WEBVTT - RED WAVE 2022: MID-TERM PREVIEW

0:00:11.657 --> 0:00:14.937
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Buck Sexton Joe podcast, make sure

0:00:14.937 --> 0:00:17.977
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

0:00:17.977 --> 0:00:30.657
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. The twenty twenty two midterm

0:00:30.697 --> 0:00:33.777
<v Speaker 1>elections are just a few months away, and with Democrats

0:00:33.817 --> 0:00:37.617
<v Speaker 1>unable to find answers on the struggling economy, are open borders,

0:00:37.737 --> 0:00:41.337
<v Speaker 1>rising crime rates, a lot of stuff, Republicans are poised

0:00:41.337 --> 0:00:44.137
<v Speaker 1>to make significant gains. I think that's putting it mildly.

0:00:44.497 --> 0:00:46.817
<v Speaker 1>In this special edition of Hold the Line, we'll take

0:00:46.857 --> 0:00:49.497
<v Speaker 1>a deep dive into the races you should be keeping

0:00:49.497 --> 0:00:59.777
<v Speaker 1>an eye on as November rolls around. Welcome to this

0:00:59.857 --> 0:01:02.857
<v Speaker 1>special edition of Hold the Line. I'm Buck Sexton. Let's

0:01:02.857 --> 0:01:07.657
<v Speaker 1>start with this. Biden is in free fall, the Democrats

0:01:07.857 --> 0:01:10.737
<v Speaker 1>going along with them. It is a mess for the

0:01:10.857 --> 0:01:15.257
<v Speaker 1>left or the Libs. Joe Biden's approval rating as we

0:01:15.417 --> 0:01:19.937
<v Speaker 1>go to air here approve thirty seven percent. Okay, disapprove

0:01:20.737 --> 0:01:25.977
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight percent. Those are abysmal numbers. Those aren't like.

0:01:26.137 --> 0:01:27.937
<v Speaker 1>Those are rookie numbers. Get them up a little bit.

0:01:27.937 --> 0:01:32.897
<v Speaker 1>Those are time to throw your hat in the ring

0:01:33.137 --> 0:01:36.297
<v Speaker 1>of or rather put your hat up and retire. How

0:01:36.297 --> 0:01:39.497
<v Speaker 1>about that one time to be done. Joe Biden can't

0:01:39.537 --> 0:01:41.817
<v Speaker 1>get it done. That's why the numbers are going in

0:01:41.857 --> 0:01:44.617
<v Speaker 1>this direction. We can all see it now. What's pushing

0:01:44.657 --> 0:01:47.497
<v Speaker 1>this sentiment right American voters in the condition of the

0:01:47.537 --> 0:01:50.737
<v Speaker 1>economy we got is a Fox News poll. Five percent

0:01:50.817 --> 0:01:52.897
<v Speaker 1>say it's excellent, and I wonder how many of them

0:01:52.937 --> 0:01:58.177
<v Speaker 1>get stock tips from Nancy Pelosi. Thirteen percent say good,

0:01:58.737 --> 0:02:03.617
<v Speaker 1>they're twenty five percent poor, fifty seven percent those there

0:02:03.617 --> 0:02:06.297
<v Speaker 1>are also people who are known as readers or those

0:02:06.297 --> 0:02:10.697
<v Speaker 1>who pay attention. So yeah, it's bad add out there

0:02:10.697 --> 0:02:13.777
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats, there is no question about it. The only

0:02:13.857 --> 0:02:16.177
<v Speaker 1>questions that remain outstanding, it seems, right now as we

0:02:16.297 --> 0:02:20.737
<v Speaker 1>go into this midterm election are will Republicans have a

0:02:20.977 --> 0:02:24.617
<v Speaker 1>historic win in the House and will they be able

0:02:24.657 --> 0:02:27.377
<v Speaker 1>to take control of the Senate. Senate race is probably

0:02:27.377 --> 0:02:29.537
<v Speaker 1>going to be close, because this isn't a great cycle

0:02:30.097 --> 0:02:35.017
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans irrespective of the political conditions right now, but

0:02:35.617 --> 0:02:38.657
<v Speaker 1>voters that rather voters that issues care about and that

0:02:38.737 --> 0:02:41.497
<v Speaker 1>the GOP handles better take a look at this inflation,

0:02:41.577 --> 0:02:44.297
<v Speaker 1>which is so high in the list, Republicans are up

0:02:44.417 --> 0:02:49.977
<v Speaker 1>nineteen points on that one. Border security also up nineteen points, crime,

0:02:50.017 --> 0:02:53.857
<v Speaker 1>Republicans up thirteen points, even foreign policy up eight. Well,

0:02:53.897 --> 0:02:55.777
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about how we got to this point before

0:02:55.777 --> 0:02:59.697
<v Speaker 1>we break down some of the places where there will

0:02:59.737 --> 0:03:05.657
<v Speaker 1>be key contests and hopefully some big Republican pickups. But

0:03:05.737 --> 0:03:08.337
<v Speaker 1>let's see how we got here. On inflation, the Biden

0:03:08.377 --> 0:03:11.497
<v Speaker 1>administration decided thing they did when they came into office

0:03:11.497 --> 0:03:14.737
<v Speaker 1>really was trying to push and did push a party

0:03:14.817 --> 0:03:18.137
<v Speaker 1>line one point nine trillion dollars spending packet. Now that

0:03:18.257 --> 0:03:22.297
<v Speaker 1>alone is a point of some madness, obviously, because they

0:03:22.337 --> 0:03:26.297
<v Speaker 1>had already gone through a period under COVID of lockdowns

0:03:26.377 --> 0:03:30.857
<v Speaker 1>of trillions of dollars of additional spending. This was a

0:03:31.137 --> 0:03:35.497
<v Speaker 1>really bad idea. Okay, this was a really bad idea.

0:03:35.577 --> 0:03:37.657
<v Speaker 1>And what did Joe Biden want to do beyond that?

0:03:38.297 --> 0:03:42.337
<v Speaker 1>He decided that he should spend five trillion additional dollars

0:03:42.337 --> 0:03:46.337
<v Speaker 1>with Bill back better. So, if you think inflation comes

0:03:46.417 --> 0:03:51.937
<v Speaker 1>from poor monetary policy and too much government expenditure, then

0:03:52.017 --> 0:03:54.497
<v Speaker 1>you realize that the Democrats are to blame here. On

0:03:54.537 --> 0:03:59.377
<v Speaker 1>the border, it's rather straightforward. The Democrats do not believe

0:03:59.537 --> 0:04:03.537
<v Speaker 1>that illegal immigration is a problem. They think that it's

0:04:03.577 --> 0:04:06.977
<v Speaker 1>just something to be managed. But in terms of the

0:04:07.017 --> 0:04:10.817
<v Speaker 1>incentives that it should really be in purred because they

0:04:10.937 --> 0:04:13.937
<v Speaker 1>view this as helpful to them over the long term

0:04:13.977 --> 0:04:17.377
<v Speaker 1>for their electoral prospect. They think that the more people

0:04:17.417 --> 0:04:21.297
<v Speaker 1>who come here illegally from developing countries around the world,

0:04:21.617 --> 0:04:24.257
<v Speaker 1>the likelier it is that Democrats will have a permanent

0:04:24.537 --> 0:04:27.457
<v Speaker 1>voting majority. They speak about this openly. This is part

0:04:27.497 --> 0:04:30.097
<v Speaker 1>of their strategy. One interesting part of this, though, is

0:04:30.097 --> 0:04:34.977
<v Speaker 1>that the numbers actually for Hispanic Americans are increasingly trending

0:04:35.017 --> 0:04:38.057
<v Speaker 1>toward Republicans. In fact, in a lot of recent polling,

0:04:38.097 --> 0:04:41.937
<v Speaker 1>you've seen that Hispanic voters in this country may well

0:04:42.057 --> 0:04:47.137
<v Speaker 1>go as a majority for the Republican candidates. So that's

0:04:47.137 --> 0:04:52.017
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. On crime, it couldn't be any more obvious.

0:04:52.057 --> 0:04:57.577
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are the party of defund the police, of progressive prosecutors,

0:04:57.617 --> 0:05:02.337
<v Speaker 1>of ending mass incarceration, and these are the things that

0:05:02.377 --> 0:05:06.377
<v Speaker 1>have led to the rapid deterioration of safety and security

0:05:06.417 --> 0:05:09.577
<v Speaker 1>in our cities, in our towns, even in rural areas

0:05:10.097 --> 0:05:13.097
<v Speaker 1>of the country. It turns out that when you undermine

0:05:13.137 --> 0:05:16.977
<v Speaker 1>the very foundation of your criminal justice system because of

0:05:17.017 --> 0:05:22.817
<v Speaker 1>a panic over systemic racism and a desire to go

0:05:23.057 --> 0:05:27.297
<v Speaker 1>easier on criminals. I mean, these Democrat notions could only

0:05:27.377 --> 0:05:30.617
<v Speaker 1>lead in one direction in terms of defunding police and

0:05:30.697 --> 0:05:33.817
<v Speaker 1>the things that the policy decisions they've made, and here

0:05:33.857 --> 0:05:36.057
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing what's going on with it. And then,

0:05:36.057 --> 0:05:39.217
<v Speaker 1>of course, on foreign policy, Joe Biden was supposed to

0:05:39.257 --> 0:05:42.057
<v Speaker 1>be a foreign policy expert. He realized that they brought

0:05:42.177 --> 0:05:44.417
<v Speaker 1>him on to the Obama ticket to be vice president

0:05:44.457 --> 0:05:47.057
<v Speaker 1>because he was a steady hand on foreign policy. But

0:05:47.177 --> 0:05:50.217
<v Speaker 1>what do we really know about Joe. He is on

0:05:50.377 --> 0:05:54.817
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy issues the most consistently wrong person in the game.

0:05:54.857 --> 0:05:57.657
<v Speaker 1>Over the last forty or so years. We saw this

0:05:57.697 --> 0:06:00.337
<v Speaker 1>with the debacle of the US pull out in Afghanistan,

0:06:00.457 --> 0:06:04.697
<v Speaker 1>how it was done, the actual pullout, and the decision

0:06:04.737 --> 0:06:08.457
<v Speaker 1>making day to day there, and then also with just

0:06:08.497 --> 0:06:10.457
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we have the biggest war in Europe

0:06:10.457 --> 0:06:13.217
<v Speaker 1>since World War Two underway, the Russian invasion of Ukraine,

0:06:13.697 --> 0:06:16.297
<v Speaker 1>which has not been managed well by the Biden administration.

0:06:16.497 --> 0:06:19.497
<v Speaker 1>This war never should have even been able to start

0:06:19.697 --> 0:06:22.777
<v Speaker 1>if there was deft diplomacy in the White House. Though,

0:06:22.817 --> 0:06:24.537
<v Speaker 1>these are some of the things we're going to be

0:06:24.537 --> 0:06:28.217
<v Speaker 1>looking at here as issues that are going to be center,

0:06:28.977 --> 0:06:32.017
<v Speaker 1>front in center in some of these major campaigns, with

0:06:32.177 --> 0:06:34.777
<v Speaker 1>just one pickup needed for Republicans to swing the balance

0:06:34.817 --> 0:06:36.897
<v Speaker 1>of power in their favor. Millions of dollars are pouring

0:06:36.897 --> 0:06:39.657
<v Speaker 1>into a number of key US Senate races. We'll take

0:06:39.657 --> 0:06:42.177
<v Speaker 1>a look at those races to watch with commentary editor

0:06:42.217 --> 0:06:52.257
<v Speaker 1>for The Washington Examiner con Carrol. Coming up. Does the

0:06:52.257 --> 0:06:55.737
<v Speaker 1>current nationwide shortage of infant formula have you asking what next?

0:06:55.817 --> 0:06:57.377
<v Speaker 1>Did you know that nearly one hundred percent of our

0:06:57.457 --> 0:07:00.617
<v Speaker 1>nation's supply of antibiotics is produced outside the United States,

0:07:00.737 --> 0:07:03.777
<v Speaker 1>mainly in China and India. If we can't control our

0:07:03.857 --> 0:07:06.297
<v Speaker 1>domestically produced baby formula, what about all the life saving

0:07:06.297 --> 0:07:09.977
<v Speaker 1>medications produced overseas. Many experts predict that if there were

0:07:10.137 --> 0:07:13.937
<v Speaker 1>supply chain disruption in the pharmaceutical industry, pharmacies could run

0:07:13.977 --> 0:07:16.857
<v Speaker 1>out of most antibiotics in a matter of weeks. Thankfully,

0:07:16.897 --> 0:07:18.977
<v Speaker 1>there's a new service to help you prepare for such

0:07:19.017 --> 0:07:21.497
<v Speaker 1>an event. Have you heard of the Chase case. It's

0:07:21.497 --> 0:07:23.937
<v Speaker 1>a back of five different courses of antibiotics that you

0:07:23.937 --> 0:07:26.537
<v Speaker 1>can use to treat a long list of bacterial illnesses,

0:07:26.577 --> 0:07:31.977
<v Speaker 1>including UTI's, respiratory infections, sinusitis, and skin infections. Every household

0:07:32.017 --> 0:07:34.937
<v Speaker 1>needs at least one Jace case. Go to Jace medical

0:07:35.057 --> 0:07:37.817
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash buck right now and use the code

0:07:37.817 --> 0:07:40.617
<v Speaker 1>word buck ten for ten dollars off your Jase case.

0:07:41.017 --> 0:07:43.577
<v Speaker 1>That's code word buck ten for ten dollars off at

0:07:43.617 --> 0:07:48.217
<v Speaker 1>Jase medical dot com slash buck Jacemedical dot com slash buck.

0:08:03.217 --> 0:08:05.897
<v Speaker 1>With the United States sent an evenly split fifty fifty

0:08:05.937 --> 0:08:09.137
<v Speaker 1>between parties, there's a very good chance that the Chamber

0:08:09.177 --> 0:08:13.017
<v Speaker 1>could flip to publican control in November. In total, thirty

0:08:13.017 --> 0:08:15.417
<v Speaker 1>five US Senate seats will be contested in this year's

0:08:15.457 --> 0:08:18.977
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections. The GOP needs just one pickup to change

0:08:18.977 --> 0:08:21.777
<v Speaker 1>the balance of power. There are four competitive races in

0:08:21.817 --> 0:08:26.537
<v Speaker 1>particular that Republicans should be keeping an eye on Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada,

0:08:26.577 --> 0:08:29.977
<v Speaker 1>and Arizona. I mean, now makes sense of all this

0:08:30.057 --> 0:08:33.937
<v Speaker 1>commentary editor at the Washington Examiner, mister Cohn, Carol Cohn,

0:08:34.017 --> 0:08:37.097
<v Speaker 1>great to see it, Go to see you buck. So,

0:08:37.657 --> 0:08:41.737
<v Speaker 1>just at the at the overview level, how's it looking

0:08:41.817 --> 0:08:45.657
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans in terms of just Senate control going into

0:08:45.657 --> 0:08:51.337
<v Speaker 1>this mid term? I mean, I'm seeing House percentage likelihood

0:08:51.857 --> 0:08:55.817
<v Speaker 1>going to the GOP ninety percent, ninety two percent of

0:08:55.857 --> 0:08:58.737
<v Speaker 1>people seem very very confident. Sen It feels like a

0:08:58.737 --> 0:09:02.697
<v Speaker 1>different deal. What are you seeing, Yeah, I've seen the

0:09:02.777 --> 0:09:06.017
<v Speaker 1>Republicans just not getting good candidates in the races they need.

0:09:06.257 --> 0:09:09.617
<v Speaker 1>In the House. It's a lot more about the environment

0:09:09.657 --> 0:09:13.857
<v Speaker 1>as more about the president's approval rating. When the Senate,

0:09:13.857 --> 0:09:16.617
<v Speaker 1>it's going to come down to candidates and Republican sister

0:09:16.737 --> 0:09:20.897
<v Speaker 1>not getting the candidates they need to guarantee a Senate victory.

0:09:21.137 --> 0:09:22.737
<v Speaker 1>I still think they're going to pull it out, but

0:09:22.857 --> 0:09:25.257
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be close. So let's take a look

0:09:25.297 --> 0:09:29.857
<v Speaker 1>at some of these individual races you have In Pennsylvania

0:09:30.057 --> 0:09:33.457
<v Speaker 1>seat that was or is vacated now we'll be vacated

0:09:33.497 --> 0:09:38.977
<v Speaker 1>by retiring Pennsylvania Senator Pat Toomey, Republican Senator Pat Toomey. So,

0:09:39.137 --> 0:09:43.057
<v Speaker 1>right now the race is between doctor Oz, doctor methmt OZ,

0:09:43.177 --> 0:09:45.177
<v Speaker 1>known to a lot of people, and this guy John Fetterman.

0:09:45.257 --> 0:09:49.297
<v Speaker 1>Feederman's ahead at fifty percent, the Ozz is forty four percent. Now,

0:09:49.337 --> 0:09:51.617
<v Speaker 1>Oz got a lot of money personally, and I've got

0:09:51.617 --> 0:09:55.537
<v Speaker 1>a lot of recognition because of his media profile. Why

0:09:55.657 --> 0:09:57.697
<v Speaker 1>is Fetterman ahead of Ozz at this point? Do you

0:09:57.697 --> 0:10:01.457
<v Speaker 1>think he can close the gap? I do think OZ

0:10:01.457 --> 0:10:03.457
<v Speaker 1>could close the gap. He's going to have to have

0:10:03.537 --> 0:10:06.257
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things break his way. Feederman's just a

0:10:06.297 --> 0:10:10.337
<v Speaker 1>real authentic person. He's a great candidate. Oz is an

0:10:10.337 --> 0:10:13.337
<v Speaker 1>okay Candidate's he's a newbie. This is his first race.

0:10:14.297 --> 0:10:18.017
<v Speaker 1>But as your viewers may know, Fetterman did have a

0:10:18.017 --> 0:10:20.937
<v Speaker 1>stroke on actually election night, and he hasn't had a

0:10:20.937 --> 0:10:24.457
<v Speaker 1>lot of public appearances since then. In fact, he's going

0:10:24.497 --> 0:10:27.617
<v Speaker 1>to have a fundraiser in Philadelphia to night, and it's

0:10:27.617 --> 0:10:29.417
<v Speaker 1>gonna be really going to the first time he could

0:10:29.417 --> 0:10:33.177
<v Speaker 1>see him in action, and what I'm hearing is he's

0:10:33.217 --> 0:10:35.977
<v Speaker 1>not all there yet. And he even admitted himself he

0:10:36.017 --> 0:10:38.177
<v Speaker 1>went to go visit some campaign workers and said I'm

0:10:38.217 --> 0:10:40.697
<v Speaker 1>not back yet. So it's really going to come down

0:10:40.777 --> 0:10:44.177
<v Speaker 1>to the debate and how with it Fetterman scenes at

0:10:44.217 --> 0:10:47.537
<v Speaker 1>that time. If it appears that he's lost a step,

0:10:47.817 --> 0:10:51.737
<v Speaker 1>Oz could definitely pull out this race, no problem. So

0:10:52.257 --> 0:10:55.537
<v Speaker 1>that one is going to be obviously very closely watched.

0:10:55.577 --> 0:11:00.017
<v Speaker 1>Another one, I think the one that the media focus

0:11:00.137 --> 0:11:03.377
<v Speaker 1>maybe the most intense on of all these upcoming Senate

0:11:03.457 --> 0:11:07.857
<v Speaker 1>races could be the Georgia Senate race. This seat that's

0:11:07.897 --> 0:11:09.657
<v Speaker 1>up for grabs, well, not up for grabs. I mean,

0:11:09.697 --> 0:11:15.017
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously right now in Raphael Warnock's possession, but it's

0:11:15.017 --> 0:11:19.337
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Warnock versus Herschel Walker forty seven for Walker

0:11:19.457 --> 0:11:22.297
<v Speaker 1>the latest polling, we could pull fifty percent for Warnock.

0:11:22.377 --> 0:11:24.817
<v Speaker 1>We know it's gonna be a close one. How is

0:11:24.857 --> 0:11:27.697
<v Speaker 1>Herschel doing as a candidate, and what do you think

0:11:27.737 --> 0:11:29.497
<v Speaker 1>the chances are he could pull this off? What has

0:11:29.537 --> 0:11:33.977
<v Speaker 1>to happen in Georgia. This is another newbie candidate, someone

0:11:34.017 --> 0:11:37.257
<v Speaker 1>who's never run a race before. But even even worse

0:11:37.297 --> 0:11:40.297
<v Speaker 1>than oz, Oz had a very competitive primary. He went

0:11:40.297 --> 0:11:42.897
<v Speaker 1>out and debated, he went out and met with people,

0:11:43.297 --> 0:11:46.617
<v Speaker 1>He interacted with the press multiple occasions, gave tons of interviews,

0:11:46.737 --> 0:11:51.977
<v Speaker 1>was on talk radio, very comfortable on television. Walker's not

0:11:52.017 --> 0:11:56.017
<v Speaker 1>doing any of that. He's basically bunkered down, sitting in

0:11:56.057 --> 0:11:59.137
<v Speaker 1>his campaign room, not doing anything. He's not going anywhere,

0:11:59.177 --> 0:12:01.617
<v Speaker 1>he's not talking to people, he's not giving interviews, and

0:12:01.657 --> 0:12:03.377
<v Speaker 1>it has a lot of people nervous because he just

0:12:03.417 --> 0:12:06.217
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been tested. Meanwhile, you've got war Knock out there.

0:12:06.297 --> 0:12:09.177
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna raise probably more money than any other Senate candidate,

0:12:09.697 --> 0:12:12.977
<v Speaker 1>and people in Georgia. Republicans and Georgia have a right

0:12:13.017 --> 0:12:15.137
<v Speaker 1>to be worried. He just doesn't look like herschel Walker

0:12:15.617 --> 0:12:19.297
<v Speaker 1>is so far a fighter. He's someone who wants to

0:12:19.297 --> 0:12:22.377
<v Speaker 1>stay home and let the party do the work for him.

0:12:23.057 --> 0:12:27.377
<v Speaker 1>Is Warnock getting a ton of donation money from out

0:12:27.377 --> 0:12:29.577
<v Speaker 1>of state? We've seen that in some other some other

0:12:29.657 --> 0:12:33.257
<v Speaker 1>races up to this point. Yeah, him and Abrams are

0:12:33.337 --> 0:12:36.297
<v Speaker 1>getting tons of money, particularly from California. This is a

0:12:36.337 --> 0:12:38.857
<v Speaker 1>seat that National Democrats really want to hold on to.

0:12:39.257 --> 0:12:40.977
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of what they see as a red steat,

0:12:41.017 --> 0:12:43.177
<v Speaker 1>maybe a purple steat, but it's one of the redder

0:12:43.217 --> 0:12:44.977
<v Speaker 1>ones out there, and they really feel like they can

0:12:45.017 --> 0:12:48.057
<v Speaker 1>win this. And then Warnock has a shot. Now we

0:12:48.177 --> 0:12:53.777
<v Speaker 1>move to Nevada and the Senate race there between Adam Laxalt,

0:12:53.937 --> 0:12:56.657
<v Speaker 1>who I've I've interviewed him many times. He was state

0:12:56.737 --> 0:13:00.737
<v Speaker 1>attorney general there, the very sharp guy, smart guy, and

0:13:01.057 --> 0:13:06.337
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was actually the roommate of Rhonda Santis

0:13:06.417 --> 0:13:08.817
<v Speaker 1>do I have that. I think they bunked together in

0:13:08.857 --> 0:13:11.217
<v Speaker 1>the military at one point, or maybe it was in

0:13:11.297 --> 0:13:13.657
<v Speaker 1>law school. I can't remember now. And then there's Catherine

0:13:13.737 --> 0:13:17.377
<v Speaker 1>Cortez Mastow, the Democrat there, she's a little ahead. Tell

0:13:17.457 --> 0:13:20.577
<v Speaker 1>me in this Devata sedate race, what's going on? Well, here,

0:13:20.617 --> 0:13:22.697
<v Speaker 1>you have a more blue state, you have an incumbent.

0:13:22.897 --> 0:13:25.657
<v Speaker 1>This is one Republicans should not be winning. But unlike

0:13:25.657 --> 0:13:28.137
<v Speaker 1>the last two races, here the Republicans have a good candidate.

0:13:28.257 --> 0:13:30.537
<v Speaker 1>Lax also good like like like you said, he's smart,

0:13:30.857 --> 0:13:33.697
<v Speaker 1>he's with it, he does media appearances, he's on the trail,

0:13:33.817 --> 0:13:38.097
<v Speaker 1>he's out mixing it up with a ranking profile voters.

0:13:38.097 --> 0:13:41.697
<v Speaker 1>He's the real deal. So in a wave year when

0:13:41.857 --> 0:13:44.497
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are doing well and the economy is not doing well,

0:13:44.937 --> 0:13:47.217
<v Speaker 1>Laxil's the type of candidate who can put in the

0:13:47.217 --> 0:13:52.137
<v Speaker 1>work and can definitely beat the Democratic incumbent out there. Absolutely. Now,

0:13:52.537 --> 0:13:55.577
<v Speaker 1>we got an interesting situation here in Arizona where the

0:13:55.617 --> 0:13:59.737
<v Speaker 1>GOP primary is just going to be decided coming up

0:13:59.777 --> 0:14:02.657
<v Speaker 1>here in a matter of weeks. We've got three candidates

0:14:02.697 --> 0:14:06.297
<v Speaker 1>who are all pretty much in striking distance of each other. Right,

0:14:06.337 --> 0:14:08.977
<v Speaker 1>We've got Blake Masters out front twenty five percent, but

0:14:09.457 --> 0:14:12.297
<v Speaker 1>Mark Burne of Itch the AG is at fourteen percent. There,

0:14:12.377 --> 0:14:16.337
<v Speaker 1>Jim Lamon is at eighteen percent. Now, Masters has a

0:14:16.417 --> 0:14:18.817
<v Speaker 1>solid lead, but there's still some time left here, and

0:14:18.857 --> 0:14:20.897
<v Speaker 1>obviously if you would only had two candidates, it might

0:14:20.897 --> 0:14:23.337
<v Speaker 1>be a very different situation. What do you think of

0:14:23.817 --> 0:14:25.657
<v Speaker 1>you know, what do you think of this race so far?

0:14:25.897 --> 0:14:27.857
<v Speaker 1>Why has Masters been able to get out front? Do

0:14:27.857 --> 0:14:30.937
<v Speaker 1>you think? Do you think he keeps that lead? I do?

0:14:31.177 --> 0:14:32.937
<v Speaker 1>I do. I think Masters is a new breed of

0:14:32.977 --> 0:14:36.857
<v Speaker 1>Republican along the lines of Jade Vance. All. Both of

0:14:36.857 --> 0:14:39.857
<v Speaker 1>those guys are backed by Peter Teel. I think they're

0:14:39.897 --> 0:14:44.817
<v Speaker 1>a strong kind of new national conservative type Republican that's

0:14:45.097 --> 0:14:49.497
<v Speaker 1>a very big America first on American families and protecting

0:14:49.497 --> 0:14:52.537
<v Speaker 1>American families. They're both a lot of rhetoric and policy

0:14:52.537 --> 0:14:55.137
<v Speaker 1>along those lines. I think that's going to sell. I

0:14:55.177 --> 0:14:57.377
<v Speaker 1>think Masters is going to pull this out, and then

0:14:57.417 --> 0:14:58.817
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to be Mark Kelly in the

0:14:58.817 --> 0:15:02.097
<v Speaker 1>general election. Yeah, tell me about that. How's Kelly doing

0:15:02.657 --> 0:15:05.617
<v Speaker 1>right now in terms of support Mark Kelly? I saw

0:15:05.657 --> 0:15:07.697
<v Speaker 1>something that Blake Masters said that, you know, not everything

0:15:07.737 --> 0:15:09.617
<v Speaker 1>can be about how I used to be an astronaut.

0:15:09.697 --> 0:15:12.377
<v Speaker 1>So how's Kelly actually doing in his home state in

0:15:12.457 --> 0:15:17.817
<v Speaker 1>terms of polling? Not well, He's underwater approval wise. He

0:15:17.857 --> 0:15:20.937
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really staked out an idea beyond being voting with

0:15:20.977 --> 0:15:24.097
<v Speaker 1>Schumer all the time. You know, unlike Cinema, who's really

0:15:24.137 --> 0:15:28.097
<v Speaker 1>definitely established a brand of independence and has bucked her party,

0:15:28.577 --> 0:15:30.577
<v Speaker 1>Mark Kelly has gone in the opposite direction and has

0:15:30.617 --> 0:15:33.057
<v Speaker 1>basically done whatever Truck Schumer tells him to do, and

0:15:33.097 --> 0:15:34.737
<v Speaker 1>that's going to hurt him in a state where you know,

0:15:34.777 --> 0:15:36.897
<v Speaker 1>you have mavericks like John McKay and et cetera. And

0:15:37.217 --> 0:15:40.617
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes think that's a little silly, but it's

0:15:40.617 --> 0:15:42.857
<v Speaker 1>a brand that Cinema has embraced and is doing well,

0:15:43.217 --> 0:15:46.417
<v Speaker 1>and it's something where Mark Kelly hasn't, and he's has

0:15:46.977 --> 0:15:49.457
<v Speaker 1>Blake Masters or real Republican Canada is is gonna have

0:15:49.457 --> 0:15:52.737
<v Speaker 1>a great opportunity to define Kelly as a national Democrat

0:15:52.737 --> 0:15:55.057
<v Speaker 1>who needs to be kicked out of office. Don I

0:15:55.057 --> 0:15:57.377
<v Speaker 1>always appreciate the insight, sir, Thanks for being with us.

0:15:57.937 --> 0:16:02.777
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely blackay time. While national races make the headlines, it's

0:16:02.817 --> 0:16:04.777
<v Speaker 1>local elections that may have the biggest impact on the

0:16:04.777 --> 0:16:06.977
<v Speaker 1>lives of Americans when we come back. The founder of

0:16:06.977 --> 0:16:11.297
<v Speaker 1>the seventeen seventy six Project Pack, Ryan Grdusky, joins us

0:16:11.337 --> 0:16:20.297
<v Speaker 1>to explain how a lot of companies promise that your

0:16:20.337 --> 0:16:23.417
<v Speaker 1>privacy is guaranteed, but we know that's not true. That's

0:16:23.457 --> 0:16:26.897
<v Speaker 1>why you need a new privacy and cybersecurity application tool

0:16:26.937 --> 0:16:31.457
<v Speaker 1>called Secure spelled sek You are Secure is using proprietary

0:16:31.537 --> 0:16:35.577
<v Speaker 1>encryption and offering secure instant messaging and email. With Secure,

0:16:35.657 --> 0:16:38.177
<v Speaker 1>all of your communication is based on servers and data

0:16:38.217 --> 0:16:41.017
<v Speaker 1>centers hosted in Switzerland without using any of the big

0:16:41.057 --> 0:16:44.777
<v Speaker 1>tech platform. Privacy is a big issue now. Without real security,

0:16:44.977 --> 0:16:48.137
<v Speaker 1>people can read your emails, messages, even your bank information.

0:16:48.497 --> 0:16:50.937
<v Speaker 1>Secure will never mind your data and never ask your

0:16:50.937 --> 0:16:53.937
<v Speaker 1>phone number. You can send emails to your doctor, banker, lawyer,

0:16:54.017 --> 0:16:56.537
<v Speaker 1>or anyone else with total confidence you're not being spied

0:16:56.537 --> 0:17:00.057
<v Speaker 1>on by your internet provider or big tech. Secure is

0:17:00.057 --> 0:17:03.017
<v Speaker 1>your solution to stop the constant theft of your digital identity.

0:17:03.177 --> 0:17:05.937
<v Speaker 1>It costs only five dollars to the messenger only ten

0:17:05.977 --> 0:17:08.977
<v Speaker 1>dollars for the messenger and email combination package. Go to

0:17:09.017 --> 0:17:11.577
<v Speaker 1>secure dot com and take back your privacy today. That's

0:17:11.657 --> 0:17:15.137
<v Speaker 1>sekure dot com and use promo code buck for twenty

0:17:15.137 --> 0:17:18.177
<v Speaker 1>five percent off. We'll be right back with more. Hold along.

0:17:32.657 --> 0:17:36.057
<v Speaker 1>While congressional, Senate and governor's races make the headlines, local

0:17:36.097 --> 0:17:39.337
<v Speaker 1>elections arguably have just as much of an impact on

0:17:39.377 --> 0:17:42.257
<v Speaker 1>the everyday lives of americ kids. Perhaps the most important

0:17:42.337 --> 0:17:44.377
<v Speaker 1>races are those for local school boards in many ways,

0:17:44.377 --> 0:17:47.177
<v Speaker 1>which said and implement the policies that kids are being

0:17:47.217 --> 0:17:50.417
<v Speaker 1>taught in public schools. For more on how twenty twenty

0:17:50.417 --> 0:17:53.337
<v Speaker 1>two is shaping up for America's school board races, let

0:17:53.377 --> 0:17:55.897
<v Speaker 1>me turn to Ryan Grdusky, the founder of a seventeen

0:17:55.937 --> 0:17:58.897
<v Speaker 1>seventy six project pack End, which is an organization that

0:17:58.937 --> 0:18:02.257
<v Speaker 1>supports candidates around the country who oppose critical race theory

0:18:02.297 --> 0:18:06.697
<v Speaker 1>instruction in schools. Ryan, good to see him. Hey, thanks

0:18:06.697 --> 0:18:09.377
<v Speaker 1>for having me. So can you give us just an

0:18:09.417 --> 0:18:12.737
<v Speaker 1>overview of why school board races which is something that

0:18:13.017 --> 0:18:14.777
<v Speaker 1>I think even a few years ago people would have

0:18:14.777 --> 0:18:18.257
<v Speaker 1>thought are as important as local dogcatcher There's been an

0:18:18.297 --> 0:18:22.417
<v Speaker 1>awakening about this. Where does that come from? Yeah, school boards.

0:18:22.457 --> 0:18:24.337
<v Speaker 1>I mean they decided a lot of things during COVID

0:18:24.377 --> 0:18:28.737
<v Speaker 1>that were really impactful, like school shutdowns, like mask mandates,

0:18:28.737 --> 0:18:32.817
<v Speaker 1>which people are continuing to push. San Diego County schools

0:18:32.857 --> 0:18:35.137
<v Speaker 1>just announced that they're into a mask mandate comes September

0:18:35.257 --> 0:18:39.297
<v Speaker 1>for students, and they also promoted a lot of superintendents

0:18:39.297 --> 0:18:43.337
<v Speaker 1>that pushed from promoted critical theory throughout schools. This is

0:18:44.257 --> 0:18:46.537
<v Speaker 1>what children learned, This is how they learned. This is

0:18:46.537 --> 0:18:50.057
<v Speaker 1>how teachers are forced to teach him any respects. And

0:18:50.057 --> 0:18:53.057
<v Speaker 1>this is also how disciplinary action is held within schools.

0:18:53.417 --> 0:18:55.897
<v Speaker 1>A couple of years ago, they about a decade ago,

0:18:56.937 --> 0:18:59.697
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama sat there and said, hey, we're anything called

0:18:59.937 --> 0:19:03.537
<v Speaker 1>ending the school to prison pipeline. And that allowed a

0:19:03.577 --> 0:19:06.977
<v Speaker 1>lot of children who should have been notified by police

0:19:06.977 --> 0:19:09.977
<v Speaker 1>officers that they had criminal conduct in school to evade

0:19:10.417 --> 0:19:12.537
<v Speaker 1>being detected by police. And I'm a young man named

0:19:12.577 --> 0:19:16.617
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Cruz was never ever brought to police's attention and

0:19:17.137 --> 0:19:19.817
<v Speaker 1>in any serious way anyway, and he was able to

0:19:19.857 --> 0:19:22.497
<v Speaker 1>buy a gun and commit a mass shooting. This all

0:19:22.617 --> 0:19:25.817
<v Speaker 1>happens through the school board process, through the superintendent process,

0:19:25.817 --> 0:19:28.177
<v Speaker 1>and people have rarely ever paid attention to it. And

0:19:28.177 --> 0:19:30.937
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm very passionate about this issue to get

0:19:30.977 --> 0:19:33.497
<v Speaker 1>conservatives involved and actually know who to vote for, because

0:19:33.497 --> 0:19:36.217
<v Speaker 1>most superintendent elections are nonpartisan. They don't have our Republican

0:19:36.297 --> 0:19:39.697
<v Speaker 1>Energy Democrat behind their name, and a lot of people

0:19:39.777 --> 0:19:41.777
<v Speaker 1>drop off the ballot. They vote for president or governor

0:19:41.857 --> 0:19:43.977
<v Speaker 1>or senator or maybe Congress, and then they stopped voting.

0:19:43.977 --> 0:19:46.217
<v Speaker 1>They don't vote to the city councilman, or the mayor

0:19:45.897 --> 0:19:51.657
<v Speaker 1>or the school board attendant. Remember, So that is why

0:19:51.657 --> 0:19:53.737
<v Speaker 1>it's critical to why you should care about this issue.

0:19:54.537 --> 0:19:59.537
<v Speaker 1>Have the anti critical race theory candidates for school board?

0:19:59.537 --> 0:20:02.457
<v Speaker 1>Have they been making some serious gains over the last

0:20:02.537 --> 0:20:06.497
<v Speaker 1>year and what are your expectations going into the next cycle. Yeah.

0:20:06.537 --> 0:20:08.977
<v Speaker 1>Last year we did my pack support of fifty eight

0:20:09.057 --> 0:20:12.857
<v Speaker 1>candidates and forty two one in Texas. We did fifteen races,

0:20:12.897 --> 0:20:15.297
<v Speaker 1>all fifteen one. We lost some in Georgia and we

0:20:15.337 --> 0:20:17.857
<v Speaker 1>won some in New York. We're looking at Florida right now.

0:20:17.857 --> 0:20:19.977
<v Speaker 1>Florida is a big state. Governor to Santas is the

0:20:19.977 --> 0:20:23.817
<v Speaker 1>first governor in recent times any way to endorse dozens

0:20:23.817 --> 0:20:26.257
<v Speaker 1>of school board candidates, to try to get school board

0:20:26.257 --> 0:20:29.217
<v Speaker 1>candidates who actually believe in his opinions and his views.

0:20:29.497 --> 0:20:33.137
<v Speaker 1>And there's races across this entire country in November, a

0:20:33.177 --> 0:20:36.617
<v Speaker 1>lot of big ones in California, Michigan, Rhode Island, Maryland,

0:20:37.297 --> 0:20:41.057
<v Speaker 1>really really important. Georgia again, they're really important races, you know.

0:20:41.137 --> 0:20:43.857
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's it's convenient because people think I'm you know,

0:20:43.897 --> 0:20:46.177
<v Speaker 1>I live in a red state or red county, I'm not.

0:20:46.377 --> 0:20:48.337
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to worry. You know, my kids are

0:20:48.377 --> 0:20:51.297
<v Speaker 1>completely fine in my area is completely fine. But but

0:20:51.417 --> 0:20:54.777
<v Speaker 1>what Governor Santas understands, it's in red county America, It's

0:20:54.777 --> 0:20:58.417
<v Speaker 1>in red state America. It's not something that is that's hidden,

0:20:58.657 --> 0:21:02.257
<v Speaker 1>you know, beyond the pale. And a lot of governors, unfortunately,

0:21:02.297 --> 0:21:04.937
<v Speaker 1>who could do more. I have not done enough. And

0:21:05.097 --> 0:21:08.097
<v Speaker 1>a lot of school board members and superintendents have not

0:21:08.217 --> 0:21:11.057
<v Speaker 1>been pushed out who are really support of this idea.

0:21:11.137 --> 0:21:12.897
<v Speaker 1>One of the give you a perfect example. One of

0:21:12.937 --> 0:21:15.217
<v Speaker 1>the races that we're looking at right now is Indian

0:21:15.297 --> 0:21:20.897
<v Speaker 1>Falls County, Florida, perfectly Republican county. Voted for Donald Trump twice,

0:21:20.977 --> 0:21:24.937
<v Speaker 1>voted for Romney, John McCain, George W. Bush twice, Republican

0:21:25.017 --> 0:21:29.857
<v Speaker 1>county right now, in their school, in their school platform,

0:21:29.937 --> 0:21:33.257
<v Speaker 1>it says that they're going to eliminate disparities in classrooms,

0:21:33.257 --> 0:21:36.857
<v Speaker 1>removal based on race and ethnic subgroups. What does that mean?

0:21:36.977 --> 0:21:39.257
<v Speaker 1>That means that they're trying to make all kids who

0:21:39.257 --> 0:21:43.297
<v Speaker 1>are suspended from schools, black, Hispanic, white, exactly the same.

0:21:43.777 --> 0:21:45.897
<v Speaker 1>Nothing in life is exactly the same. And with a

0:21:45.937 --> 0:21:48.417
<v Speaker 1>lot of kids going you know, who are black and

0:21:48.497 --> 0:21:52.457
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic being who shouldn't been suspended, they're creating alternatives from suspension,

0:21:52.537 --> 0:21:54.657
<v Speaker 1>so that way black and Hispanic kids who should be

0:21:54.697 --> 0:21:56.617
<v Speaker 1>suspended should be me being notified for the police that

0:21:56.657 --> 0:21:59.977
<v Speaker 1>they have criminal behavior, are looking at alternatives to suspension.

0:22:00.297 --> 0:22:03.257
<v Speaker 1>White children, they are who should be suspended, are being

0:22:03.257 --> 0:22:05.697
<v Speaker 1>suspended because the white number needs to be high enough

0:22:05.697 --> 0:22:08.257
<v Speaker 1>to match blackness back numbers. We're seeing this right now

0:22:08.257 --> 0:22:10.857
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, which we saw the removal three school

0:22:10.897 --> 0:22:14.777
<v Speaker 1>board members in America's most liberal city. Sixty five percent

0:22:15.137 --> 0:22:18.897
<v Speaker 1>of Black students in San Francisco are chronically absent, twenty

0:22:18.897 --> 0:22:22.777
<v Speaker 1>seven percent are proficient in reading, forty percent are proficient

0:22:22.817 --> 0:22:25.977
<v Speaker 1>in math, and yet graduation rates are at eighty seven

0:22:26.017 --> 0:22:29.177
<v Speaker 1>percent for black students in San Francisco public schools. That

0:22:29.377 --> 0:22:32.097
<v Speaker 1>is not because they are able to read, write, due math,

0:22:32.457 --> 0:22:35.337
<v Speaker 1>or they are you know, an investment in an educated

0:22:35.377 --> 0:22:39.057
<v Speaker 1>workforce into the future. This is really a complete loss

0:22:39.097 --> 0:22:42.377
<v Speaker 1>of their ability. Is that there be extremely functioning adults

0:22:42.377 --> 0:22:45.097
<v Speaker 1>in the best possible way and fully capable of getting

0:22:45.097 --> 0:22:49.017
<v Speaker 1>a great job. Hispanic numbers are not as high, but very,

0:22:49.097 --> 0:22:51.057
<v Speaker 1>very high at the same exact amount, and yet fifty

0:22:51.057 --> 0:22:53.457
<v Speaker 1>percents they'll go to college. This is a dumbing down

0:22:53.457 --> 0:22:56.017
<v Speaker 1>on our standards, it's a dumbing down of our workforce,

0:22:56.057 --> 0:22:58.537
<v Speaker 1>and it's a future that's very, very hard for a

0:22:58.577 --> 0:23:01.097
<v Speaker 1>lot of people to grass where it's easy people to

0:23:01.217 --> 0:23:04.137
<v Speaker 1>victims because they are being victims from the early age

0:23:04.177 --> 0:23:06.937
<v Speaker 1>of going to a grammar school and or a public

0:23:06.977 --> 0:23:11.057
<v Speaker 1>elementary school and being pushed through simply because you have

0:23:11.177 --> 0:23:14.977
<v Speaker 1>to keep quotas very high. You mentioned Florida Governor of Scientists,

0:23:15.297 --> 0:23:20.137
<v Speaker 1>Florida's Governor of scientists endorsing board school board candidates. I'm

0:23:20.137 --> 0:23:23.537
<v Speaker 1>just wondering, why haven't governors done that, and are you

0:23:23.577 --> 0:23:28.497
<v Speaker 1>expecting that there'll be more Republican governors who follow suit well,

0:23:28.537 --> 0:23:30.817
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, in my experience, every time that I

0:23:30.857 --> 0:23:33.777
<v Speaker 1>got involved in a school board election, I was politicizing

0:23:33.937 --> 0:23:38.017
<v Speaker 1>education because you know, teachers unions have never politicized education.

0:23:38.537 --> 0:23:40.257
<v Speaker 1>And I think that a lot of people thought it

0:23:40.337 --> 0:23:42.617
<v Speaker 1>was just beyond the pale that a governor care right

0:23:42.657 --> 0:23:45.137
<v Speaker 1>an executive order or pass a bill and that was

0:23:45.177 --> 0:23:48.417
<v Speaker 1>good enough, or they could, you know, even appoint people

0:23:48.497 --> 0:23:51.257
<v Speaker 1>who are you know, governor youngcan in Virginia has now

0:23:51.297 --> 0:23:54.897
<v Speaker 1>appointed people who are part of the statewide Virginia school

0:23:54.937 --> 0:23:58.017
<v Speaker 1>system that are very much against the equity, against against

0:23:58.177 --> 0:24:02.737
<v Speaker 1>the critical theory version of equity. The previous Democratic governor

0:24:02.777 --> 0:24:06.817
<v Speaker 1>had school a statewide school program that was very much

0:24:06.817 --> 0:24:10.777
<v Speaker 1>a promoting equity, which which has cause a lot of

0:24:10.777 --> 0:24:13.777
<v Speaker 1>these problems. So I think some governors are really grasping

0:24:13.777 --> 0:24:15.937
<v Speaker 1>it or understanding it. But I don't know if any

0:24:16.017 --> 0:24:19.737
<v Speaker 1>of yet sat there and have jumped jumped into the

0:24:19.737 --> 0:24:23.777
<v Speaker 1>school board races. Governor Schmidt, you know, Oklahoma has endorsed

0:24:23.777 --> 0:24:27.737
<v Speaker 1>and campaign on behalf of a statewide superintendent, which is

0:24:27.777 --> 0:24:30.937
<v Speaker 1>a rare position that meant not many states have. And

0:24:31.017 --> 0:24:33.977
<v Speaker 1>he's working, you know, with a man named Ryan Walters,

0:24:33.977 --> 0:24:37.057
<v Speaker 1>who we've also at seventeen sent project backs also endorsed

0:24:37.537 --> 0:24:40.977
<v Speaker 1>for statewide superintendent of education. But aside from those very

0:24:41.057 --> 0:24:44.297
<v Speaker 1>rare cases, a lot of them are still not understanding

0:24:44.337 --> 0:24:47.777
<v Speaker 1>how detrimental the system is right now towards young people.

0:24:48.257 --> 0:24:51.697
<v Speaker 1>And Ryan, you know, you understand these races and are

0:24:51.817 --> 0:24:54.537
<v Speaker 1>and are involved in trying to get people to become

0:24:54.537 --> 0:24:57.897
<v Speaker 1>involved themselves. What is it require if someone's watching this,

0:24:57.977 --> 0:25:00.257
<v Speaker 1>say you know what I want to get into the

0:25:00.257 --> 0:25:04.057
<v Speaker 1>school board race in my county, in my town district,

0:25:04.097 --> 0:25:07.457
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be. What do you what's required? How

0:25:07.497 --> 0:25:09.817
<v Speaker 1>do they do it? Well? I mean you just file

0:25:09.857 --> 0:25:11.737
<v Speaker 1>a run. I mean anyone can file to run, and

0:25:11.817 --> 0:25:14.497
<v Speaker 1>every state it's different, sometimes require signatures. Some I think

0:25:14.537 --> 0:25:16.417
<v Speaker 1>it's just putting some money, like five dollars down to

0:25:16.457 --> 0:25:19.137
<v Speaker 1>get on the ballot. It's not very complicated, and running

0:25:19.137 --> 0:25:21.617
<v Speaker 1>for school board is not as expensive obviously is running

0:25:21.617 --> 0:25:24.097
<v Speaker 1>for state legislature or Congress. You can probably run with

0:25:24.217 --> 0:25:26.497
<v Speaker 1>just a few thousand dollars if you're in a rural district,

0:25:26.577 --> 0:25:28.337
<v Speaker 1>or maybe fifth up to fifty thousand dollars in a

0:25:28.417 --> 0:25:32.017
<v Speaker 1>more urban or suburban district. The bigger thing is is

0:25:32.057 --> 0:25:33.777
<v Speaker 1>that most people are not going to run there, but

0:25:33.817 --> 0:25:35.897
<v Speaker 1>they are going to vote. So what I would always

0:25:35.897 --> 0:25:37.817
<v Speaker 1>recommend a vote or is this vote from the bottom

0:25:37.857 --> 0:25:40.017
<v Speaker 1>of the ballot up most of the vote for the

0:25:40.017 --> 0:25:42.137
<v Speaker 1>governor or the senator, and they just forget to vote

0:25:42.137 --> 0:25:44.537
<v Speaker 1>down ballot, vote at the bottom and then work your

0:25:44.577 --> 0:25:47.537
<v Speaker 1>way up and be very well informed of who you know.

0:25:47.577 --> 0:25:49.977
<v Speaker 1>Your teacher's union is supporting because they always endorse public

0:25:50.017 --> 0:25:55.377
<v Speaker 1>school candidate super school board candidates look at who maybe

0:25:55.377 --> 0:25:58.697
<v Speaker 1>some local politicians have indorsed. That's always very, very important.

0:25:58.977 --> 0:26:02.457
<v Speaker 1>But also school board candidates are all year long. The

0:26:02.497 --> 0:26:05.177
<v Speaker 1>Florida elections are August twenty third, Primary day, and if

0:26:05.177 --> 0:26:08.097
<v Speaker 1>you get over fifty percent, you don't have a November election.

0:26:08.497 --> 0:26:11.097
<v Speaker 1>So primary day in the case of that's the whole

0:26:11.177 --> 0:26:13.297
<v Speaker 1>kit and caboodle. In many of these races, they won't

0:26:13.337 --> 0:26:15.697
<v Speaker 1>have an election come November, so you need to find

0:26:15.697 --> 0:26:18.137
<v Speaker 1>out when these dates are and actually vote on them

0:26:18.377 --> 0:26:20.817
<v Speaker 1>when the election matters. Florida does not have a competitive

0:26:20.817 --> 0:26:24.097
<v Speaker 1>Republican governor or Senate primary, so a lot of people

0:26:24.137 --> 0:26:25.697
<v Speaker 1>are not looking to vote. They feel like they don't

0:26:25.697 --> 0:26:27.577
<v Speaker 1>have any too. But your school board is on the

0:26:27.617 --> 0:26:30.977
<v Speaker 1>ballot in Florida on primary in August twenty third and

0:26:31.017 --> 0:26:32.777
<v Speaker 1>most of these counties, and there will not be another

0:26:32.857 --> 0:26:37.537
<v Speaker 1>chance to vote for them come November. Ryan Gerdusky, always illuminating, sir,

0:26:37.697 --> 0:26:41.697
<v Speaker 1>thanks for being with us. Thank you. We'll be right

0:26:41.697 --> 0:26:50.177
<v Speaker 1>back with more of this special edition of Hold the Line.

0:26:51.457 --> 0:26:52.857
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw this, but there was

0:26:52.857 --> 0:26:55.297
<v Speaker 1>a recent story about an Arizona real estate agent that

0:26:55.337 --> 0:26:57.417
<v Speaker 1>found the home she lived in was listed for sale.

0:26:57.737 --> 0:26:59.737
<v Speaker 1>Problem was she wasn't selling her home. She was the

0:26:59.817 --> 0:27:03.017
<v Speaker 1>victim of home title fraud, a devastating crime happening all

0:27:03.017 --> 0:27:05.697
<v Speaker 1>over the country. According to the experts at home title lock,

0:27:05.777 --> 0:27:08.577
<v Speaker 1>the crime is incredibly profitable and hard to detect. An

0:27:08.617 --> 0:27:11.377
<v Speaker 1>identity thief simply creates a fake title transfer for your

0:27:11.377 --> 0:27:13.777
<v Speaker 1>home and refiles as a new owner. Then he can

0:27:13.777 --> 0:27:16.377
<v Speaker 1>take out loans on your home or sell it. Typical

0:27:16.417 --> 0:27:19.817
<v Speaker 1>identity theft services don't cover you, and neither there's homeowners insurance.

0:27:20.097 --> 0:27:23.337
<v Speaker 1>Home title lock does. Home tedtle lock puts a barrier

0:27:23.417 --> 0:27:26.377
<v Speaker 1>around your home's title. The instant they detects anyone tampering

0:27:26.377 --> 0:27:28.457
<v Speaker 1>with your home's title, they help shut it down and

0:27:28.497 --> 0:27:30.657
<v Speaker 1>help get your home back in your name. Here's what

0:27:30.777 --> 0:27:33.297
<v Speaker 1>you should do. Go to home titlelock dot com and

0:27:33.417 --> 0:27:37.017
<v Speaker 1>read the testimonials from FBI agents and government officials. Then

0:27:37.137 --> 0:27:39.497
<v Speaker 1>register address to see if you're already a victim and

0:27:39.537 --> 0:27:41.537
<v Speaker 1>don't even know it. And when you protect your home,

0:27:41.617 --> 0:27:44.057
<v Speaker 1>tell him Buck sent you to get thirty free days

0:27:44.057 --> 0:28:02.577
<v Speaker 1>of protection hometedlelock dot com. Again, that's hometedle lock dot com.

0:28:02.577 --> 0:28:04.897
<v Speaker 1>As we get closer to the midterm elections, it remains

0:28:04.977 --> 0:28:06.697
<v Speaker 1>likely that a red wave is going to sweep over

0:28:06.697 --> 0:28:09.937
<v Speaker 1>the House of Representatives. None of the Republicans, but Democrats

0:28:10.057 --> 0:28:12.137
<v Speaker 1>are now upset with the way the country is moving

0:28:12.137 --> 0:28:16.417
<v Speaker 1>backwards under President Biden, plumbting approval ratings inflation through the roof.

0:28:16.657 --> 0:28:19.337
<v Speaker 1>So well we see some Democratic voters jump ship and

0:28:19.417 --> 0:28:23.057
<v Speaker 1>join the right and be in the rights election day.

0:28:23.417 --> 0:28:26.297
<v Speaker 1>I mean, now to discuss c of American majority, Ned,

0:28:26.657 --> 0:28:30.097
<v Speaker 1>Ryan my man, Ned, how are you doing doing well? Buck?

0:28:30.137 --> 0:28:32.617
<v Speaker 1>Good to be back with you. So let's let's just

0:28:32.697 --> 0:28:36.497
<v Speaker 1>let's set the table here. Okay, going into we talk

0:28:36.497 --> 0:28:40.537
<v Speaker 1>about the Senate. Senate looks like a very close House Representatives.

0:28:40.897 --> 0:28:43.177
<v Speaker 1>We gotta win. If we don't, I mean, why are

0:28:43.217 --> 0:28:46.537
<v Speaker 1>we even showing up to pretend Republican party matters? But

0:28:46.697 --> 0:28:48.617
<v Speaker 1>how much do we have to win by? I mean,

0:28:48.657 --> 0:28:50.937
<v Speaker 1>here's a graphic showing the current House balance of power.

0:28:51.457 --> 0:28:55.657
<v Speaker 1>Democrats two twenty, Republicans two eleven, need two eighteen for control.

0:28:56.057 --> 0:29:00.737
<v Speaker 1>What's your target, Ned, what are we trying to get to? Well,

0:29:00.737 --> 0:29:02.897
<v Speaker 1>first of all, Buck, you're right, if we do not

0:29:02.937 --> 0:29:05.697
<v Speaker 1>take the majority back in the House in a year

0:29:05.737 --> 0:29:08.097
<v Speaker 1>like twenty twenty two, and all the dynamics are in

0:29:08.097 --> 0:29:11.137
<v Speaker 1>our favor, again, this is a political that goes back

0:29:11.137 --> 0:29:15.337
<v Speaker 1>to really twenty ten. But would I would tell people

0:29:15.497 --> 0:29:19.977
<v Speaker 1>for perspective. I've seen recent approval polls with Biden's approval

0:29:20.017 --> 0:29:24.217
<v Speaker 1>in the low thirties, and right before Democrats got wiped

0:29:24.257 --> 0:29:26.577
<v Speaker 1>out in the twenty ten mid terms, Obama was about

0:29:26.657 --> 0:29:30.297
<v Speaker 1>mid forty forty four point seven. So when a president

0:29:30.337 --> 0:29:33.497
<v Speaker 1>is that far underwater, the party in power in the

0:29:33.537 --> 0:29:36.337
<v Speaker 1>White Houses that far under water, it does not bode well.

0:29:37.137 --> 0:29:39.697
<v Speaker 1>So we've really got to gain just a handful of

0:29:39.697 --> 0:29:41.937
<v Speaker 1>seats to take the majority back. But I don't want

0:29:41.937 --> 0:29:44.257
<v Speaker 1>to settle for that Buck. I think we need to

0:29:44.257 --> 0:29:46.657
<v Speaker 1>go for forty or fifty, and I think that's very

0:29:46.737 --> 0:29:49.697
<v Speaker 1>doable if you look at some of these these districts,

0:29:49.737 --> 0:29:53.257
<v Speaker 1>and I've even been saying this in a variety of places, Buck,

0:29:54.097 --> 0:29:56.297
<v Speaker 1>based off what I saw in Virginia, and again that's

0:29:56.337 --> 0:29:59.097
<v Speaker 1>where I'm at. I'm in Loudon County, a state that

0:29:59.137 --> 0:30:02.017
<v Speaker 1>Biden won by ten points in twenty twenty, young Ken

0:30:02.097 --> 0:30:04.657
<v Speaker 1>wins by two, and I want people to look at

0:30:04.657 --> 0:30:07.457
<v Speaker 1>that and realize, I think in these mid terms, anything

0:30:07.577 --> 0:30:09.897
<v Speaker 1>any of the new districts, and there's about forty five

0:30:10.057 --> 0:30:14.097
<v Speaker 1>Democratic district that are Biden plus twelve or less. I

0:30:14.137 --> 0:30:16.817
<v Speaker 1>think all forty five of those are absolutely in play.

0:30:17.457 --> 0:30:21.057
<v Speaker 1>That's remarkable. I mean, that would be a red wave

0:30:21.097 --> 0:30:23.537
<v Speaker 1>the likes of which we have not seen in a

0:30:23.537 --> 0:30:26.897
<v Speaker 1>long time, and you could have Republicans in a position

0:30:27.537 --> 0:30:30.057
<v Speaker 1>of power in the House that would go back to

0:30:30.217 --> 0:30:34.497
<v Speaker 1>historic proportions, right, all time proportions. Here's a chart made

0:30:34.537 --> 0:30:37.897
<v Speaker 1>from Real Clear Politics that shows the generic congressional vote

0:30:38.257 --> 0:30:40.537
<v Speaker 1>from July of last year to July of this year.

0:30:40.577 --> 0:30:43.297
<v Speaker 1>The generic vote has kind of done a one eighty

0:30:43.577 --> 0:30:49.057
<v Speaker 1>in favor of Republicans. I mean, the based on the data, ever,

0:30:49.137 --> 0:30:52.497
<v Speaker 1>can assume the economy inflation huge part of this. But

0:30:52.577 --> 0:30:55.057
<v Speaker 1>are there any other things that are really moving this

0:30:55.137 --> 0:30:58.937
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of is just the realization that Joe

0:30:58.937 --> 0:31:01.377
<v Speaker 1>Biden and his party haven't gotten anything done? I mean,

0:31:01.377 --> 0:31:03.817
<v Speaker 1>what are the key indicators here, or rather the you know,

0:31:03.817 --> 0:31:06.537
<v Speaker 1>the key signposts along the way to what seems to

0:31:06.577 --> 0:31:13.377
<v Speaker 1>be a huge shift in sentiment toward the generic Kennedy Well,

0:31:13.537 --> 0:31:16.017
<v Speaker 1>I think part of it comes from the Biden White House.

0:31:16.377 --> 0:31:18.977
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing in the more recent polls in which he

0:31:19.017 --> 0:31:22.737
<v Speaker 1>has absolutely bummited with his approval rating they're asking, do

0:31:22.777 --> 0:31:25.577
<v Speaker 1>you think that Joe Biden has the answers or the

0:31:25.617 --> 0:31:28.617
<v Speaker 1>ability to fix these problems? And of course a lot

0:31:28.657 --> 0:31:31.257
<v Speaker 1>of people are saying no. The overwhelming majority of people

0:31:31.257 --> 0:31:33.937
<v Speaker 1>are saying no. Again, because I would remind people they're

0:31:33.977 --> 0:31:36.617
<v Speaker 1>not interested in solution all of this that has brought

0:31:36.617 --> 0:31:40.017
<v Speaker 1>about the inflation and the high gas prices. It's intentional.

0:31:40.337 --> 0:31:42.017
<v Speaker 1>So of course they don't have the solutions because they

0:31:42.057 --> 0:31:45.177
<v Speaker 1>don't want the solutions. What they are doing is absolutely intentional.

0:31:45.217 --> 0:31:47.457
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing I would point out block that

0:31:47.777 --> 0:31:50.297
<v Speaker 1>they're always an important dynamic. You've always got the red

0:31:50.457 --> 0:31:52.777
<v Speaker 1>versus Blue teams, and a lot of the Red's going

0:31:52.817 --> 0:31:54.457
<v Speaker 1>to vote Republican, a lot of the blue are going

0:31:54.497 --> 0:31:57.457
<v Speaker 1>to vote for Democrats, don't forget the independent. And a

0:31:57.457 --> 0:32:01.257
<v Speaker 1>lot of these approval rating polls, Joe Biden's at nineteen percent,

0:32:01.297 --> 0:32:03.057
<v Speaker 1>I've even seen in some of them, but most of

0:32:03.057 --> 0:32:06.697
<v Speaker 1>the time a mid to low twenties. That's staggering those

0:32:06.777 --> 0:32:09.977
<v Speaker 1>numbers that the independent voters look at the Democratic par

0:32:10.257 --> 0:32:13.777
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Biden and in such low approval ratings, and

0:32:13.937 --> 0:32:15.817
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of them are going to vote Republican.

0:32:15.817 --> 0:32:17.457
<v Speaker 1>That's where you're going to see the major shift in

0:32:17.537 --> 0:32:20.057
<v Speaker 1>the electorate because again, a lot of people vote either

0:32:20.097 --> 0:32:23.457
<v Speaker 1>Democrat or Republican based off their actual affiliation. Is the

0:32:23.577 --> 0:32:26.017
<v Speaker 1>independence of which there's a significant amount that I think

0:32:26.017 --> 0:32:27.697
<v Speaker 1>are going to really prove the difference because they have

0:32:27.857 --> 0:32:30.937
<v Speaker 1>absolute susdain for Joe Biden and as policies. Do you

0:32:30.937 --> 0:32:35.697
<v Speaker 1>think there could be some major upsets or some pickups

0:32:35.737 --> 0:32:40.257
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans winning in winning a congressional race, let's say,

0:32:40.417 --> 0:32:42.297
<v Speaker 1>in what was a deep blue state that would have

0:32:42.297 --> 0:32:47.697
<v Speaker 1>been unthinkable even a year ago. I do. I've even

0:32:48.017 --> 0:32:50.577
<v Speaker 1>had the thought, and it sounds maybe a little crazy

0:32:50.657 --> 0:32:54.257
<v Speaker 1>right now, book, but these trajectories. Inflation is not getting better,

0:32:54.337 --> 0:32:57.097
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden's approval ratings are not getting better. All of

0:32:57.097 --> 0:32:59.697
<v Speaker 1>these trajectories. As you get closer to the mid germs,

0:32:59.697 --> 0:33:01.937
<v Speaker 1>and we're not that far away, they start to harden

0:33:02.257 --> 0:33:04.057
<v Speaker 1>and they're going in a certain direction, which is not

0:33:04.097 --> 0:33:06.897
<v Speaker 1>good for Democrats. I think, and I know this sounds

0:33:06.897 --> 0:33:09.217
<v Speaker 1>crazy even as I'm saying it. If anything that Joe

0:33:09.217 --> 0:33:12.257
<v Speaker 1>Biden won by two twenty points or less in twenty

0:33:12.337 --> 0:33:14.417
<v Speaker 1>twenty might actually be in place. So think about the

0:33:14.457 --> 0:33:16.857
<v Speaker 1>forty five Democratic seas that are plus twelve or less,

0:33:17.137 --> 0:33:19.097
<v Speaker 1>you might even get up to the plus twenty range

0:33:19.257 --> 0:33:23.137
<v Speaker 1>or less. That Republicans could absolutely be competitive him and

0:33:23.217 --> 0:33:25.177
<v Speaker 1>sneak a few House seats, and I think even maybe

0:33:25.177 --> 0:33:29.417
<v Speaker 1>sneak the Senate tater two as well. Here is MSNBC,

0:33:29.697 --> 0:33:34.537
<v Speaker 1>for example, worried that losing the midterms could be worse

0:33:34.577 --> 0:33:37.377
<v Speaker 1>for them than even losing the presidency. They say, watch this,

0:33:37.977 --> 0:33:40.457
<v Speaker 1>we're approaching the hundred day out from the mid term.

0:33:40.897 --> 0:33:43.777
<v Speaker 1>If things don't go well in the mid term, as

0:33:43.777 --> 0:33:46.777
<v Speaker 1>if meaning if these election deniers win Secretary of State,

0:33:47.297 --> 0:33:50.497
<v Speaker 1>the win, governorships, win attorney General, take back the Senate,

0:33:50.777 --> 0:33:53.897
<v Speaker 1>take over the House, it doesn't matter who's on the

0:33:53.977 --> 0:33:59.657
<v Speaker 1>ballot in twenty twenty four. You know, Doubts and moron,

0:33:59.817 --> 0:34:02.377
<v Speaker 1>But I do think he's right in so far as

0:34:03.097 --> 0:34:07.817
<v Speaker 1>if Biden has a divided Congress going into whatever the

0:34:07.857 --> 0:34:09.777
<v Speaker 1>re election cycle is going to be, whether it's Biden

0:34:09.817 --> 0:34:12.017
<v Speaker 1>or somebody else, it's not going to be good for

0:34:12.017 --> 0:34:15.897
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. But even more, that's probably the most intelligent

0:34:15.977 --> 0:34:18.617
<v Speaker 1>thing I've heard Doubt say in years. But I think

0:34:18.657 --> 0:34:20.937
<v Speaker 1>what he's really alluding to, Buck is even beyond the

0:34:21.017 --> 0:34:25.697
<v Speaker 1>federal races, there's thirty six gubernatorial, thirty five, I think

0:34:25.737 --> 0:34:31.217
<v Speaker 1>attorney general, twenty six, twenty seven secretary of state races

0:34:31.257 --> 0:34:35.577
<v Speaker 1>this midterm. If Republicans can take the gubernatorial seats, and

0:34:35.617 --> 0:34:37.177
<v Speaker 1>I think they have a legitimate chance on all of

0:34:37.177 --> 0:34:42.537
<v Speaker 1>these in Pennsylvania, in Michigan, and Wisconsin, maybe even in Nevada,

0:34:42.697 --> 0:34:44.657
<v Speaker 1>you win in twenty twenty four. By winning in twenty

0:34:44.657 --> 0:34:47.657
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, Democrats can't pull the same tricks they pulled

0:34:47.697 --> 0:34:50.177
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty if you're holding on to the gubernatorial

0:34:50.497 --> 0:34:52.337
<v Speaker 1>and the secretary of state and you've got all the

0:34:52.417 --> 0:34:55.657
<v Speaker 1>legislative seats, I think, really what doubt is realizing that

0:34:55.737 --> 0:34:58.497
<v Speaker 1>if they get obliterated, not only at the federal level

0:34:58.497 --> 0:35:01.097
<v Speaker 1>but at the state level, Democrats are gonna have a

0:35:01.217 --> 0:35:04.177
<v Speaker 1>very very hard time winning in twenty twenty four because

0:35:04.377 --> 0:35:06.457
<v Speaker 1>they can't pull the center for tecon civic life, they

0:35:06.497 --> 0:35:09.697
<v Speaker 1>can't skirt state laws and constitutions, they can't pull the

0:35:09.777 --> 0:35:11.937
<v Speaker 1>univer some mail in ballot tricks that they pulled in

0:35:11.937 --> 0:35:13.897
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these battleground states in twenty twenty four.

0:35:13.977 --> 0:35:17.457
<v Speaker 1>That's what he's starting to realize, and it might be

0:35:17.497 --> 0:35:20.417
<v Speaker 1>a reugh election for some Rhinos. Out there. From what

0:35:20.497 --> 0:35:24.537
<v Speaker 1>I understand, Wyoming GOP primary race, for example, shows Liz

0:35:24.657 --> 0:35:31.417
<v Speaker 1>Cheney behind Harriet Hadria Hageman. I don't know Harriet thirty

0:35:31.417 --> 0:35:33.857
<v Speaker 1>one to fifty nine Liz Cheney, she's gonna lose her

0:35:33.897 --> 0:35:38.577
<v Speaker 1>seeing you think, you know. The only dynamic that people

0:35:38.617 --> 0:35:41.337
<v Speaker 1>should be aware of his Democrats can crossover, and a

0:35:41.377 --> 0:35:43.617
<v Speaker 1>lot of Liz Cheney's campaign right now is trying to

0:35:43.617 --> 0:35:46.817
<v Speaker 1>get Democrats to cross over and vote for her in

0:35:47.297 --> 0:35:51.537
<v Speaker 1>that primaries. An open primary in Wyoming, there's just simply

0:35:51.577 --> 0:35:54.377
<v Speaker 1>not enough Democrats in the state of Wyoming, though, I

0:35:54.377 --> 0:35:57.737
<v Speaker 1>think the sable is Cheney. But the August primaries are

0:35:57.737 --> 0:36:00.177
<v Speaker 1>going to be very interesting. Back I would encourage people.

0:36:00.217 --> 0:36:03.337
<v Speaker 1>August second got some really interesting primaries in Michigan and

0:36:03.377 --> 0:36:06.657
<v Speaker 1>in Washington State in which Trump endorsed candidates are going

0:36:06.737 --> 0:36:09.977
<v Speaker 1>up against impeachment voters. And then you've got also a

0:36:10.257 --> 0:36:12.817
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks later that Wyoming primary as well. So

0:36:13.057 --> 0:36:15.377
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see some pretty interesting results

0:36:15.577 --> 0:36:18.737
<v Speaker 1>in Republican primaries in August. It's also going to be

0:36:18.777 --> 0:36:22.057
<v Speaker 1>another telling sign how is Trump's endorsement record going to

0:36:22.097 --> 0:36:26.257
<v Speaker 1>hold up against incumbents. But again, these incumbent incumbents voted

0:36:26.257 --> 0:36:27.857
<v Speaker 1>for impeachment. I think a lot of them are in

0:36:27.897 --> 0:36:31.297
<v Speaker 1>serious trouble, like Liz Cheney. Then, thanks so much. Good

0:36:31.297 --> 0:36:35.377
<v Speaker 1>to see you. Thanks Buck. In addition to federal elections,

0:36:35.377 --> 0:36:38.297
<v Speaker 1>Americans in thirty six states we'll choose their next governor.

0:36:38.417 --> 0:36:40.737
<v Speaker 1>We'll take a look at some of those races with

0:36:40.817 --> 0:36:43.977
<v Speaker 1>the politics editor for the Washington Examiner, Jim Ansel. When

0:36:43.977 --> 0:37:00.857
<v Speaker 1>we come back with the mid terms just around the corner,

0:37:00.937 --> 0:37:03.337
<v Speaker 1>everyone's wondering if we're going to see this red wave

0:37:03.417 --> 0:37:05.777
<v Speaker 1>takeover at the state level as well as the federal

0:37:06.137 --> 0:37:09.497
<v Speaker 1>For gubernatorial races, there are thirty six states to elect

0:37:09.537 --> 0:37:12.537
<v Speaker 1>their new governor. For more on this, let me bring

0:37:12.537 --> 0:37:16.417
<v Speaker 1>in Jim Antil. He's the politics editor at the Washington Examiner. Jim,

0:37:16.457 --> 0:37:19.857
<v Speaker 1>thanks for being with us. Thanks for having me so

0:37:19.977 --> 0:37:23.257
<v Speaker 1>a new USA. Today's Suffolk University poll shows Democrats with

0:37:23.297 --> 0:37:27.137
<v Speaker 1>a narrow advantage over Republicans of the congressional ballot forty

0:37:27.137 --> 0:37:30.177
<v Speaker 1>four to forty percent, a bit better than the forty

0:37:30.257 --> 0:37:32.937
<v Speaker 1>forty split they scored in June. But gloom about the

0:37:33.017 --> 0:37:36.257
<v Speaker 1>nation's economy and its politics still pose big hurdles for

0:37:36.297 --> 0:37:40.937
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to avoid significant losses going forward. What are you

0:37:40.977 --> 0:37:43.737
<v Speaker 1>looking at in terms of some of these governors races,

0:37:43.777 --> 0:37:45.537
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the big ones that are top

0:37:45.577 --> 0:37:48.897
<v Speaker 1>of your radar right now. Well, there are a couple

0:37:48.977 --> 0:37:52.177
<v Speaker 1>of different things. I mean, one, you have a couple

0:37:52.217 --> 0:37:57.297
<v Speaker 1>of really important sitting Republican governors who are running for reelection,

0:37:57.737 --> 0:38:01.817
<v Speaker 1>and I think chief among those is Florida Governor Ronda Santis,

0:38:01.857 --> 0:38:05.257
<v Speaker 1>who is widely considered to be a twenty twenty four

0:38:05.337 --> 0:38:09.537
<v Speaker 1>possibility may become the front runner of former President Donald

0:38:09.537 --> 0:38:14.177
<v Speaker 1>Trump doesn't run, but certainly would be a competitive candidate

0:38:14.257 --> 0:38:17.137
<v Speaker 1>should they both choose to run. And so he's running

0:38:17.137 --> 0:38:22.617
<v Speaker 1>for reelection this year, and the margin by which he wins,

0:38:22.617 --> 0:38:25.657
<v Speaker 1>should he win and he is favored to do so,

0:38:26.097 --> 0:38:29.337
<v Speaker 1>could tell us a lot about his future prospects. He's

0:38:29.417 --> 0:38:34.937
<v Speaker 1>taken some pretty strong stands, conservative stands in which historically speaking,

0:38:35.417 --> 0:38:39.497
<v Speaker 1>within a battleground state, and he fought a close election

0:38:39.897 --> 0:38:42.337
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen to get elected in the first place.

0:38:42.657 --> 0:38:45.177
<v Speaker 1>So if he's able to get re elected by a

0:38:45.257 --> 0:38:48.897
<v Speaker 1>comfortable margin, that should be a pretty good indicator of

0:38:48.937 --> 0:38:52.857
<v Speaker 1>his electoral strength that may have national implications. Can I

0:38:52.897 --> 0:38:55.337
<v Speaker 1>just see another You're throwing the mix here really quickly, Jim,

0:38:55.657 --> 0:38:59.017
<v Speaker 1>the state of Florida, we got some numbers here Desantists

0:38:59.057 --> 0:39:03.057
<v Speaker 1>versus his expected Democrat opponents, right, either Charlie Christ or

0:39:03.137 --> 0:39:07.177
<v Speaker 1>Nicky Freed versus Christ. Desantist is at fifty percent, and

0:39:07.217 --> 0:39:09.457
<v Speaker 1>the most recent polling we could find Charlie Chris is

0:39:09.497 --> 0:39:12.137
<v Speaker 1>at forty one, so he seems to have a pretty

0:39:12.137 --> 0:39:16.097
<v Speaker 1>comfortable lead there. And then if it is DeSantis versus

0:39:16.177 --> 0:39:19.457
<v Speaker 1>Nikki Freed, who believes the Agricultural Commissioner for the State

0:39:19.457 --> 0:39:23.577
<v Speaker 1>of Florida, Desantist is a fifty two to thirty nine percent,

0:39:24.297 --> 0:39:28.697
<v Speaker 1>is there any expectation that that's going to turn around

0:39:28.817 --> 0:39:30.617
<v Speaker 1>or is it? Look I mean, doesn't DeSantis have like

0:39:30.617 --> 0:39:34.097
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million dollars war chest. I mean, if you're

0:39:34.097 --> 0:39:36.977
<v Speaker 1>looking in terms of how much money he has, in

0:39:37.097 --> 0:39:40.297
<v Speaker 1>terms of how much exposure he has, and in terms

0:39:40.297 --> 0:39:43.137
<v Speaker 1>of how well he's doing in the polls, the Democrats

0:39:43.177 --> 0:39:45.977
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to have a very good chance here. And

0:39:46.297 --> 0:39:50.537
<v Speaker 1>in the recent past, the Republicans have actually outperformed their

0:39:50.577 --> 0:39:53.857
<v Speaker 1>poll numbers, have tended to do better on election day

0:39:53.857 --> 0:39:56.577
<v Speaker 1>than the bulls have predicted. So if that's the case,

0:39:57.097 --> 0:39:59.737
<v Speaker 1>he could be looking at a re election landslide. It's

0:39:59.737 --> 0:40:03.417
<v Speaker 1>obviously it'll be a good year for Republicans, but that

0:40:03.457 --> 0:40:06.537
<v Speaker 1>would really put him in a strong position to say

0:40:06.577 --> 0:40:10.417
<v Speaker 1>that he easily won re election in a battleground state

0:40:10.817 --> 0:40:14.497
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of conservative model on things ranging from

0:40:14.537 --> 0:40:20.057
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen to fighting corporations. Now, let's take a look

0:40:20.057 --> 0:40:23.937
<v Speaker 1>at Pennsylvania. Jam the Democratic nominee. There is current Attendant

0:40:23.937 --> 0:40:27.657
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Josh Shapiro. There are a number of Republican

0:40:27.697 --> 0:40:31.817
<v Speaker 1>candidates fighting for the possibility of being the next governor.

0:40:31.857 --> 0:40:33.857
<v Speaker 1>There who stands out in your mind? How's this race

0:40:33.897 --> 0:40:39.857
<v Speaker 1>looking so? Doug Masciano was the Trump endorsed candidate in

0:40:39.937 --> 0:40:44.297
<v Speaker 1>the Republican primary. He will be the Republican nominee against Shapiro.

0:40:44.697 --> 0:40:48.457
<v Speaker 1>This is the candidate many Democrats wanted to face off against,

0:40:48.817 --> 0:40:53.817
<v Speaker 1>and establishment Republicans didn't want him, largely due to his

0:40:53.937 --> 0:40:57.897
<v Speaker 1>stance on the twenty twenty presidential election and questioning some

0:40:58.017 --> 0:41:02.377
<v Speaker 1>of Pennsylvania's practices. There. You know it's a close race.

0:41:02.417 --> 0:41:04.617
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the polling, it's competitive, and the

0:41:04.737 --> 0:41:08.057
<v Speaker 1>national Party has been hesitant to get involved. If he

0:41:08.177 --> 0:41:12.177
<v Speaker 1>can't show that he'll be com editive, but the indications

0:41:12.177 --> 0:41:15.417
<v Speaker 1>are that this could be a tight race. So Democrats

0:41:16.057 --> 0:41:18.777
<v Speaker 1>often need to be careful what they wish for because

0:41:18.857 --> 0:41:20.537
<v Speaker 1>they just might get it. And this is going to

0:41:20.617 --> 0:41:24.377
<v Speaker 1>be a key state nationally in twenty twenty four as well,

0:41:24.457 --> 0:41:27.937
<v Speaker 1>So this is an important race for Republicans and if

0:41:27.977 --> 0:41:29.937
<v Speaker 1>they were to win, it would be a pickup of

0:41:29.937 --> 0:41:33.257
<v Speaker 1>a seat. Another showdown that's going to get a lot

0:41:33.297 --> 0:41:35.937
<v Speaker 1>of attention for a governor's mansion, at least a lot

0:41:35.937 --> 0:41:39.457
<v Speaker 1>of media attention going to be down in Texas where

0:41:40.257 --> 0:41:43.257
<v Speaker 1>current governor or Greg Abbott is going to be up

0:41:43.297 --> 0:41:49.097
<v Speaker 1>against Beto Robert O'Rourke. Right now, Greg abbotts at forty

0:41:49.097 --> 0:41:53.257
<v Speaker 1>seven percent to Beto at forty one percent. How is

0:41:53.297 --> 0:41:57.257
<v Speaker 1>this lining up and what are your expectations? Well, see

0:41:57.257 --> 0:41:59.977
<v Speaker 1>o Rourke is an interesting character because he's kind of

0:41:59.977 --> 0:42:04.137
<v Speaker 1>gotten this reputation among national Democrats and has a huge

0:42:04.577 --> 0:42:09.417
<v Speaker 1>national fundraising base basically from running a little bit better

0:42:09.457 --> 0:42:12.857
<v Speaker 1>than you'd expect to Democrat to run statewide in Texas

0:42:13.657 --> 0:42:17.377
<v Speaker 1>but still losing and that's only an impressive thing to

0:42:17.417 --> 0:42:20.617
<v Speaker 1>do so many times, So that's going to be a

0:42:20.617 --> 0:42:23.577
<v Speaker 1>big problem. All Rourke has going into this race, now,

0:42:23.617 --> 0:42:26.137
<v Speaker 1>I would expect Abbott to have a much bigger lead

0:42:26.457 --> 0:42:29.577
<v Speaker 1>than what he currently does in the polls, so that

0:42:29.617 --> 0:42:33.777
<v Speaker 1>would be him being below fifty percent is mildly concerning.

0:42:34.057 --> 0:42:36.537
<v Speaker 1>But when you think of the fact that O'Rourke came

0:42:36.617 --> 0:42:40.777
<v Speaker 1>up short in twenty eighteen in a statewide race during

0:42:40.777 --> 0:42:44.337
<v Speaker 1>a very good cycle for Democrats nationally, you can't really

0:42:44.377 --> 0:42:48.257
<v Speaker 1>expect him to pull off the upset here this November.

0:42:48.937 --> 0:42:53.417
<v Speaker 1>And now moving to the state of Georgia, Stacy Abrams

0:42:53.777 --> 0:42:58.137
<v Speaker 1>square it off against the current governor, Kemp. How do

0:42:58.177 --> 0:43:00.777
<v Speaker 1>you think Abrams is looking in this race? How is

0:43:00.817 --> 0:43:03.857
<v Speaker 1>that going to shake out? You know, the polling has

0:43:03.937 --> 0:43:06.257
<v Speaker 1>been a little varied there, but most of the polls

0:43:06.377 --> 0:43:10.617
<v Speaker 1>do show Brian Kemp ahead, and it only he differs

0:43:10.617 --> 0:43:14.017
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how far he's ahead. You know. Stacy

0:43:14.097 --> 0:43:17.617
<v Speaker 1>Abrams is another case where coming close in twenty eighteen

0:43:18.017 --> 0:43:21.497
<v Speaker 1>a great Democratic cycle might not cut it in a

0:43:21.577 --> 0:43:24.897
<v Speaker 1>more republican cycle, in a more republican year. So if

0:43:24.937 --> 0:43:28.057
<v Speaker 1>there's a red wave, Stacy Abrams might not be able

0:43:28.097 --> 0:43:33.297
<v Speaker 1>to claim that voter suppression somehow denied her her rightful governorship.

0:43:33.337 --> 0:43:36.137
<v Speaker 1>It may not be close enough for her to plausibly

0:43:36.817 --> 0:43:39.577
<v Speaker 1>make those types of contentions, although that may not stop her,

0:43:40.377 --> 0:43:43.377
<v Speaker 1>but it's not looking like it's shaping up to be

0:43:43.417 --> 0:43:45.857
<v Speaker 1>a good year for her now that the Senate race

0:43:46.017 --> 0:43:49.217
<v Speaker 1>being tight, and maybe with the Democrats still leading there,

0:43:49.697 --> 0:43:54.417
<v Speaker 1>Republicans can't completely give up on the idea that Georgia

0:43:54.457 --> 0:43:57.737
<v Speaker 1>will be a competitive state across the board. Obviously, it

0:43:57.857 --> 0:44:00.377
<v Speaker 1>was a closely fought state in twenty twenty, so they

0:44:00.417 --> 0:44:03.857
<v Speaker 1>can't really rest on their laurels. But at the moment,

0:44:03.897 --> 0:44:07.097
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like the best time for Stacy Abrams

0:44:07.137 --> 0:44:10.377
<v Speaker 1>to be forcing this rematch. And I'm just wondering if

0:44:10.417 --> 0:44:13.817
<v Speaker 1>there are any places, any other governors' races you're looking

0:44:13.817 --> 0:44:15.937
<v Speaker 1>at where you think you could actually get a GOP

0:44:16.337 --> 0:44:21.137
<v Speaker 1>or a Democrat upset. Well, the big thing will be

0:44:21.577 --> 0:44:25.657
<v Speaker 1>there is similar to Pennsylvania. There was Democrats tried to

0:44:25.697 --> 0:44:29.297
<v Speaker 1>intervene in the Republican primary in Maryland and they got

0:44:29.297 --> 0:44:31.377
<v Speaker 1>their wish and it was also a Trump in doors

0:44:31.377 --> 0:44:34.657
<v Speaker 1>to candidate. This is a state that is very, very blue.

0:44:35.417 --> 0:44:39.737
<v Speaker 1>But the two term, retiring term limited Republican Governor Larry Hogan,

0:44:40.337 --> 0:44:43.977
<v Speaker 1>who has some presidential aspirations of his own, has held

0:44:44.137 --> 0:44:46.337
<v Speaker 1>the Fort down there pretty well in terms of being

0:44:46.337 --> 0:44:49.977
<v Speaker 1>able to beat Democratic challengers. Is this a year that's

0:44:50.017 --> 0:44:55.417
<v Speaker 1>read enough that Democrats will have miscalculated by helping the

0:44:55.457 --> 0:44:59.617
<v Speaker 1>Republican nominee win this time in this primary. That's a

0:44:59.617 --> 0:45:03.097
<v Speaker 1>good question, and we'll have to see it. Jim appreciate

0:45:03.137 --> 0:45:05.737
<v Speaker 1>the expertise, Thanks for being with us, Thank you for

0:45:05.777 --> 0:45:08.057
<v Speaker 1>having me. That's all the time we have for the

0:45:08.137 --> 0:45:09.857
<v Speaker 1>special edition up hold the line. I'd like to thank

0:45:09.897 --> 0:45:12.897
<v Speaker 1>my guess ned Ryan con Carol, Jim Antle, and Ryan

0:45:12.937 --> 0:45:15.337
<v Speaker 1>gre Dusky for sharing their expertise with us. The No

0:45:15.537 --> 0:45:18.017
<v Speaker 1>Spin News with Bill O'Reilly is coming up next. Shield's

0:45:18.057 --> 0:45:26.417
<v Speaker 1>High