WEBVTT - Bessent Says Nvidia, AMD Deals Could Be a “Model”

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and Edma low Intend frances Go.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Treasury Secretary Scott Besson says the US is open to

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 3>discussing the use of nvideo chips with China US.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 4>China's ten Cent shows fast growth across its gaming and

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 4>ad businesses and plans for smart AI spending.

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 3>And our conversation with the CEO of core Weave after

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 3>its earnings we discuss how the company plans to scale

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 3>to meet AI demand.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 4>But first we check in on these markets that are

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 4>very close, if not at record highs. Once again, ed

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 4>we drive higher and it's more about federal reserve policy.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 4>Will we get a megacut coming later in the year.

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Now A's at one hundred clint to games, but we

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 4>are near a record at a record high, so too

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 4>for bitcoin seven ten percent Ether is high too. We

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 4>now have four trillion dollars market cap for the entirety

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 4>of the crypto market, just about the same size as

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 4>say in Vidia, what are you looking at?

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm looking at Nvidia and AMD Now I'm going

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 3>to be really clear here. It's really hard to see

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 3>the catalyst to cause or link for why Nvidia is

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 3>down a percentage point in AMD's up four and a

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 3>half percent. Social media volumes for AMD have quadrupled in

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 3>the last hour. People are talking about it. There's a

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 3>reason why they're talking about it. It's because this is

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 3>what Treasury Secretary Scott Besant told Bloomberg Samory hoard in

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 3>earlier today.

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 5>We would not sell.

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 6>Any of the advanced chips, So the aged twenties, I

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 6>don't know whether you'd say there are four or five

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 6>six levels down the chip stack. What we do not

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 6>want here, em Marie, is for Huawei to have a

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 6>digital Belton road, right, So we do not want the

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 6>standard to become Chinese across the world or even in China.

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Let's understand this administration's policies for chip makers and speaks

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 3>of Bloomberg Surveillance co host Amry Horden, who just conducted

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 3>that interview, the underlying assumptions changed actually this week whether

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 3>or not China even wants America's reduced power chips. But

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 3>what I found some interesting about the content of what

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Beson was telling you is that they feel that it's

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 3>not really even a national security concern. They're very clear

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 3>that these are lower performance chips and they want American

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>tech to be present there.

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Give us the digest of what else you said.

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that was really his answer to my question of

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 7>what do you say to critics that basically think this

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 7>administration is putting revenue in front of national security concerns

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 7>that export licenses now look to be seemingly for sale.

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 5>He said that the H twenty chip.

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 7>And I guess similar to AMD, the m I three

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 7>or eight is four or five, six stacks down from

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 7>that higher level, and they're never going to allow China

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 7>to get to the higher level chip. He almost sounded

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 7>a little bit like someone you speak to often when

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 7>it comes to Jensen Wang about what it means to

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 7>make sure that Nvidia or AMD have a footprint in

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 7>China because they don't want Huawei to get control of that.

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 5>And the big question.

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 7>Mark is now is that what is the appetite in

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 7>Beijing for these chips given the fact that there's been

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 7>this new urgency since the administration is allowing these export

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 7>licenses once again from the CCP to send out these

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 7>letters to firms telling them to snub these chips and

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 7>go for some of their own national champions. And this

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 7>is something the Treasury Secretary told me and Jonathan that

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 7>he is going to bring up with his Chinese counterpart.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 5>I Marie.

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 4>What's also interesting is he also told you and Jonathan

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 4>that maybe this could be replicated at the moment. It's unique,

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 4>he mentioned, but maybe it applies to other chip makers

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 4>on the industries.

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 5>He said.

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 7>It's a unique model, something that the President likes to do,

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 7>try to things. But yeah, that's something that caught me

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 7>off guard as well, or something that we've been also

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 7>just exploring.

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 5>Every day with guests. Whether or not this is new.

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 7>Rules of engagement and rules of the road for corporate America.

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 7>Can other companies potentially strike these types of deals with

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 7>the United States or maybe the other way around. Could

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 7>the Oval Office and the President tell other companies, if

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 7>you want to gain access to a market, we're going

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 7>to have to get part of that profit. Because what's

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 7>going on right now, and this has been a really

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 7>long saga, we should note for the H twenty chips,

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 7>remember in April there was an export ban.

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 5>On these chips.

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 7>Then this was reversed in the meantime, we had US

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 7>and Chinese counterparts to having trade negotiations, and a lot

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 7>of people glean into this, and the Treasury Secretary told

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 7>me in a previous interview this H twenty was a

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 7>chip part of the mosaic of these trade negotiations because

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 7>the US needed rare earths. And now that the US

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 7>has lifted the ex control instead of just allowing the

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 7>export licenses to come back, it seems a president struck

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 7>this deal one on one with Jensen Wang in the

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 7>Oval Office. Reported the President throughout twenty percent, and then

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 7>Jensen Wang said, well, how about fifteen percent? And then

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 7>what does this mean is a big question for other

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 7>companies in corporate America down the road.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 3>The very quick question is what happens next? Right, because

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Treasury Secretary Beston, on top of what the President said

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 3>earlier in the week, says that they'll discuss the idea

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 3>of unenhanced Blackwell chips essentially with China. He leads talks

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 3>just very quick, what does happen next?

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think it depends on the leverage in these

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 7>negotiations and what the US wants to get out of China.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 7>We also had the President the other day talk about

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 7>the purchasing agreement he struck in his first administration when

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 7>it comes to things like soybeans. There is now a

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 7>ninety day extension which brings us to November for these

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 7>trade talks between these two counterparts. And in my previous

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 7>interviews with the Treasury Secretary in July, he taught talked

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 7>about how now there'll be more of a frequent cadence

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 7>between him and his Chinese counterpart to have these discussions.

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 7>All of this likely will lead up potentially to a

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 7>meeting between Chairman she and President Trump, either on the

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 7>sidelines of the APEC summit or even maybe the President

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:17.239
<v Speaker 7>going to China.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 4>New Max Savanien's co host amriy hold On it was

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 4>a brilliant interview. Thanks for breaking it down for us.

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Let's delve more into the corporate implications China US the

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 4>AI competition major it is with US Alien Spernstein joining

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 4>US now, and I'm really interested as to how Alliance

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 4>Spernstein thinks about pricing this in if at all, How

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 4>are you looking at the opportunity to access the Chinese

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 4>market going forward?

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think China has always remained one of the

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 8>most strategic markets and will remain so, and particularly in

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 8>the AI world. If you think about AI, how we

0:06:55.000 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 8>think about the scale benefit right the ecosystems. It's always

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 8>been a bit for a big part of the origination

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 8>of innovations, particularly technology innovations, but China has done a

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 8>phenomenal job in terms of using it and then using

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 8>it at a very large scale. When you think about

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 8>in the AI context having the ecosystem globally, it's this

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 8>very important strategic advantage long term. The more data you have,

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 8>the better the model becomes. And that's not just for

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 8>China alone, but think about globally, who wants to be

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 8>the dominant standard? Having the operating system that layer is

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 8>very very strategic for most companies' longer term. So that's

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 8>why we're thinking. That's what Jensen said, That's what leads

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 8>us to at AMD said, and then I think that's

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 8>how we're thinking about it, which is who will be

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 8>the dominant AI standard? We want to have a one

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 8>global ecosystem or are we going to have different forks

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 8>into the future.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 4>But these so will dumb down in President Trump even

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 4>call them obsolete chips being allowed into China, does that

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 4>ensure that they remain part of the tech stack.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's too early to tell.

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 8>For the most part, I think necessity usually drives innovation.

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 8>So when we don't export anything, then it probably is

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 8>a greater incentive for China to develop its own domestic

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 8>ecosystem that's completely separate.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 5>So this is a bridge.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 8>I think in my mind that we can abridge that

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 8>big drastic action that we've seen earlier on this year.

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 8>I think China does have advantages to some extent, and

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 8>it has a more newly developed power infrastructure system, it

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 8>has vast amount of data, and it's developed a lot

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 8>of these open source models that they are really rapidly pushing.

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 5>So it remains to be seen.

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 8>But I think it's quite important and quite strategic for

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 8>the US companies to think about the global standard.

0:08:58.080 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 5>Think about iPhone.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 8>For instance, right, yes, the iPhone or Tesla, the data

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 8>resides in China. We respect that. But that said, there's

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 8>still lessons that we learn from adoption at this point.

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 8>If you think about a lot of AI models, we've

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 8>trained a lot of datas already, but going forward, the

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 8>use of AI, the use of applications, and that's new

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 8>sets of data that's constantly being generated and we don't

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 8>want to not have access.

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>To that lay.

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 3>The Treasury Secretary indicated to us that this pay to

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 3>play or quid pro quo of a revenue share in

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:38.599
<v Speaker 3>exchange for access to the Chinese market could be expanded.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 3>What I want to know from you is, if that

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 3>were to be the case with high bandwidth memory or

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 3>telematics or other parts of the server design, would you

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 3>then upgrade your overall outlook for in megawatt terms or

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 3>giga what terms the amount of installed capacity we could

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 3>see around the world.

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 5>I think it's too early to tell.

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 8>I think think, as you've seen from a policy standpoint,

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 8>there has been quite a bit of fluidity in terms

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 8>of the changes back and forth. But I think it's

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 8>certainly promising that you know, some of the really drastic

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 8>assumption that we had in April, some of it is

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 8>being discounted today.

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 5>So it remains to be seen.

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 8>And I would say it's very early, and I would

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 8>refer from making any assumptions, whether too aggressive or I

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 8>would say it is definitely an improvement from the worst

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 8>case scenario.

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Late tu of a Linespernstein, thank you very much.

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Shares of ten cent, well, look they are rising today

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 4>after posting second quarter revenue that beat analyst expectations. The

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 4>company says it plans to accelerate spending on AI research,

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 4>will focus on integrating it across its services, across its

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 4>content from all Bloomergs.

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 5>Henry Wren joins us.

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 4>And it's interesting though they said they're going to invest smartly.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Is this prudent capex?

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 9>It feels like, yeah, thanks for having me. And it's

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 9>pretty interesting because when you look at their CAPEX budget

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 9>for the quarter, they spent about nineteen billion R and

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 9>B in a quarter, so that has been you would say,

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 9>a fraction of what US tech giants have been spending.

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 9>And on the court they mentioned that they will be

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 9>spending on AI chips, that's a priority. They also be

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 9>recruiting talents. However, they will adopt this more prudent approach,

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 9>so it does seem that they're not in a rush

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 9>to spend as much as they can. They say that

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 9>they have enough AI chips for now. They say that

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 9>their stockpile is enough for training and for inferences. And

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 9>that's probably why.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 3>There is some skepticism from the anless community. In the

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 3>same way that they look at the American companies on

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 3>how CAPEX translates to top line growth anyway, specific AI growth,

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 3>but in the courter gone, they're just parts of the

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 3>business that are doing well. Where's ten cents strong, Henry.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I would say they're firing on all cylinders for

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 9>this quarter. So the games has been a standout. International

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 9>games grew by about thirty five percent in a quarter.

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 9>They launched some new games, including one called Dune Awakening

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 9>in international markets, but domestically it's about their evergreen games.

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 9>So we're talking about the peace Keeper Elite, which is

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 9>a six to zero old game. The company said that

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 9>it's gaining traction because of a new game model. That

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 9>game saw a thirty percent increase in user volume.

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 2>For the quarter.

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 9>That's about games, but at revenue site it's growing very

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 9>strong as well, twenty percent increase for the quarter.

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 2>The company said it's.

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 9>Benefiting from AI tools being adopted over there as well,

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 9>so it's basically strength across the board.

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloombergs Henry Wren, thank you very much. Let's get more

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>and bring in Jacob co founder and CEO WPIC Marketing

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>and Technologies and e commerce and technology consultancy focused on

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 3>the Asian region. Somebody asked me a question earlier today

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 3>that fits into the ten Cent story so well, which

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 3>is we've been so focused on the movement of chips

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 3>across borders or a lack of we haven't really talked

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 3>about the movement of software, right, And when I think

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 3>about ten Cent and the gaming portfolio in particular, are

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 3>there Chinese domestic companies that are getting international foothold across

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 3>e commerce, gaming and other digital businesses?

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely.

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 10>I mean even ten Cent is one of those with

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 10>their big investments and a shoppie really kind of being

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 10>a top leading player in Southeast Asia in terms of

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 10>e commerce. But yeah, I mean ten Center is they're

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 10>taking a lot of the advertising dollars you know, that

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 10>are coming from that big e commerce boom inside China

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 10>as well too. They're not so much of a player

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 10>as as say Ali Baba, you know in terms of

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 10>the B to B software that they have a whole

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 10>suite of, but you know, in terms of the advertising

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 10>becoming a bigger and bigger player in that in that part,

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 10>we saw that revenue also up by five percent this quarter.

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, the theme from Meta's earnings if there was

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:58.239
<v Speaker 3>some softness in advertising was a pullback of Chinese advertisers

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 3>in the European region in particular, perhaps in the United

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 3>States because of the geopolitical environment. I'm trying to read

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 3>through what's going on with ten Cent, and I just

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 3>don't see that macro level headwind, do you.

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 10>And I think that really what you're seeing though, is

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 10>because a lot of that advertising is still based in China.

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 10>That you know, we're coming out of a year of

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 10>pretty big stimulus in terms of the government and e

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 10>commerce spending, so we should naturally see that trickle down

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 10>come into about now Q three and Q four as

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 10>well being pretty strong in terms of the advertising dollars

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 10>that they're coming in. No, they never really had that

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 10>major post COVID stimulus in China and they waited a

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 10>little while, So we're seeing good numbers now, and we

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 10>would expect that they would hold because you know, low

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 10>inflation numbers in China as well. It also bides really

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 10>well for the consumers. So we're pretty excited about ten

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 10>cents earnings and we think that probably you're going to

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 10>see some pretty more good news from the e commerce

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 10>providers in China in the coming weeks as well.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we braced ourselves to Alibaba later in the week,

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 4>for example, called Jacob, I want to hear how much

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 4>access they're having to GPUs, how much AI and to

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 4>AI might be held back by ultimately the infrastructure they need.

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 4>It sounded as though, once again ten Cent trying to say,

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 4>we've got all the chips we need for inference, we're

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 4>not worried about it. They wouldn't go into the nitty

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 4>gritty about in video access for example.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 5>But Jacob, is it a worry?

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean we've all been saying this, but we've

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 10>now seen you know, three successive like the QN model

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 10>exactly from Ali Baba that's now leading, not leading, but

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 10>certainly up there in terms of its ability to code,

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 10>and they're going down a little bit different path at Alibaba,

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 10>but and Deep Seek as well. I mean, all of

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 10>those models are competing internationally despite the chip band. So

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 10>if ten Cent comes and says that you know, they

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 10>have all the chips they need, there's no reason not

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 10>to believe that.

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 4>More broadly, the geopolitical context, it doesn't seem to be

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 4>knocking the wind out are owning these Chinese companies sales.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they've all recovered significantly from their lows.

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think that one of the things, you know,

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 10>for us that are boots on the ground in China.

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 10>You know, there is the really high level government that

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 10>you know, where the relations are not great, and we

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 10>see the headlines, but you know, for boots on the

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 10>ground and for the local level, it's actually been very

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 10>very strong. You know, people to people connection is still

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 10>very good over there, and there's still a lot of

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 10>businesses that are setting records international business that are setting

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 10>sales records in China. So you know, there's the headlines,

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 10>but actually on the ground, I think people have been

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 10>doing business over there for quite a long time. Relationships

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 10>have been built up over decades. So we're kind of

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 10>expecting this to blow over, just like it kind of

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 10>did with the first Trump administration, and people will get

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 10>back to business.

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 3>You still have a president that in a press conference

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 3>is talking about a paid to play arrangement where the

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 3>CEO of the biggest company in the world, Nvidia, has

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 3>gone to him and agreed to a revenue share right

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 3>to get access to the Chinese market. In a tariff

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 3>or a trade dispute in China, does the same thing happen?

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you have the leaders of.

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 3>These biggest technology companies talking about and acknowledging their government's

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 3>policies in the same way and vice us.

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 10>Well, no, you don't, certainly, but I mean there's almost

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 10>the exact opposite approach. I mean there's been an export

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 10>tax credit out of China for a long time too,

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 10>so it's almost like they're going the other way and

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 10>trying to reduce prices for international consumers as opposed to

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 10>the strategy of essentially taxing exports. So no, you know,

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 10>through all these things, you know, like we said, you know,

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 10>no one's really had a problem getting access to what

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 10>they needed to get access to, and pricing seems to

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 10>be okay in the Chinese market. So yes, there's going

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 10>to be some headwinds. Q one was you know, particularly

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 10>tumultuous in the US China business cycle. But you know,

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 10>we've been through this before and we're probably going to

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 10>get through it again. And the numbers I think are

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 10>starting to say that we're probably getting over the hump here.

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 4>We'll see how the rest of the earnings come through

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 4>for these Chinese giants. Jacob Kok is always great to

0:17:50.160 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 4>check out with you. The CEO of WPIC marketing and technologies.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 5>To a company.

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Bullish raised more than a billion dollars in an IPO,

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 4>pricing it shares above the marketed range and the digital

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 4>asset exchange operator and also the owner of Media Outlook

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 4>coindesk so thirty million shares yesterday for thirty seven dollars each.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Anthony Hughes joins us as we await the company

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 4>to actually start training on the NYSE that indicated to

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 4>open sixty five to seventy dollars each. That not quite double.

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 4>There's another big pop for another hot retail EPO.

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 5>It feels like, Yes.

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 11>We've had a number of strong IPOs recently, obviously Circle

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 11>in June and then Figma a few weeks ago, So

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 11>this is really directionally a.

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Very similar story. And we've seen very stronger.

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 11>Man and we reported earlier today that there was north

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 11>of twenty times out of subscription levels for this IPO

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 11>and that a lot of institutional investors got no shares

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 11>in this offering, and from all accounts, there's been pretty

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 11>a lot of action amongst the retail brokers.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 2>You've got a little bit of the stock as well.

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I didn't and see I don't know too

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 3>much about Bullish, but I was interested to read that

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 3>like across co founders and board members taking a big

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 3>chunk of the shares or have a big chunk.

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 11>Yes, So from what we heard that when the shares

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:10.719
<v Speaker 11>are allocated here that people had a relationship with management

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 11>did receive some of the shares. And that's not completely unusual.

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 2>But often with.

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 11>These hot IPOs you get management having a big say

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 11>in the allocations because they want to place the shares

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 11>with I guess, you know, people who they think will

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 11>be long term supporters of the shares or long term

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 11>supporters of the company, or you know, they may have

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 11>other reasons for giving.

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Them the stock.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 11>But certainly in this case, that seems to be something

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 11>that sort of is you know, it's quite you know,

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 11>a big ass a major aspect of the way in

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 11>which the shares were allocated here, Brendon Bloomer.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Block one CEO, co founder, he's going to be the

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 4>biggest holder about thirty percent. ARC gets a cut, so

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 4>does black Rock. What's interesting, though, is to think about

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 4>how Tom Farley became the CEO. Originally, it's because he

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 4>was leading a spack, a special acquisition company that was

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 4>going to buy and merge back in the day for

0:19:58.240 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 4>nine billion dollars.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 2>This is a strong.

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 4>IPO, but it's not nine billion valuation. It's interesting we

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 4>saw Circle have to do the scene there, spak Han

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 4>wound back in a few years ago. Then they come

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 4>back to the market and IPO strongly e Toro another

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 4>they are managing to come but not perhaps at the

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 4>head e valuations of the past for.

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 11>A bullish yeah, although I think in the case of

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 11>Circle it quickly reclaimed the back valuation and went much

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 11>much higher. So you know, it is really interesting that

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 11>a lot of these back mergers back in that twenty

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 11>twenty one era that fell over for reasons that were

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 11>partly to do with uncertainty around the ones that were

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 11>crypto related, and it was uncertainly around cryptoregulation and aspects

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 11>like that, but also there was just a big sort

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 11>of sell off in a lot of growth names as

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 11>well in that period. So you know, it just tells

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 11>you that we're sort of somewhat back to that sort

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 11>of twenty one twenty twenty one period, not quite as

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 11>extreme as that, but you know, we're certainly in a

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 11>situation in an environment where we're looking at sort of

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 11>lower rates and the market at record highs. You know,

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 11>we're sort of starting to get a lot of a

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 11>lot of hot money in the ip market, but also,

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 11>you know, a lot more IPOs are probably going to

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 11>come in the later stages of twenty twenty five as well.

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 2>We're waiting for trading to start.

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 3>But bullishees indicated open somewhere sixty to sixty five dollars

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 3>each after pricing at thirty seven. Blueberg's anenty hughes. Thank

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 3>you very much, indeed.

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. Check in on these markets

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 4>richer floating between gains and losses on the last that

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 4>one hundred are currently just off by eight points, but

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 4>we are near record highs once again. All eyes on

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 4>the Fed policy, whether we get the big cuts. It's

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 4>helping crypto.

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 5>We're up four tens percent.

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 4>We're coming down from the previous highs earlier in the session,

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 4>but still one hundred and twenty thousand. You're at a

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 4>record high in the market cap of crypto now for

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 4>trillion at the same as in video. Let's look at Vidio.

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's look at the chip stocks more broadly ed, because

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 4>they are in the eye of the geopolitical storm right

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 4>now in video off by one point six percent after

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 4>we all digest really what a fifteen percent payment on

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 4>all your age twenties to China really means for the business.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 4>How much that's going to extra uplating to China? Not

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 4>wanting those chips? AMD though up three point ten percent.

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 4>Interesting the difference here that we're seeing in the two

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 4>key names I'm looking at all Micron off by.

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 5>More than two percent. Ed you've been pointing this out now.

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 4>Remember has rallied the four days prior to this almost

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent after it pre announced some of its numbers.

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 4>They look strong in dram but interesting reports of course

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 4>that they are laying off people.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 5>In China at the moment.

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's look at another mover, and actually this decline is

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 3>massively accelerated. Shares of Core we've now down almost nineteen

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent in the session. They'd been down nearer to

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 3>ten percent after the company posted a disappointing earnings outlook.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Margins are under pressure from this kind of rapid AI

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 3>data center expansion. We spoke with the CEO MI coin

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 3>traitor earlier today.

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 2>The message was.

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Training demand, sustained inference demand, fast growing.

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 2>Listen to this, we continue.

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 12>To see massive demand for training. Right like that, that

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 12>hasn't in any way. But what you're seeing is a

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 12>continue cranking up of the demand for inference, and we

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 12>see it within our portfolio of data centers because when

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 12>when the compute is being dispatched, if it's being used

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.719
<v Speaker 12>for training, you'll see a step function right the training

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 12>job begins, it runs, it steps down when it's over.

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 12>But when you're when you're viewing the compute being used

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 12>for inference, what you see is a much more gradual

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 12>increase and decrease as you move through the day, as

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 12>people begin to come on and off their demands for

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 12>artificial intelligence and the the uh. You know, we haven't

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 12>lost demand for training new models, but we have been

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 12>incredibly pressed across the industry for compute for additional inference capacity.

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 3>What's the percentage split inference training for you?

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 12>The last time I looked, and it does move a lot,

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 12>it was over fifty percent for inference at this point.

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's an interesting change because I think I ask

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 3>you that quite regularly and it seems to be at

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 3>that mark. The thing that I've been thinking about a

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 3>lot recently is the aging the aging GPU. You know,

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 3>basically a video commits to that change right on an

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 3>annual basis in the context of the demand picture you

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 3>just outlined, but also what you're trying to do in scaling,

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 3>how do you keep up with the aging GPU scenario.

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so, look, what we're seeing in our infrastructure is

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 12>a consistent movement of the newest iterations of architecture that

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 12>come out of in video being used to drive the

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 12>most bleeding edge training infrastructure jobs required. And what happens

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 12>is is the prior generation begins to pick up the

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 12>load on infernt and you see it kind of passing

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 12>from one generation to a next generation to the next generation.

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 13>We are not.

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 12>Seeing meaningful declines in the H one hundred demand, which

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 12>is the prior generation to the Grace Blackwell that is

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 12>the cutting edge right now. We're also not seeing any

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 12>real decreasing demand for the Ampire series, which is even

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 12>prior to the H one hundreds. There is broad based

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 12>inference demand absorbing that compute.

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 13>It's being picked up into term.

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 12>Contracts by many of the same players that are looking

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 12>to support the ever growing demands of inference.

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 3>You diversify the business. Mica away from just open AI

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 3>and Microsoft.

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 12>Look, it's a huge focus for our organization. We've made

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.479
<v Speaker 12>tremendous progress. I talked a little bit about it in

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 12>the earnings last night. As we take on new clients,

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 12>as we basically penetrate additional layers of the enterprise space.

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 12>I talked a little bit about how we're not only

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 12>seeing diversification of clients, but we're also seeing green shoots

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 12>and new parts of the economy that are beginning to

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 12>integrate artificial intelligence. And I focused a little bit on,

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 12>you know, two sectors, and it's just two sectors that

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 12>we chose. The one was the VFX space, where we

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 12>saw companies like Moon Valley come in and begin to

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 12>integrate artificial intelligence into visual effects.

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 13>Uh.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 12>You know, it's an incredible growth sector for us. We're

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 12>seeing a lot of new companies begin to ramp there.

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 12>We're also seeing real developments so begin to occur in

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 12>the life sciences portion of the market. There are you know,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 12>I spoke about hipocratic AI and you know, like those

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 12>are wonderful developments. It really is speaking to a resilient

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 12>broadening of artificial intelligence as it penetrates the economy.

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Michael We've been studying really closely how x Ai went

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 3>about building Colossus and what Meta plans to do with

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 3>its next gen capacity.

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 2>They very much kind of go it alone.

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 3>And I wondered if you talk a little bit about

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity or maybe lack of opportunity you see to

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:22.959
<v Speaker 3>work with those two names.

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so that is a client of ours, you know,

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 12>and and we we we are you know, we work

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 12>with them very well. We think there's lots of opportunities

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 12>for us to expand our relationship with them and and

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 12>to broaden their use of our computational infrastructure.

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 13>We think that, you know, the work that x is.

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 12>Doing at at their sites is incredibly impressive, you know,

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 12>but we believe that ultimately, when you're dealing with the

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 12>scaling exercise that looks like what is going on within Ai,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 12>you're always going to wind up using partners.

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 13>It's just the nature of it. You need to build

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 13>so much so fast.

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 12>So broadly, we're very confident that there's really great opportunities

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 12>for us to continue to work with.

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 13>A broad set of companies. You know.

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 12>I spoke a little bit about this on the earnings also,

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 12>which was you know, in the last eight weeks, we've

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 12>seen two of our hyper scale our clients come back

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 12>and execute extensions and broaden their contractual relationship with us.

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 12>It's very exciting and it is representative of space that's

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 12>broadly trying to address this systemic imbalance of which you know,

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 12>Corewave is a wonderful solution. We deliver, you know, best

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 12>in class technology, best in class software stack to be

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 12>able to allow different users across the space to really

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 12>take advantage of the infrastructure that we're building.

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 5>What a rich deep dive with the call we CEO.

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech, and you're looking at a live

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 3>shot of the principal room. Check out the Bloomberg Tech podcast.

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:10.479
<v Speaker 3>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 3>online on Apple, Spotify and iHeart this is Bloomberg.

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 6>This is a very unique solution allows Invidia to expand

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 6>into China. It can make in Vidia chips the bellweather

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 6>for Chinese technology, and then the US taxpayer gets a

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 6>share of that.

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Key words unique, Is it unique to Invidia an amt

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 3>or is this a model for other companies?

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I think we.

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 6>Could see it in other industries over time. I think

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 6>you know right now this is unique. But now that

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 6>we have the model and the beta test, why not

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 6>expand it?

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Treasury Secretary Scott beston joining Bloomberg TV earlier today. Let's

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 4>talk more about what this unique deal can mean for

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 4>companies in the US and in China. Mischeal Green has

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.479
<v Speaker 4>found a managing partner of lead Edge Capital. You're an

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 4>investor in Chinese names of the past, the IPOs, Valie, Baba,

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Byte Dance, you hold a course, but you're also in

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 4>many other areas and industries. We heard in that conversation

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 4>with Scott Besson that maybe this does apply to other

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 4>industries and maybe will this be a pay for play?

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 5>More broadly, what do you make of it?

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 14>You can figure out how to read the US and

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 14>Chinese government relations between you know what they say and

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 14>what they all do. Please please keep me enlightened and

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 14>inform me, because you know we're as confused as every

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 14>other viewer that you listen to. I do think both

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 14>of these countries leaders fully know that they need to

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 14>work together. You know, one hundred and fifty percent tariffs

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 14>on our companies selling to them, their companies selling to

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.479
<v Speaker 14>us is just stupidity and all facets of it.

0:30:58.800 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 13>We're going to work together.

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 14>Look clear as it comes back to technology, you know AI,

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 14>the implementation of it is very global. I mean, I'm

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 14>talking in my own book here that we were big

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 14>investors on a dollar basis, and White Dance obviously very

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 14>small as a percentage just giving up big the company is,

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 14>but we think White Dance is one of the foremost

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 14>AI companies on the planet.

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, is there a.

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Wary Mitchell though that if their own government is telling

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 4>them that they shouldn't really be going for age twenties. Yes,

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 4>they're called obsolete by President Trump and they're not really

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.479
<v Speaker 4>able to access them as much as they'd like. Mitchell,

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Is that a worry for the future of Bite Dances

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 4>the AI powerhouse alongside some of the other Chinese rivals.

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 13>I would not bet against.

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 14>Chinese ingenuity in designing systems, solutions and systems around You know,

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 14>you saw what happened.

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 13>In deep Sea.

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 14>Who knows how much they spent, but obviously they trained

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 14>a model and used it in independent tests. That was

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 14>you know, a fraction of a fraction of a fraction

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 14>what it.

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 13>Costs some of these US people to do without. Who

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 13>knows a bad access to.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.479
<v Speaker 14>These chips are not I wouldn't bet against the Chinese

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 14>semiconductor industry. Now it's not I'm actually we're not semi

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 14>conductor experts, but like I think, if Nvidia chips are

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 14>not allowed over there are certain chips aren't allowed in there.

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 14>I wouldn't bet against these companies and these entrepreneurs from

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 14>figuring out, you know, ingenious solutions around designing them.

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 13>Right.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 3>The underlying assumption the Treasury secretaries mating is that China

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 3>wants America's chips, irrespective of how much revenue those companies

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 3>pays the Treasury or wherever it goes. Anyway, I actually

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 3>wanted to ask you about software. I had a fun

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 3>a few week here in London and various European and

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 3>British software names kind of went down and Monday dot

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Com is at the heart of it. That's the story

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 3>where it's like no code, traditional SaaS has bad print,

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 3>and the market's like, oh AI makes all of this

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of legacy software stuff not very good anymore.

0:32:59.240 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 13>Right?

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Could you explain that to me? You kind of know

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 2>this this field.

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So it's it's funny.

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 14>At a higher level, a lot of these like software

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 14>companies are actually in no man's land. You have half

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 14>the investors out there screaming for growth. You have the

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 14>other half of the investors out there screaming for profits

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 14>and on a value on multiples of profits. And it's

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 14>like this tuggle work. The companies aren't growing as fast

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 14>now because they're really really freaking big, and the much

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 14>smaller companies and software are still growing fast because there's

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 14>not nearly as big. When you're two billion of revenue,

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 14>it's a lot harder and forty percent than it is

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 14>if you're like two hundred million of revenue. Right, I

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 14>can tell you we are investors in our primary business

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 14>is investing in application software companies, you know, And I

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 14>will tell you that almost every one of our companies

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 14>is using AI to become more productive.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 13>You know.

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 14>We have a company up in Toronto Gravity that may

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 14>have I don't know, ten to fifteen software engineers. They

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 14>can now use it to have the equivalent of forty

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 14>five software engineers and just be more productive. But they're

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 14>not firing all their software engineers. They think people who

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 14>work with this code, you know. Our belief is that

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 14>if you are like software that's like system of record

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 14>and you have data, we actually think that it's really

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 14>really valuable. And I don't have to tell the viewers

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 14>out there that if you if you know, if the

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 14>work they are going to legacy companies. A lot of

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 14>legacy companies are going to massively benefit from AI, just

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 14>like they did with the Internet. Like the biggest beneficial

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 14>of the Internet may have been like you know, you know,

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 14>you know, literally a iPhone, people like Amazon and Facebook

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 14>and Google and Microsoft. It was it was around before mobile,

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 14>Like these are the guys that benefited. You know, who's

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 14>going to win Snowflake, salesforce, workday, data dog, Private companies

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 14>like Gafana, public companies like Toasts, like all these companies

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 14>are going to use them to be that much more productive.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 14>We think ninety to ninety five percent of the AI

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:08.919
<v Speaker 14>application software companies.

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 13>Getting built today are zeros.

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 14>Horrible economics, negative gross margins, burning money like crazy.

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so in the year's time, let's check back and

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 3>we'll keep track of that. On Mitchell Green, founder and

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 3>managing partner lead Aage Capital, great heavy back on the show.

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Two launches blasting off in the last twenty four hours,

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 3>ULA's Vulcan rocket on its first national security mission in

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 3>Europe's Arian six completing just its third mission. Ever, let's

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 3>get more from Bloomberg'slauren Grass, who leads our space coverage.

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to start the ULA launch. Tell me about it.

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Why is it significant?

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, this was.

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 15>The third launch for the Vulcan rocket, but as you

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 15>mentioned earlier, it was their first national security mission, which

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 15>is really what Vulcan.

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 13>Was designed to do.

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 15>ULA as one of an elite group of launch providers

0:35:54.480 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 15>that can launch the Defense Department's most sensitive national security satellite,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 15>but this was their first time doing so with this

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 15>particular rocket. They had to receive certification for it. So

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 15>first they had to launch two rockets or two missions

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 15>with Vulcan to prove to the Space Force that it

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 15>could handle launching national security satellites. And it actually suffered

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 15>a tiny issue on its second flight. A strap on

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 15>booster had a small explosion. The rockets still made it

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 15>to orbit, but it delayed the certification process. However, it

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 15>did receive that certification in March and then ultimately was

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.319
<v Speaker 15>able to do this launch, and so that'll pave the

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 15>way for even more national security missions moving forward.

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 4>And turning our attention to Europe and Ariane six. How

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 4>much is this just countries entire areas of the globe

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 4>trying to wean themselves less on dependency from SpaceX and

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 4>have their own competitives.

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I think it was. There was a lot of

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 15>symmetry last night because these were the third flights of

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 15>both of these rockets, and both of these vehicles are

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.760
<v Speaker 15>in this similar class to that of the SpaceX Falcon

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 15>nine rocket, which has essentially had a de facto monopoly

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 15>on the launch market for the last few years, at

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.720
<v Speaker 15>least with this particular class of rockets. So the launches

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 15>of these two vehicles kind of do civilize, you know,

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.439
<v Speaker 15>perhaps there are going to be more options for other

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 15>satellite providers in the future looking for this class of vehicle.

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 15>Of course, it's going to take some time. As I said,

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:27.959
<v Speaker 15>these are the third flights. They both struggled to ramp

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:30.720
<v Speaker 15>up in terms of their launch cadence, whereas the Falcon

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 15>nine is launching every few days, So it's going to

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 15>take a while for them to reach up.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 13>But at least there.

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 15>Are more and more rockets of this caliber coming online

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 15>that satellite operators can turn.

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 4>To perhaps produce that logjam. Bloomberg's long brush. Great reporting

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 4>is always thank you very much. Indeed, Now that does

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 4>it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. What a lot

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 4>of earnings we still digested and.

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 5>Got to come.

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and a critical conversation with a Treasury secretary recap

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 3>on the podcast. You know where to find it on

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg terminal as well as online, Apple, Spotify and

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 3>on iHeart. From London and New York City, this is

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech.