WEBVTT - Betting on Kamala Harris (with special guest Matt Glassman)

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:26.164
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:26.204 --> 0:00:30.284
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Nate Silver. Marie is out today, but

0:00:30.364 --> 0:00:35.084
<v Speaker 1>my friend and fellow politics slash poker slash degenerate enthusiast

0:00:35.124 --> 0:00:37.924
<v Speaker 1>Matt Glasman is here to talk about Joe Biden dropping

0:00:37.924 --> 0:00:41.324
<v Speaker 1>out and Kamala Harris stepping in. How are you, Matt, come,

0:00:41.444 --> 0:00:41.964
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great.

0:00:41.964 --> 0:00:44.004
<v Speaker 2>I'm so happy to be here. This is sort of

0:00:44.004 --> 0:00:47.044
<v Speaker 2>the Wheelhouse podcast for me, and hopefully I'll be able

0:00:47.084 --> 0:00:48.524
<v Speaker 2>to contribute in a meaningful way.

0:00:48.764 --> 0:00:50.564
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Matt is a friend of the pod and a

0:00:50.644 --> 0:00:53.844
<v Speaker 1>senior fellow at the Government Affairs Institute at Georgetown University.

0:00:54.324 --> 0:00:56.604
<v Speaker 1>He's been on and around the Hill for a decade,

0:00:57.124 --> 0:00:59.204
<v Speaker 1>getting up close and personal with the inner workings of

0:00:59.244 --> 0:01:01.964
<v Speaker 1>the legislature for the Congressional Research Service and the House

0:01:02.004 --> 0:01:05.884
<v Speaker 1>Appropriations Committee. Basically, he knows his stuff and I'm excited

0:01:05.884 --> 0:01:08.284
<v Speaker 1>to have him on. So anything I missed any other

0:01:08.764 --> 0:01:09.404
<v Speaker 1>key context?

0:01:10.004 --> 0:01:12.084
<v Speaker 2>No, I love talking politics, I love talking poker, and

0:01:12.124 --> 0:01:13.804
<v Speaker 2>here we are at the perfect intersection of the two.

0:01:13.924 --> 0:01:14.564
<v Speaker 2>Let's get into it.

0:01:21.244 --> 0:01:24.164
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to kind of go when chronological order here. First,

0:01:24.164 --> 0:01:26.644
<v Speaker 1>talk about what it took for Joe Biden to make

0:01:26.684 --> 0:01:30.204
<v Speaker 1>his decision, then why the party consolidated around Kamala Harris

0:01:30.204 --> 0:01:33.124
<v Speaker 1>so quickly, and then look forward to what Kamala Harris's chances,

0:01:33.284 --> 0:01:36.244
<v Speaker 1>advantages and my abilities might be in the general election

0:01:36.284 --> 0:01:39.244
<v Speaker 1>against Donald Trump. Matt, Where were you when you when

0:01:39.324 --> 0:01:40.924
<v Speaker 1>you first heard the news on Sunday?

0:01:41.604 --> 0:01:44.564
<v Speaker 2>I was stuck in traffic on the New Jersey Turnpike

0:01:44.684 --> 0:01:47.684
<v Speaker 2>down between Exit two and three, heading south on ninety five.

0:01:47.764 --> 0:01:49.964
<v Speaker 2>It was one of those moments where like I knew

0:01:50.004 --> 0:01:52.324
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna remember where I was forever in this spot,

0:01:52.684 --> 0:01:55.124
<v Speaker 2>and here I am stuck in traffic in New Jersey.

0:01:55.204 --> 0:01:57.244
<v Speaker 2>Just came across like the radio and now I'm just

0:01:57.284 --> 0:02:00.324
<v Speaker 2>like stewing in the traffic with time to think. Unbelievable.

0:02:00.324 --> 0:02:02.964
<v Speaker 1>Where were you? Yeah, we were in upstate New York

0:02:03.004 --> 0:02:05.564
<v Speaker 1>and Hudson, New York, kind of gradually driving back to

0:02:06.084 --> 0:02:09.204
<v Speaker 1>the city. I thought we had a nice relaxing day,

0:02:10.404 --> 0:02:12.524
<v Speaker 1>stop for some lunch and go to all the you

0:02:12.524 --> 0:02:14.844
<v Speaker 1>know whatever fruit freu antique stuff up there and things

0:02:14.884 --> 0:02:17.204
<v Speaker 1>like that. I meanwhile, I was trying to run the

0:02:17.204 --> 0:02:19.204
<v Speaker 1>model run for the day. We update the model almost

0:02:19.204 --> 0:02:23.124
<v Speaker 1>every day, even weekends, And I text Eli my fabulous

0:02:23.844 --> 0:02:28.044
<v Speaker 1>assistant elections analyst the newsletter and I'm like, okay, here,

0:02:28.084 --> 0:02:30.324
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are ready for you. He produces the graphics

0:02:30.364 --> 0:02:33.044
<v Speaker 1>and he texts back just Joe Biden's tweet. It was

0:02:33.124 --> 0:02:34.684
<v Speaker 1>kind of hard to decipher at first. It was a

0:02:34.764 --> 0:02:37.724
<v Speaker 1>very long tweet, right, It didn't say I'm dropping out.

0:02:37.724 --> 0:02:39.364
<v Speaker 1>You have to like read a like the fourth paragraph.

0:02:39.444 --> 0:02:41.924
<v Speaker 1>And I went to poly market and it's like Biden's

0:02:41.964 --> 0:02:45.044
<v Speaker 1>dropping out ninety eight percent or whatever. But yeah, I

0:02:45.084 --> 0:02:47.884
<v Speaker 1>mean it's never like it's never like, you know, usually

0:02:47.964 --> 0:02:51.604
<v Speaker 1>made a poker tournament with something like this happens. But yeah, yeah,

0:02:51.604 --> 0:02:53.084
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of stuck up there with not very

0:02:53.164 --> 0:02:54.084
<v Speaker 1>much Wi Fi signal.

0:02:54.364 --> 0:02:56.724
<v Speaker 2>I was in a World Series event during the debate,

0:02:57.204 --> 0:02:59.244
<v Speaker 2>and so I was sitting in one of those rooms

0:02:59.244 --> 0:03:01.164
<v Speaker 2>at the Horseshoe and no one is watching the bait.

0:03:01.204 --> 0:03:02.724
<v Speaker 2>It's not in the TV anywhere, and all I'm getting

0:03:02.724 --> 0:03:05.604
<v Speaker 2>these furious texts like, oh my god, this can't be happening.

0:03:05.604 --> 0:03:08.124
<v Speaker 2>What is happening? What is happening? And yeah, there's sort

0:03:08.124 --> 0:03:09.924
<v Speaker 2>of like a helpless feeling to it. Right, We're just

0:03:09.924 --> 0:03:11.644
<v Speaker 2>stuck in traffick in New Jersey and all I want

0:03:11.684 --> 0:03:14.124
<v Speaker 2>to do is like ask people things and tell people things,

0:03:14.204 --> 0:03:16.244
<v Speaker 2>and know here I am staring at the Delam World

0:03:16.244 --> 0:03:17.084
<v Speaker 2>Bridge for half an hour.

0:03:17.284 --> 0:03:20.604
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a bunch of moments, right. It's the assassination

0:03:20.804 --> 0:03:24.764
<v Speaker 1>attempt against Trump, which the winds playing a different direction

0:03:24.804 --> 0:03:26.684
<v Speaker 1>and we're in a very different world. Right. It's the

0:03:26.884 --> 0:03:28.924
<v Speaker 1>it's the debate. It's the fact that it was only

0:03:28.964 --> 0:03:30.684
<v Speaker 1>a month ago or something that Trump was convicted I

0:03:30.724 --> 0:03:32.964
<v Speaker 1>guess more than a month ago, now, like six weeks ago,

0:03:32.964 --> 0:03:35.564
<v Speaker 1>seven weeks ago he was convicted on various felony counts.

0:03:36.404 --> 0:03:39.364
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that, like there's been this consolidation around

0:03:39.444 --> 0:03:43.924
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris, we may soon have the first, uh first

0:03:43.964 --> 0:03:48.404
<v Speaker 1>woman of color, everybody nominated by a major presidential ticket. Yeah,

0:03:48.404 --> 0:03:50.084
<v Speaker 1>they packed a lot. They packed a lot in here,

0:03:50.124 --> 0:03:53.684
<v Speaker 1>I think. But but putting on more of a political

0:03:53.724 --> 0:03:59.684
<v Speaker 1>science government institutional observer hat, if you were making bets

0:03:59.684 --> 0:04:04.204
<v Speaker 1>on prediction markets and we would have bought dropout stock, Matt,

0:04:04.204 --> 0:04:06.524
<v Speaker 1>can you tell me more of the thinking behind that

0:04:06.684 --> 0:04:09.324
<v Speaker 1>and kind of what this says about political parties, or

0:04:09.404 --> 0:04:10.564
<v Speaker 1>at least the Democratic Party.

0:04:11.044 --> 0:04:13.164
<v Speaker 2>Sure, I mean, I think the main thing to take

0:04:13.204 --> 0:04:17.124
<v Speaker 2>away from this is that you know, parties matter, and

0:04:17.164 --> 0:04:20.564
<v Speaker 2>that individual candidates for office, be it the president United States,

0:04:20.604 --> 0:04:23.604
<v Speaker 2>a member of Congress, someone running for the PTA, aren't

0:04:23.644 --> 0:04:26.044
<v Speaker 2>just sort of these individuals up there with authority. They

0:04:26.084 --> 0:04:29.124
<v Speaker 2>have these coalitions underneath them. And you exist because you

0:04:29.124 --> 0:04:32.164
<v Speaker 2>have a coalition of voters and interest groups and money

0:04:32.164 --> 0:04:34.604
<v Speaker 2>people and other politicians who support you. And if they

0:04:34.644 --> 0:04:38.084
<v Speaker 2>withdraw their support, right, it really collapses on you, almost

0:04:38.124 --> 0:04:40.284
<v Speaker 2>like a sand castle underneath you. And this was sort

0:04:40.284 --> 0:04:43.524
<v Speaker 2>of an open question because presidents have become so powerful

0:04:43.764 --> 0:04:46.004
<v Speaker 2>and when we think about them in terms of parties,

0:04:46.044 --> 0:04:47.884
<v Speaker 2>often we think the president controls the party.

0:04:48.084 --> 0:04:48.244
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:04:48.244 --> 0:04:50.044
<v Speaker 2>In the nineteenth century, we knew that wasn't true. The

0:04:50.044 --> 0:04:51.884
<v Speaker 2>party was dominant. In the twentieth century it was sort

0:04:51.884 --> 0:04:54.444
<v Speaker 2>of a battle between parties and presidents. But now we think, well,

0:04:54.484 --> 0:04:58.924
<v Speaker 2>the president controls the party and he reshapes the party, right.

0:04:58.964 --> 0:05:00.684
<v Speaker 2>You see this with Clinton or with Trump, like the

0:05:00.684 --> 0:05:03.004
<v Speaker 2>party just reshapes under them. They pick the DNC heads,

0:05:03.124 --> 0:05:05.084
<v Speaker 2>they pick all the sort of the people. But when

0:05:05.084 --> 0:05:07.684
<v Speaker 2>push comes to shove, it turns out parties are still

0:05:07.724 --> 0:05:10.484
<v Speaker 2>important actor And you could see as soon as elite

0:05:10.564 --> 0:05:13.924
<v Speaker 2>actors and the populace start to withdraw their support of Biden.

0:05:14.084 --> 0:05:15.124
<v Speaker 2>It just collapsed on them.

0:05:15.364 --> 0:05:18.564
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and Joe Biden in particular is a politician who

0:05:18.964 --> 0:05:21.724
<v Speaker 1>was dependent on the support of his party. Right, I mean,

0:05:21.724 --> 0:05:25.124
<v Speaker 1>look at think about twenty twenty was not quite like

0:05:25.484 --> 0:05:28.884
<v Speaker 1>Biden dropping out moment. But you kind of have like

0:05:28.924 --> 0:05:32.164
<v Speaker 1>the super friends get together and they flew, am I

0:05:32.204 --> 0:05:33.924
<v Speaker 1>getting this remember in this right, Like Pete Buha, Jude

0:05:33.964 --> 0:05:36.564
<v Speaker 1>and Amy Klomachar like all flew to like the same

0:05:36.644 --> 0:05:40.684
<v Speaker 1>rally to like endorse Biden after Jim Clyburn had endorsed

0:05:40.764 --> 0:05:44.284
<v Speaker 1>him in South Carolina. So this is two elections in

0:05:44.324 --> 0:05:48.564
<v Speaker 1>a row where the Democratic Party made a really strong move.

0:05:48.724 --> 0:05:50.964
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I mean because if you read the reporting,

0:05:53.044 --> 0:05:55.044
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi say we can do this the easy way

0:05:55.124 --> 0:06:00.124
<v Speaker 1>or do it the hard way. And apparently people in

0:06:00.164 --> 0:06:02.964
<v Speaker 1>his inner circle were at least willing to level with

0:06:03.084 --> 0:06:08.164
<v Speaker 1>him about about the polling being very bad about I mean,

0:06:08.204 --> 0:06:10.924
<v Speaker 1>apparently they hadn't actually done very much pulling in the

0:06:10.964 --> 0:06:12.884
<v Speaker 1>past couple of months. It's the fact that Biden hadn't

0:06:12.884 --> 0:06:14.684
<v Speaker 1>been polling the White House, had not been pulling the

0:06:14.684 --> 0:06:18.284
<v Speaker 1>swing States was probably a bad sign. But something got

0:06:18.284 --> 0:06:20.044
<v Speaker 1>through to him. But play it out what had happened.

0:06:20.284 --> 0:06:22.124
<v Speaker 1>What would the next week, Matt, do you think have

0:06:22.204 --> 0:06:25.084
<v Speaker 1>looked like if Biden remained obstinate and said I don't

0:06:25.084 --> 0:06:25.444
<v Speaker 1>want to go.

0:06:26.044 --> 0:06:28.324
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think they're playing this game of

0:06:28.404 --> 0:06:32.284
<v Speaker 2>chicken where it's quite obvious that the party actors want

0:06:32.364 --> 0:06:34.684
<v Speaker 2>him go on, and it's quite obvious that he is

0:06:34.724 --> 0:06:37.804
<v Speaker 2>resistant to that idea, and lurking in the background is

0:06:37.844 --> 0:06:39.884
<v Speaker 2>the idea of like, are you willing to sort of

0:06:39.884 --> 0:06:42.724
<v Speaker 2>wreck the party to get your way here? And that

0:06:42.764 --> 0:06:44.604
<v Speaker 2>made it precare us for everyone, because I think no

0:06:44.684 --> 0:06:48.004
<v Speaker 2>one sort of thought of this as a situation where

0:06:48.044 --> 0:06:50.244
<v Speaker 2>you could credibly commit to sort of the game of

0:06:50.324 --> 0:06:52.284
<v Speaker 2>chicken like we would in game theory, right, Whether the

0:06:52.404 --> 0:06:54.004
<v Speaker 2>key to the game of chicken, if two cars are

0:06:54.004 --> 0:06:56.324
<v Speaker 2>sort of heading at each other, is to just credibly

0:06:56.324 --> 0:06:58.364
<v Speaker 2>commit that you're not going to swerve, throw the steering

0:06:58.404 --> 0:07:00.604
<v Speaker 2>ro out the window, improve you can't swerve to make

0:07:00.644 --> 0:07:03.404
<v Speaker 2>their payoffs have to be better to swerve than to

0:07:03.484 --> 0:07:05.804
<v Speaker 2>keep going, and hope you swerve. You can't anymore. Now,

0:07:05.804 --> 0:07:06.964
<v Speaker 2>I think what was going to happen in the next

0:07:07.004 --> 0:07:08.484
<v Speaker 2>week was they're going to ramp up the game of

0:07:08.564 --> 0:07:10.924
<v Speaker 2>chicken to the point where maybe it was going to

0:07:11.004 --> 0:07:13.044
<v Speaker 2>hurt his chances of winning the presidency if he did

0:07:13.044 --> 0:07:15.404
<v Speaker 2>hold on. Essentially, they were going to sort of credibly

0:07:15.404 --> 0:07:17.364
<v Speaker 2>commit it to say, look, you can be the nominee

0:07:17.364 --> 0:07:19.124
<v Speaker 2>if you don't want to deal with us, but you're

0:07:19.124 --> 0:07:20.764
<v Speaker 2>going to lose the election. And that's sort of like

0:07:20.804 --> 0:07:23.804
<v Speaker 2>the extreme version, but it was headed that direction. Everyone

0:07:23.844 --> 0:07:25.724
<v Speaker 2>was circling around him, and I think the writing's on

0:07:25.764 --> 0:07:28.124
<v Speaker 2>the wall and sort of, you know, Biden then takes

0:07:28.164 --> 0:07:30.924
<v Speaker 2>the sort of obvious way out right, which is do

0:07:31.004 --> 0:07:33.084
<v Speaker 2>the quote unquote right thing for the party, which is

0:07:33.124 --> 0:07:34.804
<v Speaker 2>what it's ended up going to be presented as, like

0:07:34.844 --> 0:07:36.644
<v Speaker 2>the party is not stupid, Like the message's going to

0:07:36.644 --> 0:07:39.604
<v Speaker 2>be here, a huge celebration of Biden passing the torch, doesn't.

0:07:40.564 --> 0:07:42.324
<v Speaker 2>I can't imagine what this convention is going to look like, right,

0:07:42.324 --> 0:07:44.964
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna's a huge celebration of Biden's career and his

0:07:45.124 --> 0:07:47.484
<v Speaker 2>presidency and always accomplished. And then they're going to hand

0:07:47.484 --> 0:07:49.684
<v Speaker 2>it over to Harris and it's all going to look like, well,

0:07:49.684 --> 0:07:51.524
<v Speaker 2>Biden did this noble thing, which I don't buy for

0:07:51.564 --> 0:07:53.804
<v Speaker 2>a second. They shoved him out, and this is why

0:07:53.844 --> 0:07:56.244
<v Speaker 2>parties pass those things up. I mean, one thing I

0:07:56.244 --> 0:07:59.524
<v Speaker 2>wanted to go back to is this this idea of

0:07:59.524 --> 0:08:02.164
<v Speaker 2>how parties think people started to get worried about their

0:08:02.164 --> 0:08:05.564
<v Speaker 2>own re elections, and and that's an important piece of parties.

0:08:05.564 --> 0:08:07.924
<v Speaker 2>Their group decisions and the people in the parties have

0:08:08.004 --> 0:08:09.884
<v Speaker 2>all different goals and they don't even have to have

0:08:09.964 --> 0:08:12.204
<v Speaker 2>the same goal to arrive at the same conclusion. Like

0:08:12.244 --> 0:08:14.044
<v Speaker 2>a lot of House members and swing districts might have

0:08:14.084 --> 0:08:16.084
<v Speaker 2>start worried about their own reelection. As you point out,

0:08:16.284 --> 0:08:18.524
<v Speaker 2>party leaders or members of the House might start worried

0:08:18.524 --> 0:08:20.724
<v Speaker 2>about control of the chamber right and might be like, well,

0:08:20.764 --> 0:08:22.404
<v Speaker 2>we can lose with anyone, but let's not go down

0:08:22.444 --> 0:08:25.124
<v Speaker 2>and flames here. Let's hold onto the House. Other people

0:08:25.164 --> 0:08:27.644
<v Speaker 2>might have been concerned about policies. They might decided, well,

0:08:27.884 --> 0:08:30.324
<v Speaker 2>Biden's old and honestly Harris will be better on this issue,

0:08:30.364 --> 0:08:31.604
<v Speaker 2>or that it should have been an agenda that's more

0:08:31.644 --> 0:08:34.684
<v Speaker 2>comftabed with me. And you know, others might think Harris

0:08:34.724 --> 0:08:36.364
<v Speaker 2>just actually has a better chance, and they're worried about

0:08:36.364 --> 0:08:39.964
<v Speaker 2>controlling the presidency, and all these things come together and

0:08:40.284 --> 0:08:43.684
<v Speaker 2>ultimately like it congeals into a decision, but it's not

0:08:43.724 --> 0:08:46.564
<v Speaker 2>like everyone made this decision for the same reason within

0:08:46.564 --> 0:08:49.204
<v Speaker 2>the party. The party output spits out in some way

0:08:49.244 --> 0:08:51.164
<v Speaker 2>that you hope is rational, But it's a collection of

0:08:51.164 --> 0:08:53.564
<v Speaker 2>individuals who all thinking differently, And this isn't like a

0:08:53.604 --> 0:08:55.444
<v Speaker 2>surprise anyone, Like if you've ever been at a PTA

0:08:55.564 --> 0:08:57.444
<v Speaker 2>meeting or an HOA meeting, or just decide where to

0:08:57.444 --> 0:08:59.764
<v Speaker 2>go to dinner with your family, Like, group decisions are

0:08:59.764 --> 0:09:03.764
<v Speaker 2>not sort of like necessarily meta rational, but each individual

0:09:03.844 --> 0:09:06.044
<v Speaker 2>might be acting rational to create sort of the endpoint.

0:09:06.124 --> 0:09:08.604
<v Speaker 1>I mean, apparently, according to reporting like this was a

0:09:08.644 --> 0:09:12.564
<v Speaker 1>relatively recent decision. By the way, we have not actually

0:09:12.724 --> 0:09:14.324
<v Speaker 1>heard from Maybe by the time you listen to this

0:09:14.364 --> 0:09:17.324
<v Speaker 1>you will have right. We haven't heard from Biden directly

0:09:17.404 --> 0:09:21.204
<v Speaker 1>beyond these initial statements on Twitter and other social media networks,

0:09:21.204 --> 0:09:25.444
<v Speaker 1>which is a little bit strange, I suppose. But as

0:09:25.484 --> 0:09:28.004
<v Speaker 1>someone who has spent more time in and around the

0:09:28.004 --> 0:09:31.084
<v Speaker 1>halls of power and more time in DC and mesanity

0:09:31.124 --> 0:09:34.644
<v Speaker 1>than I have, what do you think the inner circle

0:09:34.684 --> 0:09:37.124
<v Speaker 1>of the White House was thinking? I mean, there's been

0:09:37.124 --> 0:09:40.684
<v Speaker 1>reporting that the Biden campaign was in some form of

0:09:40.724 --> 0:09:44.804
<v Speaker 1>denial about what the polls said. Do you think they

0:09:46.324 --> 0:09:48.644
<v Speaker 1>knew deep down that this wasn't working. Do you think

0:09:48.724 --> 0:09:50.484
<v Speaker 1>they were drinking the kool aid? Do you think they

0:09:50.484 --> 0:09:53.484
<v Speaker 1>felt like they had like a professional obligation to play

0:09:53.524 --> 0:09:56.364
<v Speaker 1>out the string for Biden or what I mean?

0:09:56.404 --> 0:10:00.444
<v Speaker 2>I think that it's very easy when you're a campaign

0:10:00.444 --> 0:10:03.964
<v Speaker 2>staffer or a staffer to an elected official, to talk

0:10:04.004 --> 0:10:07.244
<v Speaker 2>yourself into the reasons why they're indispensable. One thing is

0:10:07.284 --> 0:10:09.284
<v Speaker 2>that the incentives of the staffers are a little different

0:10:09.444 --> 0:10:13.004
<v Speaker 2>and the incentives of the principles in these spots. If

0:10:13.684 --> 0:10:16.484
<v Speaker 2>you know, if a staffer gives up on Biden and

0:10:16.524 --> 0:10:18.844
<v Speaker 2>says it's time to throw in the towel, they're probably

0:10:18.884 --> 0:10:21.924
<v Speaker 2>out of a job on the campaign, especially at the

0:10:21.964 --> 0:10:24.124
<v Speaker 2>top senior levels. They're probably out of our future job

0:10:24.124 --> 0:10:26.324
<v Speaker 2>in a different administration in the White House. And it

0:10:26.364 --> 0:10:28.324
<v Speaker 2>doesn't surprise me at all that the people close to

0:10:28.364 --> 0:10:30.004
<v Speaker 2>the Biden would be the people most resistant to this.

0:10:30.044 --> 0:10:32.364
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's almost just human nature, right. This is

0:10:32.404 --> 0:10:34.764
<v Speaker 2>their guy, and of course he's going to beat Trump.

0:10:34.804 --> 0:10:36.804
<v Speaker 2>He's beat Trump in the past, and like this isn't

0:10:36.804 --> 0:10:39.884
<v Speaker 2>just talking points, Like you can actually believe this. And

0:10:40.004 --> 0:10:42.964
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it like was lost on them that

0:10:43.284 --> 0:10:45.804
<v Speaker 2>they probably don't think much or as much as other

0:10:45.804 --> 0:10:47.884
<v Speaker 2>people do, of sort of like Harris's chances.

0:10:48.004 --> 0:10:50.724
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're gonna talk about Harris in a second,

0:10:50.724 --> 0:10:53.364
<v Speaker 1>including the complex dynamics of like why the White House

0:10:53.364 --> 0:10:56.604
<v Speaker 1>seemed to lack confidence in her. Maybe let me ask

0:10:57.324 --> 0:11:01.604
<v Speaker 1>one more question, though, Is this evidence that Democrats are

0:11:01.604 --> 0:11:06.324
<v Speaker 1>more rational than Republicans or is that not a fair conclusion.

0:11:06.964 --> 0:11:09.404
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's. I mean, it's certainly evident.

0:11:09.964 --> 0:11:13.124
<v Speaker 2>It's one piece of evidence that way. And I do

0:11:13.164 --> 0:11:16.524
<v Speaker 2>think sort of Trump and sort of populous like Trump

0:11:16.724 --> 0:11:19.364
<v Speaker 2>tend to produce these cults of personality. I'm proud of

0:11:19.364 --> 0:11:21.164
<v Speaker 2>them party for doing this right. This is not an

0:11:21.204 --> 0:11:23.764
<v Speaker 2>easy thing for a party to do. And if you've

0:11:23.804 --> 0:11:25.204
<v Speaker 2>ever been in a room trying to make a decision

0:11:25.204 --> 0:11:26.884
<v Speaker 2>with ten people, you can imagine how hard it is

0:11:26.924 --> 0:11:30.124
<v Speaker 2>to turn around in that decision. And so I think

0:11:30.124 --> 0:11:33.484
<v Speaker 2>they did really well here for themselves. I don't think

0:11:33.524 --> 0:11:36.284
<v Speaker 2>it says anything about them relatively Republicans, except in this

0:11:36.364 --> 0:11:38.644
<v Speaker 2>current instance. It's hard to picture Trump being pushed out

0:11:38.644 --> 0:11:42.404
<v Speaker 2>this way, but again that's Trump's a different type of leader,

0:11:42.444 --> 0:11:45.004
<v Speaker 2>a different person. If the Republicans were faced with, you know,

0:11:45.164 --> 0:11:47.644
<v Speaker 2>sort of our mirror image of Biden. I can imagine

0:11:47.644 --> 0:11:48.444
<v Speaker 2>them doing the same thing.

0:11:53.444 --> 0:11:55.284
<v Speaker 1>We're going to take a quick break. When we return,

0:11:55.404 --> 0:12:10.404
<v Speaker 1>Matt and I will talk about Kamala Harris. So, Matt,

0:12:11.124 --> 0:12:15.284
<v Speaker 1>if you go to Polymarket or other betting markets, Kamala

0:12:15.324 --> 0:12:17.924
<v Speaker 1>Harra says about an eighty three percent chance when I

0:12:17.924 --> 0:12:22.564
<v Speaker 1>looked fifteen minutes ago to be the Democratic nominee for president.

0:12:23.724 --> 0:12:26.604
<v Speaker 1>Is eighty three percent too high or too low?

0:12:27.444 --> 0:12:30.524
<v Speaker 2>I'm buying at eighty three. I think, I really think

0:12:30.604 --> 0:12:33.244
<v Speaker 2>she's at the point where what you're talking about is

0:12:33.244 --> 0:12:35.884
<v Speaker 2>sort of the three to five to seven percent whatever

0:12:35.924 --> 0:12:38.644
<v Speaker 2>it is of sort of like black swan event keeping

0:12:38.644 --> 0:12:40.884
<v Speaker 2>her from the nomination. That could be some undisclosed piece

0:12:40.924 --> 0:12:43.844
<v Speaker 2>of information, or she could be sick, knock on wood

0:12:43.964 --> 0:12:47.044
<v Speaker 2>or whatever and something go wrong. But I think she's

0:12:47.164 --> 0:12:50.044
<v Speaker 2>virtually a lock at this point. The way the Democrats

0:12:50.084 --> 0:12:55.044
<v Speaker 2>have consolidated around her is remarkable. Everybody just flew out

0:12:55.084 --> 0:12:57.524
<v Speaker 2>from across the spectrum. You had the CBC, you had

0:12:57.604 --> 0:13:00.724
<v Speaker 2>various House and Senate members, you had her opponents, and

0:13:01.604 --> 0:13:03.644
<v Speaker 2>basically what they did was they said, you know, this

0:13:03.724 --> 0:13:05.764
<v Speaker 2>is a done deal. What those endorsements mean. Starting with

0:13:05.804 --> 0:13:09.364
<v Speaker 2>the President and then it keeps any sort of potential challenge.

0:13:09.684 --> 0:13:12.044
<v Speaker 2>And now I see every possible challenger to her has

0:13:12.084 --> 0:13:15.044
<v Speaker 2>basically endorsed her, So the field has been cleared.

0:13:15.244 --> 0:13:17.684
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, do you think this just like guaranteed to happen

0:13:17.684 --> 0:13:19.364
<v Speaker 1>and we're just discovering that now, or do you think

0:13:19.364 --> 0:13:23.764
<v Speaker 1>it's a situation where like it's kind of an unstable equilibrium.

0:13:23.964 --> 0:13:27.564
<v Speaker 1>Once the herd starts to move one way, then the

0:13:27.604 --> 0:13:30.484
<v Speaker 1>outcome becomes inevitable. Therefore you want to jump on the bandwagon.

0:13:30.524 --> 0:13:34.444
<v Speaker 1>How many metaphors am I mixing here? But like, do

0:13:34.484 --> 0:13:36.524
<v Speaker 1>you think there's a world in which this doesn't happen

0:13:36.644 --> 0:13:38.644
<v Speaker 1>that's adjacent to the actual world that we live in?

0:13:40.404 --> 0:13:44.484
<v Speaker 2>Only if sort of she thought that her stepping aside

0:13:44.484 --> 0:13:47.284
<v Speaker 2>would help the party too in some sort of altruistic way.

0:13:47.524 --> 0:13:50.484
<v Speaker 2>I think the issue here is that the big danger

0:13:50.524 --> 0:13:52.444
<v Speaker 2>for the party in Biden stepping aside was that they

0:13:52.484 --> 0:13:54.444
<v Speaker 2>weren't gonna be able to put the coalition back together,

0:13:54.684 --> 0:13:57.404
<v Speaker 2>like the big Coalition was going to crack, and that

0:13:57.484 --> 0:13:59.084
<v Speaker 2>it was never gonna be able to clean up by anyone,

0:13:59.124 --> 0:14:01.404
<v Speaker 2>And you're gonna have people who were bitter and vindictive

0:14:01.444 --> 0:14:05.004
<v Speaker 2>about what happened and looks like they've minimized that. But

0:14:05.564 --> 0:14:08.484
<v Speaker 2>passing over her would have been the most obvious way

0:14:08.524 --> 0:14:10.564
<v Speaker 2>to create that sity situation where you're not gonna be

0:14:10.564 --> 0:14:13.564
<v Speaker 2>able to put the coalition back together for any number

0:14:13.564 --> 0:14:15.884
<v Speaker 2>of reasons. Her and her people directly sort of the

0:14:15.884 --> 0:14:18.924
<v Speaker 2>people who support her interests, sort of a script of

0:14:18.924 --> 0:14:21.684
<v Speaker 2>representation groups if you anger sort of African Americans and

0:14:21.764 --> 0:14:24.284
<v Speaker 2>you skip over her for you know, Whitmer or whatever.

0:14:24.804 --> 0:14:26.924
<v Speaker 2>And so I think this was the most obvious way

0:14:26.964 --> 0:14:30.884
<v Speaker 2>to go it least party tension and best chance to

0:14:30.924 --> 0:14:33.084
<v Speaker 2>make sure the coalition comes back together, which there is

0:14:33.084 --> 0:14:35.724
<v Speaker 2>no guarantee anyway, Like there's still that one group that

0:14:35.764 --> 0:14:38.124
<v Speaker 2>you worry about, which is sort of like the hardcore

0:14:38.204 --> 0:14:40.924
<v Speaker 2>inner circle. Biden Knight's not playing nice and I don't

0:14:40.924 --> 0:14:43.364
<v Speaker 2>think that's gonna happen, but they're still sort of out there.

0:14:44.124 --> 0:14:46.524
<v Speaker 2>The advance for Harris in terms of information reveal over

0:14:46.564 --> 0:14:48.604
<v Speaker 2>any other candidate is also there. She's been vetted in

0:14:48.644 --> 0:14:52.084
<v Speaker 2>a national election before, which is not nothing. If we

0:14:52.124 --> 0:14:54.724
<v Speaker 2>had gone with Whitmer, like great year governor of state,

0:14:54.924 --> 0:14:57.444
<v Speaker 2>We've seen plenty of governors of states have stuff revealed

0:14:57.444 --> 0:15:01.124
<v Speaker 2>about them in national elections and national primaries that cause

0:15:01.204 --> 0:15:03.404
<v Speaker 2>problems from a vetting point of view, and so she's

0:15:03.684 --> 0:15:06.764
<v Speaker 2>a safe candidate in that sense. But the most important

0:15:06.764 --> 0:15:08.404
<v Speaker 2>thing is that she's the vice president of United States.

0:15:08.484 --> 0:15:10.764
<v Speaker 2>She's the obvious there parent. Biden picked her to be

0:15:10.804 --> 0:15:13.204
<v Speaker 2>second in command, and now you're stepping aside. You better

0:15:13.204 --> 0:15:14.924
<v Speaker 2>come up with a damn good reason to pass over

0:15:14.964 --> 0:15:16.484
<v Speaker 2>her if you want to keep party harmony.

0:15:17.004 --> 0:15:18.804
<v Speaker 1>And probably the way it could have been done would

0:15:18.844 --> 0:15:20.804
<v Speaker 1>be to have this kind of mini primary where you

0:15:20.804 --> 0:15:25.844
<v Speaker 1>have somehow public forums voter participation like that might have

0:15:25.884 --> 0:15:27.644
<v Speaker 1>been tenable, But it also seemed like not very many

0:15:27.684 --> 0:15:30.284
<v Speaker 1>of the people were that interested in the job because

0:15:30.364 --> 0:15:33.884
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden has been wobbling for how w was debate

0:15:33.924 --> 0:15:37.244
<v Speaker 1>almost a month ago now right. If you were Gavin

0:15:37.324 --> 0:15:41.884
<v Speaker 1>Newsome and you were really interested in the nomination, I mean,

0:15:41.924 --> 0:15:45.204
<v Speaker 1>you would probably have floated something sooner or like tried

0:15:45.244 --> 0:15:47.044
<v Speaker 1>to start some momentum running and there was like no

0:15:47.084 --> 0:15:50.204
<v Speaker 1>other obvious alternative. But like, but look, let me ask

0:15:50.244 --> 0:15:56.004
<v Speaker 1>you this, based on reporting, the White House itself is

0:15:56.044 --> 0:16:01.364
<v Speaker 1>not that confident about Kamala Harris's chances against Trump. She

0:16:01.804 --> 0:16:05.804
<v Speaker 1>is down in the polls currently against Trump. That might change.

0:16:05.844 --> 0:16:07.964
<v Speaker 1>Poles sometimes change when you go from being a hypothetical

0:16:08.004 --> 0:16:10.724
<v Speaker 1>to an actual candidate. But but for the time being,

0:16:10.724 --> 0:16:14.364
<v Speaker 1>her polling looks maybe a point better than Biden's. But

0:16:14.404 --> 0:16:17.484
<v Speaker 1>Biden's polling was pretty bad, so that's not saying very much.

0:16:19.004 --> 0:16:21.084
<v Speaker 1>Why would a can who we've just been were a

0:16:21.084 --> 0:16:25.004
<v Speaker 1>party rather who we've just been praising for being hyper rational?

0:16:26.644 --> 0:16:31.324
<v Speaker 1>Why would they worry about not wanting to offend X

0:16:31.404 --> 0:16:34.524
<v Speaker 1>or Y in group or outgroup if they can increase

0:16:34.564 --> 0:16:37.964
<v Speaker 1>their chances of beating Trump from say thirty five percent,

0:16:38.004 --> 0:16:40.244
<v Speaker 1>which is roughly what prediction markets assumed about hair As

0:16:40.324 --> 0:16:43.644
<v Speaker 1>to like fifty or fifty five percent with the hypothetical

0:16:43.724 --> 0:16:47.604
<v Speaker 1>perfect you know, Gretchen Whitmer, I don't know who else

0:16:47.644 --> 0:16:48.804
<v Speaker 1>ticket I've.

0:16:48.684 --> 0:16:50.764
<v Speaker 2>Put Whitmer and Shapiro on a ticket and just be like, well,

0:16:50.804 --> 0:16:53.524
<v Speaker 2>now we're coming after Michigan and Pennsylvania, that kind of thing.

0:16:53.924 --> 0:16:54.324
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:16:54.644 --> 0:16:57.924
<v Speaker 2>I think that the parties are probably a little too

0:16:58.004 --> 0:17:01.164
<v Speaker 2>risk averse in situations like this, but the fear of

0:17:01.404 --> 0:17:05.804
<v Speaker 2>party crack up always looms over any sort of coalition,

0:17:06.884 --> 0:17:10.084
<v Speaker 2>and I think they thought that, you know, if we're

0:17:10.124 --> 0:17:13.084
<v Speaker 2>pushing Biden out because he's too old and he can't

0:17:13.084 --> 0:17:16.364
<v Speaker 2>do this anymore. Then we're not saying he ran a

0:17:16.364 --> 0:17:18.604
<v Speaker 2>bad administration. We're not saying there's any wrong with the administration.

0:17:18.644 --> 0:17:20.804
<v Speaker 2>There's not anything wrong with his record. And so what

0:17:20.924 --> 0:17:24.684
<v Speaker 2>is your reasoning for going around Harris except that you're saying, oh, well,

0:17:24.724 --> 0:17:28.324
<v Speaker 2>other people pull better. Maybe maybe they do. But again,

0:17:28.364 --> 0:17:30.764
<v Speaker 2>I think the party crack up aspect of this looms

0:17:30.764 --> 0:17:33.004
<v Speaker 2>so large, and I think the only way to get

0:17:33.044 --> 0:17:35.684
<v Speaker 2>around Harris was to have that open competition. And I

0:17:35.684 --> 0:17:38.444
<v Speaker 2>don't think the party wanted an open competition. I don't

0:17:38.484 --> 0:17:41.484
<v Speaker 2>think parties ever want that situation, right, because that is

0:17:41.484 --> 0:17:44.684
<v Speaker 2>what creates sort of bad blood. And what happens if

0:17:44.684 --> 0:17:46.644
<v Speaker 2>you end up in a situation where an open competition

0:17:46.964 --> 0:17:49.444
<v Speaker 2>and you have a narrow victory, right, where does that

0:17:49.524 --> 0:17:52.084
<v Speaker 2>leave everybody? What does that clean up? You're just asking

0:17:52.084 --> 0:17:55.084
<v Speaker 2>people to back the party, and I think this is

0:17:55.364 --> 0:17:57.604
<v Speaker 2>sort of the safest route.

0:17:57.644 --> 0:17:57.844
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:17:57.884 --> 0:17:59.924
<v Speaker 2>Again, there's a variance issue here. They may be thinking

0:17:59.924 --> 0:18:03.084
<v Speaker 2>about variance incorrectly. They may need variants right now. I

0:18:03.084 --> 0:18:04.644
<v Speaker 2>think that's the point you've made in the past. But

0:18:04.724 --> 0:18:07.124
<v Speaker 2>there's a huge variance issue. And if you're thinking about

0:18:07.204 --> 0:18:10.364
<v Speaker 2>protecting the House representatives, for instance, and your best chance

0:18:10.404 --> 0:18:12.404
<v Speaker 2>to take control of the House all of a sudden

0:18:12.604 --> 0:18:15.764
<v Speaker 2>losing with Harris keeping the coalition intact, It's not the

0:18:15.804 --> 0:18:17.244
<v Speaker 2>worst thing in the world. We know where we'll get.

0:18:17.684 --> 0:18:20.124
<v Speaker 2>It won't be the disaster of old man Biden, like

0:18:20.164 --> 0:18:22.084
<v Speaker 2>falling asleep on the campaign trail sometime in the next

0:18:22.084 --> 0:18:23.684
<v Speaker 2>two months. I mean, that was the real disaster that

0:18:23.764 --> 0:18:26.644
<v Speaker 2>was looming, is that Biden would completely self destruct in

0:18:26.684 --> 0:18:29.884
<v Speaker 2>October and the entire Democratic Party were from crashing down

0:18:29.884 --> 0:18:33.204
<v Speaker 2>with him. That won't happen with Harris to lose. Maybe

0:18:33.204 --> 0:18:35.364
<v Speaker 2>she's a bad candidate, right or whatever reason, Like she

0:18:35.364 --> 0:18:37.964
<v Speaker 2>doesn't do well. Trump wins, but it doesn't feel like

0:18:38.804 --> 0:18:41.164
<v Speaker 2>she's gonna go out there and just bring the Democratic

0:18:41.204 --> 0:18:44.204
<v Speaker 2>Party down with her, and the crackup could cause that.

0:18:44.284 --> 0:18:47.204
<v Speaker 2>Now again, you may be looking for variants. You may

0:18:47.204 --> 0:18:50.724
<v Speaker 2>be looking for Josh Shapiro to shake things up, or

0:18:50.764 --> 0:18:53.444
<v Speaker 2>Gretchen Whitmer. I think Whitmer is probably the only other

0:18:53.524 --> 0:18:57.244
<v Speaker 2>realistic option. The Democrat Party is a collection of interest in.

0:18:57.244 --> 0:18:59.244
<v Speaker 2>One of those interests is that we have wide representation

0:18:59.404 --> 0:19:02.044
<v Speaker 2>of both mind maority groups and women, and to pass

0:19:02.084 --> 0:19:04.924
<v Speaker 2>over to Harris and then pass over Whitmer and be like, oh, look, dude,

0:19:04.924 --> 0:19:07.244
<v Speaker 2>we got this white guy in Pennsylvania. It's gonna be perfect.

0:19:07.404 --> 0:19:09.484
<v Speaker 2>I think that would have caused enough tension in the part.

0:19:14.044 --> 0:19:16.164
<v Speaker 1>Right. I think came the closest anyone actually saying he

0:19:16.244 --> 0:19:18.404
<v Speaker 1>wanted it. It's like the Biden campaign was, like, among

0:19:18.444 --> 0:19:23.684
<v Speaker 1>other things, for Democrats, extremely demoralizing, where every day you

0:19:23.724 --> 0:19:26.604
<v Speaker 1>wake up and there are these polls showing Biden losing

0:19:27.204 --> 0:19:29.564
<v Speaker 1>and he's either not giving public remarks or when he

0:19:29.604 --> 0:19:32.404
<v Speaker 1>does it's embarrassing half the time. It was very disheartening

0:19:32.444 --> 0:19:34.844
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats. And I think just having like the semblance

0:19:34.884 --> 0:19:38.284
<v Speaker 1>of a normal campaign I think is a potent lever

0:19:38.484 --> 0:19:42.844
<v Speaker 1>for Harris and for Democrats here. I mean, do you

0:19:42.844 --> 0:19:46.364
<v Speaker 1>think they'll come to regret not having a mini primary

0:19:46.524 --> 0:19:48.444
<v Speaker 1>or is it like it just wasn't going to fly,

0:19:49.164 --> 0:19:52.564
<v Speaker 1>and once it's not going to fly, then it's better

0:19:52.684 --> 0:19:54.204
<v Speaker 1>to be unified than not.

0:19:54.844 --> 0:19:57.924
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think largely allowed to Look, you know,

0:19:58.124 --> 0:20:01.044
<v Speaker 2>when Harris loses, we're gonna hear every sort of idiotic

0:20:01.084 --> 0:20:04.244
<v Speaker 2>take we can about this decision because the results oriented

0:20:04.324 --> 0:20:06.084
<v Speaker 2>thinking it's going to come back of this, So like oh,

0:20:06.124 --> 0:20:09.124
<v Speaker 2>Biden could have won, right, Whitmer could have won. All

0:20:09.164 --> 0:20:11.044
<v Speaker 2>of the things are going to come out, and of

0:20:11.084 --> 0:20:13.204
<v Speaker 2>course that's you know, as a poker a bridge player

0:20:13.324 --> 0:20:15.404
<v Speaker 2>would say that that's ridiculous. Right. You make the decision

0:20:15.404 --> 0:20:17.164
<v Speaker 2>with the best information you have and sort of whatever

0:20:17.204 --> 0:20:20.404
<v Speaker 2>happens with the rolls of the dice you can't control.

0:20:21.044 --> 0:20:25.884
<v Speaker 2>I do think that you know one thing going with

0:20:25.964 --> 0:20:29.204
<v Speaker 2>Harris now, does is it? Lets sort of the sort

0:20:29.244 --> 0:20:32.524
<v Speaker 2>of the thing move forward quicker. Right. We saw this

0:20:32.684 --> 0:20:35.204
<v Speaker 2>massive fundraising haul for the Democrats yesterday, right, and this

0:20:35.324 --> 0:20:37.404
<v Speaker 2>wave of sort of popular enthusiasm and who knows how

0:20:37.444 --> 0:20:39.324
<v Speaker 2>on in this last But if you say, oh, we're

0:20:39.364 --> 0:20:41.284
<v Speaker 2>going to set up a process now for the next

0:20:41.284 --> 0:20:42.844
<v Speaker 2>two weeks, people are going to bicker with each other

0:20:42.844 --> 0:20:44.684
<v Speaker 2>about who should be their nominee, and then at the

0:20:44.724 --> 0:20:47.444
<v Speaker 2>convention in August, we'll deal with this. You're waiting a

0:20:47.524 --> 0:20:49.804
<v Speaker 2>long time to sort of get to that point, and

0:20:49.844 --> 0:20:52.164
<v Speaker 2>I think that the time running short aspect of this

0:20:52.644 --> 0:20:55.404
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be underestimated. You know, either we have Harris coming

0:20:55.444 --> 0:20:57.604
<v Speaker 2>in now and she's gonna be the candidate today. There's

0:20:57.644 --> 0:21:01.244
<v Speaker 2>logistical issues transferring her the money from from the Biden

0:21:01.284 --> 0:21:03.724
<v Speaker 2>campaign was easier than anyone else. And so there's all

0:21:03.764 --> 0:21:06.004
<v Speaker 2>these things sort of build up for different people, I think,

0:21:06.204 --> 0:21:07.724
<v Speaker 2>and you get to the point where it's like, well,

0:21:07.924 --> 0:21:09.724
<v Speaker 2>does Whitmer even want to run for president?

0:21:09.804 --> 0:21:10.124
<v Speaker 1>Right now?

0:21:10.524 --> 0:21:12.724
<v Speaker 2>Right? That's the other question hiding behind all this is,

0:21:12.764 --> 0:21:14.724
<v Speaker 2>like all these candidates they backed the way real quick.

0:21:14.804 --> 0:21:17.004
<v Speaker 2>When they decide to coordinate on Harris, a lot of

0:21:17.044 --> 0:21:18.724
<v Speaker 2>them might not have been interested anyway. So we're gonna

0:21:18.724 --> 0:21:20.844
<v Speaker 2>hold them any primary who's going to show up? Right,

0:21:21.644 --> 0:21:24.364
<v Speaker 2>Harris will show up, probably maybe a couple of themill

0:21:24.364 --> 0:21:25.604
<v Speaker 2>show up, but as soon as a couple of other

0:21:25.644 --> 0:21:27.044
<v Speaker 2>show up, the rest are going to drop out. Like,

0:21:27.084 --> 0:21:29.004
<v Speaker 2>it's not clearly what a many primary would've even look

0:21:29.164 --> 0:21:31.564
<v Speaker 2>like in terms of which candidates want to get in

0:21:31.604 --> 0:21:33.964
<v Speaker 2>one hundred days before the election to try and get

0:21:34.004 --> 0:21:36.484
<v Speaker 2>the Democratic nomination in a precarious situation where they're going

0:21:36.524 --> 0:21:38.084
<v Speaker 2>to be an underdog.

0:21:39.684 --> 0:21:46.124
<v Speaker 1>How seamless is a transition between Biden and Harris? Are

0:21:46.244 --> 0:21:48.684
<v Speaker 1>like all the Biden people like running her campaign? Now

0:21:49.244 --> 0:21:51.524
<v Speaker 1>will she want to replace them with her own staff?

0:21:51.564 --> 0:21:54.284
<v Speaker 1>There is lots of talk about, by the way, internal

0:21:54.324 --> 0:21:58.844
<v Speaker 1>tension between the Biden staff and the Harris staff. How

0:21:58.844 --> 0:22:00.564
<v Speaker 1>does that actually like physically work.

0:22:01.604 --> 0:22:04.964
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean this is a huge issue because you know,

0:22:05.404 --> 0:22:10.524
<v Speaker 2>the campaign staff are notoriously sort of territorial, and even

0:22:10.604 --> 0:22:13.364
<v Speaker 2>on campaigns that are sort of normal and get started

0:22:13.364 --> 0:22:15.684
<v Speaker 2>in the primaries and roll forward, you have internal tensions

0:22:15.724 --> 0:22:19.604
<v Speaker 2>between different staffers on the campaign, you know, and you know,

0:22:19.644 --> 0:22:22.964
<v Speaker 2>whether the campaign manager gets along with the candidate's spouse

0:22:23.004 --> 0:22:25.564
<v Speaker 2>is always sort of like a classic crack up in Congress, right,

0:22:25.724 --> 0:22:27.764
<v Speaker 2>And all of these things now have to sort of

0:22:27.764 --> 0:22:32.124
<v Speaker 2>be dealt with in faster than normal real time for politics.

0:22:32.284 --> 0:22:34.644
<v Speaker 2>I think I saw that the Biden staffers from the

0:22:34.684 --> 0:22:37.084
<v Speaker 2>campaign said they were all going to you know, flip

0:22:37.124 --> 0:22:39.564
<v Speaker 2>over and help Harris for now, right, And that seems

0:22:39.604 --> 0:22:42.084
<v Speaker 2>sort of normal. But I don't think you know that

0:22:42.244 --> 0:22:46.204
<v Speaker 2>the Biden campaign is the set of staffers, the set

0:22:46.244 --> 0:22:49.364
<v Speaker 2>of strategies, the set of money people, and the set

0:22:49.364 --> 0:22:51.524
<v Speaker 2>of get out the vote operations that Harris would have

0:22:51.564 --> 0:22:53.364
<v Speaker 2>set up had she just won the primary right now,

0:22:53.404 --> 0:22:55.084
<v Speaker 2>and sort of an opens thing Biden said, I'm not

0:22:55.084 --> 0:22:56.924
<v Speaker 2>going to run Harrison's the primary. She would have set

0:22:56.964 --> 0:23:00.164
<v Speaker 2>up an entirely different apparatus, and so the friction there

0:23:00.244 --> 0:23:02.804
<v Speaker 2>is real and I think there's no doubt she's going

0:23:02.884 --> 0:23:04.964
<v Speaker 2>to change some of the people, particularly the top, the

0:23:04.964 --> 0:23:07.364
<v Speaker 2>senior levels or the places where you know, probably the

0:23:07.404 --> 0:23:10.204
<v Speaker 2>biggest change will happen. But just sort of she is

0:23:10.244 --> 0:23:13.364
<v Speaker 2>going to be forced to run, at least for a while,

0:23:13.444 --> 0:23:16.324
<v Speaker 2>on an apparatus that she didn't build and she didn't direct,

0:23:16.324 --> 0:23:18.324
<v Speaker 2>and her people and people she's comforted with and her

0:23:18.364 --> 0:23:21.004
<v Speaker 2>allies didn't build and direct. And that's a challenge. It's

0:23:21.044 --> 0:23:23.404
<v Speaker 2>not insurmountable, but it certainly is different than what she

0:23:23.444 --> 0:23:26.484
<v Speaker 2>would have done otherwise. And I suspect we're going to

0:23:26.524 --> 0:23:30.164
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of changes in the campaigns and even

0:23:30.204 --> 0:23:33.444
<v Speaker 2>right down to sort of you know, the surrogates that

0:23:33.484 --> 0:23:36.604
<v Speaker 2>they use for on television, on cable news and here,

0:23:36.644 --> 0:23:37.884
<v Speaker 2>and there are going to be a different set of

0:23:37.884 --> 0:23:41.964
<v Speaker 2>people surrounding you know, Kamala Harris the coalition than Joe

0:23:41.964 --> 0:23:44.844
<v Speaker 2>Biden the coalition. Right, they're linked together, but they are

0:23:44.884 --> 0:23:45.844
<v Speaker 2>different coalitions.

0:23:51.724 --> 0:23:53.644
<v Speaker 1>We're going to take one more break here and then

0:23:53.684 --> 0:23:55.764
<v Speaker 1>be back to talk a little bit about Kamala Harris's

0:23:55.764 --> 0:23:57.764
<v Speaker 1>odds and what we have to look forward to between

0:23:57.884 --> 0:24:12.204
<v Speaker 1>now and November. So, if you go to prediction markets,

0:24:12.244 --> 0:24:13.684
<v Speaker 1>I know, we're spending a lot of time on them,

0:24:13.684 --> 0:24:15.884
<v Speaker 1>but it's a time when there's a lot of uncertainty,

0:24:16.204 --> 0:24:20.124
<v Speaker 1>there's not really enough polling. Yet they basically imply that

0:24:20.204 --> 0:24:23.004
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris has about a thirty five percent chance of

0:24:23.804 --> 0:24:27.284
<v Speaker 1>beating Trump conditional upon winning the nomination, which we both

0:24:27.324 --> 0:24:32.884
<v Speaker 1>expect her to do. Interestingly, in my model, thirty five

0:24:32.924 --> 0:24:36.244
<v Speaker 1>percent was a chance that Biden had before the debate.

0:24:36.364 --> 0:24:40.164
<v Speaker 1>So in some ways you're resetting to the pre debate

0:24:40.204 --> 0:24:42.204
<v Speaker 1>moment where we thought Joe Biden would run, or maybe

0:24:42.204 --> 0:24:44.524
<v Speaker 1>Matt and I didn't think that, but most people assume

0:24:44.564 --> 0:24:47.164
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Biden would run kind of this normal democratic

0:24:47.204 --> 0:24:51.804
<v Speaker 1>campaign under slightly difficult circumstances. You know, I asked you

0:24:51.844 --> 0:24:54.444
<v Speaker 1>to buy or sell before on Harris's nomination chances. Do

0:24:54.484 --> 0:24:57.644
<v Speaker 1>you think thirty five percent is in the right general

0:24:57.724 --> 0:25:00.404
<v Speaker 1>vicinity or do you want to kind of wait for

0:25:00.444 --> 0:25:02.244
<v Speaker 1>more info before you make an assessment.

0:25:02.924 --> 0:25:05.484
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not buying or selling for more info because

0:25:05.524 --> 0:25:07.364
<v Speaker 2>I think the key question we have here, and I

0:25:07.364 --> 0:25:10.524
<v Speaker 2>think this is kind of funny actually, is thatocrats need

0:25:10.604 --> 0:25:13.684
<v Speaker 2>to really hope the problem was Biden's age, right, Like

0:25:13.804 --> 0:25:17.044
<v Speaker 2>if the problem was Biden's age and not inflation and

0:25:17.084 --> 0:25:20.924
<v Speaker 2>not sort of the policy's administration. Right, then you're looking great, right,

0:25:20.924 --> 0:25:24.044
<v Speaker 2>like relatively speaking, right, And so I would like to

0:25:24.124 --> 0:25:25.404
<v Speaker 2>wait because I think the Polley is going to be

0:25:25.444 --> 0:25:28.964
<v Speaker 2>really important. And obviously, like I am the total layman here,

0:25:28.964 --> 0:25:32.484
<v Speaker 2>you're the expert, but in the coming weeks about whether

0:25:32.724 --> 0:25:35.924
<v Speaker 2>sort of that is an explanation and if Harris instantly

0:25:35.964 --> 0:25:38.404
<v Speaker 2>has sort of like a exogenous shock of you know,

0:25:38.724 --> 0:25:41.844
<v Speaker 2>three or four or five points relative to Biden a

0:25:41.924 --> 0:25:44.284
<v Speaker 2>relative to where she was before, that's a big deal.

0:25:45.324 --> 0:25:47.444
<v Speaker 2>And you know, well, you know, people won't be able

0:25:47.484 --> 0:25:49.684
<v Speaker 2>to figure that out definitively. But if you see a

0:25:49.764 --> 0:25:52.004
<v Speaker 2>jump for her, then maybe the Biden old thing was

0:25:52.044 --> 0:25:54.724
<v Speaker 2>really dragging down a set of Democrats or a set

0:25:54.764 --> 0:25:56.804
<v Speaker 2>of swing voters right, who are now like much more

0:25:56.844 --> 0:25:58.724
<v Speaker 2>comfortable coming back to Harris. Now, I don't know if

0:25:58.764 --> 0:26:01.044
<v Speaker 2>that's true, and she's got her own negatives, but I

0:26:01.044 --> 0:26:04.164
<v Speaker 2>am definitely in wait and see mode. I certainly think

0:26:04.324 --> 0:26:06.364
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats who all of a sudden think they have

0:26:06.404 --> 0:26:10.404
<v Speaker 2>the answer are crazy. I think it is complete nonsense

0:26:10.444 --> 0:26:12.484
<v Speaker 2>to be like, oh, now we've solved this and now

0:26:12.484 --> 0:26:15.204
<v Speaker 2>we're favorites to win this. I can't even imagine that.

0:26:16.444 --> 0:26:20.204
<v Speaker 2>And you know, and they have a long road ahead

0:26:20.284 --> 0:26:24.404
<v Speaker 2>uphill with in my view, a less than perfect candidate,

0:26:24.684 --> 0:26:27.804
<v Speaker 2>but someone that's improved their situation from where they were,

0:26:28.284 --> 0:26:30.044
<v Speaker 2>at least on the extreme margin.

0:26:30.324 --> 0:26:32.164
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I don't know what the poker analogy is, but

0:26:32.204 --> 0:26:34.564
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's like that you hit like a hit, like

0:26:34.644 --> 0:26:37.324
<v Speaker 1>a four outer, like chop the pot. This is getting

0:26:37.404 --> 0:26:40.244
<v Speaker 1>very esoteric, right, but like you find some way to

0:26:40.324 --> 0:26:42.684
<v Speaker 1>like salvage be able to continue gambling. And if you

0:26:42.724 --> 0:26:47.924
<v Speaker 1>kind of read read accounts of like gambling addicts, then

0:26:47.964 --> 0:26:50.044
<v Speaker 1>not that democratsic gamle adics are probably too risk averse

0:26:50.044 --> 0:26:53.844
<v Speaker 1>on average. They just want to win to continue to play, right,

0:26:53.884 --> 0:26:56.644
<v Speaker 1>not winning for winning's sake, but winning winning to play

0:26:56.684 --> 0:26:58.964
<v Speaker 1>and like they're and they're in the game now at least.

0:26:58.964 --> 0:27:02.084
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, look, it's ironic that like you would get

0:27:02.164 --> 0:27:05.284
<v Speaker 1>yelled at for suggesting that Biden's age is the problem,

0:27:05.364 --> 0:27:08.204
<v Speaker 1>because there are other issues too. I mean, incumbent parties

0:27:08.204 --> 0:27:14.164
<v Speaker 1>all around the world have have been struggling. You know. Look,

0:27:14.204 --> 0:27:17.004
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I think goes too often overlooked is

0:27:17.044 --> 0:27:21.284
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats are still at a disadvantage in the electoral College.

0:27:21.724 --> 0:27:24.404
<v Speaker 1>If anything, Biden's disadvantage might have narrowed a little bit

0:27:24.444 --> 0:27:27.924
<v Speaker 1>because he was doing well. I wasn't doing better among anyone, right,

0:27:28.004 --> 0:27:30.764
<v Speaker 1>but he was holding his numbers up better relatively speaking,

0:27:31.204 --> 0:27:34.564
<v Speaker 1>with like older white voters versus any voters of color

0:27:34.724 --> 0:27:39.364
<v Speaker 1>and any younger voters. So older states like Michigan, Pennsylvania

0:27:39.364 --> 0:27:43.844
<v Speaker 1>that are pretty white Wisconsin were holding up comparatively well

0:27:44.004 --> 0:27:48.524
<v Speaker 1>versus Georgia, for instance. Harris may do better overall. I

0:27:48.604 --> 0:27:52.004
<v Speaker 1>think she probably will, but she may actually expand back

0:27:52.044 --> 0:27:57.004
<v Speaker 1>out that electoral college popular vote gap, and that's tricky.

0:27:57.044 --> 0:27:58.564
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you might bet she might be the favorite

0:27:58.564 --> 0:28:01.404
<v Speaker 1>to win the popular vote. I don't know if she's

0:28:01.444 --> 0:28:04.124
<v Speaker 1>the favorite to win the electoral college, unfortunately for Democrats.

0:28:04.844 --> 0:28:12.004
<v Speaker 1>But let's give let's give, like a more optimistic version

0:28:12.084 --> 0:28:14.844
<v Speaker 1>of it. It's November sixth, and Kamala Harris has one,

0:28:15.444 --> 0:28:18.724
<v Speaker 1>let's say, by a compable enough margin where we're not

0:28:18.764 --> 0:28:20.684
<v Speaker 1>still counting. The vote wasn't huge, but she won the

0:28:20.724 --> 0:28:23.284
<v Speaker 1>popular vote by three points, and she won the Midwestern states,

0:28:23.284 --> 0:28:28.684
<v Speaker 1>and say Nevada or something, tell me the story where

0:28:28.724 --> 0:28:29.244
<v Speaker 1>this happened.

0:28:30.084 --> 0:28:32.444
<v Speaker 2>I think the story where this happens is the Democratic

0:28:32.444 --> 0:28:35.004
<v Speaker 2>Party unites behind her. Of course, that's a baseline must

0:28:35.044 --> 0:28:38.724
<v Speaker 2>have her campaign gets off the ground without any sort

0:28:38.724 --> 0:28:41.364
<v Speaker 2>of sputtering, which we could see. She turns out to

0:28:41.444 --> 0:28:46.604
<v Speaker 2>be something of a better campaigner slash candidate slash charismatic

0:28:46.724 --> 0:28:51.564
<v Speaker 2>leader than we observed in the primaries. She probably moderates

0:28:51.564 --> 0:28:53.884
<v Speaker 2>her position successfully. I think this is gonna be the

0:28:53.924 --> 0:28:56.204
<v Speaker 2>tough one for the Democrats to swallow, is that she

0:28:56.364 --> 0:29:00.204
<v Speaker 2>really needs to move to the center from where she's been.

0:29:00.284 --> 0:29:03.724
<v Speaker 2>She's grown up her entire career in politics and sort

0:29:03.764 --> 0:29:06.844
<v Speaker 2>of the liberal sort of bastions and running up through

0:29:06.844 --> 0:29:10.124
<v Speaker 2>California's system is like that proves some thing, like you're

0:29:10.164 --> 0:29:12.564
<v Speaker 2>you're good at something, but it doesn't really challenge you

0:29:12.644 --> 0:29:15.764
<v Speaker 2>to look for sort of swing voters nationally, and so

0:29:15.804 --> 0:29:17.364
<v Speaker 2>she'll have to sort of figure out how to do that,

0:29:17.604 --> 0:29:20.284
<v Speaker 2>and then I think after that the Biden age thing

0:29:20.324 --> 0:29:23.564
<v Speaker 2>will have had to be sort of important, and then

0:29:23.604 --> 0:29:27.324
<v Speaker 2>she will successfully, in my view, present a campaign that

0:29:27.524 --> 0:29:30.204
<v Speaker 2>is forward looking versus backward looking. And I think that's

0:29:30.204 --> 0:29:32.684
<v Speaker 2>the one thing she has going for her, is that

0:29:32.844 --> 0:29:35.724
<v Speaker 2>if she wants to push this campaign into like Donald

0:29:35.764 --> 0:29:38.684
<v Speaker 2>Trump's the past and I represent the future. That's a

0:29:38.804 --> 0:29:41.964
<v Speaker 2>very strong sell in America, and it will be a

0:29:42.004 --> 0:29:44.884
<v Speaker 2>contrast that might sort of pick her up the swing

0:29:44.964 --> 0:29:47.084
<v Speaker 2>voters who have decided that not was Biden too old,

0:29:47.204 --> 0:29:49.284
<v Speaker 2>and that when Biden represent the past, he's a silent

0:29:49.364 --> 0:29:52.604
<v Speaker 2>generation dude, but that Trump is too uh, and that

0:29:52.644 --> 0:29:56.884
<v Speaker 2>Trump is sort of clinging to a backwards looking old

0:29:56.924 --> 0:29:59.244
<v Speaker 2>man thing. And look, I think you know, I don't.

0:29:59.364 --> 0:30:00.684
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's sort of like you. I don't

0:30:00.684 --> 0:30:01.924
<v Speaker 2>think you just turn around and be like, well, our

0:30:01.924 --> 0:30:03.324
<v Speaker 2>guy was too old, so we dumped him, and now

0:30:03.364 --> 0:30:05.324
<v Speaker 2>you're guys too old, you are the problem. I don't

0:30:05.324 --> 0:30:07.004
<v Speaker 2>think that quite works. Yeah out loud.

0:30:07.164 --> 0:30:10.004
<v Speaker 1>People have to be a little bit careful about about yeah.

0:30:10.044 --> 0:30:12.284
<v Speaker 1>And you've seen these happen a couple You've had Republicans

0:30:12.364 --> 0:30:14.924
<v Speaker 1>say so some of the Biden I call them dead enders.

0:30:15.204 --> 0:30:18.124
<v Speaker 1>We're saying, well, fourtune million people voted in the Democratic primaries.

0:30:18.324 --> 0:30:20.484
<v Speaker 1>You know, actually in the state where I am, New York,

0:30:21.364 --> 0:30:23.684
<v Speaker 1>every candidate but Driiden had already dropped out right by

0:30:23.724 --> 0:30:25.244
<v Speaker 1>the time the Democrat New York would have had the

0:30:25.244 --> 0:30:27.404
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to vote. And so it's it's kind of a

0:30:27.404 --> 0:30:30.724
<v Speaker 1>BS talking point, but that got recycled by Republicans, and likewise,

0:30:30.804 --> 0:30:33.004
<v Speaker 1>this point about oh, you can't have someone who's going

0:30:33.044 --> 0:30:34.844
<v Speaker 1>to be eighty years old during the presidential term run

0:30:34.884 --> 0:30:38.364
<v Speaker 1>has now been used by Democrats. I mean, people voters

0:30:38.364 --> 0:30:42.924
<v Speaker 1>have some type of memories, right, They actually are more

0:30:42.964 --> 0:30:45.724
<v Speaker 1>resistant to hypocrisy than you might think. So give those

0:30:45.804 --> 0:30:48.844
<v Speaker 1>arguments a little bit of time to dry out before

0:30:48.884 --> 0:30:50.444
<v Speaker 1>you try to recycle them or whatever.

0:30:50.524 --> 0:30:56.244
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, good, no, no, you got mat. I mean, I

0:30:56.484 --> 0:30:59.484
<v Speaker 2>you know. One thing that for me personally has always

0:30:59.764 --> 0:31:01.884
<v Speaker 2>been a problem here is that my main concern is

0:31:01.884 --> 0:31:03.964
<v Speaker 2>about the age of Biden and Trump have never really

0:31:04.004 --> 0:31:07.684
<v Speaker 2>been electoral concerns. Partisan voters will look past a lot

0:31:07.724 --> 0:31:09.724
<v Speaker 2>of stuff, right like how far Biden and head of

0:31:09.764 --> 0:31:12.244
<v Speaker 2>decline before the voters really started to sort of be

0:31:12.324 --> 0:31:14.764
<v Speaker 2>concerned about it. My concern has always been that these

0:31:14.764 --> 0:31:17.684
<v Speaker 2>guys are too old to do the governance job. And

0:31:17.884 --> 0:31:21.004
<v Speaker 2>that's something that I think is really important. That we

0:31:21.044 --> 0:31:23.564
<v Speaker 2>want someone who's competent twenty four to seven on call

0:31:23.644 --> 0:31:26.844
<v Speaker 2>in the White House and energetic in a management capacity

0:31:26.844 --> 0:31:28.804
<v Speaker 2>and a leadership quality. And I just don't think eighty

0:31:28.884 --> 0:31:31.404
<v Speaker 2>year olds have it that said, that's not how must

0:31:31.444 --> 0:31:34.204
<v Speaker 2>voters think. Most voters are cross pressured by their opinions

0:31:34.244 --> 0:31:38.084
<v Speaker 2>on abortion and their views on taxes, and their ties

0:31:38.244 --> 0:31:40.884
<v Speaker 2>sentimental ties to parties, and that's not how they think.

0:31:40.924 --> 0:31:43.764
<v Speaker 2>And so I don't think there's anything that prevents a

0:31:43.764 --> 0:31:45.924
<v Speaker 2>candidate who's going to be in their eighties like Trump

0:31:46.004 --> 0:31:48.484
<v Speaker 2>or like Biden was four years ago, from winning an election.

0:31:49.124 --> 0:31:51.524
<v Speaker 2>Voters are more than willing to overlook that stuff in

0:31:51.524 --> 0:31:54.324
<v Speaker 2>the name of parsonship or ideology. And so you know,

0:31:54.404 --> 0:31:56.124
<v Speaker 2>it's not sort of the definitive way to beat Trump.

0:31:56.124 --> 0:31:59.004
<v Speaker 2>He's old. But I amused yesterday that Harris could run

0:31:59.044 --> 0:32:02.844
<v Speaker 2>a campaign of something like he's too old, he's too extreme,

0:32:02.844 --> 0:32:04.884
<v Speaker 2>he's too incompetent, and he's too dangerous, and make it

0:32:04.964 --> 0:32:07.084
<v Speaker 2>part of the campaign, which would be sort of this

0:32:07.124 --> 0:32:10.404
<v Speaker 2>forward looking campaign. Again, that's the optimistic I have for her.

0:32:10.604 --> 0:32:13.404
<v Speaker 2>I'm not particularly optimistic about Harris. I think there's every

0:32:13.484 --> 0:32:15.764
<v Speaker 2>chance in the world that she loses, and loses badly here.

0:32:16.124 --> 0:32:19.644
<v Speaker 2>But the bigger point, and this isn't isn't news to you,

0:32:19.804 --> 0:32:24.164
<v Speaker 2>is that you take your least worst options, and in

0:32:24.204 --> 0:32:27.404
<v Speaker 2>a game thiry sense, when one path is foreclosed for you,

0:32:27.484 --> 0:32:29.404
<v Speaker 2>and you are not going to win, you try another.

0:32:29.604 --> 0:32:31.724
<v Speaker 2>The poker analogy is this, if you're at the river

0:32:32.244 --> 0:32:34.924
<v Speaker 2>and you know you can't win by calling because you're

0:32:34.924 --> 0:32:38.044
<v Speaker 2>holding six high, well then you stop thinking about calling,

0:32:38.364 --> 0:32:41.644
<v Speaker 2>and you ever decide what's better folding or raising. And

0:32:42.084 --> 0:32:44.044
<v Speaker 2>Biden at this point was the call with six high

0:32:44.084 --> 0:32:47.724
<v Speaker 2>in some ways not exactly, but it was the call

0:32:47.764 --> 0:32:48.524
<v Speaker 2>with a very weekend.

0:32:49.324 --> 0:32:52.084
<v Speaker 1>I mean to sound like a little sports talk radio

0:32:52.764 --> 0:32:58.044
<v Speaker 1>Bill Simmonsy. You know one reason I can imagine Harris winning,

0:32:58.084 --> 0:32:59.884
<v Speaker 1>And again, I think we'll have our model out in

0:32:59.884 --> 0:33:01.564
<v Speaker 1>a week or so. Thirty five percent seems like a

0:33:01.604 --> 0:33:07.004
<v Speaker 1>sensible biggest line for now. She kind of has in

0:33:07.044 --> 0:33:09.244
<v Speaker 1>a weird way. And I know people are gonna get

0:33:09.244 --> 0:33:13.004
<v Speaker 1>mad because of the stakes and an election, but psychologically

0:33:13.084 --> 0:33:16.044
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of like having nothing to lose.

0:33:16.764 --> 0:33:18.684
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about the VP. How much do you

0:33:18.684 --> 0:33:21.484
<v Speaker 1>think the VP pick matters? And do you agree with

0:33:21.524 --> 0:33:24.924
<v Speaker 1>conventional wisdom that you know the names that are better

0:33:25.804 --> 0:33:28.204
<v Speaker 1>about the most, not bettered about better at about the

0:33:28.204 --> 0:33:32.924
<v Speaker 1>most are like Shapiro, Andy Basher in Kentucky, who else?

0:33:33.124 --> 0:33:35.884
<v Speaker 1>Whitmer a little bit, although it seemed people seem to

0:33:35.884 --> 0:33:38.644
<v Speaker 1>think that you'd rather have at least one man on

0:33:38.724 --> 0:33:40.964
<v Speaker 1>the ticket, Roy Cooper, do you have a preference between

0:33:40.964 --> 0:33:43.444
<v Speaker 1>and among those and how much difference would you expect

0:33:43.444 --> 0:33:45.004
<v Speaker 1>a VP pick to make well?

0:33:45.044 --> 0:33:47.004
<v Speaker 2>In general, I would not expect a VP pick to

0:33:47.004 --> 0:33:50.604
<v Speaker 2>make much difference at all in any sort of electoral sense.

0:33:50.804 --> 0:33:52.044
<v Speaker 2>That's sort of the guiding history.

0:33:52.164 --> 0:33:52.404
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:33:52.564 --> 0:33:55.084
<v Speaker 2>That's often because you know, people at pick sort of

0:33:55.164 --> 0:33:58.724
<v Speaker 2>like competent, traditionally sort of qualified vice presidents.

0:33:58.804 --> 0:33:58.964
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:33:59.324 --> 0:34:01.644
<v Speaker 2>The one place we do see I think in the

0:34:01.644 --> 0:34:03.844
<v Speaker 2>polling some drop off was with the plent pick. Right.

0:34:04.124 --> 0:34:06.284
<v Speaker 2>If you make a terrible pick, right, like, it could

0:34:06.284 --> 0:34:07.604
<v Speaker 2>go back for on you. But I think it's pretty

0:34:07.604 --> 0:34:09.644
<v Speaker 2>hard to make a terrible pick. I think sort of

0:34:09.724 --> 0:34:12.564
<v Speaker 2>internal party politics are just as important as anything else

0:34:12.604 --> 0:34:15.684
<v Speaker 2>in a VP pick. It seems like the conventional wisdom

0:34:15.724 --> 0:34:18.884
<v Speaker 2>is sort of like moderate white guy governor is the

0:34:18.884 --> 0:34:21.164
<v Speaker 2>way to go here, sort of like this balancing of

0:34:21.164 --> 0:34:23.044
<v Speaker 2>a scriptive representation, which is something that the parties are

0:34:23.044 --> 0:34:25.004
<v Speaker 2>obsessed with. But I also think that the voters like,

0:34:25.084 --> 0:34:29.684
<v Speaker 2>so I think it's okay. I think that Whitmer might

0:34:29.844 --> 0:34:32.164
<v Speaker 2>be a good candidate, except that I think parties are

0:34:32.324 --> 0:34:35.324
<v Speaker 2>very risk averse about things like putting two women in

0:34:35.364 --> 0:34:38.644
<v Speaker 2>the ticket, both for like reasonable reasons. I think historically

0:34:38.924 --> 0:34:41.124
<v Speaker 2>parties have always sort of run sort of like white

0:34:41.164 --> 0:34:43.924
<v Speaker 2>Protestant dudes for a president because they're very worried that

0:34:43.964 --> 0:34:46.004
<v Speaker 2>even if it only costs you half a point from

0:34:46.044 --> 0:34:48.164
<v Speaker 2>someone who doesn't like Catholics or whatever, like half a

0:34:48.204 --> 0:34:50.524
<v Speaker 2>point matters in elections like this is planned for keeps,

0:34:50.804 --> 0:34:52.884
<v Speaker 2>and so they've been very risk averse about heading off

0:34:52.884 --> 0:34:56.004
<v Speaker 2>into sort of minority group risk representation. And I think,

0:34:56.644 --> 0:34:58.404
<v Speaker 2>right or wrong, the view would be that two women

0:34:58.444 --> 0:35:01.284
<v Speaker 2>would potentially hurt you on the margins when the margins

0:35:01.324 --> 0:35:03.964
<v Speaker 2>really matter. I think a lot of people also seeing

0:35:04.004 --> 0:35:07.204
<v Speaker 2>ghosts from Clinton in twenty sixteen when they think that way,

0:35:07.284 --> 0:35:09.124
<v Speaker 2>it's probably not that big a deal. But I think

0:35:09.124 --> 0:35:11.644
<v Speaker 2>it is a deal, and so yeah, I think, you know,

0:35:11.764 --> 0:35:14.284
<v Speaker 2>I think the conventional wisdom now is that like Basher

0:35:14.444 --> 0:35:18.964
<v Speaker 2>or Cooper North Carolina are like sort of people you

0:35:19.044 --> 0:35:21.164
<v Speaker 2>might pick because there can you know, moderate white guys

0:35:21.164 --> 0:35:24.764
<v Speaker 2>who have proven records and sort of reddish states. Shapiro

0:35:25.244 --> 0:35:27.564
<v Speaker 2>is sort of more of a well, this guy could

0:35:27.564 --> 0:35:30.964
<v Speaker 2>help us win Pennsylvania type pick. I think the the

0:35:31.004 --> 0:35:32.844
<v Speaker 2>you know, the political science evidence is that maybe the

0:35:32.924 --> 0:35:35.404
<v Speaker 2>VP could give you a point or two in their

0:35:35.404 --> 0:35:39.284
<v Speaker 2>home state potentially, and that's not nothing in Pennsylvania.

0:35:40.044 --> 0:35:41.844
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna leave it there. Thank you so much for

0:35:41.884 --> 0:35:42.884
<v Speaker 1>pinch hitting today, Matt.

0:35:42.924 --> 0:35:44.124
<v Speaker 2>All right, Nate, thanks for having me on.

0:35:44.204 --> 0:35:46.564
<v Speaker 1>This is awesome for listeners. This is probably our early

0:35:46.644 --> 0:35:50.324
<v Speaker 1>episode of the week, but we've said that before. There's

0:35:50.364 --> 0:35:54.004
<v Speaker 1>world series of poker controversies to talk about, so expect

0:35:54.044 --> 0:35:55.884
<v Speaker 1>back next week with a mix of poker, politics and

0:35:55.924 --> 0:36:03.644
<v Speaker 1>everything else. But thank you for listening. Risky Business is

0:36:03.644 --> 0:36:06.924
<v Speaker 1>hosted by me, Nate Silver and my co host Maria Kannakova.

0:36:07.764 --> 0:36:11.044
<v Speaker 1>The show is a co production of Push Industries and iHeartMedia.

0:36:11.724 --> 0:36:14.284
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Isabel Carter and edited by

0:36:14.404 --> 0:36:18.364
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Nix. Our associate producer is Gabriel Hunter Chang. Our

0:36:18.404 --> 0:36:21.644
<v Speaker 1>executive producer is Jacob Goldstein. If you want to listen

0:36:21.684 --> 0:36:24.124
<v Speaker 1>to an ad free version, sign up for pushkin Plus.

0:36:24.204 --> 0:36:26.324
<v Speaker 1>For six hundy nine a month, you get access to

0:36:26.404 --> 0:36:28.564
<v Speaker 1>ad free listening. Thanks for tuning in.