Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom huge Democrats plotting another coup
Speaker 1: against President Trump, Murder spiking in thirty six of fifty
Speaker 1: top US cities. Holland's top doc says there's no evidence
Speaker 1: masks really worked against COVID. A seven year old bar
Speaker 1: owner sent to jail under lockdown, Chieranny plus TikTok faces
Speaker 1: sale or band. This is the Buck Sexon Show, where
Speaker 1: the mission or mission is to decode what really matters
Speaker 1: with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake American great, You're a
Speaker 1: great American. Again the Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a
Speaker 1: great guy. No, welcome everybody to the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Hope you had a great weekend. Thank you so much
Speaker 1: for being here, as always an honor and a privilege
Speaker 1: to have you here with me and mine. Do we
Speaker 1: have much to get to today as we tend to.
Speaker 1: I know it's August, but it's August in a presidential
Speaker 1: election year, which means that there's going to be a
Speaker 1: lot more going on in the news cycle than there
Speaker 1: usually would be. And we also have a pandemic raging.
Speaker 1: We have an anti cop protest movement making cities across
Speaker 1: the country less safe. We have rioters running around in
Speaker 1: the streets like lunatics on a regular basis, and an
Speaker 1: economy that no one really knows the full damage done
Speaker 1: to it until we get out of this current situation,
Speaker 1: this current state. So that then brings me to what
Speaker 1: I'm starting to see the early signs of, and it
Speaker 1: is the Democrats making sure that they use everything they
Speaker 1: can right now to create an unfalsifiable narrative of Trump
Speaker 1: cheated if he wins. That's going to be a thing
Speaker 1: you hear. And more than that, and this is where
Speaker 1: I start to get really concerned. You see a movement
Speaker 1: among Democrats to create narratives. And we know the power
Speaker 1: of narratives. We know how dangerous they can be. For example,
Speaker 1: cops kill unarmed black men as part of an epidemic
Speaker 1: of racism across the country on a continuous and systematic basis. Therefore,
Speaker 1: let's defund cops. Let's treat law enforcement like they're the enemy.
Speaker 1: That's a terrible idea, and people are dying because of that.
Speaker 1: So I think it's important we all keep that in
Speaker 1: mind here, right, that narratives can push us to make
Speaker 1: very very poor decisions. But you have, for example, the
Speaker 1: story of Russia collusion, which has just faded into the background,
Speaker 1: even though it was the single most prominent news story
Speaker 1: of the first three years of the Trump presidency. It
Speaker 1: was all alive. We used to hear from so called
Speaker 1: experts and big time news journos, multi millionaire anchors on
Speaker 1: a nightly basis that Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier,
Speaker 1: was such a brilliant a brilliant intelligence mind. Clearly, if
Speaker 1: he wrote this dossier, it must be true. We heard
Speaker 1: that there were going to be all these massive revelations,
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff and other Democrat members of Congress promising the
Speaker 1: other shoe would drop TikTok TikTok any day. Now, No,
Speaker 1: that was not true. That was all a lie. And
Speaker 1: what we saw was that that lie wasn't just a
Speaker 1: media lie used for the purposes of a political weapon
Speaker 1: against the president, but also used as an excuse within
Speaker 1: the apparatus of the federal government to go after the
Speaker 1: president of the United States, to use the law enforcement
Speaker 1: apparatus to try and create it's not not just an investigation,
Speaker 1: but a prosecutable offense out of nothing, to force an impeachment,
Speaker 1: to force a destruction of all that so far the
Speaker 1: Trump administration had been able to accomplish. We see all
Speaker 1: of this, and we understand very clearly that this was
Speaker 1: a deep state coup effort. Right We see that they
Speaker 1: were using these lives beyond just convincing people that Trump
Speaker 1: was evil, the Trump was bad. They were using them
Speaker 1: as the basis, as the predicate for investigation, as the
Speaker 1: justification for spying tools to be used against the president
Speaker 1: of the United States. And now we see something else happening.
Speaker 1: The story that's out there about Trump won't concede. Trump
Speaker 1: won't allow himself to be defeat in this election. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. He won't step down. Now there's no basis
Speaker 1: for this right there. There's no reason to believe that
Speaker 1: this is actually true. But it doesn't matter that it's
Speaker 1: not true, the same way it didn't matter that Russia
Speaker 1: collusion was all a big lie. They are going with this.
Speaker 1: They're doing everything they can here because it is useful
Speaker 1: for as long as they can get away with it.
Speaker 1: It's useful to say things like Trump is a fascist.
Speaker 1: That's absurd. He's had the biggest opening for fascism imaginable
Speaker 1: if that's what he had wanted. And look who the
Speaker 1: real fascists are Cuomo yelling at people that they need
Speaker 1: to do what he says or else, Newsom unleashing the
Speaker 1: force of the state to lock people down. Unless it's
Speaker 1: a protest, then it's okay. Remember how last week I said, sarcastically,
Speaker 1: are rules just for the little people? We know they
Speaker 1: are just for the little people. Mayor Bowser of DC
Speaker 1: officially exempted. And I believe that I got the ball
Speaker 1: rolling here with a megaviral tweak. I was gonna say
Speaker 1: it that was seen all over the country saying, hold
Speaker 1: on a second, why do we have a two week
Speaker 1: quarantine in DC for anyone who comes from certain states?
Speaker 1: But it doesn't apply to all the not socially distanced
Speaker 1: mourners that John Lewis's fourth funeral ceremony. Really ah, it's
Speaker 1: all political rules are for the little people. It does not.
Speaker 1: They don't care how much they have to live, They
Speaker 1: don't care how they're distorting and destroying principles on a
Speaker 1: regular basis. It is useful in the moment. Hypocrisy is
Speaker 1: powerful if you embrace it, and that's what they've done.
Speaker 1: So we have these stories that President Trump is not
Speaker 1: going to leave office. This is basically nothing. We have
Speaker 1: stories about him as a fascist or even if people
Speaker 1: coming Here's Jim Clyburn saying exactly that play thirteen. What
Speaker 1: I said starting about two and a half maybe three
Speaker 1: years ago, after one instead of the unions, that I
Speaker 1: feel very strongly that this man has taken on a
Speaker 1: strong arm tactics, and I feel very strongly that he
Speaker 1: is Mussolini, who is Hitler. I said that back then,
Speaker 1: and I believe that I believe very strongly this guy
Speaker 1: never had an idea about being one to peacefully transfer power.
Speaker 1: I don't think he plans to leave the White House.
Speaker 1: He doesn't plan to have an unseted elections. I believe
Speaker 1: that he plans to installed himself in some kind of
Speaker 1: emergency way to n to office. And that's why the
Speaker 1: American people had better wake up. Oh we're supposed to
Speaker 1: wake up and believe this absurd lie. We're supposed to
Speaker 1: believe that Trump is a fascist who won't leave office
Speaker 1: if he loses. What are they sending this based on
Speaker 1: absolutely nothing? But you know, in the meantime, you have
Speaker 1: the liberal intelligensia such as it is, the lib establishment,
Speaker 1: being very clear that they think that there might be
Speaker 1: a contested election, so they're trying to convince you Trump
Speaker 1: won't leave office if he loses. They're also telling you
Speaker 1: there's going to be an election that they don't think
Speaker 1: is going to be a clear victor on election night.
Speaker 1: But I thought Trump was so terrible. He's gonna lose
Speaker 1: by so much. Oh no, no no, no, they know it's
Speaker 1: gonna be. It is going to be a tight election.
Speaker 1: We all see that coming. And they're doing things like
Speaker 1: having John Podesta in a war game. This is written
Speaker 1: about in the New York Times, and this is how
Speaker 1: it goes. A big popular win for Joe Biden and
Speaker 1: a narrow electoral defeat, presumably reached after weeks of county
Speaker 1: of votes in Pennsylvania in a war game. For this
Speaker 1: war game, they cast John Podesta, who was Hillary Clinton's
Speaker 1: campaign chairman, in the role of mister Biden. They expected
Speaker 1: him when the votes came in to concede, just as
Speaker 1: Missus Clinton had, but mister Podesta, playing Biden, shocked the
Speaker 1: organizers by saying his party felt they wouldn't let him concede,
Speaker 1: alleging voter suppression. He persuaded the governors of Wisconsin and
Speaker 1: Michigan to send pro Biden electors to the Electoral College.
Speaker 1: In that scenario, California, Oregon, and Washington then threatened to
Speaker 1: secede from the United States if mister Trump took office
Speaker 1: as planned. The House named mister Biden president. The Senate
Speaker 1: and the White House stuck with mister Trump. At that
Speaker 1: point in the scenario, the nation stopped looking to the
Speaker 1: media for curers and waited to see what the military
Speaker 1: would do. The military side in the election. These are
Speaker 1: very influential, powerful Democrats. This is the New York Times
Speaker 1: writing about this and their war gaming out what happens
Speaker 1: if Biden doesn't concede the election and Democrats say, no, sorry,
Speaker 1: not letting it happen. A hold on a second. I
Speaker 1: thought they were worried that Trump wouldn't concede the election.
Speaker 1: Oh what you're really getting here? I know you could
Speaker 1: say this is fantasy, this is war gaming. Why they
Speaker 1: waste their time on this? This is absurd? Or is it?
Speaker 1: What you see here is a psychological refusal among the
Speaker 1: Democrat party. And I don't mean this just a few Democrats,
Speaker 1: a few crazies. Am I talking about Antifa here? I'm
Speaker 1: talking about the very top levels. Think of how much
Speaker 1: Trump has deranged them, and this presidency has emotionally wounded Democrats.
Speaker 1: They can't psychologically process how the country could elect this man,
Speaker 1: the thought of him being president for four years, us
Speaker 1: going through a pandemic, and then the American people still
Speaker 1: picking Donald Trump over the Democrat, doesn't matter the Democrat is.
Speaker 1: They simply cannot bear it. They can't bear it to
Speaker 1: the point where they're considering any and all options to
Speaker 1: stop it from happening. Given that they already tried the
Speaker 1: soft coup of the Russia collusion lie and the deep
Speaker 1: state against Trump, given that they've tried to convinced some
Speaker 1: stealth Democrats to leave behind in the administration or in
Speaker 1: the executive branch, to use the twenty fifth Amendment to
Speaker 1: remove Trump from office, all these that they tried this
Speaker 1: preposterous impeachment of nothing that didn't go anywhere. Given all
Speaker 1: these things, what do you think the Democrats are not
Speaker 1: willing to do the next time around? When you ask
Speaker 1: yourself that question, you see the options are narrowing. With
Speaker 1: each passing week, they're narrowing. And that's also why they're
Speaker 1: trying to change the rules now. They will not accept
Speaker 1: Donald Trump winning four more years, just as they didn't
Speaker 1: accept Trump winning the first four years. That is what
Speaker 1: we're heading for now as a country. Understand that, understand
Speaker 1: where we are going. There is no future in which
Speaker 1: Donald Trump wins reelection and Democrats accepted, So we might
Speaker 1: as well embrace this fight. Now you're in the freedom mind.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Call me a
Speaker 1: cynic Joe if you will. But one thing I think
Speaker 1: we all learned in the year two thousand is the
Speaker 1: Republicans are pretty good at fixing the way we count
Speaker 1: ballots in this country. And now with this whole furer
Speaker 1: over mail in votes, we could be sitting down for
Speaker 1: Thanksgiving dinner not really knowing specifically who the president elect
Speaker 1: of the United States is. Now we all have to
Speaker 1: pray that there's going to be a landslife for Joe
Speaker 1: Biden in order to avoid this conflict. Notice how they're
Speaker 1: already assuming that the problem is going to be with
Speaker 1: Trump not accepting the results of the election, and then
Speaker 1: they immediately will slip to But yeah, I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: we're not going to be able to accept it if
Speaker 1: Trump wins. Right, they go back and forth. They haven't
Speaker 1: covered from all sides of course, mail in ballots. We've
Speaker 1: run an experiment here in New York for a congressional
Speaker 1: race with mail in ballots, and it is being described
Speaker 1: even in the New York Times. This is a Democrat
Speaker 1: primary as botched. Why the botched New York City primary
Speaker 1: has become the November nightmare, that's the name of the
Speaker 1: piece here. Nearly six weeks later, two congressional races remain undecided,
Speaker 1: and officials are trading blame over the mishandling of tens
Speaker 1: of thousands of mail in ballots. So you'll notice there's
Speaker 1: been a knee jerk, reflexive reactionary, Oh my gosh, Trump
Speaker 1: says mail in ballots are going to be a problem.
Speaker 1: So we can't we simply can't allow that to be
Speaker 1: the consensus opinion. We have to shoot down, shout down
Speaker 1: anything Trump says. But mail in ballots are going to
Speaker 1: be a problem. And you know, the best way that
Speaker 1: I can see to describe this was actually an off
Speaker 1: hand description from somebody who works for the Board of
Speaker 1: Elections here in New York, and it's a person familiar
Speaker 1: with the internal operations of the city's Board of Elections
Speaker 1: but not authorized to speak on the record. Said that
Speaker 1: having to increase the number of mail in ballots had
Speaker 1: caused enormous struggles at the agency. Imagine saying this is
Speaker 1: the quote from the person in the article. We don't
Speaker 1: know who this is, but it really illustrates it. Well.
Speaker 1: Imagine saying I'm having a dinner party for ten people
Speaker 1: and then saying, no, it's a hundred people. It's a
Speaker 1: very steep learning curve. You don't say, oh, but back,
Speaker 1: people have been doing absentee voting for years. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: a small percentage of overall votes. And absentee votes often
Speaker 1: don't even get counted before the election is determined. Right,
Speaker 1: They would only get counted if the election is so
Speaker 1: tight in certain states that you would need to see
Speaker 1: based on the outstanding ballots. What happened in New York?
Speaker 1: Why is it that six weeks? Six weeks? Can you
Speaker 1: imagine what the country would be going through? Can you
Speaker 1: imagine what we would be facing as a country if
Speaker 1: we went through a six week long Oh, let's fight
Speaker 1: it out over how to count these different Remember it's
Speaker 1: what you saw in Florida and the year two and
Speaker 1: ended in Bush v. Gore. The Supreme Court play that
Speaker 1: out across the entire country America. Every state has mail
Speaker 1: in ballots, Every state is going to be contested under
Speaker 1: all kinds of rules, and they'll they will argue over
Speaker 1: not just how the rules are enforced about ballots. Democrats
Speaker 1: left just because we know they always try to structure
Speaker 1: the system to favor and outcome, not a system that
Speaker 1: favors fairness. Democrats will contest the very rules themselves that
Speaker 1: they will then also contest based on outcome. Oh, they
Speaker 1: should not have been a requirement beforehand. Oh, this is
Speaker 1: on constitutional, this is discriminatory. Everything they will They're going
Speaker 1: kitchen sink, my friends, They're going to throw everything they
Speaker 1: have at this. What were the problems in the New
Speaker 1: York ellection. This includes Karl Maloney, who's been my congressman
Speaker 1: in New York City for a very long time. And
Speaker 1: it's a classic rich she's got a primary challenge, and
Speaker 1: you're you're going through how many votes need to be
Speaker 1: in question for there to be a problem, and looking
Speaker 1: at this congressional primary, well, when you start to see
Speaker 1: what the real difference is here, then all of a
Speaker 1: sudden you understand, Hold on a second, we are signing
Speaker 1: up for a disaster, an absolute disaster. If we allow
Speaker 1: this to go forward. You're talking about in the low
Speaker 1: thousands of votes that separate out these two these two candidates.
Speaker 1: New York City Board of Elections sent more than seven
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand ballots with prepaid return envelopes. Four
Speaker 1: hundred thousand were mailed back. And when you look at
Speaker 1: the difference in these races, you're talking about a few
Speaker 1: thousand votes right now, separate out who's ahead, who gets
Speaker 1: to be a member of Congress from who doesn't. And
Speaker 1: we're going to believe what that they're going to get
Speaker 1: it better. Oh, here we go, mister patell trails the
Speaker 1: incumbent Representative Karen Maloney by some thirty seven hundred votes.
Speaker 1: More than twelve thousand ballots have been disqualified, twelve hundred
Speaker 1: of them were missing postmarks. This is going to be
Speaker 1: This election is going to turn into a This is
Speaker 1: going to turn into a factional fight for control of
Speaker 1: the United States government if we let the Democrats have
Speaker 1: their way. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. One of the things that
Speaker 1: are happening and you're reading about every day is we
Speaker 1: have many vaccine candidates are in the final phase of
Speaker 1: clinical trials, and we expect to have a vaccine available
Speaker 1: very very early before the end of the year, far
Speaker 1: ahead of schedule. There's never been a schedule. The FDA
Speaker 1: has been great at my instruction, and they're doing it
Speaker 1: in literally a tiny fraction of the time. This could
Speaker 1: have taken years, and literally we're in months and we're
Speaker 1: very close to having that vitalized, and then we're using
Speaker 1: our military to distribute the vaccine all over Logistically, we've
Speaker 1: also cut mountains of red tape to speed the development
Speaker 1: of hundreds of new therapeutics and treatments, and that's coming
Speaker 1: along very well. Remedisseverere has already out, it's been very successful,
Speaker 1: and many other things are happening therapeutically, which is going
Speaker 1: to be, frankly, as far as I'm concerned, in many
Speaker 1: respects more important than the vaccine, because you can have
Speaker 1: people get a shot or have a transfusion and they
Speaker 1: leave the hospital to get better. Now, if you were trying,
Speaker 1: as being of wargaming, to create a circumstance where you
Speaker 1: could test whether Democrats love power more than the country.
Speaker 1: Whether the media is, in fact, in this country, the
Speaker 1: mainstream media, the corporate media, the enemy of the American people,
Speaker 1: if you were trying to construct the true test of that,
Speaker 1: even more so than in rooting against Americas in subtle
Speaker 1: or not so subtle ways during a time of war,
Speaker 1: saying oh no, we're just we're just about peace, man,
Speaker 1: we just want the war to end. You know, the
Speaker 1: things that you've seen the media do in the past.
Speaker 1: But if you're looking for the purest distillation of their
Speaker 1: lust for power at the expense of their fellow Americans,
Speaker 1: I think you may see that in the next ninety days,
Speaker 1: because here's what's going to happen. There will be an effort.
Speaker 1: There will be an effort underway to undermine the confidence
Speaker 1: and faith that the American people can have in Operation
Speaker 1: warp Speed, which is Trump's name for the all out
Speaker 1: get a vaccine program that the federal government's currently engaged in. Now,
Speaker 1: let me and let me put aside for a second
Speaker 1: any concerns that anybody has in general about vaccines. That's
Speaker 1: not that's not a debate I want to have today,
Speaker 1: and that's not what I'm talking about. I'm telling you
Speaker 1: that specifically here The New York Times, which I can
Speaker 1: assure you is all about vaccinations in all other circumstances,
Speaker 1: is going to be at least up until the election. Now,
Speaker 1: we probably won't have a vaccine, according to people in
Speaker 1: the White House I've been talking to, until very end
Speaker 1: of years, So that means likely December. It might be
Speaker 1: the greatest Christmas present we've ever gotten in our lifetime, right,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, you know, vaccines are out there,
Speaker 1: but you're also going to be told in the meantime, oh,
Speaker 1: we're not sure it will be there. We don't know
Speaker 1: if it's going to be that effective. Uh. You know,
Speaker 1: there's going to be so much politics at play in
Speaker 1: this whole conversation around a vaccine, because here's the narrative,
Speaker 1: the Democrats are desperate to destroy Trump dealt with a
Speaker 1: very difficult situation. But because of his ability to harness
Speaker 1: both public and private sector research, use the Defense Production Act,
Speaker 1: and use the Coronavirus Task Force led by Vice President
Speaker 1: Pence to the best possible effect, we would have a
Speaker 1: vaccine in what would be the shortest time period that
Speaker 1: anybody's ever even imagined for something like this, and we're
Speaker 1: going to get our lives back, and we're going to
Speaker 1: get back the America in terms of the economy, the dynamism,
Speaker 1: the economic growth, the wage growth, the super low unemployment.
Speaker 1: We're going to get all of that back once this
Speaker 1: vaccine gets distributed. They will do anything, anything to shut
Speaker 1: that narrative down. They just don't want that to be
Speaker 1: or perception, and that even includes I mean, I just
Speaker 1: did by way of an offhand search. Sometimes this is
Speaker 1: a very good way to measure perception and what's going
Speaker 1: on in the with the media. I just did coronavirus
Speaker 1: at New York Times or sorry, vaccine New York Times.
Speaker 1: Rather in new search. Here's what comes up. This is
Speaker 1: from today. A coronavirus vaccine is coming. Just don't call
Speaker 1: it warp speed. Scientists need to show us the data
Speaker 1: that's exactly what they're working on. Don't call it warp speed.
Speaker 1: Huh why not? Why is that? Why is that bad?
Speaker 1: Scientists worry about political influence over coronavirus vaccine project. It
Speaker 1: just keeps going. Russia sets mass vaccination for October after
Speaker 1: a shortened trial. We think, would you I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: ask you this, would you rather inject yourself with something
Speaker 1: the Russian government rushed through or the US government when
Speaker 1: quickly as it could on. Just remember that as the
Speaker 1: way New York Times Canada's key role in creating a
Speaker 1: once awaited vaccine. My friends, you're going to see so
Speaker 1: much of the following. Trump is not responsible for the
Speaker 1: vaccine progress. Don't hold your breath on a vaccine. It
Speaker 1: may not work that well. We may not be able
Speaker 1: to get doses to minorities and those most affected disproportionately,
Speaker 1: which is those that construct The media has for this,
Speaker 1: even though the virus affects everybody, may not be able
Speaker 1: to get it out there fast enough. It could have
Speaker 1: been faster if it weren't for Trump. You'll hear that
Speaker 1: they'll they'll find endless variations of negativity to infuse into
Speaker 1: all reporting on the vaccine up until the election day.
Speaker 1: Because think about this, what is the what is the
Speaker 1: lives saved estimate that we would have if Trump gets
Speaker 1: this vaccine done in let's say, by the end of
Speaker 1: the year. And look, I understand this. Presidents don't fight wars.
Speaker 1: Soldiers do. Presidents don't create a dynamic economy. Workers and
Speaker 1: entrepreneurs and people working in business do right. So presidents
Speaker 1: get more and less credit in a lot of ways
Speaker 1: than they should. But let's understand Trump has been held
Speaker 1: responsible by the media for every state failure against COVID,
Speaker 1: for the bad economy, all this stuff. Well, guess what.
Speaker 1: He also then needs to be given credit for spearheading
Speaker 1: a mass vaccination program that may well be setting an
Speaker 1: unprecedented record here for effectiveness and speed, right, and he
Speaker 1: should get credit for that too. They want to make
Speaker 1: sure that doesn't happen. They want him to get all
Speaker 1: of the downside, including things he had nothing to do
Speaker 1: with him that were completely out of his control, from
Speaker 1: the fight against COVID, and none the upside from success.
Speaker 1: Because here's here's the choice they really don't want people
Speaker 1: to be faced with because I think we a lot
Speaker 1: of us now this would go okay if it turns
Speaker 1: out Trump can handle the pandemic and we do have
Speaker 1: a vaccine and we are seeing finally our way out
Speaker 1: of the woods, so to speak. You want a Trump
Speaker 1: economic recovery or a Biden economic recovery. Mean Biden is
Speaker 1: the proverbial sack of potatoes that Democrats are saying they
Speaker 1: would vote for Rover Trump. Here I'm cor barbernar Rut there,
Speaker 1: Malayja got the sun on them, and I know what's
Speaker 1: going on. You know, I'm just gonna yearn sir and
Speaker 1: the caramera and I've been doing this for like one
Speaker 1: hundred and eighty years, and I'm kind of just gonna
Speaker 1: be that guy. That's who they want you to vote for,
Speaker 1: that's who they think is the dynamic leadership figure that
Speaker 1: should be in charge. Then I'd says, we're supposed to
Speaker 1: find out this week as vice president will be. We
Speaker 1: will have to see. I feel like they're going to
Speaker 1: keep delaying that better to give the media a talking
Speaker 1: point for another week or two, to get in as
Speaker 1: many and as diverse an array of name as possible
Speaker 1: so that we're not talking about Biden because the vice
Speaker 1: president thing, that's going to be exciting to everybody in
Speaker 1: the media for like a couple of weeks and then
Speaker 1: they'll probably move on to something else. But the Democrats
Speaker 1: are going to be willing to say all kinds of
Speaker 1: things between now in the election about vaccines that they
Speaker 1: would never normally say, and it will change behaviors, it
Speaker 1: will affect policy. It is reckless what they will do.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you that right now, it's not just about
Speaker 1: preventing Trump from getting the credit. They're going to want
Speaker 1: to keep people more afraid, more in despair. Remember we
Speaker 1: have had so many drug overdoses and suicides, depths of despair.
Speaker 1: I mean the impact on public health right now. You know,
Speaker 1: we Americans in particular have a very high at very
Speaker 1: indulgent food culture. And I'm speaking, yes, you know, from
Speaker 1: a guilty conscience on this one, but we also tend
Speaker 1: to have a high output and like to be very
Speaker 1: you know, aggressive about strength and working out and aerobic exercise.
Speaker 1: That has been wiped away from millions and millions of US.
Speaker 1: I know it sounds a little superficial, but it's not.
Speaker 1: The impact on public health from that is massive, massive,
Speaker 1: and they're not calculating any of that. They don't care
Speaker 1: about any of that. They'll continue the lockdowns and they'll
Speaker 1: be doubters of the vaccine until Joe Biden gets elected.
Speaker 1: And then I can assure you, if Biden wins in
Speaker 1: late November, there'll be all these news stories or made
Speaker 1: to late November, all these news stories of ah because
Speaker 1: of some Biden decisions. Now, there'll be more vaccine than
Speaker 1: anybody anticipated, Oh it turns out the vaccine is really safe. Oh,
Speaker 1: look at that, We actual actually have a cure for coronavirus.
Speaker 1: But they're not going to say it until after the election,
Speaker 1: because everybody knows that their single biggest asset right now
Speaker 1: in their pursuit of political power is the misery and
Speaker 1: the anxiety of the American people. And that's why they
Speaker 1: need to make sure that the story continues that Trump
Speaker 1: has done the worst job of anyone. Joe Scarborough, fake Republican,
Speaker 1: actual Democrat, play Cliff too, so you can go through
Speaker 1: that laundry list. It's people aren't making a decision based
Speaker 1: on his personality. They're making a decision based on just
Speaker 1: calamitous policies that have put the United States and the
Speaker 1: worst position of any country on the planet. I mean,
Speaker 1: we should not be where we are right now, the
Speaker 1: worst position of any country on the planet. That's just
Speaker 1: not true. The only real way to measure this would
Speaker 1: be in per per capita, per capita deaths from COVID.
Speaker 1: And when you do that, when you actually adjust for population,
Speaker 1: guess what, you know, we are in a much better position,
Speaker 1: have been in a much better position than a whole
Speaker 1: lot of countries also, because Democrats were apoplectic screaming about
Speaker 1: how when you do test and test and test more,
Speaker 1: all this testing need, right, we have all this need
Speaker 1: for testing. Now we know more about the infected population.
Speaker 1: I think a lot of other countries, the infection, especially
Speaker 1: among younger among the younger cohorts just ripped through them
Speaker 1: and people cleared it and now they're okay, And that's
Speaker 1: what happened. We are heading toward her immunity in America.
Speaker 1: I know you're not supposed to say that, Oh, that's
Speaker 1: like the most evil and vicious thing I managed, but
Speaker 1: we are heading toward her immunity. Despite the best efforts
Speaker 1: of the United States, Government of the States, of the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party and a lot of Republicans to pretend that
Speaker 1: we could stop the spread of this virus. It's simply
Speaker 1: not true. We're heading to herd immunity. But we're doing
Speaker 1: so with the maximum amount of pain, suffering, stupidity, and
Speaker 1: economic devastation possible. We have made this whole thing so
Speaker 1: much worse. And it was going to be bad, but
Speaker 1: we have made it so much worse. The failure to
Speaker 1: protect senior citizens. I mean, when you look at the
Speaker 1: average age of those deceased from this, the median age
Speaker 1: of those diseased, it's increasingly clear it's over eighty. It's
Speaker 1: people who are at risk from any and all health
Speaker 1: health challenges that could be lethal, right, whether it's the
Speaker 1: flu or heart disease or anything else. And instead of
Speaker 1: an all out focus to protect those communities, you know,
Speaker 1: to give our seniors who are eighty eighty five another
Speaker 1: good fifteen years of life if possible, right, instead of
Speaker 1: that folk or more than fifteen. But you know, instead
Speaker 1: of that focus, we have a focus that was on
Speaker 1: everyone lock them down and just smash their face into
Speaker 1: the nonsense of universal masking outdoors always all the time,
Speaker 1: endless lockdown, not opening schools. It's a disaster, but it's
Speaker 1: a disaster that a lot of people have been egging
Speaker 1: on because you know what the ultimate truth of this
Speaker 1: situation is to your average Democrat, and they should, really
Speaker 1: they should do a poll on this question. But to
Speaker 1: your average Democrat, if asked whether Donald Trump or COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen is the bigger disaster to hit America, I bet
Speaker 1: you a vast majority would say it is Donald Trump
Speaker 1: who is the true pandemic. They are insane. You're in
Speaker 1: the Freedom hud. This is the Buck Sex and Show post. Well,
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders just acknowledged the reality. I mean, Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: campaign really is a trojan horse for the far left
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party. Bernie Sanders and Alexandrocasio Cortez wrote
Speaker 1: his criminal justice platform, which is going to let violent
Speaker 1: felons out of prison, which is going to eliminate the
Speaker 1: use of bail, so violent felons are going to get
Speaker 1: out of prison or going to get out of jail
Speaker 1: while they're pending their trial for violent crimes. But it's
Speaker 1: not just that. I mean, look at what Joe Biden
Speaker 1: himself said on the campaign trail that Data O'Rourke is
Speaker 1: going to run his gun control policy, which is going
Speaker 1: to be gun confiscation. They're going to give amnesty to
Speaker 1: millions and millions of illegal immigrants so they can take
Speaker 1: your jobs and also get their healthcare funded by you.
Speaker 1: At the same time, they're going to take away your
Speaker 1: health insurance on the job. They're also going to take
Speaker 1: radical steps like turning Washington, DC into a state or
Speaker 1: packing the Supreme Court to rubber step their left wing agenda.
Speaker 1: I understand now in more detail than ever before, that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is actually the perfect candidate for the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party right now. He's perfect for them. Let me explain why,
Speaker 1: because he's been in politics so long and he's an
Speaker 1: entirely unremarkable white male senator from Delaware. Right people that
Speaker 1: don't pay that much attention to politics, perhaps some of
Speaker 1: the swing voters will not really know about the leftism
Speaker 1: which Senator Cotton. Their points out that Joe Biden will
Speaker 1: infuse all across America, the socialism that will really be
Speaker 1: a driving characteristic of a Joe Biden presidency. But also
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has no political legacy to protect. He in
Speaker 1: his sense, becomes the man brought in to shake everything up,
Speaker 1: to destroy, to do whatever is necessary, whatever the left
Speaker 1: wants him to do, and they will revere him for
Speaker 1: all time afterwards for it. But he has no There's
Speaker 1: no Biden, there's no Biden's son who's going to to
Speaker 1: run for president. There's no Biden name that's going to
Speaker 1: echo through the ages as someone that is going to
Speaker 1: be elected just based upon that. No Biden will do
Speaker 1: his part for the left. He'll be well compensated, which
Speaker 1: is very important to him and his family and heirs
Speaker 1: and do whatever whatever they want him to do, without
Speaker 1: any regard for what the future looks like. Right in
Speaker 1: a sense, he's brought in as as the guy who
Speaker 1: doesn't care what comes politically ten years down the line.
Speaker 1: This is his shot to be president. The left knows it,
Speaker 1: and so he's being offered up and he'll do whatever
Speaker 1: they He'll do whatever they want him to do, and
Speaker 1: the most disastrous of their policies Biden's not smart enough
Speaker 1: to figure this out, will be left at his feet.
Speaker 1: But things like amnesty, once they get that through, my friend,
Speaker 1: there's no undoing it. So Biden then just becomes the
Speaker 1: perfect weapon of the socialist left. That's what's happening. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the Buss and Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio, Apple or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Biden supports raising your taxes. They want
Speaker 1: to raise your taxes three, four or even five times.
Speaker 1: And on businesses, they want to put all your businesses,
Speaker 1: which is basically from a lot of standpoint, your jobs
Speaker 1: out of business. He wants to pack the court with
Speaker 1: radical far left judges. Indoctrinate your children with what they're
Speaker 1: teaching in schools, which we're ending and we've ended. And
Speaker 1: they want to have open borders, sanctuary cities, but open borders.
Speaker 1: They want to rip down your wall. Think of this.
Speaker 1: Wants to rip down your wall. We're spending billions of
Speaker 1: dollars building one of the most incredible structures you've ever seen.
Speaker 1: It's one of the largest developments ever in the history
Speaker 1: of this country. Think of that. The wall, it's you know,
Speaker 1: hundreds of miles long, over five hundred miles. They want
Speaker 1: to daniel wall. It's what kept a lot of very,
Speaker 1: very sick people out of our country, and now it's
Speaker 1: keeping bad people out of our country, people that we
Speaker 1: don't want. The Trump said, there, what could you point
Speaker 1: you and say, it's not true about Joe Biden, higher taxes,
Speaker 1: sanctuary cities, abolished borders, and doctorate your children. I mean,
Speaker 1: they would quibble with the terminology, but all of that's true.
Speaker 1: That is what Joe Biden would do. That is what
Speaker 1: Joe Biden wants, That's what the Democratic Party wants. All true.
Speaker 1: So why is it that that's not really reflected in
Speaker 1: perception in so many of the states that are going
Speaker 1: to be in play for this election well, because as
Speaker 1: you know, there's going to be different messages for different groups.
Speaker 1: And oh gosh, Governor witt Marop in Michigan, when she's
Speaker 1: not being a tyrant, oh yeah, she's making sure that
Speaker 1: Michiganders know that Joe Biden's on their side. Play fifteen.
Speaker 1: I think Joe Biden's message resonates with Michiganders. Were hard working,
Speaker 1: good people who want competent governance that looks out for
Speaker 1: us and keeps us safe. And Joe Biden offers the
Speaker 1: kind of steady, ethical leadership that we're craving right now.
Speaker 1: And number two, the fact that they've announced that they're
Speaker 1: taking ads off makes me very suspicious. You know, I've
Speaker 1: seen poles that have them up double diges. I've seen
Speaker 1: poles that have it in single diges. The fact of
Speaker 1: the matter is just by them announcing that, we know
Speaker 1: that the divorce group here in Michigan is going to
Speaker 1: backfill that to some extent. And so this is still
Speaker 1: going to be a competitive race. It is going to
Speaker 1: tighten up, and no one should be taking Michigan for granted.
Speaker 1: That's what's going to happen. Democrats who are in the
Speaker 1: more purple and in play states are going to be
Speaker 1: taking a message to their people of just platitudes and bs.
Speaker 1: Oh gosh, Joe Biden. Yeah, he just wants good governance
Speaker 1: and looking out for you. And Joe Biden's a moron,
Speaker 1: really not a smart guy. No one thinks he's a
Speaker 1: smart guy. No one thinks he's good at anything really
Speaker 1: other than running for Senate in a state that and
Speaker 1: no offense at Delaware. You know, once you kind of
Speaker 1: get in trench there, I mean, you're kind of the
Speaker 1: senator from Delaware, and I'd be a whole lot of challenges.
Speaker 1: So you know, the guy really is about as you know, politically,
Speaker 1: is as impressive as being like the mayor of Buffalo,
Speaker 1: but he does sit in the United States, or mayor
Speaker 1: of any kind of mid mid tier city. But nonetheless,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is the offering of the Democrat Party in
Speaker 1: this year. This is what they're telling us we need
Speaker 1: to be doing. I think it's completely absurd. And he's
Speaker 1: also at the forefront of a party that right now
Speaker 1: wants to defund police. They haven't given up on this,
Speaker 1: they're still acting like this isn't the most insane policy
Speaker 1: decision of recent memory. I mean, you know, it's one
Speaker 1: you could argue about the virus stuff and COVID the lockdowns.
Speaker 1: There are arguments to be had on different side to
Speaker 1: that issue. I think that unfortunately hysteria has won out
Speaker 1: over reason and adult thinking. But you can at least
Speaker 1: there are different sides to these issues. When it comes
Speaker 1: to defunding the cops, there's no intelligent argument for yeah,
Speaker 1: let's just let's just in places where they're having more
Speaker 1: violent crime and where they can't get violent crime under control,
Speaker 1: let's give police less resources and less political support to
Speaker 1: do their jobs. There's no serious argument for that, and
Speaker 1: Trump points this out play a team. Biden's record can
Speaker 1: be summed up as four decades of betrayal, calamity, failure.
Speaker 1: Biden signed a joint manifesto with Bernie Sanders. He has
Speaker 1: an agreement with Bernie Sanders, which means Biden is now
Speaker 1: running as the most extreme left candidate in history. This manifesto,
Speaker 1: as I call it, this is far left of where
Speaker 1: Bernie was. So it was supposed to be going to
Speaker 1: the right, and it's far left. When asked whether he
Speaker 1: would defend and defund our police, Biden said, we're going
Speaker 1: to fund him. He wants to defund. He's going to
Speaker 1: defund the police. He's going to cut it way down,
Speaker 1: cut it way back, just like in New York they've
Speaker 1: already cut it by a billion dollars in Crime is
Speaker 1: soaring in New York. Crime is soaring. In Chicago, they're
Speaker 1: cutting back on their police. We are doing just the opposite.
Speaker 1: Yes that I was in Florida and I got the
Speaker 1: entire law enforcement group, including all the sheriffs in Florida.
Speaker 1: They endorsed Donald Trump for president, very strong endorsement. Biden
Speaker 1: will take away your guns. He'll take away your second Amendment.
Speaker 1: Biden will band fracking, killing over six hundred thousand Pennsylvania jobs.
Speaker 1: And Biden will side with the anarchists and the agitators,
Speaker 1: the mob that you've been watching in Portland and Seattle.
Speaker 1: They want all cities to be like that. This is
Speaker 1: according to the Wall Street Journal. Homicides are rising at
Speaker 1: a double digit rate this year is compared to last
Speaker 1: year in thirty six of America's top fifty cities. Almost
Speaker 1: four out of five cities, folks substantial increase in crime.
Speaker 1: They kind of increase in homicides than in any given
Speaker 1: year would give that mayor that police commissioner concern over
Speaker 1: whether they would keep their job when the next decision
Speaker 1: is made the next time. Around thirty six out of
Speaker 1: fifty cities we're ty believe. And this is with a
Speaker 1: lockdown in place for months, far fewer people on the streets,
Speaker 1: far fewer incidental contacts between individuals that could lead to
Speaker 1: a violent exchange, far fewer targets for criminals to go after,
Speaker 1: and yet we're seeing big spikes in murder. This is
Speaker 1: because of the far left narrative of BLM and the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party. They have made everything worse for everyone. As
Speaker 1: I have been telling you, this is what has happened.
Speaker 1: It's not surprising. In fact, no one is surprised who
Speaker 1: is intelligent and serious that the narrative of BLM from
Speaker 1: the Democrats was in any way anything other than a disaster. Right.
Speaker 1: There was no oh, we're gonna have police reform, greater transparency,
Speaker 1: greater transparency for police violence is not going to stop
Speaker 1: dozens of people from getting shot on a bad weekend
Speaker 1: in Chicago. It's not gonna do anything for that. We
Speaker 1: all know that. But the far left is getting their
Speaker 1: way here. There is a sense of I think snapback
Speaker 1: as well. There's there's blowback from the Trump presidency and
Speaker 1: that the left is both enraged and descendant at this
Speaker 1: point in time. And while as I said, Governor Whitmer,
Speaker 1: oh gosh, yeah, you're gonna have all these all these
Speaker 1: like real down home Democrats who just oh gosh, I
Speaker 1: want everyone to be fine, and I just want Oh,
Speaker 1: Biden just wants to make sure you and your kids
Speaker 1: are safe. Oh sure, they're gonna be telling you all
Speaker 1: that crap. That's what they're gonna say in Michigan, in Ohio,
Speaker 1: in Florida. You know, their Democrats surguates are gonna go
Speaker 1: out with that message. But to the base, it's gonna
Speaker 1: be very different. To the base, they're going to be
Speaker 1: speaking the truth about how this is going to be
Speaker 1: the most left wing presidency in history. It's gonna be
Speaker 1: like Bernie without the burn Black Cliff three. We're gonna
Speaker 1: fight out our differences fter Biden is elected, But right now,
Speaker 1: the immediate task is to come together to defeat Trump,
Speaker 1: and then as progressives, we're going to do everything that
Speaker 1: we can to make the Biden administration the most progressive
Speaker 1: administration that it can become. But right now, my message
Speaker 1: to how it support is, hey, not only you get
Speaker 1: out to vote, vote early, but get your friends, your
Speaker 1: co workers, your co students out to vote as well.
Speaker 1: You see, Bernie Sanders greatest vulnerability in running for president,
Speaker 1: his greatest political vulnerability was the honesty of his positions.
Speaker 1: He is not really that different at all from the
Speaker 1: mainstream Democrat Party. In fact, he has clearly brought the
Speaker 1: mainstream Democrat Party closer to him than the other way around.
Speaker 1: Look at look at healthcare, look at you, look at education,
Speaker 1: look at college student loans. All these things, the areas
Speaker 1: now of shift in the Democrat Party have all been
Speaker 1: toward the left. That there is not some rise of
Speaker 1: centrism and technocratic realism in the Democrat Party at all.
Speaker 1: That does not exist at all. What do you have
Speaker 1: Bernie Thunders style policies? And that's why I think Scarborough,
Speaker 1: I mean, that's why I think Sanders here is speaking
Speaker 1: to the base in a in a way that they know,
Speaker 1: they know that all they have to do is show up. Yeah,
Speaker 1: maybe they don't like bid, no one's enthusiastic about them.
Speaker 1: They show up, they vote for this guy, and they'll
Speaker 1: get Sanders policies from a super old white dude like
Speaker 1: Sanders in that regard, who is going to put a
Speaker 1: female minority on the vice president ticket and is gonna
Speaker 1: then catapult that VP to run in four years. And
Speaker 1: let's also be very clear, why why would Joe Biden
Speaker 1: not a year or two into his presidency for personal
Speaker 1: or health reasons, say I'm going to step aside and
Speaker 1: let my vice president take over. Now he then becomes
Speaker 1: they're they're absolute hero, right. He can do whatever policies
Speaker 1: the left wants. He can step aside, hand over the reins,
Speaker 1: and he will have saved and the Democrats, I saved
Speaker 1: them from four more years of Trumpism. That that to
Speaker 1: him and he gets to just, you know, ride off
Speaker 1: into the sunset and they're all going to talk about
Speaker 1: how wonderful he is and how he saved the Republic.
Speaker 1: And it's a and doesn't have to do anything really,
Speaker 1: He's just to show up. In a sense, it's like
Speaker 1: Biden as VP for Obama. They don't have the guys.
Speaker 1: A moron. He just has a show up but be
Speaker 1: Obama's VP. But now he gets to be the presidential
Speaker 1: contender just because he was there He's the I just
Speaker 1: show up guy, and somehow, like magic, it keeps working
Speaker 1: for him. Just show up, be wrong, be corrupt, be dumb,
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. Show up, and he will. He will have
Speaker 1: the most, you know, the most incredible opportunity to become
Speaker 1: a beloved, truly beloved Democrat figure. Now again, I said
Speaker 1: they're gonna make him maybe do a lot of crazy
Speaker 1: policy stuff. We'll see. He might do that. He also
Speaker 1: might just move aside and let the left wing VP
Speaker 1: that he picks do all of that, and he will
Speaker 1: have just been the transition piece. Either way, he wins
Speaker 1: minimum effort, maximum positive outcome for Joe Biden. Can't we
Speaker 1: all see how this is shaking out? It makes sense,
Speaker 1: It makes sense easier if you're a far left Democrat.
Speaker 1: Increasingly that's just a Democrat. But if you're somebody on
Speaker 1: the far left the Democrat party, it is a more
Speaker 1: easy rationalization to come out and say vote for Joe
Speaker 1: Biden right in this context than it was for Hillary.
Speaker 1: What Hill could even really do? Her voice there? Right
Speaker 1: there we go with Hillary. You were voting for her
Speaker 1: to be president for eight years and you were going
Speaker 1: to have to deal with her. Hear her speeches protect
Speaker 1: you know, defend her and protect her reputation despite her unlikability,
Speaker 1: her rampant self dealing and greed and corruption. Democrats were
Speaker 1: going to have to deal with all that with Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Vote for Biden, but you're going to get the first
Speaker 1: female minority president out of the bargain. And and you're
Speaker 1: going to fool enough people in those flyover states Michigan, Wisconsin,
Speaker 1: Ohio that you're gonna have Biden and then give them
Speaker 1: a left wing policy agenda. It's perfect, it's perfect if
Speaker 1: you're a left winger. This is this is really, in
Speaker 1: a lot of ways, the best possible situation for you.
Speaker 1: You'll get the policies and the legacy you want by
Speaker 1: pretending that you're offering up a moderate establishment Democrat who
Speaker 1: wants to unite the country, who is just a facade,
Speaker 1: it's just a trojan horse. As many have been saying,
Speaker 1: you're in the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. But the six hundred dollars is essential,
Speaker 1: But it's essential for America's working families. And again, to condescend,
Speaker 1: to disrespect their motivation is so amazing, how how insistent
Speaker 1: the Republicans are about a working family and their six
Speaker 1: hundred dollars, and how cavalier they are about other money
Speaker 1: that is going out. Why not a thousand dollars a week, Nancy?
Speaker 1: I mean, come on, why be so cavalier with people's
Speaker 1: troubles and there and their problems in their future? Why
Speaker 1: not a thousand dollars a week in COVID relief for
Speaker 1: everybody who's home. Does anyone want to try to answer that?
Speaker 1: I mean, under Democrat logic, the more money the federal
Speaker 1: government gives to people who are staying home, the more
Speaker 1: it cares about them, the more considerate an understanding and
Speaker 1: decent they are. Forget about whether that disincentivizes people going
Speaker 1: back to work. You see, Democrats fundamentally seem to think
Speaker 1: that value and wealth are created through government policy. That
Speaker 1: if the government passed a law, if Nancy passed a
Speaker 1: law that said that everybody in America is worth a
Speaker 1: million dollars and just put a million dollars in a
Speaker 1: bank account for everybody, then we would all be millionaires.
Speaker 1: They never think about what that would actually mean to
Speaker 1: our monetary system, to the price of goods, to the economy,
Speaker 1: to the creation of actual wealth goods and services and
Speaker 1: the free transactions that those things enable and allow to
Speaker 1: create greater productivity and to make us all better off. Right,
Speaker 1: you go to the grocery store. The shelves are full
Speaker 1: of food, so many different kinds of you know, milk available,
Speaker 1: almond milk, you know, hazelnut milk, cow milk, gold milk,
Speaker 1: you didn't even know, I guess. Spend twenty minutes in
Speaker 1: the milk section. That's capitalism, right, That is an economy
Speaker 1: that has dynamism and people are rewarded for their work.
Speaker 1: If you just have the government determining on its own
Speaker 1: what things are, what things should be costing, and how
Speaker 1: much people should make, it all starts without price, without incentives,
Speaker 1: It all starts to collapse and fall apart. Now, I'm
Speaker 1: not saying the old econom milk collapse if we continue
Speaker 1: six hundred dollars a week of unemployment insurance. I'm just
Speaker 1: pointing out that it's a disingenuous position for Democrats to say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: we just need to extend six hundred again. Republicans are
Speaker 1: only fighting that because they're condescending and mean. Now, Republicans
Speaker 1: are saying, look, we want to get people money, but
Speaker 1: we do need people to start going back to work.
Speaker 1: Why should somebody be able to stay home and collect
Speaker 1: a paycheck when grocery store workers and truckers and others
Speaker 1: are out there engaged with their communities and providing a
Speaker 1: necessary service, you know, frontline workers, cops, firemen. Teachers not
Speaker 1: so much. A lot of teachers think that they should
Speaker 1: be able to stay home and get paid fully. You know,
Speaker 1: it's pretty amazing as you see this play out, I
Speaker 1: just don't know what it's going to take. They're also
Speaker 1: shutting down private schools now increasingly because they don't want
Speaker 1: This is classic cartel activity. The public school sector doesn't
Speaker 1: want them to be an alternative. Imagine what it looks
Speaker 1: like if people have the dollars given to them by
Speaker 1: the federal government that their student would have been receiving
Speaker 1: per capita to go to public school and they start
Speaker 1: setting up private associations of education private schools and they
Speaker 1: don't have terrible COVID problems and kids are doing well
Speaker 1: in the schools. I mean, this could destroy the public
Speaker 1: school cartel, which is an enormous center of power for
Speaker 1: Democrats because of all the union dues that go to
Speaker 1: Democrat politicians. Forced union dues, and because these public schools
Speaker 1: are indoctrination centers for left wing politics and Democrat attitudes
Speaker 1: and views of history and so on and so forth.
Speaker 1: That's what happens. That's what's at stake right now with
Speaker 1: all of this. So I'm I'm sympathetic very much. So.
Speaker 1: I mean, I have friends who are out of work.
Speaker 1: I have friends who have lost their jobs, and I
Speaker 1: know that it's very tough right now. I want people
Speaker 1: have been getting six hundred dollars a week of unemployment insurance,
Speaker 1: which is which is helpful, certainly, and they add that
Speaker 1: to their state level of uninsurance, and you know, there's
Speaker 1: certainly there's certainly some assistance that comes from all of this.
Speaker 1: But are we going to transition back or not locking
Speaker 1: schools down for another year? Endless six six hundred dollars
Speaker 1: a week, unemployment insurance, all the stuff, folks. We can't
Speaker 1: keep doing this. The costs of all this, we're not
Speaker 1: going to feel them until we stop, and then we're
Speaker 1: going to realize what an economic catastrophe this is. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts,
Speaker 1: listen to the scientists. The Democrats all shout constantly as
Speaker 1: if that's an answer, as if that's a policy, as
Speaker 1: if that really tells us all that much. Trump has
Speaker 1: been listening to the scientists. I think in the case
Speaker 1: of the FOUCH, you know the mitigation, the measures you
Speaker 1: gotta take, you know the data. I think far too
Speaker 1: much listening to the scientists on policy matters. Policy is
Speaker 1: about what all of us have to live under and
Speaker 1: deal with. These health experts are largely technicians with knowledge
Speaker 1: in one area that can tell us factual truths about
Speaker 1: certain things and a lot of questions that they can answer.
Speaker 1: I would remind everybody they tell us factual truths about
Speaker 1: certain things, and then what we do with that is policy.
Speaker 1: What the government puts in place, or mandates or decides
Speaker 1: as a result of that information's policy. We've had the
Speaker 1: bleed over of the experts as the policy deciders, and
Speaker 1: then the complaints about how we're not listening to them enough,
Speaker 1: which is crazy, but we know that there's there's an
Speaker 1: actually not a principle that's at work here. Doctor Deborah
Speaker 1: Burks slammed The New York Times because the Times is
Speaker 1: now on a on a gihad against the Trump administration
Speaker 1: relationship with top doctors Faucci, Redfield, and Burks. We all
Speaker 1: know Fauci, right, We've got Redfield, he's at the he's
Speaker 1: a CDC director, and he said, guys, we got to
Speaker 1: send people back to school. This is We've got to
Speaker 1: send kids back to school. This is nuts. So there
Speaker 1: there are going to go after him now too. Listen
Speaker 1: to the scientists until the scientists say anything of The
Speaker 1: Times doesn't like, and then that doesn't that doesn't count anymore.
Speaker 1: And then you also have the attack on the relationship
Speaker 1: between Trump and doctor Burkes. And Trump has even responded
Speaker 1: to this this morning in a tweet. It got his attention.
Speaker 1: And this is just remember we got a pandemic and
Speaker 1: they're still playing stupid games. So the Times is writing
Speaker 1: this stuff. Crazy Pelosi, as Trump calls her, said horrible
Speaker 1: things about doctor Deborah Burkes, going after her because she
Speaker 1: was too positive on the very good job we're doing
Speaker 1: on combating the China virus, including vaccines therapeutics in order
Speaker 1: to counter Nancy. Deborah took debate and hit us pathetic.
Speaker 1: So Trump is upset with doctor Burkes about this Pelosi's
Speaker 1: talking some smack. Here, here's what doctor Burke says, Play twelve.
Speaker 1: The House Speaker on another network just said that she
Speaker 1: does not have confidence in either the President or you,
Speaker 1: Doctor Burkes, do you want to respond? I have tremendous
Speaker 1: respect for the speaker, and I have tender this respect
Speaker 1: for her long dedication to the American people. And I
Speaker 1: think it was unfortunate that New York Times wrote this
Speaker 1: article without speaking to me. I could have brought forth
Speaker 1: the data. I provide data every single day with an analysis.
Speaker 1: The day that they're talking about that, I was quote pollyanish.
Speaker 1: It said there was improvement in the New York metro,
Speaker 1: but ongoing cases in Boston, in Chicago, a new outbreak
Speaker 1: in Houston in full log rhythmic spread. And knew it
Speaker 1: concerning operates in Baltimore, New Haven, and Washington, DC. This
Speaker 1: was not a Pollyannish view. I have never been called
Speaker 1: pollyanish or non scientific or non data driven. And I
Speaker 1: will stake my forty year career on those fundamental principles
Speaker 1: of utilizing data to really implement better programs to save
Speaker 1: more lives. In programs to save lives, Doctor Burkes's like
Speaker 1: I know what I'm doing here. I've done a good job.
Speaker 1: Back off, I thought we're supposed to listen to scientists
Speaker 1: until we're undermining them for political reasons. Right, we see,
Speaker 1: we see the games that the Libs play. I understand
Speaker 1: what they're up to. None of this is surprising to
Speaker 1: me in the least. But I do think I think
Speaker 1: it's important that we all understand. We all see very
Speaker 1: clearly that they're not being honest when they say listen
Speaker 1: to scientists. Here, here's Netta saying it herself. Blake Clip
Speaker 1: seven Political reported that in a closed meeting on Friday,
Speaker 1: you accuse doctor Deborah Burkes of the Coronavirus Task Force
Speaker 1: of spreading disinformation about the pandemic. Is that true? And
Speaker 1: do you have confidence in her? I think the president
Speaker 1: is spending spreading disinformation about the virus, and she is.
Speaker 1: She is his appointee. So I don't have confidence of there. No,
Speaker 1: does not have confidence. Wait. I thought we're supposed to
Speaker 1: listen to the scientists. Oh except for this scientist because
Speaker 1: she's not negative enough. You see, they're they're lying, folks.
Speaker 1: They just pick and choose as they go through. They
Speaker 1: are lying to you. This is not about science or scientists.
Speaker 1: This is about who gets to make determinations about America's
Speaker 1: future and tells you and can tell you what to do.
Speaker 1: Who gets power. The great disease of the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: is it's obsession with being in charge of other people
Speaker 1: in every way constantly. It's just a it's a psychology
Speaker 1: of harassment, of obsession with the petty, dictatorial delights. People
Speaker 1: like Cuomo are showing us this every day. There's so
Speaker 1: much more of it. I you know, over the weekend,
Speaker 1: I went to play. I played tennis, which I like
Speaker 1: to do. I played in Central Park. You're in New York.
Speaker 1: I would probably the most famous park in New York,
Speaker 1: one of those famous parks in the world. They've got
Speaker 1: some tennis sports there and it was remarkable to me.
Speaker 1: I mean, they're people, We're all standing outdoors, we're all
Speaker 1: about to go play tennis, and everyone has a mask
Speaker 1: on and we're outside and I mean, I'm wearing a mask.
Speaker 1: It's required to wear a mask. And then because of
Speaker 1: the way they set this up, everyone has to congregate
Speaker 1: right before they all walk out of the courts in
Speaker 1: one tiny area. And I'm thinking to myself, what's more
Speaker 1: important here to stay far away from the possible, unlikely,
Speaker 1: but possible virus breath into the air that people are
Speaker 1: doing right where they're they're shooting these aerosolized viruses out
Speaker 1: of their mouths in the air, or to be wearing
Speaker 1: this cloth from which people are still breathing through and
Speaker 1: breathing out viral particles because they make an assault. They
Speaker 1: packed us all in like sardines before we walk onto
Speaker 1: the court. You're all close together waiting there. You got
Speaker 1: to wait there, all close together. And then you get
Speaker 1: to why am I wearing a mask? If they're gonna
Speaker 1: make me do this the policies, it doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1: I got into an uber here in New York to
Speaker 1: go to the court, and I see the guy. He's
Speaker 1: got it. He's got AC going, he's got his windows
Speaker 1: all up, and he sees me get into the car.
Speaker 1: You know what he does, pulls his mask up. Guess
Speaker 1: what that does? Absolutely nothing. This guy is in an
Speaker 1: enclosed environment, he has the windows up AC on. He
Speaker 1: if he has COVID, which I'm not worried about it.
Speaker 1: I don't think he doesn't. If he did, I'll deal
Speaker 1: with it right. But he's he's just filling this car,
Speaker 1: this enclosed area with COVID with his open mouth, breath
Speaker 1: the whole time. But I'd get into the car, he
Speaker 1: pulls up his mask. It's theater, friends, it's theater. You.
Speaker 1: There are countless ways in which we see that this
Speaker 1: is just it's absurd. This doesn't make any sense. It
Speaker 1: doesn't make any sense. Look, doctor Burke's recently said that
Speaker 1: given that the spreads ever brought folks, remember when I
Speaker 1: told I told you that contact tracing was a joke,
Speaker 1: And I was right, because the thing is all over
Speaker 1: the place. Not going to trace this. We had a requirement.
Speaker 1: We weren't going to even enter phase one in New
Speaker 1: York until we get enough tracers in place. Stupidity a joke.
Speaker 1: Oh we're going to trace this, Yeah, sure we are.
Speaker 1: It's now in rural areas all across the country, folks.
Speaker 1: This is spreading everywhere. It's spreading everywhere. But the death
Speaker 1: rate is much lower. As long as seniors are are
Speaker 1: sequestered as needed and protected in different areas of the country,
Speaker 1: we're going to have a pretty low death rate in
Speaker 1: this phase the pandemic. And then when we get through
Speaker 1: this phase, we're going to be closer to her immunity,
Speaker 1: if not be at a degree of herd immunity, so
Speaker 1: that we don't ever have these kinds of major outbreaks
Speaker 1: like this again. And if that's what ends up, if
Speaker 1: herd immunity ends up stopping the outbreak, all this stuff
Speaker 1: they've made you do, all the masking and all the
Speaker 1: all the hospitals and all this stuff. The fifteen days
Speaker 1: that's now heading for one hundred and fifty days, we're
Speaker 1: gonna be at one hundred fifty days in the next
Speaker 1: two weeks, fifteen days to one hundred and fifty days
Speaker 1: to stop the spread. And when we find out is
Speaker 1: that about one hundred and thirty five of those days
Speaker 1: we're totally unnecessary. All we have to do is basic precautions.
Speaker 1: Don't go to work if you're sick, wash your hands,
Speaker 1: keep your distance from people as you can, and go
Speaker 1: about living your life. What I have the same outcome.
Speaker 1: Here's a story that you're not going to see in
Speaker 1: CNN or in these mainstream And when I say not
Speaker 1: going to see, it might be on you know, the
Speaker 1: bottom of the website linked somewhere and get a total
Speaker 1: of five thousand clicks or something over the course of
Speaker 1: twenty four hours. Right, it might be a nothing burger
Speaker 1: story for them, but I think it's important because we
Speaker 1: are told that if you have any questions about about
Speaker 1: what about masking, you're a bad person who doesn't listen
Speaker 1: to science. The Netherlands is a very sophisticated, highly educated
Speaker 1: European country with a very high quality of life, excellent
Speaker 1: health services. And here I just I just tell you
Speaker 1: the Netherlands the Dutch, right, the Dutch people don't wear masks.
Speaker 1: They don't wear masks. The only place they wear masks
Speaker 1: is on public transport because there's no ability to socially
Speaker 1: distanced by the way. If that's if that were the
Speaker 1: requirement here, I'd be fine with that. Okay, mass transit,
Speaker 1: even if it's a little bit, a little bit helpful,
Speaker 1: maybe it's worth it there, Doctor Burke said recently, if
Speaker 1: you live with an elderly relative or somebody, maybe take
Speaker 1: that extra that extra layer of protection and put a
Speaker 1: mask on. But for mask the what we've been led
Speaker 1: to believe recently is that mass masking will stop this pandemic,
Speaker 1: and people who don't mask constantly are the reason for
Speaker 1: the pandemic. I want to pound this table as hard
Speaker 1: as I can. That is bull. The science does not
Speaker 1: support that, has never supported that. People are nuts. They've
Speaker 1: lost it over this. It's just not true. It's just
Speaker 1: not true. We've had mask wear I mean in California,
Speaker 1: in New York, everyone's bearing wearing masks all the time
Speaker 1: everywhere they go, and we've been on lockdown for months
Speaker 1: and months. Another disease is spread all over the country,
Speaker 1: all over the country. Here you go the head of
Speaker 1: infectious disease in swed Lumburg, which is the reason the
Speaker 1: region rather hit hardest by the pandemic. In Holland, the Netherlands,
Speaker 1: same thing. Pointed to a Norwegian study, again very sophisticated,
Speaker 1: very high level of healthcare and scientific scientific capability. A
Speaker 1: Norwegian study showing that two hundred thousand people must wear
Speaker 1: surgical masks for one week to stop a single COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen case. This is the deli mail that's starting to
Speaker 1: sound about right, Given how ineffective these masks are. What
Speaker 1: you're telling everybody is we're gonna have a million people
Speaker 1: that are going to wear masks to stop five ten
Speaker 1: COVID cases from happening. Of those five or ten COVID cases.
Speaker 1: What are the chances that it's somebody who's going to
Speaker 1: be deathly ill? Very very small. So the disease is
Speaker 1: still spreading everywhere despite the mask wearing, and no one's
Speaker 1: even allowed to talk about it. In the Netherlands, they
Speaker 1: do not They do not wear masks. Face masks in
Speaker 1: public places are not necessary based on all the current evidence,
Speaker 1: said Cohen Brens, spokesman for the National Institute for Public
Speaker 1: Health and the Environment in the Netherlands. Quote there is
Speaker 1: no benefit and there may even be negative impact. Is
Speaker 1: I just want to know. Is the National it's basically
Speaker 1: the equivalent of the National Health Service of the Netherlands.
Speaker 1: Are they a bunch of science denying lunatics. Is that
Speaker 1: what we're supposed to believe. No, they're talking about actual studies,
Speaker 1: study of whether masks work. You know what everybody else
Speaker 1: relies on. Wear a mask because we say so, because
Speaker 1: we think it'll help maybe, but we don't know, But
Speaker 1: wear it or else fear fear. If it was so effective,
Speaker 1: my friends, if it was really meaningfully effective, look at
Speaker 1: the way that these viruses spread. You know, they always
Speaker 1: talk about the R one number, and if you know,
Speaker 1: if each person infects two people, then you get to
Speaker 1: exponential spread. If the mask was even fifty percent effective,
Speaker 1: you'd be able to shut down the pandemic very quickly
Speaker 1: anywhere you want it. If the mask is ten percent effective,
Speaker 1: does it really make a difference. No, If ninety percent
Speaker 1: of the spread that you would have from an infective
Speaker 1: person happens even if they have a mask on, then
Speaker 1: what are we doing? What don't we really think the
Speaker 1: benefit is? And there are drawbacks to it. I was
Speaker 1: walking around yesterday's ninety degrees here in New York could
Speaker 1: barely breathe. It sucks, Okay, I hate it, and people
Speaker 1: that are walking around tho goal, just wear it through
Speaker 1: your part, No idiots, I'm outside, I'm not infected, and
Speaker 1: I'm not getting infected, and I'm not infecting anybody else.
Speaker 1: Stop living in a fantasy land of fear, you know.
Speaker 1: I just want to know why the Dutch, why the
Speaker 1: Dutch are able to go through life like this and
Speaker 1: they're they're fine, and they're they're not they have they've
Speaker 1: had a better health outcome than other European states with
Speaker 1: severe lockdowns and mask wearing, you know. And this was
Speaker 1: all in response to a major study. The nation's top
Speaker 1: scientists have examined key data and research and declared there
Speaker 1: is no firm evidence to back the use of face coverings. Indeed,
Speaker 1: they argue that wearing the wretched things may actually hamper
Speaker 1: the fight against the disease. So the Dutch, who are
Speaker 1: such anti science savages. The Dutch are like, guys, look
Speaker 1: at the data. It does not support mask wearing. It
Speaker 1: just does. Does anyone seem does anyone care? Does it
Speaker 1: even matter anymore? Or are people so invested in their
Speaker 1: belief about the magic of the mask that it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter what science tells us. You're in the freedom hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Oh and
Speaker 1: it's not just the mask wearing, it's also the other
Speaker 1: lockdown policies. This coming from the Blaze place that I
Speaker 1: remember working when it just had a handful of employees.
Speaker 1: I was there when nothing started. Exclusive Arizona bar owner
Speaker 1: charged with crime for violating COVID nineteen executive order says
Speaker 1: the business may not survive. Deborah Wall. This is a
Speaker 1: story from Aaron Colon. Deborah Wall owns a small neighborhood
Speaker 1: bar and apache junction Arizona called Lucky Strikes our business
Speaker 1: has been financially devastated by COVID nineteen lockdowns, and on
Speaker 1: the one day she opened up to offer takeout services
Speaker 1: in April, she was charged with a crime. As a result,
Speaker 1: Wall is facing thousands of dollars in fines from the
Speaker 1: misdemeter and from citations issued by the Arizona Department of Liquor.
Speaker 1: With her business barely surviving, she can't afford to pay,
Speaker 1: and she doesn't believe she did anything wrong, and so
Speaker 1: now they are she's facing the possibility of getting, you know,
Speaker 1: getting arrested over this. Now, now we're arresting seven year
Speaker 1: old ladies that have run their business for years and
Speaker 1: years and years because they didn't do things exactly as
Speaker 1: the state mandated, based on what is increasingly obviously capricious
Speaker 1: and arbitrary junk bullcrap scientific interpretation where it's really just
Speaker 1: fear and control, folks. I mean the guy, I want
Speaker 1: to know someone explained this to me, okay, because I'm
Speaker 1: trying to make sure everyone understands really what's at stake
Speaker 1: here and how how bad all this is as as
Speaker 1: far as I'm concerned, in America's new COVID tyranny, A
Speaker 1: governor could issue an executive order that you must eat
Speaker 1: vegan as a health emergency, whether it's from a heart disease,
Speaker 1: climate change, take your pick. And if you refuse to comply,
Speaker 1: that governor could imprison you. Sorry, but it's for your health,
Speaker 1: they'd say, as they clank the door on your metal cell.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. How are some of the worst
Speaker 1: hit states by COVID cases at least this summer doing
Speaker 1: right now? What does the policy look like? Are they
Speaker 1: finally on the other side of that oh so difficult curve.
Speaker 1: We've got Congressman Andy Biggs with us now from the
Speaker 1: great state of Arizona. Congressman, good to have you back.
Speaker 1: Gonna be with you, Buck. Let's start before we get
Speaker 1: into more general national level policy, how we get our
Speaker 1: lives back, how we end the tyranny, how we start
Speaker 1: living again as a country in freedom and in some
Speaker 1: degree of prosperity. Just let's focus on Aerrorzona, because you
Speaker 1: were getting a lot of attention for big spike in cases.
Speaker 1: How are you guys doing there? How's hospital capacity? What
Speaker 1: are the cases looking like? Are you on the other
Speaker 1: side of the curve? Tell us what you can. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think we are so one thing buck is As
Speaker 1: in so many places, the numbers don't tell the story.
Speaker 1: They were counting. Essentially almost three thousand beds is full.
Speaker 1: That we're basically surge beds which they never used and
Speaker 1: we never got there and so were The hospitalization rate
Speaker 1: is way down over the last six weeks, The case
Speaker 1: fatality rate is way down over the last six weeks.
Speaker 1: The percentage of beds that are going to COVID patients
Speaker 1: is down, and there's a lot of a lot of
Speaker 1: space in the hospitals, and you know what, it's time
Speaker 1: for this governor to really open this thing up. Where
Speaker 1: are you right now in terms of lockdown? I think
Speaker 1: people keep referring to a reopened. No major state that
Speaker 1: I know of has reopened. That's not really the way
Speaker 1: that people should be thinking about it. We're just in
Speaker 1: a less severe lockdown. Certainly the case in New York
Speaker 1: where they've changed where I'm doing this show right now,
Speaker 1: they keep changing what the opening status is, even from
Speaker 1: the metrics that they themselves sent. How are you doing
Speaker 1: in Arizona and what would you like to see happen
Speaker 1: over the next day thirty days. Well, the governor issued
Speaker 1: about a month ago lockdown on bars swimming in public
Speaker 1: swimming pools and water parks, you know, this type of thing.
Speaker 1: The reality is he could open that up and we're
Speaker 1: gonna be fine. We're gonna be fine. We have to
Speaker 1: trust people to be free, and that's what I would
Speaker 1: like to see. The other issue is he's basically put
Speaker 1: this weird thing on the schools where he says, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're gonna push back the opening of school, but then
Speaker 1: he's going to leave it up to the locals. And
Speaker 1: so this becomes a problem because you've got some districts
Speaker 1: where the unions are saying that they don't want to
Speaker 1: open no matter what, and then you've got parents who
Speaker 1: want to send their kids to school. The data is
Speaker 1: real clear on this, and we just need him to
Speaker 1: make a decision. That's really, in my opinion, forward thinking.
Speaker 1: Now we're speaking of Concresman any bigs of Arizona. There
Speaker 1: is a package, a relief package that's supposed to get
Speaker 1: done in the Congress, and we're hearing that there's a
Speaker 1: Gulf there's a wide separation right now between Democrats and Republicans.
Speaker 1: Can you tell us give us an update on the
Speaker 1: status of this when? When can people listening to this
Speaker 1: expect that there will be the additional COVID relief bill,
Speaker 1: which will include unemployment payments among other things. And what
Speaker 1: do you want to see included in this? I mean,
Speaker 1: we haven't really talked about this version of it yet
Speaker 1: this iteration on the show. So bring us up to speed, Congressman. Okay, So,
Speaker 1: first of all, Buck, you need to know that there's
Speaker 1: still something over a trillion dollars that has not been
Speaker 1: dispersed from the last building. And that's the last report
Speaker 1: I got late last week. And the chasm that you
Speaker 1: described is there. It's present. The Democrats want to continue
Speaker 1: the lockdowns, they want to continue to keep the economy closed.
Speaker 1: They want to continue to incentivize people not to go
Speaker 1: back to work. That's what That's what all of their
Speaker 1: their deal is. And they want to actually spend upwards
Speaker 1: of another two trillion dollars, maybe even as high astool.
Speaker 1: They want more than three trillion, but I think they'd
Speaker 1: be willing to settle for two. Training the Republicans in
Speaker 1: the Senate. Some of them have come out and I
Speaker 1: think they're exactly right. They said, we just can't keep
Speaker 1: shoveling trillions of dollars out the door and give us
Speaker 1: this mounting national debt because that undermines the foundation of
Speaker 1: the economy. So what I think you're going to see
Speaker 1: is you're going to see something with regard to unemployment bonuses.
Speaker 1: So the federal bonus currently is six hundred bucks that
Speaker 1: just expired. For Republicans want in the Senate want two
Speaker 1: hundred bucks. The Democrats want to continue with six hundred bucks.
Speaker 1: There's also this desire to send twelve hundred dollars per
Speaker 1: person back out I you know, just in direct payments.
Speaker 1: I don't understand what that's about. The reality is. And
Speaker 1: then the big issue for Republicans, of course, is liability
Speaker 1: protection for people who are trying to open up businesses
Speaker 1: and get the economy going again, churches who want to
Speaker 1: do at social clubs, everybody who wants to get back
Speaker 1: in the game and they're following CDC guidelines or local guidelines.
Speaker 1: They want some kind of protection from that. That's that's
Speaker 1: the substance of really what people are talking about. Then
Speaker 1: there's a whole and you know this buck, there's a
Speaker 1: whole lot of orbit and periphery around that where people
Speaker 1: want to come and spend just a ton of money.
Speaker 1: But with the last party questions, what would I like
Speaker 1: to see? I would like to see liability protection. I
Speaker 1: would like to see a payroll tax holiday. And I
Speaker 1: would like to say, let's call it good and let's
Speaker 1: incentivize people to go back to work instead of uncentivising
Speaker 1: people not to go back to work and incentivising people
Speaker 1: to stay closed. That's a huge problem. How long do
Speaker 1: you think that your Democrat colleagues in the Congress may
Speaker 1: hold this thing hostage with unreasonable demands and extend out
Speaker 1: there for the anxiety that people already feel over these
Speaker 1: different issues of the unemployment checks and so on and
Speaker 1: so forth. They will stick with it as long as
Speaker 1: they as they're polling numbers tell them that they're that
Speaker 1: they're at least breaking even They want to leverage this.
Speaker 1: They this chaos really benefits and they think politically and
Speaker 1: so and I hate to put anything in political terms,
Speaker 1: but that's the way my opponents think. They are looking
Speaker 1: to see how long can we keep this thing in
Speaker 1: a state of chaos and not start losing ground with
Speaker 1: the American voter. That's what this is about, Buck. And
Speaker 1: so if it's a week, um, they'll take a week.
Speaker 1: If it's two weeks, they'll take two weeks. But that's
Speaker 1: that's really what's driving then. And Congressman, before we let you,
Speaker 1: I know it's difficult to make predictions about much of
Speaker 1: anything these days, but you are in the state of Arizona,
Speaker 1: or Congressman there, how are we looking for a Trump
Speaker 1: victory in the fall in your home state? Yeah, I
Speaker 1: think if the election were held today, I think Trump
Speaker 1: would win. It would be a close election, but President
Speaker 1: Trump would win. I would suspect that you would be
Speaker 1: looking at the congressional makeup roughly the same. And we'll
Speaker 1: have to see how it plays out, because in the
Speaker 1: order for us to get an additional seat back or
Speaker 1: something like that, we really need President Trump to win
Speaker 1: by five to seven points here in Arizona, and right
Speaker 1: now he's probably going to win by two to four,
Speaker 1: two to four percent if it were held today. I
Speaker 1: think though, that the tide is turning and people want
Speaker 1: safety and security, they want predictability, and they want the
Speaker 1: economy to come back and they look at President Trump
Speaker 1: as capable of delivering on all those things. And as
Speaker 1: part of all that, I know, I said one more
Speaker 1: for you, but I got another one. I meant to
Speaker 1: get to schools opening. Uh. In New York, there's a
Speaker 1: you know, I know it's state by state. I know
Speaker 1: the situation here best because it's it's my home state.
Speaker 1: But there they were talking about a hybrid program. They
Speaker 1: said they're gonna have new guidance. They pushed back the
Speaker 1: new guidance. They said they're not going to open schools fully.
Speaker 1: They may open them partially, they're not. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: a complete mess, Congressman. I mean I'm speaking about it
Speaker 1: as a mess because it is a mess. What's happening
Speaker 1: in Arizona and what do you want to see as
Speaker 1: as school open policy nationwide? So first of all, in Arizona, Uh,
Speaker 1: it's it's kind of a bit of a mess right
Speaker 1: now too. The governor pushed back the opening of schools,
Speaker 1: and then he didn't give any real guidance or direction
Speaker 1: on what he wanted to see. I want to see
Speaker 1: us back in schools, but if you're not gonna but
Speaker 1: our unions are not wanting to go back in Arizona, UM.
Speaker 1: Some districts are saying that they that their teachers have
Speaker 1: to come in, so even if they're doing remote, they're
Speaker 1: gonna have to do it from the school site itself.
Speaker 1: What I would like to see is if if that's
Speaker 1: if we're gonna be um all over the board, you're
Speaker 1: where you're gonna have some remote some I would like
Speaker 1: to see us go to kind of a scholarship accounts
Speaker 1: or stick it on the backpack of the kid that
Speaker 1: we get thirteen thousand bucks a kid here and let
Speaker 1: them choose to go to charter, private wherever they want
Speaker 1: to go. Because I can tell you parents want to
Speaker 1: get their kids in schools, and the charters and privates
Speaker 1: are the ones that are moving to open up, and
Speaker 1: the traditionals are not. So I would like to see
Speaker 1: that money go to the kids and let the parents
Speaker 1: make the decision on what they think is best for
Speaker 1: the kid, whether it's remote learning or in person learning
Speaker 1: through a charter or private or some districts that actually
Speaker 1: may open up. Congressman any Biggs, appreciate you joining, sir,
Speaker 1: come back soon. Thank you, Buck, take care. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom life. This is the Buck Sex and show podcast.
Speaker 1: I have been very opposed to TikTok. I was one
Speaker 1: of the first to expose the Chinese links, and I
Speaker 1: have urged that TikTok be closed down in America. There's
Speaker 1: a new proposal the New Chin and Meadows brought it
Speaker 1: up yesterday to have Microsoft take it over. There are
Speaker 1: some questions that have to be answered. How will the
Speaker 1: day to be stored and secured? Do the Chinese will
Speaker 1: still the Chinese have links into TikTok, So before I
Speaker 1: would be for such a merger, I'd have to get
Speaker 1: some answers to these questions. What I will confirm is
Speaker 1: because TikTok acquired a US company had was subject to
Speaker 1: scifious jurisdiction of the Civious Committee unanously made a recommendation.
Speaker 1: That's one alternative, which told forced to sale presence. As
Speaker 1: I said, can also use AIPA as He's discussed, and
Speaker 1: there is enormous bipartisan support. We are not keeping TikTok
Speaker 1: in its current form where the app can send back
Speaker 1: information and location on a hundred billion Americans. TikTok is
Speaker 1: in some trouble or at least it might get sold.
Speaker 1: It could get banned. It has already been banned in India,
Speaker 1: where it was in very widespread usage. Producer Mark, do
Speaker 1: TikTok yet? Are you tiktoking? I watch TikTok's. I don't
Speaker 1: make tiktoks? What about you know producer Mark makes the
Speaker 1: most delicious gravy? You know nothing, doesn't you know Mark
Speaker 1: is a very bad cook? Okay, well then then don't
Speaker 1: make that TikTok. That's a fair that's a fair thing
Speaker 1: to say. I'll tell you this. Um, I've I've checked out.
Speaker 1: I know people say book, how could you want you
Speaker 1: download TikTok? I know it's but I thought, you know
Speaker 1: a better. I need to understand this thing. So I
Speaker 1: do have it on my phone, which I guess means
Speaker 1: that the Chinese do pop perhaps have this back end
Speaker 1: access into my all my data and my information or
Speaker 1: collecting all kinds of stuff on me. I'm aware, I'm aware.
Speaker 1: But but here's what has really happened. We've had a
Speaker 1: wake wake up call that the Trump administration is largely
Speaker 1: provided to the American people about China. China and what's
Speaker 1: true about the Chinese government intentions for the future, how
Speaker 1: they try to get economic advantage over us. I mean
Speaker 1: these are all very important, at least I think very
Speaker 1: important areas of much greater public attention. And the surveillance
Speaker 1: state that they operate at home now has its tentacles
Speaker 1: extended all over the world. Information increasingly is power. We
Speaker 1: recognize this. The information advantage that is used by different
Speaker 1: countries for their economics sector is the single greatest advantage
Speaker 1: in any country could have. That's really in an information
Speaker 1: based economy, obviously, where you are able to best your competitors.
Speaker 1: And the Chinese have been stealing our intellectual property for
Speaker 1: decades in a way that nobody can ever really fully
Speaker 1: understand other than just say it has been massive, systematic,
Speaker 1: and catastrophic for our long term competitive advantages. Catastrophic I
Speaker 1: think we're already there. Doesn't mean we shouldn't stop it now,
Speaker 1: but who knows what the long term consequences of this
Speaker 1: are going to be. And that then brings me to
Speaker 1: what we're going to do about TikTok because people are concerned.
Speaker 1: A lot of Democrats and Republicans are concerned that this app,
Speaker 1: which if you don't really know what it is, it's
Speaker 1: like watching Instagram but only videos, and they're these short
Speaker 1: videos that pop up in your feed, and they all
Speaker 1: have the pretty much not all of them. They usually
Speaker 1: they have music. And I'll tell you this, it's addictive.
Speaker 1: I mean, you could sit there and waste forty minutes
Speaker 1: of your life looking at TikTok videos as in the
Speaker 1: blink of an eye. It just feels like what, you know,
Speaker 1: you got videos about how to do different So I'm
Speaker 1: just constantly watching on a loop video of people making
Speaker 1: different kinds of meat, you know, just lots of cooking
Speaker 1: of steak and barbecue, and people, I think think, oh,
Speaker 1: TikTok's at Chinese app These are Americans making all this
Speaker 1: content that you're watching, at least in America, so you're
Speaker 1: why your fellow Americans do all this stuff. But there
Speaker 1: are very real concerns about what it means to have
Speaker 1: Chinese back end access to all this data. And you
Speaker 1: start to look at the biometric data and all this
Speaker 1: going back to the Chinese government, and people just know
Speaker 1: that they're they're not okay with this. We don't want
Speaker 1: to China to effectively be operating a mass surveillance tool
Speaker 1: with a complicit US public on US soil. That that's
Speaker 1: really where this whole thing has has turned into a massive,
Speaker 1: you know, a massive news story, and they may sell
Speaker 1: this to Microsoft. So then I suppose we would say, okay,
Speaker 1: we at least it's in an American company's hands, which
Speaker 1: is certainly better than the alternative. But China is a
Speaker 1: problem for us, My friends, we're finally understanding this. I
Speaker 1: think that's where that's if, if nothing else, a a
Speaker 1: part of this discussion that I think is heading in
Speaker 1: the right direction. At least China is a major problem
Speaker 1: for the US. That's not going to change anytime soon.
Speaker 1: And they also could be trying to influence our elections.
Speaker 1: Your Secretary of State Pompeio talking about exactly that play eleven,
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party, and you saw this with our
Speaker 1: closure of the consul in Houston is running espni's operations
Speaker 1: inside the United States and attempting deep influence targeting of
Speaker 1: American business leaders, of American congressman, of city council members.
Speaker 1: We saw it happened up to a state senator in Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: This is a deep effort to conduct influence operations to
Speaker 1: undermine American democracy and put our nation at risk. This administration,
Speaker 1: President Trump, for the first time has said this is
Speaker 1: enough for this, We're going to fix this, and has
Speaker 1: given us all the guidance, and you've seen us act
Speaker 1: on it, whether it was what we did to the
Speaker 1: consult with Houston. You saw the FBI indict several pl
Speaker 1: members who were studying here in the United States engaged
Speaker 1: an activity that was clearly unlawful. We're taking seriously this threat.
Speaker 1: We're going to protect the American people from these Chinese
Speaker 1: influence operations. It's about time, friends, It's about time we
Speaker 1: should be protecting the American people from exactly that. And
Speaker 1: and there was a by partisan failure for decades to
Speaker 1: understand the threat of the Chinese government post. So you
Speaker 1: have these the surveillance issue, the theft of intellectual property,
Speaker 1: and this is all around us. I mean, I look,
Speaker 1: I have a Chinese app on my phone. I know
Speaker 1: you're all gonna yell at me for it, and I
Speaker 1: understand that, and I probably you know, but at this point,
Speaker 1: I'm like, well, they've already had it on and they're
Speaker 1: going to sell it to a US company in the
Speaker 1: next thirty days, and they probably already got whatever they've done.
Speaker 1: Plus they've they've I got the one of those emails
Speaker 1: of up. They hacked OPM office Personal Management of the
Speaker 1: federal governments. They have all kinds of data on me already.
Speaker 1: They know a lot about the Buckster. Not not that
Speaker 1: much exciting stuff China to know, but nonetheless, and there's
Speaker 1: the way that the Chinese government. Now you may say,
Speaker 1: buck the Wigers, this is an internal problem. Yes, it's
Speaker 1: a humans right, human rights violation, it's terrible, but what
Speaker 1: are we really going to do about it? Remember, how
Speaker 1: a country is willing to treat its own population is
Speaker 1: an excellent proxy for understanding how much worse it will
Speaker 1: treat other populations around the world if it gets the
Speaker 1: opportunity to. And that's why it's important that Secretary of
Speaker 1: Pompeio keeps pointing out how China's repression against the Wigers
Speaker 1: is so unacceptable and the whole global community needs to
Speaker 1: speak out against this. Despite what it means for the
Speaker 1: economic bottom line play ten well, the risk to the
Speaker 1: people in that region has been great. I've talked about
Speaker 1: this as the greatest human rights violation of this century
Speaker 1: to date. And what we've attempted to do is make
Speaker 1: clear to China, if you want to participate in the
Speaker 1: world stage. You can't engage and behavior like this. So
Speaker 1: we've begun to impose sanctions on the individuals and businesses
Speaker 1: involved in this. Most recent set of sanctions put up
Speaker 1: by the Department of Treasury will put the businesses operating
Speaker 1: there unnoticed. They've got to change their behavior. They've got
Speaker 1: to stop using slight labor, they've got to stop participating
Speaker 1: these systems that have been connected to forced sterilizations, forced deportions.
Speaker 1: These are terrible things that are taking place there, and
Speaker 1: we're going to impose real costs on those businesses. This
Speaker 1: company is involved in the cotton trade, and so it
Speaker 1: has deep connectivity to Western businesses, including those in the
Speaker 1: United States, and we've been very clear. We've told US
Speaker 1: businesses to take a real deep look into their supply change.
Speaker 1: And I'll think companies, some brand names here in America
Speaker 1: want to be connected to what's taking place there. Amen,
Speaker 1: the fight is on between the US and China for
Speaker 1: global supremacy in the twenty first century. I'm just glad
Speaker 1: now it's a two way fight. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts, Liberty,
Speaker 1: Truth and Great Hair. Feel those funky beats. It's time
Speaker 1: for roll call. Indeed, time for roll call. Let's get
Speaker 1: to it, my friends. Always a pleasure to hear from
Speaker 1: all of you at a nice, relaxing weekend. I hope
Speaker 1: you did the same, but we know this week is
Speaker 1: gonna be madness with the news cycle, and I need
Speaker 1: to hear what the team thinks. What you want to hear,
Speaker 1: more about what you want us to be doing here
Speaker 1: in the hut. So let's let's get it. Let's get
Speaker 1: it rocking. Remember Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. If
Speaker 1: you want to send us a message, you can also
Speaker 1: send them on Instagram at buck Sexton Direct Message, or
Speaker 1: email Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com. All right, and
Speaker 1: make sure're gonna buck Sexton dot com. We got great
Speaker 1: stuff there, and pass the buck. Tell somebody list in
Speaker 1: the podcast who has not yet listened to the podcast, TJ.
Speaker 1: Hey Buck. My wife and I went in for an
Speaker 1: ultrasound for our second child the other day. The ultrasound
Speaker 1: tech seems to think there's going to be an explosion
Speaker 1: of births in this country since COVID started. At least
Speaker 1: there'll be one good thing that comes out of this pandemic. Indeed, TJ. Although,
Speaker 1: as I saw someone pointed out to much acclaim on Twitter,
Speaker 1: it's going to be a whole lot of during lockdown.
Speaker 1: It will be a whole lot of firstborn children. People
Speaker 1: are thinking that maybe having you know, a lot of kids,
Speaker 1: what you gotta be lockdown could be tough of just
Speaker 1: that was the joke that people were making. That was
Speaker 1: the joke. Lastly, I have a Nostradamis prediction to make
Speaker 1: for the last election debate, if they actually happen, when
Speaker 1: we are much closer to having a COVID vaccine, I
Speaker 1: predict that Trump will say something along the lines of,
Speaker 1: regardless of who wins the election, my administration will have
Speaker 1: a COVID vaccine ready by the end of the year
Speaker 1: or before the next inauguration, at which point the left
Speaker 1: will accuse him of holding the vaccine as ransom for
Speaker 1: people to vote for him. Of course, I'll vote for
Speaker 1: him regardless, across broken glass, over burning coals, whatever it takes.
Speaker 1: She'll tieh TJ. Yeah, the vaccine politics that we're all
Speaker 1: going to see, that we're all going to be subjected to,
Speaker 1: will be really, really ugly. That's for sure. That's definitely
Speaker 1: gonna happen. There's gonna be a lot of ugly vaccine politics.
Speaker 1: And the way as I was saying or in the show,
Speaker 1: the media is going to raise all kinds of doubts
Speaker 1: about whether it'll actually be here on time and will
Speaker 1: it be effective, and it'll ramp up the closer we
Speaker 1: get to the election. This is how propaganda works. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there are real concerns about effective is there are real
Speaker 1: questions about this, But the way the media does it
Speaker 1: will be timed for maximum negative impact on public perception
Speaker 1: as we go into the actual election. That's what's going
Speaker 1: to happen. That's the reality that we face. So yeah, man,
Speaker 1: I think that's absolutely true TJ. And we should get
Speaker 1: ready for it. And yep, I think there will be
Speaker 1: a whole lot of There'll be a whole lot of
Speaker 1: babies born right around the New Year's would be my guests,
Speaker 1: because that's when people went into quarantine. And you know
Speaker 1: when the quarantine huts a rockin, don't come a knockin,
Speaker 1: John Buck. What I think we've seen so far are
Speaker 1: a lot of tiny infringements on our rights. Obviously it's wrong,
Speaker 1: but each of the infringements aren't inconvenient enough to make
Speaker 1: Americans attempt mass non compliance. People have a for the
Speaker 1: greater good mentality. I hope Fauci pushes for a goggle
Speaker 1: mandate because I don't see people complying with that. The
Speaker 1: useful idiots will, sure, but I think all the rest
Speaker 1: of us who have been drunk under the greater good
Speaker 1: mentality will wake up and say enough is enough. John,
Speaker 1: I think you're right. It's it's the proverbial boiling boiling
Speaker 1: frog in the pot. We're boiling pot with the frog
Speaker 1: in it. And that's the idea. That's the situation that
Speaker 1: I think I think we face. And they've been steadily
Speaker 1: chipping away at right, steadily chipping away at our sense
Speaker 1: of telling the government, blank off, humaniacs, you can't stop
Speaker 1: this disease. You're not helping, you're making things worse, and
Speaker 1: your morons. Let us live our lives, let every individual
Speaker 1: take common sense precautions themselves. But with the government mandates
Speaker 1: on this or nuts. And I asked the question, and
Speaker 1: they never answer, why don't we have all these government
Speaker 1: mandates every year for flu season? They won't answer it
Speaker 1: now because that raises problems for what they're trying to
Speaker 1: accomplish in this moment. But here's what I will tell you.
Speaker 1: There will come a point in the future when people
Speaker 1: will start to raise that for flu season as well.
Speaker 1: The government loves all this control. Democrats love all this control.
Speaker 1: They don't want this to stop. Karen, Hey Buck, your
Speaker 1: show keeps me informed to enter Jane while I'm doing
Speaker 1: housework and yard work. I really appreciate how hard you
Speaker 1: improducer Mark work to make it happen. Thank you, Karen.
Speaker 1: It is not a lot of work, but we love it.
Speaker 1: But we appreciate that you appreciate it. Your impressions of
Speaker 1: Doctor's Fauci Bernie Sanders, Nancy Pelosi, and Elizabeth Warrener spot on.
Speaker 1: You have a great ear for voices and accents. Thank you. Karen.
Speaker 1: You said you feel uneasy about doing Trump, but I've
Speaker 1: heard you fall into Trump voice for half a sentence
Speaker 1: here and there, and it's really good. Go for it,
Speaker 1: you know you want to, Probably, Karen, I know I
Speaker 1: see the very best, the best. No, my heart's not it.
Speaker 1: My heart's not in it. When you force it, it's
Speaker 1: really bad, right, Yeah, it just happens, That's true. Of
Speaker 1: so many impressions though. This is why people will say Buck,
Speaker 1: do so and so, even friends of mine, and I'm
Speaker 1: I can't. It's just you hear it in your head,
Speaker 1: and you do it when you hear it. You know,
Speaker 1: if you try to force it, it it doesn't really work
Speaker 1: as well. You know, I've got a great producer Mark impression. Buck.
Speaker 1: Don't forget about that interview this afternoon. Buck, be on
Speaker 1: time today. Buck, send that email you said you're gonna send. Buck.
Speaker 1: Where's the multipodcast? See? I sound just like him. We'll
Speaker 1: do all those things that I won't say any of
Speaker 1: that stuff anymore. I'm just telling you guys, by impersonation
Speaker 1: to producer markus spot, it's not really an impersonation. It's
Speaker 1: more of a recounting of the things I tell you
Speaker 1: to do. Well, you know, close enough, Andrew Bucket Producer Mark.
Speaker 1: I laughed out loud as I was driving home of
Speaker 1: your podcast and you played the mask debate montage that
Speaker 1: should be used more often. Yes, indeed, the mask debate
Speaker 1: is a very important thing to keep in mind. You
Speaker 1: gotta be on. You gotta make sure that you're focused
Speaker 1: during the mask debate. I masked debated this weekend. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I can happen. You know, sometimes you're just out in
Speaker 1: public and someone sees you and you're all of a
Speaker 1: sudden you find yourself, you know, in the midst of
Speaker 1: a mask debate, and they can get very upset when
Speaker 1: they see that. I've heard of public mask debate is
Speaker 1: actually a crime. It can be, especially if you get
Speaker 1: a little violent during the mask debase. All right. Also,
Speaker 1: if you form a team buck group on PS four,
Speaker 1: I'll learn how to play Call of Duty and join
Speaker 1: you and that tall guy in Texas Shields Hie. Well, Andrew,
Speaker 1: I'm certainly thinking about it. Although my brother, my older brother,
Speaker 1: who's the one with the PS four that he gave
Speaker 1: to me, came back and took it away already. He's like,
Speaker 1: actually I want it this week. I'm like, well, I
Speaker 1: don't have a PS four. If you don't have a
Speaker 1: PS four, how do you play PS four? The Governor
Speaker 1: wants you to know that PS four for some of you,
Speaker 1: who's going to be a bit of a waste of time. However,
Speaker 1: what do I mean by waste of time? It means
Speaker 1: you're not doing the mask and the delay that you
Speaker 1: need to do. Instead, you're going to be pretending to
Speaker 1: be a special operation show the soldier killing all the
Speaker 1: bad guys. Why do you want to kill the bad guys?
Speaker 1: Because when you own someone, you're playing in multiplayer by
Speaker 1: squatting down on them and making up scene gestures after
Speaker 1: you've shot them with a sniper rifle of philomatic weapon.
Speaker 1: Things actually kind of funny. See, I played some I've
Speaker 1: played some Call of Duty PS four stuff, Michael, hey Buck.
Speaker 1: Can the CIA get involved in domestic law enforcement in
Speaker 1: this country if things get too far out of control?
Speaker 1: I guess they're I guess they're less visible than local
Speaker 1: state police or even the FBI. Michael. Now, they can't
Speaker 1: buy law, and you wouldn't want them too. There'll be
Speaker 1: a lot of CI people like, good heads, what will
Speaker 1: we do our cappuccino machine has been toppled by the rioters.
Speaker 1: I will write a memo. That's what the CIA doing
Speaker 1: law enforcement would be like. I'm just telling you the truth.
Speaker 1: They're like, oh no, I've been typing so much today
Speaker 1: about how we need law and order that my hands hurt.
Speaker 1: I need to put them in I need to put
Speaker 1: my podgy little fingers in some vasoline. It's I'm just
Speaker 1: telling you it's not CIA is not what people think
Speaker 1: it is. Um, Mitch, hey Buck, faithful listener one zero, oh,
Speaker 1: KF A bleven ten KF ab Omaha and the podcast.
Speaker 1: All right, thank you so much. I'm an over the
Speaker 1: road driver for ups at Night. Maybe you've already said this,
Speaker 1: but is that strange how few federal politicians have gotten
Speaker 1: the COVID nineteen virus. I wonder if it weren't for
Speaker 1: hippo laws, we would have found out by now the
Speaker 1: bulk of critics of hydroxy chloroquin have been taking it
Speaker 1: prophylactically in secret. Well, Mitch, first of all, we love
Speaker 1: kf ab Omaha. That's one of our original stations that
Speaker 1: came out here with us on the show, and we've
Speaker 1: had a great listenership there for years now and we
Speaker 1: really really do appreciate It's a big shout out to
Speaker 1: kfaby Omaha. And as for politicians maybe taking hydroxy chloroquin
Speaker 1: as a prophylaxis, I M I'm sure there are people
Speaker 1: who are taking it prophylactically and not telling anybody, especially
Speaker 1: if they're going to be exposed for a certain period time,
Speaker 1: the same way you would for malaria. Right take. I
Speaker 1: forget exactly how it works, but I know for some malarials,
Speaker 1: you take it for I think a week before you're
Speaker 1: in the endemic area and then up to a month
Speaker 1: when you come back, to make sure that it never
Speaker 1: gets a toe hold, that the parasite, which malaria is
Speaker 1: a parasite, doesn't get a toe hold in your system
Speaker 1: to replicate itself and then take over. And then malaria
Speaker 1: is really rough because not only can it kill you
Speaker 1: the first time around, you can have malaria relapses where
Speaker 1: the parasite, if your immune system gets compromised, can come
Speaker 1: back and really mess you up later on. So malaria
Speaker 1: is a debilitating, terrible disease. So people take the prophylaxis
Speaker 1: for it. I bet there are people out there who,
Speaker 1: especially if they're in a high risk situation or taking
Speaker 1: malari prophylaxis I mean taking covid hydroxy chloric and prophylaxis
Speaker 1: and not talking about it. I just don't understand why
Speaker 1: they keep talking about studies of super sick people in
Speaker 1: the hospital see and we all look at them and say,
Speaker 1: that's not that's not what the use case is supposed
Speaker 1: to be. The use case is supposed to be an
Speaker 1: onset of symptoms, which is exactly the use case for tamiflo.
Speaker 1: If you go to a doctor and you've had the
Speaker 1: flu standard flu for five days, they're gonna say, no,
Speaker 1: don't take tamiflu for the most I mean, unless maybe
Speaker 1: you're a special situation. I don't know, but generally speaking,
Speaker 1: they're gonna tell you if you don't take tamiflu in
Speaker 1: the first forty eight hours, it's not really that effective
Speaker 1: for you, because it's trying to stop the virus replication,
Speaker 1: and tama flu doesn't cure you. It just means for
Speaker 1: some people there's a lesser duration and less severity of symptoms,
Speaker 1: but you've got to take it early on, and that's
Speaker 1: you know. It's also true of PREP, which is a
Speaker 1: pre exposure prophylaxis for HIV. So if you think you've
Speaker 1: been exposed to h you're going to be or in
Speaker 1: a high risk group for HIV exposure, you take PREP
Speaker 1: before and it's less likely than if you do get
Speaker 1: exposed to HIV that you'll actually have the virus take
Speaker 1: hold in your system and have a full scale infection.
Speaker 1: So I think there are people taking hydroxy chloroquine who
Speaker 1: aren't talking about it. But I can't even get to
Speaker 1: tell you how many. I have no idea you're in.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast, all right. Next
Speaker 1: up here we have actually a proucer Mark. How's your weekend, buddy? Well?
Speaker 1: Uh not great. Hockey's back. So I just spent the
Speaker 1: weekend screaming explutives at my television. Well, at least you
Speaker 1: got to have that bit of escapism, I guess so. Well,
Speaker 1: all the Rangers and Metstu. Who the two teams that
Speaker 1: are playing right now is make my life miserable? Who's
Speaker 1: better in their sport? Of the two teams, It's a
Speaker 1: toss up. They're both about the same right now. I
Speaker 1: think the Rangers have a better future. Are they bottom
Speaker 1: of the barrel in the league? No? No No, they're both
Speaker 1: about league average league average. Okay, should be better, but
Speaker 1: they aren't. Yeah. I definitely did not watch any NBA
Speaker 1: games because you're gonna kneel during the anthem, you're not
Speaker 1: gonna have the bucks they're watching, No surprise on that one.
Speaker 1: You wouldn't have watched anyway. I was about to say that,
Speaker 1: but at least I want to get the credit for
Speaker 1: not watching too. This has become a favorite conservative past time.
Speaker 1: Now we're like, we will not watch that spot. I
Speaker 1: will not watch uh curling if they take a knee,
Speaker 1: you know, and then they take a knee. I've decided
Speaker 1: to give up watching curling. Have you ever seen curling
Speaker 1: you've been talking about and of course I know what
Speaker 1: curling is. Yeah, yeah, I will give up all. I
Speaker 1: will not watch figure skating this year because someone took
Speaker 1: the knee or you know, we do a lot of
Speaker 1: That sounds a lot like cancel culture to me, a producer,
Speaker 1: Mark producer, Mark brings up a very interesting point of
Speaker 1: the debate. But no, it's not cancel culture if it's
Speaker 1: always been canceled because you've never watched it because you
Speaker 1: don't care. You can't cancel any sports because you've never
Speaker 1: watched sports. I'm saying, but I want the credit. Oh,
Speaker 1: I've I have abstained from watching you know, the NHL
Speaker 1: this year or MLB. It's like, well, I've abstained for
Speaker 1: the last thirty eight years. Big protests from Buck, there,
Speaker 1: big protest movement from the Bucks or that that's fair,
Speaker 1: that's true. All right, we get Katie up here in
Speaker 1: Roll call, Hey, Buck, I don't recommend getting a game system.
Speaker 1: I've been playing the Switch all summer and I'm utterly useless.
Speaker 1: On the other hand, I've lost a few pounds because
Speaker 1: I'm playing video games instead of eating Ben and Jerry's.
Speaker 1: So there's that shields high. What do we think of
Speaker 1: video games as a weight loss tool? Producer Bark Though
Speaker 1: we used to be Remember they had like we Tennis
Speaker 1: and we bowling and all that stuff. Again last I
Speaker 1: feel like that lasted a month and everyone's like, I
Speaker 1: want to sit I don't want to do this crap.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I mean all the better games came out,
Speaker 1: like Mario Carton and all that stuff. Exactly want to
Speaker 1: sit on your butt while you're going what Luigi in
Speaker 1: like firing little you know, mushrooms or whatever at people.
Speaker 1: I don't even know what they I used to I did,
Speaker 1: used to play a lot of Mario card I just forget,
Speaker 1: I would hope. So everyone Car was amazing. Mary Carr
Speaker 1: was amazing, especially if you had maybe imbibed a few
Speaker 1: beverages before. For some people, perhaps even in their high
Speaker 1: school or college years, some substances that we're not entirely
Speaker 1: legal at the time before playing the Mario card not
Speaker 1: that I recommend that, but I do understand that that
Speaker 1: was an entertaining thing to do sometimes. Well, I mean
Speaker 1: with the switch, you can do that even better now, Mario, Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: it's totally true. So wait, what's the switch? The switch
Speaker 1: is the newest Nintendo platform. I did not even the
Speaker 1: handheld end freak end. You can plug it into your TV. Wow,
Speaker 1: I know nothing about this. I'm learning something new every day.
Speaker 1: Speaking of weight loss tools, I got a haircut, a
Speaker 1: real professional haircut this weekend, and it was like someone
Speaker 1: shaved a yak with a weed whacker. But it's amazing
Speaker 1: how much lighter the skull feels now. And so that's
Speaker 1: a that's a thing. It was about to say, did
Speaker 1: you ask your gardener to do it? Pretty much? That
Speaker 1: showed up and he was like, has anyone cut your
Speaker 1: hair in a long time? He's like, it looks like
Speaker 1: someone's been cutting a little bit. I was like, well, yes,
Speaker 1: but he's like, how long has it been? I had
Speaker 1: not gotten an official haircut. I go to a barber.
Speaker 1: By the way, I don't go to a stylist salon
Speaker 1: before you make no, it's a barber shop. Okay, they
Speaker 1: got a little barber thing out front. I got to
Speaker 1: a barber. Is it is it men and women not
Speaker 1: just dudes? Okay, yeah, but it It had been six
Speaker 1: months since I had actually got a haircut. It's the
Speaker 1: longest I think I've ever gone. Wow. Yeah, all right.
Speaker 1: Toby Buck and producer Mark Mike's later touched on the
Speaker 1: subject of postmodernism last week. That's that fancy Yale guy stuff.
Speaker 1: Is it a subject I think you could deep dive into. Yes,
Speaker 1: maybe that instead of the multipodcast would be helpful for
Speaker 1: people to understand the riots we are seeing. Shields high. Yes,
Speaker 1: let's talk about some postmodernism. No, I'm just kidding, Toby.
Speaker 1: That's a good idea. We got a lot of ideas,
Speaker 1: but we don't have much time to execute on all
Speaker 1: of them because we're very, very busy bees here in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt. We'll add it to the list of
Speaker 1: things that Buck says he's going to do, but it
Speaker 1: doesn't correct. So everybody please do pass the buck speaking
Speaker 1: of that guy, and tell somebody down on the podcast
Speaker 1: this week. Our numbers keep going up because of all
Speaker 1: of you, and we'll be back tomorrow with you, same time,
Speaker 1: same play, same love of freedom. She'll tie