WEBVTT - How many moons does the Earth have?

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Kelly, do you ever wish that our night sky

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>was I don't know, a little bit more dramatic, more dramatic.

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>We've got a huge moon, planets, stars, and all of

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>the Milky Way. You've got pretty high standards for the

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>night sky. What did you have in mind? I don't know.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I think it's boring to have just that one

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>huge moon. It seems like it might be more exciting

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to have lots of little moons up there. Okay, all right,

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that's true. It's kind of like having an only child. Yeah,

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and not just an only child, like a single mega child.

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>You want drama. What's more dramatic than the Earth's mega

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>child hovering above you in the sky. Yeah, I guess

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I wanted drama. But now I'm worried that the idea

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of a mega child is going to give me nightmares. Yeah,

0:00:51.760 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>me too. I like my two little ones. Hi. I'm Daniel.

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm a particle physicist, and I'm very happy to have

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>too normal sized children instead of one mega child. And

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kelly. I'm a parasitologist, and I also have two

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>normal sized children, and that works well for me. You

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>having considered the concept of like combining them together into

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>one child unification of the children. You know, Zach likes

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to joke that they stack when he stacks them. They

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>don't seem very happy about it, and so you know,

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I haven't thought too hard about trying to combine them.

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they'd be big fans of that. I'm

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure my kids wouldn't be into that either. Well,

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the podcast Daniel and Jorge explain the universe

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and which we ask the hard questions of the universe.

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>We talked about the crazy stuff that's out there deep

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in the cosmos, and we talked about the tiny little

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>particles that are wriggling around inside my children, your children,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's children. We try to explore the entire universe

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and explain all of it to you. Normally we have

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>my friend and co host Jorge him here on the podcast,

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but he's unavailable today, so we have our wonderful, hilarious

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>guest host, Kelly Weener Smith. Hello, I'm excited to be back.

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for joining us and for talking to

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>us about crazy stuff in the universe. So on the podcast,

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we sometimes like to dig into stuff that's really complicated,

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>like how does quantum field theory work, and what is

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the real charge of the electron? Or what is it

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>like to go inside a black hole? These are deep

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and complicated questions about the universe that we try to

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>take apart and explain to you. But sometimes we also

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>like to dive into simpler seeming in questions, questions that

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>might seem like they have an obvious answer but then

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>have some interesting little wrinkles. It's good to have diversity, yeah,

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.119
<v Speaker 1>because questions are at the heart of science, and they're

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>not just the questions that scientists ask when they're doing

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>their research, but we're also interested in the questions that

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody asks. And sometimes the best questions are the questions

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that children ask, the most obvious questions which sometimes have

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a tricky answer. And I remember looking up at the

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>night sky with my kids, who are now twelve and fourteen,

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but earlier asked very simple, basic, fun questions about the universe,

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like why do we only have one moon? Or do

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we only have one moon? Kelly, what kind of questions

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>do your kids ask when they look at the night sky?

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:18.959
<v Speaker 1>I was just trying to think of a good example

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of Like, my daughter is seven, and she's always asking

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>me questions that I don't know the answer to some

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of them super fundamental, which makes me think, how is

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it that I'm walking around not knowing the answer to

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>all of these fundamental things, but yet I still managed

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to survive. But no good example is coming to mind

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. But we've got one of those apps on

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>our phone where you can sort of point it at

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever in the night sky and it tells you what

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it is. And we spend a lot of time sitting

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>on our car at night looking up at stuff, and

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of fun. She asked lots of questions,

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>but nothing's coming to mind right now that I did

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>not know the answer to. What's your favorite question your

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>kids have asked you? One of my favorite questions my

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>kids have asked me are questions like where are we

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in the universe. You know, they're just getting used to

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea of like our houses in the neighborhood, and

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the neighborhood is in the city, and that city is

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in a state somewhere we have like a location and address,

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and so they wanted to know, like, where are we

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in the universe? What's our like universe address? And of course,

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the hardcore physics answer is that every place

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in the universe is the same, and physics doesn't care

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>about location and translationally and variant and stuff. But that

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>answer is not very satisfying for a four year old. Yeah,

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's a bummer to have a physicist for

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a dad. But instead I try to describe to them,

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, what the galaxy looks like, and how the

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>galaxy fits in with other galaxies, and what we know

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>about sort of our cosmic neighborhood. And the thing I

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>love about their questions is that they are both easy

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and hard. They're like easy to ask but sometimes hard

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to answer. And they're the obvious questions, as you said,

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that you don't always think about when you're walking around

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the world. But that's why I think that children really

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>are sometimes the most natural scientists, because they don't just

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>accept things as they are. They ask questions about the

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and say why is it this way or is it

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that way? After all? Totally, And what I love about

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Ada is that she'll tell me that I'm wrong. I

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>wish I had that confidence. So you know, not only

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>do they ask good questions, but they still have the

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>confidence of children to be like, no, I don't think so.

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And so today in the podcast, we'll be talking about

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a question which seems to have an obvious answer. So

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>on today's program will be answering the question how many

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>moons does the Earth have? So, Kelly, tell me what

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>you thought when you saw that we would be talking

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>about this today. So you sent me a list of

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>topics we could talk about, And when I read this one,

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought, well, the answer seems obvious. The answer is one.

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And if the answer seems obvious, then either Daniel needs

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to be fired because he's not asking good questions anymore,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>or there's something fundamental that I'm missing, and it's probably

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the second. And so I suggested that we talked about

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this one because I figured this was a question that

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>would teach me something new. Awesome. This is a fun

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>question to dig into. We get to hear about like

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>what exactly is a moon, what counts as a moon,

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>even a little bit about the etymology of the word

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>moon and when it came into use, and what else

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is out there orbiting around the Earth and could you

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>call it a moon? So, as usual, before I dug

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>into this, I wanted to know what everybody else out

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>there thought. Sometimes I used to walk around the campus

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>if you see Irvine and ask students there these questions

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to see what the general level of knowledge was or confusion.

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>These days, of course, because the pandemic, I'm sending emails

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>out into the Internet asking listeners to speculate baselessly without

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the chance to do any research on these difficult physics questions.

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you actually stop students on the campus and ask

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>them how many moons does they are? Have? No, I

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't because this question is too recent, But I wonder

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>what they would say. I've noticed that our listeners tend

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to give better informed answers than the random you see

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Irvine student. Nothing against you see Irvine. Of course, our

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>listeners may just be like a subset of the universe

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that's more interested in understanding the universe. But I hope

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>one day to get back to campus and getting to

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>ask the students those questions. It was fun to sort

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of see their faces when I asked them these questions.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I bet you have a reputation as being one of

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the like super weird professors. Well, you know, I don't

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>dress very fancy, so maybe they just think I'm some

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>random homeless person asking them hard physical questions. Every college

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>has homeless person or physics professor, it can be hard

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell the difference, physics professor, you can't tell the

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>difference between Yeah, anyway, Thank you to everybody who volunteered

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to answer these questions. If you'd like to participate for

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a future episode of the podcast, please write to me

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>two questions at Daniel and Jorge dot com. Here's what

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>some of our listeners had to say. The obvious answer

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that pops into my head immediately would be one. So

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure that answer is wrong. Well, we have

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>just our celebrity moon, the moon, and I don't know,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe we might have caught up some small objects there,

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>probably a Deslo car elon musk scent, who knows. I

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly. I'm one sure that the Earth has

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>two moons, the classic moon that we see in the

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sky and Keith Moon. I would say the Earth has

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>one moon. I don't know if you would consider satellites

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or a space station a moon because the orbit the Earth,

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>but I would probably just consider one moon. Well, I

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>guess this depends on your definition of moon the natural moons.

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>It has the one large natural moon, and I believe

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they've discovered a couple of asteroids that have been captured

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in loose enough for bits that they're probably temporary. If

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 1>you're going to call any artificial uh satellite a moon,

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>which they've been called artificial moons, then that number goes

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>into the millions, depending on how small a particle you

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>want to count. There's nuts and bolts and pieces of

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>rocket and larger things that satellites, fragments of satellites that

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have collided with each other, so uh, a whole lot

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of them, all right, Kelly, So what do you think

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>about our listeners responses here? I thought there were some

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>very insightful responses, you know. One of them was essentially

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>asking questions about maybe how do we define moons. I

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>thought somebody had a clever thought that the Tesla car

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>might now be sort of orbiting, although I think of

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:35.479
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla car was shot Mars word instead of moonword.

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But it was clear that people sort of thought through

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>their answers, and yeah, they had some clever answers. What

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think? Yeah, I was impressed as well. In

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the end, of course, it's going to come down to

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the definition. I hope that we end up with the

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>definition of moon that doesn't allow Elon Musk to have

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>created his own personal moon. That would seems sort of unsatisfying.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>That would be too much power for one person. The

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>dude's already a billionaire and owns three like really valuable

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>companies like it, doesn't need to create astronomical objects on

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>top of all of it. Although he wants to create

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>a Mars colony, which is maybe even more powerful than

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>creating a moon. So I guess we'll have to see

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what the future holds. Do you think that's because he

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to be dictator of Mars? I like joking about

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>that with Zack. Yes, he claims he wants a representative

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>not a direct democracy, So we'll see what happens when

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the time comes. Well, if he gets to pick who

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>goes to Mars, and they're probably going to elect him

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>president anyway. But let's get back to the topic. We're

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>not talking about Elon Musk's plan to colonize Mars. We're

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about moons and how many moons the Earth has

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and what exactly is a moon? So let's dig into

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that first and talk about what qualifies as a moon. So,

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>without doing any research, Kelly, what would you use to

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>define a moon? So I would have guessed that a

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>moon is a big thing that isn't bigger than the

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>planet that it orbits. So a big thing that orbits

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>around a planet, and it has to be big, but

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>it can't be bigger than the thing that it's orbiting around.

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>That's how I would have defined it. But but probably

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that's wrong. And then your definition would it have to

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>be natural or could be manned? Me that? Could we

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>build an artificial moon? Oh h no, No, I've always

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>thought of it as being natural. Yeah, what about you? Well,

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I really wasn't sure because it seems like in lots

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of directions there are arbitrary distinctions you have to make.

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's the problem often in astronomy is that the

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>categories between things get blurred, and you always find something

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>right on the edge between the different categories, and in

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the end, you know, we're just we're looking at the

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>universe and we're trying to categorize it to understand is

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that we can talk about it together. Doesn't mean that

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>those categories actually reflect something deep and true about the universe.

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>There's sometimes just the words we've used to describe stuff,

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and so as we see more stuff out there in

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the universe, we're gonna find things that break those categories.

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>But the definition that I found for moon is that

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it has to be a quote natural body, right, So

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be a natural body that's orbiting a planet.

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And to me already this is problem that like a

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>natural body means not like a human made satellite. So

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 1>we built a death Star for example, Officially that wouldn't

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>qualify as a moon. But what if we just like

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, pulled out a huge chunk of Earth and

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>threw it out into space and then it went into

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>orbit around the Earth. Is that a natural body? It's

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>like made of rock, right, It's essentially the same process

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that created our moon as we understand it. But I

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>think according to this definition, it wouldn't be a moon

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>because you know, it would have been like as the

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>result of a human process. It really does seem like

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>if you just took a chunk of earth and you

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>put it up there, it should count. But I suppose

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>satellites are just chunks of Earth that we've we've done

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>things too, that we send up into space, and so

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 1>maybe it shouldn't count. Yeah, exactly, That's where I was going.

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>What is a satellite other than like an ultra refined

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>piece of Earth that you've somehow, you know, manipulated into

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a complex technological object. But in the end, it's a

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>piece of the Earth that we've launched into space. And

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, for those of you who don't know the

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 1>history of our moon, we think that our moon is

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>basically a big chunk of Earth that was vaulted out

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>into space when another proto planet hit Earth when it

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>was very very young, and this collision led to this

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 1>enormous blab of stuff getting tossed out there, which eventually

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>coalesced into the Moon. And when we studied the surface

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Moon, we found elements of it which look

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same as elements of the surface of the Earth,

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>which suggests that they really do have sort of a

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>common origin. So this definition of a moon being a

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>natural body not a human made object is a little tricky,

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think the definition there is very clear.

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask a sort of tangential question, of course, So, well,

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Zach and I were reading about the Moon. We came

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>across this fact that the Moon is sort of carbon poor,

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like maybe there's some carbon up there, but you're gonna

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>have trouble growing plants and stuff because there's not a

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of carbon. If the Moon is just a chunk

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of Earth that got expelled, why do we have so

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>much carbon and they have so little. Is that the

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>result of natal processes that happened after the Moon got

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>cut off partly, Yeah, Mostly the Earth and the Moon

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>are made up of very similar stuff. It's mostly oxygen

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and silicon and calcium and iron and that kind of stuff.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>That's because we think that the Moon and the Earth

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>are made up of the remnants of a huge collision

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>between the proto Earth and a Mars sized planet, like

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty million years after the Solar system formed, and the

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>remnants of that huge collision coalesced into the Earth and

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>into the Moon. But you're right that there is very

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>little carbon on the Moon, but there is carbon on

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's surface, and we're not sure why. One theory

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is that carbon tends to form very volatile compounds, things

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that would end up in an atmosphere if the Moon

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>could keep one. So the Earth hangs onto some of

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>these things, some of this carbon, because it's big enough

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep hold of its atmosphere it has more gravity,

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But the Moon can't. Anything like an atmosphere on the

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Moon just boils away. Interesting okay, thanks. So the definition

0:14:58.240 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of a moon is that needs to be a natural

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a body in orbit around a planet, and you said

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that it needs to be big. Officially, technically there's no

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>minimum size to a moon. A moon could be like huge,

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like our moon, or you know, according to astronomers, it's

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>okay to have a moon that's like a kilometer in size.

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I find that very unsatisfying. Like to me, a moon

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is something that you should be able to, like put

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a settlement on one day, and you can't really do

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that with a one kilometer sized quote unquote moon. I

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't want to buy that, but apparently

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it's part of the definition. It would be like the

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>little prints right walking around this tiny little planet. But

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that comes from our experience, right, just because

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we have this one big moon, we tend to think

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what you gotta have in a moon. But as

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>well talk about later, so many planets in the Solar

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>System don't have a huge moon, to have a lot

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of smaller moons, And so part of the joy of

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>astronomy and and of exploring the universe is discovering that

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>our corner of the universe is weird, is unusual, is

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>not representative, and we've got to sort of like stretch

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>our mind then get used to a different way of

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what a moon is. Yeah, it is really

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>hard to wrap your mind around just how different it is.

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I'm very earth centric. I guess I would

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>like moons to all sort of fits in a nice

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>little mold that matches the moon that I have, and

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you touch it on really all the important issues. I

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>think that was really tremendous. The other thing you mentioned

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is that it shouldn't be bigger than the planet, right,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>And in the definition of a moon, officially, the upper

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>limit on the size of a moon is pretty vague,

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Like what happens when the moon approaches the size of

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the planet. Then you might ask, like, well, which one

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is the planet and which one is the moon? Right?

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Or if they're exactly equal size, could you consider them

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to be like a binary planet system? So where does

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>our moon fall relative? And they'll like Earth to Moon

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>ratio side, Like, is our moon big for a moon?

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Is it the biggest relative to the size of the

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>planet it orbits is? So is our moon weird relative

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to the other moons? Our moon is very weird. Our

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>moon is basically that megachild. The diameter of the Moon

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is more than a quarter of the diameter of the Earth,

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>and that's the biggest moon to planet ratio in the

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Solar System by like a factor of five. There's no

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>other planet out there that has such a big moon

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>relative to the planet. Like there are moons of Jupiter

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that are roughly the same size as our moon, but

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of course Jupiter is huge, and so relative to the

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>size of Jupiter, those moons are very very small, So

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a really weird big moon. You know, it's

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of amazing that we've managed to figure out anything,

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of a phrase that, if I'm remembering correctly,

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I've said in almost every single one of these episodes

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>we've done together. But it seems like, you know, our

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Solar System is so weird, and our planet and the

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>moon is so weird. It gives us such a weird

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>frame of reference. But I know, it's exciting that we

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>can still figure stuff out. Yeah, and it's a real

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>journey to peel away these preconceptions and understand that things

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we thought were fundamental, things we thought we're obvious or universal,

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>are really just unusual. You know. It's just like when

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you go traveling and you discover like, oh, not everybody

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>drinks coffee for breakfast. You know, it turns out there

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>are other ways to live, and that's the joy of

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>exploring the universe, you know, discovering the tea is also

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>acceptable at breakfast times. No, no, no, no, no, no,

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that's just wrong. One fact that I really liked while

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I was reading through here was that those like one

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>kilometer size moons are sometimes called moonlits. And I thought

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that was super cute. So I asked my seven year

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>old today. I was like, how many moons does the

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Earth have? So she, being a very clever kid, was like, well,

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was one, but you're asking me this,

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>so what does that mean? And and so I told

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>her like, well, you know you can have these little

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>things called moonlits. And she said, well, what does that mean?

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I tried to explain that let's means little

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>things and she was like, well, when else does it

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>mean that? And I had a like, uh, you know,

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>like a moment of not being able to figure it out,

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>but I came up with piglets and outlets, and I

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>was very proud of myself. So anyway, that was a

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>fun moment with the seven year old today. Yeah, I

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>love those little endings lits and like, it's just like

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the diminutive in Spanish, you know, eto or eno or

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>these kind of things in romance languages. So I'm glad

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that we have those in English. Also, you could really

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>stick them on anything, you know, like I'm not having dessert,

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm having dessert lits. It makes everything cuter, it really does.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>So where are we with the moons? Moons have to

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>be a natural body orbiting a planet. No minimum size.

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>The oppera limit is kind of vague. One thing I

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>read suggested that you could effectively describe an upper limit

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on the moon by requiring that the center of mass

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.239
<v Speaker 1>of the planet and moon together should be inside the

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>diameter of the planet. Right, So the center of mass

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.719
<v Speaker 1>of two objects is sort of like the weighted average

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of all of their stuff. If you've got more stuff

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 1>in the planet than in the moon, it's going to

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be closer to the planet mathematically and physically. It's actually

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the location that the two things are orbiting. Right. We

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>say that the Moon, for example, orbits the Earth, but

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>actually the two things are orbiting each other, or more precisely,

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>they're both orbiting the center of mass of the two things.

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And if you have two things that are equal mass,

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>then their center of masses right between them. If one

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of them is infinitely massive, then the center of mass

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>is at the center of that very massive object. In

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a more realistic scenario, where one thing is very massive

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and one thing is much smaller, you can have the

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>center of mass of the system of the two things

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>be close to the center of the larger object. And

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>so here the definition is like, is the center of

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>mass of the two objects underneath the ground within the

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>radius of the larger object. That's sort of a cool definition.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>That is a cool So I have a couple of

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>questions to see if I understand. So one, does it

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>depend on how far apart the things are or is

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>it like you just when you make this comparison, you

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of mentally put these things right next

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to each other and then compare the center of mass.

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>It definitely depends on how far apart they are, right

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>because for example, if they're equally massive, you'd be right

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>between them, and that definitely depends on the distance between

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the two objects. Yes, and so that would mean you

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have two planets as opposed to a moon and a

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>planet in that definition. And so so you have two

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.239
<v Speaker 1>things that are like one is just a little bit

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>smaller than the other, and one is big er, but

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the smaller one is made out of something much more

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>massive or dense or I'm not quite sure what word

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for here. Could the smaller thing end up

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>being the planet that gets orbited by a bigger thing

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>because it has more like gravitational pull? Absolutely? Yeah. For example,

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>if you had something orbiting a black hole, right, a

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>super duper dense object, then the center of mass of

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the system is definitely going to be within the event horizon,

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>even if though the black hole could be smaller. Right,

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>black holes are very very compact. They don't have to

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>be very very large, but they are supermassive. So that's awesome.

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>You're really like pushing the boundaries of this definition. But

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I guess a black hole could have

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a planet orbiting it. I'm not sure if you would

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 1>call that a planet or a moon, right, if you're

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>orbiting a black hole, Yeah, it's trippy, I guess, I,

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>as a not physicist, find it sort of unsatisfying that

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>if the moon is too far away, it might or

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>if something that feels sort of moon like is too

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>far away, it wouldn't count as a moon because the

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>center of masses is not within the bigger body or something.

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>It feels like distance shouldn't matter for the definition, But

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a biologist take on it. Well, it definitely has

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to be in orbit. And I think that one problem

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>with this whole categorization is that this is like a

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>natural hierarchy. I mean, you have the Sun and the

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff orbiting around the Sun, and then you call those planets,

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>but that's sort of arbitrary because they're orbiting around the Sun.

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>And then there's things orbiting around the planets, right, and

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you call those moons. In the end, it's just sort

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of a natural hierarchy of stuff orbiting stuff that's orbiting

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>other stuff, and our categorization of it is you're really

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>going to try to draw lines there where they really

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't lines. Yeah, but that's like a fundamental problem with science.

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, in biology, we categorize things, and constantly nature

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>does not care how we categorize it. She moves away

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>outside of our categories. Yeah, I guess it's tough just

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>finding a definition that is useful I guess in biology

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a huge revolution a couple hundred years ago,

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>right because you guys had been categorizing stuff based on

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>how it looked and what it did, and then discovered

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the genetic relation ships between everything, and that there was

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>actually a real, true organization to all these animals that

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily respect how they looked or how we observe

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 1>them well. And then it turns out that, you know,

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>how do you define species? That's actually a pretty difficult question.

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>The tree of life doesn't just branch, it sort of comes,

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the branches come back together and you get horizontal gene transfer.

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And how do you categorize species of bacteria when they're

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>swapping jeans all the time, and it gets complicated fast. Well,

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in physics, it's interesting they think about how these words

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>were used for a long time. People use the word

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>satellite to also refer to moons, and this is before

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we had things in space like GPS and telecommunications, satellites

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, laser weapons and all that kind of stuff. Now,

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>when you say satellite, you think of something people build,

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe electronics and launched into space. But before spot Nick,

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>before ninety seven, astronomers used the word satellite to talk

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>about anything orbiting another object, and so they didn't really

0:23:55.800 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>use the word moon scientifically. They referred to Luna, for example,

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>as Earth satellite. Then when they launched sput Nick, they realized,

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>whole on a second, what are we going to call that?

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 1>And so they started to use the word artificial satellite.

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>But that was a little bit too cumbersome, and so

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>now we just say satellite when we mean artificial satellite.

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>And then moon, which was a word mostly used like

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in science fiction and a sort of popular culture, became

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 1>a more official scientific word. I think that's sort of

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>cool that the scientists adopted a word from sort of

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>common usage. That's totally fascinating. And I've been reading about

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the space race and I didn't know this history of

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the word satellite. And when I saw that they named

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.239
<v Speaker 1>spot Nick an artificial satellite, I was like, well, that's

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of clunk. Why not just call it satellite? But

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense now. A lot of the fathers of

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>rocket science or whatever. We're really into sci fi. I

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>think almost all of the fathers of rocket science claimed

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>that they were inspired by Jules Verns. What is it

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>called to the moon? I wonder if the fact that

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they were all super into sci fi sort of helped

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>get the word moon into the scientific literature. Yeah it

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>makes me one or what else? Like will in the

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>future be part of science. You know, things that we

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>say but you wouldn't hear a scientists say, you know,

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>like a shooting star is our word for a meteor,

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>but you never see that in the science paper. But

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe someday in the future, you know, the language will

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:18.719
<v Speaker 1>transmogrify itself into official scientific physics speaker could be. All right,

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So we have our definition of a moon. It has

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a natural body, right, not something engineered by

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 1>humanity or elon Musk. Has to orbit a planet. But

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>there's really no minimum size to it, though there seems

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to be some sort of sense of an upper limit

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that you shouldn't have your moon being larger than your planet.

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 1>All right, So, now that we have our definition, or

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>at least a definition we're gonna work with for the

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>rest of this episode, let's take a break before we

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>move back to figuring out exactly how many moons Earth has.

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>So we have a definition. Now, how many moons do

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>we have, Daniel, So let's count them first. Of course,

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>we have the number one candidate. The classic moon, the

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>one you're familiar with, the one we all grew up loving. Right,

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the moon we call the moon, which is

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of a silly name, right, calling the moon the moon.

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me actually, when I was a kid, we

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>had a cat and nobody could agree on what to

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>call the cat, so we just called it the cat,

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and that just became its name. And for a while

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I felt sad for like, oh, poor cat doesn't get

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>a name, But he didn't care. It got fed, it

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>got pet it doesn't need a name. I think it's

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>good that you became more creative that you got I

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>can't tell if calling it the moon is very egocentric,

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like that is our moon, so it is the moon,

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>or if it just represents a lack of creativity. Hard

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to say. Well, as we were saying earlier, it's really weird,

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Like it's huge. It's more than a quarter of the

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>diameter of the Earth in the Solar System. The next

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>largest moon relative to his planet is one of the

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 1>moons of Neptune, which is almost six percent of the

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>diameter of Neptune. So that's a pretty big gap. Like

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mostly moons are small compared to their planet. The moon

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>is really a very weird and Or and I did

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a whole episode about how the Earth got its moon

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and the various theories and how people are testing those,

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and so if you're interested in the details of the

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>history of the moon, then good check out that episode.

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting that, you know, in the sort of

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the history of astronomy I was reading about this, people

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't really think about the Moon as a moon until

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>they discovered Jupiter's moons. Like people were looking up in

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the sky and they saw, of course stars and they

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.479
<v Speaker 1>saw the moon, but they just thought of it as

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>like another celestial object. They were wrong. And then you know,

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>when Galileo and other folks saw the moons of Jupiter

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, hey, look at that, there are things

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>orbiting Jupiter. That's when it clicked in the place and

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 1>they're like, wait a second, what Jupiter's got over there

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>is the same thing that we've got over here. And

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that's when they really eyes that this was a whole

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>new kind of thing in space. That's so interesting. That's

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>why it's so important to you know, to learn more

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and to step outside your comfort zone because there's so

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>many things that become obvious when you see how other

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>things are done, and the moon is actually considered a

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>planet for a while, though the definition of a planet

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>has also changed. Back then, a planet was just like

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>another astronomical object. People didn't really understand the relationship between

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the planets and the stars and all this kind of stuff.

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you go back to very early astronomy, what

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>these words mean is totally different from what they mean today.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's pretty tricky to read, like you know, early

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>astronomical texts. That sounds super confusing. So it makes me wonder.

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you can be changing what the definition of

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a planet is, can you have things that are not

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>planets that have moons? You can definitely have things that

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.479
<v Speaker 1>are not planets that have stuff orbiting them, and we

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>will talk about that later in the episode. There are

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>things in the Solar System orbiting other things that are

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>not planets, for sure. Sorry I got excited. It is

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>very cool. And for example, you know, just as a teaser,

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Pluto no longer considered a planet, but it does have

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>things orbiting it, right, Pluto has something which you would

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>call a moon, Sharon, which is half the diameter of Pluto.

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's pretty fuzzy, like which one is a planet,

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>which one is the moon. Pluto is only twice as

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>big as its moon. So if Sharon or Charon, however

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you say, it ends up being called the moon, that

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>makes our moon a little bit less exciting. Yeah, Or

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>if Pluto gets repromoted back into it being a planet,

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>then Sharon would be the largest moon relative to a

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>planet in the Solar System. But because Pluto's no longer

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>technically a planet, Sharon loses that distinction. Sharon shure, Sharon, Alright,

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so everybody knows about the moon. That's not what people

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>want to hear about. Are there other things orbiting the

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Earth that could also be considered moons and so at?

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there are, but they're sort of on the

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>border line of whether you would really technically call them

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a moon. One of my favorites, they say, the object

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>which I won't even try to pronounce. You're gonna have

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to look it up, but it goes by the name

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of the space being, and it's this object like five

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>kilometers in diameter that's orbiting the Sun in the vicinity

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Earth. But it seems like we've got to

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>try to pronounce it, right, So I'm gonna try crew

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>with me, Crew with crew with me. That sounds about right.

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>If I had no idea how to pronounce it, I

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>would guess that was correct. And I have no idea

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>how to pronounce it, so I guess that's correct. I

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what the like, you know, origin of that,

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>what language that comes from. It looks Irish to me,

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and I have I have no reason. I don't actually

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>know anything about the Irish language. So mean, maybe I

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>should stop. Maybe it's Gaelic for space being. Somebody out

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>there who speaks Gaelic let us know how to say

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>space being in Gaelic. So this is a fun object

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's in orbit technically around the Sun, but it's

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>ring resonance with the Earth. This is something maybe people

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't realized that, like things that are orbiting the Sun

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>are also interacting with each other. Right, our orbit around

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the Sun is mostly a big lips and it's dominated

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>by the Sun. The shape of that lips is mostly

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>controlled by the gravitational power of the Sun. But there

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>are other things also orbiting with us, and they tug

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>on us, they pull on us, and they can change

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>our orbit. And sometimes you get two objects and what

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you call a resonance, which means that they are very

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>regularly tugging on each other in a systematic way that

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>changes both of their orbits and makes it stable, so that,

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, they will like meet two or four times

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>while going around the Sun, depending on their relative speed,

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and nudge each other in just the right way. So,

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, Saturday and Jupiter are both really really powerful

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and they're in an orbital residence with each other. So

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>this is an object that's moving around the Sun, but

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's in resonance with the Earth, so it's strongly influenced

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>by the Earth's gravity. But does it does it orbit

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in the same shape the Moon duns? So how is

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>an orbit and a resonance different? So this thing moves

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>around the Sun, you know, but so does the Moon.

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Right if you tracked the moon. The Moon goes around

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the Sun. The Earth goes around the Sun one but

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Moon is gravitationally mostly bound to the Earth. This

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:08.959
<v Speaker 1>thing is primarily mostly bound to the Sun, but because

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of the influence of the Earth, if you look at

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>its orbit from the Earth, it looks like it makes

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a bean shaped motion around the Earth. Like if you

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>put the Earth, if you're sending of your reference frame

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and you plot where the space being is and you

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like take data points from day to day and imagine

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>where it is. It makes a bean shape all the

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>way around the Earth. So does that mean it doesn't

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>quite fit the definition? Because like do orbits need to

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>be elliptical and not not being shaped? It means that

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>there's not really a clear distinction. We have a three

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>body system. We have the Sun, we have the Earth,

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and we have the space being, and they're all tugging

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>on each other. And so to ask the question like

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>what is the space being orbiting? Is it orbiting the Earth?

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it orbiting just the Sun, doesn't have a clear

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>precise answer unless you define an arbitrary distinction. But there

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is no natural distinction between these two scenarios. Is like

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a smooth continuum of being like the Moon where you're

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>very clearly disorbiting the Earth and being like Mercury, where

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you're very clearly disorbiting the Sun. And then these quasi

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>satellites of Earth that are very clearly affected by Earth

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and sort of moving around Earth as they move around

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the Sun. And that's what the space bean is. It's

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a quasi satellite of the Earth. All right, So two things. One,

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.479
<v Speaker 1>every time you say space being I'm going to continue

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to chuckle. I don't think I'm gonna stop doing that,

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's just funny and cute and too you know,

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it would be really nice in science

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>classes if like, how hard it is to do these

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>definitions and how so few things fit into these definitions

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>was sort of made more clear, and maybe they do

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that in school today. It constantly blows my mind how

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>much I think that we have the world bend nicely.

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>But everything breaks the bins. Everything breaks the bins because

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the world is continuous, right, and it's huge, and so

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>there's always going to be an example of something in between.

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>These crisp distinctions are are our artificial way to try

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to impose order on the universe. And back when we

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:08.280
<v Speaker 1>hadn't seen so many things, those gaps might have seen meaningful.

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>But as we keep looking at the universe, we find

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff that feels in those gaps, and you know, the

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>same must be true in biology, right, that's what the

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>duck bill platypus is. Right, It's like, hold on a second,

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean mammals? You know, right, right, it's

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>nature's way of being, like, you cannot put me in

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a box. Yeah, so that's the space being. Also, I'm

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>saying the space being because it is fun to say,

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and because I'm trying to avoid having to pronounce the

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>actual name of the thing. Yeah. No, sure, that makes sense,

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It's okay. So here's what I want to know. So

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we're not taught that the space being is a moon

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in school, or at least I wasn't. So if you

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>were to walk into a random astronomer's office at some

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>university and ask them does the space being count as

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a moon? Are they gonna like roll their eyes and

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>be like not this again. Or are they going to

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, that's a really interesting question, Like how

0:34:56.480 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 1>does the astronomy community do this question? That's a great question.

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I bet that half of them would roll our eyes

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 1>and half of them would be like, you know, I

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>was on the committee that decided what a quasi satellite is,

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and I have a very strong opinion about it, because

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, they get hotheaded about this stuff, right, And

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you will now sit for three hours while I explain

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the difference to you and you regret asking immediately. Yeah,

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes I wonder, like what does it matter? You know,

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>people argue about whether Pluto is a planet or a

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>dwarf planet, like, what are the consequences? Why does anybody

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.760
<v Speaker 1>really care? We're just making these names up. It doesn't

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>change what Pluto is. It's not like Pluto shrinks if

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we call it a dwarf planet or grows in importance

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>if we call it a real planet. These are just

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>our arbitrary categorizations of the universe. So the affect how

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we think and how we talk, but really it's it's inconsequential.

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>You know. I can see why it would matter to

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you if you are an astronomer, because maybe it affects

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the way you model things based on how these definitions

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>fall out. But I imagine to the lay public it's like,

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>what are we paying these people for. That's a good point.

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point. And so we have this thing

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that said the moons to the quasi satellite, and that's

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>just one example. You know, there are lots of these

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 1>things that are sort of loosely bound to the Earth

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>orbiting the Sun that can be fairly small, like this

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>thing is only five kilometers in diameter. As you get

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>smaller and smaller, there are many many more of these things.

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are more loosely bound to the Earth.

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if you're gonna call this thing a moon,

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>then you've got to call all those other little things

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>moons also, So if you're gonna open the door that wide,

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>then Earth is going to have a lot of little moons,

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and high school astronomy becomes totally untenable. And unfortunately, it

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change what it looks like in the sky, right,

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:35.919
<v Speaker 1>You can't look up in the sky and see this thing.

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>The closest it ever comes to Earth is like seven

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half million miles away, which is thirty times

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>further away from the Earth than our moon is. Plus,

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 1>of course it's super tiny, so you have almost no

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>change of spotting this thing. It was difficult for astronomers

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to even see it in the first place. It was

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 1>only discovered in the last twenty years. Is it safe

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to assume that it's center of masses within the Earth

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.280
<v Speaker 1>or the center of mass for the two bodies falls

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>within Earth? Absolutely? Yeah, because the Earth totally dominates this

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>thing when it comes to mass. This thing is only

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>five kilometers in diameter, and it's just a big chunk

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of rock, and so the Earth dwarfs this thing. Okay,

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 1>even though it's super far away, it still works. Okay,

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that's our like best candidates, is there like a second

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>best candidate. There's something else which I think is super fun,

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>which astronomers and science communicators called a temporary moon for

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a while. And this is a weird object which at

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of last year sort of swooped in from

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 1>deep space and orbiting the Earth a couple of times,

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and people are like, oh, what is this thing? It

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>was like only forty ft long, and it has this

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>strange cylindrical shape, and they spotted it on his telescope

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, wait a second, what is this thing?

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And it looks like a piece of a rocket. What

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it's space debris. It's space debris. And so it turns

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>out this is a long lost piece of an ill

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>faded NASA mission. There was this mission in nineteen sixty

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>six called Surveyor two. Is a robotic spacecraft that was

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>going to go land on the Moon and it was

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>going to go explore the Moon, etcetera. But mid course

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 1>there was a failure in the sort of ballistics and

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the trajection and they lost contact with the craft and

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the thrusters failed to ignite, and so basically

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>they lost this thing. Part of it crashed on the Moon,

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>and part of it just like tumbled out into deep

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>space sort of lost, they thought forever. And so this

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>thing has been like out there in space for you

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>know what, seventy years, almost bouncing around, swooshing around, and

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>somehow it ended up coming back to Earth. That's crazy,

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I think it's more like fifty years though, right,

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.879
<v Speaker 1>But like, it's amazing that we have that much resolution

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that we could find it again. It's really incredible. But

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we are monitoring stuff that comes close to Earth,

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're looking for stuff that's sort of like tumbling

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>towards the Earth. This is a pretty small object though

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's also a weird shape. Right. If you're looking

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 1>out in the space and you see this forty ft

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>long cylindrical object, my first guess is gonna be like aliens, right,

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And so how disappointed to look at it and then see,

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>like you say, written down the side, it's just our

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>old trash. But it's fascinating. People have done a study

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to figure out like what happened to it, and it

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>turns out that when it tumbled out into space. It

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>was very gently pushed further into space by the pressure

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 1>of sunlight. We talked about this on the podcast, that

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.879
<v Speaker 1>you could build a spaceship that sails on light. It's

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>called a solar sail. Just have a huge sheet of

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>material and the photons from the sun when they hit

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 1>it are going to transfer their momentum to that, just

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like wind on Earth transfers its momentum to a sail

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>on a sailboat. And so that's like by design. But here,

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 1>of course, it's just a rocket tumbling in space, was

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>very gently, over decades and decades pushed deeper out into space.

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Are you familiar with Project Westward? No? Tell me, Oh

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>my gosh. So the idea here was so this was

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like during the Cold War, and the US was worried

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>that they would lose their ability to communicate with other

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>nations if our undersea cables got cut by the Soviets,

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and so in that case we would have to rely

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>on sending radio waves up and we would have to

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 1>hope that they would bounce off the ionosphere. But that's

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of a not super reliable way of sending radio communications,

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 1>and so I think it was m i T came

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>up with the solution where they were like, well, we

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>could be sure that the ionosphere would have stuff that

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>would bounce the radio waves back if we put up

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>over four hundred million copper needles. That's a great idea, right,

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And so the argument was that you would put these

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>needles up and it would give us some information about

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>how well this was gonna work. But in about two

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to three years, the combination of gravity and the sun

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 1>pushing these needles back into the atmosphere would clear everything out,

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>clear everything out. Does that mean these copper needles come

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>raining back down to the service to impale people. Well,

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>they do start raining back down towards Earth, but they're

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>like literally only a couple of maybe centimeters long, like

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe two centimeters or something. These aren't huge, and that's

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 1>why they needed four million of them. That sounds like

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>approximately the size is of a bullet. You're talking about

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>space bullets raining down on the Earth. But that would

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely burn up before it hits Earth, right, right, Yes,

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of course I think so. Yeah, so our atmosphere is

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like a bulletproof vest. Yes, thank you atmosphere. But so

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the first one that they shot up there, it didn't

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>deploy the right way, so a bunch of these needles

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.839
<v Speaker 1>clumped instead of spreading nicely, and so some of these

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>clumps fifty years later are still tracked as space debris

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>because the clumps didn't de orbit the way that they

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>thought they would. And then they did a second shot,

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and the second shot dispersed and they were able to confirm, yes,

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the radio waves bounced back more when we have supplemented

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the ionosphere with all of these needles. But then we

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>had to go to the United Nations and promise we

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>were going to stop messing up the space environment and

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that we were going to consult people from here on out.

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And one of the articles of the Outer Space Treaty

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>actually requires people to do consultations. And that was motivated

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:54.399
<v Speaker 1>by Project Westward, because what the heck is the US doing?

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, tangent related to the Sun pushing things back

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>into orbits or sorry, back into the atmosphere. Yeah, and

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a whole fun podcast episode about space junk

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and how dangerous it is and that's all smashing into itself.

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And if we don't get this stuff under control, all

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of space might be useless to us. We might be

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>trapped down here on Earth because we'd be surrounded by

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.800
<v Speaker 1>our own garbage. So check out that episode if you're interested.

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 1>But this is one particularly interesting object, and it came

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in November twenty and made a few large loops around

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the Earth. And so that's why they called this sort

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of like a temporary moon, because even though it was

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>lost in deep space, somehow it ended up close enough

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Earth to grab it again and loop around.

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't a stable orbit, which is really fascinating.

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>It was like stable enough to loop around a few

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>times and then get tossed back out into space. So

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in March continued his journey and is now back into

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>deep space somewhere. WHOA. So, so was this like a

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>sycom angle for getting people interested in this, because it

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>seems like because it was artificial, it shouldn't count as

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a moon at all, not a temporary moon. It shouldn't

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 1>be a moon. Or do different people use different definitions

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>than the one that we settled upon at the beginning

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of the episode, Yeah, exactly. I think this was just

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a clickbait moon, not really by any definition. If you're

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>going to require that moons be natural, may not be

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>manufactured by humanity. Then this is definitely not a mood.

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's cool that we capture something from deep space

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and it orbited us a little while before going back

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:24.479
<v Speaker 1>out into the dark deep emptiness. Yeah, no, that's super cool.

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's take our second break before we

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>start to talk a bit more about moons on planets

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>other than our own. Okay, so we've talked a bit.

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 1>How about how Earth has one for sure moon and

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 1>a couple maybe moons, quasi moons, quasi moons. Right, tell

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>me a bit more about what else is typical in

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the Solar System. How many moons do the other planets have.

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting because the Earth, as we were saying,

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is really weird, Like having a really big moon is weird. Also,

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>having just one moon is weird. So the eight planets

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 1>in the Solar System, of course, the Earth has one moon.

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Two of the planets have no moons, Mercury and Venus,

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and the other five planets have two hundred and four

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 1>moons in between them. So that's really fascinating and you

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:24.319
<v Speaker 1>might wonder like, well, why do Mercury and Venus have

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>no moons? And the reason is that they're so close

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Sun. The Sun is this like really terrible

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming gravitational force and it tugs on things. We talked

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to the program before about tidal forces. The closer you

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>are to the Sun, the more it tugs on you.

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you're an object, it's not just like a point.

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:45.799
<v Speaker 1>If you have like an extent to you, and the

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Sun is going to tug harder on the bit that's

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>closer and not as hard on the bid that's further away,

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>and that's an effective force on you. So the Sun is,

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, squeezing mercury and venus all the time. It's

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 1>pulling on them, and that makes it very hard for

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 1>them to have any in a stable orbit around them. Basically,

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>if they have a moon, the Sun is going to

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>steal it when it swoops around the planet on the

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 1>close side. So here I'm finding that I want to

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 1>ask you if that means in other Solar systems, the

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>close planets don't have moons. But I'm jumping if I

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 1>do that, aren't I We don't know the answer to

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that question yet. We'll talk about that in a minute,

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it's a fascinating question. We know that in

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>our Solar system, the innermost planets Mercury and Venus have

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>no moons, and you know, that might be part of

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the answer of why the Earth only has one moon

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's a really big one. It might be that

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 1>anything else the Sun is basically going to steal, and

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're only capable of having like either really big

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 1>moons or quasi moons that were sort of sharing with

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the Sun. That might be the partial answer to that question. Interesting,

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So we have the Sun to thank for the space being. Yeah,

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the Sun is toasting our space being for us. But

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 1>then further out in the Solar system, there are lots

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and lots of moons. You know, the other five planets

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:58.320
<v Speaker 1>with moons have two hundred and four of these things combined,

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, in Jupiter and sat And have like dozens

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of them. And you know, Saturn has this crazy ring system,

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and inside those rings are rocks that are big enough

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 1>to be considered moons. Sometimes they're called you know, moonlits,

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:14.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes are called minor moons. But there are all sorts

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of things, and so the deeper you go out into

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 1>our Solar system, the more you find these objects that

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>have moons and lots and lots of moons. To do

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 1>any of the moons have moons. I wish they did

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 1>have moons. And what would you call that anyway? Would

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that be like a moon moon or squared? That's a

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:36.720
<v Speaker 1>great question. And so far we haven't found any moons

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that have moons. And the reason is similar to why

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Mercury doesn't have moons. If you're a moon, then you're

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>near a big planet, and that means that there are

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:48.720
<v Speaker 1>tidal forces, and so it's pretty hard to hold onto

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 1>something and not have it gets slurred up and just

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 1>become another moon of the planet you're orbiting. So if

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:57.359
<v Speaker 1>you're Io and you're orbiting Jupiter, right, Jupiter is an

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 1>enormous gravitational pull. The reason that Io is like hot inside,

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it's because of Jupiter's tidal forces, and so anything orbiting

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Io is just going to get pulled away. It's very

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>very hard to have a stable orbit. Although there's this

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:14.239
<v Speaker 1>really crazy moon of Saturn. This moon is called Rhea,

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and recently they've spotted some stuff in orbit around Rhea,

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:21.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe sort of like these very small particles. It almost

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>looks like this moon of Saturn has its own ring system.

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:29.279
<v Speaker 1>What I know, isn't that cool? I never thought about

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.280
<v Speaker 1>like a moon with rings around. It is pretty cool.

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome. So so how if it can't have moons,

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 1>how does it manage to maintain its rings? Well, the

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>reason you sometimes have rings instead of moons are because

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of tidal forces. Basically, rings are moons that have been

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>torn apart by tidal forces. And so it might be

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that there was an object there and then it got

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of shredded by tidal forces, and what we're seeing

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is something transient that these rings might not last for

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 1>very long. You know, by very long we mean on

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>astrophysical time scale. So they might be there a million

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 1>years or so. But if you leave the Solar system

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and come back and five million, you might find that

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not there anymore. Okay, so let's move out of

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 1>our solar system. What does this look like in other

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>solar system? So, for example, do the mercury and venus

0:48:12.080 --> 0:48:16.319
<v Speaker 1>equivalents and other solar systems lack moons like we see

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in our solar system. It's such a good question and

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:21.360
<v Speaker 1>one we just don't know the answer to yet because

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we have never seen a moon in another solar system,

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Like every moon that any human has ever seen has

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>only ever been in our solar system. Isn't that like

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>crazy and slightly frustrating. It's both of those things, And

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it reveals to me, like just how often I assume

0:48:37.280 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that science has figured out so many things that are

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 1>much harder than I apparently understand. So why do we

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:44.360
<v Speaker 1>know that all these other solar systems have planets but

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't know that they have moons? Well, moons are

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 1>much smaller, and they're just harder to see them planets.

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we now sort of take it for granted

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:53.839
<v Speaker 1>that we can see planets around other stars, But that's

0:48:53.880 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty recent. It was like that we started to be

0:48:57.040 --> 0:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>able to really do this and spot planets and other soldiers.

0:49:00.400 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Until then, we had never seen a planet around a

0:49:03.280 --> 0:49:07.160
<v Speaker 1>star that wasn't our star. We didn't know until then, if,

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:10.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, our star was the only one that had planets,

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>we could have been like the weirdest star in the universe. Now,

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, we know, because we've looked and we've seen

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:17.919
<v Speaker 1>that lots and lots and lots of stars have lots

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and lots of planets. We're also learning, of course, that

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 1>our Solar system is weird in all sorts of interesting ways.

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:25.319
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is that the techniques we used to

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>see those planets are better when the planets are large

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and when they're close to the Sun, and that makes

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it pretty hard to see moons, which tend to be

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>small and further from the star. We haven't found any

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>instances of a moon that's like huge or one of

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:41.840
<v Speaker 1>those instances where it's hard to determine which one is

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the planet and which one is the moon because they're

0:49:43.680 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>both pretty big, and so there's no big things that

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 1>break this rule. We haven't confirmed any moons and other

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:52.799
<v Speaker 1>solar systems are you're looking for the duck built platypus

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of moons out there somewhere No so far zero. There

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>have been some candidates. People have some really clever ideas

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 1>for how you might see moons around planets in other

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 1>solar systems. Like one way that we see the planet

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:07.839
<v Speaker 1>is that the planet passes in front of the star

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 1>makes like a little eclipse, it like dims the star

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:12.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And if it does that several times,

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you can see a pattern, so you can get a

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sense for like, oh, this is really something that's passing

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:18.439
<v Speaker 1>in front of the star. It must be a planet. Now,

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:21.320
<v Speaker 1>if there's a moon around that planet and it's orbiting

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that planet. As it passes around the planet, it might

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 1>add to that eclipse a little bit and then pass

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 1>behind the planet and dip again. And so if you

0:50:29.680 --> 0:50:33.280
<v Speaker 1>have really refined measurements, you might see these like wiggles

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on the wiggles that tell you that there's something going

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>around that planet. And there are some cases where people

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the data and they're like, yeah, I think

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 1>those are wiggles and wiggles, but other people analyze the

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 1>same data and they're like, no, there's no evidence for that.

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:48.799
<v Speaker 1>So we're really at the edge of being able to

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:52.840
<v Speaker 1>detect XO moons. We haven't seen any yet. Well that's exciting, Like,

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:55.879
<v Speaker 1>hopefully in our lifetime we figure out how to do that. Well, yeah,

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully in our lifetime. I mean, we're on the edge

0:50:58.160 --> 0:51:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of learning so much about these other solars to times,

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like figuring out what's any atmosphere of those planets, seeing

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>what moons there are. There was also a lot of excitement.

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you remember about this one particular

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>star called Tabby Star, which dimmed really weirdly all of

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:13.879
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, and people thought like, wait a second, what's

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>blocking this star? Is this evidence of like an alien megastructure.

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Is somebody out there building a dison spear around this star,

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 1>which was really fun and you know inspired, I'm sure

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of science fiction novels. But it turns out

0:51:25.320 --> 0:51:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that it was just like a big cloud of dust

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and debris. But it might be that, like, you know,

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:33.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a planet out there and it had a moon,

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:36.759
<v Speaker 1>and that moon got like tidally disrupted and torn up

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and ended up being this big cloud of stuff that

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 1>partially blocked the star. So that might have been like,

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, evidence of the destruction of an excellent moon. WHOA,

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:48.919
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty cool. That's pretty cool. Yeah, But I'm looking

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:51.359
<v Speaker 1>forward to scientists figuring that out and so we can

0:51:51.400 --> 0:51:54.440
<v Speaker 1>get a sense for like how unusual is it to

0:51:54.560 --> 0:51:57.839
<v Speaker 1>have just like one big moon, How unusual is it

0:51:57.880 --> 0:52:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to have inner planets with no moons? How weird is

0:52:00.719 --> 0:52:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it to have huge gas giants with like a dozen moons.

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 1>We ask these basic questions because we just don't know

0:52:06.200 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the answers, and really the only way to figure it

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>out is to go out there and explore the universe

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and to like actually look with our eyeballs and our

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 1>telescopes and get the answers. It's a cool time to

0:52:15.800 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 1>be alive. It is a cool time to be alive. So, Kelly,

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>what are you going to go back and tell your

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:23.279
<v Speaker 1>seven year old about how many moons the Earth has? Well,

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I think she's going to be super excited. She We've

0:52:25.640 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 1>been talking to her about Apollo and the space race,

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think she'll be super excited to hear that

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:32.359
<v Speaker 1>one of those you know, boosters came back around again

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and is still floating in deep space. So I'll tell

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:37.160
<v Speaker 1>her about that, and I definitely think she's going to

0:52:37.280 --> 0:52:40.759
<v Speaker 1>love that there's something called a space being or something

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we referred to as a space being because we can't

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 1>pronounce its real name. I think she's going to get

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a total kick out of that information. What about you,

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna tell your kids? Yeah, my kids

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 1>also will tell them that there's weird stuff floating out there,

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and that in the end, it's all just sort of arbitrary.

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:56.320
<v Speaker 1>What we call a moon and what we call a

0:52:56.400 --> 0:53:00.279
<v Speaker 1>quasi satellite is really just an arbitrary distinction, but that

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>their questions are valuable questions, and that these really simple,

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:06.560
<v Speaker 1>basic questions about the universe are sometimes the most interesting,

0:53:06.840 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the hardest to answer and reveal something about you know,

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:12.879
<v Speaker 1>what we've thought about our place in the universe, what

0:53:12.920 --> 0:53:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we think is natural, what we think is normal, what

0:53:15.120 --> 0:53:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we think is typical, and it probably is really unusual.

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's somewhere out there there's an alien kid looking

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 1>up at the sky and asking the alien mom, like,

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 1>why do we have five moons? You know, it's just

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:29.760
<v Speaker 1>every planet to have five moons. I love that idea

0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're all asking the same questions, but just very

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>much separated. All right, So thank you very much everybody

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for going on this curiosity journey with us and listening

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to us talk about the number of moons around the Earth.

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>If you have stuff you'd like to hear us talk about,

0:53:43.760 --> 0:53:46.840
<v Speaker 1>please send them to us two questions at Daniel and

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Jorge dot com. Thanks again, Kelly for joining us today

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and thanks to all of you for tuning in. Thanks

0:53:51.680 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for having me. It was a lot of fun. Thanks

0:54:00.960 --> 0:54:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge explained. The

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Universe is a production of I Heart Radio or more

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast from my Heart Radio visit the I Heart Radio app,

0:54:10.480 --> 0:54:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.