WEBVTT - Great Courses: Shinnecock Hills

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Shinnecock Hills Golf Club, as designed by William Flynn in

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty one, is one of the greatest golf courses

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and today we're going deep on it.

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Garrett Morrison, and this is designing.

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Golf, all right.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Later in this episode, I'm going to bring on the

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>golf historian Bob Crosby, and we're going to talk about

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the early history of the design at Shinnecock Hills. Basically,

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the course went through a few different very interesting iterations

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>before it's settled on its current form, and I would argue,

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Bob would argue that the story of Shinnacock in its

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>early years was basically the story of American golf architecture.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>So we'll get into all of that in the second

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>half of the episode with Bob Crosby. But the first

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>thing I want to talk about is what makes Shinnacock

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Hills golf course. And it is a really great golf course.

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But that's not because it is hosted US opens, or

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's difficult, or because it's an exclusive club. It's

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>because there are qualities inherent to its land, design and

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>presentation that make it great. So in this episode, We're

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>going to go through six big factors that explain why

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we love Shinnakok Hills. And to help me do that,

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I've brought on my Friday Golf colleague, Matt Rusius. Matt

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>how's gone.

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Doing well, doing well, Just gearing up for a trip

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 3>to Ireland in a few days, so talking American Links

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 3>golf is fitting absolutely.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Where are you going in Ireland?

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll be headed to the southwest side, so making stops

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>at places cycle hinch Belly, Bunyon, Waterville, dune Bag. So

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 3>really looking forward to that.

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Not bad courses. I'm actually going to Northwest Ireland in

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a few days for a Friday Golf club trip. So

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it's work, but it's obviously going to be very fun

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>as well. So we're both setting off for Ireland very soon.

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>First we're talking about Hinnacock Hills, which is actually you know,

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for a course in the US that

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>resembles somewhat in Irish Links, Hinnacock Hills might not be

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>a million miles away. So first of all, some basics

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>on the golf course. The club was founded in eighteen

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety one by some very well off New Yorkers, including

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a member of the Vanderbilt family. Of course, it was

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the first movers in American golf, so it

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>claims to be the oldest incorporated golf club in the

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>US and to have the oldest dedicated golf clubhouse in

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>the US. The clubhouse was built in eighteen ninety two.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 1>As I've mentioned, I'll talk more about the early development

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>of the golf course with Bob Crosby later in this episode,

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but basically the first twelve holes were constructed in eighteen

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety one. The first eighteen was completed in eighteen ninety five.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>About twenty years later, CB McDonald and Seth Rayner revised

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 1>the course, but all of those versions of Shinnecock Hills

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>are now gone because in the late nineteen twenties the

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>club purchased new land and hired William Flynn to build

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a new course in that course, which is basically today's

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Shinnecock Hills. Opened in nineteen thirty one. Shinnecock hosted its

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:35.839
<v Speaker 1>first US Open in eighteen ninety six. This is now

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>recognized as the second ever US Open, and that was

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously played over the earliest version of the eighteen hole course,

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>so pre McDonald, pre Flynn really didn't resemble today's course

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>at all, and then the club didn't host another US

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Open for the next ninety years. Basically, it came back

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty six. Ever since then it has staged

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a US Open about every decade, so nineteen ninety five,

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four, twenty eighteen, and of course this

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>year twenty twenty six. So if rankings mean anything to you,

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.799
<v Speaker 1>shinnakaka Is is consistently ranked as a top five golf

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>course in the US. It's up there with with Cyprus

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and Pine Valley and Augusta. You know, pretty much everybody

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>agrees that it belongs in that top tier. And over

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the past few decades the club has done a lot

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of good work to maintain that reputation. They've they've removed

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>thousands of trees to reinstate the property's essential Lynksland character,

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and they've worked with Corn Crenshaw over the past twelve

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>years or so to bring back certain details of William

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Flynn's design. But on the whole, the course was pretty

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>well preserved over time. Aside from you know, tree pl

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>planting and mowing lines, it really never strayed too far

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>from its roots. So those are the basics. Let's get

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>into the six factors that make Shinnecock Hills a great

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>golf course. In our opinion, at least, the first big

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>factor has to be the land. The property sits pretty

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>near the eastern tip of Long Island, right between the

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Great Peconic Bay to the north and the Atlantic Ocean

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to the south. It consists essentially of glacial outwash. A

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch of sand came in from the glaciers and was

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>deposited in this spot and kind of blown into these dramatic,

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>undulating configurations. It's Lynx land effectively. I would say it's

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the purest lynx land of properties you'll find

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in the US. Those certain parts of it have a

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>little more clay than others. So what do you make

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of the of the land at Chinnacock.

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I think the thing that makes the land so great

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 3>is how it's almost uniformly good. The quality of the

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 3>land is so uniformly good across the entire site. Now,

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 3>while I'm saying that there are very much more dramatic

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 3>sections of the land, I feel like, in a general

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 3>sense kind of the closer you get to the clubhouse,

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the more dramatic the dunes are there's kind of a

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 3>huge main ridge line that the clubhouse sits up on,

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 3>and it kind of follows that. I believe it's the

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Tuckahoe Road, which kind of goes between the fourteenth hole

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 3>and the thirteenth hole, so there's a kind of a

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 3>massive ridge line there, and then another massive ridge line

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 3>that kind of goes along the tenth hole and the

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 3>eleventh green sits on top of. So really that section

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of to the right of the clubhouse if you're

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 3>looking out over the course and like kind of the

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 3>beginning in the back nine is some of the most

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 3>ramatic terrain and it's very very undulating, which produces these

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of truly one of a kind of golf holes.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 3>And then the closer you get towards kind of the

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.559
<v Speaker 3>bay to the north, the land starts to mellow out.

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 3>But while I say that, like it does mellow out,

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 3>it gets flatter, but it's still tremendous golfing ground with

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 3>lots of intricissies, good roles and contours and the fairways

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 3>that kind of great strategy and interest on a lot

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 3>of those holes, but maybe just a little bit less

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 3>eye catching and less dramatic kind of the further away

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>you get from the clubhouse.

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say there are actually three sections of

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>terrain at Shinnacock that I could identify. You've talked about

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the two main ones, which are the very dramatic highlands,

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>which basically holds nine through fifteen and eighteen occupy this

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>big ridge that Tuckahoe Road goes over that the clubhouse

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>is built on top of.

0:07:59.080 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 2>All of these.

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Holes play kind of most of them play along the

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>side of that ridge, right, are kind of clinging to

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the edge of it. Some play up on top of it,

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, this is obviously the best land at Shittacock.

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Then you have the lowland section which you're describing, still

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>good still you know, some contour, but not nearly as

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>impressive as the other land. And in fact some sections

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of it are almost dead flat. But those sections are

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>generally not used for golf holes. That's really striking how

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you look at the holes themselves, and most of the

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>holes in that lower section of the property, the flatter section,

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 1>do have you know, some good role to them, whereas

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>if you look just to the side of the fairway

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it might be completely flat. So obviously Flynn was able

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to find the best sections of that slightly inferior section

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>of the prom but basically this is where it holds

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>four through eight and sixteen through seventeen are right. Then

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a third section which is these softly

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 1>rolling midlands right which have a little bit more elevation

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>change to them, and that to me is the first

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>three holes. The first hole tease off from the ridge obviously,

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think most of the hole sits in this

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in this kind of more broadly moving area of the property,

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's not to me, those first three holes don't

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>really occupy the lowlands. They're they're not as flat as that,

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's also not highlight it's not it's not the

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, super chaotic stuff either, and that's the section

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>of the property. Interestingly, that's closest to National Golf Links.

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>National Golf Links is right next door to that, and

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're familiar with those holes at the kind of

0:09:56.000 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>turn of the out and back configuration of National Golf Links,

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>then you kind of know what this land is like

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>where there's elevation change and there's there's some undulation, but

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very broad slopes. So there are some holes at

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinnecock that occupy that as well. But yeah, so you

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>have these you have these different sections of the property

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and all all of the sections of the property have

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>something going for them, right, and good land is found

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>within them, right. Yeah.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 3>And I think another thing that's kind of interesting to

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 3>look at is on the flatter terrain you get a

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 3>lot more bunkering and these kind of more expansive sandy

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 3>waste areas. If you just pull up Google Earth and

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 3>quickly glance at it, like you can kind of see

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 3>there's this almost diagonal effect across the property is more

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 3>sand up on the top left corner and a little

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 3>bit less and smaller bunkers towards the more dramatic land.

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 3>So it's really cool to see how Finns able to

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 3>really maximize the use on the best land and then

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe have a little bit more built features kind of

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 3>guiding the strategy on the lamb that's slightly less interesting.

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, Yeah. And also the greens are much more

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>built up and manufactured the less dramatic parts of the property.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Think of the Seventh Green is the most obvious example

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of that, where it's just you know, it kind of

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>sits on a nothing green site. There's not much there

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to tie into. You know, if you look to the

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 1>right of the seventh green, there there is a nice

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>swale there that the green kind of ties into visually

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>at least, but mostly it just sits on sits on

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a flat stretch of ground. But that green is so

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>severely built up it really stands out among the other

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>holes at Shinnecock. And if you look at the greens

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>for five and six as well, on those flatter sections

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of the property, those are pretty dramatic too. So it's

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>obvious that Flynn turned up the dial a little bit

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>when he was given ground that wasn't giving him quite

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>as much. So very well executed design in that way.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>The fundamentals are there, all right. The second big factor

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that I want to talk about is the elements, especially

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the wind in relation to William Flynn's routing. So the

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>summer wind at Shinnecock comes out of the kind of

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>south southwest part of the compass. A good way to

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>orient yourself with the map of the course is to

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the fifth hole and remember that the fifth

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>hole plays basically directly downwind, So that's the that's the

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>wind direction at Shinnacock, and the routing is really built

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for that specific wind direction. It was It's obvious that

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>William Flynn had that wind direction in mind when he

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>built the course. Apparently, the winter wind is just it's

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of it's kind of miserable to play the course

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in it because it doesn't click together in the same

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>way that the routing does for the summer wind. In general,

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the shorter par four play into the wind and the

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 1>longer par fours play downwind. But the course is constantly

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>changing direction, right. You can never settle into a groove

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>with the wind and the way it's affecting your ball.

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>It changes with every single shot. And this is partly

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>because of Flynn's heavy reliance on dog leg holes, and

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it's also partly because he uses triangles really cleverly in

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>this routing. So Shinnacock basically has these three groupings of

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>three to four holes that form triangles in the routing.

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So look at holes four through six, ten through thirteen,

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen through sixteen. Each of these sequences is arranged

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in a big triangle, and that means that nothing is

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>linear essentially in relation to the wind. You're never moving

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>straight ahead from hole to hole, and you're hardly ever

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>even moving like parallel or at right angles from hole

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to hole. It's always these funky triangular angles, and that's

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>just a great test of the player's ability to adjust

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to the wind from shot to shot. So anything to

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>add about the elements and the routing at Chinnaicog.

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you kind of noted that the triangle holes,

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>and I know you're probably talking to Bob about this,

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 3>but one thing to note about it is kind of

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 3>the back nine, which was originally the front nine when

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Flynn designed, it was all kind of new land that

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 3>they had gotten, so you get a lot of those

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 3>triangles that he specifically designed, whereas the front nine he

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 3>was more so adapting the old CEB McDonald course to

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 3>his new kind of designs. So you only get like

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 3>these two whole stretches where you have holes kind of

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 3>playing in the same direction, and that's holes two and

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 3>three and then seven and eight are kind of the

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 3>only two holes and those are both kind of sections

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 3>of the course where they kind of adapted the new

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 3>William Flynn design to the old ZB McDonald design. So

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 3>I find that interesting how you kind of have these

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 3>two different dynamics on the front nine and back nine

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 3>is where on the back nine, you're constantly changing direction,

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 3>and like you said, you're never playing straight downwind. But

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 3>in addition to that, none of the holes really ever

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 3>play in a singular straight line. There's always a dog

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 3>lag or some sort of s curve. So depending on

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 3>where the tea is set up that day or where

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 3>you are in the fair way, the wind can really

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 3>affect your ball from multiple different directions on the same

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 3>golf hole, from the tee shot to the approach shot.

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 3>So there's just so much variability in the way that

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 3>the holes lay in the ground that makes wind just

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 3>so prevalent. And then also with the land and the

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 3>wind is when you get into these big peaks and

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 3>valleys you're walking along the golf course. At least when

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 3>I was playing, I felt it really hard to get

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 3>like a good perception of the wind and have a

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 3>good confident, like I guess, understanding of how fast the

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 3>wind is and where it's coming from. Holes like ten

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 3>and eleven kind of show this off really well. I mean,

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 3>you go down into this massive bowl towards the second

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 3>half of the tenth fairway, feels like the wind dies

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 3>down a lot, and then you get back up onto

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the green, and the wind picks up again, and the

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 3>eleventh T is right behind it, But then the eleventh

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 3>green is another twenty or thirty feet above you from there,

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 3>so it gets really hard to judge how fast that

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 3>wind is moving because it just felt like it was

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 3>almost not moving at all. It picks up, and then

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 3>you can only imagine how much more that wind is

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 3>blowing up by the eleventh green, which is one of

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 3>the highest points on the entire property. So I find

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 3>that was like, at least when I was playing last fall,

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 3>just judging the wind and knowing how fast it was

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 3>coming from and how much it was going to affect

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 3>your ball is almost constantly changing because you're moving through

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 3>these is ridges and valleys throughout the routing.

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and especially on the back nine, you're really exposed

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to the wind, partly because you're up high on this

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>highland section of the property. It's one of the highest

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>points in the entire area, so you're getting the full

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>brunt of the wind. But also a lot of the

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>t's on the back nine are elevated. Ten is an

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>elevated T, twelve is an elevated T. Thirteen is a

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>very elevated T fourteen, is a very elevated T fifteen.

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Very so one after the other, you're hitting tea shots

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>where you're very exposed to the wind. You're just a

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>sitting duck for the wind on those tea shots. And

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that's something that is that really comes out on the

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>back nine because on the front nine you're mostly in

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this lowlands action of the property. A lot of the

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>tea's are kind of flush with the ground, and so yeah,

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>once you get up in the air, you start to

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:12.239
<v Speaker 1>experience the wind even more. Yeah, going back to your

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>point about the McDonald philosophy versus the Flynn philosophy of routing. McDonald,

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know at National he did this at a lot

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of courses. McDonald would would do, you know, the kind

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of out and back routings. His routings tended to be

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more linear. Rainer certainly explored different ways

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of routing courses. I would not call you know, Rayner's

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>habit of routing to make things linear, but certainly get

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the sense that that McDonald's version of Shinnacock, and we

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know much about McDonald's version of Shinnacock honestly was

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit more linear in relation to the

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>wind than Flynn's was. And you see that even on

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>poles two and three, which do roughly play in the

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>same direction, but there is a little bit of turn in.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I will give the routing credit in those first three holes.

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>They all play kind of out to one section, to

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>one corner of the property, but each of them turns

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, so it's not exactly the same. And

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>then on the third hole, a very clever thing that

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Flynn did is that he basically just moved the tee

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>way to the left so that the hole played on

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a diagonal now instead of straight ahead. And so that's

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>one way that Flynn was, yeah, enhancing the strategy of

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the hole because now it's a diagonal instead of a

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>straight ahead kind of situation. But also he varied the

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>relationship to the wind direction by moving that tee over

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and kind of essentially turning the hole into a dog lake.

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Flynn was obviously really thinking hard about how

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the wind related to the golf course. And so I

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>would say shinecok Kills is probably one of the best

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>designs in relation to elements and wind that there is

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>an American. It's really cool. We're going to be on

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the third big aspect of Shinnecock Hills that I want

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, and it's somewhat related to what we

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>just discussed, and that is the way the course is

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>constantly playing with angles, diagonals, offsets, dog legs. Basically, this

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is a course that totally resists anything linear. It's remarkable,

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, how many t shots on this golf course

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>play to a diagonal or offset fair way. And this

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>does a couple of things. One, it poses a risk

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>reward question. In general, if you challenge the long side

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of the diagonal or the inside of the dog leg,

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.959
<v Speaker 1>you get an advantage of both distance and angle. But

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>also occasionally it's a fake out because it's you know,

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's actually better to play to the outside of

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the dog leg or the outside of the diagonal, and

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>that's specifically the case on holes eight and thirteen. The

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>second thing that all these kind of all this diagonal

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>movement does is that it challenges both line and distance

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>off the tee. You can't just bash it down a

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>certain line and say, you know, if it goes three hundred,

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, or if it goes three fifty it's fine.

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>You have to be specific about matching line with distance,

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise you're going to run through the fairway or

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>not get to the fairway. So how do you think

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>about about angles and diagonals and all that kind of

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>thing it should have gotten.

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think something that you didn't even touch on

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 3>right there is the green angles. So many of the

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 3>greens are set on very sharp angles that then enhance

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 3>the strategy that you were just talking about off the

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 3>tee is where you really need to get into the

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 3>right positions to attack certain pins. And the way that

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the greens are built, like you talked about on the

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of lower lands where a lot of holes are,

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 3>the greens are kind of pushed up. There's so many

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 3>runoffs and rolloffs on all these greens on all the

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 3>different sides. So it really does put a very strong,

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I guess importance on where you are in the fair

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 3>way and how you're approaching these greens. And then that

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 3>just gets so complicated when you throw in the wind

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 3>and the constant changing winds. I think that's something we

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 3>might not have touched on on the wind section. But

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 3>the wind can frequently completely flip directions during the day

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 3>when you're playing at Shinnacock. When we played it last fall,

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 3>we had the north wind, which was kind of the

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 3>unusual wind, and it just made things so much more

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 3>difficult to judge. So it really is kind of the

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 3>total package that enhances the angles and the diagonals and

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 3>creates such a challenge when you're playing this golf course,

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 3>and like you said, like a whole like sixteen, it

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 3>plays relatively dead straight all the way for six hundred

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 3>and twenty yards or whatever it is, but the fairway

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 3>is constantly snaking its way through the landscape, and there's

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 3>different bunkers kind of pushing and pulling the direction of

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 3>the fairway, forcing you to kind of navigate this s

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 3>curve even though the whole basically plays dead straight from

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 3>tea to green. If you just drew a line, it

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 3>would go right down the middle, but the fairway doesn't

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 3>follow that. So there's a lot of things like that

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 3>that he was able to do, which I think was

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 3>somewhat a product of fitting the golf course into the

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 3>landscape and finding the best place for fairways to go

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 3>and bunkers to go. There's never going to really be

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of a straight linear path to take in a

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 3>site that has kind of dune formations like this. But

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 3>he was also able to like strategically place teas in

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 3>certain areas that either create some obscurities or diagonal angles

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 3>that really make you think when you're standing on the

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.239
<v Speaker 3>tee boxes. So it it really is kind of this

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 3>total package staying where all the different little aspects, especially

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 3>the six that we've picked out, all kind of feed

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 3>into each other and enhanced the design in many different ways.

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Designing Golf is brought to you by Mobjack.

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Mobjack is a craft brand specializing in luxury lifestyle belts.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>These belts are forged from the mastery of skilled artisans

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>who pour their expertise and care into every detail. They're

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>handcrafted in the USA using traditional cutting and stitching leather

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>working techniques. Mobjack belts are produced in small batches with

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Italian leather finished to the highest standards. Basically, what we're

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about here is a full leather backed belt with

0:24:55.400 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>colorful woven patterns made from fade resistant materials. They have

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>nickel plated solid brass hardware, so really high quality stuff

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to break down, and they're really versatile.

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>They can be worn with golf attire and they can

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>also be worn with business attire. They're a great alternative

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to the typical club logo belt when you're trying to

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of keep your logo count down. Obviously, the Burner

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>verse would would approve, and also keep an eye out

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for the great Mobjack summer styles right now, including the Southampton,

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the Newport, and the watch Hill. So step up your

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>style with a little bit of help from Mobjack. Go

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to mobjack dot com to see everything that they're offering

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and use the special code fried Egg for fifteen percent off.

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>That's code fried Egg one word at mobjack dot com.

0:25:51.800 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get back to the episode. Yeah, everything

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>at Shinnacock is off kilter. That for me was the

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of keyword of going around Shinnecock. It's just off kilter.

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Nothing is straightforward, nothing is again to use this word linear,

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it's all offset, angled, diagonal. It's off kilter, tilted right.

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So you're you're going through the course and you're constantly

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>dealing with this, you know, with the unexpected nature of

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>off kilter things, and that feels very natural. It just

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's the landscape. But it's obviously intentional on

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the part of the design to constantly keep the player

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>off balance in sixteen, which you brought up, is a

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>great example of this. I don't know how you play

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it that whole. I don't know because there's so many options.

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>It's that each landing zone has a diagonal and has

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>hazards on on on one side or the other. And

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I think you probably do something different if you're if

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking that you're going to go for the green

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in two, but it's a very long hole and it's

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>often it's often kind of you know, mostly into the wind,

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and so how often are you going to be going

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>for it in two? But if you play it as

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>a three shot hole, there are a couple of different

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>ways to do it. Do you want to get left

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on your second shot to to hit into that green

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>or do you want to go I mean, it is

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 1>just it's not clear what the what the you know,

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>prevailing or you know, dominant strategy of that hole is.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>You just have to make your way up it. Uh

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in in whatever way I think you think you'll get

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>an advantage. But it's just you know, on different days,

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it might be different approaches that are that are optimal

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>there and uh, And that's a great representation of shinnakok

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in general, it doesn't nothing is clear, There aren't bright

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 1>lights around what the best strategy is. You just you

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>have to kind of discover it. And that leads very

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>nicely into the fourth factor I want to talk about here,

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and that is naturalism. The naturalism of this golf course,

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 1>of William Flynn's design, Shinnecock just seems to respond to

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the land, right. It doesn't seem to be doing anything

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>architecturally extroverted, right, It's just taking the land as it comes,

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and the course is highlighting using the land. But in general,

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this course represents late Golden Age naturalism at

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>its peak. So what do you make of this aspect

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of Shinnacock's design.

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Men, I think one of the big things that I

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 3>guess stands out to me in terms of naturalism and

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 3>when you're playing the golf course is kind of the

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 3>obscurity and the slight blindness. I'm not sure if there's

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 3>anything that's really truly blind. I guess kind of the

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 3>t shot on ten is pretty blind and you're kind

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 3>of playing through the spectacle bunkers up on the hill

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 3>there and you don't really know where you're going if

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 3>you've never played there. But a whole like six was

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 3>really kind of stuck out to me on first play

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 3>if vividly remember Andy Johnson or coworker like talking with

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 3>the caddie for several minutes trying to pick a line

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 3>on where he wanted to play. And that's because you

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 3>play up over this kind of slight rise and then

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the fairway kind of pitches down pretty severely down towards

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 3>the lake that sits probably I don't know, one hundred

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 3>and twenty yards in front of the green, but you

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 3>can't see where the fairway's going. You can't really see

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 3>the extens of the fairway lines. So just by laying

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 3>the golfer over the natural landscape creates all this uncertainty

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 3>on the tee and you're not exactly sure or confident

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 3>where you want to play. It will start your ball

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 3>and hit that golf ball. So I think that's like

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 3>a big thing. But the naturalism of the golf course

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 3>had an effect on me at least when playing the

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 3>ninth is very similar, where you're kind of dog lagging

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 3>around a kind of hill on the inside of the

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 3>dog leg, and you want to hit it over that

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 3>hill to get the shortest approach in there. In the

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 3>best angle, but you don't really know how far it

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 3>cuts around that corner. You don't know where the far

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 3>lion stops around that corner. So there's a lot of

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 3>things like that when you're playing that makes you feel

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 3>uneasy and uncertain of exactly what you want to do.

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 3>And I found that really really impactful. When you're playing

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 3>the golf course.

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it feels like you're just playing over a landscape, right,

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.479
<v Speaker 1>which is what a lot of Lynks golf feels like.

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And Shinnacock manages to create that impression even though the

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>presentation the agronomy of the course is very premium. You know,

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like you're just in a raw field. Obviously,

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it's much more curated than that. But on holes like

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>five and six, especially those kind of low lying holes,

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the blindness of those, the kind of visual confusion of

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>those is really something that we don't see in modern

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>golf architecture very much. You know, there's a boldness to

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that that is, you know, kind of surprises you. And

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>on both of those holes you can see the greens

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>from the tee. The greens are kind of on rises

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>right or even pushed up a little bit, and so

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you can see what the ultimate goal is, but what's

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in between is just this kind of tumbling low stuff

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that is it's not clear how to navigate it. And

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>those holes, those holes really stick with me. I think

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>they're brilliant golf holes, and they're on some of the

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>lowest potential land at Shinnacok Hills. It's obvious that a

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of effort was put into the design there, but

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't feel artificial, right, They just they use what

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>they have and use it so well that they become

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>these these incredibly memorable golf holds. But you know, Shittacock,

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to place it in the history of

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>golf architecture, and you know, Bob Cosby and I are

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about this a little bit more later,

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it really does represent where American golf architecture got by

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of the nineteen twenties. You know, it represents

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that full development of this art form where architects really

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>figured out how to make golf courses look and feel

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and play natural. And that was a big goal for

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>these guys because part of what they loved about the

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>old Links courses is that they just felt like a

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>piece of nature. But it was so hard to create

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that feeling and that aesthetic on land that wasn't immediately

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>suited to it. Now, Shittacock Hills, you have a good

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>piece of linksland where you can do that kind of stuff.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's not Scottish links land. It's not

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same. You can't just start playing golf over

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it as soon as you walk on the property. Some

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>architecture had to be done, but the architecture that William

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Flynn did is so concealed at Shinnakoka. It really does

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>show where golf architecture developed too by the end of

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenties. Did you get that feeling? I also

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>get this feeling from like Perry Maxwell's nineteen thirties golf

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>courses right, and maybe some of Alistair McKenzie's late work.

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it certainly feels like a very well thought out

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 3>and complete golf course. And one thing I really found

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 3>myself admiring about Shindacock Hills is just the ability of

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Flynn to use the natural landscape to kind of derive

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 3>strategy on a lot of holes and create consequences. One

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 3>perfect example is on the third hole in the landing

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 3>zone of fairway. There's this massive bowl that kind of

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 3>is scooped out of the fairway, but it was a

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 3>natural hollow there, and he set up the tee where

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 3>you're basically driving straight towards this giant hollow that kind

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.439
<v Speaker 3>of feeds down into the bunkers on the right side

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 3>of the fairway, and it's just like a brilliant way

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 3>to make a really wide fairway essentially a lot smaller,

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 3>because if you're on the right half of the fairway,

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 3>your ball is going to tumble down into this bowl.

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 3>If it has too much speed, the bowl is gonna

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 3>kind of careem it into the bunker, or you're just

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 3>gonna end up in the bottom of this fairway hollow

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 3>and kind of have a completely blind shot into this

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 3>very long part four. So just his ability to use

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 3>the natural landscape kind of in harmony with his design

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:50.240
<v Speaker 3>is just pretty brilliant all the way around the golf course.

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 3>And that's just one kind of small example of it

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 3>that I found myself admiring.

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So the fifth factor that I want to talk

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>about here also relates to William Flynn's kind of subtle

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 1>but brilliant design ability, and that's the green designs. So

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this is obviously a big part of what

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 1>makes Shinnecock such a complete golf course is that the

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>green architecture is incredible as well. At Shinnecock. For me,

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not as much about the internal contour of the greens.

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And in that sense, you know, I just said that

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that Shinnacock is kind of representative of the late Golden

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Age state of the art, but in this specific way,

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of not because a lot of the top

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 1>architects in the late twenties and early thirties were starting

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to experiment heavily with internal contouring of greens. Donald Ross

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 1>was moving toward this at the end of the nineteen

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>twenties and that's why we get what we got at Aeronomy.

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Alistair mackenzie of course was doing very bold things that

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>passa tiempo, and later at Augusta National, and then Perry

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Maxwell in the nineteen thirties had his own approach to

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 1>interior contour, the kind of rolls based or spine based

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>way of constructing interesting green contour. Shinnecock is not as

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 1>much about that, right, It's more about broad slopes and

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>tilts on the putting surface. Itself. Some greens are extremely tilted,

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's always with the kind of natural tilt of

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the land. But you know, the greens certainly aren't flat,

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's not undulating contour in the middle. It's more

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of these you know, sometimes there's contour, sometimes there's artificial contour,

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's but it's more broad and feeding. Right, Everything

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 1>on the green kind of tends toward one direction or

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>one outlet. But then on the exterior of these greens

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot more complexity, right, big runoffs and

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>spines around the greens, and that's what you really end

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 1>up focusing on. I think when you're playing into these

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:09.240
<v Speaker 1>greens is what's outside of them? What is the short

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:14.839
<v Speaker 1>grass contouring around the putting surface. You obviously are thinking

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>about the tilts as well, like that's a big deal.

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>But an interesting thing to do at Chinnacock is too

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>is to start at the green and look back at

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the hole, and look around the green and see where

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the big runoffs are. What are the most punitive runoffs,

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>especially behind the greens. That often determines the strategic angles

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of the holes. The big runoff is not what you

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 1>want to be hitting your ball toward right, because your

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>ball could very well run through the green and end

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>up down that big runoff. You want to be playing

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>into the greens at the angles where what's behind the

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>green is not as punitive, and so yeah, for me

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>at Chinnacock, it is so much about those exterior or

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>complexities paired with the big tilts and broad slopes of

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the greens.

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's definitely kind of the I guess the main

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 3>theme of a lot of the greens. Another thing that

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 3>finn Fln did so much on basically all of the

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:21.879
<v Speaker 3>golf courses was locate greens on ridges and put them

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 3>in very challenging locations within the landscape. I mean, the

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 3>eleventh hole is a prime example. It's one of the

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 3>most insane green sites I think I've ever seen. Almost

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 3>I almost guarantee that no modern architect would ever consider

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 3>placing a green on that tiny little ridge line that

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 3>feeds up there and just falls off so severely on

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 3>both sides. And you see that a lot, like, there's

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 3>so many greens that are perched up and fall away

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 3>on multiple sides, and that's just a product of kind

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 3>of the landscape and where he routed the golf holes.

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 3>But Conversely, there's also a lot that kind of even

0:38:56.200 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 3>if they are up, they do sit down in slight hollows.

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Ninth Pole, for example, sits way up in the air,

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 3>but it's kind of in this slight little depression. So

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 3>if you just kind of get it up there and

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 3>around the green, it's going to be a decent shot.

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:15.760
<v Speaker 3>So that's one thing that I found so common among

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:17.919
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the green sites is just they kind

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 3>of are derived from the landscape and what was there,

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 3>and then on the holes where maybe the land wasn't

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 3>quite as interesting, there's more of these kind of exterior

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 3>bulges that you were talking about that really dictate the

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 3>strategy where you want to be in the fair way

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 3>coming into them, so that these bulges are helping you

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 3>rather than kind of kicking you away from the pin

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 3>and repealing your golf ball. So there's just a lot

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 3>of different variety and all the green sites that he chose,

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 3>even though a lot of them are really kind of

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:49.320
<v Speaker 3>derived from from what was sitting there in the land.

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>The fourteenth Green is another good example of what you're

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about with nine, where fourteen is a very difficult

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>long golf hole and green is elevated just tough, tough, tough,

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>but the fourteenth green sits in this saddle that offers

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of forgiveness so that the whole is

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>not just, you know, completely punishing from beginning to end.

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's a nice variation of grains that are sitting

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 1>on kind of exposed knobs and where everything runs away

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 1>from them and greens that are have a little bit

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>more of a feeding character to them. So yeah, I

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 1>think these are greens that maybe won't come across clearly

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on the telecast for the US Open. I hope that

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what they do is kind of show what those exterior

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>contours are like in some way. But it's not like

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Augusta National's greens, where the the internal contour of the

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>greens is so dramatic that it can become part of

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 1>the narrative of the tournament. And I'd say that that's

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the case at Ironomic as well and a few other courses,

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>but at Shinnacock it's there's a little bit more subtlety

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 1>as to what's happening, because as you're saying that, the

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 1>greens are so responsive to the natural landscape and are

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>just kind of enhancing the what the natural landscape offered.

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Sixth and final factor I'd like to talk about six

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and final factor in Shinnecock Hills's greatness is the stewardship

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of the golf course, which I think has been almost

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>completely exceptional. At Shinnacock. The course, the turf, grasses and

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the soils have basically been preserved rather than blown up

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and put back right. The fairway grasses are this kind

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 1>of motley mixture of a little bit of everything. The

0:41:54.360 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>greens are original push up construction, no sub you know,

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 1>USGA spec. There's some greens that have been supported more

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>by drainage and stuff like that, but these are the

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 1>original greens and the grass on them is POA, but

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:15.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of like Oakmont, it's Shinnacock POA, you know. It's

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it's really seasoned, experienced POA that has taken on its

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>own characteristics. The restoration work over over the past thirty

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 1>years or so, starting with tree removal, has been very

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 1>restrained and sensitive. You know. Corn Crenshaw have worked with

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the club for the past number of years now and

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>their approach has not been to rebuild. It's just been

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to kind of nudge the course in the right direction

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>and then of course, everything plays as it should. I

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>think it is firm and fast out there, now, is it?

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Would it be?

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Would it be amazing if this course were full rescue? Sure,

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know that would be That would be incredible. I

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think it would be possible in this particular environment

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:08.240
<v Speaker 1>because the grasses at Chinnacok, you know, these are veteran

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>turf grasses that have adapted to their environment. So I

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think that imposing fescue on this course would necessarily

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>be the being the best interest of the golf course.

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's it's it's with any US sea

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>side course. It's hard not to fantasize about it about

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:32.479
<v Speaker 1>it just being fescue. But with that said, the place

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is firm and fast, it dries out super quickly, it's sandy,

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is what you want. The ball, you know,

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of leaps into the air at unexpected moments, so

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it gives you everything you want in a seaside course.

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Anything to add there about the about the kind of

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 1>stewardship and presentation.

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Of the course, I think you summed it up really well.

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 3>There's sort of this intangible that old golf courses have

0:43:56.560 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 3>when they've sat there and evolved for sixty seven eighty

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 3>ninety one hundred years long, where the grass has just

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:07.880
<v Speaker 3>become one with the environment in the ecosystem and the

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:10.839
<v Speaker 3>habitat that it sits in. So it's almost like these

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 3>grassives have been even trained for one hundred years to

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 3>be perfectly suited for the soil type, for the conditions

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 3>and what kind of it's facing on a day to

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 3>day basis. So that just enhances the design and playability

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 3>so much.

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:27.240
<v Speaker 1>There's so much.

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:31.359
<v Speaker 3>Going for it that it's just I honestly don't know

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 3>what else like you could change or to the turf

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 3>to try and make it better. Like you said, Vescue,

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm not even sure if that would play a whole

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:42.839
<v Speaker 3>lot better than what they have they're growing. They have

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 3>sort of this hodgepodge of grass and the fairways that

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 3>are just have been optimized, like I said, for over

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 3>one hundred years to this environment. So that's just like

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 3>you can't replicate that. Only time can can create that,

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 3>and that's something that's really special about the agronomy at

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Shinnecock Hills. And then additionally, I think as a holistic

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of visual thing, just the textures and the visual

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 3>appearance and aesthetic of the golf course really is pretty beautiful.

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 3>You have these kind of dried out white sand bunkers,

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 3>the green kind of rownish tint of the grass and

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 3>the turf on the plane surfaces, and then you get

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 3>this bright orange kind of fescue grass and blue stem

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 3>grass in the native areas that blows in the wind

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 3>and there's just acres and acres and acres of it

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 3>between the golf hole, so it really defines the golf

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:41.760
<v Speaker 3>hole that you're on and just creates these awesome visuals

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.720
<v Speaker 3>across the property. Being able to look at the tall

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 3>grasses blowing in the wind and look at all the

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:50.919
<v Speaker 3>different green sights and flagsticks kind of perched up out

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 3>of the ground is just it's really awesome to just

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 3>to look at. And I hope that maybe you know,

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 3>the one of the evenings during the open, that you'll

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:03.359
<v Speaker 3>get that low light and you'll get to see all

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 3>the awesome shadows and kind of that golden glow across

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 3>the entire golf course, which really highlights kind of that ecsthetic.

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think the keyword here is texture. Shinnacak has texture,

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and that's what a lot of courses lose when they

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>rebuild everything, when they strip it down to the dirt

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and put up these new turf grasses, irrigation systems, drainage systems, subair,

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>et cetera in their place, right, they lose texture. They

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:41.800
<v Speaker 1>become monochromatic. And that's happened to so many golf courses,

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like just about every other big championship course that the

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>PGA Championship where the US Open is going to go to,

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>has had over the years some degree of texture loss.

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And this becomes, unfortunately, especially visible at courses that remove

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of trees. I am generally in support of

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>those tree removal programs if they are done for kind

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of historical and agronomic and playability reasons. But one of

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 1>the things that you lose when you lose trees is

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>texture variation, right, You lose that bit of difference that

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a tree brings. And so when you take out trees,

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you've got to somehow recapture the natural texture of the

0:47:28.480 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 1>property through grasses and through other methods, and a lot

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:35.399
<v Speaker 1>of courses don't do that. They just maintain the kind

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of a lawn in place of where the trees were

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>between the holes, and that's a real shame, and that

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is not something that they've done at Shincock Hills, Right,

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 1>they remove their trees and they recaptured the natural texture

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of the property, not only between the holes, but then

0:47:56.040 --> 0:48:00.120
<v Speaker 1>they also preserved the texture of their fair ways and

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 1>their original greens, so that when you walk on these fairways,

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you can see, as you're explaining that you're not walking

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 1>on a mono stand, right, you're walking on a fairway

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that has all sorts of different colors and turf types

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in it. And to me it's beautiful. A lot of

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 1>people might look at that and say, oh, wow, is

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this really an elite club, Like why isn't it kind

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of uniform? But to me, that's so much better looking

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and so much more textured than the typical, you know,

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>high tech fairway grass that we see. And you know,

0:48:33.120 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>although the greens are a kind of monostand of poe

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:39.879
<v Speaker 1>annua its, it's unique poe annuals. It is. It's been

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 1>there for a long time and it's adapted to its environment.

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:48.839
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, you feel that that variety of texture every

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:50.880
<v Speaker 1>step you take on the property, and it's something that

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>makes Shinnecock so memorable and again enhances the naturalism of

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the place. You feel like you're on a real piece

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of land, not in an artificial environment. So yeah, we

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess we love Shinnacock Hills. I guess that's the uh,

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the message here. Are there any critiques of Shinnecock

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Hills that that we should that we should air At

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this point, it's very difficult, if you're very difficult to

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:19.359
<v Speaker 1>critique this golf course. It's it's really hard to poke

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>holes in it. I I don't really I don't love

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the seventh hole. There were Dan you know, some people

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>might take offense to that, but I think it's you know,

0:49:27.320 --> 0:49:30.439
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like a parody of a ra Dan hole.

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It's really different in philosophy from the rest of the

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:36.319
<v Speaker 1>golf course. And you know, it would be if the

0:49:36.360 --> 0:49:40.080
<v Speaker 1>green speeds were a little bit a little bit uh

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:42.880
<v Speaker 1>lower than I think it would probably work better. But

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 1>as it is, it it's a bit of a one

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:48.839
<v Speaker 1>dimensional type of Dan and you really got to play

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it through the air. But at the same time, it's

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it's super memorable, you know, like it's there's no doubt

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:57.239
<v Speaker 1>that it's a it's a moment when you stand on

0:49:57.239 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that tea and try to hit that shot, so it's

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 1>got that going for it. But yeah, it's hard to

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:05.879
<v Speaker 1>think of anything else where you would where you would

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>criticize it.

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:09.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, seven was really the one thing that stuck out

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 3>to me when I played. It just kind of feels

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 3>a bit like a sore of thumb sticking out of

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 3>the ground. And like you said, it doesn't really play

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 3>like the original for Dan, where you can bounce the ball.

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:20.799
<v Speaker 1>In and run it up.

0:50:20.840 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 3>The slope in front of the green is just too

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 3>steep to do that. So with modern technology it's become

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 3>more of this aerial pursuit of a golf hole, and

0:50:29.680 --> 0:50:31.600
<v Speaker 3>it really doesn't fit in with kind of the rest

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:34.759
<v Speaker 3>of the design of the golf course. It's kind of

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:37.400
<v Speaker 3>like this one odd hole out, which is really interesting

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 3>because it's kind of become almost the most famous hole

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 3>in the golf course and the one that most people

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:46.799
<v Speaker 3>can recognize. So it is an interesting aspect of kind

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 3>of that core of the property.

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 1>It's understandable that it's become a famous hole or a

0:50:53.480 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of point of focus during tournaments because visually it

0:50:58.239 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is so legible, right, and in that way, it's different

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>from the rest of the course, which which very much

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>just follows the land, and so it's hard to tell

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:11.440
<v Speaker 1>what the golf course is quote unquote doing. Right on

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the seventh hole, you can see what the golf course

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is doing because it's it's right there, sticking up out

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:17.839
<v Speaker 1>of the ground. And and so I think that's part

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of the reason that it's become famous. But yeah, aside

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:28.360
<v Speaker 1>from that, it's just it's really hard to to find

0:51:28.440 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 1>things about Shinnecock that that fall short. And and so

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, it is one of the most complete,

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:45.000
<v Speaker 1>near perfect golf courses in America certainly, and so so

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 1>where do we where do we put it in those ranks?

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting to try to compare it to

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a Cypress Point or an Oakmont or an Augusta National.

0:51:56.560 --> 0:51:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I think in a lot of ways, Shinnacock does things

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>better than those courses. Like, yeah, Cyprus might have the

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:08.600
<v Speaker 1>more remarkable and memorable piece of land with the kind

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 1>of seaside portion of it and that amazing, you know,

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>white sand dune that it plays through and that incredible routing,

0:52:17.080 --> 0:52:19.239
<v Speaker 1>But the turf grass at Chinnacock and the way it

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:22.280
<v Speaker 1>plays and the relationship between the elements of the golf

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is way better at Chinnacock right now, you know, And

0:52:26.719 --> 0:52:30.360
<v Speaker 1>so where do you put it among the great golf courses,

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at least of the ones that you've seen. I don't

0:52:32.120 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 1>think either you or I have seen Pine Valley.

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:38.440
<v Speaker 3>No I haven't, but I think it's certainly in question

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:42.240
<v Speaker 3>for the greatest golf course in the world. Like we said,

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:45.799
<v Speaker 3>there's really not that much wrong with it. You have

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 3>the wind, you have the firmness, and the incredible landscape.

0:52:51.160 --> 0:52:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Like there's no reason why anyone should not say that

0:52:54.640 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 3>it's not the best golf course in the world. There's

0:52:57.320 --> 0:53:00.520
<v Speaker 3>so much going for it. It's an incredible test golf.

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 3>It's very, very difficult, and this is something I was

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 3>thinking of. Some of the best golf courses in the

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 3>world really are really challenging. There's not really very many

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:14.440
<v Speaker 3>golf courses that are highly regarded that are easy or

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:20.400
<v Speaker 3>less challenging than something like Shinnacock. So if in my

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:23.399
<v Speaker 3>book it could be the it could be the number one,

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 3>it could topple Pine Valley as the best golf course

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:28.760
<v Speaker 3>in the world. But it's all really a personal preference.

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:31.480
<v Speaker 3>So I do think it kind of lives in that

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:37.439
<v Speaker 3>absolute upper echelon of golf courses, basically top top five

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 3>in the world in my eyes.

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:43.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, man, thank you for coming on the podcast.

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Always fun to talk to you. Looking forward to the USO.

0:53:46.480 --> 0:53:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thanks for having me. Really looking forward to watching

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 3>the pros try and tackle it one more time.

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:54.239
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Next up here we have Bob Crosby joining me to

0:53:58.480 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about the early history of the architecture at Shinnakak Hills.

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's go to that. This episode of Designing Golf

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by Perfect Practice. Perfect Practice putting

0:54:18.480 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 1>mats and chipping nets are the perfect Father's Day gifts.

0:54:22.880 --> 0:54:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Father's Day is coming up. You need gift ideas. Perfect

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Practice is a good one. The putting mat creates a

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>realistic putting experience. It's crafted with unique crystal velvet material

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that ensures a smooth and precise ball movement which simulates

0:54:38.600 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 1>real greens, and the chip shot is the only automatic

0:54:43.000 --> 0:54:45.879
<v Speaker 1>ball return chipping net. It also includes a grass matt

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:48.239
<v Speaker 1>and target net that lets you get a ton of

0:54:48.239 --> 0:54:52.560
<v Speaker 1>reps in without chasing balls, and it's suited for either

0:54:52.640 --> 0:54:56.400
<v Speaker 1>indoor or outdoor use. Starting to warm up across the

0:54:56.480 --> 0:54:59.320
<v Speaker 1>US right now, so you might move it into your backyard,

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:03.279
<v Speaker 1>but during colder times it can be used indoors. I

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:05.719
<v Speaker 1>have mine set up in the backyard right now and

0:55:05.719 --> 0:55:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it's really helped me stay in chipping shape during a

0:55:09.120 --> 0:55:11.880
<v Speaker 1>time when frankly, I haven't been playing that much golf.

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:15.319
<v Speaker 1>You can purchase the putting matt and chip shot on

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the Perfect Practice website, Amazon and golf Galaxy, and if

0:55:20.239 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you go to perfect Practice dot com you can use

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the promo code design Design Design for twenty percent off.

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:31.880
<v Speaker 1>That's actually a great way to show support for this podcast.

0:55:32.239 --> 0:55:35.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're interested in a putting mat or chipping net,

0:55:36.120 --> 0:55:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Perfect Practice makes the best ones that I've used, and

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you can use a promo code specifically for designing golf design.

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:55.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get back to the episode. Bob Crosby,

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the podcast.

0:55:56.719 --> 0:55:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Great to be back here.

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to talk with you today, Bob, about

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the early history of Shinnecock Hills. Eight years ago, you

0:56:06.040 --> 0:56:10.520
<v Speaker 1>co authored a short article with Wayne Morrison for the

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:14.440
<v Speaker 1>USGA website about the evolution of this golf course over

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:17.880
<v Speaker 1>its first forty years, essentially right from eighteen ninety one

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to nineteen thirty one. The opening sentence of that article

0:56:21.239 --> 0:56:24.960
<v Speaker 1>basically lays out its thesis. You say, if you were

0:56:25.000 --> 0:56:27.439
<v Speaker 1>looking for a case study on the evolution of golf

0:56:27.520 --> 0:56:31.279
<v Speaker 1>architecture in America, Shinnecock Hills would be a good place

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to start. Effectively, what you then go on to argue

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is that between eighteen ninety one and nineteen thirty one,

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>there were three main versions of the course, and each

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of those versions represents a different stage in the history

0:56:43.040 --> 0:56:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and development of American golf course design. I found this

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. I think you know it's for me. It's

0:56:48.000 --> 0:56:50.680
<v Speaker 1>less about the specifics of those versions of the course

0:56:50.719 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 1>than about what they represent in history. And so that's

0:56:55.120 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of what I want to get in to with

0:56:57.239 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you today now. The first to get us at the beginning,

0:57:02.360 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the first iteration of Shinnecock Hills was designed by two

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:12.440
<v Speaker 1>British professionals, Willie Davis and Willie Dunn. Davis designed the

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 1>first twelve holes in eighteen ninety one and Done completed

0:57:16.760 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen in eighteen ninety five. So do you just

0:57:20.120 --> 0:57:23.560
<v Speaker 1>want to start there maybe and talk about that version

0:57:23.600 --> 0:57:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of Shinnecock Hills and what it said about, you know,

0:57:26.360 --> 0:57:28.080
<v Speaker 1>historical trends of the period.

0:57:28.800 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Sure, the first versions of shinnecock were designed by two

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Actually they were Scottish professionals.

0:57:37.320 --> 0:57:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Were they both Scottish? I was having a hard time

0:57:40.160 --> 0:57:42.880
<v Speaker 1>figuring out. I used British as a catch all sometimes.

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I know Scottish people maybe resist being British, and British

0:57:46.760 --> 0:57:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is not wrong, but yeah, Britain. But there really weren't

0:57:51.320 --> 0:57:54.439
<v Speaker 1>very many English professionals at the time. Yeah, I thought

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Willy Dunn was one. I was in English, happened to

0:57:57.480 --> 0:58:00.760
<v Speaker 1>be an English person, But I know Willys was scott

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:58:01.160 --> 0:58:04.160
<v Speaker 2>You may be right because his father was at Wimbledon

0:58:04.360 --> 0:58:05.120
<v Speaker 2>for a long time.

0:58:05.160 --> 0:58:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he was from London and that you're right,

0:58:08.680 --> 0:58:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes you don't know when you're like this is

0:58:10.920 --> 0:58:13.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of a digression already. But it's a funny thing

0:58:13.360 --> 0:58:19.080
<v Speaker 1>about researching early history, in early golf history, especially in America,

0:58:19.240 --> 0:58:22.720
<v Speaker 1>with these Scottish and English and you know whoever else

0:58:22.760 --> 0:58:26.040
<v Speaker 1>professionals coming over because they're all named Willie.

0:58:26.440 --> 0:58:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Was there a Willy And they all died before their

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 2>fiftieth birthday. For those remarkable how quickly they all died.

0:58:33.160 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 2>They all had pneumonia or something. And in fact, it's

0:58:36.160 --> 0:58:38.800
<v Speaker 2>a good, good correction because I want to come back

0:58:38.880 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 2>to something about Willy Dunn that ties in with English

0:58:43.440 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 2>golf courses. But yeah, they they were part of a

0:58:48.120 --> 0:58:53.480
<v Speaker 2>literally a title wave of British professionals that immigrated to

0:58:53.520 --> 0:58:57.320
<v Speaker 2>the United States starting about eighteen eighty five or so.

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:05.440
<v Speaker 2>It was such a large title way that by the

0:59:05.520 --> 0:59:09.520
<v Speaker 2>late eighteen nineties AJ Balfer, who was at the time

0:59:09.600 --> 0:59:12.920
<v Speaker 2>it would become eventually Prime Minister of Britain but at

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the time was a fairly high functioning high functionary in

0:59:16.560 --> 0:59:21.240
<v Speaker 2>the British government, suggested that they enact but Parliament enact

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:26.040
<v Speaker 2>rules to limit the immigration of these professionals to America.

0:59:27.400 --> 0:59:29.160
<v Speaker 2>And they went for all sorts of different reasons. I

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:31.560
<v Speaker 2>think most of them was because they were being paid

0:59:31.560 --> 0:59:34.880
<v Speaker 2>more money, they had a higher social standing in the

0:59:35.000 --> 0:59:39.560
<v Speaker 2>United States. It was just in all sorts of ways,

0:59:39.640 --> 0:59:43.120
<v Speaker 2>very very attractive. What ended up happening, and this will

0:59:43.520 --> 0:59:47.040
<v Speaker 2>not be news to many people, is that various professionals

0:59:47.120 --> 0:59:51.800
<v Speaker 2>went to various American metropolitan areas and created a whole

0:59:51.920 --> 0:59:55.480
<v Speaker 2>range of They built the whole range of golf courses

0:59:56.360 --> 1:00:02.200
<v Speaker 2>all over the United States. What from a historical perspective

1:00:02.400 --> 1:00:06.240
<v Speaker 2>is remarkable about all of that is how similar all

1:00:06.320 --> 1:00:12.040
<v Speaker 2>of those golf courses were. You had literally dozens, if

1:00:12.080 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 2>not hundreds of professionals in the United States introducing golf

1:00:18.040 --> 1:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>to Americans who knew relatively little about it at the time,

1:00:21.440 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 2>and then designing the same or very similar Victorian style

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:31.720
<v Speaker 2>golf courses. By eighteen ninety or by the time Shinnacock

1:00:31.880 --> 1:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>was built, there was a fair amount of There was

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>a large consensus that golf courses should include cross hazards

1:00:43.960 --> 1:00:48.880
<v Speaker 2>to force balls to carry them, the idea being that

1:00:48.920 --> 1:00:52.840
<v Speaker 2>we wanted to find objective tests for players who could

1:00:52.880 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 2>hit the ball far ensure. That whole idea came from

1:00:57.640 --> 1:01:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Laidlaw Purpose and really begins in some respects with Laidlaw

1:01:02.640 --> 1:01:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Purvose's original iteration of Sandwich, which opened for play in

1:01:06.720 --> 1:01:11.040
<v Speaker 2>eighteen ninety seven. Laidlaw Purpose then lays out his design

1:01:11.120 --> 1:01:15.000
<v Speaker 2>theories and an article in the Early Golf which became

1:01:15.040 --> 1:01:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Golf Illustrated later which talks about the need for Carrie

1:01:20.000 --> 1:01:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Hazard's whole links were critical and for the most part,

1:01:26.560 --> 1:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and I'm actually having trouble finding exceptions, the Scottish professionals

1:01:31.080 --> 1:01:35.479
<v Speaker 2>that came to America about eighteen ninety followed that those

1:01:35.520 --> 1:01:41.919
<v Speaker 2>sorts of principles fairly strictly there were. There is a

1:01:42.040 --> 1:01:44.720
<v Speaker 2>thread on golf club batlast that's been going on now

1:01:44.840 --> 1:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>for I think about ten years, which is basically compilation

1:01:48.880 --> 1:01:52.600
<v Speaker 2>of old routings and drawings of early American golf courses.

1:01:53.560 --> 1:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm having trouble finding any golf course on that thread

1:01:56.320 --> 1:02:00.240
<v Speaker 2>that wasn't a Victorian golf course. So these guys come

1:02:00.280 --> 1:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>to Shinnacock and they designed what they were all taught

1:02:02.720 --> 1:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>to designer all as soon was the correct way to

1:02:04.800 --> 1:02:09.160
<v Speaker 2>design a golf course. Willie Davis does the first twelve holes,

1:02:10.160 --> 1:02:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Willie Dunn does finishes it off. Actually, I think he

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>won the Open the year he finished the golf course,

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:23.880
<v Speaker 2>in eighteen ninety six, and that was pretty much it,

1:02:24.080 --> 1:02:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean. But the antecedents to all of that was

1:02:29.520 --> 1:02:34.120
<v Speaker 2>this wave of Scottish immigrants that came to America to

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:39.920
<v Speaker 2>a place where the game was still relatively unknown. Nobody

1:02:39.960 --> 1:02:42.440
<v Speaker 2>had the clue about how to design a golf course,

1:02:43.080 --> 1:02:48.680
<v Speaker 2>and these guys supplied the need and that was the

1:02:48.720 --> 1:02:51.040
<v Speaker 2>beginnings of Schnakock.

1:02:52.000 --> 1:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think they all got their ideas about

1:02:56.280 --> 1:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>how to design a golf course where they reading material

1:03:02.040 --> 1:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>about this? Did they just gather it by osmosis by

1:03:07.120 --> 1:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>growing up in Great Britain wherever they might have been.

1:03:10.800 --> 1:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my understanding is that Willie Davis was at

1:03:13.480 --> 1:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Hoylake for some of his training as a professional. Willy

1:03:18.520 --> 1:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Dunn may have been at Westward ho for a while.

1:03:24.360 --> 1:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you think this kind of consensus formed. What

1:03:28.920 --> 1:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>were the mechanisms for spreading these ideas?

1:03:32.840 --> 1:03:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm not clear about. There was almost a complete unanimity

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>about the way golf courses should be designed. I'm not

1:03:41.640 --> 1:03:45.480
<v Speaker 2>sure where that came from. I can tell you a

1:03:45.520 --> 1:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>bit about the story of Willy Dunn, whose father and

1:03:50.520 --> 1:03:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I think he then succeeded. His father was at Wimbledon

1:03:53.880 --> 1:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>for eleven or twelve years. That was laid Law Purvis's

1:03:58.800 --> 1:04:03.960
<v Speaker 2>London course. Leidlow purpose had a number of disagreements with Wimbledon,

1:04:04.400 --> 1:04:07.280
<v Speaker 2>which may have in the end led him to set

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:11.720
<v Speaker 2>up a new club, now Royal St George's in Sandwich.

1:04:13.480 --> 1:04:17.200
<v Speaker 2>But he had very very strong opinions about golf architecture,

1:04:17.280 --> 1:04:20.240
<v Speaker 2>about the shortcomings of the old course at Saint Andrews,

1:04:20.920 --> 1:04:23.440
<v Speaker 2>and where golf ought to go if it's going to

1:04:23.480 --> 1:04:30.840
<v Speaker 2>be a quote progressive, more objective, fair sport, and his

1:04:31.000 --> 1:04:35.440
<v Speaker 2>ideas were basically what we see what we now. You

1:04:35.480 --> 1:04:38.200
<v Speaker 2>don't see many of them anymore, but his ideas were

1:04:38.240 --> 1:04:43.840
<v Speaker 2>basically embodied in the doctrines of Victorian golf architecture, the

1:04:43.920 --> 1:04:48.000
<v Speaker 2>cross hazards, the whole links and the whole bit. It was,

1:04:48.080 --> 1:04:51.880
<v Speaker 2>by the way, not a crazy philosophy. It was seamless.

1:04:51.920 --> 1:04:56.360
<v Speaker 2>In fact, it answered all the questions, and it was

1:04:56.800 --> 1:05:00.200
<v Speaker 2>before that reason easy for these pros to use. It

1:05:00.240 --> 1:05:03.640
<v Speaker 2>was a matter of measuring links, laying out cross hazers

1:05:03.640 --> 1:05:07.480
<v Speaker 2>at the right intervals, and it required very little imagination

1:05:08.920 --> 1:05:11.800
<v Speaker 2>on the on the part of the people building the courses.

1:05:11.840 --> 1:05:14.360
<v Speaker 2>It was. It was a It was a It was

1:05:14.400 --> 1:05:17.960
<v Speaker 2>a plan that the details of which were put in

1:05:18.040 --> 1:05:20.920
<v Speaker 2>their laps and they built. It was.

1:05:21.000 --> 1:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a way to spread golf quickly, which was

1:05:24.080 --> 1:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously a big goal in the eighteen eighties and nineties

1:05:27.840 --> 1:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>when the game was really catching on and suddenly people

1:05:31.040 --> 1:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>needed courses, and sometimes they wanted them in places that

1:05:34.760 --> 1:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>were not particularly well suited to golf. Now, Shannacock Hills

1:05:37.680 --> 1:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>happened to be a land that was pretty well suited

1:05:41.480 --> 1:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to the game, but they were putting courses in places

1:05:45.000 --> 1:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that courses hadn't been put before, and so they needed

1:05:48.040 --> 1:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a way to do it right, and you could do

1:05:49.680 --> 1:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it quickly.

1:05:50.280 --> 1:05:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I do I write some account of Willie Davis. Willy

1:05:53.240 --> 1:05:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Davis did the first twelve holes at Shirakok in a month.

1:05:56.880 --> 1:05:59.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean it, you know, just give me the land,

1:05:59.080 --> 1:06:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I'll do the crows hazards, and you got your golf

1:06:04.000 --> 1:06:08.920
<v Speaker 2>course right. It's it's it's pretty amazing and it you know,

1:06:09.000 --> 1:06:12.080
<v Speaker 2>it was a philosophy though that was we pooh pooh

1:06:12.120 --> 1:06:13.919
<v Speaker 2>it and make fun of it. But it was very

1:06:13.960 --> 1:06:19.280
<v Speaker 2>sophisticated purpose answered all the questions, had an answer for

1:06:19.400 --> 1:06:20.600
<v Speaker 2>all the questions.

1:06:20.600 --> 1:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>A coherent worldview.

1:06:22.120 --> 1:06:27.600
<v Speaker 2>In a way, hear it a seamless architectural universe that

1:06:27.720 --> 1:06:30.040
<v Speaker 2>left nothing unaddressed.

1:06:29.760 --> 1:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Right, And that was the original version of Shinakok Hills.

1:06:33.240 --> 1:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>There are some pictures out there that that I think

1:06:35.720 --> 1:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>might be striking to people because of how different they

1:06:38.800 --> 1:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>look from the current version of the course, which is

1:06:42.680 --> 1:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>very naturalistic. There were some pretty wild booking cross bunkers

1:06:48.600 --> 1:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and and things of that nature, with designs that were

1:06:52.560 --> 1:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>not attempting to emulate the natural environment, were maybe just

1:06:56.040 --> 1:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>attempting to look cool. But there's one particularly famous one

1:06:59.600 --> 1:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of a of a cross bunker with what they call

1:07:02.640 --> 1:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the cop right a a kind of vertical berm that

1:07:07.360 --> 1:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't straight but instead had this kind of squiggle pattern, right,

1:07:12.840 --> 1:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know. And uh and so there were things like

1:07:15.440 --> 1:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that at this at this first version of the course,

1:07:18.840 --> 1:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>things that now you know, looked very strange to us.

1:07:21.600 --> 1:07:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, it was a it was a very it's called

1:07:23.720 --> 1:07:26.000
<v Speaker 2>a bastion bunker at the time b A S T

1:07:26.160 --> 1:07:31.440
<v Speaker 2>I O N. It was very funky. Somebody had a

1:07:31.480 --> 1:07:35.560
<v Speaker 2>spasm of imagination it built this very weird thing. But

1:07:36.480 --> 1:07:40.360
<v Speaker 2>to address something you just mentioned, their point, in fact,

1:07:40.480 --> 1:07:45.080
<v Speaker 2>their objective was not to have natural golf courses. Natural

1:07:45.120 --> 1:07:48.800
<v Speaker 2>golf courses allowed too much haphazardous and luck in the game.

1:07:49.080 --> 1:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>They wanted objective tests for a player's ability to hit

1:07:53.640 --> 1:07:58.160
<v Speaker 2>a ball, as laid La Purbis said, far insure their

1:07:58.520 --> 1:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>ergo you have carry bunker at various intervals on each hole.

1:08:03.680 --> 1:08:06.240
<v Speaker 2>And that's what he that that was, that was the

1:08:06.320 --> 1:08:07.360
<v Speaker 2>design intent.

1:08:08.040 --> 1:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm. Golf becoming maybe a little bit more like tennis,

1:08:11.840 --> 1:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>like establishing an official playing field as opposed to just

1:08:15.760 --> 1:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>these kind of natural environments, which is where the where

1:08:19.320 --> 1:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the game started. But there wasn't at the time a

1:08:23.000 --> 1:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>huge specific value put on the original links courses. In

1:08:28.680 --> 1:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a way they were thought of as being kind of

1:08:31.360 --> 1:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>outmoded or old fashioned, and that there must be a

1:08:34.400 --> 1:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a new modern way of doing golf course construction. And

1:08:38.320 --> 1:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, this first version of Shinnecock Hills was representative

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:44.479
<v Speaker 1>of that. But now we move on from there to

1:08:44.600 --> 1:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the second version of Shinnecock Hills, which has hotly sort

1:08:49.240 --> 1:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of forgotten these days. You know it's a given who

1:08:53.920 --> 1:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>was involved in building it, But maybe tell me a

1:08:57.160 --> 1:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that. What is this second main itera

1:09:00.320 --> 1:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of the golf.

1:09:01.000 --> 1:09:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, first, let me just jump in and say that

1:09:03.120 --> 1:09:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Wayne Morrison knows more about Shinacock way Morrise has forgotten

1:09:07.120 --> 1:09:08.519
<v Speaker 2>more about Shinnicock.

1:09:08.040 --> 1:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>That I know, of course, all of us fact but.

1:09:13.760 --> 1:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Wayne told me back in the day that there's very

1:09:16.760 --> 1:09:21.080
<v Speaker 2>little known about the McDonald version of Shinnecock There are

1:09:21.960 --> 1:09:25.000
<v Speaker 2>very few drawings, very few photographs, and very little was

1:09:25.040 --> 1:09:29.160
<v Speaker 2>written about it, which makes it a bit of a

1:09:29.200 --> 1:09:29.920
<v Speaker 2>blank slate.

1:09:30.680 --> 1:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And now let me jump in real quick to be clear.

1:09:33.720 --> 1:09:36.639
<v Speaker 1>The second version of Shinnecock Hills was designed by Cebe

1:09:36.720 --> 1:09:40.680
<v Speaker 1>McDonald and Seth Rainer in nineteen sixteen, and this was

1:09:40.920 --> 1:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>just five years after National Golf Links, McDonald's masterpiece and

1:09:46.560 --> 1:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>really his showcase golf course. Just five years after that

1:09:51.360 --> 1:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>course opened right next door to Shinnecock Hills. So five

1:09:55.000 --> 1:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>years later we have Cebe McDonald and Seth Rainer coming

1:09:58.000 --> 1:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>in and redesigning the golf.

1:10:00.240 --> 1:10:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Course, and as far as we know, he designed, at

1:10:03.880 --> 1:10:07.080
<v Speaker 2>least by all accounts, he designed the usual slate of

1:10:07.120 --> 1:10:10.240
<v Speaker 2>template holes, or at least partly a partial slate of

1:10:10.280 --> 1:10:17.640
<v Speaker 2>the template holes. I think the interesting question for McDonald,

1:10:17.760 --> 1:10:21.679
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's by nineteen sixteen still somewhat true,

1:10:22.880 --> 1:10:28.639
<v Speaker 2>is that he wanted to introduce a better way of

1:10:28.680 --> 1:10:32.240
<v Speaker 2>designing golf holes, one that was better in all sorts

1:10:32.280 --> 1:10:35.639
<v Speaker 2>of different ways than the Victorian courses that I think

1:10:35.680 --> 1:10:44.879
<v Speaker 2>he saw in America. He says in Scotland's Gift Golf,

1:10:44.920 --> 1:10:49.920
<v Speaker 2>which is published in nineteen twenty eight. He says in

1:10:49.960 --> 1:10:53.639
<v Speaker 2>there that his ideas for different kinds of golf holes

1:10:53.720 --> 1:10:58.200
<v Speaker 2>came from the Golf Illustrated discussion of Best Holes in

1:10:58.280 --> 1:11:03.960
<v Speaker 2>nineteen oh one, and John Lowell played a predominant an

1:11:04.040 --> 1:11:06.559
<v Speaker 2>important role in that discussion. I'll get to that. We'll

1:11:06.640 --> 1:11:12.000
<v Speaker 2>return to that, hopefully later. But he says in Scotland's

1:11:12.040 --> 1:11:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Gift that he took the holes people liked out of

1:11:16.760 --> 1:11:22.479
<v Speaker 2>that discussion. He only took some of them, actually, And

1:11:22.840 --> 1:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>he wanted to devise a kind of golf architecture that

1:11:27.560 --> 1:11:30.800
<v Speaker 2>was based on those holes, which he took to be

1:11:31.880 --> 1:11:34.519
<v Speaker 2>the best holes, because the experts in Britain thought they

1:11:34.520 --> 1:11:38.240
<v Speaker 2>were the best holes. But consider the problem he had

1:11:38.600 --> 1:11:42.519
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen oh one or so. He wanted to design

1:11:42.560 --> 1:11:46.400
<v Speaker 2>a golf course based on the best holes of which

1:11:46.680 --> 1:11:50.800
<v Speaker 2>nobody in America had seen, and nobody in America was

1:11:50.880 --> 1:11:54.800
<v Speaker 2>going to see in any numbers in any time soon.

1:11:55.720 --> 1:11:59.280
<v Speaker 2>So he had to figure out a way to make

1:11:59.360 --> 1:12:03.760
<v Speaker 2>those holes known to them. And I think that was

1:12:03.840 --> 1:12:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the origins of his notion of going out and drawing

1:12:07.560 --> 1:12:13.760
<v Speaker 2>inexquisite detail the templates for a series of holes. And

1:12:13.840 --> 1:12:17.200
<v Speaker 2>it was those templates that he could use to educate

1:12:17.280 --> 1:12:22.439
<v Speaker 2>American golfers about the best holes in Britain. And not

1:12:22.520 --> 1:12:25.559
<v Speaker 2>only that, he could give those templates to a non

1:12:25.640 --> 1:12:31.519
<v Speaker 2>golfing surveyor rainer who could use those those plans to

1:12:32.040 --> 1:12:37.679
<v Speaker 2>build his golf courses. But his problem was to educate

1:12:37.680 --> 1:12:40.400
<v Speaker 2>American golfers about what the best tolls in Britain were

1:12:40.400 --> 1:12:42.960
<v Speaker 2>at the time, and he used that as the basis

1:12:43.000 --> 1:12:46.800
<v Speaker 2>for his own design theories. And that's what he took

1:12:46.840 --> 1:12:47.440
<v Speaker 2>to Shinikock.

1:12:48.520 --> 1:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and so at this second version of Shinnacock Hills,

1:12:53.200 --> 1:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>we have we believe versions of the radan version of

1:13:01.320 --> 1:13:05.839
<v Speaker 1>the Cape hole, uh and and perhaps a couple of others,

1:13:05.880 --> 1:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe an Eden and a short template. And so these

1:13:10.240 --> 1:13:14.479
<v Speaker 1>were these were the kind of standard part of the

1:13:14.479 --> 1:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>standard catalog of McDonald and Rayner designs that were now

1:13:19.320 --> 1:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>being installed at at Shinnecawk Hills. And so you know,

1:13:23.680 --> 1:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>when you consider this approach to design, what what new things,

1:13:32.160 --> 1:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what new ideas? Did it help inject into the blood

1:13:36.000 --> 1:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>stream of golf architecture, especially in America?

1:13:41.600 --> 1:13:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, I have I have a couple of thoughts.

1:13:48.040 --> 1:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>It it injected into the American blood, the bloodstream of

1:13:53.040 --> 1:13:56.759
<v Speaker 2>the American Gulf. First full just affected these other holes

1:13:56.800 --> 1:14:01.560
<v Speaker 2>existed and they're worth worth being attention to. But it

1:14:02.439 --> 1:14:10.479
<v Speaker 2>also brought attention to the fact that these holes. Let

1:14:10.520 --> 1:14:16.720
<v Speaker 2>me pack up a minute, well, these holes differed dramatically

1:14:16.880 --> 1:14:19.960
<v Speaker 2>from the Victorian kinds of designs that he inherited at

1:14:19.960 --> 1:14:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Shinnakock and other places. The design theories behind the Victorian

1:14:26.479 --> 1:14:30.000
<v Speaker 2>golf courses basically set out in exquisite detail the kinds

1:14:30.040 --> 1:14:34.600
<v Speaker 2>of holes you should be designing. The design goals of

1:14:34.680 --> 1:14:37.800
<v Speaker 2>laid Law, Purvos and other people sort of fell out

1:14:37.840 --> 1:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>from that. There was no need to go and if

1:14:39.800 --> 1:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>you design these kinds of holes, the design principles will

1:14:42.360 --> 1:14:45.599
<v Speaker 2>take care of themselves. My design goals will take care

1:14:48.880 --> 1:14:53.240
<v Speaker 2>McDonald had very different ideas about the right kinds of holes,

1:14:53.280 --> 1:14:57.439
<v Speaker 2>but his methodology was very much like Purposes in the

1:14:57.520 --> 1:15:00.799
<v Speaker 2>sense that I'm going to give you a fa really clear,

1:15:01.160 --> 1:15:05.040
<v Speaker 2>detailed description of the kinds of holes you should be building,

1:15:05.920 --> 1:15:09.599
<v Speaker 2>and if you build those holes, my design goals will

1:15:09.640 --> 1:15:15.120
<v Speaker 2>fall out without naturally. And his design goals were make

1:15:15.200 --> 1:15:19.479
<v Speaker 2>holes more strategic, make them require the golfer to do

1:15:19.560 --> 1:15:23.160
<v Speaker 2>more thinking. It involved more than simply clearing a cross

1:15:23.160 --> 1:15:29.800
<v Speaker 2>hazard at various distances. But from an architectural methodological point

1:15:29.800 --> 1:15:35.000
<v Speaker 2>of view, he wasn't allowing the architect much leeway. I'm

1:15:35.040 --> 1:15:38.759
<v Speaker 2>going to give you the whole kitten kaboodle you design

1:15:38.840 --> 1:15:42.479
<v Speaker 2>a golf hole like my templates and your design goals

1:15:42.600 --> 1:15:46.760
<v Speaker 2>take care of themselves. That's the And that was a

1:15:46.880 --> 1:15:51.000
<v Speaker 2>methodology that he shared with the Victorious. He didn't get

1:15:51.120 --> 1:15:57.080
<v Speaker 2>he really never got past that there's all sorts of

1:15:57.160 --> 1:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>old stuff and McDonald's that. Bernard Darwin wrote an article

1:16:02.200 --> 1:16:05.559
<v Speaker 2>about McDonald in nineteen thirteen or nineteen fourteen. He had

1:16:05.600 --> 1:16:09.200
<v Speaker 2>just visited Nationville Golf Links. Loved just absolutely loved it.

1:16:09.200 --> 1:16:11.920
<v Speaker 2>But you know, there's a yeah, but he said, you know,

1:16:11.960 --> 1:16:15.639
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of really old stuff here. This is

1:16:15.680 --> 1:16:23.160
<v Speaker 2>not cold. And and McDonald at one point brags about

1:16:23.200 --> 1:16:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the fact that his Eden Hoole at National Golf Links

1:16:26.479 --> 1:16:30.520
<v Speaker 2>has a water hazard between the green and the tee

1:16:30.880 --> 1:16:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and he said that's good, he said, because that means

1:16:33.960 --> 1:16:37.160
<v Speaker 2>you can't play the hole with a putter. And that

1:16:37.400 --> 1:16:40.680
<v Speaker 2>was the main Victorian objection to the Eden Hole. With

1:16:40.720 --> 1:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the old course, it didn't have a cross hazard. You

1:16:43.960 --> 1:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>could play with a putter. You could play down in

1:16:45.840 --> 1:16:48.280
<v Speaker 2>the valley and putt between the hill bunker and strathbunker

1:16:48.280 --> 1:16:50.479
<v Speaker 2>and get to the green, and that was viewed as

1:16:50.520 --> 1:16:55.200
<v Speaker 2>a major problem with the Edenhole. Well, McDonald's figure when

1:16:55.240 --> 1:16:59.080
<v Speaker 2>McDonald was bought into that Victorian argument at the Eden

1:16:59.320 --> 1:17:02.600
<v Speaker 2>at National Golf Links. It's a very odd sort of

1:17:03.120 --> 1:17:06.200
<v Speaker 2>throw in for somebody that we considered sort of the

1:17:06.280 --> 1:17:10.040
<v Speaker 2>father of modern strategic golf architecture. In many ways, he

1:17:10.200 --> 1:17:12.880
<v Speaker 2>was not. He was really he was really stuck in

1:17:12.920 --> 1:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>an ear older ear slightly, although we had different preferences

1:17:16.000 --> 1:17:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and holes. So it's well, go ahead.

1:17:21.000 --> 1:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm curious about about where you see McDonald in

1:17:25.360 --> 1:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>that kind of evolutionary path. What insights do you think

1:17:32.160 --> 1:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>McDonald and Rainer for that matter, did not yet have

1:17:37.800 --> 1:17:43.559
<v Speaker 1>about golf architecture, what remained to be done after their work,

1:17:43.600 --> 1:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Because I mean, if you look at you know, one

1:17:45.439 --> 1:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>might argue, you look at National Golf Links, there aren't

1:17:47.880 --> 1:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that many golf courses that have been built that are

1:17:49.920 --> 1:17:50.559
<v Speaker 1>better than that.

1:17:52.000 --> 1:17:55.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a it's a wonderful golf course. But his design,

1:17:56.560 --> 1:18:01.759
<v Speaker 2>his design methodology was exactly the reverse of the design

1:18:01.840 --> 1:18:05.400
<v Speaker 2>methodology of William Flynn, who will we'll talk about later

1:18:05.880 --> 1:18:10.439
<v Speaker 2>and William Flynn's progenitors, which is Harry Colt and other

1:18:11.160 --> 1:18:15.839
<v Speaker 2>other people, which is that the the the design goals

1:18:15.880 --> 1:18:20.400
<v Speaker 2>of a golf course come out of a particular terrain,

1:18:21.400 --> 1:18:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to I'm going to shape a particular piece

1:18:25.439 --> 1:18:31.719
<v Speaker 2>of land so as to achieve certain prior design goals.

1:18:32.400 --> 1:18:35.640
<v Speaker 2>For McDonald's and in frank for the For the Victorians,

1:18:35.680 --> 1:18:38.559
<v Speaker 2>it was the reverse. I'm going to tell you how

1:18:38.600 --> 1:18:41.519
<v Speaker 2>to design a golf hole, and the design goals will

1:18:41.600 --> 1:18:47.719
<v Speaker 2>just come out automatically, and you can build my whole,

1:18:47.880 --> 1:18:50.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, within certain limits. You can build my hole

1:18:50.560 --> 1:18:53.760
<v Speaker 2>on a whole bunch of different kinds of terrain. But

1:18:53.800 --> 1:18:57.560
<v Speaker 2>if you follow my instructions, things will come out. You know,

1:18:57.760 --> 1:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>the design objectives will be achieved. What's interesting rereading Scotland's

1:19:04.960 --> 1:19:10.040
<v Speaker 2>gift and I urge I recommend it to everyone. In

1:19:10.080 --> 1:19:14.680
<v Speaker 2>his section on golf architecture in the book, he reproduces

1:19:14.760 --> 1:19:18.320
<v Speaker 2>almost in total his nineteen oh six article on the

1:19:18.360 --> 1:19:24.320
<v Speaker 2>ideal golf course from Outing magazine, and lest we forget,

1:19:24.960 --> 1:19:29.640
<v Speaker 2>he actually worked up a mathematical table for the features

1:19:29.760 --> 1:19:33.439
<v Speaker 2>a good hole should have. He also worked up a

1:19:33.479 --> 1:19:37.639
<v Speaker 2>sort of mathematical table on the links and various approach

1:19:37.760 --> 1:19:41.120
<v Speaker 2>distances that any good eighteen hole golf course should have.

1:19:42.680 --> 1:19:46.759
<v Speaker 2>That should all remind you of the controversial Joshua Crane

1:19:47.040 --> 1:19:51.519
<v Speaker 2>course rankings that used essentially the same formula twenty years later.

1:19:53.479 --> 1:19:56.519
<v Speaker 2>McDonald was, in some respects a sort of a halfway

1:19:56.600 --> 1:20:01.200
<v Speaker 2>house to the kinds of things that we that we

1:20:01.360 --> 1:20:05.960
<v Speaker 2>talk about and see today in modern in modern golf architecture.

1:20:07.840 --> 1:20:12.000
<v Speaker 2>It was it was still he still had a foot

1:20:12.080 --> 1:20:13.320
<v Speaker 2>in the Victorian world.

1:20:14.520 --> 1:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>He was a systematizer, wasn't he, And and so he

1:20:18.880 --> 1:20:23.719
<v Speaker 1>was approaching the question of how to build a great

1:20:23.720 --> 1:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>golf course in a way that wasn't dissimilar from how

1:20:29.040 --> 1:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Laidlaw Purvis was approaching it. His method, his kind of

1:20:34.040 --> 1:20:39.880
<v Speaker 1>disposition as a thinker was was pretty parallel to that,

1:20:40.479 --> 1:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>but the conclusions that he came to were different. Because clearly,

1:20:45.000 --> 1:20:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in reproducing some of these great links holes, he was

1:20:49.160 --> 1:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>first of all respecting the links and not saying we

1:20:53.200 --> 1:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>can do better than that, but saying we should be

1:20:55.360 --> 1:21:00.519
<v Speaker 1>learning from these courses. And he was also re producing

1:21:00.560 --> 1:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>strategic concepts. So clearly he was able to kind of

1:21:03.720 --> 1:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>read these holes and derive from them strategic principles that

1:21:09.120 --> 1:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>that could then be applied to different pieces of land.

1:21:11.960 --> 1:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But his insight that these holes had strategic content was

1:21:16.080 --> 1:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was something new, or at least something different from most

1:21:20.320 --> 1:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen eighties and eighteen nineties designers, So there was there

1:21:24.120 --> 1:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>was definitely a key insight there. But as you say,

1:21:29.120 --> 1:21:33.759
<v Speaker 1>his kind of habits of mind were still very similar

1:21:33.800 --> 1:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to that Victorian attitude of we can make a science

1:21:36.920 --> 1:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>out of this, right, Yeah, And.

1:21:38.680 --> 1:21:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's I've had always had reservations about the

1:21:42.200 --> 1:21:50.120
<v Speaker 2>template holes. They leave very little room for the imagination

1:21:50.240 --> 1:21:53.720
<v Speaker 2>of the architect. You need you need to find the

1:21:53.800 --> 1:21:56.400
<v Speaker 2>right spot for them. You need to find the right

1:21:56.439 --> 1:22:01.439
<v Speaker 2>place in an eighteen hole round are very extraneous questions.

1:22:01.479 --> 1:22:07.760
<v Speaker 2>But if you're seth Rayner, you follow the template and

1:22:07.920 --> 1:22:10.799
<v Speaker 2>those happen to be very good holes. Don't get me wrong,

1:22:12.120 --> 1:22:14.439
<v Speaker 2>but it is a very different way to design a

1:22:14.439 --> 1:22:18.120
<v Speaker 2>golf course than from the one that I think Low

1:22:18.200 --> 1:22:21.920
<v Speaker 2>would have. In fact, I'm pretty sure Low disagreed with

1:22:22.040 --> 1:22:24.840
<v Speaker 2>that way of going about designing a golf course. Colt

1:22:24.960 --> 1:22:31.080
<v Speaker 2>certainly did, Darwin certainly did, Mackenzie certainly did. And we

1:22:31.080 --> 1:22:33.400
<v Speaker 2>can talk about that when we get to the next

1:22:33.439 --> 1:22:42.719
<v Speaker 2>stage at Shennacock. But McDonald presents interesting intellectual puzzles about

1:22:42.720 --> 1:22:45.960
<v Speaker 2>what it is about template holes that made sense and

1:22:46.080 --> 1:22:48.200
<v Speaker 2>that were also problematical.

1:22:48.880 --> 1:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, let's get to that third version of the

1:22:52.800 --> 1:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>golf course nineteen thirty one, at least that's when it

1:22:56.040 --> 1:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was finished. New Land was purchased because the highway Route

1:23:01.840 --> 1:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven I believe it is, was routed close to

1:23:06.960 --> 1:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the existing course, or really through the pre existing course

1:23:11.080 --> 1:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at Shinnakak Hills, and so they needed to expand the

1:23:14.080 --> 1:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>course elsewhere. And of course, you know, technology had advanced

1:23:17.080 --> 1:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're maybe looking for a digger course as well

1:23:19.360 --> 1:23:22.839
<v Speaker 1>than the one that McDonald and Rayner built in nineteen sixteen,

1:23:22.840 --> 1:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>which topped out at about six thousand yards. So they

1:23:25.800 --> 1:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>brought in William Flynn to design a new golf course. Really,

1:23:31.439 --> 1:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>there are some holes that are kind of located near

1:23:35.120 --> 1:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>old holes, some holes that roughly occupy the same corridors.

1:23:38.800 --> 1:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>But this was really a brand new golf course. It

1:23:41.439 --> 1:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a renovation. This was a William Flynn design. And

1:23:45.200 --> 1:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>so how do you read this design and then connect

1:23:49.160 --> 1:23:52.599
<v Speaker 1>it to these kind of historical trends that we're talking about.

1:23:52.960 --> 1:23:57.200
<v Speaker 2>We have to add, Garrett, that one trip the controversial

1:23:57.479 --> 1:24:00.599
<v Speaker 2>wild Man, founder of Pan American Airways, was the one

1:24:00.640 --> 1:24:04.400
<v Speaker 2>that brought William Flinn in. I think that's interesting, very interesting,

1:24:05.520 --> 1:24:09.000
<v Speaker 2>though younger younger listeners may not know it. Pan American

1:24:09.040 --> 1:24:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Airlines was at one time one of the larger, one

1:24:11.520 --> 1:24:12.840
<v Speaker 2>of the major air carriers.

1:24:12.960 --> 1:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It was it was the most romantic airlines as far

1:24:17.760 --> 1:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>as I can see, the most fashionable and cool one.

1:24:22.160 --> 1:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess I.

1:24:23.000 --> 1:24:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Have a friend who was a stewardess or a flight

1:24:26.240 --> 1:24:29.519
<v Speaker 2>attendant sorry on pandem and it was The stories are

1:24:29.680 --> 1:24:36.040
<v Speaker 2>amazing at any rate. To step back just a minute,

1:24:36.320 --> 1:24:41.799
<v Speaker 2>there is an assumption among US Americans that golf arket,

1:24:41.800 --> 1:24:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the evolution of golf architecture was American, that it was

1:24:47.920 --> 1:24:53.559
<v Speaker 2>all it all sort of happened here, and that's sort

1:24:53.560 --> 1:24:58.240
<v Speaker 2>of all we need to know. There's a similar view

1:24:58.280 --> 1:25:00.519
<v Speaker 2>of the American Revolution. We all we need to know

1:25:00.640 --> 1:25:04.679
<v Speaker 2>was what happened with Washington, Hamilton, Jefferson. There was in fact

1:25:04.680 --> 1:25:06.680
<v Speaker 2>a hell a lot going on in Britain, and to

1:25:06.800 --> 1:25:09.280
<v Speaker 2>get the whole picture you need to understand that well.

1:25:09.200 --> 1:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Especially considering that those guys were English.

1:25:12.800 --> 1:25:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Through English, right. So so William Flynn raises the whole

1:25:20.920 --> 1:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>history of Synagogue, actually raises the question is American golf

1:25:26.080 --> 1:25:31.280
<v Speaker 2>architecture really the tale on a British Dog? And I

1:25:31.320 --> 1:25:36.760
<v Speaker 2>think it is. William Flynn came out of what was

1:25:37.080 --> 1:25:41.000
<v Speaker 2>now called what is now called the Philadelphia School George Crump,

1:25:41.000 --> 1:25:49.200
<v Speaker 2>A W. Tilling Has George Thomas, Uh, I'm leaving people out, Wilson. Wilson. Yeah,

1:25:51.560 --> 1:25:58.439
<v Speaker 2>a school of golf architecture that that was acknowledged its

1:25:58.479 --> 1:26:03.360
<v Speaker 2>its debt to a number of important English golf architects.

1:26:04.280 --> 1:26:07.479
<v Speaker 2>George Crump at one point was stuck at Pine Valley

1:26:07.520 --> 1:26:11.679
<v Speaker 2>and brought Harry Colt in to fix it. That sort

1:26:11.760 --> 1:26:19.160
<v Speaker 2>of thing. They understood what was being written and talked

1:26:19.160 --> 1:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>about and built in the UK. They understood it was

1:26:23.280 --> 1:26:26.240
<v Speaker 2>probably a better way to go about designing golf courses,

1:26:26.920 --> 1:26:33.479
<v Speaker 2>and they brought those ideas to America. That's why I

1:26:33.600 --> 1:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>think they are such an important chapter in American golf architecture.

1:26:38.600 --> 1:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>William Flynn was part of that, probably one of the

1:26:41.080 --> 1:26:48.640
<v Speaker 2>younger members of that group. Brought in to redesign Shnacock

1:26:49.880 --> 1:26:54.919
<v Speaker 2>along more traditional what we would call traditional strategic lines,

1:26:56.320 --> 1:27:00.160
<v Speaker 2>made it the great golf course it is today. But

1:27:00.479 --> 1:27:04.960
<v Speaker 2>broke with McDonald and i'll get harp again on my

1:27:05.080 --> 1:27:11.439
<v Speaker 2>theme that did he didn't design Shnacock based on a

1:27:11.520 --> 1:27:16.640
<v Speaker 2>set of plans that described for him various design details

1:27:16.680 --> 1:27:19.120
<v Speaker 2>of the various holes. He went out and looked at

1:27:19.160 --> 1:27:23.880
<v Speaker 2>what the terrain said to him, interpreted it. He had

1:27:23.920 --> 1:27:28.960
<v Speaker 2>an artistic flare about things. Built a golf course from

1:27:29.160 --> 1:27:33.839
<v Speaker 2>a specific piece of land that would reflect basic design

1:27:33.960 --> 1:27:37.240
<v Speaker 2>goals that he and others of the Philadelphia school had.

1:27:38.000 --> 1:27:42.439
<v Speaker 2>And I think that that approach to golf architecture, it

1:27:42.520 --> 1:27:47.280
<v Speaker 2>was flipping McDonald in some respects, was far more productive,

1:27:47.880 --> 1:27:51.760
<v Speaker 2>made for far better golf courses, and opened the way

1:27:51.840 --> 1:27:56.800
<v Speaker 2>to basically modern golf architecture. The cores, the doakes, all

1:27:56.840 --> 1:28:01.680
<v Speaker 2>the rest. And it was the beginning. You know, it

1:28:04.080 --> 1:28:08.280
<v Speaker 2>was quietly revolutionary. Although Flynn was late in the game

1:28:08.280 --> 1:28:12.439
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen thirty one, the real revolutionary stuff was happening

1:28:12.479 --> 1:28:13.280
<v Speaker 2>a little bit earlier.

1:28:13.840 --> 1:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, certainly by the time he designed Shinnecock Hills, this

1:28:17.520 --> 1:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>idea of golf architecture had reached a kind of maturity.

1:28:20.960 --> 1:28:23.719
<v Speaker 1>This is Lake Golden Age architecture. This is when Alistair

1:28:23.760 --> 1:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie is doing a lot of his work in California

1:28:26.520 --> 1:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and similarly reaching a kind of apex there. But you know,

1:28:31.760 --> 1:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe one way of understanding what you're describing is that

1:28:35.680 --> 1:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you know Flynn's approach focusing on the land first, but

1:28:40.840 --> 1:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>also introducing these strategic concepts that are broadly shared with

1:28:45.320 --> 1:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>McDonald and Rayner. Is that whereas McDonald and Rayner might

1:28:49.840 --> 1:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>have kind of signposted the strategic ideas of their holes,

1:28:55.479 --> 1:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>really highlighted them for the player and shown them what

1:28:58.840 --> 1:29:05.639
<v Speaker 1>they are doing through artificial features, at the new Shnecock Hills,

1:29:06.400 --> 1:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>those ideas were still there, but they are all concealed

1:29:10.080 --> 1:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>because it all just looks like the land, right, and

1:29:12.960 --> 1:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>so these strategic features are are kind of pre existing

1:29:18.240 --> 1:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>humps and bumps, and you know if they when there

1:29:21.160 --> 1:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>are bunkers, they appear to be in the right place

1:29:24.080 --> 1:29:26.759
<v Speaker 1>where a bunker might be on this kind of land,

1:29:26.840 --> 1:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and so it's all there's a kind of seamlessness about

1:29:29.840 --> 1:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the architecture and a lack of sign posting that allows

1:29:33.040 --> 1:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the player to then discover the strategic nature of the holes,

1:29:36.400 --> 1:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to having that taught to him.

1:29:39.720 --> 1:29:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's an interesting way to put it. I

1:29:41.600 --> 1:29:45.880
<v Speaker 2>would put it slightly differently. I think the strategic the

1:29:45.920 --> 1:29:49.759
<v Speaker 2>strategic aspects of the of the of the Flynn design

1:29:49.880 --> 1:29:55.760
<v Speaker 2>at Shinnikok emerged from the natural conditions there in the

1:29:55.840 --> 1:29:58.080
<v Speaker 2>land and the new land they acquired what one hundred

1:29:58.080 --> 1:30:02.919
<v Speaker 2>and ten acres I think after McDonald's course was closed

1:30:02.920 --> 1:30:05.439
<v Speaker 2>down Route twenty seven cut off most of.

1:30:05.360 --> 1:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It, including some of the best land.

1:30:09.160 --> 1:30:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you've ever been there, Yeah, yeah, it's ever

1:30:12.160 --> 1:30:13.640
<v Speaker 2>been there. It's it's great and it would have been

1:30:13.680 --> 1:30:15.599
<v Speaker 2>great land down there. But there's just a big highway

1:30:15.600 --> 1:30:22.400
<v Speaker 2>in a railroad down there. But but Flynn looks out

1:30:22.479 --> 1:30:27.080
<v Speaker 2>over a piece of land. His genius is to devise

1:30:27.240 --> 1:30:33.720
<v Speaker 2>ways to design golf holes from which an emergent quality

1:30:34.000 --> 1:30:40.120
<v Speaker 2>is strategy. McDonald told you what to design, and the

1:30:40.160 --> 1:30:46.680
<v Speaker 2>strategy just falls out naturally from his instructions, and and

1:30:47.120 --> 1:30:51.799
<v Speaker 2>Flynn's was it is the modern way to design golf courses.

1:30:53.520 --> 1:30:55.360
<v Speaker 2>That's how people do it now, or at least the

1:30:55.400 --> 1:31:02.200
<v Speaker 2>good ones. And it is it is an important stage

1:31:02.280 --> 1:31:05.400
<v Speaker 2>in golf architecture. But it is I think a stage

1:31:05.479 --> 1:31:11.280
<v Speaker 2>that is to some extent derivative of hard thinking and

1:31:11.360 --> 1:31:14.559
<v Speaker 2>hard lessons that people learned in Britain earlier.

1:31:15.320 --> 1:31:19.479
<v Speaker 1>How would you trace that intellectual history of this idea

1:31:19.520 --> 1:31:22.479
<v Speaker 1>of golf course design that William Flynn then executed in

1:31:22.520 --> 1:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the third version of Shneakak Hills. We can go we

1:31:26.320 --> 1:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>might we could go too deep on this, but take

1:31:29.080 --> 1:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>us back a little bit. What is you know, what

1:31:32.320 --> 1:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is the history of this idea and how did it

1:31:35.000 --> 1:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>eventually come out here.

1:31:37.000 --> 1:31:38.559
<v Speaker 2>I'll take you as deep as you want to go.

1:31:39.160 --> 1:31:44.880
<v Speaker 2>You cut me off. McDonald begins with the best golf

1:31:44.920 --> 1:31:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Holes discussion in Golf Illustrated in nineteen oh one, and

1:31:48.479 --> 1:31:54.080
<v Speaker 2>he highlights Lowe's contribution to that which was, by any measure,

1:31:54.160 --> 1:31:57.280
<v Speaker 2>the beginnings think of a different way of thinking about

1:31:57.360 --> 1:32:01.160
<v Speaker 2>golf architecture and frankly the beginning of mine in golf architecture.

1:32:01.360 --> 1:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and just to give people context here about the

1:32:03.800 --> 1:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>best holes discussion, this was a moment when this publication

1:32:11.680 --> 1:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Golf Illustrated, right, Golf Illustrated had basically asked the question

1:32:17.040 --> 1:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to people, you know, what are what are the best

1:32:20.160 --> 1:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>golf holes? What is really class golf? You know? Or

1:32:24.000 --> 1:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>what is the what is what is a good golf course?

1:32:26.439 --> 1:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And and they, you know, a lot of significant figures

1:32:29.920 --> 1:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in golf at the time ended up responding with their

1:32:32.000 --> 1:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>opinions about what the best golf holes were, and most interestingly,

1:32:36.680 --> 1:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>some like like John Lowe, who were inclined toward, you know,

1:32:41.400 --> 1:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>more kind of intellectual pursuits. It ended up writing these

1:32:44.920 --> 1:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>big articles about the philosophy of what made a good

1:32:48.240 --> 1:32:48.639
<v Speaker 1>golf hole.

1:32:49.360 --> 1:32:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Since you've opened the door, I'll walk in it, walk

1:32:51.520 --> 1:32:57.679
<v Speaker 2>through it. In early nineteen oh one, Golf Illustrated published

1:32:57.840 --> 1:33:01.719
<v Speaker 2>a long article, almost certainly by laid law purpose, that said,

1:33:01.760 --> 1:33:04.160
<v Speaker 2>we now know so much about the design of golf course,

1:33:04.200 --> 1:33:08.519
<v Speaker 2>and the basic ideas are so settled that we need

1:33:08.520 --> 1:33:13.519
<v Speaker 2>to build a standardized golf course in order to facilitate handicaps.

1:33:16.320 --> 1:33:19.320
<v Speaker 2>There was a very strong reaction to that. The standardization

1:33:19.400 --> 1:33:22.240
<v Speaker 2>of golf courses was not a very popular idea, even

1:33:22.280 --> 1:33:26.800
<v Speaker 2>if it facilitated handicaps. So in response, Garden Smith, the

1:33:26.880 --> 1:33:29.439
<v Speaker 2>editor of Golf Illustrated, said, well, let's do a survey

1:33:29.600 --> 1:33:31.719
<v Speaker 2>of what people think the best holes are and maybe

1:33:31.720 --> 1:33:34.320
<v Speaker 2>there'll be a consensus. We can arrive at a consensus

1:33:35.200 --> 1:33:37.559
<v Speaker 2>and build golf courses based on those holes.

1:33:38.840 --> 1:33:39.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't have that.

1:33:39.640 --> 1:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I think there were fifteen or eighteen people that responded

1:33:43.200 --> 1:33:47.599
<v Speaker 2>to the survey, and the instructions of the survey would

1:33:47.640 --> 1:33:50.439
<v Speaker 2>tell us your favorite part three, par four and par five.

1:33:52.479 --> 1:33:55.800
<v Speaker 2>A whole bunch of people responded, gave their holes, and

1:33:55.840 --> 1:33:59.599
<v Speaker 2>then Golf Illustrated asked three or four people, including John Lowe,

1:33:59.600 --> 1:34:03.440
<v Speaker 2>who was at the time only in his late twenties.

1:34:05.080 --> 1:34:10.920
<v Speaker 2>They asked him, along with Hutchinson and Hilton, to give

1:34:10.960 --> 1:34:15.360
<v Speaker 2>a more elaborate answer, and Lowe's essay is one of

1:34:15.439 --> 1:34:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the most remarkable things written ever in golf. It took

1:34:20.479 --> 1:34:24.240
<v Speaker 2>on the assumption that almost everybody else on the survey had,

1:34:24.280 --> 1:34:27.639
<v Speaker 2>which was that good golf holes have certain cross hazers

1:34:27.640 --> 1:34:31.720
<v Speaker 2>at certain intervals, and good golf require full shots of

1:34:31.840 --> 1:34:36.880
<v Speaker 2>certain length. Low took all that on said no, no

1:34:38.560 --> 1:34:45.639
<v Speaker 2>golf course designed as evidence by Saint Andrew's and other

1:34:45.720 --> 1:34:50.719
<v Speaker 2>golf courses, requires the careful placements of shots in order

1:34:50.760 --> 1:34:53.880
<v Speaker 2>to open up to make easier the next shot, and

1:34:53.960 --> 1:34:57.920
<v Speaker 2>it requires various analysis and thinking as opposed to pure

1:34:58.000 --> 1:35:01.880
<v Speaker 2>athletic skill. He went on to develop those ideas over

1:35:01.920 --> 1:35:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the next two or three years. He right after that

1:35:05.000 --> 1:35:08.920
<v Speaker 2>he became a weekly columnist for the for the for

1:35:08.960 --> 1:35:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the The Athletic, which was a London weekly UH newspaper,

1:35:15.120 --> 1:35:18.200
<v Speaker 2>and developed his ideas, you know, almost on a weekly

1:35:18.240 --> 1:35:28.599
<v Speaker 2>basis thereafter over the next several years. Colt Uh, Alison, Simpson, Fowler, Darwin,

1:35:29.720 --> 1:35:35.320
<v Speaker 2>everybody picks up on his ideas, and literally, overnight, the

1:35:35.400 --> 1:35:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Victorian golf courses begin to disappear. It's it's staggering how

1:35:40.160 --> 1:35:47.679
<v Speaker 2>quickly they vanish. That is the background, to the British

1:35:47.760 --> 1:35:52.880
<v Speaker 2>background to golf, to to to modern golf architecture. Americans

1:35:52.920 --> 1:35:56.880
<v Speaker 2>picked up on that A little later. McDonald came to

1:35:56.920 --> 1:35:59.599
<v Speaker 2>the party. A little later. Travis came to the party

1:35:59.640 --> 1:36:04.080
<v Speaker 2>a little A little later, Travis pulls Ross aside in

1:36:04.200 --> 1:36:08.479
<v Speaker 2>nineteen twelve and says, don you got to rethink how

1:36:08.479 --> 1:36:12.720
<v Speaker 2>you're designing this Pinehurst stuff. And Ross completely changes the

1:36:12.720 --> 1:36:17.719
<v Speaker 2>way he designs his golf courses. The number two becomes

1:36:17.760 --> 1:36:23.880
<v Speaker 2>a whole different golf course. But it all starts, I think,

1:36:24.280 --> 1:36:29.639
<v Speaker 2>with Low beginning to question the basic tenets of Victorian

1:36:29.680 --> 1:36:34.200
<v Speaker 2>golf architecture, and everybody goes hold the phone. He's right,

1:36:35.720 --> 1:36:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and Victorian golf architecture dies suddenly. It literally. There's still

1:36:42.280 --> 1:36:44.800
<v Speaker 2>some courses in America being built as late as nineteen

1:36:44.840 --> 1:36:47.760
<v Speaker 2>oh five, nineteen oh six, but not very many, most all, most,

1:36:48.280 --> 1:36:51.400
<v Speaker 2>most of most of the courses in America are beginning

1:36:51.479 --> 1:36:56.200
<v Speaker 2>to reflect the newer ideas, and William flynn is is

1:36:56.200 --> 1:36:59.400
<v Speaker 2>is at the tail end of that the golden age

1:36:59.439 --> 1:37:06.000
<v Speaker 2>of golf arcitecture is that golf architecture. The golf architecture

1:37:06.120 --> 1:37:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I think motivated by Lowe's id is the Colts, the followers.

1:37:10.160 --> 1:37:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you get on the usual list that is

1:37:13.840 --> 1:37:16.519
<v Speaker 2>the golden age of golf architecture. William Flynn comes in

1:37:16.560 --> 1:37:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and sort of the tail end of that, but nonetheless

1:37:20.920 --> 1:37:26.360
<v Speaker 2>an enormously talented guy who did great work, and Sinacock

1:37:26.520 --> 1:37:27.400
<v Speaker 2>is the beneficiary.

1:37:28.400 --> 1:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So would you say that since MacDonald read Lowe himself

1:37:35.479 --> 1:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and was influenced by this best Holes discussion, that he

1:37:40.080 --> 1:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>just kind of had a different interpretation of this material

1:37:45.240 --> 1:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>than say, Harry Colt and Alistair McKenzie and the progenitors

1:37:51.520 --> 1:37:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of this more kind of naturalist approach to golf course

1:37:54.840 --> 1:37:58.439
<v Speaker 1>design that William Flynn then implemented later at Shinnecock Hills.

1:37:59.200 --> 1:38:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It seems like they're had two different sprouts out out

1:38:03.280 --> 1:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of this discussion in Golf Illustrated, you know, one represented

1:38:06.160 --> 1:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>by the McDonald Rainer school and the other represented by

1:38:09.080 --> 1:38:10.360
<v Speaker 1>these other architects.

1:38:10.640 --> 1:38:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I started to say, but I will now say it

1:38:15.120 --> 1:38:21.479
<v Speaker 2>is that McDonald's and low and low by Low, I mean, Reed, Cold,

1:38:21.520 --> 1:38:27.640
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. McDonald and Low were both reactions to Victorian

1:38:27.640 --> 1:38:31.599
<v Speaker 2>golf architecture, but very different kinds of reactions to Victorian

1:38:31.600 --> 1:38:37.799
<v Speaker 2>golf architecture. McDonald still had some of the methodological features

1:38:37.840 --> 1:38:40.080
<v Speaker 2>that will that Laid Law Crobus brought to it. That

1:38:40.200 --> 1:38:41.800
<v Speaker 2>is to say, I'm going to tell you how to

1:38:41.800 --> 1:38:46.320
<v Speaker 2>design golf holes, and the design objectives I have in

1:38:46.360 --> 1:38:48.840
<v Speaker 2>mind will fall out naturally if you design the holes

1:38:48.880 --> 1:38:54.599
<v Speaker 2>according to my plans. Low approached things differently the way

1:38:55.640 --> 1:38:58.960
<v Speaker 2>William Flynn did, which is that there is a I

1:38:59.000 --> 1:39:01.600
<v Speaker 2>have a philosophy of how a golf course ought to

1:39:01.680 --> 1:39:06.200
<v Speaker 2>operate on a golfer. I have no specifics as to

1:39:06.240 --> 1:39:11.320
<v Speaker 2>how you do that, but your genius is to figure

1:39:11.360 --> 1:39:14.960
<v Speaker 2>it out, and you go find a piece of land

1:39:15.600 --> 1:39:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and that particular hole or that particular golf course its

1:39:20.840 --> 1:39:23.759
<v Speaker 2>features will be unique to that particular piece of land.

1:39:23.840 --> 1:39:27.240
<v Speaker 2>But we do have at least some general idea of

1:39:27.280 --> 1:39:31.200
<v Speaker 2>your objectives, and I'm not going to tell you how

1:39:31.240 --> 1:39:34.559
<v Speaker 2>to do it. I'm not going to give you template

1:39:34.600 --> 1:39:38.400
<v Speaker 2>holes that make your job easier. On the other hand,

1:39:38.600 --> 1:39:42.880
<v Speaker 2>by making your job harder, it also opens the way

1:39:43.000 --> 1:39:47.439
<v Speaker 2>to you being more imaginative and artistic. You can do

1:39:47.560 --> 1:39:52.000
<v Speaker 2>things that replicating template holes won't allow you to do,

1:39:53.280 --> 1:39:56.160
<v Speaker 2>and that I think was part of what made Colt

1:39:56.240 --> 1:39:59.040
<v Speaker 2>so great. While we still love his golf courses and

1:39:59.120 --> 1:40:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the hole, the whole group of those guys. Uh uh.

1:40:03.439 --> 1:40:05.680
<v Speaker 2>And then the Philadelphia School really picks up on a

1:40:05.680 --> 1:40:06.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of that.

1:40:06.400 --> 1:40:06.519
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

1:40:07.640 --> 1:40:09.680
<v Speaker 2>And I'm just limiting to the Philadelphic School. There are

1:40:09.680 --> 1:40:14.240
<v Speaker 2>others too, but it's a different it's a dramatically different

1:40:14.280 --> 1:40:17.320
<v Speaker 2>way to approach the question of how you design a

1:40:17.320 --> 1:40:18.720
<v Speaker 2>golf mm hmm.

1:40:18.920 --> 1:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>It's prescriptions. Well, no, it's principles rather than prescriptions.

1:40:23.400 --> 1:40:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, principles. But I think I used the word prescription

1:40:26.160 --> 1:40:29.000
<v Speaker 2>in that old essay about in that old article about

1:40:29.280 --> 1:40:33.519
<v Speaker 2>about Sherika. Sure, it is not a prescription, it's it's

1:40:33.600 --> 1:40:37.880
<v Speaker 2>a it's just a general sense of where you want

1:40:37.880 --> 1:40:39.599
<v Speaker 2>to be at the end of the day.

1:40:40.400 --> 1:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, so I want to give a a kind of

1:40:43.560 --> 1:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a stamp of approval to this line of thinking that

1:40:46.960 --> 1:40:50.839
<v Speaker 1>you've guided me through here, Bob, by bringing in something

1:40:50.880 --> 1:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that Bill Corr said to us recently. And this is

1:40:53.960 --> 1:40:57.719
<v Speaker 1>this is actually unpublished material. It is I'm just reading

1:40:57.760 --> 1:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>from a transcript of an interview that we did with

1:41:00.800 --> 1:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Bill Corr about Shinnacak Hills, and parts of that interview

1:41:03.920 --> 1:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to be included in our video on the

1:41:06.160 --> 1:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>course coming up, I think in a couple of weeks here.

1:41:09.760 --> 1:41:15.400
<v Speaker 1>But he said something that really I think illuminates or

1:41:15.439 --> 1:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>matches with in a nice way, what we've been talking about.

1:41:18.080 --> 1:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>He said, you know, MacDonald and Raider, they owed to

1:41:21.560 --> 1:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>classic golf imported from the UK, the best holes, the

1:41:25.000 --> 1:41:31.639
<v Speaker 1>best possible holes to create here in America, and these

1:41:31.680 --> 1:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>were the kind of natural gifts that they imported from

1:41:34.560 --> 1:41:38.479
<v Speaker 1>from Scotland. Shinnecock, on the other hand, Flynn's Shinnecock was

1:41:38.560 --> 1:41:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a tribute to the landforms that were there. So you know,

1:41:43.760 --> 1:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>clearly when Bill went on to say, you know, he

1:41:47.240 --> 1:41:49.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly understood the National and all the classic holes that

1:41:50.200 --> 1:41:52.800
<v Speaker 1>had so influenced the building of the National. But I

1:41:52.840 --> 1:41:54.639
<v Speaker 1>have an idea he would have said, okay, I'm letting

1:41:54.680 --> 1:41:57.840
<v Speaker 1>this land more dictate this golf course instead of trying

1:41:57.880 --> 1:42:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to emulate or create existing holes somewhere. And so I

1:42:01.960 --> 1:42:05.439
<v Speaker 1>think that that, you know, Bill puts it that way,

1:42:05.560 --> 1:42:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I think because you know, first of all, it's it's true.

1:42:08.640 --> 1:42:11.639
<v Speaker 1>There's a truth there about about William Flynn's design approach

1:42:11.720 --> 1:42:15.479
<v Speaker 1>in contrast to McDonald and Rainers. But Bill is also

1:42:15.520 --> 1:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about his own design approach in a way, you know,

1:42:17.920 --> 1:42:18.599
<v Speaker 1>because well.

1:42:18.479 --> 1:42:21.040
<v Speaker 2>He absolutely is and and and he is very much

1:42:21.040 --> 1:42:25.439
<v Speaker 2>in line with Cole William Flynn. So it's dope. I mean,

1:42:25.439 --> 1:42:30.280
<v Speaker 2>these guys are all part of a similar perspective on golf,

1:42:31.120 --> 1:42:36.280
<v Speaker 2>on golf architecture. To be sympathetic to McDonald a bit, yeah,

1:42:36.600 --> 1:42:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to get there because I'm still add who

1:42:39.400 --> 1:42:41.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't a man who doesn't need sympathy?

1:42:41.680 --> 1:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Right is that?

1:42:46.400 --> 1:42:48.559
<v Speaker 2>And I said this earlier, but I'll try to say

1:42:48.560 --> 1:42:52.439
<v Speaker 2>it again real quickly. He he. He took from the

1:42:52.439 --> 1:42:55.040
<v Speaker 2>best Hole discussion in Go in nineteen oh one a

1:42:55.160 --> 1:42:57.320
<v Speaker 2>set of holes that he thought were really good. He

1:42:57.479 --> 1:43:01.280
<v Speaker 2>traveled to Scotland and England often had seen the holes,

1:43:01.360 --> 1:43:04.439
<v Speaker 2>knew the holes. He had though, to come back to

1:43:04.760 --> 1:43:07.800
<v Speaker 2>America and try to convince people that these were really

1:43:07.840 --> 1:43:12.639
<v Speaker 2>good holes. Nobody had seen them, nobody was familiar with them,

1:43:12.800 --> 1:43:16.400
<v Speaker 2>nobody was going to see them anytime soon. And so

1:43:17.439 --> 1:43:22.240
<v Speaker 2>he decides to do templates. I'm going to show you

1:43:22.280 --> 1:43:26.960
<v Speaker 2>what these holes look like, because he needed to, and

1:43:29.560 --> 1:43:32.679
<v Speaker 2>so to some extent if he's going to base golf

1:43:32.840 --> 1:43:36.120
<v Speaker 2>architecture on holes nobody has seen, he's got to at

1:43:36.200 --> 1:43:39.760
<v Speaker 2>least show them what he's talking about. And so he,

1:43:39.960 --> 1:43:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I think was in a bitter He was cornered in

1:43:43.000 --> 1:43:46.800
<v Speaker 2>that respect. He had no choice but to do templates.

1:43:46.960 --> 1:43:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Now he could have loosened up his dictates about all

1:43:50.120 --> 1:43:52.920
<v Speaker 2>that with Rayner, you know, do what you want to do,

1:43:54.040 --> 1:43:56.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, mess around with their Dan concept if you

1:43:56.400 --> 1:43:58.320
<v Speaker 2>want to. But he didn't seem to be inclined to

1:43:58.320 --> 1:44:02.240
<v Speaker 2>do that. He was he was very much authoritarian figure.

1:44:03.400 --> 1:44:08.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a pattern in discussions of cultural history

1:44:08.360 --> 1:44:11.479
<v Speaker 1>that I've noticed and that I'm not saying you're falling into,

1:44:11.560 --> 1:44:13.960
<v Speaker 1>but in fact, I think you're you're resisting to an

1:44:13.960 --> 1:44:17.400
<v Speaker 1>extent where when we tell these stories about the development

1:44:17.479 --> 1:44:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of a cultural form, whether it's golf architecture or literature

1:44:21.360 --> 1:44:28.800
<v Speaker 1>or film, we tend to underrate the cultural artifacts that

1:44:28.840 --> 1:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>came early in that development or came before the development.

1:44:33.240 --> 1:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>When we tell our story of the you know, kind

1:44:35.120 --> 1:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of progress of an art form, the implication is that

1:44:40.800 --> 1:44:42.880
<v Speaker 1>what we get at the end of that progress is

1:44:42.920 --> 1:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the best thing, and that everything else was kind of

1:44:44.880 --> 1:44:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a stepping stone. Along the way to get there and

1:44:47.160 --> 1:44:50.280
<v Speaker 1>therefore not as good in and of itself.

1:44:50.000 --> 1:44:53.320
<v Speaker 2>The Whig interpretation of history exactly.

1:44:53.400 --> 1:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a very yeah, this is this

1:44:57.120 --> 1:44:59.439
<v Speaker 1>corresponds with actually a lot of stuff you've written about

1:44:59.439 --> 1:45:03.519
<v Speaker 1>about the the kind of you know, Victorian perspective on

1:45:04.360 --> 1:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>things that everything's progressed and the stuff in the past

1:45:07.080 --> 1:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is mcclasse and we can disregard it. And this very

1:45:10.760 --> 1:45:13.400
<v Speaker 1>much became an attitude like after World War Two and

1:45:13.560 --> 1:45:16.439
<v Speaker 1>accounted for a lot of the destruction of the great

1:45:16.439 --> 1:45:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Golden Age golf architecture that we both love. But in

1:45:19.479 --> 1:45:24.240
<v Speaker 1>any case, I think we need to be careful about

1:45:24.280 --> 1:45:27.679
<v Speaker 1>that because you know, to say that McDonald and Rayner

1:45:28.120 --> 1:45:31.280
<v Speaker 1>were part of the progress toward a certain idea of

1:45:31.439 --> 1:45:35.160
<v Speaker 1>golf architecture that we got to at the Great Shinnekhawk

1:45:35.280 --> 1:45:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Hills isn't to say that McDonald and rayner were bad,

1:45:38.760 --> 1:45:41.160
<v Speaker 1>or that National Golf Links is bad or the Chicago

1:45:41.240 --> 1:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Golf Club is bad. In fact, those are terrific, wonderful

1:45:44.520 --> 1:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>golf courses, but they do sit in this, you know,

1:45:50.280 --> 1:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in a certain place in this narrative of history. So

1:45:53.120 --> 1:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>just as you know, not every film that was made

1:45:57.880 --> 1:46:00.280
<v Speaker 1>before the kind of revolution in Hollywood. It in the

1:46:00.360 --> 1:46:04.519
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies with Martin Scorsese and Francis Ford Coppole, et cetera.

1:46:05.040 --> 1:46:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Just as not every film made before that was a

1:46:07.320 --> 1:46:10.280
<v Speaker 1>bad film. In fact, Alfred Hitchcock made some made some

1:46:10.320 --> 1:46:13.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty good stuff in the fifties. Uh that that, you know,

1:46:14.479 --> 1:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody still loves we We can't, you know, uh, persuade

1:46:21.560 --> 1:46:25.280
<v Speaker 1>ourselves to to disregard the things that were made before

1:46:26.200 --> 1:46:28.599
<v Speaker 1>the thing that we find to be the most fully developed.

1:46:29.439 --> 1:46:32.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I McDonald pushed things along. I mean he he

1:46:32.640 --> 1:46:36.959
<v Speaker 2>he was. He was a helpful at least in America

1:46:37.040 --> 1:46:40.519
<v Speaker 2>he was, and he was never a factor, never a

1:46:40.560 --> 1:46:45.920
<v Speaker 2>factor in Britain they allyby kind of scoffed at his ideas.

1:46:45.960 --> 1:46:48.840
<v Speaker 2>But he helped America along because America knew nothing about

1:46:48.840 --> 1:46:51.439
<v Speaker 2>any of this. They it was, it was there was

1:46:51.439 --> 1:46:54.080
<v Speaker 2>still a new sport. But getting back to your wig

1:46:54.160 --> 1:47:01.400
<v Speaker 2>thing that that history tends towards progress, that there's an

1:47:01.520 --> 1:47:05.320
<v Speaker 2>arc to history which goes from the primitive to the

1:47:05.400 --> 1:47:10.240
<v Speaker 2>more sophisticated. What I think of the glories of John

1:47:10.320 --> 1:47:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Lowe and his and his close friend Harry Colt and

1:47:14.400 --> 1:47:19.800
<v Speaker 2>others is that they viewed golf. The history of golf

1:47:19.920 --> 1:47:24.559
<v Speaker 2>architecture is anti Whigism. That is to say, we don't

1:47:24.600 --> 1:47:27.599
<v Speaker 2>want to see progress in golf course design. We already

1:47:27.640 --> 1:47:31.200
<v Speaker 2>know what's the good stuff. It's the stuff that some

1:47:31.479 --> 1:47:34.360
<v Speaker 2>mystery man we don't know who it was designed for.

1:47:34.400 --> 1:47:37.320
<v Speaker 2>The holes at the Old Course and other great links courses,

1:47:38.120 --> 1:47:42.920
<v Speaker 2>uh and and and and the the templates, wrong word,

1:47:43.400 --> 1:47:49.599
<v Speaker 2>the the ideas behind those golf holes are timeless, and

1:47:50.000 --> 1:47:52.000
<v Speaker 2>there is no sense in which you're going to ever,

1:47:52.120 --> 1:47:54.519
<v Speaker 2>if you're any good you ever get beyond them. You'll

1:47:54.600 --> 1:47:58.640
<v Speaker 2>just you'll just manipulate them, interpret them, apply them in

1:47:58.680 --> 1:48:02.840
<v Speaker 2>different contexts, all sorts of things, but that the core

1:48:03.000 --> 1:48:07.720
<v Speaker 2>ideas are more or less timeless, and that there is

1:48:07.760 --> 1:48:10.160
<v Speaker 2>no sense in which you're going to move beyond them

1:48:10.240 --> 1:48:12.840
<v Speaker 2>to some other better kind of golf course.

1:48:14.240 --> 1:48:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So you've got to be I guess what I'm arguing,

1:48:18.120 --> 1:48:20.479
<v Speaker 1>and what I'm taking from what you're saying is that,

1:48:20.600 --> 1:48:23.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of being open minded about about the

1:48:23.479 --> 1:48:26.559
<v Speaker 1>past is a great idea for an artist, because if

1:48:26.600 --> 1:48:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you disregard entire swaths of things that were built or

1:48:31.360 --> 1:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>created in the past, then you're kind of you know,

1:48:34.120 --> 1:48:38.240
<v Speaker 1>limiting yourself and and that was an insight that the

1:48:38.320 --> 1:48:42.559
<v Speaker 1>early Golden Age architects in Britain, cults, et cetera brought

1:48:42.720 --> 1:48:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and they said, actually, actually look at these lengths courses.

1:48:46.280 --> 1:48:50.880
<v Speaker 1>They're amazing. And I you know, what you're saying also

1:48:51.439 --> 1:48:55.639
<v Speaker 1>resonates so much with where golf architecture and the discussion

1:48:55.640 --> 1:48:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of golf architecture is right now, because there are many

1:48:59.520 --> 1:49:03.519
<v Speaker 1>there are many people who bemoan the fact that golf

1:49:03.640 --> 1:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>architecture doesn't seem to be innovating or coming up with

1:49:07.280 --> 1:49:09.519
<v Speaker 1>new ideas, or seems to be stuck in the Golden

1:49:09.560 --> 1:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Age or stuck in this links tribute stage and are

1:49:14.080 --> 1:49:16.360
<v Speaker 1>very frustrated with that. A lot of people think that

1:49:16.360 --> 1:49:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a bad thing because they see art as something

1:49:19.320 --> 1:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that necessarily must always be breaking the past and progressing

1:49:23.680 --> 1:49:27.120
<v Speaker 1>on to something new. But my own attitude towards it

1:49:27.160 --> 1:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is that we don't necessarily need to do that. What

1:49:32.200 --> 1:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to do is to react to the land

1:49:34.800 --> 1:49:39.559
<v Speaker 1>and to stay true to the principles that we know

1:49:39.640 --> 1:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to be true.

1:49:41.280 --> 1:49:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, there are all sorts of applications to

1:49:43.360 --> 1:49:50.240
<v Speaker 2>new terrains and new features, but those applications there is

1:49:50.280 --> 1:49:57.080
<v Speaker 2>a limited set of applications that one can productively do

1:49:57.400 --> 1:50:01.880
<v Speaker 2>to a specific sort of terrain, and the genius is

1:50:01.880 --> 1:50:05.080
<v Speaker 2>figuring out which is best, which how to nuance that

1:50:05.080 --> 1:50:07.760
<v Speaker 2>that sort of thing. But it's not like you're going

1:50:07.800 --> 1:50:10.479
<v Speaker 2>to ever. I think it's the wrong question to think

1:50:10.520 --> 1:50:14.360
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to somehow move beyond that to a new, different,

1:50:14.640 --> 1:50:18.160
<v Speaker 2>better universe of golf architecture. It's not going to happen.

1:50:18.800 --> 1:50:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, golf architecture is not like the evolution of

1:50:22.000 --> 1:50:24.120
<v Speaker 2>physics or chemistry.

1:50:24.439 --> 1:50:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It has even poetry for that matter.

1:50:26.760 --> 1:50:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, say yeah, it's it's it's it is what it is,

1:50:30.280 --> 1:50:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and we all, you know, practitioners struggle with the same

1:50:34.840 --> 1:50:39.120
<v Speaker 2>issues that they'd struggled with in nineteen ten. They have

1:50:39.200 --> 1:50:41.840
<v Speaker 2>better equipment, they have you know, that sort of thing,

1:50:41.920 --> 1:50:44.400
<v Speaker 2>but it's just the issues are the same, and there

1:50:44.439 --> 1:50:46.320
<v Speaker 2>will I don't think there will ever be a time

1:50:46.360 --> 1:50:49.040
<v Speaker 2>where we sort of break through to a new, different

1:50:49.160 --> 1:50:55.040
<v Speaker 2>universe with a cleaner slate of questions that will all

1:50:55.080 --> 1:50:57.800
<v Speaker 2>applaud I just it's not going to happen.

1:50:59.320 --> 1:51:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, Bob, this has been, as always, a very interesting conversation.

1:51:03.960 --> 1:51:06.519
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for coming on the podcast again. Looking forward,

1:51:06.520 --> 1:51:07.759
<v Speaker 1>to Shinnecock Hills.

1:51:08.200 --> 1:51:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me. I look forward to it

1:51:09.720 --> 1:51:14.520
<v Speaker 2>as well.

1:51:18.479 --> 1:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Designing Golf was produced by Will Balsam.

1:51:22.560 --> 1:51:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Will, so obviously, as you heard in this episode,

1:51:26.560 --> 1:51:29.759
<v Speaker 1>the next men's major is upon us the US Open

1:51:29.920 --> 1:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at Shinnecock Hills, and to celebrate the occasion, we've got

1:51:33.080 --> 1:51:37.040
<v Speaker 1>new additions to our major's collection in the Friday Golf

1:51:37.080 --> 1:51:40.679
<v Speaker 1>pro Shop. Everyone on the team here is very excited

1:51:40.680 --> 1:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>about seeing Shinnecock Hills in action, so my colleague Cameron

1:51:45.000 --> 1:51:48.920
<v Speaker 1>heard us created a new routing map, T shirt and poster.

1:51:49.479 --> 1:51:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Cameron is one of the best in the business at

1:51:52.240 --> 1:51:55.400
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of things, and we also have an incredible

1:51:55.800 --> 1:52:00.719
<v Speaker 1>illustrated poster by Will Eager. There's much more availab including

1:52:00.760 --> 1:52:04.240
<v Speaker 1>plenty of US Open themed apparel and hats, so go

1:52:04.400 --> 1:52:08.920
<v Speaker 1>check it out at Proshop dot Thefrida Egg dot com.

1:52:08.960 --> 1:52:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening, and we'll be back again soon,

1:52:11.560 --> 1:52:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact next week for another episode.