WEBVTT - Market Surprise Will Be A Blowup From Europe: Ezrati

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast on Paul Swing You.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits, each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. The u S shares have reversed

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier gains. They are going sharply lower. One speculation is,

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and of course everyone always tries to give a narrative

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and then everybody else puts it down. But one narrative

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is that we aren't getting any details on this possible

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:37.639
<v Speaker 1>agreement between President Trump and Chinese jusion paying over reducing

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>tariffs or living them all together. Joining us now to

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>talk about this and what else is going on in

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a global scale that could affect your investments. Milton as Ratti.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>He has independent economics and investment strategy consultant and chief

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>economists for Vested. So Milton, thank you so much for

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>being here. Do you agree that the market has mostly

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>priced in some sort of trade deal and that the

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>details actually very much at or in terms of whether

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the market will rally or not on the heels of it. Yeah.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree. The fact of a trade deal is there.

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>The market uh weeks ago decided we weren't going to

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>have a trade war, and now they're looking for details.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>And I suspect that the details are because the Chinese

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>are interested in trade and the United States is interested

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in protecting the integrity of its corporate structures and its

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>technology and um. But Mr Trump of course has harped

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>on trade, so he has to come out with some

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>face saving and the Chinese have to come out with

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>some face saving as well. All right, Well, it seems

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>like we're moving along the path to some degree for

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, some trade negotiations in a trade pack with China.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the other side of the world where

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it's less clear, much less clear, which is Brexit. Uh.

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>It appears that these the two sides, the EU and UK,

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to stumble towards some type of resolution. What do

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you think is going to happen there? Uh? Well, I

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>think the significant thing that happen and it's not happening

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>between Brussels and London, and it's the Labor Party has

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>endorsed another referendum. Uh, you'll forgive my cynicism, but it

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like Britain is following the European model of you

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>will vote and you will vote until you get it right.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So you think there's gonna be another referendum. I think

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>there will probably be another referendum. I don't know when

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>it will be scheduled, but they get it right. Um

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>right now. I think the British public, at least, if

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the polls are to be believed, would vote to remain,

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>but not under these same terms that they existed prior

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to the vote. So may if she's still in an

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>office at that time, we'll be able to go to

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Europe after this referendum to sort of qualified referendum to

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>remain and say let's renegotiate the arrangements. And I think

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that that might be enough of a bone, uh for

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>her to quiet the Brexit side of her party. So

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we've all talked herself blue in the face about Brexit

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>with little resolution because things seem to get mess your

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>mess here. But there's been increasing focus on the slowdown

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing in the euroregion, in particular stemming from Germany, UH,

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the area's biggest economy. How worried should we be about that?

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that is the great worry. I'm not suggesting

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that that the probability suggests a blow up in Europe,

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>but I am seeing this is where the surprise will

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>come for US markets and for global markets. The Brexit

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>deal is a mess. Even if they promise another referendum

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>in the future, uh, it will remain a weight boat

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on the British economy and the European economy. It's significant

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Britain is a fifth of the combined EU economy. So

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>this hiatus, if even if it's not an exit, is

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a wait for their position, and they're slowing down a

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>great deal. In the meantime, you have the Italians, who

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>are both both parts of the Car coalition, despise the

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>EU and would like to follow Britain's example. Yeah, but

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>what would you say that that there is the likelihood

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of a surprise is how much of a surprise could

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>there be? We already have talked a lot about how

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>much the economy is slowing down, in the populous trends

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in Italy and even Spain. Well, I think the problem

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>here is that the Italians are the Italians are defying

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Brussels read Berlin. They're defying Berlin on on their budget

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and they have threatened to leave and they have run

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on a leaf platform. That doesn't mean Italy is going

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to leave, but it does suggest to me that, uh,

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>there could be another round in this ongoing European financial crisis,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>this slow motion crisis where every few years there's a

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>problem and that rocks global markets. It's uh, and that's

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>where I think the surprise would be, not that Europe

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>is going to grow fast or go into recession. I

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think either will happen um. And the problem on

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>more fundamental level, Uh, Europe has to address the Euro.

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>The Euro is Europe's problem, and even the Germans, who

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>have benefited tremendously from the Euro, have have alluded to

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they need to make some adjustments. But

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>with the slowdown, the Germans cannot make any concessions. What

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>type of adjustments you think needs to be made to

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the Euro? Well, I think there's a realization in Europe

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that when the Euro was formed, currencies were out of

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>whack with each other, That the deutsch Mark when the

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Germans entered, was cheap, the Lira, the pasada, all the currencies,

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the periphery with deer. That's set up a

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>situation where the Germans exported to the periphery and the

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>periphery consume which was unsustainable. So I think even the Germans,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and certainly the Dutch and the Fins and people who

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>are involved who have strong economies have suggested that the

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Germans have to make concessions. The Germans have alluded to

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they would, but the time is not right.

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>They have political problems and their economy is slowing down.

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to make concessions now. That means that

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the pressure remains. All the reasons the Italians want out

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>or a new deal remains. The British, who are not

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>part of the euro it's not it's not their problem,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>but that comp ounds the situation for the Franco German alliance.

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh I think we could have I'm not. I don't

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's probable necessarily, but I think that would be

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the surprise another financial blow up in Europe, and with

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Italy it's a lot more significant than Greece. But you

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think necessarily that there's going to be a recession

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>in the near term in the Eurozone. It sounds like

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you're fairly sanguine on China at least given the stimulus.

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>What about the US? Do you foresee a near term

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>recession here? Uh No, not near term. I think the

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>economy has no excesses. I know that recently, no excess

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>No except in Washington, and that's perennial. UM. But UM,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't the business community has strong balance sheets. I

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>know people have talked about debt. A lot of that

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>debt was getting in while the yields were low, and

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>they paid off of the debt. Uh. So statistic I

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I stick on there is that the debt growth has

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>been about six point one percent a year. Their liabilities

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>growth has been about two percent a year. Clearly, they're

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>using the debt to pay down high expensive borrowing from

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the past, UM, and they have used it to buy

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>back stock. It's true, UM, the consumer has a strong

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.559
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet to slowdown. That we're seeing now is part

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of a pattern where they have shown remarkable prudence for

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>American consumers UM, where they if they're savings rate falls

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a little low, they pull in their horn and re

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>establish a stronger savings right. And that's what they're doing.

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think later this year they will actually begin

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to pick up. I know that there's some constraints in

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the labor market, but um uh that that can be resolved.

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>The consumers are powering this economy still, so they're as

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Milton has Roddy, thank you very much. Milton is the

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>independent economics and Investment Strategy consultant, a Chief Economists or

0:07:49.480 --> 0:08:06.239
<v Speaker 1>vested Joining us here, Paul, there is a big question

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in the era of big data and companies getting a

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of it, the digitization of everything, what are the

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>potential implications from a regulatory standpoint for individual investors who

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>log onto their app or connect to some kind of

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>advisory firm that uses an app or uses some machine

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>learning behind it to understand their client. What are the

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>potential risks here? And joining us now, I'm very pleased

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to say. Somebody who's given a lot of thought to

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this Gregory LeBlanc. He has a lectured at Host School

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 1>of Business at Berkeley Law School. He is uh here

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>with us in Scottsdale, but University of California Berkeley is

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>also I'm sure beautiful right now, So uh, as a professor,

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>what's your sense of this? I mean, what is the

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>potential risk here? Well, if you think about a financial

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>advisor is someone that you know. Usually you want, you

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>want to trust, right, They're not somebody that you want

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 1>have an arm's length relationship. If you want them to

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>provide you with high quality service, high quality advice, then they,

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>like your doctor, like your lawyer, right, have to get

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>your trust, and that means you're gonna give them a

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>ton of information. I mean, right now, robo advisors ask

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you things like your age and uh, maybe your planned

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>retirement date. Uh, and um, you know your tolerance for

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>risk and sort of survey based Um, that's gonna change. Right,

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have robo advisors that know you better than

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>your mother, right, just like Facebook and Google now know

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you better than your mother based on information that they

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>lean from other sources. Well, part of it's gonna be

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>information that you provide. You're gonna probably opt into giving

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>them lots of information. So for instance, UM, if we

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>really want to know your appetite for risk, rather than

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>asking you questions, we should observe your behavior. Do you

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>go to casinos? Right? Do you bungee jump? Right? That

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. That's that's a much more accurate way

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of of of understanding you. Um, and you know we

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>want the financial advisor to protect us from our our

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>worst h impulses, and so we want them to know

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>about our our worst impulses. And so we're gonna we're

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna share this information. And so in order for them

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to provide us with high quality service, they need to

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>know a lot about us. But as we've seen the

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>casino companies also, I want to know a lot about us,

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and and and that they do they use the information

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that they get to uh, you know, make sure we

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>leave the casino with less money, right rather than more money.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>So how how have individual investors have their expectations changed

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how they interact with I don't know

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the consumer finance, whether it's a broker or a banker

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 1>there we how has that change? Well, if you think

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>about a typical financial advisor, I mean, the typical financial

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>advisor is usually over fifty and their clients are over fifty,

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and most younger people don't really want to deal with

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this this uh, their dad's financial advisor, and so they're

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>beginning to put their trust into rob advisors. Right. You know,

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you you open up an app and and then you

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>press a few buttons and you don't actually have to

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>deal with the the backslapping human right and uh and

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so I think every financial services company realizes this and

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>and they're starting to move in that direction. But it's

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>not just a consumer facing app, but it's also the

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>technology that lies behind it. So have there been any

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>instances where a financial advisor that runs a robo advisory

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>outlet that judges draw in these millennials? Has there been

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>any cases of them using the information to the dutchriment

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of the investors saying, you know, we're going to sell

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>them this much riskier thing that gives us bigger fees

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>because we know that they bungee jump and they listened

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to Death Metal. Well, okay, that's right, We're not there yet.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 1>But I mean we all know about Wells Fargo and um,

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you know which a lot of friends who work there,

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's a perfectly fine financial institution. But you know,

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, any big financial institution is if it doesn't

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>have proper controls. Uh, if it has incentives for people

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to generate revenue, then that they're going to use this data.

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Wells Fargo famously got in trouble because

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they used data for cross marketing purposes and uh, um,

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, aggressively, UM created accounts and and you know,

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>pursued marketing campaigns for individuals based on what they knew

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>about their propensities to buy these different products. Are uh

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>not noticed that these products were being obtained for them? Right?

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So I guess one thing that I'm just wondering is

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>like how much is this a regulatory issue? How much

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is this something that should be coming from the government,

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>and how much is this just a cultural issue in

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>each firm, because there's there's really a fuzzy line here.

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right. I mean, it's the same. Really, this

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>discussions we're having right now about Facebook, we're gonna be

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>having about all of our financial advisors. UM. You know,

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>we have a very lazy fair attitude right now where

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>people opt in. Uh. The problem with most Americans that

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>they say, oh, I believe in privacy, but then if

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>you offer a free slice of pizza in exchange for

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>their DNA, they take it right. And and so you know,

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I think at some point that the law is going

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to catch up. I mean, I'm not sure whether we're

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna copy something like gdp R in Europe, but UM

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>and like the big companies are probably going to benefit

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>from those kinds of privacy protections. But that kind of

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>brings my next question, which is which companies or which

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>types of financial institutions are doing this. Well, yeah, well

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>nobody yet. OK. So, um, the you know about betterment

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh personal capital and financial engines. These are robo

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>advisors that have you know, made some headway, and then

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Schwab and Fidelity and some of the others have copied

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>what they do. But we're at the very very primitive stage.

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're at the MySpace era of of you know,

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>rob advising. I think, um, you know, there's just so

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>much potential here that we're just beginning to scratch the surface.

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>So I guess just lastly, in real quick here, do

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you think that there is an appropriate amount of information

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>for these rob advisors to collect or do you think

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>it's important for them to have all this information? It's

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>just having some sort of control as far as how

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>they use it. Yeah, I mean, the more information they have,

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the better the job that can do. If you think

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>about Facebook, I mean pretty much every ad I get

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook is totally relevant. I mean I would never

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>get rid of my what as soon as I land

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>here in Phoenix, I start getting you know things, but oh,

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>here are some fun things to do in Phoenix. I'm like, oh,

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this is great information, right because they know me well. Um,

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know you you darn well better trust them.

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>And if they lose your trust, then they lose your business.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And and so you know, the companies that have the

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>name brands that they have to be very very careful

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that they don't lose the trust of their investors because

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>one big scandal and uh, you know Facebook and monopoly,

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>but but financial institutions that we have a lot of

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>competing financial institutions, and so you know, you can't just

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you can you can't cancel your Facebook account, but hey,

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I can cancel my Morgan Stanley account and you know,

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and and and move it over to you know, Goldman

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Sacks with the click of a mouse. So so I

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>think people have to do behave Gregory Leblan, thank you

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Gregory is the lecturer at

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the Hot School of Business at Berkeley at the University

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of California. We are talking all things asset management, front office,

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>back office, the whole thing. Joining us to kind of

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>drill down deeper and some key issues is Steve Meyer.

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Steve is a global wealth management services at s c

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I SEI has over three billion dollars under management, spased

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in Oaks, p A. But Steve joins us here in

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Lovely Scottsdale. Steve, thanks for joining us, Thank you for

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>having me. Boy your industry. It's just tremendous here about

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>all the change that's going on, whether it's regulatory change,

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>competitive change, you know, just investors changing how they're investing.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>What is the number one issue that you and your

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>attendees here are trying to tackle today. Well, I don't

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>think there's one number one. I think everything you listed

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is on the minds here. Um. You look, you look

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>at asset management. There's a lot of feed compression and

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>pressure on managers today. Regulatory changes, Um, you know, ironically

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we look at them as opportunities to help our clients,

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>but they are challenges for our clients. Uh. And then

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>really you look at all the new technology coming out

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that can support a manager from how they invest and

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>pick stocks all the way through as we started to

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about, through their back office, middle office to front office.

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that all of that is on their minds

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>as well as how is looking forward they differentiate themselves.

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's one of the key notes of

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this conference to get these clients together, a very diverse

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>group of people and firms to start to look at

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the industry not just what's happened, but what's going on

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in the future and how they can kind of talk

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and collaborate and come up with some things that would

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>help them in their strategy. So, Steve, let's dig into

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the changes that are happening, particularly in the

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>processing side. It's not just settlements and and things like that.

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>It's also requests for redemptions and deposits in hedge funds

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and other issues. What are some of the big developments

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>recently from your end um, Well, I think all of them.

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, everything is being driven and there's an understore

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>underscore of technology and much of this um when you

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>look at the processing side, Uh, really, you have to

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>scale and have a very efficient process. Uh So there's

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a ton of enabling technologies that many firms like US

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are looking to employ. But one just not from scaling

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>efficiency standpoint, But if you think about it, the back

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>office is where it all starts. Um. That's the core

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of the foundation. If you don't have a seamless, well

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>processed back office, you're not going to have the best

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>front office or investor and experience that you can have.

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>The back office is obviously where a lot of the

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>data resides too, and in these days you can't go

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>too long without someone talking about UH. Folks are looking

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to get into more data analytics, predictive analytics. All of

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that's going to come out of the back office. That's

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>where it starts. So that's what's pushing what some of

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the trends were starting to see right now. One of

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 1>the themes obviously that we've heard in the yesset management

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>business over the over many years, and I'm certainly here

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I've heard it here just at this conference is UH

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is the pressure on fees that asset managers are dealing with.

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>How are so, how are they responding and what are

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>some proper responses that you're seeing in the marketplace. Well,

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they a couple of things. I think they're looking at

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>what their core strategies are UM. You know, most managers,

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>especially multi strap managers are looking and saying, you know,

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>where they want to really make their bets for the future,

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>what their core investment pisis is UM and they're shuttering

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>products that either aren't in favor or aren't really core

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>for their strategy to uh So, I think they're trying

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>not to be all things to everybody and think that's

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a very good strategy too. They're also focusing on what

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>their core is, and their core is managing money and

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>focusing on clients. So everything else from their technology infrastructure

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to their processing, if they're doing that in house, they're

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>outsourcing it because they're going to firms like ours that

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that's our core, that we can give them a better

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>experience and give them more scale in doing that. Do

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you have trouble hiring people to do what you need

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>them to do? Now, we've been very blessed. We have

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>a very good location our headquarters now Oaks, Pennsylvania. We

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>also have a number of offices across the US and

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>globally London and Dublin, and we have a really good

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>talent base that we can draw from. The reason why

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I ask that is because a lot of people say,

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>especially when they're trying to build out their tech specialist,

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>because this is a different skill than say processing something

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>by facts, especially if you're talking about data analytics. People

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about a shortage of eligible employees, but you have

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>not found that. No, I mean we we look at

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we hire uh, certain subject matter experts, and you know,

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we bring them in from all others all over, so

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>some of them might have to be relocated. But then

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we do do a very good job of training people.

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 1>So we do a balance of hiring and getting locate

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>that talent outside as well as putting together a pretty

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>good training program to train up the personnel we need.

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>How about just real quickly twenty seconds US versus let's

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>say Europe. What how's the regulatory or just the competitive

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>environment in your versus here? Well, I'd say the regulatory Uh,

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's tough across the lobe, but especially outside the US

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and the European UH sector is very tough. Rules are changing,

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they seem to be changing daily. Uh. They seem to

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>be getting tougher. Uh. There seems to be quite a

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>large gate uh you know for asset managers there too

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>to hurdle. And but again we look at this as

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for us to help managers navigate that. Thank

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us and for having

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>us here. Stiff, head of Global Wealth Management Services at SEI,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>which oversees more than three hundred billion dollars and also

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>serves a variety of clients from hedge funds to big

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>asset managers with the intricacies of making it work. One

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>aspect that's driving markets a bit higher today is the

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that China is apparently giving more fiscal stimulus, particularly

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to its manufacturing sector. Joining us now Tom or Like,

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 1>chief economist for Bloomberg Economics, to discuss kind of what

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this tax break is that they are giving particularly to manufacturers,

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and whether markets are accurately reflecting the boost. So Tom,

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 1>what is this VAT tax that we're talking about here

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and what did China do? So we've got the National

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>People's Congress coming up this week, Lisa. Tomorrow, we're going

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>to get Premier Lika Chiang giving his annual work reports

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>UM to the Chinese legislature. So the V eight T

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to be part of it. And we've got

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg News scoop suggesting a cut in the v

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>A T rate which could be worth around nor point

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>six percent of g D rate or what is this

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>in practical terms? So this is the the value added tax.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's a tax which businesses pay on the value

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>added component of their manufacturing UM. The bigger picture, though, Lisa,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>is that um China's policymakers have recognized that they've pushed

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>all the buttons that they can push in terms of

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy, and so when the economy needs more support,

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>like it does in two thousand and nineteen, it has

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to come from fiscal channels. So part of it is

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be this v A T cut, But

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the bigger picture is that we're expecting a larger fiscal

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>deficit target for two thousand and nineteen. We think if

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 1>you add up the central government deficit some special bonds

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>which they're going to ally the local governments to issue,

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>we could be looking at a fiscal to sit target

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of about five pc of GDP for the year. That's

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>including the v A T cut that we were suggesting.

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So China's policy makers lining up to give a pretty

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>significant fiscal boost to growth in two thousand and nineteen.

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the Chinese economy this year is going to look

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>a bit like the US economy last year with that

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>big turbo charge from the Trump tax cut. And I

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's why we're seeing a bit of optimism creeping

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>into the markets. So Tom, let me let me just

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>start off here I mean you and I known each

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 1>other for a while. How many years did you live

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in Beijing studying the Chinese economy? Um? I was there

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>eleven years, Paul, Like, I got it just before my

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>lungs gave in. All right, so you know what's going

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>on there. So let me give you just get your

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>opinion on these on again, off again trade talks. They

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>seem to be back on again. My question to you is,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>will there be anything substantive in these trade talks number

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>one and number two? Uh? Can we verify that China's

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>actually will will actually you know, kind of uh do

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.239
<v Speaker 1>what they say they're gonna do. I think there's going

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>to there's going to be a bunch of components to

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>this pool, and as you suggest, verification is going to

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>be absolutely key for the US side. Um, So, I

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to get some immediate results. There's going

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a dollar amount which China agrees to buy,

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's soybeans or natural gas or corn or whatever.

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>But there's going to be a dollar amount for a

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>specific amount of purchases which China commits to make to

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>reduce the trade deficit. And then there's going to be

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>some immediate things right, So there'll be some immediate things

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>around allowing businesses from the US to operate as wholly

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>owned foreign ventures in China, not forcing them into joint ventures.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>The more difficult things though, can we protect intellectual property,

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Can we reduce subsidies to stay owned firms. Can we

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>allow foreign firms to operate on a level playing field

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>in China? These are clearly things which you can't do

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in a week or a month or even a year.

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>So that's why there's going to be a need for

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>an enforcement mechanism to go into place. So meanwhile, as

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>these trade talks continue, the reason why people are so

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>interested in the v A T tax or sort of

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>some of these fiscal stimulus measures is there is a

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>question of how much the Chinese economy is slowing down

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime and how much ammunition they have left

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.479
<v Speaker 1>frankly get it going again. I mean, it's still growing,

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but at that six percent target rate that they would

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>like to see. So what's your view on that. Do

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>you think that they have enough juice to kind of

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of get that going. Yeah, it's a slightly sort

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of complex and unsatisfactory answer, Lisa, But um, they've got

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>less we're used to those they've got left. They've clearly

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>got less firepower than they did. Um. If you look

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>at the economy as a whole, debt is around two

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and fifty of g d P. That's a lot of debt.

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So they've got less firepower than they did have. Even so,

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>government debt is still relatively under control. The banking system

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>as well funded. So if they need to stimulate this year,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>next year, the year after, I didn't see a huge

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.239
<v Speaker 1>problem with that. I still think the structure are all

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>drag on China. The kind of the point where they're

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>out of ammunition. I think we're talking about in the

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>mid twenty twenties, not the next two or three years. Hey, Tom,

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>just real quickly, in the next twenty seconds. Um, you

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>know the China. What have you believe that GDP is

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a six or six percent growth number for them? We've

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>heard much lower potentially, what do you think that real

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>number is? So the question I have for the datas

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>on China's GDP data is you seem really happy to

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>believe that credit growth is super fast. If credit grades

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>super fast and that's going into some kind of meaningful activity,

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 1>then there has to be some growth so we think

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>there's smoothing in the GDP numbers, but we're skeptical that

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>they're real numbers, very far below what the official data suggests. Interesting, okay,

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>because we've heard numbers you know, significant or maybe exactly

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Tom more like, thank you very much. Tom again, eleven

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>years in China studying the economy, so he is certainly

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the go to person here. Tom's chief economist for Bloombrick Economics.

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>He joined us on the phone and from Washington, d C.

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abram Woyds. I'm

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa A. Bram Woyds. One. Before the podcast,

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio