WEBVTT - NFL Reaction: Micah Parsons WANTS OUT, Caleb STRUGGLES + Luka & Lakers EXTENSION

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in episode three fifty five of What's Right with

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Nick Wright, And as always, this episode is brought to

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you by our friends at boost Mobile. So much to

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>do amazing weekend. I wasn't able to say what I

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>was doing beforehand, and I'm not able to say the

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>results yet. But if you guys remember back in the day,

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the NBC Heads Up Poker Championship sixty four person March

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Madness style bracket that plays down six rounds to one

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>champion twenty five thousand dollars a person entry top prize.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I think back then, I don't know what it was.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>This time it was half a million bucks for top prize.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Everyone in the Sweet sixteen I got twenty five K.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Elite eight got seventy five K. Final four one hundred

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and fifty K second place, quarter million, first place, half

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a million. I was in it and got the not

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>low draw. I had Chino Reem in the first round.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>If I were to win the first round, I was

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>staring at either Eric Lingrin or Jason Kohn, and in theory,

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it just got harder from there. But that's what I

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>was doing this weekend, and it will air on Peacock

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in October and on Poker Go uh afterwards and so

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>once it aired, like no spoilers. It's like taping a

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>season of Survivor, except you know, you know, either more

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>cool or less cool, depending on what you like. Where

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I know the results and I can't discuss them. And

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>again no spoilers. But if on you know, if on

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the next pod, I'm wearing a new watch, maybe I did. Well.

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>What I will tell you is it was an unbelievable experience.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to really be able to talk about it.

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>But that's what I was doing over the weekend. Here

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>is another thing that happened over the weekend. Demon say

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this is this is You'll love this. You'll love this.

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Listeners should love this as well. I think so. I

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>played in Uh yeah, I think it's fair. I played

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in a pretty famous private card game in Vegas. And

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say whose it was, because all

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, card games they're getting, you know, just

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>ask Gilbert Arenas that can go sideways on you. This

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of course that none of those you know, unsavory elements,

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>but whatever, it was some of the more famous card

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 1>players in the world, and there were two people there

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know, but were, you know, big time card

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>players and my first day there after, about twenty minutes,

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the guys came over to me and I'd

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>love to say who these people were, but it's privacy

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and whatever. So am I going to and he says,

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to show you something and he opens up

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>his podcast app and the podcast he was listening to

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>on the way in was You and Me our last

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>episode from third Day. And I was like, that is

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>so cool, and.

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 2>This is on what day?

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Though? This is this was on Saturday night. Saturday night.

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>He was listening to Thursday Thursday. Yeah, so cool. Then

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>like two hours later, this British guy that I've been

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sitting next to for hours, he has a similar he

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>had a similar chain as me, and so we were

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about it and he had talked about where he

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>got his and you know whatever, and I was saying,

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, hey, if you're ever in New York, like

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I've got a pretty good connect, you know that I

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>at least you know, because whenever you buy like a

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>any diamond jewelry, unless you're a diamond expert, like it's

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you're just risk getting totally scammed, you know what I mean? Like,

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are these real are they not? Am I you know?

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying they're vv with this? I think it's

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that like, who the hell knows? And he was like,

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>he's like, man, I really might take you up on that.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>He like, I've had this forever and then he just

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>drops in He's like, but I think your two chain

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>thing looks so cool. On the pod with Demanda, I'm like,

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know he knew who I was, a

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>dude that lives in England, but he's watching, so shout out.

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So it made me feel great about the podcast. So

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that that was awesome, and I, as always, I can't

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>thank Brent Hanks, Jeff Platt, Morey and all the guys

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>at Poker Go and the guys at Poker Stars Garry

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Gates and such for getting me in the field. It

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>was an invitational only field, so it was really really

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>awesome and so really appreciate all those guys getting me

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in there. And in October we'll be able to talk

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>about it. Like I didn't even Instagram or post that

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I was there because then people would be like, oh,

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>how'd you do and I'd be like, well, I can't

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>tell you. And so so all promote it when it's on,

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's great Curtis. By the way, says Nick

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Crazy here, it's episode three fifty five. I've been listening

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>since episode one. We greatly, greatly appreciate that, and we

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the other thing we'd appreciate is if you would like

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>great subscribe review get the alerts on YouTube, put some

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>reviews in on iTunes and Spotify. That would be wonderful,

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe there as well. All right, let's get to straight.

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>The voicemail brought to you by Boost Mobile. Game of

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the Year is the first game of the year. And

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not just saying this because it's on Fox, but

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>one versus two Texas Ohio State in August is pretty

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>freaking sweet. The fact that August thirtieth, this month that

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>we're in right now, you have a massive, massive college

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>football game is sick. Darren Fox signs a Max extension.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that one. That was you have Castle,

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 1>you have Harper, Now you have Fox, who is a

0:05:55.960 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>player I've always liked a lot, but Fox it sixty

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>some million a year. A little bit under the question,

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Daniel writes in the Dock, is is it because he's

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a trade piece? My question is is he more or

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>less tradable on this extension or was he more tradable

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.119
<v Speaker 1>on an expiring I don't know. I like Fox a lot,

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but is Darren Fox ever going to be a top

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>ten player? Obviously not? Is he clearly and unequivocally a

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>top twenty player? Not clearly and unequivocally. He's like in

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the mix for that. So that just worries me a

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>bit if I'm being totally honest, and Noah, Lyle's quest

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to just being totally unlikable continued, you know what I mean,

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in full force, and the of course Kenny Bednarik shoved

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>him because he ran into his lane. Like, I just

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>don't get Lyles.

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there was some stuff going on between

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 2>those two before the race.

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree, No, there clearly was. But you still can't

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>cross over into the dude's lane. He's ran one hundred

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>meters basically as fast as a human being can run it.

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna be able to throttle down immediately. Amazing

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>weekend for track. Sixteen year old ran a minute forty

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>two eight hundred the sixteen. A sixteen year old just

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ran a time in the eight hundred that would have

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>won the college national championship last year. It is it's

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for the track nerds out there. They said, it's one

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of another poker guy. Chris Brewer, who was a collegiate

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>track guy, said it's one of the most impressive track

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>accomplishments ever what that guy did. And one other thing

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that didn't quite make the cut. And I didn't want

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to do a full topic on it, but President Trump

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>says Saquon Barkley's part of the President's Athleticism Council or whatever.

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Saquon Barkley's like then afterwards is like I am shocked. No,

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I am not, And I can't believe he would say

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that without talking to me, to which I would say,

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this is why some of us kind of said, buddy,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>like you can say, you're just you know, you play

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>golf with everybody and everything's fine and you don't have

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a take, but you know, you get in that orbit

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit and all of a sudden, maybe you get

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you get scammed a bit. I don't know, just just

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>my take. I'm not that I'm not that shocked that

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that went down that way. And Saquon I think it's

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>too smart to where he shouldn't be that shocked either.

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Now to the biggest story in the sports world, the

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>six quarterbacks on the Cleveland Browns. Let's get to it, Demanse.

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So the Browns who officially released their quarterback hierarchy,

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>and it goes as follows with Flacco as number one,

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Picket number two, Gabriel at number three, and Shador You're

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 2>gou ahe at number four. And so there's they're bringing

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 2>in Snoop unty because of injuries to Gabriel and Picket.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 2>You wanted to lead with the show with this, why

0:08:59.720 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 2>is that?

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay? So here is what is so interesting about where

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I have found myself with the Shadoor Sanders conversation before

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the draft, I was one of the biggest skeptics. If

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>you remember, like I I said almost immediately that I

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>did not think there was any real like who which

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback is gonna go first overall debate. It was cam

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Ward clearly and unequivocally. I then also talked about how

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought there was a very real chance that the

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers would be able to draft Shadoor without trading up.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>In one of my very first mocked drafts back when

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Shador was mocked in going top five. I had him

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>sliding all the way to Pittsburgh. Then when the in

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the twenties, when the this is all pre draft, when

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the rope reports came out that Pittsburgh was flatly just

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>going with Aaron Rodgers, I said on the TV show

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and on this show, Sorry, I just rolled over the

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>dexter on the TV show and on this show that

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a very real possibility should Or

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>slid out of the first round entirely. And I was

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>discussing how I did not think that was because of

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>personality stuff. Now maybe I was wrong about that, but

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought everyone was focused on Shador the person when

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought Shador the player just wasn't a dominant player

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the way some people thought he was. That was my

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>pre draft take. My pre draft take is good, not

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>great athlete, not a super strong arm, you know like that.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that he was a blue chipper. Those

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>are still all my takes on Shador, by the way,

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But what's happened in Cleveland. He then ends up going

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to a team where the quarterback options are the second

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>oldest quarterback in football, Joe Flacco, an injured first round bust,

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 1>and Kenny Pickett a wee little fella in Dylan Gabriel

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and him. And so the point I made on last

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>week's pod was the only guy on the roster with

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 1>actual upside, even if it's very small, is sure. And

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>since then, all Dylan Gabriel has done is have awful

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>practice after awful practice where the beat writers covering the

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>team or talking about how you almost feel badly for

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>him and gotten hurt. Kenny Pickett has also gotten hurt.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>So here's why I want to talk about the Snoop

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Huntley thing. So the Browns play Friday night, it looks

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>like demand's a picket and Gabriel are not going to

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to play, okay, so that those snaps are

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>gone flacos one hundred. I would imagine they never planned

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>on him playing preseason game one. So the only quarterback

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they've got is Shadoor. So if that's why they signed

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Snoop Huntley, just because they need ensure you know, you

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to run your offense even in

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the preseason game, so other guys get reps. And what

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>if something happens to Shadoor or something like that, So

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>be it, that's fine that there's no there's no issue

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>with that, but Snoop Huntley should not be taking more

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>than five practice snaps from Shoudoor, and the plan for

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Friday should be whatever you want to do with Flacco,

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you do, whether that's playing one series whatever. They Flacco's

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>their starting quarterback and going to be their starting quarterback,

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and they don't want to just punt the season before

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the season starts. Even though their depth chart. Have you

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>seen like the Browns offensive depth chart is something to

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>be you just stare at it. Right now. It's Flacco

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback, David and Joku, who's a very nice player

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>at tight end. Jerome Ford's their starting running back. Cedric Tillman,

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Jamari Thrash and Jerry Judy are their top three receivers,

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>with Deontae Johnson being their number four, and an offensive

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>line of Dwan Jones, Joe Potonio, Ethan Pochick, Patchick, pardon me,

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Wyatt Teller, and Jack Conklin as their offensive line. It's impossible.

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So we know they're gonna be bad, but they don't

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>want to say off the top they're gonna be bad,

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>so be it. So whatever you think you need to

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do to have Flacco ready, you do. After that should

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>or Sanders should play the entirety of that preseason game.

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.839
<v Speaker 1>If Gabriel and pick it or hurt, there is no

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>reason whatsoever on Friday for Snoop Huntley, who is right

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>now the sixth quarterback on the Browns roster, because D'shaun's

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>on the roster. I know he's not playing for Snoop

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Huntley to get a single snap. And again, this is

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>not a knock on Snoop Puntley, who sneakily has a

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowl to his name and started a playoff game

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>for your Baltimore Ravens, you know, a couple of years ago,

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad Huntley's getting another look this. I promise

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not an indictment on Snoop, But this is the

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to see how Shaudor books in a big sample

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>against a live defense. And there are local Browns fans

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and media have gotten a little conspiratorial about you know,

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>what the team does and doesn't like about Shadors whatever

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it is, And are they trying to kind of you know,

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>slow as progress? Is it weird because the coaches didn't

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>want them, but the owner did, you know, I don't know, you.

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Don't think they're getting ready to like trade them or anything.

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 2>There's something.

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>So if that's the case, then that's even more of

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a reason to showcase him. Right, Like, if here's one

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that I find interesting and that I think actually could

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>be like a best case scenario. For best case, If

0:15:56.000 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Shadoor, I am hoping beyond hope, I get three

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>quarters maybe the whole game, because if Flacco's not gonna play,

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>then Shador in theory, should play the entire game. Yeah,

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that I look decent, and that the Los Angeles Rams

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>call the Browns and the Los Angeles Rams call the Browns,

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>so I can be their third string quarterback, as odd

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>as that sounds, because that's right. The Rams story right

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>now is U Matt Stafford's got a bad back, and

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that is really concerning and their backup quarterback. While a

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>fine backup quarterback has his own injury concerns, which is

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo. If I'm Shador and I can't like getting

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to Los Angeles, no, there will be no media attention

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>like should he be the starter? Stafford's there, And for

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the Rams, it gives you a chance to maybe have

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>an answer it quarterback, even if it's a long shot.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And again I've never believed Store is a sure fire

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>NFL starter, but he's got a shot have an answer

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback after this year if this does end up

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>being Stafford's last year, and maybe more importantly, not more importantly,

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but equally important as to why you would do this

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>trade now rather than the offseason, whatever it is if Stafford,

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, isn't ready for the start of the season,

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>because yesterday McVeigh was talking about Stafford and he's like

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>he's doing some light cardio, he's walking around like what

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. That's that's not great. So let's just say

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Stafford's not available the very beginning of the season, and

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>let's say Jimmy Garoppolo gets clocked during Week one, then

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, you're staring at stetsn't Bennett, and

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>so like, even if it's just a little short term

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>gap starter and we saw McVeigh get Baker ready in

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>one day for a start like you could have. So

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I do hope that. And if you're the Browns, if

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you'd spent a fifth on Shaudoor and just trade him

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for a fourth, you won. It's a great job, that's great,

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>great process. You know what I mean so. But I

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>say all that to say I am not a conspiracy theorist.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>But if we get this Browns practice report and Snoop

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Huntley was taken a lot of raps and on Sunday

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Shadoor plays a half and Snoop plays a half, that's

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>my conspiracy theorist at Tenna will pop up as Wild

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>does on Tea because that makes no sense for anyone involved,

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for anyone involved. So that's why I wanted to lead

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Browns. I'm actually fascinated by it. We also

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the only other we the court. We don't really have

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterback competitions this year except for the saddest one ever

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in Indy with Anthony Richardson or Dan and your guy,

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>My guy Anthony Richardson and your guy Daniel Jones.

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Jones is winning that battle, right though.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Seems like, oh, the Saints as well. You know what,

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I tend to forget the Saints or an NFL team

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this year, and I think that one is sadder. By

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the way. You want to know an unbelievable fact that

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure is a fact before I

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>say it, So the Saints. Yeah, it is a fact,

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and by a lot actually the Saints quarterback battle is

0:19:55.600 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Rattler, A Hayner and their second round pick Tyler Shuck.

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Tyler Shuck, who was their second round pick

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this year. Demonse, you're gonna laugh at this is eight

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>months older than Trey Lance.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 2>It's think about that.

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>He's eight months olderly than Trey Lance, who, by the way,

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>shout out Trey Hall of Fame game. Still though, he

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just needs to get you know, like he's it. Trey

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>just turned twenty five, so like he's been in the

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>league forever. But again he's younger than a second round

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>pick this year, which is so weird. Also, the Saints,

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? The demonse, what year did you

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>graduate high school?

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Twenty seventeen.

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>So Tyler Shuck, who is the Saints' draft pick this year,

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 1>he graduated in twenty eighteen. He's won and he's just

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>like he finished college four months ago. Like that's a long.

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 2>That's long as long it takes.

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>A long college career. All right, we'll keep going. By

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, if you can't tell from the leading with

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the Browns and the Tyler Shuck discussion in the A Black,

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it is the dog days of summer, which means it's

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>time for the boys this summer to kick it into gear,

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>and the best way to cash in on your baseball

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>IQ is with DraftKings Sportsbook. Stretch Drive begins. DraftKings Sportsbook

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>has you covered with live betting, home run props, odds, boos,

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and more. Whether you're chasing dingers or jumping in mid game,

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>there's always action to be had never been on baseball before.

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Simple pick a guy to go yard, handle some hammer,

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>some live odds mid game, or just ride with your

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>squad and hope for the best. No spreadsheets, just vibes

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and dingers, guys, I gotta you know. I've got a

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>lunch for the staff. Bet with wilds on this Royals

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox series. The Red Sox won the first game,

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>so I'm pot committed on the Royals on the money

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>line tonight plus two hundred. Also, if you want to

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>make some home run, that's how our Bobby wit diat

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a home run or Salvy did a home run, that's

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>plus five fifty and plus six point fifty. Again, of

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>course line's an odds subject to change, but we are

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>riding with the Royals tonight. Something special for first time

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>ers new DraftKings customers, Oh this has moved up. Bet

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>five dollars, get two hundred dollars in bonus bets instantly.

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Download the DraftKings sportsbook app now and use code right.

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>That's code right for new customers to get two hundred

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars in bonus bets instantly when you bet just five

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>bucks only on DraftKings. The Crown is yours.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New York

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 3>called eight seven seven eight eight hope and wire text

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 3>hope and wy at four six seven three six nine

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 3>In Connecticut. Help is available for a problem gambling called

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 3>eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven,

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 3>or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 3>of booth Hillka Cinnamon Resorting Kansas twenty one on over

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 3>agent eligibility varies by jurisdiction VOYD and Ontario. Bet must

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 3>win to receive reward minimum minus five hundred odds required.

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Bonus bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issue.

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 3>In four additional terms and responsible gaming resources see DKNG

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 3>dot co slash audio.

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, demonse, let's get to the news that broke

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 1>right as I got to Vegas, which is the Micah

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Parsons News.

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Micah Parsons officially requested or trade. He was on Friday Saturday,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and he Friday unfortunately, I no longer want to be here.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 2>And Jerry follow it up with I'm not in any

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 2>way revising the mentality that I have about how I

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 2>go about negotiations. What do you think about the drama

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 2>in Dallas and Jerry?

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, here's the deal. I I find the way Jerry

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>tried to go about these negotiations, whether he meant to

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>do it like this or not, but to be unethical,

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and I don't appreciate it. I think I think that

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it is totally fine for a manager and an employee two,

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, be having a conversation compensation or you know,

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a contract or something comes up and they start discussing it.

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fine. And I think that if you're

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the if you're Micah, you're smart enough to

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>know that if you weren't comfortable having any part of

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that conversation, that you can just say, hey, I'm not

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>talking money here. That's what my agent's for, you know

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? And I think it's fine to try

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to work on a framework from those conversations. I think

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that is totally fine, and I think that it's even

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>reasonable at times for I think it's reasonable at times

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that you might actually come to a real agreement. Then

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it might be like, yeah, yo, you'll pay me that

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>that's what I want, that's what you want, great, Sure,

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>no problem. I think it is outrageous for the management

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>side to think whatever is said in that setting is

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>binding in any way, shape or form. I don't think

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it's outrageous for the player to think what the manager

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>is offering is a real offer, because that the Jerry

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Jones is the person negotiating for the Cowboys, Micah Parsons

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is not the person negotiating for Micah. And so here

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 1>is the way I understand it this went. Jerry and

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Micah got together in March. Micah thought they were having

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a general meeting about team leadership. During that meeting, a

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>potential contract came up. It seems like Jerry threw out

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a number or they had an idea, and Micah in

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the moment was like, yes, sounds good, Yeah, that would work.

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Micah then went to his agent and his agent said, Okay,

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, but I think we can do better. I

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>think we will do better. They need to talk to me,

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys stance from that moment forward has been,

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to talk to you. We are not

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>talking to you. We have an agreement in place. That's

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that's unethical. That is, when you know someone has a

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>professional that they pay massive amounts of money to negotiate

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>for them, and it is outrageous to then assume any

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>negotiation that is done without that person's involvement is binding.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And Jerry now saying, and there's another piece of this

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that I also really really don't like, which is I

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>do not view rookie contracts the way I view second contracts.

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So let me give you an example from my team

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>and a guy that I love, Chris Jones. So, Chris

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Jones had a rookie deal of let me, I want

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to four years, six million bucks, right. He then got

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>franchise tagged and then they worked out a new deal

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 1>four years, eighty million dollars. Okay. During the going into

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the final year of that deal, he wanted a new

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:26.719
<v Speaker 1>contract entirely, and the Chiefs made him an offer. They

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>were you know what, they made him what they thought

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was a fair offer. He disagreed. That led to his holdout.

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember he missed Week one against the Lions. He's watching

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it from the box. And then they ended up giving

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.479
<v Speaker 1>him a little extra money to make him happy, but

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>not a new contract, just a little slight bump in

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that final year. They held the line on what they

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>thought was reasonable and they they never used these terms,

0:28:55.800 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>but it was listen, man, like, we negotiated a four

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>year deal. We're in year four. We are open to renegotiation.

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But if we need to have you play this out,

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>we're okay with that because we agreed to this contract.

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not how the rookie contracts work. At all rookie contracts,

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>there is no negotiation, there is no agreement, there is

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>no back and forth. You are drafted in a certain spot,

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you are slotted in that spot. It is a four

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>year contract. If you're a first round pick, the team

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>can then add a fifth year to it. That again,

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you have no saying, you have no ability to negotiate

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to change. I don't want to pick it up. So

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that is why every single first round pick for Micah's

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>draft class that has performed at a high level has

0:29:56.160 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>gotten their next deal, because it's the first deal they

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>actually get to negotiate and they have it is why again,

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>whether you think it was you know, some of these

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>deals you might think was done by the team. But

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence got a new deal after year three, Jamar

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Chase got a massive deal this summer. Jalen Waddle got

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a new deal after year three, Pine Sewell got a

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>massive deal.

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 2>J C.

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Horn, Matt top of market deal, Patrick Sir Tan top

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of market deal, Deavonte Smith great deal after year three.

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Rashaun Slater just got a top of market deal. That's everyone.

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So I just went over ten guys taken in the

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>top thirteen. Here are the people. Maybe it wasn't ten,

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>but here are the top thirteen picks from the twenty

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty one draft who did not have not gotten huge

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>second contracts. Zach Wilson, Trey Lance, Justin Fields, Micah Parsons.

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>It's outrageous.

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 2>That puts it in a perspective right there.

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, they guy. So top thirteen picks who from

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that draft class who have gotten new deals? Oh, I

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>apologize I left one guy out. Kyle Pitts has not

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten one. Sorry, but that may again. So the ones

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>who have gotten let me do it again. Top thirteen picks.

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Trevor got a deal, Jamar Chase, Jalen Waddle, Penay Sewell,

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>j C. Horn, Patzer, Tan Devonte Smith, Rashaun Slater. Those

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of the eight with new deals, here are the five

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>without them. Zach Wilson, who's on been on multiple teams,

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Trey Lance, who's been on multiple teams, Justin Fields who's

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>been on multiple teams. Kyle Pitts who's shown flashes but

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>hasn't you know, achieved up to what people exc effected.

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And Micah freaking Parsons, who's the first player in NFL

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>history to be top three defensive Player of the Year

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>voting in each of his first three seasons. And for

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>them to be holding him hostage based on we had

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>an agreement in March is insane and Jerry, Now, do

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to trade him? I do not.

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Do I think he ultimately will get paid? Yeah? Probably do.

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be another year where Jerry,

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>because of the way he does business, gets the headlines,

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>gets the discussion, and you know, and then it's much

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>ado about nothing. Maybe, but it is not in anyone's

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>interests for Mica to not be out there practicing they

0:32:56.000 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>have a new head coach. They they are he's the

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>best player on the team, and this is not a

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, I don't love in general the honor

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of the contract stuff in the NFL because teams obviously

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>can cut players at any time. We are so ingrained

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in teams cutting players that when a new contract, think

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>about this is where the media can be unintentionally a

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>little insidious. Hold on one second, if you're watching on YouTube, yeah, Dexter,

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you're blocking or boost mobile pillow. Hold on, you gotta

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>people at boost Mobile pay good money to sponsor this show,

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and Dexter, you're laying up on their pillow. I'm back

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the the way. Think about how when a new contract

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is signed in the NFL, it is framed. You'll hear this,

0:33:55.960 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a five year, one hundred and ten million dollar

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:09.439
<v Speaker 1>deal with forty five million guaranteed, and the team can

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>get out of it after three years. The day it's signed,

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.240
<v Speaker 1>it's looked at as okay, it's five years, but really,

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 1>if if it's not a good contract, when is the

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>team able to cut ties? How quickly into it? Because

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>we know that's how it works. So I'm not a

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of asking players to honor the contract anyway,

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>when nobody gets mad when players get cut by teams,

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 1>But it is particularly outrageous to ask players to honor

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a rookie contract that they did not get to negotiate,

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that they had no saying, and especially a first If

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Micah was just a slightly worse college player, he would

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>have already been paid because the Cowboys wouldn't have had

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a fifty year option on him and he wouldn't have

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>been a first round pick. So I think he gets paid.

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, Oh, he's on the subject of fIF options?

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the fifth years options to be taken

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 2>away if you make a Pro Bowl? Are all pro?

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting. I I think that the idea behind

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the fifth year option, in my opinion, was, I'll give

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.879
<v Speaker 1>you a great example. You know who. The fifth year

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:33.439
<v Speaker 1>option is really good for Kyle Pitts because he has

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>not achieved at the level they wanted him to. But

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he they spin a top five pick on him, and

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>he has shown flashes and they don't want to, you know,

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>just move on immediately, right, So I think that that

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is a fair compromise in his instance. So what I

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to say is, I think the player should

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to decline the fifth year option, but that's

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>probably tricky because then every player would probably decline it.

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Should you be able to achieve out of fifth year

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>option eligibility? Yeah, I think that because you have to

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>declare fifth year option for a team after year three,

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>I think an All Pro spot is a very high threshold.

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's probably fair if this Pro Bowls

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>too tricky? Now, because what is and what isn't a

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowler? You know what I mean? You could maybe

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 1>you could say on the original Pro Bowl team, you

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.720
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, like one of the not an alternate,

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>not a replacement whatever some but certainly so this is

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what I would say. If a player in their first

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>three years makes at multiple Pro Bowls or a singular

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>All Pro team first or second team, then yeah, fifty

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 1>year options out of there, like if you want. And

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the team still has the franchise tag, right, uh,

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you know the but at least and for Micah because

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>he has been an All Pro, the price of the

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 1>fifth year option is the same as the franchise tag,

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So you might say, what good would that do? Well?

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>You can only franchise tag a player, ever, twice. The

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>rule is three times, but no one's ever getting franchise

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>taged a third time because the third one is so exorbitant,

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and so at least if the Cowboys right now we're

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>threatening to franchise Micah, he would then know, okay, like, fine,

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.479
<v Speaker 1>you could do this once more than I can never

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be franchised again the rest of them my career, and I,

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have ultimate leverage like Dak ended up getting.

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so I I don't like how the Cowboys

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>are doing this, and I don't like that Jerry, I

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think knows better about what ethical negotiations are and isn't

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>really honoring that.

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 2>In my opinion, you said, oh you didn't you didn't

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 2>see Michael Parsons getting traded. Uh, so you want to

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 2>do it? Likely? Maybe? What if? What do you think

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the situation is that'll end up coming?

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's likely that he gets let me pull up

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:44.399
<v Speaker 1>T J. Watts deal. TJ. Watt got three for one

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty three with one oh eight guaranteed forty one million

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a year. I think it is likely that Micah gets

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>four for one seventy with one hundred and ten guaranteed,

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:16.760
<v Speaker 1>so forty two million a year. The first three years

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>basically fully guaranteed, and the fourth year is a you know,

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:25.399
<v Speaker 1>basically a team option. That's how I think this will

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>play out. I think that's likely. I think maybe maybe

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't come to an agreement and he plays this

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 1>year out. That's probably the least likely. And the what

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>if is what if a team says, what if Buffalo

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 1>just says, you know what salary cap? Be damned. The

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that we tried this with von Miller before didn't

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>work out, be damned. We are not Sean mcdermot's like

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I lose to Patrick Mahomes in the playoffs because we

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>allow thirty points. Again, I'm out of here anyway. You know,

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:19.280
<v Speaker 1>let's figure out how to make this. I I would

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>not want the Chiefs to trade for Micah Parsons, and

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Micah is arguably the best defensive player in football.

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I just think if you have the superstar quarterback, which

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens, the Bills, the Chiefs have, you, well you

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to. It's not you can you have to,

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you just can't. Like and you know, the Chiefs already

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>have a super expensive Chris Jones, you know what I mean?

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>And so like they I don't think it would be

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a good idea for the Ravens to trade for Micah

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>if the Bills, the Bills maybe have to change something,

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:06.439
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean? So, would it's scary? Here's

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the answer on would it scare me? It would certainly

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>bum me out for this season. But I think if

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the Bills Chiefs rivalry as being over

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the next five years minimum, I think that is the

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 1>type of trade that they would long term regret. Yeah,

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:32.240
<v Speaker 1>even if Micah wins Defensive Player of the Year twice

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 1>in that timeframe, I just think you'd have to give

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>up so much and pair away so much of the

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:40.399
<v Speaker 1>rest of the roster that you know what I mean,

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:44.879
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't. Uh, So, scare is maybe the wrong. Here's

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a team that I think, you know, might want to

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 1>say screw it and do it. The Raiders. Oh, like,

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>we got no Pat, we got no secondary, but we

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>could have Max and Micah. We're trying to win right

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 1>now anyway, why not? You know what I mean? Like

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that is that's one I think there are a few

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>teams that might make sense. All right, let's go to

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton.

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 2>So, Yeah, the media has been super high on the Broncos.

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.359
<v Speaker 2>You have not been so is Sean Payton. He came

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 2>out and said, the short term goal is winning the division.

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 2>But this is a team capable of winning the Super Bowl.

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I've caught six teams that I thought could win a

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 2>super Bowl. This is my seventh. Yes, so should we

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 2>believe in this? Is he too high? Too low?

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>He also said bow Knicks in the next two year

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a top four or five quarterback

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world. He also said he's going to be

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a superstar. Also, by the way, check out what when

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you're subscribing to What's Right with Nick right on YouTube,

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>there's another new channel you can subscribe to on YouTube.

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Did you see this? Demanse is uh bo Nicks's new

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel.

0:42:55.680 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 4>And my my take that bo Nicks might take going

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 4>into the draft was bon Nicks was Mac Jones.

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>For those of you wondering how that has how that

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 1>looks so far? Well, Mac Jones in year one with

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots, made a somewhat fraudulent Pro Bowl

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 1>as an alternate bon Nicks check. The team won ten

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 1>games kind of surprisingly made the playoffs. Bon Nicks check.

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 1>The team played the Buffalo Bills in Round one, lost

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>by four touchdowns. Bon Nicks check and Mac Jones that

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>offseason trademarked Mac ten and all this silly stuff because

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:51.720
<v Speaker 1>he was a future star. Go follow bon Nicks on YouTube.

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Here is my problem with the Broncos hype and discussion.

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Gosh darn it, Dex, you know what, I you know what.

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I actually think it's value add It draws attention exactly

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>right here is here is what I think people are

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:20.800
<v Speaker 1>not recognizing when they are talking about the Broncos as content.

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Broncos have an excellent defense and that matters now. Dre

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Greenlaw's dealing with a quad already, and Hufanga, who I

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>love as a player, has been injured every year since

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>his rookie season. Those are their two big additions. The

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>other problem is this last year, Demonse, they won ten games. Okay,

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the first game they won, they beat Baker Mayfield, salute,

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a real thing. Who's who they beat after that? Okay,

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, who the Jets thing got rid of. They

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>then beat Spencer Rattler, who is in a quarterback the

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>saddest quarterback battle of the year. They then beat Bryce

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>before Bryce got hot. They then beat Kirk Cousins right

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:22.399
<v Speaker 1>before they benched him. They then beat Gardner Minshew who

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I left that out earlier. They actually beat Gardner twice.

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:31.279
<v Speaker 1>They then beat whoever the hell was starting for the

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Browns at the time, Jamis who is currently I think

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a third string quarterback. They then beat Anthony Richardson and

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they then beat Chad Henney. That's all their wins. Now

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we are now saying they're contenders. Well to be contenders.

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's just start with the conference. How did you do

0:45:56.680 --> 0:46:00.800
<v Speaker 1>against playoff teams in your conference? Well, you played Pittsburgh

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>week two and lost. You played the Chargers week six

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and lost. You played the Ravens week nine and lost.

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You played the Chiefs week ten and lost. You played

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers week sixteen and lost. You played the Bengals,

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 1>who weren't in the playoffs, but that was a playoff

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:17.799
<v Speaker 1>level game that game because they were still alive week

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and lost. You then played the Bills in the

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 1>actual playoffs and lost thirty one to seven. Why am

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I supposed to believe that team all of a sudden

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:34.319
<v Speaker 1>is going to be great? Now? Folks out there, like

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>ah Nick, you always just hate on the Broncos last

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>year preseason gambling show our favorite win total of the year,

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Broncos over five and a half, even though I didn't

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>believe in bo Nicks because that number was too low.

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>They had a last play schedule. Russ, it was so

0:46:56.680 --> 0:46:59.839
<v Speaker 1>terrible for him. I'm just calling it as I see it.

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And right now, is there any other team this year

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 1>or any year that you can remember that had the

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>pretty universally accepted worst quarterback in their own division that

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we were like, yep, that team look out for him? Like,

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:29.760
<v Speaker 1>let's just look at the other teams across the league

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 1>who have the worst quarterback in the division. What we

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>think of them? Justin Field's and the Jets, were we

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>afraid of them? Whoever's starting for the Browns, Joe Flacco?

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>How are they looking getting? The Colts with Daniel Jones,

0:47:53.200 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Giants with Russ, the Vikings JJ, and again that's

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 1>harsh on him, but he's just young. Now maybe Demondray

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it's Caleb Yeah, I mean again, I don't think I

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:15.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think people is even though Caleb stock is dropping,

0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 1>have JJ ahead of him? In the South, the Saints

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with whatever they're dealing with, and in the West, Seattle

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>with Darnold or Arizona. I guess with like I, I

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>just they just believe in them.

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I am again, they believe in themselves.

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton has talked a lot of ship though, and yeah,

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and listen, this is a tricky one because Sean Payton,

0:48:50.080 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 1>as great of a coach as he is, he must

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>be a better hang because the media loves him. So

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:01.759
<v Speaker 1>many of my colleagues at Fox just from the one

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 1>year of working with him, they love him. I think

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Peter Schrager my pal. He loves him. And we kind

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of give Sean Payton Nate, you know, like he walks

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:19.919
<v Speaker 1>into Denver, does the interview about what a clown show

0:49:19.960 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it was under Nad Hackett, and by week three the

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins are hanging seventy on him. Last year, after sneaking

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:39.560
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs and then getting absolutely demolished by Buffalo,

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 1>has the audacity to say, if we had won this game,

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:49.759
<v Speaker 1>we really liked our next matchup, which was going to

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:53.759
<v Speaker 1>be against the Chiefs, a Chiefs team that then beat

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo team that he lost to by one hundred.

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And now he's like talking division isn't big enough for us.

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:06.360
<v Speaker 1>We need to be talking Super Bowl when that team

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 1>has not won the division since the last year they

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>won the Super Bowl.

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I just right now, I think, is what's going on?

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe. And here's the other thing, Demanse, I am very

0:50:25.200 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 1>very prepared for a month into the year the Broncos

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to maybe be four and h and people and people

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 1>are firing stuff back at me, like because their softest

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>part of their schedule is the beginning in my opinion

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 1>home for Tennessee at the Colts at the Chargers, which

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is a home game home for Cincinnati. But I'm curious

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 1>how the rest of that's going to go for them.

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see. But I am I, uh, this is

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 1>one where I've put my money where my mouth is.

0:51:13.440 --> 0:51:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the process right now of negotiating a real

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Broncos bet with poker legend and one of the best

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>sports betters ever, David Baker. I think I'm gonna give

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 1>him Broncos to win the division at plus three twenty.

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:35.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think we're also going to what demands that

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you look flighted by that.

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 2>He wants to bet and give you money for the

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Broncos winning the division.

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, I got to give him plus three twenty, so

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:48.799
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, if we bet one thousand bucks,

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>he can win thirty two hundred. But yeah, he wants

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:58.279
<v Speaker 1>that bet and he but I'll also I think bet

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:04.240
<v Speaker 1>him make miss playoffs and so like, maybe I'll be wrong,

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:14.279
<v Speaker 1>but I'm I want this take understood and I want

0:52:14.280 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to see and you know what, maybe I'll maybe I'll

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>make a third bet with David if we can find

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:24.839
<v Speaker 1>a fair price on this and have it be an

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:28.279
<v Speaker 1>either or and if it's neither, then it's no action.

0:52:29.280 --> 0:52:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Which is the Broncos are so much more likely to

0:52:35.200 --> 0:52:40.919
<v Speaker 1>finish last in the AFC West, Dan finish first. They

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:46.440
<v Speaker 1>are like I think the Chargers are a are better

0:52:46.480 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>than them. I know the Chiefs are better than them,

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Raiders because of schedule, coaching, quarterback,

0:52:57.880 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the Raiders can pop. Now, the most likely

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 1>outcome is the Broncos finished third. I understand that, but

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I see no outcome whatsoever were the Broncos finish first.

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:18.279
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see, We'll see how the future superstar bo

0:53:18.480 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Nicks looks come November. Maybe I'll be wrong. I doubt it, though,

0:53:25.000 --> 0:53:32.799
<v Speaker 1>uh and Boss Ajs says in the chat show us

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the team and quarterbacks the Chiefs beat. It's not that

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 1>impressive last year. If we can do that, I let's

0:53:44.560 --> 0:53:46.640
<v Speaker 1>see who are the teams in the who are the

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks the Chiefs beat last year? Lamar, Josh Allen, Cousins, Herbert, Carr, Purty, Minshew, Baker, Nix,

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Brian Minshew, Herbert. I thought I said Burrow, oh Cleveland,

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 1>whoever was their quarterback? Then CJ whoever the Steelers quarterback?

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh Ross, then CJ again, then Josh Allen, So every

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>single dog though, yeah, they didn't play their guys. They

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:33.160
<v Speaker 1>set everyone and uh and then they got crushed in

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. They beat every So in other words,

0:54:35.280 --> 0:54:37.640
<v Speaker 1>they beat every single good quarterback in football except for

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Jaden who they never played, Hurts who beat them, and

0:54:40.280 --> 0:54:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Stafford who they never played. Good try, good effort. All right.

0:54:46.880 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, this is a message that applies to

0:54:49.719 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent of you listening right now, because that's how

0:54:53.040 --> 0:54:55.400
<v Speaker 1>many of you can be covered by fast and reliable

0:54:55.440 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 1>service on the Boost Mobile network with nationwide coverage. And

0:55:00.480 --> 0:55:02.359
<v Speaker 1>if you don't think you deserve a deal, listen up.

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:05.479
<v Speaker 1>You have another thing coming right now. When you switch

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to Boost Mobile, you can get iPhone fifteen with dynamic

0:55:08.840 --> 0:55:12.520
<v Speaker 1>island and a forty eight megapixel main camera for one

0:55:12.600 --> 0:55:15.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty nine ninety nine. That's one hundred and

0:55:15.960 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 1>forty nine dollars and ninety nine cents for iPhone fifteen

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:23.960
<v Speaker 1>on a nationwide network. I'm ninety nine percent positive Boost

0:55:24.040 --> 0:55:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Mobile just gave all of us a really good freaking

0:55:27.520 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 1>deal in store offer only thirty five dollars. Device setup

0:55:30.239 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 1>fee may apply, requires credit qualification, ID verification and activation

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on a sixty dollars plan. Taxes extra five G speeds

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 1>not available in all areas. All right, demonse, let's keep going.

0:55:45.000 --> 0:55:46.920
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go faster through these next ones.

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Campus camp has been slightly unfortunate for your guy, Kleb Williams.

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:56.160
<v Speaker 2>He went five of seventeen with three interceptions. It's also truck.

0:55:56.239 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Can I say something real quick, I'm putting a slow

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:04.239
<v Speaker 1>light asterisk on this five of seventeen. I saw one

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:08.759
<v Speaker 1>person tweet it, and then I saw articles written that

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:13.640
<v Speaker 1>cited the tweet, So I'm not certain that was the

0:56:13.840 --> 0:56:18.360
<v Speaker 1>exact number. But he obviously struggled in front of the fans.

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Now keep going.

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 2>He had to lay a game penalties, and he was

0:56:23.400 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 2>throwing a ball at this net and he could not

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 2>get it in the net and he got really mad.

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:29.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, do we want to play this?

0:56:29.920 --> 0:56:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so demons, okay, do you remember when we had

0:56:43.840 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the dartboard out on the back deck. That final throw

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:55.560
<v Speaker 1>reminded me of when I would be playing darts and

0:56:55.719 --> 0:56:59.959
<v Speaker 1>barely miss my first two attempts, and then the third

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:03.239
<v Speaker 1>one I would just rear back and fire it, sometimes

0:57:03.280 --> 0:57:10.759
<v Speaker 1>miss the board entirely. And so here's the serious take.

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:18.600
<v Speaker 1>The little pout reaction after is in my opinion, more

0:57:18.680 --> 0:57:24.800
<v Speaker 1>concerning than the throws. Like we know Caleb Williams can

0:57:24.840 --> 0:57:29.640
<v Speaker 1>make short, quick pinpoint throws like he he didn't there,

0:57:30.080 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but we know, like it's not like, oh man, this

0:57:32.800 --> 0:57:38.160
<v Speaker 1>guy he's not When he is not deep in his

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:42.840
<v Speaker 1>own head, he is an accurate, precise passer. The problem

0:57:42.960 --> 0:57:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is the getting in his own head and the problem

0:57:47.120 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is the body language, uh, and the emotional stability of

0:57:57.080 --> 0:58:02.440
<v Speaker 1>him as a player. Now, I I think Ben Johnson

0:58:04.120 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is and I'm gonna talk about in this drill. I'm

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:08.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about the delay of games and that I think

0:58:08.680 --> 0:58:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Ben Johnson is intentionally trying to break him down a

0:58:13.360 --> 0:58:17.440
<v Speaker 1>bit to then build him back up. And trying to

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 1>throw yes and trying to throw as much at him

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:27.040
<v Speaker 1>as possible. I know there was a I know there

0:58:27.160 --> 0:58:30.600
<v Speaker 1>was a clip or not a clip, but a report

0:58:31.000 --> 0:58:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that Ben intentionally cut out the communication between Caleb's headset

0:58:35.840 --> 0:58:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to see how he reacted to that he's doing a lot,

0:58:38.880 --> 0:58:41.640
<v Speaker 1>so they can then when it's time for the actual games,

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:45.960
<v Speaker 1>streamline it and things will feel easier than they actually are.

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's smart as long as Caleb doesn't get

0:58:49.920 --> 0:58:52.960
<v Speaker 1>too down on himself, and as long as Caleb can

0:58:53.040 --> 0:58:56.280
<v Speaker 1>handle it well. And I do think one of the

0:58:57.080 --> 0:59:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't love the commentary about Caleb after he cried

0:59:04.000 --> 0:59:07.439
<v Speaker 1>in college because so much of it felt kind of

0:59:08.240 --> 0:59:11.200
<v Speaker 1>lowest common denominator and there was a lot of like

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 1>winking in a nod to paint his nails carries immerse

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and now he's crying, and it just felt like, we

0:59:19.720 --> 0:59:23.480
<v Speaker 1>know what you're trying to imply and like and so

0:59:23.480 --> 0:59:28.360
<v Speaker 1>so I stayed out of it. I do think though,

0:59:28.400 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 1>there was something to the taking a loss that hard

0:59:35.880 --> 0:59:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and not being you know, able to compose yourself that

0:59:40.760 --> 0:59:44.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh that you know, that's something you know,

0:59:45.160 --> 0:59:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just like the What I didn't like was it felt

0:59:49.120 --> 0:59:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that I would have felt the exact My opinion would

0:59:51.640 --> 0:59:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have been the exact same if instead of crying he

0:59:55.120 --> 0:59:57.960
<v Speaker 1>had gone to the gatorade table and thrown that and

0:59:58.040 --> 1:00:01.920
<v Speaker 1>broken stuff or whatever. But it felt like the general

1:00:01.960 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>reaction would have been very different because they were basically

1:00:06.840 --> 1:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>saying he's feminine, Like that's what the attacks were, and

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that part, like that's bullshit. But the inability to like keep.

1:00:16.440 --> 1:00:19.560
<v Speaker 2>The loss and keep the composure.

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>That part's real. That part's real, and that's like a

1:00:22.400 --> 1:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>fair concern. So I I still fully believe in Caleb.

1:00:32.280 --> 1:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think that he has to He doesn't have

1:00:37.720 --> 1:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to be excellent week one on, but he has to

1:00:44.320 --> 1:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>either be solid all year or you know, the final

1:00:52.400 --> 1:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>two months a la Jordan Love's first year with the

1:00:55.360 --> 1:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know Packers, where it like looks pretty shaky early,

1:00:58.800 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like oh man, is this guy not the guy? And

1:01:00.800 --> 1:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>then bam, you know it's like, oh shit, he just

1:01:03.440 --> 1:01:07.439
<v Speaker 1>won Offensive Player of the Month, you know, something like that.

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>If he's the guy I think he is, he has

1:01:11.120 --> 1:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to give you a tangible reason to believe it in

1:01:15.280 --> 1:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>year two, by.

1:01:18.560 --> 1:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>The way, to be pretty good over there. I think

1:01:20.960 --> 1:01:23.680
<v Speaker 2>he needs to make an effort in that department because

1:01:24.400 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>the say on him right, it's not great. Like with

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:28.400
<v Speaker 2>the attitude thing, I think it's a it's a much

1:01:28.400 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 2>bigger thing than what it needs to be right now.

1:01:30.560 --> 1:01:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Outside of just.

1:01:31.200 --> 1:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>That, I agree with you. I agree with you, and

1:01:33.800 --> 1:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you know from your you know, to small

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>our experience together. Yeah, in in sports, how important I

1:01:46.440 --> 1:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>think that is. I think that when you are a

1:01:49.480 --> 1:01:52.919
<v Speaker 1>team's best player and a Caleb's not, you know, maybe

1:01:52.920 --> 1:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>he's not their best player yet, but he's the starting

1:01:54.880 --> 1:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and number one pick, like you're the de facto

1:01:57.480 --> 1:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>leader it. People take their cues from you. And this

1:02:02.720 --> 1:02:07.439
<v Speaker 1>is something that I you know, I used to give

1:02:07.480 --> 1:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>demands so much shit about that that he wore his

1:02:11.920 --> 1:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>emotions on his sleeve, and I thought that opponents saw it.

1:02:16.760 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But more importantly, like it, people that are the leader

1:02:21.280 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of a team are the best player on a team,

1:02:24.200 --> 1:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you're less. The teammates of yours that aren't as talented

1:02:28.880 --> 1:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>as you take their cues from you. So I'm not gonna,

1:02:31.760 --> 1:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, play favorites here, like he's got to be

1:02:34.720 --> 1:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>better about that. And it is one of, in my opinion,

1:02:41.440 --> 1:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>something Patrick Josh and Lamar do exceptionally well, it's always

1:02:49.720 --> 1:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>first of all, your pointing thumbs not fingers. And Burrow

1:02:53.000 --> 1:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, by the way, is great at this and

1:02:55.560 --> 1:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it's we got it, you know what I mean, we

1:02:57.800 --> 1:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>got it. And one of the things that you see

1:03:03.720 --> 1:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit again, I'm not trying to pick on anybody,

1:03:07.520 --> 1:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's accurate. Jaalen, by the way, also

1:03:10.360 --> 1:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously is a great leader in this stuff. But one

1:03:12.960 --> 1:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of the things you see a little bit from Lamar

1:03:16.840 --> 1:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in the postseason is some of these.

1:03:20.560 --> 1:03:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Illustrations it leaks out.

1:03:22.560 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like what like it's where it feels like he

1:03:26.320 --> 1:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>feels like, oh my god, it's happening you're at in

1:03:29.920 --> 1:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a way that never happens in the regular season. And

1:03:33.000 --> 1:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>so like I do think that stuff really matters, and

1:03:37.160 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, he's got to get better about it. He's

1:03:40.320 --> 1:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>got to get better about it, no doubt about it.

1:03:43.680 --> 1:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>All Right, let's go to Luca A.

1:03:45.720 --> 1:03:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Selucas signed is three year, one hundred and sixty five

1:03:48.160 --> 1:03:50.840
<v Speaker 2>million extension with the Lakers over the weekend. We've all

1:03:50.880 --> 1:03:53.520
<v Speaker 2>been waiting on that. So now that's finally happened. Do

1:03:53.560 --> 1:03:56.280
<v Speaker 2>you think that it's time for Eleda really press the

1:03:56.360 --> 1:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>gas on trying to succeed in the now.

1:03:59.480 --> 1:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, I got it. I said after they didn't

1:04:03.880 --> 1:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>re sign Dorian Finney Smith that I thought there was

1:04:06.760 --> 1:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a chance I put Lucas signing the extension. Was it

1:04:10.880 --> 1:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent? I had it. I dropped it to like

1:04:14.080 --> 1:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent. So I do think this is good, important,

1:04:17.280 --> 1:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>real news. I also think that because he signed the extension,

1:04:22.560 --> 1:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>they are able to slow walk this a bit if

1:04:26.320 --> 1:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>they want to, because Luca is not going anywhere over

1:04:29.360 --> 1:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the next three years. And by the way, the next

1:04:31.440 --> 1:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>deal he'll signed Demons will be the league's first million

1:04:37.280 --> 1:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar a game deal super Max.

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean, was that what he was supposed to?

1:04:43.360 --> 1:04:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Was that what he was coming up on in Dallas?

1:04:45.680 --> 1:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>No, he was, No, he could have signed. No, the

1:04:51.520 --> 1:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>he would have gotten the biggest deal ever in Dallas,

1:04:54.320 --> 1:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but it wouldn't. We wouldn't have gotten that threshold yet.

1:04:58.560 --> 1:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But three years from now his contract will average more

1:05:02.040 --> 1:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>than eighty two million a year and there's eighty two games.

1:05:05.440 --> 1:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a really remarkable thing here is though my general

1:05:10.240 --> 1:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Lakers take that. No one, even the biggest anti lebron folks,

1:05:15.560 --> 1:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't been able to explain to me where I'm wrong

1:05:19.240 --> 1:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>on this. I think it is overwhelmingly likely that over

1:05:26.360 --> 1:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the lifetime of this extension, these next three years, Luca

1:05:32.320 --> 1:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>never has a teammate better than Lebron is right now. Now, listen,

1:05:38.360 --> 1:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're gonna get Yannis and I'll be wrong. Maybe

1:05:43.280 --> 1:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, they have their eyes on Joker, and

1:05:47.440 --> 1:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll be wrong. But Shay ain't going anywhere, and Tatum's

1:05:53.480 --> 1:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>not going anywhere, and now we're like running out of

1:05:56.400 --> 1:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>people who are better than Lebron right now. Okay, So

1:06:03.960 --> 1:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I would if I were the Lakers, prioritize trying to

1:06:08.640 --> 1:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>win right now, because if they think this is their

1:06:13.720 --> 1:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>last year with Lebron, I do not know that Luca

1:06:16.800 --> 1:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to have a better running mate than Lebron

1:06:19.200 --> 1:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>over these next three years. Now, again, if they have

1:06:22.040 --> 1:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>real intel that if they keep the cap sheet clean

1:06:28.040 --> 1:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in two years, Yannis plans on just coming there in

1:06:32.560 --> 1:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>free agency, then so be it. Then you know what,

1:06:36.800 --> 1:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>if they like then see, you know, it's not like

1:06:39.680 --> 1:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>they're drawing dead this season, like they've got a nice roster,

1:06:44.520 --> 1:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>then then keep it flexible. But that's a hell of

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a gamble to take, Like a hell of a gamble

1:06:51.400 --> 1:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to take.

1:06:52.040 --> 1:06:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Do you are you worried at all that there's like

1:06:54.440 --> 1:06:58.040
<v Speaker 2>a riff potentially formed between Luca and Lebron or do

1:06:58.080 --> 1:07:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you think that Luca knows that it's I don't think.

1:07:01.160 --> 1:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think it's between Luca and Lebron at all.

1:07:04.880 --> 1:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I Lebron was Luca's all time favorite player. Luca is

1:07:08.200 --> 1:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the guy Lebron tried to sign to his shoe line.

1:07:11.800 --> 1:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Luca like, I don't think there is anything between them

1:07:15.480 --> 1:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>at all. I think there is some obvious frustration for Lebron,

1:07:21.920 --> 1:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>fair or not that the Lakers are not pressing the

1:07:27.720 --> 1:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>gas even more on this season. Now you can say

1:07:30.400 --> 1:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that's unfair, that they shouldn't whatever, but that is to me,

1:07:33.480 --> 1:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the entirety of the frustration is that right there, all right, guys,

1:07:38.480 --> 1:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys know it. We're just a couple weeks away.

1:07:41.040 --> 1:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I am so excited to go to the US Open

1:07:46.040 --> 1:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>here in New York City. I go every single year,

1:07:48.920 --> 1:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and I go thanks to my friends at seat geek.

1:07:52.840 --> 1:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>They are a sponsor of today's show, and they deserve

1:07:55.920 --> 1:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge shout out. With over twenty eight million downloads,

1:07:59.680 --> 1:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>see geek is the number one rated ticketing app. There

1:08:03.360 --> 1:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>are more than seventy thousand events listed on seat geek,

1:08:05.920 --> 1:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>including concerts, sports, music festivals, and more. Right now you

1:08:10.480 --> 1:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>can get tickets to the NFL season which is right

1:08:12.920 --> 1:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>around the corner. Major League Baseball going on right now,

1:08:15.400 --> 1:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>which is in full swing. And as I've said, I

1:08:17.960 --> 1:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>love using seat Geek. You go to the app, type

1:08:21.120 --> 1:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in US Open Tennis. Let's just see what I mean.

1:08:24.040 --> 1:08:28.599
<v Speaker 1>Look at this the wow, it really is two weeks from,

1:08:28.640 --> 1:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>two weeks from today. Mixed doubles session, fifty bucks day session. Bang,

1:08:34.479 --> 1:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Now this one, I mean, look at that. You just

1:08:37.280 --> 1:08:39.719
<v Speaker 1>get in there, fifty all. I'm just show the phone.

1:08:39.760 --> 1:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Sorry my bad, I was too busy looking at it.

1:08:42.000 --> 1:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Fifty bucks for at Ash, fifty bucks at Ash. What's

1:08:45.880 --> 1:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the first? Where's our first? Grounds? Sessions? Grounds admission? August

1:08:51.040 --> 1:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourth, You get into Billy Jean King National Tennis Center,

1:08:55.640 --> 1:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Grab me a ticket right there. It's just as good

1:08:58.040 --> 1:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>as it gets. You guys know how it works. Each

1:09:00.920 --> 1:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>ticket's rated on a scale of one to ten. You

1:09:03.000 --> 1:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>know you're getting a good deal. Look for the green dots.

1:09:05.479 --> 1:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Green means good, red means bad. Every ticket is backed

1:09:08.880 --> 1:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>by their buyer guarantee and you guys can help me

1:09:12.800 --> 1:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>out a lot, because there is nothing I like more

1:09:17.000 --> 1:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>than sponsors with products that I've used well before their sponsors.

1:09:21.640 --> 1:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Seat Geek is definitively one of them. So use my code.

1:09:26.680 --> 1:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>If you see code, write ten wriighd ten for timbercent

1:09:31.280 --> 1:09:33.519
<v Speaker 1>off your next set of tickets at seat Geek. That's

1:09:33.520 --> 1:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>tim percent off any tickets with promo code write ten.

1:09:36.760 --> 1:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you click the link in the description, download

1:09:38.920 --> 1:09:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the app, have the code automatically added to your account

1:09:41.800 --> 1:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>so you can use it later. Thank you to seat Geek.

1:09:46.320 --> 1:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, Demanse, let's run through the very end here

1:09:49.280 --> 1:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>because I got to go.

1:09:51.080 --> 1:09:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah. So Baker Mayfield came into that number fifty

1:09:53.960 --> 1:09:56.479
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. Top on your list. He answers this

1:09:56.560 --> 1:09:59.479
<v Speaker 2>year as the eighth best odds for MVP in Tampa

1:09:59.520 --> 1:10:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Bay also drafted Amika Agbuka and they're getting got one

1:10:02.840 --> 1:10:05.800
<v Speaker 2>back from his injury. What are your expectations for Baker

1:10:05.840 --> 1:10:06.200
<v Speaker 2>this year?

1:10:08.760 --> 1:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Expectations already has another really good season. Ceiling is he

1:10:13.439 --> 1:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is a frontline MVP candidate and they are a true

1:10:18.200 --> 1:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>contender in the NFC. Like I think that's on the board.

1:10:22.240 --> 1:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And here's the thing. In order for them to be

1:10:25.240 --> 1:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a contender, he has to be an MVP candidate because

1:10:29.120 --> 1:10:31.479
<v Speaker 1>that defense is not going to be great. They are

1:10:31.520 --> 1:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to outscore people. But Baker had forty touchdowns

1:10:34.960 --> 1:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>last year. He was a badass, man. Yeah, I mean

1:10:39.240 --> 1:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>he was a badass last year. I'm so and he

1:10:42.760 --> 1:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>right now has I want to make sure I'm right

1:10:45.760 --> 1:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>about this that I didn't miss it yet. He's on

1:10:49.120 --> 1:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the best non rookie contract in the NFL. Three years,

1:10:54.920 --> 1:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million bucks for Baker Mayfield.

1:10:58.520 --> 1:10:59.000
<v Speaker 2>He is.

1:11:00.760 --> 1:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>One more good season away from getting a two hundred

1:11:06.800 --> 1:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million dollar deal. He's been that level of player.

1:11:11.080 --> 1:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just happy for him, man, because this shit

1:11:13.880 --> 1:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>went so sideways on him. Yeah, and his teammates love him.

1:11:22.040 --> 1:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>He is true to himself. He's tough. He is a

1:11:26.760 --> 1:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>legit awesome playoff performer. Like this is the thing that

1:11:32.479 --> 1:11:36.519
<v Speaker 1>people I think underrate with Baker. He has played I

1:11:36.520 --> 1:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>think five career playoff games. I'm gonna tell you what

1:11:39.640 --> 1:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>he did. First playoff game ever. The Cleveland Browns go

1:11:45.000 --> 1:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>into Pittsburgh hang forty eight on him. Baker throws for

1:11:49.439 --> 1:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>two sixty three touchdowns a one to fifteen rating. Second

1:11:54.040 --> 1:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>playoff game ever, his only ever bad playoff game. He's

1:11:58.040 --> 1:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>against the two time to find AFC champion. Oh I'm sorry.

1:12:04.160 --> 1:12:08.479
<v Speaker 1>He's against the defending Super Bowl champion Chiefs, and he's

1:12:08.520 --> 1:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty three to thirty seven for two hundred yards, one touchdown,

1:12:11.040 --> 1:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>one pick, seventy five ratings. But he's in arrowhead in

1:12:14.120 --> 1:12:17.639
<v Speaker 1>round two against the twenty twenty Chiefs. Like no shame

1:12:17.680 --> 1:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in that. He then makes the playoffs with Tampa. His

1:12:21.800 --> 1:12:26.839
<v Speaker 1>first playoff game ever against Philly, and again it's so crazy,

1:12:27.320 --> 1:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this is Philly. This game was in January of twenty

1:12:31.320 --> 1:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. Yeah, exactly, thirty two to nine, three touchdowns,

1:12:36.439 --> 1:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>no picks, a one to twenty rating. The next game

1:12:39.880 --> 1:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>against Detroit three hundred and fifty yards, three touchdowns, two picks,

1:12:45.720 --> 1:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a ninety five rating, they lose by eight. And in

1:12:48.640 --> 1:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the game against Washington last year, a wild one where

1:12:53.080 --> 1:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>he only throws eighteen times, but he's fifteen of eighteen

1:12:57.560 --> 1:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>for a buck eighty five, two touch downs and a

1:13:01.200 --> 1:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>one forty seven rating. In his playoff career, he's got

1:13:05.439 --> 1:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a one zero six rating, twelve touchdowns, three picks, like,

1:13:09.720 --> 1:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's just been awesome in the bat Yeah

1:13:13.240 --> 1:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>so I yeah, so I'm a Baker believer through and through.

1:13:18.360 --> 1:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Uh, let's do these last two real quick.

1:13:21.640 --> 1:13:23.600
<v Speaker 2>James Cook is holding in as he looks for his

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:24.800
<v Speaker 2>contract extension.

1:13:25.040 --> 1:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

1:13:25.520 --> 1:13:28.000
<v Speaker 2>After a few years a big dollar running backs paying off,

1:13:28.080 --> 1:13:30.519
<v Speaker 2>it seemed like the debate was put to rest, But

1:13:31.000 --> 1:13:33.760
<v Speaker 2>that conversation opens back up again. Or do you think

1:13:33.760 --> 1:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Cook is just not that guy?

1:13:35.400 --> 1:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Well? No, I just I think Cook's really good. But

1:13:38.120 --> 1:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I the Bills have no cap space. He's under contract

1:13:42.120 --> 1:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>for five million bucks. They know they can franchise tag

1:13:44.960 --> 1:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>him for not much. And even if you think he's awesome,

1:13:48.760 --> 1:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think he's gonna be awesome four years from now?

1:13:52.360 --> 1:13:55.200
<v Speaker 2>So, like, go ask me A huge part of their

1:13:55.240 --> 1:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>offense last year, like huge the last two years, right exactly.

1:14:00.120 --> 1:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I just think they think he's gonna blink. Bro. I

1:14:03.880 --> 1:14:05.519
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's that they you know what I mean.

1:14:05.600 --> 1:14:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that they think we'll give him a little

1:14:07.800 --> 1:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>more money, but not long term, you know what I mean,

1:14:11.360 --> 1:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing long term and then or maybe a one year extension.

1:14:15.720 --> 1:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But the report is he wants you know, I don't

1:14:17.760 --> 1:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>know if it's what he wants. I don't want to

1:14:19.040 --> 1:14:21.839
<v Speaker 1>get this wrong, but I saw four years forty million

1:14:22.040 --> 1:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>bouncing around, which is only ten million a year. But

1:14:24.920 --> 1:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I just think they think at that position his style,

1:14:27.600 --> 1:14:30.439
<v Speaker 1>in two years he could be done, and they just

1:14:30.520 --> 1:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just such a tough business for running backs. Man,

1:14:33.680 --> 1:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just such a tough business for running backs, all right,

1:14:38.040 --> 1:14:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Like rate subscribe review to the pod. Let's get to

1:14:41.520 --> 1:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>some of these listener questions quickly, if we can, please.

1:14:46.240 --> 1:14:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Justin says Fox is getting paid more than Lebron. Is

1:14:49.160 --> 1:14:52.200
<v Speaker 2>he ever gonna be better than year forty Lebron? How

1:14:52.280 --> 1:14:54.919
<v Speaker 2>was his contract not holding back the Spurs like Lebron's

1:14:54.960 --> 1:14:56.320
<v Speaker 2>contract calls back the Lakers.

1:14:56.680 --> 1:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that's the So that's one of the

1:14:58.680 --> 1:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>reasons the Lebron kind of track discussion was so absurd. Like, no, people, again,

1:15:05.400 --> 1:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I he is Lebron is demonstrably better than Fox, and

1:15:10.000 --> 1:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>most people, I'm not one of them. Most people like

1:15:14.479 --> 1:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the Fox contract a lot. I'm a little skeptical of it,

1:15:17.479 --> 1:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Like that's it's just so much of Lebron discourse just

1:15:20.360 --> 1:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>so stupid.

1:15:22.800 --> 1:15:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Indie ass Uh, Okay, I don't hear you about the

1:15:25.240 --> 1:15:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Indie asked, Nick, can you compare the first twenty one

1:15:27.800 --> 1:15:31.160
<v Speaker 2>playoff games from Patrick versus Tom Brady? I think people

1:15:31.200 --> 1:15:32.920
<v Speaker 2>need to see just how great Pat has been in

1:15:32.920 --> 1:15:33.479
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs.

1:15:34.240 --> 1:15:36.519
<v Speaker 1>Uh. I can do that another time. But Pat's seventeen

1:15:36.560 --> 1:15:39.799
<v Speaker 1>and four in the postseason and the all time highest

1:15:39.840 --> 1:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>passer rating. That all of it, the numbers are just bananas.

1:15:42.880 --> 1:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's played. No resume is going to compare well to that.

1:15:47.200 --> 1:15:48.519
<v Speaker 1>There's just no question, all right.

1:15:48.600 --> 1:15:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Next Matt asked, is is flat is flatley?

1:15:53.920 --> 1:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

1:15:54.120 --> 1:15:56.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Is flatly your favorite word?

1:15:57.200 --> 1:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh? Do I use it a lot? I must? I

1:15:59.160 --> 1:16:04.519
<v Speaker 1>have some verbal like that, so maybe the a little bit. Yeah,

1:16:04.600 --> 1:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>so I didn't. I didn't know, but go ahead.

1:16:07.360 --> 1:16:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Dustin says Nick. I watched all of the N

1:16:10.880 --> 1:16:14.280
<v Speaker 2>one movies. I don't know what one is Mission impossible, Okay,

1:16:14.280 --> 1:16:18.160
<v Speaker 2>mission possible, Mission impossible movies after your cloning recommendation, and

1:16:18.200 --> 1:16:23.400
<v Speaker 2>love them. How would you rank all the all movies? Uh?

1:16:23.800 --> 1:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>That you know that is? I will do that another time.

1:16:32.840 --> 1:16:34.639
<v Speaker 1>I can't do that at the very end of a show.

1:16:34.800 --> 1:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>It deserves too much, you know, it deserves Uh an impossible? Yeah,

1:16:41.040 --> 1:16:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're just I mean it's just the greatest

1:16:43.640 --> 1:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>film franchise ever. Uh all right, Adam says, uh that

1:16:48.840 --> 1:16:52.519
<v Speaker 1>it's his twenty sixth birthday. He got eight tickets to

1:16:52.560 --> 1:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>see the Socks play the Royals and finway with our

1:16:54.880 --> 1:16:57.679
<v Speaker 1>seat eat code. How about that. Appreciate that, he said,

1:16:57.720 --> 1:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>much love from New Hampshire, Happy birthday. Also, Adam, all right,

1:17:00.840 --> 1:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>like rate, subscribe, review, Appreciate you guys. I've got Colin

1:17:04.120 --> 1:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in about an hour and then first things first at

1:17:06.400 --> 1:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>three o'clock, see you guys there. What's right? Oh wait,

1:17:08.760 --> 1:17:11.559
<v Speaker 1>wait wait, Thank you to Volume Draftings, Blue Duck, Boost,

1:17:11.960 --> 1:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Seat Geek and of course our friends at Did I

1:17:15.960 --> 1:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>get everybody? Did I leave anybody out? I think I

1:17:18.920 --> 1:17:21.479
<v Speaker 1>got everybody. Thank you to everybody. Talk to you guys later.

1:17:21.479 --> 1:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>What's right,