WEBVTT - Interview Only w/ Sean O’Brien - Why Union Members Flipped On Democrats & Supported Trump

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, joining me now is one of the most I

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>think interesting people in American politics today. It's the head

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>of the Teamsters Union and Sean O'Brien. Before we get

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>started with sort of your life in the literally in

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the center lane of American politics these days, the Teamsters

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in general have a reputation, you know, my lifetime, of

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>being the less partisan of the major unions that you know,

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>while you know, when I was growing up, most of

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the labor movement was Democratic. But if there was a

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>labor union that would be open to supporting Republicans, it

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>was the Teamsters. Walk me through that. What is that relationship?

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Why is that What would you say explains that history?

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think what explains the histories. We are one

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>of the lodgest We always have been one of the largest,

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I believe, most influential unions in the country. You know,

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 2>we've been around since nineteen oh three. But we're very diverse.

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>We're a very diverse union. We always have been and

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I think we always will be. And you know there's

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 2>no secret that you know, we have endorsed Republican candidates prior,

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 2>but historically we've always went with Democrats, and I think

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 2>you know that I'm a lifelong Democrat, so I was

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 2>brought up in a Democratic state, so you know, you

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 2>always pulled that party line. But you know the history,

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 2>if you look back in history, it wasn't always that

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>way with the teams As union, you know, I think

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>the philosophy has always been, let's try and work with

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the people that are going to work on behalf of

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 2>the best interests of our members. And that's why we're

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>a little bit different than most because we're a lot,

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 2>we're transparent, we're inclusive, and we want to support people

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>that are going to support our issues regardless of what

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 2>their political affiliation has. And that's always been the case

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty much.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh. The if I were to paint a picture of

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the average Teamsters member of a Teamsters union, it's a

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a truck driver. But that is I think being

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>very myopic. Tell me, you're actually a very diverse set

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of workers, uh that are that are members of the

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Teamsters Union. Walk my listeners through that.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 2>The easiest way to describe it, because it is a

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>very complicated, uh description if you try to you know,

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 2>sector bisector, so building trades or a company or electrician. Uh,

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>you're a plumber, right. Everybody knows that's what you are.

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>The teamster is the best way to say it, and

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.839
<v Speaker 2>I say it all the time. We represent everybody from

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 2>airline pilots to zoom keepers and everybody in between.

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember, like you guys have been helping to organize

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Amazon worker we have.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we we've uh, we've actually taken that fight on.

0:02:55.440 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 2>We joined forces with Amazon Labor Union, which success organized

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 2>in New York. And you know, there's no secret that

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 2>we have a longstanding relationship bargaining relationship with UPS, which

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 2>is one of the was the largest UH package delivery companies,

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 2>and so it was a natural fit for us to

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>uh joined forces and women organizing uh the direct employees

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 2>and also organizing the third party leasing arrangement, which is

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>a scam and a shell game, which we all know about.

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>So that's been our biggest focus. Amazon not just to

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 2>the teams is Union, not just to you know, germane

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>to us. But they're probably going to be the biggest

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 2>threat to organize labor UH because they have their fingers

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>in so many different industries and so many different uh

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, technologies that could affect us.

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, let's talk about automated robotic. Look, Amazon

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is going hard at replacing the human being. They want

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to replace the human being as fast as possible. Amazon's

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>not alone, They're just the largest entity with the resources

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to do it. You're try to protect human labor.

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, we have to protect human labor, because you know,

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 2>without human labor, where are these folks gonna go. And

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>that didn't get the opportunity to go to college, that

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 2>didn't get the opportunity that that some people got, and look,

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, AI is probably the biggest threat to the

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 2>human population. And I think, you know, and I've been

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 2>focused on this meeting with people that I normally wouldn't

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 2>even talk to because my concern is, like, what is

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 2>what effect is AI? Because it's so it's so complicated.

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 2>But I think what we're going to see with AI

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 2>and this automation and all these corporations that are falling

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 2>in love with it, you're going to see the the

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 2>upper management of a lot of these corporations be affected

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 2>by AI because they're not gonna need all these analysts,

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 2>they're not gonna need all these white collar jobs. So

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 2>you're going to see a further disparity once that middle

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 2>layer management is you know, basically affected and they lose

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 2>their jobs, You're going to see CEOs pay continue to

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 2>grow because all the savings. My mission is to make

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 2>sure that we capture capture that money for the folks

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 2>that are still working these blue collar jobs and create

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 2>hopefully opportunity for retraining in new jobs as a result

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.799
<v Speaker 2>of the implementation of technology. And Amazon, to your point,

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't care about the humans. They care about they care

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 2>about their brand, and they care about their profits, and

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 2>that's it.

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm pretty convinced that the issue of twenty

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight is going to be like, if you're a

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidate and you don't have a policy on AI

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>job displacement, you shouldn't be running for president. No, it's

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be the table stakes, right, I.

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Mean, twenty twenty eight is going to be like, so,

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I just did some little bit of research on you

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 2>because I'm a huge fan, but I'm a little bit

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 2>more mature because I'm six days older than you. I

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 2>was born Actril second, nineteen seventy two.

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>No, kiddy, look at that, all right.

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 2>But it's gonna be like twenty twenty eight has the

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>potential to be like, do you remember WWF what was

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>that big event they used to have every a summer.

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Slam, Summer Wrestlemanians, WrestleMania.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like WrestleMania, but ye you.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Put the rumble at the end where there's a million

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>people in the ring.

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 2>But now, yeah, it's happening right now across the street

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 2>from where I'm at. But no, I mean, look, this

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 2>is a huge threat to the American workforce, and whether

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 2>you're a Republican or Democrat, you have to have a

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 2>solution in support network to support workers whose jobs are

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 2>going to be at risk. Maybe even you know extinct

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 2>and you're spawn on. I mean, everybody falls in love

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 2>with convenience and technology. We're all guilty of it. You know,

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 2>we own something online, we hit that button, we want

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 2>it yesterday. But what cost does that come at? Right?

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Does it comes at a cost of someone's job?

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>What is your leverage? So let's take UPS UPS a

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>big you know the UPS drivers, and UPS says hey man,

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we love these robot trucks and we're going to have

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>these robot drivers. What's your leverage to protect your human.

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>My leverage is the collective Bogging agreement we negotiated where

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 2>we negotiated language that any technological change needs to be

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 2>agreed upon. If there's a disagreement, it's subject to arbitration.

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 2>But we also know we also negotiate provisions that UPS

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 2>has to maintain a certain level of full time jobs

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 2>and create full time jobs as a result of it.

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 2>So you know, we're already in stages and it's been

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 2>going off a ten of twelve years where UPS in

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 2>the warehouses, where we have fifty four percent of our

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>membership out of three hundred and forty thousand apart time

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 2>is to get full time benefits, health and welfare, pension.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>So we're very, very sensitive to any type of job elimination.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>But we we're convinced and we have committees where because

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 2>of our collective bogging agreement, we can identify opportunities to

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>create new jobs as a result of technology being implemented.

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 2>So that's the difference right now between an unionized company

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 2>like UPS versus non union FedEx and or Amazon. We

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 2>have the ability because we negotiated those terms and conditions.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>But you know, if you're a non union Amazon employee

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 2>inside the warehouse, you know chances are at some point

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 2>in time, if Amazon has the opportunity to replace you

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 2>with a robot. They are going to do their best

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 2>to do that. And I got to tell you, I

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 2>think we all know technology it's not full growth and

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the best I always tell people, like when we're fighting

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 2>about these autonomous vehicles, which is disturbing to me, you know,

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 2>and I'm a Democrat. It's disturbing to me when you

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 2>have governors in California, in Illinois and Colorado who say, hey,

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to support working people. I want to support

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, the creation of jobs. And when you work

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 2>bipartisan on a state level and you have agreed to

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 2>legislation that's going to mandate human operators and commercial vehicles

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 2>and it gets to the governor's desk and they veto it,

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 2>what does that signal this just happened.

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So you brought this up? You look you it's like

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you read my research on you, and but I was

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>about this was very recent legislation. And these are three

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Democratic governors who all are all want labor support. I

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>probably all believe, you know, would say they're very supportive

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of collective party. But Jared Poulos, Dab Pritzker, Gavin Newsom,

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>what's their explanation for why they vetoed these bills.

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 2>That is a great question. So what do they tell

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>you? You're probably going to find this how to believe Newsom

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 2>is not a big fan of Sean O'Brien. Have been

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 2>critical of him because he's in love with big tech.

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's the bottom line, right.

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>You see tech as adversarial.

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 2>I see tech as adversarial because the script has been

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 2>flipped right from where the report publicans were fifteen years ago.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Now the Democrats seem to be holding their seats and

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 2>falling in love. I call it like Stockholm syndrome. You know,

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>some of these governors have fallen in love or some

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 2>of the Democrats have fallen in love with their captor, right,

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 2>and they don't know the result, the catastrophic result. I

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>talked to the governor from Colorado, right, called him up

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 2>before because we were getting word that. You know, he

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 2>was on the fence whether he was going to veto

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 2>it or sign it into legislation. No, I forget. I

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 2>was in Times Square, I was at another event, and

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I called him. I said, look, this is going to

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 2>be detrimental to working people. It's going to be detrimental

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 2>to CBL license holders. It's not just a union issue.

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I go, there could be like two hundred and fifty

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 2>thousand people affected by this. He's like, I love the team,

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>says I go, okay, this is where I've always supported

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 2>you and everything you've done. I don't know whether that's

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 2>true or not. I'm saying to myself, he says, but

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 2>I just can't be with you on this one. I said, really,

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 2>this is the one that really matters. This is the

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 2>only one that matter is. I said, where are you

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>going to put those two hundred and fifty thousand well

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 2>to why I'm going to set two hundred thousand, two

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 2>unre fifty thousand people that lose their job? Where are

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 2>they gonna go? I said? And furthermore, I drove a

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 2>truck my whole life. I said, you know, the best

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 2>technology and the best information is a human hot instinct

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 2>in their brain. They can react quicker than any computer.

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 2>What are you going to do when you're platooning a

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 2>vehicle wearing two hundred forty thousand pounds and a malfunction

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 2>kills a family of four? Are you gonna be okay

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 2>with that? Because I certainly am not going to be

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 2>okay with it? And he says, oh, you know what,

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 2>don't worry about that stuff. It's ten to fifteen years

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 2>down the road. I said, no, it's ten to fifteen

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 2>minutes down the road. But that's the perplexing stuff for us.

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's where you know, I get criticized sometimes because

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 2>they'll say, well, you're a labor leader and you're criticizing

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats. Well, I'm a label leader that criticizes the Republicans.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm a labor leader criticizes the independence as well when

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 2>you're not making reasonable decisions on how it's going to

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 2>affect working people. More so, your constituents who if they

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 2>don't have a job, where do they go? They want,

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 2>they go, They go on the they go on the

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 2>they go on the done.

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Look, I look at your job is to you have

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>one job, right, You're there to protect your workers. You're

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>there to do that. I get that. What is you

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>also have to be responsive to technological change? What's your recipe?

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>If you could go back to Polus, you could go

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>back to pritzkerg and say, look, I get that. You

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>want to you want to be able to innovate. You

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to to to allow automation to

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>have a chance in some areas, where maybe automation will

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be better in certain in certain things. You know, you

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>see things with microsurgeries, right that maybe having a robot

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>do it is better than the human hand. I think

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we all accept that. Where's your line on this and

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>where do you feel where do you feel like you

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:04.599
<v Speaker 1>have to show some flexibility?

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question. I don't think. I think people

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a perception out there when you speak against anything

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 2>that has an effect on jobs, you have viewed as

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:19.599
<v Speaker 2>an impediment, right, and that impediment is what That impediment

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 2>is the bottom line of a balance sheet and the

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 2>profits of that company, int or technology. We do not

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>want to be an impediment that is going to potentially

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe improve our members' jobs, improve productivity, improve work as safety.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 2>We are going to embrace technology because we have for

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>since nineteen oh three. I mean, think about think about

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 2>what's behind me two horse heads and carriages. Right. What

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 2>technology that we had to deal with was a combustible

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 2>engine that came and created vehicles that we got off

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 2>of horses and got behind staring wilds and trucks. Right,

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 2>So we're not trying to be an impediment. We know

0:13:54.559 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 2>what's coming the problem is it's a difference between implementation

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 2>versus conversation and input. So, in other words, there seems

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 2>to be a disconnect where hey, we're just going to

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>implement this technology without any consideration of having a conversation

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 2>to say, hey, look this is what we're thinking of doing.

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>This potential could be the effect. What do you think

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 2>about this technology? It would say, great, However, where can

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>we create jobs? How is this going to affect workers?

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Those conversations aren't happening. It's you know, we don't want

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 2>to be an impediment, but we want to be part

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 2>of the solution to a potential problem. As a result

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 2>of it, we know it's coming. Just give us a

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>seat at the table and hair our point of view.

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>And like we're seeing the grocery warehouse industry, you know,

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>there was a big push and there is a big

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 2>push in these big grocery warehouses where we represent you know,

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 2>thousands upon thousands of workers nationwide, the big grocery chains

0:14:55.320 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 2>where they did implement robots to select orders that did jobs. However,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 2>we created jobs as a result of it. Who's going

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to program these robots, who's going to maintain these robots,

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 2>who's going to do quality control. So we were able

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 2>to create jobs because we had those conversations, and we

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 2>maintain the workforce. We do not want to be impediment

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 2>to anything that's going to potentially make life easier. But

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 2>we can't embrace something where we don't have the knowledge

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and or a solution to the bigger problem, which where

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 2>do you put these people to work.

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to the nineties and NAFTA and what

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>was in anticipation of what was going to be huge displacement,

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>massive job shifting, outsourcing overseas. Some of it was just

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>outsourcing from the north to the south, right to work

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>states versus so called white to work states, et cetera.

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>What were the mistakes that your predecessors in the labor

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>leadership world made then that you don't want to repeat, Well,

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>as we bring AI on board here.

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so again we took people for their word. I

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 2>think back then, you know, think about it when when

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 2>NAFTA came into effect, you know, Clinton introduced that. We

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 2>were very supportive of Clinton in the ninety two election.

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 2>All this isn't going to hurt, it's going to help.

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, There'll be a residual value as a result.

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Of these trade agreements, I think we trust Agay, you

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 2>guys were the least.

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>If I remember, the Teamsters were the most supportive of

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA compared to the other unions, right.

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Because it was well initially, yeah, initially we were very

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 2>very well. After that, we were anything that was introduced.

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it was p and tr after that, Yeah,

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to trade Dale and I think KAFTA was after that.

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 2>After getting burnt on NAFTA, you know, the skepticism was

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 2>at an all time high. So I think to your question,

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 2>what mistakes were made that I don't want to make

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 2>that my predecess made. They trusted the people that we

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 2>supported at that point in time, where I'm not suggest

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 2>you shouldn't trust people. But just because someone has a

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 2>d the name doesn't mean that making good policy behalf

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 2>of American workers. And I don't think it was well

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 2>thought out, uh and or explained. Well, maybe it wasn't

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 2>explained to to with all the facts associated with it.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 2>So that's why we're being different. We're different nowadays under

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 2>our leadership because I'm having those conversations with both sides.

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 2>If the Republicans introduce something that it's good for us

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go to the Democrats and say, all right,

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 2>the Republicans are telling us that this this is good

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 2>for our members. Is it good in your opinion?

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Is it good?

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>And if it is, why is it? If it's not,

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 2>why is it not? So I don't think any of

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.719
<v Speaker 2>those discussions happened, and I think people just back then, uh,

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, took people for their word. I mean, I

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 2>just I'm not gonna do that, you know. I want

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 2>to know exactly what the effects are going to be.

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 2>And look, hopefully they're going to be honest and open

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 2>with us. If look, if I'm gonna if I'm gonna

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 2>take a hit, tell me I'm gonna take a hit.

0:17:57.600 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 2>That way, I can be prepared to defend it, you know.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 2>But if you're going to be, you know, less than

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 2>honorable in telling us the effects and or your intentions,

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 2>then that's a problem for the people that tell us.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>That there's a reason results matter more than promises, just

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>like there's a reason. Morgan and Morgan is America's largest

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>injury law firm. For the last thirty five years, they've

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>recovered twenty five billion dollars for more than half a

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>million clients. It includes cases where insurance companies offered next

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to nothing, just hoping to get away with paying as

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>little as possible. Morgan and Morgan fought back ended up

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>winning millions. In fact, in Pennsylvania, one client was awarded

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty six million dollars, which was a staggering forty times

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the amount that the insurance company originally offered. That original

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>offer six hundred and fifty thousand dollars twenty six million,

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and fifty thousand dollars. So with more than

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>one thousand lawyers across the country, they know how to

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>deliver for everyday people. If you're injured, you need a lawyer.

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You need somebody to get your back. Check out for

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the People dot com, Slash podcast, Ordal Pound Law, Pound

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>five two nine law on your cell phone. And remember

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>all law firms are not the same. So check out

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free unless they win.

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>When we look at you, know you've pointed out how

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.479
<v Speaker 1>close an age we are. And in some ways, when

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you and I were growing up, Democrats were the party

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of labor. Republicans were to party of business. As you

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and I became adults, the Democrats started to become basically

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the Clinton wing of the party became the party of

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>business also, So then all of a sudden and there

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was this moment where it looked like labor was shrinking

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and shrinking and shrinking. Then then I think that the

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Great Recession sort of awoken to people, right, and suddenly

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>there was people realized, oh, job protections, Maybe I can't

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>trust these entities. Where would you see? Was was the

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>setup a mistake back when we were kids that labor

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have been tied to one party and frankly business

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have been tied to one party.

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think if we all had a

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 2>duel of us, so to speak, no, we know now,

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I think most of us would adopt the philosophy that

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 2>we're trying to adopt now. From my union, I can

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 2>only speak for my union.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Being Teamster's transactional rather than D and R.

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, right, It's just what's who is going to bet?

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Who is going to you know, make decisions that are

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 2>going to support working people. I mean, that's it's It's

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 2>not hard, it's pretty simple, and I think oftentimes we

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 2>complicate too many things. But I think if we had

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 2>a do over, it wouldn't be just you know, embracing

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 2>one party versus the other. And conversely, you know, one

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 2>party shouldn't embrace big business versus working people either. I mean,

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 2>I think both sides are guilty of that, right and

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 2>who's paying the consequence as far right now, I mean,

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 2>you think about these trade deals, these trade deals right now,

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 2>if you go back and you look at footage of

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, and again I don't want to seem like

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm picking on the guy Chuck Schumer. In nineteen ninety six,

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 2>he's given a speech on the Senate floor, I believe,

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 2>or maybe the House floor saying how bad the Chinadale

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 2>is and how we need to these tariffs and all

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 2>this other stuff. And then two thousand and seven, two

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight, Hillary Clinton's you know, explaining to her

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 2>policy and immigration. Now fast forward, you know, the same

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>positions that these folks were taking, you know, fifteen twenty

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 2>years ago, is the same policy is basically implemented under

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 2>this administration, although the immigration policy has been a little

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 2>bit more aggressive than probably people thought, which you know,

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 2>again that's another debate for another conversation, but it's like

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 2>contradicting it best. So for me and you, we've been

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 2>fortunate enough to look at what the the argument was

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 2>from the Dems then to what it is now, what

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the arguments from the Republicans were then, and where we

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 2>are now. It's like it's so contradicting, Like who do

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>you believe?

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's quite curious, you know, I've watched Marco Rubio

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>as a senator started to do this transition, right, the

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>guy who ran in twenty ten, in twenty sixteen versus

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the guy you saw run for reelection in twenty twenty two.

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe him?

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know him that well, okay, but if you.

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't want to pay I'm not picking on him. He's

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>an example of somebody that has shifted to being a

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more friendly to your positions. But the question is

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>whether how do you get trusted? Is it just rhetorical?

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Is he only there for the voters? You know?

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 2>No, So I agree with you he has he has

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 2>gotten a lot more sympathetic to our issues. I had

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 2>a conversation with him, and again I met a lot

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 2>of these folks at the r n c H when

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I went there, But I had a conversation about a

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 2>month ago at the White House, and he probably didn't

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 2>know me from a hole in the wall prior to

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the r n C. But he came right up to

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 2>me and he gave me his whole history of his

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 2>dad being a hotel worker, losing his job, they went

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 2>on strike, and he said all the right things, and

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 2>he's like, look, I like I embraced unions. It helped

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 2>me through my whole you know, childhood. We led a

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 2>good middle class life. So he's saying all the right things,

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 2>and the dealings that we've had to deal with them

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 2>on he's been fair, you know. Now, whether that's you know,

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 2>sincerity or politically motivated, the truth always comes out. I mean,

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>so if you had to ask me out, how's Macromobile?

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 2>Nice guy, great conversations with him, says all the right things.

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>When you what do you make of of of this

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>shift in the Republican Party over the last ten years?

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it how much of it's been just rhetorical and

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>how much of it have you actually seen in policy?

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 2>So I'll tell you I can probably go a little

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 2>bit more. I can probably give a better better description

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 2>over the last three and a half years and ten

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>years because I come from Massachusetts, right and in Massachusetts,

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 2>as you know, especially Boston, That's where I'm from.

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I never would I never would have guessed yeah, yeah,

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>this southern accent.

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 2>And cowboy boots on two. But uh, you know, we

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 2>never looked at it as Dems are Republicans because how

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I looked at it, and this philosophy is unqualified opinion.

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 2>I always looked at people are only a certain party

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 2>affiliation because of the zip code where they lived. Right,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 2>nine out of ten times. There was bipartisanship on many

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 2>and most issues. So when I came to the SEE

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 2>three and a half years ago, and we had a

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 2>lot of success working with the legislation. I did twenty

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 2>years as a head of a local twenty five in Boston,

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the one of the biggest locals, and I had a

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 2>great relationships with both Democrats and Republicans. We got a

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:13.479
<v Speaker 2>lot of good work down.

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 4>We've got autism autism legislation past mandating private insurance companies

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 4>to provide services for families with autism.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 2>We passed movie tax and centers into perpetuity. That's going

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 2>to support an industry, and that was all bipartisan did

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 2>a lot of great work, brought casinos to Boston. So

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>when I came here. I'm like, you know, I'll take

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the JV and I don't mean that disrespectful, the junior

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 2>varsity template, and we're going to bring into the varsity game.

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>And we started reaching out across the aisle, talking new

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 2>people like our age demographic, jade, like Josh Hawley, jd Vance,

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Roger Marshall, a lot of folks that we had a

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 2>lot in common with, may not agreed on everything. And

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>that's how last three and a half years, I think

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 2>the one thing that we've we've done well, which is

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 2>always room for employment, is reached across the island. Had conversations. So,

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 2>for instance, Josh Howley, when I first met with him,

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.239
<v Speaker 2>we talked about a lot of issues, told him how

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 2>many members we had in the state, and we said,

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, we don't support national right to work. We

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 2>don't support right to work, and he said why I

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 2>support right to work. I'm like, well, tell me why.

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 2>And we had this conversation. I told him why we didn't,

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and we put out some you know, facts and figures.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you know he flipped his narrative right away and said,

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, I no longer support right to work. This

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 2>is not getting my constituents. So think about if we

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't have those conversations, and look, not all of them

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 2>in the success story that you know, look.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I look holly to me, you know, I look I

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>am not. I am more and more convinced that it

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter who you elected, It matters what your incentives are.

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, right.

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>He lives in a state. You just it's a union state.

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a conservative state culturally, right, but it's a union state,

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>always has been, and which is why I think that

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>whole you know, Missouri, the Democrats hung on longer there

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 1>than because of the fight over right to work.

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Now you look at you look at do you look

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 2>at Ohio for instance?

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:23.479
<v Speaker 2>That used to be completely blue, right right? Pretty much

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of industry Ohio was crushed with these bad

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 2>trade deals. I mean when you really think about it.

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 2>So what we've focused on is and then this is

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 2>the example of you know, my unqualified opinion in the

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 2>last three and a half years is you get Senator

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Bernie Marino, Republican. I mean, he's embracing, he's embracing, uh,

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of policies, pushing forward a lot

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 2>of our agenda because he represents those people that were

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 2>affected in Ohio and as a result, I mean he

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 2>first hand witnessed, you know, the demonization of industry in

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Ohio as a result of these bad trade deals. He's

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 2>been another breath of fresh air. There were working with

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Senator Eustead as well, who came in, you know, filling

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Vice President Vance's seat, has also started to come to

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.959
<v Speaker 2>that philosophy. Plus it's an election, yeah.

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Right, any space and a guy like Shared Brown, who

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you do have a relationship with.

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 2>We do. And Sharon Brown wasn't happy that I went

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 2>and spoke at the r n c R and I said, look,

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 2>I would have gave that same speech had I been

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 2>invited to the DNC. And you know, it's funny in politics.

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 2>And you know, still.

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Trying to understand why you weren't invited to the dancing.

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know you have a good explanation.

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I no, I wish I did. I wish I did.

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I listen, I tell people all the

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>time when I at my age, when I don't get

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 2>invited to weddings, I'm okay because I'll just send a check.

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't need to go.

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's so funny, you say that right. You know,

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I joke about this all the time.

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You hit a certain age. First, you're younger, you're like,

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>how come I didn't get invited to this? You're older,

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>You're like, God, why did I get invited to this?

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 2>So I tell people all the time, Look, don't invite me.

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna send a check anyways, it's a fundraiser. Just

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 2>don't invite me. Know that I'm thinking of you. I'll

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 2>send the donation, right, But no, I mean it's our

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's it's there. There's some good Republicans coming

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 2>along that way having dialogue with now there's something that

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 2>no matter what dialogue we have and or case we make,

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 2>they're just rigid. They're rigid and not going to move.

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's okay too. But you know, I think the

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 2>last three and a half years, the conversations UH have

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 2>been have been very positive. UH in continuing even if

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 2>we agree to disagree on issues, my goal, and I

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 2>think I think I would love it to be everybody's goal,

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 2>especially now. I mean, this is such an awful, hostile,

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 2>gross time in the United States when you fail to

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 2>keep communicating regardlessl of talks are going good or bad.

0:29:57.920 --> 0:29:59.959
<v Speaker 2>You're failing your job, You're failing your constituents.

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>What could Kamala Harris have done differently to earn a

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>even co endorsement from you?

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Not run for president? No, it was just never gonna Yeah,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 2>it's just it wasn't gonna happen for us. I'm members

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 2>we we did some significant pulling. I'm not suggest I'm

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 2>not getting personal, but uh, let me let me back

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 2>up for a second. Joe Biden was was was great

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to unions as a president. I'm never going to take

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 2>that away from him.

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>When he came, he was probably the most pro union

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>president he was you have ever had, We've had since FDR.

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 2>There's no doubt. There was no doubt. And again, uh,

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, people always remind you of what they've done

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 2>for you in the past, not what they're going to

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 2>do for you in the future. And Joe Biden came

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 2>and met with us, and I got to tell you, like,

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I felt bad. I really did, because you know, I

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 2>was brought up to be always respectful of people that

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 2>are older than your be just always respect the position,

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 2>respect the person. And you know, he lost his fastball

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>and it was like, you know, part of it for

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 2>me personally, was like, it just looks like someone's being

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 2>propped up and then not looking out for his best interest,

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 2>in looking out for their own personal interest. And then

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 2>when you know, he dropped out of the race and

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Kamala came in, it kind of gave the sense of

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 2>it was like a birthright for her to be the candidate.

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 2>And you know, that was a big, big mistake I

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 2>think on the Democratic Party. This should have been a

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 2>continguency plan two years prior to the election, and that

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 2>wasn't there. And you know, you hear all these stories

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 2>living in DC. You know that he was going to

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 2>be a transitional president. There was a meeting and you know,

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 2>he got pushed back from a lot of staff people

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 2>that whose jobs could have been in jeopardy, all this

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 2>other stuff. I mean, I think, you know, hey, she

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 2>ran for the president. She lost. You can't recreate history.

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think she was the best candidate. You know,

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 2>if I really had to think about, there were a

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 2>lot more candidates out there and it probably would have

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 2>gave Trump a run for his money.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Would you describe your membership as pretty fifty to fifty.

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 2>No, sixty, It was sixty five thirty five when we

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 2>did a polling, we did significant polling. We actually rump

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:19.239
<v Speaker 2>sixty five for Trump Republican. Yes, so we did so,

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you it was interesting. We've never done this

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 2>before as an organization. But you know, we're out in

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 2>the field every single day and we're talking to our

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 2>members social media. There's so much communication and some of

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:35.719
<v Speaker 2>it's not credible, but you could just see members gravitating

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 2>towards the Republicans. And I don't think it was just

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 2>because it was Trump. I think it's just, you know,

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats weren't controlled the last sixteen out of twenty years,

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 2>and what really have we got done? What really Democrats

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 2>do for us? Under Obama we had a Democratic House, Senate,

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 2>and president. And our biggest issue back then was the

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Employee Free Choice Act should have been a layout right,

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 2>which was basically the pro Act right that didn't happen.

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 2>And then under Biden this was.

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>The basically the ability to ask for collective bargaining right.

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.239
<v Speaker 2>The ability of an employer to once there was a

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 2>majority status, to recognize and sit down and bargain and

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, come to a collective bargain agreement. And it

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 2>should have been a layup. But it again, that's part

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 2>of the reason why our members started defecting. They was

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 2>seeing time and time again that you know, the working

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 2>people's agendas weren't being put forward. I mean, you think

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 2>about bankruptcy. Bankruptcy laws in this country are antiquated, and

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 2>we deal with it all the time when companies go bankrupt.

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>This is an Elizabeth Warren obsession, right to the bankruptcy

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>legislation right.

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 2>When companies go bankrupt, and we've seen it, you know,

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 2>everybody gets this, right. We had a last line of creditors.

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Uh in the line they're not even treated as creditors. No,

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 2>we're treated as qumodity commodity right, like we'll throw them

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 2>three cents on the dollar and tell them that's not

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 2>we can do. So, you know, the whole system has

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 2>failed us. And even when there were times like under

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:12.439
<v Speaker 2>strong democratic leadership, you know, our issues weren't taken in consideration. Now,

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 2>one thing that Biden did unbelievable for us on is

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, funding these pension funds so that they didn't collapse.

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 2>And I say that all the time, and that got

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 2>thrown in my face when I spoke at the RNC

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 2>right after it. You know a lot of Democrats, like

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Sherrid Brown was not happy that I spoke there. He

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 2>came to my office and he said, you know, I

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 2>help with that legislation. Butch lewis no doubt you helped

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 2>us with that legislation. We are grateful we got pensions.

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.760
<v Speaker 2>They're going to be solving till twenty fifty one. People

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 2>aren't going to have to worry about. That was the

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 2>right thing to do. However, who broke them? Who broke

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 2>these pensions? What do you mean? And I had the

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 2>same conversation with a lot of other Democratic senators. I said,

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen eighty, Ted Kennery from Massachusetts pass legislation deregulation

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the trucking industry. The Teams to union lost four hundred

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 2>thousand trucking jobs, and that deregulation started filtering into other industries.

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 2>If you lose four hundred thousand jobs, that's four hundred

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 2>thousand contributions times forty hours a week, times you know,

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 2>fifty two weeks a year. That is a significant drain

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 2>on these funds. You know, each year it goes on.

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 2>And then take into consideration a lot of these companies,

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 2>good companies were forced into bankruptcy where none of these

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 2>monies were captured because the bankruptcy laws did pax. And

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I said, look, I'm very grateful you fixed the problem

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 2>that you helped create. And I use this analogy. I'm

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 2>playing street arc in my neighborhood nineteen eighty' you know,

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 2>eight years old, right, I break my mother's window. Forty

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 2>years later, I say, I'm going to fix that window.

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Should I look for accolades from my mother for fixing

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 2>a problem that I helped create? And Joe Biden was

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 2>the center. He signed off on the legislation of deregulation,

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 2>and that was when Reagan was a president, who by

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 2>the way, we endorsed Reagan as well. So it's you know.

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Everybody lets you down on that one.

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, But my point is, you know, once you

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 2>took a position like we did, because the polling we did,

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 2>and we did three intense poems, we did a straw

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 2>pole in the Union Halls where we could have tipped

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.720
<v Speaker 2>it should have been tipped like eighty twenty to Biden,

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 2>and it was like, you know, thirty five percent Biden,

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 2>thirty percent Trump, and then independent factored in as well.

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 2>We're like, all right, this isn't a good gauge. So

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 2>then we do a publication every month, every quarter, I

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 2>believe every month it's one. It goes to one point

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 2>six million people. And we got record participation with a

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 2>with a code, a QR code, and Harris was in

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 2>the race with Waltz at this point in time, and

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:57.839
<v Speaker 2>it went sixty five thirty five Republican, and like, all right,

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 2>let's do one more poll. So we utilize the impolster

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 2>that the Harris Waltz campaign utilized and it was the

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 2>same result as we got from the QR code of

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 2>our members. So we were like, all right, we've got

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.280
<v Speaker 2>to represent sixty five percent of our members. We also

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 2>have to represent the thirty five percent. You know, this

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 2>is too close. We're gonna we're going to take a pass.

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 2>We're going to not make an endorsement. Local unions, joint consuls,

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 2>they're autonomous. You do what you want to do in

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:26.240
<v Speaker 2>this one.

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And they kind of did, if I'm not mistakes, they did.

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the majority of them, I mean, California

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 2>was probably the most outgoing for Harris and Wallas, and

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 2>there were some other uh maybe maybe Illinois, but most people,

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, chose to take a step back as well,

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 2>because again, now members of their constituents.

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>What's your relationship these days with the rest of the

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>labor movement, right, it's it's sometimes with the collective of

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the afl CIO and all of that. And they've been

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they've been back and forth overtime, and you know, to me,

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>there's the Teamsters, then there's the afl CIO. Is that

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that's still that's still the pecking order in your in

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>your mind.

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 2>You're not a member of yeah c IO, right, yeah,

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 2>well not a member of the fl CIO. I mean,

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 2>they do good work, there's no doubt about it. We

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 2>definitely represent different interests with our members versus you know there.

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Why aren't you a part of a fl CIA.

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 2>You know what happened when probably about I think twenty

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 2>years ago when you know, there was there was a

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 2>riff between I think President trumpker at that point in

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 2>time and some of the other labor unions I think

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 2>the Laborers, the Compenters, the Teamsters, uh, and there are

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 2>a couple other affiliates. I think s c IU formed

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 2>their own change to Win coalition.

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Well I remember that that really blew things up and with.

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Drew withdrew UH the international unions, but you know, a

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 2>lot of the affiliates and that was one of them.

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 2>In Boston, we stayed. We stayed with the fl CIO

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 2>locally for some time and that's still that's still the practice.

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 2>That's the encouragement from us. We just you know, we

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 2>do our own thing. We've got our own staff, we've

0:38:57.120 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 2>got our owner ability to lobby, We've got our own ability.

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean there are times we work on projects together.

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I think, to your question, I'm gonna answer it honestly.

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.439
<v Speaker 2>I think, Uh, you know this this some ill will

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 2>from other unions on us non endorsing UH Vice President Harris.

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 2>But you know, at the end of the day, Chuck,

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 2>I will help any union. I will help any affiliate,

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 2>even if we do have a difference of opinions. But

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:28.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, there is I've heard some chatter now again

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 2>when you see them, everybody is your best friend, right,

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 2>but you know, you go online and you see everything.

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't take it personally, I get it. My whole

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 2>focus and goal is I've got to serve the people

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that I'm elected to serve, and I got to make

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 2>decisions and recommend decisions. H and the best interests in

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I believed at the time, and I

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 2>still believe that we made the best decision possible. And look,

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 2>we're in a good spot. I mean, some of these

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 2>unions that criticized me, uh with help broker meetings with

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 2>with with the White House, you know, to you know,

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 2>stop any kind of attack on a certain industry, or

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 2>to help facilitate a relationship. So look, I'm sure there's

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 2>some hurt feelings, but even if we did endorse in

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 2>the selection, it wouldn't have moved the needle. You know,

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 2>we did what was the best interesting. Look, we pulled

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 2>our members, and you know, I think we made the

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 2>right decision.

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:27.879
<v Speaker 1>So if Andy Basheer, Wes Moore, I'll throw I'll throw

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a Gretchen Whitmer.

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 2>We forget, don't forget Josh Shapiro.

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Josh Shapiro, the four of them come to you and say,

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>what do I do to make sure I'm not at

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the thirty five of a sixty five thirty five split

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty eight.

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I want to tell them, what do you tell them?

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Go out talk to your constituents, our members. Remember to member,

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 2>have face to face conversations. Ask their opinions, don't dictate

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 2>what they should.

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Be doing for you.

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 2>You work for them. You need to win the trust

0:40:59.000 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 2>back over.

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I was part of the problem.

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Give me an example of something. I mean, I've heard

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a similar look. You know, there's sort of this stereotype

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of that I joke these days of Democrats and Republicans.

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Republicans go out of their way to agree with the voter.

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats go out of their way to convince the voter

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're right, and it's it's sort of a you

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 1>know which, which is actually a much harder thing to do.

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to get your true testimonial.

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I was speaking at an International Union's convention, uh probably

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 2>about a month ago in Hawaii, and I was explaining

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 2>just what I explained to you, the polling and everything

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 2>else and after the whole and it was like in

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 2>front of about five thousand people walking out, and a

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 2>lady approaches me, and I can see it coming and

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 2>you just see the body language. And she walked right

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 2>up to me and pointed her finger and said, what

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 2>are you doing to educate those sixty five percent of

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.919
<v Speaker 2>the numbers? I said, I'm not doing anything to educate them.

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I said, what are the Democrats doing to find out

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:21.399
<v Speaker 2>why sixty sixty five percent of our members didn't support them.

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 2>That's not up to me, that's up to the members.

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I said, that's the problem here. It's my job to

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 2>educate someone who made a choice based upon you know,

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 2>personal and or maybe validated concerns with the party. What

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 2>do you want me to do? Is educating me telling

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 2>what to do? Because that's not what we're going to do.

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting, It's a dilemma. I know some

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 1>unions have a similar split, particularly the Trades, where a

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>majority of their members are Trump, but the leadership all

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>went to the Democrats, right, and they do try to

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 1>quote educate their members. Look, we know you may not

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>like these issues, but do you know Speaker Pelosi is

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 1>what got this done and you may not like her,

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but here's why we're siding with her. Is that on

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a labor leader to explain or not?

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you have to. I think you have to in

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 2>that scenario. Like I've been critical of both Republican and Democrats,

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 2>However I always acknowledge what they've done for us or

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 2>haven't done for us. So you know, Chuck Schumer, you

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 2>know reminds me every time he sees me that you know,

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 2>he fixed our pensions. Well he didn't do it alone, right,

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 2>And I'll tell people, Look, Joe Biden was the most

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 2>pro union president. He actually signed the legislation I fixed

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 2>out pensions, and then I'll give the story on why

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 2>these pensions were broke. Like I said to you, So, yeah,

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 2>it is up to us to give the tale of

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 2>the table on both sides as far as yeah, they

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 2>did this over here, but I could also point to

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 2>three or four different things that they haven't done either,

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Like I've had situations where saying, hey, you know, Josh

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Hally isn't for working people, or Roger Marshall's for working people.

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh really, I said, they signed on to support letters

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 2>for our members, though we're potentially going to strike at ups.

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 2>They signed on to help our rail workers who didn't

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 2>have a contract for four years. Yeah, although so and

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 2>so a Democrat might have, you know, said, taken credit

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 2>for something, they didn't sign onto this legislation, as signed

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:30.439
<v Speaker 2>on to the support of this legislation. They didn't sign

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 2>on to support Amazon workers. So we can always point

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 2>and I think to your point, Yeah, we're going to

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 2>point out what people have done for us, but we're

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 2>also going to point out what they haven't done for us.

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.840
<v Speaker 1>We've spent a lot of time noting where Democrats have

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 1>let you down. Why do you trust the these? Uh,

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the the your new allies, some of your new allies.

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Listen, I'm a Democrat, always going to be a Democrat.

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't trust anybody. Okay, I want to see when

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:02.359
<v Speaker 2>people say something looking And I was brought up and

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:04.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, I was brought up by a very very

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 2>strong Irish woman and my very strong Irish father who's

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 2>no longer with us. But the one thing they always said,

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 2>with all you have left in your life is your

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 2>reputation and your work. And the Republicans have a great

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:22.719
<v Speaker 2>opportunity right now because the Democratic parties fraction. They're portraying

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 2>themselves as wanting to be the party of working people,

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 2>and the Democrats have to win the trust and support

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:35.959
<v Speaker 2>back of working people. And I'm leveraging both of those narratives. Hey,

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 2>you said when you were running, you want to you

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:40.359
<v Speaker 2>want to you want to be the party working people. Well,

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 2>why aren't you jumping on board support? And you know,

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:47.359
<v Speaker 2>the Faster Labor Contracts Act as Republicans. Because we've got

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 2>bipartisans support and growing in that, that's an opportunity for

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Republicans to actually say well or to demonstrate, hey, we

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 2>do support we do support working people. And also if

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 2>they do that, the Democrats going to come home and

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 2>criticize that. No, they can't. But but if the Republicans

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 2>say I'm not supporting it or we don't get Republican support,

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 2>they're just allowing the Democrats to weaponize that issue. And

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's the Maybe that's the UH strategy. I don't know.

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Let me get you out of here. In two things

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 1>one twenty twenty six is is this a low I

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 1>saw for instance, in Michigan, various teamsters, you know, the

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>state went one way, a couple of locals went another.

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Is that mostly how teamsters endorsements work into in a

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 1>midterm year or will the National Will year office sort

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of way in uncertain Senate races, certain House races.

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're going to We're going to weigh in on

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 2>certain Senate races, especially the senators and House members that

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:49.240
<v Speaker 2>support us, whether you have a D n R or nine.

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, the beauty of the teams to's union. We

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 2>have three hundred and nineteen local unions in thirty I

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 2>believe thirty something, joint councils, regional councils. You know, everybody's

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 2>they like their pride of autonomy, and we give them that. However,

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 2>if we are working on legislation like fastera Labor Contracts

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Act or warehouse protection, and we're getting support from from

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 2>people that are currently in office that might have a

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 2>dn R, we're gonna we're going to weigh in and say, look,

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 2>this is what these people have done for us. But

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the day, it's usually left up

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to the local unions and the joint consuls.

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna paint a scenario for you. Uh, the athletes

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Big ten decide they're going to organize. I

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:37.759
<v Speaker 1>think it's coming, frankly, collective bargaining in college sports. There's

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:41.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money at state. There's frankly no protections

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 1>for these athletes right now in various ways. Is do

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you do the teamsters want? You know, would would athletes

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:57.959
<v Speaker 1>who got a collective you know, we're able to sort

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of get a collective be recognized as a union. Would

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:05.359
<v Speaker 1>you want them as Teamsters members? Or is that too far.

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that too far? There's no there's no union out there. Okay,

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 1>well explain why, explain why teamsters, we'll be able to

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:16.360
<v Speaker 1>help the big ten football players.

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 2>I play college football one semester. Right. It's a full

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:23.879
<v Speaker 2>time job, a lot of demands. Uh, and there's no guarantees.

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to go put sports aside? Do you

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 2>want to go work for an employer whether there's a

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of demand and no return. No, you don't, so

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 2>that that's right in our whalehouse. As far as repers,

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I will represent anybody you know we were accused of.

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 2>If a fire hydrant wanted to negotiate a contract, the

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 2>teams would represent them. Right, No, we would love to

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:47.759
<v Speaker 2>because you don't think about it. You are don't you

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 2>believe that's coming? I think it's coming. Look a good

0:48:50.080 --> 0:48:51.839
<v Speaker 2>friend of mine, I know you're a you're a huge

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 2>University of Miami. Gino Torrett is a very good friend

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 2>of mine. Oh you know he and our Yeah, way

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 2>back when I mean he was saying, you know, this

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 2>is a full time job, like it was forty plus

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:06.520
<v Speaker 2>hours per week, and the demands that are put on you,

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 2>like you don't have you don't have the ability to

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:12.399
<v Speaker 2>say no to these college coaches or these even the administration.

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.359
<v Speaker 2>So it's like, you know, there's no rights of these

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 2>call they owned you, and no one should be owned.

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 2>No one should be mandated what to say and what

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to do. And let's let's face it, I mean college sports,

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:28.759
<v Speaker 2>the NCAA, you know this nil money. I mean, I

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:30.959
<v Speaker 2>think you're one hundred percent right, it's coming and.

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, yeah, we just.

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Don't want to be the union that represents them. You know,

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 2>my son plays college hockey and you know, he's forty

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:43.800
<v Speaker 2>hours a week, you know, up in the morning training practice,

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:46.839
<v Speaker 2>and then classes are like you know, eight seven, eight

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 2>o'clock at night. There's twelve thirteen hour days. But the

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 2>majority of the time during the season is focused on

0:49:51.960 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the season.

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, and with all this, I mean when you're talking

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 1>multi billion dollar TV contracts now for these conferences. So

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the only way this works is if it's

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:06.879
<v Speaker 1>a players union by conference, but who knows, I mean yeah,

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it's by region or something like that. Yeah,

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:12.239
<v Speaker 1>it'd be nice if our conferences were by region, but

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't it. Yeah, we got that maybe BC would be

0:50:17.480 --> 0:50:19.160
<v Speaker 2>a competitor.

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Were you a BC player? Where'd you play?

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I went to the University of Mass Mass You Mass, Yeah, yeah.

0:50:25.680 --> 0:50:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Trying hard to be an FBS I love.

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah yeah. So I went to the U Mass

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:32.919
<v Speaker 2>Boston campus. I went to University of New Haven first

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 2>and then went to you Mass. No.

0:50:36.000 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, by the time this airs will know whether the

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox have beaten the Yankees or not.

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:44.839
<v Speaker 2>But it's gonna be a tough one. Huh yeah, it's

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna be.

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:48.920
<v Speaker 1>How great two of three between old rivals like this.

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, no matter what, we hate to see someone

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:52.879
<v Speaker 2>losing that in that situation, you know.

0:50:53.520 --> 0:50:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Get out of here. I got a Red Sox fan.

0:50:55.640 --> 0:50:57.319
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean you hate to see someone lose?

0:50:57.360 --> 0:50:59.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, you do because I mean, look, they're playing that

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:02.080
<v Speaker 2>high n right. They hate each other.

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Your your empathy, You're filled with empathy. Where's the where's

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the Boston hate? Man?

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Listen, Let's talk hockey. Let's talk football like there's no

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:15.240
<v Speaker 2>other team than Boston Bruins and the New England Patriots.

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, So that's where you that's that's where they

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:18.359
<v Speaker 1>come at.

0:51:18.680 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Baseball's baseball, you know, Baseball great American sport. We

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:24.120
<v Speaker 2>used to say my neighbor. But yeah, the kids that

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 2>can't skate end up playing baseball. Oh wow, I know

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 2>exactly where you grew up.

0:51:30.600 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey, shot up bright. This is great man. I appreciate you.

0:51:33.480 --> 0:51:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate you, my friend. This is all right,