WEBVTT - Nuclear Harbors Big Dreams Despite Hurdles

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the BNAF podcast. Today we talk about nuclear energy. It's

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>really fallen out of fashion over the last decade with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>retirements taking place all over the world, but recently countries

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>are starting to make noises again about this proven low

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 1>carbon technology and the question is really is it back Well,

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it all depends on whether or not words become action.

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>At COP twenty eight in Dubai. At the end of

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>last year, twenty five nations committed to tripling global nuclear

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>capacity by twenty fifty. So how might that take shape?

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Will they be reopening shutter nuclear facilities or building new ones,

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and if they are new, will the new ones be

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>small modular reactors? And does the recent spike in the

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>price of enriched uranium dampen that outlook? So today we

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>feature our b and EF resident nuclear expert, Kris Kodomski,

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and he shares some of the findings from the most

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:00.279
<v Speaker 1>recently published Nuclear Market Outlook. As a quick reminder, give

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>us a review if you want to help other people

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>find us and subscribe if you want to help yourself

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>find future shows as they're published. But right now, let's

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about nuclear's potential for a comeback story with Chris Kadomski. Chris,

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the show. Well, thank you, we're here

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>to talk about nuclear what else? And well we've had

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you on the show before. You give us an update

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>on what's happening in this space. Post Fukushima. There were

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of retirements of nuclear power plans. Plenty of countries,

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>including Japan, including Germany, really backed away from it. And

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say the temperature in the room got a

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>bit cold for nuclear. But now I want to know

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>what would you say the temperature in the room is

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is nuclear? Is it back? Is it coming back?

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, one of the younger analysts that BF came up

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to me and said that nuclear energy, specifically SMR small

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>module reactors, is trending now. And I was very very

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 2>happy to hear that. It certainly is trending when you

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 2>look at say the media coverage and interest from politicians

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 2>and interest from environmental groups and goos or so, it

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 2>certainly is trending. But being a cheerleader for nuclear power

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 2>does not necessarily translate to an actual build out and

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 2>rapid expansion of nuclear power, which we would all sort

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 2>of hope would happen for us to go ahead and

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 2>tackle our net zero aspiration and our climate change goals.

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean because in many respects, when you think about

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>nuclear as this carbon free source of energy, everything that

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>we shut down we've got to backfill with something else,

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases that's ended up being coal, and

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that certainly is not carbon free. And for everything that

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we shut down, that's something else that it doesn't actually

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>get to replace. So the renewables are replacing then the

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>nuclear instead of other high carbon parts of the economy.

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So it certainly is part of the solution, and let's

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>talk a bit about what part of the solution it

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>could be in the future. So with small modular let's

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>just do a definition for everybody who's listening, how do

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you define small modular reactors?

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 2>Small module actors of which they're about eighty being developed

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 2>around the world, are defined to be somewhat less than

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 2>three hundred megawats electric, but of course there's exemptions to that.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.839
<v Speaker 2>Or the Rolls Royce reactor is coming in at over

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and forty megawats a reactor, and so it's

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>also I characterize that as being an SMR. So besides

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the size characteristic. We want to look at other aspects

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 2>of the technology. That it's safer, that it's modular, it

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 2>could be manufactured in a factory instead of built on site,

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 2>and that provides a lot of advantages as far as

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 2>getting down the cost learning curve and hoping to produce

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 2>a reactor that is going to be less expensive on

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>a per kilowatt basis. There also is extinction that we

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 2>need to sort of make between SMR which are small

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>and advanced reactors. Small SMRs are typically characterized by being

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>light water reactors, so it's in small innovations. It's a

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 2>small move and the only really innovation is really shrinkages side.

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe there's some additional safety features that they incorporate in

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 2>the post Fukushima environment. There's also something that I characterizes

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 2>advanced reactors that are using different types of technology, new technologies,

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 2>and the example would be the fast reactor that Bill

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Gates is developing with terror power, which neutrons and electrons

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>are flying around at a much faster speed. They have

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 2>the ability therefore to sort of consume spent fuel and

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to burn the fuel much more effectively. It's a hedge

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 2>against proliferation and it perhaps deals with the longevity issue

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.679
<v Speaker 2>of spent nuclear fuel. There are also high temperature gas

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 2>reactors which theoretically cannot melt down, and there's molten salt

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 2>reactors where the uranium is already in molten state, very

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 2>very hot. So these are advanced features, more safety and

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 2>suggests that these reactors could be located closer to population

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 2>centers and also without the extensive then and expensive containment

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 2>that typically characterize the large reactors.

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So more safety and certainly a lot of new technology

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that's coming out. So yeah, definitely trending from a news standpoint,

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>trending topically, but let's talk about implementation. So where in

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the world have they started working with SMRs.

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 2>For example, there's only two SMRs that operate in the

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 2>world today. One is in Russia north of the Arctic

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Circle that's been operating since twenty nineteen early twenty twenty.

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 2>The other one has been operating for six months in China,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's an advanced reactor, a high temperature gas reactor.

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Both the Russians and the Chinese are working on additional SMRs,

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and there are other places in the world. Argentina has

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>been working on an SMR for the last ten years,

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.799
<v Speaker 2>so and with very little progress for political and management

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 2>changes that are going on at the site. And very sadly,

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 2>the US had a leading SMR project that was to

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 2>be built in Idaho at Idaho National Labs, and that

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 2>project fell on its sword last November because they realized

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 2>that the cost of electricity they were delivering to the

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 2>customer ums was going to be too high and they

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>mutually agreed to terminate the project. So there are a

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of questions about whether SMRs can deliver on the

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>promise of providing inexpensive electricity or competitive electricity that makes

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 2>it worthy of consideration by utility customer.

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>So now there are a number of countries though, that

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>are looking to really ramp up their nuclear capacity, or

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>at least that's what they said at COP twenty eight.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk a little bit about what those commitments

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>were and how much they're looking to increase nuclear on

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>their grids.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 2>So the big news that came out of COP twenty

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 2>eight eight, who was an agreement between twenty five countries

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 2>or so to triple nuclear capacity from about three hundred

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 2>and seventy gigawatts now presently installed around the world to

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 2>over eleven hundred gigawatts by twenty fifty and so that's

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>a huge, huge lift. And so the question is that

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 2>was a proclamation by politicians NGOs, and I question whether

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 2>or not the execution can be followed through so that

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>we actually go ahead and get there. And if you

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 2>look at the ramp, you know, nuclear capacity around the

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>world has been essentially flat since Fukushima. This varies a

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit, but if we're going to triple capacity in

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the next say twenty five years twenty six years, we

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 2>really need to step on the gas and start developing things.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 2>And the world is going to be characterized by different

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 2>technologies in different markets. In the East, where there's a

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 2>tremendous growth in demand for electricity, think China, India, Indonesia, Vietnam,

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 2>large reactors will probably fill role better than small reactors.

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>In the West where you have slower growth. Nevertheless, you

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 2>are having a lot of growth from the data centers

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 2>now projected, but they all the SMR technology would be

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>used preferably over large reactors for a variety of different reasons.

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 2>And in a market like the UK, UK is relying

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 2>on both large reactors. They're building Hinkley and they're planning

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 2>to build sizeball. But they'll also complement that with smaller reactors.

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 2>And the ideal thing about small reactors that they're more agile,

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 2>quicker to build, allegedly, less expensive to build, less risky

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>to build, and they sort of can replace the existing

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 2>coal infrastructure the country like the UK or Poland or

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 2>the US may have. So there's a little niche for

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 2>these SMRs to sort of replace coal and act as

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 2>a compliment to renewables. What's happening now, renewables is growing

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 2>like crazy, and as renewables grow, we need to add

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 2>natural gas capacity for the backup stand by a power

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>for when the wind is and blow or the sun

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't shine. We need to replace those natural guess capacity

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 2>with small SMRs that are agile enough to ramp up

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 2>to rapidly changing conditions and demand for electricity on the grid.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, I know it's been less than a year since

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the last COP so these twenty five countries or so

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't had a chance to actually really well build any

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of these new projects. But does it look like what

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>are they making noises about potentially doing? Is it going

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to be really varied all over the world? Are they

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>waiting for new technology? And you think they're going to

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially say we're going to do this a little bit

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>closer to twenty fifty or some countries really getting started

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, we've been tracking the development of SMRs and the

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 2>prognosis is not very very exciting as far as how

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 2>quickly they can be deployed. You know, there's twelve reactors

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>or ten reactors in the US that are undergoing pre

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 2>application feasibility studies or negotiations with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 2>and after they complete those pre application studies, the next

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 2>step will be for them to go ahead and formally

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 2>apply for an application to get a license to operate

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 2>and build a nuclear power plant. New Scale spent between

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 2>five hundred and six hundred million dollars to license its technology,

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 2>so it's a huge financial challenge and it takes a

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 2>very very long time, especially with some of these advanced

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 2>reactors which are atypical of what has come beforehand, which

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 2>is the light water boiling water reactors are pressurized water reactors.

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 2>So the NRC in the US and the Canadian authorities

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 2>and the authorities in the UK, you need to gear

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 2>up to understand the differences between the new types of

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 2>reactors that will be coming forward and respond accordingly. So

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>time is a problem, at cost is a problem, and

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of technological risks. We don't understand which

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 2>one of these reactors are going to be most sought

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 2>after by utility customers and by data centers and to

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 2>produce hydrogen. So there's a lot of opaque in the

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>market right now, and I'm hoping that that can clear

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>and we can make some decisions quickly and move forward

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 2>for the technology to deploy.

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And when technology is kind of just getting started and

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>just getting momentum, those first companies that are doing it

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>really under a lot of scrutiny. And sometimes when things

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>don't go very well, they become a canary in the

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>coal mine, and other times they are just the fact

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that businesses, maybe not every single one makes it along

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this road to scale. So that then brings me to

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>New Scale. Can you talk a little bit about what

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>happened at New Scale and whether or not this is

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>something that is teaching lessons to other part of the

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>market or is it just isolated to that specific company.

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>So and your Scale is developing a seventy seven megawatt

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 2>reactor and they intend to bundle two four six of them,

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 2>possibly twelve of them together to fulfill the demand requirements

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 2>from their customer. And what their approach is is to

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 2>have these individual reactors sitting in a pool of water,

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>six story swimming pool if you can imagine, and that

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 2>requires a lot of physical concrete excavation of the ground

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 2>and whatever. So they tried to simplify the approach by

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing these these reactors in an assembly line and to

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 2>produce them simply and get them across because the smaller

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the reactor is, the broader the amount of companies that

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>can manufacture these technologies. But in doing so they also created,

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, a law of unforeseen circumstances where there is

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 2>a problem now that you need to dig deep into

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the ground to keep this reactor swimming pool. Into encase,

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 2>these these six to twelve reactors underground, and so you

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 2>now have an excavation course that some of the other

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 2>reactors do not have. So apparently the cost of doing

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 2>so in Idaho was prohibitive, and there were some unique

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 2>circumstances that existed at Idaho where the site was proposed

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 2>that made them sort of raise the cost for building

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>producing the reactor. Secondly, the customer was UAMS. UAMS is

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 2>an association of fifty or so municipal utilities, and they

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 2>didn't have any historic experience operating nuclear power plants. It

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 2>would have been much easier had you had a Duke

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Energy or a Southern Company or Dominion, which are large

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 2>nuclear operators in the US. They could have better understand

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 2>some of the challenges that would have existed in building

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 2>a first of a kind reactor in a remote place.

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 2>And so the customer was perhaps ill prepared for the

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 2>complexities of building and operating a nuclear power plant, and

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 2>they threw a lot of money the Department of Energy,

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 2>and there was nobody else around the town. New Scale

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 2>was the only company that has gotten an NRC license

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 2>to date, and so we were hoping that this would

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 2>be leading the way and that they would have some

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of success in developing that. So a combination of

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 2>technology that perhaps was not really thought out as well

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 2>as that should have been for that particular location, a

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 2>customer that didn't have the expertise that some of the

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 2>other larger utilities could have provided and could have foreseen

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 2>some of the issues and cut them off at the pass.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 2>And the fact that you had one company going forward

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 2>that had a lot of US government support, and perhaps

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 2>there were some questions and issues over there. The New

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Scale technology represents an incremental move forward. The innovation was

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 2>a shrinkage in size, and it did not provide some

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 2>of the other advantages that say, a fast reactor or

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>a high temperature gas reactor would have provided. And it

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>turned out to be more complicated and more expensive than

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 2>people had anticipated.

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>But not wholly uncommon when we think about new technology

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of any kind. And I know you know the stakes

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>are high with nuclear, but when you're thinking about implementing

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>new technology, there are going to be some implementation hiccups.

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this, because the stakes are so high,

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to cause problems for the wider industry for

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>us or will it just be that this particular thing

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>has been difficult and maybe the next one will be

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>less difficult.

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, we asked New Scale those questions, and they were

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>very quick to point out that the site characteristics and

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the individual circumstances of the Carbon Free project, which was

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 2>the name of the project, were unique. And New Scale

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 2>has been pretty aggressive and developing other data center applications

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 2>forwards technology, and some of the competitors to New Scale

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a whole tech or a terror power or whatever. They

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 2>are all very quick to distinguish the differences between their

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 2>approach and their technology and what went wrong at the

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Carbon Free project. So there's hope that there will be

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>additional pathways or new pathways that these other companies can

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 2>run down and succeed. And I hope that's the case.

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a second about enriched uranium and what's

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>been happening on that side. Last time we had you

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on this show, I asked you whether or not there

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>was enough uranium in the world for are current and

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>future nuclear plans, and there was a resounding yes. But

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>from the enrichment side, we've actually seen enriched uranium fluctuating

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>prices this year. We've seen prices go up. Can you

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about what has caused that and

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>really what's going to happen on the price side when

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to enriched uranium.

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so from the price of uranium, uranium is traded

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 2>in the form of yellowcake U three eight, and there

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 2>is uranium is traded in the spot market, which utilities

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 2>and minors can sort of negotiate sell on a short

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 2>term basis. But what's really really important is the term market.

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 2>The term market is long term pricing contracts because utilities

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 2>understand that what's really important is not so much the

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 2>price of the uranium, but the availability of the uranium.

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Nuclear utility does not want to not have uranium to operate,

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 2>so it's must of concern for the price than it

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 2>is for the availability. Availability is very, very important, and

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 2>we've seen the price of uranium double in twenty twenty three,

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 2>and there has been a set of hive around one

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred and six earlier this year, sometime in February. It's

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 2>retreated a little bit about out since then, but there's

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 2>been in the news a lot because of the fact

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 2>that enriched uranium. Uranium comes out of the ground at

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 2>points zero seven percent uranium two thirty five, which is

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 2>the fissile part of the atom, which is unstable, as

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>opposed to uranium two thirty eight, which is the more

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 2>stable fertile part of the atom. And so you enriched

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the natural uranium from points zero seven percent in its

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.199
<v Speaker 2>natural state up to four and a half percent for

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 2>suitable use for a nuclear power plant. If you are

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 2>having an advanced reactor, you'll want to go ahead and

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 2>push that uranium up to say nineteen and a half

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent or somewhere in between, and that's called HALU.

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Highest say low enriched uranium and I say loan rich uranium.

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>The only commercial source for that in the world these

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 2>days are the Russians, and it's a very expensive process.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 2>You just don't all of a sudden decide well, I

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 2>want to go ahead increase my uranium levels enrichment levels

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 2>from four and a half percent up to twenty percent,

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 2>because you have to go through a lot of regulatory

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 2>and licensing steps in order to do that. So it's

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 2>pretty expensive proposition. And also another problem is that there's

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 2>an uncertainty of demand. You have ten to twelve companies

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 2>in the US, as an example, that are going through

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 2>the licensing process or discussions with the NRC. We're not

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 2>sure how many of them will go through and whether

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 2>or not those companies that do go through the process

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 2>will actually deliver a commercial product that will have a

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 2>demand for uranium. So it's like a chicken and egg

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 2>situation as far as HALU demand is concerned. Now, the

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 2>US government has stepped in and made a lot of

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>incentives recently to sort of support a domestic uranium industry

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 2>laws left and right. Most recently earlier this week, there's

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 2>executive order from the President of Biden that he's going

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 2>to try to support large reactors, which I think is

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 2>a surprising development. He's also going to support the deployment

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 2>of advanced reactors on military basis, and he's also providing

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 2>a lot of support to the uranium industry to create

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 2>and strengthen the uranium industry in the US. The uranium

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 2>we used to produce a lot of uranium in this

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 2>country and then for environmental reasons and for the fact

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 2>that nuclear fill out of favor in the wake of Fukushima,

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, our production has gone down to next to nothing.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Now we're starting to produce more and more uranium. But

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 2>we have only one facility in the US that can

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 2>make highes say loan rich uranium, and that's Centrist and

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 2>that company is just gearing up and looking to try

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 2>to expand its operations and hopefully with support from the

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 2>US government, financing will flow to the construction of a

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 2>larger facility with which they'll be able to provide commercial

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 2>amounts of HALO for the US industry and other markets globally.

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So if the Biden administration, during an election year, has

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>announced that they want to see more uranium enrichment and

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>more large nuclear plans. What I want to understand is

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>really what underlies that. Is it domestic security of energy

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.959
<v Speaker 1>supply and invariably this is a country that exports natural gas,

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or is it a big job creator? And are we

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about jobs here something else that maybe I'm not

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>getting well.

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Jobs has been one of the big highlights of the

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 2>nuclear power industry. One of the reasons that I believe

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>that they went forward with the Hinckley project because it's

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 2>not an expensive electricity, but it was twenty five thousand jobs.

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>So the decision was made by politicians years ago to

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 2>build this facility because I'll put twenty five thousand people

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 2>to work and would produce a tremendous amount of electricity,

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 2>and it would be domestically produced electricity, carbon free electricity.

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 2>So there was a lot of reasons for going ahead

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 2>with that decision, aside from producing the least expensive election electricity.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 2>And so that's a big driver for nuclear power is

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 2>the fact that it keeps people at work, and it

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 2>provides energy security, and it's also carbon free, and it's

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 2>a good balance and a good complement to the increasing

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 2>amount of renewables that are being deployed. So I think people,

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I think erroneously look at nuclear as a competitor to renewables.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 2>I look at nuclear as a complement to renewables, and

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 2>that you have renewables as a preferred option, and you

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 2>have a complementary source that's baseload that's available twenty four

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 2>hours a day that can sort of complement and enable

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 2>the growth of carbon free energy, especially renewables. And we

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 2>see data centers entering the picture right now. Data centers

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 2>have a requirement for twenty four to seven clean energy

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 2>and that can be best supplied with nuclear power.

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So essentially the US's solution to enriched uranium is to

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>do it domestically.

0:21:56.119 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there's Urinko is another supplier of enriched uranium. They

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>have operations in Europe and they have an operation in

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 2>New Mexico. But I think that Russians we're providing a

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 2>pretty substantial chunk, about twenty seven percent of the enrich

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 2>uranium to the US, and that's something that needs to

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 2>be changed from a political perspective, and also it's a

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 2>very very helpful, healthy thing for the US to go ahead,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 2>and because we are the largest market for uranium in

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 2>the world with ninety four reactors operating. The other closest

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 2>country is France and China, which have you know, just

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 2>over fifty.

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>You had mentioned twenty four to seven clean power, and

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the question I have for you is can you give

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>me some examples of where those projects are kind of

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the companies that are looking at those sorts of projects

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And additionally, you know, are they including nuclear in this

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>or when they're seeing twenty four seven clean power, they

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how to do it with renewables only.

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 2>I think that if you look at all of the

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 2>press releases that are coming out from some of these

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 2>advanced reacted to companies SMR developers, they're all talking about

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the big opportunities from data centers, new scale being one,

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 2>oklow being another one. And so this is a very

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 2>very important thing. Microsoft operates a huge fleet of data

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 2>centers and they've signed a contract with a fusion company, Helion,

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 2>to provide electricity for that data center by twenty twenty eight.

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 2>And so there's a lot of interest from data centers

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 2>to sort of gear up and have carbon free power,

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 2>which reliable, secure and affordable because what will happen is

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 2>that the data centers will contract directly with these nuclear

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 2>operations and sort of bypass the retail and wholesale rates

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 2>that they would have to pay by buying that electricity

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 2>from the grid. So we're seeing situations where nuclear power

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 2>plans are signing power purchase agreements with data centers to

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 2>directly supply them.

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So we had talked about the new projects that the

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration is encouraging and then commitment to cop to

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>trouble nuclear capacity and new technology, But what about the

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>existing technology that's already online. In this post Fukushima way,

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>we saw a number of those getting retired. Have the

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>retirements stopped?

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that the era of nuclear retirements is behind us.

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 2>It's now very politically unacceptable to close down a nuclear

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 2>power plant which is carbon free for a variety of

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 2>different reasons. In the US, most of the nuclear power

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 2>plants were closed down because they were uncompetitive with chief

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>natural gas. And we're seeing for the first time in

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the US, if not the world, where a nuclear power

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 2>plant that was closed because I couldn't compete with cheap

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 2>natural gas is now being supported by the US government

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 2>and the state government of Michigan to bring it back online,

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 2>and that's a very very significant thing. And the Biden

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 2>administration is also talking perhaps about other nuclear power plants

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 2>that have been closed in an era a very cheap

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 2>natural gas to try to bring them back online, and

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>that's something that would be of great interest. It's part

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 2>of a triative strategy to keep the existing fleet operating longer,

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 2>to expand the capacity of the existing fleet, to bring

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 2>back some reactors that have closed. I don't know how

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>successful and to what extent that will be, And to

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 2>build advanced reactors in this country and in the US market,

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 2>I really question the wisdom about building large reactors because

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 2>large reactors take ten years to build, they're very, very expensive,

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>and the decision process of a utility is such that

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the CEOs typically last five to six seven years at

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 2>a leadership position. So CEO who starts initiates a project

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 2>to go ahead and build a nuclear actor will not

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 2>be there when it finally comes online. And so there's

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of risk and a lot of cost overrun

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and time scheduling, and it takes a very long time

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 2>to build these reactors, and I think that poses a

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 2>huge amount of risk for you toies what distinguishes the

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 2>nuclear power industry from the other renewable industries is that

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 2>policy decisions are less effective than market pull to get

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 2>nuclear power plants built. So you can have all the

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 2>policy in the world, but you really need to have

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 2>a utility say hey, I really need this twenty four

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 2>to seven carbon free energy, and I'm willing to spend

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money to go ahead and get that,

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 2>and the cost of doing so and the time frames

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 2>for doing so are so prohibitive in the United States

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 2>that I suggest that the solution will be for advanced

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 2>reactors which are smaller, provide less capital risk, in fact,

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 2>they costs. They're smaller, they cost less, and that they

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 2>can build in a shorter period of time, and they

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 2>sort of become more acceptable to the decision makers out

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 2>of utility or are an operator of a lot of

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 2>data centers to chase after smaller nuclear reactors as opposed

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 2>to large reactors which can take forever.

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>So we know that nuclear is now providing flexibility, it's

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>carbon free, it has a role to play in twenty

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>four to seven clean power. And you had mentioned earlier

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>that China was one of the countries that was looking

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at installing more on the small modular side. Is there

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a parallel and can I essentially be hopeful that costs

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>are going to come down, not just for the smaller

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>reactors because they're smaller therefore less expensive, but are we

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>going to see cost of clients, because when I think

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>about what's happened with China and solar manufacturing and battery manufacturing,

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we have seen prices drop precipitously when they have entered

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a market really at scale. Are we going to see

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the same thing.

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 2>In nuclear There's a fundamental difference between the US market

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 2>for nuclear power plants and the Chinese market for nuclear

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 2>power plants, and the two significant differences. One is that

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 2>in the US, we are greening the electrical grid. In

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 2>China they're expanding the electrical grid in a much faster way.

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 2>So large reactors become very very appropriate. If you're expanding

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 2>the size of your generating capacity, We're going to do

0:27:59.920 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 2>that in a smaller way than the Chinese are doing.

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of coal plants that we need

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 2>to retire. So if you're retiring coal plants that are

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 2>four or five hundred megawatts, typically you want to have

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 2>them replaced by smaller mountor reactors that are closer in

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 2>size to what you're gearing down. And another most significant

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 2>distinction between the Chinese market and the US market is

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>that Chinese, because they have such experience building large nuclear

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 2>power plants, they're very good at it, and they can

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 2>produce and the cost of building a nuclear power plant

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 2>is probably one quarter in China as it is in

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the US based on the data we have collected, So

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 2>it makes a lot of sense for the Chinese to

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and build large reactors. They'll put six reactors

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 2>at one site and they'll do them sequentially, so it's

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 2>a very very cost effective way of manufacturing and producing

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 2>large reactors. So I see China being a leader in

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 2>large reactive development for a while, even though they're starting

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 2>to develop their own small react the technologies potentially for

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 2>export and for smaller remote areas, and they're ahead of

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 2>the US in doing so.

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Already, you've already discussed that the US is getting back

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>into the game here and that China's looking at it.

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And then historically Russia has been focused on nuclear power

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. The Middle East is potential growth area. Can

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>we talk a little bit about some of the dynamics

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>there and why that might be taking place.

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 2>The UAE signed a lot of agreements with US advanced

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 2>reactor companies, which I think is very very encouraging because

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 2>they can provide a source of capital and they can

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 2>provide access to local markets in the region. One of

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the things that a very markedly difference between the market

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 2>for electricity in the Middle East as opposed to the

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 2>US is that the demand for electricity in August is

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 2>typically twice what the demand is for electricity in December

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 2>because of the huge air conditioned load. So what you

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 2>end up doing is you try to apply your peak

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 2>demand and you have all this excess capacity. So we've

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.239
<v Speaker 2>had conversations with prospects in the Middle East who are

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.239
<v Speaker 2>looking to develop nuclear power in order to sort of

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 2>provide that peak demand, and then they can use when

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 2>there's less demand for electricity, switch the energy to desalidating

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 2>water and also to producing hydrogen. And that's not a

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 2>very very effective way of not one hundred percent utilizing

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 2>your electrolyizer, but it's very easy to store water. So

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you can have these nuclear power plants switching to desoalidating

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 2>water or producing hydrogen, and that makes a lot of sense,

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 2>and we see a lot of interest in the region.

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 2>We see also a lot of growth in nuclear power

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 2>where you have Turkey and Egypt are both building for

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 2>large nuclear power plants. The UAE has just completed for

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 2>large nuclear power plants and it's talking about a second

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 2>large plant over there. And also Saudi Arabia has been

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 2>toying with building nuclear power plant for a lot of years,

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 2>and they are at one time we're considering seventeen nuclear

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 2>power plants. Now it's down to two or so. But

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of a lot of issues and a

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of opportunity to provide some carbon free generation over there,

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to sort of have them stop burning oil for their

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 2>power generation needs. So the Middle East and other parts

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 2>of Africa can be very very interesting prospects for the

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 2>right type of nuclear technology.

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the potential use cases for nuclear is for hydrogen. So,

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>as we know from the show, you make hydrogen from

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>other sources of energy and then use it for perhaps

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>hard debate space and various things that are more difficult

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:48.479
<v Speaker 1>to decarbonize, like cement or steel or aluminum. Can you

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the advantages of using nuclear as

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the energy source for hydrogen.

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 2>There are plans in the US to develop nuclear powered

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 2>hydrogen hubs, and there is a big distinction between producing

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 2>hydrogen from nuclear power as proposed to producing hydrogen from

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 2>renewables and the fact that you can use solid oxide electrilizers, soees,

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>and these things take effect electrilyizing steam as opposed to

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 2>electrializing water. And so the thermal energy available from a

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 2>nuclear power plant combined with electrical energy from a nuclear

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 2>power plant gives the cost give a certain cost advantage

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 2>to producing hydrogen from nuclear power as opposed to producing

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 2>hydrogen from renewables, And that's something that is being looked at,

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and whether or not it's actually true is perhaps something

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 2>that needs further exploration. I know in Poland Rolls Royce

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 2>is talking to a company called Industria and they're thinking

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 2>about developing nuclear and hydrogen projects in the country, but

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the timeframe for that is not going to be until

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 2>mid to early twenty thirties.

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Now, a girl's got a dream when it comes to

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:08.239
<v Speaker 1>thinking about technology breakthroughs that could really fundamentally change the

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>economics and therefore missions of the energy industry. Can you

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>tell me a bit about how close we are getting

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on fusion.

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.959
<v Speaker 2>Fusion is a great topic. It's received about six billion

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars in private investment in the last several years, and

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 2>there are several companies in the UK, in the US

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and Asia who are really pushing forward to sort of

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 2>commercialize this technology. I have visited six or seven different

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 2>fusion companies in Europe, in the UK, and in the US,

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 2>and I'm very impressed by what I see. One has

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 2>to understand that what has enabled this rapid increase in

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 2>interest in fusion, and it boils down to several things.

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 2>The tools that the engineers and scientists need to produce

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 2>fusion devices have suddenly become much more readily available, and

0:33:55.480 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 2>they include supercomputing, three D printing, advanced material and high

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 2>temperatures some conductor magnets. So the available of these four

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 2>things coming together all of a sudden gives these brilliant

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 2>people the tools with which to go ahead and miniaturize

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 2>fusion devices and to make them much more efficient. And

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 2>as a result of that, we have progress made and

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 2>several different continents to recognize the potential and realize the

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 2>potential of fusion. So we're very, very hopeful that we'll

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 2>see some additional announcements in twenty twenty five that will

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of introduce a second wave of enthusiasm for fusion.

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Several companies took a billion dollars two billion dollars in

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 2>one case of Commonwealth fusion in twenty twenty two, I believe,

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and so they're now investing that money and producing prototypes

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 2>which will hopefully produce net energy gain. And when that happens,

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 2>then I expect we'll see another influx of capital that

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 2>will be able to sort of lead to the commercialation

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 2>of fusion devices, hopefully by the end of the decade.

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's good reason to be hopeful. Chris, thank you

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining today and forgiving it's an update

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>on what's happening in nuclear.

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 2>My pleasure always. Thank you.

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode of Switched On was produced by Cam Gray

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>with production assistance from Kamala Shelling. Bloomberg NIF is a

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>recording does not constitute, nor should it be construed, as

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>investment advice, investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to an

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>investment or other strategy. Bloomberg ANIF should not be considered

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 1>as information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision.

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Neither Bloomberg Finance LP, nor any of its affiliates makes

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the information contained in this recording, and any liability

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>as a result of this recording is expressly disclaimed