WEBVTT - GameStop’s Plunge Triggers Halts as Platforms Restrict Trades

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanebeck. We're here every day bringing

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world's of business and finance,

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. So I have to say, Tim,

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we were taking our weekend show this morning, and you know,

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a crazy week when virus news is overshadowed in

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>our world by the phenomenon that is game stopped, which

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.279
<v Speaker 1>we are going to continue talking about over the next

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>few hours. It's the story. It is the story. But

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>let's not forget the other big story is the virus. Yeah,

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and look, um, it does feel like we are getting

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 1>to a point where it's the sad reality is that

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people dying, our fellows citizens every day is

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>not the headline anymore. No, and Um, and though the

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers are still troubling, even though some of them are

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>coming down, let's talk about it because there's a lot

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of stuff going on, including we talked about the variant,

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the South African variant for the virus UH finding cases

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in South Carolina. Dan Pulsky is with us. He's professor

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of health policy and Management at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of Public Health. He has studied health economics and health

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>care policy. The Bloomberg School of Public Health, supported by

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Michael R. Bloomberg, founder a Bloomberg ALP and Blomberg Philanthropies,

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>stands with us on the phone from Philadelphia. Dan, good

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to have you here with Tim and myself. Um, there

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 1>is a fair amount of headlines out and about there. Uh,

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is most important for our audience

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>to kind of focus on right now when it comes

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to COVID and the vaccine rollout. Um. I guess patience

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's patients with a C. Yes, exactly. UM. You know,

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of optimism that everything's going

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to get back to normal, but it's going to take

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>some time. Um. And you know, the vaccines are in shortage,

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>so all of the issues that I think are um

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>out there around you know, the anxiety about getting my dose.

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>When am I going to get it? What's going wrong? Um?

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>You know it comes back to that. They're just it's

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a little time to produce vaccines for for

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 1>everyone around the world. Dan, I I gotta ask. Um.

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>You know Carol mentioned the South African strain being found

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>in South Carolina today. Uh. We we don't know, based

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>on testing how effective the existing vaccines are against new

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>strains that emerge. UM, but we do know that the

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>drug manufacturers are already altering their formulas in order to

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>address this. Should should people put off getting a vaccine

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>that first shot to try to get one that actually

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>uh protects against new strains? Uh? No, don't put it off.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Get your vaccine when it's your turn to get your vaccine,

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>for sure. UM. But you know in the new variants

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>UM bring up, you know it's something similar to flu

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and that over the law, we're going to be living

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>with this virus for a long time, UM, for years, UM,

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna keep evolving, just like we need a

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>flu shot every year. UM. I wouldn't be surprised if

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we end up needing ah, you know, to get the

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>COVID whatever variants of the year into our um shot. Um,

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>just as part of how we conduct our daily lives.

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. I groaned when I heard that, but then

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought to myself, Hey, that's not so bad. You know,

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>getting the flu shot is not that big of a deal. Yeah,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not the big of a deal. But also getting

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>flu isn't that big of a deal. I mean, it's

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it's still you know, a serious can be serious for people,

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>especially if they're vulnerable. UM. You know right now, COVID

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is certainly much more serious than the flu. So that's

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I think where the difference is. Getting a flu shot

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't a big deal, but you know, getting getting of

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it certainly is worse. And I think that's some of

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the fear on the new variants is just so much

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty and you think, Okay, well we've finally got this tackle,

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and then these variants come up, and it just brings

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>up the fact that you know, this is something we're

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to live with one way or another for

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>quite some time. When you say that we may have

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to get a vaccine for COVID on a regular basis,

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>just like we do for a flu vaccine. Will it

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be a case that it's the same thing that if

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't know, you might get a little sick, or

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is it a case that if you don't get it,

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get really sick and maybe create some problems

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in society? Um, you know, I think it's the same

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>messaging as as flu that every person who gets the

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>flu vaccine, you're not only protecting yourself, but you're protecting others,

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly those most vulnerable that actually can't get the flu vaccine.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's certainly um going to be the case for

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>for the coronavirus vaccine as well. Um. Uh, but you know,

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and and then I think on top of that, uh,

0:04:58.160 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a kind of thing that you know,

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>like up a expert in in like you know, Dr

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Fraud she can explain better than myself. But um, if

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>if the vaccine doesn't have really great coverage, variants that

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>can spin out when you know a lot there's a

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of people covered, but not enough people covered. Yeah

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>that the viruses. People are fighting against the virus, and

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 1>then the virus kind of fights back, and and the

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>one who's fighting back the virus who who's fighting back

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit stronger than the one that before.

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of the scientific challenge why it's so

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>important to get vaccinated. Dan, Um night, We we only

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>have about thirty seconds left. But I know you've been

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>looking very closely at the rollout of the vaccine. Um,

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>we've heard a lot about speed bumps in your opinion.

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>How are we doing so far, because this is a race. Well,

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing pretty poorly. Um, but you know we

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.559
<v Speaker 1>now have you know Biden's goal of a hundred million

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>doses in a hundred days. Um, it's gonna be some

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more bumps in the road to kind of

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>get to the point where, um, things are rolling at

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a pace where I feel like that can be achieved. So, UM,

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a worthy goal and I'm optimistic. Let's

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>get back to you. Dr Dan Pulsky, Professor of Health

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>economics and Policy at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Health.

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from Philadelphia. The Johns

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health is supported by Michael R. Bloomberg,

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>founder of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Dan I wanted

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to get your thoughts on what we We just heard

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>from Jason Farley at the Bloomberg who's the professor of

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>nursing at talking all about how we need to ramp

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>up production of vaccine to get those shots in arms.

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>What is the right way to ramp up production and

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>then also ramp up distribution in an administration of vaccine UM,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>I would say that the challenge of ramping up distribution

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is you know, were more challenging and that it's so distributed.

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>So to ramp up production, you know, we can rely

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>on industry UM that I think has that capacity. But

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to ramp up distribution, it's like inventing a new company. UM.

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's putting up places to distribute vaccine, that's

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>training people how to do it. UM. The staffing challenges,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the logistical challenges, the information system challenges are you know,

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there's just no infrastructure in place to really UM, you know,

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>ramp up quickly and reliably. But I think one thing

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that's so frustrating to people is that it's not like

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>we had no warning, right, Like, this is something that

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we knew since you know, some people since February, most

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>people since March, that we would need to distribute an

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>administer vaccine and manufacture tons and tons of vaccines. Well

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but the manufacturing. And we're not mad at you, We're

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>just trying to understand how did it happen. I mean,

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it was, you know, a leadership, a vacuum

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in the prior administration. Uh. You know, I was part

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of this panel talking of you planning for one aspect,

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, how to distribute vaccines equitably when

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's in shortage, And we were talking back in the

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>summer and making really detailed plans for that. But we

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we we just wanted information about what the administration was

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>doing to plan for this period that we all knew

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>was going to start, you know, six months in the future, right,

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and we never got any information. We were frustrated, like

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>why why aren't they sharing any information? Only now do

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>we realize there was no information to share. It's like

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>planning for It's like planning for war, right, planning for war.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>You know it's coming, we know we have to manufacture

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tanks and being really basic here and

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>then okay, we make the tanks, but wow, how do

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we get it to people in the field who need it?

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>How do we get it to you know, the members

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of the military. I mean, I feel like that's what

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we did, and I just into it staggering. And I

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>do know the body administration has been has been rather

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>frank about saying that maybe the situation was a lot

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>worse than we anticipated, and they're getting up to speed.

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>But I guess I just don't understand why it is

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 1>a nation all of the companies involved just say okay,

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go on, you know, into overdrive and just let's

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.599
<v Speaker 1>ramp up manufacturing of the vaccines and do everything and

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>anything to get them out there. Yeah. Um, well, the

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the the issue with the manufacturing, it is actually it's

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>quite a miracle, and that a typical way of vaccines

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>developed is the manufacturing doesn't start to laughter, everything has

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>been approved, but this was such an extraordinary circumstance that

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:43.599
<v Speaker 1>everything was being done in parallel. Um, so while the

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>drug was being tested, manufacturing was being ramped up. And uh,

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's actually been quite a feat compared to the past.

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a highly regulated industry. It's hard to do these things.

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>A tremendous amount of um collaboration between industry partners, new

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>partnerships being developed and working with government, so you know,

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>while it's certainly not fast enough and there's a lot

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of challenges to get it at a rate that I

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 1>think people would feel would be you know, even a

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>bee will probably not to be here. UM. But you know,

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the larger perspective is that, um, it has

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>been you know, historic feat of development and of manufacturing.

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just the demand is so an extraordinary Dan, we

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>only have about fifteen seconds left. Your best estimation for

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>when everybody who wants a vaccine will be able to

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>get one here in the United States? Um, I would say,

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, through the year, end of the year. Wow,

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot different than what we heard from the

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>President earlier this earlier this week, who said that it

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>will be by this spring. Yeah. Well it's it's yeah, Dan,

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, UM, and really appreciate it. Dr

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Dan Pulsky, Professor of Health economics and Policy at Johns

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins Bloomberg schoo Public Health, on the phone from Philadelphia

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and of course the Bloomberg School of Public Health supported

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg Elpy and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Listen,

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I know you and I kind of hammer. He was

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>such a gem. But you know, I think we all

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of want to know, like when when do we

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>start to get back to normal? When will we be vaccinated?

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sick of this pandemic. No I'm not the

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>only one, alright, So great story. Pillow King. Mike Glendel,

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you know him from those late night commercials. You'll also

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>know him because a couple of years ago Bloomberg business

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Week did a deep dive into him. He's an ally

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of former President Donald Trump, and his reporter Josh Dean

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is back writing about him again. Laugh at dam Shunn

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>his business sue him. That my pelo ceo will not

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>stop trying to prove Donald Trump got cheated. That's the headline,

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Josh joining us on the phone in New York along

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg business Week editor Joe Webber on the access

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>line in Brooklyn. Tim and I could not get enough

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of this story. Chill uh boy? I I could, um,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>but that was mainly just because of what it is.

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, backstory here. Four years ago, Aosh Dean

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 1>wrote basically the definitive story on Mike Lindell and just

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>the preposterous business success story. Um. That that is my

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>pillow And this is a guy who went from basically

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>being a crack addict UM to an unlikely entrepreneur with

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>actually like a pretty successful business. UM. And Josh actually

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>did that story four years ago for the magazine and

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it happened to coincide basically with the first couple of

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>visits that Lindell had with Trump. And obviously, if you

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>know anything about Mike Lindell, the past four years, UM

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>have become much trumpier UM, let's say. And so when

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the administration was in its last days, we've kind of

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>reached out to Josh and said, what do you what

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>do you think about getting back in touch with Mike

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Lendel And so that led to a pretty memorable conversation

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that Josh had with him and this feature. UM, Josh,

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what was the what was the opening question? How did

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the converse stations start with with Mr Lindell? I don't

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>even know if I needed to ask a question. I

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>think I think I just said hello often running started

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>just going I mean that man is UM. I think

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I said in the original story, you know, he's been

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>off cocaine and crack now for a long time, but

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like his body is permanently stuck in up in

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>up cocaine mania. Like, I don't think he's used drugs

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in a long time, but he talks like someone who's

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>who maybe just did it for so long that he

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>can't he can't control himself anymore. Well so listen, though

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>he's definitely an ally of Donald Trump, we know that,

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and you laid out really well, why has he continued

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to be so adamant despite the court cases that have

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>shown that there was no fraud in the election? Why

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>has he and I know this is when he was

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>often running and talking with you, why has he, though

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>continued to say there was fraud. I mean, he's he's

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>just one of those people who are so convinced of

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>something that no amount of information or evidence would ever

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>change his mind. I mean he would tell you, you know,

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>for hours on end that he's convinced and that he

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>has this you know, quote unquote forensic evidence of machine

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>hacking and all this stuff, and talking about examples like

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this man and Italy who allegedly confessed and cord to hack. Well,

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean some of these stories you just have to

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>do a little bit of begging to realize, like it's

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>either been debunked or it's being spun in a slightly

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>um disingenuous way so that the evidence isn't really evidence.

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, you know, unless he's completely doing this

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>for show, and I don't think that he is. He

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>truly believes that, you know, he's here to save Donald

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump's presidency and to save democracy. Well, Josh, I was

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>so surprised to read that he's not concerned at all

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>by this, uh what you call a big danger the

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>dominion voting systems UM having threatened him with a defamation suit.

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh you write that a decision in Dominion's favor could

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>destroy my pillow as a company. Uh, why is he

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>not concerned about this? This is a big deal. Yeah,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here's probably the most convincing evidence that he

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>truly believes what he's saying, that it's not some kind

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of act, because yeah, I mean, this is a potentially

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>an existential threat to my pillow, like a decisive judgment,

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking like, you know, I think dominions going

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>after these these defense for hundreds of millions of dollars.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>If they choose to sue him, um, and he loses,

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>then he could lose the company. But he thinks that

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>he's right, So he believes as he as he tells it,

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go to court and I'll present my

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>evidence and i will prevail. I mean it's from the

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>outside objectively, it seems crazy and self destructive, but he

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't see it. Tell uh, what do you have to

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>say about how his business has been doing? Because there

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>was this photograph taking taking of him, uh leaving the

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>White House with what appeared to be um some papers

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that referenced martial law. Uh, and and I'm curious, like, hey,

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you say about that? And then be how

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is how his business been doing well? The martial law

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of thing he said that was we're not his notes.

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So basically he was going to see Trump to present

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>his you know, quote unquote evidence of of like election fraud.

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>And then a lawyer friend of his, if he wouldn't name,

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>gave him a second set of notes that included um,

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that martial law reference. So he's like, I don't even

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>know what marshal is. That wasn't me um. As for

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the business, he's you know again, he thinks that this

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>is good for his business, and it may be. I mean,

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, he says, sales are up, he's

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>hiring more people. He's actually added floor space because you know,

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's probably everything is political today, right, so

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>people maybe buying pillows as a reaction to what they

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>see as like left wing blowback. Yeah, it's interesting. Really

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a buddy of Donald Trump's. No, I mean I asked

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you talked to the president. He said, no, Like I

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have his faw number. We've only met a handful

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of times. But I mean he loves he thinks it's

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump is amazing. I mean they've had some meetings. He

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>appeared at that that famous or infamous I guess some

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus briefing. He's been on, you know, in in tons

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>of rallies. But he said they're not friends. They've just

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>met a fanful of times. And what about you guys

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about Yeah, go ahead, go ahead, Joel. What else

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>do you guys talk about? Josh, we talked about the pandemic,

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and um coronavirus. Mike does not believe that

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the threat that we all believe it to be.

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And he takes a supplement that he also sells that

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>he thinks keeps him safe. He will not be getting

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. Wow, that's shocking to hear. I mean, I

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>guess there is some vaccine skepticism. Um. What about his

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>political ambitions, Well, for for a lot of the past year,

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>there's been pretty rampant speculation in Minnesota the who runs

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>for governor? And he has not discouraged that. Um, I

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>think the Minnesota Republican Party has has essentially propped him

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>up as a likely candidate. He's now saying he's not

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>so sure. I mean, this is how far in the

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.959
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole he is that he believes, like this fraud

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>was so bad and so um widespread that no election

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>going forward can ever be trusted if there are machines us.

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is basically his position now. So he's like,

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>why would I run for governor? Couple just deal up

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>for me. I just want to know, Jan Krokowski, they're

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.719
<v Speaker 1>not dating. Can we just set the record straight. Definitely

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 1>not dating that one. That story? Yeah, well, Josh, real quick,

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>what are the pillows? Like? Very briefly you got him off.

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Jane Krokowski, I don't know love these pillows, right, you know,

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of those people who I like a memory

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>film pillows. I don't I have to say my husband

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>one night if because we both were not sleeping, we

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>bought some. Uh, I'm not going to say we have

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different kinds of pillows on our bed.

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dean is a great read. We're going to feature

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it in the weekend story as well. Uh, and Jill

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Webber thank you as well, really appreciate it. You're listening

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stenovy on Bloomberg Radio. So, yeah, a top

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>story this hour, this day, this week, and I already

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>know that in December when we look back, it's going

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>to be a top story this year. It's game Stop

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and the like other names that we don't usually talk about,

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>but all of a sudden, they've been really dominating the

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>trade in terms of big moves. Yeah. Look it's it's

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>not just game Stop, right, it's other stocks as well.

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>And and look we're just learning moments ago the Senate panel,

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a Senate panel is planning to hold a hearing on

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the current state of the stock market. And this prompted

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>by the activity that we've seen this week. Totally alright,

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>So let's get into it, and let's get you up

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to speed on some of the day's headlines because they

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>are happening as we speak. Let's bring in Bloomberg News

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>cross At reporter Katie greifeld Uh and talk about kind

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>of where we are. We're also going to get to

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Schelp. She's director Financial Regulation Studies over at the

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Cato Institute, and we'll bring her in just a moment. Katie, though,

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>set the scene. Um, where are we when it comes

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to what's going on with game Stop and other stocks

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that have had some big moves and the playing the

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>trading platforms that they trade on, Well, it's very much

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>a fluid situation. Obviously. The big story today is that

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you have apps like robin Hood and other brokerages limiting

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>trading on some of those popular names such as game Stop,

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 1>UM and some of the other we've been calling the

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>meme stocks that have just taken off this week. And

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>so interestingly, I mean, as you mentioned, game Stop is

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking today, as is a n C Holdings, and you

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have seen the benchmark indexes bounced back like the SMP

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, it's having a best game game in two months,

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>whereas yesterday it was the worst fault since October. So

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>clearly a total flip in in who's leading and what's leading.

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And part of the theory is that all of the

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds who are just getting crushed yesterday on their

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>short bets, now that that speculation is curbed, at least temporarily,

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they're basically regrossing and re leveraging on their position. So, Katie,

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>when you say restricting trades on platforms like robin Hood,

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>what what exactly do you mean? Does that mean that

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>if somebody holds robin Hood and they want to sell it,

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they mean, excuse me, holds game Stop and they want

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to sell it, they can't necessarily do that, that's the question.

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a bit different across apps. So robin Hood,

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, I mean, there are restrictions placed on shares

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and options, and the fact that options trading is restricted

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting nuance here because that's theorized the

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that you fall just such rampant call buying in

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>some of these names. People were saying that's fueling this

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>bullish feedback loop. So obviously, with these restrictions and the

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that you can't trade options, it's clearly having an

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>impact on the stocks, whether because you know the fact

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that people aren't really able to trade the retail traders

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>at least hedge funds can still trade those names. Or

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean perhaps it's just a turn and sentiment that

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, this idea that there could be further regulation coming. Yeah,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we're certainly looking into all of that. Katie, Thank you

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>so much. Our own Katie Greifeld, cross ass at reporter

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News. Let's get to our next guest. We

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in, Jennifer Schulp. She is Director of

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Financial Regulation Studies at the Cato Institute's Center for Monetary

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and Financial Alternatives. She focuses on the regulation of securities

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>and capital market. She's also a former director UH in

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Enforcement at FINRAD. She joins us on

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the phone in Washington, d C. Jennifer, forgive me if

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>I shaalp it is right, okay, so right, okay. I

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure UM really appreciate you being here,

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>as you know, our top story here. What do you

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>make of what we're seeing in terms of the trades.

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Initially that all of a sudden got a lot of

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>these trading platforms attention for them to all of a

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>sudden start restricting them. Well, I think it's a powerful

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>message about the power of retail trading that Heretofore Wall

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Street has been able to generally ignore the retail trader,

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're we're really seeing that that's no longer the case.

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And with the rise of low cost trading apps and

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>this kind of increased activity on the chat boards, we're

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.479
<v Speaker 1>really seeing actions here that they are going to make

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street stand up and take notice about retail trading. UM,

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe not call them dumb money anymore. Um, that might

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>be a harder habit to break than just this one time. Well,

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what it means for potential regulation. I mean,

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing lawmakers way in a Senate panel is going

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to hold a hearing on the current state of the

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>stock market. This reached the White House briefing room yesterday.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Two of the three people yesterday the first three people

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask questions to fed chair your own pole at

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the press conference, ask questions about games game stop specifically, UM,

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what is potential regulation that you know that that we

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>could see out as a result of this. I think

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a difficult road to walk and

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to find any sort of regulatry path here UM,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think that Congress is going to find that

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>as they start digging in. This is obviously an unusual situation. UM.

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Although rallies and bubbles are not UM, nor is short selling.

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>This is just a different twist with different players taking

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>different positions than where they've been before. UM. We might

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>see some additional regulation in looking at how short selling

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>operates UM, just the mechanics. UM so that some of

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>these feedback feedback loops that we're seeing here, UM, that

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>might be a place to take a look to see

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>if there's a better way to do things to prevent

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the feedback. Do you think Robin Hood's wrong? Interacting brokers

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 1>is wrong? Do you think they should not have restricted trading?

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a tough question. UM. I think as

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a matter of principle, UM, the traders should be able

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to trade. But there's also UM risks to the brokerage

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>houses at issue here as well, UM clearing risks that

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that Robin Hood or some of these

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>other brokerage houses would be able to continue to operate

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>through the clearing firms and through the clearing process given

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>how fast the stock was rising. So I think it's

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a you know a matter of principle, yes, um, individual

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>traders should be allowed to keep trading. So it sounds

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like a technological limitation more logistical, right, and logistical and

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>just capital um in order for the firms to be

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>able to put up money um to clear through the

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>settlement process. I just don't know that there's not capital

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>limitations on what robin Hood can do to support this

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>trading at this point. Do you think they think that's

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>something we're going to find out if we move through

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>these lawsuits. Yeah, listen, we're gonna we're gonna come back

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and talk some mohorrew but we've got about forty seconds here.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this could potentially be the end of

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood though? Uh, I don't think so, But I

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>think they could have done some reputational damage that they're

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>going to have to come back from. All right, listen,

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>sit tighten, Jen, We're gonna do a little bit of

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>news and then we'll come back with Jennifer Schalp. She's

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Director of Financial Regulation Studies over at the Cato Institute,

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and she's a former director at FINRA, specifically at their

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Department of Enforcement. I mean a lot of questions coming

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>out and you want markets to move and operate smoothly efficiency.

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>It's why we had trading stops put in right after

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the big stops we saw from from the eighties.

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>We did different measures after the financial crisis. Um, but

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you have to make sure it's still free markets and

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, free for everybody. Yeah, you do, and especially

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>with with a platform like robin Hood. I think a

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>fascinating story following this will be what is the reputational

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>damage if any, to robin Hood and to what extent

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>can it hold on to its customers. So earlier this week,

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>NASAC CEO Dina Freedman participated in the Bloomberg the Year

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>head Virtual event UH and she was asked about the

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>trading that we've seen this week. She talked about specifically

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>how the NASDAC handles potential market disruptions from social media.

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Check it out. We basically have some tools that track

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>changes in chatter on social media. We think that there's

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>something unusual or you know, even worse nefarious going on,

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we can halt the stock and then we will contact

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>the company make sure there's no news all right, And

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that was again nasac CEO at Dina Freeman. So what

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they do when there's you know, social media chatter, which

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we know Tim has been a big part of the

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>run ups that we've seen in game Stop. There have

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 1>been conversations going on for weeks. Yeah, yeah, they have.

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean it makes sense given that this is you

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>know it. I guess what. What's what's kind of surprising

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>about this whole story, Carol, is this stuff was happening

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the nineteen nineties on message boards, right. The

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>differences I think the apps and the commission free trading

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and that that you're allowed to do now. But I

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>mean people have been been talking talking their book for

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>since books existed, exactly. It happens all the time. So

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to Jennifer Schullp. She's Director of Financial

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Regulation Studies over at the Cato Institute's Center for Monetary

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and Financial Alternatives. She's also former director in the Department

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Enforcement at FINNERA. Still with us on the phone from Washington,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>d C. What do you make of what you just

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>heard from nastac CEO aDNA Freedman about how they deal

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>with talk about social media and Tim's right, I mean,

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 1>go back to you know, the dot com bubble. I mean,

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>people were talking about things. UM, what's different, what's new?

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>What do we need to do? You know, I agree

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>with him, this is this is not new, so to speak. UM.

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And I don't fault Nasdack at all for keeping an

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>eye on social media, particularly where there might be misinformation

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>or in fighter information that's been leaked. That's that's great

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>things for the UM, for the exchanges to be keeping

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>an eye on to see if there is a need

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to pause trading. UM. Where I where I walk away

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Is nazdac statement yesterday that they would

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have stopped trading here for extended period of time? UM,

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of at least implicitly supporting some of the thirty

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>day type of suspensions of trading that it's Secretary of

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>State of Massachusetts Bill Galvin was supporting. UM. I think

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that gets in the way of actual markets from san

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and this type of discussions trading talking your book, this

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is normal, even if the outcome here might not look

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>look normal at the moment. Well, that's what that was exactly.

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>My next question to you, Jennifer, I mean, our our

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>markets functioning normally here? Is this what's supposed to be happening.

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is yes. UM. I think that

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>there's concerned because there's a bubble um. But but bubbles

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>are part of our markets, have been a part of

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>markets since their inception. Um. We don't need to talk

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>about tulips to know that, right. Um. And the overall market,

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it, I mean today it's you know,

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not like it's bringing down the overall market. And

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder if if we are ignoring that, and

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't be that the fact that the market rose

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:54.719
<v Speaker 1>today when it was pulling down a little bit as

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a sign that that's something. Well, I'm saying that something

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't that you're seeing, you know, a pretty signific get

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>correction in game stopped today, and yet the rest of

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the market is doing okay, it's actually valid. I don't

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think there's any indication here that we have sort of

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a contagious event um and that there's any sort of

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>larger market instability problem. I think we're functioning correctly. It's

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>just kind of crazy. So how does the story end?

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is this something that we're going to continue

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to see because Wall Street bets on Reddit is a

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>thing and there's so much interest around it, or are

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is this going to be a flash in the pan.

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting question, and I think some of that's

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>going to play out in how badly some of these

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>individual investors get hurt when the stock comes down UM,

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think the stock is going to come down.

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's a controversial position, and I think

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that UM individuals are going to lose money here UM

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is not a controversial position to the extent that people

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>really get burned. I think we might see less excitement

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>for jumping into another bubble in the future UM. But

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I think people are having fun

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>here UM, either fun just for fun's sake or fun

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to stick it to Wall Street. And I wouldn't be

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>surprised if we see more of this, at least in

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the short term. It's interesting because I do feel like

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of big trading houses and firms

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.959
<v Speaker 1>and investment firms who often talk about, you know, what

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>we need to, you know, figure out ways for alternative

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>investments for it to be much more accessible to kind

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of the little guy and retail investors. So there is

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that argument in one hand. But as soon as kind

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of retail investors figure out how to I guess game

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the market Um, but it doesn't look like they're breaking

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the law. You know, everybody kind of gets upset, and

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I would point out that hypocrisy. Um, I'm I'm pretty

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>solidly in favor of giving retail investors the opportunity both

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in the alternative investments front and here. Um, we need

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to make sure people are educated and understand the risks

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of the markets that they're playing in, and those risks

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>are real, but giving them the opportunity to try, I

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>think we should be permitting that on all fronts. Yeah,

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, Um, I'm just looking at the amount

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of the questions and things that are coming in on

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter feed because this is really resonating with a

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. Tim, Yeah, it is. And and and look,

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a big part of this story is

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>about the little guy versus you know, the big guys

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and them like sticking it to the man and sticking

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it to those hedge funds. Well, somebody tweets me, you know,

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>so should we have a lot of bands people from

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>going to Vegas so we can protect them from losing money?

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just there's I know you're looking at No.

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know the answer this is like

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>uncharted territory in some ways. Yeah, exactly. Um, Jennifer, thank

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Really really enjoyed that. Jennifer shelp. She's

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>director of Financial Regulations. Studies are at the Cato Institute

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives. She as a director

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>at the Deportment director former director in the Department of

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Enforcement at Finneret. Listen, there's gonna be lots of conversations

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>about this to come, so stay tuned. Everybody. Buckle in

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot more to come. You're listening to

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and this is Bloomberg Radio. So we

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>want to get to the big story of the day

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and really the week, and it's already going to be,

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>as we said earlier, a story of the year. Let's

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>get right to Interactors Brokers chairman and founder Thomas Peturfhee.

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>He is on the phone in Connecticut. Interactive Brokers among

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the platforms that did start restricting trading of stocks that

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have run up rapidly, including game Stop. They did that

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>earlier today. Thomas, good to have you here with Tim

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and myself. First of all, why did you stop the trades?

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>What was the nail and the coffin that made you

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>ultimately decide to do it. And I'm curious if you

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>were getting calls from either clients, investors, or even your

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>board that you had to do something. Uh So, first

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of all, I'm in Sunny Bomb Beach Okay, sorry, which

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I was told Connecticut. I wish I was there too.

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for inviting me onto the show. Yes are

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>The answer is yes? So this stuff today games the

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>game game gm E, it was at one point as

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>low as two as one and twelve dollars and one

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>point as high as for under an eighty three dollars.

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Currently it is reading at two londerd and thread four

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars um. So why did we resort to these measures.

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>We did because we are extremely concerned about the continuing

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>viability of intermediaries, the clearinghouses and the brokers. Now why

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is that Because every option contract there is a buyer

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and sellers to a number of For each number, each

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>each option contract that that exists in the world, there

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is a loser and a winner. The broker stands between

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the broker and the clearinghouse spends between the winners and

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the losers. The broker has to collect from the losers,

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.439
<v Speaker 1>give it to the clearing cause. The clearing cause gives

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:08.919
<v Speaker 1>it to the winners broker and gives it to broke

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 1>winners broker gives it to the winning The problem arises

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>when the loser loses more money than is in his

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>or accounts. Right now, there are currently um three billion

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>options contracts are standing on game. The average option contract I,

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>since the stuff has moved around so much, I estimate

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the average option contract is worth about ten thousand dollars.

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So un some three million contracts, half of them are

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.359
<v Speaker 1>worthless half of the worth on the average of ten

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. That's uh, that's fifteen billion dollars of the

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>winners and losers, right. So now the brokers have to

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>collect from the losers and pay to the winners. If

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they can't, they have to put up their own money,

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>right right. So uh, Luckily enough, we have a very

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>large uh capital base of nine billion dollars and they

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>have automated liquidation systems. But many of other brokers do

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>not have them. But but can I, if Thomas, if

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I can break in, and we should put out that

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Interactor Brokers is a sponsor Bloomberg Radio and Bloomberg TV.

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's not the case that traders were doing anything

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>wrong or illegal. It's just a case of logistically there

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 1>were going to be problems right in terms of clearing houses.

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's more an operational problem versus a market problem

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>or traders doing something wrong. Correct. No, no, no, not correct.

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 1>So so short squeezes are illegal. Na, when when you

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>buy a stock for three hundred dollars that months ago

0:36:55.920 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>was the failing company right there, you know, basically a

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>second and store for for video games, right, Uh so

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't really worth and it's much money and it's

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>not reading that two hundred and thirty dollars, right, So

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>your only motivation to buy that stuff with you know

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>full well eventually we'll go down to seventeen dollars is dead.

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, there is. I don't know what that's okay,

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>We're all getting a lot of Skype calls at home

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>when working from home these days, right, So we go ahead,

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, I want you to finish that time, if

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I may, if I may continue, please, So your only

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>motivation to buy this start or two hundred and thirty

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars could be to join the short screech, because why

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>would this stuck go up. Why is the first two

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty dollars, It's first hundred dollars right right?

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 1>Are you are you guys closing out account? Are you

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>closing closing out positions? We learned just minutes ago that

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood has told users that it may close some

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>at risk positions previous legislation they introduced in Thomas, I

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I don't know if you can hear us. Yeah, yeah,

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I can hear you now. I just didn't hear you

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 1>before that at least positions. What did you mean? Yeah?

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Are you are you closing out any accounts? We did

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>know that robin Hood says that it told users that

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 1>it may close some at risk positions. We have we

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>have closed thousands of positions. We have we have twenties

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>as of yesterday morning, we have twenty seven thousand customers

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>who are involved in in GM stock, either via the

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>stock or via options them. Of course many many of them,

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>especially since we have tend to have professional customers that

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>tended to be at the short side. So yes, we

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>close out many of those positions. And was a lot

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of the the positions that you closed out of me?

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about in terms of your business. How much

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 1>is retail investors individual investors versus bigger institutional clients. So well,

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to spell our Our average client account is uh,

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just under three d dollars, so they are not your

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>regular Moments clients. But of course many of them are

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>solder are many of them are much bigger, but it's

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>just the average. Ye have one point one eight million customers.

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, hey, you know, Thomas, you know it's hard,

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're trying to get our head about

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I have lots of conversations with you know, big name

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>shops too, and and investors who say, you know, we're

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>increasingly trying to open up alternative investments to individual investors,

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>give them access to the types of investments that the

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>bigger institutional clients typically have. And yet I feel like

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>when a smaller retail investor to some extent acts like

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the big guys, all of a sudden, their

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>hands gets slapped. I So I don't think that's true.

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So short squeezes are not legal. Maybe many of the

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 1>long heres do not know that they are participating in

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a short squreet, but uh that that that's the only

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>issue I see that they inadvertently doing something that they

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be doing. But it's it's really stupid to look

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>at the stock and buy the three hundred dollars and

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that it's a it's a little business, right,

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a corner store. Thomas. We only have

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen seconds for this. But are you worried that there's

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be a pr impact from this and retailer

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 1>traders will go to other trading platforms. I don't think so,

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>because our professional customer understands that we have to protect

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace for their's sake and their money. We have

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to protect. Do you think regulators just quickly twenty seconds?

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>I have to get involved from Congress and others. I

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:08.720
<v Speaker 1>think unless regulators come out and say that training should

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>be in these stocks for liquidation only, and this is

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>going to continue indefinitely and that's not good. Thomas. I

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>know it's been a busy day, uh, And we really

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.720
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you finding some time for us. Interactor Broker's chairman

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and founder Thomas Petter feed joining us on the phone.

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Interactor Broker's a sponsor of Bloomberg Radio and Bloomberg TV.

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Global News