1
00:00:02,640 --> 00:00:05,320
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast. I'm Paul Swinge. You.

2
00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:07,640
Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Wicks. Each day

3
00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:10,240
Speaker 1: we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

4
00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:12,520
Speaker 1: you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

5
00:00:12,560 --> 00:00:15,480
Speaker 1: the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

6
00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:17,959
Speaker 1: Podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

7
00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:23,280
Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com. Well, it is Fed Wednesday on

8
00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:26,080
Speaker 1: Wall Street. All eyes are on the Federal Reserve today?

9
00:00:26,200 --> 00:00:28,600
Speaker 1: How many rate cuts will the Fed be carrying out

10
00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:30,880
Speaker 1: this year? And how the markets react? We get some

11
00:00:30,920 --> 00:00:33,839
Speaker 1: answers to those questions. We welcome our next guest, Michael Collins.

12
00:00:33,920 --> 00:00:37,080
Speaker 1: Mike as a senior investment officer and senior portfolio manager

13
00:00:37,159 --> 00:00:40,120
Speaker 1: for ke G. I AM fixed income based in Newark,

14
00:00:40,120 --> 00:00:43,000
Speaker 1: New Jersey. Mike, thanks so much for joining us. What

15
00:00:43,040 --> 00:00:47,320
Speaker 1: do you expect to hear from Chairman Pal today? Yeah,

16
00:00:47,360 --> 00:00:50,040
Speaker 1: good morning Paul and Alex. Yeah, this is like our

17
00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:52,080
Speaker 1: our super Bowl, right, This is about as exciting as

18
00:00:52,080 --> 00:00:55,279
Speaker 1: it gets for for pond geefs, Like we haven't had

19
00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:59,200
Speaker 1: this much uncertainty for a FED meeting in a long time.

20
00:00:59,280 --> 00:01:01,320
Speaker 1: I mean the way we could. There are four different

21
00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:05,240
Speaker 1: things the FED could do. One is really not come

22
00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:07,600
Speaker 1: across as being a dovish, right kind of moving the

23
00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:10,640
Speaker 1: dots down a little bit. Remember their last out plot

24
00:01:10,640 --> 00:01:13,680
Speaker 1: in March showed a median expectation for a hike uh

25
00:01:13,720 --> 00:01:15,760
Speaker 1: this year. So let's say they just lower that, so

26
00:01:15,800 --> 00:01:18,720
Speaker 1: the medium expectation is for for no change this year.

27
00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:21,560
Speaker 1: That would be viewed, I think as being rather rather

28
00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:24,240
Speaker 1: hawkish by the market and probably resulting to sell off.

29
00:01:24,560 --> 00:01:27,000
Speaker 1: The second probability is that they actually lower the dots,

30
00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:30,559
Speaker 1: still don't cut, but show that they're probably gonna cut

31
00:01:30,600 --> 00:01:33,760
Speaker 1: once or maybe even twice this year. I think that

32
00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:36,560
Speaker 1: would probably be okay. Maybe the markets would do okay

33
00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:39,240
Speaker 1: in that environment. The third is that they actually cut

34
00:01:40,160 --> 00:01:43,400
Speaker 1: beats and signal that they might cut another time this year.

35
00:01:43,600 --> 00:01:45,959
Speaker 1: And of course fourth is that they do the fifty

36
00:01:46,319 --> 00:01:48,280
Speaker 1: right and and there are people out there who think

37
00:01:48,320 --> 00:01:50,720
Speaker 1: that that's possible. I would put the probabilities that those

38
00:01:50,760 --> 00:01:56,480
Speaker 1: four different scenarios at like thirty ten, right, So, um,

39
00:01:56,600 --> 00:01:59,480
Speaker 1: it's really evenly distributed. So that's leading to all this

40
00:01:59,720 --> 00:02:02,400
Speaker 1: on certainty and handwringing today. Yeah, I like to look

41
00:02:02,440 --> 00:02:04,080
Speaker 1: at the e I a data I don't know you

42
00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:06,920
Speaker 1: nerds look at but that's kind of my jam. Okay,

43
00:02:06,920 --> 00:02:11,680
Speaker 1: but no, it's seriously so okay the dollar question, how

44
00:02:11,720 --> 00:02:15,280
Speaker 1: are you positioned over the next three hours? Yeah, so

45
00:02:15,280 --> 00:02:19,239
Speaker 1: so interestingly, right, if you look at FED funds futures,

46
00:02:19,240 --> 00:02:24,120
Speaker 1: what's priced in through July, there's just about one cut

47
00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:26,919
Speaker 1: priced in, and we think it's actually a pretty good

48
00:02:27,000 --> 00:02:30,720
Speaker 1: chance that they do cut once or maybe even twice,

49
00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:33,760
Speaker 1: meaning you know, if they don't do a fifty today,

50
00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:36,320
Speaker 1: maybe they do it in July. Um. So actually, that's

51
00:02:36,320 --> 00:02:38,400
Speaker 1: something that looks like a pretty attractive way to play

52
00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:41,120
Speaker 1: this right now, betting that they do cut at least

53
00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:43,160
Speaker 1: once by the end of July. And you can actually

54
00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:46,120
Speaker 1: make money in that trade right now on the credit side,

55
00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:49,160
Speaker 1: which is really important here, right because there's been such

56
00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:52,120
Speaker 1: a big rally in credit spread in anticipation of a

57
00:02:52,200 --> 00:02:55,639
Speaker 1: dosh FED in aish E c B. We're actually looking

58
00:02:55,720 --> 00:02:59,600
Speaker 1: at today's news if they sound dobsh and markets rally,

59
00:02:59,720 --> 00:03:03,600
Speaker 1: meaning spreads tighten and equities go up. I think you're

60
00:03:03,600 --> 00:03:06,239
Speaker 1: supposed to take some profits on that trade, right, because

61
00:03:06,600 --> 00:03:09,840
Speaker 1: ultimately it's going to be really tough for the FED,

62
00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:12,799
Speaker 1: for the e c B for for Trump uh to

63
00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:17,720
Speaker 1: to continue to provide positive surprises to the market. So, Mike,

64
00:03:17,760 --> 00:03:20,120
Speaker 1: are you you one of those folks that are thinking

65
00:03:20,200 --> 00:03:23,800
Speaker 1: about our discounting into your models a recession maybe sometime

66
00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:27,560
Speaker 1: in mid you know, it feels like that probability has

67
00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:29,240
Speaker 1: gone up a lot. I know, if you look at

68
00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:31,680
Speaker 1: all the you know, normal indicators, and if you look

69
00:03:31,680 --> 00:03:35,360
Speaker 1: at the typical speculative excesses that build up later in

70
00:03:35,360 --> 00:03:38,360
Speaker 1: the cycle that typically lead to a recession, we actually

71
00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:40,080
Speaker 1: haven't had a lot of them, right, I mean, the

72
00:03:40,120 --> 00:03:44,080
Speaker 1: banking system is in the best financial condition of our lives,

73
00:03:44,560 --> 00:03:46,560
Speaker 1: um so, so that's kind of something to hang your

74
00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:48,640
Speaker 1: hat on. So we actually think the probability of recession

75
00:03:48,680 --> 00:03:52,360
Speaker 1: is pretty moderate. That being said, we're really bad. Everybody's

76
00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:55,320
Speaker 1: really bad. The FED is really bad at predicting recessions, right.

77
00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:59,279
Speaker 1: They tend to become self fulfilling and kind of snowball

78
00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,920
Speaker 1: into recession. So, you know, looking at the business confidence

79
00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:06,840
Speaker 1: falling pretty hard, Looking at China, China data really falling

80
00:04:06,840 --> 00:04:09,440
Speaker 1: off a cliff, and Europe arguably is kind of teetering

81
00:04:09,680 --> 00:04:12,720
Speaker 1: on a recession. Now. It is not unlikely that in

82
00:04:12,760 --> 00:04:17,480
Speaker 1: twelve or eighteen months, we have a pretty significant global slowdown,

83
00:04:17,480 --> 00:04:19,120
Speaker 1: and maybe we're just starting to see that now. So

84
00:04:19,160 --> 00:04:23,160
Speaker 1: you have to position your portfolios for that scenario. So

85
00:04:23,800 --> 00:04:28,280
Speaker 1: is that scenario worth twelve trillion dollars in negative yielding

86
00:04:28,279 --> 00:04:32,480
Speaker 1: debt around the world. Yeah, it is. I think it's

87
00:04:32,480 --> 00:04:34,520
Speaker 1: gonna that twelve is going to keep getting bigger. Right,

88
00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:36,200
Speaker 1: does that mean the recession we see is going to

89
00:04:36,279 --> 00:04:39,719
Speaker 1: be terrible or does it? What does that mean? Well, um,

90
00:04:40,160 --> 00:04:43,240
Speaker 1: I think there's the base cases that it's actually not

91
00:04:43,320 --> 00:04:45,600
Speaker 1: a terrible recess and that it's just kind of more

92
00:04:45,640 --> 00:04:50,360
Speaker 1: of the same, that global growth just continues to slow, right,

93
00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:53,800
Speaker 1: driven by these big secular forces, driven by you know,

94
00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:58,279
Speaker 1: confidence waning, maybe generally more trade friction, even if Trump

95
00:04:58,360 --> 00:05:01,799
Speaker 1: and g you know, talk nice and next week in Japan,

96
00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:04,920
Speaker 1: But notwithstanding it, I think we're in a world of

97
00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:09,919
Speaker 1: more trade friction, more geopolitical friction, rather than less. You

98
00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:11,760
Speaker 1: look what's happening in Turkey this morning. You look at

99
00:05:11,760 --> 00:05:13,840
Speaker 1: what's happening, and I ran, So that's the state of

100
00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:17,120
Speaker 1: the world probably indefinitely. Uh So, it's just I think

101
00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:21,800
Speaker 1: it's just a slow slog towards slower growth. Um. Not

102
00:05:21,839 --> 00:05:25,080
Speaker 1: necessarily a deep kind of V shaped recession. And in

103
00:05:25,160 --> 00:05:27,960
Speaker 1: that world, you know, central banks continue to be really

104
00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:31,279
Speaker 1: easy and rates just continue to stay low, and US

105
00:05:31,360 --> 00:05:33,800
Speaker 1: rates obviously have the most scope to fall of all

106
00:05:33,839 --> 00:05:36,840
Speaker 1: the big developed government bond markets. So Mike, I mean,

107
00:05:36,839 --> 00:05:38,960
Speaker 1: you guys are predential are just massive. I mean, almost

108
00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:41,840
Speaker 1: eight hundred billion in fixed income under management. How are

109
00:05:41,880 --> 00:05:45,680
Speaker 1: you allocating you know that between you know, maybe some

110
00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:50,679
Speaker 1: of the safer investment grade UH securities versus perhaps pushing

111
00:05:50,680 --> 00:05:52,080
Speaker 1: the risk out a little bit and high yield in

112
00:05:52,160 --> 00:05:55,080
Speaker 1: some other riskier aspects in the credit markets. Yeah, I

113
00:05:55,120 --> 00:05:57,720
Speaker 1: mean we're we're generally positioned in a in a barbell

114
00:05:57,839 --> 00:06:01,400
Speaker 1: type of UM credits ructure, and that is you know,

115
00:06:01,400 --> 00:06:02,919
Speaker 1: I always say, you want to you want to do

116
00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:05,040
Speaker 1: well in the base case, and the base case isn't

117
00:06:05,200 --> 00:06:07,279
Speaker 1: isn't that horrible? But you don't want to, you know,

118
00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:09,919
Speaker 1: really have a big draw down in in these tail risks,

119
00:06:09,920 --> 00:06:12,719
Speaker 1: which would be the recession. So the barbell we have

120
00:06:12,839 --> 00:06:16,040
Speaker 1: on is you know, there are opportunities in high yield

121
00:06:16,200 --> 00:06:19,800
Speaker 1: or select opportunities in emerging markets. UM. You know, even

122
00:06:19,800 --> 00:06:24,080
Speaker 1: in investment grade corporate European banks and US banks still

123
00:06:24,120 --> 00:06:26,320
Speaker 1: look pretty cheap to us. So so you can add

124
00:06:26,360 --> 00:06:28,640
Speaker 1: your yield and your coupon and your and your beta

125
00:06:29,040 --> 00:06:32,040
Speaker 1: and your best ideas in those areas. Uh. And then

126
00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:34,240
Speaker 1: the other half or so of a lot of our

127
00:06:34,240 --> 00:06:38,000
Speaker 1: portfolios are in very high quality responds, and a lot

128
00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:40,800
Speaker 1: of that are in actually in asset back securities or

129
00:06:41,000 --> 00:06:44,680
Speaker 1: different structured products like you know, triple A rated commercial

130
00:06:44,720 --> 00:06:48,560
Speaker 1: mortgage backed securities or collateralized loan obligations or asset backs,

131
00:06:48,839 --> 00:06:51,360
Speaker 1: things that have such a low probability of losing principle

132
00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:54,720
Speaker 1: and they still have a pretty decent yield or or spread.

133
00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:57,000
Speaker 1: So to me that that's kind of the ballast in

134
00:06:57,040 --> 00:06:59,279
Speaker 1: the portfolio if you do have a credit to this location.

135
00:06:59,800 --> 00:07:02,480
Speaker 1: Like Collins, thanks so much for joining us. Mica Senior

136
00:07:02,520 --> 00:07:05,880
Speaker 1: investment Officer and senior portfolio manager at p G. I

137
00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:10,000
Speaker 1: AM fixed income based in Newark, New Jersey. And it's interesting, uh,

138
00:07:10,280 --> 00:07:12,040
Speaker 1: you know still, you know, I think still a lot

139
00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:15,200
Speaker 1: of institutional investors, a lot of professional investors are still

140
00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:17,920
Speaker 1: willing to put some risk on into their portfolio despite

141
00:07:17,920 --> 00:07:19,040
Speaker 1: the fact where we are in the you know, the

142
00:07:19,040 --> 00:07:22,880
Speaker 1: economic cycle, and where we are with potential economic slowdown,

143
00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:26,120
Speaker 1: and and it's just this lower rate environment. Yeah. What's

144
00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:28,880
Speaker 1: also really puzzling to me, and I feel like this

145
00:07:28,960 --> 00:07:31,240
Speaker 1: is gonna be the conversation after the FED too, is

146
00:07:31,280 --> 00:07:34,160
Speaker 1: the interest rate differentials in particular, let's just call it

147
00:07:34,280 --> 00:07:36,640
Speaker 1: US and Europe for example, like Germany, And then how

148
00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:40,200
Speaker 1: it's not actually being reflected in the apex market, and

149
00:07:40,200 --> 00:07:43,120
Speaker 1: how you're seeing just like weird trading happenings like what's

150
00:07:43,200 --> 00:07:46,480
Speaker 1: leading what I think is also a little bit confusing.

151
00:07:46,520 --> 00:07:48,880
Speaker 1: And do the carry trades then in that environment still work?

152
00:07:48,920 --> 00:07:52,080
Speaker 1: I don't know, yeah exactly. And we saw Mario drag

153
00:07:52,200 --> 00:07:54,400
Speaker 1: I guess earlier this week, you know, talking about they

154
00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:56,560
Speaker 1: will they have lots of tools and their toolbox to

155
00:07:57,040 --> 00:07:59,040
Speaker 1: try to jump start the European economy. But you look

156
00:07:59,040 --> 00:08:01,880
Speaker 1: at the you know, negative yielding rates in in Germany.

157
00:08:01,920 --> 00:08:03,240
Speaker 1: You mentioned that, you know, the twelve and a half

158
00:08:03,240 --> 00:08:06,040
Speaker 1: billion dollars of negative yielding debt. It's just extraordinary and

159
00:08:06,040 --> 00:08:08,720
Speaker 1: at some point, uh, you know, it has to reverse,

160
00:08:08,880 --> 00:08:11,720
Speaker 1: one would think, one would think, But we didn't hear

161
00:08:11,760 --> 00:08:15,880
Speaker 1: that Fromario Draga earlier. Normal man, slow rates forever, not

162
00:08:16,080 --> 00:08:18,600
Speaker 1: for longer, but forever forever, I guess. And so we'll

163
00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:22,120
Speaker 1: see what the FED does later today again, uh that

164
00:08:22,200 --> 00:08:25,360
Speaker 1: coming up around to thirty with Chairman Powe with some

165
00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:28,320
Speaker 1: of his commentary that will be covering that of course

166
00:08:28,320 --> 00:08:45,920
Speaker 1: at Bloomberg Radio. Facebook yesterday jumped into the cryptocurrency game

167
00:08:45,960 --> 00:08:48,560
Speaker 1: in a pretty big way. They announced the launch of

168
00:08:48,559 --> 00:08:50,960
Speaker 1: what they're calling Libra, which will launch as soon as

169
00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:53,560
Speaker 1: next year and be what's known as a wait for it,

170
00:08:53,920 --> 00:08:57,280
Speaker 1: stable coin, which is a digital currency that's supported by

171
00:08:57,520 --> 00:09:01,120
Speaker 1: established government backed currencies and purities. To get the latest,

172
00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:05,720
Speaker 1: we welcome our good friend Leonard Laurent, calumnists covering Brussels

173
00:09:05,800 --> 00:09:09,360
Speaker 1: for Bloomberg Opinion. He is based in London today, Leonard,

174
00:09:09,480 --> 00:09:12,800
Speaker 1: thanks so much for joining us. What's the what's new

175
00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:16,400
Speaker 1: about lie bro? There's other cryptocurrencies in the marketplace. What

176
00:09:16,520 --> 00:09:19,760
Speaker 1: is Facebook bring to the table? In your opinion? So,

177
00:09:19,840 --> 00:09:24,040
Speaker 1: I think that this is the first time that a

178
00:09:24,040 --> 00:09:27,960
Speaker 1: company of Facebook sides that's almost three billion users they have,

179
00:09:28,600 --> 00:09:33,000
Speaker 1: has essentially come out with the cryptocurrency or endorse the

180
00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:35,560
Speaker 1: space in the way that it has. So that's that's new.

181
00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:38,080
Speaker 1: The second thing that's new is that they clearly do

182
00:09:38,120 --> 00:09:41,400
Speaker 1: not want to be associated with bitcoin and the kind

183
00:09:41,400 --> 00:09:45,080
Speaker 1: of crotocurrencies that have no intrinsic value, nothing to stop

184
00:09:45,120 --> 00:09:47,840
Speaker 1: them being worth nine thousand dollars or a hundred dollars

185
00:09:47,920 --> 00:09:51,000
Speaker 1: or fifteen thousand dollars, depending on which which day of

186
00:09:51,040 --> 00:09:53,199
Speaker 1: the year it is. These this currency is gonna be

187
00:09:53,240 --> 00:09:56,360
Speaker 1: backed by hard assets, so in theory it should never

188
00:09:56,360 --> 00:10:01,360
Speaker 1: be worth more than the reserve currencies backing it. And finally,

189
00:10:01,760 --> 00:10:04,080
Speaker 1: I just think we should realize that this is the

190
00:10:04,200 --> 00:10:07,240
Speaker 1: culmination of many years of experimentation from Facebook and trying

191
00:10:07,240 --> 00:10:10,319
Speaker 1: to expand in payments. It has had several stabs at

192
00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:13,000
Speaker 1: getting a payments business going. This to me is part

193
00:10:13,080 --> 00:10:17,040
Speaker 1: of that. It's not just about crypto, so it's definitely new.

194
00:10:17,440 --> 00:10:21,120
Speaker 1: Whether it's succestful, whether it's really some bold new vision

195
00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:23,880
Speaker 1: or a kind of incremental step in terms of Facebook's

196
00:10:23,880 --> 00:10:26,199
Speaker 1: business that I think is the is the remaining question

197
00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:29,319
Speaker 1: to me. You said the two magic words in theory,

198
00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:33,000
Speaker 1: So on a technical basis, I'm kind of wondering how

199
00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:35,559
Speaker 1: they wind up having Libra stay consistent if it's made

200
00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:37,400
Speaker 1: up of a bunch of currencies that wind up moving

201
00:10:37,440 --> 00:10:41,440
Speaker 1: a lot. Well, I think they basically want to be

202
00:10:41,559 --> 00:10:45,520
Speaker 1: their own central bank in a way. We have examples

203
00:10:45,559 --> 00:10:48,720
Speaker 1: of currencies that are managed in this way that are

204
00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:52,120
Speaker 1: pegged to currencies. Now we all know the dollar currency peg.

205
00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:53,720
Speaker 1: This is not going to be a dollar currency peg.

206
00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:56,280
Speaker 1: This is going to be a mix of currencies. There's

207
00:10:56,320 --> 00:10:57,920
Speaker 1: a lot we don't know about what goes in there.

208
00:10:58,000 --> 00:10:59,560
Speaker 1: There's a lot we don't know about how it's gonna

209
00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:02,360
Speaker 1: be managed. At the point being is that their their

210
00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:05,000
Speaker 1: claim would always be that they have a one to

211
00:11:05,120 --> 00:11:11,200
Speaker 1: one assets backing every piece of liber So again in theory,

212
00:11:11,240 --> 00:11:13,760
Speaker 1: because markets can do funny things if you believe what

213
00:11:13,800 --> 00:11:16,960
Speaker 1: they say, it should never fluctuate wildly in the way

214
00:11:17,000 --> 00:11:20,480
Speaker 1: that nonpaid currencies do so le you know they when

215
00:11:20,480 --> 00:11:22,320
Speaker 1: it made this annound me yesterday, I guess they announced

216
00:11:22,440 --> 00:11:24,920
Speaker 1: they have twenties seven or so partners some of the

217
00:11:24,920 --> 00:11:30,240
Speaker 1: big credit card companies Visa, master Card, even PayPal. What

218
00:11:30,320 --> 00:11:32,480
Speaker 1: did you make of the list of companies that are

219
00:11:32,520 --> 00:11:34,680
Speaker 1: partnering with him? Was it the names you wanted to see?

220
00:11:34,800 --> 00:11:36,480
Speaker 1: Was it as many names as you wanted to see?

221
00:11:36,480 --> 00:11:38,240
Speaker 1: Do they have more work to do? How do you

222
00:11:38,320 --> 00:11:41,920
Speaker 1: view that? Yeah? It was? I mean, look that there

223
00:11:42,040 --> 00:11:45,920
Speaker 1: is It depends on what what the ambitions are. Um,

224
00:11:46,600 --> 00:11:49,560
Speaker 1: it's pretty obvious that none of Facebook's big competitors were

225
00:11:49,559 --> 00:11:52,840
Speaker 1: on the list. There was no Amazon, there was no Apple,

226
00:11:53,440 --> 00:11:55,280
Speaker 1: There were no banks on the list. Again, you might

227
00:11:55,440 --> 00:11:59,400
Speaker 1: question whether Facebook again that's that's the right competition of Facebook.

228
00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:03,000
Speaker 1: So there were no banks. There were a few services

229
00:12:03,040 --> 00:12:05,880
Speaker 1: companies like Spotify, like Uber, so you can you can

230
00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:09,480
Speaker 1: sort of try and piece together how in future this

231
00:12:09,559 --> 00:12:11,640
Speaker 1: crepital currency might be used, because this is the big

232
00:12:11,720 --> 00:12:16,000
Speaker 1: question with any kind of form of electronic money, what

233
00:12:16,200 --> 00:12:17,720
Speaker 1: is the use case? If you're just going to fill

234
00:12:17,840 --> 00:12:20,959
Speaker 1: an electronic wallet with with some money, do you have

235
00:12:21,000 --> 00:12:22,760
Speaker 1: stuff that you can do with it? I mean, we

236
00:12:22,800 --> 00:12:25,080
Speaker 1: have PayPal already, so I think that they have a

237
00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:29,520
Speaker 1: sort of predictable but pretty small list of partners. It

238
00:12:29,679 --> 00:12:32,079
Speaker 1: is Facebook, after all. I'm not sure that many companies

239
00:12:32,160 --> 00:12:35,520
Speaker 1: wants to kind of be in its orbits today. But

240
00:12:35,640 --> 00:12:39,080
Speaker 1: I'm guessing or assuming their theory is that if it

241
00:12:39,120 --> 00:12:41,719
Speaker 1: gains traction, more people will come. If you build it,

242
00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:45,680
Speaker 1: they will come. I have no certainty that's true, though, Paul.

243
00:12:45,720 --> 00:12:47,240
Speaker 1: Do you also know who comes if you built something

244
00:12:47,240 --> 00:12:53,679
Speaker 1: new and cool? When it comes to currencies, regulators they're like, hey,

245
00:12:53,840 --> 00:12:55,880
Speaker 1: I mean what I what I found really interesting is

246
00:12:55,920 --> 00:12:58,400
Speaker 1: that yesterday it felt like Congressman kind of came out

247
00:12:58,440 --> 00:13:03,319
Speaker 1: in full force, being like unprecedented power, unprecedented experience, and

248
00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:06,040
Speaker 1: then today you hear from shell Sandberg it can being like, yeah, yeah,

249
00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:08,640
Speaker 1: we're talking to regulator. Is it the process? Do you

250
00:13:08,679 --> 00:13:15,079
Speaker 1: kind of buy that? I buy that Facebook is totally

251
00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:18,440
Speaker 1: conscious of the scrutiny that it's under. And you know,

252
00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:22,800
Speaker 1: companies do funny things when they are under huge regulatory scrutiny,

253
00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:28,120
Speaker 1: when they're under potential antitrust investigation. This seems totally reckless

254
00:13:28,440 --> 00:13:30,160
Speaker 1: at first glance, but on the other hand, you could

255
00:13:30,160 --> 00:13:32,360
Speaker 1: easily see why a company that makes something like nineties

256
00:13:32,400 --> 00:13:36,480
Speaker 1: six of its money from advertising and is looking exceptionally

257
00:13:36,960 --> 00:13:39,520
Speaker 1: powerful and concentrated, you can see why they might go, well,

258
00:13:39,600 --> 00:13:43,360
Speaker 1: let's diversify, let's find other revenue streams. And as for

259
00:13:43,400 --> 00:13:46,160
Speaker 1: the As for the regulation part, I haven't seen anyone

260
00:13:46,960 --> 00:13:50,760
Speaker 1: say outrights that they would, you know, ban Libra or

261
00:13:50,960 --> 00:13:53,800
Speaker 1: stop it or properly clamped down on it, because it

262
00:13:53,880 --> 00:13:56,400
Speaker 1: is actually quite easy. If you wanted to stop Libra,

263
00:13:56,480 --> 00:13:58,960
Speaker 1: you could just ban crypto currencies. You can you can

264
00:13:59,040 --> 00:14:00,360
Speaker 1: do things. So I think that they are going to

265
00:14:00,440 --> 00:14:03,320
Speaker 1: do everything in their power too, quite rightly, ask a

266
00:14:03,360 --> 00:14:05,760
Speaker 1: more transparency. Let us get in there, let us access

267
00:14:05,800 --> 00:14:08,680
Speaker 1: the data, let us localize the data. Remember, this is

268
00:14:08,920 --> 00:14:11,240
Speaker 1: going to be across many, many countries, and it's going

269
00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:13,880
Speaker 1: to be an ongoing kind of fight and ongoing friction

270
00:14:13,880 --> 00:14:17,320
Speaker 1: over the next year. Leonard Laurent Calmas, covering Brussels for

271
00:14:17,400 --> 00:14:19,800
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Opinion, joining us on the phone from London. Thank

272
00:14:19,840 --> 00:14:40,520
Speaker 1: you so much, leone. Well, over the past several weeks,

273
00:14:40,520 --> 00:14:44,120
Speaker 1: we've had an inverted yield per from on several occasions,

274
00:14:44,160 --> 00:14:47,359
Speaker 1: and that typically for many investors, suggests that a recession

275
00:14:47,800 --> 00:14:51,440
Speaker 1: maybe coming. Our next guest says, maybe not so fast.

276
00:14:52,280 --> 00:14:56,240
Speaker 1: Our next guest, James Skank, president and CEO of Pentagon

277
00:14:56,680 --> 00:14:59,440
Speaker 1: Federal based on Alexander, Virginia, joins us. James, thanks so

278
00:14:59,520 --> 00:15:02,800
Speaker 1: much for joining us again. You wrote this article op

279
00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:05,960
Speaker 1: ed opinion for the USA Today where you suggest that

280
00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:09,680
Speaker 1: maybe investors shouldn't be too concerned about a recession following

281
00:15:09,960 --> 00:15:14,040
Speaker 1: an inverted your curve. Oh, I think you got exactly right. Um, again,

282
00:15:14,040 --> 00:15:16,120
Speaker 1: we're just one data point, but we serve about one

283
00:15:16,160 --> 00:15:19,240
Speaker 1: point eight million Americans, and so on any given day

284
00:15:19,280 --> 00:15:22,480
Speaker 1: we're getting a really good um consumer data. That's demand

285
00:15:22,480 --> 00:15:26,600
Speaker 1: for autos, mortgages, credit cards, and refinance student loans. And

286
00:15:26,640 --> 00:15:31,000
Speaker 1: basically what we're seeing consumers spending is remaining extremely small strong.

287
00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:33,200
Speaker 1: We had a really strong May, came out of a

288
00:15:33,240 --> 00:15:37,640
Speaker 1: strong April. Wage rates are rising and that's having more

289
00:15:37,680 --> 00:15:41,520
Speaker 1: disposable income into the consumers pockets. Lots of people are working,

290
00:15:41,680 --> 00:15:45,280
Speaker 1: Unemployment claims are very low, and there's low inflation. So

291
00:15:45,400 --> 00:15:48,200
Speaker 1: you know, I think the most recent revision of the

292
00:15:48,400 --> 00:15:51,400
Speaker 1: Bureau of Economic Analysis, in the first quarter, the economy

293
00:15:51,400 --> 00:15:53,360
Speaker 1: grew three point one per cent. So we're not buying

294
00:15:53,360 --> 00:15:56,800
Speaker 1: into naysayers. We're seeing incredibly strong demand for our products

295
00:15:56,800 --> 00:16:00,400
Speaker 1: and services. So the obviously the issue with the curve

296
00:16:00,520 --> 00:16:02,960
Speaker 1: is at some point banks don't want to lend any

297
00:16:02,960 --> 00:16:04,760
Speaker 1: money because they're not going to make any money off

298
00:16:04,760 --> 00:16:06,600
Speaker 1: of it. That's the whole point, right, You're gonna borrow

299
00:16:06,640 --> 00:16:09,440
Speaker 1: short and then lend Longum. Have you noticed any of

300
00:16:09,440 --> 00:16:13,520
Speaker 1: that in your business anecdotally, And that's the one difference

301
00:16:13,520 --> 00:16:15,520
Speaker 1: Alex with the with the credit union, so we can

302
00:16:15,560 --> 00:16:18,120
Speaker 1: really play the long game. Unfortunately, for a lot of

303
00:16:18,120 --> 00:16:20,960
Speaker 1: the banks, if the FED does drop rates are flat

304
00:16:21,000 --> 00:16:25,080
Speaker 1: yield curve, they're they're really constrained by the quarterly earning reports.

305
00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:27,720
Speaker 1: They got to grow their earnings and continue to grow

306
00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:30,880
Speaker 1: quarter to quarter without missing a beat, otherwise they get

307
00:16:30,920 --> 00:16:33,440
Speaker 1: slaughtered into public markets. As a credit union is about

308
00:16:33,440 --> 00:16:36,120
Speaker 1: five thousand, four hundred credit unis in America can really

309
00:16:36,160 --> 00:16:38,120
Speaker 1: play the long game because we're not We're owned by

310
00:16:38,120 --> 00:16:41,080
Speaker 1: our members, unlike being owned by a shareholder, So we

311
00:16:41,120 --> 00:16:43,680
Speaker 1: can continue to lend through the cycle, and we can

312
00:16:43,680 --> 00:16:47,080
Speaker 1: continue to give competitive rates. Uh. What I wrote at

313
00:16:47,080 --> 00:16:48,480
Speaker 1: my article, what you see a lot of times what

314
00:16:48,520 --> 00:16:50,720
Speaker 1: banks are gonna do is they're going to really tighten

315
00:16:50,800 --> 00:16:53,360
Speaker 1: credit because they have to be concerned because they lend

316
00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:55,680
Speaker 1: a lot deeper throughout the year that we do go

317
00:16:55,720 --> 00:16:58,720
Speaker 1: into a recession, their delinquency is going to go up significantly,

318
00:16:58,720 --> 00:17:01,360
Speaker 1: which really impacts their earning. So they start tightening. Then

319
00:17:01,400 --> 00:17:04,639
Speaker 1: they have to put their expenses across a much shorter

320
00:17:04,760 --> 00:17:07,239
Speaker 1: number of new consumers, and so they start driving up

321
00:17:07,320 --> 00:17:09,320
Speaker 1: rates and higher feed You don't have that in the

322
00:17:09,320 --> 00:17:11,080
Speaker 1: credit union business, and we're very proud of that that

323
00:17:11,119 --> 00:17:12,760
Speaker 1: we can really do what's right for the consumer for

324
00:17:12,760 --> 00:17:16,679
Speaker 1: the long haul. So, James, what I didn't really know about, uh,

325
00:17:16,720 --> 00:17:18,879
Speaker 1: Pentagon Federal is how big you guys are You the

326
00:17:18,960 --> 00:17:22,080
Speaker 1: second largest credit union in the US with over assets,

327
00:17:22,119 --> 00:17:24,640
Speaker 1: So you obviously, as you mentioned earlier, have your finger

328
00:17:24,680 --> 00:17:26,640
Speaker 1: on the pulse of kind of the consumer. Let's talk

329
00:17:26,640 --> 00:17:29,280
Speaker 1: about credit quality right now. We're, you know, ten plus

330
00:17:29,359 --> 00:17:33,240
Speaker 1: years into this economic cycle. UH, there's some concerns among

331
00:17:33,640 --> 00:17:36,080
Speaker 1: some creditors that credit quality may become an issue. What

332
00:17:36,119 --> 00:17:39,840
Speaker 1: do you seeing. We're seeing still strong. We're not seeing

333
00:17:39,840 --> 00:17:42,119
Speaker 1: a huge uptick in credit quality right now, and we

334
00:17:42,160 --> 00:17:44,600
Speaker 1: think it was a combination of the tax cuts last

335
00:17:44,680 --> 00:17:48,080
Speaker 1: year put additional income in the Americans pockets and also

336
00:17:48,119 --> 00:17:51,280
Speaker 1: with the rising UH rates. As far as salaries, after

337
00:17:51,440 --> 00:17:54,520
Speaker 1: a ten year expansionary cycle, it really has only been

338
00:17:54,520 --> 00:17:57,480
Speaker 1: in the last twelve to eighteen months that we're starting

339
00:17:57,520 --> 00:17:59,399
Speaker 1: to see sort of real wage growth, with you know,

340
00:17:59,480 --> 00:18:02,200
Speaker 1: unemployed up blow four percent, you're starting to see more

341
00:18:02,280 --> 00:18:05,320
Speaker 1: income being paid to the consumer. And across the banks too,

342
00:18:05,320 --> 00:18:07,520
Speaker 1: with their tax cuts, they've been able to pay for

343
00:18:07,640 --> 00:18:10,480
Speaker 1: talent and UH take really good care of the customers.

344
00:18:10,480 --> 00:18:12,840
Speaker 1: So we're not seeing the credit concerns right now at

345
00:18:12,840 --> 00:18:14,919
Speaker 1: this time. You always have to be concerned with it.

346
00:18:15,160 --> 00:18:16,879
Speaker 1: But if you continue to sort of you play for

347
00:18:16,920 --> 00:18:19,840
Speaker 1: the long haul, make good credit decisions, UH, and don't

348
00:18:19,840 --> 00:18:22,080
Speaker 1: stretch too deep. You can you can weather any cycle.

349
00:18:22,400 --> 00:18:27,000
Speaker 1: So typically, where do you see the cracks first? Where

350
00:18:27,000 --> 00:18:28,600
Speaker 1: do you see the cracks first? You'll see it in

351
00:18:28,800 --> 00:18:31,720
Speaker 1: UM some someone of the auto lending when you start

352
00:18:31,760 --> 00:18:34,920
Speaker 1: seeing eighty four months and even longer financing periods as

353
00:18:35,119 --> 00:18:39,000
Speaker 1: auto raids continue to rise. You'll see it in credit

354
00:18:39,040 --> 00:18:43,600
Speaker 1: card receivables, the delinquency on credit card portfolios. So those

355
00:18:43,600 --> 00:18:45,760
Speaker 1: were you were the first to. You know, usually mortgages

356
00:18:45,920 --> 00:18:48,840
Speaker 1: UM the consumer holds onto the mortgage the longest. But

357
00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:51,119
Speaker 1: so we always look at a credit card delinquency and

358
00:18:51,160 --> 00:18:53,359
Speaker 1: auto delinquency to start looking for any sort of cracks

359
00:18:53,359 --> 00:18:56,320
Speaker 1: and credit quality. James Kank, thank you so much. James

360
00:18:56,400 --> 00:19:00,119
Speaker 1: as president and CEO of Pentagon Federal Credit Union Alexander

361
00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:18,880
Speaker 1: of Virginia dollars under management well more than a year ago,

362
00:19:19,040 --> 00:19:21,639
Speaker 1: actually seems longer than that. T Mobile and Sprint announced

363
00:19:21,800 --> 00:19:24,520
Speaker 1: their merger. The deal would combine the number three and

364
00:19:24,600 --> 00:19:28,080
Speaker 1: number four wireless carriers in the United States, and no

365
00:19:28,160 --> 00:19:30,919
Speaker 1: surprise of regulators have been studying this deal very closely

366
00:19:30,960 --> 00:19:33,720
Speaker 1: to get the latest on where we stand with this saga,

367
00:19:34,000 --> 00:19:36,280
Speaker 1: we turned to our good friend Tara la Chapelle. She

368
00:19:36,359 --> 00:19:39,720
Speaker 1: covers deals, telecom and media for Bloomberg Opinion. She joins

369
00:19:39,800 --> 00:19:42,280
Speaker 1: us in our Bloomberg and Actor broker studio. Tara, thanks

370
00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:44,480
Speaker 1: so much for joining us. Boy. This seems to be

371
00:19:44,560 --> 00:19:47,640
Speaker 1: the never ending deal, the deal that just can't get closed.

372
00:19:47,760 --> 00:19:50,600
Speaker 1: What's the latest on this deal now? So, the latest

373
00:19:50,640 --> 00:19:53,040
Speaker 1: in this saga is that it looks like T Mobile

374
00:19:53,040 --> 00:19:56,440
Speaker 1: and Sprint may actually be inching closer to winning approval

375
00:19:56,520 --> 00:19:59,719
Speaker 1: from the US Justice Department for this deal. They already

376
00:19:59,760 --> 00:20:02,480
Speaker 1: see to have gotten a nod from the Federal Communications Commission,

377
00:20:02,880 --> 00:20:07,119
Speaker 1: So the Justice Department wants them to help sort of

378
00:20:07,200 --> 00:20:10,600
Speaker 1: lay the groundwork for the formation of a viable fourth

379
00:20:10,640 --> 00:20:13,120
Speaker 1: competitor that would sort of replace or fill the whole

380
00:20:13,160 --> 00:20:15,119
Speaker 1: that Sprint is going to leave behind when they buy Sprint,

381
00:20:15,480 --> 00:20:17,520
Speaker 1: which seems like it was sort of negate the whole

382
00:20:17,560 --> 00:20:20,520
Speaker 1: reason for doing this merger. But it sounds like, according

383
00:20:20,560 --> 00:20:24,240
Speaker 1: to my Bloomberg News colleagues, they're hearing from sources that

384
00:20:24,720 --> 00:20:28,359
Speaker 1: Dish Network, they satellite TV provider run by Charlie organ

385
00:20:28,960 --> 00:20:31,480
Speaker 1: is in talks to buy about six billion dollars worth

386
00:20:31,520 --> 00:20:34,600
Speaker 1: of assets from these companies, including Spectrum and the boost

387
00:20:34,600 --> 00:20:37,480
Speaker 1: Mobile prepaid brand, in order to help smooth this along

388
00:20:37,560 --> 00:20:39,959
Speaker 1: and appease the Justice Department, And I guess they're hoping

389
00:20:40,359 --> 00:20:43,200
Speaker 1: that this will be enough to get the deal through. Um,

390
00:20:43,200 --> 00:20:45,760
Speaker 1: the spectrum is the jam, like, that's what everyone wants.

391
00:20:45,760 --> 00:20:48,280
Speaker 1: It's the good stuff, right, So is it a good

392
00:20:48,320 --> 00:20:50,040
Speaker 1: thing that T Mobile wants to sell it or not?

393
00:20:50,160 --> 00:20:53,160
Speaker 1: And isn't it good if Dish buys it? So one

394
00:20:53,160 --> 00:20:55,440
Speaker 1: of the reasons for T Mobile doing this deal is

395
00:20:55,480 --> 00:20:58,040
Speaker 1: that Sprint has a lot of midband spectrum that would

396
00:20:58,040 --> 00:21:00,280
Speaker 1: be really helpful for T Mobile and building out of

397
00:21:00,320 --> 00:21:03,640
Speaker 1: five G next generation wireless network, which is something all

398
00:21:03,680 --> 00:21:06,320
Speaker 1: these carriers are focused on now. Um, so that will

399
00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:08,840
Speaker 1: really help them. And where I think it's puzzling is

400
00:21:09,160 --> 00:21:11,240
Speaker 1: T Mobile is the one that needs the spectrum Dish

401
00:21:11,280 --> 00:21:14,760
Speaker 1: really doesn't. Dish isn't a wireless carrier as of yet.

402
00:21:14,800 --> 00:21:17,720
Speaker 1: They're supposedly building a network and are working towards that,

403
00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:20,720
Speaker 1: but they've basically been squatting on all this valuable spectrum,

404
00:21:20,760 --> 00:21:22,720
Speaker 1: not really doing much with it for all these years.

405
00:21:23,080 --> 00:21:26,160
Speaker 1: So it's puzzling to me that Dish wants more spectrum

406
00:21:26,160 --> 00:21:27,760
Speaker 1: and T Mobile is the one willing to give some

407
00:21:27,920 --> 00:21:29,720
Speaker 1: up in order to get this deal through. It's it's

408
00:21:29,720 --> 00:21:31,840
Speaker 1: a little bit puzzling given what we know about what

409
00:21:32,080 --> 00:21:35,600
Speaker 1: both these companies actually need. So, Tara, are we getting

410
00:21:35,640 --> 00:21:38,359
Speaker 1: to the point now if I'm Sprint t Mobile that

411
00:21:38,480 --> 00:21:40,920
Speaker 1: the vestures that the regulators are asking me to make

412
00:21:41,240 --> 00:21:43,280
Speaker 1: kind of make this deal in the first place not

413
00:21:43,400 --> 00:21:45,840
Speaker 1: worth doing. Yeah, that's where I'm a little bit concerned.

414
00:21:45,880 --> 00:21:47,359
Speaker 1: I mean, a lot of deals when they go on

415
00:21:47,480 --> 00:21:50,600
Speaker 1: this long and they have this many regulatory hangups, they

416
00:21:50,680 --> 00:21:52,480
Speaker 1: kind of get to a point where you start to wonder,

417
00:21:53,000 --> 00:21:54,960
Speaker 1: are is the desire to do this deal sort of

418
00:21:54,960 --> 00:21:57,240
Speaker 1: clouding the company's judgment? And so many times we see

419
00:21:57,240 --> 00:21:59,359
Speaker 1: mega mergers not really work out in the end, you know,

420
00:21:59,359 --> 00:22:02,480
Speaker 1: they don't really pay off for shareholders because the executives

421
00:22:02,480 --> 00:22:04,280
Speaker 1: maybe took it too far, either in price or what

422
00:22:04,320 --> 00:22:06,080
Speaker 1: they were willing to concede in order to get their

423
00:22:06,119 --> 00:22:08,840
Speaker 1: deal done. So I'm worried in this case that you know,

424
00:22:08,920 --> 00:22:10,800
Speaker 1: we don't know the details yet, we don't know what

425
00:22:10,920 --> 00:22:13,320
Speaker 1: exactly dishes buying and what this is going to look like.

426
00:22:13,760 --> 00:22:16,880
Speaker 1: But is Team Team Mobile giving up something and potentially

427
00:22:16,920 --> 00:22:20,320
Speaker 1: creating a situation where the competitive market wouldn't really be

428
00:22:20,480 --> 00:22:22,719
Speaker 1: more favorable to them if the steal goes through than

429
00:22:22,760 --> 00:22:25,040
Speaker 1: it is now where they're just competing against Sprint, which

430
00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:27,119
Speaker 1: is a much weaker player at the moment. We'll do

431
00:22:27,119 --> 00:22:32,679
Speaker 1: just make you miss your analyst days this deal it

432
00:22:32,760 --> 00:22:38,720
Speaker 1: was a CMS vicom So what would Dish do? Like? Okay,

433
00:22:38,760 --> 00:22:41,120
Speaker 1: so has all this spectrum is again that a good

434
00:22:41,119 --> 00:22:43,359
Speaker 1: thing are bad? I mean that's the big question. So

435
00:22:43,440 --> 00:22:45,919
Speaker 1: if you ask, you know most analysts and investors, and

436
00:22:45,920 --> 00:22:47,920
Speaker 1: in this tone is sort of changing at this point,

437
00:22:47,920 --> 00:22:50,439
Speaker 1: but they would tell you that Charlie Organ's plan all

438
00:22:50,480 --> 00:22:52,679
Speaker 1: along was to sell the spectrum, that it's worth so

439
00:22:52,800 --> 00:22:54,240
Speaker 1: much and you know he's not really going to do

440
00:22:54,240 --> 00:22:57,480
Speaker 1: anything with it, and that that was their goal, is

441
00:22:57,560 --> 00:22:59,879
Speaker 1: to eventually sell out and get a big exit. He

442
00:23:00,160 --> 00:23:02,840
Speaker 1: and says that they are working towards building this Internet

443
00:23:02,840 --> 00:23:04,520
Speaker 1: of Things network and it's going to be sort of

444
00:23:04,560 --> 00:23:07,919
Speaker 1: a beginning stage of them getting to five G. So

445
00:23:08,000 --> 00:23:11,199
Speaker 1: it sounds like they are dedicated to building a network,

446
00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:13,480
Speaker 1: in which case, you know, maybe the spectrum is useful

447
00:23:13,520 --> 00:23:15,640
Speaker 1: to them. But I think it'll be interesting to see

448
00:23:15,640 --> 00:23:19,480
Speaker 1: that if this deal comes together with Dish that whether

449
00:23:19,520 --> 00:23:22,280
Speaker 1: the FCC puts in place some sort of provision that

450
00:23:22,320 --> 00:23:24,800
Speaker 1: says Dish can't then turn around and sell this to

451
00:23:24,880 --> 00:23:27,240
Speaker 1: somebody else, that they need to commit to doing something

452
00:23:27,240 --> 00:23:29,800
Speaker 1: with these spectrum licenses. Yeah, and they I mean they

453
00:23:29,840 --> 00:23:32,280
Speaker 1: have I guess he has a he has a FCC

454
00:23:32,400 --> 00:23:34,600
Speaker 1: limit to build it with his existing spectrum, and I

455
00:23:34,600 --> 00:23:38,320
Speaker 1: guess he's just barely meeting the terms of that of

456
00:23:38,359 --> 00:23:40,399
Speaker 1: those restrictions. So it's really unclear. As you mentioned, I

457
00:23:40,400 --> 00:23:41,680
Speaker 1: know you spend a lot of time with Dish and

458
00:23:41,760 --> 00:23:44,359
Speaker 1: Charlie Organ, it's really unclear what his strategy is. I

459
00:23:44,400 --> 00:23:46,960
Speaker 1: think investors maybe might get it a little tired of waiting.

460
00:23:47,119 --> 00:23:50,520
Speaker 1: It's super expensive, right, like that's the whole thing. Yeah, yeah,

461
00:23:50,560 --> 00:23:53,040
Speaker 1: I mean it underpins the company's valuation. At this point,

462
00:23:53,119 --> 00:23:55,320
Speaker 1: Dish has an eighteen billion dollar market cap, which is

463
00:23:55,400 --> 00:23:59,159
Speaker 1: huge for mostly satellite TV business losing tons of subscribers

464
00:23:59,200 --> 00:24:01,600
Speaker 1: every quarter as people cut the cord. So, I mean

465
00:24:01,640 --> 00:24:03,520
Speaker 1: a lot of people are really focused on the spectrum

466
00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:05,080
Speaker 1: and what he's going to do with it, and I

467
00:24:05,119 --> 00:24:08,040
Speaker 1: would I would believe that most investors aren't really looking

468
00:24:08,040 --> 00:24:10,920
Speaker 1: forward to them spending years on a costly network build

469
00:24:10,920 --> 00:24:13,720
Speaker 1: out as opposed to hoping that he sells it. Tara

470
00:24:13,760 --> 00:24:16,000
Speaker 1: La Chapelle, thank you so much for joining us terror

471
00:24:16,040 --> 00:24:19,359
Speaker 1: covers deals in the telecom media space, for Bloomberg Opinion,

472
00:24:19,400 --> 00:24:21,800
Speaker 1: joining us on a Bloomberg Interactive broker studio. She's been

473
00:24:22,160 --> 00:24:25,280
Speaker 1: on top of the Sprint T Mobile deal. Thanks for

474
00:24:25,320 --> 00:24:27,520
Speaker 1: listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can

475
00:24:27,520 --> 00:24:30,359
Speaker 1: subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

476
00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:33,640
Speaker 1: podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at

477
00:24:33,640 --> 00:24:36,320
Speaker 1: pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa abram Woods. I'm on Twitter at

478
00:24:36,359 --> 00:24:38,800
Speaker 1: Lisa A. Bramw Woods. One before the podcast, you can

479
00:24:38,840 --> 00:24:41,240
Speaker 1: always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio