WEBVTT - Leverage 'Party' Is At Root of Fund Blowups: Ben Hunt

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Looking at the equity markets,

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>we are at or near all time highs, but there's

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely some concerned building in this marketplace that maybe it

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is overheated. You can look no further, maybe than some

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of the blowups we've seen just recently, whether it's the

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Archegos from last week, Melvin Capital on all the Reddit stocks,

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and some others. Here to help us put it all

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>on perspective, we welcome Ben Hunt. He's co founder and

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer of Second Foundation Partners. He's also the

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>creator and author for Epsilon Theory newsletter and website based

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in Reading, Connecticut. So Ben is, as you take a

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, whether it's Greensial or Archegos or

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Capital, what do you see when you see some

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of those kind of blow ups in the market Yeah, well,

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on to talk about this, Paul, I.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. You know, you know, I obviously all

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>three of these, right, So Melvine Capital, as you mentioned,

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>that's that's Gabe Plotkin's hedge fund that was at the

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>epicenter of the Game Stop robin Hood debacle. Right. You've

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>got Green Silk Capital with supposedly you know, supply chain

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>financing uh, and then most recently you've got Archagos UH

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and and whatever that was. Right, And certainly these are

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>all a little different. I mean, I guess it was,

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I forget who it was, the Tolstoy. Every unhappy family

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>is unhappy in its own way, right, so so you know,

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>they're they're clearly differences in the situation of all three

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of these, but there's also really important similarity. And that similarity,

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I think is that all three of these institutions were

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>levered to the hilt funded by other financial institutions. And

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I and I think that sort of leverage is at

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the demise, or, at least in the

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>case of Melvin, the misfortune that that that all three

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of them have had ben Correct me if I'm wrong,

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and if I'm stepping out a line. But it is

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>very easy in times like these to blame the Fed.

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>They've pumped up this market with unlimited quei, unlimited stimulus.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is fomo. We all have confetti emojis when we

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>make trades. How much of this is a problem because

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>money is too easy? Well, look, I mean this is

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>always this issue, right, I mean, this is the punch bowl.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And what happens when you've got uh an unlimited punch

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>bowl with spite with with with pure grade alcohol. Well,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, people get drunk and and I think that's

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>what we have being represented market today. But but look,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's yes, you're you're so right easy to blame

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the fat And frankly, I do think that zero interest

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 1>rate policy for so long has to have these sort

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of consequences that we're seeing today. But but I think

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it also goes beyond the fat Taylor. Honestly, I think

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that one of the big reasons that that we are

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in this situation is that the lenders, the people who

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are extending the leverage that's being gobbled up by the

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>bill loongs of the world or the gay Plotkins of

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the world. You know, it means something when we talk

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>about too big to fail. It means something when we

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about these systemically import financial institutions. They can extend

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this leverage. They can take these losses without frankly, taking

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the consequences of bad risk management and bad decision making.

0:03:55.840 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, so the bullmarket been for this market is

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear for most investors. And then you know in

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the FED with low low interest rates, fiscal stimulus,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the reopening trade, and we all know the bull case. Here,

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>where is the risk in that bulk case? From your perspective,

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it seems it's pretty clear to a lot of investors.

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>But where do you see the risk in that bull call? Well, look,

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the risk is is where the risk always is right,

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the uh can the party go on forever?

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>The risk is always what happens as as we're seeing

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>some examples today of the enormous losses that are made

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>possible by the use of leverage. Uh. You know what

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>we're experiencing today, I think is a reversal and a

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>number of the I'll call them correlations, but but but

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>really what they are these gigantic economic barges that have

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>been sailing in the same direct action for like thirty

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>or forty years. I'm talking about inflation expectations, moving from

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>expectations of deflation to inflation. You're seeing that being reflected

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in interest rates. I'm talking about the reversal and globalization,

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this massive force for deflation, but also for these the

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>supply chains, supply finance, trade finance. It's been a one

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>way market in both inflation expectations and globalization for thirty

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or forty years, and I think we're clearly seeing signs

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that those one way bets are shifting. So that's why

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that that well, that's what I think could

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>cause went to pay the piper. With the enormous amount

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of leverage that's being extended to so many of these

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>investment firms, how much of this two comes down to

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the need for transparency. I just watched that great I

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think it was a PBS documentary about Brooksley Born and

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 1>long term capital management. And I met Taylor Riggs Capital Management,

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and I know what I've lent you, and Paul Sweeney

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>at his Capital Management knows what he's lent you. But

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he and I have no idea what we have combined

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>collectively lent you. And therein lies the problem. Well, I'll

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>say that that's a problem in two respects. One, it's

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a problem that our regulators are are are not seemingly

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>able to provide or capture that that sort of of transparencies.

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>You're saying, that sort of visibilities that we can know

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>what risks exist in the market. But but I'll also

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>say it gets back to this this notion of being

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>too big to sail. You know, you know you're never

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop investment banks or prime brokers from taking risk.

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>We wouldn't want to. We wouldn't want to stop that, right.

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's very different. We live in a

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>world of today where I don't know that we can

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>have a Bear Stearns moment, right. I don't know that

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it's paul sable for a prime broker today too, you know,

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to extend so much leverage that that they get taken

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>out in the street and shot. Huh and and and

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a yeah, right right, absolutely, we hope not. But

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>what I would say is that if if that ultimate

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>um penalty doesn't exist, then I think that takes away

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of the motivation of the banks to say, hey,

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>let me let me do a little more digging here,

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and let me let me have a conversation with other

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>banks about how much leverage they're extending to this guy

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>or that guy. I think it comes back to that

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>too big to sail notion. All right, Ben, thanks so

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>much for joining so we appreciate your thoughts here on

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>these markets. Ben Hunt, co founder and chief investment officer

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of Second Foundation Partners. Let's all recent news that Goldman

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Sachs called quit on a dollar short the currency team

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>closed it's recommended short green back position against a basket

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of G ten come any currencies, including the Aussie and Kiwi,

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in a note titled Tactical Retreat. Let's get some color

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on those currency markets. We do that with Dr Win Thin,

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>global head Currency Strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman. Uh when

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. What do you

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>make of that Goldman call there on the dollar? Oh,

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>first of all, thanks for having me. It's always it's

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>always a pleasure to be on here. Um. You know,

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they pretty much had to acknoledge the inevitable.

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Now I can't fault like the original call because think

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>about you know, this is anty history, but think about

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>where we started the year. January one, the US virus

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>numbers were exploding vaccines were nowhere being rolled out. Um,

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>most of the con was closed. Um, we're looking at

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it at a split government and all of a sudden

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>June six have even changed. And you know that if

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things happened that day, but the main

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that happened was that was the day after the

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Georgia send It runoffs and we got um, the Democrats swept,

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing the fruits to that right now. We

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>saw an aggressive fiscal package already, we're talking about another

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>two trillion infrastructure spending, another one coming after that. So

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>one onom line is that the US economic outlook is

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>much much better than it was when we started the year. UM.

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>The two twenty was clearly dollar negative. We did a

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>terrible job with the pandemic. But really we've seen one

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>eight over there over Q one, and I think the dollar,

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>equity market, spawn markets are all reflecting this. This really

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a new outlook. UM. Effects is certainly part of that trade. Now,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>how are you thinking about the impacts on e M.

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Where we thought we were going to have big dollar weakness,

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we ended up not. We had some dollar strength. You

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>have some rising yields here in the US. As you

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>think about capital flows and relative attractiveness. How then, does

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this change the outlook for emerging markets. Yeah, that's a

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>great question because you know it's it's I think that

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the drivers to e M are in stense constlickting right now.

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So the global growth story again it's not just the US,

0:09:58.080 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>but you know, China is doing well, Japan is starting

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>pick up um. The global growth outlook is is very

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>positive for e M UM. You know, we're seeing strong exports,

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>have Taiwan, Korea, high commodity prices, and that's all great,

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>you know well and good for em UM. But in

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of currency, the strong dollar definitely, you know, throws

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a monkey you mentioned into it. You know, it's it's

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>there are times when the dollar can diverge against the majors,

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>against em but right now it seems to be sort

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of you know, full on dollar strength UM. And that's

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>not to say that's bad for for em you know,

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>some your currency UM exchange ways is actually not bad

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for e M. I think many of the policymakers in

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the emerging markets were concerned about the week dollars strong

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>local currencies, and I think they're sort of getting almost

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>getting in a sweet spot. So I would say negative

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on EM currencies, but positive on EM equities and e

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>M growth. All right, when how about you know, we

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about dollar strength. Where do you see opportunities in

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>some G ten currencies here where some where are you

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>guys doing some work? Sure so, UM, I think the

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>all will will will really do best against sort of

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the big the big three. That would be a sterling, euro, yen,

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen that in the sort of the UH

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you know REU to date performance. But where I see

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>some performance within the majors is the UM dollar block

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:16.719
<v Speaker 1>and scandies. And it goes back to what I just

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>said about EM and that's the similar things would hold

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.599
<v Speaker 1>for the sort of these growth sensitive major currency. You know,

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously can the Cadian dollar, um naki are oil related

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>very positive there? Um you know, uh, Swedish krona um

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>AUSSI key we you know, kind of keyed into Chinese

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and global growth. So those currencies can outperform. But again

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it's would be very hard sort of um you know,

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I think really gain against when the dollars is just

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>on such a tear. Um you know, I think you know,

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the Q two outlook UH is really strong for growth

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>right now we're talking about seven percent. I think it's

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>key senses carrying over to seven percent in two three,

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's when the rest of the you know, when

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>most of Europe is struggling. That you know, that's sort

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of the other part of the equation. You know, France

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>just went back into lockdown, Germany Itaier extended there, you know,

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the limited lockdown. So you know, the European outlook. Um,

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you know x x UK is really quite poor right now,

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, I think that we can really

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>see this performance against the euro and to lesser extent

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>agen sterling. But but you know, the growth sensitive majors

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of holding up. Okay quickly here the yen hedge

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>funds boosting their short yen bets to the highest in

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>two years. Is this a traditional and still safe haven

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>or is there something else going on? Well no, I

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>think um really, uh, we're kind of unwinding that safe

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>haven right So the short sirred record high, So I

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>think people are so you know, I think we're seeing

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>similar price action in the swissy as well. We're moving

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the safe havens and more into the sort

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of you know growth um, you know, cyclical type currencies. UM,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's yen uh dollar yen rise again.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Weakness can continue. We've got to march high the eleven

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>one eleven seventy. I wanna go even further. We're looking

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>at a two eighteen higher on one five. But you know,

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>let's take things one steparate time. UM, let's go a

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>quarter by quarter. But right now to me this I

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>think this, you know, today's weakness. Not notwithstanding, I think

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a technical move. I think the fundamental

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>drivers remain dollar positive. I should just add one quick thing, um.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I've noticed is that the set funds

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.719
<v Speaker 1>futures are starting to move up. The fet tightning expectations.

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh hike in two three is about almost half priced

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in and almost fully priced in by end twenty two UM,

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>which is very much of the Hodes with the dot

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>plots saying steady rates three. So that's at the margin

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>also very thirty dollar positive. So all these things are

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of falling in the place of the

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar really sort of reversal what we saw in so

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>here we are, you know, taking back your dollars short.

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Dr Winton, thank you so much for joinings. We always

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your thoughts on the global currency market's global head

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>currency strategy of Brown Brothers Herriman. Let's talk about this

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>reopening trade. We've got lots and lots of evidence that

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>this economy here is reopened, but we're also seeing some

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>bottlenecks in supply chains, in logistics. Let's get a sense

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of kind of what's going on out there in corporate America.

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 1>We could do that with Chris Dansbury, CFO Arrow Electronics.

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>They are based in where are they Centennial, Colorado? So

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>there dangerously close to some of the best skiing in

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the world. Chris, thanks so much for joining us here. Briefly,

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just describe Arrow Electronics for our listeners who may not

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>be aware of it, and then give us a sense

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of kind of what you're seeing in your business. Yeah.

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Great to be with you this morning. Thanks for having me.

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Arrow is a distributor of semiconductor and electronic component products

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>around the world. You've got a really broad line card,

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>so we represent a broad swath of suppliers and we

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>help customers choose the right parts for their products. Uh.

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And that can include engineering designs for you know, semiconductor

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>board assemblies and whatnot. That go into finished products, so

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that can be everything from your toaster to your car.

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Um and uh as as more and more electronic content

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>goes into into products, we we do see abroad view

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of the overall economy. So what's interesting about where we

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sit today is that as we went into two thousand nineteen,

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>if we wanted to clock back a couple of years,

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the market went into just a cyclical decline and so

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>people leaned out inventories, our customers leaned out inventories. Uh

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that looked like it was about to recover at the

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>beginning of last year, and then the pandemic hit and

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>inventories came down again. So where we find ourselves right

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>now is in a situation where people are sitting on

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>lean inventories and there's really high demand for those products.

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting. It's going back and reviewing the

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>transcript from your earnings call that was really just two

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>months ago, and lot of questions of course about the

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>chip shortage and how big the difference is between supply

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and demand. What has changed in the last two months.

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Has it gotten any better? Uh? Now, I would say

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's continuing to progress along those lines. Again, It's we're

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in unstarted territory here where the business does go through cycles.

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>But we're we're starting this ramp up following a cyclical

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>slowdown and a pandemic. So I think that the biggest

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>example that we see and we all hear about is

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>on the automotive side, right. Car dealers would love to

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have more cars on lots um, and the automotive sector

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>leaned out inventories as they went into the pandemic, you know,

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>expecting things to really soften and and really what we

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>saw happen was, uh, you know, people spend less on

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the things that they just physically couldn't spend money on

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>travel leisure restaurants, and they started to spend end it

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on other areas, uh, you know, home improvement, electronics, uh,

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, for for not just consumer products, but for

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the home and car sales actually remained fairly strong. So

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>we we ended up in the latter part of uh

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>last year and into this year with just broad demand

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>across all industrial categories and that continues. So it's interesting, Chris,

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking at your stock all time high today

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>up about two d four dollars um. What's the market

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>discounting your stock price? Are you viewed as a reopening trade. Yeah.

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I think really we UM were looked at as First

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, we were very strong from a counter cyclical standpoint.

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>The stock held up well through the pandemic because we

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>generate a lot of cash in a downturn, right, We

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of inventory and working capital that

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>we re reduce in those windows, and it allows us

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to paint on debt and buy stock a good prices.

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And so we've done that. But now I think investors

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>are really seeing the earnings potential the growth from the

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>business as the economies around the world recover and uh

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and more and more consumption of semiconductor product takes place. UM.

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You know where we fit as interesting because the underlying

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.239
<v Speaker 1>product that we sell has a deflationary value to it,

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>which which is a headwind UM. The tail wind is

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is that UM more than offsets. That is, is that

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>there's more and more electronic consumption in everything that we

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>consume and use, and and certainly with environmental pressures and whatnot, uh,

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, that will continue. So that's a that's a

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>much bigger tail wind for us. And I think the

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>market recognizes that we only have about a minute left.

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Wanted to get your thoughts on some of the comments

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we heard from the President last week in the infrastructure plan.

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of production of chips and that nationalism, right,

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>bringing that back to the US. How does that impact you?

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's we we um distribute product all over

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the world. We're buying it from from multiple geographic locations

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and shipping it to other geographic locations. So I don't

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>think it really changes what we do. Uh. You know.

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.239
<v Speaker 1>The reality is is that for the last you know,

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>five to ten years, there's there's obviously been an increase

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in nationalistic tendencies around the world. Um, you know, I

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>think that has its challenges with trade, but certainly from

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a a you know what we do standpoint, if there's

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>more made here, then we'll just be shipping more from

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>here and less from other places. So we're quite happy

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to shift as the market ships. We had to do

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that with teriffs, we've had to do it with other things,

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, being nimble is part of the

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>value we bring our suppliers and customers. Hey, Chris, thanks

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We really appreciate chatting with you,

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>getting some update on your company and on some of

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>these global supply chain issues, which you guys are right

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>smack in the middle of Christiansbury Cevo of Arrow Electronics.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>They are based in any suburb of Denver, Colorado. One

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of the key pillars underneath the equity bull call has

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>been the reopening trade, and we certainly be getting some

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>data points that support that, whether it's the airlines, whether

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>it's the gaming companies or the UH some of the

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>other leisure businesses. And also we got last Friday that

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>very very strong jobs reports, So again, the reopening trade

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to be in play. UH. Is that enough to

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 1>push this market higher? Let's check in with Phil Orlando,

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>chief equity market strategist and head of client portfolio Management

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>at Federated Herme's. Phil, thanks so much for joining us

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>once again. You've been a consistently bullish call on this

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>equity market. Are you still there? I am absolutely still there?

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Um this UH? I don't know if you read in

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>my market commentary on Friday. I was working Friday because

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bureau of Labor Statistics thought they'd released the jobs

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>report on Friday. Numbers were astounding, you know, aside from

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the nine hundred and sixteen thousand jobs added and the

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty six thousand revisions positive for January and February.

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Getting under the hood exactly puts an exclamation mark on

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the point you just made. So you look at the

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>household survey adding six hundred nine thousand jobs, triple the

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>prior month. Leisure and hospitality added two hundred and eighty

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand jobs. State and local education schools are opening up

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>now added another hundred and one thousand jobs. All of

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this is because the pace of vaccination is improving. We're

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>now up to like what two point seven million vacs

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is a day. Uh. And as a result, now schools

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>are reopening bars, restaurants, stores, and end. These these lower skilled,

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>lower wage workers who were forced to the sidelines because

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of these you know, lockdowns, are now flooding back into

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the labor market. And um, this one statistic is will

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>blow your mind. If you have less than a high

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>school diploma, UM, your rate of unemployment in February was

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>ten point one percent. It improved in March from ten

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>point one percent to eight point two percent, roughly a

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>two percentage point decrease in the rate of unemployment. That's

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>telling us these people are coming back into the labor market.

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>And that's good for the overall economy and for the

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>financial market. Phil I'm typically on in the afternoons and remain.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Bostick and I are having a huge debate every day.

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>We fight it out. He does not believe in inflation.

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I firmly believe in inflation. We see the I S

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>M services in March now the highest on record, prices paid,

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the highest since two thousand and eight. When are inflationary

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>problems going to be an issue? Though? For the equity market, well,

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:05.959
<v Speaker 1>it's a question of nominal versus core Romaine is uh.

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, for those who are looking at inflation, if

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you're focused upon the nominal numbers, Copper prices have quadrupled

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>over you know, doubled over the last year. Lumber prices

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>have quadrupled, Oil has doubled h corn wheat uh soybeans

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>are up seventy eight percent. So all of those nominal

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>prices are up sharply as the economy has recovered. But

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>remember the core inflation, the consumer price Index and the

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Personal consumption expenditure index. They strip out the increases and

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the food and energy prices, so those numbers look relatively

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>more muted. But something's going to happen over the next

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>three months what the Federal Reserve refers to as a

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>procedural base effect. To go back and look at the

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>inflation in in this time last year. Uh, you know, February, March,

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>April May, those numbers were negative. Well, we're gonna roll

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>those numbers off now progressively over the next three or

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>four months, so it's gonna look like core inflation is spiking.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>But basically all we're doing is lopping off a negative

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>number and adding on a positive number. So core PC,

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, we could see that number of two and

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a half percent um over the summer, which is exactly

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>where the Fed wants to see it. The question is

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is it going to keep going up to three, four

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>or five. We think the answer is no. We think

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna stay in sort of that two two and

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a half percent neighborhood on a core level, even though

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the nominal numbers have moved up pretty strongly here. Alright,

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So given that inflation backdrop in your overall bullish call,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>what are the sectors that are you guys are doing

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the most work on right now? Well, we were sticking

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to our guns here that that the cyclical trade is

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the one that's working. We we we took the r

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:57.199
<v Speaker 1>overweight in technology back to neutral last August, and we

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>felt that the catalyst was in place that categories like

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>financials and industrials and consumer discretionary and energy, that those

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>categories were ready to catch a bid here because the

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>economy was was out of recession and was gonna was

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna rebound very strongly. That's that's played out, but the

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>valuation gap hasn't hasn't been fully closed. So so domestic

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>large cap value is going to continue to do well. International,

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly emerging markets and international SMID and the small caps,

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>those are the areas that I think you're going to

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>continue to do well. Okay, Hey Phil, thanks so much

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. We always appreciate chatting with you. For

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the Little WINDA chief equity market strategist for Federated Hermes,

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller in three and on ball Sweeney I'm

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Lumberg Radio m