,920 Speaker 1: and when they when they needed to go to him 676 00:31:09,960 --> 00:31:12,120 Speaker 1: in the second half last week, he was very dynamic, 677 00:31:12,760 --> 00:31:14,440 Speaker 1: very dynamic, and I can see him scoring one or 678 00:31:14,480 --> 00:31:17,320 Speaker 1: two touchdowns here. Should be a high scoring game. Vegas 679 00:31:17,400 --> 00:31:19,480 Speaker 1: likes it for nearly fifty three points and and I 680 00:31:19,520 --> 00:31:21,440 Speaker 1: have a hard time seeing that nut coming to to 681 00:31:21,560 --> 00:31:26,000 Speaker 1: fruition with those offenses in place. So um great GPP 682 00:31:26,120 --> 00:31:28,760 Speaker 1: option in my opinion. Last week we saw j g 683 00:31:28,840 --> 00:31:30,760 Speaker 1: I e Um. You know, after he put up two 684 00:31:30,800 --> 00:31:34,400 Speaker 1: hundred yards have pretty low ownership because everyone thought everyone's 685 00:31:34,440 --> 00:31:36,120 Speaker 1: going to be excited about him, and nobody played him 686 00:31:36,120 --> 00:31:39,000 Speaker 1: and he went for two hundred and the bills very 687 00:31:39,080 --> 00:31:40,760 Speaker 1: rarely get run on like that Like that was just 688 00:31:40,880 --> 00:31:43,120 Speaker 1: a very very weird game. Like I mentioned before, I 689 00:31:43,200 --> 00:31:44,520 Speaker 1: am a fan of that team, so I watch a 690 00:31:44,560 --> 00:31:47,360 Speaker 1: lot of football there, but um, it was it was 691 00:31:47,520 --> 00:31:50,760 Speaker 1: very uncharacteristic of them to play that way. And frankly though, 692 00:31:50,920 --> 00:31:52,920 Speaker 1: the guy looks like a really strong runner right now, 693 00:31:53,040 --> 00:31:55,160 Speaker 1: being a ji e, So sometimes you just got to 694 00:31:55,200 --> 00:31:58,320 Speaker 1: trust the talent um and uh and I think Freeman's 695 00:31:58,360 --> 00:32:01,320 Speaker 1: that kind of guy in this situation. This week, I'm 696 00:32:01,360 --> 00:32:03,640 Speaker 1: wondering how Matt Forte is gonna end up. Obviously, he 697 00:32:03,720 --> 00:32:06,200 Speaker 1: had a big game, he got thirty carries, two touchdowns 698 00:32:06,320 --> 00:32:09,640 Speaker 1: last week, and now he gets an easier matchup at Cleveland. 699 00:32:10,400 --> 00:32:11,640 Speaker 1: I don't know if they give him the ball that 700 00:32:11,760 --> 00:32:14,320 Speaker 1: much again, but I love the matchup. I think he's 701 00:32:14,320 --> 00:32:16,520 Speaker 1: gonna be about four or five percent owned even after 702 00:32:16,600 --> 00:32:19,880 Speaker 1: that big week. I like him and Balalpal I like 703 00:32:20,000 --> 00:32:23,000 Speaker 1: him both. I mean, you gotta like anybody against Cleveland. Yeah, 704 00:32:23,120 --> 00:32:28,600 Speaker 1: I agree, he's not going to be terribly highly owned, honestly, 705 00:32:28,760 --> 00:32:30,880 Speaker 1: but I think that you need to definitely give it 706 00:32:30,960 --> 00:32:33,520 Speaker 1: some consideration. And then la Garrett Blount, whos scoring a 707 00:32:33,560 --> 00:32:36,360 Speaker 1: touchdown virtually every week, even with Tom Brady back, They're 708 00:32:36,360 --> 00:32:38,240 Speaker 1: still giving him the ball in the red zone. He's 709 00:32:38,240 --> 00:32:40,800 Speaker 1: still making plays, and he's going up against Buffalo who 710 00:32:40,840 --> 00:32:42,440 Speaker 1: just got torched. And I know you say they don't 711 00:32:42,440 --> 00:32:44,800 Speaker 1: get run on, but they've got some injuries up front. 712 00:32:45,080 --> 00:32:48,200 Speaker 1: And I don't mind playing Blount against any defense just 713 00:32:48,280 --> 00:32:49,600 Speaker 1: because you know he's going to get the ball in 714 00:32:49,600 --> 00:32:51,480 Speaker 1: the red zone. I think this could be another nice 715 00:32:51,520 --> 00:32:53,680 Speaker 1: week for him. Yeah, absolutely, he's going to be an 716 00:32:53,720 --> 00:32:56,560 Speaker 1: under the radar play. And don't be shocked to see though, 717 00:32:56,800 --> 00:32:59,600 Speaker 1: if Brady and the Pats get up get up by 718 00:32:59,640 --> 00:33:01,560 Speaker 1: you know, touch end are too late, like they're they're 719 00:33:01,600 --> 00:33:04,040 Speaker 1: not gonna take it easy. They've already lost the Bills 720 00:33:04,080 --> 00:33:07,480 Speaker 1: this year, and you know that Belichick doesn't really like 721 00:33:07,600 --> 00:33:10,200 Speaker 1: to take it easy in any sense at all. So 722 00:33:10,640 --> 00:33:12,920 Speaker 1: so look for look for big numbers all around, and 723 00:33:13,280 --> 00:33:15,320 Speaker 1: that that will likely work in favor of Blunt as well, 724 00:33:15,320 --> 00:33:16,800 Speaker 1: because to your point, you always is going to get 725 00:33:16,800 --> 00:33:19,280 Speaker 1: those goal line carries. But but that's what leaves me 726 00:33:19,400 --> 00:33:22,440 Speaker 1: in a good feeling about about Brady as well. In general. 727 00:33:22,480 --> 00:33:23,920 Speaker 1: I just don't think that they're going to stop, even 728 00:33:23,960 --> 00:33:25,320 Speaker 1: if they do have a lead in the fourth. They're 729 00:33:25,320 --> 00:33:27,120 Speaker 1: just going to pound it and found it and pound 730 00:33:27,160 --> 00:33:30,840 Speaker 1: it all right, Jared Wide Receiver and Hulu Jones. He's 731 00:33:30,920 --> 00:33:34,000 Speaker 1: extremely expensive this week, but do you think it still 732 00:33:34,040 --> 00:33:38,120 Speaker 1: makes sense for cash games maybe even GPGPP lineups? Absolutely, 733 00:33:38,280 --> 00:33:40,440 Speaker 1: I mean, honestly, I know he's I know he's expensive, 734 00:33:40,720 --> 00:33:43,760 Speaker 1: but we don't have an Antonio Brown. We don't really 735 00:33:43,800 --> 00:33:46,280 Speaker 1: even have an AJ Green here because of the Sunday 736 00:33:46,360 --> 00:33:49,400 Speaker 1: Morning game um talking about the main slate. So he's 737 00:33:49,400 --> 00:33:51,040 Speaker 1: actually one of my favorite plays of the week when 738 00:33:51,080 --> 00:33:53,760 Speaker 1: you just look at the matchup, you know, price aside, like, 739 00:33:53,880 --> 00:33:56,440 Speaker 1: he's a guy that you got to play. And frankly, 740 00:33:56,600 --> 00:33:59,200 Speaker 1: I think that because of the way that the slate 741 00:33:59,240 --> 00:34:01,680 Speaker 1: breaks down, there's just so much value here it's going 742 00:34:01,720 --> 00:34:03,360 Speaker 1: to be actually pretty easy to find room for him. 743 00:34:03,560 --> 00:34:05,880 Speaker 1: So I was actually playing with some lineups and testing 744 00:34:05,920 --> 00:34:08,480 Speaker 1: it out before we got on before we got on 745 00:34:08,880 --> 00:34:12,000 Speaker 1: the podcast, and I had no problem fitting him in, honestly, 746 00:34:12,120 --> 00:34:14,239 Speaker 1: both for for something I was happy with for cash 747 00:34:14,320 --> 00:34:18,480 Speaker 1: and the same for GPPs. So he's the guy that 748 00:34:18,560 --> 00:34:19,920 Speaker 1: I think that you can play with a very high 749 00:34:19,960 --> 00:34:23,279 Speaker 1: degree of confidence and absolutely pay up for him. Jared, 750 00:34:23,360 --> 00:34:26,400 Speaker 1: this is a week where there aren't many plays that 751 00:34:26,480 --> 00:34:29,399 Speaker 1: I really like, and so I just can't see myself 752 00:34:29,440 --> 00:34:32,640 Speaker 1: doing a bunch of GPP lineups. I'm looking at one 753 00:34:33,400 --> 00:34:36,800 Speaker 1: super cash game lineup and it's because there's three wide receivers. 754 00:34:36,840 --> 00:34:39,280 Speaker 1: I love you guys already know. I love Davante Booker 755 00:34:39,360 --> 00:34:41,920 Speaker 1: and Spencer were So I think I'm just going to 756 00:34:41,960 --> 00:34:44,520 Speaker 1: play a ton of cash games this week. And I've 757 00:34:44,560 --> 00:34:48,000 Speaker 1: got Julio Jones in this lineup. To Julio Jones, Mike Evans, 758 00:34:48,080 --> 00:34:51,520 Speaker 1: and Brandon Marshall all have great matchups. And look, I 759 00:34:51,600 --> 00:34:54,160 Speaker 1: know they're all really expensive, but I'm getting them all 760 00:34:54,280 --> 00:34:56,600 Speaker 1: in there. I trust them, and I don't really trust 761 00:34:56,800 --> 00:34:58,520 Speaker 1: many of the other wide receivers. And we'll talk about 762 00:34:58,520 --> 00:35:00,719 Speaker 1: some of those options for you guys. But I love 763 00:35:00,800 --> 00:35:05,080 Speaker 1: Hulu Jones even at this price. Yeah, I'm right there 764 00:35:05,120 --> 00:35:07,840 Speaker 1: with you. I think he's I don't want the listeners 765 00:35:07,880 --> 00:35:09,920 Speaker 1: to overthink it. Honestly, play him. He's going to be 766 00:35:09,960 --> 00:35:12,400 Speaker 1: a great He's gonna have a great week. So obviously 767 00:35:12,440 --> 00:35:14,480 Speaker 1: the Packers offense is going to put us some points. 768 00:35:14,880 --> 00:35:18,480 Speaker 1: But which wide receivers are the best to own? Yeah, 769 00:35:18,600 --> 00:35:21,279 Speaker 1: this is a really interesting topic this week. I'm I'm 770 00:35:21,360 --> 00:35:23,960 Speaker 1: curious about what's going to happen with Randall Cobb. I mean, 771 00:35:24,040 --> 00:35:26,440 Speaker 1: the news right now does not look very good for him, 772 00:35:27,640 --> 00:35:30,600 Speaker 1: So I'm really worried about that. So if that does 773 00:35:30,760 --> 00:35:32,919 Speaker 1: actually turn out to be the case for him sitting out, 774 00:35:34,280 --> 00:35:36,400 Speaker 1: do we look to Davante Adams? I mean, I think 775 00:35:36,480 --> 00:35:38,600 Speaker 1: based on price and how great he was in his 776 00:35:38,719 --> 00:35:40,640 Speaker 1: last game, I think that you've got to really consider 777 00:35:40,760 --> 00:35:42,960 Speaker 1: him for some exposure. It could be a bit of 778 00:35:43,000 --> 00:35:45,120 Speaker 1: a JGI E effecting. It wouldn't shock me to see 779 00:35:45,160 --> 00:35:46,800 Speaker 1: his ownership actually be a little bit lower than it 780 00:35:46,840 --> 00:35:49,600 Speaker 1: should be if you think about a guy that had 781 00:35:49,640 --> 00:35:53,160 Speaker 1: a great week. But the guy for me that I 782 00:35:53,280 --> 00:35:55,360 Speaker 1: think that you need to think about for GPPs is 783 00:35:55,440 --> 00:35:58,719 Speaker 1: Jordy Nelson. And I'm only really saying that because he's 784 00:35:58,760 --> 00:36:01,680 Speaker 1: been such a letdown that's are this year that you know, 785 00:36:01,760 --> 00:36:04,800 Speaker 1: the negative recency bias is absolutely going to be in 786 00:36:04,880 --> 00:36:08,719 Speaker 1: full effect here and and his ownership should be incredibly low. 787 00:36:09,239 --> 00:36:12,239 Speaker 1: Um and and so if he happens, you know, to 788 00:36:12,360 --> 00:36:15,320 Speaker 1: catch a couple you know, fades in the in the 789 00:36:15,360 --> 00:36:17,160 Speaker 1: back corner of the end zone like he he tends 790 00:36:17,160 --> 00:36:19,239 Speaker 1: to do at you know, at many times in his 791 00:36:19,520 --> 00:36:21,960 Speaker 1: uh in his over the course of his career, like 792 00:36:22,239 --> 00:36:23,640 Speaker 1: you know, this could be the week that you own 793 00:36:23,719 --> 00:36:25,439 Speaker 1: the guy that no one's gonna want a roster because 794 00:36:25,440 --> 00:36:27,239 Speaker 1: they've just been burned so many times by him. So 795 00:36:27,840 --> 00:36:30,759 Speaker 1: I'm I'm really intrigued by by him. I mean, that's 796 00:36:30,840 --> 00:36:34,600 Speaker 1: that's on the wide receiver side of things. UM on Fandel, 797 00:36:34,640 --> 00:36:37,200 Speaker 1: and then when you think about DraftKings and also bring 798 00:36:37,320 --> 00:36:39,080 Speaker 1: in Time Montgomery even though he is a running back 799 00:36:39,120 --> 00:36:41,080 Speaker 1: on Fandel, I think that you need to consider him too. 800 00:36:41,560 --> 00:36:44,560 Speaker 1: So this is really only a situation where I only 801 00:36:44,640 --> 00:36:48,600 Speaker 1: want to stack um Packers if I'm with Rogers, if 802 00:36:48,640 --> 00:36:51,520 Speaker 1: I'm going to have exposure to that team. Um. But 803 00:36:52,040 --> 00:36:53,840 Speaker 1: but there's there's so many different ways that it could go. 804 00:36:53,920 --> 00:36:56,120 Speaker 1: It's really hard to handicap. I mean, if if Cobb 805 00:36:56,200 --> 00:36:57,680 Speaker 1: was one hundred percent, I'd be going all in on 806 00:36:57,840 --> 00:36:59,759 Speaker 1: him because he's just been great the last few weeks 807 00:36:59,800 --> 00:37:02,040 Speaker 1: and looks like he's back to his normal self. But 808 00:37:02,520 --> 00:37:04,360 Speaker 1: I'm really worried about that injury. I'm not sure how 809 00:37:04,400 --> 00:37:06,160 Speaker 1: you look at it, but but that's kind of where 810 00:37:06,200 --> 00:37:09,000 Speaker 1: my mind's at. Yeah, it definitely scares me about Cobb. 811 00:37:09,080 --> 00:37:11,719 Speaker 1: He's been getting so many targets though that if he 812 00:37:11,840 --> 00:37:13,439 Speaker 1: goes I've got to trust that they're going to pepper 813 00:37:13,480 --> 00:37:16,440 Speaker 1: him with targets. Again, I like Jordan Jordy Nelson. We 814 00:37:16,480 --> 00:37:18,919 Speaker 1: actually have him at about nine ten percent oh this week, 815 00:37:19,040 --> 00:37:21,960 Speaker 1: so um, you know, I know people have been scared 816 00:37:22,000 --> 00:37:25,160 Speaker 1: off by the recency biased but yeah, well when he 817 00:37:25,280 --> 00:37:28,000 Speaker 1: plays with Aaron Rodgers, he puts up points. And I 818 00:37:28,080 --> 00:37:29,879 Speaker 1: know he hasn't been great this season, but I still 819 00:37:29,920 --> 00:37:31,520 Speaker 1: think quite a few people are going to play him 820 00:37:31,800 --> 00:37:35,760 Speaker 1: a lot because of Packers stacks. But for me, Davante Adams, 821 00:37:36,360 --> 00:37:38,960 Speaker 1: I'm scared to death of him. There is no chance 822 00:37:39,080 --> 00:37:41,560 Speaker 1: I'm using him in a cash game. He's just pooped 823 00:37:41,600 --> 00:37:45,439 Speaker 1: in his pants too many times for me. GPP, sure 824 00:37:45,680 --> 00:37:49,000 Speaker 1: load him up, but cash games, I'm not even thinking 825 00:37:49,040 --> 00:37:52,319 Speaker 1: about it. Yeah. No, I have a really hard time 826 00:37:53,040 --> 00:37:56,680 Speaker 1: with seeing it makes sense in cash games as well. 827 00:37:56,719 --> 00:37:58,480 Speaker 1: I completely agree with you there, but but I have 828 00:37:58,600 --> 00:38:01,239 Speaker 1: again no problem with it for GPP at all. So 829 00:38:01,320 --> 00:38:04,360 Speaker 1: I already mentioned Mike Evans, and I really like Brandon Marshall, 830 00:38:04,480 --> 00:38:07,480 Speaker 1: who hasn't been as good. But Ryan Fitzpatrick's coming back. Um, 831 00:38:07,800 --> 00:38:10,680 Speaker 1: Eric Decker's out, and you know Brandon Marshall's the guy 832 00:38:10,760 --> 00:38:13,799 Speaker 1: there at Cleveland. I love Brandon Marshall this week. Which 833 00:38:13,920 --> 00:38:17,359 Speaker 1: other top price wide receivers do you like? Charing Yeah, 834 00:38:17,920 --> 00:38:20,560 Speaker 1: mentioned aj Green quickly. If you do have a way 835 00:38:20,600 --> 00:38:23,840 Speaker 1: to get him into a contest for for the Sunday 836 00:38:23,880 --> 00:38:26,720 Speaker 1: morning game, I think he's a must play. Mike Evans, 837 00:38:26,800 --> 00:38:29,879 Speaker 1: He's a target monster, probably the most owned guy I'm 838 00:38:29,880 --> 00:38:32,480 Speaker 1: going to have this week across across the board. Wouldn't 839 00:38:32,480 --> 00:38:35,400 Speaker 1: be shocked if I'm if I'm going kind of Aldavontae 840 00:38:35,440 --> 00:38:37,120 Speaker 1: Booker on him like you are and putting him in 841 00:38:37,120 --> 00:38:40,080 Speaker 1: a hundred percent. Um. You mentioned Brandon Marshall, who I 842 00:38:40,239 --> 00:38:41,600 Speaker 1: like a lot as well, and then the one other 843 00:38:41,680 --> 00:38:43,839 Speaker 1: guy that I think could be a nice tournament play 844 00:38:43,840 --> 00:38:46,640 Speaker 1: as Brandon Cooks. Um they play, you know in the 845 00:38:47,200 --> 00:38:49,440 Speaker 1: in Coors Field, you know this week? I love. I 846 00:38:49,520 --> 00:38:52,399 Speaker 1: love using that term um and uh And honestly, even 847 00:38:52,440 --> 00:38:54,719 Speaker 1: though it is against a good defense, he's just the 848 00:38:54,800 --> 00:38:56,400 Speaker 1: kind of guy that has the talent and ability to 849 00:38:56,480 --> 00:38:59,600 Speaker 1: explode and and just put up absolutely massive numbers. So 850 00:39:00,320 --> 00:39:01,759 Speaker 1: you know, he has a good shot as anyone to 851 00:39:01,760 --> 00:39:03,960 Speaker 1: put up over one hundred yards and a touchdown or two. 852 00:39:04,080 --> 00:39:05,920 Speaker 1: So in a game that I think will also be 853 00:39:06,000 --> 00:39:09,040 Speaker 1: a lot higher scoring than people think he's a guy 854 00:39:09,120 --> 00:39:11,239 Speaker 1: that will have probably the lowest ownership of the names 855 00:39:11,280 --> 00:39:13,920 Speaker 1: that we've mentioned to this point in this in this 856 00:39:14,120 --> 00:39:16,360 Speaker 1: quick little segment, and I think he's got all the 857 00:39:16,440 --> 00:39:19,359 Speaker 1: upside that they all do, and potentially even more. Now 858 00:39:19,400 --> 00:39:21,560 Speaker 1: we're projecting Derek Carr to be a pretty good quarterback 859 00:39:21,600 --> 00:39:23,960 Speaker 1: this week. But who's he throw to? Amari Cooper or 860 00:39:24,080 --> 00:39:26,040 Speaker 1: Michael Crabtree. Which of these guys are you willing to 861 00:39:26,040 --> 00:39:29,600 Speaker 1: put in your lineup? Yeah? I mean maybe this is 862 00:39:29,640 --> 00:39:32,480 Speaker 1: just because I'm a multi entry guy, but I have 863 00:39:32,640 --> 00:39:35,239 Speaker 1: no problem putting them like kind of rotating them both in. 864 00:39:35,960 --> 00:39:38,759 Speaker 1: I'd never like to leave any stone unturned. And and 865 00:39:39,120 --> 00:39:41,439 Speaker 1: because it's it's so hard to handicap, you just don't 866 00:39:41,480 --> 00:39:43,760 Speaker 1: know who that's gonna gonna be on a weekly week basis, 867 00:39:44,160 --> 00:39:47,239 Speaker 1: I'd honestly go fifty fifty on each. So I don't 868 00:39:47,280 --> 00:39:49,080 Speaker 1: really think that you ever want to really play both 869 00:39:49,120 --> 00:39:52,239 Speaker 1: of them. It's a hard situation to see that really 870 00:39:52,280 --> 00:39:54,319 Speaker 1: come to life and be super fruitful because because o' 871 00:39:54,440 --> 00:39:56,319 Speaker 1: Tavis Murray does tend to steal some goal on work 872 00:39:56,360 --> 00:39:58,839 Speaker 1: as well, But it really does seem to me when 873 00:39:58,840 --> 00:40:01,399 Speaker 1: you watch the games him and Crabtree have that much 874 00:40:01,480 --> 00:40:05,040 Speaker 1: more rapport Um and Uh and I know his touchdowns 875 00:40:05,080 --> 00:40:07,040 Speaker 1: have been super high. And again it's tough. I always 876 00:40:07,040 --> 00:40:09,520 Speaker 1: your predict those, but when does when does it become 877 00:40:09,560 --> 00:40:12,080 Speaker 1: a trend? And when does that become a situation where 878 00:40:12,080 --> 00:40:13,400 Speaker 1: you're like, yeah, you know what, it just looks like 879 00:40:13,480 --> 00:40:16,279 Speaker 1: he and and Uh and Crabtree just have a better 880 00:40:16,360 --> 00:40:20,000 Speaker 1: chemistry than than Cooper. So if I had a gun 881 00:40:20,040 --> 00:40:21,160 Speaker 1: to my head and I had to choose one to 882 00:40:21,200 --> 00:40:24,280 Speaker 1: play this week, it's it's Um. It's it's Michael Crabtree, 883 00:40:24,520 --> 00:40:27,080 Speaker 1: just based on what I've been able to see. Um. 884 00:40:27,239 --> 00:40:29,960 Speaker 1: But but Cooper is obviously a great person to have 885 00:40:30,080 --> 00:40:32,280 Speaker 1: in there for GPPs, just because he is so talented 886 00:40:32,320 --> 00:40:35,320 Speaker 1: to but um loving this game for exposure. We've already 887 00:40:35,320 --> 00:40:37,279 Speaker 1: talked about it at length. I just have a really 888 00:40:37,320 --> 00:40:39,239 Speaker 1: hard time picking one or the other. Um, But if 889 00:40:39,280 --> 00:40:42,360 Speaker 1: I had to, I'd lean Crabtree before we move on 890 00:40:42,440 --> 00:40:44,879 Speaker 1: to the lower price guys, another player that I really 891 00:40:44,960 --> 00:40:47,279 Speaker 1: like is Larry Fitzgerald. I mean, we don't know if 892 00:40:47,360 --> 00:40:49,400 Speaker 1: John Brown's gonna play, we don't know if Michael Floyd's 893 00:40:49,400 --> 00:40:52,719 Speaker 1: gonna play, and they're playing Carolina's defense there's no chance 894 00:40:52,760 --> 00:40:55,040 Speaker 1: they're gonna stop Larry Fitzgerald, even if they're playing two 895 00:40:55,120 --> 00:40:57,719 Speaker 1: three guys on him. Um, and if those two guys 896 00:40:57,760 --> 00:41:00,399 Speaker 1: are out watched through injury wire. If those two guys 897 00:41:00,400 --> 00:41:02,839 Speaker 1: are out, Larry Fitzgerald is gonna have a huge week. 898 00:41:03,120 --> 00:41:05,520 Speaker 1: I will definitely be pluging him in my lineup. I'd 899 00:41:05,560 --> 00:41:08,040 Speaker 1: say there's about a thirty forty percent chance both those 900 00:41:08,120 --> 00:41:10,759 Speaker 1: guys are out. But if it happens, man, there could 901 00:41:10,760 --> 00:41:13,080 Speaker 1: be some magic. I'm so happy you mentioned him. He's 902 00:41:13,080 --> 00:41:15,200 Speaker 1: actually the first guy that I had in this column 903 00:41:15,280 --> 00:41:17,440 Speaker 1: that or in this little segment to talk about. I 904 00:41:17,480 --> 00:41:20,480 Speaker 1: actually ended up running him in my cash game lineups 905 00:41:20,520 --> 00:41:25,240 Speaker 1: on Thursday night for the Thursday to Monday contests on FanDuel. 906 00:41:26,040 --> 00:41:29,359 Speaker 1: Great floor ceiling combination, amazing role for only seven thousand bucks, 907 00:41:29,560 --> 00:41:32,279 Speaker 1: and so I'm really glad that you called him out. 908 00:41:32,280 --> 00:41:33,640 Speaker 1: I don't really need to do much more than that, 909 00:41:35,160 --> 00:41:37,239 Speaker 1: all right, Jared, If you're trying to spend down at 910 00:41:37,280 --> 00:41:40,359 Speaker 1: the position this week, we're a couple of players to consider. Yeah, 911 00:41:40,440 --> 00:41:42,279 Speaker 1: so I just mentioned Fitzgerald. I consider him a bit 912 00:41:42,280 --> 00:41:44,840 Speaker 1: of a spendown. That's actually where I have him sitting 913 00:41:44,920 --> 00:41:47,160 Speaker 1: here as as kind of one of the top under 914 00:41:47,200 --> 00:41:50,600 Speaker 1: seven k plays on FanDuel. I do like Emmanuel Sanders 915 00:41:50,640 --> 00:41:53,960 Speaker 1: based on his targets in the matchup at under seven 916 00:41:54,000 --> 00:41:55,840 Speaker 1: thousand bucks, and I talked about how I like Semion 917 00:41:55,880 --> 00:41:58,560 Speaker 1: as well. You've already kind of quickly touched on Quincy 918 00:41:58,600 --> 00:42:01,680 Speaker 1: and Nona. I've been playing a player of him ever 919 00:42:01,760 --> 00:42:04,719 Speaker 1: since I saw how well he looked against Buffalo in 920 00:42:04,960 --> 00:42:08,640 Speaker 1: the opening couple weeks of the season. Michael Thomas continues 921 00:42:08,680 --> 00:42:10,080 Speaker 1: to be a guy that I like a lot in 922 00:42:10,120 --> 00:42:13,280 Speaker 1: the Saints. His price hasn't really caught up yet, and honestly, 923 00:42:13,320 --> 00:42:16,239 Speaker 1: the same ghostry Willie Sneed. I'm not shy about playing 924 00:42:16,280 --> 00:42:19,080 Speaker 1: both of these guys in GPPs this week, even though 925 00:42:19,160 --> 00:42:23,440 Speaker 1: they're We're going up against Seattle, and honestly, I'm going 926 00:42:23,480 --> 00:42:25,040 Speaker 1: to be somewhat bold and say I think at least, 927 00:42:25,400 --> 00:42:26,840 Speaker 1: well not at least I think only one of them 928 00:42:26,960 --> 00:42:27,960 Speaker 1: is going to do it, but I think one of 929 00:42:28,000 --> 00:42:29,799 Speaker 1: them is going for one hundred and a touchdown this week. 930 00:42:30,120 --> 00:42:34,439 Speaker 1: I really do super value on DraftKings this week would 931 00:42:34,440 --> 00:42:38,400 Speaker 1: be Mohammed Sanu. If you want exposure to that Atlanta 932 00:42:38,480 --> 00:42:40,560 Speaker 1: offense and you don't want to pay much for it 933 00:42:40,680 --> 00:42:42,879 Speaker 1: and think that there's a good chance that Julio gets 934 00:42:42,880 --> 00:42:44,839 Speaker 1: SAG gets a bit more coverage and is shut down. 935 00:42:45,239 --> 00:42:48,480 Speaker 1: Forty one dollars on DraftKings could get you double digit targets. 936 00:42:48,600 --> 00:42:51,000 Speaker 1: Kind of guy in a in a huge in a 937 00:42:51,120 --> 00:42:55,160 Speaker 1: huge scoring game, strictly a GPP tournament play, very high risk, 938 00:42:55,480 --> 00:42:56,960 Speaker 1: but I'm gonna keep an eye on if you really 939 00:42:57,040 --> 00:42:59,600 Speaker 1: want to low own candidate there. And then we've talked 940 00:42:59,600 --> 00:43:01,600 Speaker 1: about Time Montgomery as well. I think he's a really 941 00:43:01,680 --> 00:43:04,160 Speaker 1: nice play for the price on Draft Kings as a 942 00:43:04,200 --> 00:43:06,480 Speaker 1: wide receiver and if you can find a way to 943 00:43:06,520 --> 00:43:08,640 Speaker 1: get Jamison Crowder active, just like we talked about with 944 00:43:08,680 --> 00:43:11,120 Speaker 1: aj Green before, I think that as a value on 945 00:43:11,200 --> 00:43:12,960 Speaker 1: Draft Kings, you need to consider him just because he's 946 00:43:13,000 --> 00:43:16,440 Speaker 1: under five k very solid possession PPR receiver, and that's 947 00:43:16,480 --> 00:43:18,399 Speaker 1: the format that we have on draftings. So I don't 948 00:43:18,400 --> 00:43:21,000 Speaker 1: want to miss him because he's been very solidately. Now 949 00:43:21,080 --> 00:43:23,640 Speaker 1: you mentioned Michael Thomas, and look, I know he's going 950 00:43:23,719 --> 00:43:26,760 Speaker 1: up against Seattle and that's scary, but at fifty seven hundred, 951 00:43:27,280 --> 00:43:30,720 Speaker 1: he's on pace to break Marquise Colston and Reggie Bush's 952 00:43:30,760 --> 00:43:33,440 Speaker 1: records for rookies there in New Orleans. Yeah, those are 953 00:43:33,480 --> 00:43:35,680 Speaker 1: better beames. He's got to be the best DFS player 954 00:43:35,800 --> 00:43:38,040 Speaker 1: so far this year that no one's talking about, honestly, 955 00:43:38,120 --> 00:43:40,239 Speaker 1: and the site's haven't caught up to it yet. And 956 00:43:40,560 --> 00:43:42,840 Speaker 1: I remember when I was on this program with you 957 00:43:42,880 --> 00:43:44,960 Speaker 1: a few weeks ago, we were talking about this similar 958 00:43:45,040 --> 00:43:48,040 Speaker 1: type of type of segment and you know, some lower 959 00:43:48,080 --> 00:43:52,239 Speaker 1: owned and lower lower price guys, And I'm just going 960 00:43:52,320 --> 00:43:54,400 Speaker 1: to quickly pull it up because I remember talking about it. 961 00:43:54,719 --> 00:43:57,880 Speaker 1: I think it was when they went up against the 962 00:43:58,000 --> 00:44:02,040 Speaker 1: Chargers later that week, and or was it against the Falcons. 963 00:44:02,080 --> 00:44:04,320 Speaker 1: I don't remember. Either way, he had double digit FanDuel 964 00:44:04,400 --> 00:44:07,640 Speaker 1: points and very low ownership, and it was I was 965 00:44:07,680 --> 00:44:09,839 Speaker 1: glad we talked about it because he made me proud. 966 00:44:09,960 --> 00:44:13,200 Speaker 1: But thirteen targets last week, ten receptions one hundred and 967 00:44:13,239 --> 00:44:16,440 Speaker 1: thirty yards, and the guys caught at least four balls 968 00:44:17,320 --> 00:44:19,279 Speaker 1: so far in every game he's played this year, and 969 00:44:20,680 --> 00:44:22,319 Speaker 1: in five or more, and three of his last four 970 00:44:22,360 --> 00:44:24,359 Speaker 1: games with a touchdown in three of those last four 971 00:44:24,400 --> 00:44:26,600 Speaker 1: as well. So everything's trending in the right direction. He's 972 00:44:26,640 --> 00:44:28,719 Speaker 1: got a very solid role, and for whatever reason, the 973 00:44:28,760 --> 00:44:32,560 Speaker 1: price hasn't moved on really, so great play in my opinion, 974 00:44:32,640 --> 00:44:35,560 Speaker 1: and a phenomenal value on FanDuel. Here. There's a few 975 00:44:35,640 --> 00:44:37,560 Speaker 1: other players at this price that I really like. Will 976 00:44:37,640 --> 00:44:42,080 Speaker 1: Fuller at Detroit already talked about how Brockoswiler could go off, 977 00:44:42,400 --> 00:44:44,600 Speaker 1: which is just crazy to say, but it's Detroit case 978 00:44:44,719 --> 00:44:47,319 Speaker 1: Keenum went off, So Will Fuller, He's a guy at 979 00:44:47,360 --> 00:44:51,360 Speaker 1: that price point I like. And doctor Moncrief at fifty 980 00:44:51,440 --> 00:44:53,480 Speaker 1: four hundred. This is a guy that was draft in 981 00:44:53,520 --> 00:44:56,920 Speaker 1: the fourth fifth round of Fantasy leagues. And if he's healthy, 982 00:44:56,960 --> 00:44:59,799 Speaker 1: if he goes, why not against Kansas City. Kansas City's 983 00:44:59,800 --> 00:45:02,319 Speaker 1: begin it up a lot of Fantasy points. Fifty four 984 00:45:02,560 --> 00:45:05,759 Speaker 1: hundred dollars. Now, there's a few other names that I'm 985 00:45:05,880 --> 00:45:08,800 Speaker 1: kind of fond of here. I'm intrigued by only for GPP, 986 00:45:09,000 --> 00:45:12,719 Speaker 1: Justin Hunter for Buffalo. If Marquis Goodwin doesn't go, Hunter 987 00:45:12,880 --> 00:45:15,400 Speaker 1: is the number one guy, which is ridiculous. But if 988 00:45:15,400 --> 00:45:17,960 Speaker 1: they're playing from behind against the Patriots, they're gonna have 989 00:45:18,000 --> 00:45:20,040 Speaker 1: to throw the ball. And Justin Hunter, if he's the 990 00:45:20,120 --> 00:45:22,600 Speaker 1: only guy at fifty two hundred, he's the only guy. 991 00:45:23,040 --> 00:45:27,960 Speaker 1: Adam Humphries they've got Mike Evans and Adam Humphries and 992 00:45:28,040 --> 00:45:30,800 Speaker 1: they're going up against Oakland. So already mentioned Jameis Winston. 993 00:45:30,960 --> 00:45:34,720 Speaker 1: Five thousand dollars for Adam Humphries on FanDuel. And then finally, 994 00:45:35,360 --> 00:45:37,839 Speaker 1: and if you want to go really cheap, this guy 995 00:45:37,960 --> 00:45:40,920 Speaker 1: is obscure. He's not even available on FanDuel, but on 996 00:45:41,080 --> 00:45:45,680 Speaker 1: Draft Kings he's three thousand dollars. Robbie Anderson actually had 997 00:45:45,840 --> 00:45:48,160 Speaker 1: more snaps than Quincy and noon Will last week and 998 00:45:48,280 --> 00:45:52,760 Speaker 1: only one less target three thousand dollars against the Browns. 999 00:45:53,040 --> 00:45:54,840 Speaker 1: And I think that against the Browns, they're not gonna 1000 00:45:54,840 --> 00:45:56,640 Speaker 1: mind getting this guy into the game a lot more 1001 00:45:56,719 --> 00:46:00,399 Speaker 1: to see what he can do him with Fitzpatrick trying 1002 00:46:00,400 --> 00:46:03,080 Speaker 1: to save his job, I think they're going to throw 1003 00:46:03,120 --> 00:46:06,239 Speaker 1: the ball quite a bit. And Robbie Anderson, he could 1004 00:46:06,239 --> 00:46:08,719 Speaker 1: be a steal at three thousand dollars. He's actually had 1005 00:46:08,880 --> 00:46:12,359 Speaker 1: six targets twice already this year, So food for thought there. 1006 00:46:12,400 --> 00:46:14,880 Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, I didn't know until you've mentioned his 1007 00:46:14,960 --> 00:46:16,680 Speaker 1: name because he's just not really on my radar, But 1008 00:46:17,360 --> 00:46:20,560 Speaker 1: total dart throw you could do a lot worse. So 1009 00:46:20,640 --> 00:46:22,839 Speaker 1: if you had to go real contrarian, I just went 1010 00:46:22,920 --> 00:46:25,279 Speaker 1: there with Robbie Anderson, who's one guy and that you're 1011 00:46:25,320 --> 00:46:28,279 Speaker 1: fond of. Well, I'm gonna be a little bit of 1012 00:46:28,360 --> 00:46:30,960 Speaker 1: a broken record here, but I'm not really sure how 1013 00:46:31,040 --> 00:46:33,120 Speaker 1: super contrarian it is, but it definitely would be a 1014 00:46:33,160 --> 00:46:35,919 Speaker 1: low own play. I think Damerius Thomas has a chance 1015 00:46:35,960 --> 00:46:38,040 Speaker 1: to have a great week, and I'll tell you why. 1016 00:46:39,120 --> 00:46:42,279 Speaker 1: Seven plus targets in all but Week one and five 1017 00:46:42,360 --> 00:46:45,360 Speaker 1: plus receptions in each since then. He scored a touchdown 1018 00:46:45,400 --> 00:46:48,040 Speaker 1: in four of his five games since that point, but 1019 00:46:48,160 --> 00:46:50,040 Speaker 1: he's failed to hit the fifty yard plateau in each 1020 00:46:50,080 --> 00:46:53,040 Speaker 1: of those last three despite all the other positive numbers 1021 00:46:53,040 --> 00:46:57,800 Speaker 1: I've shared. So the opportunity is there. The matchup is phenomenal, 1022 00:46:57,880 --> 00:47:00,120 Speaker 1: I mean, and there is a chance that Bucker or 1023 00:47:00,200 --> 00:47:01,640 Speaker 1: is held in check a little bit. Like you mentioned 1024 00:47:01,680 --> 00:47:03,440 Speaker 1: that the Chargers did a good job with the run 1025 00:47:03,719 --> 00:47:06,480 Speaker 1: well last time these guys. These guys matched up, but 1026 00:47:06,600 --> 00:47:09,600 Speaker 1: just with such the high consistency that that Demerius sees 1027 00:47:09,640 --> 00:47:11,880 Speaker 1: in terms of volume and with the comfort level for 1028 00:47:11,960 --> 00:47:15,920 Speaker 1: semi and increasing, he has all the tools and ability 1029 00:47:15,960 --> 00:47:19,719 Speaker 1: to be a red zone beast for for semi and 1030 00:47:19,760 --> 00:47:21,960 Speaker 1: if they do have some offensive opportunities, down there that 1031 00:47:21,960 --> 00:47:24,040 Speaker 1: I expect them to do and getting eighty to one 1032 00:47:24,120 --> 00:47:25,920 Speaker 1: hundred yards and one or two touchdowns. It sounds a 1033 00:47:25,960 --> 00:47:29,000 Speaker 1: little bit obscured, but honestly, his price is decent on 1034 00:47:29,120 --> 00:47:31,160 Speaker 1: both sides. I think the ownership is going to be 1035 00:47:31,239 --> 00:47:33,759 Speaker 1: way down. And I already told you I like this 1036 00:47:33,840 --> 00:47:36,600 Speaker 1: matchup a lot for San Diego, excuse me for for Denver. 1037 00:47:36,800 --> 00:47:39,279 Speaker 1: So wouldn't shock me if he turns out to be 1038 00:47:39,320 --> 00:47:43,960 Speaker 1: a really high, high value ROI guy, considering he's only 1039 00:47:44,040 --> 00:47:46,120 Speaker 1: seven thousand bucks on FANDEL and I think he's even 1040 00:47:46,360 --> 00:47:48,960 Speaker 1: cheaper on Draftkicks. Dude, that's a great prize for a 1041 00:47:49,040 --> 00:47:51,800 Speaker 1: talent like Thomas, and we've seen him put up some 1042 00:47:52,080 --> 00:47:54,440 Speaker 1: huge numbers every once in a while, and if it's 1043 00:47:54,440 --> 00:47:55,960 Speaker 1: going to happen, this is a good week for him 1044 00:47:55,960 --> 00:47:57,759 Speaker 1: to do it. So yeah, I could definitely see that. 1045 00:47:58,960 --> 00:48:02,239 Speaker 1: Yeah he's sorry. I turn not a cash game guy, though, 1046 00:48:02,280 --> 00:48:05,399 Speaker 1: but purely an upside GPP play better on the talent 1047 00:48:05,480 --> 00:48:08,480 Speaker 1: bet on this situation. He's a high target guy. He's 1048 00:48:08,480 --> 00:48:10,839 Speaker 1: got twenty six percent of his team's targets this year. 1049 00:48:10,880 --> 00:48:12,520 Speaker 1: Like that, there's not too many receivers I get to 1050 00:48:12,560 --> 00:48:16,720 Speaker 1: say that, So let's not forget that point. My contrarian guys, 1051 00:48:16,800 --> 00:48:20,320 Speaker 1: Julian Edelman. He does not have ten Fantasy points in 1052 00:48:20,480 --> 00:48:23,360 Speaker 1: any game this year. People are so sick of playing Edelman. 1053 00:48:23,480 --> 00:48:25,839 Speaker 1: Last week he had nine receptions against Pittsburgh. This week 1054 00:48:25,880 --> 00:48:28,840 Speaker 1: he gets Buffalo, and I'm afraid of Stephen Gilmore. But 1055 00:48:28,920 --> 00:48:30,479 Speaker 1: Stephen Gilmore is not going to be in the slot 1056 00:48:30,560 --> 00:48:32,960 Speaker 1: covering Julian Edelman. So I think this could be a 1057 00:48:33,000 --> 00:48:34,759 Speaker 1: real big week for him. We already talked about with 1058 00:48:34,840 --> 00:48:37,920 Speaker 1: Tom Brady and Bill Belichick just wanted to take it 1059 00:48:38,000 --> 00:48:40,719 Speaker 1: to Rex Ryan. Julian Edelman is going to be off 1060 00:48:40,760 --> 00:48:43,280 Speaker 1: the radar because nobody's going to play him after zero 1061 00:48:43,400 --> 00:48:45,440 Speaker 1: touchdowns this year. But it's gonna be the game where 1062 00:48:45,440 --> 00:48:47,920 Speaker 1: he gets two or three touchdowns. It's going to happen eventually. 1063 00:48:48,040 --> 00:48:50,279 Speaker 1: It might be this week. Hey, just never know who 1064 00:48:50,360 --> 00:48:52,680 Speaker 1: Belichick is gonna game play for our game plan for 1065 00:48:52,880 --> 00:48:54,920 Speaker 1: right it could just be we're getting Julian Edelman one 1066 00:48:54,960 --> 00:48:58,120 Speaker 1: hundred yards and two touchdowns this week. It's absolutely could 1067 00:48:58,120 --> 00:49:00,359 Speaker 1: be the case. I have a tough time I'm seeing 1068 00:49:00,360 --> 00:49:02,479 Speaker 1: Gronk not do stuff. But but if that's the case 1069 00:49:02,680 --> 00:49:05,839 Speaker 1: with Edelman, and you choose to play him over Gronk, 1070 00:49:05,880 --> 00:49:08,000 Speaker 1: for example, in a tournament door stack like that could 1071 00:49:08,000 --> 00:49:10,680 Speaker 1: be a great low impairing. All right, moving over to 1072 00:49:10,719 --> 00:49:12,479 Speaker 1: tight end. We're gonna move a little faster here because 1073 00:49:12,480 --> 00:49:14,600 Speaker 1: we're kind of running out of time. We have. Gronk 1074 00:49:14,719 --> 00:49:17,160 Speaker 1: is the highest home player this week, and I'm playing 1075 00:49:17,239 --> 00:49:19,320 Speaker 1: him in my lineup if I can. Um. I already 1076 00:49:19,320 --> 00:49:21,480 Speaker 1: talked about the three huge wide receivers I've getting in there, 1077 00:49:21,520 --> 00:49:23,320 Speaker 1: so I probably won't have the money to do it, 1078 00:49:23,480 --> 00:49:25,960 Speaker 1: but um, you know, if I'm able to, I love 1079 00:49:26,040 --> 00:49:29,040 Speaker 1: Gronk this week. M Jared, who do you like? Yeah? 1080 00:49:29,200 --> 00:49:31,319 Speaker 1: I'm right there with you. I was going to say 1081 00:49:31,400 --> 00:49:33,640 Speaker 1: the same guy. So let's say let's do our ourselves 1082 00:49:33,719 --> 00:49:35,080 Speaker 1: a favorite on time and just move on to the 1083 00:49:35,160 --> 00:49:37,800 Speaker 1: next question contrary and play a tight end. Who do 1084 00:49:37,840 --> 00:49:41,839 Speaker 1: you like? Yeah? I don't know if i'd say, well, 1085 00:49:41,840 --> 00:49:44,480 Speaker 1: I mean the two guys that I love this week, 1086 00:49:44,680 --> 00:49:46,160 Speaker 1: and I talked about one of them in the starting 1087 00:49:46,200 --> 00:49:48,560 Speaker 1: five on Fantasy Cruncher is Jimmy Graham. If you're not 1088 00:49:48,640 --> 00:49:50,960 Speaker 1: playing Rob Gronkowski and it looks like he's going to 1089 00:49:51,000 --> 00:49:52,880 Speaker 1: be up to snuff, I mean, you've got you've got 1090 00:49:52,920 --> 00:49:55,560 Speaker 1: such a great, a great you know narrative there with 1091 00:49:55,680 --> 00:49:58,919 Speaker 1: Graham going back to New Orleans, and he's been he's 1092 00:49:58,920 --> 00:50:01,120 Speaker 1: been looking really, really, really strong. I think we actually 1093 00:50:01,160 --> 00:50:03,360 Speaker 1: talked about him the last time I was on the podcast, 1094 00:50:03,400 --> 00:50:05,799 Speaker 1: and he's looked really good since then. Um. But two 1095 00:50:05,880 --> 00:50:08,120 Speaker 1: other guys that I think that are are great lower 1096 00:50:08,160 --> 00:50:12,160 Speaker 1: own options are Gary Barnage and Kobe Fleiner. Um. Fleaner's 1097 00:50:12,160 --> 00:50:14,759 Speaker 1: really settled in and honestly, he steps his game up 1098 00:50:14,840 --> 00:50:16,759 Speaker 1: so far when when he's playing at home he's done 1099 00:50:16,800 --> 00:50:18,600 Speaker 1: really well on the home at home versus the road 1100 00:50:18,640 --> 00:50:21,080 Speaker 1: the last couple of games that he's played there, so 1101 00:50:22,040 --> 00:50:24,960 Speaker 1: high scoring affair that I'm expecting would not shock me 1102 00:50:25,040 --> 00:50:27,520 Speaker 1: if he's very productive. And then Barnage and we talked 1103 00:50:27,520 --> 00:50:30,399 Speaker 1: about McCown very briefly at the top of the show. Um, 1104 00:50:31,360 --> 00:50:34,000 Speaker 1: I think this is the prayer that Gary Barnage owners 1105 00:50:34,040 --> 00:50:37,000 Speaker 1: have been waiting for. Um and uh. And he you know, 1106 00:50:37,080 --> 00:50:39,840 Speaker 1: he consistently gets targets. He's been a very solid possession 1107 00:50:39,920 --> 00:50:43,080 Speaker 1: guy with absolutely terrible quarterbacks throwing him the ball so 1108 00:50:43,200 --> 00:50:45,880 Speaker 1: far this year hasn't scored a touchdown, much like Julian 1109 00:50:45,960 --> 00:50:47,759 Speaker 1: Edelman as you mentioned, but the volume has been there, 1110 00:50:47,880 --> 00:50:52,120 Speaker 1: the talents still there too. Um, he's and they're gonna 1111 00:50:52,160 --> 00:50:54,560 Speaker 1: they're gonna have to pass the ball. Yeah, I mean, 1112 00:50:54,600 --> 00:50:57,080 Speaker 1: I mean, if it's not Truell Prior or Gary Barnage, 1113 00:50:57,080 --> 00:50:59,200 Speaker 1: who the heck is it? I mean, let's let's be honest. 1114 00:50:59,239 --> 00:51:02,840 Speaker 1: And McCown is, in my opinion, the best Fantasy friendly 1115 00:51:03,719 --> 00:51:05,759 Speaker 1: quarterback on that roster, even when a guy like RG 1116 00:51:05,880 --> 00:51:09,320 Speaker 1: three is healthy, so I think that he's just and 1117 00:51:10,160 --> 00:51:12,640 Speaker 1: Fleaner as well, are both criminally underpriced based on what 1118 00:51:12,719 --> 00:51:15,160 Speaker 1: their upside could be. And and I actually wrote an 1119 00:51:15,239 --> 00:51:18,319 Speaker 1: article about about maybe even thinking about a double tight 1120 00:51:18,440 --> 00:51:21,800 Speaker 1: end situation on draft Kings when the situation's right. Wouldn't 1121 00:51:21,800 --> 00:51:26,080 Speaker 1: shock me if two of Gronk, Fleaner, Barnage and or 1122 00:51:26,200 --> 00:51:29,319 Speaker 1: even what's the guy I mentioned before, Jimmy Graham ends 1123 00:51:29,400 --> 00:51:31,520 Speaker 1: up being on the optimal lineup this week, wouldn't shock 1124 00:51:31,600 --> 00:51:34,759 Speaker 1: me one bit. It's amazing some of these prizes on 1125 00:51:34,800 --> 00:51:37,160 Speaker 1: und draft Kings. I mean, I'm looking at it. Gary 1126 00:51:37,200 --> 00:51:41,000 Speaker 1: Barne just thirty three hundred, Kobe Fleiner thirty four hundred, 1127 00:51:41,520 --> 00:51:44,279 Speaker 1: and he gets Seattle. Seattle's horrible at defending the tight end. 1128 00:51:44,320 --> 00:51:47,680 Speaker 1: They have been for years. And then Kyle Rudolph, who 1129 00:51:47,760 --> 00:51:49,560 Speaker 1: I have is the number two tight end this week 1130 00:51:50,040 --> 00:51:53,440 Speaker 1: thirty five hundred dollars. He's the number one target on 1131 00:51:53,480 --> 00:51:56,040 Speaker 1: their team. He's better than Stefon Diggs. He's going to 1132 00:51:56,080 --> 00:51:58,879 Speaker 1: get the ball at thirty five hundred dollars, that's half 1133 00:51:58,960 --> 00:52:01,960 Speaker 1: the price of Gronki. If you don't think he's a 1134 00:52:02,040 --> 00:52:05,520 Speaker 1: good bet to score half the points of Rob Gronkowski, 1135 00:52:05,800 --> 00:52:08,399 Speaker 1: I think you're crazy. I think he could be right 1136 00:52:08,480 --> 00:52:13,040 Speaker 1: up there by Gronkowski. So DraftKings Kyle Rudolph. I've got 1137 00:52:13,200 --> 00:52:15,040 Speaker 1: to play him in cash games. Now. I can see 1138 00:52:15,120 --> 00:52:18,400 Speaker 1: Rob Gronkowski and GPP and for fandol on playing Gronk. 1139 00:52:18,480 --> 00:52:23,200 Speaker 1: But DraftKings Man Kyle Rudolf thirty five. What are they doing? Well, 1140 00:52:23,239 --> 00:52:25,080 Speaker 1: it's tough because they're also not in the main slate, 1141 00:52:25,160 --> 00:52:26,960 Speaker 1: so I don't think they really care about that contest 1142 00:52:27,040 --> 00:52:29,160 Speaker 1: as much as they as they do because they're playing 1143 00:52:29,160 --> 00:52:32,520 Speaker 1: the Monday night games. So I also think that we're 1144 00:52:32,600 --> 00:52:34,080 Speaker 1: looking at a bit of a chalky your play just 1145 00:52:34,160 --> 00:52:36,120 Speaker 1: because he has, to your point, had that narrative and 1146 00:52:36,440 --> 00:52:38,840 Speaker 1: that reputation. But if you do have a way to 1147 00:52:38,880 --> 00:52:40,680 Speaker 1: get him, get him active, let's say on a Sunday 1148 00:52:40,680 --> 00:52:42,640 Speaker 1: to Monday contest, you have to really think about him. 1149 00:52:42,680 --> 00:52:44,120 Speaker 1: I was just kind of focusing on the main slate. 1150 00:52:44,160 --> 00:52:46,120 Speaker 1: But I'm glad you mentioned him. Yeah, yeah, that's a 1151 00:52:46,160 --> 00:52:48,080 Speaker 1: good point. I can't even think about that when I 1152 00:52:48,160 --> 00:52:50,479 Speaker 1: was saying it, But yeah, you're right on the money. 1153 00:52:50,920 --> 00:52:53,279 Speaker 1: All Right, Defense is who's a contrarian play that you 1154 00:52:53,320 --> 00:52:56,239 Speaker 1: think could force a couple turnovers, maybe getting the end zone. Yeah. 1155 00:52:56,400 --> 00:53:00,439 Speaker 1: I defense is really not that great this week. It's bad. Yeah, 1156 00:53:00,680 --> 00:53:02,560 Speaker 1: I don't really like it very much. The team I 1157 00:53:02,640 --> 00:53:05,600 Speaker 1: actually like the most heading into this was Tennessee and 1158 00:53:06,040 --> 00:53:08,799 Speaker 1: we were just talking quickly. Well, we had some difficulty there, 1159 00:53:08,840 --> 00:53:12,600 Speaker 1: but they're up big at the half. As we record 1160 00:53:12,640 --> 00:53:15,200 Speaker 1: this on Thursday night, they were the guy. There were 1161 00:53:15,200 --> 00:53:16,960 Speaker 1: the guys that I had heavy exposure to on my 1162 00:53:17,040 --> 00:53:19,759 Speaker 1: Thursday night contests. But if I had to kind of 1163 00:53:19,800 --> 00:53:23,640 Speaker 1: shift my focus over to Sunday, I'm thinking about the Chiefs. 1164 00:53:23,920 --> 00:53:26,360 Speaker 1: I know you talked about Andrew Luck, but but I 1165 00:53:26,440 --> 00:53:30,840 Speaker 1: kind of look for team team's skill and honestly, a 1166 00:53:30,920 --> 00:53:34,480 Speaker 1: good situation to exploit I think could be Indianapolis. Luck 1167 00:53:34,600 --> 00:53:37,560 Speaker 1: has had an interception in four was last six games, 1168 00:53:37,640 --> 00:53:39,400 Speaker 1: which is not a great trend but gives you a 1169 00:53:39,440 --> 00:53:41,279 Speaker 1: bit of a floor there for the Chiefs. And they 1170 00:53:41,320 --> 00:53:44,080 Speaker 1: actually have the highest team takeaway right on the board 1171 00:53:44,160 --> 00:53:47,239 Speaker 1: this week, and so I think that that they have 1172 00:53:47,520 --> 00:53:49,480 Speaker 1: a very good chance of being a fairly low owned 1173 00:53:49,760 --> 00:53:53,279 Speaker 1: but also a very solid defensive unit. And the other 1174 00:53:53,360 --> 00:53:55,920 Speaker 1: one that I'd say is is from a bit of 1175 00:53:55,960 --> 00:53:58,920 Speaker 1: a contrarian play would be would be the Cardinals. We 1176 00:53:59,000 --> 00:54:02,239 Speaker 1: talked a little bit about Cam Newton being a really 1177 00:54:02,280 --> 00:54:05,640 Speaker 1: intriguing play on the offensive side of things, but but overall, 1178 00:54:06,320 --> 00:54:09,160 Speaker 1: Arizona has plenty of talent there. It wouldn't shock me 1179 00:54:09,200 --> 00:54:11,759 Speaker 1: if they're like sub five percent owned even in GPPs 1180 00:54:11,880 --> 00:54:14,000 Speaker 1: and uh and and they have the ability to, you know, 1181 00:54:14,080 --> 00:54:17,920 Speaker 1: to force fumbles and and and Cam Newton has been 1182 00:54:17,920 --> 00:54:19,960 Speaker 1: known to turn over the ball too. So as much 1183 00:54:20,000 --> 00:54:22,000 Speaker 1: as we like him for for GPPs, I think there's 1184 00:54:22,000 --> 00:54:24,080 Speaker 1: plenty of reason to consider that there's a there's a 1185 00:54:24,120 --> 00:54:27,279 Speaker 1: decent chance um they're gonna be able to put up 1186 00:54:27,320 --> 00:54:30,080 Speaker 1: ten to fifteen points on both sides. It feels really 1187 00:54:30,160 --> 00:54:33,640 Speaker 1: weird to say this, but I like Oakland's defense this week. 1188 00:54:34,239 --> 00:54:36,920 Speaker 1: They're playing it against Jamis Winston and look I love Jamis, 1189 00:54:37,520 --> 00:54:40,560 Speaker 1: but he's probably gonna throw a couple of interceptions, maybe 1190 00:54:40,640 --> 00:54:43,520 Speaker 1: fumble a few times. In Oakland, they've actually had three 1191 00:54:43,719 --> 00:54:47,360 Speaker 1: games with multiple interceptions. They've got some talented guys and 1192 00:54:47,400 --> 00:54:49,279 Speaker 1: they're roaming around in their secondary and I know they're 1193 00:54:49,280 --> 00:54:51,359 Speaker 1: given up a bunch of points because they're not very 1194 00:54:51,360 --> 00:54:54,239 Speaker 1: good at covering, but they're good at making plays, and uh, 1195 00:54:54,560 --> 00:54:56,160 Speaker 1: you know, if you get interceptions, you have a chance 1196 00:54:56,200 --> 00:54:58,719 Speaker 1: to get in the end zone. I like Oakland as 1197 00:54:58,840 --> 00:55:01,680 Speaker 1: a you know, try to hit a home run play. 1198 00:55:01,800 --> 00:55:04,080 Speaker 1: Probably not going to happen, but you know, they've got 1199 00:55:04,160 --> 00:55:07,440 Speaker 1: a chance here, and they're cheap, so I definitely wouldn't 1200 00:55:07,440 --> 00:55:10,279 Speaker 1: mind going with Oakland. Now, how about if you had to, 1201 00:55:10,719 --> 00:55:12,479 Speaker 1: if you had to bet on somebody get ten plus 1202 00:55:12,560 --> 00:55:15,400 Speaker 1: DFS points, who do you believe in? I mean, we 1203 00:55:15,520 --> 00:55:17,760 Speaker 1: just talked about Kyle Rudolph not being on the main slate. 1204 00:55:17,880 --> 00:55:20,280 Speaker 1: I'd say it's got to be Minnesota. Their their defense 1205 00:55:20,320 --> 00:55:24,279 Speaker 1: has been so good, and with Chicago having zero quarterbacks left, 1206 00:55:24,400 --> 00:55:26,200 Speaker 1: I think they're what are they turning back to Jacoler 1207 00:55:26,280 --> 00:55:31,640 Speaker 1: this week? That's just a great situation for Minnesota to exploit, 1208 00:55:31,680 --> 00:55:34,000 Speaker 1: even though they're on the road very expensive on DraftKings. 1209 00:55:34,440 --> 00:55:36,839 Speaker 1: But honestly, if you're looking for a cash game floor 1210 00:55:36,880 --> 00:55:38,960 Speaker 1: and you're going to play that slate where they're eligible, 1211 00:55:39,000 --> 00:55:41,000 Speaker 1: I think you've got to go that route. If you're 1212 00:55:41,040 --> 00:55:44,680 Speaker 1: just talking about, um, if you're just talking about what's 1213 00:55:44,680 --> 00:55:48,040 Speaker 1: it called the main slate, I think you got to 1214 00:55:48,080 --> 00:55:50,840 Speaker 1: give the Jets some consideration just simply because of Cleveland's 1215 00:55:50,840 --> 00:55:55,000 Speaker 1: turnover tendencies. I know we both like the potential for 1216 00:55:55,040 --> 00:55:57,279 Speaker 1: a Gary Barnage and maybe even Josh McCown have a 1217 00:55:57,320 --> 00:55:59,400 Speaker 1: slumbat surprising day, but at the end of the day, 1218 00:55:59,400 --> 00:56:03,400 Speaker 1: they're still there. And uh and and overall, um, the 1219 00:56:03,560 --> 00:56:06,239 Speaker 1: Jets aren't aren't that bout of a defensive unit, and 1220 00:56:06,239 --> 00:56:09,839 Speaker 1: they're very affordable on fandel this week. So I think that, um, 1221 00:56:10,320 --> 00:56:11,719 Speaker 1: if you had to choose one there, I think that 1222 00:56:11,760 --> 00:56:14,840 Speaker 1: they're interesting. For me, it's the Patriots. They're my defense. 1223 00:56:14,880 --> 00:56:17,480 Speaker 1: We already talked about them going going up to Buffalo 1224 00:56:17,520 --> 00:56:20,600 Speaker 1: and just trying to crush Rex Ryan. They're thirty three 1225 00:56:20,760 --> 00:56:23,080 Speaker 1: hundred undraft kings, and when you're playing from up that 1226 00:56:23,280 --> 00:56:26,560 Speaker 1: much a team like the Patriots, they've got some real playmakers. 1227 00:56:26,600 --> 00:56:28,200 Speaker 1: They weren't great at the beginning of the season. But 1228 00:56:28,239 --> 00:56:30,920 Speaker 1: they had a couple of guys out for suspension, injury, 1229 00:56:31,520 --> 00:56:34,120 Speaker 1: what have you, and another back, and now they're going 1230 00:56:34,160 --> 00:56:35,919 Speaker 1: to crush the Bills. And when the Bills are throwing 1231 00:56:35,920 --> 00:56:39,000 Speaker 1: them from behind. Look, I love Tyrod Taylor, but um, 1232 00:56:39,200 --> 00:56:40,840 Speaker 1: you know, he's not the kind of guy who's going 1233 00:56:40,920 --> 00:56:43,440 Speaker 1: to storm back and put two or three touchdowns on 1234 00:56:43,520 --> 00:56:45,360 Speaker 1: the board. He's going to be forced to try to 1235 00:56:45,400 --> 00:56:48,000 Speaker 1: make some throws and the Patriots are going to pick 1236 00:56:48,040 --> 00:56:50,000 Speaker 1: one or two off. So I really like them to 1237 00:56:50,040 --> 00:56:52,319 Speaker 1: get ten points. And at thirty three hundred dollars, that's 1238 00:56:52,320 --> 00:56:54,680 Speaker 1: a great price. Yeah, I can't argue with that at all. 1239 00:56:54,680 --> 00:56:56,919 Speaker 1: They're they're kind of next on my list, to be honest, 1240 00:56:57,000 --> 00:56:59,480 Speaker 1: I'm not just making that up. I had to, but 1241 00:56:59,560 --> 00:57:01,880 Speaker 1: I'm glad you mentioned them. Helps helps just cover it 1242 00:57:01,920 --> 00:57:04,920 Speaker 1: all up, all right, Jared, Let's talk about stacks. If 1243 00:57:05,000 --> 00:57:07,839 Speaker 1: you had to pick one stack for cash games, who 1244 00:57:07,880 --> 00:57:10,799 Speaker 1: do you trust the most? Winston and Evans. Baby, going 1245 00:57:10,880 --> 00:57:13,600 Speaker 1: back to the to the earlier part of our discussion, 1246 00:57:14,200 --> 00:57:18,200 Speaker 1: Famous Jamis and target Monster Mike Evans. Those two guys, 1247 00:57:18,240 --> 00:57:19,760 Speaker 1: I think you can lock in load and just about 1248 00:57:19,760 --> 00:57:21,640 Speaker 1: any contest for HiMAT this week and feel good about it. 1249 00:57:22,160 --> 00:57:24,880 Speaker 1: For me, it's Brady and Gronk. I love Jamis and Evans, 1250 00:57:25,960 --> 00:57:27,880 Speaker 1: but it's Brady and Gronk for me. I trust them 1251 00:57:27,880 --> 00:57:29,800 Speaker 1: a ton, Matt Ryan and Hulu Jones. That's a really 1252 00:57:29,800 --> 00:57:33,720 Speaker 1: expensive one, but man, there's some real good stacks. If 1253 00:57:33,760 --> 00:57:36,520 Speaker 1: I had to go with three players, however, I'm going 1254 00:57:36,560 --> 00:57:40,000 Speaker 1: with Aaron Rodgers. Yeah. If you're doing stacks, it's probably 1255 00:57:40,040 --> 00:57:44,040 Speaker 1: for GPP, right, Aaron Rodgers, Davante Adams, and Time Montgomery. 1256 00:57:44,320 --> 00:57:48,200 Speaker 1: They're they're cheap enough, and Jordy Nelson just hasn't been 1257 00:57:48,240 --> 00:57:50,200 Speaker 1: showing it lately. I know I talked the other way 1258 00:57:50,240 --> 00:57:53,640 Speaker 1: on Jordy Nelson earlier, but if I'm relying on a 1259 00:57:53,680 --> 00:57:58,880 Speaker 1: stack at those prices, Davante Adams and and Ty Williams, 1260 00:57:58,960 --> 00:58:01,200 Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Time Montgomer. They've been getting a ton of 1261 00:58:01,560 --> 00:58:04,000 Speaker 1: targets thrown their way. So I like Green Bay as 1262 00:58:04,000 --> 00:58:09,640 Speaker 1: a three team, three player stack. This week. Well, the 1263 00:58:09,800 --> 00:58:11,800 Speaker 1: next question is going to be about a contrarian stack, 1264 00:58:11,880 --> 00:58:14,440 Speaker 1: isn't it. That's right, let's do it. Contrarian stack. Who 1265 00:58:14,440 --> 00:58:18,120 Speaker 1: do you have well at the exact same combination you 1266 00:58:18,240 --> 00:58:21,720 Speaker 1: just mentioned, Because I think I think I think that 1267 00:58:21,920 --> 00:58:23,640 Speaker 1: that there's going to be a lot well not really 1268 00:58:23,680 --> 00:58:25,720 Speaker 1: the same but from the same team. I do think 1269 00:58:25,760 --> 00:58:28,600 Speaker 1: there's going to be a lot more attention on other 1270 00:58:28,680 --> 00:58:31,320 Speaker 1: guys outside of outside of Green Bay, when when you 1271 00:58:31,360 --> 00:58:34,960 Speaker 1: could easily look at a guy like like Rogers. Um, 1272 00:58:35,280 --> 00:58:37,960 Speaker 1: I actually think the combination that if I was looking 1273 00:58:38,000 --> 00:58:40,440 Speaker 1: for a bit of a contrarian situation, I'd go Rogers, 1274 00:58:40,520 --> 00:58:43,080 Speaker 1: Nelson and Montgomery. I would leave I leave Adams off 1275 00:58:43,200 --> 00:58:46,680 Speaker 1: just because I think Jordy Nelson's got more people hating 1276 00:58:46,760 --> 00:58:48,480 Speaker 1: him right now than he does liking them. And so 1277 00:58:49,960 --> 00:58:51,880 Speaker 1: especially if we're thinking about Fandel where you can put 1278 00:58:51,920 --> 00:58:54,120 Speaker 1: Montgomery on at your running back, which I don't think 1279 00:58:54,200 --> 00:58:56,040 Speaker 1: very many people are going to want to do, since 1280 00:58:56,120 --> 00:58:58,200 Speaker 1: there are some other very solid values at that same 1281 00:58:58,240 --> 00:59:01,520 Speaker 1: price or even cheaper. UM think a Rogers Nelson Montgomery 1282 00:59:01,600 --> 00:59:03,280 Speaker 1: stacking and frankly, if you want to box it that 1283 00:59:03,360 --> 00:59:06,160 Speaker 1: with Rogers items in Montgomery. I think to your point, 1284 00:59:06,840 --> 00:59:09,560 Speaker 1: both of those are really intriguing. Jared, this is gonna 1285 00:59:09,600 --> 00:59:13,880 Speaker 1: sound really bad because it's Sam Bradford, But Sam Bradford, 1286 00:59:14,160 --> 00:59:18,000 Speaker 1: Kyle Rudolph, and Stefan Diggs. There's nobody else to pass 1287 00:59:18,040 --> 00:59:20,000 Speaker 1: the ball too, and so I feel really good about 1288 00:59:20,000 --> 00:59:23,720 Speaker 1: those two wide receivers. And look, Chicago's secondary is a 1289 00:59:23,840 --> 00:59:26,440 Speaker 1: train wreck this season. I know they've sharpened it up 1290 00:59:26,440 --> 00:59:29,640 Speaker 1: a little bit lately, but last week was a disaster 1291 00:59:29,800 --> 00:59:33,520 Speaker 1: again against Green Bay. They're playing at Chicago on Monday night, 1292 00:59:33,560 --> 00:59:35,640 Speaker 1: and it's not the main slate, but if you're playing 1293 00:59:35,720 --> 00:59:39,480 Speaker 1: one of those, you know, Sunday morning to Monday night slates, sneak, 1294 00:59:39,520 --> 00:59:41,960 Speaker 1: sneak one of these GPP lineups in there with Bradford, 1295 00:59:42,080 --> 00:59:45,160 Speaker 1: Diggs and Kyle Rudolph. At their price is Sam Bradford's 1296 00:59:45,200 --> 00:59:48,800 Speaker 1: five thousand undraftkings. Man, I think you could really hit 1297 00:59:48,840 --> 00:59:51,960 Speaker 1: a home run here. Yeah, you've got a compelling argument 1298 00:59:52,000 --> 00:59:54,080 Speaker 1: made there. Honestly, I think you can really get away 1299 00:59:54,120 --> 00:59:55,960 Speaker 1: with it. All right, Jared, that's all the questions we have. 1300 00:59:56,040 --> 00:59:58,040 Speaker 1: We're in the show this week. As always. It's the 1301 00:59:58,120 --> 01:00:01,560 Speaker 1: pleasure since we have the same lineup. It's good lucky 1302 01:00:01,680 --> 01:00:04,680 Speaker 1: this weekend. I hope it goes well and thanks for 1303 01:00:04,760 --> 01:00:07,520 Speaker 1: coming on. Yeah, thanks so much once again. Always a blast. 1304 01:00:07,600 --> 01:00:09,400 Speaker 1: And uh and yeah, hey, best of left to you 1305 01:00:09,520 --> 01:00:11,600 Speaker 1: this week as well, and all the listeners out there 1306 01:00:11,880 --> 01:00:13,280 Speaker 1: and that's all we here for you guys this week. 1307 01:00:13,400 --> 01:00:15,960 Speaker 1: Next week, we'll have three more shows, highlighted by James 1308 01:00:16,040 --> 01:00:18,920 Speaker 1: Cove the NFL Network to talk about his rankings on Wednesday, 1309 01:00:19,240 --> 01:00:21,720 Speaker 1: make sure to tune him for those. Thanks for listening, 1310 01:00:22,080 --> 01:00:24,400 Speaker 1: and good luck this weekend. I just wanted you to watch. 1311 01:00:34,680 --> 01:00:36,400 Speaker 1: I don't even know how against