WEBVTT - Bloomberg Technology: TikTok Latest, Tech Deals

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collide

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hyde and.

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Ed Louvelow live from New York.

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology. We are getting straight to our

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 3>top story.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Out of Washington.

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 3>TikTok is at the US Supreme Court fighting for its future.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Justices are hearing.

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.639
<v Speaker 3>Arguments only nine days before a federal law is set

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 3>to ban TikTok in the United States if it isn't

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 3>sold by its Chinese parent company. Bloemberg's Tyder Kendall standing

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 3>by at the court and remind us Tyler, the key

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 3>questions for the court is it national security versus free speech?

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Here?

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, hey, Caroline or all arguments here at the Supreme

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Court now just reaching about their one hour mark. Lawyers

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 4>for TikTok started their opening arguments by saying that this

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 4>is a First Amendment issue, arguing that if that band

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.119
<v Speaker 4>does go into place, it could potentially curtail the freedom

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 4>of expression of it's more than one hundred and seventy

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 4>million US based users. The lawyer for TikTok, arguing today,

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 4>Noel Francisco, also added that the timeline for the ban

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 4>is unrealistic and quote very difficult, asking the Court at

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 4>the very least to delay the ban going into place.

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 4>On the other side of this is what you mentioned,

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 4>the national security concerns. In a brief submitted to the

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Supreme Court today ahead of today's arguments, the US federal

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 4>government says this is not about freedom of speech, since

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 4>there is still a viable path on the table for

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 4>TikTok to operate if they divest. Rather, they're not trying

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 4>to restrict freedom of speech. They're trying to restrict what

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 4>they call foreign adversary holding, considering bite Dance's connections to

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 4>China and what that could mean to national security. Now,

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 4>that appears to be the thread that we're seeing the

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 4>support the Supreme Court justices pull on here, potentially expressing

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 4>some skepticism when it comes to TikTok's arguments. For example, Caroline,

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 4>the first question out of the gate from Justice Clarence

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 4>Thomas was whether or not TikTok was trying to convert

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.239
<v Speaker 4>a potential restriction on byte Dance's ownership of TikTok into

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 4>a restriction onto the freedom of speech of TikTok and

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 4>its users.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.399
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Kendall, We thank you so much.

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 3>And look, just reading the tea leaves here shares of

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 3>snap Meta on the higher side. It doesn't seem as

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 3>though thus far the arguments are going in TikTok's favor,

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 3>as has been on our tea live blog on the

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Frank McCord is with us to keep the conversation going.

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Executive chairman of the Court Global and founder of Project Liberty,

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>which just made a formal offer to acquire TikTok. You

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 3>call it the people's bid. Why is Project Liberty and

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 3>your consortium the right owners if indeed bite Dance says

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 3>it will divest.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.399
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Hi, Carolyn, how are you good?

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Good?

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 6>It's I think we're the right buyers because we have

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 6>put all the pieces together. We have the funding, we've

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 6>worked through all the legal issues, We've put a formal offer,

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 6>as you point out, right in front of Biteden, so

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 6>they have something now to react to. And most importantly,

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 6>we have the clean American tech stack to move the

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 6>user base over to. And we don't need or want

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese algorithm. And so I think that the algorithm

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 6>is something that China's very very beholden to and has

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 6>it said clearly that they're not going to be selling it.

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 6>We don't need it or want it, as I point out,

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 6>So I think we're particularly unique bidder and well positioned,

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 6>and I think as a matter of fact, we have

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 6>the leading bidder right now.

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 3>We were just seeing some of the share price reactions

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 3>of rivals out there. From your reading into what's happening

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 3>in Washington right now, does it look to be going

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 3>in the favor you'd want to see, because would you

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>actually like a delay to proceedings to be able to

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 3>go forward with a.

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 6>Bit, Well, we'd like to buy us TikTok, that's what

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 6>we'd like to see as an end result, and move

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 6>the user base over to this clean American stack. And

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 6>I think that it's no surprise that the argument is

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 6>going well for the government because this is a real

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 6>national siksecurity issue, a strongly bipartisan piece of legislation that

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 6>was passed by Congress upheld by the appellate court.

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 5>So I think the.

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 6>Conventional wisdom is that the government's position will be upheld,

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 6>the legislation will will stay in effect, which means on

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 6>January nineteenth, Byte Dance has to decide are they going

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 6>to shut it down or sell, and in order to sell,

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 6>they need to enter into an agreement, which is why

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 6>we put a formal offer in front of them in

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 6>the last twenty four hours.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 2>What is the price tag of that formal offer.

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 6>So what we've said to byte Dance is we're not

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 6>going to be talking about terms of the deal until

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 6>we get into a formal conversation with them. And we

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 6>want to be very very respectful of byte Dance because

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 6>it's a very sensitive time here. We know they're arguing

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 6>in front of the Supreme Court. We've given them space

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 6>to do that, and at the point in time where

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 6>we engage in an active negotiation, we'll be happy to

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 6>share details once we sort things with them.

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 3>Have you spoken to any of the current investors in

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 3>byte Dance who are United States based, General Atlantic, Susquehanna.

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 3>We also known that Sequoias involved KKR. There's a lot

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 3>of them.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there are, and I believe we've spoken to all

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 6>of them and they've indicated an interest in rolling over

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 6>their investment. Why not, I mean, they don't want to

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 6>lose their entire investment in us TikTok. We've put a

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 6>real proposal forward which gives them value for us TikTok.

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 5>Having said that, they too.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 6>Are waiting to see what byte Edance decides to do

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 6>before committing.

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm really interested in the fact that investors are interested

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 3>in rolling over. What value will you reccreate for the

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 3>business going forward? Because you want as you've articulated a

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 3>totally different tech stack, how will that change the use

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 3>of TikTok? How will you monetize it as well? Because

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 3>you want a different form of social media. You don't

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 3>want us as content for the ultimate users and being

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 3>advertised against.

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well they'll be advertisement advertising on the new TikTok.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 5>Let's call it TikTok two point zero.

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 6>But we see an Internet evolving where, rather than an

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 6>attention economy, meaning algorithms designed to keep us addicted and

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 6>online in a very unhealthy fashion, why not an intention

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 6>economy where we just let people know we're interested in

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 6>buying something or reading something, our information on something, and

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 6>then we get that from the business or the advertiser.

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 6>And inference is much less valuable than intention. So rather

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 6>than have algorithms that surveil us, scrape our data, and

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 6>then guess that we might want something, why not you

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 6>and I just be very clear, you know, verify that

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 6>we're a human being, and be very clear about what

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 6>we want and then receive it On the Internet. We

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 6>have technology available now that didn't exist twenty five years

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 6>ago that enables you and I to actually control our identity,

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 6>our data, and our relationships. So let's put people in

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 6>charge of their data. Our data is very valuable, as

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 6>it turns.

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Out, I mean, and that's why so much value has

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 3>been accrued on a private market basis, at least to

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 3>byte dance and to TikTok. But ultimately by not making

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 3>these things quote unquote addictive, do you lose.

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Some of that value? And is that the right compromise here?

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, there are other factors here, right in the case

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 6>of this Supreme Court hearing and the legislation that's being discussed.

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 5>There are national security risks.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 6>There's also issues around safety to children. There are issues

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 6>about a viability of our democratic system with such polarization.

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 6>So the algorithms may be powerful, that doesn't mean that

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 6>they're good or constructive. We just have an Internet technology

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 6>that's evolved into one that's attention based, which means these

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 6>platforms scrape our data. They aggregate it, and to do that,

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 6>they're actually surveilling us, right, and then they profile us.

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 6>And this is the problem with what's going on with TikTok,

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 6>because it's not only the surveillance and the information on

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and seventy million people, it's that ByteDance can

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 6>then provide what they want to feed to the one

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 6>hundred and seventy million people.

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 5>So it's an influence device as well.

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 6>So I think we're all learning together that the current

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 6>architecture which takes advantage of people is not the best architecture.

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 6>It's leading to some very poor outcomes. This is just engineering.

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 6>It's just it can be designed differently to work differently.

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 6>We can get all the benefits we get from Internet

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 6>technology without the harms.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 5>And it's interesting that this.

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 6>TikTok problem could actually be the way forward to a

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 6>much bigger solution to having an Internet that's much healthier

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 6>for all of us.

0:08:55.360 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 3>How has that got ramifications on meta on snow, which

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 3>on the day are doing well because people feel okay.

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 3>If TikTok loses this argument, it's out and then the viewers,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 3>the followers, the users just go to these other rival platforms.

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 3>The money the advertising money goes to these rival platforms.

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Why are analysts like Morgan Stanley that have pointed this

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 3>out not saying there's a legitimate bid here and we

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 3>think this could be a whole new dawn future for

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>social media.

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Why aren't people not taking that seriously?

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 5>I think they'll begin to now.

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 6>I think that BYT Dance has been playing out their

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 6>legal strategy and it's coming to an end.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Has been a good legal strategy from your perspective, Sorry,

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 3>hasn't been a good legal strategy from your perspective.

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 6>From the vantage point of looking at the legislation and

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 6>how it was passed strong bipartisan legislation and the real

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 6>national security risks. I think that the Byte Dance pursuit

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 6>of a legal strategy was an uphill battle from the

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 6>very beginning. And I think, as I say, it's coming

0:09:55.760 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 6>to an end now that that's that path is closing

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 6>down on them. Now they're confronted with January nineteenth, So

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 6>we're talking about not nine days and something has to give,

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 6>so either that it's going to be shut down or

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 6>there'll be a transaction. That's why we put a formal

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 6>offer in place so there's enough time for them to

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 6>process that, and we hope they do because we want

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 6>to see TikTok stay alive.

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 5>We want to see it lit up. We don't want

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 5>to see.

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 6>It banned or shut down, just like President Electrump does not.

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 3>We want to see about President Electrump and ultimately what

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 3>January the twentieth means for all of this and the

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 3>request he's made of the Supreme Court to just delay facts.

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think the legislation will operate. It will be

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 6>the legislation and it's a hard and fast date of

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 6>January nineteenth. So the timing here is very interesting, isn't it.

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 6>President Biden will still be president. It doesn't get to

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 6>President Electrump unless the ninety day of the three month

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 6>extension kicks in. So it's a Biden administration decision to

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 6>extend the timeframe for Bye Dance in TikTok, and then

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 6>it gets coot.

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>To allow some sort of delay, which many don't think

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>will happen.

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm assuming in answering your question that that won't happen.

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 6>If it does, it's a different ballgame.

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 5>I understand that.

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 6>But you know, when you step back and think about this,

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 6>why wouldn't Bye dance accept an offer. If it doesn't

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 6>include the algorithm, they win. President Trump wins because it's

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 6>not banned. The shareholders that you mentioned win they get

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 6>value as opposed to getting nothing for us. TikTok Us

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 6>citizens win because our clean stack will protect them.

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 5>The national security risk has gone.

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 6>And of course TikTok users win because the app stays

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 6>in business.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Why aren't there competing bids.

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 6>The legislation requires that you have a clean stack. If

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 6>this be independent of by dances technology, that's not an

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 6>easy thing to do. If we hadn't been working on

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 6>the technology and invested a half a billion dollars over

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 6>the last five years, we wouldn't be in a position

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 6>to bid. It's very serendipitous in a way that the

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.719
<v Speaker 6>work that Project Liberty has been doing to reimagine how

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 6>the Internet works just so happens to be right place,

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 6>right time to actually be the winning bidder for TikTok

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 6>keep the app going, move the user base to a

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 6>clean stack, and at the same time demonstrate to people

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 6>that there's another version of the Internet where they're in

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 6>charge of themselves. They own their data, they own their relationships,

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 6>they can get value for it.

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 5>They can parse out and permission.

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 6>Its use as opposed to being surveilled and having the

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 6>data be in the hands of someone else who's deciding

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 6>what to feed them, what to tell them.

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Briefly, next steps for you.

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 3>You've kind of given us your time today, But what

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 3>happens after we start the arguments finish at the Supreme Court.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 6>I think we're all anxiously awaiting the Supreme Court to

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 6>make their decision, and then we'll look forward to a

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 6>conversation with ByteDance and see if we can.

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 5>Get something.

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 6>Completed prior to the nineteenth so that the Biden administration

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 6>can get it this Roe month extension.

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Please come back if that conversation happens. Frank McCourt, executive

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 3>chairman of McCourt Global, Founder of Project Liberty, and the

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 3>beard on.

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>The table for us TikTok.

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we'll take a look at some of the

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 3>tech themes dominating the deal sector in twenty twenty five.

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe this is a deal we need to talk about,

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 3>potentially a purchase of US TikTok with Barack ravin Is

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>of Ey America's that's next.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 2>This is blue Meg technology.

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 3>A quick check on the market, so look broader benchmarks

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 3>are down today because the job's numbers were so hot.

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Once again, we question whether the rake cuts will come

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 3>from the Federal Reserve or off by two percent on

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:03.599
<v Speaker 3>the NASDAP. But we want to shine a light on

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 3>the key story in the Supreme Court today.

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 2>TikTok fighting for its future.

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Meta platforms hire by five tens of percent, snap up

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 3>seven point seven percent.

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 2>This as investors tried to.

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Descend the Actually, some of the oral arguments thus far

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 3>don't seem to be going in TikTok's favor.

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's just dwell on TikTok a little bit more, because

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.239
<v Speaker 2>couldn't it be a deal.

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 3>To watch for twenty twenty five as we hear those

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 3>oral arguments over in the Supreme Court, as we discern

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the future of TikTok and the United States tech deals

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 3>continue to be really impressive as they were in twenty

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty four. Remember US volumes werep thirty two percent. Bak

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Revied is the man to ask ey America's strategy and

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Transactions technology sector leader joining us Now, Barak, I know

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 3>you can't tell us about the intricacies of whether it

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 3>or not we actually get a deal out of us TikTok,

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 3>But have you been thinking through that particular deal. Is

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the deal outlook for tech a strong one?

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Caroline, thank you for having me appreciate it. The

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 7>outlook is actually very strong, and we feel generally pretty poor,

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 7>I think on you know, you're obviously you're talking about

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 7>TikTok today and it's a it's it's capturing a lot

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 7>of the imagination. But you know, when we think about

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 7>this deal, obviously we can't talk about it specifically, but

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 7>if you think about any large transaction, obviously it gets

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 7>very complex. And this is the kind of stuff that

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 7>generally tends to move the market and tends to show

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 7>that other M and A is possible and really can

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 7>help ignite the market if it was to happen. But

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 7>I do think that, you know, if we were to

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 7>go through this, when we talk to our clients about

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 7>complicated and complex carve outs, typically we talk about months

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 7>and quarters in terms of timelines to getting it done,

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 7>not you know, not generally not days or weeks, And

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 7>so you know, to the extent that some of that

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 7>work has been going on, that's that's fantastic. Depends on

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 7>who the buyer is in terms of what the stack

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 7>actually looks like, and how how capable they are to

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 7>receive it. All of that, you know, will will drive

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 7>the timeline here no matter what happens, and obviously you

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 7>need willing buyers and sellers.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 3>Ultimately, this is a geopolitical discussion that drives the potential

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 3>sale of TikTok. How much is geopolitics going to play

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 3>into M and A into carve outs as perhaps relationships

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 3>between the US and China become ever more tense.

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's a great question, Caroline. It's impossible to underestimate

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 7>the impact that it already has had, in the chilling

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 7>effect it has had, particularly when you think about big tech,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 7>particularly when you think about the semiconductor space, I think

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 7>anti trust enforcement in the US, I think tariff wars

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 7>or skirmishes or battles. However you define those between the

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 7>US and China and potentially the EU and other countries,

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 7>suddenly adds complexity to that. So when you think about

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 7>big tech and semiconductors and social media getting caught in

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 7>that crosshet, it really is a big has a big

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 7>chilling effect on M and A More broadly, Now, if

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 7>you think about the market more broadly than that ninety

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 7>something percent of the market, it isn't really involved in

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 7>that doesn't get caught up in that. So it's only

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 7>the US anti trust enforcement which will matter to them.

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 7>And if that kind of easies off under an incoming

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 7>Trump administration, I think that's generally a nice tailwind for

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 7>M and A going into twenty twenty five.

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 3>And you said, of course there need to be willing

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 3>sellers and willing buyers. What's interesting is we're talking with

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 3>frant McCord is. He's got other in his combined concilidation

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 3>of people coming forward to want to buy it, private equity,

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 3>family offices. For you, who are the willing buyers? Is

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 3>PE a big player here?

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 7>Pe, when you know, thinking more broadly about the market,

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 7>PE definitely has a role to play, I think, whether

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 7>it's in this deal and more broadly, you know, they're

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 7>experts at getting deals done. They've seen all the most

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 7>difficult deals, they've seen the easy deals, they've seen it all.

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 7>They add balance sheet, they add availability of capital. So

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 7>they are fantastic owners to be part of any kind

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 7>of bid, particularly as a It's very complex, and I

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.719
<v Speaker 7>think the industry has a lot of experience in you know,

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 7>looking at carve outs come you know, this would be

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 7>effectively a carve out, and so looking at big carve

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 7>outs coming out of you know, large enterprises. I think

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 7>private equity has a very large role to play in that,

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 7>whether it's this still specifically or more broadly, I think

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 7>in general, PE is very interested in items that get

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 7>carved out of larger take enterprises. Generally, their viewers that

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 7>these are you know, these have been unloved a little bit,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 7>they're potentially undermanaged. This isn't obviously the TikTok example we're

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 7>talking about here, but this is more broadly, and they

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 7>do see it as an opportunity to create value and

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 7>and and drive shareholder it time.

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 2>You can have a busy year. Thanks for fitting us in.

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Eric Ravid of Ey America.

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 3>I just want to check in on in video Stock

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 3>right now because the company has been criticizing what we

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 3>expect to be new export restrictions coming from the Biden

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 3>White House ahead of any announcement that we expect later today,

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 3>and video is saying it's trying to undercut the incoming

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration by imposing last minute rules. Bloomberg's Mike Shppard

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 3>joins us a more in video setting off three percent.

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 3>More to do with the macro jobs data, I'm sure,

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 3>but tell us a little bit about what also could

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 3>be a key headwind in terms of selling their devices worldwide.

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 8>Well, this really would be a headwind, and it would

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 8>come on top of other restrictions on AI chip sales

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 8>in China and Video is already facing from the US.

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 8>Those were imposed about a year and a half ago

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 8>by the Biden administration. In this new set of proposed

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 8>restrictions that could come in the next few days, this

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 8>would add a velvet rope to the world where the

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 8>US would be controlling access to these chips. It would

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 8>be capped. Your access would be capped on a company

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 8>and country basis, and the closest US allies, say Europe,

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 8>the UK, Pan Australia, they would have the most and

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 8>easiest access. Most of the rest of the world would

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 8>face tougher restrictions. They would have to meet security requirements

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 8>and also human rights requirements as well. And then there

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 8>are a handful of US adversaries, namely China and Russia

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 8>that would face the most restrictions in the least likelihood

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 8>of having access to this sophisticated AI technology. That is

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 8>coming from the US and principally from Nvidia.

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Mike, what is so fascinating is it hasn't even been

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 3>announced yet and we've heard this strong response. I'm not

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 3>aware of how often we tend to hear these strong

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 3>rebuttals coming from companies, and video usually keeps relatively quiet

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:38.479
<v Speaker 3>about these political changes.

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 8>You know, Carolyn, I'm glad you framed it that way,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 8>because this was a really unusual comment from Nvidia, and

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 8>we also heard objections more broadly from the group here

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 8>in Washington that represents the chip maker's industry, and they

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 8>together were curative criticizing very harshly the Biden administration move

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 8>ahead of its release. Seeing would be unnecessarily restrictive on

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 8>whatever Trump may want to do is foreign policy, but

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 8>it would also inflict wide pain on other parts of

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 8>the economy. Think the gaming industry, think computing, and just think.

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 8>Back in September, when he was asked by our own colleague,

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 8>Tyler Kendall, Jensen, Wang said, look, we will abide by

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 8>any restrictions and government policies, and now he is saying

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 8>earlier this week he told our friend Ed Ludlow he

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 8>is interested in meeting with Donald Trump, and so this

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 8>would give them something very much to talk about as

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 8>a new administration takes office.

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 3>It would then Meg's Mike Shepherd across what we anticipate

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 3>to be the latest amount of the announcement out of

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 3>the White House. Thank you, Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Karen Hyde in New York. A quick check on

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 3>these markets. Look, I want to focus in on what

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 3>has been a macro story of the day as well.

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 3>Job's numbers really strong, two hundred and fifty six thousand added.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 3>What does that mean in terms of the Fed policy

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 3>rate cuts on pause?

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Of course, growth stocks pull back.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 3>We're down one point nine percent on the NASDAK biggest

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 3>drags to the downside, also Apple in Vidia. Of course

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 3>we've got key nines on what is going to be

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 3>announced from the White House in terms of further limitations

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 3>on exports from Nvidia to the rest of the world.

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 3>That's playing on the stock but on the upside. Key

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 3>point driver on the green side is Meta and of

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 3>course that is feeling into where our key story is today.

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 3>TikTok what to expect today around what's happening over in Washington.

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Of course, the Supreme Court hearing arguments about the future

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 3>of TikTok. That of course plays into Meta's hand if

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 3>indeed TikTok is indeed banned. Let's get to Bloomberg's Kurt

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.479
<v Speaker 3>Wagner because it's interesting Snap and Meta trading higher. It

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 3>feels as though in the court it doesn't seem to

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>be going their direction for TikTok.

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Kert.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, we're only halfway through right now. The

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 9>lawyer for the creator aspect of the lawsuit is making

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 9>his arguments before the court. But the first hour was

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 9>TikTok's lawyer, and I listened to the whole thing. I

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 9>don't listen to a ton of Supreme Court oral arguments,

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 9>but I walked away feeling that TikTok's in real trouble.

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 9>A lot of the justices did not seem convinced with

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 9>TikTok's argument that this is a free speech issue. A

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 9>lot of them push back on the idea that you know,

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 9>it's not just speech, this is also a data in

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 9>a security issue, and so they did not seem convinced

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 9>from my opinion, as to what the TikTok lawyer was

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 9>presenting this morning, and.

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Certain analysts Morgan Stanley, for example, have theorized what would

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 3>happen if indeed TikTok is banned, money goes to Snap potentially,

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 3>but the key winner is Meta YouTube. Can you spell

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 3>out who the winners and losers are and what it

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 3>means in terms of advertising revenue here?

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean you hit the top three. I think

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 9>Meta and Google and YouTube in particular are probably one

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 9>A and one B there because they both have products

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 9>in YouTube shorts and in reels at Meta that are

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 9>you know, essentially TikTok clones, right, So if you are

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 9>a TikTok creator, if you're a TikTok user, very easy

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 9>to migrate to one of these other services, And they

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 9>both have massive advertising businesses already, so I think they don't,

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, they don't have to do a lot different

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 9>to really capitalize on the fact that all of the

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 9>money that's currently going and TikTok will need to go

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 9>somewhere else. So I think there's a very you know,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 9>obvious reason why MetaStock is up right now today. It's

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 9>that people see there's a real potential for this mass

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 9>migration of users from TikTok over to reels if indeed

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 9>TikTok gets banned.

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Kut Wagner the the latest from the court and what

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 3>it means for the rivals. We thank you more on

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 3>TikTok's impact on the social media landscape. But please to

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.239
<v Speaker 3>welcome Spreta Coajuria, Will Research Global Internet Managing director who

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 3>has thought long and hard about who the.

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Winners and the losers are.

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Schwetter just take us to what you're reading of the

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 3>tea leaves of the arguments right now.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't seem to look good for TikTok.

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 10>I agree, first fall, thanks for having me. I actually

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 10>listen to part of the argument this morning, and I

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 10>know it's far from over. But my understanding from and

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 10>I don't do a lot of these Supreme Court argument hearings,

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 10>but I guess my understanding is that the TikTok lawyer

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 10>did not come off convincing enough for the justices, and

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 10>not only around free speech, but also around the privacy

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 10>and security natural security of US citizens. So with that,

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 10>why is we are already seeing stock reactions as it

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 10>relates to the internet name Snap is up, as is Meta,

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 10>and as is Google. Based on our research, we think

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 10>that there is an eight to ten percent upside to

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 10>metas earnings per share. That's quite meaningful because we think

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 10>that over fifty percent of the time spent can actually

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 10>be going to meta reels as the number one beneficiary

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 10>for YouTube shorts, we think that about thirty to forty

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 10>percent of the time spent on TikTok today could go

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 10>to YouTube short and we think that there is about

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 10>five to eight percent upside to YouTube's revenue. And then

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 10>for Snap, part of the reason why it's trading up

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 10>so much is because of the volatility around how much

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 10>benefit Snap could have on a smaller base, and we

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 10>think that it could be about five to ten percent

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 10>of its revenue even if only ten to fifteen percent

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 10>of the time spent today on TikTok goes to Snapchat Wow.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 3>And of course eyeballs and focus of a consumer means

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 3>more advertising revenue. Ultimately, is that also how it's a

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 3>portioned meta gets the bulk of the advertising revenue that

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 3>currently is sent towards TikTok's direction, and then it's apportioned

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 3>to YouTube and then Snap as well.

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 10>That's exactly right, and what we're actually hearing from advertisers

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 10>right now is that the budgets have actually not yet migrated,

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 10>even with the upcoming risk of TikTok being banned. I

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 10>think the advertisers want to see the ban being implemented

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 10>and then transition the ad dollars in part with snap

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 10>There will be integrations required for those advertisers who have

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 10>not integrated with Snapchat just yet. But what we're also

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 10>hearing is that that work has already begun Shutta.

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 3>That's so interesting because if advertised, if marketers aren't changing yet,

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 3>the reason is because there is one hundred and seventy

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 3>million US users of TikTok who really like the product.

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 3>And from that perspective, do you think that actually it

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 3>does just overnight go away. Have you thought through the

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 3>action of if indeed it is banned, what technically happens

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 3>and if we see users migrade, how long that takes.

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 11>Oh?

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 10>I believe that it will be a moderately fast leak.

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 10>I don't think it will be overnight that the advertising

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 10>budgets will be shut down, in part because there will

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 10>be still some TikTok users in the United States. I mean,

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 10>you won't be users won't be able to download them,

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 10>and service providers will say that we are not going

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.400
<v Speaker 10>to be supporting TikTok, but there will still be millions

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 10>of users and eyeballs on TikTok platform, and the technological

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:43.400
<v Speaker 10>integrations of ad dollars going away from TikTok into meta

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 10>may not all happen overnight, as advertisers still try and

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 10>figure out how they want to shift their budgets and

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 10>what kind of targeting they want to do, so it

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 10>will be a slow lead. My guess is that it

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 10>will probably take about a quarter or two before most

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 10>of the budgets will move.

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 3>At the start of the show, we had Franklin Court,

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 3>junior joint of Project Liberty.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 2>He, as far as he's.

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Aware, has made the only bid for us TikTok, asking

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Byte Dance ultimately to sell, which they promised us far

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 3>not to do. But have you thought through the likelihood

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 3>of Bite Dance selling TikTok based.

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 10>On the arguments of this morning, It did not sound

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 10>like that would be a very high likelihood outcome, whether

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 10>that was even a possibility in a ninety day window

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 10>or even in a one hundred and eighty day window,

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 10>So I would be very surprised. I would put it

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 10>in a low probability scenario where that actually happens. I'm

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 10>not sure if they actually want that to happen. If

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 10>we're speculating, so to speak, on who the buyer could be.

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if Elon Musk makes

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 10>a bid. He already has Twitter and he has the

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 10>resources to do so too. But I just don't think

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 10>that that will be a high likelihood scenario that they

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 10>actually sell the asset.

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Amazon has been another name that and thrown out that

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 3>would benefit by purchasing TikTok, for example.

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 2>So the next steps from your perspective, how do you start.

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 3>To judge the day reactions of these companies? Followed by

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 3>the as you say potential? What did you mention for

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Meta up to like eight to ten percent upside in

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 3>terms of revenue? How long apath for this share price

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 3>reaction to last?

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 10>You think, I think it'll be sustained. Today's hearing will

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 10>be whether the Supreme Court tells us their decision today

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 10>or not. The way it goes will be very telling

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 10>in terms of the likelihood of the outcome, because it

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 10>seems like it will be binary whether TikTok is banned

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 10>or Supreme Court is going to bring it as a

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 10>hearing to see what happens if TikTok is expected to ban,

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 10>then the rally actually stays and there will be a

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 10>lot more interest from investors on Meta and in fact

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 10>the potential overhand on these stocks on Meta and Snap

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 10>on the uncertainty of where TikTok, whether TikTok will be

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 10>banned or not, will be lifted, so that in part

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 10>will also be a relief.

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Treider Conjuria of all for research. Great to get your

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 3>take on the implications of social media.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.959
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, look, we're going to delve into LTK President

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Ama Ven's Boxes perspective. She's got the take on the

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 3>frade of TikTok as it impacts the creator economy.

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 2>This is blome meg Technology.

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Now, as the Supreme Court is hearing arguments on the

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 3>future of TikTok and the United States, let's take a

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 3>look at the apps impact on the creator economy. Here's

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 3>what TikTok CEO had to say about that.

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 11>A couple of months ago, creators from all around the

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 11>world come to TikTok to be discovered, to find an

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 11>audience that live their dreams of fame and fortune. Now,

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 11>in addition to launching countless global stars. The discovery and

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 11>authenticity that defined the TikTok experience have also made the

0:30:56.160 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 11>platform home the serious issues that are vital to the

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 11>global good.

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring an LTK co founder president Ammaven's Box, who

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 3>knows a thing or two about these content creators worldwide.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 3>How are they reacting at the moment.

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 12>Well, Kiln, I have to start out by acknowledging what's

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 12>happening with the wildfires in La are the arts and

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 12>prayers are with the huge portion of the LTK community.

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 13>That's impacted today.

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 12>We have ten thousand creators that are operating their businesses

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 12>out of La County, and so I'd be remiss not

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 12>to acknowledge that they really have had a struggle in

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 12>the start of this year, both with how they will

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 12>operate out of their homes and with what products that

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 12>they show to their audience, and then now also thinking

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 12>about rehoming their community.

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 13>So I did want to start there.

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Well said thank you, Ama, do you want to then,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 3>having discussed, of course the heart that goes out to

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of your user base, a lot of your

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 3>user base are therefore also having to analogize what's happening

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 3>in Washington.

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 2>At the same time.

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 13>Exactly.

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 12>Well, you know, on the TikTok side, we've had nine

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 12>months to prepare, and so we have been educating our

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 12>creators about what they can do to get their arms

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 12>around their audience. We call it meat and keep, and

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 12>so over that period of time, they've been educating their

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 12>communities of where.

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:13.719
<v Speaker 13>They can be found.

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 12>What we've seen in the numbers is that with our

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 12>TikTok creators specifically they've launched their LTK pages, they've actually

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 12>produced twice the number of video in twenty twenty four

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 12>versus the year prior, and I would describe that as

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 12>really making a house a home. They want to make

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 12>sure that when that community transitions to the LTK that

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 12>they have a place that they love and they're getting

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 12>tons of content there.

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 13>That has returned in material growth in their earnings.

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 12>Our TikTok creators earned twice as much last year as

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 12>the year prior, so they've got a way to.

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 13>Really transition that community.

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 12>And then on the brand side, we've actually seen that

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 12>brands intend to spend more on creator marketing in twenty

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 12>twenty five. That was a finding from our Northwestern study

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.719
<v Speaker 12>where we pull the cmos both inside of LTK, all

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 12>eight thousand of them, plus those outside of our universe.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 12>They all expect to continue to grow their investment, and

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 12>I know Goldman still says that by twenty twenty seven

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 12>they expect this industry to be worth five hundred billion.

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 12>So these brands are not slowing down their investment creators.

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 12>They're really seeing it as a channel play and not

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 12>a platform play.

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 3>As you mentioned, money marketers looking at LTK. But where

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 3>else do you think we'll ultimately benefit if, for example,

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 3>it is indeed banned, is it immediately Meta that benefits

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 3>the most? Is CMO is going to be putting most

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 3>of the advertising dollars that they would have spent on

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 3>TikTok to Instagram?

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 13>Right?

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 12>I think on the biggest losers certainly would be TikTok themselves.

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 12>You know, they're losing eight billion dollars it's expected of revenue,

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 12>and of course they are based in Asia and so

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 12>that revenue is going to their kind of homeland. On

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 12>kind of the biggest winners, I do think that Meta

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 12>will be the biggest winner out of this. I echo

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 12>your other guests that we saw here today. Really from

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 12>the creator industry side, though cmos are putting their dollars

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 12>with the creators themselves. Those creators are on average four

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 12>different platforms today, and so it will ultimately drive content

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 12>into the other existing social platforms.

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 13>I think Meta will be the biggest winner.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 12>There, followed by YouTube and then on down the line.

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:18.720
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is ultimately how creators themselves not only using

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 3>TikTok and other platforms to tell people how to circumvent

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 3>any future ban, maybe trying to advocate the use of VPNs,

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 3>but have they been migrating their user based to other platforms.

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 3>They said, they've come to you a lot more with LTK,

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 3>But have they managed to convert their YouTube audience and

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 3>not their YouTube audience TikTok audience over to YouTube, over

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 3>to Instagram ahead of this.

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 12>Yes, and actually so for LTK, the way they're thinking

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 12>about us is like the home base for across all

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 12>of their platforms, Like where can they gain ownership of

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 12>that community? Because you have to think, what's happening with

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:52.760
<v Speaker 12>TikTok is a revolution. This is a moment in time

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.439
<v Speaker 12>where it might go away entirely. But what we've seen

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 12>over twenty twenty four is an evolution of every other platform.

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 12>You're looking at YouTube shorts, or you're looking at what's

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 12>happened across Instagram. It's no longer a place to follow

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 12>people or be part of a community. It's an interest

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 12>based entertainment platform. So creators across the entire creator economy

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 12>have been looking for where they are going to house

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 12>and have ownership of their audience. We've seen that, you know,

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 12>in Q four, specifically those last three months of the year,

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 12>we saw a tremendous uptick in TikTokers applying to LTK

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 12>to get their shops launched so that they can have

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 12>their home base there. But it's a trend across the

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 12>entire creator universe where they know they've got to get

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 12>their arms around that community because the most important thing

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 12>about their ability to continue their business is their reachable,

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 12>engaged audience. And the problem is not just here on

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 12>TikTok it's across all platforms today.

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is there is a smaller probability that bite

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 3>dance does decide to sell. If it does and we

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 3>have a change of ownership and a change of the

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 3>underlying algorithm, how sticky do you think the one hundred

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 3>and seventy million used reso of TikTok, or indeed the

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:02.919
<v Speaker 3>content courage is on that actually are.

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 12>You know, I actually believe it's an algorithm preference. There

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 12>are some unique things about TikTok when they first started,

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 12>specifically around music. I think those things have become a

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 12>little bit more ubiquitous. But I think we learn a

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 12>lot by looking to Europe. You know, TikTok does exist

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 12>in Europe, except that they have much more restrictive privacy

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 12>over there versus what we have here in the United States,

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 12>and TikTok has not really been able to grab hold

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.359
<v Speaker 12>of the European customer the way it has the United

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 12>States customer. If you have a TikTok, that's not I

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.279
<v Speaker 12>mean it, excuse me. If you few an algorithm that's

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 12>informed by less data, it's just inherently lesser, and so

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 12>ultimately this becomes an algorithm choice for our US consumers.

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 12>I do expect that you know the patterns that we've

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 12>created as individuals of how much time and how frequently

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 12>we are picking up our phone. I think I just

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.479
<v Speaker 12>read that the average American user picks up their phone

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 12>over twenty two hundred times a day. What are they opening?

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 12>They're looking for entertainment. I don't think that they're going

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 12>to stop that behavior. I do believe that there's going

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 12>to be a lift and shift to other platforms, and

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 12>creators are hoping that that lift comes directly then over

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 12>to them as creators so they can continue their businesses.

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 12>Because remember, the platforms are not the ones that pay creators.

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 13>Creators are responsible.

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 12>For building their own business in their own revenue streams,

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 12>but except for a YouTube and long format, they are

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:23.320
<v Speaker 12>really not being paid at scale or really any meaningful

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 12>way by the platforms directly. So it's very critical that

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 12>they own that customer relationship so that they can create

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 12>those businesses around their reach.

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm a ven's box.

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 3>I let you go back and tap for one of

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 3>the twenty two hundred times you're going to be picking

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 3>up your phone today. LTK co founder president, It's always

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 3>great to have you.

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. TikTok fighting for its future in the Supreme Court.

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring back Bloomberg's Tyler Kendall, who is outside that

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 3>court and the latest in terms of the arguments, I

0:37:56.080 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 3>understand US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prologar is now testify.

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 4>Yes, she's representing the federal government in this case, who

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 4>is arguing that this is an issue of national security.

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Before that happened that we just heard the lawyer representing

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 4>TikTok creators wrap up his statements to the Supreme Court,

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 4>and Jeffrey Fisher made similar arguments to what we heard

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 4>from TikTok's lawyer earlier today, that this is an issue

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 4>of freedom of speech and potentially curtailing the freedom of

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 4>expression of the nearly one hundred and seventy million US

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 4>based users who use the app. Now, it does appear

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 4>that the Supreme Court justices are signaling they are skeptical

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 4>to that argument. I've been struck just how many times

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 4>they had brought up the specifics of the text of

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 4>the bill that Congress passed, saying that this is not

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 4>an outright ban, that the lag could knew that the

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 4>app could still continue to operate. Rather, it is a choice,

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 4>and that the app has to divest in order to

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 4>maintain its platform. You overcall, of course, that this text

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 4>was originally introduced by the China Select Committee on a

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 4>partisan basis over those national securities cancers. We even heard

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Chief Justice John Roberts hit on that saying that Congress

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 4>is not concerned about what is on the platform. They

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 4>are concerned about what the federal government calls a foreign adversary,

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 4>holding who.

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 2>Owns the platform.

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Tyler, what's also some intriguing about all of this is

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 3>President elect Trump and where he feels the delay should

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 3>come in.

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Right exactly so, a lawyer for Trump actually filed a

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 4>Friend of the Court brief last month of requesting that

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:31.400
<v Speaker 4>there be a delay and citing Trump's own negotiation skill,

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 4>saying that he could ultimately help reach some sort of

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:37.399
<v Speaker 4>agreement between the parties to get this done and as

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 4>well as address those national security concerns. Now, if this

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 4>span is put into place, we actually heard this come

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:45.720
<v Speaker 4>up in the questioning whether or not Trump could delay it. Further,

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 4>we know that the law was written to include a

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 4>ninety day pause if there is a potential deal on

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 4>the table, but of course that would have to materialize.

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 4>He also could potentially instruct his Department of Justice to

0:39:57.200 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 4>not enforce it, however, that would open him up to

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 4>legal scrutiny. And then lastly, you could try to work

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 4>with Congress to repeal the law that they put into place,

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 4>but that appears highly unlikely considering the bipartisan support that

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 4>this bill originally received when it passed back in April.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about unlikely allies coming together to push it forward,

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 4>such as the Democratic House Leader Hackeing Jeffreys and House

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Speaker Mike Johnson working hand in hand on this one.

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:25.839
<v Speaker 3>Bipartisan ship perhaps has its limits. Tyder Kendall, we thank

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 3>you so much. Let's get out more for intricacies around

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 3>the legal arguments. Bloom back Sarah Forden for more in DC.

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 3>And you're really analyzing how it's all unfolding inside the

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 3>court the arguments.

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 2>Anything struck here?

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 14>Well, first, let's go back to the legal framework. Why

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 14>this is in front of the Supreme Court. They're basically

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 14>being called to decide on a request from Trump to

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:52.919
<v Speaker 14>pause the start of the band January nineteenth. So they're

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 14>going to have to decide do they pause the band

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 14>and if they do, is it just a temporary pause

0:40:57.680 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 14>so they can figure out what they want to do

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 14>on the underling issues of the law, or is it

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 14>a permanent band. They're also being asked by TikTok to

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 14>ponder the national security versus the First Amendment rights question.

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 14>Of course, TikTok is really really bearing down hard on

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 14>the fact that this reflects a violation of people's First

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 14>Amendment rights. But then you have the Justices coming in

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 14>and saying, well, actually, foreign actors don't have First Amendment

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 14>rights the way Americans do. So there's a lot of

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 14>parsing there. You know, is TikTok considered a foreign actor.

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 14>It's technically a US company, but it's owned by a

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 14>Chinese company, and so there is so much to unpack

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 14>in these arguments.

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 3>That is very briefly, probability of thirty percent that TikTok

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 3>wins is what Bloing Bag Intelligence thinks. Have you got

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 3>a probability what people have been saying?

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I mean, I think that our analyst is really

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 14>calling it pretty pretty correctly. And as we're seeing, as

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 14>Tyler mentioned, you know, the Justices are expressing a lot

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 14>of skepticism about the First Amendment arguments, and they are

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 14>also raised in concerns about the national security arguments. It's

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 14>true that we don't have as much visibility on what

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 14>the government feels as the most concerning about TikTok, but

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:19.399
<v Speaker 14>we've had a lot of examples of propaganda and data security,

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 14>privacy and more.

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:23.879
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Forden the latest from DC.

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 3>We so appreciate it on those legal arguments, But that

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.760
<v Speaker 3>does it for this particular edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Do not forget to check out the podcast. You'll find

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 2>it on the

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify, Aniheart, this

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg