WEBVTT - Instant Reaction: Apple Beats on Sales and Earnings

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Apple second quarter revenue

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>ninety point seventy five billion. That's slightly better than the

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>forecast of ninety point three to three billion. iPhone revenue

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>forty five point ninety six billions, slightly above the estimate

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>of forty five point seventy six billion. The company here's

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a big one to buy back additional one hundred and

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollars worth of shares and boosting its quarterly dividend.

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the Apple playbook, and it is now up two

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>point three percent. Initial reaction here in the after mark, Yeah.

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say, who cares about those other numbers.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>It's that buyback of additional one hundred and ten billion

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>dollars of shares and boosting that quarterly dividend that certainly

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 2>has investors expected. Some additional color here. Second quarter Greater

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 2>China revenue Carol sixteen point three seven billion. Even though

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.639
<v Speaker 2>that was a decline of over eight percent year over year,

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 2>it still did beat estimates of fifteen point eight seven

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars. Second quarter revenue coming in above estimates at

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 2>ninety point seventy five billion. Estimates are for ninety point

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>three to three iPhone revenue also coming in above estimates

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 2>forty five point nine to six billion. Estimates were forty

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 2>five point seven six billion dollars.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple raising that dividend to twenty five cents a share

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>from the previous dividend of twenty four cents a share.

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So just to keep in mind that we start, you know, slowly.

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>We've seen all of these big tech companies, the Magnificent

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>seven offering up things like a dividend and so on.

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 2>Our own Mark German all over this story. Here's his take. Initially,

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Apple sales decline less sharply than feared last quarter, held

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 2>by stronger than expected demand in China, sparking optimism that

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 2>the company slow down, maybe easing. Apple also set it

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>expects three turned sales growth in the current period, with

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 2>revenue climbing by a percentage in the low single digits.

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 2>That's according to Luka Maistri, the company's CFO. He told

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 2>ut Bloomberg Television's Emily Chang in an interview.

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, so let's get some analysis right now. Our

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>own Ana Agrana is standing by of our Bloomberg intelligence

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>team on RAG. You've got the numbers, and of course

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the additional big buy back of one hundred and ten

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars worth of share, boosting its quarterly dividend. But

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it looks like, you know, they came in either online

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>or better than expected. But what's your smart take on this?

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would say anything. The number that stands out

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>really is that the decline in China was not as

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 3>bad as I guess it was communicated before, so slightly

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 3>better than before, but it's still overall still a negative number.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 3>There is no and then you know, we will find

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 3>out on the conference call whether they make a comment

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 3>or not, or what kind of guidance they give for

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.399
<v Speaker 3>next quarter. But overall, I would say the results were

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 3>okay compared to I'd say going into the quarter when

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the pessimism is very high.

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 2>What's the big headline here? Is it the boarder proving

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 2>plans to buy back an additional one hundred and ten

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars worth of company stocks? Is it Apple increasing

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 2>its dividend four percent to twenty five cents a share?

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Are those the numbers that investors should be focused on

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 2>right now?

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I would have been expecting, you know, them to buy

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>at least one hundred million dollars of stock every year.

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 3>So that's you know, to me at a table stake

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 3>ten billion. Yeah, it's just it's just normal. I really

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 3>need to know where the growth is going to come from,

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 3>and you know, how our things shaping up for the

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.839
<v Speaker 3>second half of the year. And but most importantly, what

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 3>are they doing in the AI of you know, arena

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 3>at this point and what kind of features should we

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 3>expect going forward.

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>So remind us to Honora, this company typically doesn't release

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>the outlook in their call. I forget. I mean you

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about it on the call, but not in the release, correct.

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's not in the release. They're going to give

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 3>some indication about each of the product lines on the call.

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>So when we look at these results, you know, services

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 3>is good, you know, iPhone modestly better, you know overall,

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 3>I would say, in line to slightly better quarter. But

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 3>it all boils down to the commentary on the conference

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 3>call about how the things shaping up in the current quarter.

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So if they are talking down China in particular, or

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>revenues or overall, that is going to get you concerned.

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean that is going to you know all

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 3>the all the you know, the current you would say,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 3>the minor beat will be all offset by if there

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 3>are any comments negative comments about you know, continued weakness

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 3>of the iPhone in the third quarter, because remember, if

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 3>we consensus right now, iPhone revenue for next quarter is

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be down two percent. Now, remember in this

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 3>quarter was down ten percent, So we need to know

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 3>whether that two minus two percent holds true or are

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 3>we going to see better than that in line or worse.

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Shear's higher in the after hours right now by about

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>four percent. Fair to say, we're seeing this reaction as

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 2>a result of just expectations being so low going into

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 2>this exactly.

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, absolutely, this is this is a true game

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 3>of where pessimism has been so high and they go

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 3>out and you know, beat by a slight amount. But

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 3>again I will give you my final verdict after the call.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we're also seeing where we said Greater China

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>revenue better than expected, it was still about a billion

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half low a year ago. Sales are down considerably.

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Also in Japan, the rest of Asia Pacific, and in

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>the Americas. The lone bright spot seems to be some

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>minor growth in Europe. You know, it's interesting on surveillance

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>this morning, Ana Rag Tom Keane asking one of his guests,

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.559
<v Speaker 1>is this a growth stock? Is this a value stock?

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about it? I know you don't

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>give stock recommendations, but in terms of the growth metrics,

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>it's always big numbers. But is it big growth numbers

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>anymore when it comes to Apple.

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 3>No, we don't think it's good growth numbers for Apple

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 3>at all, only because I think the big spike we

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 3>saw during the pandemic, people buying a lot of iPads,

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 3>computers or AirPods, all of that is now, you know,

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 3>basically you could say haunting them. We are coming into

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 3>a world where Apple's growth rate is going to hover

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 3>somewhere between zero to five percent for at least the

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 3>next two to three years. Now that's a good case.

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 3>We really need to get make sure that the China

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 3>situation is handled, even if even before we can make

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 3>that claim. Otherwise it's going to be closer to that

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 3>zero to two percent rather than closer to five percent.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Honor Ragaran Mark German on the lifeblog, making the point

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 2>that the company declined nearly across the board on an

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 2>annual basis, despite the fact that they beat Wall Street estimates.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 2>So that's overall revenue the iPhone buy a lot, the

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 2>iPad buy a lot, Wearables, home and accessories, buy a lot.

0:05:57.560 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 2>The bright spots are growth and services and for the

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Mac to the M three due to the M three

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Mac book care. Let's talk services. This is a category

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 2>that was fair to say, was really created under Tim

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Cook and it's just been an incredible growth over the

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>last few years. What are the bright spots within services?

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 3>So in our view, services is really what's holding Apple

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 3>together only because it gives you in the ecosystem field.

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 3>It's not easy to get out of the ecosystem and

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 3>leave Apple for another product. And which is why you know,

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 3>the numbers over here are truly important because you know

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 3>this time they grew around close to fourteen percent if

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>I remember correctly, that's that's better than what the company

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 3>had initially you know indicated. So this is this is

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 3>a growth driver. This is what provides value to the ecosystem,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 3>and we are hoping that they're going to come out

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 3>and you know, talk good things about the next quatter

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 3>also from services, because this is the only growth drivate

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 3>left of this point.

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>Hey Anna rok, how much of now it's just under

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>a four percent gain here in the aftermarket for shares

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>of Apple. How much of it is at a relief

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't worse than expected, especially when it comes

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to what's going on in China, but also that big

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>boost in terms of buyback and the dividend.

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is a big relief, frankly, because again, this

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 3>is the one company everybody has been concerned about over

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 3>the last twelve months. Now, that's why I'm saying, this

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 3>is not like you know, Amazon or Microsoft beating their

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 3>cloud numbers by a big amount. It's just you know,

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>somebody saying, oh my god, it's not bad enough, It's

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 3>just okay. So it's a very different sentiment. But again

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>that's the way market behaves, Frankly, it's a game of expectations.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, how much of the jump in the

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>aftermarket is it mostly just that it wasn't worse than

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is expected? Or is it also a big check of

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the buyback.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Now, the buybacks, as I said, they do about one

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 3>hundred million dollars a year, so one hundred and ten

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>billion is not a big deal.

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Go to quarterly dividend increasing penny.

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But once again, you know, this is a technology stock.

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 3>We really need to see the growth for this company

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 3>to actually see their valuation go up.

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so what has you concerned here?

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I just want to know what's happening in China.

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Frankly we don't. This report has not has told me

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 3>that the things in China are not as bad as

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 3>what the street was looking at. But that doesn't mean

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 3>it's still a decline.

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 2>How much of an issue is it? And again Mark

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Krman pointing this out, Wearable's Home and Accessories a big decline,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>dipping nearly a billion dollars. He says it's shocking because

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 2>it's the same quarter that Apple launched the Vision Pro,

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 2>which is included in that category, its first major new

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 2>product in nearly a decade. Bad news for Vision Pro.

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we were never expecting any major contribution from that device.

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Think about it, three five hundred dollars. Even if you

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 3>sell four hundred thousand units the entire year, which is

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 3>very big, you're not going to get that much revenue

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 3>boost from it. So it's not really a needle mover.

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 3>The thing that actually surprised me more was that the

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 3>IPID decline was very sharp. Now, this is something that

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 3>I think they're going to have to explain on the call,

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 3>and they're launching a new series next week. So seventeen

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 3>percent decline is what I remember, you know, briefly from

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 3>a couple of minutes ago. That's a big decline in iPads. Also,

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 3>all right, gonna lead there.

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>We know you've got lots going on, so appreciate your

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>immediate response to Apple earnings. Our own Ragrana, who follows

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple for a Bloomberg Intelligence team. Apple shares, by the way,

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>continuing to move up in the aftermarket, up about three

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent. We've got another great voice for

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>us on this, Dan Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Sonova's Trust, Dan,

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>which jumps out for you here.

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm trying to come up with some great ideas

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 4>different than what you've already talked about. Again, it was

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of a mixed report, I think. You know, as

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 4>you were talking about earlier. The big things that stood

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 4>out to me were obviously the better than better than

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 4>expected numbers in China. You know, obviously iPhone a slight beat,

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 4>which is a positive. But you know, Carol Timo, it's

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 4>kind of interesting. I've been following Apple stock for about

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 4>thirty years, and I can remember back in twenty fourteen,

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 4>they had a very similar situation where everybody was very negative.

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 4>They were having issues in China and the stock was

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 4>really floundering.

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 3>And then they came out and.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 4>They did a seven for one stock split, they raised

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 4>a dividend, and they started buying more shares and everybody

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 4>went crazy. So it's kind of interesting in this scenario,

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 4>we see the dividend going up, and we see, as

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 4>you were talking about before, an announcement of one hundred

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 4>and ten a billion dollars are going to purchase at stock.

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 4>It'd be interesting to see if they call up thing

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 4>else on the conference call in terms of, you know,

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 4>financial engineering to try to kind of reinvigorate interest back

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 4>into Apple.

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, I'm kind of glad you went there

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, and this maybe just gets to how

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>do we classify Apple. I mean, this is a behemoth,

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like whenever the numbers come across, maybe

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>the growth rate isn't there, but I mean, revenue above

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>ninety billion dollars every time, we have to kind of

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 1>dissect these numbers, Dan, and we've done it a lot

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of times with you. I mean, this is a company

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that's very entrenched globally, kind of in the consumer space,

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and I just I think is that enough to continue

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>just by selling a lot of stuff? As long as

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they continue to sell a lot of stuff, even if

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the growth trajectory isn't there, still makes it an interesting

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and engaging company for investors.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Did on the button, Carroll, I mean, just think about

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 4>the new vision pro I mean, they're supposed to do

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 4>four hundred million dollars in revenue alone just on that product.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 4>And I heard you just mentioned that the wearables missed,

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 4>so it's kind of itching. That's more than some companies

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 4>generate toil a revenue. And you're right. I mean, they

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 4>have what one point five billion users you put together

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 4>the whole house, it's close to two billion when you

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 4>look at all the different services that they have, and

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 4>it's just a tremendous cash generator. I'm sure you've talked before,

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 4>what one hundred and seventy two billion dollars with marketable

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 4>securities and cash. They generate free cash flow about one

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 4>hundred and five hundred and seven billion. So those numbers

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 4>are kind of going back to the Warrant Buffett school

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of the old security analysis they teach out to

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 4>your Chicago and you know there's value in that, and

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 4>even though we want to see an incredible new AI

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 4>product that's just going to be like the next iPhone,

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 4>it's probably not.

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Going to happen.

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 4>And I think we just have to kind of accept

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 4>that and look at the company just for what it

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 4>is is and it doesn't mean they can increase your

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 4>stock price through these other avenues. Does that make sense?

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes sense. Dan, Hey, I want to keep

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 2>you because I also want to bring in Markerman, Bloomberg

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>News chief technology correspondent, who was fresh off the live blog,

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 2>has the write up that you need to read about

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 2>these earnings. But I do want to start at the top.

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Mark big picture, what sticks out to you. We've been

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 2>discussing this NonStop for the past twelve minutes.

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so a big picture here is that Apple's doing

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 5>a little bit better than feared. Right, you still see

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 5>declines across all of their segments other than the MAC

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 5>and services, but a little bit better than what we

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 5>had anticipated, or not what we had anticipated, but what

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 5>had some it anticipated. In China, certainly a lot of

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 5>optimism around artificial intelligence. But you know, the big picture

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 5>here is that Apple is no longer in growth mode.

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 5>They're a stable company generating as much revenue as they

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 5>did the past year and the year before that and

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 5>the year before that. So nothing is necessarily broken here,

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 5>but they do need to figure out a way to

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 5>grow in the future, and just it's very unclear how

0:12:58.880 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 5>that's going to happen.

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that was next question for you, Mark, What is

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 2>going to return Apple to growth mode? And give us

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 2>a little Apple history here, like when was the last

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 2>time Apple found itself in this position and what did

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 2>they do to get themselves out of it.

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so I'm gonna answer this question this way. The

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 5>scariest line that you're going to see in Apple's press

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 5>release is the wearables, home and Accessories number. That's about

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 5>an eight hundred nine hundred million dollar annual decline, pretty considerable,

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 5>about a ten percent decline there for that business that

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 5>covers Airpod's, Apple Watch, appel TV, HomePod, you name it.

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 5>Why is that so concerning? Because this is the launch

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 5>quarter of the Apple Vision pro which is supposedly their

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 5>future and their savior for growth. And if you're going

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 5>to have that category of the Vision pros and have

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 5>one of its biggest declines ever in the launch quarter

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 5>of your new product. Clearly things are not going so

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 5>hot in what you're betting your future on. The last

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 5>time that Apple was sort of stuck in terms of

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 5>lack of growth was really before the iPhone came out.

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 5>So it has the company has been growing for a very, very,

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 5>very long time. Right at some point momentum runs out.

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 5>The momentum has run out. The good news is that

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 5>it's not like they're you know, creating.

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Mark, real quick, I did bring that up. I

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 2>saw you wrote wrote that about that in the our

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 2>great live blog. Everybody should check that out as they're

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 2>listening to this. And I brought that up to Honor

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>rog and he made he made the point that, you know,

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the Vision pro is still very expensive, and even if

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 2>they sold a ton of them, then it wouldn't have

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 2>a huge impact just because it's still relatively early in

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 2>the product life cycle. Why is it still so scary

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 2>to you though?

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 5>Oh well, I mean I look at it differently. It

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 5>is so expensive, and so if they do sell a

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 5>ton of them, that should generate you know, a good

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 5>amount of revenue. Right and we're talking We're not talking

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 5>hundreds of billions of dollars here, We're talking about an

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 5>eight nine billion dollar category, So an eight hundred million

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 5>dollars percent is actually quite a lot. And so if

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 5>they're if they're if they want to bet a lot

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 5>on this product, it's just going to have to start

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 5>creating some momentum. But it's done nothing to date, and

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 5>sales for these types of devices, especially at this price point,

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 5>you're getting the bulk of those sales very early on

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 5>in the process. You're getting them this quarter. So it

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 5>only really goes down here downhill from here for the

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 5>Vision Pro until they make major improvements on price.

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 3>And wait, hey, still with us.

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>We're talking with our own marker and in Bloomberg News,

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>chief technology correspondent Dan Morgan, still with us, senior portfolio

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>manager over at Sonovas. As we are looking at Apple

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>shares up about six and a half or set here

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the aftermarket as their second quarter revenue tops estimates

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and they also boost their buyback. Dan Morgan, come on

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>in on it. You've been listening to the conversation thoughts

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to wearables and the Vision Pro.

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean that was one of the mark was

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 4>mentioning that was kind of one of the catalysts that

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 4>people are looking out for that. Potentially Apple could start

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 4>to get some momentum back in the stock. We know

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 4>they've got a new tablet that's supposed to come out

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 4>I guess next week in May. They've got the big

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Developers conference in June, and then of course they come

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 4>out with iPhone sixteen and the new iOS eighteen in September.

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 4>So there are going to be some opportunities down the road, guys.

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 4>I know this reports as exciting as we would have

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 4>hoped for for Apple to kind of reinvigorate, you know,

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 4>interest in what they're doing obviously along that road. Hopefully

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 4>they'll lay out some sort of AI roadmap that's a

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 4>little more specific than what they have so far on

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 4>the conference calls. But again, I think this is just

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 4>kind of a quiet period right now for Apple, and

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we have to hit I don't think

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 4>you'd hit the panic button if you hold chair. Let's

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 4>just see how this thing plays out. Hey, Mark Germott,

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 4>not everybody's in video, Mark.

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Germant, I'm wondering if you have a question for from

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Dan Morgan, who's been following you know, Apple for thirty years,

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing times when you know a lot of investors gave

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>up on this company only to see it come roaring back.

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Do you have a question maybe for Dan?

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 5>That's a good question. I don't have a question for Dan,

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 5>but I'd love to engage in a back and forth

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 5>with Dan on this. I mean, you know, I agree

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 5>with you. There is no reason to panic here, Dan,

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 5>especially if you're a shareholder of Apple, right. I mean,

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 5>you put money into Apple. It's kind of like a bond.

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 5>You're not going to lose all your cash there, right,

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 5>But you're also not going to get those in Nvidia

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 5>like returns. At this point. The question is how long

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 5>our investors willing to wait until there's a next big thing?

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.719
<v Speaker 5>And what I will say is I don't anticipate there

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 5>being any new next big thing on the horizon anytime soon,

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 5>so we'll be looking out for that.

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Dan, do you anticipate any next big thing being on

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the horizon?

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 4>I would agree with Mark one hundred percent. I mean,

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 4>I remember, guys, Carol, probably I don't want to date us,

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 4>but we've been around a while. You've brought up in

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 4>the nineteen nineties, when you know, we made the migration

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 4>from a client server environment and we went to the

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 4>IBM compatibles, and everybody was into Gateway and Dell and

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 4>HP and all the big PC makers were going crazy,

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 4>and Apple was almost ready to go bankrupt. I mean,

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 4>they had a very you know, very niche group of

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 4>people that bought Max and then in two thousand and

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 4>seven they came out with the iPhone, and a couple

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 4>of years before that they came out with the iPod

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 4>and the rest is history. So Apple's been down before,

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 4>and Apples had setbacks and been through periods of time

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 4>with when people kind of film aside and you know,

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 4>we'll just see where they are ten years from now.

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 4>That's all I can say.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I just want to end with Mark on AI,

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 2>because ten years from now, I know that Apple would

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 2>love to be a leader when it comes to.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>AI, I will be replaced by AI.

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Hey maybe, Mark, what's the vision? What's the vision that

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 2>internally they're talking about it Apple when it comes to AI,

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 2>lay it out for us.

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 5>The vision of AI is integration, deep integration into hardware,

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 5>privacy and security, and really not an Apple designed chapot

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 5>like you've seen from Chat, GPT, open AI, Google, Gemini, Microsoft,

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 5>you name it. This is about integrated into the phone.

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 5>I'll give you an example. We're on this call, my

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 5>phone's in my pocket. I probably missed twenty notifications depple

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 5>earning season. I'll take my phone out of my pocket

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 5>when this is done, and it'll catch me up with

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 5>some AI and tell me everything I missed. That's the

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 5>type of AI feature to think about if you're when

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 5>you're expecting AI features from Apple summaries, useful day to

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 5>day tools based on artificial intelligence, not sort of twenty

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:02.959
<v Speaker 5>one questions.

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's Apple's DNA, right, all about enhancing the

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>value of the hardware and getting you to buy that

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 2>next phone.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan Morgan thirty seconds left here, so something like that.

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>How does as AI is integrated into the Apple model

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and they figure out, you know, how to monetize it.

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>How important is that in terms of maybe making the

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>growth trajectory change? And again, just kint about thirty seconds.

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's huge, Carol. You know, as Mark was

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 4>mentioning when they have taken a dive into the chip space,

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.479
<v Speaker 4>they're creating their own silicon. They do have a product

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 4>they're working on called Ajax, which is kind of like

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 4>a chat GPT, but it's on your phone. So there

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 4>are things they are doing, but as Mark was saying,

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 4>it's all integrated into the iOS, into the phone. It's

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 4>not going to be some new product that we've never

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 4>heard of that just comes out of left field.

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, I know I can't live without my iPhone,

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>so bring it on, all right, guys, thank you so much.

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Mark German, Bloomberg News Chief Technology correspondent, Dan Morgan, senior

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager at Sonva's trust on Apple stock is up

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>about six and a half percent here