1 00:00:01,280 --> 00:00:03,440 Speaker 1: Hello, everybody, Welcome into the cycle. 2 00:00:03,600 --> 00:00:06,640 Speaker 2: I am Ryan Warmley, joined as always by Mike Mayer. 3 00:00:07,360 --> 00:00:10,080 Speaker 2: I will try and get through this episode totop coughing 4 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:12,040 Speaker 2: too much. I am in the I think the early 5 00:00:12,080 --> 00:00:12,840 Speaker 2: stages of cold. 6 00:00:12,840 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: I don't know what it is. 7 00:00:13,520 --> 00:00:15,720 Speaker 2: My throats father and me father. The best I can 8 00:00:15,760 --> 00:00:18,520 Speaker 2: here to power through and give you guys the Fantasy 9 00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:21,319 Speaker 2: Baseball goodness that you have come to appreciate each and 10 00:00:21,360 --> 00:00:24,400 Speaker 2: every week. I hope if you guys like this content, 11 00:00:24,440 --> 00:00:27,080 Speaker 2: the best freeway to show your support and encourage more 12 00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:29,960 Speaker 2: content like this is to leave a positive review at 13 00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:33,840 Speaker 2: fantasypros dot com slash MLB review And as I mentioned 14 00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 2: every week, if you leave a question in your review, 15 00:00:36,159 --> 00:00:37,720 Speaker 2: may Or and I will be sure to answer it 16 00:00:37,800 --> 00:00:39,360 Speaker 2: in the following week's episode. 17 00:00:39,560 --> 00:00:40,920 Speaker 1: Just let everybody know stick around. 18 00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:43,080 Speaker 2: Later in the show, I have a conversation with our 19 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:46,800 Speaker 2: friend and colleague Chris Welsh. We talk about Paul Skeins, 20 00:00:47,080 --> 00:00:49,680 Speaker 2: we talk about Christian Scott, we talk about Jackson Holliday, 21 00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:52,159 Speaker 2: we talk about Jason Demingez. We'll talk about some other 22 00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:55,040 Speaker 2: prospects to stash now that schemes is up. It's a 23 00:00:55,080 --> 00:00:58,000 Speaker 2: pretty good conversation so definitely check around that in the 24 00:00:58,040 --> 00:01:01,160 Speaker 2: second half of the show. Start off, as we always 25 00:01:01,160 --> 00:01:02,600 Speaker 2: do with rounding the bases. 26 00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:03,760 Speaker 1: Mayor. 27 00:01:04,480 --> 00:01:07,880 Speaker 2: I was playing softball last night and then I saw 28 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:09,959 Speaker 2: a message from you that said, well, I guess we 29 00:01:10,040 --> 00:01:13,759 Speaker 2: need to talk about Ronelle Blanco on tomorrow's show. And 30 00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:16,800 Speaker 2: I said why in my head, and I went and 31 00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:18,360 Speaker 2: looked it up. I was like, did he get hurt? 32 00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:21,360 Speaker 2: You know, did he get shelled? Turns out he's been cheating. 33 00:01:21,959 --> 00:01:23,959 Speaker 2: I mean I say that kind of tongue and cheek. 34 00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:26,600 Speaker 2: It's like, not entirely clear. He has been suspended for 35 00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:31,800 Speaker 2: ten days by Major League Baseball. They found substance on 36 00:01:31,840 --> 00:01:34,479 Speaker 2: his arm and it was checked and he was out 37 00:01:34,480 --> 00:01:37,840 Speaker 2: of the game, and, like I said, now suspended. What's 38 00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:41,760 Speaker 2: really interesting in situations like this for me is less 39 00:01:42,080 --> 00:01:45,280 Speaker 2: looking backwards at you know, trying to figure out how 40 00:01:45,400 --> 00:01:48,560 Speaker 2: much of what he had done this season was related 41 00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:53,040 Speaker 2: to the cheating, intentional or otherwise or whatever, you know, 42 00:01:53,640 --> 00:01:55,040 Speaker 2: like looking at spin rates and things like that. I 43 00:01:55,080 --> 00:01:58,279 Speaker 2: saw Welsh tweeting about this. Actually it's more about looking forward. 44 00:01:58,680 --> 00:02:00,640 Speaker 2: What do we expect out of him when he returns. 45 00:02:00,920 --> 00:02:03,000 Speaker 2: So that's kind of where I'm at. What was your 46 00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:04,720 Speaker 2: initial takeaway when you saw this and what are you 47 00:02:04,760 --> 00:02:06,080 Speaker 2: thinking about now a day later. 48 00:02:07,160 --> 00:02:10,840 Speaker 3: Well, my initial takeaway was, oh, no, he's my two 49 00:02:10,919 --> 00:02:13,600 Speaker 3: star pitcher against Ryan for this week, so I have 50 00:02:13,680 --> 00:02:16,680 Speaker 3: to I guess I'm going to automatically lose. And that's 51 00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:18,840 Speaker 3: one of the main reasons I initially messaged you. I 52 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:20,640 Speaker 3: was like, well, got to talk about this. What a 53 00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:24,640 Speaker 3: disaster for me. I've also I'm also someone who has 54 00:02:24,760 --> 00:02:26,880 Speaker 3: kind of not been high on renal bloca. 55 00:02:26,960 --> 00:02:28,240 Speaker 4: But like when he kind. 56 00:02:28,160 --> 00:02:29,679 Speaker 3: Of broke out and had just no hitter, we talked 57 00:02:29,680 --> 00:02:33,120 Speaker 3: about him, and I think most of the industry just 58 00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:35,639 Speaker 3: kind of agreed. You know, this is this is kind 59 00:02:35,639 --> 00:02:37,600 Speaker 3: of a fluke thing. It's not gonna last. He's going 60 00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:39,839 Speaker 3: to turn back into a pumpkin. And then he's where 61 00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:41,800 Speaker 3: eight starts in and the number. You know, there are 62 00:02:41,840 --> 00:02:46,440 Speaker 3: some obviously concerning underlying numbers, but you know, his actual 63 00:02:46,520 --> 00:02:49,520 Speaker 3: numbers continue to be really good, and there are some 64 00:02:49,520 --> 00:02:51,720 Speaker 3: some signs that, you know, like we talked about the 65 00:02:51,760 --> 00:02:55,680 Speaker 3: change up and you know that stuff. But now I 66 00:02:55,720 --> 00:02:58,160 Speaker 3: feel like I don't know anything. It's hard to know 67 00:02:58,200 --> 00:02:58,840 Speaker 3: what to believe. 68 00:02:59,040 --> 00:02:59,240 Speaker 4: You know. 69 00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:02,000 Speaker 3: It's like you said, has he been cheating all along? 70 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:04,240 Speaker 3: You know, is this a one off thing? And you 71 00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:07,320 Speaker 3: know everyone is you know, I've seen everyone kind of 72 00:03:07,320 --> 00:03:09,680 Speaker 3: talking about the spin Rate's like nothing was noticeably different 73 00:03:09,680 --> 00:03:12,680 Speaker 3: in this start. Does that mean he wasn't really cheating? 74 00:03:12,960 --> 00:03:16,720 Speaker 3: Does it mean he's always been cheating? Like I feel 75 00:03:16,720 --> 00:03:18,239 Speaker 3: like I don't know what to believe now, and it's 76 00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:20,240 Speaker 3: like he already was kind of a cell high, and 77 00:03:20,280 --> 00:03:22,400 Speaker 3: now it's like, can you even you know, the CBS 78 00:03:22,440 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 3: guys were talking about this. Can you know he was 79 00:03:24,520 --> 00:03:26,840 Speaker 3: a cell high? But now can you is he now 80 00:03:26,880 --> 00:03:30,919 Speaker 3: a by low? Because maybe you just you know, someone's like, oh, 81 00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:32,359 Speaker 3: you know, they got to get out from underneath the 82 00:03:33,040 --> 00:03:35,880 Speaker 3: Renel Blanco. Maybe you can just get him for nothing, 83 00:03:36,000 --> 00:03:38,119 Speaker 3: or because they're concerned about this. You know, it's only 84 00:03:38,120 --> 00:03:41,400 Speaker 3: a short suspension, but it's like, you know, they're obviously 85 00:03:41,480 --> 00:03:44,160 Speaker 3: you know, we already had concerns and now no one 86 00:03:44,240 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 3: really can believe anything. 87 00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:49,160 Speaker 2: I'll tell you this, I will buy low now emphasis 88 00:03:49,200 --> 00:03:52,040 Speaker 2: on low. It needs to be low, but I'll buy 89 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:54,640 Speaker 2: low and say, listen to his era is like two 90 00:03:54,720 --> 00:03:55,720 Speaker 2: what is it two oh nine? 91 00:03:55,880 --> 00:03:56,440 Speaker 1: This season? 92 00:03:56,640 --> 00:03:58,400 Speaker 2: I know that, like you said, there's some underlying stuff, 93 00:03:58,440 --> 00:04:01,600 Speaker 2: but almost a strikeout. And again, in the modern landscape 94 00:04:01,640 --> 00:04:04,480 Speaker 2: of pitching, like taking a chance that this was kind 95 00:04:04,480 --> 00:04:08,960 Speaker 2: of like some fluke like mix of sweat or whatever. 96 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:11,760 Speaker 2: Like I'm not going to pretend to sit here and say, 97 00:04:11,800 --> 00:04:15,040 Speaker 2: like I definitively know like what he was attending, what 98 00:04:15,120 --> 00:04:18,719 Speaker 2: was actually happening, et cetera, et cetera, and it might 99 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:21,320 Speaker 2: you know, not not pan out. Maybe he has been 100 00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:23,080 Speaker 2: cheating all along and now he's going to turn back 101 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:25,280 Speaker 2: into a pumpkin. Maybe he was always going to turn 102 00:04:25,320 --> 00:04:28,080 Speaker 2: back into a pumpkin because he's thirty years old, having 103 00:04:28,120 --> 00:04:30,880 Speaker 2: this late career breakout, and we just expect those guys 104 00:04:30,960 --> 00:04:31,520 Speaker 2: to regress. 105 00:04:31,560 --> 00:04:32,040 Speaker 1: I don't know. 106 00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:35,440 Speaker 2: But if I can truly buy low and get him 107 00:04:35,480 --> 00:04:38,600 Speaker 2: for like essentially nothing, which I don't think is possible everywhere, 108 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:40,920 Speaker 2: but I think it's definitely possible in some places, I'm 109 00:04:40,960 --> 00:04:43,920 Speaker 2: happy to do that and take that swing and say, 110 00:04:44,720 --> 00:04:47,120 Speaker 2: you know, best case scenario, he comes back and he 111 00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:48,720 Speaker 2: is the guy that he has been the first month 112 00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:51,400 Speaker 2: and a half of the season, and it's kind of 113 00:04:51,440 --> 00:04:53,880 Speaker 2: like a key cog in my fantasy rotation. 114 00:04:54,360 --> 00:04:56,360 Speaker 1: Worst case I didn't give up much to get him. 115 00:04:56,640 --> 00:04:59,479 Speaker 2: I think you know, if you asked me, you know, buy, seller, hold, 116 00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:03,919 Speaker 2: the correct answer is probably hold. I would think I 117 00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:07,200 Speaker 2: would not be selling low. You obviously can't sell high 118 00:05:07,279 --> 00:05:10,159 Speaker 2: right now. I would not be selling low. I would 119 00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:12,279 Speaker 2: be buying low or holding if I already have him. 120 00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:13,000 Speaker 1: What do you think? 121 00:05:13,560 --> 00:05:15,120 Speaker 4: Yeah, I would agree with that. I think you have 122 00:05:15,160 --> 00:05:17,040 Speaker 4: to hold and not sell low. 123 00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:21,280 Speaker 3: I mean, it's if he comes back and stinks up 124 00:05:21,320 --> 00:05:23,680 Speaker 3: the place, you're gonna sell low or have to drop 125 00:05:23,720 --> 00:05:25,840 Speaker 3: him anyway. But there's not really much to gain by 126 00:05:25,880 --> 00:05:28,320 Speaker 3: selling low now. I do want to mention I saw A. J. 127 00:05:28,440 --> 00:05:31,000 Speaker 3: Pruzinski talking about this today and he had some pretty 128 00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:33,479 Speaker 3: strong feelings which I kind of agreed with. And he 129 00:05:33,520 --> 00:05:36,760 Speaker 3: just talked about the whole process of of you know, 130 00:05:36,920 --> 00:05:39,600 Speaker 3: flagging these pictures and how an umpire gonna be like, yeah, 131 00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:41,960 Speaker 3: that's sticky stuff like throw and not only do you 132 00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:44,200 Speaker 3: throw them out of the game, he's automatically suspended for 133 00:05:44,240 --> 00:05:47,359 Speaker 3: ten games. And he was he was arguing, we have 134 00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:49,240 Speaker 3: the science to figure this out, like we can tell 135 00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:51,119 Speaker 3: if that was rosen or not, Like it's not hard, 136 00:05:51,560 --> 00:05:53,920 Speaker 3: you know, like give us a swab and by tomorrow 137 00:05:53,960 --> 00:05:55,400 Speaker 3: morning we'll know if it was you. 138 00:05:55,360 --> 00:05:57,320 Speaker 4: Know, we'll know what the substance is. 139 00:05:58,040 --> 00:06:00,000 Speaker 3: And he kind of made the case like you can 140 00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:03,560 Speaker 3: just have an umpire with a grudge against the pitcher, 141 00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:07,080 Speaker 3: and knowing what we know about these umpires and some 142 00:06:07,200 --> 00:06:11,320 Speaker 3: of their you know, opinions and attitudes and just general personalities, 143 00:06:11,800 --> 00:06:14,560 Speaker 3: that's not necessarily something that you know, is out of 144 00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:16,680 Speaker 3: the realm of possibility that someone could just like have 145 00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:20,520 Speaker 3: a grudge against someone and there's just no checks and balance. 146 00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:22,719 Speaker 4: As you just said, Yep, that's sticky stuff. I don't 147 00:06:22,720 --> 00:06:23,320 Speaker 4: think it's sweat. 148 00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:25,520 Speaker 3: I think I think you're cheating and you're out of 149 00:06:25,520 --> 00:06:27,520 Speaker 3: this game and ten games suspension. I thought that was 150 00:06:27,520 --> 00:06:30,320 Speaker 3: an interesting point, and I think I agree with him. 151 00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:34,760 Speaker 2: If you are waiting on public checks and balances for 152 00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:36,640 Speaker 2: Major League Baseball umpires, you're gonna be. 153 00:06:36,640 --> 00:06:37,400 Speaker 1: Waiting a long time. 154 00:06:38,160 --> 00:06:38,679 Speaker 4: That's fair. 155 00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:41,200 Speaker 1: We'll tell you that. Yeah. 156 00:06:41,240 --> 00:06:43,520 Speaker 2: I mean, he's been one of the more interesting stories 157 00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:46,280 Speaker 2: of the start of the season. Like, like, obviously the 158 00:06:46,360 --> 00:06:49,200 Speaker 2: no hitter really like boosts the kind of profile around 159 00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:51,520 Speaker 2: a guy. But like to your point, he has been 160 00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 2: really consistent since then too for a bad Astros team. 161 00:06:55,960 --> 00:06:58,159 Speaker 2: He he is four and oh for a team that 162 00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:01,880 Speaker 2: is not winning a lot of games, so it's pretty significant. 163 00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:05,039 Speaker 2: And I'm really curious, really curious to see what he 164 00:07:05,080 --> 00:07:08,680 Speaker 2: looks like when he's back on the mound. Like I said, 165 00:07:08,800 --> 00:07:11,480 Speaker 2: I'm happy to I won't be starting him that first 166 00:07:11,480 --> 00:07:11,920 Speaker 2: start back. 167 00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:13,119 Speaker 1: I don't even care who he's facing. 168 00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:15,280 Speaker 2: He will not be he will be on my bench, 169 00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:18,600 Speaker 2: but I want him on my roster just just in case. 170 00:07:18,640 --> 00:07:21,760 Speaker 2: And this is kind of a fluke or again some 171 00:07:22,160 --> 00:07:26,760 Speaker 2: sort of incidental mixing of whatever, and that really really quickly, 172 00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:28,960 Speaker 2: what do you think about the hitters who said when 173 00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:30,920 Speaker 2: this offers started happening like that they kind of like 174 00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:33,680 Speaker 2: some of the sticky stuff just to make sure the 175 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:35,960 Speaker 2: pitcher like had control over the ball and wasn't going 176 00:07:36,040 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 2: to be like you know, slipping around and throwing kind 177 00:07:38,840 --> 00:07:39,560 Speaker 2: of haphazardly. 178 00:07:39,680 --> 00:07:40,560 Speaker 1: What do you think about that? 179 00:07:41,720 --> 00:07:44,280 Speaker 3: Well, yeah, I mean it's a real I don't want 180 00:07:44,320 --> 00:07:46,040 Speaker 3: to say pet peeve, but it really annoys me that 181 00:07:46,080 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 3: baseball changes the ball so much. And you've seen there 182 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:53,040 Speaker 3: are other leagues, like I think the KBO does it 183 00:07:53,360 --> 00:07:55,800 Speaker 3: where they have like a pre tacked ball, like the 184 00:07:55,880 --> 00:07:59,800 Speaker 3: ball is already sticky, and I think everyone is kind 185 00:07:59,840 --> 00:08:02,200 Speaker 3: of with that you know, obviously hitters have to deal 186 00:08:02,240 --> 00:08:04,160 Speaker 3: with some better breaking pitches, but they're also not just 187 00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:06,040 Speaker 3: going to get you know, pitches in the side of 188 00:08:06,080 --> 00:08:08,200 Speaker 3: their neck because the slider doesn't slide kind of a thing, 189 00:08:08,960 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 3: and you don't have to worry about all this stuff. 190 00:08:10,560 --> 00:08:13,480 Speaker 3: And you know, there's also some argument to be made 191 00:08:13,480 --> 00:08:15,160 Speaker 3: that some of the sticky stuff is a result you know, 192 00:08:15,400 --> 00:08:17,480 Speaker 3: or lack they're like how slick the balls are is 193 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:20,280 Speaker 3: resulting in some injuries. I forget if it was last 194 00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:21,840 Speaker 3: year of the year before we saw a ton of 195 00:08:21,880 --> 00:08:25,400 Speaker 3: pitchers start to go down with like blisters and stuff 196 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:28,000 Speaker 3: that they were having trouble with the new baseballs. And 197 00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:31,440 Speaker 3: I think in the lower one of the lower minor 198 00:08:31,520 --> 00:08:34,120 Speaker 3: league levels where they kind of like start to experiment 199 00:08:34,160 --> 00:08:35,600 Speaker 3: with all these things, I think they're already using a 200 00:08:35,640 --> 00:08:38,840 Speaker 3: pre tacked ball. So I hope, you know, just for 201 00:08:38,880 --> 00:08:40,680 Speaker 3: the sake of the game, I hope they maybe bring 202 00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:43,080 Speaker 3: that to Major League Baseball and we get, you know, 203 00:08:43,320 --> 00:08:46,400 Speaker 3: less variance between baseballs and just kind of have a 204 00:08:46,400 --> 00:08:49,360 Speaker 3: pre tact ball that everyone you know is agreement that 205 00:08:49,440 --> 00:08:50,160 Speaker 3: you know, these work. 206 00:08:51,400 --> 00:08:55,920 Speaker 2: Next topic here, U stat Cast really interestingly released swing 207 00:08:56,240 --> 00:08:57,360 Speaker 2: tracking data. 208 00:08:58,040 --> 00:09:00,839 Speaker 1: So this is stuff like the. 209 00:09:00,280 --> 00:09:04,000 Speaker 2: That speed on the swing, the that length in terms 210 00:09:04,040 --> 00:09:05,800 Speaker 2: of how short the swing is, you know, how compact 211 00:09:05,800 --> 00:09:08,599 Speaker 2: it is versus how long it is. Stuff about the 212 00:09:08,679 --> 00:09:11,240 Speaker 2: number of blasts you have, which is kind of like 213 00:09:11,280 --> 00:09:13,880 Speaker 2: squaring up a ball but with a certain you know, 214 00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:18,320 Speaker 2: you know, exsit velocity slash bat speed. I haven't memorized 215 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:19,680 Speaker 2: all the numbers yet, but it's that kind of thing 216 00:09:20,280 --> 00:09:23,280 Speaker 2: which is really interesting. You know. Obviously, every year it 217 00:09:23,320 --> 00:09:26,600 Speaker 2: seems like we're kind of learning more and more about 218 00:09:26,600 --> 00:09:29,679 Speaker 2: the game, and specifically getting more and more numbers about 219 00:09:29,679 --> 00:09:33,440 Speaker 2: the game, and you know, seeing like obviously, if you 220 00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:35,559 Speaker 2: and I were to sit down before we ever saw 221 00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:38,480 Speaker 2: a single one of these metrics and guess who do 222 00:09:38,520 --> 00:09:41,720 Speaker 2: you think has the fastest like that swing in baseball, 223 00:09:42,360 --> 00:09:44,240 Speaker 2: it would not have been long before we mentioned John 224 00:09:44,280 --> 00:09:48,040 Speaker 2: Carlos Stanton, and he's number one by a lot. He 225 00:09:48,440 --> 00:09:50,720 Speaker 2: is like a couple miles per hour ahead of the 226 00:09:50,720 --> 00:09:55,280 Speaker 2: rest of you know, anybody else in baseball. So there's 227 00:09:55,320 --> 00:09:57,199 Speaker 2: not really like one or two guys I want to 228 00:09:57,240 --> 00:09:58,840 Speaker 2: highlight here, if you want to, please go ahead. 229 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:00,160 Speaker 1: I just wanted to kind of ask. 230 00:10:00,440 --> 00:10:03,000 Speaker 2: Just your general takeaways. Were their names that stuck out 231 00:10:03,040 --> 00:10:06,880 Speaker 2: to you the application of this. Do you see a 232 00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:10,160 Speaker 2: use for fantasy managers? Do you see a use for 233 00:10:10,280 --> 00:10:13,160 Speaker 2: baseball managers? Is this just kind of a novelty fun 234 00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:15,160 Speaker 2: thing to look at. What was your reaction to a 235 00:10:15,400 --> 00:10:19,600 Speaker 2: seeing this, that this data exists, and be any particular 236 00:10:19,679 --> 00:10:20,880 Speaker 2: data points that sit out to you? 237 00:10:22,040 --> 00:10:23,600 Speaker 4: Yeah? So I kind of had a lot of takeaways. 238 00:10:23,679 --> 00:10:26,760 Speaker 3: But I don't want to just talk forever and put 239 00:10:26,760 --> 00:10:28,840 Speaker 3: everyone to sleep, because it's probably what would happen if 240 00:10:28,840 --> 00:10:33,440 Speaker 3: you listen to me talk about swing tracking data for 241 00:10:33,480 --> 00:10:36,000 Speaker 3: ten minutes. But yeah, like you, I'm not going to 242 00:10:36,040 --> 00:10:37,840 Speaker 3: go through through a ton of the names. It was 243 00:10:37,920 --> 00:10:40,800 Speaker 3: really interesting to see, you know, obviously John carol Stan. 244 00:10:40,720 --> 00:10:42,240 Speaker 4: Has the highest average bat speed. 245 00:10:42,920 --> 00:10:44,760 Speaker 3: I also thought it was really funny if you looked 246 00:10:44,760 --> 00:10:46,599 Speaker 3: at you know, they have things like average batspeed and 247 00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:49,480 Speaker 3: then also like your fast swing rate, like how often 248 00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:53,880 Speaker 3: your swing rate is above seventy five miles per hour 249 00:10:53,920 --> 00:10:56,120 Speaker 3: And he's at ninety eight percent so pretty much all 250 00:10:56,120 --> 00:10:58,800 Speaker 3: of his swings. And it also really made me laugh 251 00:10:58,920 --> 00:11:00,800 Speaker 3: just looking at like you know, you mentioned like the 252 00:11:00,800 --> 00:11:04,120 Speaker 3: squared up percentages in the blast, which is you know, 253 00:11:04,200 --> 00:11:06,720 Speaker 3: an interesting metric. I also thought It was really interesting 254 00:11:06,720 --> 00:11:10,760 Speaker 3: that they went with pitching Ninja, who invented this term swords, 255 00:11:10,800 --> 00:11:13,280 Speaker 3: where which is just like these really kind of embarrassing swings, 256 00:11:13,280 --> 00:11:15,360 Speaker 3: where like you just kind of get full on a 257 00:11:15,400 --> 00:11:17,280 Speaker 3: pitch and you almost don't like finish your swing. It's 258 00:11:17,360 --> 00:11:20,400 Speaker 3: just an embarrassing kind of mess up, and you know, 259 00:11:20,480 --> 00:11:22,120 Speaker 3: you're just like, yeah, you got me on that one. 260 00:11:22,320 --> 00:11:25,200 Speaker 3: Joe Krolstan has zero of those because he just always 261 00:11:25,200 --> 00:11:27,360 Speaker 3: finishes his swings as hard as he can, whether he's 262 00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:29,600 Speaker 3: fulled or not, whether he misses the ball by three feet, 263 00:11:29,800 --> 00:11:31,840 Speaker 3: he's swinging as hard as he can and he's not stopping. 264 00:11:32,040 --> 00:11:33,600 Speaker 3: So I thought it was funny that he just swings 265 00:11:33,679 --> 00:11:36,880 Speaker 3: rate swings fast ninety eight percent of the time and 266 00:11:36,920 --> 00:11:39,520 Speaker 3: has zero swords, despite you know, being someone who strikes 267 00:11:39,559 --> 00:11:40,720 Speaker 3: out a lot and that's two hundred. 268 00:11:40,800 --> 00:11:42,559 Speaker 4: He just always swings as hard as he can. 269 00:11:42,800 --> 00:11:44,280 Speaker 1: He's such a crazy outlier. 270 00:11:44,600 --> 00:11:47,200 Speaker 2: His average swing is eighty point six miles per hour, 271 00:11:47,559 --> 00:11:50,640 Speaker 2: almost three miles per hour faster than anybody else. 272 00:11:50,640 --> 00:11:52,000 Speaker 1: That is a massive gap. 273 00:11:52,280 --> 00:11:53,920 Speaker 2: Three miles per hour might not sound like a lot, 274 00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:59,400 Speaker 2: it is ginormous. Also, about twenty two percent of swings 275 00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:02,559 Speaker 2: across the reached the seventy five mile per hour threshold 276 00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:06,280 Speaker 2: is ninety eight percent of the time. Like you just mentioned, 277 00:12:06,720 --> 00:12:10,959 Speaker 2: it's like almost quadruple what the average is across the 278 00:12:11,200 --> 00:12:13,280 Speaker 2: It's more than quadruple in my mag it's more than 279 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:13,960 Speaker 2: quadruple with the. 280 00:12:13,960 --> 00:12:16,640 Speaker 1: Average across the league. It's it's a wild outlier. 281 00:12:17,480 --> 00:12:21,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, one of the more interesting names. You know, there 282 00:12:21,120 --> 00:12:23,600 Speaker 3: there were some some obvious kind of names you would 283 00:12:23,600 --> 00:12:26,600 Speaker 3: you would expect to see, like Luisa Ariah's had, you know, 284 00:12:26,679 --> 00:12:30,120 Speaker 3: a very slow bat speed but a really kind of 285 00:12:30,120 --> 00:12:31,559 Speaker 3: like quick compact swing. 286 00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:33,760 Speaker 2: Well, well to that point quickly before you mentioned the 287 00:12:33,800 --> 00:12:36,280 Speaker 2: next name. He leads, He led the league. I was 288 00:12:36,280 --> 00:12:38,120 Speaker 2: reading in the ESPN article, So there's so many of 289 00:12:38,120 --> 00:12:40,760 Speaker 2: these new stats. I'm trying to remember which ones I 290 00:12:40,800 --> 00:12:44,320 Speaker 2: was looking at. But Arias I believe he leads. It 291 00:12:44,360 --> 00:12:47,120 Speaker 2: was it is the slowest swing. But he also leads 292 00:12:47,160 --> 00:12:51,240 Speaker 2: in squaring uprate I believe it is, which is really 293 00:12:51,240 --> 00:12:55,440 Speaker 2: interesting to me because that is such a profile of 294 00:12:55,480 --> 00:12:56,240 Speaker 2: a contact here. 295 00:12:56,280 --> 00:12:56,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's what it is. 296 00:12:56,920 --> 00:12:59,120 Speaker 2: His squared up rate forty three and a half percent, 297 00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:01,800 Speaker 2: a best in base ball while also having the slow spats. 298 00:13:01,800 --> 00:13:04,640 Speaker 2: So like he is doing he is basically every at 299 00:13:04,679 --> 00:13:06,800 Speaker 2: bad of his is me growing up. When I two 300 00:13:06,840 --> 00:13:09,720 Speaker 2: strikes on me, it's like the classic, like choke up, 301 00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:12,920 Speaker 2: just get the barrel on the ball and tried square 302 00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:15,160 Speaker 2: up the ball somewhere and don't swing too hard. 303 00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:16,679 Speaker 1: That's him all the time. 304 00:13:17,720 --> 00:13:21,800 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, exactly, And yeah there's a There was a 305 00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:24,280 Speaker 3: good write up about it an ESPN, which I encourage 306 00:13:24,280 --> 00:13:26,400 Speaker 3: people to read. The Athletic also did one which is 307 00:13:26,440 --> 00:13:29,199 Speaker 3: pretty good. Yeah, I read the one by Jef Passon. 308 00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:30,680 Speaker 3: I don't want to like steal all of his his 309 00:13:30,800 --> 00:13:33,200 Speaker 3: names and whatever, but it was it was interesting that 310 00:13:33,200 --> 00:13:35,640 Speaker 3: there were some some names you wouldn't really expect and 311 00:13:35,679 --> 00:13:37,880 Speaker 3: some names you would expect, you know, like Juan Soto 312 00:13:37,920 --> 00:13:39,959 Speaker 3: and choh Tani were up there, like you know, shocking, 313 00:13:39,960 --> 00:13:41,559 Speaker 3: and they have really good swings and you know, kind 314 00:13:41,600 --> 00:13:44,480 Speaker 3: of a really good approach at the plate. William Contraras 315 00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:46,960 Speaker 3: was like surprisingly maybe the best hitter in baseball with 316 00:13:47,000 --> 00:13:48,320 Speaker 3: like more blast than anyone else. 317 00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:50,360 Speaker 4: That was, you know, kind of a niame that jumped out. 318 00:13:50,600 --> 00:13:53,040 Speaker 3: What I'm really interested to see with this data because 319 00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:54,640 Speaker 3: when it first came out, it was it was a 320 00:13:54,640 --> 00:13:57,600 Speaker 3: lot to digest and I wasn't even sure like how 321 00:13:57,920 --> 00:13:59,720 Speaker 3: you know, before I really like dove in and you know, 322 00:13:59,760 --> 00:14:02,320 Speaker 3: read the breakdowns and just let look the numbers of myself. 323 00:14:02,360 --> 00:14:04,520 Speaker 3: I wasn't sure like how actionable this would be for fantasy. 324 00:14:05,840 --> 00:14:06,640 Speaker 4: And I do think there. 325 00:14:06,520 --> 00:14:07,760 Speaker 3: Are gonna be times where we kind of get a 326 00:14:07,760 --> 00:14:09,640 Speaker 3: little carried away with like, oh, look, he only has 327 00:14:09,640 --> 00:14:12,880 Speaker 3: a seventy four mile an hour average bat speed kind 328 00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:14,680 Speaker 3: of thing, because there's going to be outliers that just 329 00:14:14,679 --> 00:14:17,720 Speaker 3: like don't really fit neatly into this data. It for me, 330 00:14:18,840 --> 00:14:20,120 Speaker 3: it is going to be interesting as we start to 331 00:14:20,120 --> 00:14:22,280 Speaker 3: get into year over year data for this when you 332 00:14:22,360 --> 00:14:26,520 Speaker 3: see someone like it would be interesting to see because 333 00:14:26,760 --> 00:14:29,040 Speaker 3: because like this is pretty new data, and it's new 334 00:14:29,080 --> 00:14:30,360 Speaker 3: in the sense of like there are more cameras and 335 00:14:30,360 --> 00:14:32,560 Speaker 3: stuff that they're that they're looking at. So we don't 336 00:14:32,600 --> 00:14:34,680 Speaker 3: really have like a lot of year over year data 337 00:14:34,800 --> 00:14:38,600 Speaker 3: right now unless I'm misunderstanding all of this, But it'll 338 00:14:38,600 --> 00:14:41,200 Speaker 3: be interesting to see going forward year over your data 339 00:14:41,560 --> 00:14:45,360 Speaker 3: if if numbers for a certain player drastically change, and 340 00:14:45,520 --> 00:14:48,320 Speaker 3: you know that player is like getting better or is 341 00:14:48,360 --> 00:14:49,920 Speaker 3: like struggling, Like it would be interesting to see like 342 00:14:49,920 --> 00:14:51,960 Speaker 3: a you know, like a corporate Carol, you know, is 343 00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:57,000 Speaker 3: his bat speed or the length of his swing drastically different? 344 00:14:57,000 --> 00:14:59,760 Speaker 3: And I also the next thing is I want to 345 00:14:59,760 --> 00:15:02,560 Speaker 3: see this kind of stuff which I think we're gonna 346 00:15:02,560 --> 00:15:05,080 Speaker 3: see infugi yeers added to the minor leagues, which is 347 00:15:05,120 --> 00:15:07,240 Speaker 3: gonna be kind of terrifying in the sense that we're 348 00:15:07,280 --> 00:15:09,560 Speaker 3: just gonna treat all these prospects like robots with like 349 00:15:09,920 --> 00:15:13,040 Speaker 3: everyone with like the highest metrics. Whenever we add stat 350 00:15:13,040 --> 00:15:15,360 Speaker 3: cast to minor league ballparks, is just gonna kind of 351 00:15:15,400 --> 00:15:17,320 Speaker 3: just be like whoever has the best the highest bat 352 00:15:17,320 --> 00:15:20,080 Speaker 3: speed and sprint speed, and everything's just gonna automatically like 353 00:15:20,400 --> 00:15:22,400 Speaker 3: be the ones we're talking about with when when we 354 00:15:22,560 --> 00:15:26,400 Speaker 3: start to like fade away from actual production. But uh yeah, 355 00:15:26,440 --> 00:15:28,560 Speaker 3: this stuff is gonna be interesting going forward, for sure. 356 00:15:29,560 --> 00:15:32,280 Speaker 2: We you gave me a hard time last week about 357 00:15:32,760 --> 00:15:36,640 Speaker 2: kind of posing the rhetorical rhetorical question of is shohe 358 00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:39,360 Speaker 2: tany the best hitter in baseball? Some of the bat 359 00:15:39,400 --> 00:15:42,040 Speaker 2: speed stuff shows it like it actually might be one 360 00:15:42,200 --> 00:15:44,800 Speaker 2: so too, because his is like in if you look 361 00:15:44,800 --> 00:15:47,280 Speaker 2: at like kind of the quadrant, he like stands really 362 00:15:47,320 --> 00:15:50,360 Speaker 2: far ahead in the right and up quadrant, which is 363 00:15:50,360 --> 00:15:52,000 Speaker 2: like the best one to be in in terms of 364 00:15:52,240 --> 00:15:55,200 Speaker 2: you know, bat speed, and I think it was length 365 00:15:55,200 --> 00:15:58,040 Speaker 2: the swing was the other was on the y axis, 366 00:15:58,720 --> 00:16:01,280 Speaker 2: but like square it up ratest, like all of them, 367 00:16:01,320 --> 00:16:04,040 Speaker 2: sotos is really high. The one last note that I 368 00:16:04,080 --> 00:16:07,560 Speaker 2: will take from Jeff Passen's article because he put it 369 00:16:07,600 --> 00:16:10,359 Speaker 2: on Twitter and I thought it was a fantastic nugget. 370 00:16:10,400 --> 00:16:12,720 Speaker 2: The average bat speed for the best hitter in Major 371 00:16:12,760 --> 00:16:15,840 Speaker 2: League Baseball this season called you know show Eatani seventy 372 00:16:15,880 --> 00:16:17,280 Speaker 2: five point four miles per hour. 373 00:16:17,720 --> 00:16:19,600 Speaker 1: The average bat speed for the worst. 374 00:16:19,360 --> 00:16:23,000 Speaker 2: Hitter in Major League Baseball this season Javier Baiaz seventy 375 00:16:23,040 --> 00:16:24,680 Speaker 2: five point four miles per hour. 376 00:16:24,760 --> 00:16:25,760 Speaker 1: Exactly identical. 377 00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:27,800 Speaker 2: So that is as good a nugget as any to 378 00:16:27,800 --> 00:16:30,000 Speaker 2: tell you that bat speed is not everything. 379 00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:34,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, and that's where it's really interesting when they compare 380 00:16:34,200 --> 00:16:37,600 Speaker 3: like the bat speed and the fast swing rate and 381 00:16:37,640 --> 00:16:40,520 Speaker 3: the length of the swing, which is another, you know, 382 00:16:40,680 --> 00:16:42,680 Speaker 3: something that we're gonna have to pay attention to, because 383 00:16:42,680 --> 00:16:45,440 Speaker 3: there's a difference between a real because you know, even 384 00:16:45,480 --> 00:16:48,600 Speaker 3: when we look at John Carlos Stan he has the 385 00:16:49,520 --> 00:16:51,680 Speaker 3: fastest or the highest however you want to ward at 386 00:16:51,680 --> 00:16:54,600 Speaker 3: bat speed, he also has the longest swing length. It 387 00:16:54,680 --> 00:16:57,360 Speaker 3: takes him the longest for his whole swing to kind 388 00:16:57,360 --> 00:16:59,080 Speaker 3: of get through the zone. So like the bat's moving 389 00:16:59,120 --> 00:17:02,880 Speaker 3: fast but or sorry second slowest behind I your bias 390 00:17:02,920 --> 00:17:06,760 Speaker 3: shockingly enough, but you know, it's more about just like 391 00:17:06,800 --> 00:17:09,200 Speaker 3: the you know, how big your swing is, Like it's 392 00:17:09,200 --> 00:17:12,760 Speaker 3: moving quickly, but you're also like it's just an enormous swing. 393 00:17:12,880 --> 00:17:14,920 Speaker 3: So it's kind of you know, I think that's why 394 00:17:15,000 --> 00:17:17,240 Speaker 3: he's such a boomer bust kind of swinger. 395 00:17:17,640 --> 00:17:19,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, let's go to our next topic here. 396 00:17:19,800 --> 00:17:22,399 Speaker 2: I'm sure we might have more takeaways on some of 397 00:17:22,400 --> 00:17:24,200 Speaker 2: this swing data later on in the season, but I 398 00:17:24,240 --> 00:17:26,960 Speaker 2: think that's, you know enough for now. Next topic here, 399 00:17:27,320 --> 00:17:29,440 Speaker 2: there was an article on MLB dot com some of 400 00:17:29,480 --> 00:17:32,760 Speaker 2: the likeliest players to be dealt by the trade deadline. 401 00:17:33,520 --> 00:17:35,359 Speaker 2: I have somebody who I know you there have to 402 00:17:35,400 --> 00:17:37,199 Speaker 2: be two sides to every trade, and you need a 403 00:17:37,200 --> 00:17:40,760 Speaker 2: willing partner. But I always hate when teams who are 404 00:17:40,760 --> 00:17:44,679 Speaker 2: obvious buyers wait until like mid July, because I'm like, 405 00:17:45,080 --> 00:17:47,280 Speaker 2: you know, what the Orioles need right now is a 406 00:17:47,320 --> 00:17:50,400 Speaker 2: back end of the bullpen arm. Go trade for them 407 00:17:50,440 --> 00:17:53,600 Speaker 2: now and don't give away eight more games between now 408 00:17:53,640 --> 00:17:56,600 Speaker 2: and the end of July, because you haven't overworked and 409 00:17:56,720 --> 00:17:59,560 Speaker 2: incompetent back end of the bullpen, like go make the 410 00:17:59,600 --> 00:18:01,600 Speaker 2: move now. And so it really bothers me when teams 411 00:18:01,600 --> 00:18:03,959 Speaker 2: wait again. I get it that the other teams need 412 00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:07,399 Speaker 2: to be willing to sell, but I just wish that 413 00:18:07,480 --> 00:18:09,119 Speaker 2: we would see moves sooner. We already saw with the 414 00:18:09,200 --> 00:18:11,680 Speaker 2: rias you know, early on this year, but I want 415 00:18:11,720 --> 00:18:15,320 Speaker 2: to see more and more earlier in in you know, 416 00:18:15,320 --> 00:18:17,560 Speaker 2: in the summer and in the trade deadline. So going 417 00:18:17,560 --> 00:18:19,560 Speaker 2: through this article, there's a bunch of names. I don't 418 00:18:19,560 --> 00:18:22,360 Speaker 2: think we need to like highlight every one of them specifically, 419 00:18:23,040 --> 00:18:25,040 Speaker 2: but you know it's names like from all the kind 420 00:18:25,080 --> 00:18:29,320 Speaker 2: of usual suspect teams you would imagine, the Angels, the A's, 421 00:18:29,880 --> 00:18:33,800 Speaker 2: the Cardinals, the Rockies, the White Sox, the Marlins. 422 00:18:34,160 --> 00:18:35,359 Speaker 1: So you know, some of the names. 423 00:18:35,400 --> 00:18:38,000 Speaker 2: Just to quickly read through that, the article highlighted Joe 424 00:18:38,040 --> 00:18:41,680 Speaker 2: Addell Mason Miller obviously. You know he's a guy I'd 425 00:18:41,680 --> 00:18:44,520 Speaker 2: love to see in Baltimore. You know who wouldn't love 426 00:18:44,560 --> 00:18:46,560 Speaker 2: to see them on their team? You know, Aaron Otto, 427 00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:52,879 Speaker 2: Charlie Blackman, you know Tanner, Scott Hasslizardo, Luis Robert Kopek, 428 00:18:53,640 --> 00:18:56,760 Speaker 2: Alex Bregman is listening to the article, which I think 429 00:18:56,800 --> 00:18:58,399 Speaker 2: that might be a bridge too far, But any of 430 00:18:58,440 --> 00:19:00,879 Speaker 2: these namestep stand out to you, and you know what 431 00:19:00,920 --> 00:19:03,600 Speaker 2: do you kind of think about where we stand, you know, 432 00:19:03,640 --> 00:19:05,320 Speaker 2: a couple months out from the trade deadline. 433 00:19:06,280 --> 00:19:08,520 Speaker 3: So when I see an article like this, the first 434 00:19:08,520 --> 00:19:12,240 Speaker 3: thing I try to kind of piece together or just 435 00:19:12,359 --> 00:19:15,240 Speaker 3: imagine the hypotheticals in my mind is who on the 436 00:19:15,280 --> 00:19:19,359 Speaker 3: list from a fantasy perspective has the most to gain, Like, 437 00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:24,080 Speaker 3: who could you potentially acquire in fantasy now before a trade? 438 00:19:24,880 --> 00:19:26,880 Speaker 3: Who their value is going to go up, Like they're 439 00:19:26,880 --> 00:19:28,359 Speaker 3: going to go to a better lineup, or they're going 440 00:19:28,440 --> 00:19:31,280 Speaker 3: to go to a you know, just a better like 441 00:19:31,280 --> 00:19:32,719 Speaker 3: if they're especially if they're a picture, if they're going 442 00:19:32,760 --> 00:19:35,200 Speaker 3: to go to a better team, have more run support, 443 00:19:35,640 --> 00:19:38,080 Speaker 3: have better defense behind them, potentially win more games kind 444 00:19:38,119 --> 00:19:40,439 Speaker 3: of thing, And just you know who could probably just 445 00:19:40,520 --> 00:19:41,479 Speaker 3: use a change of scenery. 446 00:19:41,960 --> 00:19:43,200 Speaker 4: I think you mentioned Alex Bragman. 447 00:19:43,280 --> 00:19:45,880 Speaker 3: He's probably you know, his numbers don't look good enough 448 00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:48,800 Speaker 3: despite his big game the other day. Don't know if 449 00:19:48,800 --> 00:19:51,200 Speaker 3: a change of scenery is going to matter that much 450 00:19:51,240 --> 00:19:53,679 Speaker 3: for him, the Astros should be a lot better than 451 00:19:53,680 --> 00:19:55,119 Speaker 3: they are. It's not like he's in a bad lineup. 452 00:19:55,119 --> 00:19:56,600 Speaker 3: He's in a good lineup. But just I'm not really 453 00:19:56,640 --> 00:19:58,600 Speaker 3: sure what's going on there, Joe Adallas. 454 00:19:58,680 --> 00:20:02,240 Speaker 2: I'm not really expecting the Astros to sell like that. 455 00:20:02,480 --> 00:20:04,560 Speaker 2: Just maybe I'm just it's just so ingrained in my 456 00:20:04,600 --> 00:20:07,119 Speaker 2: head that they're always in the alcs. But it's just 457 00:20:07,200 --> 00:20:10,320 Speaker 2: it's weird for me to imagine this iteration of the 458 00:20:10,440 --> 00:20:12,680 Speaker 2: roster that they, like you said, they should be better 459 00:20:12,680 --> 00:20:14,600 Speaker 2: than they are. I just I can't imagine that two 460 00:20:14,600 --> 00:20:15,680 Speaker 2: months from now they'll be selling. 461 00:20:15,680 --> 00:20:16,400 Speaker 1: But maybe I'm wrong. 462 00:20:17,000 --> 00:20:17,960 Speaker 4: Yeah, I think they would. 463 00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:19,760 Speaker 3: I think they would need to continue, and like you said, 464 00:20:19,760 --> 00:20:20,960 Speaker 3: they're not going to be one of those teams that 465 00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:23,080 Speaker 3: sells early. They're going to ride this into the ground 466 00:20:23,160 --> 00:20:26,040 Speaker 3: and only sell that they have to, you know, late July. 467 00:20:27,600 --> 00:20:29,400 Speaker 3: Joe Adell is a name that kind of is interesting 468 00:20:29,520 --> 00:20:33,120 Speaker 3: just because of his like he's kind of breaking out finally, 469 00:20:34,040 --> 00:20:35,720 Speaker 3: but he's in He's not in a great lineup. 470 00:20:35,760 --> 00:20:37,000 Speaker 4: Trout's gonna be out for a while. 471 00:20:37,760 --> 00:20:40,200 Speaker 2: I promise I won't interrupt you on all these guys, 472 00:20:40,200 --> 00:20:42,080 Speaker 2: but I do just have to say on Adell, Like, 473 00:20:43,000 --> 00:20:46,919 Speaker 2: I would be really wary of trading for him. Uh, absolutely, 474 00:20:47,200 --> 00:20:50,320 Speaker 2: because not even about just like the past, but like, 475 00:20:50,400 --> 00:20:52,760 Speaker 2: let's say you even believe that it's that the breakout 476 00:20:52,800 --> 00:20:54,520 Speaker 2: is one hundred percent legit, and you're like. 477 00:20:54,600 --> 00:20:57,120 Speaker 3: Wait, I mean trading Wait, I'm gonna interrupt you now, 478 00:20:57,359 --> 00:21:00,840 Speaker 3: and the tables have turned. Yeah, do you mean wary 479 00:21:00,840 --> 00:21:03,280 Speaker 3: of trading him as a fantasy manager or as an 480 00:21:03,400 --> 00:21:04,040 Speaker 3: MMV team? 481 00:21:04,640 --> 00:21:04,920 Speaker 4: Both? 482 00:21:05,080 --> 00:21:09,440 Speaker 2: And I'm wary of trading for him in both because 483 00:21:10,160 --> 00:21:13,040 Speaker 2: even if you I'm worried of trading for him in 484 00:21:13,119 --> 00:21:15,360 Speaker 2: fantasy if you expect him to be traded away from 485 00:21:15,359 --> 00:21:17,879 Speaker 2: the Angels, and I'm wary of trading for him in 486 00:21:17,960 --> 00:21:20,760 Speaker 2: real life. You know, if you're any team not the Angels, 487 00:21:20,760 --> 00:21:22,680 Speaker 2: I think I might have said, oo, the Angels. 488 00:21:23,440 --> 00:21:25,880 Speaker 1: Because even if you believe it. 489 00:21:25,840 --> 00:21:27,880 Speaker 2: Is one hundred percent legitimate and this is a real 490 00:21:27,920 --> 00:21:31,399 Speaker 2: breakout and he is now this hitter, I worry that 491 00:21:31,440 --> 00:21:33,120 Speaker 2: it took him so long to get to that point 492 00:21:33,119 --> 00:21:35,600 Speaker 2: in Los Angeles that whatever they did to work with him, like, 493 00:21:35,600 --> 00:21:38,639 Speaker 2: I think it's probably meaningful given all the struggles he 494 00:21:38,640 --> 00:21:41,000 Speaker 2: had before, And I would be really scared of him 495 00:21:41,440 --> 00:21:44,000 Speaker 2: changing sceneries. You know, it's it's like like the opposite 496 00:21:44,000 --> 00:21:45,800 Speaker 2: of Bregmann, Like I would be really worried about a 497 00:21:45,840 --> 00:21:48,919 Speaker 2: change of scenery negatively impacting him, even if you think 498 00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:51,200 Speaker 2: the breakout is real in Los Angeles? 499 00:21:51,400 --> 00:21:51,720 Speaker 1: Is that? 500 00:21:52,359 --> 00:21:54,800 Speaker 2: Does that make sense? Am I like kind of maybe 501 00:21:54,880 --> 00:21:57,280 Speaker 2: overthinking it? Or would you be happy to trade him 502 00:21:57,280 --> 00:21:59,760 Speaker 2: even if he gets traded in fantasy versus reality? 503 00:22:00,600 --> 00:22:02,040 Speaker 4: I think it's fair. I think there's a lot to 504 00:22:02,040 --> 00:22:02,440 Speaker 4: worry about. 505 00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:04,000 Speaker 3: You know, we already kind of talked about Joe Odell, 506 00:22:04,040 --> 00:22:07,040 Speaker 3: and you know, everything looks kind of good, but it's 507 00:22:07,040 --> 00:22:08,919 Speaker 3: looked so bad for so long that it's hard to 508 00:22:09,000 --> 00:22:10,680 Speaker 3: believe this is just a whole new Joe Odell. 509 00:22:11,280 --> 00:22:13,840 Speaker 4: I think you would have to be. 510 00:22:13,880 --> 00:22:16,520 Speaker 3: Confident in wherever he's like being traded to, and kind 511 00:22:16,560 --> 00:22:18,520 Speaker 3: of you know, it's impossible to like know all this 512 00:22:18,520 --> 00:22:21,840 Speaker 3: stuff off the back, you know, just in the back 513 00:22:21,880 --> 00:22:23,680 Speaker 3: of your mind of just you know, which which kind 514 00:22:23,680 --> 00:22:26,639 Speaker 3: of teams have like a really good track record of 515 00:22:27,240 --> 00:22:29,760 Speaker 3: developing these young you know, these young hitters. The Angels 516 00:22:29,800 --> 00:22:31,639 Speaker 3: are probably not one of those teams, So maybe he 517 00:22:31,680 --> 00:22:34,680 Speaker 3: could go somewhere where they do have a better track 518 00:22:34,720 --> 00:22:38,520 Speaker 3: record of developing young hitters like the Orioles of a 519 00:22:38,560 --> 00:22:42,160 Speaker 3: team that has done that it recently, someone who isn't 520 00:22:42,200 --> 00:22:45,480 Speaker 3: the Rockies, who are just like the poster team of 521 00:22:45,600 --> 00:22:50,159 Speaker 3: how to not develop prospects, but something like something like 522 00:22:50,200 --> 00:22:51,680 Speaker 3: that where you would you would have to be like, Okay, 523 00:22:51,720 --> 00:22:53,520 Speaker 3: this is good. He's going to go to a better ballpark, 524 00:22:53,560 --> 00:22:56,040 Speaker 3: a better lineup, and to a team with a track 525 00:22:56,040 --> 00:22:58,560 Speaker 3: record of developing, you know, young hitters. So I think 526 00:22:58,560 --> 00:23:01,240 Speaker 3: that would be kind of but even that, like we're 527 00:23:01,240 --> 00:23:03,879 Speaker 3: talking redraft, like how much of a difference is going 528 00:23:03,960 --> 00:23:06,040 Speaker 3: to make this season as opposed to like a keeper 529 00:23:06,080 --> 00:23:08,800 Speaker 3: of dynasty league where you can kind of see, you know, 530 00:23:09,000 --> 00:23:10,199 Speaker 3: changes going forward. 531 00:23:10,600 --> 00:23:12,800 Speaker 2: I would not be going after somebody like Tanner Scott 532 00:23:12,840 --> 00:23:14,880 Speaker 2: in fantasy because I think if he gets traded it's 533 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:16,919 Speaker 2: likely as like a seventh or eighth inning guy in 534 00:23:16,960 --> 00:23:19,320 Speaker 2: an already good bullpen. I don't think it's likely that 535 00:23:19,359 --> 00:23:21,240 Speaker 2: he's a closer somewhere else, so I think he would 536 00:23:21,320 --> 00:23:25,240 Speaker 2: lose value, you know, maybe kind of the same thought 537 00:23:25,240 --> 00:23:25,840 Speaker 2: for Copek. 538 00:23:27,359 --> 00:23:28,440 Speaker 1: I mean some of these other like. 539 00:23:28,400 --> 00:23:31,400 Speaker 2: Hayeses Lozardo, you know, would would certainly have a better 540 00:23:31,480 --> 00:23:36,359 Speaker 2: chance at wins and then another uh, you know team, 541 00:23:36,440 --> 00:23:40,840 Speaker 2: But it's not like he's you know, it's not like 542 00:23:40,840 --> 00:23:43,320 Speaker 2: he's somebody that I mean, there's talent that I don't 543 00:23:43,320 --> 00:23:47,560 Speaker 2: I don't want to like like downplay the talent there, 544 00:23:47,600 --> 00:23:50,680 Speaker 2: but like it hasn't Quip been there this season, right, 545 00:23:50,760 --> 00:23:53,280 Speaker 2: So I'm not sure how much value he's bringing, even 546 00:23:53,320 --> 00:23:55,480 Speaker 2: if there's a better chance for wins. 547 00:23:56,119 --> 00:23:56,359 Speaker 4: Yeah. 548 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:01,520 Speaker 3: Yeah, you'd have to hope for like a bounce back 549 00:24:01,560 --> 00:24:03,720 Speaker 3: to kind of the potential we've seen this. You know, 550 00:24:03,760 --> 00:24:05,439 Speaker 3: he's like a high ceiling, low flower kind of guy, 551 00:24:05,520 --> 00:24:07,080 Speaker 3: so it's hard to know what you're going to get there, 552 00:24:07,600 --> 00:24:10,359 Speaker 3: Michael Michael Kopak, is anything that would be interesting, but 553 00:24:10,400 --> 00:24:12,480 Speaker 3: he would have to be like you said, like the 554 00:24:12,480 --> 00:24:14,639 Speaker 3: Tanner Scott situation. I need him to go to a 555 00:24:14,640 --> 00:24:17,520 Speaker 3: place where he's closing. And it's like he's probably more 556 00:24:17,600 --> 00:24:20,159 Speaker 3: likely to be like that multi inning you know, bring 557 00:24:20,280 --> 00:24:22,000 Speaker 3: him in the six and seven then you know, get 558 00:24:22,200 --> 00:24:23,919 Speaker 3: six guys out kind of a thing. Even though the 559 00:24:23,920 --> 00:24:26,000 Speaker 3: White Sox are using him as a closer, and I 560 00:24:26,040 --> 00:24:28,199 Speaker 3: think that's his future is being a closer. I think 561 00:24:28,280 --> 00:24:31,439 Speaker 3: the starter experiment is over. Let's let's just make him 562 00:24:31,440 --> 00:24:33,200 Speaker 3: a closer. He's got the stuff to be a good closer. 563 00:24:33,280 --> 00:24:35,960 Speaker 3: Let's just lean into that and just let's go have 564 00:24:36,000 --> 00:24:39,359 Speaker 3: a career. Michael Kopek, Let's not worry about the starter stuff. 565 00:24:39,480 --> 00:24:43,040 Speaker 4: Yeah, his name, you know. 566 00:24:43,119 --> 00:24:45,879 Speaker 3: Yeah, maybe he's getting older and would do some you know, 567 00:24:45,960 --> 00:24:48,760 Speaker 3: do for some negative stuff. But he's like being He's 568 00:24:48,800 --> 00:24:51,240 Speaker 3: like fine right now in a lineup that is not 569 00:24:51,359 --> 00:24:52,400 Speaker 3: fine around him. 570 00:24:52,480 --> 00:24:55,439 Speaker 2: The most intriguing name by a mile in this article 571 00:24:55,480 --> 00:25:00,199 Speaker 2: is Mason Miller. Oh yeah, do you think he gets moved? 572 00:25:00,040 --> 00:25:02,159 Speaker 2: I have no idea what the what the a's are, 573 00:25:02,640 --> 00:25:04,600 Speaker 2: What wouldn't even take to get him, because like the 574 00:25:04,640 --> 00:25:07,000 Speaker 2: a's are bad and you and you generally want to 575 00:25:07,200 --> 00:25:09,000 Speaker 2: cap I know they like had a hot streak greasely, 576 00:25:09,040 --> 00:25:11,000 Speaker 2: but like you generally, if you're a bad team want 577 00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:13,520 Speaker 2: to capitalize on a strong reliever season. That's like a 578 00:25:13,680 --> 00:25:17,800 Speaker 2: really straightforward way to improve your organization is to if 579 00:25:17,800 --> 00:25:21,000 Speaker 2: you're a bad team, trade a good reliever for whatever haul. 580 00:25:20,920 --> 00:25:24,040 Speaker 1: You can get. Mason Miller is ridiculous. 581 00:25:24,600 --> 00:25:28,600 Speaker 2: He is like that one of the nastiest closers stretches 582 00:25:28,640 --> 00:25:31,240 Speaker 2: I've ever seen in my life. And I watched twenty 583 00:25:31,280 --> 00:25:37,399 Speaker 2: sixteen Zach Brittain. He is ridiculous under control for a while, 584 00:25:38,000 --> 00:25:41,320 Speaker 2: there's bin injury stuff in the past. Obviously, the way 585 00:25:41,320 --> 00:25:43,720 Speaker 2: he throws, it's like, you know, you don't really expect 586 00:25:43,760 --> 00:25:47,120 Speaker 2: to like to last forever. But again, like just using 587 00:25:47,160 --> 00:25:51,040 Speaker 2: the oils as an example, a guy like Heston Kerstad 588 00:25:51,160 --> 00:25:53,439 Speaker 2: is blocked. He's a top twenty five prospect in baseball. 589 00:25:53,480 --> 00:25:57,080 Speaker 2: He's ready for the big leagues. Like, I don't even 590 00:25:57,119 --> 00:26:00,399 Speaker 2: know if that would be considered a reasonable for the 591 00:26:00,440 --> 00:26:03,280 Speaker 2: A's or not, because it's just kind of a unique 592 00:26:03,320 --> 00:26:06,600 Speaker 2: situation combining all these factors that aren't typically combined. 593 00:26:07,880 --> 00:26:10,240 Speaker 3: And what you said there is kind of the kind 594 00:26:10,240 --> 00:26:13,680 Speaker 3: of the issue is because the the rumors all along, 595 00:26:13,800 --> 00:26:16,120 Speaker 3: because I think this came up months ago with like, oh, 596 00:26:16,200 --> 00:26:18,480 Speaker 3: maybe they could look to move Mason Miller because they're 597 00:26:18,760 --> 00:26:22,640 Speaker 3: ridiculous and the apparently the asking price has been astronomical, 598 00:26:22,720 --> 00:26:24,320 Speaker 3: so it's like they're just kind of like floating him 599 00:26:24,320 --> 00:26:27,040 Speaker 3: out there. Okay, if you want to make us an 600 00:26:27,040 --> 00:26:28,720 Speaker 3: off where we can't refuse, like we're the A's, we'll 601 00:26:28,800 --> 00:26:31,360 Speaker 3: do anything. We'll get nuts. And I think the other 602 00:26:31,440 --> 00:26:33,679 Speaker 3: thing that you mentioned there that could be potentially interesting 603 00:26:33,920 --> 00:26:38,920 Speaker 3: is I think if you're well, I guess it would 604 00:26:38,920 --> 00:26:41,240 Speaker 3: depend like the team like the Orioles would make not 605 00:26:41,280 --> 00:26:42,959 Speaker 3: the like I want to, you know, break my own 606 00:26:43,000 --> 00:26:44,840 Speaker 3: rule and talk about the Ools on the show. But 607 00:26:44,960 --> 00:26:46,920 Speaker 3: a team like the Orioles could make a lot of sense, 608 00:26:46,960 --> 00:26:50,680 Speaker 3: and in the sense that they're set up for a 609 00:26:51,119 --> 00:26:52,080 Speaker 3: long competing window. 610 00:26:52,160 --> 00:26:55,000 Speaker 4: Here they have some pretty good pitching depth. 611 00:26:56,000 --> 00:26:58,480 Speaker 3: They could use more starting pitching depth, but like they have, 612 00:26:58,760 --> 00:27:02,639 Speaker 3: you know, like you said, in a fundance of young hitters. 613 00:27:03,560 --> 00:27:06,120 Speaker 3: And I think for a lot of teams you would 614 00:27:06,119 --> 00:27:08,640 Speaker 3: almost have to like wonder if you're acquiring Mason Miller, 615 00:27:08,720 --> 00:27:10,560 Speaker 3: like do you view him as a high end starter 616 00:27:11,200 --> 00:27:14,520 Speaker 3: going forward or just as a reliever. And the Oriels 617 00:27:14,520 --> 00:27:16,000 Speaker 3: are a team that could be like, we're happy with 618 00:27:16,119 --> 00:27:17,639 Speaker 3: him as like a lockdown reliever. We don't need to 619 00:27:17,680 --> 00:27:20,119 Speaker 3: worry about him making a starter, whereas I think other 620 00:27:20,200 --> 00:27:22,320 Speaker 3: teams they might want to kind of look at him 621 00:27:22,359 --> 00:27:25,280 Speaker 3: as like a twenty twenty four closer, but then also 622 00:27:25,400 --> 00:27:27,920 Speaker 3: a high end starting pitching prospect that we can stretch 623 00:27:27,960 --> 00:27:30,680 Speaker 3: out and turn into an ace, and that I think 624 00:27:30,760 --> 00:27:33,160 Speaker 3: in order to match what the A's want, it might 625 00:27:33,280 --> 00:27:35,320 Speaker 3: be what you have to view him as. 626 00:27:36,240 --> 00:27:38,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's an interesting wrinkle. I mean again, like a 627 00:27:38,280 --> 00:27:39,040 Speaker 1: team like the Orioles. 628 00:27:39,080 --> 00:27:41,880 Speaker 2: You know, next year theoretically Felix Bautista back, so maybe 629 00:27:41,960 --> 00:27:44,080 Speaker 2: then you maybe even for them, it's like a one 630 00:27:44,160 --> 00:27:48,600 Speaker 2: year closer. But I mean, like a reliever, this dominant 631 00:27:49,040 --> 00:27:51,600 Speaker 2: is like actually not that easy to find. Like, good 632 00:27:51,720 --> 00:27:55,119 Speaker 2: relievers are out there and sometimes they're hard to predict, 633 00:27:55,240 --> 00:27:58,120 Speaker 2: but they're not hard to find. Relievers at this level 634 00:27:58,160 --> 00:28:02,400 Speaker 2: are hard to find. So I'd be perfectly content whether 635 00:28:02,440 --> 00:28:05,560 Speaker 2: it's the Orioles or anybody, to just see him, just 636 00:28:05,640 --> 00:28:08,880 Speaker 2: let them say, like, listen, you on a good team 637 00:28:09,040 --> 00:28:12,879 Speaker 2: could get five hundred saves and also strike out like 638 00:28:12,960 --> 00:28:15,520 Speaker 2: two batteries an inning for your whole career, Like like 639 00:28:15,680 --> 00:28:17,680 Speaker 2: just say, look how dominant you are. Why mess with 640 00:28:17,760 --> 00:28:20,040 Speaker 2: a good thing? I wouldn't be opposed to that, you know, 641 00:28:20,080 --> 00:28:24,040 Speaker 2: wherever he goes. So he's the really interesting one. Let's 642 00:28:24,080 --> 00:28:27,080 Speaker 2: move on to our bylow cell high for the week. 643 00:28:28,080 --> 00:28:30,840 Speaker 2: I'll go first in the by Low. My favorite by 644 00:28:30,920 --> 00:28:33,040 Speaker 2: Low actually in the article and everybody should go check 645 00:28:33,040 --> 00:28:37,440 Speaker 2: it out. Fantasypros dot Com is Matt Olson. However, we 646 00:28:37,600 --> 00:28:40,400 Speaker 2: just talked about him last week when discussing grading your trade. 647 00:28:40,520 --> 00:28:42,840 Speaker 2: So rather than talk about him again, I will say 648 00:28:42,880 --> 00:28:45,080 Speaker 2: my second favorite from the article, which is Boba Schett, 649 00:28:45,720 --> 00:28:48,000 Speaker 2: And it's less about, you know, with Matt Olsen, there's 650 00:28:49,680 --> 00:28:52,000 Speaker 2: you know, reasons for optimism from some of the bad 651 00:28:52,040 --> 00:28:55,200 Speaker 2: etball data. There's not really that with Boba Schett. It's 652 00:28:55,240 --> 00:28:57,440 Speaker 2: more just like it's not like he's old. There's a 653 00:28:57,480 --> 00:29:00,480 Speaker 2: real track record here. He's actually even hard to heat 654 00:29:00,600 --> 00:29:03,280 Speaker 2: up a bit in the last you know, several days. 655 00:29:04,600 --> 00:29:07,880 Speaker 2: So I just think he's somebody that again we always 656 00:29:07,920 --> 00:29:11,400 Speaker 2: say I'm not buying I'm buying low and you're gonna 657 00:29:11,400 --> 00:29:13,239 Speaker 2: give me a bilo opportunity and a guy who has 658 00:29:13,360 --> 00:29:15,600 Speaker 2: legitimately struggled this year, but who has the kind of 659 00:29:15,640 --> 00:29:17,320 Speaker 2: ceiling that we know Bobachett has. 660 00:29:17,960 --> 00:29:19,480 Speaker 1: And again it's it's early. 661 00:29:19,400 --> 00:29:21,360 Speaker 2: Enough that you can kind of look past a slow start, 662 00:29:21,880 --> 00:29:25,520 Speaker 2: even if it's not bad luck, it's actually a bad start, 663 00:29:25,960 --> 00:29:29,480 Speaker 2: and say this guy could easily bounce back. So, like 664 00:29:29,520 --> 00:29:31,760 Speaker 2: I said, Matt Olson is my favorite from this week's article, 665 00:29:31,800 --> 00:29:33,840 Speaker 2: but Bobachhet is my second favorite. 666 00:29:35,040 --> 00:29:39,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, I like Bobachhet. The thing I like about him 667 00:29:39,240 --> 00:29:40,560 Speaker 3: and one of the reasons I like him as a 668 00:29:40,600 --> 00:29:45,200 Speaker 3: by low Is. The concerning thing last year was you know, 669 00:29:45,280 --> 00:29:47,000 Speaker 3: he was a little banged up and he wasn't running, 670 00:29:47,320 --> 00:29:48,720 Speaker 3: and it was like, oh no, here we go. This 671 00:29:48,880 --> 00:29:51,120 Speaker 3: is like the Mike drought syndrome. We have a superstar 672 00:29:51,640 --> 00:29:54,960 Speaker 3: who broke into the league as like a thirty thirty 673 00:29:55,000 --> 00:29:57,600 Speaker 3: potential kind of guy, and you know, in his breakout 674 00:29:57,680 --> 00:30:00,280 Speaker 3: year he went twenty nine to twenty five and everyone 675 00:30:00,360 --> 00:30:02,080 Speaker 3: was salvating over the potential there. It was like a 676 00:30:02,160 --> 00:30:05,760 Speaker 3: high average power speed, like this guy's little package, and 677 00:30:05,880 --> 00:30:09,400 Speaker 3: he kind of just gradually got worse, like not terribly worse, 678 00:30:09,480 --> 00:30:10,960 Speaker 3: but like the numbers just kind of went down. 679 00:30:11,040 --> 00:30:12,000 Speaker 4: He's been banged up a little. 680 00:30:12,000 --> 00:30:13,320 Speaker 3: You know, he's banged up a little bit last year, 681 00:30:13,320 --> 00:30:15,760 Speaker 3: Like I said, after two really you know, solid years. 682 00:30:16,040 --> 00:30:18,680 Speaker 3: Batting average has been there up until this year. But 683 00:30:19,400 --> 00:30:22,360 Speaker 3: he wasn't running in twenty twenty one, twenty five stolen basis, 684 00:30:22,400 --> 00:30:26,640 Speaker 3: twenty twenty two, thirteen last year five. So the good 685 00:30:26,720 --> 00:30:28,840 Speaker 3: The one thing I like to see this year is 686 00:30:28,880 --> 00:30:30,560 Speaker 3: that he already has four and not that four is 687 00:30:30,560 --> 00:30:33,000 Speaker 3: a lot, but he only stole five all last year 688 00:30:33,000 --> 00:30:35,280 Speaker 3: and he already has four, and so that is an 689 00:30:35,360 --> 00:30:38,360 Speaker 3: encouraging sign that you know he could be getting. 690 00:30:38,440 --> 00:30:38,880 Speaker 4: You know, he's not. 691 00:30:38,960 --> 00:30:40,400 Speaker 3: It doesn't seem like he's gonna ever go back to 692 00:30:40,480 --> 00:30:43,080 Speaker 3: that thirty thirty potential. But he could be like a 693 00:30:43,160 --> 00:30:45,880 Speaker 3: twenty five to fifteen guy with a really good average, 694 00:30:47,280 --> 00:30:48,719 Speaker 3: and you know, there's just a lot to like there. 695 00:30:48,760 --> 00:30:50,800 Speaker 3: I'm I'm a big Bobachette fan, so I'd definitely be 696 00:30:50,840 --> 00:30:51,400 Speaker 3: buying well. 697 00:30:51,320 --> 00:30:53,000 Speaker 1: Two, who's your pick here? 698 00:30:54,040 --> 00:30:56,600 Speaker 3: So my pick here is actually someone I stole from Welsh. 699 00:30:57,360 --> 00:31:00,760 Speaker 3: The person I wrote up in the article is Aaron Savale, 700 00:31:00,840 --> 00:31:02,280 Speaker 3: and I wrote how I'd be going down with the 701 00:31:02,320 --> 00:31:06,400 Speaker 3: Aaron sa Valet ship and just babbling about needing a 702 00:31:06,480 --> 00:31:08,560 Speaker 3: larger sample size as we loaded the women and children 703 00:31:08,960 --> 00:31:13,040 Speaker 3: under the rescue boats. But we've already talked about Arnsavalley 704 00:31:13,040 --> 00:31:14,960 Speaker 3: on the show a little bit, so we don't need to. 705 00:31:14,960 --> 00:31:16,120 Speaker 4: Go back down that road. 706 00:31:16,640 --> 00:31:20,840 Speaker 3: So I stole jazz chism from Welsh, and it was 707 00:31:20,880 --> 00:31:22,320 Speaker 3: because I read his write up and I thought there 708 00:31:22,360 --> 00:31:25,920 Speaker 3: was an interesting reason. It wasn't necessarily about what we 709 00:31:25,960 --> 00:31:27,760 Speaker 3: always talk about, which is, you know, like his underlying 710 00:31:27,840 --> 00:31:29,720 Speaker 3: numbers are much better. This is a clear buy low 711 00:31:29,840 --> 00:31:31,000 Speaker 3: kind of a thing, which you know, there was a 712 00:31:31,040 --> 00:31:33,520 Speaker 3: little bit of that, but he he was also speculating 713 00:31:33,560 --> 00:31:36,400 Speaker 3: that he could be traded, which you know, is a 714 00:31:36,480 --> 00:31:38,520 Speaker 3: perfect kind of segue to what we just talked about. 715 00:31:38,560 --> 00:31:41,520 Speaker 3: You know what, who who could see their value drastically 716 00:31:41,600 --> 00:31:44,640 Speaker 3: increase if they land in a new environment, and he's 717 00:31:44,640 --> 00:31:45,520 Speaker 3: a perfect candidate for that. 718 00:31:45,600 --> 00:31:47,800 Speaker 4: I don't know if he will be moved, but you 719 00:31:48,160 --> 00:31:48,640 Speaker 4: similar to. 720 00:31:48,640 --> 00:31:49,920 Speaker 3: What we were talking about with the A's, you can't 721 00:31:50,000 --> 00:31:53,080 Speaker 3: rule out anything the Marlins, do, you know, Like you 722 00:31:53,120 --> 00:31:56,560 Speaker 3: said before, you hate waiting to see teams wait till July. 723 00:31:56,880 --> 00:31:59,080 Speaker 4: They made it trade two weeks ago. They're already ready 724 00:31:59,120 --> 00:31:59,440 Speaker 4: to roll. 725 00:32:00,800 --> 00:32:03,440 Speaker 3: And so I was kind of looking at his contract too, 726 00:32:03,440 --> 00:32:04,760 Speaker 3: because I was like, well, I feel like he's under 727 00:32:04,800 --> 00:32:05,160 Speaker 3: control for. 728 00:32:05,160 --> 00:32:05,680 Speaker 4: A little while. 729 00:32:05,840 --> 00:32:08,520 Speaker 3: Maybe they won't trade him. He is kind of already 730 00:32:08,560 --> 00:32:10,920 Speaker 3: in his arbitration or not kind of. He is already 731 00:32:10,920 --> 00:32:13,520 Speaker 3: in his arbitration seasons, which, as we know, your your 732 00:32:13,800 --> 00:32:17,000 Speaker 3: contract gradually goes up, you know, into the millions. 733 00:32:17,720 --> 00:32:18,560 Speaker 4: Every year you're in that. 734 00:32:19,320 --> 00:32:23,880 Speaker 3: And the Marlins are notoriously really cheap, and they don't 735 00:32:23,960 --> 00:32:28,040 Speaker 3: view arbitration years the way that the big market teams view, 736 00:32:28,160 --> 00:32:31,200 Speaker 3: as you know, affordable years. They view them as these 737 00:32:31,240 --> 00:32:33,320 Speaker 3: are getting more expensive, like maybe we should start to 738 00:32:33,640 --> 00:32:37,000 Speaker 3: sell why while we can. It's it's clear from their 739 00:32:37,040 --> 00:32:39,880 Speaker 3: moves they don't think they're anywhere close to a contention window. 740 00:32:40,240 --> 00:32:42,520 Speaker 3: So maybe he could be moved in some kind of 741 00:32:42,560 --> 00:32:45,600 Speaker 3: blockbuster deal. Or he goes to a really good lineup, 742 00:32:46,720 --> 00:32:49,280 Speaker 3: bats pretty highly in that lineup, and you know, now 743 00:32:49,320 --> 00:32:51,880 Speaker 3: we're talking about someone who, just as I already mentioned, 744 00:32:52,200 --> 00:32:54,960 Speaker 3: he's in a much better situation, probably in a better ballpark, 745 00:32:55,040 --> 00:32:57,240 Speaker 3: with you know, better run support or you know, better 746 00:32:57,360 --> 00:33:00,200 Speaker 3: like lineup support around him. I think that's a really 747 00:33:00,240 --> 00:33:04,360 Speaker 3: intriguing name. So I commend Welsh for that idea, and 748 00:33:04,440 --> 00:33:06,160 Speaker 3: I gladly steal it from him for the show. 749 00:33:07,720 --> 00:33:09,160 Speaker 1: Let's go to the cell highs Now. 750 00:33:09,320 --> 00:33:12,600 Speaker 2: I didn't like the cell high options in this week's article, 751 00:33:12,680 --> 00:33:15,680 Speaker 2: so I picked my Rather than picking my favorite cell high, 752 00:33:16,040 --> 00:33:19,880 Speaker 2: I picked my least favorite cell high from the article. 753 00:33:20,640 --> 00:33:21,760 Speaker 1: And that's Aaron Judge. 754 00:33:22,920 --> 00:33:25,280 Speaker 2: We talk a lot about the color of your stat 755 00:33:25,400 --> 00:33:28,760 Speaker 2: cast page. It's remarkably red. I mean there's a couple 756 00:33:28,960 --> 00:33:31,520 Speaker 2: you know, obviously, like strikeout rate and with rate are 757 00:33:31,600 --> 00:33:33,560 Speaker 2: kind of usually high with him, but it is it 758 00:33:33,680 --> 00:33:35,800 Speaker 2: is pretty dark red across the world. He actually while 759 00:33:35,800 --> 00:33:37,960 Speaker 2: we were recording this hit a home run four hundred 760 00:33:38,000 --> 00:33:40,920 Speaker 2: and sixty seven feet tonight. So we were recording this Wednesday, 761 00:33:40,960 --> 00:33:42,200 Speaker 2: by the way, everyone, not. 762 00:33:42,320 --> 00:33:45,000 Speaker 1: Thursday like usual. I mean, he has ten home runs. 763 00:33:46,240 --> 00:33:48,720 Speaker 2: You know. The batting average is down at two thirty six, 764 00:33:48,840 --> 00:33:51,200 Speaker 2: but he's only thirty two. It's not like he's some 765 00:33:51,400 --> 00:33:54,120 Speaker 2: old man you can't hack it anymore. His bat speed 766 00:33:54,280 --> 00:33:57,040 Speaker 2: is ninety seven percentile, so clearly he can still swing hard. 767 00:33:58,440 --> 00:34:01,160 Speaker 1: I'm maybe not ying high on Judge. 768 00:34:01,200 --> 00:34:04,600 Speaker 2: I think that's reasonable, but I'm really not actively looking 769 00:34:04,680 --> 00:34:07,680 Speaker 2: to sell on Aaron Judge really really at all. 770 00:34:08,000 --> 00:34:09,000 Speaker 1: What do you think about Judge? 771 00:34:10,080 --> 00:34:12,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, so we kind of talked about him recently and 772 00:34:12,280 --> 00:34:15,600 Speaker 3: I kind of said that I am not always kind 773 00:34:15,640 --> 00:34:18,759 Speaker 3: of selling high, but I rarely have shares of Aaron 774 00:34:18,840 --> 00:34:20,840 Speaker 3: Judge because he goes so high in drafts or so 775 00:34:21,040 --> 00:34:23,000 Speaker 3: for so much money and auctions, and I'm always kind 776 00:34:23,040 --> 00:34:25,840 Speaker 3: of the older he gets, the more concerned I am 777 00:34:25,840 --> 00:34:30,080 Speaker 3: about injury. So I feel like baking an injury concerns 778 00:34:30,080 --> 00:34:34,200 Speaker 3: would have to be your reason for selling high. And 779 00:34:34,560 --> 00:34:36,880 Speaker 3: because but if like if you drafted him, you already 780 00:34:36,920 --> 00:34:38,480 Speaker 3: knew that, So why are you bothering to. 781 00:34:38,480 --> 00:34:40,840 Speaker 2: Sell high at this point, I don't have him in 782 00:34:40,880 --> 00:34:42,640 Speaker 2: a lot of places, to be clear, because I'm similar 783 00:34:42,719 --> 00:34:45,200 Speaker 2: to you in that he just typically goes higher than 784 00:34:45,360 --> 00:34:49,040 Speaker 2: I'm comfortable taking on that risk on actual draft day, 785 00:34:49,400 --> 00:34:51,400 Speaker 2: So I don't really have the opportunity to sell him 786 00:34:51,400 --> 00:34:54,200 Speaker 2: even if I wanted to. But if I did, again, 787 00:34:54,239 --> 00:34:56,359 Speaker 2: he's somebody that like, you know what you're getting when 788 00:34:56,440 --> 00:35:01,279 Speaker 2: you draft him, and I'm not uncomfortable enough with what 789 00:35:01,320 --> 00:35:04,360 Speaker 2: we've gotten that I'm looking to get out just because 790 00:35:04,360 --> 00:35:05,320 Speaker 2: he's having a hot streak. 791 00:35:05,320 --> 00:35:08,239 Speaker 1: Here to start, May, who's your cell high? 792 00:35:09,200 --> 00:35:13,720 Speaker 3: My cell high is Reese Elsen, and I'm I'm saddened 793 00:35:13,719 --> 00:35:15,640 Speaker 3: to hear that you didn't like my choice of a 794 00:35:16,000 --> 00:35:17,759 Speaker 3: cell high. I thought we were supporting each other on 795 00:35:17,840 --> 00:35:20,520 Speaker 3: this show, so why don't I return it to you? 796 00:35:21,400 --> 00:35:24,120 Speaker 3: Why do you not like Reese Elson as a cell high? 797 00:35:24,640 --> 00:35:28,759 Speaker 2: So is to pull the cur I wasn't gonna like 798 00:35:29,160 --> 00:35:32,640 Speaker 2: point this out once I realized this has happened. I'm 799 00:35:32,680 --> 00:35:36,840 Speaker 2: actually pulling from our by low sell high article options, 800 00:35:37,080 --> 00:35:41,800 Speaker 2: not from our featured pros multiple people options. So I 801 00:35:41,920 --> 00:35:44,600 Speaker 2: was trying to highlight our writer who does bilo sell 802 00:35:44,680 --> 00:35:48,239 Speaker 2: high every week, Brett USTERI and pick from his where 803 00:35:48,280 --> 00:35:50,560 Speaker 2: I did not like his sell high options, which were 804 00:35:51,040 --> 00:35:53,160 Speaker 2: Aaron Judge, Mitch Keller, and Jameson tie On. 805 00:35:53,680 --> 00:35:55,399 Speaker 1: So I don't like any of those. 806 00:35:55,640 --> 00:35:59,840 Speaker 2: I didn't actually compare to your article or choice. So 807 00:36:00,239 --> 00:36:02,000 Speaker 2: I'm not saying you made a bad choice. Go ahead 808 00:36:02,000 --> 00:36:04,400 Speaker 2: and sell me this pen On resource. 809 00:36:07,280 --> 00:36:09,920 Speaker 3: He's just I mean, his numbers right now are incredible. 810 00:36:10,040 --> 00:36:11,719 Speaker 3: He has a two point zero nine ERA. 811 00:36:12,800 --> 00:36:16,480 Speaker 1: And an incredible zero to four one lost record. 812 00:36:17,600 --> 00:36:20,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, and that's that's kind of the reason for the 813 00:36:21,040 --> 00:36:25,239 Speaker 3: cell high because you can kind of, you know, sell 814 00:36:25,320 --> 00:36:26,759 Speaker 3: someone on the on the fact that, look, you know, 815 00:36:26,840 --> 00:36:28,960 Speaker 3: he's got these incredible numbers, the wins will come. But 816 00:36:29,080 --> 00:36:31,800 Speaker 3: he is on the Tigers, and he also has you know, 817 00:36:32,120 --> 00:36:34,880 Speaker 3: he has zero wins. He also has zero home runs allowed, 818 00:36:35,239 --> 00:36:38,880 Speaker 3: which is both impressive but also incredibly lucky, very scary. 819 00:36:39,360 --> 00:36:42,400 Speaker 4: Yeah, that just that kind of luck just isn't going 820 00:36:42,480 --> 00:36:43,680 Speaker 4: to continue the rest of the season. 821 00:36:44,000 --> 00:36:45,880 Speaker 3: Although as I mentioned in the article, he does have 822 00:36:45,960 --> 00:36:47,520 Speaker 3: a really you know, there are some reasons like he's 823 00:36:47,600 --> 00:36:50,440 Speaker 3: kind of doing that. He's he's allowing some decent hard contact, 824 00:36:50,480 --> 00:36:53,120 Speaker 3: but he's he's got a ridiculous fifty five percent ground 825 00:36:53,160 --> 00:36:55,160 Speaker 3: ball rate, So he is keeping the ball on the ground. 826 00:36:56,719 --> 00:36:58,120 Speaker 4: But at the same time, he's not missing a lot 827 00:36:58,160 --> 00:36:58,479 Speaker 4: of bats. 828 00:36:58,520 --> 00:37:00,000 Speaker 3: And so while he's not walking in ton a guy, 829 00:37:00,760 --> 00:37:03,800 Speaker 3: he's letting up some hard contact no home runs, and 830 00:37:03,920 --> 00:37:06,960 Speaker 3: kind of keeping them all on the ground. It's it's 831 00:37:07,040 --> 00:37:09,240 Speaker 3: just not sustainable, you know, when when you're not missing 832 00:37:09,280 --> 00:37:10,719 Speaker 3: a ton of bats and you're giving up a decent 833 00:37:10,760 --> 00:37:12,759 Speaker 3: amount of hard contact, it doesn't really matter. Like he's 834 00:37:12,760 --> 00:37:16,200 Speaker 3: gonna have some blow up starts here. His expected era 835 00:37:16,400 --> 00:37:18,759 Speaker 3: numbers are like, aren't terrible. Like his actual RA is 836 00:37:18,760 --> 00:37:21,400 Speaker 3: two point zero nine. All of his other numbers are 837 00:37:21,480 --> 00:37:23,640 Speaker 3: between two point five four and three point seven seven, 838 00:37:23,960 --> 00:37:26,000 Speaker 3: which even if you fully regrets. 839 00:37:25,640 --> 00:37:27,960 Speaker 4: To those like, that's still not bad. And so it's 840 00:37:28,000 --> 00:37:30,040 Speaker 4: not like a you know, it's not like a regular 841 00:37:30,160 --> 00:37:31,120 Speaker 4: sell or a cell low. 842 00:37:31,920 --> 00:37:35,480 Speaker 3: It's a cell high. I want to sell what we 843 00:37:35,719 --> 00:37:38,600 Speaker 3: what we've seen in the you know, in production, for 844 00:37:39,200 --> 00:37:42,640 Speaker 3: something better, you know something. And this is sometimes we 845 00:37:42,719 --> 00:37:44,279 Speaker 3: talk about these trades and we kind of get caught 846 00:37:44,360 --> 00:37:45,920 Speaker 3: up in like what picture would you want? I like 847 00:37:46,000 --> 00:37:47,279 Speaker 3: to do the opposite trades. I like to do a 848 00:37:47,320 --> 00:37:50,040 Speaker 3: picture for a hitter, and I would rather. You know, 849 00:37:50,680 --> 00:37:52,879 Speaker 3: I think I mentioned I wrote it today, so I'm 850 00:37:52,880 --> 00:37:55,080 Speaker 3: trying to remember what I wrote. I think I mentioned 851 00:37:55,080 --> 00:37:56,719 Speaker 3: I would rather like I would, I would like to 852 00:37:56,840 --> 00:38:00,560 Speaker 3: swap him for almost like a buy high hitter like 853 00:38:00,600 --> 00:38:03,239 Speaker 3: a Joe Adele, or a by low hitter like a 854 00:38:03,280 --> 00:38:03,920 Speaker 3: George Springer. 855 00:38:05,640 --> 00:38:06,279 Speaker 1: I think that's fair. 856 00:38:06,360 --> 00:38:09,200 Speaker 2: You made a great case, and I'm not gonna say 857 00:38:09,239 --> 00:38:11,719 Speaker 2: you're wrong about that. Like I said, just drawing from 858 00:38:11,760 --> 00:38:14,160 Speaker 2: a different article. That's that's how organized we are here. 859 00:38:14,960 --> 00:38:17,640 Speaker 2: Let's kick it to my conversation with Welsh. Like I said, 860 00:38:17,640 --> 00:38:19,640 Speaker 2: we dive into a whole bunch of prospects and other 861 00:38:19,719 --> 00:38:21,719 Speaker 2: young players, and then you and I will come back 862 00:38:21,760 --> 00:38:22,359 Speaker 2: on the other side. 863 00:38:24,480 --> 00:38:27,080 Speaker 1: Back in with Chris Welsh, our guest of the week. 864 00:38:27,160 --> 00:38:28,720 Speaker 1: We are here for Prospect Corner. 865 00:38:29,440 --> 00:38:31,560 Speaker 2: Only one of us who's going to talk to Welsh today, 866 00:38:31,600 --> 00:38:33,600 Speaker 2: And of course I drew the short straw, so mayor 867 00:38:33,719 --> 00:38:37,279 Speaker 2: lucked out chat with the Well. No, it is a 868 00:38:37,320 --> 00:38:40,360 Speaker 2: delight to talk to our friend and coworker, Chris Welsh. 869 00:38:40,520 --> 00:38:43,319 Speaker 2: We're talking to prospects now Welsh. Last week we were 870 00:38:43,360 --> 00:38:45,880 Speaker 2: in the middle of recording with Kelly Kirby, who was 871 00:38:45,920 --> 00:38:48,680 Speaker 2: our guest last week when news dropped that Paul Skens 872 00:38:48,840 --> 00:38:51,839 Speaker 2: was officially finally getting the call, we had a sense 873 00:38:51,880 --> 00:38:54,880 Speaker 2: that this was probably, you know, around the horizon. Sometime 874 00:38:55,000 --> 00:38:57,320 Speaker 2: soon it finally did happen. So here we are a 875 00:38:57,360 --> 00:38:59,719 Speaker 2: week later. We have a start to actually look at 876 00:38:59,840 --> 00:39:02,080 Speaker 2: and react to, and I want to ask you about 877 00:39:02,080 --> 00:39:03,600 Speaker 2: that and also kind of looking ahead for the rest 878 00:39:03,600 --> 00:39:05,200 Speaker 2: of the season, just get the chance for the folks 879 00:39:05,239 --> 00:39:07,799 Speaker 2: to hear your reaction and kind of expectations. 880 00:39:07,840 --> 00:39:09,680 Speaker 1: But just off the bat, what did you think of 881 00:39:09,760 --> 00:39:10,240 Speaker 1: the debut? 882 00:39:10,560 --> 00:39:13,640 Speaker 2: You know, four innings, seven strikeouts, give a three earned runs, 883 00:39:13,640 --> 00:39:16,920 Speaker 2: a home run, a couple of walks. You know, you're 884 00:39:16,960 --> 00:39:18,719 Speaker 2: not gonna put too much dock in you just one start, right, 885 00:39:18,719 --> 00:39:20,400 Speaker 2: and it was the kid's major league debut. 886 00:39:20,520 --> 00:39:23,000 Speaker 1: But the stuff is unreal. Everybody already knows it. 887 00:39:23,360 --> 00:39:24,920 Speaker 2: I mean, I guess let me actually backtrack again and 888 00:39:24,960 --> 00:39:27,960 Speaker 2: ask you initially, was this the most excited you were 889 00:39:28,080 --> 00:39:30,640 Speaker 2: for a pitching prospect since Strasburg? That was kind of 890 00:39:30,640 --> 00:39:32,719 Speaker 2: the comparison point a lot of people were giving. Is 891 00:39:32,760 --> 00:39:33,839 Speaker 2: that kind of how you felt too. 892 00:39:34,080 --> 00:39:37,320 Speaker 5: Yeah, for a pitching prospect? Sure, I mean it's sometimes 893 00:39:37,320 --> 00:39:40,840 Speaker 5: shooing far between. I will tell you it probably would 894 00:39:40,880 --> 00:39:44,359 Speaker 5: have been like McKenzie go I loved McKenzie, a huge 895 00:39:44,440 --> 00:39:48,560 Speaker 5: mackenzie Gore guy. But Gore then kind of fell apart 896 00:39:48,719 --> 00:39:50,600 Speaker 5: before he made that major league debut. And that's a 897 00:39:50,640 --> 00:39:53,200 Speaker 5: tough thing. That's that's actually kind of the uniqueness about 898 00:39:53,280 --> 00:39:58,680 Speaker 5: Paul Skeins is everyone is always picked on top pitching prospects. 899 00:39:58,719 --> 00:40:00,319 Speaker 5: Because if you go back and you li ok at 900 00:40:00,719 --> 00:40:03,480 Speaker 5: just any list, you know, go to pipeline, you go 901 00:40:03,520 --> 00:40:05,120 Speaker 5: to mine, but you go to like pipeline or something 902 00:40:05,160 --> 00:40:08,520 Speaker 5: for MLB, and you go back and look top twenty 903 00:40:09,000 --> 00:40:11,680 Speaker 5: overall prospects for the last like five or six, maybe 904 00:40:11,719 --> 00:40:13,319 Speaker 5: eight years, and you go and look at like who 905 00:40:13,360 --> 00:40:18,359 Speaker 5: are the top pitching prospects, Force Whitley, Alex Reyes, McKinsey, Gore. 906 00:40:18,400 --> 00:40:22,160 Speaker 5: There's failure, but the failure happens before they even hit 907 00:40:22,200 --> 00:40:25,720 Speaker 5: the majors. The failure happens in the midst of the process. 908 00:40:26,600 --> 00:40:28,839 Speaker 5: Paul Skeins wasn't a round for there to be time 909 00:40:28,920 --> 00:40:32,080 Speaker 5: for failure. But it's such a quick successful run that 910 00:40:32,160 --> 00:40:35,160 Speaker 5: he made to the major So yeah, from an excitement standpoint, 911 00:40:35,960 --> 00:40:37,160 Speaker 5: this is the top dog. 912 00:40:38,040 --> 00:40:41,000 Speaker 2: Would you say, like maybe even more exciting than Strasburg. 913 00:40:41,040 --> 00:40:43,279 Speaker 2: I saw that debate going on. For me, Strasburg kind 914 00:40:43,280 --> 00:40:46,120 Speaker 2: of stands alone. I was also in DC when that 915 00:40:46,239 --> 00:40:46,920 Speaker 2: debut happened. 916 00:40:46,960 --> 00:40:47,880 Speaker 5: Yeah, a little different for you. 917 00:40:48,400 --> 00:40:50,360 Speaker 1: I don't really remember. 918 00:40:50,640 --> 00:40:53,479 Speaker 5: It's not in my brain like how I felt. 919 00:40:53,520 --> 00:40:53,920 Speaker 4: Obviously. 920 00:40:53,960 --> 00:40:59,600 Speaker 5: I think his performance was like excitement versus met expectations, 921 00:41:00,120 --> 00:41:03,839 Speaker 5: like if I'm doing a selfish one, Max sureser, Max sure, 922 00:41:04,080 --> 00:41:06,520 Speaker 5: I'm a diamondback guy. When Max Scherzer made his debut 923 00:41:06,719 --> 00:41:09,400 Speaker 5: and he struck out like eight in four innings, like, 924 00:41:09,480 --> 00:41:11,719 Speaker 5: it was really exciting, So it was kind of near there. 925 00:41:11,800 --> 00:41:15,560 Speaker 5: But you know, you also brought up expectations. This is 926 00:41:15,719 --> 00:41:18,120 Speaker 5: I mean, you know you doing the social here like 927 00:41:18,280 --> 00:41:20,880 Speaker 5: I did the social video for you, not not to 928 00:41:20,960 --> 00:41:22,600 Speaker 5: pull a piece of pa here, but I was pretty 929 00:41:22,680 --> 00:41:24,560 Speaker 5: damn close to right if you look at it, like 930 00:41:24,640 --> 00:41:26,920 Speaker 5: and then it'll pat myself on the back. But like 931 00:41:27,120 --> 00:41:28,799 Speaker 5: I said, I thought he was going to go four. 932 00:41:29,080 --> 00:41:29,640 Speaker 1: I thought he was in. 933 00:41:29,760 --> 00:41:33,239 Speaker 5: I said eight strikeouts, I said, two earned runs and 934 00:41:33,360 --> 00:41:36,680 Speaker 5: two walks. We're pretty close. Seven strikeouts, three earned runs, 935 00:41:36,760 --> 00:41:41,680 Speaker 5: two walks. And the reason I thought and the reason 936 00:41:41,719 --> 00:41:45,600 Speaker 5: why like this didn't surpass or underwhelm my expectations is 937 00:41:45,760 --> 00:41:47,360 Speaker 5: obviously because like this is what I thought he was 938 00:41:47,400 --> 00:41:50,279 Speaker 5: going to do. I thought he was gonna have a 939 00:41:50,320 --> 00:41:53,200 Speaker 5: little bit, especially in this specific matchup, which I had 940 00:41:53,239 --> 00:41:55,480 Speaker 5: talked about in some of the social videos, was the 941 00:41:55,560 --> 00:41:58,520 Speaker 5: Cubs are a team that can drive pitch counts a 942 00:41:58,560 --> 00:42:00,640 Speaker 5: little bit more like they were little bit in the 943 00:42:01,000 --> 00:42:03,799 Speaker 5: higher range. I think close to ten percent overall walk 944 00:42:03,920 --> 00:42:07,160 Speaker 5: rate they put up. And Skeens is a guy that 945 00:42:07,200 --> 00:42:10,719 Speaker 5: obviously is going to pump a fastball, but like he 946 00:42:10,840 --> 00:42:13,600 Speaker 5: also drives counts. I think he went over five once 947 00:42:13,800 --> 00:42:16,440 Speaker 5: in the minor leagues. He had gotten to seventy five 948 00:42:16,520 --> 00:42:21,120 Speaker 5: pitches at the tippy top. Like it's not Blake Snell. 949 00:42:21,840 --> 00:42:24,080 Speaker 5: But I don't know if Skeens is going to be 950 00:42:24,120 --> 00:42:25,880 Speaker 5: a guy that's going to have a whole lot of 951 00:42:26,080 --> 00:42:30,120 Speaker 5: like low pitch count innings because he you got guys 952 00:42:30,160 --> 00:42:33,040 Speaker 5: that can't can't even get contact on one hundred and 953 00:42:33,080 --> 00:42:35,080 Speaker 5: two mile an hour fastball. He topped at one to 954 00:42:35,200 --> 00:42:39,400 Speaker 5: one point nine in that start. So inherently you're probably 955 00:42:39,480 --> 00:42:43,360 Speaker 5: gonna have more often than not, you know, fifteen to 956 00:42:43,560 --> 00:42:47,400 Speaker 5: eighteen pitch innings. So that is gonna get you to 957 00:42:47,440 --> 00:42:50,040 Speaker 5: struggle a little bit from the uh, you know, getting 958 00:42:50,080 --> 00:42:52,040 Speaker 5: to like five and six innings. So I'm saying all 959 00:42:52,080 --> 00:42:54,239 Speaker 5: of this without jumping too far ahead and whatever you're 960 00:42:54,239 --> 00:42:57,960 Speaker 5: gonna want to talk about. This was expectationally where I 961 00:42:58,040 --> 00:43:01,880 Speaker 5: thought Paul Skeins was going to be. I loved the fastball. 962 00:43:01,920 --> 00:43:03,719 Speaker 5: The only thing I thought was weird was I think 963 00:43:03,760 --> 00:43:08,680 Speaker 5: it was Yasmini Grindal who was altering the pitch mix, 964 00:43:08,800 --> 00:43:11,080 Speaker 5: because early on, if you watch the start schemes, was 965 00:43:11,200 --> 00:43:14,120 Speaker 5: electric with the fastball. It was early fastballs in the 966 00:43:14,160 --> 00:43:16,680 Speaker 5: first inning, struck out two second and then all of 967 00:43:16,680 --> 00:43:20,320 Speaker 5: a sudden it started turning to like sliders and you 968 00:43:20,400 --> 00:43:23,240 Speaker 5: were seeing that splinker or whatever they call the splitter 969 00:43:23,880 --> 00:43:25,560 Speaker 5: that he was on the splitter, change up type of thing. 970 00:43:26,000 --> 00:43:28,360 Speaker 5: And it felt like in two strike counts they were 971 00:43:28,400 --> 00:43:32,120 Speaker 5: going to those instead of just barreling down one hundred 972 00:43:32,160 --> 00:43:34,200 Speaker 5: and two. And I thought that was a catcher decision 973 00:43:34,239 --> 00:43:37,279 Speaker 5: which maybe drove counts where you want to see more fastballs. 974 00:43:37,920 --> 00:43:40,800 Speaker 5: But I think like, regardless of the result, you should 975 00:43:40,840 --> 00:43:45,080 Speaker 5: be happy. This is him meeting the expectation of Paul 976 00:43:45,160 --> 00:43:48,080 Speaker 5: Skins is a big win. It just doesn't add up 977 00:43:48,160 --> 00:43:52,920 Speaker 5: to the Bonker's pre expectations people had those trades on 978 00:43:53,120 --> 00:43:55,040 Speaker 5: leading off that we were seeing Someone's like, I can 979 00:43:55,080 --> 00:43:58,120 Speaker 5: get Matt Olsen for Paul Skins. Yeah, Someone's like, would 980 00:43:58,120 --> 00:43:59,680 Speaker 5: you trade Paul Skins for Corbyn Burns? 981 00:44:00,239 --> 00:44:00,439 Speaker 4: Yeah. 982 00:44:00,960 --> 00:44:04,480 Speaker 5: I think the performance took away some of the oh 983 00:44:04,600 --> 00:44:07,480 Speaker 5: my god, Paul Skeins is a little bit human, So 984 00:44:07,600 --> 00:44:09,719 Speaker 5: now you can't quite make those trades. So now it's like, 985 00:44:09,880 --> 00:44:11,239 Speaker 5: who would you rather have rest of the season, like 986 00:44:11,280 --> 00:44:13,800 Speaker 5: Paul Skins or Chris Sale. I think that makes a 987 00:44:13,840 --> 00:44:15,359 Speaker 5: little bit more sense in people's minds. 988 00:44:15,600 --> 00:44:17,640 Speaker 1: What range are you ranking him rest of season? 989 00:44:18,440 --> 00:44:22,000 Speaker 5: So in the initial rank on my rest of season, 990 00:44:22,120 --> 00:44:24,600 Speaker 5: I had put him before the start at thirty three. 991 00:44:24,880 --> 00:44:28,040 Speaker 5: That's where I had set him. I'm still working on 992 00:44:28,160 --> 00:44:30,800 Speaker 5: the finalizing the rest of season. We're trying to do 993 00:44:30,880 --> 00:44:33,719 Speaker 5: it weekly, but we've had a lot of stuff going on, 994 00:44:33,840 --> 00:44:36,840 Speaker 5: so I'm kind of resetting it. I think he's gonna 995 00:44:36,920 --> 00:44:40,879 Speaker 5: sit between twenty eight and thirty. And some of that's 996 00:44:40,920 --> 00:44:43,839 Speaker 5: by proxy, because it's like guys are falling off the list, 997 00:44:43,960 --> 00:44:46,280 Speaker 5: like Chris Bassett's kind of falling apart, Like I'm finally 998 00:44:46,360 --> 00:44:49,120 Speaker 5: kind of getting done with Kevin Gossman. I'm kind of 999 00:44:49,120 --> 00:44:52,359 Speaker 5: getting done with Chris Bassett. So I think it's fair 1000 00:44:53,160 --> 00:44:56,440 Speaker 5: to value. It's fair to say, like Paul Skans could 1001 00:44:56,440 --> 00:44:58,200 Speaker 5: be a top twenty five s p rest of season. 1002 00:44:58,520 --> 00:45:01,680 Speaker 5: I think the disconnect is people are like, you hear 1003 00:45:01,840 --> 00:45:05,080 Speaker 5: top twenty five, and then you're like, oh, top twenty five, 1004 00:45:05,800 --> 00:45:09,439 Speaker 5: could that mean he's top fifteen overall? I think he's 1005 00:45:09,520 --> 00:45:12,960 Speaker 5: gonna sit in that twenty five range because it's like 1006 00:45:13,040 --> 00:45:15,120 Speaker 5: it's gonna be tough for him to get wins and 1007 00:45:15,200 --> 00:45:18,000 Speaker 5: go five every single inning, But like he's an exceptional talent, 1008 00:45:18,120 --> 00:45:20,759 Speaker 5: so you should if you're trading him, I think you 1009 00:45:20,800 --> 00:45:23,040 Speaker 5: should view him as a top twenty five. So that's 1010 00:45:23,120 --> 00:45:25,839 Speaker 5: the value return at least I would want. 1011 00:45:26,560 --> 00:45:29,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, I was gonna ask how much you know, weighing 1012 00:45:29,120 --> 00:45:31,000 Speaker 2: into that is sort of what you mentioned about the 1013 00:45:31,040 --> 00:45:34,000 Speaker 2: pitch count going up. The Pirates aren't very good, so 1014 00:45:34,200 --> 00:45:36,160 Speaker 2: like they're not gonna be motivated to really push him 1015 00:45:36,160 --> 00:45:38,680 Speaker 2: beyond whatever their kind of innings limit that they've set 1016 00:45:38,719 --> 00:45:41,040 Speaker 2: for him is. So you know, that is somebody to 1017 00:45:41,080 --> 00:45:44,000 Speaker 2: keep in mind for really any top pitching prospect. But 1018 00:45:44,120 --> 00:45:46,800 Speaker 2: you know in this case as well, is that innings 1019 00:45:46,920 --> 00:45:49,279 Speaker 2: like you may get them but they are a question 1020 00:45:49,360 --> 00:45:50,200 Speaker 2: mark at the very least. 1021 00:45:50,280 --> 00:45:52,400 Speaker 5: And that's the positive could be though, is if the 1022 00:45:52,440 --> 00:45:55,920 Speaker 5: Pirates keep winning. That's the thing, like the formidable rotation, 1023 00:45:56,160 --> 00:45:58,799 Speaker 5: Jerry Jones, Paul Skains, Mitch Keller, that's your top three. 1024 00:45:59,239 --> 00:46:01,680 Speaker 5: There are a couple games out of the wild card. 1025 00:46:01,719 --> 00:46:03,839 Speaker 5: I think right now we're divisionally like they're not over 1026 00:46:03,920 --> 00:46:06,360 Speaker 5: five hundred. But it's like, oh, if this team just 1027 00:46:06,400 --> 00:46:08,480 Speaker 5: said we're just not going to keep doing pirate things 1028 00:46:08,520 --> 00:46:10,200 Speaker 5: and we're going to try to win win, maybe they 1029 00:46:10,280 --> 00:46:12,560 Speaker 5: start pulling some more pieces and that's where you get 1030 00:46:12,600 --> 00:46:16,320 Speaker 5: into maybe they'll cut the court a little bit on 1031 00:46:16,560 --> 00:46:20,040 Speaker 5: being hyper sensitive about innings pitched or you know that 1032 00:46:20,200 --> 00:46:23,000 Speaker 5: Jared Jones situation where he was on four days rest, 1033 00:46:23,080 --> 00:46:25,239 Speaker 5: so they're like he's only going five and he pitched 1034 00:46:25,239 --> 00:46:29,879 Speaker 5: fifty nine total pitches. That if this team is being competitive, 1035 00:46:30,400 --> 00:46:33,240 Speaker 5: it's the best possible scenario for a guy like Paul Skins. 1036 00:46:33,239 --> 00:46:38,200 Speaker 5: When they stop being competitive, then it's a cheap kind 1037 00:46:38,239 --> 00:46:40,080 Speaker 5: of comp and it's the sore spot for you and 1038 00:46:40,120 --> 00:46:43,120 Speaker 5: our old conversations about Uri Perez. But like Uri Perez 1039 00:46:43,239 --> 00:46:46,800 Speaker 5: last year where you know, like they sent Eury Perez 1040 00:46:46,880 --> 00:46:48,880 Speaker 5: down for a little bit, and then they were maintaining 1041 00:46:48,960 --> 00:46:51,080 Speaker 5: innings and stuff like that, like if the Pirates aren't winning, 1042 00:46:51,480 --> 00:46:55,280 Speaker 5: that's the worry that can happen for Paul Skins. 1043 00:46:55,680 --> 00:46:57,560 Speaker 2: You know, for the rest of the year, we're gonna 1044 00:46:57,560 --> 00:46:59,200 Speaker 2: talk about more than this Paul Skians. But I just 1045 00:46:59,280 --> 00:47:02,000 Speaker 2: want to mention before get off the topic, to share 1046 00:47:02,080 --> 00:47:07,360 Speaker 2: a sad story. I had tickets to Strasburg's debut and 1047 00:47:08,120 --> 00:47:11,440 Speaker 2: I didn't end up going because it was a buddy 1048 00:47:11,480 --> 00:47:15,880 Speaker 2: of mine in school and he was like, I have 1049 00:47:16,040 --> 00:47:19,200 Speaker 2: these tickets, like I got, I got too, and you're 1050 00:47:19,200 --> 00:47:21,279 Speaker 2: a big baseball fan. We weren't even that close to friends. 1051 00:47:21,320 --> 00:47:22,480 Speaker 2: He some day that I knew, but he's like, I 1052 00:47:22,520 --> 00:47:23,480 Speaker 2: know you're a big baseball fan. 1053 00:47:23,760 --> 00:47:26,040 Speaker 1: Do you want to come? I was like, holy cow, 1054 00:47:26,239 --> 00:47:31,000 Speaker 1: yes I do. He texted me that afternoon. 1055 00:47:30,520 --> 00:47:35,160 Speaker 2: After we got out of school and said, hey, my 1056 00:47:35,320 --> 00:47:38,239 Speaker 2: parents said I can't go because it's a school night. 1057 00:47:38,680 --> 00:47:40,880 Speaker 1: And they made me sell the tickets. 1058 00:47:40,520 --> 00:47:43,120 Speaker 4: And I was like, why did you give them to me? 1059 00:47:43,480 --> 00:47:44,360 Speaker 1: What are you doing? 1060 00:47:44,880 --> 00:47:45,640 Speaker 5: Let me buy them. 1061 00:47:46,080 --> 00:47:47,600 Speaker 1: I would have happily bought them. 1062 00:47:48,239 --> 00:47:49,960 Speaker 2: So he sold them and I didn't get to go, 1063 00:47:50,120 --> 00:47:53,000 Speaker 2: and then he struck out fourteen Pirates and looked amazing. 1064 00:47:53,280 --> 00:47:56,000 Speaker 2: I will never forget the fact that I wasn't at 1065 00:47:56,600 --> 00:47:59,400 Speaker 2: the debut of really the most tight pitching prospect that 1066 00:47:59,520 --> 00:48:00,359 Speaker 2: I can fad. 1067 00:48:00,800 --> 00:48:02,879 Speaker 1: That is a sad story. So that's the other. 1068 00:48:03,000 --> 00:48:05,399 Speaker 2: The other fun story quickly, high school teammate of mine 1069 00:48:05,440 --> 00:48:07,520 Speaker 2: who also went by a worm. The name is Keith Worm, 1070 00:48:07,560 --> 00:48:08,320 Speaker 2: and he went to uv A. 1071 00:48:08,440 --> 00:48:11,080 Speaker 5: I played with him at actually worm like it's just 1072 00:48:11,480 --> 00:48:13,919 Speaker 5: not like yours abbreviated worm. Was it worm worm? 1073 00:48:14,440 --> 00:48:14,560 Speaker 2: Uh? 1074 00:48:15,040 --> 00:48:15,560 Speaker 4: No, it was. 1075 00:48:15,800 --> 00:48:19,560 Speaker 2: It was also like a nickname abbreviat. But he he 1076 00:48:19,760 --> 00:48:21,880 Speaker 2: played at UVA and he got a hit off Strasbourg 1077 00:48:22,040 --> 00:48:23,280 Speaker 2: in the College World Series. 1078 00:48:23,920 --> 00:48:26,239 Speaker 5: So that see, that would that's one of those things 1079 00:48:26,360 --> 00:48:28,880 Speaker 5: like I would love to have, Like you'd love to 1080 00:48:29,000 --> 00:48:30,680 Speaker 5: have that, Like, oh yeah I got a hit off 1081 00:48:30,719 --> 00:48:33,400 Speaker 5: of like this immensely talented talk about. 1082 00:48:33,160 --> 00:48:35,480 Speaker 1: It, like back the closest thing of that for me. 1083 00:48:37,560 --> 00:48:37,799 Speaker 2: Yeah. 1084 00:48:38,040 --> 00:48:38,239 Speaker 1: Yeah. 1085 00:48:38,560 --> 00:48:41,120 Speaker 2: There was a kid in you know when I played 1086 00:48:41,120 --> 00:48:43,960 Speaker 2: in high school who was go He was like signed 1087 00:48:44,040 --> 00:48:45,839 Speaker 2: to pitch at uv A and he ended up hurting 1088 00:48:45,880 --> 00:48:47,279 Speaker 2: his arm so he didn't. But he was really really 1089 00:48:47,320 --> 00:48:51,160 Speaker 2: good and he threw a one hitter against us, and 1090 00:48:51,239 --> 00:48:53,640 Speaker 2: I didn't get the one hit, but I did work 1091 00:48:53,680 --> 00:48:56,400 Speaker 2: the count to full before I struck out against him. 1092 00:48:56,440 --> 00:48:58,120 Speaker 1: Oh that's right, that was That was my. 1093 00:48:58,239 --> 00:49:02,640 Speaker 5: Best, but my best to as I caught a theoretical 1094 00:49:02,800 --> 00:49:06,200 Speaker 5: touchdown from Casey Weldon, who used to be a quarterback 1095 00:49:06,880 --> 00:49:08,759 Speaker 5: for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. I think he played it 1096 00:49:08,840 --> 00:49:09,800 Speaker 5: like Florida State. 1097 00:49:12,000 --> 00:49:12,520 Speaker 4: Deep pass. 1098 00:49:12,600 --> 00:49:14,520 Speaker 5: I was able to catch it over a cornerback, which 1099 00:49:14,600 --> 00:49:16,759 Speaker 5: was really cool. And then I got to do a 1100 00:49:16,920 --> 00:49:20,960 Speaker 5: media BP session at the Diamondbacks one time and I 1101 00:49:21,120 --> 00:49:24,880 Speaker 5: had toughy ghost switches bat and they started launch and 1102 00:49:25,000 --> 00:49:27,480 Speaker 5: we had the machine and I stepped in the box 1103 00:49:27,719 --> 00:49:31,560 Speaker 5: and I was the only person to almost hit a homer. 1104 00:49:32,160 --> 00:49:34,320 Speaker 5: I hit it. I hit the So this is on 1105 00:49:34,440 --> 00:49:36,719 Speaker 5: Salt River Fields, the backfield, the one that the major 1106 00:49:36,800 --> 00:49:41,040 Speaker 5: leaguers use, And I turned on one and I hit 1107 00:49:41,880 --> 00:49:45,680 Speaker 5: three feet under the wall. Like so, I hit the wall, 1108 00:49:46,080 --> 00:49:48,480 Speaker 5: but it was three feet from going over with toughy 1109 00:49:48,520 --> 00:49:51,680 Speaker 5: ghost witch's bat. And it's like, had I just gotten 1110 00:49:51,760 --> 00:49:53,680 Speaker 5: a little bit more and hit a homer with a 1111 00:49:54,080 --> 00:49:56,359 Speaker 5: pro baseball player's bat on the field that they used, 1112 00:49:56,360 --> 00:49:56,880 Speaker 5: that would. 1113 00:49:56,640 --> 00:49:58,640 Speaker 1: Have been You could live on that the rest of 1114 00:49:58,719 --> 00:49:59,120 Speaker 1: your life. 1115 00:49:59,200 --> 00:50:02,000 Speaker 5: Oh, Yeah, yeah, the losers like us, so that that 1116 00:50:02,080 --> 00:50:05,560 Speaker 5: would have filled my my loser a bucket for a 1117 00:50:05,640 --> 00:50:08,239 Speaker 5: long time. Yeah, tell everybody, no big deal, but I hit. 1118 00:50:08,160 --> 00:50:09,680 Speaker 4: A hole round the Diamondbacks facility. 1119 00:50:09,960 --> 00:50:12,359 Speaker 2: Well, well we are losers, so we'll move on from 1120 00:50:12,440 --> 00:50:15,640 Speaker 2: reliving our glory. He can talk about actual good baseball players. 1121 00:50:16,400 --> 00:50:19,160 Speaker 2: I wanted to ask you about another picture. When we 1122 00:50:19,280 --> 00:50:21,520 Speaker 2: had a friend of show, Brendan Tuma, on a couple 1123 00:50:21,520 --> 00:50:23,200 Speaker 2: of weeks ago to talk with me and Mayor, he 1124 00:50:23,320 --> 00:50:25,080 Speaker 2: talked a lot about Christian Scott and how about he 1125 00:50:25,239 --> 00:50:27,279 Speaker 2: was a stash that he thought everybody should be hanging 1126 00:50:27,280 --> 00:50:27,480 Speaker 2: on to. 1127 00:50:27,960 --> 00:50:29,520 Speaker 1: And now he's come up. He looks good. 1128 00:50:29,920 --> 00:50:31,279 Speaker 2: What do you make of the first couple of starts 1129 00:50:31,320 --> 00:50:32,960 Speaker 2: of his career? And you know, I don't want to 1130 00:50:32,960 --> 00:50:35,040 Speaker 2: call him like a like, Like he is breaking out 1131 00:50:35,120 --> 00:50:37,000 Speaker 2: to a degree this year. He's moved up a lot 1132 00:50:37,080 --> 00:50:38,800 Speaker 2: on a lot of the prospect rankings. He wasn't like 1133 00:50:38,840 --> 00:50:41,600 Speaker 2: he was unheard of before, but like he looks really 1134 00:50:41,640 --> 00:50:43,800 Speaker 2: really good in a way that he maybe didn't before. 1135 00:50:44,120 --> 00:50:45,560 Speaker 1: So what do you make of Scott? 1136 00:50:45,600 --> 00:50:47,840 Speaker 2: Both in terms of just evaluating him as a young pitcher, 1137 00:50:47,920 --> 00:50:49,759 Speaker 2: but also what we've seen so far at the big 1138 00:50:49,840 --> 00:50:50,319 Speaker 2: league level. 1139 00:50:50,680 --> 00:50:52,560 Speaker 5: Yeah, I was never like I was never big on 1140 00:50:52,719 --> 00:50:54,799 Speaker 5: Christian Scott last year and even into this year because 1141 00:50:54,800 --> 00:50:57,919 Speaker 5: I just hadn't seen enough statistically like things look good. 1142 00:50:58,360 --> 00:51:00,560 Speaker 5: But it's one of those cases, and it's it's it's 1143 00:51:00,600 --> 00:51:02,960 Speaker 5: truly in like evaluating prospects, like when you get to 1144 00:51:03,000 --> 00:51:05,160 Speaker 5: see them live and you really or you know, you 1145 00:51:05,280 --> 00:51:07,719 Speaker 5: really lock into multiple games if you're watching even on 1146 00:51:07,880 --> 00:51:10,680 Speaker 5: like you know, MiLB dot TV or something, and you 1147 00:51:10,760 --> 00:51:12,360 Speaker 5: can lock into a player, you just pick up so 1148 00:51:12,480 --> 00:51:14,960 Speaker 5: much more. And I was even like a little bit like, oh, 1149 00:51:15,040 --> 00:51:17,200 Speaker 5: let's wait and see. And then I got to catch 1150 00:51:17,239 --> 00:51:18,520 Speaker 5: some of it early on and this year, and I 1151 00:51:18,600 --> 00:51:20,480 Speaker 5: jumped on it. And he had been on that Prospects 1152 00:51:20,480 --> 00:51:24,200 Speaker 5: to Stash article for some time. His first start. I 1153 00:51:24,360 --> 00:51:27,160 Speaker 5: was so impressed, and I've said this multiple times, just 1154 00:51:27,239 --> 00:51:31,200 Speaker 5: with his poise. I thought, cool cucumber. He was able 1155 00:51:31,320 --> 00:51:34,640 Speaker 5: to not get phased. I loved his ability to command. 1156 00:51:34,840 --> 00:51:36,439 Speaker 5: And I know I've said this a couple of times, 1157 00:51:36,480 --> 00:51:39,360 Speaker 5: but like there there are a lot of things that 1158 00:51:39,400 --> 00:51:42,160 Speaker 5: reminded me of Brandon Fought, Like what I wanted from 1159 00:51:42,200 --> 00:51:44,640 Speaker 5: Brandon Fought when he came up because thought had to 1160 00:51:44,719 --> 00:51:49,400 Speaker 5: adjust his pitch type to be like a sweeper, fastball 1161 00:51:49,520 --> 00:51:52,360 Speaker 5: sinker type of guy, and I and the command was 1162 00:51:52,360 --> 00:51:55,759 Speaker 5: a little bit spotty. Christian Scott had that right away, 1163 00:51:55,840 --> 00:51:57,600 Speaker 5: and that was the thing that stood out to me 1164 00:51:57,920 --> 00:52:02,440 Speaker 5: so much. He was the designation slider sweeper. You know 1165 00:52:02,520 --> 00:52:05,480 Speaker 5: he'll use those, but the split finger can kind of 1166 00:52:05,520 --> 00:52:07,800 Speaker 5: work as a sinker. And he was throwing split fingers. 1167 00:52:07,840 --> 00:52:10,920 Speaker 5: He was throwing fastballs up on corners, he was throwing 1168 00:52:10,960 --> 00:52:15,480 Speaker 5: the sweeper across the zone. I thought his stuff with 1169 00:52:15,680 --> 00:52:19,439 Speaker 5: command looked tippy top. And then in the next start 1170 00:52:19,560 --> 00:52:21,600 Speaker 5: got to hit up a little bit more. But you're 1171 00:52:21,640 --> 00:52:23,879 Speaker 5: seeing more of it. I mean, over two starts he's 1172 00:52:23,920 --> 00:52:27,600 Speaker 5: gone six. He's struck out at least six in both starts. 1173 00:52:27,920 --> 00:52:30,560 Speaker 5: Walks haven't been a big issue. Twenty eight percent k 1174 00:52:30,719 --> 00:52:34,360 Speaker 5: percentage to only six percent walk rate. That already is 1175 00:52:34,480 --> 00:52:37,040 Speaker 5: better than where Skeins is at. And I think Christian 1176 00:52:37,080 --> 00:52:39,520 Speaker 5: Scott isn't going to have the upside of the strikeouts, 1177 00:52:39,560 --> 00:52:42,160 Speaker 5: but if he continues to have a low walk rate, 1178 00:52:42,560 --> 00:52:44,279 Speaker 5: this is gonna work really well for him. Guys are 1179 00:52:44,360 --> 00:52:47,840 Speaker 5: not barreling him up because of the command with those pitches. 1180 00:52:48,400 --> 00:52:52,120 Speaker 5: I am very, very interested in Scott and he's been 1181 00:52:52,200 --> 00:52:54,319 Speaker 5: a pick up for weeks weeks weeks before he got 1182 00:52:54,400 --> 00:52:56,920 Speaker 5: called up. But what's so enticing now is I think 1183 00:52:56,960 --> 00:53:00,480 Speaker 5: he's locked to a S. I think it would take like, oh, 1184 00:53:01,120 --> 00:53:03,359 Speaker 5: we want to maintain this guy's innings and not ruin him, 1185 00:53:03,360 --> 00:53:04,960 Speaker 5: blah blah blah for them to send him down like 1186 00:53:05,000 --> 00:53:08,200 Speaker 5: they just sent Budo down. They've got spots in the rotation, 1187 00:53:08,360 --> 00:53:10,640 Speaker 5: and I think he's going to kind of continue rolling it. 1188 00:53:11,840 --> 00:53:14,080 Speaker 5: I think he's going to be one of those unherlded 1189 00:53:14,120 --> 00:53:15,560 Speaker 5: bets at the end of the year. Like I wouldn't 1190 00:53:15,560 --> 00:53:18,719 Speaker 5: be surprised in NL voting if like Christian Scott had 1191 00:53:18,840 --> 00:53:21,040 Speaker 5: like you know, top five Rookie of the Year votes 1192 00:53:21,120 --> 00:53:22,960 Speaker 5: or something like that when it's all said and done. 1193 00:53:23,000 --> 00:53:24,760 Speaker 5: But yeah, I'm very much into Christian Scott. 1194 00:53:26,040 --> 00:53:28,120 Speaker 2: I want to ask you about Jackson Holliday because the 1195 00:53:28,160 --> 00:53:30,880 Speaker 2: last time you were on, we spent like half an 1196 00:53:30,920 --> 00:53:33,880 Speaker 2: hour just like praising him, and you know, obviously I 1197 00:53:34,280 --> 00:53:35,560 Speaker 2: leave that up getting. 1198 00:53:35,760 --> 00:53:36,799 Speaker 1: Giddy and over the moon. 1199 00:53:36,920 --> 00:53:39,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, it did not age entirely well, although I mean 1200 00:53:39,719 --> 00:53:41,239 Speaker 2: it's not like we said he was going to come 1201 00:53:41,280 --> 00:53:43,600 Speaker 2: out and be an MVP. From day one, Like he's 1202 00:53:43,680 --> 00:53:46,600 Speaker 2: the twenty year old kid who moved really faster than minors, 1203 00:53:46,640 --> 00:53:49,320 Speaker 2: and there's always an adjustment, you know. I've seen a 1204 00:53:49,320 --> 00:53:51,560 Speaker 2: lot of people mention that, you know, the gap between 1205 00:53:51,600 --> 00:53:53,880 Speaker 2: Triple A and the majors has basically never been bigger 1206 00:53:53,920 --> 00:53:55,560 Speaker 2: than it is now in terms of the talent gap. 1207 00:53:55,680 --> 00:53:57,200 Speaker 1: Like it's a hard transition to make. 1208 00:53:57,280 --> 00:53:59,640 Speaker 2: So I want to ask you essentially what I just 1209 00:54:00,320 --> 00:54:04,000 Speaker 2: which is how much are we panicking both for this 1210 00:54:04,160 --> 00:54:06,239 Speaker 2: year and long term? I'm assuming the answer long term 1211 00:54:06,360 --> 00:54:08,239 Speaker 2: is not at all. I mean that's literally only how 1212 00:54:08,280 --> 00:54:11,720 Speaker 2: I feel yet, like literally zero. As a reminder for everybody, 1213 00:54:12,560 --> 00:54:15,279 Speaker 2: the stat line two for thirty four in thirty six 1214 00:54:15,360 --> 00:54:19,000 Speaker 2: played appearances, he scored five runs. He struck out in 1215 00:54:19,120 --> 00:54:21,200 Speaker 2: like half of his app his played appearances, I believe 1216 00:54:21,200 --> 00:54:24,239 Speaker 2: it was literally half eighteen of his thirty six played appearances. 1217 00:54:24,880 --> 00:54:25,920 Speaker 1: Just so it's really overmatched. 1218 00:54:26,000 --> 00:54:29,600 Speaker 2: Looked fine in the field, good bass runner, And I 1219 00:54:29,640 --> 00:54:31,360 Speaker 2: actually kind of think he was starting to come around 1220 00:54:31,480 --> 00:54:34,400 Speaker 2: a little in his last couple of games. Not like 1221 00:54:35,000 --> 00:54:37,360 Speaker 2: getting hot, but I thought he looked a little more comfortable, 1222 00:54:37,440 --> 00:54:39,759 Speaker 2: just anecdotally, like watching every Orioles game, I thought he 1223 00:54:39,840 --> 00:54:41,600 Speaker 2: was looking a little more settled in at the plate, 1224 00:54:41,640 --> 00:54:44,319 Speaker 2: even if it wasn't leading to results yet. But they 1225 00:54:44,360 --> 00:54:47,280 Speaker 2: sent him back down. So long term, you and iron 1226 00:54:47,560 --> 00:54:50,760 Speaker 2: lockstep he's still, you know, arguably the best prospect of baseball. 1227 00:54:50,960 --> 00:54:54,080 Speaker 2: Not worried at all for this season if he gets 1228 00:54:54,120 --> 00:54:56,719 Speaker 2: called back up. When he gets called back up, how 1229 00:54:56,800 --> 00:54:59,040 Speaker 2: will you be reacting to that in any kind of 1230 00:54:59,160 --> 00:54:59,920 Speaker 2: non keeper form. 1231 00:55:00,760 --> 00:55:03,440 Speaker 5: Yeah, so I guess you could look at it like 1232 00:55:03,520 --> 00:55:06,000 Speaker 5: I will be a glutton for punishment in that respect, 1233 00:55:06,080 --> 00:55:08,680 Speaker 5: because here's one thing I do believe is when he 1234 00:55:08,920 --> 00:55:12,279 Speaker 5: is back up, he will have answered. There's a lot 1235 00:55:12,360 --> 00:55:15,160 Speaker 5: of public pressure early on when he didn't make the 1236 00:55:15,200 --> 00:55:17,680 Speaker 5: opening day roster and they're like he needs to work 1237 00:55:17,719 --> 00:55:20,040 Speaker 5: on hitting lefties, and first at bat in the minors 1238 00:55:20,120 --> 00:55:22,480 Speaker 5: he hits off a left like it felt like a 1239 00:55:22,560 --> 00:55:25,040 Speaker 5: whole bunch of nonsense that they sold us. Now it 1240 00:55:25,160 --> 00:55:27,759 Speaker 5: definitely is. It's more of that like, oh yeah, we're 1241 00:55:27,800 --> 00:55:29,360 Speaker 5: not in management of baseball, and they knew what they 1242 00:55:29,400 --> 00:55:32,200 Speaker 5: were talking about. So I'm leading this to say the 1243 00:55:32,320 --> 00:55:35,560 Speaker 5: public pressure is gone. He failed at the major league level, 1244 00:55:35,640 --> 00:55:37,560 Speaker 5: they sent him back down, and they're going to have 1245 00:55:37,680 --> 00:55:39,839 Speaker 5: clear cut things. Part of it might just be get 1246 00:55:39,880 --> 00:55:42,200 Speaker 5: your head straight and then it's going to be you know, 1247 00:55:42,360 --> 00:55:44,440 Speaker 5: this is what didn't work at the major league level. 1248 00:55:44,480 --> 00:55:45,920 Speaker 5: Here's what we need to work on. So what I'm 1249 00:55:45,960 --> 00:55:49,560 Speaker 5: saying is when he comes up, when that happens, I 1250 00:55:49,640 --> 00:55:52,839 Speaker 5: feel confident that they will feel confident and they're going 1251 00:55:52,920 --> 00:55:55,400 Speaker 5: to have him up to get it bats. He won't 1252 00:55:55,440 --> 00:55:58,080 Speaker 5: be there to sit. So when he comes back up, 1253 00:55:58,800 --> 00:56:00,799 Speaker 5: I'm going to feel more calm, confident, and I will 1254 00:56:00,880 --> 00:56:05,520 Speaker 5: pick him up in every spot because long term, everything 1255 00:56:05,600 --> 00:56:09,360 Speaker 5: I said before still stands. I think he's a high contact, 1256 00:56:10,000 --> 00:56:13,000 Speaker 5: low strikeout guy, even though that's been his bugaboo. The 1257 00:56:13,120 --> 00:56:15,200 Speaker 5: guy gets on base, has always had an over four 1258 00:56:15,280 --> 00:56:17,960 Speaker 5: hundred OVP. I thought he was going to run. He 1259 00:56:18,040 --> 00:56:20,680 Speaker 5: just didn't get on base to even run, so that, 1260 00:56:20,840 --> 00:56:23,520 Speaker 5: you know, it's really tough to say. I just don't 1261 00:56:23,520 --> 00:56:26,760 Speaker 5: think there's anything to pull from the debut. Sometimes that happens, 1262 00:56:26,800 --> 00:56:30,080 Speaker 5: sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes there's gleaning ideas of the player. 1263 00:56:30,160 --> 00:56:32,880 Speaker 5: I don't think there's anything to pull from it. It 1264 00:56:33,040 --> 00:56:36,080 Speaker 5: may not be right, you know, because maybe he's gonna 1265 00:56:36,120 --> 00:56:38,960 Speaker 5: come back, and you know, I assume when he comes back, 1266 00:56:39,440 --> 00:56:42,160 Speaker 5: he's going to get the same treatment as far as 1267 00:56:42,239 --> 00:56:44,520 Speaker 5: how pitchers were attacking him, and that is going to 1268 00:56:44,560 --> 00:56:46,280 Speaker 5: be the thing he'll be working on in the minor, 1269 00:56:46,320 --> 00:56:50,120 Speaker 5: so that will be very telling. But I don't have 1270 00:56:50,200 --> 00:56:53,000 Speaker 5: any stash. I'm not trying to stash right now. Stashing 1271 00:56:53,080 --> 00:56:57,560 Speaker 5: prospects is an overall net failure for this year, and 1272 00:56:58,320 --> 00:57:00,319 Speaker 5: even though I think we're going to talk about guy 1273 00:57:00,360 --> 00:57:02,600 Speaker 5: that's going to be coming up very soon, stashing in 1274 00:57:02,680 --> 00:57:05,320 Speaker 5: general has been a net failure. That you can do 1275 00:57:05,520 --> 00:57:09,640 Speaker 5: things in better spots. Anyways, I'm fine with with not 1276 00:57:09,880 --> 00:57:11,560 Speaker 5: doing that, and I'm not stashing a lot of these 1277 00:57:11,600 --> 00:57:13,880 Speaker 5: players because I think it's a super unknown. And I 1278 00:57:13,960 --> 00:57:16,439 Speaker 5: also don't think the next big oriole to be called 1279 00:57:16,480 --> 00:57:19,160 Speaker 5: up is Jackson Holliday. I think I think it has 1280 00:57:19,240 --> 00:57:22,480 Speaker 5: to be Kobe Mayo. Kobe Mayo's destroyed, so that makes 1281 00:57:22,520 --> 00:57:25,920 Speaker 5: it even tougher for him unless there's a major injury 1282 00:57:26,440 --> 00:57:28,640 Speaker 5: or two to the middle infield and it's like, well, 1283 00:57:28,680 --> 00:57:30,520 Speaker 5: we clearly have to move him. But the problem is 1284 00:57:30,560 --> 00:57:32,600 Speaker 5: is Jordan Westburg can go over to second, Mayo can 1285 00:57:32,680 --> 00:57:35,400 Speaker 5: play third. So that's I think Holiday is going to 1286 00:57:35,440 --> 00:57:37,160 Speaker 5: have a longer road to get back. But I do 1287 00:57:37,320 --> 00:57:39,800 Speaker 5: believe when he is back up, that's going to be 1288 00:57:39,840 --> 00:57:42,160 Speaker 5: the time to trust because he'll have answered those questions 1289 00:57:42,200 --> 00:57:43,280 Speaker 5: that the Orioles were looking for. 1290 00:57:44,120 --> 00:57:46,040 Speaker 1: You read my mind on the on the stash question. 1291 00:57:46,200 --> 00:57:46,720 Speaker 1: That's interesting. 1292 00:57:46,920 --> 00:57:49,720 Speaker 2: So the thing with Mayo that I've been I think 1293 00:57:49,760 --> 00:57:52,280 Speaker 2: he's like ready, Like, I think he's a I love 1294 00:57:52,400 --> 00:57:54,320 Speaker 2: him as a prospect obviously, like both as an Orioles 1295 00:57:54,360 --> 00:57:56,240 Speaker 2: fan and for fantasy, like I would love to see 1296 00:57:56,320 --> 00:57:58,680 Speaker 2: him the big leagues. I've been kind of thinking, given 1297 00:57:58,760 --> 00:58:00,960 Speaker 2: his youth, give that there was some like swing and 1298 00:58:01,000 --> 00:58:02,440 Speaker 2: miss with the strikeouts. 1299 00:58:02,000 --> 00:58:05,880 Speaker 5: And there's still at Crimes. May turned over and he 1300 00:58:06,040 --> 00:58:07,240 Speaker 5: was having some strikeout issues. 1301 00:58:07,280 --> 00:58:08,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, still is. 1302 00:58:09,080 --> 00:58:11,560 Speaker 2: I've been wondering if Dave were kind of of the 1303 00:58:11,640 --> 00:58:14,520 Speaker 2: mindset of maybe waiting for him to be like a 1304 00:58:14,560 --> 00:58:17,800 Speaker 2: September call up and keeping that eligibility to compete for 1305 00:58:17,920 --> 00:58:19,840 Speaker 2: Rookie of the Year next year and try and get 1306 00:58:19,840 --> 00:58:21,640 Speaker 2: them a pick in the future, because he seems like 1307 00:58:21,680 --> 00:58:23,600 Speaker 2: the most obvious candidate. You know, a guy like Heston 1308 00:58:23,640 --> 00:58:27,840 Speaker 2: Kerstad is like twenty five years old already, and I 1309 00:58:27,920 --> 00:58:30,480 Speaker 2: know he just got sent back down Curestad, but like, 1310 00:58:30,880 --> 00:58:33,320 Speaker 2: you're not saving a twenty five year old for another 1311 00:58:33,400 --> 00:58:35,000 Speaker 2: year just to try and get Rookie of the Year, right. 1312 00:58:35,200 --> 00:58:38,560 Speaker 2: Connor Norby is I think a really good prospect, but 1313 00:58:38,720 --> 00:58:40,600 Speaker 2: probably blocked enough that he's not gonna win rooky of 1314 00:58:40,600 --> 00:58:42,280 Speaker 2: the Year next year, like Mayo's kind of the and 1315 00:58:42,640 --> 00:58:44,600 Speaker 2: Holiday being as good as he is, expecting him to 1316 00:58:45,120 --> 00:58:46,960 Speaker 2: lose that eligibility this year. So Mayo is kind of 1317 00:58:46,960 --> 00:58:48,400 Speaker 2: the one where I thought maybe if they were trying 1318 00:58:48,440 --> 00:58:50,720 Speaker 2: to play that system. Also the fact that they don't 1319 00:58:50,720 --> 00:58:53,240 Speaker 2: really need the infielder. I mean they do now that 1320 00:58:53,360 --> 00:58:56,240 Speaker 2: Holiday's down and they're starting Mateo or Arius every day. 1321 00:58:57,160 --> 00:58:59,040 Speaker 2: But for all those reasons, I thought that Mayo might 1322 00:58:59,120 --> 00:59:03,000 Speaker 2: be one that they did didn't aggressively promote. But I 1323 00:59:03,040 --> 00:59:06,240 Speaker 2: mean he's he's leading the organization in home runs, then 1324 00:59:06,240 --> 00:59:09,280 Speaker 2: the ones he hits are bombs, and I just I 1325 00:59:09,400 --> 00:59:11,840 Speaker 2: follow all the Orioles, you know, minor league accounts, and 1326 00:59:11,880 --> 00:59:15,000 Speaker 2: I'm watching these videos every day while the Orioles score 1327 00:59:15,080 --> 00:59:16,920 Speaker 2: one run, not that that happens often, they're a good 1328 00:59:16,920 --> 00:59:18,959 Speaker 2: team at the big league level, but the oorial score 1329 00:59:19,040 --> 00:59:21,000 Speaker 2: run run. Oh look, Mayo went three for five with 1330 00:59:21,080 --> 00:59:23,600 Speaker 2: a double and a home run and eight RBI, and 1331 00:59:23,680 --> 00:59:25,560 Speaker 2: it just seems like every day that's happening. I do 1332 00:59:25,720 --> 00:59:28,200 Speaker 2: really like Mayo, but like I'm worried that they won't 1333 00:59:28,240 --> 00:59:31,280 Speaker 2: call him up, you know, that soon. But that's interesting 1334 00:59:31,320 --> 00:59:33,400 Speaker 2: that you kind of highlight him as the next big 1335 00:59:33,520 --> 00:59:36,240 Speaker 2: call up. I do want to ask about h you know, 1336 00:59:36,760 --> 00:59:40,240 Speaker 2: kind of the other stashes you alluded to, if not holiday, 1337 00:59:40,360 --> 00:59:42,800 Speaker 2: because it's you know what we've already seen and he's 1338 00:59:42,800 --> 00:59:44,160 Speaker 2: a guy will pick up but don't really want to 1339 00:59:44,200 --> 00:59:46,560 Speaker 2: hold on to. Who are the guys the one or 1340 00:59:46,600 --> 00:59:48,680 Speaker 2: two names at the top of the stash rankings right now? 1341 00:59:49,360 --> 00:59:51,680 Speaker 5: Yeah, so you know, we'll do a segment on leading 1342 00:59:51,760 --> 00:59:54,320 Speaker 5: off and I'll have my article, my prospects to stash article. 1343 00:59:54,400 --> 00:59:57,160 Speaker 5: Last week, what I did was I lowered the number 1344 00:59:57,360 --> 00:59:59,800 Speaker 5: of guys that I was writing up that are of 1345 01:00:00,080 --> 01:00:03,080 Speaker 5: quote the idea of stashing, by the way, uses air 1346 01:00:03,160 --> 01:00:05,120 Speaker 5: quotes right now, because I know there's some people like, oh, 1347 01:00:05,160 --> 01:00:07,160 Speaker 5: you don't stash any and it's like, well, this year's 1348 01:00:07,200 --> 01:00:10,440 Speaker 5: kind of been right, But the idea of stashing is like, 1349 01:00:10,480 --> 01:00:11,720 Speaker 5: these are the guys that are going to be close 1350 01:00:11,760 --> 01:00:13,960 Speaker 5: to get some production and then i'd have a watch list. 1351 01:00:14,200 --> 01:00:16,560 Speaker 5: So this past week I lowered the number of guys 1352 01:00:16,600 --> 01:00:19,920 Speaker 5: that you're actually worth quote unquote stashing. And I raised 1353 01:00:20,200 --> 01:00:22,760 Speaker 5: the watch list players because it's like, I don't know, 1354 01:00:23,000 --> 01:00:24,680 Speaker 5: I don't know when these guys could come up, but 1355 01:00:24,720 --> 01:00:26,800 Speaker 5: you should. You should have these guys in mind. The 1356 01:00:26,840 --> 01:00:28,480 Speaker 5: reason I'm telling you this is like there's been a 1357 01:00:28,560 --> 01:00:31,600 Speaker 5: mount rushmore of players that have sat at the tippy 1358 01:00:31,680 --> 01:00:35,080 Speaker 5: top of like worth stashing, and at this point it's 1359 01:00:35,120 --> 01:00:37,640 Speaker 5: really only two players. And unfortunately the article is probably 1360 01:00:37,680 --> 01:00:40,560 Speaker 5: going to be the same in that respect, though other 1361 01:00:40,680 --> 01:00:43,240 Speaker 5: names will start coming up, and number one is Junior Caminaro. 1362 01:00:43,640 --> 01:00:48,400 Speaker 5: But the Junior Camenaro side got more interesting today. I 1363 01:00:48,440 --> 01:00:50,640 Speaker 5: think it was today or yesterday as we're doing this, 1364 01:00:51,800 --> 01:00:53,720 Speaker 5: is he played second base for the first time. He 1365 01:00:53,800 --> 01:00:55,680 Speaker 5: finally got off because he's played entire he was a 1366 01:00:55,840 --> 01:00:57,919 Speaker 5: shortstop at some point and then he's played third base 1367 01:00:58,120 --> 01:01:03,080 Speaker 5: all year. He started second base, and last week just 1368 01:01:03,120 --> 01:01:06,440 Speaker 5: for fun, because I absolutely nailed the Paul Skins call up, 1369 01:01:06,680 --> 01:01:10,880 Speaker 5: I decided I'm gonna do another prediction, and my prediction 1370 01:01:11,000 --> 01:01:13,400 Speaker 5: for cam and Aro because there's this negative article that 1371 01:01:13,480 --> 01:01:16,320 Speaker 5: came out about the Rays and holding him down and 1372 01:01:16,360 --> 01:01:19,000 Speaker 5: they're not looking to bring him up anytime soon. I 1373 01:01:19,120 --> 01:01:22,240 Speaker 5: said May twenty fourth, and I did that because I 1374 01:01:22,320 --> 01:01:24,920 Speaker 5: think that gives enough time for him to have consistent 1375 01:01:24,920 --> 01:01:27,760 Speaker 5: at bats if they did want to do a positional thing. 1376 01:01:28,000 --> 01:01:31,200 Speaker 5: That gives enough time. And really, there was a day 1377 01:01:31,240 --> 01:01:34,280 Speaker 5: off in between this time period. There's a day off 1378 01:01:34,320 --> 01:01:36,400 Speaker 5: on the twenty third, So I'm just gonna stick there. 1379 01:01:36,440 --> 01:01:38,680 Speaker 5: There's my update, and I feel better about it because 1380 01:01:38,680 --> 01:01:41,640 Speaker 5: he played second base and start at Brandon lau Is. 1381 01:01:41,760 --> 01:01:44,439 Speaker 5: I think he's hurt right now. Maybe this timeline gets 1382 01:01:44,480 --> 01:01:47,560 Speaker 5: pushed up and it's even sooner, but his bat has 1383 01:01:47,880 --> 01:01:50,560 Speaker 5: just been live, and I know unfortunately all the guys 1384 01:01:50,600 --> 01:01:52,600 Speaker 5: that get called up, they've been hitting over three hundred. 1385 01:01:52,680 --> 01:01:55,840 Speaker 5: That's where he is the positives. It's been a low 1386 01:01:55,880 --> 01:01:59,440 Speaker 5: strikeout rate, first time since Dominican Summer League. He has 1387 01:01:59,440 --> 01:02:01,960 Speaker 5: a double digi walk rate at tripa A. He's hitting 1388 01:02:02,000 --> 01:02:04,360 Speaker 5: over three hundred. He's got a three almost four or 1389 01:02:04,400 --> 01:02:07,560 Speaker 5: five slash. He's at seven homers in twenty four games. 1390 01:02:07,880 --> 01:02:10,880 Speaker 5: He has opposite field power for days. He's got an 1391 01:02:11,000 --> 01:02:14,600 Speaker 5: incredible sense of the plate, which I've always loved, and 1392 01:02:14,800 --> 01:02:16,640 Speaker 5: I don't think he's going to strike out a bunch. 1393 01:02:16,840 --> 01:02:19,160 Speaker 5: I do think that pure raw power is going to 1394 01:02:19,200 --> 01:02:22,560 Speaker 5: play well for him, good hard hit numbers, you know, 1395 01:02:22,640 --> 01:02:24,720 Speaker 5: good hard hit and barreling. That's the type of guy 1396 01:02:24,760 --> 01:02:27,040 Speaker 5: that he is. And now that he's playing second base, 1397 01:02:27,080 --> 01:02:30,360 Speaker 5: they're finding some spots for him because Isak Prates has 1398 01:02:30,400 --> 01:02:33,000 Speaker 5: been great. He really has been a really good player. 1399 01:02:33,200 --> 01:02:35,560 Speaker 5: So the only option at this point had been with 1400 01:02:35,720 --> 01:02:38,560 Speaker 5: then you d h Camonaro or parades. But maybe they're 1401 01:02:38,600 --> 01:02:40,960 Speaker 5: now looking at it and saying, screw it, we can 1402 01:02:41,000 --> 01:02:43,760 Speaker 5: get Cameron Aro in that lineup because Caballero has played 1403 01:02:43,800 --> 01:02:46,800 Speaker 5: well at shortstop. You've got a med Rosario who's playing around, 1404 01:02:47,160 --> 01:02:50,000 Speaker 5: and they're gonna look. My idea would be for Caminaro 1405 01:02:50,040 --> 01:02:52,000 Speaker 5: to be the everyday second basement and then he also 1406 01:02:52,040 --> 01:02:53,439 Speaker 5: has flexibility. 1407 01:02:52,840 --> 01:02:53,320 Speaker 4: To play third. 1408 01:02:53,400 --> 01:02:56,320 Speaker 5: That's what they value. They value players that can play 1409 01:02:56,560 --> 01:03:00,320 Speaker 5: around the field. Cow Manzardo told me year and a 1410 01:03:00,360 --> 01:03:02,440 Speaker 5: half ago they wanted him to pick up a third 1411 01:03:02,440 --> 01:03:04,360 Speaker 5: base glove in spring training because they wanted to have 1412 01:03:04,440 --> 01:03:06,720 Speaker 5: that flexibility, and then they traded him. But cam and 1413 01:03:06,760 --> 01:03:09,280 Speaker 5: Aro doing this, I think that is the most telling 1414 01:03:09,440 --> 01:03:11,720 Speaker 5: sign of this raised team. So I'm gonna kind of 1415 01:03:11,720 --> 01:03:13,760 Speaker 5: stick to it. I think we're in a ten to 1416 01:03:13,880 --> 01:03:16,480 Speaker 5: two week window where Cameron Aro could come up and 1417 01:03:16,600 --> 01:03:19,240 Speaker 5: the new position helps, and he is, you know, one 1418 01:03:19,280 --> 01:03:21,920 Speaker 5: of the more prolific bats out there. So that is like, 1419 01:03:22,080 --> 01:03:23,280 Speaker 5: that's the number one guy. 1420 01:03:24,240 --> 01:03:25,640 Speaker 2: And I know the other guy that we talked about 1421 01:03:25,640 --> 01:03:27,800 Speaker 2: in the pre show who I am really excited to 1422 01:03:27,840 --> 01:03:30,240 Speaker 2: see in the big leagues is James Wood. You have 1423 01:03:30,400 --> 01:03:34,120 Speaker 2: Cameron now ahead of Wood in terms of your STASH rankings. 1424 01:03:34,840 --> 01:03:38,760 Speaker 5: Yeah, and Stash in Dynasty, they're both next to each other. 1425 01:03:38,920 --> 01:03:42,800 Speaker 5: James Wood is immensely interesting, especially from this list because 1426 01:03:42,840 --> 01:03:47,320 Speaker 5: he's the power speed guy. I didn't even realize this 1427 01:03:47,440 --> 01:03:49,000 Speaker 5: until I just look now. He has a lower K 1428 01:03:49,120 --> 01:03:52,200 Speaker 5: percentage than Cameron Aro in the minors so far, and 1429 01:03:52,320 --> 01:03:54,760 Speaker 5: he has like double the games, which is very impressive 1430 01:03:54,800 --> 01:03:57,360 Speaker 5: because last year in Double A James Wood had a 1431 01:03:57,400 --> 01:04:00,520 Speaker 5: thirty three percent K percentage. I watched a bunch when 1432 01:04:00,560 --> 01:04:02,360 Speaker 5: he was a padre and he has some bad swing 1433 01:04:02,440 --> 01:04:04,760 Speaker 5: and miss. He has really worked and changed on that. 1434 01:04:04,880 --> 01:04:08,040 Speaker 5: He has a almost career high walk percentage at fifteen percent, 1435 01:04:08,160 --> 01:04:11,760 Speaker 5: an under twenty percent K percentage, seven homers, nine stolen bases, 1436 01:04:11,960 --> 01:04:14,320 Speaker 5: a three four five slash. He's hitting three point fifty 1437 01:04:14,520 --> 01:04:18,040 Speaker 5: seven in Triple A right now. This is literally, I mean, 1438 01:04:18,160 --> 01:04:22,240 Speaker 5: the Nationals are putting out Nixon, Zell and Jacob Young, 1439 01:04:22,400 --> 01:04:24,320 Speaker 5: and I don't want to be dismissive of this entire 1440 01:04:24,400 --> 01:04:27,000 Speaker 5: lineup or anything like that. You know, Victor Roebliss is 1441 01:04:27,040 --> 01:04:29,640 Speaker 5: out there in right field right now. Any other team 1442 01:04:30,160 --> 01:04:32,680 Speaker 5: they're gonna go and they're gonna put out James Wood. 1443 01:04:32,920 --> 01:04:36,040 Speaker 5: But this team is I would not be shocked. I 1444 01:04:36,120 --> 01:04:39,040 Speaker 5: suppose if they held him back to September to try 1445 01:04:39,080 --> 01:04:41,640 Speaker 5: to get extra pit compensation, but at the same time 1446 01:04:43,040 --> 01:04:46,320 Speaker 5: going back to Kobe Mayo or James Wood, Like, I 1447 01:04:46,400 --> 01:04:50,880 Speaker 5: don't know what you what is the growth of keeping 1448 01:04:51,440 --> 01:04:54,960 Speaker 5: a guy like James Wood who obviously has this Like 1449 01:04:55,320 --> 01:04:57,160 Speaker 5: you tell me what are the things that need to 1450 01:04:57,200 --> 01:04:59,200 Speaker 5: be fixed? And this is kind of rhetorical. I'm asking 1451 01:04:59,600 --> 01:05:01,840 Speaker 5: is like, Okay, what do you guys want him to 1452 01:05:01,840 --> 01:05:03,919 Speaker 5: work on? Because he's hitting three fifty seven, he's running, 1453 01:05:03,920 --> 01:05:06,160 Speaker 5: he's stealing, he's not striking out, he's walking more than 1454 01:05:06,200 --> 01:05:08,480 Speaker 5: he's ever done. He's doing everything you could do. Is 1455 01:05:08,560 --> 01:05:11,600 Speaker 5: it advantageous to keep him down here? Is it advantageous 1456 01:05:11,800 --> 01:05:13,920 Speaker 5: for Mayo to stay down with the team, maybe to 1457 01:05:13,960 --> 01:05:15,640 Speaker 5: work on strikeouts? But what do you get if you 1458 01:05:15,760 --> 01:05:17,560 Speaker 5: keep them there for four months? What do you get 1459 01:05:17,600 --> 01:05:19,880 Speaker 5: with James? Would you keep them there for four months? 1460 01:05:20,000 --> 01:05:23,920 Speaker 2: Outside of it, I've been a huge proponent of in 1461 01:05:24,040 --> 01:05:25,840 Speaker 2: talking to my friends about all this, like kind of 1462 01:05:25,920 --> 01:05:30,520 Speaker 2: log in with the Orioles about like just like trade 1463 01:05:30,600 --> 01:05:33,080 Speaker 2: somebody to make it happen, because even if you take 1464 01:05:33,080 --> 01:05:36,800 Speaker 2: a short term hit, like while they're adjusting, because at 1465 01:05:36,840 --> 01:05:38,760 Speaker 2: a certain point, I'm a big believer in if you 1466 01:05:39,040 --> 01:05:41,880 Speaker 2: have solved a level and are stuck there, it's going 1467 01:05:41,960 --> 01:05:44,680 Speaker 2: to hinder your development, Like it's gonna actually be by 1468 01:05:44,840 --> 01:05:46,920 Speaker 2: not continuing to be like, oh I need to grow 1469 01:05:46,960 --> 01:05:47,640 Speaker 2: into the next step. 1470 01:05:47,680 --> 01:05:49,919 Speaker 1: Now I've already solved this. I just think it's bad 1471 01:05:49,960 --> 01:05:50,160 Speaker 1: for you. 1472 01:05:50,600 --> 01:05:52,160 Speaker 2: A team like the Orioles, I get it a little 1473 01:05:52,200 --> 01:05:53,960 Speaker 2: more because they're like, we don't want to trade Ryan 1474 01:05:54,040 --> 01:05:55,600 Speaker 2: or Herd because he's getting the crap out of the ball, 1475 01:05:55,640 --> 01:05:56,720 Speaker 2: and like we want to win the games. 1476 01:05:57,080 --> 01:05:59,080 Speaker 1: The Nationals the only. 1477 01:05:58,920 --> 01:06:01,120 Speaker 2: Thought process with them, and I know they've got off 1478 01:06:01,120 --> 01:06:03,600 Speaker 2: to a better start than you know, kind of expected 1479 01:06:03,680 --> 01:06:06,360 Speaker 2: or whatever, but like the only thought for them should 1480 01:06:06,360 --> 01:06:08,440 Speaker 2: be what is best for James. Would So if you 1481 01:06:08,480 --> 01:06:11,680 Speaker 2: think James Wood has solved the minors, he needs to 1482 01:06:11,720 --> 01:06:14,160 Speaker 2: be on the next plane to DC. Like there's just 1483 01:06:14,480 --> 01:06:17,440 Speaker 2: like to me, that's the only the only calculus is 1484 01:06:17,760 --> 01:06:18,920 Speaker 2: has he solved this level? 1485 01:06:19,120 --> 01:06:20,680 Speaker 1: Yes, time to call him up. 1486 01:06:21,160 --> 01:06:23,600 Speaker 5: And like I'd love to hear that, Like, so you 1487 01:06:23,760 --> 01:06:26,040 Speaker 5: tell me not again, this is rhetorical to their management, 1488 01:06:26,400 --> 01:06:28,800 Speaker 5: tell me what the thing that he hasn't solved? So 1489 01:06:28,880 --> 01:06:31,040 Speaker 5: if he has solved it and he has got this 1490 01:06:31,360 --> 01:06:36,080 Speaker 5: level down, do you like, is it important that you 1491 01:06:36,280 --> 01:06:40,320 Speaker 5: see sixty games of consistent production or do you think 1492 01:06:40,840 --> 01:06:44,000 Speaker 5: maybe at the point where a guy is hitting three 1493 01:06:44,000 --> 01:06:47,640 Speaker 5: point fifty seven, there are around two hundred plate appearances, 1494 01:06:47,840 --> 01:06:49,640 Speaker 5: is that maybe enough to give them more of a 1495 01:06:49,760 --> 01:06:51,840 Speaker 5: challenge and to be fair, like, you know, maybe we're 1496 01:06:51,840 --> 01:06:53,920 Speaker 5: being hyper aggressive about it, but when they're putting out 1497 01:06:54,000 --> 01:06:57,280 Speaker 5: like the Merrill Vargas and Victor Robliss and Jacob Young, 1498 01:06:57,360 --> 01:06:59,280 Speaker 5: and it's like, yeah, James Wood would instantly be the 1499 01:06:59,320 --> 01:07:01,360 Speaker 5: best the medical player on this team. And then guess 1500 01:07:01,400 --> 01:07:05,440 Speaker 5: what I think from a developmental standpoint, it is beneficial 1501 01:07:05,640 --> 01:07:07,800 Speaker 5: for that guy to get the major league time and 1502 01:07:07,920 --> 01:07:10,680 Speaker 5: then if the warts are there, you go and fix them. 1503 01:07:10,720 --> 01:07:13,160 Speaker 5: It doesn't not everybody has to be Joe Adell where 1504 01:07:13,200 --> 01:07:15,520 Speaker 5: it's three years of disastrous you threw them into the 1505 01:07:15,640 --> 01:07:17,240 Speaker 5: fire and it didn't work, and it's like, well, no, 1506 01:07:17,640 --> 01:07:20,520 Speaker 5: be very hands on, but why do not the amount 1507 01:07:21,120 --> 01:07:23,560 Speaker 5: Creig Council. I didn't get to say this earlier, Cret 1508 01:07:23,640 --> 01:07:26,720 Speaker 5: Council years ago when talking about Hestin and Kira or 1509 01:07:26,800 --> 01:07:32,360 Speaker 5: Kesten Heira, I said Heston kers yeah, yeah, he was 1510 01:07:32,440 --> 01:07:35,600 Speaker 5: having a rough time. And Crek Council was like, listen 1511 01:07:36,120 --> 01:07:38,240 Speaker 5: the jump because you said this earlier. The jump from 1512 01:07:38,240 --> 01:07:40,200 Speaker 5: Triple A to the majors is as big of a 1513 01:07:40,240 --> 01:07:44,680 Speaker 5: gap as it's ever been in baseball. And the more 1514 01:07:44,760 --> 01:07:47,280 Speaker 5: that we have, I mean, we have new pitch introductions, 1515 01:07:47,320 --> 01:07:49,440 Speaker 5: the sweepers are taking over this year. It's the year 1516 01:07:49,480 --> 01:07:53,360 Speaker 5: of the splitter, high fastballs. There are that the hands 1517 01:07:53,480 --> 01:07:57,040 Speaker 5: on nists that happens in the lower levels I think 1518 01:07:57,080 --> 01:07:58,880 Speaker 5: would kind of astonish people because I think we have 1519 01:07:58,920 --> 01:08:01,760 Speaker 5: an idea of like what base and every team is. 1520 01:08:02,000 --> 01:08:04,480 Speaker 5: There's a group of guys with tablets that are like, Okay, 1521 01:08:04,600 --> 01:08:06,560 Speaker 5: you did this and this, and it's not the case 1522 01:08:06,800 --> 01:08:09,680 Speaker 5: the amount of in person work and attention that happens 1523 01:08:09,680 --> 01:08:11,560 Speaker 5: at the major league level that doesn't happen at minor 1524 01:08:11,640 --> 01:08:15,600 Speaker 5: league levels would throw people off. So why not take 1525 01:08:15,640 --> 01:08:18,400 Speaker 5: a guy who's doing everything right, get them to the majors. 1526 01:08:18,840 --> 01:08:22,840 Speaker 5: Let the organization, the top people in the organization analytically 1527 01:08:22,960 --> 01:08:25,400 Speaker 5: break down everything, especially if they're struggling, and then you 1528 01:08:25,520 --> 01:08:27,280 Speaker 5: take that down. Same thing I would have said about 1529 01:08:27,320 --> 01:08:30,040 Speaker 5: Jackson Holiday. Some teams just think let a guy go, 1530 01:08:30,200 --> 01:08:32,320 Speaker 5: and maybe the Nationals would do that. But yeah, this 1531 01:08:32,520 --> 01:08:34,559 Speaker 5: is all the like, this is just the criminal stuff. 1532 01:08:34,560 --> 01:08:36,320 Speaker 5: We look at Camanaro and James Wood and we see 1533 01:08:36,360 --> 01:08:38,599 Speaker 5: how successful they are and we want to see them up. 1534 01:08:39,680 --> 01:08:42,080 Speaker 5: Executives have a pretty good argument right now, and they 1535 01:08:42,120 --> 01:08:44,200 Speaker 5: can go, Okay, that's cool. Well look at Jackson Holiday, 1536 01:08:44,320 --> 01:08:46,519 Speaker 5: look at com Manzardo, look at Jordan Beck. You know, 1537 01:08:46,920 --> 01:08:48,639 Speaker 5: list goes on and on. They can kind of keep 1538 01:08:48,720 --> 01:08:51,720 Speaker 5: doing that. But if you're going to get into the 1539 01:08:51,800 --> 01:08:54,639 Speaker 5: stash game, those of the two that I think James 1540 01:08:54,680 --> 01:08:58,040 Speaker 5: Wood and Camnaro are within two or three weeks. There's 1541 01:08:58,080 --> 01:09:00,439 Speaker 5: a host of other players that are worth the common conversation, 1542 01:09:01,120 --> 01:09:03,760 Speaker 5: but I do think it's circumstantial. It's like if if 1543 01:09:03,840 --> 01:09:07,120 Speaker 5: there was an injury in the Orioles rotation. Kde Povich 1544 01:09:07,240 --> 01:09:08,960 Speaker 5: is one of the first players I would think that 1545 01:09:09,040 --> 01:09:12,800 Speaker 5: would come up to the majors. Adam Maser just got 1546 01:09:12,840 --> 01:09:15,080 Speaker 5: called up the Triple A with the Padres. He's had 1547 01:09:15,080 --> 01:09:18,240 Speaker 5: a phenomenal year. If there was a big injury in 1548 01:09:18,320 --> 01:09:20,519 Speaker 5: the rotation for the Padres, that would be a guy. 1549 01:09:20,600 --> 01:09:25,080 Speaker 5: So I think there's a lot of situational prospect issues. 1550 01:09:25,160 --> 01:09:28,640 Speaker 5: There's only so many that force their way on, and 1551 01:09:28,720 --> 01:09:30,760 Speaker 5: I think Camonaro and James Wood are the players that 1552 01:09:30,800 --> 01:09:31,960 Speaker 5: are forcing their way on. 1553 01:09:32,960 --> 01:09:36,160 Speaker 2: I'm not saying he's the same stylistically or that he 1554 01:09:36,360 --> 01:09:38,840 Speaker 2: is as good as what I'm about to say the 1555 01:09:39,040 --> 01:09:41,080 Speaker 2: name I'm about to throw out, But when I think 1556 01:09:41,120 --> 01:09:43,599 Speaker 2: of James would I think of Ellie da la Cruz 1557 01:09:43,680 --> 01:09:45,800 Speaker 2: in the sense that they're just way too big for 1558 01:09:45,840 --> 01:09:48,479 Speaker 2: the positions they play, and yet they're still. 1559 01:09:48,280 --> 01:09:50,360 Speaker 1: Like some of the best prospects. Somebody asked me, like 1560 01:09:50,680 --> 01:09:51,680 Speaker 1: our speed. 1561 01:09:51,479 --> 01:09:53,960 Speaker 5: And like a year ago when I was on CBS, 1562 01:09:54,560 --> 01:09:57,840 Speaker 5: someone asked, They're like, who is the next Ellie de 1563 01:09:57,960 --> 01:10:01,400 Speaker 5: la Cruz And I said, all right, I'll give you 1564 01:10:01,520 --> 01:10:04,040 Speaker 5: the name. And it's not just because of a one 1565 01:10:04,120 --> 01:10:06,679 Speaker 5: hundred percent of the physical presence, but you're talking about 1566 01:10:06,680 --> 01:10:10,679 Speaker 5: a player that puts up crazy big evs. James Wood 1567 01:10:10,720 --> 01:10:12,720 Speaker 5: is a guy that can hit when one eighteen that 1568 01:10:13,000 --> 01:10:15,880 Speaker 5: runs way bigger than their physical style. It is James Wood, 1569 01:10:15,920 --> 01:10:21,439 Speaker 5: and James Wood does have a physical similarity to Ellie 1570 01:10:21,520 --> 01:10:23,840 Speaker 5: day La Cruz, though he's bigger. But James Wood is 1571 01:10:23,880 --> 01:10:26,360 Speaker 5: the type of guy that, like I said, one eighteen 1572 01:10:26,640 --> 01:10:30,040 Speaker 5: Evs could hit thirty homers, could steal thirty bases like that, 1573 01:10:30,240 --> 01:10:31,880 Speaker 5: is a guy that could come onto the scene and 1574 01:10:31,960 --> 01:10:36,120 Speaker 5: go nuts. The difference between, ironically, between those two guys 1575 01:10:36,280 --> 01:10:38,800 Speaker 5: was at one point I really would have said, like, oh, yeah, 1576 01:10:38,880 --> 01:10:41,600 Speaker 5: James is actually just like Ellie. But James has so 1577 01:10:41,880 --> 01:10:46,439 Speaker 5: vastly improved his back to ball skills and his strikeout 1578 01:10:46,479 --> 01:10:50,360 Speaker 5: percentage and making good outs and putting you know, barrels 1579 01:10:50,400 --> 01:10:52,880 Speaker 5: on the ball that it's like James Wood might have 1580 01:10:52,960 --> 01:10:54,640 Speaker 5: a higher ceiling at that point. I don't think he's 1581 01:10:54,680 --> 01:10:57,280 Speaker 5: gonna steal like Ellie. Like Ellie has proven. You know, 1582 01:10:58,040 --> 01:11:00,200 Speaker 5: the best thing I've done this year was that lay 1583 01:11:00,240 --> 01:11:02,599 Speaker 5: day La Cruz to lead the league in stolen bases. 1584 01:11:02,680 --> 01:11:03,600 Speaker 1: And he's doing that. 1585 01:11:03,880 --> 01:11:07,000 Speaker 5: Yeah, he's doing that in the droves right now. But 1586 01:11:07,120 --> 01:11:10,880 Speaker 5: like James Wood is the type of guy the in 1587 01:11:10,960 --> 01:11:13,479 Speaker 5: the future, the comp might be maybe more similar to 1588 01:11:13,520 --> 01:11:15,200 Speaker 5: like an Aaron Judge. You know, that might be where 1589 01:11:15,240 --> 01:11:18,040 Speaker 5: it goes at some point. But yeah, yeah, the main 1590 01:11:18,120 --> 01:11:20,160 Speaker 5: crux here is, like you want to talk about dynamic 1591 01:11:20,280 --> 01:11:23,080 Speaker 5: skill sets, James Wood has that feel of a guy 1592 01:11:23,160 --> 01:11:26,519 Speaker 5: that could lead the league in homers and stolen bases 1593 01:11:26,560 --> 01:11:27,160 Speaker 5: in like a month. 1594 01:11:27,320 --> 01:11:27,840 Speaker 4: He's crazy. 1595 01:11:28,200 --> 01:11:30,719 Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely quickly. 1596 01:11:31,360 --> 01:11:33,080 Speaker 2: You know, I've been watching a lot of clips lately 1597 01:11:33,240 --> 01:11:35,360 Speaker 2: from one of my favorite movies the last decade, which 1598 01:11:35,439 --> 01:11:39,720 Speaker 2: is The Martian. And speaking of The Martian, Jason Dominguez 1599 01:11:40,000 --> 01:11:43,439 Speaker 2: is rehabbing, so we're kind of up on it on time, 1600 01:11:43,479 --> 01:11:45,760 Speaker 2: But just some quick thoughts from you on you know 1601 01:11:45,840 --> 01:11:47,640 Speaker 2: what it means, what we'll see from him when he 1602 01:11:47,640 --> 01:11:49,960 Speaker 2: gets back to the big league level and is healthy again. 1603 01:11:50,600 --> 01:11:52,519 Speaker 5: Yeah, if he's sitting out there, I'm picking him up. 1604 01:11:53,000 --> 01:11:55,400 Speaker 5: He's still one of my favorite from a dynasty perspective. 1605 01:11:56,120 --> 01:11:58,600 Speaker 5: This is probably the last opportunities for buys if they 1606 01:11:58,640 --> 01:12:02,080 Speaker 5: even exist, because he just started his rehab assignment and 1607 01:12:02,200 --> 01:12:04,320 Speaker 5: that's a huge thing. He's going to get back into 1608 01:12:04,400 --> 01:12:08,400 Speaker 5: playing time. He got a hit in his first game. 1609 01:12:09,200 --> 01:12:11,439 Speaker 5: He's an insane talent that I think people have kind 1610 01:12:11,439 --> 01:12:13,840 Speaker 5: of forgot about. So you know, in Dynasty, I think 1611 01:12:13,880 --> 01:12:15,600 Speaker 5: he's a great buy that it still might be a 1612 01:12:15,640 --> 01:12:18,080 Speaker 5: little bit cheaper in redraft to be sitting out there. 1613 01:12:18,400 --> 01:12:21,040 Speaker 5: I guess I don't assume him is like the prospects 1614 01:12:21,080 --> 01:12:23,120 Speaker 5: to stash because he's made his major league debut. But 1615 01:12:23,160 --> 01:12:25,120 Speaker 5: if he is out there, i'd stash him because I 1616 01:12:25,120 --> 01:12:27,920 Speaker 5: think you're probably two weeks ish away, just however long 1617 01:12:28,000 --> 01:12:30,519 Speaker 5: they feel the rehab assignment has to go. And I 1618 01:12:31,040 --> 01:12:33,840 Speaker 5: don't think it's you're gonna throw him back into Triple A. 1619 01:12:33,840 --> 01:12:35,479 Speaker 5: I think you're gonna throw him right back into the 1620 01:12:35,520 --> 01:12:37,840 Speaker 5: major So there's a little bit of a glut there 1621 01:12:37,960 --> 01:12:39,280 Speaker 5: with some of the guys that are up. But maybe 1622 01:12:39,280 --> 01:12:42,080 Speaker 5: they you know, maybe they cut bait with a with 1623 01:12:42,280 --> 01:12:46,240 Speaker 5: a Trent Grisham, and you know, Dimingez can get back 1624 01:12:46,280 --> 01:12:48,720 Speaker 5: in the outfield. Maybe he's dhing a little bit. You 1625 01:12:48,840 --> 01:12:51,160 Speaker 5: keep stanting at the DH like Jason, Dimingez is going 1626 01:12:51,200 --> 01:12:53,160 Speaker 5: to get back in that lineup. So if he is 1627 01:12:53,200 --> 01:12:55,960 Speaker 5: out there, you should get him. And I have pretty 1628 01:12:56,000 --> 01:12:59,240 Speaker 5: high expectations because I was very impressed with the major 1629 01:12:59,320 --> 01:13:01,760 Speaker 5: league debut that he had hit two fifty eight four 1630 01:13:01,840 --> 01:13:03,680 Speaker 5: homers in eight games. I think he's gonna kind of 1631 01:13:03,680 --> 01:13:04,439 Speaker 5: pick right back up. 1632 01:13:05,960 --> 01:13:06,280 Speaker 1: Welsh. 1633 01:13:06,360 --> 01:13:08,439 Speaker 2: It's always a pleasure to talk to you. Thanks so 1634 01:13:08,560 --> 01:13:11,439 Speaker 2: much for coming on. You know, I appreciate you making 1635 01:13:11,479 --> 01:13:15,519 Speaker 2: the time and giving us all this knowledge. Everybody stick around. 1636 01:13:15,560 --> 01:13:17,479 Speaker 2: I'll be right back with Mayor on the other side. 1637 01:13:17,960 --> 01:13:21,720 Speaker 2: All right, Mayor, let's wrap up here with our weekend excitement. 1638 01:13:22,240 --> 01:13:23,120 Speaker 1: I will go first. 1639 01:13:23,439 --> 01:13:25,920 Speaker 2: Wasn't a super long list, so I just highlighted kind 1640 01:13:25,920 --> 01:13:27,280 Speaker 2: of the thing that stood out to me most, and 1641 01:13:27,400 --> 01:13:31,519 Speaker 2: that is Paul skeins against the Cubs again, you know, 1642 01:13:32,200 --> 01:13:32,880 Speaker 2: before innings. 1643 01:13:32,920 --> 01:13:34,599 Speaker 1: Seven strikeouts in that first start. 1644 01:13:35,280 --> 01:13:38,280 Speaker 2: Obviously, like we talked about this, everybody listening just heard 1645 01:13:38,320 --> 01:13:41,160 Speaker 2: me talk about this with Welsh, you know, most typed 1646 01:13:41,240 --> 01:13:47,400 Speaker 2: pitching debut since Steven Strasburg. I'm still salty about having 1647 01:13:48,000 --> 01:13:51,080 Speaker 2: to give away the tickets for Strasburg's debut, which is 1648 01:13:51,120 --> 01:13:53,479 Speaker 2: a story everybody heard during. 1649 01:13:53,320 --> 01:13:55,160 Speaker 1: The interview with Welsh. 1650 01:13:55,640 --> 01:13:59,200 Speaker 2: But again, just really really exciting, you know, pitching prospect 1651 01:13:59,240 --> 01:14:01,840 Speaker 2: here finally got the call up, and he's going up 1652 01:14:01,840 --> 01:14:04,080 Speaker 2: against the same team he faced in the first game out. 1653 01:14:04,720 --> 01:14:06,160 Speaker 2: I want to see if he does better. I want 1654 01:14:06,160 --> 01:14:08,320 Speaker 2: to see if he goes into the into the you know, 1655 01:14:08,400 --> 01:14:10,519 Speaker 2: deeper into the game. Not that he was awful in 1656 01:14:10,600 --> 01:14:12,000 Speaker 2: that first start, but you know it was your first 1657 01:14:12,040 --> 01:14:14,240 Speaker 2: start ever. You know, it's you never know how a 1658 01:14:14,280 --> 01:14:15,880 Speaker 2: guy's going to react to that. But I'm just really 1659 01:14:15,880 --> 01:14:17,920 Speaker 2: excited to see what he does over the weekend. 1660 01:14:19,640 --> 01:14:21,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, for sure, Paul Skins is the obvious one. We 1661 01:14:21,720 --> 01:14:23,200 Speaker 3: kind of talked before the show and I was like, 1662 01:14:23,280 --> 01:14:25,800 Speaker 3: I don't really know what I wanted to see. Paul 1663 01:14:25,840 --> 01:14:27,680 Speaker 3: Skins is a really good one. That's the obvious one. 1664 01:14:28,400 --> 01:14:31,160 Speaker 3: Matt Perrault the host of our Daily Juice podcast over 1665 01:14:31,240 --> 01:14:33,120 Speaker 3: on the Betting Pro Feed, which I encourage everyone to 1666 01:14:33,600 --> 01:14:37,000 Speaker 3: check out. He does a daily really quick hitting you know, 1667 01:14:37,040 --> 01:14:38,720 Speaker 3: here's what I'm betting for the day. It's a it's 1668 01:14:38,760 --> 01:14:40,800 Speaker 3: a really enjoyable fifteen minute, you know, ten to fifteen 1669 01:14:40,800 --> 01:14:41,840 Speaker 3: minute podcasts every morning. 1670 01:14:42,360 --> 01:14:43,960 Speaker 4: Matt Parol is actually going to be at that game. 1671 01:14:44,040 --> 01:14:47,720 Speaker 3: He's he's flying from Vegas to Chicago to go see 1672 01:14:47,760 --> 01:14:51,200 Speaker 3: Paul Skins. So excited to hear how he how he 1673 01:14:51,280 --> 01:14:55,360 Speaker 3: thinks he does. We kind of default to pitching matchups 1674 01:14:55,680 --> 01:14:57,400 Speaker 3: or kind of team matchups. I'm like, what we're excited 1675 01:14:57,439 --> 01:14:59,679 Speaker 3: for this weekend and we're kind of talking. Before the show, 1676 01:14:59,720 --> 01:15:01,400 Speaker 3: I was kind of just you know, you were you 1677 01:15:01,479 --> 01:15:03,479 Speaker 3: were talking about whatever you were talking about. It wasn't listening, 1678 01:15:03,760 --> 01:15:08,000 Speaker 3: but I was looking at the weekend slate and I 1679 01:15:08,160 --> 01:15:10,960 Speaker 3: was just kind of like, ah, I don't really know 1680 01:15:11,040 --> 01:15:12,880 Speaker 3: what I'm looking forward to. Like, I'm definitely looking forward 1681 01:15:12,880 --> 01:15:16,479 Speaker 3: to watching baseball, but I mean I want to see 1682 01:15:16,520 --> 01:15:19,160 Speaker 3: Jack Flaherty's at Gallen, both because I think that's a 1683 01:15:19,200 --> 01:15:20,800 Speaker 3: good pitching matchup and because I have a lot of 1684 01:15:20,840 --> 01:15:23,559 Speaker 3: those guys in my leagues, so that's a matchup. I'm 1685 01:15:23,560 --> 01:15:26,840 Speaker 3: looking forward to Freddie Perlta justin Berlander. I don't have 1686 01:15:26,880 --> 01:15:28,519 Speaker 3: any Verlander, but I have a bunch of Peralta and 1687 01:15:28,600 --> 01:15:30,840 Speaker 3: that's a good pitching matchup. And I'm I just keep 1688 01:15:30,880 --> 01:15:32,719 Speaker 3: waiting for the Astros to turn back into the Astros 1689 01:15:32,720 --> 01:15:35,240 Speaker 3: and like we said, are they going to sell if 1690 01:15:35,240 --> 01:15:37,760 Speaker 3: they keep plummeting? You know, not that I thought I 1691 01:15:37,800 --> 01:15:39,800 Speaker 3: want them to do better. I'm ready to not see 1692 01:15:39,960 --> 01:15:43,240 Speaker 3: the Houston and the Alcs this year. Enough is enough 1693 01:15:43,920 --> 01:15:46,400 Speaker 3: on that front. But other than that, I feel like 1694 01:15:46,439 --> 01:15:49,600 Speaker 3: there's a lot of like okay pitching matches, but not 1695 01:15:49,760 --> 01:15:53,920 Speaker 3: a lot of kind of premier ones, So Paul Skenes 1696 01:15:53,960 --> 01:15:56,120 Speaker 3: is kind of the obvious one. And then there's just 1697 01:15:56,200 --> 01:15:59,360 Speaker 3: a lot of like, oh, that's interesting, you know, that's 1698 01:15:59,560 --> 01:16:02,120 Speaker 3: that's okay, Like I don't I don't feel like unless 1699 01:16:02,160 --> 01:16:02,960 Speaker 3: I'm missing. 1700 01:16:04,400 --> 01:16:07,439 Speaker 1: You don't need to fake it or sell us soldness. 1701 01:16:07,479 --> 01:16:09,479 Speaker 2: It's not the most exciting from what the type of 1702 01:16:09,479 --> 01:16:12,320 Speaker 2: stuff you and I usually highlight this segment. I think 1703 01:16:12,360 --> 01:16:13,479 Speaker 2: we've named enough of them. 1704 01:16:14,320 --> 01:16:14,599 Speaker 1: We don't. 1705 01:16:14,640 --> 01:16:17,920 Speaker 2: We don't need to to, you know, lose the trust 1706 01:16:18,040 --> 01:16:21,080 Speaker 2: of our audience by just pretending we care about. 1707 01:16:21,240 --> 01:16:23,040 Speaker 4: You know, some of the lower I'm not pretending. I'm 1708 01:16:23,080 --> 01:16:25,840 Speaker 4: saying I'm trying to. I'm trying to look is. 1709 01:16:25,880 --> 01:16:28,000 Speaker 6: Not the same as like we can excitement, what are 1710 01:16:28,040 --> 01:16:30,600 Speaker 6: we really looking forward? I was also looking like are 1711 01:16:30,640 --> 01:16:33,160 Speaker 6: there any good like team matchups this weekend? Yeah, I 1712 01:16:33,200 --> 01:16:35,840 Speaker 6: was kind of and I haven't really stood out to 1713 01:16:35,960 --> 01:16:38,120 Speaker 6: me white sox Yankees doesn't really do it. 1714 01:16:38,120 --> 01:16:42,360 Speaker 2: For me, shockingly. All right, let's go to our two 1715 01:16:42,360 --> 01:16:48,519 Speaker 2: start picture competition. Last week, my picture Emerson Hancock got 1716 01:16:48,600 --> 01:16:50,320 Speaker 2: sent down after his first start. 1717 01:16:50,640 --> 01:16:52,080 Speaker 1: I knew I was kind of going out on a limb. 1718 01:16:52,080 --> 01:16:53,640 Speaker 2: Anyway, it was like not a week I love that 1719 01:16:53,720 --> 01:16:57,240 Speaker 2: was let me just take a shot here on Hancock. 1720 01:16:57,320 --> 01:17:00,360 Speaker 2: For whatever reason crossed my mind last week, Uh did 1721 01:17:00,439 --> 01:17:02,040 Speaker 2: not pan out because well, part of it was I 1722 01:17:02,120 --> 01:17:05,320 Speaker 2: was excited about to start against the A's and didn't 1723 01:17:05,320 --> 01:17:11,000 Speaker 2: even get it. Your pitcher this week is even worse 1724 01:17:11,080 --> 01:17:13,320 Speaker 2: as you mentioned Renel Blaco, or is it worse? Is 1725 01:17:13,360 --> 01:17:16,639 Speaker 2: getting sent down better or worse than your guy getting 1726 01:17:16,680 --> 01:17:19,000 Speaker 2: suspended during the week you picked him as a two 1727 01:17:19,000 --> 01:17:21,240 Speaker 2: star pitcher. I genuinely don't know the answer to that, 1728 01:17:22,240 --> 01:17:24,840 Speaker 2: but as you are already highlighting the outline because of 1729 01:17:24,920 --> 01:17:28,280 Speaker 2: that fact, A, you know you got an auto win 1730 01:17:28,400 --> 01:17:30,200 Speaker 2: last week, I would say, and B I'm gonna get 1731 01:17:30,200 --> 01:17:32,640 Speaker 2: an auto win this week. So I believe we are 1732 01:17:32,720 --> 01:17:35,280 Speaker 2: actually tied through six weeks including this week, that we're 1733 01:17:35,280 --> 01:17:37,320 Speaker 2: currently in at three wins a piece. 1734 01:17:37,520 --> 01:17:41,400 Speaker 1: So it's an exciting race so far. Who you got 1735 01:17:41,520 --> 01:17:42,040 Speaker 1: for this week? 1736 01:17:43,000 --> 01:17:46,080 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think the time breaker there was not just 1737 01:17:46,320 --> 01:17:48,960 Speaker 3: that your guy got sent down and then my guy 1738 01:17:49,000 --> 01:17:52,000 Speaker 3: got suspended, which it's kind of on one hand, it's 1739 01:17:52,040 --> 01:17:53,760 Speaker 3: kind of fun because normally we have to kind of 1740 01:17:53,840 --> 01:17:56,599 Speaker 3: wait an extra week to talk about who won. Now 1741 01:17:56,640 --> 01:17:58,840 Speaker 3: we're two weeks ahead, we already know into the future, 1742 01:17:58,880 --> 01:18:02,040 Speaker 3: who's won not only this week but next week or 1743 01:18:02,160 --> 01:18:04,080 Speaker 3: not like last week but this week kind of a situation. 1744 01:18:04,400 --> 01:18:06,479 Speaker 3: I think the tiebreaker there is that my guy wasn't 1745 01:18:06,600 --> 01:18:09,640 Speaker 3: just suspended. He was suspended for cheating. He didn't like 1746 01:18:09,680 --> 01:18:11,519 Speaker 3: get into you didn't like throw at someone and get 1747 01:18:11,680 --> 01:18:13,720 Speaker 3: like thrown out of the game and get a five 1748 01:18:13,760 --> 01:18:18,440 Speaker 3: game suspension. He got caught cheating, allegedly cheating and was suspended. 1749 01:18:19,280 --> 01:18:21,880 Speaker 3: So I feel like that tiebreaker makes it worse than 1750 01:18:21,920 --> 01:18:24,120 Speaker 3: getting sent down, although they are both pretty bad. My 1751 01:18:24,280 --> 01:18:26,080 Speaker 3: pitcher for this week is Kyle Bradish. 1752 01:18:27,200 --> 01:18:27,840 Speaker 4: Did you say, is it. 1753 01:18:27,880 --> 01:18:29,599 Speaker 1: Bratish or British bradish? 1754 01:18:30,080 --> 01:18:30,439 Speaker 4: Bradish? 1755 01:18:30,479 --> 01:18:30,519 Speaker 2: Like? 1756 01:18:30,640 --> 01:18:34,320 Speaker 3: I don't know why I doubted myself there, but I 1757 01:18:34,479 --> 01:18:36,280 Speaker 3: made sure for one of the first times ever, I 1758 01:18:36,280 --> 01:18:39,080 Speaker 3: got to the sheet before you. And similar to the 1759 01:18:39,160 --> 01:18:41,720 Speaker 3: pitching matchups and the team matchups for this weekend, I 1760 01:18:41,840 --> 01:18:43,760 Speaker 3: didn't love what we were seeing in terms of two 1761 01:18:43,840 --> 01:18:46,720 Speaker 3: start pitchers next week, and so I was like, you know, 1762 01:18:47,479 --> 01:18:50,040 Speaker 3: not only does he have two good matchups in the 1763 01:18:51,040 --> 01:18:52,280 Speaker 3: one of the worst teams we've ever seen in the 1764 01:18:52,280 --> 01:18:56,559 Speaker 3: White Sox and the struggling Mighty League Cardinals, but also 1765 01:18:57,360 --> 01:18:59,320 Speaker 3: I got to grab an Oils pitcher before you did, 1766 01:18:59,439 --> 01:19:01,960 Speaker 3: and so I was happy to take Kyle Bradish. 1767 01:19:03,160 --> 01:19:07,479 Speaker 2: Uh. Yeah, you know what, that's okay. I'm not beating 1768 01:19:07,520 --> 01:19:09,840 Speaker 2: myself up over it. He didn't do that well today 1769 01:19:11,000 --> 01:19:13,360 Speaker 2: eighty five pitches and four innings. The O's did get 1770 01:19:13,400 --> 01:19:14,320 Speaker 2: the window extend there. 1771 01:19:14,800 --> 01:19:16,439 Speaker 4: He's warming up for me next week, that's why. 1772 01:19:16,800 --> 01:19:19,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, Suell for me, I'm going with Chris sale 1773 01:19:21,720 --> 01:19:24,200 Speaker 2: Has By the way, do you know Chris Sales thirty five? 1774 01:19:24,320 --> 01:19:26,160 Speaker 2: Like I know, he's been around a while, but I 1775 01:19:26,240 --> 01:19:28,840 Speaker 2: didn't realize he he'd hit the mid thirties yet or 1776 01:19:29,000 --> 01:19:30,920 Speaker 2: like that level of it. I would have guessed like 1777 01:19:31,000 --> 01:19:34,960 Speaker 2: thirty two or thirty three. But he's He's pitched really 1778 01:19:35,000 --> 01:19:37,759 Speaker 2: well in his last three starts. His last three starts, 1779 01:19:38,520 --> 01:19:43,479 Speaker 2: he's gone a combined eighteen innings one earned run. What 1780 01:19:43,680 --> 01:19:46,200 Speaker 2: is this twenty eight strikeouts? I didn't actually I had 1781 01:19:46,200 --> 01:19:49,000 Speaker 2: to do math on the fly, just one walk. So 1782 01:19:49,080 --> 01:19:51,840 Speaker 2: he's been really good since since the calendar flip to May, 1783 01:19:52,640 --> 01:19:54,280 Speaker 2: and he was good even prior to that too. 1784 01:19:54,360 --> 01:19:58,120 Speaker 1: He's obviously had a really stellar season so far, so 1785 01:19:58,160 --> 01:19:58,880 Speaker 1: I'm gonna take him. 1786 01:19:59,200 --> 01:20:03,360 Speaker 2: His matchups a are against the Padres and at the Pirates. 1787 01:20:04,479 --> 01:20:06,800 Speaker 2: So we'll see who breaks the tie here seven weeks 1788 01:20:06,840 --> 01:20:09,920 Speaker 2: into the season and takes a lead in our contest. 1789 01:20:10,040 --> 01:20:14,040 Speaker 2: Any other thoughts here before we wrap up? Nope, all right, 1790 01:20:14,040 --> 01:20:16,000 Speaker 2: we'll get out of there on that. Thank you everybody 1791 01:20:16,000 --> 01:20:17,840 Speaker 2: for tuning in. Thank you again to Welsh for joining 1792 01:20:17,920 --> 01:20:20,519 Speaker 2: me earlier. I hope everybody enjoyed that segment, and I 1793 01:20:20,560 --> 01:20:23,040 Speaker 2: hope everybody enjoyed the show. For Mayor and Welsh, I'm 1794 01:20:23,120 --> 01:20:23,679 Speaker 2: Ryan Warmley. 1795 01:20:23,760 --> 01:20:24,720 Speaker 1: We'll see you again next week. 1796 01:20:25,360 --> 01:20:28,520 Speaker 2: Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast. 1797 01:20:28,840 --> 01:20:32,360 Speaker 2: Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros, 1798 01:20:32,520 --> 01:20:35,000 Speaker 2: and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com 1799 01:20:35,200 --> 01:20:36,759 Speaker 2: slash Fantasy Pros MLB