WEBVTT - Draft Show: Will You Be My Draft Crush?

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:08.719
<v Speaker 1>He's the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, your war

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>room for incenter news and draft analysis from deep within

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the confines of Cowboys Headquarters at the Star in Frescope,

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys like T D Lamb, Sargler and now your

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>hosts Dane Brugler, Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner and Kyle Yeoman's

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a Thursday edition of the Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show. As we are seventy four days away from

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Draft. It's hard to keep count at this

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>point because we're getting closer and closer along the way.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But we are going to break it down in early

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Valentine's Day gift for all of you listeners out there

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>who decided to tune in, as we're gonna give our

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Valentine's crushes of draft prospects at each position. And plus, hey,

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Dave Brugler gave you a nice little mot draft Valentine

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Day gift earlier today. We're gonna go through that as

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you can find that on the Athletic. But I want

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to start things off today by asking mister Jeff Kavanaugh

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a question because I feel like you're probably the more

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>likely of the four of us to do this. But

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>if you were on a boat and you have the

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Lombardi trophy in your hand, would you have the guts

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>to toss it to another boat in the middle of

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a bay, let's say Tampa Bay, at some point throughout

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.279
<v Speaker 1>that celebration. Would you have the guts to do something

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>like that? Oh? Yeah, I don't care about pretty much anything, Kyle. Yeah. Yeah.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Plus I'm an experienced boatman. Ye are I'm a lake Yeah? Yeah,

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, I'm a lake man. But I'm an experienced boatman,

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm an experienced drinker. So I think that I

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>could pull that off with no problems whatsoever. I could

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>throw the Lombardi to kat and I could throw it.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll say I could throw it from without even knowing

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>how much it weighs. I'll say I could make that

0:01:55.920 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>toss from eighteen yards. Okay, Katie, would you make the catch? Tank? Uh? Yeah, no,

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I've got very good at hands. My problem is getting

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>separation because I'm a little chubby. I'll set a pickup

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for you and run the dig. We'll be good. I'll

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>call them both. That's all I need to be doing. Yeah,

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I can make that point for you. Okay, I just

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make sure. I just wanted to ask that

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>question because I don't know why, but yesterday I was like,

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>which one of the three of these Draft Show guys

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>would be more willing to toss a Lombardi Trophy. My

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>first thought was Dane's face whenever it happened, whenever he

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>actually saw it. But then my second thought was, oh,

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Jeff would probably ultimately make this toss. Now, Dane, what

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>did you think about the Super Bowl? Is? We didn't

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 1>get the chance to get your thoughts on or all

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>three of y'all's thoughts on the Draft Show Tuesday? What

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.119
<v Speaker 1>you think about the final of Tampa Bay taking down

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City thirty one that night? A little surprised that

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs were not more ready for the Bucks defensive

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>game plan. I thought that, you know, Andy Reid knows

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>way you know, add up all our football knowledge and

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid still knows way, way more. Um So, you know,

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I just thought they'd be a little more ready and

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to adjust to what the Bucks were doing.

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But I mean credit to uh, you know, that defense,

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the pressure they put on the pocket. Um you know,

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of course Tom Brady what he was able to do.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's really remarkable. Um, you know it's

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think just as a you know, the thirty

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand foot view, the fact that we got through the

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>season with no cancelations, a few postponements here and there,

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a few scares, a few teams had to you know,

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>play a game without coaches and players and all that,

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, ultimately we made it. We made it

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to the finish line. And credit to the Bucks for

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think if you we watched him throughout

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the year, just get better and better and better. And

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously part of that is you know, Tom Brady bringing

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>his uh of knowledge to offense and getting comfortable and

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>just everything jelling at the right time. So uh, you know,

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>they they're ready to come back and do it next year,

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>so it should make it interesting. I thought that game

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>provided a lot of hope to other teams around the

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>league of like, hey, you might be closer than maybe

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe you think. I mean for the Chiefs, and we

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>know how dangerous the Chiefs are with their weapons and

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. In my homes, I don't have to

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>tell you that, but like the mistakes, kind of the

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>sloppiness on defense, and everyone's gonna grap about the penalties,

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but they put themselves in a position to like not

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>overcome those penalties by stupid mistakes. I'll never understand someone

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>lining up off sides on a field goal attempt. It's

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the dumbest thing in sports. Um So, like I see

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>things like that, I'm a man. I kind of what

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Dane said. I can't believe they weren't more ready. And

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>I think in the NFC, you know, I think that

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that since, like I know, Tom Brady's a monster and

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, but that defense is the story for

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>me at Tampa Bay defense, and that kind of tells you, Okay,

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>look we can go put points up in if we

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>can find a way to build our defense a little bit,

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>we've got a chance to compete in the NFC. And

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we saw that with New Orleans in Green

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Bay thinking they had a shot and the Rams that

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they kind of had a shot for a while until

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterback chaos ensued. And whatever happens with Seattle, I know

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson's been saying a lot of stuff. Whatever happens

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>with Seattle will be interesting. But the NFC to me

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is still very wide open. Jet I think it showed

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>me that the draft show is where you build champions,

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at Tampa Bay's last three years

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of drafts, you're gonna find three years ago, Vita Bay,

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones, Carlton Davis, Alex Kappa, Jordan Whitehead, everybody that

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I named as a starter. I mean Ronald Jones, I

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>guess kind of sometimes twenty nineteen, Devin White, Sean Murphy Bunting,

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Dean. Every one of those is a starter. And

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>then last year Tristan Worf's Antoine Winfield Junior. Those are studs.

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>So I named you at least three Pro bowlers and

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of starter and a whole bunch of

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>good starters. So basically, when a team gets to the

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, show me their last three to four years

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of drafts, and I'll tell you if they were actually there.

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And for Tampa Bay, the answer is absolutely. And then

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they convinced the Goat to show up, and then he

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>brought his friends. But a lot of what they built

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is the last three years of the draft. I just

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>gave you part of their offensive line, their entire secondary,

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the best nose tackle in football, a guy who's going

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>to be an All Pro offensive tackle for a bunch

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of years of Pro Bowl safety. That's all in the

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>last three years of drafting. So that's nothing. Well, I'm sorry,

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Jeff. That's where the Cowboys defense is. Where

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it's at right now is because they've missed a lot

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.799
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty seventeen draft. But Taco Cheeto, Jordan Lewis,

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, we talked about Xavier Woods. You know, Zavier

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Woods might be a starter, you know, like, that's where

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>their defense is. Where it's at. They missed our entire

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>year of drafting, and that can't happen. That sets you

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>back if you completely with on one year. And you

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>can also argue maybe twenty nineteen two without half a

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>first round draft pick and then Triston Hill being your

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>second round pick. I mean you could argue there that

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 1>you missed as well. Now there's still a lot to

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of from come to fruition with the twenty nineteen

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>draft that we don't know if Tristan Hill is a

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>miss yet. But you didn't have that first round pick,

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think not having that hurt you on the

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the football. It's pretty nice to have

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a Maria Cooper on the offensive side. But I completely agree.

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about it a little bit this morning on

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com about the building of Tampa Bay

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and how it's kind of reversed from what the Cowboys

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have been doing over the last couple of years. It

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>seems like the Cowboys have said, hey, let's sign all

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>these free agents, try and get a cheap deal or

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>at least a bargain discount on free agents, and then

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>fill those holes with some draft picks. Now, Tampa Bay

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>did the opposite. They drafted really, really well, and they'd

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>say it, Hey, now that we've drafted well, let's bring

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in these guys. Like Jeff said, the Goat and his

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>friends came along and then all of a sudden, you're

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a Super Bowl contender. But the Cowboys have a long

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>way to go in order to do that, and they're

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to hit on a couple of picks in

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>order to do so. But let's talk talk about Dane's

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>first round mock draft. You can find it on the

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Athletic It's mock Draft three point Oh. Mister Dane Brugler. First,

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>give us just kind of your initial thoughts on riding

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>this up, and then we'll get into the Cowboys pick

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and kind of how things in suit scenario wise, Well,

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to switch things up a little bit and

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>introduce some trade opportunities. You know, it's mock drafts are

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point in the process, all about laying out scenarios.

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, what are the possibilities, what could happen, And

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's not realistic, honestly to do a mock

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>draft without some type of trades. You know, just last

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>year's draft, in the first round, there were eleven teams

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that drafted in a spot other than that where they

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>were originally slotted. So there's going to be movement. It's

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, especially when you consider the quarterbacks at

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the top of this draft. Now, is it, you know,

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>almost unrealistic to nail those trades. Yeah, but at least

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>we can lay out some of those possible scenarios that

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>could be on the table for some of these teams.

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And so that's what I tried to do, lay out

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, trade compensation, the reasoning behind some of these moves.

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>And you know, all and Ali had six trades in

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>this first round mock draft, so a lot of movement.

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys stayed at ten, but there were two trades

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in front of them. Uh. You know, we talk about

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks and how they're probably gonna go quickly, and

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what happened in this scenario. So that's you know,

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, it'd be great for a quarterback to

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>fall to ten because then you can talk trade down

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>and all that. But at the same time, if four

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks go top ten, that means you're pushing another good

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>player to you at ten. I think that's what happened

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in this draft. Was there a scenario in there somewhere

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>where you thought about trading the Cowboys pick either to

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>go up or down at any point? Not up? I

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>think it really just it would come down to because

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>there were there were a few possibilities that I looked at.

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>When you have the Giants sitting there at eleven, and

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>let's say Jamar Chase Davante Smith goes somewhere in the

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>top ten, I think there's one more receiver in this

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>draft that's really in that top tier, being Jail and Waddle.

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And so you're looking at a few teams, you know,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>like the Patriots or you know a few of these

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>other teams that are maybe looking for that weapon, and

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in front of the Giants to

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>go get that weapon, and so at ten, I think

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a possible landing spot for one of these teams.

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>The other scenario that I looked at was a team

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>like the Charger sitting there at thirteen. They are a

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>very offensive line needy team right now. They need to

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>keep Justin Herbert healthy. They need to do something to

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>upgrade that offensive line in several spots. And so if

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you know Penne Suo goes early, and then you know

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Rashawn Slater, if he's the next guy off the board,

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and let's say that a team like the Chargers has

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a gap between Slater and that next offensive tackle, well

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe they would look to trade up to number ten

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>ahead of you know, a team you know like that

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>could possibly trade in front of them to get that

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive tackle. So I think there are a few scenarios

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>here that are plausible. But at the end of the day,

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had them stay put at ten. Patrick

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Surtan was there, and it made sense for them just

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to stay put. If they don't have a deal on

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the table that blows them away, stay put and draft,

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's what they did in this scenario. So in

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>your scenario, the biggest trade was the fact that the

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Panthers went from number eight up to number three and

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they ended up taking Justin Fields instead of maybe letting

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones kind of fall into their lap. A lot

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of quarterbacks. Trevor Lawrence number one, Wilson goes number to

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fields goes number three. That's pretty much what you

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>would think about the first three picks of the draft,

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>no matter who's going to be picking there. Maybe with

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the exception of Miami, Kyle Pitts goes number five, the

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>tied end from Florida, the Eagles, Well, we will now

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>have to see Jamar Chase wide receiver out of LSU,

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>for the next couple of years. Twice year Trey Lance

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is Washington's new quarterback. Is they traded up to seven

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>to go get a quarterback there? So just talking about

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East opponents here, Jeff and Kat specifically, whenever

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the early parts of this mock draft,

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>having to see Jamar Chase twice a year, and then Washington,

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a team who won the division last year, finally getting

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback that's at least somewhat competent and not injured

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in the backfield like a Trey Lance. What does that

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>say to you about the NFC East potential If they're

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>going to trade up and try and go get these

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>guys with the Eagles, if they're not going to take

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback, I wouldn't worry about the Eagles for the

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>next half decade because I think Carson Wentz is gonna

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>get traded and I don't think Jalen Hurts is good

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>enough to be a good NFL quarterback. So if they're

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>going to take a wide receiver, I think that's fine.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>What would worry me as a Cowboy observer is if

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia takes a quarterback and hits. So in this scenario,

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>I would say Washington is the team that's doing themselves

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:03.719
<v Speaker 1>a real favor and Philadelphia is still going to be

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. It's nice to have weapons, but if your

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback's not good enough, and I don't think Jalen Hurts is,

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>then you're not gonna win a lot of football games.

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Washington finding a quarterback, a real life quarterback because Alex Smith,

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>ain't it, Taylor Einekey, who knows. But if they find

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a real life quarterback, that roster is better than the

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys roster. If they have a quarterback, they can win

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the division again. But the Cowboy and now there's wild

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>cards there. If the Cowboys get their entire offensive lineback

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and you have Dak and he's fully recovered, blah blah

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah, then you can still win the division.

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But Washington finding a real life quarterback. That's the biggest

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>problem in this division for the Cowboys. And I think

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you made a good point about the Eagles, and that's

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>they're really interesting in this scenario, with Carson Wentz likely

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>on his way out, what do the Eagles do a

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>number six? Is there a quarterback there that they feel

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>great about that they'd want to go get in In In

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this scenario, the only quarterback available Trey Lant or you know,

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones, even if you want to include him. But

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the Eagles are at a point where, even

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>if you do add a young quarterback, is the rest

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of the roster good enough, you know, And so I

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>think that they're at a point where they can build

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>up the talent around the quarterback in this draft and

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>then aim for a quarterback in next year's draft, or

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>if they feel strongly enough about a quarterback, just drop

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>them now and then you know, do your best to

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>fill in the pieces later. So the Eagles are interesting

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>crossroads here that I think makes them a real wild card,

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and I like the idea though at the question we're

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of talking about the NFC East. But you know,

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>if I'm the Falcons at pick four and three, quarterbacks

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are off the board in this scenario where Carolina has

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>traded up, if I like that guy a little bit,

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably going to pull the trigger. And I know,

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe they think they can extend Matt Ryan a little

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more his career a little bit more, I might

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and rip off the band aid and start

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to rebuild. I guess my question for you, Dan, I

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>know you've answered this before, but like next year's quarterbacks,

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>what's the what's the feeling quite a bit of a

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>drop off compared to this year? I mean I think so, um,

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's the vibe or who's what I've been

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>told by many around the league is just they're not

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>wild by next year's class. Um, you know, the North

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Carolina kid. Um. You know, we'll see if the Oklahoma

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterback can you know, really develop in you know, the

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>next season, so much will be dependent on what happened

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>next year and the steps that these guys take. But

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's no feel at least at this point.

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>There's no Trevor Lawrence. Uh, there's you know, no that guy.

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there wasn't a Joe Burrow Um, you know,

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>going into his senior year. So you know, we just

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know. But I think it's interesting with atlantup because

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>they're in a spot with a brand new regime, new

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>head coach, new general manager. You know, they they could

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>absolutely start building for the future. And if they take

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback at number four and it plays out you

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>know like this where a quarterbacks go one, two, three, four,

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that'll be the first time it's ever happened. We've never

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>seen that before. We've had it happened where quarterbacks go one,

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>two three, but number one, two, three four. I think

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with Atlanta, though, with a new regime coming in first

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>year general manager, you want to hit on this pick

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>more than anything, and I think adding Pennay Sewell to

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>upgrade that offensive line from the get go, Atlanta can

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>still compete. I mean, yes, they need to get better

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>on defense, but you add an offensive line piece like

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Pennai Suel Matt Ryan is not going to go down

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>without a fight. He still has weapons a throw to.

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>You make some additions, upgrades on defense and free agency,

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta can make some noise in that division. So, uh,

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that the Atlanta is in an interesting spot

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>where they can still compete and you know, maybe not

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>go the quarterback route even though they do have a

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>top five pick. So let's ask another quick question. Yeah,

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>go for Katie. Those are real quick. So in all,

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these Mark Jeff scenarios, you know, and

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in this one we have the Cowboys taking Patrick Surtan.

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>If we had to rank if say the four quarterbacks

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>win earlier, if you had to rank for Dan or

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Jeff or whoever, if you had to rank Patrick Certain,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Farley, Pine Sewell or a Shawn Slater, how would

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you rank those four prospects overall for the Cowboys or

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>just in a in a vacuum in a vacuum. But

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know that we know the Cowboys are thinking

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>about these guys because those are possibly positions of need

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at least at least off it's tackles possible, right, Yeah,

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean I know for me, I Sewell would be

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.719
<v Speaker 1>my top guy and then it would be a debate

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>between Slater and Farley for the next for the next player.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Sewell, I think is just he's He's

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a premier offensive lineman who is not even close to

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>playing his best football yet. You know he doesn't turn

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty one and t October. Just there's so much ability

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>there and you know that's there's just a lot that

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you can do with the player like that. So Sewell

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>will definitely be my guy. And then it would be

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a debate between Slater and Farley who who would number

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>two be on that list. I'm interested in the fact

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that you said Slater and Farley next and not certain

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that corrected? Did I hear that right? Or did

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>I hear it the other way? No? Yeah, I like

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Certain Um, I just I like Slater Farley just a

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. Yeah, I mean, I go for it, Dane. Sorry,

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't mean to catch you off. It's it's a situation

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>where you're, you know, the better player versus a better prospect.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean Caleb Farley, I think when you know we've

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>talked about before, talk about his athleticism, that size the

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>ball awareness, how much better you think he's going to

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>get still with Curtan. I think he's a top fifteen

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>player in this draft. Uh just you know, he's missing

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that speed element that you want

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and missing a little bit of that twitch, but he

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>consistently stays in phase, he finds the football. Uh you know,

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy who's ready to step in from day

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>want to be a starter for you. So I mean,

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to sound like it'd be a bad

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>pick if they went that to direction, but when you

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>stack those four players, I think he'd probably be the

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>fourth of the group. But it's four really good players

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>right there. So based off of what you said and

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>having Slater ahead of Curtan, Certan was the pick for

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys in this mock draft. At ten, they stayed put.

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>They took Sirtan. Now Farley and Sewell were off the board.

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Farley went one pick prior number nine to Denver and

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>then Sewell win earlier than draft to Atlanta at pick

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>number four. Slater was still on the board here and

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>even you talk about a fun trade. Slater went two

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>picks later to the New York Jets after they traded

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in your mock draft, after they traded a first round

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>pick number twenty three overall in Sam Darnold in order

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to get up and get that pick from San Francisco.

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Why was that the case in terms of curtain going

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to Dallas and then also showing that other teams value

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>as highly as they do. Ris Shawn's later, Well, I

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>think first off, the question was Slater is going to

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>be for a lot of teams. Can you play tackle? Um,

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>there's there's I know there are some teams that have

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>him on the board as a guard center, so you know,

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys might be one of those teams. I don't know, uh,

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:13.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, And if they don't think he can play tackle,

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>then maybe that changes the conversation a little bit um.

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, not that you don't draft a guard at

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>number ten overall, but not having that position flex because

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the reason why personally I love Slater

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so much, because I think he gives you that position versatility.

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>But if the Cowboys don't see that, if they see

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>him as a guard prospect, then maybe that changes things

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Um. And in this scenario, I you know,

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>knowing the Cowboys the way they look at the they

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we know that they like to predetermine what they're going

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to do And in this scenario, in this draft, where

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>there's two pretty solid corners at the top, it just

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's a very like the most likely scenario

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>is them going with one of these corners, depending on

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>which one's available for him. And that trade situation, you know,

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it just comes down the Jets if they get a

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>good deal for Darnold because they don't have to trade them,

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think they will if the right values there.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>And this trade scenario that I propose is basically the

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of two second round picks, because the Jets are

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>moving up from twenty three to twelve, so the forty

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>nine ers are still sticking in the first round and

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>giving up a twenty twenty two second round pick and

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to get their quarterback. And so it's a it's an

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting opportunity for both teams. And for the Jets, they

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>get up to twelve, and okay, you've got a chance

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>to draft a player that's gonna upgrade their offensive line

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and you pair Slater McKay Beckton at left tackle and

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 1>left guard for the foreseeable future. That's gonna be a

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun. So it's an interesting, you know wrinkle

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that would you know, surely shake things up. Do you

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>think this is the safe pick, Jeff, whenever it comes

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Cowboys instead of taking an offensive tackle in

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a slater? Or is this the risky pick, taking a

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>guy who may not be the better prospect but it

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>fits your needs right now? I mean, I do think

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a safe pick. I think Drick Curtan is a

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>safe pick to say he's going to play ten years

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL and he's going to be a starter,

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think this scenario that Dane has drawn

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>up brings a whole bunch of different names into play.

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I think for the Cowboys, I wouldn't be surprised if

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it brought the name Micah Parsons into play. For me,

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I would I would rather hear the name Jeremiah Wosu Coromoa,

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the Notre Dame linebacker. Gosh, does Christian Barmore come into play?

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me? But like I mean to me, that's early,

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>but that it's kind of along the same vein as

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>what the Curtan pick would signify, which is, look, here's

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're looking at in terms of need. Because in

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of the best players available for me, it would

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>be Jaylen Waddle and Rashawn Slater and Jeremiah Wosu Coromoa

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and and Patrick Curtan and those would kind of be

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the names that would be in that group for me.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'm with Dane where I think what's going to

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>happen is you'll have you know quite a guys that

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>told you as yeah, these are solid first round picks.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>We're sitting here at number ten. We have a desperate

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>need for cornerback. So if Caleb Farley or Patrick Sartan

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is there, I think it makes sense. I don't think

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 1>he would be the top player according to me that's

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 1>available there, but it's a pick that makes tons of

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>sense for the Cowboys, And I think part of it

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is I'm taking the best player there because I feel

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty good about cornerback and offensive tackle depth in the

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>second round when you're picking at forty four. And that

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't real rule out taking a defensive tackle or a

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>defensive end or a linebacker or any of those things

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in that spot, but I do feel really good about

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>offensive tackle and cornerback depth. Going back to Day two,

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Waddle is the best player. What if it's Jalen Waddle, Okay,

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>best player available at a position of need. Right, I'm

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>just checking. But now you're right. I like that you're

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>throwing that out there, because I did. I at least

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>turned my head like I do every time I go

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>into a seven eleven and I see some wine. Is

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that wine in a seven eleven? Yeah? I don't know

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>if I'm gonna buy it, but I might because there's

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>wine in a seven eleven. That's That's what Jalen Wattle

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle Pitts do for me at that area. That's interesting.

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>And hey, maybe maybe Jaylen Waddle ends up being the

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>miller light in the seven eleven and then all of

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a sudden you're really cooking because you have to select it.

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the issue. And a water burger on the way home,

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm saying? Whoa, oh, some of them

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm at at and t phone. Maybe some of the

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>other other players that were that we've kind of talked

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>about and where they landed. In Dane's mock draft, the

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Patriots take Michael Parsons at fifteen. That just seems like

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a Patriots pig. Goodness gracious um. Christian Barnmore goes seventeen

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to Las Vegas as the Raiders take him mister Jeremiah

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Usu Koramora, linebacker out of Notre Dame, who we all

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Detroit Lions who traded out of the top ten,

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>gave a quarterback to Washington ended up taking Jeremiah Usu

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Koramora to pair in that defense at the linebacker spot.

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's pretty impressive, I think from a standpoint of

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a team trading back and still grabbing a guy. Jc

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Horn another Cowboys rumored guy. Buffalo Bills take him at

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. Any other picks though here before we take

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>our first break down, that's stuck out to you when

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you made him. Well. I love the Steelers trading up

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a few spots to get Christian Darrisaw. You know, they

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>need help attackle and derris Saw just seems like a

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>great fit for not only that scheme, but just the

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>type of player that the Steelers look for. So they

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>make a little bit of a move and get their guy,

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the forty nine Ers. They make that move,

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>they move back to twenty three from the twelve pick,

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and they still get a solid player in quitty pay. Yeah,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe they can or a quitty pay at twelve, and

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>they fall down to twenty three still get him. I

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>think Mac Jones at twenty eight to the Saints is

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 1>just a perfect fit in terms of him being the

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>new Drew Brees. There really fits that offense well and

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they could hit the ground running. And you

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>know the Colts, they get kind of shut out at

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>left tackle with Derris off the board and a few

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>other guys, So they move back and get Leah Meikenberg

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the first round, which I think

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>would be a nice fit for them, and then last

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>pick of the first round Miami, which this is Miami's

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>third trade in this h this mock draft scenario. They

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>trade back into the first round for the their third

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>pick in this year in this first round situation, and

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they get Travis etn So, Davonte Smith, Zavin Collins, and

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 1>then they moved from thirty six to thirty two to

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>get their explosive running back, so trying to get to

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>us some more help on that offense. I love it.

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a fantastic and I wish the Cowboys

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>would do something like that and get multiple first round

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>picks as Miami already has too. They said, nah, we

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>want one more. Let's go ahead and snag this guy

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and try and make a run for the thing, because

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we also don't know what Miami's gonna do with two

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>uh and if he's even going to be that quarterback

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. So there's a lot of moving and shifting

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to be done. And while we're talking about trades, we've

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>got Twitter on the twenty coming up on the other

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>side of the break, and I'm gonna ask all three

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of these guys what it would be like to trade

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>down and maybe go get one of those defensive players

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like a Jeremiah Usu Corribora or a Christian Barmore. How

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>far would they have to fall? And are the Cowboys

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>secretly in a rebuild. We'll talk about it when we

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>come back on the other side of the break. This

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, presented by

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Miller Latte. There's nothing as unique as our eyes, which

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is why SLOR pioneers ways to make lenses as unique

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>as you vera lux for super sharp vision, Essential Blue

0:27:56.160 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for protection on Krisolve for freedom from glam cutting ex

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>solutions in a single unique lens. So whatever your needs,

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>insist on selor this ain't your local SLOR experts and

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>find a perfect lens for you Seymour Domore Slor. Since

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty five. Stetson hats are American maid with pride

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>right here in Texas, and Stetson is proud to be

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>on the field with America's team. Want to show your

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Texas and team pride too, You can by purchasing your

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>own Stetson. You can look just like how the flag

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>guys do on field at every home game. Stetson hats

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys and your

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite football team. Get yours today at shop dot Dallas

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com. I'm j Novachek,

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>former tight end for the Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day.

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I was the guy who always got the tough yards

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I run with John Deer today. In fact,

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a John Deer three zero twenty five E

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>tractor that can handle any yardwork I need to do,

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>even the tough yards way out back. So if you

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>have one acre or a thousand, John Deer has the

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>equipment that's just right for you, Visit a John Dear

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>dealer today and run with us. We are the official

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys here, it's nineteen oh eight.

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think we should get electricity and stop using

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>candles to see it night? It's just electricity lights up

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the room fast, It's more reliable than candles blowing out,

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and people seem to love it nationwide. Well, candles, DA,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>did you just run into the wall? I have a

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>new candle please. Historically, switching to new technology is a

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>no brainer. Today it's AT and T five G fast, reliable, secure,

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and nationwide. Switch to AT and T five G. It's

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>not complicated. Five G requires compatible plant may not be

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in your area. See att dot com slash five G

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for you for details. Is the Dallas Cowboys dot com

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show into the second segment here the Dallas Cowboys

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Draft Show. It's a Thursday edition. Kyle Yeoman's

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Dame Burglar, Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Kate T. Turner, and now

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got you guys answering fan questions on some Twitter

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>on the twenty on the Chris beam as always doing

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>fantastic work in the back and Jeff caving all. This

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is your time to shine, my friend, because this is

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a segment for mister trade down. Yep, yep, it's happening.

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, oh cool, yeah, captain trade down. No, this

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing, this is this is solid. Okay,

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So multiple questions on Twitter on the twenty. I'm gonna

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>try and read off every name. If I miss your name,

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I apologize. Just no, I'm thinking of you. Jason Pruitt

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>asked Sherman asked, um, there's like three other people that

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>ask this as well. Edward Canberra Junior. All want to

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>know what is the scenario like to trade down for

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys? What would it look like? How far would

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to go to get one of these top

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>prospects that you were talking about. We mentioned a bevy

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of names in the first segment. What would it take

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys to trade back down and how far

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>would they fall? Well, I want to point out first

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that like Dane's mock draft scenario, he screwed it up

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to trade down because he let all

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>four quarterbacks go before the Cowboys pick. So ideally, you

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>let one of the quarterbacks get to number ten, you

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>let somebody come up and get them, and you move

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>back and let's see the teams that would need said quarterback.

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.959
<v Speaker 1>The Dane, now all these trades are in the way,

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>New England, Pittsburgh, Washington, right night, either at Chicago, you

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>know Indy, so you know you could go as low

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>as twenty one. But here's the danger, because I play

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>with the mock draft simulators way too often on my

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>little YouTube page, way too often, and uh, one time

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I went down to like twenty or twenty one and

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I lost everybody and it was the worst mock draft

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I've ever done. So, um, that's a great question that

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll try to remember and let you know. But because

0:31:57.800 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>because here's the names that i'd be interested in a

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>trade down. If if the k yes, it was awful,

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>If the Cowboys trade down, then great, you accumulate an

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>extra pick the names that I would be thinking about

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>when I do it, and I'll go off of Dane's

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>mock draft. Here is Sir Tan probably goes somewhere. Rashawn

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Slater is a name you'd love to have available. Jeremiah

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Wusu Coromoa, the Notre Dame linebacker. I would love to

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>have available, Christian Barmore, JC Horn. If all of those

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>names are gone after I trade it down, then I

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>quit and I ask if we can redo it. I'd

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>be like Hey, Hey, I didn't mean it. Can we

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>switch back? Because that is about the end of the

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>defensive players that I'm trying to pick there in the

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>top twenty. So if I don't end up with one

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of those guys that I would say my trade Doown

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>failed and I'm not having a good time anymore. So

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>those are the targets. So you gotta be careful how

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>far you go according to this captain trade Doown, I

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>would agree. I don't really have too much to elaborate on.

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I think what you get to the Eric Stokes of

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the world that you know, if you want to say

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Leah Eikenberg or whatever you want to say, no offensive tackle,

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>if that's where you're looking, the one name that I

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that I go. And I'm just kind of using Dane's

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>my draft as a as a jumper and he's not

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>even my safety one. But if the Cowboys liked Moreig

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the safety from TCU is it twenty five, maybe that's

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a little it's a little far from me and really

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>not the guy that I want at safety anyways. But

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just throwing out names in scenarios because that's what

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we do in the draft. Who do you want it? Safety?

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Richie Grant, baby, Okay, I just wanted to make sure

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I like Richie Grant a lot. Where did yeh? Did

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Richie Grant go on the top the front first round? Here, Dane,

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't see him here? No, no, Morg's snuck in there. Uh.

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Richie Grant did not. He was not in his first

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>round balk Okay, where would you have him? Probably agree

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>with Katie there, Yeah, I mean I get somewhere in

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the top, you know, forty five picks, But I would

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>agree with kt I mean, I think it's it's a

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:04.479
<v Speaker 1>it's a close call. Who's safety one in this class.

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a case to be made for

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Grant over Moorick. So it's it's a it's a really

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>interesting group of safeties. I hope Richie, a guy in

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the early thirties go, let's say, great, well, Grant might

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have to have to have to be a guy where

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you're at forty four and you're like, gotta love this guy.

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I gotta jump up to thirty five or thirty six

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and get it. Like maybe that's the thought process there. Yeah,

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I Dane said, top forty five picks. If he goes

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>in the top forty four and he slides in there

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>at forty four, I would do cartwheels. That might be

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that would maybe be my player that I would run

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to the star and back four again this year. I'm

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>not saying I'm making that bet again because I don't

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>really want to, but uh, Richie Grant would maybe be

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that guy if he was there at forty four and

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys picked him. But hey, I might might try

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and think that through. But uh, sticking the bet, well,

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. Let me let me get through everybody first

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>before I make the bed. One other thing with I

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't hear you guys taught or mention any edge rushers

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 1>in a trade down scenario, And I think that's where

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe edge rusher becomes more of a possibility, you know,

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>with a quidty pay or he's Audilarry my top pass

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>rusher in this draft. You know, I think one of

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>these pass rushers could be more of a realistic option

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>if they'd end up trading back seven eight spots and

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe get shut out in another position. I can do Audillarry,

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>and that's about the only one because I would just

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:37.479
<v Speaker 1>I would look back at what you gave up at ten,

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and this edge class is just so weird to me

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>where I'm with you in terms of who the top

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>guy is and my second guy is Quitty pay, but

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel great about that. And then it's just

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of dudes lumped together. Where if that's

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>what I traded away from picking at number ten overall

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>four and I'd end up picking j In Phillips or

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Basham, I'd be like, what happened when we could

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>have picked Patrick's or tam guys? What happened when it

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>could have picked for Sean Slader? Guys? Depends what you

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>get too. If you get an extra two and say

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a you know in early two and it ends

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>up being another quality starter for you, then it it's

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.240
<v Speaker 1>an interesting discussion if you're talking about a pass rusher,

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a corner and a safety in your first two rounds

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>or just a corner and a safety, you know, it

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 1>just it makes it a really interesting scenario, you know,

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>with the quantity over quality argument three versus two players,

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>what would it take to get Let's say, if the

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys were at ten Dane and they went

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>from ten but they stayed in the top twenty, what

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>would that kind of compensation, look like, what do you think,

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:54.879
<v Speaker 1>probably a two And it depends what people are trained

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>up for. If it's for a quarterback, then that compensation

0:36:58.000 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is probably gonna be a little bit more because the

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>radically there will be more than one team trying to

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>get up there, and so maybe you can drive the

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>price up a little bit. But you know, likely if

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you're moving up, say say, well, I can't say Washington

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think the Cowboys are going to trade

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>with Washington, but uh, you know, say it's a it's

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>another team. Say say Pittsburgh trades up to eighteen and

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>then they look to try to get up to ten.

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 1>When they you know, try to get a quarterback or

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 1>something like that, you know, then you know you're probably

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about a two and a four or something like that,

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>where you know you're not not gonna have to trade

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the farm. But with when a quarterback's involved, the compensation

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is always a little bit more. I like it. I

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>like having that and having one of those guys I'm

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>there with you, captain trade down. I think if they

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>if there's a quarterback there and it seem wants to

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>come up and get them, let's do it. Let's just

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:49.439
<v Speaker 1>not drop too far. I don't want to drop into

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the twenties. I want to stay in the top twenty

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>pick right around where we did last year. Of course,

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we had a CD lamb last year. Let's try and

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>figure something out on the defensive side this time and

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>have to second round pick, two third round picks, two

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 1>fourth round picks, so on and so forth, because that's

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:10.919
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it would. Yeah, we got a man down. Yeah,

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, oh he's back. Sorry. I got so excited

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>about the idea of getting down into the team somewhere

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and drafting Jeremiah Wusu Cormoa and then removing a certain

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>player from the roster and saving seven point two million

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars and then using that money to go sign somebody

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 1>else that could help your team. And man, you could

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>just you could upgrade a linebacker and that would be

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. Wait, you you would be You

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>would be getting rid of a player and replacing him

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>with that same school in the same position. Is that

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what if you're talking about? Is that what we're at

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>referencing here? I mean, oh no, all I'm saying is

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that I would go with with like a guy that's

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>two legged bipedal and uh wow, and that celebrates celebrates

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 1>usually when good things happen, not just all the time.

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh goodness, all right, let's go ahead and go to

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to and this will be my last

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 1>draft show. Thank you everybody. It's been a whole fun

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>ride with Captain trade down. Uh, can you get the

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>crew This is a question from Christian. Can you get

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.839
<v Speaker 1>the crew to give their thoughts on Sean Wade from

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State. He was a disaster in the championship game.

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But would he project better as a safety? We were

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.240
<v Speaker 1>just talking about Morigg and Richie Grant at the safety

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>spot with Sean Wade transition over better, Katie, I mean,

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>but just let's just go play inside. Let's do what

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we know you're good at like that, and that's that

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 1>would probably be my goal, is like he would just

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>be my my slot corner most of the time. And

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I know he's a little a little long for that

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>six one of course, linked is fine there, right, Um,

0:39:58.040 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what I saw in twenty nineteen. You saw

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a good tackler and good in coverage and things like that.

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 1>And when they moved outside for some reason, he struggled

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and just couldn't keep up with the fry Fogels of

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the world. You know, uh, the Indiana wide receiver things

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I got to use in Daily Fantasy, that Trifogel guy. Yeah, dude,

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I just I think also, I do think you

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 1>have a situation though when you talk about him. If

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be playing a lot of cover three,

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe you give him another shot, but you're not taking

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>him in the top one hundred picks. Now, I don't

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>think I think you're banking on I think you're I

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>think you're banking on a miracle if you do that.

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 1>But let's say you get to day three, Sean Wade's there,

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to play a lot of cover three in

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the first place, you know, where he can kind of

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>keep the ball in front of him. I think I

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 1>don't think I'm like fully on board. It's just like

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>abandoning the position based on fit. But that is a

0:40:56.520 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that became a very extremely difficult evaluation after really loving

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>his twenty nineteen team, Dana just don't know what you

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>do with him. I mean, he he he can't can't

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>play outside corner. I mean he showed that, um uh

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>he And what gave me a lot of pause was

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>just how the lack of urgency that he played with. Um,

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a technique thing. It's not just him

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.720
<v Speaker 1>not being fast enough. It's just a lack of urgency

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>that he that he showed that that right there is

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 1>a huge red flag to me that I'm not even

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm not even I would have even mess with it.

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I would I wouldn't draft him. Um, he would not

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 1>be on my board. But that's just me. I mean,

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>some team's gonna try and you know, uh, you know

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:42.760
<v Speaker 1>my guests would be early Day three draft and develop

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and see if you have something. But you know, he's it.

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Just it was not the twenty twenty season that uh

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>he needed to uh for the NFL draft. Jeff, I, yeah,

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Dan Dane beat me to the punch because I didn't

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>think Dane would have the stones to say I wouldn't

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>put him on the board. But that's like my thought

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on a guy like Sean Wade is I'm gonna let

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody else pick him. And that's like that's not my

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>not me predicting he's gonna go undrafted. He'll probably get

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>picked him the third or fourth, maybe even the fifth.

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's just one of those guys that

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>if somebody were dumb enough to let me be a

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>decision maker for an NFL team, I'd be like, guys,

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we're not messing with that one. Somebody else is gonna

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 1>pick that guy, Like, what's your plan. He's a strong

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>safety that we haven't seen play strong safety. That's our plan.

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know what your plan is with

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Sean Wade. It was what happened for him in twenty

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty was bad news bears because I wouldn't know what

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to do with him, and if you don't know what

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to do with them, don't put him on the board.

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting because he I mean, he was mocked after

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>what was his twenty nineteen tape game was it first

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>round bocked draft or second early second type of area

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and then now where is he gonna fall? Yeah, I

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>mean I think his tape last year with more day

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>two tape. But I thought coming into the year, like

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 1>my first you know, draft board, I projected him. I

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>think it was like in that twenty overall because I thought, okay,

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 1>based off of what he did last year and based

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 1>off improvements, I'm projecting him because I thought he'd be

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a natural at outside corner because he has good size,

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>he's really good tather, he gets physical and you know,

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>based off his twenty nineteen film, I thought it would

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:24.399
<v Speaker 1>be you know, his tools would actually translate better outside

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and just absolutely wrong on that. And so um, you know,

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:32.720
<v Speaker 1>before the season, based off of projecting him forward, you thought, okay,

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy could maybe get into the first round, and

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>just the twenty twenty season, now he was hurt a

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:40.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit. That's part of it, you know, playing a

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>new position. But again, the lack of urgency, you know

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that right there is a turn off for me, you

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>know it more so than just him struggling at the position.

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So now it's just it's going to be interesting. And

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 1>you know he should have went to the Senior Bowl,

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't. You know, part of that again, he

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>had some injury stuff to clean up. There's no combine

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot's gonna be on his pro day.

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>He needs to go out there and test extremely well

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:10.479
<v Speaker 1>to get back in the good graces of teams and say,

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to get them more optimistic about Okay, well,

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you know he's he's a good sized player. He runs

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>into low four fars. You know, the short area agility stuff.

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll take a chance on Natsy if we can develop him.

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of pressure on his pro day to perform.

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So kind of sticking with the defensive side of the football,

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Stingray on Twitter says, does the change at defensive coordinator

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>make the urgency for drafting defense a bit lower than

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it was previously? And he says, in other words, can

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they get better performance from existing players? Jeff, what do

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 1>you think about that? One? H No, because I don't

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think you're like a lot of your existing players aren't

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 1>existing players. You have a whole bunch of free agents

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and those players weren't good enough. You know, you go

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>across this defense, and I'm very comfortable saying that Tank

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Lauren it is a good football player, Like Tank Lawrence

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is a very good starter on your defense. That's the

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>end of my list of guys that I know are

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>very good starters on my defense. It's at one. So

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like you saw some Donovan Wilson flash. That's gonna get

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>people excited. Randy Gregory can play, but at linebacker, you're like,

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, at defensive tackle, it's I don't know.

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>A corner you have Anthony Brown and Treyvon Diggs. That's

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what you got, and you don't have a free safety

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:34.879
<v Speaker 1>under contract. Really, so no, this team was Look, Mike

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Nolan was a train wreck for this organization last year.

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>The defensive coaching was a train wreck. It was embarrassing.

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>They should have never been hired. But at the same time,

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 1>your talent on defense was also bad. And that's a

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:48.919
<v Speaker 1>product of some misses, some signings that didn't work out.

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>It was everything. Your urgency to change your personnel and

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>defense doesn't change at all. You have to add Golllee,

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:02.399
<v Speaker 1>three to six newts on defense. Yeah, it's a lot.

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot. You have a lot to do, and

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that urgency does not change. Katy, I have nothing more

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to say. I mean, Jeff, Jeff neld It, it'd be

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>de scool, Jordan Lewis or Cheeto or Xavier Woods had

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:19.359
<v Speaker 1>a like strong eight game run you know that made

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:22.359
<v Speaker 1>you go wow. Well, now now that those guys were

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in contract years and didn't do enough to solidify a

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>spot next year, uh, and didn't help their market any

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's frustrating. It's interesting, Dane, any thoughts or

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to add on that. Well, I think the only thing

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I would add is we don't know how coach Quinn

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the new additions to that coaching staff,

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>they already have preconceived notions about some of these players,

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:48.760
<v Speaker 1>UM and so coming in and you know, during draft

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:51.759
<v Speaker 1>meetings and as they're deciding what the roster's gonna look

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like moving forward. Uh, you know, there's a fresh perspective

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>from these defensive coaches and we just don't know how

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 1>they're going to feel about some of these play I

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be interesting to see because there's we

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about it. Literally, the name of the Tuesday Draft

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Show was one hundred different Ways. There's one hundred different

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 1>ways the Cowboys could go, and really nineties seven of

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>those ways involved the defensive side of the football. And

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna depend on who these front office personnel or

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>who the front office personnel has their has their crushes on,

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna talk about our Valentine's crushes. Kat leads

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the final segment and we talk about some of these

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>top notch draft prospects. When we come back, it's an

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 1>early Valentine's Day edition of the Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show. We're back in a tasty treat that's sweeping

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 1>airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor Pepper and creep Soda.

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen, Doctor Batman cream soda. Is he

0:47:48.280 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a new Combonu's music to My ears? Okay, doctor Music

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to My Ears? And mouse new Doctor Pepper and cream soda.

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:11.839
<v Speaker 1>A delis. There's nothing as unique as our eyes, which

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is why SLOR pioneers ways to make lenses as unique

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>as you. Varilux for super sharp vision, Essential Blue for protection,

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and Krisol for freedom from glare. Three cutting edge solutions

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and a single unique lens. So whatever your needs, insist

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 1>on Selor, visit your local SLOR experts and find a

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:39.320
<v Speaker 1>perfect lens for you. Seymore Do Moore Selor. The Cowboys Way,

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 1>where sixteen Hall of Famers and five championships shows us

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:46.400
<v Speaker 1>what success looks like. Where Turkey is always the second

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>best part of Thanksgiving Day, Where we are all defined

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:53.840
<v Speaker 1>by one single thing, the Star, where we as fans

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:56.959
<v Speaker 1>know it's our job to keep the tradition going. Bank

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of America is proud to be the official bank of

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys and to support the quest of living life.

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys Way copyright twenty twenty Bank of America Corporation. Dear,

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's nineteen oh eight. Don't you think we should get

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>electricity and stop using candles to see it? Money? It's

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 1>just electricity lights up the room fast, it's more reliable

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>than candles blowing out, and people seem to love it nationwide. Well, candles, dar,

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 1>did you just run into the wall. Have a new

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:25.800
<v Speaker 1>candle please? Historically, switching to new technology is a no brainer.

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Today it's AT and T five G fast, reliable, secure,

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 1>and nationwide. Switch to AT and T five G. It's

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 1>not complicated. Five G requires compatible plan. May not be

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in your area. See att dot com slash five G

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>for you for details. Is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show. Final segment here of the Dallas Cowboys dot

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Com Draft Show. It's a Thursday edition. Valentine's Day coming

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:52.399
<v Speaker 1>up next week and we won't have another show until then.

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to join us though Tuesday, ten am Central Time.

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:58.480
<v Speaker 1>It'll be Brian broad Us, Bucky Brooks, David Hellman and

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the other group crew of the Draft Show. We'll talk

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:04.800
<v Speaker 1>with those guys about maybe who their Valentines are. But Katie,

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we've got a bit of a segment here about ten

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>minutes to do it, kind of explain how things are

0:50:09.440 --> 0:50:13.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna go and then get us underway. Well, I thought,

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:16.279
<v Speaker 1>with Valentine's Day coming up, we all have something that

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we we've called over the years, quote pet cats, But

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a little more shocking. I think now

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:25.399
<v Speaker 1>it's time to talk about our NFL Draft Valentines. Who

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>are the players that we're kind of in love with? Now?

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 1>This could be a fifth round guy, a guy who

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>might we've projected to go on Day three. It could

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>be the Trevor Lawrence. You know, it could do whatever.

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:37.920
<v Speaker 1>But I thought we could just kind off there's some

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>guys who you like, you might like more than others,

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.319
<v Speaker 1>or a guy that maybe you just in love with

0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 1>their tape. Let's just go around the horn and talk

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 1>about them. So I'd like to start with you, Jeff,

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and I know you like one of those TCU safeties,

0:50:50.880 --> 0:50:52.880
<v Speaker 1>but I'll let you just to go. Who's one of

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:57.840
<v Speaker 1>your draft Valentines? Our Darius Washington, the best safety at TCU,

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the best safety in this draft class. Mel Kiper didn't

0:51:01.880 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>put him in his top ten safeties. Dane disrespects him

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 1>every time he puts out a list, or Darius Washington.

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:11.800
<v Speaker 1>If there were a combine, he would be the lightest

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 1>safety in the history of the combine. He might be

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the shortest safety in the history of the combine. But

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm just I'm tired of all you size

0:51:19.480 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 1>shamers out there. Or Darius Washington safety one. When he

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 1>gets picked in the fifth round, don't tell me that

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong about him. Just wait for his career

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to play out. The great our Darius Washington, Well, it's

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>because he's not a safety, But I digress. I mean

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>unless you want him to play safety. I mean, if

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you want him to play the slot, he'll play the

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>slot and he'll be better than your slot corner. If

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to play safety, he'll be better than Mary

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>get it, wherever you wanted to play. It's whatever I'm

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 1>going with. The true safety that's Richie Grant, who he

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:50.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier. This guy the last three years led the

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:55.360
<v Speaker 1>team and tackles twice. He accounted for seventeen career turnover

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:59.840
<v Speaker 1>worthy plays, ten interceptions, seven forced fumbles. Place be production

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the tape. He can do receiver like things at the catchpoint.

0:52:03.880 --> 0:52:06.280
<v Speaker 1>He'll run the alley, he'll go for the kill shot.

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>He only gave up three touchdowns the last two years,

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:13.239
<v Speaker 1>so you know, there's some consistency issues that he needs

0:52:13.239 --> 0:52:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to iron out. But NFL starting range, eyes, ballhawking skills,

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 1>he could play single high, he could be a split safety.

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this guy's gonna be a starter as a rookie,

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, it's we're still kind of figuring

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:31.360
<v Speaker 1>out how early he's going to go. But I'm crushing

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 1>on him for sure. I like that. I like that

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Yeah, I think, yeah, I think he's probably

0:52:38.760 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the draft show darlings. I think of the

0:52:41.400 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 1>whole the whole realm. Really, I think all of us

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of look at Richie Grant as one of those

0:52:45.320 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>guys that could really be special. Now my draft crush

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 1>has to do and it's kind of an obligatory, like,

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:53.799
<v Speaker 1>let's not forget about this guy. It's one of those

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 1>trade doown targets, and it's Christian Barmore from Alabama, the

0:52:56.719 --> 0:53:00.160
<v Speaker 1>defensive lineman. He's gonna be you're starting three technique if

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys take him. I think he's better than Neville Gallimore.

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's better than Tristian Hill. He's better than

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:06.839
<v Speaker 1>any of those guys on the defensive line. And if

0:53:06.840 --> 0:53:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about a guy who, yes he flashes on film,

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes his production was there when he was healthy at Alabama.

0:53:13.120 --> 0:53:17.240
<v Speaker 1>But another guy that I also really respect in terms

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of evaluating a specially defensive line talent, and that's Matt Rule,

0:53:21.640 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>who's now with the Panthers. He was with Baylor for

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. You saw what he did with Baylor's

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:28.840
<v Speaker 1>defensive line in just three years of talent evaluation and

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:32.439
<v Speaker 1>building there. But he recruited Christian Barmore to Temple where

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:35.759
<v Speaker 1>he originally committed before turning over and going to Alabama

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:38.279
<v Speaker 1>and then showing out for Nick Sabans. So I like

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Christian Barmore all of his tape. I like his background.

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I like the way that he could fit in as

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:46.359
<v Speaker 1>a three technique for the Cowboys in twenty twenty one.

0:53:46.400 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So if the Cowboys trade down, let's say in the

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:52.400
<v Speaker 1>mid twenty or not even mid twenties, but right before

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth pick, get right back into that fifteen to

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:58.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen range, then all of a sudden, if Christian Martmore

0:53:58.239 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is there, I think he needs to be in the

0:53:59.560 --> 0:54:02.439
<v Speaker 1>discussion as a front seven defender that the Cowboys could take,

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the lack of like top end dts, like,

0:54:08.080 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe a team gets a little urgent. Maybe maybe he's

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a top twelve guy. Maybe he ends up higher than that,

0:54:13.000 --> 0:54:15.439
<v Speaker 1>just because I mean, it seems a little crazy, but

0:54:16.239 --> 0:54:19.719
<v Speaker 1>it could happen. Let's have a little fun here, Dan,

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to get your thoughts on this guy too.

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:23.360
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if Jeff you, I don't know. No,

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Kat found an undrafted guy, small school. Let's go to

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's go edge rusher Chris Rough the second from Duke,

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:39.920
<v Speaker 1>because look, he's light, he's two hundred and twenty five pounds,

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>play defensive end, so maybe he's a three to four

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:47.120
<v Speaker 1>outside linebacker. But speed is the trade, baby, Speed all

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:49.840
<v Speaker 1>day long, all over the field, making plays. He had

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 1>eight sacks last year. And again he's long, he's got

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a lean build, but he is all over the field,

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:59.759
<v Speaker 1>chasing down plays from the backside, just making plays all

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:02.839
<v Speaker 1>over the place. Look, he's gonna have issues when an

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:04.839
<v Speaker 1>offensive lineman is able to get his hands on him

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:07.400
<v Speaker 1>because he's two hundred and twenty five pounds. But also

0:55:07.600 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>his attitude is Look, there's a three hundred pound offensive

0:55:10.080 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 1>lineman I'm gonna be faster than him and I'm gonna

0:55:13.040 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>get around him. So still needs to work on some

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>some nuanced things at the past rush Rose, But Chris

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Rump the second from Duke is one of my favorite

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of fun. It was just fun to watch

0:55:24.600 --> 0:55:28.120
<v Speaker 1>his tape because that's speed off the edge. That might

0:55:28.160 --> 0:55:29.960
<v Speaker 1>be the best speed off the edge in this class.

0:55:30.400 --> 0:55:32.879
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it's obvious because he's two hundred and twenty

0:55:32.880 --> 0:55:35.439
<v Speaker 1>five pounds, but get a good look at Chris Rump

0:55:35.520 --> 0:55:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the second from Duke. Everyone I believe his father's a

0:55:38.600 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>coach for the Texans, although everyone gets what the Texans

0:55:41.800 --> 0:55:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is like wanting out of town now. But Chris Rump, Yeah, yeah,

0:55:46.080 --> 0:55:48.279
<v Speaker 1>his dad's been an assistant in the NFL for a

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:52.120
<v Speaker 1>long time. So and he's Chris Rum's a captain at Duke,

0:55:53.120 --> 0:55:55.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, high pedigree type of guy. Yeah. I just

0:55:55.800 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you do with him because he

0:55:57.600 --> 0:56:00.120
<v Speaker 1>just he gets dominated versus a run, I mean the

0:56:00.160 --> 0:56:03.880
<v Speaker 1>point of attack. He's an Asian trouble But I agree

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:07.200
<v Speaker 1>with you. As a as a pass rusher, he the

0:56:07.239 --> 0:56:10.799
<v Speaker 1>motors outstanding good forward bend. He has ranged at the

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 1>position um because he is a little bit smaller. That

0:56:14.360 --> 0:56:17.360
<v Speaker 1>makes it tough for an He moves so fast offensive

0:56:17.400 --> 0:56:19.640
<v Speaker 1>linemen to get their hands on him. So it's a

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:22.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a pro and con there. So you know,

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of things like about him. I'm

0:56:24.280 --> 0:56:26.920
<v Speaker 1>just not sure. Is he a sub package guy? Can

0:56:26.960 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 1>he play off the ball or you know? It just

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:32.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of questions. I think you have to

0:56:32.400 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be You have to find the answers for and be

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:37.440
<v Speaker 1>confident about before you draft a player like the Katie

0:56:37.440 --> 0:56:40.520
<v Speaker 1>would Jeff Well, I would just really quickly before we

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:42.399
<v Speaker 1>go back to Jeff on this duke guy, Katie, when

0:56:42.440 --> 0:56:45.439
<v Speaker 1>you said edge rusher out of Duke, I actually thought

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you were gonna go with Victor Demikaji. I think, is

0:56:47.960 --> 0:56:50.920
<v Speaker 1>how you say his name? Do meca gee? Uh? He's

0:56:50.960 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 1>six foot two play guy? Well, I looked it up

0:56:55.160 --> 0:56:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and I couldn't find it at the at the very moment.

0:56:57.400 --> 0:57:00.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'll get to that point, I promise. But a

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Mikage out of duke, I think he's even better than

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:06.319
<v Speaker 1>what Rumf has to bring to the table in terms

0:57:06.360 --> 0:57:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of a Duke edge rusher. He's bigger, he's stronger, he's

0:57:09.640 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a four three base end, he's I mean, you know

0:57:12.560 --> 0:57:15.040
<v Speaker 1>what he is, you know what you're getting out of him, Dana.

0:57:15.080 --> 0:57:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to kind of get your comparison on

0:57:17.360 --> 0:57:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the two before we go back to Jeff real quick. Yeah,

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:26.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously different styles of player. D mc cage is strong

0:57:26.040 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>at the point of attack. He's not gonna give you

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a great pass rush. He's inconsistent, as you know, set up,

0:57:33.840 --> 0:57:36.280
<v Speaker 1>spends too much time attached to blocks. But he can

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 1>get a field quickly, and he's got strong hands and

0:57:38.720 --> 0:57:40.840
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna bring it on every down. So yeah, he

0:57:41.160 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is a draftable player, probably somewhere on day three. De mukage.

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what I found just now. De muge. I'm trying, Jeff.

0:57:50.160 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Jeff, what's your crush? All right, I'm gonna

0:57:53.840 --> 0:57:58.720
<v Speaker 1>try to pronounce this name right, Payton Turner. That's Houston.

0:57:59.120 --> 0:58:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Defensive line, Peyton Turner. Take him with your second round

0:58:02.760 --> 0:58:05.360
<v Speaker 1>pick and prosper. He's six five, two seventies, got the

0:58:05.360 --> 0:58:08.600
<v Speaker 1>longest arms on planet Earth, and offensive lineman just can't

0:58:08.600 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>reach him. So whether you play him inside or outside,

0:58:11.120 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 1>he has an absolute problem for offensive lineman. Peyton Turner

0:58:14.920 --> 0:58:18.959
<v Speaker 1>defensive line, Houston, take him in the second We're good. Yeah,

0:58:18.960 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I like that's he's really along. He's also one of

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the best effort rushers that I've scouted in this class,

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and so that competitive energy that he brings is awesome

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 1>inside outside versatility. I'm gonna go with another guy that

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned earlier as he's Audillary. I think, you know,

0:58:34.160 --> 0:58:37.640
<v Speaker 1>he's not being talked about enough as a legitimate top

0:58:37.680 --> 0:58:41.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen guy, and he should be. You know, he you know,

0:58:41.640 --> 0:58:43.640
<v Speaker 1>he got frustrating watching him on film when they would

0:58:43.680 --> 0:58:45.640
<v Speaker 1>drop him or at you know, not play him as

0:58:45.640 --> 0:58:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a pass rusher. And he's still let the sec in

0:58:48.120 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>sack so explosive athlete, dippin rip, he can corner scheme versatility,

0:58:52.840 --> 0:58:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy is still scratching the surface. So I'm a

0:58:55.920 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 1>big Audilary fan. So my my first I guess draft

0:59:02.560 --> 0:59:06.680
<v Speaker 1>crush was having to deal with a position of need

0:59:06.800 --> 0:59:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and maybe reaching a little bit with that position of need.

0:59:09.720 --> 0:59:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm reaching with a position that's not so much

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of a need. And Katie, I know you know this guy, Yes, sir, Yes, sir,

0:59:16.720 --> 0:59:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it's Jalen Darden, North Texas. Baby, He's gonna go in

0:59:21.040 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the third round. Not really, He's probably gonna go in

0:59:23.280 --> 0:59:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like the fifth or the sixth. But if the Cowboys

0:59:26.080 --> 0:59:27.560
<v Speaker 1>pick him in the fifth of the six I would

0:59:27.560 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 1>want to do do cartwheels because he'll be your fourth

0:59:30.280 --> 0:59:33.040
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. He'll be a touchdown scoring machine just like

0:59:33.040 --> 0:59:35.600
<v Speaker 1>he was in college. Doesn't matter if he was at

0:59:35.600 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a small school. If they score touchdowns in college, are

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:40.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna find a way to score touchdowns in the pros.

0:59:40.440 --> 0:59:42.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what Jaalen Darden is to me, and I want

0:59:42.360 --> 0:59:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys to select him. He is such a draft

0:59:44.880 --> 0:59:46.840
<v Speaker 1>crush for me, and I'm trying to get the Cowboys

0:59:46.840 --> 0:59:50.760
<v Speaker 1>on that bandwagon. Darden to Dallas. Baby, Let's figure it out.

0:59:50.840 --> 0:59:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Katie High is tiny, but I love it. Five seven

0:59:58.840 --> 1:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half. It means Jeff will like him. Yeah,

1:00:02.160 --> 1:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>he might be this year. Is Jakim Grant. We'll see,

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>But our Darius Washington to lock him up. I don't know.

1:00:08.880 --> 1:00:13.439
<v Speaker 1>That's the one line I want to see. I don't

1:00:13.440 --> 1:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about this guy a lot because Jeff

1:00:15.600 --> 1:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>just tweeted about him today and I had him on

1:00:17.360 --> 1:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>my list. I'm want to do someone else. But everyone

1:00:19.800 --> 1:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>go get a good look at Kelvin Joseph, the cornerback

1:00:22.160 --> 1:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>from Kentucky and there's especially in the play where he

1:00:25.440 --> 1:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>boxes out Davante Smith. But I want to go to

1:00:29.600 --> 1:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>running back because oh no again, just guys, I love,

1:00:34.920 --> 1:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I love because the tape is fun. That mess my

1:00:36.720 --> 1:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite running back Kenneth Gainwell from Memphis, and we know

1:00:40.960 --> 1:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Memphis will churn out some runners. Kenneth Gainwell from from

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Memphis was so fun to watch. Only he set out

1:00:48.400 --> 1:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty. You I could watch his twenty nineteen tape.

1:00:51.360 --> 1:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a play where they lining up at wide receiver

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and they throw a back shoulder to him and he

1:00:55.480 --> 1:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>just flips his hips makes the catch. I mean I

1:00:58.200 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>think he said yeah. I mean he's he ended up

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>natural doing it out of the backfield on a wheel route.

1:01:04.400 --> 1:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Just hit him in stride Boom, never stops running, hits

1:01:07.840 --> 1:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>top speed. I mean, he's a dynamic playmaker. You know.

1:01:10.720 --> 1:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he's your twenty to twenty five

1:01:12.880 --> 1:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>carrying game guy, But I don't know if that player

1:01:14.720 --> 1:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>exists in the league anymore. Except for zeke Um. You know,

1:01:17.840 --> 1:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy who just like, hey get him on

1:01:20.000 --> 1:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>my team. I'm gonna get get him the ball fifteen

1:01:21.920 --> 1:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>times a game. Dating real quick. I was gonna see

1:01:31.680 --> 1:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I I was gonna see if you if you had

1:01:33.800 --> 1:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>anything to add on Kat's guy. No, he summed it

1:01:38.800 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>up perfectly. Why Gainwell is is awesome. It's the pass

1:01:41.840 --> 1:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>catching skills h and his ability to catch outside his

1:01:45.760 --> 1:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>frame and without breaking stride and make things happen. Um, yeah,

1:01:49.920 --> 1:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we know, like Katy said, Memphis has has those athletes.

1:01:53.120 --> 1:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think pretty sure he was a quarterback in

1:01:55.600 --> 1:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>high school and so you know, a guy that's emerging. Um,

1:01:58.920 --> 1:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>he really only had one year of experience because he

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>opted out of this past year, so there are still

1:02:04.120 --> 1:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>some things we're you know, learning about him. But if

1:02:06.800 --> 1:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he has a nineteen film was a lot of fun.

1:02:09.440 --> 1:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I liked this, kat This was fun, kind of throwing

1:02:12.000 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>out a bunch of names, getting to kind of go

1:02:14.320 --> 1:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>round table and find some guys that maybe we haven't

1:02:17.760 --> 1:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily had a chance to talk about yet, because we're

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna have these conversations all the way up until April

1:02:22.360 --> 1:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>about guys we like, guys we don't like. Maybe we

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>need to find like an anti Valentine next week. Guys

1:02:27.400 --> 1:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>we just don't like that. Maybe our Greg Russeau right

1:02:30.720 --> 1:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. Yeah, Hey, there you go, Gregory Rousseau,

1:02:34.440 --> 1:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey why Mary. Oh, We've got plenty more to come

1:02:39.960 --> 1:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>next week. Catch these guys Thursday, ten am Central Time,

1:02:43.880 --> 1:02:46.479
<v Speaker 1>But until next time for Jeff Kavanaugh, for Kevin kat

1:02:46.760 --> 1:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Turner for Dane Brugler and Chris Beam in the back

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>up Kyle Yeoman's thanks for joining us here on the

1:02:50.840 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show presented by Miller Lite. This has been a

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys

1:02:58.280 --> 1:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Football Club.