WEBVTT - Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend: Jobs, Fed, AI, Europe

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>top stories in the coming week from our day Break

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>anchors all around the world, and straight ahead on the program,

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the job market and what it means.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>For all of us. I'm Top Busby in New York.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm Stephen Carolyn London, where we're looking ahead to a

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 3>meeting of some of Europe's top economists and business people

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 3>in France at a time when yours own growth is stuttering.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm Doug Prisner the challenges of developing artificial intelligence in China.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm Joe Matthew in Washington. Next week we get a

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 5>fly on the wall view of the last FED meeting.

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 6>Coming up, we'll look ahead to the release of FED minutes.

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 6>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 6>Eleve Them three own New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg one O six one, Boston, Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco,

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 6>DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius XM one nineteen and around

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 6>the world on Bloomberg Radio dot com and via the

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Business app.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 7>You.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby, and we begin today's program with the

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>June jobs report coming out this coming Friday. Joining me

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what's expected and what it all means.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Global Economics and Policy editor Michael McKee. Now, before

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>we talk about June, let's start by looking back at

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>May's data. There was three hundred and thirty nine thousand

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>jobs added, way more than forecast, a sign of a

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty healthy labor market. Gains some professional business services, government, healthcare,

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and very important to the Fed, we saw wage growth

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 1>slow the same time inflation started to pull back.

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 7>It was a confusing report because the establishment survey, the

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 7>three hundred and thirty nine thousand, was so strong, but

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 7>on the household side, we lost jobs. The household survey

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 7>produces the unemployment rate, and it jumped from three point

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 7>four percent to three point seven percent. So the Fed's

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 7>going to really be watching this coming month to see

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 7>if that same dynamic plays out. Right now, the forecast

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 7>for unemployment is unchanged at three point seven percent, but

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 7>we'll have to see when we get to next Friday

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 7>what the final number is and how it compares with

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 7>job creation.

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And what kind of raw number were you looking at

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in ads.

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, here's the funny part. We've had a lot of

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 7>strong economic data over the last week, and people have

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 7>been talking about how the economy is in better shape

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 7>than thought, but you kind of have been marking down

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 7>their forecast for job growth. We're at one ninety five now.

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 7>Earlier in the last week we were at about two twenty.

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 7>So I'm not sure why the pessimism, but people are

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 7>thinking that maybe the trend is finally breaking and then

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 7>we will get lower job creation, although that's still very strong,

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:49.839
<v Speaker 7>lower job creation and slightly higher unemployment, even if we're

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 7>seeing strength in other areas of the economy.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>But that's something right in the fed's playbook, right, that's

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>what they're hoping to see.

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 2>That's what they're hoping to see.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 7>The Fed's been hoping that we would a slow down

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 7>in consumer spending, a slowdown in therefore business investment, and

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 7>then a slow down in hiring, and the fewer people

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 7>that get jobs, that's less money that goes into spending

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 7>in the overall economy, cools. It's the standard playbook for

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 7>central banks and it just hadn't worked yet.

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of the FED, just this past week we saw

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Powell was in Madrid at an ECB event, and

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>he said some things that really rattled investors.

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 8>A strong majority of committee participants expect that it will

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 8>be appropriate to raise interest rates two or more times

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 8>by the end of this year. Inflation pressures continue to

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 8>run high, in the process of getting inflation back down

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 8>to two percent has a long way to go.

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 2>That is a mouthful.

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, the FED had forecast at their last meeting that

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 7>we would see the possibility of two more rate increases,

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 7>and he seems to be underlining that the market had

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 7>only priced in one, so he seems to be interested

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 7>in pushing them to add to that. And we did

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 7>see the swaps market react and at least start to

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 7>price in the idea of two. But remember the FED

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 7>has been saying all along it's very data dependent, and

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 7>we haven't got a lot of employment or inflation data yet.

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 7>We will be getting that, and so for the FED,

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 7>it's a question of do they really have to carry

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 7>through with two rate increases or will the data give

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 7>them an out maybe only do one. And the market

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 7>is kind of thinking the same way.

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And we've still got four weeks before the next meeting

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that they have, and then six weeks after that.

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Right in September.

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 7>Yes, so we will see one more CPI report before

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 7>the FED meeting, and of course next Friday is the

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 7>Jobs report, and those will give us a pretty good

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 7>idea of where we are at the moment. The question

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 7>is what's the long run view, And since we only

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 7>get one report, it's going to be harder for the

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 7>Fed to make a forecast that works for the month

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 7>of August, taking the month of August off and then

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 7>not until September. Having another meeting, we will have j

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 7>Powell and Jackson Hall, so if he has something to say,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 7>we'll hear it. But the Fed itself won't be voting again.

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 7>So you're right, it's going to be an interesting vacuum

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 7>for the market to fill.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>But so far, what the Fed has done took a while,

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>but it appears to be bearing fruit.

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 7>Well, they have brought down the inflation rate and it's

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 7>about halved, but it's considered the low hanging fruit. I mean,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 7>we saw energy prices in particular falloff, and gasoline prices.

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 7>Now the question is is they're embedded inflation in the

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 7>core rate of inflation. That's going to be hard to eradicate.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 7>Our companies raising prices because they still have to pay

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 7>more for their inputs. Are they raising prices because they can?

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 7>People are used to it? Is labor still an issue

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 7>in terms of having to make up the cost of

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 7>additional wages for people. So we're not out of the woods.

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 7>And the FED thinks that it's going to be much

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 7>harder to get that last two percent wrung out of

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 7>inflation than the first six percent.

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and Chairman Pal said, it's not this year, it's

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>not next year. It looks like it's going to be

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five hopefully.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's a they're being conservative because they have been

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 7>fooled and it's been much stickier than they thought. The

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 7>Fed is thinking twenty twenty five, we are going to

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 7>see inflation come down because the whole rent question, we've

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 7>talked about a lot that it takes a long time

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 7>for housing costs to get into and out of the

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 7>inflation data. They're going to that's finally going to hit

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 7>and we're going to see some drops in inflation. But

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 7>then does that continue And that's something they don't know

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 7>because we've started to see some home price and rent

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 7>increases and now may take another six months or a

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 7>year to go into the data, but it's going to

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 7>be out there and it'll keep them farther away from

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 7>two percent if that indeed happens.

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, Mike, I want to shift gears a little bit

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>here and talk about the kinds of jobs that are

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>going away, the kind of jobs that are we're seeing

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>gains in the last couple of months, we've seen, or

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so far this year, hundreds of thousands of tech jobs

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that have been some of the big techies. Now we

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>all know that they overhire during the pandemic when things

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody knew which way we're going to go. But as

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you have said before, every company is a tech company,

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of those people are finding work, you know,

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>with AI. It looks like things are shifting that in

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that marketplace for those jobs.

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Tech jobs.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I'm not smart enough to know how easily you

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 7>can transition to an AI job from another kind of

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 7>tech job. And of course when we talk about tech,

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 7>it's a very large category, everything from hardware to software

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 7>and all different kinds of software. But it does look

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 7>like that category has stabilized because people can find more jobs.

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 7>The thing that was slow was temporary hiring because usually

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 7>when you're seeing an economic ramp up. Companies add people

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 7>on a temporary basis because they're worried about whether or

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 7>not they'll have the businesses to sustain hiring them, and

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 7>that turned around last month we saw some gains in

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 7>temporary hiring. Healthcare has always been a last couple of years,

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 7>has been a very strong category, and that saw gains.

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 7>As we get older, we need more healthcare, and so

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 7>we're looking to see where the weakness is going to come.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 7>It has been in manufacturing. Manufacturing was losing jobs for

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 7>a bit, but now it seems to have added not

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 7>at a huge pace, but we're starting to see more

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 7>production and more hiring there. And construction. I know you've

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 7>been following this. Construction jobs have really surprised. So it's

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 7>the housing market. But builders have been putting up houses

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 7>as fast as they can and they need construction workers.

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 7>And now we're seeing the impact of some of the

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 7>measures Congress passed in the last year, the Chips Act

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 7>and the Inflation Reduction Act that incentivize constructing, especially for

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 7>green energy new facilities, and we're seeing a huge amount

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 7>of construction spending on business facilities, which means they need

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 7>more people as well. So construction, which is normally very

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 7>affected by interest rates is not confounded and that's another surprise.

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 7>So none of this is working out as the previous

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 7>models would have suggested.

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Another thing you talked about manufacturing, and this is timely

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>because the UAW this month in July is talking to

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>all of Detroit's Big three about a new contract. And

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>boy has that industry changed over the last three or

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>four years dramatically Because they know the UAW. Electric cars

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>do not have the components that gas engine cars have

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and therefore do not need the same amount of workers

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>putting it together to assemble those cars. So they've got

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>their work cut out from the UAW.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 7>It is going to be a very interesting negotiation. Labor

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 7>relations in the auto industry have gotten better, so hopefully

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 7>they will be able to avoid strike. And many years

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 7>ago now doesn't seem like it to us old guys,

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 7>but they went to two tier wages with younger people

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 7>coming in at lower wage levels, and so that has

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 7>helped the automakers a lot. Now, how they handle a

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 7>technological change rather than an age change is going to

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 7>be very interesting. And what kinds of people do you need?

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 7>What kinds of jobs are you going.

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 2>To have to fill?

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, Michael, thank you so much for being here. That

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>was Michael McKee, our Global Economics and Policy editor, and

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>coming up on.

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Daybreak weekend.

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>How about a trip to France the Summer Economic Conference

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>coming to ex Au Provence. I'm Tom Busby and this

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>look ahead at the top stories for investors in.

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 2>The coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Up later in our program big global gathering on artificial intelligence.

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>It's in the works for next week, but first, After

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>scraping through a difficult winter, Europe's major economies are stagnating

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>as the impact of higher interest rates now kicking in.

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting time for some of the continent's stop economists,

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>policymakers and business people to be gathering in the south

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of France for the annual Economic Conference in the city

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of ex A, Provence.

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 2>For more, let's head to London.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe banker Stephen Carroll Tom.

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 3>It's a staple of the European economists calendar. This conference

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 3>organized by the French group Sec de seconist or the

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Circle of Economists. The theme this year is Renewing Hope

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 3>and features politicians, CEOs and some ECP policymakers joining the

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 3>discussions as well. Bloomberg's Power supporter Carolyn Connan will be

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 3>there and she joins us now for more on this Carolyn,

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 3>many of our listeners may not be familiar with excellent Provence.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Can you tell us a bit about first of all,

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 3>where this event is taking place.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 9>Even I think you have to close your eyes and

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 9>imagine the village atmosphere of Provence. So it's in southeast

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 9>of France, less than one hour north of Marseille. You

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 9>can hear the sound of the cicadas because it's the

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 9>beginning of summer, and you have some concerts, some opera

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 9>at night. That's where the conference is taking place. Probably

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 9>one of my favorite events of the year, even though

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 9>sometimes the weather might get very hard to occasionally close

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 9>to the forty degrees celsius. So most important, most importantly,

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 9>I would say it's one of the best events to

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 9>mingle with French executives and ministers because they are relaxed,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 9>they're very open to conversations and sometimes they actually share

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 9>some news with you. Really enjoyed the conference because it's

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 9>also the same weekend as the Opera Festival in Excellent Province,

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 9>and it comes at a quiet period before the first

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 9>half earning season, so not too much pressure. It's kind

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 9>of like DeVos in France. That's why we call it

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 9>here the French divors.

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Ah, well, you're making us all very jealous the prospect

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 3>of that setting. Anyway, for the organization, talk to us

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 3>about the key topics they're going to be up for discussion.

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 9>As you mentioned this year, the mental topic is renewing hope,

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 9>which couldn't be of course more appropriate given the geopolitical uncertainties,

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 9>the war in Ukraine, the rebellion of Wagner and Russia,

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.719
<v Speaker 9>and the concerns also on the economic front about a

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 9>credit crunch and the danger of possible recession. So we'll

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 9>get some general comments about all that, but the outlook

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 9>for the economy, but also some of the other issues

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 9>supply chain innovation, labor shortages for example. But X, as

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, also lacks expanding the topics for discussions. So

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 9>for example, well the ECB president Kittin Lagard is doing

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 9>a panel about gender equality. You've also got the former

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 9>prime minister and presidential hopeful Edward Philip who will talk

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 9>about choices for the future of society. So there will

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 9>be also a lot of discussions about ecological awareness, healthcare, work,

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 9>life balance. There is a one panel for example, which

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 9>is called working to live or living to work. That's

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 9>a interesting choice, and of course education. The younger generations

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 9>will also be discussing. On the other side of the spectrum,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 9>the retirement because we're just a few months after President

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 9>Macon pass is very controversial pension reform.

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, look, it's a fascinating set of discussions.

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 3>I do think it's very interesting, as you say that

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 3>when we have this summer setting and the idea that

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, people are perhaps a little bit more relaxed,

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 3>they'll take time to dig into the broader economic issues

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 3>that perhaps you don't get to during the rest of

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 3>the year. But having said that, we have got a

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 3>couple of ECB names are going to be attending as

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 3>well will be expecting to hear from them.

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 9>There are no less than five central bankers attending, including

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 9>four from the ECB President La Gard, also the French

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 9>Villa Gualo, the Portuguese and the Spanish, and also separately

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 9>you got the Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey, who's

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 9>going to be there on a Sunday. So very interesting

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 9>and it's not usually a place where Christine Lagarde breaks

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 9>a lot of news, but some of the others they

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 9>like talking. They like to be a bit more open

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 9>minded to talking on the sideline. So we'll check if

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 9>they give any signals regarding the next ECB meeting in

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 9>July and also of course the highly expected September meeting.

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 9>What will be the policy after these sellin next meetings?

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 9>How many more rate hikes are we going to see?

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 9>That will be some of the key questions. And who knows,

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 9>if you're lucky, I might actually have an exclusive sit

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 9>down with one of those central bankers. And my good

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 9>feeling this will actually happen.

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we're all wishing for that as well, Carolyne. Let's

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 3>set ourselves up for that ECB conversation, though, and bring

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 3>you some of the interview that we had with the

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 3>ECB Vice president least again to us. In recent days

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 3>he's been speaking to Bloomberg at the ECB forum in

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 3>CenTra and Portugal and told our editor at large, Francine Laqua,

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 3>that the September rate hike decision was open.

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 10>We are not done. There is more ground to recovered,

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 10>and you know, the key factory is going to be

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 10>the blution of inflation. And so what we want to

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 10>indicate is very clearly our determination to reduce inflation and

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 10>to bring inflation down or definition of press ability.

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 11>So what happens for future interest rate hikes? I know

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 11>your data dependence. I know September is a question mark.

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 11>But given the data points we have, now, are you

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 11>just going to power ahead and hike Well.

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 10>I think that July is afeta complete. It has been indicated,

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 10>and you know, it's quite clear September. September will depend.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 10>You know, you know, what are the factors that are

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 10>going to determine what happens in September will be our

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 10>bank lending survey that I think that is very important

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 10>because it's going to be an indication of how our

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 10>monetary policies trust to the financial system and from the

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 10>financial system to the rest of the economy. How you know,

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 10>the title in the financing conditions fed through to the

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 10>real economy. The second will be you know, our predictions

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 10>in September we will have a new round projections. And finally,

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 10>the lusion of core inflation underline inflation. That I think

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 10>that is you know, very relevant in the person's scumstances.

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 10>So these are the three elements that we will take

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 10>into consideration. But well, I said that in July it

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 10>was afterta complete or it is after the complete in September.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 10>I think that is open.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 11>Do you believe, Vice President, this is a matter of

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.719
<v Speaker 11>credibility for the Central Bank to get to two percent

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 11>no matter what happens.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think that is very important. It's our mandate.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 10>You know, it's not only well, credibility is very relevant,

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 10>but as well you know, we have a definition of

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 10>pressability and our mandate is to to to rich and

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 10>to guarantee that presstability is so for us is key.

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 3>That's the ECP's vice president least to gain us Speaking

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 3>to Bloomberg last week, Carolyne Connor, what are the other

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 3>names that you'll be watching out for an ax On

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 3>province aside from the center bankers.

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 9>So in between you're going to have a multitude of

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 9>French executives including carfour, Sanofi, LG mh Elberts, Total NGI

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 9>and also all the banks BNP sociitation in Hall. And

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 9>then you've got a lot of member of the French government,

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 9>including the Finance minister Brinolomer, the European Minister Lawrences Boon,

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 9>that we're going to talk to on Friday, and I

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 9>was mentioning earlier the presidential hopefully war Philip. That will

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 9>be also interesting to see him there.

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna bringing those entews on Bloomberg Radio and television

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 3>as well. Lawrence Spoon always a very interesting name to

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 3>lest Night for of course she's former chief economist at

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 3>the OECD as well, so somebody well known to the

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.239
<v Speaker 3>listeners and viewers at Bloomberg. Talk to us a bit

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 3>about the economic context for this event, Caroline, because it's

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 3>happening at a time in France where the recent economic

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 3>data has been quite mixed.

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, you've got the economy context and the political context.

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 9>Of course, inflation in France remains above five percent, so

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 9>it's actually slightly lower than the average in the US

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 9>on which is closer to six percent. But clearly the

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 9>French growth is expected to remain subdued about plus zero

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 9>point six percent this year after two point five percent

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 9>last year, so that would be below the one percent

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 9>growth target that Macron's government was counting on to cut

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 9>the budget deficit, and that will be another key discussion

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 9>in x is whether Emaniel Macon will be able to

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 9>pass more reforms after the very controversial pension reform, whether

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 9>he'll be able to cut this budget deficit and a

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 9>very high French debt. We've also seen business and consumer

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 9>confidence also deterior rating because of high rates, of course,

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 9>but also because of high food inflation. And in spring,

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 9>remember you had even a Feitch cutting Frances credit rating.

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 9>So very interesting economic discussions ahead.

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 3>Plenty to watch out for them. Thank you to Bloomberg's

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Carolyn Connor in Paris, and we will bring you coverage

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 3>of the excellent Province Economic conference on Bloomberg Radio and

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 3>television as well. I'm Stephen Carroll in London. You can

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 3>catch us every weekday morning here for Bloomberg Daybreak here

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 3>but getting at six am in London and one am

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Streets.

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom bel c Stephen and coming up on Bloomberg day

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Break weekend, here comes the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai.

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby and this is.

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg broadcasting live from the Bloomberg it a Active Brokers

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 6>studio in New York. Bloomberg Elemon three oh to Washington,

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 6>d C, Bloomberg ninety nine one to Boston, Bloomberg one

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 6>oh six one to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixteen to

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 6>the country, Syrius XM Channel one nineteen to London DAB

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 6>Digital Radio, and around the globe the Bloomberg Business app

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 6>in Bloomberg Radio dot com. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend.

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York with your global look

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>ahead at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Investors tracking the coming World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>very closely. For more on the conference and what to expect,

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>let's go to our Bloomberg Daybreak Asia host Doug Krisner.

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Tom.

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 4>We know chatchipt and other generative AI applications have sparked

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 4>intense interest in the promise of artificial intelligence, and for

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 4>China it sparked a new obsession competing with US titans

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 4>names like Alphabet and Microsoft in the race for revolutionary

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 4>apps for both business and consumers. Joining me now is

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Alan Jan He is Bloomberg Senior editor and our Shenzen

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 4>bureau chief, joining us from our studios in Shenzen. Alan,

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 4>thanks for being with us. This is being branded as

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 4>a world conference. Now, I know you're going to be

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 4>there covering World AI. It's happening in China, obviously, and

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 4>I'm wondering whether the story here is really about Chinese

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 4>firms using this as a platform to showcase their potential

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 4>and determination to compete with companies in the US. Do

0:21:58.320 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 4>you think that's likely?

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 12>Oh, for sure. I mean all the big names are

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 12>going to be there since time, and those are the

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 12>two main Chinese companies that rolled OUTQPT services. So we're

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 12>going to see a lot more. I'll see a lot

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 12>of stops to see what they're working on. This is

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 12>grapportunity to see how far along China is in terms

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 12>of catching up to US in terms of AI.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 4>Now, there are two important issues that I think we

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 4>have to address. One is the government, which we can

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 4>talk more about in a moment. The other is the

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 4>semiconductor issue that AI is reliant upon. So we are

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 4>told the Biden administration is planning to tighten export controls

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 4>on sales of some artificial intelligence chips to China. That

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 4>proposal is expected we are hearing in July, and it

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 4>would revise current US export controls aimed at making it

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 4>more difficult to sell some chips to China without a license.

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 4>This move may be aimed in part at Nvidia's A

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 4>eight hundred chip. Last week on Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, we

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 4>spoke with Vlad Savov our tech at during Hong Kong

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 4>and he offered some insight.

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 13>And Vidia had the restrictions in O sober from the

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 13>US government, and it developed China specific chips which were

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 13>less powerful. And now it seems like the government is

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 13>going to increase its sanctions, get even further into it,

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 13>and without those chips, like you say, it's very questionable

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:21.479
<v Speaker 13>that Chinese companies will be able to compete.

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 4>That is Bloomberg's Glad savof Alan. It seems like without

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 4>access to the type of computing power that's necessary these

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 4>graphics processors that basically are being used by companies that

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 4>are playing in AI, without access to that technology, it's

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 4>a very very high hurdle to try to advance the

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 4>technology going forward.

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't you agree with that?

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 12>I think it's a challenge for sure. But this has

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 12>been going for a while, right, I mean, China has

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 12>been pose all kinds of sanctions in preventing a lot

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 12>of these US tech companies from exploiting to the US

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 12>and the video of course is the I mean, they

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 12>have to kill a chip so to speak, right, the

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 12>accelerate chip that a lot of these open AI services

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 12>rely on. But I always I would argue that China's

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 12>gonna be able to find a work around. I mean

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 12>they have so far in many different areas. I think

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 12>they're gonna be able to try to outsource it from

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 12>other you know, other countries. And I think that domestically,

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 12>there are companies that are producing you know, similar chips.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 12>Maybe not as robust as the video, but but I

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 12>think there's definitely a challenge. And then now you've also

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 12>got a lot of venture capital invested, uh, you know

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 12>in this area as well, I mean, to catch up

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 12>to the US. So I think, you know, you've got

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 12>that going on. You've got the government as well, the

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 12>Big fund investing in developing similar type chips. Right, So

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 12>I think that you have a lot of other vendors.

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 12>I think I think the short term, yes, it's gonna

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 12>be an obstacle, but I think that China will figure

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 12>figure a way out.

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about the role of the government. You just

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 4>mentioned it there in one case, we know China is

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 4>a vastly different landscape from what we're what we have

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 4>here in the US, and obviously the American companies that

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 4>have been playing in artificial intelligence in many respects are

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 4>as much as three years ahead. And I'm wondering now

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 4>because a lot of the AI in terms of these

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 4>large language models that are required to train AI programs,

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 4>we know the data situation in China is very very

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 4>different visa viv the Internet than it is in the West,

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 4>and I'm wondering whether this is going to make it

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 4>increasingly difficult for China to play catch up as well.

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 12>Oh for sure, I think you know you've got the

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 12>data issue. There's two problems right. First is that you know,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 12>there's a lot of data regulation in China and Governor

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 12>has already said that it would have to approve any

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 12>kind of rollout of any kind of genitor AI services.

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 12>That problem and then the problem of scraping the data. Right,

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 12>a lot of the you know, data in China, you know,

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 12>comes from the Chinese Internet, and it's censored, so it's

0:25:58.240 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 12>not not gonna be as robust as what you said

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 12>the WES. But that's said you know, in the US

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 12>you have problems with you know a lot of you know,

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 12>fake news and this information as well. In China, one

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 12>issue I think is that you know, a lot of

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 12>Chinese they get the information from the super app right,

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 12>we chat right, So it's a bit different from the

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 12>US where you have the Yeah, everyone used the Internet.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 12>I think that there are limitations to that, the fact

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 12>that you know, you can't you know, scrape the the

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 12>Chinese Internet for lots different reasons. They're also privacy issues

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 12>as well. But it is it is a challenge. But

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 12>I think that in some ways it creates opportunity for

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 12>some of these companies like bay Do and Sense Sense Time,

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 12>just because they know what the ground rules are.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 12>They know that, you know, certain things are going to

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 12>be prohibited and it's gonna be up to the all

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 12>these what do you call Internet platforms to the censor

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 12>all this stuff. So there's a But it's not something

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 12>that's new, is it. I mean, you've got China, You've

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 12>got to Chinese intinet right people right use by doing

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 12>all that, so it still works, you know, saying.

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Well you mentioned by Do and I saw a piece

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 4>on the Bloomberg terminal over the past week, they were

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 4>comparing the by do ernie bot to chat GPT and

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 4>by a couple of measures, by Do at least is

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 4>claiming that the early Bought now beats Chat GPT. So

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 4>to your point, there are companies in China that are

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 4>pushing the envelope, so to speak, and trying to develop

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 4>certain types of AI technology more on the consumer side.

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 4>But I'm also curious is what's happening on the business side.

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 4>Is there a conversation happening that has to do with

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 4>how AI might be useful for manufacturing or even healthcare

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 4>in China?

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 12>Oh, for sure. I mean what they're planing and what

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 12>to hear anyway, is they're planning to create these chatbots

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 12>to help manufacturers, you know, analyze consumption trends. You know,

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 12>there are a lot of business applications. I mean, for

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 12>by do they plan to incorporate their erni body into

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 12>everything that they're doing cloud computing, uh, in their evs.

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 12>So I think that yeah, I mean they're they're actually

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 12>large uh not just consumption but uh, you know business

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 12>software type applications, uh that can really use this kind

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 12>of AI technology. And that's that's the area where trying

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 12>to lacks relative to US. Right in business software.

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 4>We were mentioning the funding issue a moment ago, and

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm curious in terms of trying to find capital to

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 4>support this type of growth in China. Where is it

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 4>coming from? Where will it come from?

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, That's the thing about it is that if you

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 12>look at what's been happening last couple of years, right,

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 12>this has this big tech crackdown and a lot of

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 12>you know, Vegria capital into Chinas sort of plunge. Right.

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 12>But then over the last you know, several months, we're

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 12>seeing the value of deals UH in this area surging,

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 12>saying like from a lack of years half of US

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 12>levels and now they're you know, the two thirds of

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 12>where the US is. So a lot of money is

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 12>coming from these venture capitalists and also from the government

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 12>as well. I mean earlier this year, the government UH

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 12>said that it was trying to get private capital to

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 12>work with the government in order to uh, you know,

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:25.479
<v Speaker 12>sort of develop these technologies, especially high tech chips, UH,

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 12>in order to compete with the WES. So you've seen

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 12>a sea change in the way the government has approached

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 12>big tech. And when I said big tech, I'm seeing

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 12>I'm saying basically, in some ways outside of Alibaba ten

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 12>sent the fact that now there're you know, a lot

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 12>of money is going into any companies that are working

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 12>on you know, like these kind of chips that are

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 12>being used for AI.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Alan, thank you so much. I look forward to your

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 4>coverage in the week ahead from the World Ai Conference

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 4>in Shanghai. Alan one is a Bloomberg senior editor, also

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 4>our Shenzen bureau chief. I'm Doug Prisner. You can join

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Brian Curtison myself weekdays here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia beginning

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 4>at six am in Hong Kong six pm on Wall Street.

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Tom, thank you, Doug.

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And coming up here on Bloomberg day Break Weekend, We're

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>about to get more insight from the Fed, because here

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>come those Fed minutes, and they come at a very

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>important time. I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg. This

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look ahead at

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Tom Busby in New York. As we've been reporting, the

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>FED is watching the jobs report heading our way this

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>coming Friday. Also this coming week, we'll get to be

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a fly on the wall when the FED releases the

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>minutes from its latest policy meeting, and for more on

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that part of the story, that's heed to our Bloomberg

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine to one newsroom in Washington and Bloomberg Sound

0:30:57.560 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>On host Joe Matthew.

0:30:59.400 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Thanks.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 5>We're going to look ahead now to the release of

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 5>FED minutes next week as investors try to get inside

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 5>the minds of policymakers, not that Chair j. Powell has

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 5>been vague on this lately.

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 8>At our last meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee decided

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 8>to maintain the target range for the Federal funds rate

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 8>at five to five and a quarter percent, while continuing

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 8>the process of significantly reducing our securities holdings. We made

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 8>this decision in light of the distance we've come in

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 8>tightening policy, the uncertain lags in monetary policy, and the

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 8>potential headwinds from credit tightening. As noted in the fmc's

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.959
<v Speaker 8>Summary of Economic projections, a strong majority of Committee participants

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 8>expect that it will be appropriate to raise interest rates

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 8>two or more times by the end of this year.

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Two or more times by the end of this year.

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 5>That's Powell from recent testimony on Capitol Hills just a

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 5>little over a week ago, and he's reiterated that line

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 5>several times. Joining us here in Washington, Bloomberg's Kate Davidson

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 5>and Eric Wasson with the view on the FED and

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 5>on Congress as the FED also deals with a response

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 5>to the bank failures earlier this year. Kate, let's start

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 5>with you here in the release of minutes.

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 14>What are you looking for already? It's crazy?

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 5>Is that possible?

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 14>I know? No, Well, just because we've bits been the

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 14>NonStop Jay Powell Show, so we forgot. It's been almost

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 14>three weeks since the meeting. Yeah, so I think, you know,

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 14>we we kind of know a lot from the projections

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 14>that we got. You know, normally we'd be looking for

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 14>those minutes to just glean more insight from how big

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 14>is the group of officials that want to go further

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 14>and thinks the Fed keeps need to keeps, needs to

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 14>keep raising rates. But we know from the dot plot

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 14>that we just got that there are a lot of them.

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 14>So I think that we'll, you know, we'll be looking

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 14>to see how you know, is that likely to happen

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 14>in July and September? Our officials thinking they want to

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 14>shift to in every other meeting stands I mean, we

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 14>heard a little bit from Powell talking about that idea, saying,

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 14>you know, consecutive rate hikes aren't off the table, which

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 14>is a little puzzling because he kind of framed this

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 14>as well, it's a moderating the pace. We're gonna pop

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 14>as a meeting and then go. But now he's saying

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 14>they could go back to back again. So I think

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 14>there that you know, anything we can learn about about

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 14>that and the pace, But just it really, it really

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 14>just seems like the group of hawks is surprisingly big

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 14>right now, like all these worries about the banking crisis

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 14>seem to really have faded.

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 5>Eric, what does Congress think of the FED at this point?

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 5>Does it really fall along party lines?

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 15>I do see a real difference between the way Republicans

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 15>are approaching Pal versus Michael Barr. You know, they seem

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 15>to be very concerned about what Barr could be up to,

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 15>could be proposing, you know, flagging the idea that this

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 15>could actually have an impingement on bank risk taking in

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 15>the economy versus I you know, when we asked a

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 15>couple of weeks ago, it's pretty wide survey of members

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 15>talking about Pal. There seems to be general praise is

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 15>that he's humble, he acknowledges mistakes, so I think they're

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 15>trying to to sort of play good cup back up

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 15>there a little bit.

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 5>Moving beyond transitory finally.

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 15>Right, So I know, you know, they do feel that

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 15>he does bear shoulder some of the blame for acting,

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 15>you know, too late to strain of inflation. But they

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 15>send to focus the fire on Biden, someone they can

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 15>actually unsee.

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 5>We're still looking for two more as the consensus.

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I mean to at least two, right, And it's

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 14>kind of interesting. That's how Powell has been wording it.

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 14>It's not entirely different from what he's said, but he's

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 14>you know, we've all taken note it's been two or more,

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 14>which again he points to the dot plot. You look

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 14>at the projections, and that is what it says. But

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 14>he's not not trying to shy away from that. He's

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 14>not playing that down. Two or more is the expectation.

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 5>To be confounded by a market that's still betting on

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 5>rate cuts.

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 3>It is.

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 14>It is pretty interesting, although I think every time he

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 14>gets out there, you know, they inch up and inchub

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 14>and you get data like you saw, it's all very

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 14>strong still.

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 5>Great conversation and many thanks to Bloomberg's Kate Davidson on

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 5>the FED and Bloomberg's Eric Watson on Congress. I'm Joe

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 5>Matthew in Washington. I hope you have a happy fourth

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Tom back to you in New York.

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Joe.

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And that was Bloomberg's sound on co host Joe Matthew

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 1>reporting from our Bloomberg ninety nine one newsroom in Washington.

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>And you can hear sound on weekdays one to three

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>pm on Bloomberg Radio. And that does it for this

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Join us again Monday morning

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>at five am Wall Street Time for the latest on

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.439
<v Speaker 1>markets overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby. Stay with us.

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Top stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.