WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2024 US Open Betting Preview

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Check it down man, Thursday morning, August twenty second. It

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is the Beating the Book podcast. US Open Tennis preview

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>betting preview skill Alexander pumped because the draw just happened.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I have not even seen it, but my two guests have.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Drew Dinsick of course at Whale Underscore Capper, co host

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of not only the Deep Dive podcast, which he does

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with Andy moletor That's the Deep Dive Podcast with Andy Montor,

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>but also NBC Sports bet the edge was happening, Drew,

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you for doing this well yet again.

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 2>My friend it is. It is a great tradition. I

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 2>appreciate being invited back. And there's a lot going on

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>in the world of tennis right now. And if you're

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>asking yourself, how can you care about tennis when the

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 2>season's winding down and football is about to start, well,

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>guess what. Preseason's over. We have like eighteen days to

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 2>sit around and tool of our thumbs before we actually

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>have real NFL games that matter.

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>So there is no if you.

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Don't already have a a tennis hard oh you know,

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 2>placed in your heart. Now is a perfect time to

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 2>get one, because this US Open is going to be amazing,

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 2>and yes it is.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Again, like.

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 2>A lot of fans of this podcast have reached out,

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 2>you're going to be at the Open this year, I'm not.

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm very, very sad about it. I went last year.

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 2>It was an incredible experience. I would recommend anyone who

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>cares about tennis to get there at some point just

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 2>for the experience. And yeah, I'm excited for this year's

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Open because it's going to be full of drama.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Full of drama. And you have said it brilliantly in

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the past, which is Tennis has the decency to schedule

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the Slams perfectly around the NFL season, right like NFL

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>playoffs are happening. Okay, we'll play the Australian Open. NFL

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>seasons about to start. Okay, let's let's end the US

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Open on the first Sunday. So it's a beautiful thing.

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I got to tell my US Open story real briefly

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>if I happened before. But first I want to introduce

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>our other guests. Zach Cohen, making his second peer's on

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. He was here for Wimbledon. Wimbledon was pre draw,

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>so it was kind of kind of tough for us.

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's grass to begin with. But here we are

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>a US Open. The draw has happened. Zach Cohen at

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>betting on X on Twitter, and he is the glue

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that holds VS in together. How you doing, Zach doing well?

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Echo the set of it of the scheduling being perfect.

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 4>I just feel like, you know that the hardcourt season

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 4>for tennis is just at the perfect time where you

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 4>know we're slow for football. You just got to kind

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 4>of dive in two hours and hours of tennis. And

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 4>it was a really exciting build up to the US Open.

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 4>It's almost like a build up to WrestleMania if you're

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 4>a wrestling fan out there. And we had we had

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 4>the Yanick Sinner drama too to cap it all off.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, just a really fun time to be in

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 4>on tennis.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let me tell you a US Open story real quick,

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>which may not be interesting to anybody, but I just this,

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this tripped me out when it happened. I have been

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to the US Open one day in my life. It

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is a bucket list item. I've always wanted to go

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to the US Open, especially at night in the night session,

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>because it gets raucous there. So I can't remember what

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>year this was, but it was about eight nine years

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>go thereabouts. I saw Sloan Stevens play Anna Ivanovitch for instance.

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>That gives you an idea about what years we're talking

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>about young Sloane Stevens. And then we went to another

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>court and we watched Gial Simone play Marty Fish, which

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>which which people are going to be like, what the

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>hell Jill Simone versus Marty Fish and I had the

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>same reaction. It went late in the night. It was

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a great match. Whatever. But then last year have you

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>seen this Marty Fish documentary? Have you guys seen this

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>at all?

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 2>This is the one where he basically is talking about

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 2>his struggles of yes, he fell into a tough time

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 2>and then he worked his way out. He was Andy

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Rocks like basically hitting partner was like, wait a minute,

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm good enough to play exactly.

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 3>That is a good watch.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's the documentary. It's basically about Marty Fish losing

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>his like mental health crisis on the tennis court. That

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>was the night I was there. That was the match.

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's like he's like, this is the match and

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I saw currently the match that I was there present

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>for watching. I had no idea that marty Fish inside

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>his cranium was having a mental breakdown, the likes of

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>which defined his entire career. I love that freaking out

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>yeah twenty eleven.

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Twenty eleven and the cooler coolest parts about that if

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 2>you haven't already watched it is like him in the

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>car all right, like you get all of the extra yes,

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Like he doesn't just like talk about what happened. They

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>have like footage of like like literally just like I

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 2>can't do this, I can't play like that's that was crazy.

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe you're there.

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm literally watching the documentary looking up in the stands

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to see if I could see myself out there. I

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>was sitting right about there anyway, Okay, said you brought

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>up Yonic Center. Let's just start there. So Yanick Center.

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>For those who missed it this week, this came out

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of the blue. Drew was actually on air with me

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game Tuesday morning, as he always is,

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and this happened apparently because he told me about it

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>right before he came on, which is, oh, look at this. Uh.

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yanick Onyx Center apparently tested positive for a very small

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of a banned substance, but it was quickly ruled

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was inadvertent applied by a masseuse, and so

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>he was not suspended. He was fined and docked the

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>points from from Indian Wells that he had garnered. Otherwise,

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>other than that, though there was no suspension, it was

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>swept under the carpet, and here we are all these

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>months later. It's like the ATP was quick to be like,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no problem. We really we really appreciate the quick

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>ruling on that. It was a wonderful thing and it

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>was found to have no no, no fault of his

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's just start there a just for your personally, like

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's bullshit? And then two, do you

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>think after all this time, because Yanick Center has been

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>playing with this quote unquote hanging over his head, but

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he knew that the public didn't know about it, do

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you think this will have any effect on his game

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>in the US Open.

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>That's a fair question.

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 2>I'll jump in first, and I'm going to do my

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 2>best not to get you sued.

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Gil.

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, if you think that your favorite tennis player, man

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 2>or woman in history is not using some sort of

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 2>performance enhancement to be able to withstand the physical just

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 2>absolute war on the body that the atp or air

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 2>w t A tour is then you're living under a rock.

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 2>And so like hearing that, you know, hearing that, oh,

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 2>somebody at the top of the sport got popped, like

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 2>it should never really surprise you unless you are you

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>know again like blissfully ignorant.

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 3>But that's fine. And I and.

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 2>To me at least, the you know, the more powerful

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 2>you are, the more money you have, you have a

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>team of chemists who are keeping you know, towing the

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 2>line of you know, whatever it is, you know, whatever

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 2>is allowed.

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean like this isn't I'm not this is you

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 3>know this, this is how it works at the highest level.

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 2>And you know, there's so much money at stake and

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 2>there's you know there there is so much you know,

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>legacy at stake that yeah, you toe the line.

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 3>You are very careful generally.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 2>And the fact that this weird kind of random tiny

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 2>amount slipped through the cracks through some bizarre like they

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 2>like the explanation was so bizarre, it's almost you have

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>to believe it. But and but that said, like it

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of strangely giving tennis cover for what is

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 2>probably a bigger issue that ought to be explored, which

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>is like the therapeutic use you use exemptions for, like

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the asthma medications that they're taking, the testosterone creams that

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 2>they use that don't flag and like, you know, so

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:53.239
<v Speaker 2>I think ultimately like it was probably harmless. The only

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of uh maybe it wasn't harmless in the back

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 2>of my head was that, oh, I don't know, YadA

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Center missed the Olympics because of tonselitis what oh and

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and this was going on at the same time, like

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 2>huh yeah, Olympic Olympic testing program a little different.

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Uh. And you know it may have it may have been.

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, somewhat team decision oriented that he you know

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>that he uh uh you know, stay out of that.

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>But but again, like you know, I want the best

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 2>tennis players healthy, playing the best tennis the most of

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>the year, so I don't really care what they're doing

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 2>to get themselves onto the court, uh and being in

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>top shape. And again, like if you think that some

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 2>of the all time greats, the guys we would consider

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the greatest guys in gals that we would consider the

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 2>greatest in sport, haven't you know towed the line?

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Uh? Then I got I got, I got a lovely

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 3>piece of land in California City to sell you.

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're gonna get suit for that at all. Drew,

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you for couching it the way that the couch

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I agree with everything you've said, but

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>it still comes down to the question of there there

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is a mental aspect to this, right because I even

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>with all that said, sure does yonick center then now

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's out there, is he the type of guy?

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>There's no way to know for sure, but is do

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to as a handicapper just kind of keep

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it in the back of your mind if you see

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>him sort of not play well. Let's say, I'm just

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna go hypothetical. If he's not playing well in the

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>first couple of rounds, will it creep into your head? Oh,

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he's probably just like not mentally all there right now

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>because of this.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Or so I gotta say, like the worst part about

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 4>it is like because I don't want to believe that

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 4>he is using it. I mean, I agree, like these

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 4>guys are probably all using something, but you know, the

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 4>timing of it. His body started to break down afterwards,

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 4>and you know, after he had gotten you know, three

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 4>or four months being completely healthy, and he's a guy

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 4>that has historically battled injuries throughout his career. Now all

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden, you know, he fails these two tests.

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Now he's you know, starting to have the hip flare

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 4>up again. His stamina is an issue on the court,

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 4>so you know, that kind of is an argument for

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 4>that he was using something, and you know, you know

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 4>that's kind of what I'm concerned about going into the

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 4>US Open is kind of his body, you know, handle

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 4>best of five tennis again, especially in human conditions. We

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 4>just saw a tournament that he won in Cincinnati, but

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, there were matches that he looked really banged up.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 4>There were people that didn't think he was going to

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 4>play the final of that tournament. He was able to

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 4>make it his way through it, but yeah, I'm definitely

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 4>nervous about the physical aspect of it. Also strikes me

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 4>as a type of kid that like will feel guilty

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 4>about what happened.

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what That's what I'm getting at.

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not not the type of guy that, like Djokovic,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 2>is going to embrace the villain status.

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what I mean, Right, Djokovic wouldn't care I

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even ask the question, was Djokovic but center, I

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I don't know. It's just in the back

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of my mind.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, it's it's it's honestly, the mental part of

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 2>it is enough for me to be a little cool

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 2>independent of what, you know, whatever advantage I see on

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 2>price for him, and you know it, Uh yeah, I

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's he ended up with you know, we

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>can pivot right to the draw.

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 3>He ended up with the draw where you know he's

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 3>going to have to again.

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 2>You brought up the Anna Ivanovich Slan Stevens match, like, yeah,

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I imagine that was tilted. I imagine the crowd was

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 2>pretty pro Sloan Stevens, a pretty anti Anavanovich.

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like you look at Sinner's draw. He's gonna He's

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 3>got a.

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Couple of matches where he is not going to be

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 2>the crowd favorite. You add a little bit of you know,

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of motivation for uh, you know, the

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>New Yorkers to kind of get up his ass, and

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, like yeah, maybe he is not

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 2>like especially performing well mentally and and and isn't enjoying

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 2>this experience and is ready to go home. Like that

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't shock me. But that said, you know, the quality

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 2>of tennis you're seeing from him right.

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Now is pretty unreal. So uh, he's a he's a

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 3>tough bet against.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, So talk to me about the draw. Both

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of you have seen it. I have not. I was

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>doing a show. So let's break it. Let's break down

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the men's sort of quarter by quarter if you could,

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the headlines drew as you see it.

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:56.119
<v Speaker 3>Sure, so, uh the sinner's quarters is he Center.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Is your first your first seed, So he's in Q one,

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 2>top of the draw, and his draw is is bad.

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 3>It's tough in particular.

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 2>I look at quarterfinals, semi finals, and he's you know,

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 2>if he gets to that point in the tournament, he

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 2>is drawn Daniel Medvedev in the quarterfinal, who plays his

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 2>best tennis at this particular venue, and he is drawing

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Carlos al Kraz in the semi finals, who's of course

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 2>a poor previous champion here and has clearly shaken some

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 2>of the injury concerns that existed for him in the fall,

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean in spring, and maybe a little bit even

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.719
<v Speaker 2>a little bit fresher than Center at this point, and

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 2>has also embraced the best of five tennis to the

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 2>degree that I think should scare everyone on tour. So

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, Centner's quarterfinal matchup, semifinal matchup are gnarly, and

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 2>then at that point you're presumably playing Djokovic in the

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 2>final because you have an imbalanced draw between top and bottom.

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 2>You know, Djokovic and saverev are on the bottom center

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>and al Kraz are on the top, And I think

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 2>two of those three are not you know, two of

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 2>the three of those four not like the others in

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 2>terms of you know, championship equity here, and they happen

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 2>to be on the top. So Sinner, if you like

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 2>him at this particular venue and you think he's winning

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 2>his second second hard court slamb of the season, I

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 2>would almost say your best bet is to just bet

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 2>and match by match, because he's going to be a

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 2>dog against Outcrass, he could be a dog against Djokovic,

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 2>and he's going to be a short favorite against Medvedev,

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 2>I would think, So you can probably exercise a little

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 2>bit better value betting center match by match if you like.

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think it's pretty clear that Q

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 2>two is wide open for al Kraz, and I think

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 2>it's pretty clear that the bottom half is wide open

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>for Djokovic.

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Djokovic is Q four's verevus Q three.

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>So Djokovic going, of course for his uh for his

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifth Grand Slam Singles title. After he gets the

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>goal at the Olympics, that was like the big crowning

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of victory that he had not had through his

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>other otherwise illustrious career. He gets that in the it

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was just the most awesome, awesome final against Carlos Alkarez.

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>But to get a twenty fifth, that perfect number twenty five,

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that would also get him above Margaret Court, just for

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like historical context, since that would almost be, like you

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about it, if there's anything else left. The Olympics

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>was the big thing left, but that would be the

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>other thing. And so Djokovic gets the favorable draw. Is

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that generally how you see it?

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 4>Zach as well, I think that Djokovic early on has

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 4>some tests. I do think that his quarter, you know,

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 4>later on, you know, third, fourth rounds, is definitely easier

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 4>than the other guys. But you know, he's gonna potentially

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 4>get like John Leonard strufe Alexi Popper in the first

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 4>two matches and then a third round match I believe

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 4>against either Ben Shelton or Francis Tiafo. So you know,

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 4>if he doesn't come into this tournament ready to go,

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 4>like he is going to get tested pretty much, you know,

0:14:57.800 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 4>right out the gates, just playing a bunch of big servers.

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 4>But generally speaking, I do think he has the easiest

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 4>draw of the other guys. So yeah, it's it's looking

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 4>like twenty five is definitely possible, just especially because he's

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 4>only going to have to beat you know, Alcoraz or Center,

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 4>not both of them.

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh DraftKings. I just though it was the first book

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I pulled up does not have men's futures up but

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>right now after the draw, but Fandle does Alcoraz plus

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>one seventy five, Djokovic plus two thirty, Center plus three

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty zero ten to one, and Medvedev, uh sixteen to one.

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Of the five guys we mentioned at the top. If

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I came to you from the future and I said, hey,

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>guess what none of those five guys won, this is

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>almost an impossible question to ask.

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I guess the two kind of the

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 2>two narratives that I think are worth pointing out. I

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>think well, the one you were kind of teasing, which

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>is this is Djokovic's chase for twenty five, like take

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 2>cards on the table, this is his worst slam. Yeah,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't even really know how you you need you

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 2>need to say any more than that, Like he struggles

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>in the heat, he struggles at this venue. But a

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of the time that's because this is coming in

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the part of the calendar where he's played a sugar

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 2>loaded tennis and this wasn't really born out that way.

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 2>So you know, he's he's a little bit more well

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 2>rested than he is in a normal year, I think,

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 2>And so that's kind of changes the calculus a bit

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>real quick.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Interrupted with the slams this year, lost a cinner in

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the Semis I believe at the Australia don't pulled out of.

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 3>The fringe after round four.

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then lost the Wimbledon final too well right.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, right, sorry, But the intermedia tournaments he was he

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 2>was a no show for a lot of those. So

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 2>it's just his time on court is low and and

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I think the idea there has been a lot of

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 2>swirling circulating, and I don't know how much of this

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 2>is fanboy stuff. For how much of this is coming

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 2>from his camp, But there's been a lot of circulating

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 2>like he's going to get number twenty five and then

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 2>right off into the sunset kind of stuff like that.

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 3>That's not out of the realm of possibility.

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Considering he seems to have, you be pretty satisfied to

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:12.479
<v Speaker 2>himself winning gold medal in France. But yeah, I mean,

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, if that ultimately becomes the chase here, then

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 2>you got to pay attention to that sort of thing,

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>because again, like I didn't think he could elevate his

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 2>game to the level he did at the in the

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Olympic final. We hadn't seen tennis like that from him

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 2>in a really long time, and it was unbelievably impressive stuff.

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 2>And if he decides I'm going to dig down and

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to find that for a couple of matches

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 2>that I need to in this tournament to get this title,

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 2>and then I can call it a career because I'll

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>be satisfied.

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Then I don't think any of this should be surprised.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 2>The other narrative is I think that the gap between

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 2>the top of the men's tour and the bulk of

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 2>the men's tour continues to get bigger. There was moments

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>in time where the guys at the top were dealing

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 2>with injuries, questions were swirling, all kinds of stuff, and

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 2>you could make the case that this thing is wide open.

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 2>That was making that case for the front open. I

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 2>think that the gap has kind of reastateablished a bit.

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 2>And I you know, if if there is a shock

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 2>surprise winner here, it's going to be a US player

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 2>who just captures the momentum of the crowd. I'll uh,

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, Francis Tiafo type of thing.

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 3>I would guess, slash Shelton, that kind of thing.

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Tiafo, slash Shelton, slash Tommy Paul, Like those are

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the kind of those guys are playing well enough and

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 2>couldn't you know, kind of get the get the crowd

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 2>behind them to the tune of being a problem here,

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I would suppose.

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 3>But again, like the for any of that to happen,

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 3>they're going to need some help.

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Like I don't think a player like Tiafo is ousting

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Djokovic and then getting uh and then getting Zevera a

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 2>couple of rounds later, and then beating Center or Altcraz

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 2>in the final, right, like they're gonna need a fortunate

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 2>break and that's a little tough to predict.

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you said it about Tiafo some time ago. Be

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the home road splits on Tiafo, United States and otherwise

0:18:55.480 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this is such an interesting thing, Okay, So I don't

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>know some exact same question. If it's not one of

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>those top five guys, who would it be.

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, my answer for a guy that I think

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 4>can make a really deep run, I don't know if

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 4>he'd be able to win it, just because physically I'm

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 4>not sure where he is. I think Matteo Barrettini has

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 4>a shot really deep. Yeah, at the same time, you know,

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 4>I am really high on Zverev in this tournament. They're

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 4>in the same quarter, so you know it can't be

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 4>both of them. But Barattini is just playing tennis similar

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 4>to the level that made him number six in the

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 4>world a few years ago. He had a really bad

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 4>performance two weeks ago, which kind of, you know, took

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of wind out of those sales. But

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, still a guy that's you know, holds it

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 4>about ninety percent, has one of the biggest fourhands on tour,

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 4>is in a really good season so far. Really, you know,

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 4>winning tournaments on clay, which which I think. You know,

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 4>I still think hardcore is best surface if or grass.

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 4>I still think he's a fast court player. So I

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 4>think that we're going to see Barretini back in the

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 4>top ten pretty soon. I just wouldn't be surprised if,

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, he kind of makes a statement run at

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 4>this event, just because health is kind of of the

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 4>only thing keeping him back from being a top player

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 4>in the sport. I don't think there's that big of

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 4>a gap between him and the top guys when he

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 4>is healthy.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a good answer, because he's serve bodish, if not

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>considered a serve bot. But yet if you if you

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>go on a run with your serve and get free points,

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is your guy a Mapetchi paracard playing dreue. Is he

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>in this at all?

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I haven't have it searched, but his his serve numbers

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 2>are hilariously insane. He is the most he is the

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 2>most diabolical serve on tur diabolical serve on tour right

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 2>now by margin. You know who kind of got a

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 2>very very very favorable draw h Taylor Fritz. He is

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 2>in the top half of Q three the top seeded player.

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 2>There is Casper Rude, who presumably is good to play

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 2>and show up everybody else kind of in his little

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 2>sub section. There is you know, not you mentioned, but

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.479
<v Speaker 2>Baratini Bartini. Fritz is going to be a fun, uh

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of round three match. But I would imagine Fritz

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 2>has the crowd there and then if you know, there's

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 2>a path where he can kind of come through and

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 2>only have to play a couple of the big boys,

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 2>which is sort of where he wilts when he does

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 2>have a little momentum going and you know, I know

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 2>he or whatever it's worth. He has stunk on the

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 2>hard court swing to this point in the calendar, but

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 2>I thought he played very well on the clay swing

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 2>in Europe this year for reasons unknown, and this is

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 2>playing relatively slow at least through qualifying here, So he's

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of a little bit of kind of improvement on

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 2>his all court game could be enough to make a

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 2>little noise here. So he's been totally forgotten about because

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 2>he was just not very good in candidate Cincinnati, and

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I think he's still a top ten player at least

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 2>by my numbers.

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Talking about home road splits. He's the literal home run,

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>right if it playing in southern California, he's a different player.

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well that's a good point. That's a very good point,

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 3>all right.

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're way too close to the draw being released

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to have quarter numbers out anywhere. But just a glance,

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any because it's way too close, and

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>these take a little bit nice of the US Open

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to have the draw out though, with some days before

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>the actual tournament begins. Is there anything that catches your

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>eye at any quarter that you can assume you'll probably

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>get a pretty juicy price on. Let's do it hypothetically.

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, Q three is where you want to attack on

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>the men's side, And I don't know what kind of

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 2>price would you expect to zach on market for Barattini

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 2>versus Fritz.

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 3>If that's round two, I.

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Would say Fritz ends up being like minus two hundred

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 4>or so.

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe so basically, so if you can get double

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 2>the price on Barattini for Q three as you would

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 2>for Fritz, then I would have to give that some

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 2>serious consideration. But yeah, those are sort of the two

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 2>players that stand out in terms of like can take

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 2>advantage of the weakest sub section of the weakest quarter.

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I think you said that makes sense.

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>You said, Rude is the number one seed in Q three.

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 3>Rude is the top seed in there.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Where is Zverev? Where is he?

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Zverev is the well so you know how I kind

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 2>of break him up into heats, right, and the top

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 2>half is Rude, the bottom half of Q three is

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Verev Okay, and Zverev's little sub section is not tough,

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>but he's got to go through Polga, Rune, Sarundelo. He's

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 2>going to have some tough middle of the tournament matches

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 2>that could do a little bit of damage that makes

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 2>him susceptible in that quarterfinal.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think remember it was Verev who had this tournament

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on his racket the year that Djokovic. Depending on what

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>verb you want to use, Some would say, you know,

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>gently hit a lines person with Others would say bean

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to the living crap out of a lines person with.

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 2>So he had he had this tournament on his racket twice,

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 2>that one and then the year that Djokovic barely outlasted

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 2>him in the semi final. Yeah, I thought Spa was

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 2>clearly the better player and the mental just got the

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 2>better of him at the end of that one.

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>So you're but you're not giving him serious consideration.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Here at price.

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Not really at price. Yeah, that's a good that's that's

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a good call at price.

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Not really. Yeah, he's clearly the fourth choice.

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, clearly the fourth.

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 4>I did grab zamarrav A twelve to one before the draw,

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 4>and I do think that he's pretty live to win

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 4>this tournament. I agree that there's some early matchups that

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 4>are really tough, but man, I think that the way

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 4>that the courts are playing, at least from what I've

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 4>seen in qualifying, is going to help him out a

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 4>little bit. I think that that forehand has been kind

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 4>of a nightmare the last few weeks, you know, prevented

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 4>him from winning some big tournaments. But it's going to

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 4>sit up in that strike zone for him and make

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 4>it a little easier for him to just make contact

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 4>with the ball. He's hitting the ball off the frame

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 4>of his racket key points now, so that that shot

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 4>is definitely low in confidence. But I think that his

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 4>serve and his ability to grind will will help him

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 4>a little bit here.

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Just as you brought this up, Drew, the you're seeing

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a noticeable separation like we thought things might have been

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>getting tighter now, but now a bit of a separation

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>between say, the Alcarez center Djokovic line versus the next

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>line down Rune, you brought up what do we feel

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>about him? Because he was one of the names right

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>like him, He was one of these guys. Okay, well,

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>if he's if he continues a trajectory, he will get

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to the top tier of tennis one day. And it

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really happened yet. I probably have the worst record

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>fading that guy than anybody in the world, and all

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and all of the losses are near wins, right like,

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>he just cuts it out at the end. Where is

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he Q one, Q two three, Q four?

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Here?

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Where did he end up?

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh, he's in Q three. He's in the top half

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of He's in the top half of his very sub sections.

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 2>So that would be a round fourmatch. And his draw Israel.

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>He's got to go through his draws off, he's got

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 2>to go through Messetian. It's basically that little sub section

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 2>is going to have the best round three matches. You're

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna get Rene Mussetti, You're gonna get Cerrinda o z Vera.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Both of those are gonna be must watched that'll be

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.479
<v Speaker 2>a ton of fun Mateshi Parakard is in there too,

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 2>so yeah, there you Go is in there.

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>So too much of a gonelet in other words, too

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in there.

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Knakashima's in there. Corino Busta is back and he's

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 2>in there.

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Who did you say? Who did you say before? Na Kashima?

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Keknanovich.

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, A little subsection where Zverev exists is full of

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 2>really fun players.

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>By the way, could you guys remind me I have

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>two reminders that you need to give me next year.

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>One don't play grass and then two from the Olympics

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>on to last week. I was having such a run

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and then I started playing these Winston Salem and Cleveland tournaments.

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't fucking win a match. It's unbelievable. Hey, I've

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>been up five, I had. I had a match where

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I was up five love in one of the sets

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and she lost seven to five.

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Gallia, bitch.

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, just unbelievable, seven seven set points, four

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of fifteen on break points like these things happened. And

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.199
<v Speaker 1>then yesterday was anyway, no one was here.

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 2>The only match I've ever bet at Winston Salem, by

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the way, was I bet against Alexander Dolgoppolov.

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I was going to ask you, is that is that

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the one you landed on.

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 2>That's a great Back in the day when it leaked

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 2>that he had like his private ere he had like

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 2>a plane res to take him to New York, like

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the day of like he had it like that night

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 2>he was leaving and you're like, oh, I guess he's

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.719
<v Speaker 2>not winning this match. Said he was a minus pondered favorite.

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 2>He closed like plus three thirty or something. That was

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 2>that was quite fun.

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh I wish I was on the tennis threadback then.

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh I have some screenshots from from our conversation. It

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 3>was hilarious.

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>That's amazing. Okay, So then, so the best quarter bets

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that I'm hearing were that you're going to keep an

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>eye on the Fritz Barattini thing for Q three since

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't have those out there, but that's a potential

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback at Baratini. Was you know more than double Fritz

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you said there, because it'll probably Uh, I think you're right, Zach.

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably a round minus two hundred on

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Fritz in that maybe a little lower but somewhere in there.

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>But to win it all then in the end, you

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>do you have it out right here? Or now it's

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve to one, Drew, you have a ton to one.

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't the gunplay it.

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I haven't played anything yet because this looks like it's

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 2>going to check out to me.

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and is there a first round match? Again? I

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't looked. I don't do we have first round lines up? Again?

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>This is happening right as the draw came out. So

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I apologize for how quickly we did this, but this

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is by the way, I'm looking at some of these. Uh,

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>let me see some of these markets here. In addition

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to outrights, what do they have here? They got some

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>props populating right now. Is there a first round match

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that you are eyeing and you're like, oh, this could

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>be a batable opportunity.

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Uh, there's a couple on the women's side that really

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 2>stand out as like pretty high level, pretty sing and

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 2>like I mentioned, the quarter to watch is going to

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 2>be Q three. The sub section is a Verev sub section.

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 2>There's some unbelievably cool fun matches in there.

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, let's let's talk about go ahead.

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, yeah, say yet? Yeah?

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Our guy GMP against etrvery Round one is going to

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 2>be a ton of fun. I would take GMP clearly

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 2>as a dog, which I would expect he is in

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 2>that one. I think russ Or can cover against Saverev.

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 2>He has always been a tough matchup for Zverev. I

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 2>think Nakashima can cover against Rene. Rene plays with his

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>food way too much at the slam level. And yeah,

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I think I think Fritz and Bertini come through cleanly

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 2>in that Q three and uh, there's going to be

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 2>some interesting opportunities to continue to bet that quarter in

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 2>round two and round three, So I think it's important

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 2>to pay attention to all those matches.

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Plays with his food such a great expression.

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 4>All right, Well, i'd want just outside of that quarter.

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 4>I think Coconakis could be since a pass. I've seen

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 4>enough that. Yeah, I just think that he's a nightmare

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 4>right now. Like the backhand has always been an issue.

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Now the forehand is missing, you know, more than we're

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 4>used to it seeing. And obviously it's been so bad

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 4>that he fired his dad. So I think there's a

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 4>chance that we see Coconacus win that match.

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>And he finally came out and just blasted his dad.

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it was fantastic.

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Been holding that in for years.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised. I'm surprised his dad didn't come back and say, oh,

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you think it's me? What about that girl right there?

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 2>The other the other the other two must watch around once.

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Uh we got Fabio Fonini against Thomas Mahach. Those are

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 2>two showmen. Yes, like that's going to be a ton

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 2>of fun. Fini, of course, has a rich history of

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 2>showing out at the US Open. Even if he is

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 2>his best tennis is long behind him and right below them.

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Sebastian Corda versus Moute will be a ton of fun.

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a really even matched by my numbers, So I'll

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 2>probably be on whoever the dog is in that one

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 2>corn Moute.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's go to the women's side. This is pretty

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting because we have a women's tour where again raw

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>data egostattech the world number one has the best hardcore numbers.

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>But we have all the all the ladies at the

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>top of the tour with big question marks. Maybe not

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Sabal Linca, maybe she's the exception, but IgA has had

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>some uneven right she she's up for love against Jan

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Chin win at the Olympics. I know it's clay, but

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that's her surface. She gags it. Then, Uh, what's the

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>most recent ego one? What I'm going to slipping my

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>mind right now? Canada? Was it she and Canada? Where

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>she where she lost? I can't remember now if that's

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>on my head. Yeah, Sabaleka sabalancin straight sets, that's right

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.719
<v Speaker 1>after she she played well in the previous round against

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>uh Andreva, but she loses in straight sets of Sabalaka.

0:31:58.160 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>And then you have Elena RABAKKAA I don't even know

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>if a Lena Rabakan is gonna play in this tournament

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>at this.

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Point, she's seated fourth for now, seated fourth for now.

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And then there's Coco Golf, who drew you were all

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>over at different times this year saying you know that you.

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I think at one time you'll you'll help me out

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>with it because I think one time you were super positive,

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>one time you're super negative. Maybe, I think. But Coco Golf,

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>my god, her game is I think Zach, you and

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I were fading her in one big match where she

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>was a huge favorite and we got we got home

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on that. Her forehand is just a mess. Oh it

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>was the the putin seven match. Julia putin Seva where

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like Coco. She lost the first set and then

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>she was she won the second, she was up a

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>break four two in the third, and then it's like

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>someone else inhabited her body and she could not get it.

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It was amazing. It's nice to be on the on

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the right side of one of those where someone else

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>inhabits the body. So you have a lot of question

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>marks at the top of the tour, and so it

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>begs the question, is this finally the slam were long shot?

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Play on the women's side are definitely the move.

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 4>I have a semi I mean, it's not a long shot.

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 4>I think that this is the tournament where you see

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 4>I like Jessica Pagoula quite a bit. At twelve to one.

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 4>I think that, you know, maybe it's a little bit

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 4>of recentcy bias having seen her, you know, in Cincinnati

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:18.959
<v Speaker 4>and Toronto, but I just thought she looks great at

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 4>both those tournaments. I think she took you know, some

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 4>time off early in this early in the year to

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 4>work on her serve. That was a really good reset

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 4>for her, you know, physically, and now that she is

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 4>serving well, I just think that this is a really

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 4>good tournament for her, and there's obviously pressure being an

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 4>American playing at the US Open. But you know, she

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 4>has really quick, you know, compact strokes on the base line.

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 4>She could generate power, you know, pretty easily. And I

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 4>think that she's a good defensive player. So I like

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 4>her chances, you know, as much as anyone in the

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 4>top tier. So I grabs her at that number. Just

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that the gap is that big between

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 4>the you know, big four. I guess we'll call it

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 4>on the women's side and.

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Her Kelly Kelly always says Kelly Billin, who is on

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game with me, always says this when I

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>have a Pagoula match handicap. He's always like, is she

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be okay if she loses a match? I mean,

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like financially.

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 2>That was one of the highlights of the Olympics was

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Lebron James taking a photo with Emma Navarro and Jessica

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Goula and he was the poorest person.

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Poorest person, Yeah, that is great. Jesse Bula's dad where

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's seven and a half billion, and I think Navarro's

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>dad worth one and a half billions. So she's like

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a pauper compared to Pegoula. Oh so that's an interesting one.

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Butoula twelve to one. By the way, how did the

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>women's draw shakeout? Let's start there also.

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess let me go back this step. I

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 2>take exception to your qualification of the way that the

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 2>women's game is right now.

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we are the last sled. What do you missed

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 3>the time?

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 2>We're finally gonna get some chaos And women's Sam Wimbledon

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 2>final was the most absurd, ridiculous pairing that we have

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 2>seen in our lifetimes.

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Gil on the on the heels of the hell on

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the heels of the previous year where Marquete Vandersova won it.

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, you thought you thoughta come down to

0:34:57.480 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 2>know where it was weird?

0:34:58.200 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 3>I could do you one better.

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 4>How about Chika a versus Falidi?

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 2>That was, like, I like, by my numbers, that happening

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 2>was something like one in twenty five thou Oh, I

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 2>texted you, I asked you, and I I'm I'm I'm

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:20.879
<v Speaker 2>still like, how how did that happen? And I think

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of what you need to kind of consider

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 2>for just the way that the women's game is right now.

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 2>And like it's maybe not that there's the gap is

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 2>narrow between the top and the middle class. It's that

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:37.439
<v Speaker 2>the gap between maybe player five and player eighty five

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:38.399
<v Speaker 2>is not that high.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think.

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Like certainly the fact that you have less confidence that

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the Rebaccans of the world are just going to take

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 2>care of business and knock out some of the challengers.

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Less confidence in the world that you know that somebody

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 2>is not going to step up their game against egon

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 2>a given day. Less confidence that sabalancas you know, she's

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 2>been dealing with injuries, but looked quite good in Cincinnati obviously,

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 2>and uh, you know, but still is you know, gets

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 2>to the quarterfinals, their semi final stages of Slams and

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 2>has you know, just full on checks out. So you know,

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 2>it's it's uh, it's definitely opens the door for the uncertain.

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think also like the new wave of good

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 2>young players has arrived.

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was going to ask you, is is

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>there is it worth a shot on Mirra Andreva?

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Is it Worthreva has arrived, Diana Schneider has arrived, you know,

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.919
<v Speaker 2>to a less degree and not especially young. But Emmin

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Navarro is is here, like she's capable of beating the

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 2>best on any given day. And like, just the fact

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 2>that this kind of class is, uh, you know, supplanting

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the costat Quinas and the Sacris of the world, who

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 2>you had relatively low confidence that they were going to

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 2>get it done against the best, is making the game

0:36:57.880 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 2>more competitive.

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's all. Let me if I just went

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>through like a roll call of players and you just

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>shout out, consider it better or not talking about out

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>right now? Andreva Mira, Andreva ninth. Well she's down to

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen to one. Wow, she really crashed.

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 3>She got a bad draw too.

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh she did. Okay, let's go through that first of all,

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>before I go through the name roll call Q one,

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Q one through Q four. What do you got here?

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>How did it shake you?

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 2>So here's here's how it looks. So Q one is

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:30.240
<v Speaker 2>egast quarter as is now tradition. She has three buys,

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and then it gets real, real interesting and real tough.

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Drew doesn't mean actual buys, but yes, that's right.

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Would be like she'll be minus five thousand, minus five thousand,

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 2>minus five thousand, and then and then it gets interesting.

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:46.439
<v Speaker 2>She's got a round four head to head with Mira.

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, which is interesting. Danielle freaking Collins and Pagoula.

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>She's always with freaking Collins. Freaking Colins, follows.

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Around Collins like you know, you want, you want, you

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 2>want Women's tennis Agro buckle up for IgA freaking Collins

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 2>in the quarterfinal there at Q one and so yeah,

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean honestly, like those are two tough matches. The

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the quarter two is pretty weak. You have Paulini, Putinzeva,

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Leila Fernandez, Osaka Ostapenko like these are these are all

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, could be good, but could also no show.

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 2>And then of course it's anchored by Rabakna, who were

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 2>not expecting much from so it's there. There's there's a

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of kind of middle class swings you could have

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 2>in Q two if you wanted, But realistically, anyone who

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 2>comes out of Q two I would be shocked if

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 2>they can advance to a final over whoever wins Q one,

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 2>which is probably EGA. Q three is the weakest quarter,

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 2>anchored by Coco Goff. Second choice in that quarter is

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Barbara Kachikova, and actually the player who is playing the

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:01.359
<v Speaker 2>best currently of any player in Q three right now

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 2>is Paul Badosa.

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna just got her the roll call.

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she got a clean path to a quarterfinal in

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Q three where she's only gonna have to play one

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 2>of Emma Navarro or uh or Cocoa Golf. And then

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the Q four is very top heavy, as you have

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Arena Sablanca with a with a very soft path to

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 2>a quarterfinal against uh. You know a number of players

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 2>who she's going to be huge favorites against, including jancsh Win.

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Best match of round one is in Q four with

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.240
<v Speaker 2>jancsh Win against and Amanda and a Samova.

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's going to be super fun.

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Who's been playing really well.

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Uh and uh Yeah, I think ultimately the draw looks

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 2>fairly balanced.

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Uh and it looks fairly.

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Likely that you're going to have an Ega Sabolenka part

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 2>two after seeing them face off in Cincinnati.

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Man, let me just say that, so Ego would be

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Ego looking for her sixth Slam and her second US Open.

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>That's the other thing about the flip of the coin.

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>The flip the flip side of the corner with the

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Ego Ego wins this. She is on a serena pace

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>at her age six Slam at age twenty three, Sablenka

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:27.919
<v Speaker 1>looking to close the gap because right now on tour

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Ega with five, only Krejikova and Sablenka even have two.

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So Sabolenka looking to get her third Slam. But as

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you lay that out, Drew, Now, I just looked at

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the outrights Bodosa, Who's Q is in the cocoa golf,

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Krejikova Q three that you just laid out, Bodosa's forty

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>two to one to win at all? I wonder what

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 1>her cue, what her quarter number will be because that

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>sounds kind of juicy. And then that that second quarter.

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Osaka just didn't After that French Open and

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>match against Ego, we were like, oh, boy, Osaka, US

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Open hasn't really worked out that way? Has it?

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Since? No? Yeah, I can't explain it.

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And Ostapenko has been choppy to use the Wall Street term,

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. I mean, is that if we're

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Baknna is who knows if she even goes. But if

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we're Bakna plays, you know, and has it has a

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>sideways performance? Whatever? Is Paulini the favorite in that quarter again?

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Paulini trying to get to her third straight Slam final

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I mean, I give up. Can you

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:45.399
<v Speaker 1>imagine if she got to three straight Slam finals. Sag

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and Zach, what were you saying?

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 4>They're like, I don't think you can throw darts on

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 4>the tournament per se, But I think quarter two there's

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 4>there's some opportunity. I think like Carolina Mukhova as a

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 4>player that could easily come out of that portion because

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 4>I do think you know, she has the Osaka matchup

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 4>in round one, right or on our ground two. I

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 4>think that one, even if it happens like I would

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 4>take Mojova easily, and I just think you're gonna probably

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 4>get a really good number on her and just a

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 4>player that's probably a top ten player also when she's

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 4>when she's healthy, So I think that's probably where i'd

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 4>go there.

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I agree Zach I had her to win her quarter

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>at Wimbledon. Didn't work out. But I'm with you on Macova.

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 1>She is you know, she's had the injury, so she

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>went away for a while, but she's a French Open finalist. Obviously.

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 2>My numbers say Paulini is a bet against here. Uh

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 2>she's got and rescue first first match, that's not easy.

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Putin Seva would be round three. That would be tricky.

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Carolyn plusko a round who could be tricky depending on

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 2>how her serve is in terms of rhythm. Yeah, Paulini's

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 2>got just just a test every step of the way.

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 2>If she makes this, it almost looks like this draw

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 2>is set up to stop the madness.

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Enough of this, Enough of this little girl by the way,

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>who couldn't be any more adorable and charming. I must

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>say if he.

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Was a great addition to the c and but you know,

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 2>let's give somebody else a chance to win some stuff

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:13.839
<v Speaker 2>for God's sake.

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So if I just went through so it sounds

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>like so the opportunities will exist in Q two. For

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Q two and Q three, I'll add the Coco quarter.

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Those look to me to be the opportunities. Though, So

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>if if fiatech, let's do it this way. If Tech

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>can't get out of Q one, who does.

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh Man?

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 2>Probably Paula first choice, dreav A second choice, Collins third choice.

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with that in that order. And then

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 1>in Q four, if it's not Herena Sabalanka is a

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>junction win or someone else.

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 4>I think the winner of that match goes goes d.

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 4>I could see at a Smova also going, you know,

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 4>all the way up to imaginegains sabol Anca, she wins

0:43:59.120 --> 0:43:59.759
<v Speaker 4>that first round.

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:03.320
<v Speaker 1>This is I'm actually much more pumped for the women's

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>side looking at this draw. And I mean, obviously the

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 1>tour is that way too now, but but this.

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 2>Is this is I mean, the men's let's be honest,

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the men's US Open starts in like a week and

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 1>That's right, That's exactly right. That's it kind of gets

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 1>down to that. You'll have the Drapers of the world

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and those kinds of guys having great performances. But it's like, yeah,

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really start till then. But this, man, it

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 1>does not get better than this. So, so Zach, you

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have just a review. You have Zverev on the men's side,

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 1>you have Pagoula on the women's side. As outrights both

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>pre draw you bet, I would imagine, and then drew

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the only you don't have anything in pocket right now,

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in an outright or anything. Nothing.

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm I'm literally doing my numbers as we are.

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 2>We are broadcasting here because the draw for whatever reason,

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, they did the draw quite a long time ago.

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 2>But they made us wait for absolutely no reason. Yeah,

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and so I'm just just getting to this now, but

0:44:56.680 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I will tell you my numbers right now. Have I

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 2>mean again, I haven't finished my sims of how I

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 2>think the tournament is going to play out. But I

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 2>look at I'm going to sort my rankings just basically

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 2>my players by ranking here IgA and sable Anka number

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 2>one and number two with narrow ish margin between them,

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 2>and then big old gap Rebakana, who I have as

0:45:26.160 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 2>a do not bet third, Cocoa Golf fourth.

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Actually, hang on, do not bet.

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Coco, do not bet. She is, by the way, we

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:36.279
<v Speaker 1>should mention she is the defending champion, for God's sakes,

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 1>but do not bet.

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 4>And you're getting a better number on her than you

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 4>could have imagined, you know two months ago.

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Well last year, that hard court season where she was

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in d C and beyond, like she was just unbelievable

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>on the way on the lead up, and now she's

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the opposite.

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean, you know, like obviously the crowd's

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna the crowd is going to get behind her.

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:45:56.840 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 2>So for sure, you know there's there's a chance that

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 2>she she goes you know, she does it but yeah,

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the for me, it goes Forbakna then Golf. There's a

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 2>tiny margin between Rebaccna, Golf, Collins and Jang for me

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 2>right now, And actually Pagoula is right there as well,

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 2>like you, very very narrow margin between three through seven

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:22.840
<v Speaker 2>for me, and I have lines through Rebakkna GoF just

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:27.800
<v Speaker 2>based on price and expectation for Rebakna of concerns about withdrawing.

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:31.839
<v Speaker 2>But Dosa is my eighth and highest ranked player right now,

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the way that she's playing, and I know that like

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 2>this it shouldn't be shocking because we've always known she

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 2>had that kind of ceiling. She's made the final light before,

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I think on the wat A Tour, so like not crazy,

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 2>but her number is way up relative to what it

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 2>has been.

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 3>My number on Azarenka is pretty favorable right now. I'm

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 3>not sure exactly why that is. I'm going to dig

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 3>into her results a little bit.

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 2>My number on Andreva is very favorable, Navarro, Paulini, Kalanskaya, Schneider,

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:02.399
<v Speaker 2>and and then that's kind of where it drops off

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:06.319
<v Speaker 2>to sort of the next the next tier of competitors.

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I mean my the difference for me between.

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Uh, the eighth best player in Pallabadosa and the thirty

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 2>first best player in Alexandrova is not that much. Yeah,

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:25.840
<v Speaker 2>and uh, you know there are and we have I

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 2>have circles around Anisimova, circles around Lukhova, just based on

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:35.279
<v Speaker 2>like how they look now volatility, yeah, and how that Yeah,

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 2>how they're coming on at the right of time.

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, speak, yeah, I don't know volatility is the

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 1>right word exactly, like and this Imova's was an awfully

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 1>tough player to handicap this year because you just didn't

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>have that much data to support it, you knowing which

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>version of her are we getting? The same thing as

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>we talked about with with Makova. The other thing that

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 1>you brought up when you're going through those numbers, because

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:54.720
<v Speaker 1>these check out also with some of mine that obviously

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Ega has maintained this high level of of data in

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of service return, service service percentage throughout her career.

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>The other player that you mentioned, and you're going through

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Sabalanca and every one of them, the most consistent player

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in that group, right, Like, so the Bodosa was it

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 1>three years ago when she won Indian Welles or two

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 1>years ago the same year that I think Basishvili won it,

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 1>or maybe that was a different year. I can't remember,

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:22.839
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, she won Indian. Well, she had that moment

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in her career, but then she's had the injuries and

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:27.279
<v Speaker 1>she's come back up. All these players, Sablanca up and

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>then down. Pagoula is the other most consistent player in

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>all of it. Like her level never dropped in any

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of this, Like, yes, she had it, you know, she

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 1>has a minuscule drop. Obviously she wanted to work on

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the serve, but it has always maintained at a certain level.

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I just think that's anyway, for those of us who

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:47.280
<v Speaker 1>are nerdy about it and dorky about it, that's interesting

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to me that she, besides IgA, has been the most

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>consistent at least according to what I've had. Let me

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>just go through this roll call in numbers. First of all,

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Arena Sabalanca is the short shot to win this. For

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>those who are wondering, it is plus two forty. I'm

0:48:59.000 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing it. Saba first, Aablanca shot. She is the short

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>shot at least I'm looking at FanDuel she is plus

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:11.719
<v Speaker 1>two forty, and then Ega is plus three seventy. Shop around. Wow, Yeah,

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 1>let me see if that's the same. Let me let

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:16.440
<v Speaker 1>me go to DraftKings. Is that the same as DraftKings.

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, there's now they're doing double chance. They're

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>doing double chance. Uh markets as well. I'm saying, let

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 1>me go to DraftKings to see what they have here.

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:32.920
<v Speaker 1>French open women. Now they have men up too. French

0:49:32.960 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 1>open women. Yeah no, French wow, listen to this. Wait

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:40.319
<v Speaker 1>a minute. French open women at DraftKings tech minus one

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy five Sabalanca four to one. So I think FanDuel

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is a crazy outlier. That's that's nuts, completely flipped, by

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the way. So at DraftKings it's let's just let me

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>just do the DraftKings ones. Then FanDuel number is interesting.

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings Ego minus one seventy five Sabalanca four to one.

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Then you have Rabakka on golf both at seven one,

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Mirah and Dreva down to twelve to one. Vandal had

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 1>her nineteen to one. When I just loved this is DraftKings,

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Kurjikova sixteen to one, Janshin went sixteen to one on Jabour,

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:16.759
<v Speaker 1>who we haven't even mentioned, eighteen to one. What is

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>she playing? I guess.

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Is in a not great place times.

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Paulini twenty two to one. All right, here's one. Now,

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask you guys just to react viscerally. SidD Alina

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty five to one. Any interest, No, No, Mukova twenty

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:37.160
<v Speaker 1>eight to one. This is to win outright. Lena Ostapenko

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 1>has been choppy lately, thirty to one. She's been up

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:40.399
<v Speaker 1>and down.

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 3>I've been not seeing it from her, Zach.

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing pagool At thirty to one at DraftKings, thirty

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to one, thirty to one at DraftKings, these things. You

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 1>know what, guys, you know what. I'm looking at the

0:50:53.680 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 1>goddamn wrong market. Here I pressed, I completely pressed on

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the wrong thing, pressed on the wrong thing. Forget it.

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to those that that was this DraftKings

0:51:04.600 --> 0:51:06.799
<v Speaker 1>does not have it up. Forget what I just said.

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:10.239
<v Speaker 1>This is this is. Let's go back to fandel I Botch.

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 1>That Arena Sabalanca is the short shot at plus two

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:16.239
<v Speaker 1>forty egos Fiatec plus three seventy. I must have been

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 1>looking at French Open next year. Yeah, Coco plus seven

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to fifty. We're baking a nine to one. Pagoula eleven

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to one now we're talking and Dreva nineteen to one,

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Osaka twenty one to one. No, thank you, freaking Collins

0:51:28.560 --> 0:51:31.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine to one. Janson went twenty nine to one,

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Paalini thirty two to one. Oh, here's one. Emma rod

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Ocanu thirty eight to one. Former champion, no anyone, no Bueller,

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:43.600
<v Speaker 1>no anyway, okay, but doses forty but doses forty two

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to one. That's got to be the best number on

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the board, especially as we look forward to quarter numbers.

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Maddis forty five to one. Anyone.

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 4>I was there on the on Wimbledon and just yeah,

0:51:57.239 --> 0:51:58.240
<v Speaker 4>that was that was her shot.

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Mukhova, Navarre, and Schneid are all fifty to one. For

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Djikova and an Issimova fifty five to one, and then

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:13.399
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. M wow, Maria Zakari one hundred to one. Wow,

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:15.319
<v Speaker 1>falling off of cause one.

0:52:15.320 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm always interested in it. Just I think it's gonna happen,

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 4>like a deep run is gonna happen soon. Is Marta Kostuk.

0:52:20.840 --> 0:52:23.479
<v Speaker 4>I think that she's, you know, a really interesting player

0:52:23.520 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 4>that can kind of beat anyone, So you know she's there.

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 4>I think one hundred to one, I don't think it's

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:30.360
<v Speaker 4>gonna happen here. But she's had a really good season,

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:33.399
<v Speaker 4>has had some really big wins at majors, and that's

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 4>like a deep shot that I think will play off

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:35.759
<v Speaker 4>at some point.

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Leela Fernandez former finalist, and Anna Kalinskaya who you mentioned,

0:52:40.840 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>drew both one hundred and ten to one.

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Azarenka who you mentioned one hundred and twenty to one. Wow.

0:52:48.719 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Those are big numbers.

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Those are big numbers. Wos Niaki do anything for you here?

0:52:54.640 --> 0:52:57.920
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, nothing else. O'kare like in like the

0:52:58.040 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 3>fifties right now?

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Sloan do anything for you. Sloan is always one of

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:04.799
<v Speaker 1>these who can just step it up at some point,

0:53:04.840 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but not anymore. No, all right, I think that's all.

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:09.480
<v Speaker 1>That's all the numbers. That's all the numbers I got.

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 1>By the way, what a disappointment Peyton Stearns has been

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to me as well.

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 3>She's well, oh did she lose today?

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:16.279
<v Speaker 1>No, No, I'm just saying she's like, I'm just looking

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 1>at the odds like two hundred and fifty to one,

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I don't. I'm just trying to see

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>like it doesn't get longer than two hundred and fifty

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to one. So anyway, so it sounds to me like,

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:29.359
<v Speaker 1>again Q two, Q three, huge opportunities potentially, and I'm

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>going to stare at that Bodosa number, wait for that

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Bodosa number, for for Q three, for sure, who is

0:53:37.400 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 1>who is the player? So what about those first round

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:42.279
<v Speaker 1>matches you were talking about, Drew, what's the one.

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:47.200
<v Speaker 2>You're uh, oh, we definitely Anthemova janction one. That one's

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:48.839
<v Speaker 2>going to be absolutely sick.

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Do we have a price?

0:53:52.120 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 3>I haven't seen anything yet. The uh what do you

0:53:58.760 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 3>call it?

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 2>On board that you mentioned having a little bit of

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:06.359
<v Speaker 2>a tough time lately. She drew koud Matova round one,

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 2>which is fascinating to me. So she's been very poor

0:54:12.120 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 2>lately and actually I had to like literally search for

0:54:14.920 --> 0:54:15.720
<v Speaker 2>her in my rankings.

0:54:15.760 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 3>I was, so I was like, where is she? But the.

0:54:24.040 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 2>The just the quality of the round one mnch is

0:54:27.120 --> 0:54:29.400
<v Speaker 2>from top to bottom look pretty darn good to me.

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:33.279
<v Speaker 2>On the women's side, we mentioned, well, yeah, I haven't

0:54:33.320 --> 0:54:36.800
<v Speaker 2>talked much about Diane Schneider.

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and.

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:43.960
<v Speaker 3>I think it's worth kind of noting that. Sorry, I'm

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:49.839
<v Speaker 3>having in trouble with my something stupid as as I'm

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:52.200
<v Speaker 3>trying to to make numbers while alive on the air.

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:56.360
<v Speaker 3>But the best, I think the.

0:54:56.360 --> 0:54:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Best was that French shop and we did while the

0:54:58.120 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 1>draw was coming out and we were reacting, what the yeah,

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:03.440
<v Speaker 1>what about Schneider.

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:06.680
<v Speaker 3>No, she's got an interesting.

0:55:08.560 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 2>She's got an interesting section, I think, and she's a

0:55:11.640 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 2>player that if you are not familiar with, you know,

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 2>some of the younger players on tour, I would like

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 2>to kind of highlight her and her game, which to

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:21.560
<v Speaker 2>me at least has taken the biggest step forward in

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the calendar year of twenty twenty four so far. Diana

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Schneider is a future top fixed player on tour. She

0:55:29.520 --> 0:55:30.879
<v Speaker 2>could be even higher.

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:31.880
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 2>We called out Mira Andreva early, and I think she's

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 2>pretty clearly on a path to be like a future

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:41.120
<v Speaker 2>world number three, maybe too, maybe one, And I think

0:55:41.200 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Schneider is kind of in that class as well.

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 3>She's pretty special.

0:55:44.960 --> 0:55:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Fifty to one in the outrights for Schneider, let's do

0:55:48.920 --> 0:55:53.040
<v Speaker 1>with the flip side. Top seed among the top seeds

0:55:53.120 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to get knocked out first will be.

0:55:57.760 --> 0:56:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Not a top seed for me. I've been fading Daria

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:05.279
<v Speaker 4>Cosaquina pretty hard lately. She has some twenty twenty two

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:07.880
<v Speaker 4>Arena Cybelenca level of yips right now in her second

0:56:07.960 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 4>serve just you know, ten to fifteen double falts a match,

0:56:11.560 --> 0:56:13.839
<v Speaker 4>you just can't win that way. So maybe she wins

0:56:13.840 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 4>her first round match, she's playing Jacqueline Christian. I think

0:56:16.719 --> 0:56:18.440
<v Speaker 4>you can probably win that match without a serve. But

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:20.440
<v Speaker 4>don't see her going much further than that.

0:56:20.880 --> 0:56:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I can't wait for this. This is this is awesome.

0:56:24.920 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a great way.

0:56:25.760 --> 0:56:25.840
<v Speaker 4>There.

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:28.759
<v Speaker 1>There is tennis after this. Obviously there is a there's

0:56:28.760 --> 0:56:31.680
<v Speaker 1>an indoor heart season, there's the WTA and the ATP finals,

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:35.919
<v Speaker 1>but this is really sort of the closes the meat

0:56:36.160 --> 0:56:39.759
<v Speaker 1>of the tennis calendar, if you will, and it's just

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:42.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be fantastic. So to me, I do have in pocket.

0:56:42.520 --> 0:56:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I do have EGA, not at a not at as

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:47.759
<v Speaker 1>good of a price that is as is available now.

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I made this ask you.

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 3>A little bit about EGO.

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, please, let's talk about EGA.

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 3>I love talking about going with their second serve. Yeah.

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, I'm less. I don't even phrase

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it that way. I phrase it what's going on inside

0:57:02.360 --> 0:57:04.359
<v Speaker 1>her her head?

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:06.280
<v Speaker 3>I do you think it's mental?

0:57:06.960 --> 0:57:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Yes? I think everything with her starts there. I think

0:57:11.520 --> 0:57:15.120
<v Speaker 1>if she if she didn't put I mean, she was

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the first to have like a you know, what do

0:57:17.280 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you call it? Not a mental coach, but what it

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was the term for it. Where she was the first

0:57:20.600 --> 0:57:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to have a sports psychologist with her. So she was

0:57:24.360 --> 0:57:26.800
<v Speaker 1>pression enough to know that this was a big part

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of things in her career. I find it fascinating though,

0:57:30.600 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that she is again, she's twenty three years old. She

0:57:34.400 --> 0:57:40.120
<v Speaker 1>has won five slams, and she has won ten one thousands.

0:57:40.440 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe ten or twelve. She has won ten. She's

0:57:45.720 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>won twelve one thousands. No, ten, she's won ten one thousands.

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So the pedigree is there, right, five slams, ten one thousands,

0:57:53.920 --> 0:57:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And when people say, oh, she's as a clay player, No.

0:57:55.880 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Six of the ten one thousands were hardcore. She wins

0:57:58.560 --> 0:58:01.960
<v Speaker 1>hardcore tournaments and big ones all the time. But she

0:58:02.720 --> 0:58:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe that she more than almost any other top player.

0:58:07.880 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Coco has problems with the forehand, but it's physical. I

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:13.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's mental. Ego. Just puts so much pressure

0:58:13.200 --> 0:58:16.440
<v Speaker 1>on herself in a way that I believe others do not,

0:58:16.720 --> 0:58:19.880
<v Speaker 1>or others maybe others do, but others have the ability

0:58:20.000 --> 0:58:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to block it out in a way that she can't,

0:58:23.480 --> 0:58:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and so she will get to a match where she'll

0:58:25.760 --> 0:58:29.040
<v Speaker 1>be smooth sailing and then all of a sudden something

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:33.640
<v Speaker 1>will happen to her and it just it will be perplexing.

0:58:34.400 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And yet if she wins this tournament, she's like Serena Pace.

0:58:38.880 --> 0:58:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's this weird thing where people like to get

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:42.960
<v Speaker 1>on her in a way that I don't feel is

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:47.960
<v Speaker 1>justified by the resume. And yet had she not have these,

0:58:48.280 --> 0:58:50.840
<v Speaker 1>if she didn't have these mental sort of hiccups, in

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, she would have an even more massive resume

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:56.640
<v Speaker 1>because there are some I mean, let's be honest. You're

0:58:56.680 --> 0:59:00.320
<v Speaker 1>up for love on Clay at Phillips Chatrier again junk

0:59:00.320 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 1>should win and you gack that set? Where did that

0:59:02.760 --> 0:59:03.200
<v Speaker 1>come from?

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:59:07.280 --> 0:59:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:10.400
<v Speaker 2>People are people are I mean the numbers on you know,

0:59:10.520 --> 0:59:13.240
<v Speaker 2>what her opponents are doing to her second serve make

0:59:13.320 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 2>it look.

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Very very vulnerable.

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I don't know if that means she needs

0:59:18.440 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 2>to take something off the first serve so that that's

0:59:20.600 --> 0:59:21.720
<v Speaker 2>just not exposed or what.

0:59:22.000 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 3>But it's concerning it. I guess.

0:59:25.560 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 2>For while you were a waxing poetic sorry, I finished,

0:59:29.640 --> 0:59:31.600
<v Speaker 2>you asked my sense no.

0:59:31.760 --> 0:59:34.439
<v Speaker 3>No. At the time, I was trying to buy time,

0:59:35.520 --> 0:59:35.880
<v Speaker 3>just like is.

0:59:35.880 --> 0:59:38.160
<v Speaker 1>This guy gonna shut up about this or not? Jeez?

0:59:38.440 --> 0:59:40.280
<v Speaker 3>I finished, finished my sins.

0:59:40.880 --> 0:59:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I have IgA at championship percentage forty eight point seven,

0:59:47.000 --> 0:59:49.200
<v Speaker 2>so my fare for her would be two point oh five.

0:59:51.000 --> 0:59:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I have sabol Anca at twenty just under twenty four percent,

0:59:55.080 --> 0:59:57.800
<v Speaker 2>so my fair for her would be four point one seven.

0:59:59.440 --> 1:00:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I have fair price on Sablanca to get to the

1:00:02.000 --> 1:00:05.600
<v Speaker 2>final just under fifty percent. Have fair price on Sablanca

1:00:06.080 --> 1:00:10.960
<v Speaker 2>to win her quarter at sixty eight percent, So Sablanca

1:00:11.240 --> 1:00:13.680
<v Speaker 2>at even if you can find out if they hang

1:00:13.760 --> 1:00:16.320
<v Speaker 2>that like minus one twenty or something Q four, that's

1:00:16.360 --> 1:00:17.800
<v Speaker 2>probably gonna be one of my bigger bets.

1:00:18.880 --> 1:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Which one Sabalanca to get to the final?

1:00:20.640 --> 1:00:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Sablanca q Q four Q four is going to if

1:00:24.120 --> 1:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>that if that's like they usually hang when when you know,

1:00:26.960 --> 1:00:28.640
<v Speaker 2>when you have like a kind of a clear favorite

1:00:28.680 --> 1:00:30.240
<v Speaker 2>and a weakish quarter, they usually.

1:00:30.040 --> 1:00:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Hang them in like I don't know one one thirty exactly.

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>You try to make it just minus enough that you're

1:00:35.680 --> 1:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>just you know that you're a little a little uninterested

1:00:38.160 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>in laying that juice for the tournament.

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>But you're fair. Was what I would do that?

1:00:42.440 --> 1:00:45.640
<v Speaker 3>What was your first eight percent to win Q four?

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I have EGO plus three twenty

1:00:47.960 --> 1:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to win the whole thing. So by your numbers, that's

1:00:49.640 --> 1:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a good bet.

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, and you know the data.

1:00:54.880 --> 1:00:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Anyone who's making a database number on EGA is going

1:00:57.320 --> 1:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>to be betting EGA every week because.

1:01:00.320 --> 1:01:03.560
<v Speaker 3>It's her whole break. Stuff is preposterous.

1:01:04.200 --> 1:01:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Some of that, of course, is a little inflated because

1:01:07.200 --> 1:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>when she's that much better, she's, you know, she's she's

1:01:09.600 --> 1:01:11.760
<v Speaker 2>got a little bit of a bully attitude, you know,

1:01:12.640 --> 1:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>which is fine.

1:01:13.800 --> 1:01:14.200
<v Speaker 3>I like it.

1:01:15.000 --> 1:01:18.920
<v Speaker 2>But okay, So my third choice actually by the numbers,

1:01:18.960 --> 1:01:21.400
<v Speaker 2>would be Cocoa Goff, which surprises me. But I would

1:01:21.440 --> 1:01:26.320
<v Speaker 2>make her twenty four to one. I have Daniel Collins

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>at thirty four to one. I have jiangshan when at

1:01:30.160 --> 1:01:34.920
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight to one, Azarenka would be my sixth choice

1:01:35.000 --> 1:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>to win.

1:01:35.480 --> 1:01:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Amazingly, at sixty eight to one.

1:01:37.480 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Her Chikova would be my seventh choice to win. This

1:01:40.960 --> 1:01:44.400
<v Speaker 2>is so this is kind of folding together the where

1:01:44.440 --> 1:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>they fall. It fell in the draw. I suppose with

1:01:46.320 --> 1:01:53.320
<v Speaker 2>their current ratings, I have to double check some of this,

1:01:53.440 --> 1:01:55.800
<v Speaker 2>make sure I didn't make any mistakes in terms of

1:01:55.920 --> 1:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>calling up you know, the player inputs. But Shier right

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>in the mix there, rod Bodosa's right in the mix there.

1:02:06.920 --> 1:02:09.280
<v Speaker 2>So those those two, those are two players that I

1:02:09.360 --> 1:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>think are probably well off people's radars that I think

1:02:12.320 --> 1:02:14.240
<v Speaker 2>you should pay attention to in the futures. March two,

1:02:14.320 --> 1:02:16.400
<v Speaker 2>which do Bodosa and Schneider?

1:02:16.480 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Bodosa for sure, Bidosa. That number is way too

1:02:19.200 --> 1:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on Bodosa, that's out there. I think what's your fair

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>on Bodosa.

1:02:24.000 --> 1:02:26.400
<v Speaker 3>For the toe for the tote for the title? Yeah,

1:02:27.360 --> 1:02:28.040
<v Speaker 3>eighty three to one?

1:02:28.240 --> 1:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so name is so, it's so, it's not so it's.

1:02:30.760 --> 1:02:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Not going to be ambitable to win a title.

1:02:32.280 --> 1:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>But my fair for Bodosa to win her quarter, I

1:02:37.400 --> 1:02:40.320
<v Speaker 2>give her about a twelve percent chance to win Q

1:02:40.520 --> 1:02:43.040
<v Speaker 2>three And so if you can find better than eight

1:02:43.120 --> 1:02:45.400
<v Speaker 2>to one, ish, I think that's a bet.

1:02:46.120 --> 1:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I do not think you will find better than eight

1:02:48.120 --> 1:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to one, that is my guess. By the way, last

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>thing about Ego, I want to say two things. One,

1:02:51.840 --> 1:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you said what you said. If you are

1:02:53.480 --> 1:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>just if you're running the numbers. You will be betting

1:02:55.360 --> 1:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>her every single week, and that's I take a lot

1:02:57.600 --> 1:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of shit on that. People you better you go and everything. Well, yeah,

1:03:00.280 --> 1:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>because this is what it says to bet too. Interestingly,

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what has given me more more hope for Ega to

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>win this Hope is not the right word, but with

1:03:13.440 --> 1:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>my bet, it's I'll say hope is the way that

1:03:16.800 --> 1:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that Sabolanca match ended. Do you all see that Sabalanca

1:03:20.520 --> 1:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>beat her six three sixty three, But it took Sabalanca

1:03:23.440 --> 1:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>forever to put her away on her shirt, which I

1:03:26.640 --> 1:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh okay, it's like she kind of woke

1:03:29.280 --> 1:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>up at the end, but it was too late. But

1:03:31.320 --> 1:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it was this toughness that I was I was very

1:03:34.000 --> 1:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>anxious to see and there it was. So we'll see

1:03:36.680 --> 1:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>if that carries over and then he sort of snaps

1:03:38.680 --> 1:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>out of that.

1:03:39.200 --> 1:03:42.000
<v Speaker 4>And so what it did feel like if it was

1:03:42.040 --> 1:03:45.080
<v Speaker 4>the best of five, Yes, that's what.

1:03:45.160 --> 1:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It felt like. Okay, So Drew, when you just ran

1:03:48.040 --> 1:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>through the numbers, then the best bets then juxtaposed, Well,

1:03:50.960 --> 1:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. We don't know the quarter prices yet,

1:03:52.760 --> 1:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so we don't know.

1:03:53.280 --> 1:03:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we see quarter prices, but I'm just kind of

1:03:55.760 --> 1:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>guessing from Yeah, where I have these players ranked, it's

1:03:58.880 --> 1:04:01.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna it's gonna be because you know, there's a bunch

1:04:01.400 --> 1:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>of big names in Q three. You could get better

1:04:03.000 --> 1:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>than eight to one ubudos, so that wouldn't chock me.

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, Okay, I hope, so we'll all hope for it,

1:04:07.080 --> 1:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, hopefully those hopefully those come out within twenty

1:04:10.400 --> 1:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>four hours. But you know how this goes?

1:04:11.760 --> 1:04:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Right?

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>With these books? Yeah? Is there one that usually comes

1:04:15.800 --> 1:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>out before the others? MGM and Vegas for sure is

1:04:20.120 --> 1:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the first, if the only, although William Hill sometimes will

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>put them out.

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:28.560
<v Speaker 3>What is the short offerings are so lean? I can't

1:04:28.560 --> 1:04:29.240
<v Speaker 3>even really tell you.

1:04:29.400 --> 1:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh, dude, bookmaker, are you kidding me? They'll never do

1:04:31.880 --> 1:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this anymore?

1:04:32.640 --> 1:04:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Not interested?

1:04:33.560 --> 1:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>What happened to them? They're not interested? Where did you say?

1:04:37.360 --> 1:04:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Three sixty five second markets?

1:04:38.960 --> 1:04:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're pretty fast. They're usually like as far as

1:04:41.720 --> 1:04:43.800
<v Speaker 4>US market's going, it's right there with DraftKings.

1:04:45.720 --> 1:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you all familiar with sweep steaks betting? Are you

1:04:47.880 --> 1:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>all familiar with this?

1:04:49.160 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 3>No, no idea? What this is?

1:04:51.120 --> 1:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Profit profit Exchange just pulled out of exchange betting and

1:04:56.400 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they have made the They did so because either's sports

1:04:59.400 --> 1:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>trade and there was Portrait is still doing it. They're

1:05:01.440 --> 1:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to different states with their exchange. Profit decided

1:05:04.160 --> 1:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that the licensing fees state by state was just too ridiculous,

1:05:07.720 --> 1:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and so there is this betting loophole with something called

1:05:10.480 --> 1:05:14.959
<v Speaker 1>sweepstake's betting. But you can, like people in Texas and California.

1:05:15.400 --> 1:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>The upshot of all this is can actually bet on

1:05:18.520 --> 1:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>these things through a gambling law loophole. You're gonna hear

1:05:22.360 --> 1:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about this in the coming year or two,

1:05:24.680 --> 1:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and so Profit is doing that. So anyway, I'm gonna

1:05:27.120 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>dive into it today and see if see what the

1:05:29.600 --> 1:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>tennis offerings are. But it's it's gonna be interesting. I

1:05:32.480 --> 1:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's a solution to my question of

1:05:34.640 --> 1:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>what's available, but we'll see because I don't even know

1:05:36.680 --> 1:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>if I don't even know if futures markets are even

1:05:38.760 --> 1:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>part of that, right, it might just be match by

1:05:41.520 --> 1:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>match anyway, Just a little just a little tip on

1:05:45.920 --> 1:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that last thing. Drew No no, uh, Drew Enzach both

1:05:49.720 --> 1:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>no Week three NFL preseason. I'm guessing you're punting on that,

1:05:52.720 --> 1:05:56.439
<v Speaker 1>are we? I played a little Colts, a little Colts.

1:05:56.760 --> 1:06:00.520
<v Speaker 2>That's the team that has some talent and got there

1:06:00.720 --> 1:06:03.120
<v Speaker 2>but kicked in the joint practice that I think is

1:06:03.160 --> 1:06:05.400
<v Speaker 2>going to want to try to get there, get their

1:06:05.480 --> 1:06:06.920
<v Speaker 2>mojo going before week one.

1:06:07.080 --> 1:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's the only thing I played so far, and

1:06:08.800 --> 1:06:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Zachary nothing.

1:06:10.000 --> 1:06:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Also on the Colts five and a half and I

1:06:12.640 --> 1:06:14.880
<v Speaker 4>had Buccaneers minus one and a half. I think it's

1:06:14.880 --> 1:06:17.360
<v Speaker 4>another one where the Tampa is going to play their starters,

1:06:17.400 --> 1:06:19.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, two or three quarters. Miami's not going to.

1:06:19.640 --> 1:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, best time of year US Open and Week

1:06:22.080 --> 1:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>one in the NFL, we get that that awkward week

1:06:24.320 --> 1:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>where Drew goes away with the wife and then he

1:06:26.680 --> 1:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>comes back. We went, hey, due, are you doing halftimes

1:06:29.880 --> 1:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>this year? Oh?

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Without question?

1:06:31.960 --> 1:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you do primetime games? Because because wish never.

1:06:34.360 --> 1:06:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, prime prime chat, primetimers.

1:06:36.520 --> 1:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah do you do? Is that a Twitter spaces thing?

1:06:41.840 --> 1:06:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

1:06:43.120 --> 1:06:43.760
<v Speaker 3>You know we do.

1:06:44.640 --> 1:06:47.480
<v Speaker 2>It goes up on YouTube honestly, like we used to

1:06:47.600 --> 1:06:49.760
<v Speaker 2>put it up on like you know, I used to

1:06:49.920 --> 1:06:50.880
<v Speaker 2>just go up on Twitter.

1:06:51.120 --> 1:06:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, through their video thing. But you got to be

1:06:53.160 --> 1:06:55.400
<v Speaker 3>a subscriber now to do that.

1:06:55.640 --> 1:06:58.160
<v Speaker 2>And I, for some reason, I'm having a tough time

1:06:58.240 --> 1:07:00.080
<v Speaker 2>finding it finding it in my heart to get of

1:07:00.160 --> 1:07:01.000
<v Speaker 2>elon MUK money.

1:07:01.200 --> 1:07:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm or a broken product.

1:07:03.360 --> 1:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not giving it to him personally, but but I

1:07:06.320 --> 1:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>through VS and I am so I might do Twitter

1:07:08.280 --> 1:07:10.439
<v Speaker 1>spaces as well because Todd Wish never wants to do it. Also,

1:07:11.480 --> 1:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, us open, good luck with all the bets.

1:07:14.360 --> 1:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's look for that. Butdosa Price and Beyond also interesting

1:07:18.720 --> 1:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on the on the men's side, with some of those

1:07:20.520 --> 1:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>plays in the in the middle quarters as well. Drew

1:07:24.040 --> 1:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Dinzik Whale Underscore, Capper Deep Dot podcast with Ady Molitor,

1:07:29.080 --> 1:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>also NBC Sports Bet The Edge with Jake Croucher. Those

1:07:31.760 --> 1:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>come out when typically during the week during football.

1:07:34.960 --> 1:07:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we're doing daily We're doing day pods now.

1:07:37.520 --> 1:07:41.280
<v Speaker 2>We record Sunday night at like nine pm so that

1:07:41.360 --> 1:07:43.840
<v Speaker 2>it can be hot fresh five in the morning in

1:07:43.960 --> 1:07:45.280
<v Speaker 2>everybody's feet on the East Coast.

1:07:45.360 --> 1:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

1:07:46.280 --> 1:07:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay. Then uh, and then we record the day before

1:07:48.840 --> 1:07:50.680
<v Speaker 3>for the other days of the week so that it's.

1:07:50.600 --> 1:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Basically in the in the feeds crack of down East

1:07:54.000 --> 1:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Coast time every morning.

1:07:55.760 --> 1:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And Zach, you're you're doing Tennis channel pods.

1:07:59.400 --> 1:08:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'll have some live shows for Tennis Channel on Twitter, YouTube, Facebook.

1:08:03.960 --> 1:08:06.600
<v Speaker 4>I think Monday, Wednesday, Friday's the schedule, and then those

1:08:06.640 --> 1:08:09.040
<v Speaker 4>turn into podcasts as well, and then yeah, just a

1:08:09.080 --> 1:08:11.160
<v Speaker 4>lot of stuff of visa and I'll have best bets

1:08:11.200 --> 1:08:14.880
<v Speaker 4>every day for the tournament. Friday afternoon, I'll have you know,

1:08:15.000 --> 1:08:17.600
<v Speaker 4>some futures and draw analysis up just once we have

1:08:17.720 --> 1:08:18.280
<v Speaker 4>prices out.

1:08:18.520 --> 1:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Any any chance of you ever getting on that Tennis

1:08:21.400 --> 1:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Channel live broadcast that they do during some of the

1:08:24.920 --> 1:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>matches where the three guys sit around and they just

1:08:26.760 --> 1:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>talk smack about the tennis magic front of them.

1:08:29.479 --> 1:08:31.960
<v Speaker 4>I've been on Second Serve before Second Serve be on

1:08:32.000 --> 1:08:33.200
<v Speaker 4>in a while, but I have been on.

1:08:33.280 --> 1:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Before Second Serve. That's exactly what it's called. I apologize obviously.

1:08:37.200 --> 1:08:39.479
<v Speaker 1>I watch it, so I'm not disparaging it, but it

1:08:40.080 --> 1:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's ripe for a betting element, doesn't it.

1:08:43.720 --> 1:08:45.880
<v Speaker 4>It was like I think it was originally supposed to

1:08:45.960 --> 1:08:48.000
<v Speaker 4>be a betting show, and that they you know, it's

1:08:48.040 --> 1:08:50.120
<v Speaker 4>a little murky on whether or not it is now.

1:08:50.200 --> 1:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>It is a little murky. Ben Wilson had a little

1:08:51.960 --> 1:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>flirtation with them on the betting side of things. Gentlemen,

1:08:54.720 --> 1:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, Thank you for listening. Good luck

1:08:56.960 --> 1:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>with all your bets. The US Open begins on Sunday.

1:09:00.320 --> 1:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Monday right that it begins. I don't

1:09:01.920 --> 1:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>even know anymore. Sunday Monday, do we know? Let's see.

1:09:05.479 --> 1:09:08.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it's Monday too on Monday.

1:09:08.200 --> 1:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Good luck, Thanks for listening.