WEBVTT - Airbnb and Uber Earnings, Nancy Pelosi's Taiwan Visit (Podcast)

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power COLLI

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay I'm memorily check in San Francisco and this

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. It

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>looks like we are in for a busy holiday travel season.

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb is preparing a massive share buyback and anticipating the

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>best revenue in the company history in the current quarter.

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>We will get into the details, plus a being for

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Uber send share story almost my conversation with CEO dar

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Kasra Shai about the shift in demand supply and whether

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Uber really is as he says, recession proof. And the

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>results are in Bloomberg survey more than fift hundred investors

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>about the musk Twitter saga, only one in four. I

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>believe the world which is man will actually end up

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>shelling out that four billion dollars. We'll talk about the

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>implications for musk Twitter and Tesla. I do want to

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 1>talk a little more about this big visit. US House

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>speaker Nancy Pelosi touching down in Taiwan. This makes her

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the highest ranking American politician to visit the island in

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years, and the timing of her visit is

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>particularly sensitive for China, coming one day after the anniversary

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of the People's Liberation Army. I want to bring in

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 1>our Ian Marlow joining us from Washington, who's been covering

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the story and how it is developing. Ian talk to

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>us about just how significant this visit is and and

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>what is at stake. We've got Isaac stone Fish, the

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO of Strategy Risks here as well. But Ian,

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you because I think it's

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>hard to overstate, uh, just how significant this visit is. Yeah,

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's significant for a couple of reasons. I mean, obviously,

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>she's the highest ranking of like the U s official

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to visit in twenty five years, since Sitting House Speaker

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>New Grinkoch went in ninete. But it's also a sensitive

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>time in US China relations. You've got forces on both sides.

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>In the US, you've got midterm elections, you had a

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of uh debate about whether she should go or

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>not go, and whether that would look weak on China.

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.679
<v Speaker 1>And then in China itself you have Shi jimping kind

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of balancing UH COVID zero policies with a bit of

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a slowing economy, and also a really important party congress

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>coming up later in the fall where he's expected to

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>secure a third term. So you've got a lot of

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>sensitive dynamics internally. And then uh, you know, internationally, we

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>just have a situation with the US leaning on on

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>China over Russia and the war in Ukraine. You've got

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of high level dialogues that haven't particularly moved

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the needle on the Biden administration's China policy. Uh. And

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>then you're playing with this extremely toxic situation with where

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan is just the most sensitive issue in US China relations.

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh and Pelosi visiting at this point, with the rhetoric

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>cranked up on on the Chinese side in particular in

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>US US officials kind of failing to calm down and

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of convince the Chinese side that that they're not

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to, you know, erase the status quo here, it's

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of got a bit of a mix where we're

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>now seeing some of the more the most extreme sort

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese military responses since since the mid nineties, in

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>decades now. ISAAC China has already announced these various military

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>drills at missile tests surrounding the island. How much retaliation

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>versus posturing are you expecting to see companies should shear

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>retaliation asymmetrically, So worry less about military drills, more about

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>executive from US corporations getting arrested or detained or harassed

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in China, or Chinese companies treating US companies differently, or

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Beijing suddenly discovering that a major US corporation committed tax

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>fraud or has some regularities in their books. Beijing loves

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to play it this way so that there's plausible deniability,

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>and so that it reminds the business world that, in

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Beijing's mind, the business world is also responsible for what

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the US government is or isn't doing. We've already seen

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>some retaliation from this big battery company that's pushed back

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>its plans to announce a big plant UH in North America.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Taiwan is a huge tech hub, a huge

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>spoke in the global supply chain. What kind of disruption

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>potentially longer term, ISAAC, do you think there could be

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to the global and tech economy. It's hard to imagine

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a more concrete reminder that investing in China Chinese supply

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>chain U S China relations will be unstable for the

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>foreseeable future. Base case and now is these regular fluctuations,

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the regular risk of not getting the goods when you

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>need them, not being able to parse or really understand

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Chinese policy. So people just need to throw out their

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>old assumptions and work with the assumptions that supply chains

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>will continue to be disrupted. Certain companies that say they're

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>going to do something won't be able to do what

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>they're saying. And not to be alarmists, but it is

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>very possible that moves like these do lead to a war,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>or at the very least the proxy war between the

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>U S and China, and if that happens, all of

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the assumptions underpinning US China investments for decades will be

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>written off. I talk to us about the plans for

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>the rest of this trip and the kind of signaling

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>you're expecting to see, not just from Beijing but also

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>from the White House. Yeah, I mean, I think we've

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>seen the White House playbook. Over the last couple of days.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>There was a shift for um, uh you know, denying

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that the trip was even happening, possibly the worst kept

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>secret given it was the most tracked plane. Uh you know,

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>almost in history here. Um. I think at the moment,

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the White House shifting to uh, putting

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the onus for escalation on on China itself, saying Pelosi's trip,

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>which we didn't have any say over, doesn't move the needle.

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't change US policy towards Taiwan either way. And

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>so it's the kind of ball is in is in

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>China's court. So the the amount of escalation we see, uh,

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know. And some people are talking about the military

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>exercises off off the ports and off the coast amounting

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>to a sort of an effective sort of temporary blockade.

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>We're also going to see missiles potentially crossing over Taiwan

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and landing off the coast. Um, so there's a potential

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for miscalculation. I think at the moment we're just kind

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of waiting to see how long this last. We know

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be drills, uh you know, for the

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>next few days. Um. And now I think it's just

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a matter of seeing whether China's telegraphing of this stuff

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in advance is enough to allow US officials to sort

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of manage the situation so that there's no you know,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>as they always talk about in US China relations now

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to make sure there's no miscalculation, uh, you know, and

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>veering the competition into conflict. As they also like to say,

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, thank you both so much for weighing in here,

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>strategy risks CEO Isaac Stonefish, along with Bloomer's own in Marlow.

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we're going to continue to follow every detail

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of this visit as it plays out. Airbnb shares down

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in late training after reporting second quarter results. This despite

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the home sharing giant saying revenue in the current quarter

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>will be the highest in its history. Brent Phil Jeffrey's

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>managing director and analyst, joins us now to discuss So, look,

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you've had AIRBNBI benefiting from the travel rebound, but investors

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>not happy with this report. Why is that booking's actually

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>fell emily for the third quarter in terms of below consensus,

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>about five percent below where the street was at. And

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think ultimately there's also a fear that this was

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the summer of travel that everyone went to Europe. You

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>can see local destinations inside California, for example, saw their

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>bookings down, but Europe saw this huge boom. Many of us,

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>including my own family, who went to Europe came back

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and started to look at our credit card and say, wow, okay,

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>we haven't been been anywhere for a couple of years

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to look at the bill. And so I think there's

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a little bit of a travel hangover coming in

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the fall into the winner. And that may also be

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a fear that many investors that are in my position

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>now have said, Hey, I just took the big trip,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>tap time, tap the tap the air brakes and put

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>money into other things. Uh. That's that's one element. I think.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately the macro condition is starting to show signs of weakness.

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing gas prices in the or uh you know,

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>shift where they're spending dollars. If Walmart called this out,

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other companies are calling this the shift out.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Williamson our restoration of hardware obviously saying it's not can

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>be is good in the back half. You're you're just

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing across many consumers. So we call it a discretionary

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>recession that many of us may start to rethink were

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>these dollars today that AIRBB for the most part, are

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, is spent money that is for fun? It's

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>not it's not a must have, it's a it's nice

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to have. They'll argue other otherwise for for myself, but

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to What I'm trying to put in is

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>what what Why would the stock be down? Why would

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>people be barished from here? I think those would be

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the reasons to be bullish. Obviously, they're in an incredible position,

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>amazing management team, incredible selection of uh and portfolio, and

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I think they're really innovating on the platform, and there's

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>just incredible innovation relative to any other consumer brand you

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>travel to on the web. I still think this is

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the best you want, best experience. Some of the best

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>content They did come out with categories, which was their

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>big design change in the last few months. You do

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>cover Uber as well, and I'm kind of interested in

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>comparing them. But first I want you to hear this

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>quote from Dar cause were showing you from our interview

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 1>earlier today. He is said in the past he thinks

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Uber is recession proof. Take a listen to why. Because

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we're in multiple businesses, both in mobility and delivery. I

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>think we have a kind of business that can perform

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in all weather. But at the same time, we are

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>being disciplined in terms of costs to make sure that

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>as the environment if it gets tougher, we are prepared.

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Right you saw Uber's nembers today. Do you think Uber

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>really is recession proof and is it more recession proof

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>and air being be I think to some degree, because

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to go back to work or going back

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to events, we're traveling to kids sporting events, like we're

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>using we're using their transportation, not only the cars, but

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the bikes and scooters. And again I was a huge

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>adopter of of of the line uh scooter line this

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>summer with my family in Europe and as a part

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in the partnership with Uber, and and I think ultimately

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that to to some degree. I think

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the question mark is going to be around the

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>discretionary travel. And again when we look at Airbnb, if

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>you look at other travel names, if we start to

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit of a travel hangover post this summer,

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>there could be a little bit of a setback on

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 1>that side. The positive thing for Uber is employers, including

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in our own employer, is saying get back in the office.

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We need you back multiple days a week. Obviously, we

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>still have COVID cases flaring, and I think ultimately people

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>are still reluctant to want to be a mass transport

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in a big way, and they feel comfortable, you know,

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps being in the back of a car going into

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>the winter. If if, if we'd see another UH phase

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of COVID cases. So I think, look, I I don't

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>disagree with them. I do think there's an element of

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the business that I could feel the pain. But one

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that's going for Uber right now is evaluation. It's

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the worst sentiment of any Internet company and perhaps any

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>tech company we cover. And the sentiment going into this

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>print was awful, and now they're showing cash flow and

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>they're effectively doing what we think is the right thing

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>was that it's just not a top it's got a

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>bottom line, and they're showing they can be very profitable

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:41.599
<v Speaker 1>with with their network. Interesting, all right, Brent Phil Jefferies,

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>managing Director, Thanks for giving us your quick reacts on

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>both of those companies. Coming up a tale of two coasts.

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Uber is seeing a slowdown on the West coast but

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a pickup in the East. I have more of my

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>post earnings conversation with Uber CEO dark cosbra Shy, who

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>was quite happy about the stock pop when we talked

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this morning. He's coming up next. This is Bloomberg. Uber

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>defied inflation in the second quarter, reporting better than expected earnings.

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Shares popped on that news that Lubers gross bookings including

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 1>ride sharing, food delivery, and frank rose to an all

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>time high. I spoke with CEO dar Causra Shay about

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>everything from surge pricing to a slowdown in demand on

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast. Take a listen to some extent, it's

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a continuation of the last few quarters, but we're really

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>hitting a scale point here. Like you said, twenty nine

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in gross bookings of thirty six percent on

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a year on your basis, uh as, it relates on

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a constant currency basis or three sixty two million, well

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>above our guidance range. And the guidance that we gave

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:08.359
<v Speaker 1>forward was well above street estimates, etcetera. So an indication

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of anticipated strength coming. And then a really important factor

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for us is we're free cash full positive two million

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars in free cash flow, which is a big positive

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>factor in our being self sustaining and profitable going forward.

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And when we look at the environment, the marketplace is

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>more balanced. The number of new drivers that we're adding

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in the US is up over seventy on a year

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on your basis surges down E T A s or down. Uh,

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So the business is really hitting on all cylinders and

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's reflected in the stock press, which is great. I

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>do want to ask you a little bit about the

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>broader environment, Dara. I still hear people say Uber is expensive,

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing Uber benefiting from this. When you look

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>at your earnings and the bottom line, how do you

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>think about this dynamic longer term? Do you worry at

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>all about alienating customers when they're already getting squeezed given

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that this is the worst inflationary environment in Uber's history. Yeah,

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I think inflation is hitting all of us, whether it's

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>grocery prices or fuel prices. And remember fuel is a

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>big component of our driver costs, so that affects Uber

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>prices as well, and you do see it in a result.

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>While trips were up, which is really really healthy growth growth,

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>bookings were up faster than that, which indicates some inflationary

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>effect on our results. I think the good news for

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>US is that surge levels are actually coming down E

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>T A s are coming down, so as the marketplace

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>becomes more balanced, we actually see strength in terms of

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>trip growth going forward, and we're hoping if we do

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>our jobs and so far, so good onboarding more and

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>more drivers, that prices on Uber will ease going forward.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, drivers will make really strong earnings

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. At the same time, we've heard so many

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>dire warnings about the economy. Jamie Diamond has said he's

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>prepared for an economic hurricane. I just spoke to Apple

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO Tim Cook, who said, you know, he plans to

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>be deliberate in Apple spending. You said in the past

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that you think Uber is recession resistant. Do you still

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>believe that if we continue to see these down downward

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>trends and what is uber strategy to navigate continuing downward trends? Well,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you're certainly seeing in earn results, which is uh.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>There's been a bunch of earnings results out there, and

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes they've been less than great. I think Uber's

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>earnings have been terrific in every way, top line growth,

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>profitability growth as well. Um. At the same time, we

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>are being disciplined in terms of how we grow going forward.

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>This is why our margins are improving so much on

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a year. On your basis free cash flow is now

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>positive as well. Because of the scale that we have,

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>because we're in multiple businesses, both in mobility and delivery.

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we have a kind of business that can

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>perform in all weather. But at the same time, we

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>are being disciplined in terms of costs to make sure

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that as the environment, if it gets tougher, we are prepared.

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned on the call that West coast markets are

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>taking a little bit longer to come back, and I'm

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about San Francisco and how it's been a

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>struggle to get workers back to the office. How are

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.199
<v Speaker 1>you thinking about this and Uber's, for example, Uber's own

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>flexible work policies. Do you see the flexibility that you're

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>giving workers holding up into next year, for example? Does

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like the tail of two coasts? You know,

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the East coast New York, Miami,

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>even UH cities, Atlanta, Austin, Dallas. Our business is coming back,

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is roaring back UH at this point, and we feel

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>great about that business. Now. The San Francisco market's Los Angeles, Seattle,

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>they're certainly coming back. But when you look at the

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>absolute levels versus pre pandemic levels, UH, it's a very

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 1>very different story. UM, and you know, we'll keep pushing

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and we will do our part to make sure that

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got an ample supply in those markets. Uh. And

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the service works very well. You can check out the

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>full interview with uber ceo Dark Cause with Shaw here

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Emily checking in San Francisco. I want to get back

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to our top story, and that is US House Speaker

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan. We are already seeing a

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>major company react. In a Bloomberg scoop c A t L,

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the world's biggest maker of Evy battery cells, has pushed

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>back plans to announce a North American plant because of

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this visit to Taiwan. Are at Ludlow help break this

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>story at what exactly do we know about this decision? Yes,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the sources say that CTL was considering sites in Mexico

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and the United States. As we reported a month ago,

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they were close, they were agreeing incentives, they were choosing

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>their preferred site. And given the geopolitical tension between the

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>United States and China due to Speaker Pelosi's business Taiwan,

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>they've decided to push it back to September October. So

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not necessarily saying this is not going to happen.

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>It's just the announcement has been exactly So there's a

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>commitment from CTL, according sources, to do this right. They're

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they're key customers are here. There are a big supplier

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.239
<v Speaker 1>to Tesla for Tesla's China built vehicles. They have an

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 1>agreement to supply Forward in the future. And as we've reported,

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Forward and Tesla were kind of key to those talks.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 1>But it's too hot right now, and and and you know,

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>they are also trying to think about potential incentives in

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the background from the federal government here in the United States.

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>They just don't want to get caught up in this

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 1>with what's happening. How strategically important is this company to

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>say a Tesla or Afford. Yeah, the reality is CTL

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is a Chinese company. It is the kind of crown

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>jewel in China's EV industry. It's the biggest maker, as

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you said, of EV battery cells. But the issue the

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>whole industry faces is there is not enough supply. We

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>need more battery cells, more players, and having that ct

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>L plant, whether it ends up being in the US

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>or in Mexico, nearer to where vehicles are actually being

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>built by tests or by ford is so important. If

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we've learned one thing in the last two years, it's

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>supply chains can on revel really quickly overseas, So on

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>shoring this production would really help. Now we have these

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical issues in the way. Long term though, are you

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing this as a company that could have a very

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>significant presence on this side of the Pacific Ocean. So

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the commitment that they're making initially is five billion dollars.

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>That gets you quite a lot of factory, you know,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of plant. The footprint that we've reported

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 1>on is very big. You know, we're talking about EV

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 1>battery cells at a mass scale and for multiple players.

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Think about the giga factories for example, that the Panasonic

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>has a Nevada and others have done deals on the

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>West coast, East coast. Sorry, so this is big and

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it's important, all right, I'd love them, thank you well.

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>See Bloomberg terminal clients think Elon schiill be forced to

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>own Twitter by the end of this saga about and

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>more than respondents to include portfolio managers and retail traders

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>say Mask won't end up owning Twitter, the deal that

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>led Mosque to offload about eight and a half billion

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of Tesla shares back in April. One third

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>of respondents protect he'll settle with a social media company

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for more than a billion dollars rather than seeing through

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that forty four billion dollar takeover. Joining me now Grace

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Capital founder and chief investment officer Katherine Faddis, who took

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>questions about the survey with Luke Ventures Gene Munster. Uh

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>this Tuesday morning. So what's your take, Katherine? How does

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>this play out in Delaware court? Yeah? I think I'm

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>going to agree with the respondents. I think ultimately this

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>deal doesn't happen. I'm not It's not clear to me

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>why it made sense to begin with. And I understand

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>um Elon Musk is very smart. He took testl off

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>from loss making deal and he's made it a success.

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>He made pay palace success. Maybe there's a theory he

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>was going turn around Twitter and you know, pull something

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>else out of his hat. But apparently he's lost interest

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's time to move on Dot Org.

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean for Twitter and what would it

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>mean for Tesla. You know, for Twitter, I think it's

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>been quite disruptive and I'm almost wondering if they're going

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to try to get more than the billion dollars. And

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I think if there was the people who believe in

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Elon Must thought wow, he's going to get involved in

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and he's going to turn it into a gold mine.

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think for Twitter it's it's not good either way.

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been disruptive. I think if there was hope,

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Twitter shareholders were going to get a lot

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of money. Now they're not. It's just not good. And

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Twitter's business model is struggling anyway. And for Tesla,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be good news because I think

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was a distraction. It was a distraction for

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Tesla shareholders. They want Elon must focusing on Tesla, solving

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the problems, bringing you know, the wonderful things he's done operationally,

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>supply chain efficiency, all the great things that make Tesla

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>what it is. So I think it's good news for Tesla.

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Tesla has a huge footprint in China, and I'm curious

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>how you think this big visit Nancy Pelosi going to

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan against the wishes of the Chinese government. If there's

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>an impact for Tesla here, clearly there will be an

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>impact because I think China understands the importance of Tesla

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>um as an entity, and I think it's a Tesla

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>is in many senses, a crown jewel. So if China

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to retaliate, Tesla would be an easy target. And remember,

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Tesla has big plans for China. Not only do they

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>produce a lot there, but it was going to be

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>a big market for them. So I think certainly this

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>would keep me up at night if I were on

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the board of Tesla. But it is what it is,

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's going to have to figure out

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>how to move forward. You wonder if it's keeping up

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>elon Musk, how dependent do you think Tesla's valuation, uh,

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>space x is valuation is on Musk alone. His cult

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>of personality, I think currently a lot, because he really

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>does have this fabulous track record and people look at

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>what he does. He can take anything and turn it

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>into gold, and he's done it, and so he deserves it.

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>He deserves the reputation. But I think a lot of

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>those things can be learned. So I go back to

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs and Apple. I never thought Apple could make

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it without Steve Jobs. Guess what I was wrong? Uh,

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Since when he died, Apple has beaten the stock market

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>by a thousand percent. So there is life after Elon Musk.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>There's life after all of us. But I don't want

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>to minimize its importance. Uh two space X and I

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's real. I think he really has brought process improvements.

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>If it's and see, do you look at the way

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the cars are manufacturers? Did you look at the way

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he's locked up the supply chain for years and years

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to come with lithium technology. I mean he's clearly very smart,

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So he's important. All Right, Grace Capital founder and chief

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>investment officer Katherine Faddis really appreciate your thoughts here on

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the show. Thank you for stopping by. All right, Coming

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>up over technologists signing a letter to Congress urging for

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>more skepticism in crypto. We've talked a lot about the optimists.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk a little bit about the pessimists. Next.

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. The no intermediary system does not scale

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that three to seven transactions per second world. Why that's

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the hard limit? It doesn't do whatonents say it does.

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not secure, it's not distributed, it's not reliable, it

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>doesn't scale, it doesn't actually do anything that they don't

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>actually work for payments if the payments would be processed

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>by the normal system. I think eventually it will crash,

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>because all bubbles will crash. Ethereum has been promising proof

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of steaks since basically they started. Wake me up when

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the transition happens. The problem is that blockchain adds in security,

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>it adds all sorts of inefficiencies and makes things worse.

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>It also creates another problem of he who has the

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>gold makes the rules. Right now, people are are losing

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>their money and people are really getting hurt because there's

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>so much fraud. So I think it needs serious regulation.

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>From a technological standpoint, there's no innovation. Economically, it is

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a self assembled Ponzi scheme. Nicholas we were there, professor

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>in the computer science department at you See Berkeley, along

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 1>with Bruce Nyer, a computer security professional and public policy

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>lecture at the Harvard Kennedy School. They're both some of

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the lead signatories of this open letter to Congress, signed

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>by fifteen hundred technologists and urging lawmakers to quote take

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a critical skeptical approach toward industry claims that crypto assets

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>are an innovative technology that is unreservedly good. Let's break

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it all down in today's Crypto Report with our own

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>crypto contributors Snale, Bostic, Shanale. We've talked a lot too.

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 1>We've talked to a lot of the bulls. I haven't

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.959
<v Speaker 1>talked to so many of the bears talked to us

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>more about their message to Congress. And what's interesting here

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to Emily is that it's important to remember there's a

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of a war in Washington going on when you

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think about cryptocurrency, the people who don't want congressmen and

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>women to be supporting them, and the people that do

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and are pouring millions of dollars into lobbying campaigns to

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>that effect and into political campaigns to crypto friendly a lawmakers. Remember,

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I talked to Anthony Scarammucci about this earlier this year too,

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and there are men people who believe that this is

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like him, that believe that this is going

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to be a key issue leading into the midterms and otherwise.

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.719
<v Speaker 1>So what is the problem here for the folks who

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>have signed this letter. Some of the issues are quite technical,

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and concern about not being able to reverse transactions, concerns

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:20.959
<v Speaker 1>about data privacy, and the sense that is crypto something

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a solution looking for a problem? Why crypto

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.479
<v Speaker 1>when fintech does the job. In the US we already

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>have digital payments at scale to some degree. It's interesting

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 1>because when you look at the data from it, it's

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting because you know, you saw cryptocurrency transactions. Bitcoin transaction

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>volumes surpass that of VISA, but really come down a

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>little more this year. I think which will win out

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>at the end is interesting and which technology will be dominant.

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>The skeptics and this letter are really attest to the

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>idea that bitcoin and frankly blockchain more more broadly, is

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>not the solution to these problems. There's a lot of

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>complicated dynamics at play here. We've were reported on the

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>revolving door between the crypto industry and Capitol Hill. You've

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>got crypto companies making big donations ahead of the midterms.

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>You've got crypto lobbyists shaping policy. Is there enough skepticism

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill of this industry. I think time will

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>tell on how much there is a pusher of poll

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're you're asking this question where it seems

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>like there are a lot of lawmakers that very publicly

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>go out and support cryptocurrency. But we're also in a

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>regime where the head of the SEC has been cracking

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>down on massive enforcement issues in a way that we

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have not seen to this scale, and the tensions really

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>boil over. So it's a great question, where is the

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>support in Washington when so many millions of dollars are

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>going into support the industry. Remember, this is not a panacea.

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at the crypto industry, and really this is

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a really um thorough and long critique of the blockchain

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>technology itself. U as as problematic is really how they're

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>phrasing this, because fraud mitigation is a big issue when

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes to blockchain. Let me give you another perspective here.

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>In a conversation I had with the CEO of NASDAC recently,

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>she told me that she believes there could be a

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>day where every asset on the planet could be digitized. Clearly,

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>even current as CEOs of big financial firm seem used

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to blockchain technology that these researchers are disputing, but that

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>fraud mitigation part is such a key argument to both

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>people who believe in it and the people who don't.

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Shinali, I want to touch you about another

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>developing story. I just got off a call with the

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Robin Hood Lad ten Of and their CFO

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Jason Warnick Robin Hood announcing they're laying off of the company.

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Here are a couple of thoughts from Lad on that call,

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>he said, I anticipated that what we saw in one

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the market conditions would lasts longer than

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it turned out. That's on me. Employees from all functions

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>will be impacted by these changes. Are concentrated in OPTS marketing,

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>program management. They over hired in these supports functions. He says.

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>This is to right size and exercise cost discipline. This

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is a big chunk of jobs from what was a

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>hot rising company. But you know they've only been public

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for a year, still a fairly young company. What's your take. Yeah,

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because that comment that you had put out

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>there really has gone fairly viral online. It's being shared

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty broadly that it's on me comment. So if it

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is on him, then you know what other pressure is

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>there on him? To really change the course of this business. Uh,

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they did false they pre reported. Remember they were not

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>even supposed to report their earnings today, and they did

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>fall short of expectations, including in kind of the core business,

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that transaction based revenue, that payment for order flow, money

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that comes in from the stocks and options business. In

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>addition to you know, remember that crypto business is still

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a small fraction of what they make overall when you

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>compare it to the point I've been making all day, emilies.

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>If you look at f t X, and we know

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman Freed is very exposed to Robin Hood. F

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>t X has grown massively with a few hundred employees,

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>essentially a lot smaller, a lot more nimble, but Robin

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Hood has has hired many, many hundreds of people. And

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>now you're seeing such a sharp reversal of that that

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is really going to impact an entire industry here, all right,

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we are going to continue to watch that one play out. Shanali,

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you for your insight there, Bloomberg's Shanali Bossi sticking

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>with Robin Hood, the company's crypto arm is gonna have

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to pay thirty million dollars a penalty to New York

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>state more not good news. A statement from the New

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>York Department of Financial Services points to quote significant failures

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in the areas of bank secrecy, anti money laundering obligations,

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and cyber security. Robin Hood Crypto will also be required

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to retain an independent consultant to perform a comprehensive evaluation

0:32:53.760 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of the company's compliance with the Department's regulations. Cohe City

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>has a new CEO on board. Former vm Ware CEO

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and SAP president san j pun And joining the data

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>management company as the cloud wars continue in the midst

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of rising inflation ing and a looming macro economic downturn.

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Newly minted Cohesity President and CEO, Sanja pun And joins us. Now,

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it's always been good to get your thoughts on big

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>picture trends over the years, and in the middle of

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. I remember reading the story about you. You

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>voluntarily decided to leave your last job and take some

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>time off in the pandemic, and that was kind of

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a trend among you know, tech veterans like yourself. How

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>did you decide that this was the right move. Yeah,

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it's been great. It's a day two. I've got my

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>COHESI shirt. I'm excited. But it's been a great year sabbatical,

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>almost twenty since I took one. What did you learn

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>from your sabbatical? How to spend more time with family.

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>That's always the thing that all executives are hard charging

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>need to do. Spend more time with your o ones.

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Kidding omen and that as I think the piece that

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you read talked about executives doing that. So it's been

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>great investing in companies are joined two boards, met a

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of entrepreneurs and it was in that context that

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I met Mohi who is the current founder of Cohesively,

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and I spent the last few months really vetting out.

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd heard great things about them and followed them from

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>VM or was there a big partner of ours And

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 1>these guys are the best tech in the platform, obviously

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>doing credit will and data management, data security and a

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago decide today CS and today's day two.

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 1>So do you think burnout is real and that more

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>tech executives could use a break. I think all of

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>us need to build work life balance into our lives,

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>so it isn't burnout. I wasn't you know, taking that

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>down for burnout, But when you do have a point

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in time where you can take that time off. What's

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the things that are closest to you, whether it's family,

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a hobby, whatever it is. And that's what

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it was very fortunate we will do. But I was

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>also felt there was a lot of gas in my tank.

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't ready to retire for life and I want

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 1>to get back in the saddle. So what's your take

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on what's happening in the big cloud wars and the

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>trends that we should be watching, especially as you know

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>rising inflation, all of these businesses talking about being more disciplined.

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>We just talked about Robin Hood laying off of its workforce.

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I think they out in the enterprise spending market. Yeah,

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and the point is his enterprise. The B two B

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>enterprise side of cloud is doing well. You just look

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>at the recent results and even the last three quarters

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of Amazon, Azure, Google, I build relationship with them. I

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:21.840
<v Speaker 1>think that also has a tremendous opportunity for us at

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Cohesive because we're at the junction of data, cloud and security.

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 1>So I think cloud and cybersecurity are doing well. So

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're in those sectors and B two B there's

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>some resilience. You have to prepare for potentially recession, whether

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>we go through once, You've got to be careful about

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>your spending. This is a smaller company than what I've

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>seen before VM. We're n s a P. But if

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you've got great customers like we do a global One

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>customer told me they haven't seen tech like this Emily

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>since VM. We're twenty years ago, Amazon ten years ago,

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and most recently Go Easy. That's the list of customers

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you want that will take you through even tough times.

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>The huge news today in the world and also the

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.280
<v Speaker 1>business world is this visit by Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan,

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 1>which could have broad implications for the U. China relationship

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and the tech industry, which obviously has deep ties to China.

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the longer term implications of this

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>are you know, as a business leader, does it worry you?

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to have an ad policy. I'm

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>super excited that Chip sack was was was signed and

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it really strengthens companies like Intel, all the ones that

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>do manufacturing. That's good for us, but we also need

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a strong tie with Taiwan and Taiwan s and a conductor.

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>They're also a somewhat of a beneficiary there, but a

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>strong relationship with especially Taiwan s and a conductor that's

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 1>super important. Chips are inside every fabric wildlife, whether it's cars,

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's healthcare devices, whether it's your smartphones. And

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a strong relations with Taiwan and US, I think signals

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to other people who may not want to see that happen,

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>that we're standing by neighbor and friend. How concerned are

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you about a recession? Are we already in a recession?

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Should they just call it? I'm not an economist, so

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't speculate. Many people do I I certainly think

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to brace yourself when you have these for

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>these sort of trifactor of inflation, war in Russia, Ukraine. Uh.

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>You know all of these kinds of factors, and you

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.720
<v Speaker 1>know the currency issues. So you're a brace for yourself.

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And what do you do? The strong should hopefully get

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>stronger if you're a company, you learn how to. I've

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>seen this in two thousand eight, and I saw this

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand It's not the first one I've seen.

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I think great companies get stronger. Some great companies were

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>born during the recession. You talked to uber. Google was

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>formed in two thousands, so I think great companies ubers

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eight and Google was two thousand. So

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>that's my my message to our employees of Cohesive, great

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>companies can thrive you and further if you're focusing your customers,

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>if you use the ecosystem to force multiply you and

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you keep retaining and recruiting good people. All right, Sanji Puna,

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>CEO and president of Cohesity, We'll be watching you on

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>your next adventure. Thank you, thank you very much everything.

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Tomorrow,

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be speaking with airbnbco Brian Chesky, also Anthony Nodo,

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 1>CEO of so FI post earnings results and well it's

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a big day micro Strategies Michael Sailor about his clans

0:37:55.600 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to step down and focus more on bitcoin acquisitions. Definitely

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in a show you don't want to miss, and don't

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>forget to check out our podcast wherever you get your podcasts.

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily checking in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg