WEBVTT - Confronting Sora: How Hollywood Should Heed Tyler Perry's AI Warning

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Strictly Business, the podcast in

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>which we speak with some of the brightest minds working

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>in the media business today. I'm Andrew Wallenstein with Variety.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>The handwringing over what generative AI could mean for Hollywood

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is nothing new, certainly not since last year's strikes, but

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>concerns have ratcheted up to a whole new level in

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>recent weeks when Open Ai gave the world a glimpse

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of its upcoming text to video tool SORA. At first,

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the assessments that we were witnessing the end of the

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>entertainment industry as we know it were limited to social media,

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>but then last week mogul Tyler Perry upped the Annie

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>by publicly declaring SORA had prompted him to stop construction

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>on an eight hundred million dollar expansion of his studio

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta, and he beseeched Congress to say, the industry,

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>so what's going on here? Overreaction or is it even

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>possible underestimation? To help me make sense of it all,

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I've enlisted Steven Zeitchik, who has been closely tracking the

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>intersection of AI and entertainment at his buzzworthy Substack Mind

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and Iron. We will be back with him after these messages,

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and we are back with Steve Zeitchik, formerly of The

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, and other august publications,

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>where he has written extensively about media and tech, most

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>recently on his substack Mind and Iron, which is available

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>every Thursday. You can check it out at mindanron dot com.

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm also lucky to call him a close friend for

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>more than two decades. But this is our very first

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>podcast together, and I can think of no better subject

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to finally bring us together than one that some say

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>represents the dawn of a new era in entertainment, the

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>profound implications. So Steve, I want to hear what you

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>have to say. No pressure, but thanks for stopping by.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Andy.

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 3>It's great to be here, as you say, after all

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 3>these decades. Of course, we did meet when we were

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 3>four years old, so two decades, you know, doesn't take

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 3>us back that far.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, Sora.

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 3>It has been a fascinating time, obviously really starting with

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 3>the release of Chat GPT all the way back in

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 3>November twenty two. But the anti as you note, was

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 3>incredibly upped a couple of weeks ago when open Ai

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 3>release Sora.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the text to video.

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.119
<v Speaker 3>Basically platform or program that open Ai has not yet

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 3>released commercially, but they're unrolling it, probably in the notcho

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 3>just in future. And essentially, what text to video means

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>is you can put in a text input the way

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 3>you can with Chat GPT for text or the Dot

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 3>and Mid Journeys of the World for images.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 2>You can do the.

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Same now for video and have incredibly realistic looking with

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>only some slight bugs. As I'm sure we'll get into

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 3>video and the power of such a tool. We've heard

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 3>about it for a long time. We sort of sci

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 3>fi writers have kind of dreamed of it. I don't

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 3>know if any of us thought we would actually see

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 3>the day. Certainly did not imagine. I think many of

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 3>us did not imagine seeing it so soon. Here we are,

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 3>very early in twenty twenty four, already potentially with the

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 3>capability to do this, but Soras here and it's only

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be coming on stronger.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So what was it exactly that people found so mind blowing, Because,

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as you said, there were other applications in the marketplace already.

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Text to video wasn't entirely new.

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a good question, and I think, you know,

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 3>these things are all sort of you know, a little

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 3>bit of that that Fitzgerald, you know, how did you

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 3>go broke gradually at first or then all at once

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 3>or hemingway.

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I always forget who it was, But.

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 3>That's certainly been the trajectory of AI, where it's kind

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 3>of like, oh, it's very incremental, it's very slow, it's

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 3>very slow, and then all of a sudden it seems

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 3>to be here, and we ask how it happened so quickly. So, yes,

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 3>there certainly have been some kind of video applications, I

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 3>don't think nearly as smooth.

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 2>And I think one of the reasons.

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 3>This took people back, certainly for those of us with

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 3>a long enough memory to go back to the earlier,

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 3>earlier days of the Internet, is that, if you remember,

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 3>the sort of distribution of a lot of these different

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 3>forms of media really took a long time to evolve.

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, people were using email back in

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the early nineties. I don't think we were seeing video

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 3>really distributed widely for you know, ten to fifteen years

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 3>after that. And so while on the one hand, AI

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 3>of course has been in development for many decades, some

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 3>of your listeners may know about Elizo, which was a

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of a text based chatbot back in the sixties.

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 3>But the reality is, for most people and for most

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 3>modern use cases, we really have not had any sort

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 3>of widely deployed AI until just you know, a little

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 3>a year ago with chat GPT and so to go

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.559
<v Speaker 3>from a text based you know, application to a video

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 3>based one and literally, you know, fourteen months. When you

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 3>think about you know, previous uh, you know evolutions took

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 3>fourteen years.

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that's partly why people are so shocked by this.

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there was something also about what was in market.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh prior to Sora had just lasted clips that were

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>about four seconds, and there was something about getting to

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that one minute mark that Sora that was able was

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>able to do that. I mean that I think really

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>woke people up to the fact that this technology was

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>evolving very quickly. But see, here's the thing for me,

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I think there's for me, I'm not so quick to

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>presume that means that going forward, there's going to be

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>some uninterrupted hockey stick you know, evolution up into the right.

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>That means that, you know, by the end of the year,

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Sora is going to be spitting out a ninety minute

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>movie that's going to be ready for theatrical distribution. What

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think in terms of the evolution of this

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>stuff going forward from here?

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I think the length is a very big question.

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, certainly you're right that the quantum leap we've

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 3>just had is nothing short or remarkable. Whether you think

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 3>this is a good thing or not. When I say remarkable,

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't mean that it's going to save humanity.

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 2>It could also be its destruction.

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 3>But certainly, in terms of the tech and the kind

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 3>of form factor here, it's really remarkable that we've gone

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 3>from either as you say, very short videos are really

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 3>even still images, to a full minute. But yeah, the

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 3>technical challenges without sort of getting or boring anyone with

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 3>the engineering or kind of processing requirements here, but the

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of capabilities needed to go from a minute to

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, let's say, I don't know, even a twenty

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 3>five minute episode of television is not simply a factor

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 3>of you know, twenty five where you can just stack

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 3>minute long videos together. First of all, they would not,

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>you'd have to stitch them essentially in a way that

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 3>would not work. And then even doing a lot of

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 3>limited videos, I mean we know how much power even

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 3>one minute takes. So I don't think we're going to

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 3>see full length forget feature films, but even even you know,

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 3>shorter you know, sitcom type episodes anytime soon. But I

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 3>think that the future is now in the sense that

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 3>it will only be a matter of time. I mean,

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 3>to me, the question of the question of time is

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 3>not really a significant one. You know. Again, a lot

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 3>of this is about processing power. You know, basically, how

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 3>computers can handle this much data and sort of troll

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 3>this much data in a short amount of time that

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 3>we will get there. I'm not concerned from a technical standpoint.

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think there's any there's any kind of hindrance there.

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 3>I think the question is how good will it be

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 3>when we do get there? I mean, and I don't

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 3>know if you want to get into the challenges now,

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 3>but even in the one minute, we know about all

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 3>the laws of physics that are being defined.

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, the cat with the with the fifth leg.

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Or the you know, or the hand key that never

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 3>gets eaten, yeah, the extra hand, the person who's flying backwards.

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, all of these are not small challenges. It's

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 3>not like a case. I mean, yes, you could have

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 3>humans go in and fix that, as you can with

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 3>any sort of animation, but that essentially defeats the purpose

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 3>of having a machine do this. I mean, you could

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 3>also have a human design this whole thing in an

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 3>animation studio. So I think that will be The question

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the democratization is not so much when

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 3>we can get to the length, because look, people will

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>play with minute long formats.

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 2>We have TikTok videos that are ten seconds that go viral.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm not really and eventually we will get to the

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty five minute or ninety five minute mark. I think

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>the question is how good will they be when we do?

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>But still, I want to like, just back up for

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a second. I'm just picturing like your mom, my mom

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to this podcast, and I just want to make

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>sure they understand the implications because you know, they love

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>podcasts of what we're talking about. Where you know, the

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>way I want to explain it is, you know, the

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>way it's always worked if you wanted to shoot a

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>scene of something was you know, you had to have

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>cameras and actors or at least animation, or you know,

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>a set or a location. And now, thanks to this software,

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>all you need is a computer and then you, you know,

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you whisper some text instructions into you know, Sora's ear,

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and Sora simply ushers into existence. What all that equipment

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and all the cost and time and manpower that comes

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>with that and every all of that is no longer

0:09:54.360 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>necessary and that is simply revolutionary now. Soa as we

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>currently know it, I think we've just made clear is

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>not ready for prime time. But it's not about where

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's at now, it's about where it could be in

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the future. So if you are in uh, you know,

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a traditional Hollywood production company studio, how are you not

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>freaking out?

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Well, for for better or worse.

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 3>Neither of us run studios that I think normally maybe

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 3>for worse, although on a day like today and after

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 3>the release of Soura, maybe it's a good thing we're

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 3>not dealing with this problem.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 2>But but look, you're absolutely right.

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the the the transformation, the transform transformational moment

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 4>we're in is is uh is striking and is I

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 4>would you know you you talk about just being able

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 4>to speak, and you know, our our mother is being

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 4>able to speak and a video is created.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, think.

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 3>About what just what that's meant for distribution for so

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 3>many years, where it's like, you know, it used to

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 3>take you know, an engineering degree, and if that if

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 3>you can even do it to send a video to basically,

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, tell your your friends that, hey, look at

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 3>this cute thing my my my grandkid did, or my

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 3>friend did, or my nephew did, or my child did.

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 3>And now, of course, with a flick of a keystroke

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 3>or a swipe of a screen, we can do that.

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 3>And so essentially what we're now doing is pourting that

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 3>over to not just a distribution but the production. And

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that really dovetails right into your question about

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, where where Hollywood studios are going to take

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 3>this and how worried they should be about where it's

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 3>going to go. I mean, you know, and you were

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 3>there covering it right at the dawn of the YouTube age,

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 3>where it's like the studios are sort of like, what

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 3>are we going to do that anyone can kind of

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 3>upload and share videos? And how is that going to

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 3>disrupt our business? We know what Google did about it.

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 3>They went out and bought YouTube and we saw eventually

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 3>after Netflix and other companies kind of ate their lunch,

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 3>how the legacy media outlets started to react, and I

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 3>think that's a bit of a good template maybe for

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 3>how to see this moment from a production standpoint. If

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 3>you're a studio, which is to say, massive fears of

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 3>disruption and is this going to take away our business?

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 2>And let's be real, you know the netflixes.

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Of the world that the automation of the distribution or

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 3>the ease of distribution did, in many ways, you know,

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 3>take away a lot of their business. And I think

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 3>that can and very much in some cases will happen

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 3>on the production side. That said, I don't think anyone

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 3>feels like Hollywood studios have gone away because of streaming.

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 3>In some ways, it's been another it's been a bood

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 3>for them. It's been a revenue stream. It's disrupted them

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's and it's been their salvation. And although I

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 3>don't think we quite yet know how it's going to

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 3>play out, I think using that as a sort of

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 3>rubric to say, look, the automation of production, much like

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 3>the automation of distribution, is going to be incredibly disruptive.

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 2>It's going to create you know, years, if.

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Not more, of you know, new business models, of people

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 3>having to learn new skills of people losing their jobs,

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 3>maybe some other people getting jobs, but ultimately, I don't

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 3>think from where I sit, and I'm not you know me,

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not usually a Pollyanna about this stuff. I don't

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 3>think it's going to bring down the traditional business anymore

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 3>than streaming, I e. The distribution side of this brought

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 3>down Hollywood. I think it just fundamentally transformed Hollywood, and

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 3>I think we're going to get to that point as well.

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Here well, enter Tyler Perry or should I say Chicken Little.

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>What I mean by that is he gives his interview

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>to the Hollywood Reporter in which he declares the sky

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is falling. You know, he makes some really really bold

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>statements to quote, you know, just a few of them.

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's one quote, there's got to be some sort of

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>regulations in order to protect us. If not, I just

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>don't see how we survive.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 3>End quote.

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I love the wei, by the way, as if, as

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>if he's in the same tax bracket as the people

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to protect. But now, look, I mean give

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the guy credit for doing at least what no one

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>else in his tax bracket seems willing to do, which

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is to get out there and ring the alarm in

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a major way. The question though, is, you know, is

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>he being hysterical or responsible?

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think maybe a little bit of both.

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 3>And just to go back for a second to your

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 3>week question, I think both tax bracket and job responsibility

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I think needs to be delineated there because and even

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 3>said it himself, he's like, look, as an employer, as

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 3>a boss, as an executive, this is really, you know,

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of my wildest fantasy. It's like, you can automate

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 3>large parts of the of the the assembly line, as

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 3>it were, and if you're trying to, you know, you're

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 3>worried about costs. And even Tyler Perry has to worry

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 3>about costs. Suddenly you just saved on a whole bunch

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 3>of animators or certainly kind of are able to scale

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 3>back a lot of what a lot of of the

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 3>sort of uh kind of spade work that had to

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 3>be done or grown work that had to be done

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 3>by by humans. So I think from that perspective, he's

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 3>probably not freaking out too much. But as he also notes,

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 3>as an actor, as a uh you know.

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 2>As a as a as.

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 3>A craftsman, as a fellow, you know, employee of a

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 3>lot of the people who work for him. Clearly there's

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of disruption there. I mean, look, this

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 3>is you know, I don't think Tyler Perry is I

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 3>think he's hysterical in that, you know, the notion that

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, somehow we shouldn't be building studios or we

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 3>should worry that the entire industry is just going to

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 3>evaporate because uh, you know, some you know, teenager can

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 3>suddenly you know, create the next media or whatever franchise

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 3>is going to resonate with people. I think that's an exaggeration.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think that, first of all, that's a

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 3>long way off from happening. Even when it does happen,

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 3>it'll probably be a very much a second class citizen.

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean again, you know, it is TikTok competing with

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 3>with Game of Thrones or with Succession. It's not you know,

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's competing on the mind share front, but but

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 3>clearly you know we're not We're not going to be

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 3>at the point where where any of this technology can

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 3>create the next succession. I think he's being responsible in

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 3>the sense we need to be, you know, kind of

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 3>plotting our course well in advance of when we've been

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 3>doing that. And you know, it's funny you mentioned the

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, we need regulation, we need to get get

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, kind of our duccen row here. He also

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 3>said something as he was making those comments. He said,

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 3>we need to not just like do this one guild

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 3>or one union at a time, one strike at a time.

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 2>And I think he's absolutely right about that.

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think as much as the writers and

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>actors strikes, I think put AI at the forefront. This

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of patchwork approach from a Hollywood industry perspective that

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 3>we had over the last year, where the directors went

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 3>and made their own deals, and the writers made a deal,

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 3>and then the actors kind of got what they got,

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 3>and then of course you've got all these other unions

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 3>the below the line.

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Folks. That's not really going to work.

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 3>And I would argue that not even from a labor standpoint,

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 3>but from from a studio in management and produce aial standpoint,

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 3>there needs to be a lot more alignment, a lot

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 3>more talking and and you know, you talk about regulation,

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:09.719
<v Speaker 3>a lot more negotiation with with.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 2>With Washington, because let's be real about this too.

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, the sam Altmans and and Sachinidella's and and

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 3>all the tech moguls they are, they are working at

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 3>their hardest to make sure that from a lobbying standpoint,

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 3>they have as few regulations as possible. I know there's

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 3>a big lawsuit, a few big lawsuits now, including the

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 3>New York Times suing Open AI for copyright infringement. But

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 3>the reality is, to the degree this is going to

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 3>be negotiated in the halls of Congress tech is you know,

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 3>halfway through the marathon, and you know you've got Hollywood

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 3>executives still debating what sneakers to buy. I mean, so

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.959
<v Speaker 3>this is a this is we are incredibly behind as

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 3>an industry from Hollywood standpoint, relative to where the tech

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 3>industry is in terms of figuring this out regulatorially.

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 2>So in all of those regards, I think Tyler Perry

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 2>is exactly right.

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 3>But I do think that in terms of the immediate fears,

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 3>the immediate displacement, the idea that the quality of work

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 3>can somehow start even remotely approaching what even very basic

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 3>professionals do, I think we're a ways off of them.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>We will be back in just a moment with more

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>with Steve Zeichick stick around and we are back with

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Steve Zeichik, who writes frequently about issues regarding artificial intelligence

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>at his sub stack Mind and Iron, which you could

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>check out at mindan iron dot com. He puts out

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>really good stuff every Thursday, so do check it out.

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, Steve, you were just talking about you know,

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you kind of panned back and gave us the big

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>picture in terms of the battle lines being drawn here,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and it just seems like such an impossible state of

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>affairs when you think about the regulatory picture, the guild picture,

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and what Tyler Perry is calling on for here in

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>terms of this industry getting its act together and getting

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone on the same page. What hope can we really

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>have for Hollywood to fight this battle in the right way.

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, if streaming is in any indication, I would say zero.

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's like the whole thing.

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you follow out of this stuff, like whatever

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 3>we did with social media on the tech side, let's

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.959
<v Speaker 3>do the opposite now. And I think you can make

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 3>a case that that's true with streaming as well. I mean,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, we obviously saw the legacy companies way behind,

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 3>We saw black box data issues, we saw lack of

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 3>revenue sharing. I mean, creators certainly don't want to repeat

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 3>any of that, And you know, I don't think it's

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 3>a stretch to say we're in changer of doing that

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 3>and then some So you know, I don't think the

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 3>historical precedent here is terribly encouraging. And I think, as

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 3>you've kind of been alluding to, in some ways, this

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 3>is are In a lot of ways, this is more

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 3>transformative than streaming. You know, production and creation always going

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 3>to be more fundamental to the business than distribution, though

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 3>distribution is of course very important.

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 2>So I don't have a ton of hope.

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 3>The only the only sort of in that regard the

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 3>glimmer I would offer listeners here and you could tell

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 3>me if you think I'm being too optimistic, is that

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 3>I think we have learned some lessons. I do think,

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, I talked to executives, as I'm sure to you,

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 3>who kind of say, look, you know, we are not

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 3>going to get caught unawares of the way we were.

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, there were so many people ten fifteen years

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 3>ago who dismissed a lot of this stuff as just

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 3>either you know, kind of want to be you know,

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Hollywood content or a user generated stuff. You know, we're

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 3>both old enough to remember the whole MySpace days and

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 3>the frenzy about that and that that wasn't going to

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 3>really cannibalize the business. And I think that I think

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Hollywood executives now and Labor Gill for that matter, are

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 3>just too savvy. They know that they cannot underestimate this. Now,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 3>does that mean they're going to react to that in

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 3>the right way? Are they going to align and get

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, you know, you know, can the guilds even

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 3>get on the same page. Can management and the guilds,

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 3>given some of the ranker decide what's best for them?

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Because you know, look, as much as I think the

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 3>Hollywood studios and management are in some ways, you know,

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Tyler Perry being an example in this regard the enemy

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 3>of labor, I also think they're their best ally because

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 3>because the tech companies, as we know, don't necessarily care

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 3>that much about Hollywood studios, I'm preserving their business model.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 3>They care about maximizing their profits as they should. So

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 3>to the extent that this is going to be a

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 3>battle between big Tech and Hollywood writ large, then hopefully

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 3>producers and executives and conglomerates can get on the same

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 3>page with workers and creators, because the sooner they could

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 3>do that, the better they can figure out, you know,

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 3>how to either neutralize the threat or work in concert

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 3>with with the opportunity.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>But but you know, I don't mean to.

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:06.479
<v Speaker 3>Like sing a Kumbaya tune here, but I think the

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 3>more kind of animous intention you have between Hollywood management

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 3>and Hollywood labor, the more likely it is that big

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 3>tech is going to come and eat both their lunches.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I my head is spinning just listening to this.

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm still somewhat fixated on the notion that,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I'm not I'm not pinning this on

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Perry, but you know, he's obviously calling for Congress

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to have the studios protect labor, and I guess obviously

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>not fire everyone in sight and just have computers crank

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>out all the production needs, you know, from here on in,

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and because obviously that would be tremendous cost savings. But

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I keep my when I wrap my

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>head around that scenario, I sort of say to myself,

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>so if you force the studios to keep employing people, Okay,

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>if there's some sort of protection there, how do you

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>keep the studios competition from then utilizing the technology and

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>then beating them at a fraction of the cost, and

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>keeping the purveyors of that technology from you know, do

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you keep them from from deploying the technology? Like, I

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>just I don't understand how that all that could even

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>possibly work.

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 2>You don't think Congress is in any way the answer

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 2>here is your point.

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know how you how you have Congress

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>force the studios to keep people employed, even though that

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is the most humane solution. And I don't know how

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you keep the technology companies from not deploying the technology.

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I just don't understand how that works.

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 3>So a couple of things that they're not going to

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 3>there's no way they're not going to stay the technology

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 3>companies from from deploying the technology. I think what's going

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 3>to happen is and this is not really a congressional issue.

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 2>This is a judicial issue.

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 3>And I'm I'm not an expert on regulation or legislation

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 3>in this regard or in any regard, but my understanding

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 3>from covering this a little bit is that really what

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 3>can happen on that side is.

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Just the toughening up of existing.

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Copyright laws that they're pretty tough as it is, but

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 3>they could be tougher in some respects. And then the

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 3>enforcement and of course that's going to be up to

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 3>the courts. And again we'll see where this New York

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 3>Times lawsuit goes. But but I think inso far, and

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 3>that would address kind of the second part of your question,

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 3>which is what's going to stop people from just you know,

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 3>grabbing it. On the one hand, so that that you know,

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 3>that depends on copyright and I don't think that's a

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 3>resolved issue yet. You know, can open ai just unleash

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 3>a product that lets people like you know, drop Brad

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 3>pit take Brad Pitt from I don't know seven and

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 3>drop them into their student film like I think that

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 3>there are legal mechanisms that can prevent that's totally that

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 3>convent that from getting distributed if someone does that, you know,

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't think open ai cares. I think they want

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 3>people to use this tool. I also think there could

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 3>be judicial restraint or or legislative and judicial restraints put

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 3>on you know, how much open ai could could actually

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 3>train their models on this data to begin with?

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 2>It was interesting.

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you notice this nuance, but when

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 3>sam Alwen was giving his little spiel on SOA. He

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 3>was talking about how this was all kind of trained

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 3>on publicly available information, and so I think they're very

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 3>aware now that the initial chat GPT, which was a

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 3>lot murkier in what it was grabbing, as we see

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 3>from the New York Times lawsuit, they have to be

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:41.479
<v Speaker 3>a lot more careful about that. So I think that

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 3>does address a little bit of what can be taken

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 3>and if you do take it, you have to pay

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 3>for it. And that's of course one avenue this could

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 3>all go as well, which is they do train on

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of this data that's you know, that's copyrighted,

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 3>but the studios and hopefully the artists get compensated for it.

0:25:59.400 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the jobs, I'm extremely, extremely pessimistic about

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 3>the kind of protectionism that I don't know if Tyler

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Perry is actively advocating for it, but to the degree

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 3>is kind of dangling this hope that Congress is going

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 3>to pass a law that keeps people employed when there's

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.719
<v Speaker 3>technology that can that can automate their jobs.

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, again, I am no labor.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Historian by any stretch, but if you look at the

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 3>history of automation in this country, in the auto industry

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and and and other other industries. There's just not a

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of reason to think that's that's gonna work. You know,

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 3>and you can go back to the typewriter, you can

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 3>go to you know, to Google, to search engines.

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think that's gonna work.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 3>I think what you can have, and I don't know

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.479
<v Speaker 3>if this happens legislatively or if it happens, you know,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 3>within the private sector.

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I think what you can have is retraining.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 3>You can basically say we're gonna, yes, this is going

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 3>to potentially some cases take your jobs, but in other

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 3>cases make it easier. We're going to help you do

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 3>your job better with the help of this technology, or

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 3>do a different job now that technology is doing this

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 3>current one. And I think there is room for that.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to get too like shiny optimist about that,

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:05.719
<v Speaker 3>because I think there's a limit to how much you

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 3>can retrain someone if their jobs are now completely automated.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 3>But I think there is some there's some avenue for

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 3>hope there.

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I do hope this isn't a matter of just

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>simple displacement. But we'll have to see on that and

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>on the copyright question. Keep in mind, I think copyright

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is almost like we're getting a little ahead of ourselves,

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>where we still need to see SORA be equipped with

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>having some degree of creative control where filmmakers will be

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>able to use your example, insert Brad Pit or insert

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:49.199
<v Speaker 1>you know whoever, because at this point we don't you know,

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>you can't even add sound to SOA, although eleven Labs

0:27:55.160 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>another software tool al owed there you could layer sound

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and on top of things, but you know, there's so

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>much that still needs to be demonstrated at this point.

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>What I'm also wondering about at this time is I'm wondering,

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>especially as we see one minute clips, is not even

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>just the disruption that is going to happen in terms

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>of we're obviously focusing on Hollywood premium long form entertainment.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering whether the TikTok and youtubes of the world

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>have things to worry about here because these this kind

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of technology is also going to impact, you know, the

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>social video creator economy layer of the world. Because let's

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>not forget that just because these videos can will great

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>premium video into existence, that doesn't mean everyone is Steven Spielberg.

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Not everyone is gonna be able to turn this into

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>ninety minutes or thirty minutes. But what they will be

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>able to.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Do is.

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Social video, which already has no barriers to entry. Why

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>can't open ai become the next YouTube or the next

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>TikTok In other words, I think the existing platforms in

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>social video could perhaps find a new platform emerge from

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>these new players that already power this kind of video.

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You see what I'm saying.

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 3>So you think that because right well, right now, Opening

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean Opening is purely a tech company. In fact,

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 3>they want developers forget distribution. They don't even want to,

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, they don't know we want to be creating

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the apps here. But you think that either open ai

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 3>or a company that's responsible for the tech by the way,

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Google would be would be the natural one because of

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 3>course they have both the AI capabilities and you know

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 3>with YouTube the distri abution capabilities. But do you think

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 3>there might be some kind of blurring of the lines

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 3>between the tech that enables the creation and the distribution

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 3>where those companies get into the distribution.

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's a natural extension. I mean, and Google,

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, could be right behind open ai here.

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>They have the Lumie Air is something that is coming

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that supposedly is going to be very similar to Sora.

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying open Ai, I think, why not open

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>up a distribution platform and compete because you're going to

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have tons of video coming out as people play with

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Why not get into that space as well.

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It could be a whole new play. And so I

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>just wonder whether we should be thinking even a little

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>more broadly here in terms of what disruption could come.

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.479
<v Speaker 1>If I was Sam Altman, That's how I'd be thinking.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's not shown to date a lot of interest

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 3>in and you know, you could say this is wise

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 3>or not. I actually think it kind of is. He's

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 3>not shown a lot of interest in being sort of

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 3>front facing in that way. I think he knows there's

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 3>companies with massive footholds. I think he feels like if

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 3>he does his job well and if open ai is

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 3>able to create or give developers the tools, really because

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 3>they're not really even creating a lot of this, but

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 3>they're giving developers. I mean, so it is a different case,

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 3>but they're giving developers the tools to create this stuff,

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 3>then they can go out and put it on those

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 3>distribution platforms. Though you know open Eye of course, as

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 3>we know, as a very close relationship both spiritually and

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 3>corporately with Microsoft. And you know, Microsoft clearly has a

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:38.479
<v Speaker 3>lot of reach with Windows and Office and all that,

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 3>so there's certainly some some potential there.

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I was curious.

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 3>There's something you said a second ago is interesting that

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 3>I was hoping maybe to circle back to for a minute,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Like you talk about what it can do in terms

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 3>of the barriers to entry for creators. Do you think

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the creator economy, this is like an

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 3>unabashed well, is this a good thing?

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Is this a bad thing?

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 3>It's only up the level of kind of you know,

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 3>professional or semi professional creators who are not you know,

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Hollywood types at all, your your mister beasts and and

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, your your TikTok kind of auteurs. This would

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 3>seem to really just give them tools that are almost unimaginable.

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 3>It levels the playing field for them, as I see it.

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 3>What do you what do you think it does in

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 3>terms of that world and creativity and the monetization they're up.

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you could see it level the playing field.

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you could see a whole new a whole

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>new group of players come in that are maybe more

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>adept at the kind of premium entertainment that you know,

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe the mister beasts of the world are not necessarily

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>adept at.

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just think that what we are talking

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>about here in general, whether we're talking about creator economy,

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>premium entertainment, it's so hard to get my head around

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the disruption that we're going to see. And I think

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what's gonna be disrupted, like we could

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>barely conceive of it. That's how huge this is.

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think just to add to that, I mean,

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 3>you talk about the whole new layer of creators who

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 3>who can you know, sort of h up their game

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 3>or or figure out how to master these tools in

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 3>a way that maybe this current or previous generation of

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 3>content creators have.

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I would look at animation, I really would.

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, animation, and this is where maybe

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, if I'm you know, Illumination or I'm Pixar

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 3>or on any of these companies that have that have

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 3>done this so well for so long, I'm worried because

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 3>forget just the the you know, the animators on the floor,

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 3>who should be rightly worried here, but you.

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Know, this is going to give tools.

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and I think you know, we both watched

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 3>these these videos and these demos and sort of saw

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 3>the remarkable animations that were being created. I think I

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 3>was frankly more struck by that than uh than than

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 3>some of the live stuff. And to me, if you're

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 3>able to kind of create animation up level, you know,

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 3>if your your average or slightly above average content creator

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 3>could now create you know, a one minute and then

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 3>it gets a little bit longer, you know, gets you

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.320
<v Speaker 3>know these animations that you know, pix Our, Illumination, their shorts,

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 3>and now suddenly there's like someone who's mastered these.

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Tools and maybe as an artist in their own right,

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 2>but is not.

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 3>Employed by a studio as there's no affiliation with them,

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 3>is now suddenly creating Pixar or Illumination level animation.

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 2>You know, what does that do to both sides? Right?

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 3>What does that do to the Hollywood firmament where it's like,

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 3>now suddenly you've got you get we can't distinguish between

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 3>these studios, And what does it do to to these

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 3>YouTube TikTok like platforms where suddenly it's not just you

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.479
<v Speaker 3>know uh, you know, somebody doing some fun karaoke video.

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 2>But I'm watching, you know, and I.

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 3>Know this is a bit of a stretch, but but

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 3>not as much, not as big as it was a

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:52.399
<v Speaker 3>month ago, where I'm watching someone do the next you know.

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Cocoa or cars or or minions.

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.479
<v Speaker 3>It just feels to me like there are so many

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 3>places here where the content creates could get this massive

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 3>boost again the ones who know how to use the tools.

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 3>And then you know, how does that get monetized if

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 3>suddenly someone could do really high level stuff without having

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 3>to go through the studios. Again, to your point, I

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 3>think that's an area where the level of disruption is

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 3>just mind boggling.

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And it just brings me back to Tyler Perry and

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's so easy to dismiss what he is saying

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and the profound implications of what he's raising as hysteria.

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>But the thing I keep coming back to is, and

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to end on this note, is

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>it's it's as if, you know, I'm typically allergic to hysteria,

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>but in this scenario, I find that, for once, I

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>find myself thinking hysteria is plausible, and if it's plausible,

0:35:55.960 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't it truly kind of apocalyptic? And how does disturbing

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>is that?

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I would end on this note.

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 3>From my end, the slight bit of optimism I would

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 3>inject to that and maybe leave listeners with. From from

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 3>my point of view is that if you love Tyler

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Perry and you love the media movies, or you love

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 3>you Know Spielberg or James Cameron, whoever it is, the

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 3>reality is is not only can these can these models

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 3>not actually create that? I mean they may be able

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 3>to emulate it, but they can create something that distinctive.

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 3>It's going to make those people even more prize. And

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 3>I think we're gonna love if you love you know,

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 3>whether it's from Tyler Perry to Steven Spielberg to Catherine

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Bigelow to Ava du Verne, I mean, you name it.

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 3>If you love that filmmaker, you love that creator, you know,

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 3>in the sea of pseudo professional content, that stuff is

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be even more valuable. There's going to be

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 3>even more premium, more of a premium on people who

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 3>could bring their artistry and humanity. I don't think it's

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 3>gonna touch that high level of content. In fact, it

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 3>may even put more of an emphasis on it so

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that tempers the apocalypse, but that's

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 3>the one thing I would say on.

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Score one for traditional Hollywood. Well, thanks Steve for taking

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the time out. You, of course, can check out everything

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he writes every week on his substack at Mind and Iron.

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate you taking the time out, great being here ready,

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. Be sure to leave us a review

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts and Amazon Music. We love to hear

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>from listeners. Please go to Variety dot com to sign

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>up for the free weekly Strictly Business newsletter, and don't

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>forget to tune in next week for another episode of

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Strictly Business.