WEBVTT - Commodity and Market Prices

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Right now, we want to turn our attention and we've

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 2>decided we had to go to Japan. Shushrukiyamada drives the

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>yen for Bank of America with wonderful academics out of

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.959
<v Speaker 2>the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Stanford and joins us

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 2>right now. She's Oki, are you surprised that we don't

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>have a stronger yen moving from one sixty two stronger

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>to one fifty eight and your key breakpoint of one

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>fifty five?

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, thanks for inviting me here. Well, I think the

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 3>authorities are determined to break one hundred fifty five this

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 3>time around. I think right now they're probably waiting for

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>events such as the Enerfy prints tomorrow. But this time around,

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 3>I think the cost of failure is too high because

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 3>they couldn't break hundred fifty five. If they can't break

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 3>this time, I think the market will basically assume the

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 3>authorities have run out of options to defend the end.

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 2>The romance of this is George Soros and a guy

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 2>named Druck and Miller a few years ago, where basically

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>the market vigilanties tell the authorities what's going to happen.

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Is that an ancient idea or is the market telling

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the authorities in Japan and for that matter, the Secretary

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>of Treasury what to do?

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:57.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, I think the Taka administration has potentially underestimated,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, the market force, you know, up until now.

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 3>But I do think, you know, the coordination with the

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>US basically means Japan cannot, you know, indefinitely rely on

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 3>intervention because you know, you ask someone to join your project,

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 3>you have to have a goal and that goal cannot

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 3>be just to buy time for yourself.

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think this time around, this coordination appears to

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 3>have been a well prepared in advance. I think that

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 3>implies the Japanese government is this time prepared to respond

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 3>with a comprehensive package, including faster bogy hikes.

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Sessh K. How important is it that the US worked

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 4>in coordination with the Bank of Japan in this particular.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Case, Well, I think it is quite important from two perspectives.

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 3>One is that unilateral intervention obviously have a limit, which

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 3>is the balance of FCS reserves Japan hold. But you know,

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 3>as the US joins, ultimately the US can sell the

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 3>U S dollar you know, it issues. So I think

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 3>it removes a hard limit on the intervention. And secondly,

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I think, uh, you know, US coordination is key because

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 3>without coordination on a broader community, I don't think that

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Japan has you know, Japan can determine to uh you know,

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 3>uh respond with a comprehensive package because you know, Krent

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>administration really you know, uh historically believes in easy monetary

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 3>policy and uh uh you know, lose physical policy.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 4>So we understand that the US Fed sold euros to

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 4>buy then as opposed to dollars, does that suggest maybe

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 4>their commitment isn't as great as possibly could be.

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I think there are two aspects. I mean,

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 3>first of all, they didn't sell US dollar the currency,

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 3>so you know, obviously that could imply somewhat soft commitment

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 3>at the moment. But I think there's an alternative aspect

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 3>that is, because they sold europe there is a possibility

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 3>that European policy makers may have been given an artist,

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 3>So you know, this coordination could be you know, on

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 3>a broader scale, let's say in the G seven community.

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 3>We have to see, but I think the commitment could

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 3>be that strong.

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I want to get this question because I think culturally

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>it's just so so important our perception sisqu is the

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 2>large multinationals drive the bus this time around, in this

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>modern age, the domestic Japanese, the small business, the people

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 2>politically and even financially. Do they have more power now

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 2>where they're harmed by week yain, they're harmed by higher yields.

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Do they have more power than twenty or forty years ago.

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Well that's a tough question, but I have to say

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 3>that this time it's not all bad, you know, when

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 3>it comes to what's happening in Japan. I mean, here's

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>the fact about Japan. Right since last spring, so that's

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 3>when you know, the yen started to weaken again, Japanese

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 3>equity has been the best performer in the market, right,

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 3>and we've seen the biggest balance of payment surplus in

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Japan among the developed nations. Right, So I think economically

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 3>or in the equity market, things are great. Japanese bank

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 3>stocks have performed US bank stocks, so I think, you know,

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 3>we're not in a recession, we're not in a dead crisis.

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 3>The weekend hurts, but I think so. I think from

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the public, maybe the pressure is not as strong as

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 3>you know people think outside of Japan. And obviously, you know,

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the question is why the end has been so weak

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 3>despite you know, good things like you know, strong equity

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 3>and you know policy risk is one. But you know,

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 3>I think there is an alternative hypothesis, which is that

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the equity has been too strong, meaning you know, outperformance

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 3>of Japanese equities has basically led to access end selling

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 3>from foreign investors.

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Shizuki, Thank you so much, Shazuki Yamada with the Bank

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 2>of America ahead of Japan FX rates. Stay with us

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 2>more from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch US live

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on aval,

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>Karpe and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>watch US live on YouTube.

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now, an energy fellow at the University of

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Houston barely describes editor's just definitive global ability, folks. They

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 2>have Paul sank with us, and that edit hers is

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 2>what it's about. Down at the bottom of your note.

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I've been emphasizing this. The refinery world is turned upside down.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Explain to mere mortals why the refinery world is in

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 2>real issue, like diesel at one hundred and sixty dollars

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>a barrel equivalent, and how we're going to extricate ourselves

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 2>from that mess.

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 5>I think I saw one hundred and seventy five. So

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 5>the reason is there's a shortage of refined products across

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 5>the globe, and here in the US we've been exporting

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 5>refined products now for about ten years. We bring in more,

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 5>we export what we don't use, and the US we've

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 5>been doing wonderfully well to reduce our reliance upon refined products.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 5>We're seeing growth, not necessarily altogether in evs, but the hybrids,

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 5>which get double the mileage of a normal automobile, and

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 5>so the refineries have the ability the capacity to send

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 5>product overseas. You know, as the war kicked offf Xon

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 5>Mobile chartered a couple of tankers to start sending gasoline

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.239
<v Speaker 5>and diesel to the Asian markets. It is a great

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 5>time to be a refiner, you know, once every twenty

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 5>five years. It's a good time to be a refiner.

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually surprised, or maybe I put it this way.

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Should I be surprised that oil prices BNT are not

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 4>higher than the army? We've got this war in the

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Middle East, we've got rush of sanctions, plus they're in

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.599
<v Speaker 4>a war. Why isn't oil rent like one hundred and

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 4>fifty bucks?

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 5>I don't understand, you know, I look at WTI because

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 5>of course that's what we have to buy, and Brent

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 5>should be whatever the transport cost is from from the

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Gulf of Mexico up to Brent.

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 2>Brent.

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 5>The amount of Brent crew that's produced today is less

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 5>than a thousand barrels a day. And so the Brent

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 5>benchmark is a fiction. It's a fiction. It's a fiction.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 5>It's in fact Brent includes a portion WTI includes a

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 5>portion of riata, whatever the price is. Why aren't we

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 5>there at one hundred and six million dollar one hundred

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 5>and six million barrels a day pre war, with ten

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 5>millions supposedly off the market, we should have seen a

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 5>price of oil hit about two hundred dollars a barrel.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 5>Why we haven't, Well, China has cut its imports now

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 5>by five million barrels a day. We've got increased production,

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 5>or rather increased oil coming to market because the Venezuelan

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 5>sanctions have been released. UAE has kicked up production significantly.

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 5>We've been running down the spr at about two and

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 5>a half million barrels a day. So the net effect

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 5>that is about two million barrels a day off market.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 5>So that leads to a fifty percent price increase off

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 5>the of the pre war price of fifty six dollars

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 5>a barrel, which is what it was in January before

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 5>the market priced in the war.

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 4>As an energy person, do you just assume that the

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 4>Middle East source of oil is going to be compromised

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 4>for as long as we can see because the straight

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 4>up Horn News arguably will never be open open.

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to say.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you know, the Middle East has to sell

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 5>that oil to somebody in order to make a living.

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 5>In nineteen fifty six, with the Suez crisis, Eisenhower was

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 5>approached by the UK, by France, by Israel to join

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 5>in in retaking the Suez Canal because it was the

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 5>bottleneck for oil going to Europe. And Eisenhower said, why

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 5>you can just send it around. He didn't want to

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 5>get involved with that. He knew that no matter who

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 5>owned the oil in the Middle East, the only way

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 5>it had value was for it to be sold. And

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 5>eventually they'll all come to some sort of agreement or

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 5>there will be demand destruction as they fight it out

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 5>amongst themselves.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 2>And we got to run. But I gotta get this in.

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:09.599
<v Speaker 2>When a professor comes in of his acclaim editors a

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>claim at u age and he writes a separate paragraph, Hey,

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Tom's stupid Blackstone enervis ask me so private equity Blackstone

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 2>wants to take AI and bring it into the oil business,

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and your apoplectic about it.

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 5>Discuss So Intervius is compiling data on every user or

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 5>every royalty owner and actually every oil producer. They have

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 5>data down to the graneur level on wells, on property holdings.

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 5>This is information that for example, exonmobile eog Chevron. Ordinarily

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 5>they fight hammertong, tooth and nail not to let that out.

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 5>But now Blackstone is putting itself in a position of

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 5>grabbing all of this data across private companies. And of course,

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 5>if you're a royalty owner, they know your bank account,

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 5>they know your social security number. They know what your

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 5>interest is in this well over here, the one in

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 5>West Texas, the one in Colorado, the one in West Virginia.

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 2>They have a plectic on landman.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 5>Well just imagine, just imagine Bloomberg having all of the

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 5>private data here and then now they've gone into a

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 5>banking mode. They will make you a payday loan on

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 5>your royalties for the next three or four months. And

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, in Houston some of the wealthiest oil guys

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 5>are actually the estate attorneys who've been making a market

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 5>in the little fragments so that they taking.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Out of this. For people scared of a they shouldn't.

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 5>Be terrified, because what this system is doing is it's

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 5>overseeing all of the data. It's filling and plugging numbers.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 5>You wind up as a user getting money taken out

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 5>of your account. Interest numbers change, there can be different

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 5>owner numbers, and plus they use open servers across the globe,

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 5>and so any bad actor can just go right into it.

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 2>We got to go, but editors, you got to come

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 2>back and continue this discussion because this touches folks on

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the fears that so many people here.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 5>They're acting like a bank and they're not regulated like

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 5>a bank.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 2>That's the point. The regulation's not there, Professor Hurst, thank

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>you so much. Always with the University of Houston. Stay

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 2>with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>or watch us Live on YouTube.

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 2>And we made a commercial. Steve len Zone made a

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:58.599
<v Speaker 2>special commercial about the Standard Charter Bank. Yeah okay, and

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Steve Englander's brilliant foreign exchange. Suki Cooper has a privilege,

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 2>is sitting with him global added commodities at a Standard

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Charter Bank with their whole Pacific room. How's a Pacific

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 2>rim doing with the war in the Eastern Mediterranean is

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 2>a general statement.

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 6>I think there's so much market focus there, but we

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 6>have to remember that the geopolitics, while it's been set

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 6>in the tempo for much of the commodities, some of

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 6>the base that's been set up by some of the

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 6>structural drivers. We've seen this morning in terms of copper

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 6>surprise still being one of the potentially one of the

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 6>most underappreciated risks there. But for the gold market, we

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 6>still see that structural demand is still wanting to lean

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 6>in and an allocate once there's a little bit more

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 6>clarity on uncertainty there.

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 4>So we saw gold at five thousand dollars an ounce.

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, experts are tell me, boy, that's that's really

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 4>really toppy here. But then we pull back the four thousand,

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 4>a big move down. What's the fundamental.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Call on gold today?

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Is it feel attractive or not?

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 6>I'd say if we're looking on a longer term basis,

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 6>it might look relatively expensive, but if we're looking at

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 6>the macro risks right now, then it still looks underappreciated.

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 6>So the base, we think has formed quite well, especially

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 6>as we're in the middle of a seasonal week period

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 6>for consumption. And on top of that, we have a

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 6>lot of macro headwinds that have been priced in, especially

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 6>with the market swinging so sharply to expecting great hikes

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 6>and in the US. So we think that prices have

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 6>held up very well at these sort of levels. And

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 6>now I think if we're starting to see an unwinding

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 6>of some of that positioning that was very in that

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 6>hawkish stance, we'll see gold starting to gain more traction.

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Silver I see down fourteen percent this year. I mean,

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't know anything about the commodity space, but I

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 4>always feel like gold and silver kind of trade in

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 4>tender but not really. Here's what's the feeling on gold here?

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm sorry, silvers par.

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 6>If gold is our barometer for uncertainty, silver is our

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 6>kicker on uncertainty plus the outlook for the industrial picture. Okay,

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 6>and the silt, on the one hand, did incredibly well

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 6>when we saw so much retail demands at the start

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 6>of the year, but now we're starting to see some

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 6>of these risks lurking in the background, rind substitution risk,

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 6>especially for the solar industry. So on the one hand,

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 6>you've got that AI demand boost that's growing, but the

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 6>substitution risk on the solar side could be quite sharp.

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's let's go let me. I happen to be

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>in a small store on fifty seven Street, Tiffany the

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>other day and the elevator randomly got me off with

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the silver floor. It was just packed packed. Is silver

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 2>a big part of jewelry or is it really driven

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 2>by solar panels?

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 6>It's a significant part, but it's not the main part

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 6>of jewelry consumption. It's at the moment we're seeing much more.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 6>Even though we're seeing the solar demand starting to shrink,

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 6>it's still much larger. The industrial silver industrial usages are

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 6>much larger. It's more than half of the consumption that is.

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 2>There like a shortage of silver like mines versus gold.

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 6>This is a really fascinating development because if we go

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 6>back five years, I would have been satire saying silver's

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 6>very well supply. There's plenty of above grind stock. But

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 6>we've had five successive years of undersupplied market, so that

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 6>readily available stock is no longer there, and that's one

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 6>of the reasons we're seeing these shop moves.

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm ignorant on this. I feel like, right now I'm

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 2>going to go read everything Sukie's written, plus three books

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 2>on silver. You know, I just I'm just not up

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 2>to speed. Why am I so dumb on silver? Why

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 2>do we not look at silver like we look at

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 2>gold or oil.

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 6>Silver is fascinating in that it's used in so many

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 6>different facets, like from water purification to wood preservation, and

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 6>we don't realize how many parts of our lives. It

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 6>touches and any got the ev demand aspect too, But

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 6>I think it tends to be looked at more so

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 6>as a precious metal rather than its industrial components.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, all I know tom about commodities is GLCL, GLCO.

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Go on the Bloomberg Terminal Global Commodity prices, and I

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 4>click on the metals and it gives me the base metals.

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 4>They're all up double digit this year. Fairest metals down.

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, it's iron ore and all that stuff.

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 4>But then I got to precious metals, and the precious

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 4>medals are down kind of fifteen percent across the board

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 4>here really platinum palladium talking about about those, because what's

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 4>driving this story there.

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 6>The picture for the PGMs of platinum pladium has become

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 6>much more micro in comparison to macro. So last year

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 6>maybe you could have said that platinum was riding on

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 6>the coattails of gold. But this year we've seen some

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 6>of the supply concerns maybe take a back seat and

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 6>much more focus on the demand side and whether we

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 6>might see auto demand being scaled back, or whether there

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 6>might be some challenges around the recycling side. But we

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 6>still see that the platinum market's undersupplied for this year

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 6>medium tilting into a surplus. But having said that, the

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 6>investment demand has turned a lot weaker, there's still that

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 6>structural story that is supportive of platinum.

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Two things are gonna get this said. So to summarize

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 2>your long.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 6>Gold here, we still see upside risk from here. We

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 6>have fosand six hundred and fifty as our people are average.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this is a listener emails and it's part of

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the ask ratio. That's how it works. This is missus

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 2>keane somewhere a number of streets up. Can you ask Suki?

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Is the ratio of the twenty nine thousand dollars also

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 2>Peretti small bone cuff in yellow gold twenty nine thousand

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 2>dollars versus two thousand, one hundred dollars for the same

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 2>silver cuff. Is that a proper ratio to look at

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>gold to silver for a mere mortal out there.

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 6>The gold seal. The ratio is one that people like

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 6>to look at over the longer term, and it tells

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 6>us whether one is overvalued or undervalued. But there isn't

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 6>a fundamental basis that drives what that long term average

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 6>should be. So we're starting to see that ratio normalizing

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 6>at the current levels, Tiffany, at the retail level, there's

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 6>many many other dynamics that out of play, the manufacturing,

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 6>the cast.

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Really why, I mean to me, when you look at

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 4>diamonds and now you get the Lapo diamonds, that puts

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 4>that in totally.

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 2>See Sukie's like she's got to Charter. Look on, she's

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 2>not layering this morning. Now what you do as your

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 2>layer and you mix your gold in your silver. I

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 2>learned this and you do that. I mean, thank you

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 2>so much. I folks, my ignorance of silver is just stunning.

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just have to read up about it.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 2>Is there like a silver council like a gold council.

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 6>There's a silver institute.

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Lots of institute there is, so I should go to

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 2>their website.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 6>Get Yes, there's lots of great days.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Just don't be a stranger. I'm smarter, Suki Cooper, Thank

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 2>you so much. Global had of commodities in silver. It's

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the standard Charter Bank. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Surveillance coming up after this.

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on Apple,

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Karpla and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business Up, or

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 2>At New York Life. She's at sweet Greens three days

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 2>a week. Julia and herman joins us, do you go

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 2>to sweepeas?

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 7>Do you have to agree with the prices?

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 2>Did you throw that a New York Life fam Is

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 2>that what we're doing?

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 5>That's what we will.

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 2>You have a brilliant note. What do you expect out

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 2>of notre day? It's like wicked conventional and I really

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 2>respect that. Right now, what do you learn from a

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 2>treasury curve? The vanilla difference between twos and tens? Or

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 2>dare I say in a worst kind of way three

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 2>months and thirty years?

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, really, what we've learned from the curve in the

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 7>last few weeks is that investors are struggling with not

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 7>if the Fed's going to contain inflation, but what their

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 7>glide path forward is from here. And we can learn

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 7>that because we can dissect what's happening in the tenure.

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 7>In the thirty year, we know that inflation.

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Conditions are still spread tens thirties.

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, we're looking at spreads across the entirety of the curve.

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 7>But if we just take the individual tenors themselves, we

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 7>can break this down into inflation expectations versus real yild.

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 7>It's real yield that has driven the rate move in

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 7>the last few weeks. And this is almost all attributable

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 7>to term premium. And we know that fiscal questions have

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 7>been the huge contributing driver to that term premium increased lately.

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 7>But what happened, of course, last week is now we

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 7>have these increased contributions of questions of how the Fed

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 7>is planning to contain inflation.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.479
<v Speaker 4>But the Fed's not really telling us too much these days.

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Here is that frustrating for you and for the market.

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 4>It seems like some certain folks in the market are saying,

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't like this new regime, this new sheriff in town.

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, it's not necessarily frustrating because candidly, a

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 7>lot of the curve has done a good job of

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 7>tightening financial conditions even without a ton of guidance or

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 7>specifically a rate move of course.

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 6>By the Fed.

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 7>Now, given of course, that the geopolitical situation is so

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 7>tenuous right now, so uncertain and We also know that

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 7>the fed's tools are not well suited to cope with

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 7>a supply side inflation shock like the one where dealing

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 7>with candidly, you know, if the FED cuts in the

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 7>near tur excuse me, hikes in the near term, or

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 7>stays on hold is less important right now than if

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 7>financial conditions are tightening naturally across the curve.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 2>We have no rate rise right, Sorry, you have on

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 2>a FED call. You have no rate rise right.

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 7>We have the fedal hold through year.

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Why? Why?

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 7>Because the FED is two mandates and if you look

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 7>at the labor side of the Fed's mandate. Obviously we'll

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 7>get the jobs report tomorrow, but candidly, the jobs market

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 7>is in something as close to an equilibrium as a

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 7>team of economists could really hope for. Yeah, we have

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 7>wage growth decelerating to a really nice, sustainable three and

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 7>a half is percent. Yes, hiring has been relatively stable,

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 7>but it hasn't been reaccelerating in a huge way. This

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 7>is not, to us a labor market that can tolerate

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 7>a sustained hiking cycle. Of course, we also know it's

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 7>not a labor market that has needed a lot of

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 7>cuts for support.

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 4>It looks like the bond markets maybe doing the job

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 4>for the FED. I mean, we've got rates that are

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 4>higher here a ten year, you know, with a four

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 4>to sixty four hand. I mean maybe that's maybe the

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 4>market's already spoken.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 7>I think it has in many ways, and it's contributed

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 7>to volatility on the equity side of things because there

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 7>is a mismatch between highly narrow, volatile cyclical market leadership.

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 7>And by this I specifically mean the chip leadership within tech,

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 7>and that's less compatible with a more tight rates environment.

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 7>Not necessarily because these companies need a lot of interest

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 7>rate support in order to continue their CAPEC cycle, but

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 7>simply because the status of the economic cycle is a

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 7>little bit more tenuous from here on out with a

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 7>tighter rates environment.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 4>Global market strategist, that's your title. How do you think

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 4>about the US versus rest of the world these days?

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 7>Well, I've been hearing more whispers and thoughts about this

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 7>sell America trade and it's something that we really push

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 7>back on. If you look at actual treasury flows, we

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 7>have seen consistent inflows from private foreign investors, and the

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 7>only place where we've seen foreign investor conviction start to

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 7>rattle has been in specific treasury flows from official investors,

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 7>so foreign governments and foreign central banks. But this is

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 7>a trend that started in twenty thirteen and has not

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 7>been accelerating. So rather than a sell America trade, we

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 7>think that there's actually a lot more robustness in the

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 7>teenage trade that there is no alternative to.

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Plus Julia Herman with this New York Life investment management.

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, I look at this, Julia. In the long

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 2>term in the financial media is what do you think,

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Paul six months? Yeah, I'll piss the world series maybe, yep.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 2>You have just is one statistic, three hundred and forty

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 2>seven billion something in New York Life matched up against

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 2>insurance and annuity liabilities. What do you say to the

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 2>managers of a huge, multi billion dollar portfolio New York

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Life where their short term is ten years?

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, we think about this on the strategy

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 7>perspective of the asset management side, which is where our

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.239
<v Speaker 7>team sits from the perspective of how do changes in

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 7>the rate environment impact our holistic allocation considerations. So, for example,

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 7>with the recent move in the long end of the curve,

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 7>that for us really influences our duration view for the

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 7>shorter term, which is that up until this point this year,

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 7>we have been trying to stick toward the shorter side

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 7>of neutral on duration coming out Yeah at four six,

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 7>four seven on the tenure, that's a place where we

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 7>would see more value.

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, let explain. I think our audience doesn't know this.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, duration for New York Life or any other

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 2>insurance company is a lot longer term, isn't it. Do

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 2>you are you going to buy forty year Google paper today?

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, so I can only speak from the asset.

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Management side of the business, right, Okay.

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 7>So from from the asset management side, we would see

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 7>a little bit more value at the four seven. You

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 7>know what we have historically seen a little bit more

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 7>of though, is that you know, systemically there's an institutional

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 7>bid around five for the tenure, and so you know,

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 7>being able to creep into duration from here is not

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 7>to say that we can't see a little bit more

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.679
<v Speaker 7>upward pressure on long rates again, that term premium. These

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 7>questions are on both fiscal and FED related risks are significant,

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 7>but around four to seven we would see those risks

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 7>asymmetric For investors.

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Credit risk?

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Is it worth taking credit risk?

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 2>Hereity?

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 4>You just clip the coupon that the US government's given you.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 7>It's a really good opportunity right now for not just

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 7>short duration, but short maturity credit right now in our view,

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 7>and that allows investors to think about that buy and

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 7>hold opportunity, which, yes, which as a total return perspective,

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 7>is going to lean you more toward the yield perspective.

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 7>Keeping everything short maturity specifically, in our view, is as

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 7>solved for the two key sources of volatility right now,

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 7>rates of all, of course, but also questions about the

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 7>shorter term economic outlook, given that the impact of higher

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 7>gasoline prices stemming from Iran has already contributed to consumers

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 7>trading down, for example, that's data out of the Beige

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 7>Book in the last few weeks. And we can bolster

0:27:56.520 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 7>portfolios against some of that near term economic outlook volatility

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 7>by keeping things shorter maturity.

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Julie, thank you so much. Julia Herman with his director

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Global Market Strategy for the It's like Ohio State, the

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 2>New York Life Investment Management.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal