WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - April 28th, 2023

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 2>So you might recall a Bloomberg BusinessWeek cover store Is

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 2>a while ago, and it talked about how everything is

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 2>private equity now, from pet stores and doctors practices, to

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>real estate loans, to businesses, to startups and more. Private

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 2>equity has trillions of dollars in assets under management and

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 2>has made billionaires out of many of its founders. And

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 2>according to our next two guests, private equity is wrecking America.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Pull Uzer Prize winning journalist and senior financial reporter for

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 2>NBC News, Gretchen Morgenson and Josh Rosner, financial service policy analyst,

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 2>maaging director of Graham Fisher. They co wrote you might

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 2>recall the New York Times bestseller Reckless Endangerment, which was

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 2>about the Great Financial Crisis. Their new book is entitled

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>These Are the Plunderers, How Private Equity runs and America. Guys,

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much, so great to have you here.

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Josh.

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 2>When you mentioned the book, We're like, you got to

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 2>come on, you got to come on. Private equity not

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 2>a new thing. It's been around for a long time.

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Leveraging in deals not a new thing. So why are

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 2>you guys writing about private equity? Why put the book

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 2>out now?

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 4>You know? I think that what we're learning now about

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 4>private equity, we have enough longitudinal data, right, we have

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 4>decades of data about what happens when companies are taken

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 4>over by these actors who pile the debt on them,

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 4>and we are now getting data, for example, on you know,

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 4>how many more deaths there are in nursing homes that

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 4>are owned by private equity. So it's really a lot

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 4>about the data, but it's also a lot about what

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 4>happened in COVID when we really started to see this

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 4>really huge gulf between rich and poor, and we really

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 4>wanted to look into why.

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 2>And that's what I wonder, like, if COVID didn't happen,

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>might you not be doing this or might the impact

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 2>on private equity and healthcare specifically, might this not have

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 2>come to be? Well?

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean I think that it would have in any case,

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 5>because really, what you've seen as a trajectory in the

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 5>changes in private equity. The targets, right, and they're running

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 5>out of targets, and so they are more and more targeting.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 5>Industries that used to be viewed as socially important social

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 5>goods not expected to run for profits because there's not

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 5>a target rich environment anymore, and so healthcare education have

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 5>become increasingly the focus and the target, and that would

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 5>naturally have led to worse outcomes in industries COVID or

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 5>not that are socially important.

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I have to say, though, plunderers it's a pretty strong word, right,

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 2>and I just like kind of let me throw it

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 2>up in Google definitions. Someone who steals or removes things,

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 2>especially in a violent or severe way, to rob of

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 2>goods by force. A loaded word, A strong word. Why

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>why that word?

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, when you're going into a company and

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 5>the focus is to get yourself paid out as quickly

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 5>as possible, regardless of the impact on the employees, the pensions,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.839
<v Speaker 5>the communities in which you exist, the broader economy, I'm

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 5>not sure that that's an unfair or particularly harsh word.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 3>And that seems to.

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Be where the industry has moved, or many parts of

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 5>the industry have moved. When you start looking deal by deal.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Greg, Well, you also have this, to Josh's point, this

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 4>big circle of pain.

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 4>You've got a very few people making an awful lot

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 4>of money. This is a billionaire minting machine private equity, right,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 4>and yet you have all of these other people who

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 4>are on the other side of the table. And what

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 4>we really wanted to do was to try to shine

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 4>the light on the people who are on the other

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 4>side of the table.

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 7>Can you give me an example for my mom listening

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 7>to this. We know about the nursing home impact. That

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 7>seems to be a popular one, but is there one

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 7>that you think will be most surprising to readers of

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 7>the book?

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think healthcare affects so many people that healthcare

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 4>is always going to resonate.

0:03:59.200 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 8>We have a.

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 4>Doctor in the book who was fired. He worked in

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 4>an emergency department in a hospital in the Midwest, and.

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 2>He was fired because he was.

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Trying to get the hospital to change the code blue

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 4>practices that they had. It was really impacting patients, it

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 4>was really going to have problems, cause problems. He was

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 4>fired by his staffing company, which was owned by private equity,

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 4>because he was making too much noise trying to protect

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 4>the patients. So that is I think a great example.

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 4>There are some other ones in the yeah, I mean,

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 4>I think on.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 5>Top of that, even more broadly than healthcare, another major

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 5>example is the purchase of one of the last of

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 5>the Rust Belt businesses, a large aluminum company, rolling company,

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 5>which was the largest employer in the county of one

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 5>of the poorest counties in the country. Private equity comes

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 5>in leverages up an already struggling business, forces the governor

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 5>to get involved to get them electric utility rate reduction,

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 5>while they're taking money out the back door, and within

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 5>a matter of six months they've taken all their money out,

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 5>and within three or four years they end up bankrupting

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 5>the company, laying off more than two thousand employees, almost

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 5>all of the employees, and there goes thirty percent of

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 5>the school's tax base, right, And so this is hollowing

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 5>out America.

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 2>No, and I hear what you're saying. I gotta say,

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 2>we've been talking about this book in the newsroom a lot,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 2>because I think it's been an interesting time where we're

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 2>seeing a few banks get into trouble and you know,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 2>we're wondering about, you know, with shadow banking, the term

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 2>itself feels like it's it's shady, but having other sources

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>of funding out there, especially if you think about middle

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 2>market companies who can always tap into the JP Morgan's

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 2>or the big banks that are out there, that it

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:51.679
<v Speaker 2>has provided, you know, a necessary you know, funding avenue

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 2>if you will. So I wonder you know how you

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 2>think about that, Gretchen.

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.239
<v Speaker 4>Well right to that point. I had an email today

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 4>from a guy who said, I just heard your interview

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 4>on another station, and he said this happened to me,

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 4>and he wrote chapter and verse about how his small

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 4>ash company was taken over by private equity. He said,

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 4>my founders got rich. I got a little bit richer,

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 4>but they savaged the company and left me as roadkill.

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 9>And so this is just the.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 4>Kind of thing that has happened so often across America.

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 4>I think we're going to be hearing a lot of

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 4>stories as people read this book.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 9>It's all.

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 5>So to your point though, also, Carol, I think that

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 5>you also have to think about there are proper ways

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 5>to do it. We're not condemning private equity, period We're

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 5>condemning private equity the way it's largely done with huge

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 5>amounts of debt foisted on the company with special dividends

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 5>out to the equity holders quickly, with a short term

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 5>return focus rather than a partnership, longer term focus, which

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 5>is what it should be. Right, If the purpose of

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 5>capitalism is to aggregate and allocate capital through the system

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 5>for productive purposes, this isn't that.

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 7>But then shouldn't regulation be part of that conversation?

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 5>I think that's very fair. I think I think that's

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 5>part of what we're hoping comes out of this, is

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 5>that there's a recognition that there needs to be more oversight.

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 5>There needs to be fewer waivers on transactions being able

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 5>to occur. There needs to be some constraints on if

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 5>you're taking over the company, you need to actually retain

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 5>an equity interest and not special dividend and leave the

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 5>carcass for someone else to clean up.

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 2>But there are some you know, go ahead, gretcha.

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 4>The other thing is that we really do need to

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 4>know how pervasive private equity is in this country. You know,

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 4>does everyone know that forty percent of the emergency departments

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 4>are run by private equity firms? No, It's very hard

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 4>to find that information out, and so consumers can't make

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 4>the right decisions right if they don't know who owns

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 4>these companies. And so I think just even the transparency

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 4>of knowing who owns the company, who backs the companies,

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 4>and whether they are building up enough you know, anti

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 4>competitive type behavior. I think the FDC is starting to

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 4>look into private equity in that way. I think DOJ

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 4>is starting to. This is an area that has just

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 4>been left to grow and grow and grow with very

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 4>little oversight.

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 2>And you get into though, like you know, the gaps

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 2>that are out there, And I guess I would argue

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>too that there's a lot of reasons why there are

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the gaps and inequities. We've been talking about it a

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 2>lot coming off of the pandemic, but whether it's government

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>programs or access to financing or financial literacy, like the

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 2>gaps that are out there, and I'm just curious how

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 2>you kind of counter that, well.

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 5>But the gaps that are out there matters. Remember we

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 5>had a period coming out of COVID where we had

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 5>surprise billing becoming a major issue where people would go

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 5>into an emergency room, right they'd end up with a

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 5>bill because the emergency room actually had outsourced parts of

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 5>its business to affiliates who weren't part of the insurance,

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 5>so they could then actually boost their fees and so

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 5>that became part of the problem again.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 2>The bad actor. A bad actor was a spece.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this is why they take over the emergency

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 4>departments is to you know, generate higher revenue.

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Josh Rosner's with US Managing Director Graham Fisher and Company

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 2>here in studio and at Gretchen Morgenson, senior financial reporter

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 2>at NBC News Investigative Unit, their new book, These are

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the plunderers How private equity runs in rexs America. Somebody

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter is saying, please ask them who most of

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the LPs are in these funds, public pension funds, public

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 2>pension funds, right.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 4>CalPERS, cal stirs.

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Now they are there in private equity because they want

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the outsize returns. That's correct. Are they getting the outsetce?

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 4>They need the outsize returns.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 9>We will all agree with that.

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 4>Right, they have obligations that they cannot meet. But now

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 4>the returns are not They're reverting to the mean to

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 4>the S and P five hundred much cheaper, you know,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 4>less opaque, much more transparent, you know what you own.

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 4>Plus you don't have the problem with the weird marks,

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, marking to market that private equity can do

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 4>where you don't really know what the value is.

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 7>But the pension funds think that they're getting a better turns.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely because the private equity people told them they were.

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 5>And they're not looking at it necessarily net of expense.

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, right, And that's.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 5>Part of the problem as well. The other piece with

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 5>the with the whole game is the pension funds really

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 5>are the enablers here, and you know, it's partially due

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 5>to it's partially due to the accounting rules that we

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 5>had an underfunded pension system for a very long time

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.479
<v Speaker 5>where the pension funds were allowed to make actuary assumptions

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 5>about what their future obligation was and therefore impute what

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 5>the returns needed to be. And so we ended up

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 5>with most of our pension system wildly underfunded, and so

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 5>they had to swing more and more aggressively for the fences.

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 5>They thought this was the solution, and it's become less

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 5>and less of the solution, to the point where PE

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 5>is now buying insurance companies as part of the way

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 5>for them to stuff those future liabilities.

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 2>So you guys are great, and you know some of

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.719
<v Speaker 2>The criticism that has probably already come back is that

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, you looked at certain studies and then you know,

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe didn't take is wide. There's been some other studies

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 2>that I've been reading that you know that actually private

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 2>equities holding their investments for longer. So what do you

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 2>say to some of the things that are I know,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 2>you're just starting your media tour that are coming at you.

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's funny that you bring up academic studies

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 4>because there are so many academic studies times that are

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 4>funded by private equity. You really have to look hard

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 4>to see and the authors sometimes don't tell you about

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 4>the conflicts, and so you look and you see, oh, look,

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 4>this author has an affiliation with a private equity firm.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 4>When I was helping do the reporting with Josh on this,

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 4>I went to the American Investment Council and I said,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 4>please give me studies that you would like us to

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 4>look at on the benefits of private equity. Also asked

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 4>them for best deals. You know, we really want to

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 4>hear that side of the story. And you know, unfortunately

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 4>they just gave me a lot of studies that had

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 4>private equity, you know, sort of affiliation. Next and I

0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 4>said to them, I'm sorry, I'm just not going to

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 4>do that. Really need to have unbiased resources here. The

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 4>other thing we had was we did have interaction with Blackstone.

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 4>Blackstone said that they have created two hundred thousand their

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 4>portfolio companies have created two hundred thousand new jobs, and

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 4>that they don't go bankrupt as often as the generic

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 4>sort of academic research shows, and so therefore that our

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 4>research was incorrect. And I said, well, that's fantastic. I

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 4>really want to report that. I really love to see

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 4>the data, and no, no data. Respectfully decline, Well, I'm curious,

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 4>did you talk to all of who in terms of

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 4>looking at this universe?

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you throw all of private equity in this bucket?

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 9>Yes?

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 5>No, again again I think that look, private equity is

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 5>a is a big field with a lot.

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Of players, correct, and private equity for really not just

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 2>private appa.

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 5>That's correct, and so we're really just talking about the

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 5>more traditional leveraged players, the.

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 4>People who used to call themselves leveraged by it.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 5>Exactly right, exactly, That's what we're talking about. Is that

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 5>business model should have died a long time ago with

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 5>the end of greed is good, and.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 2>It didn't Okay, so three minutes left, let's solve the problem.

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>But I'm curious if if you buy into what you're saying,

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and where does it end, like what happens then you

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 2>say it's going to wreck America? Well you would, says already.

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 5>I think it already has in many ways.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it's what's the extreme?

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, I think the extreme, as we were saying,

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 5>is most of these firms that we're talking about have

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 5>also bought insurance companies more recently less and so the

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 5>next level is you're essentially taking over retirement plans, putting

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 5>those into annuities, stuffing those retirement accounts with riskier deals,

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 5>and you're essentially begging for a future crisis not only

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 5>for retirees, but for the insurance industry and for the

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 5>public in that And I think that may well be

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 5>the terminus that we should be looking forward to.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 4>And this is in part why we started with the

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 4>executive life situation, because it is really almost full circle.

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 2>So what what should be done?

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 4>We need more transparency, we need more antitrust activities. We

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 4>just need more scrutiny on what these folks are doing,

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 4>who they're impacting and affecting the pension funds really need

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 4>to rethink whether they want to be in this business

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 4>and actually, you know, promote it and give it the

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 4>oxygen that it needs.

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Josh, you spent a lot of time up on Capitol

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Hill during the Great Financial Crisis, So what's you know,

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the will or interest in doing something more? And you know,

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to be fair, a lot of whether it's corporate America,

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, pick your institution or your sector, A lot

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 2>of people are spending a lot of time in Washington

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>or making sure that they're on the right campaign. So

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm just curious, what's the well.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 5>That was actually one of the one of the original

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 5>impetuses for this was when Gretchen and I started at

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 5>what was going on during the COVID crisis with everyone

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 5>in corporate America going hand and you know, open to Washington,

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 5>and we started seeing the private equity guys quietly lobbying

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 5>for handouts. And I'm sorry to call it that, but

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 5>that's what we're talking about, or bailouts. And I don't

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 5>think that there's a lot of interest broadly in Washington.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 5>I think what's interesting is you're starting to see people

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 5>on the progressive side and the very conservative side starting

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 5>to recognize that this is actually a family a worker.

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 7>A retirment interest loophole, right, Like that has bipartisan support,

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 7>but it hasn't gotten anywhere.

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 5>I think this is actually a little different because we're

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 5>starting to see it talked about as a maintain street

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 5>issue of jobs retirement rather than let's tax sure, right,

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 5>And I think that you're starting to see that from

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 5>the Elizabeth Warrens on the one side, to the JD

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Vance's rubios and Josh Hawley's on the other side, They're

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 5>all sort of coming to the same place here, and

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 5>that usually means the middle is going to start moving

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 5>as well.

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 2>What do you hope that somebody reads this book? What

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 2>do you hope that they ask themselves or kind of explore.

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, I hope that they say this is wrong and

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 4>I want it to change.

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm curious, like I'm going to do some

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 2>googling on my various medical practices that I'm a part

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>of your quick glass thought.

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 5>No, I mean I think that it would be nice

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 5>if we all started becoming aware of every company that

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 5>we interact with daily.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I think transparency across the board, whether it's

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 2>private equity or everything, and I think this is what

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing with ESG kind of going through a racketing

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 2>in a big way. Thank you so much for coming in.

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Really appreciate it. Josh Rosner, Imagining Director, Graham Fisher, Gretchen

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Morgenson over at NBC News. These are the Plunderers, How

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>private equity runs and wrecks America. This book is new

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 2>and it's out.

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Catch us

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays from two to five pm Eastern.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 6>On Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business App, and you too.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live to our flagship New York station,

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa, play bloom Hey.

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 2>We'll keeping an eye on shares of Tesla as well,

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 2>stock down about three and a half percent just off

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 2>their lows, and they have backtracked nearly twenty five percent

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 2>since March thirty. First, we continue to see Elon continuing

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 2>to shape strategy that includes betting the house on low

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 2>prices and razor thin margin. So this story is today's

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Big Take. It's also the upcoming new issue of

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business Week on newsstands later on this week tomorrow.

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 2>In fact, already online at Bloomberg dot com, slash BusinessWeek

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 2>and on the Bloomberg terminals. So let's get to it.

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to Bloomberg News Globals. Are cars are Craig Trudell.

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 2>He's on the phone in London, Craig, Good to have

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 2>you here with us. So, yeah, it does feel like

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 2>every day we come in and there's either another price

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 2>cut or some kind of price move from Elon. Tell

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 2>us a little bit about your story in this strategy

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 2>of mister Musk's.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well we'll see if I wake up to it

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 10>and one overnight it'd be right in the middle as

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 10>I'm sleeping. So, I mean, this has been a story

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 10>of just yeah, relentless cutting all year long, and we

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 10>really started to see hints of it even late last year. Uh,

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 10>you know, whether there were there were some cuts in

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 10>in China or some incentive offers in the US.

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 11>Uh.

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 10>But but in the end, we're we're now to a

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 10>point where, uh, where it costs almost a third less

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 10>to buy a model why now than it did just

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 10>a little over three months ago. And and this is

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 10>just something that we haven't seen before. Right, It's it's

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 10>not a model that you know is really uh, you know,

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 10>low low volume or or has been in this you

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 10>know market decline. If anything, it's been their strongest model,

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 10>and it's potentially, I mean, it could end up being

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 10>the best selling vehicle in the world this year. Uh

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 10>And yet it's a case of adding a heck of

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 10>a lot of capacity very quickly.

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 10>And and the model itself, you know, going into that

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 10>process being quite high price, being high volume. Uh and

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 10>yet with all that capacity coming online and real changes

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 10>in the sort of supply demand dynamics for the broader industry,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 10>you know, all of those things have sort of combined

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 10>to also, I guess add in a CEO who is

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 10>sort of prone to making very sort of sudden changes,

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 10>and boom, you get yourself. You know, these these massive,

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 10>you know, price cuts in the last few months.

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 7>Craig, does it work for the company?

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 10>I think that's that's a question that's really difficult to

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 10>answer because you have, you know, really smart people who

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 10>come to just radically different conclusions where you know, some

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 10>some will tell you it's it's desperation, and some will

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 10>tell you it's just disruption, and you may even actually

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 10>hear it, you know, hints of that in the in

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 10>the same answer from the same person. And I allude

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 10>there to Jim Parley, the CEO of Ford. He's talked about,

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 10>you know, just last week, you know, he told reporters

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 10>look up nineteen thirteen and he was referring, of course

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 10>to Henry Ford and the Model T and how quickly

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 10>Henry Ford dropped the price of that car when he

0:19:58.040 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 10>sort of had an edge on the rest of the

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 10>industry and had, you know, innovated with the moving assembly line.

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 10>I think, you know, Musk thinks that he's pressing an

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 10>advantage here, but I also don't think that you've cut

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 10>your prices that much that quickly from a position of

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 10>absolute strength. It's clear that he's you know, to some degree,

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 10>been pushing on a string here.

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.959
<v Speaker 2>But I do wonder, you know, is this about forgive

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 2>me going after the masses more easily, because these these

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 2>cars have been even the lower and pretty expensive.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.959
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean just last year, I mean you had

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 10>to pay sixty five thousand dollars plus for a Model

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 10>why so, yeah, this was not a cheap vehicle. It's

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 10>now to the point where you can you can get

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 10>it in the mid forties. And that's you know, something

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 10>that we haven't seen before where you know that that

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 10>vehicle was not anywhere close to what the average transaction

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 10>price was in the US, and now it's slightly below it.

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 10>And so we've seen that change. It's been about twenty

0:20:55.160 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 10>thousand dollars, you know, change in the differential. Our colleague

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 10>Tom Randall had a great story on this yesterday. Just

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 10>he's been very closely following those numbers. So you know,

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 10>it absolutely is the case that he's unlocking, you know,

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 10>a greater market. But you know, to what extent is

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 10>he able to sustain the Model three, which is is

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 10>you know, older, and then you have a sort of

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 10>very different story with the Model S and the Model X,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 10>which are are very old and really having a hard time.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting what I thought in your story

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 2>and you took us back to the Rick Wagner days

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 2>at General Motors when he was CEO. Do you think

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 2>it's fair like to share with our audience, you know,

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 2>that comparison. But I do wonder is it fair to

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 2>make that comparison, because I would say that it's kind

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:41.479
<v Speaker 2>of it feels a little different.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 10>Oh, it's it's definitely different. I do think that the

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 10>sort of similarity there is, you know, a story of

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 10>a company that has a heck of a lot of

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 10>capacity and has to make some difficult decisions when you

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 10>know it's having trouble getting and for the capacity that

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 10>it has. I think the comparisons maybe due you know,

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 10>to your to your point end there. And I think

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 10>there's a great chart in our story today capturing what's

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 10>happened to the cash and the debt on Tesla's balance sheet.

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 10>We saw, you know, in twenty nineteen and twenty twenty,

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 10>Tesla raise a ton of money from Wall Street and

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 10>in the last few years has itself you know, added

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 10>to its cash balance, you know, from its own operations

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 10>and in the process it's it's also paid off about

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 10>you know, ten billion, ten billion dollars worth of debt

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 10>in the course of three years. And that's why, you know,

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 10>just recently we saw Moody's raise Tesla to investment great.

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 2>So it's a great chart. It's how you want it

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 2>to be.

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's Tesla in a structural state anywhere close to

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 10>where GM was. Absolutely not. But I do think you

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 10>know the sort of you know, it's funny, we we

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 10>sort of thought that Tesla was something different and not

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 10>like other sort of old line carmakers. But you know,

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 10>this idea of sort of as we saw in two

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 10>thousand and one, you know, just sort of resorting to

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 10>discounting to sort of move the metal. It definitely brings

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 10>you know, it sounds familiar there.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 7>So why aren't they pouring that money into generating freshness?

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 7>Which I'm stealing from one of your sources. But Carol

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 7>and I get a lot of our best ideas, or

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 7>I do, at least from the makeup room. And what

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 7>they always talk about is the lack of availability of

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 7>different colors of Tesla's. I know that sounds silly, but

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 7>is something like that on Elon Musk's mind.

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 10>It's a good question. I mean, I don't think that

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 10>they've really sort of, you know, talked a whole lot about,

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 10>you know, significant changes to the product. And of course

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 10>you always sort of run the risk when you sort of,

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 10>you know, dangle this sort of next thing that you

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 10>sort of have the consumer weight for the changes to come.

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 10>And we may be seeing that a little bit. I

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 10>think there's been reports recently that the Model why and

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 10>the Model three are going to undergo some upgrades fairly

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 10>soon and so are we seeing some consumers hold back

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 10>and wait for the pressure models? I think another fair

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 10>question to raise here is, you know, if you're a consumer,

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 10>why the heck would you want to buy a Tuessle

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 10>right now when when the prices are coming down so quickly?

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.199
<v Speaker 10>You know, why not wait a little bit more and

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 10>see if these prices sort of settle down a little

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 10>bit before you, you know, go out and purchase something

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 10>that you know, a few weeks later, might you know

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 10>the price may depreciate another two thousand dollars, we'll go up.

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to say there's a flip side no

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 2>elib hey, I just I am curious, Craig, is Tesla

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.479
<v Speaker 2>going to be like any other carmaker though that like

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 2>every year there's a new model. It doesn't feel like,

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, Elin just does it so differently. Should we

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 2>expect as consumers that that's how.

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 8>He's going to do it?

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 2>Or is it going to be I don't know akin

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 2>to I mean Apple watches, I mean, or something that

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 2>come out every few years. I mean, how do we

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, how do we think about that when it

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 2>comes to Tesla?

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 10>I think I I think absolutely that's a that's an

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 10>observation that you know, he has very much sort of

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 10>bet on this idea that I don't need to sort

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 10>of regularly do these redesigns the way the industry has

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 10>been doing for a long time. I can make these

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:19.719
<v Speaker 10>incremental improvements to my product with software, and to his credit,

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 10>he's done that in a way that I don't think,

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 10>you know, the incumbents are still caught up in terms

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 10>of the over the air update capability that Tesla's have,

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 10>and it's still an edge that Tesla has over the

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 10>rest of the industry.

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:32.479
<v Speaker 12>Right.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 10>But that being said, I do think that, you know,

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 10>the consumer has been sort of trained over the years

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 10>to expect, you know, this model will at least get

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 10>you know, a bit of a freshening up, you know,

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 10>a bit of a nose job on it, something to

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 10>get me excited.

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 9>You know.

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 10>They did try to do that with the Model S

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 10>and X a couple of years back. It just didn't

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 10>really go over that well.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Craig Trudell, great story, Thanks for hanging up Later there

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Over in London, Craig is Global Cars are here at

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News. He is joining us on the phone from London.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 2>That story, by the way, in the upcoming new issue

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg Business Week on newstands tomorrow, already at Bloomberg

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 2>dot com, slash BusinessWeek and on the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays from two to five pm Easter.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 6>On Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business App, and you too.

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live to our flagship New York station,

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, Well, the Repo Man is back. Where

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 2>are you laughing?

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 7>I'm so sorry that I can't control.

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 9>My It's kind of funny.

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, this whole idea is just really charming. He's back,

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 2>perhaps a sign of our times. We're talking about the

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 2>repo Man. Yeah, it was not just a movie. It's

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 2>actually a real man or woman who's out there repossessing

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 2>our cars. Let's get into it with Bloomberg News Personal

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 2>finance reporter Claire Valentine, who tracked him or her down

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 2>uh and a convention who knew there's actually a convention

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 2>out there. The stories of the upcoming new issue of

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business Week on newsstands starting tomorrow, already online at

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot com slash Business Weekend on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>So let's get to it and more on her reporting.

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Claire joining us in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio along

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 2>with the editor of Bloomberg Business Week, Joel Weber and

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 2>Jill I have to say when Claire I was in

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 2>the makeup room a while ago and she's like, you know,

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 2>even believe what I'm doing. I'm like, repo, what what's

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 2>going on? So so glad we can talk about this story?

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 8>Are we not going to talk about Boys to Men?

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 8>Because the Boys to Men?

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:37.239
<v Speaker 3>Who was?

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Is that a movie?

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 8>I mean, it's a certain movie. I don't know if

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be this one. But somebody got to

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 8>the end of the road. All right, Okay the connection

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 8>so you get yeah, you get that, there's that road there. Yeah,

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 8>the producers all over that one.

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 8>So this immediate with the moment Claire started talking about

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 8>that story about the return of the reap a man,

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.199
<v Speaker 8>I was like, oh man, you had me at the

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 8>But the repost story is a really significant one. The

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 8>car is so central to the American economy, and when

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 8>people start to lose that car, I think it has

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 8>some bigger implications for the US economy, But I do

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 8>want to start with this convention because lo and behold,

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 8>there's a convention for everything, and of course there's one

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 8>for REPO men. What goes down at the REPO convention?

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 13>Claire, Well, as soon as I heard that this existed,

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 13>I told my boss I have got to go to

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 13>this and just see what it's all about. And it

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 13>did not disappoint. It was a two day convention in Orlando, Florida.

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 9>So I went.

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 13>Down on an airplane full of screaming children going to

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 13>Disney World and college students on their way to spring break,

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 13>and got this convention. And the first thing that really

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 13>struck me was how many total trucks they managed to

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 13>get in this hotel. They had displayed all their tow trucks.

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 13>There was all these vendors, all this technology on the

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 13>best way to repot cars. And it really got real

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 13>when one convention attendant looked at me and said, yeah,

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 13>everyone in this room has been shot at at least once.

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 13>You are these individuals?

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Is it largely men?

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 13>A lot of men? But it's you know, it really

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 13>is all small business. And I'm really glad I went

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 13>because in doing stories about the repoeman in the consumer

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 13>it was nice to put actual faces to this. And

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 13>what really struck me was that, you know, there is

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 13>this narrative of the evil repo man, and I'm sure

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 13>it's true in some cases, but no one here is

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 13>getting super rich off repoing cars. He's a very down

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 13>to earth, regular Americans that just happened to make their

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 13>money taking cars from people.

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:57.959
<v Speaker 8>Okay, so how is that business trending? And by business

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 8>I mean repos? Right, this is not something that you know,

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 8>we've really seen for a while, right is it? How

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 8>is it back? And how big is it?

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 13>So during the pandemic, repos largely dried up. There was stimulus, checks,

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 13>a lot of leniency from lenders on paying auto loans.

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 13>Now things are kind of starting to turn, and I

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 13>think this convention really marks almost the start of what

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 13>we're going to see as a surge in repossessions. The

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 13>estimates are that they were about one point two million

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 13>in twenty twenty two. It's up from last year, but

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 13>still down from about one point seven million and twenty nineteen.

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 13>So these are really picking up, and I think the

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 13>convention as a whole was this great window into the economy.

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 8>Right now, do they play any jokes on each other

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 8>at a convention like this?

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 13>The jokes that I saw, Let's see who's there. The

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 13>highlight was definitely the Repo demo. There's some jokes thrown

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 13>around there. With the Repo demo was all of the

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 13>convention attendees filed out to the parking lot where I

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 13>thought this was very poetic. It was a giant tow

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 13>truck that was repossessing a Toyota Hybrid. So it was

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 13>like this very liberal car that they were like repossessing,

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 13>and they everyone was crying around. The tow truck was

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 13>getting hooked up to take this car away, and they

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 13>were demonstrating all the best techniques and how you know

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 13>what the repo agent technique towing techniques. Yeah, that's what

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 13>I meant. That was the best one. Well, the thing

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 13>that stood out to me the most is that they

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 13>really emphasized that when your back is turned to the

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 13>situation behind you, that's the most vulnerable because you're at

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 13>risk of violence because you have to.

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Do it right, as somebody who's repossessing, right, you have

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 2>to physically do it so like.

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 13>You're not and it can get really dicey. That was

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 13>another big takeaway. I had no idea how dangerous this

0:31:58.760 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 13>industry was.

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 8>There's the other side of this. You talk to people

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 8>who have had their vehicles repossessed, and I'm curious what

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 8>came out of those conversations.

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 13>A lot of people really struggling right now to afford

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 13>their car loans. We saw car prices skyrocket during the pandemic,

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 13>a lot of supply chain issues. A lot of people

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 13>in America just have to have a car. There's no

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 13>way to get around if you're don't live in a

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 13>city with good public transportation. So people are taking out

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 13>loans with insane interest rates, I mean nineteen twenty percent,

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 13>and their car payments are just so high. There's not

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 13>enough money to go around, especially with inflation.

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 2>You talk about Sarah Fader in your story, and she's

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the one right who's got a nineteen percent interest loan

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 2>from American Credit Acceptance.

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 13>Yes. I went up to New Haven and met Sarah,

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.239
<v Speaker 13>met her family, saw the car, really talked with her

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 13>about her situation, and it really hits home just what

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 13>a lot of people are dealing with right now. Rent

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 13>had gone up, or groceries were so expensive, she's got

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 13>two teenagers and with a high car payment, there's just.

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 9>A tough spot.

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 7>And lenders are excited about making these loans, even if

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 7>they're letting out that money to people who they know

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 7>can't necessarily afford it.

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's a whole way. They package up these auto

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 13>loans into bonds. In some cases, investors would still get

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 13>their money back with interest if even three quarters of

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 13>barers to falls it on the loans. So it's of course,

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 13>you know, moves to Wall Street where they're eager to

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 13>package these up and sell them and make money off

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 13>of them.

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 8>Okay, So with the people that you talked to, see

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.719
<v Speaker 8>your car gets repossessed and you know you've lost out

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 8>in that vehicle, where does the story go from there?

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 8>What do they have to do to get it back,

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 8>to get back to work, to get all that stuff

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 8>that not only has impacts for them but also the

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 8>economy as a whole.

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Ring.

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, and in many cases it's not just the back

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 13>payments that they have to make that they haven't paid

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 13>so far. It's additional fees for repossession and for towing.

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 13>And then there's the hit to their credit score which

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 13>is going to affect them in the future. I talked

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 13>with a couple of people who'd had their cars repossessed

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 13>that essentially just had to count it as a loss.

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 13>They didn't have the money to get the car back,

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 13>so they were going to have to just move on

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 13>with their lives in any way they can. But it

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 13>definitely you know, when people suddenly don't have a car,

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 13>they can't get to work, maybe they lose their job,

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 13>and it's just this whole spiral cycle.

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 2>So you know, what I'm also curious about is the

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 2>individuals who are the REPO man or woman. Do they

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:40.959
<v Speaker 2>think about this, like in terms of that there are

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 2>people and you know, with problems and financial problems. I

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 2>just wonder, is it a job or is it a

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 2>lot more than that.

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 13>I think that's a great question, and it is. You know,

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 13>I don't think they're ignorant of that, but I do

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 13>think what came away from me from the conference was

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 13>very much I think there's this attitude that REPO men

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 13>are misunderstood, and it was a bit.

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 11>Of a.

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 2>That's another new movie or talking about, but go ahead,

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, that the REPO men were sort of like,

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 2>we're the good guys and we're just doing our job.

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 13>No one understands how hard or how dangerous that is.

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 13>And I think, you know, it's it's easy to point

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 13>your finger out at the villain in these situations. I

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 13>do think the truth is more nuanced. You also have

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 13>in some cases predatory lenders that are giving out loans

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 13>was kind of high interest rates. So it's a whole

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 13>system that contributes to this kind of crisis.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 8>Okay, I'm curious about the Python. Can we talk about

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 8>the Python?

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 13>Yes, the Python.

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 8>The Python.

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 13>It's a pretty impressive truck. I'm not gonna lie.

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 8>It must just like make this room get really excited,

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 8>a room full of REPO people.

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 13>I wish I had seen them get these toe trucks

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 13>into the conference room because it's it was a very

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 13>nice conference center. I mean this was like palm trees.

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 13>I mean it's Florida. It was Florida. It was very nice.

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 13>And then all of a sudden you look around and

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 13>there's five toe trucks sitting around. It's I mean, they

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 13>were huge, and what I love the most is that

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 13>to sort of demonstrate how they work, they had this

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 13>little toy car that they were towing that was just

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 13>like the size of a kid's little tricycle.

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 2>It's showing how you hook it up, so they have

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 2>a sense of humor.

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 13>There's a certain extent.

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Eighty eight thousand dollars though, what well.

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 8>And these are small businesses, you know, I found them

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 8>to be really interesting, Like it's it's not like it's

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 8>some big company. It's like you're out there on your

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 8>own repossessing vehicles. Was that true for everyone in the room?

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 8>Were they all small businesses or how many of them

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 8>work for somebody else?

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 13>I mean, I would say most of them were small businesses.

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 13>I mean you look around at the clientele, and these

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 13>are not you know, millionaires, businessmen in suits. These are

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 13>very you know, blue collar kind of workers. And I'd

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 13>say maybe they have, you know, a place with at

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 13>most to thirty employees, but there are really giant firms

0:36:57.880 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 13>doing this. Well.

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 7>It makes me wonder, Claire, like, on a personal level,

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 7>was it ever hard for you to walk up to

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 7>people and just say like, hey, can you give me

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 7>your life story?

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 9>Were you like nervous at all?

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 13>I was only because I'm pretty sure I was the

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 13>only journalist there. I'm sure I am one of the

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.879
<v Speaker 13>only women, one of the only women. These people are

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 13>not huge journalism fans, so got a lot of that,

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 13>got a lot of people coming up to me and

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 13>being like, oh, hey, I heard you're the journalist.

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so me.

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 7>Honestly, I went to a men's rights conference for Bloomberg

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 7>a few years ago.

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 13>It sounds very similar.

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.919
<v Speaker 7>You're like, hey, yeah, sorry.

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 2>It was Did you talk to the journalist?

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 13>Yeah? I do think. You know, there are pros and

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 13>cons to being a young woman in this industry, and

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 13>you know, lots of cons as you and I know,

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 13>but one of the pros is that kind of non threatening.

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 14>Yeah.

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 13>I think if I'd been a big guy coming in

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 13>there talking to the reputman, it may have been a

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 13>little different. So it was a very unique situation.

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 8>Report and why is that I've been in does make

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 8>me wonder who do these people work for? You know,

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 8>like and like how do they get their next job?

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 7>Oh?

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 13>This is fascinating. I had no idea the technology behind

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 13>all of this. There were so many firms that were

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 13>advertising their databases. So in some cases these small businesses

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 13>sign up to have access to databases with all this

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 13>license plate data that's all proprietary, right, And it was

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 13>fascinating to me. I mean these are all this is

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 13>public sector, this is or private sector. This is not

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 13>government data.

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 2>So somebody's feeding it into these these apps if you will, or.

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 13>Whatever, base like readers that compile all of this and

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:44.919
<v Speaker 13>then REPO agents can access it to then track down

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 13>your car.

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 8>AI that's work.

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 9>What do they make?

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 2>How can they afford that?

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:52.919
<v Speaker 9>Idiot? That's a dullar? What is it called?

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 8>Python?

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 8>What I want to see is what the python get repossessed?

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 13>They'll circle right, Yeah, definitely, yeah. I you know, in

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 13>terms of profit margins on these, I don't have an

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 13>incredible idea. I do think they have had a tough.

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 9>Couple of years.

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, because the numbers went down, right like the pandemic

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 8>there was you know, we the chart and the story

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 8>sort of says it all. It's like it's back because

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 8>you know, there was a lull and so and speaking

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 8>to everyone there, though, do they think that this these

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 8>numbers are going to keep going up?

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 13>I think so, yeah. I mean that's I think it's

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 13>the fact that they drop so much really has contributed

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 13>to this sort of you know, our industry is in

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 13>crisis and risk kind of mentality. And now what I

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 13>saw at the conference was a lot of people getting

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 13>more excited or getting more like, our industry is on

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 13>the upswing now we are.

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Bad news is good news.

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 13>Bad news is good news. Yeah.

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I also thought it was interesting that, you know, one

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:48.320
<v Speaker 2>of the things we talk about with I feel like

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 2>everybody who comes on is like the tight labor market,

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 2>and they're dealing with that too, just quickly they are.

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, they're having a lot of trouble hiring workers, especially

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:01.399
<v Speaker 13>because many of their repo agents from pre pandemic went

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 13>to other industries.

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Right right, Exactly did they try to recruit you? I'm

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 2>just curious.

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 13>I quite have the profile to Prussia.

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Unbelievable, really funny. You took us to a place that

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I think nobody has really seen. Clear Valentine. She's personal

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 2>finance reporter at Bloomberg News here in studio with us

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 2>a long retil Weber, the editor of Bloomberg Business Week,

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 2>and of course, the story, as we mentioned, coming up

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 2>in the new issue of Bloomberg Business Week, out on

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 2>newstands tomorrow, already online at Bloomberg dot com, slash BusinessWeek,

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 2>and also on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. That's us

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays from two to five pm Easter.

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.879
<v Speaker 6>On Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business App, and You too.

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live to our flagship New York station,

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, Play Bloomberg, You Love and thirty.

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 2>Right now, we want to get to some of the

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 2>trends that are going on in the workforce. We're kind

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 2>of counting down not only to a FED meeting, but

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.720
<v Speaker 2>our next read when it comes to the late market

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 2>and with us is Emma cod of Deloitte. She's a

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:08.959
<v Speaker 2>global inclusion leader and they did a survey that looked

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 2>at they do an annual report on women, specifically it's

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 2>up today and what they found. One of the findings

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 2>one out of five women surveyed have left their employer

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 2>in the past twelve months. That's a pretty big statistic.

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 2>So let's get to it and get some understanding of

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:22.839
<v Speaker 2>who they talk to and more on the findings. Emma

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:26.359
<v Speaker 2>joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Great

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 2>to have you here. I do feel like this is

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 2>very indicative of our times post pandemic.

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 15>Welcome, thank you, great to be here.

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Nice to have you here. So tell us a little

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 2>bit about who you surveyed specific So.

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 15>We surveyed five thousand women in the workplace across ten countries,

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 15>really try and get a good global outlook, so you know,

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 15>European countries, it's sort of over to Asia, Latin America.

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 15>It's really a good represent sample and the affect few

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 15>women in work in roles, in jobs. Eighty eight percent

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 15>to them were in full time employment. And that's actually

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 15>interesting when we come on to the well working findings

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 15>because I would say some of those would rather be

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 15>in part time employment, but given some of the issues

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 15>that we've identified, they're not. They're working full time. And

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 15>the aim for this research, as you said, this our

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 15>third year, is really to understand it's less about policies,

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 15>less about processes, to understand women's real experiences and actually

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:23.319
<v Speaker 15>to come you know, what is the secret source come

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 15>up with recommendations that businesses can use because we're not

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 15>making enough progress.

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 7>So what was the main thing then for businesses?

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 15>In terms of a takeaway, I would say, look, there

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 15>are a couple of main takeaways things that really actually

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 15>concern me. Last year we saw very high numbers around burnout,

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 15>around exclusion during hybrid working around non inclusive behaviors. And

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 15>I do think that was partly a sign of the times.

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 15>We're in this weird sort of coming back to work slowly,

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 15>and we were you know what we've been through the

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 15>last couple of years. This year, those numbers have come down,

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 15>but I want to really emphasize they're not good, that

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 15>they're still poor. So specific you look at mental health,

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 15>mental health, more women are feeling very stressed. You know,

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 15>you asked them, are you feeling more stressed than you

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 15>were a year ago? Yet around half of them are

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 15>always on. There are more women who are saying I

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 15>feel the need to always be on. So that's a

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:17.959
<v Speaker 15>big hangover from pandemic times. It's worse than last year,

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 15>but fewer women feel comfortable talking about mental health at work.

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Emma, hang on for a second, Like, how would you

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 2>say this compares to pre pandemic. I was pretty frazzled

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 2>pre pandemic.

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 15>I was pretty fuzzle pre pandemic too.

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 2>So is it because I'm trying to get an understanding of, like,

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, pandemic, which was lousy and so many people

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 2>had very difficult situations. But I'm just wondering, you know,

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 2>I have to say my first few months. I love

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 2>being home from me and my family. It made us

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 2>all stop for a moment.

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 12>Yeah.

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just wondering, like, how do you think about

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 2>it that way? You've been doing this survey since the period.

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 15>Yes, and we did a pulse during the pandemic and

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 15>the pretty bad findings well from that, So how does

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 15>it compare to pre look? Mental health has always been

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 15>an issue. You know, we have our physical health, we

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 15>have our mental health. It's just talked about more and

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 15>I think the workplace, I think how it compares is

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 15>the workplace has started to talk about it more because

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 15>of the pandemic. But you know, the mental health and

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 15>mental ill health has existed long before that, always on

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 15>has existed long before that. I think we got into

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 15>habits during the pandemic that I don't think they're going away.

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 15>And I think hybrid working is something that's new. You know,

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 15>we didn't some of us hybrid worked, just we didn't

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 15>call it hybrid working. Hybrid working is a new way

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 15>of working that. You know, it's still some challenges there

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 15>for women. So you know non inclusive behaviors. Forty four

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 15>percent of women have experienced non inclusive behaviors in a

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 15>workplace context in the last year.

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:43.919
<v Speaker 2>How would does that mean?

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 15>So that effectively means microaggressions or harassment. So of the respondents,

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 15>nearly twoy five hundred women said I experienced it on

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 15>at least one occasion a behavior that was you know,

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 15>it was a microaggression or harassment. So you know, and

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 15>was that proper the case? Yes, I mean, you know,

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 15>workplace culture has long been a challenge, and it was

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 15>a challenge pre pandemic.

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 7>We had a story the other week on the terminal

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 7>from Pew Research data showing that US women now make

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 7>as much or more than men in half of marriages.

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 7>But I think that's really interesting to square that with

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.879
<v Speaker 7>some of the findings that you have on women still

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:25.919
<v Speaker 7>feeling the need to deprioritize their careers. Can you talk

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 7>about the dichotomy there?

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, and this is interesting because the survey has been

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 15>going three years, but this is the first time we

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 15>wanted to find out about responsibilities in the home and

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 15>about prioritization and who is the primary income source. And

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:42.839
<v Speaker 15>the findings were they surprising on the share of household responsibilities?

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 15>Sadly not, they weren't. So we had you know, just

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 15>under half women saying I have primary responsibility that only

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 15>ten percent of women said their partner did. So that's

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 15>the first thing. And don't forget most of these women

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 15>are working full time as well. And then when we

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 15>looked at income source, majority of women were not the

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 15>primary income source. Majority of them prioritized their partner's career

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 15>over their own. Now, the interesting thing there is that

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 15>was still one in five for women who are the

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 15>high earner. So we had Yeah, so you know two

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:18.840
<v Speaker 15>and five, we're not one in five, we're not. So

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 15>there is this challenge, and to me, it's like this

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 15>sort of vicious circle almost because if you're deprioritizing your career,

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 15>then your chances are becoming the primary earner in the

0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 15>household are reduced.

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, so just get about forty five seconds left here.

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 2>So what do you do with this? Because I feel

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 2>like we spend years and years like we pull data.

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 2>It's very useful. I think it gives us a great

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:44.880
<v Speaker 2>snapschat of what's going on, but so many times it

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 2>doesn't get put into action.

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 15>So what do we do with it? We need to

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 15>know that we do not need to fix women. We

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:52.880
<v Speaker 15>need to fix the workplace. Okay, that's the first. What

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 15>we do with it this report, What I love about

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 15>it is it's data driven. It shows the impact and

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 15>it shows the positive impact five percent in work for

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 15>companies that are getting it right. So any employers out there,

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 15>you can look and see what is the secret source

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:10.319
<v Speaker 15>for those companies. It's around culture, it's around process, it's

0:47:10.360 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 15>around support, it's around removing barriers. That is what we.

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:13.800
<v Speaker 8>Needs to do.

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:16.359
<v Speaker 15>If we take this seriously, which we need to, then

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:17.240
<v Speaker 15>we can make a difference.

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 2>And when it's a tight labor for us, which it

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 2>still is, you know, workers are going to move to

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:23.919
<v Speaker 2>where they think they're going to have all of these

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:26.800
<v Speaker 2>things that they that they're looking for. And as you're senior,

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 2>your service. Absolutely all right, Emma, Safe travels home.

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 15>Thank you very much.

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Nice to have you here. Emma Cage's global inclusion leader

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 2>at Deloitt. Here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:49.720
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App, and you too. You can also

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>listen live to our flagship New York station, just say

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg Eleve and thirty.

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, Alexis o'hanian. He co founded Read It. He's a

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:06.359
<v Speaker 2>serial entrepreneur. He's got a VC firm, the seven seven

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:09.360
<v Speaker 2>six Fund. He's got a foundation with a similar name.

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 2>He's also all in on sports, co founder and leading

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:14.760
<v Speaker 2>investor at the Angel City Football Club, the women's soccer

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 2>team based in La We had a long ranging conversation

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 2>earlier today, but sports that's where we began, you tweeted,

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:25.319
<v Speaker 2>I think just a few days. I love sports. Have

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:26.840
<v Speaker 2>you always loved sports always?

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 11>I did not always love women's sports, though, to be clear,

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 11>I'm not. I jumped on this bandwagon really when I

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:34.799
<v Speaker 11>met my wife. That was the first time I even

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:38.360
<v Speaker 11>ever watched tennis as a sport. Yeah, but then really

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 11>went whole hog in twenty nineteen, so I'm new to it.

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, talk to us about Angel City in terms of

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 2>how it came on your radar. I mean, there's a

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of well known actresses Mia Ham's involved. There's a

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of incredible women behind it. What was it, I

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:52.799
<v Speaker 2>don't know the conversations you had with him that said

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to be a part of this.

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 11>Well, so back in twenty nineteen and I dug up

0:48:56.960 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 11>these old tweets. It was March. I was just, you know,

0:49:01.120 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 11>reading the news the US women's national team was fighting

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:07.280
<v Speaker 11>for pay equity, and I started looking at the numbers

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:13.320
<v Speaker 11>and I realized women's sports, and chiefly soccer, was being

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 11>so so undervalued. And again I only just come of

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 11>this as a businessman, as an investor, and you know,

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:25.560
<v Speaker 11>seeing the amount of attention that team was able to capture,

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 11>seeing the number of follows their biggest stars had on

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:32.280
<v Speaker 11>social media, right, this is these are facts over feelings.

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 11>This is just the democratic nature of social media, which

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 11>says you are someone I want to pay attention to,

0:49:40.280 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 11>I will click follow. Showed that these women were incredibly popular.

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:48.400
<v Speaker 11>They were individually capable of generating you know, millions of

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:52.720
<v Speaker 11>dollars in brand deals. And yet the league, the NWSL,

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 11>was still kind of a mess. I didn't even know

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 11>it existed. I think a lot of sports fans didn't.

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:01.480
<v Speaker 11>It was showing its matches on life Time Lifetime. No

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 11>offense to Lifetime, but come on, you're not watching sports

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 11>on Lifetime. And at the time a team had sold

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:10.479
<v Speaker 11>for like three million dollars and it was the same

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 11>team that Megan Rappino played on. And you don't have

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 11>think the smartest guy in the room to realize Megan

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 11>Rapino can generate at least a few million dollars a

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:22.520
<v Speaker 11>year in brand deals, and really she is worth at

0:50:22.640 --> 0:50:26.840
<v Speaker 11>least that much and soon money her entire team is

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 11>only worth three millions. Someone was epically messing up, and

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:33.479
<v Speaker 11>so I started tweeting, and I just said, I was like, look,

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 11>this is a huge opportunity. I want to buy a team.

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 11>Who do I talk to? I want to start a team?

0:50:37.719 --> 0:50:40.799
<v Speaker 11>Who do I talk to? And you know, Twitter showed

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:44.240
<v Speaker 11>up in a big way. The diehard women's soccer fans

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 11>were like, all right, you know, don't just talk about it,

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:48.920
<v Speaker 11>be about it. And then there were also trolls who

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 11>were like, you're going to waste all your money. This

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 11>is stupid. No one cares what women's sports. So I

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 11>started talking to existing owners. I realized pretty quickly I

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:57.880
<v Speaker 11>didn't want to inherit someone else's team. I needed a

0:50:57.880 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 11>blank slate. And because I was so proactively honestly tweeting

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:07.799
<v Speaker 11>about it, one of the owners of La FC, the

0:51:07.840 --> 0:51:11.880
<v Speaker 11>men's club in la introduced me to Kara Julian Knatt

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 11>created Who at the end of I think twenty nineteen

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 11>were out to market and couldn't find anyone who wanted

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:22.800
<v Speaker 11>to invest, and so I said, well, look I'm doing

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 11>this and getting connected to them. You know, they shared

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 11>a similar vision.

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:31.880
<v Speaker 2>And you know I wrote the check off and running.

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 8>That's yeah, it was.

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 11>It was kismet and I think tweeting, I mean seriously,

0:51:35.960 --> 0:51:36.960
<v Speaker 11>and it's it's this.

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 2>Show is like it can work. It's like incredible and

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 2>connecting people.

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 11>Yes, And look, I'm also the kind of person who

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 11>likes being early and right. So I love calling my

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 11>shots on Twitter because I love having those receipts later

0:51:48.320 --> 0:51:52.360
<v Speaker 11>when everyone's like history, right, Yeah, bring the receipts baby.

0:51:52.520 --> 0:51:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Well okay, god, I feel like there's a million places

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I could go. Well does that show?

0:51:55.960 --> 0:51:56.200
<v Speaker 16>Do you?

0:51:56.400 --> 0:51:58.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm going to take a sidebar here, go for it.

0:51:58.400 --> 0:52:01.840
<v Speaker 2>So social media Twitter, TikTok. There's a lot of things

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:05.480
<v Speaker 2>that are on you know, everybody's radar about usefulness, the

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:07.800
<v Speaker 2>problems that are created, you know, elin and Twitter is

0:52:07.800 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 2>a whole other story. What's your take on social media?

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Has it run its course?

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:12.840
<v Speaker 9>Uh?

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:16.279
<v Speaker 2>We? And I love a lot one. Wow.

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 11>Yes, Okay, Look, it has transformed the world. There have

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 11>been good outcomes, there have been bad outcomes, right, I

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:26.160
<v Speaker 11>very publicly left read it in protest a few years ago,

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:30.000
<v Speaker 11>and I was thrilled. They didn't response. You know, they

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 11>did finally ban hate communities, They did replace me with

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:36.960
<v Speaker 11>a black directory. They made changes as a result of

0:52:37.000 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 11>my resignation that I was so happy with at the

0:52:39.640 --> 0:52:42.920
<v Speaker 11>end of the day. But I realized, for me, I

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:46.840
<v Speaker 11>think social media is very much going to occupy a

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:52.880
<v Speaker 11>space that our children's generation will look back on with

0:52:52.960 --> 0:52:54.800
<v Speaker 11>a raised eyebrow. I mean, that's a big part of

0:52:54.840 --> 0:52:56.919
<v Speaker 11>the reason I left. I got a she was three

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:58.840
<v Speaker 11>at the time. Now she's five and a half, a

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 11>daughter who I think is going to grow up with

0:53:02.680 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 11>a very different experience on social media. And so I

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:09.360
<v Speaker 11>think part of that is cultural. You're seeing a generation

0:53:09.400 --> 0:53:12.000
<v Speaker 11>of young people and their parents who are like yo. Actually,

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:14.839
<v Speaker 11>maybe this was pretty terrible for you know, going through

0:53:14.880 --> 0:53:18.440
<v Speaker 11>adolescents where everyone has a little like button and follower

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 11>account floating above their heads, right, you know, adolescents measure

0:53:21.640 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 11>of value. It's hard enough to go through that time,

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 11>and then you now productize and weaponize it probably not

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:30.200
<v Speaker 11>great long term. So I think you can already see

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 11>culture shifting, right, you can already see this generation looking

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 11>to other platforms. I'm not an investor, but you know

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 11>the ascent in companies like be Real that are more

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:43.319
<v Speaker 11>about not living on your phone chasing hearts, but just

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 11>sharing with people you actually care about, like what's going

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 11>on in your life. I think you're gonna see that

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 11>cultural shift, and you're gonna see more technology. So I

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:52.960
<v Speaker 11>social media's not going anywhere, but it will evolve in

0:53:52.960 --> 0:53:54.319
<v Speaker 11>the way that we use it for sure.

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:57.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious how your daughter and your wife influence you

0:53:57.560 --> 0:54:05.759
<v Speaker 2>in terms of you know, equity, easy equality women. Your

0:54:05.840 --> 0:54:07.240
<v Speaker 2>daughter is an investor.

0:54:07.200 --> 0:54:09.759
<v Speaker 11>Yes, I made sure I was the.

0:54:09.640 --> 0:54:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Owner of a professional sports team.

0:54:11.360 --> 0:54:11.839
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 11>I set aside a few bucks to personally invest. I

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:17.120
<v Speaker 11>mean it was via her trust. She doesn't know this,

0:54:17.160 --> 0:54:18.600
<v Speaker 11>by the way, so hopefully she's not listening to the

0:54:18.600 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 11>podcast listen. I mean she has five and ass not

0:54:22.719 --> 0:54:22.880
<v Speaker 11>to her.

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:23.960
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, it was important, right.

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:26.319
<v Speaker 11>I wanted her not just to be the youngest center

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:28.440
<v Speaker 11>in pro sports, which is kind of cool. Yeah, but

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:32.239
<v Speaker 11>you know, like any parent, you want to create, you

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:35.719
<v Speaker 11>want to give your children something and a legacy, and

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:38.120
<v Speaker 11>frankly also I wanted to give her what she was doing.

0:54:38.400 --> 0:54:41.960
<v Speaker 11>So it was because of Olympia that really galvanized this

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:45.799
<v Speaker 11>in many ways because during the final the Women's World

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:48.359
<v Speaker 11>Cup that year, we were all watching at the home

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:50.759
<v Speaker 11>we were staying in Wimbledon, and I'd gotten Olympia and

0:54:50.800 --> 0:54:53.080
<v Speaker 11>Alex Morgan jersey and She's running around kicking her ball,

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:55.719
<v Speaker 11>and I'd commented to my wife, like any proud dad,

0:54:56.040 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 11>wouldn't it be nice one day if she played on

0:54:57.920 --> 0:54:59.479
<v Speaker 11>the Ones national team? Wouldn't that be cool?

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:00.560
<v Speaker 8>With that missing a beat?

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:03.120
<v Speaker 11>Serena says, not until they pay her what she's worth,

0:55:03.800 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 11>and I said, okay, challenge accept it, like all right,

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 11>And so so you know this, this little three year

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:15.840
<v Speaker 11>old was part of the reason why I finally was like, no,

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 11>I really this needs to happen. And so the least

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 11>I could do is give her her due. And so yeah, look,

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 11>I'm very aware of the fact that I am a

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 11>now wealthy, but a white dude who occupies space his

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 11>entire life very differently than my wife has and my

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:40.480
<v Speaker 11>daughter will, and so it has given me perspective. But

0:55:40.560 --> 0:55:47.240
<v Speaker 11>I want to stress it is nothing about the moves

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:50.240
<v Speaker 11>I make or the things I do are.

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Charitable.

0:55:53.280 --> 0:55:53.759
<v Speaker 6>What do you mean?

0:55:53.760 --> 0:55:56.480
<v Speaker 2>What are you thinking because you're an investor?

0:55:56.560 --> 0:56:04.960
<v Speaker 11>What I mean is none of this is none of

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:11.480
<v Speaker 11>this is because of charity. This is what I believe

0:56:11.960 --> 0:56:17.240
<v Speaker 11>is going to lead to the most effective outcome long term.

0:56:17.680 --> 0:56:20.560
<v Speaker 11>One of the I really believe, and this is something

0:56:20.600 --> 0:56:22.279
<v Speaker 11>I talk about with my team all the time at

0:56:22.320 --> 0:56:24.879
<v Speaker 11>seven seven six and with CEOs that I counsel now

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:31.120
<v Speaker 11>is I really believe the long term greedy mindset is

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:35.319
<v Speaker 11>just a very different way of thinking about building businesses,

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:38.320
<v Speaker 11>being more intentional about everything from the way you build

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:41.440
<v Speaker 11>teams to the way you deploy capital to the partners

0:56:41.560 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 11>that you decide to have. And I actually, like, I

0:56:45.880 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 11>worry the one thing I don't want people to hear

0:56:48.080 --> 0:56:50.080
<v Speaker 11>is like, oh, well, this dude has you know, a

0:56:50.120 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 11>black wife, a black daughter, and now he cares about

0:56:52.880 --> 0:56:55.960
<v Speaker 11>these things, right, Because I don't think you should need

0:56:56.000 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 11>to have those things in order to care. You shouldn't

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:02.640
<v Speaker 11>need to have a to care about women's sports.

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 2>But if you didn't, do you think, oh, you'd have

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 2>gotten to this point.

0:57:07.200 --> 0:57:10.439
<v Speaker 8>Probably a lot slower, if at all. So no, I can't.

0:57:10.680 --> 0:57:14.480
<v Speaker 11>So yes, it absolutely played a huge role in helping

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:18.680
<v Speaker 11>build my perspective in the same way. You know, it's

0:57:18.680 --> 0:57:22.880
<v Speaker 11>a kind of education. You know, I didn't go to

0:57:22.960 --> 0:57:26.760
<v Speaker 11>Harvard Business School, clearly, but my you know, I had

0:57:26.800 --> 0:57:30.000
<v Speaker 11>a different kind of very formative education that's come from

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:32.960
<v Speaker 11>being in a relationship and then a marriage to someone

0:57:33.080 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 11>like my wife, and having the lived experience of a daughter.

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 2>But some would say much richer and much more real

0:57:39.920 --> 0:57:41.360
<v Speaker 2>in terms of understand.

0:57:40.960 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 11>I think so oh one hundred percent. So I think

0:57:43.160 --> 0:57:45.920
<v Speaker 11>so yes, I can't deny how formative it's been. But

0:57:45.960 --> 0:57:50.440
<v Speaker 11>I just want to stress that it's not Do not

0:57:50.600 --> 0:57:55.520
<v Speaker 11>take away from this that that has to be the

0:57:55.720 --> 0:57:59.120
<v Speaker 11>reason why it's exciting. Women's sports is not exciting just

0:57:59.160 --> 0:58:01.680
<v Speaker 11>because a bunch of dudes have daughters and now feel like,

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 11>oh we got to support this. No, like women's sports

0:58:04.840 --> 0:58:09.240
<v Speaker 11>is exciting because it is a massive business opportunity that

0:58:09.320 --> 0:58:12.520
<v Speaker 11>men and women, even dudes who don't have daughters, are

0:58:12.560 --> 0:58:14.640
<v Speaker 11>going to be excited to pay attention to.

0:58:14.920 --> 0:58:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Since I have you, I'm going to get in trouble find'

0:58:16.920 --> 0:58:20.400
<v Speaker 2>actually if your question, sorry, well we did touch the media.

0:58:21.080 --> 0:58:23.440
<v Speaker 2>I know you talked about this with our TV cogs. Yeah,

0:58:23.800 --> 0:58:26.240
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence. You knew I was going to ask.

0:58:26.360 --> 0:58:28.800
<v Speaker 11>Sorry, Sure, that's fine, I'm using it everything.

0:58:29.040 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 2>What's more interesting right now? Well, okay, so what has

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:33.200
<v Speaker 2>better investment opportunities AI?

0:58:33.680 --> 0:58:38.080
<v Speaker 11>But interestingly enough, if we assume let's go down, let's

0:58:38.520 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 11>I just think in ten year terms a gift and

0:58:40.800 --> 0:58:43.640
<v Speaker 11>a curse. But so ten years down the road, AI

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:47.760
<v Speaker 11>continues to ascend. Like you can now spin up anything.

0:58:47.840 --> 0:58:51.520
<v Speaker 11>I mean, it's the ability to generate let's say, content

0:58:51.680 --> 0:58:54.959
<v Speaker 11>is trivial. Right, we could sit here, you could have

0:58:57.320 --> 0:59:01.960
<v Speaker 11>you could say you want a birthday song sung by

0:59:02.160 --> 0:59:11.240
<v Speaker 11>Beyonce naming you and your favorite puppy, and like you

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:14.800
<v Speaker 11>can customize everything and mention like I don't know pizza

0:59:14.920 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 11>because you love pizza.

0:59:16.640 --> 0:59:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Is that valuable?

0:59:18.040 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 9>I think so?

0:59:18.600 --> 0:59:20.920
<v Speaker 11>And so you need to figure out the you need

0:59:20.960 --> 0:59:23.600
<v Speaker 11>to figure out the dollars so that artists get paid

0:59:23.680 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 11>and all that stuff's going to get sort of But okay,

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:28.200
<v Speaker 11>imagine content is everywhere and anyone can create all the

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:31.800
<v Speaker 11>content they want. It actually now comes full circle back

0:59:31.880 --> 0:59:36.160
<v Speaker 11>to why having a decentralized global ledger is so important

0:59:36.720 --> 0:59:40.440
<v Speaker 11>because with a blockchain, you can now prove the prominence

0:59:40.480 --> 0:59:43.920
<v Speaker 11>and authenticity of the original, the day one content, and

0:59:44.000 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 11>so weirdly, I think in the long term the proliferation

0:59:47.160 --> 0:59:51.240
<v Speaker 11>of a actually makes a strong case for the blockchain

0:59:51.240 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 11>because blockchain.

0:59:52.200 --> 0:59:54.880
<v Speaker 2>But what about crypto. You've invested in crypto, how do

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:57.760
<v Speaker 2>you feel about that at this point after the carnage

0:59:57.760 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 2>of the last Sunerson.

0:59:59.560 --> 1:00:01.840
<v Speaker 11>So I see he did coinbase in twenty twelve. I

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:05.880
<v Speaker 11>have been through every winter, and every winter I put

1:00:05.920 --> 1:00:09.040
<v Speaker 11>on my parka and I go talk to people building

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 11>and they build. And it's actually the best time to

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:15.760
<v Speaker 11>be investing in crypto because well, every cycle, the winter

1:00:15.880 --> 1:00:17.560
<v Speaker 11>is the best time to be doing my job. Yeah,

1:00:17.680 --> 1:00:20.880
<v Speaker 11>because when you're early, you know, this is when the

1:00:20.920 --> 1:00:23.160
<v Speaker 11>noise is gone. This is when the builders are building

1:00:23.160 --> 1:00:26.000
<v Speaker 11>things people actually want. They're not worrying about what the

1:00:26.040 --> 1:00:31.919
<v Speaker 11>eath price is today. They're just building. They're shipping soft investing, yes, absolutely.

1:00:31.360 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 2>And AI are you investing?

1:00:32.680 --> 1:00:35.040
<v Speaker 11>Yes? And so in another two three years will come

1:00:35.080 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 11>out of this criptocycle, it'll probably be I think gaming

1:00:37.880 --> 1:00:40.080
<v Speaker 11>will be a big thrust of It'll be very consumer

1:00:40.120 --> 1:00:43.240
<v Speaker 11>facing as well as infrastructure, and it's not going to

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:45.320
<v Speaker 11>use any of those words You're never gonna hear about NFTs,

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:47.000
<v Speaker 11>nor should You're never gonna hear about crypt It's just

1:00:47.040 --> 1:00:49.040
<v Speaker 11>gonna be dope software that happens to be on chain,

1:00:49.360 --> 1:00:49.680
<v Speaker 11>all right.

1:00:49.680 --> 1:00:52.760
<v Speaker 2>That, of course, was Alexis o'hani and co founder of Reddit,

1:00:53.800 --> 1:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>founder of a VC firm, the seven seven six Fund.

1:00:56.840 --> 1:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>He's also got a foundation, the seven seven six Foundation,

1:00:59.440 --> 1:01:02.280
<v Speaker 2>that to fight inequity, most recently giving about twenty million

1:01:02.320 --> 1:01:04.520
<v Speaker 2>to young people of the next decade. It's all about

1:01:04.520 --> 1:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>working on climate. And then he's into sports. Co founder

1:01:06.680 --> 1:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>and leading investor at Angel City Football Club. Eva Longoria

1:01:10.560 --> 1:01:15.200
<v Speaker 2>is invested in it. Jennifer Garner, I'm leaving out Natalie Portmant.

1:01:15.200 --> 1:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's a lot of people who are involved

1:01:16.880 --> 1:01:19.000
<v Speaker 2>in it, but interesting.

1:01:19.400 --> 1:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

1:01:23.000 --> 1:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays from two to five pm Eastern.

1:01:25.600 --> 1:01:28.960
<v Speaker 6>On Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business App and YouTube.

1:01:29.200 --> 1:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live to our flagship New York station,

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

1:01:39.080 --> 1:01:48.760
<v Speaker 2>It's well, thanks, Tell may be gain For the over

1:01:48.760 --> 1:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>one hundred million obese and overweight individuals in the United States.

1:01:53.080 --> 1:01:54.880
<v Speaker 2>There is a story in the new issue of Bloomberg

1:01:54.880 --> 1:01:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Business Week. It's out on newstands, online at Bloomberg dot com,

1:01:57.680 --> 1:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>slash BusinessWeek, and on the Bloomberg terminal. And many of

1:02:00.640 --> 1:02:03.439
<v Speaker 2>these individuals would love to lose a bunch of weight

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:06.080
<v Speaker 2>to improve their health situation, and you know what, there's

1:02:06.120 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of drugs out there that can do that.

1:02:08.560 --> 1:02:11.200
<v Speaker 2>The big problem though, is the cost and having to

1:02:11.320 --> 1:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>use the drug for the rest of your life. All right,

1:02:13.600 --> 1:02:15.800
<v Speaker 2>let's get into it with our Bloomberg News healthcare reporting

1:02:15.800 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>team who wrote the story of Emma Court and Bob Langreth.

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>They are both here in our Interactive broker studio. So

1:02:21.640 --> 1:02:24.120
<v Speaker 2>excited to have both of you with us. Emma, why

1:02:24.120 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 2>don't you kick it off with us and tell us

1:02:25.640 --> 1:02:28.400
<v Speaker 2>about this class of drugs which they were mentioned at

1:02:28.400 --> 1:02:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the Oscars. Comedians talk about them. I think Elon Musk

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>has talked about them. Tell us what we're talking about.

1:02:34.280 --> 1:02:36.160
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, well, first of all, thank you so much for

1:02:36.200 --> 1:02:38.840
<v Speaker 14>having us on. Really excited about the story. It's the

1:02:38.920 --> 1:02:44.360
<v Speaker 14>cover story this week, so we're thrilled. These new drugs

1:02:44.400 --> 1:02:48.400
<v Speaker 14>are called effectively glp ones. They're named after a hormone

1:02:48.480 --> 1:02:51.920
<v Speaker 14>they mimic that essentially helps people feel fuller, they have

1:02:52.000 --> 1:02:55.640
<v Speaker 14>less appetite, they eat less, and they lose weight. What's

1:02:55.640 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 14>interesting about these drugs.

1:02:56.800 --> 1:02:58.360
<v Speaker 9>Is they're not all that new.

1:02:58.520 --> 1:03:01.520
<v Speaker 14>This class has been around for diet beds for many years,

1:03:02.000 --> 1:03:05.960
<v Speaker 14>but more recently pharma companies have been developing them specifically

1:03:06.040 --> 1:03:06.800
<v Speaker 14>for obesity.

1:03:07.320 --> 1:03:09.000
<v Speaker 9>There's a couple of different names for them.

1:03:09.040 --> 1:03:12.200
<v Speaker 14>People are very familiar by now with ozembic, which is

1:03:12.280 --> 1:03:15.200
<v Speaker 14>a diabetes drug. That's the one that Jimmy Kimmel joked

1:03:15.200 --> 1:03:16.360
<v Speaker 14>about at the oscars.

1:03:17.040 --> 1:03:18.560
<v Speaker 9>But there are also drugs.

1:03:18.200 --> 1:03:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Called Everybody laughed or whether it was like deadpan, because

1:03:21.720 --> 1:03:22.200
<v Speaker 2>it was like.

1:03:25.760 --> 1:03:27.040
<v Speaker 9>Go ahead.

1:03:28.160 --> 1:03:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Well.

1:03:28.480 --> 1:03:31.560
<v Speaker 14>There are a number of perhaps less well known drugs,

1:03:31.600 --> 1:03:34.400
<v Speaker 14>including a new one called Munjaro that hasn't been formally

1:03:34.400 --> 1:03:37.040
<v Speaker 14>approved for obesity, but likely will in the next year.

1:03:37.520 --> 1:03:40.000
<v Speaker 14>There's also a drug called Wagovi, which was the first

1:03:40.000 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 14>sort of highly effective obesity drug approved in the US.

1:03:44.160 --> 1:03:44.800
<v Speaker 9>And what's really.

1:03:44.680 --> 1:03:48.640
<v Speaker 14>Interesting about them is, you know, these are drugs that

1:03:48.680 --> 1:03:52.000
<v Speaker 14>are helping people lose up to fifty pounds in some cases,

1:03:52.040 --> 1:03:54.480
<v Speaker 14>so they're way more effective than anything that had been

1:03:54.520 --> 1:03:57.880
<v Speaker 14>available for weight loss before. And it's getting a lot

1:03:57.880 --> 1:03:59.840
<v Speaker 14>of doctors and patients excited about it.

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:02.560
<v Speaker 7>So Bob, come in here, because we've all, i think,

1:04:02.640 --> 1:04:05.360
<v Speaker 7>heard in our lifetimes about a variety of different diet

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:08.800
<v Speaker 7>pills and ways to lose weight. Certainly as a woman

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:10.919
<v Speaker 7>growing up in the nineties heard about plenty of them.

1:04:11.240 --> 1:04:13.960
<v Speaker 7>How is ozembag wee goob, how is it different? And

1:04:13.960 --> 1:04:17.200
<v Speaker 7>what are the risks and the some of the benefits imotography.

1:04:17.280 --> 1:04:19.640
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, one of the really interesting things for me as

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:22.680
<v Speaker 12>I've been covering drug industry for decades and you know,

1:04:23.000 --> 1:04:25.240
<v Speaker 12>a b city weight loss that was kind of always

1:04:25.240 --> 1:04:28.080
<v Speaker 12>like a graveyard for drugs. Dragonnacity had been trying for

1:04:28.120 --> 1:04:29.840
<v Speaker 12>a long time to come up with drugs. There was

1:04:29.880 --> 1:04:32.000
<v Speaker 12>the kind of there were a whole bunch of safety

1:04:32.120 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 12>V calls. One of the most famous ones are infamous

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:37.040
<v Speaker 12>ones was fen Fenn back in the late nineties, where

1:04:37.040 --> 1:04:41.919
<v Speaker 12>one of the components caused heart problems. So BC drugs

1:04:41.960 --> 1:04:44.880
<v Speaker 12>for a long time and a bad reputation, and these ones,

1:04:44.920 --> 1:04:46.800
<v Speaker 12>you know, sort of came a little bit almost out

1:04:46.840 --> 1:04:49.480
<v Speaker 12>of left field. As Ema said, they were developed for diabetes,

1:04:49.840 --> 1:04:53.080
<v Speaker 12>and drug companies increasingly started, you know, noting noticing the

1:04:53.080 --> 1:04:55.520
<v Speaker 12>weight loss effects they were seeing. And as I started

1:04:55.560 --> 1:05:00.840
<v Speaker 12>testing the drugs in people that didn't have dietabetes. There

1:05:00.960 --> 1:05:05.160
<v Speaker 12>that were suffered from obesity but didn't have diabetes. They

1:05:05.200 --> 1:05:09.600
<v Speaker 12>started seeing even larger amounts of weight loss. So the

1:05:09.680 --> 1:05:12.640
<v Speaker 12>safety track record and diabetes is pretty good. Like all

1:05:12.680 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 12>drugs are not without risks, you know, but they do

1:05:14.760 --> 1:05:18.560
<v Speaker 12>have a number of side effects, including nausea, in vomiting,

1:05:18.760 --> 1:05:21.000
<v Speaker 12>and diarrhea potentially, So do have a bunch of gi

1:05:21.040 --> 1:05:23.360
<v Speaker 12>side effects and you actually have to tightrate them up slowly.

1:05:23.440 --> 1:05:25.600
<v Speaker 3>These are injectable drugs. It's not a simple pill. You

1:05:25.640 --> 1:05:28.840
<v Speaker 3>have to inject them, most of them weekly. Most of yeah,

1:05:28.880 --> 1:05:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the new ones are weekly.

1:05:30.200 --> 1:05:33.200
<v Speaker 12>And what's happened is as they've gotten to sort of

1:05:33.200 --> 1:05:36.280
<v Speaker 12>more potent, long acting ones, they've seen the anti obesity

1:05:36.320 --> 1:05:39.320
<v Speaker 12>effect increase, and that's when they've started to get some

1:05:39.320 --> 1:05:43.080
<v Speaker 12>of these dramatic weight loss. And the Eli Lemanjaro drug,

1:05:43.120 --> 1:05:46.760
<v Speaker 12>which is like the newest one, it's only approved for diabetes,

1:05:46.760 --> 1:05:49.240
<v Speaker 12>but Eli Lily is very soon going to seek approval

1:05:49.280 --> 1:05:51.280
<v Speaker 12>for obesity. That's the one that's showing some of the

1:05:51.320 --> 1:05:53.720
<v Speaker 12>most dramatic weight loss effects so far. And they just

1:05:53.760 --> 1:05:56.000
<v Speaker 12>had another positive study out today.

1:05:56.320 --> 1:06:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Why is it so expensive it's the billion dollar me.

1:06:00.400 --> 1:06:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we asked this so often about drugs,

1:06:02.680 --> 1:06:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and I know we do, but why is it especially

1:06:04.800 --> 1:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>it's been around for a while, right, I'm just curious,

1:06:07.320 --> 1:06:08.440
<v Speaker 2>why is it so expensive?

1:06:09.000 --> 1:06:11.080
<v Speaker 14>So some of these drugs are newer, and they are

1:06:11.120 --> 1:06:13.400
<v Speaker 14>the most expensive ones, so they are new.

1:06:13.480 --> 1:06:15.640
<v Speaker 9>They can't say they've been around for many years.

1:06:16.160 --> 1:06:16.320
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1:06:16.520 --> 1:06:19.320
<v Speaker 14>It's a difficult question, and we certainly asked the companies

1:06:19.360 --> 1:06:21.960
<v Speaker 14>about it, and we didn't get a super straight answer

1:06:22.000 --> 1:06:22.200
<v Speaker 14>on it.

1:06:22.240 --> 1:06:24.520
<v Speaker 9>I would say, I'm curious what Bob thinks about those.

1:06:25.280 --> 1:06:28.240
<v Speaker 12>Well, I've been asking drug companies about their pricing forever,

1:06:28.360 --> 1:06:31.520
<v Speaker 12>trug forever. You know, that is one question when you ask,

1:06:31.680 --> 1:06:35.760
<v Speaker 12>it's very very difficult to get. Like my senses, they

1:06:35.800 --> 1:06:37.840
<v Speaker 12>don't really tell you the real answer, like what happened

1:06:38.560 --> 1:06:40.160
<v Speaker 12>in the back room when they decided.

1:06:40.160 --> 1:06:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I have a brother who was in pharmacuticals for ever

1:06:42.200 --> 1:06:44.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty years and he was always like, listen, we do

1:06:44.040 --> 1:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>so much R and D, And I'm like, did I

1:06:45.480 --> 1:06:48.080
<v Speaker 2>ever come on? You also make a ton of money

1:06:48.080 --> 1:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>on stuff.

1:06:48.600 --> 1:06:50.920
<v Speaker 12>So but basically in the US, you know, it's a

1:06:50.960 --> 1:06:53.160
<v Speaker 12>free market drug companies and price they are drugs at

1:06:53.240 --> 1:06:55.880
<v Speaker 12>kind of whatever price they want. And these when they

1:06:55.920 --> 1:06:59.240
<v Speaker 12>came on the market as diabetes drugs, they were priced,

1:06:59.400 --> 1:07:01.360
<v Speaker 12>you know, fairly high.

1:07:01.400 --> 1:07:03.200
<v Speaker 3>And they and some of the pricing.

1:07:03.360 --> 1:07:05.520
<v Speaker 12>There's one that will Govi drug, which is a higher

1:07:05.560 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 12>dose version of zempic that Nova Nordis sells her obesity

1:07:08.440 --> 1:07:12.520
<v Speaker 12>they priced at an even higher price than ozempic. It's

1:07:12.680 --> 1:07:16.760
<v Speaker 12>exact different doses of the exact same you know, chemical compound,

1:07:17.320 --> 1:07:20.040
<v Speaker 12>but one is a higher price, the obesity one is

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:20.720
<v Speaker 12>a higher price.

1:07:20.960 --> 1:07:23.959
<v Speaker 14>Second interesting aspect of this is like when you look

1:07:24.000 --> 1:07:26.400
<v Speaker 14>at the sheer number of people who would be eligible

1:07:26.440 --> 1:07:28.360
<v Speaker 14>for these drugs in the US, it's more than one

1:07:28.400 --> 1:07:29.320
<v Speaker 14>hundred million.

1:07:29.080 --> 1:07:30.800
<v Speaker 9>People, right, So it's like it's massive.

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:33.520
<v Speaker 14>Why are the prices so high given that the market

1:07:33.600 --> 1:07:36.520
<v Speaker 14>opportunity is huge? And we actually talked to one of

1:07:36.560 --> 1:07:39.480
<v Speaker 14>the sort of foundational scientists in this field. His name

1:07:39.520 --> 1:07:42.320
<v Speaker 14>is Dan Drucker, and he was one of the guys

1:07:42.360 --> 1:07:45.680
<v Speaker 14>who helped discover these hormones in the body many many

1:07:45.760 --> 1:07:48.360
<v Speaker 14>years ago, and he said, you know, he's asked companies

1:07:48.360 --> 1:07:50.120
<v Speaker 14>over the years, why don't you just do, you know,

1:07:50.200 --> 1:07:52.400
<v Speaker 14>be the McDonald's in the space, which is kind of

1:07:52.400 --> 1:07:55.480
<v Speaker 14>an ironic comparison if you think about it. But you know,

1:07:55.520 --> 1:07:58.960
<v Speaker 14>why don't you come out with really cheaper versions of

1:07:59.000 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 14>these drugs and lots of people take them and you'll

1:08:00.920 --> 1:08:02.040
<v Speaker 14>still make a bunch of money.

1:08:02.400 --> 1:08:05.760
<v Speaker 2>And you're talking about one in three that's our population.

1:08:06.760 --> 1:08:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Of adults in the US have obesity.

1:08:09.040 --> 1:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So what's interesting too, And I feel like there's

1:08:11.600 --> 1:08:15.840
<v Speaker 2>a bigger, broader conversation when it comes to healthcare, right,

1:08:16.040 --> 1:08:18.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean being overweight we saw it in COVID like

1:08:18.400 --> 1:08:20.920
<v Speaker 2>that could make you more susceptible to not having a

1:08:20.920 --> 1:08:25.280
<v Speaker 2>great outcome. I mean, being overweight for most people causes

1:08:25.320 --> 1:08:27.320
<v Speaker 2>all these other problems. We know, it's a big reason

1:08:27.360 --> 1:08:31.240
<v Speaker 2>why there's so much diabetes. Where is the medical community,

1:08:31.280 --> 1:08:34.360
<v Speaker 2>where's the insurance community? I'm thinking about if we can

1:08:34.400 --> 1:08:37.640
<v Speaker 2>get people to be not so overweight that it's just

1:08:37.680 --> 1:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>better for their health, come, their their healthcare, their outcomes,

1:08:41.040 --> 1:08:42.400
<v Speaker 2>and also their health care costs.

1:08:42.479 --> 1:08:42.679
<v Speaker 11>Well.

1:08:42.760 --> 1:08:45.960
<v Speaker 14>One really important and interesting aspect of this is we

1:08:46.040 --> 1:08:49.200
<v Speaker 14>often blame weight for a lot of things in our society.

1:08:49.680 --> 1:08:52.400
<v Speaker 14>And it's interesting to look at this idea of BMI

1:08:52.560 --> 1:08:54.920
<v Speaker 14>and realize it's kind of imprecise. Right, it was supposed

1:08:54.960 --> 1:08:58.040
<v Speaker 14>to be kind of a population level measure, and instead

1:08:58.080 --> 1:09:00.760
<v Speaker 14>it's been applied to individuals. So if someone has a

1:09:00.760 --> 1:09:03.599
<v Speaker 14>certain weight, regardless of what their health looks like in

1:09:03.640 --> 1:09:07.880
<v Speaker 14>other aspects, they are obese just because of their BMI, right.

1:09:07.880 --> 1:09:10.000
<v Speaker 14>If you think about that, it's kind of an interesting aspect,

1:09:10.080 --> 1:09:12.840
<v Speaker 14>Like you could be totally healthy, have no diabetes, have

1:09:12.920 --> 1:09:16.200
<v Speaker 14>no high cholesterol, whatever, and you're still ill by some

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:19.000
<v Speaker 14>of these kind of modern standards. So it is kind

1:09:19.000 --> 1:09:22.400
<v Speaker 14>of a nuanced, complicated topic. While higher weights have been

1:09:22.479 --> 1:09:25.799
<v Speaker 14>really highly associated with lots of different diseases, it's important

1:09:25.840 --> 1:09:27.720
<v Speaker 14>to note that there are a lot of shades of

1:09:27.760 --> 1:09:31.639
<v Speaker 14>gray here. Another interesting aspect of this is like does.

1:09:31.560 --> 1:09:33.599
<v Speaker 2>That mean not as many people would really kind of

1:09:34.520 --> 1:09:36.200
<v Speaker 2>be eligible for these Well that's.

1:09:36.040 --> 1:09:38.559
<v Speaker 14>The kind of million, right, So if you think about it,

1:09:38.640 --> 1:09:42.439
<v Speaker 14>maybe not everyone who qualifies as overweight or obese is

1:09:42.520 --> 1:09:45.439
<v Speaker 14>necessarily going to be the best candidate for these drugs.

1:09:45.439 --> 1:09:48.719
<v Speaker 14>There's a big, kind of murky middle of people who

1:09:48.840 --> 1:09:51.400
<v Speaker 14>where it's not totally clear how big a danger than

1:09:51.439 --> 1:09:52.240
<v Speaker 14>they are we impose it.

1:09:52.600 --> 1:09:55.360
<v Speaker 12>This is a really important question here, So like the

1:09:55.479 --> 1:10:00.680
<v Speaker 12>risks of you know, suffering from obesity, uh, you know,

1:10:01.960 --> 1:10:03.760
<v Speaker 12>as opposed to someone's normal way. A lot of that

1:10:03.840 --> 1:10:06.960
<v Speaker 12>comes from epidemiological studies. You know, what's not been proven

1:10:07.040 --> 1:10:10.240
<v Speaker 12>over the long terms. If you take the weight off

1:10:10.600 --> 1:10:13.600
<v Speaker 12>with one of these drugs, you know, do you eliminate

1:10:13.720 --> 1:10:16.439
<v Speaker 12>all these like actual like risks like the risk of

1:10:16.520 --> 1:10:19.439
<v Speaker 12>heart disease and strokes and other like concrete you know,

1:10:19.960 --> 1:10:23.200
<v Speaker 12>snple downsides. They haven't actually proven that in trials right now.

1:10:23.240 --> 1:10:27.240
<v Speaker 12>It's not necessarily the case that you know, you'll get

1:10:27.240 --> 1:10:29.800
<v Speaker 12>all that benefit because these are epidemiology studies and your

1:10:30.000 --> 1:10:32.200
<v Speaker 12>you know, you're comparing risk factors, and there might be

1:10:32.280 --> 1:10:34.479
<v Speaker 12>other things that are different, you know, when they when

1:10:34.520 --> 1:10:36.280
<v Speaker 12>they do these complicated comparisons.

1:10:36.320 --> 1:10:37.320
<v Speaker 3>So the companies.

1:10:37.200 --> 1:10:39.599
<v Speaker 12>That that's what I'm sure say, that's what they say.

1:10:39.640 --> 1:10:42.200
<v Speaker 3>This is not proven. There's only really proven to take

1:10:42.200 --> 1:10:42.840
<v Speaker 3>off a lot of weight.

1:10:42.880 --> 1:10:45.120
<v Speaker 12>You haven't proven that it prevents a heart attack or

1:10:45.160 --> 1:10:47.160
<v Speaker 12>a stroke five years from now, and you.

1:10:47.040 --> 1:10:50.599
<v Speaker 7>Have to take it forever, seemingly to prevent the heart disease.

1:10:50.720 --> 1:10:53.320
<v Speaker 14>So the that's what the pharma companies are saying. That's

1:10:53.320 --> 1:10:55.479
<v Speaker 14>what the doctors are saying. There have been studies of

1:10:55.520 --> 1:10:58.040
<v Speaker 14>this new drug, wigov that show when people quit the

1:10:58.120 --> 1:11:01.759
<v Speaker 14>drug after a year the way comes back for most people.

1:11:02.479 --> 1:11:07.000
<v Speaker 14>So that is a big issue. Such an expensive drug

1:11:07.160 --> 1:11:10.080
<v Speaker 14>like this is possibly a lifelong thing, and it does

1:11:10.160 --> 1:11:12.720
<v Speaker 14>raise questions about, well, what is the side effect profile here?

1:11:12.760 --> 1:11:14.559
<v Speaker 9>We're not talking about taking something for a few months

1:11:14.600 --> 1:11:15.480
<v Speaker 9>or years.

1:11:15.160 --> 1:11:19.280
<v Speaker 7>Forever potentially does does insurance tend to cover it? If

1:11:19.400 --> 1:11:22.519
<v Speaker 7>you are at that BMI? Then what's what's the spread?

1:11:22.840 --> 1:11:25.360
<v Speaker 12>It's all over the place right now. We do a

1:11:25.400 --> 1:11:27.760
<v Speaker 12>lot of reporting this. It's all over the place right now.

1:11:27.800 --> 1:11:30.040
<v Speaker 12>And you know, whether you have access to one of

1:11:30.040 --> 1:11:32.360
<v Speaker 12>these drugs may kind of just depend on the luck

1:11:32.360 --> 1:11:34.680
<v Speaker 12>of the drawer and what your particular insurance company you

1:11:34.720 --> 1:11:38.840
<v Speaker 12>have to you end up at. But like basically three

1:11:38.920 --> 1:11:42.360
<v Speaker 12>quarters of state we surveyed all fifty states state medicaid programs,

1:11:42.360 --> 1:11:46.280
<v Speaker 12>three quarters the states have very little coverage for obesity drugs,

1:11:46.320 --> 1:11:49.160
<v Speaker 12>and you're roughly approx give or take a few three

1:11:49.240 --> 1:11:54.040
<v Speaker 12>quarters of private insurance generally don't cover obesity drugs either. Now,

1:11:54.120 --> 1:11:57.200
<v Speaker 12>the coverage we've found signs that the coverage is starting

1:11:57.240 --> 1:12:00.320
<v Speaker 12>to increase. For example, in Medicaid, eight different states told

1:12:00.400 --> 1:12:02.760
<v Speaker 12>us they're considering it. But this is like, this is

1:12:02.800 --> 1:12:04.280
<v Speaker 12>like the big battle that's going to be going on

1:12:04.360 --> 1:12:07.360
<v Speaker 12>the next year between the drug companies and the doctors

1:12:07.360 --> 1:12:10.759
<v Speaker 12>that favor more coverage and insurance companies.

1:12:10.760 --> 1:12:12.120
<v Speaker 3>That's like, that's like the big battle.

1:12:12.320 --> 1:12:14.720
<v Speaker 14>It was amazing to see how much coverage ranged in

1:12:14.720 --> 1:12:18.240
<v Speaker 14>this fifty state survey of Medicaid plans, which Medicaid covers

1:12:18.560 --> 1:12:21.080
<v Speaker 14>low income folks for health insurance. I mean, there was

1:12:21.160 --> 1:12:23.360
<v Speaker 14>one state that literally told us we will pay for

1:12:23.920 --> 1:12:27.400
<v Speaker 14>you know, some obesity drugs for people under the age

1:12:27.400 --> 1:12:30.000
<v Speaker 14>of twenty one, for young people, but not adults.

1:12:30.400 --> 1:12:34.080
<v Speaker 2>We're like, what, like, there's so much that, I mean,

1:12:34.080 --> 1:12:35.800
<v Speaker 2>what would make it much more clear? I just got

1:12:35.840 --> 1:12:37.920
<v Speaker 2>about thirty seconds. Is it some study that needs to

1:12:37.960 --> 1:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>be like, what is it? That would be like health

1:12:40.080 --> 1:12:41.840
<v Speaker 2>insurance would be like, yeah, we got to be in

1:12:41.880 --> 1:12:42.519
<v Speaker 2>on this or not.

1:12:42.600 --> 1:12:45.040
<v Speaker 12>The big studies, the most important studies that are coming

1:12:45.200 --> 1:12:47.720
<v Speaker 12>is that both Eli Lilly and Nova noordis, but they're

1:12:47.720 --> 1:12:51.040
<v Speaker 12>the two makers. They're studying their drugs in people with

1:12:51.080 --> 1:12:53.719
<v Speaker 12>a BC to show they can prevent heart attacks and strokes.

1:12:53.720 --> 1:12:56.320
<v Speaker 12>And you know, if they do that, if those studies succeed,

1:12:56.360 --> 1:12:58.240
<v Speaker 12>it's going to be much much harder for insurance to

1:12:58.280 --> 1:12:58.960
<v Speaker 12>deny coverage.

1:12:59.080 --> 1:13:01.120
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, and that's going to be a big, big thing

1:13:01.120 --> 1:13:03.080
<v Speaker 14>that's going to come in the next couple of months.

1:13:03.240 --> 1:13:05.760
<v Speaker 14>Heart disease is the leading killer of Americans, So this

1:13:05.840 --> 1:13:07.320
<v Speaker 14>is something with really high stakes.

1:13:07.360 --> 1:13:10.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, great story, guys. It is the cover of

1:13:10.600 --> 1:13:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business Week. As we said, it is out on newsstands.

1:13:13.520 --> 1:13:15.919
<v Speaker 2>It's already on the Bloomberg terminal and online at Bloomberg

1:13:15.920 --> 1:13:19.439
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash BusinessWeek. Emma Court and Bob Langreth, both

1:13:19.560 --> 1:13:21.840
<v Speaker 2>healthcare reporters here at Bloomberg News, joining us here in

1:13:21.840 --> 1:13:24.240
<v Speaker 2>our interactive broker story. Be sure to check it out.

1:13:24.240 --> 1:13:26.360
<v Speaker 2>It's also going to be in our weekend show on

1:13:26.400 --> 1:13:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

1:13:34.760 --> 1:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

1:13:38.400 --> 1:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays from two to five pm Eastern.

1:13:40.960 --> 1:13:44.280
<v Speaker 6>On Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business App, and you too.

1:13:44.560 --> 1:13:47.599
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live to our flagship New York station,

1:13:48.160 --> 1:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

1:13:52.320 --> 1:13:54.519
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, the new issue Bloomberg Business Week. It

1:13:54.560 --> 1:13:57.280
<v Speaker 2>is out, so too. Then is another pursuit section. And

1:13:57.439 --> 1:13:59.439
<v Speaker 2>got to say it's a great mix of gems, tequila

1:13:59.479 --> 1:14:02.439
<v Speaker 2>and backpack stay with us. We'll explain in just a moment.

1:14:02.640 --> 1:14:03.920
<v Speaker 9>I mean, what more could you need?

1:14:04.000 --> 1:14:05.439
<v Speaker 7>Right, We've got women leading the.

1:14:05.479 --> 1:14:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Charge to the gems and the tequila in the backpack.

1:14:07.600 --> 1:14:08.759
<v Speaker 7>Yes, exactly, it's perfect.

1:14:09.040 --> 1:14:09.599
<v Speaker 9>It's perfect.

1:14:09.680 --> 1:14:12.000
<v Speaker 7>We've got a woman leading the charge in the booming

1:14:12.040 --> 1:14:14.720
<v Speaker 7>business of tequila, a set of stylish backpacks they could

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:17.200
<v Speaker 7>take your purson's place. And an interview with the CEO

1:14:17.240 --> 1:14:20.840
<v Speaker 7>of Tiffany as the luxury jeweler debuts its newly renovated

1:14:20.880 --> 1:14:22.879
<v Speaker 7>flagship store in Midtown Manhattan.

1:14:22.920 --> 1:14:24.519
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to it with Chris rounds Or.

1:14:24.560 --> 1:14:26.920
<v Speaker 2>He's the editor Pursuits. He joins us. Now with a

1:14:26.960 --> 1:14:29.559
<v Speaker 2>look at the section, take us to Tiffany. I mean,

1:14:29.560 --> 1:14:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I've been walking under this scaffolding for three years.

1:14:32.880 --> 1:14:35.559
<v Speaker 16>Three years. The scaffolding is down. Finally.

1:14:35.760 --> 1:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, you were at the ribbon cutting, weren't you?

1:14:37.920 --> 1:14:38.679
<v Speaker 8>I was, Yes.

1:14:39.000 --> 1:14:43.320
<v Speaker 16>So Tiffany has been renovating their flagship store, which they

1:14:43.320 --> 1:14:46.040
<v Speaker 16>now call the Landmark on Fifth Avenue and fifty seventh Street,

1:14:46.479 --> 1:14:50.120
<v Speaker 16>for three years now, and they during that period of time,

1:14:50.160 --> 1:14:54.800
<v Speaker 16>Tiffany was acquired by LVMH, and so the LVMH people

1:14:54.880 --> 1:14:57.439
<v Speaker 16>kind of tore up the plans for what was happening,

1:14:57.520 --> 1:14:59.759
<v Speaker 16>and they redid it, and they brought in Peter Marino,

1:14:59.760 --> 1:15:01.960
<v Speaker 16>which which is an art who's an architect and designer

1:15:02.000 --> 1:15:04.120
<v Speaker 16>who they use on a lot of their other stores,

1:15:04.200 --> 1:15:07.400
<v Speaker 16>and it's he's a very like chic European sensibility. Sometimes

1:15:07.439 --> 1:15:10.760
<v Speaker 16>the stores are quite dark and romantic. But you walk

1:15:10.800 --> 1:15:13.439
<v Speaker 16>into the Tiffany store, So I went in yesterday and

1:15:14.600 --> 1:15:18.240
<v Speaker 16>it's just bright and huge, and I mean obviously full

1:15:18.240 --> 1:15:21.240
<v Speaker 16>of jewels, but you walk into the main floor and

1:15:21.280 --> 1:15:23.800
<v Speaker 16>it's got these big windows on the side that are

1:15:23.800 --> 1:15:28.080
<v Speaker 16>actually digital screens showing scenes of New York City. It

1:15:28.120 --> 1:15:30.759
<v Speaker 16>feels a little like an Apple store in that main floor,

1:15:30.800 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 16>like it's it's got that color and with all the screens.

1:15:34.040 --> 1:15:36.400
<v Speaker 16>But then you explore the floor the store and there's

1:15:36.400 --> 1:15:39.360
<v Speaker 16>ten stories, including a new box that they built on

1:15:39.360 --> 1:15:41.400
<v Speaker 16>the top, a glass box they called the Diamond on

1:15:41.439 --> 1:15:44.439
<v Speaker 16>the top, and it's just every floor is different. There's

1:15:44.479 --> 1:15:48.000
<v Speaker 16>incredible contemporary art. They've spent hundreds of millions of dollars

1:15:48.080 --> 1:15:51.240
<v Speaker 16>on this renovation and it just feels cool.

1:15:51.680 --> 1:15:54.479
<v Speaker 2>I have to say. The old store, although my heart

1:15:54.560 --> 1:15:56.599
<v Speaker 2>is breaking a little bit because it was so iconic,

1:15:56.960 --> 1:15:58.960
<v Speaker 2>but field story, like you could get off at the

1:15:59.000 --> 1:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>floor be like wait because they all did kind of

1:16:00.880 --> 1:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>look alike, even though okay, this was where the wedding

1:16:03.160 --> 1:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>stuff was or the silver or leg right, but so

1:16:06.240 --> 1:16:07.680
<v Speaker 2>every floor is kind of different now.

1:16:07.880 --> 1:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:16:08.200 --> 1:16:11.439
<v Speaker 16>So Angelina, who is our Paris based luxury reporter who

1:16:11.439 --> 1:16:14.320
<v Speaker 16>covers ALMH, is in New York this week and she

1:16:14.400 --> 1:16:17.120
<v Speaker 16>and I interviewed the CEO of Tiffany, Anthony Ladru, and

1:16:17.160 --> 1:16:18.880
<v Speaker 16>he said, Yeah, on the old in the old store,

1:16:18.920 --> 1:16:21.320
<v Speaker 16>you didn't know what floor you were on, so people

1:16:21.400 --> 1:16:24.080
<v Speaker 16>didn't spend a lot of time there, and people didn't know,

1:16:24.400 --> 1:16:27.120
<v Speaker 16>like didn't know how to explore it. And this now

1:16:27.200 --> 1:16:30.559
<v Speaker 16>it's like brightly colored. There's every floor is different. There's

1:16:30.640 --> 1:16:34.000
<v Speaker 16>VIP areas, there's like a you know, an area that

1:16:34.040 --> 1:16:36.759
<v Speaker 16>has like dishware and you know, silverware and all that stuff,

1:16:36.760 --> 1:16:39.760
<v Speaker 16>and there's like bags and accessories. It just feels like

1:16:39.760 --> 1:16:40.719
<v Speaker 16>there's a lot to explore.

1:16:40.880 --> 1:16:44.240
<v Speaker 7>You mentioned that it feels a little bit European. Do

1:16:44.320 --> 1:16:47.799
<v Speaker 7>you feel like they are embracing what New York luxury

1:16:48.080 --> 1:16:51.200
<v Speaker 7>is or do they not care to have to embrace

1:16:51.240 --> 1:16:52.040
<v Speaker 7>New York luxury.

1:16:52.320 --> 1:16:55.439
<v Speaker 16>It's definitely a very new York Institution, and it feels

1:16:55.479 --> 1:16:58.080
<v Speaker 16>that way, and there's New York sort of elements in

1:16:58.120 --> 1:17:00.439
<v Speaker 16>the design in addition to the scenes on the screens.

1:17:00.439 --> 1:17:02.479
<v Speaker 16>When you get a like you can see Central Park

1:17:02.479 --> 1:17:04.919
<v Speaker 16>from the top, there's a big there's a big apple

1:17:05.160 --> 1:17:08.080
<v Speaker 16>on one of the balconies, New York, you know. And

1:17:08.120 --> 1:17:11.040
<v Speaker 16>there's a Blue Box Cafe restaurant, which is you know,

1:17:11.160 --> 1:17:14.160
<v Speaker 16>a run by Danielle Blude, who is of course who

1:17:14.200 --> 1:17:16.439
<v Speaker 16>is French, but who is really a New York chef.

1:17:17.439 --> 1:17:19.320
<v Speaker 16>And so it does feel New Yorky, but it has

1:17:19.360 --> 1:17:23.639
<v Speaker 16>an extra layer of like sort of richness, like money

1:17:24.400 --> 1:17:26.960
<v Speaker 16>in all the contemporary art that's there. There's more than

1:17:27.000 --> 1:17:30.080
<v Speaker 16>one hundred million dollars with the contemporary art there, which

1:17:30.120 --> 1:17:32.719
<v Speaker 16>that is that feels like added to the New York stuff.

1:17:32.760 --> 1:17:34.360
<v Speaker 16>But to me, it did feel New Yorky.

1:17:34.600 --> 1:17:36.640
<v Speaker 2>You know What's interesting too, though it does sound like

1:17:36.680 --> 1:17:39.360
<v Speaker 2>they want to go even more high end. I mean,

1:17:39.360 --> 1:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>they've always had expensive stuff, but they've also had like

1:17:42.240 --> 1:17:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I talk about their silver and I say that with

1:17:44.479 --> 1:17:47.080
<v Speaker 2>much love, but it's been much more accessible, you know,

1:17:47.200 --> 1:17:49.479
<v Speaker 2>to folks. But it sounds like they're trying to go

1:17:49.920 --> 1:17:50.400
<v Speaker 2>to the moon.

1:17:50.560 --> 1:17:52.920
<v Speaker 16>They are and all the luxury brands have learned this

1:17:52.960 --> 1:17:55.880
<v Speaker 16>over the past few years. Like the air, the parts

1:17:55.880 --> 1:17:57.920
<v Speaker 16>of their business that are growing are the very high

1:17:58.000 --> 1:18:01.160
<v Speaker 16>end parts and the low end parts, the lower price

1:18:01.200 --> 1:18:03.880
<v Speaker 16>point parts which are much beloved to me, Like the

1:18:03.920 --> 1:18:08.000
<v Speaker 16>silver for example. Yeah, that's dropping off a bit, and

1:18:08.040 --> 1:18:09.679
<v Speaker 16>it's still very much there when you go to the store.

1:18:09.720 --> 1:18:12.879
<v Speaker 16>It's everywhere, but they have lowered the number of skews

1:18:12.920 --> 1:18:15.720
<v Speaker 16>so like product lines that they have in the silver range,

1:18:15.760 --> 1:18:18.880
<v Speaker 16>because people are spending less on the silver and they've

1:18:19.040 --> 1:18:22.080
<v Speaker 16>raised they've sort of making more very high and stuff.

1:18:22.320 --> 1:18:24.760
<v Speaker 16>And they're making a few new watches, the CEO told

1:18:24.840 --> 1:18:27.080
<v Speaker 16>us coming in the next year, and they're trying to

1:18:27.080 --> 1:18:29.760
<v Speaker 16>bring their watch business, which actually they had some entry

1:18:29.840 --> 1:18:32.240
<v Speaker 16>level watches. The new watches are like one hundred thousand

1:18:32.240 --> 1:18:34.479
<v Speaker 16>dollars five hundred thousand dollars. They're trying to bring them

1:18:34.520 --> 1:18:36.720
<v Speaker 16>up to the level of like the high jewelry, which

1:18:36.760 --> 1:18:38.799
<v Speaker 16>is for a very small number of people.

1:18:39.439 --> 1:18:41.439
<v Speaker 7>Do we know how much the renovation costs?

1:18:41.880 --> 1:18:45.200
<v Speaker 16>We asked, and they said that it was the most

1:18:45.280 --> 1:18:49.000
<v Speaker 16>expensive store renovation that they've ever done. And so some

1:18:49.000 --> 1:18:50.639
<v Speaker 16>some of the other stores that data's out there it's

1:18:50.640 --> 1:18:52.800
<v Speaker 16>in the hundreds of millions. We asked if it got

1:18:52.840 --> 1:18:55.160
<v Speaker 16>to a billion, and they said no, so somewhere in

1:18:55.200 --> 1:18:55.760
<v Speaker 16>the nine.

1:18:59.280 --> 1:19:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Well are they going to make their money back? I mean,

1:19:01.120 --> 1:19:03.920
<v Speaker 2>what's their expectations? You talked to the head, you know,

1:19:03.960 --> 1:19:05.360
<v Speaker 2>in terms of sales at this place.

1:19:05.560 --> 1:19:05.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:19:05.840 --> 1:19:08.320
<v Speaker 16>So it used to Tiffany Store, which by the way,

1:19:08.439 --> 1:19:10.360
<v Speaker 16>was like one of the top five landmarks to visit

1:19:10.400 --> 1:19:13.679
<v Speaker 16>in New York City before it was being renovated. Account

1:19:13.720 --> 1:19:16.839
<v Speaker 16>before the renovation accounted for ten percent of total global

1:19:16.880 --> 1:19:20.000
<v Speaker 16>Tiffany sales, which is a huge amount to have riding

1:19:20.040 --> 1:19:22.439
<v Speaker 16>on one store. There was a temporary store next door

1:19:22.520 --> 1:19:25.599
<v Speaker 16>during the renovation in the old Nike Sound that made

1:19:25.640 --> 1:19:28.840
<v Speaker 16>about two hundred million dollars a year, and Bernard Arnaut,

1:19:28.840 --> 1:19:32.320
<v Speaker 16>who owns LVMH earlier this year, said he expects to

1:19:32.360 --> 1:19:34.880
<v Speaker 16>double that in the news space. So that's sort of

1:19:34.920 --> 1:19:38.840
<v Speaker 16>aiming at four hundred million dollars a year at some point.

1:19:39.120 --> 1:19:41.960
<v Speaker 2>And they're looking to take this right and expand elsewhere, right,

1:19:42.040 --> 1:19:45.280
<v Speaker 2>and create more Tiffany locations, if you will, around the world.

1:19:45.479 --> 1:19:48.040
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, they're pretty global. They're already in China and Japan,

1:19:48.160 --> 1:19:49.880
<v Speaker 16>you know, create all the places that you need to

1:19:49.880 --> 1:19:51.639
<v Speaker 16>be Are there to do some of them. Yeah, they're

1:19:51.640 --> 1:19:53.720
<v Speaker 16>redoing some of the places. They're building a couple of

1:19:53.720 --> 1:19:56.439
<v Speaker 16>new places, maybe in Milan, maybe in Paris. And they're

1:19:56.439 --> 1:19:59.280
<v Speaker 16>also taking some of the design cues from the store

1:19:59.320 --> 1:20:01.479
<v Speaker 16>in New York and putting them in other places, like

1:20:01.479 --> 1:20:04.160
<v Speaker 16>the way that the displays are. But they do want

1:20:04.160 --> 1:20:05.599
<v Speaker 16>the New York store to be special.

1:20:05.640 --> 1:20:08.400
<v Speaker 2>They're not messing around with the little blue boxes, are they.

1:20:08.560 --> 1:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>No.

1:20:08.720 --> 1:20:11.080
<v Speaker 16>You go into the cafe and it's the blue Box Cafe,

1:20:11.120 --> 1:20:13.120
<v Speaker 16>as I said, and there's just like hundreds of blue

1:20:13.160 --> 1:20:16.280
<v Speaker 16>boxes hanging from the ceiling. And also all the contemporary

1:20:16.360 --> 1:20:18.439
<v Speaker 16>art in the store, or most of it is blue.

1:20:18.560 --> 1:20:21.280
<v Speaker 16>It's like tiffany blue, like a basqueyacht, a Daniel Arsham.

1:20:21.640 --> 1:20:22.960
<v Speaker 16>It's very like all of a piece.

1:20:22.960 --> 1:20:24.559
<v Speaker 2>Should we ask about the one piece of art?

1:20:24.800 --> 1:20:27.280
<v Speaker 16>Oh, well you can. We can't talk about it, Oh

1:20:27.320 --> 1:20:31.599
<v Speaker 16>we can, Okay, we not. In our reporting we had

1:20:31.720 --> 1:20:35.280
<v Speaker 16>people had asked us if Bernard Arnaut was the buyer

1:20:35.520 --> 1:20:40.439
<v Speaker 16>of a Marilyn Monroe Andy Warhol painting from nineteen sixty

1:20:40.439 --> 1:20:43.760
<v Speaker 16>four called shot Sage Blue Marylynd which Larry Goes in

1:20:43.800 --> 1:20:46.320
<v Speaker 16>the art Dealer, who is friendly with our no bought

1:20:46.400 --> 1:20:48.479
<v Speaker 16>last year at auction for one hundred and ninety five

1:20:48.520 --> 1:20:52.439
<v Speaker 16>million dollars. Now that is the most expensive sale at

1:20:52.439 --> 1:20:54.960
<v Speaker 16>auction for any American artist and the second most expensive

1:20:55.040 --> 1:20:57.719
<v Speaker 16>art sale of all time, behind the Leonardo da Vinci

1:20:57.760 --> 1:21:00.920
<v Speaker 16>salvead Armundi. And it once painting was bought, it went

1:21:00.960 --> 1:21:03.439
<v Speaker 16>away and no one knew where it went, and so

1:21:03.439 --> 1:21:05.559
<v Speaker 16>people were playing it. Did Steve Cohen get it? Did

1:21:05.560 --> 1:21:07.960
<v Speaker 16>Bernard or No get it? And then when we started

1:21:07.960 --> 1:21:09.679
<v Speaker 16>seeing the art that was in the Tiffany store, which

1:21:09.680 --> 1:21:12.040
<v Speaker 16>is all Tiffany blue, and this Maryland Maryland is an

1:21:12.080 --> 1:21:16.160
<v Speaker 16>almost Tiffany blue amazing, we had to ask and the

1:21:16.200 --> 1:21:19.600
<v Speaker 16>CEO said, oh, no comment, So we'll see.

1:21:20.120 --> 1:21:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Wait for that unveiling. Just got a few minutes left here.

1:21:22.920 --> 1:21:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Backpacks and tequila. There's the cover stories tequila just quickly.

1:21:28.400 --> 1:21:31.240
<v Speaker 2>It's about women really calling the tequila shots.

1:21:31.240 --> 1:21:34.240
<v Speaker 16>But I'm bumm, yeah, we had to do shots pun

1:21:34.320 --> 1:21:36.280
<v Speaker 16>so in you know, there's tequila has a bunch of

1:21:36.360 --> 1:21:38.200
<v Speaker 16>rules in Mexico. It can only come from certain places

1:21:38.280 --> 1:21:42.280
<v Speaker 16>and mescal as well. And it was it's a long

1:21:42.360 --> 1:21:44.599
<v Speaker 16>running industry and for a long time it was very

1:21:44.640 --> 1:21:47.800
<v Speaker 16>male dominated, and then when corporations started coming in and

1:21:47.840 --> 1:21:50.559
<v Speaker 16>buying up a lot of these these businesses, it became

1:21:50.640 --> 1:21:53.559
<v Speaker 16>more male dominated rather than less. And so there's a

1:21:53.560 --> 1:21:56.320
<v Speaker 16>bunch of leaders in the community who are starting their

1:21:56.360 --> 1:21:58.840
<v Speaker 16>own like her company, the tequila companies, met or taking

1:21:58.840 --> 1:22:03.080
<v Speaker 16>over family Mescal company, leading these businesses. And Eva Longoria

1:22:03.280 --> 1:22:05.880
<v Speaker 16>from the US is an investor in one of the

1:22:06.080 --> 1:22:09.320
<v Speaker 16>sort of female led ones. So it's a cool time, all.

1:22:09.280 --> 1:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, And just real quickly, backpacks that we may want

1:22:11.840 --> 1:22:13.439
<v Speaker 2>and an oyster we may not want.

1:22:13.680 --> 1:22:16.800
<v Speaker 16>Yes, according to Crater, there's you got to read the

1:22:16.800 --> 1:22:19.160
<v Speaker 16>review Kate's review the Kelly Oyster.

1:22:18.920 --> 1:22:20.960
<v Speaker 7>In Lovemon, which is actually loves so much.

1:22:21.080 --> 1:22:23.479
<v Speaker 16>I know it was nine pounds for an oyster, which

1:22:23.520 --> 1:22:24.240
<v Speaker 16>is a lot.

1:22:24.960 --> 1:22:27.240
<v Speaker 2>And it doesn't even look like an oyster. So Kate,

1:22:27.320 --> 1:22:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I feel your pain.

1:22:28.280 --> 1:22:28.960
<v Speaker 9>I feel your pain.

1:22:29.040 --> 1:22:31.160
<v Speaker 2>You got to read through her article. And backpacks. I

1:22:31.200 --> 1:22:32.799
<v Speaker 2>have to say, I love backpacks.

1:22:32.800 --> 1:22:34.880
<v Speaker 16>It's very much a trend among women in New York

1:22:34.920 --> 1:22:37.759
<v Speaker 16>and everywhere is functional, stylish backpacks.

1:22:37.800 --> 1:22:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this way you don't have to have a bag.

1:22:39.240 --> 1:22:40.559
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to have a bag to carry your

1:22:40.560 --> 1:22:42.200
<v Speaker 2>stuff in a little bag. To like kind of look

1:22:42.640 --> 1:22:43.680
<v Speaker 2>like pulled together.

1:22:43.439 --> 1:22:44.920
<v Speaker 7>And you always make me spend money.

1:22:45.040 --> 1:22:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Chris like about to go by my mission packs really

1:22:50.120 --> 1:22:52.960
<v Speaker 2>good stuff and fun to go through it all with you. That,

1:22:53.040 --> 1:22:56.160
<v Speaker 2>of course, is the editor of Bloomberg Pursuits, Chris Rouser. Chris,

1:22:56.160 --> 1:22:56.400
<v Speaker 2>thank you.

1:22:56.439 --> 1:23:00.200
<v Speaker 1>As always, you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Punks.

1:23:00.560 --> 1:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live weekdays from two to five pm Eastern

1:23:03.600 --> 1:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business App, and YouTube. You

1:23:07.360 --> 1:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>can also listen live to our flagship New York station,

1:23:10.800 --> 1:23:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

1:23:15.040 --> 1:23:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Well. The Milkin Institute Annual Global Conference gets underway next week,

1:23:18.200 --> 1:23:21.280
<v Speaker 2>bringing together leaders in finance, business wellness, and more, a

1:23:21.360 --> 1:23:23.760
<v Speaker 2>variety of minds working to tackle the most urgent and

1:23:23.880 --> 1:23:27.400
<v Speaker 2>really to realize the most exciting opportunities that are out there.

1:23:27.520 --> 1:23:29.719
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and the event gives our Bloomberg teams a chance

1:23:29.760 --> 1:23:33.000
<v Speaker 7>to dig deep, especially into the day's big financial and

1:23:33.080 --> 1:23:36.719
<v Speaker 7>market concerns and the bigger trends of our time. So Carol,

1:23:36.800 --> 1:23:40.080
<v Speaker 7>you're going to be there along with Bloomberg TV's Romain Bostik,

1:23:40.080 --> 1:23:42.320
<v Speaker 7>and Romaine joins us now for a preview of what

1:23:42.360 --> 1:23:44.679
<v Speaker 7>we might expect romain very exciting.

1:23:44.720 --> 1:23:45.439
<v Speaker 6>What are you saying?

1:23:46.240 --> 1:23:47.840
<v Speaker 17>Well, what I'm expecting this is I think this is

1:23:47.880 --> 1:23:49.600
<v Speaker 17>actually going to be a big one, right because we

1:23:49.640 --> 1:23:51.639
<v Speaker 17>talk about where we are in the economy right now,

1:23:51.680 --> 1:23:54.880
<v Speaker 17>this inflection point, and where we're potentially going. The lineup

1:23:54.920 --> 1:23:56.840
<v Speaker 17>that you see at this conference, the folks that we're

1:23:56.840 --> 1:24:00.120
<v Speaker 17>going to have on Bloomberg Television and radio on the panels,

1:24:00.320 --> 1:24:03.439
<v Speaker 17>they are the economy. We talk so much about the big,

1:24:03.479 --> 1:24:06.160
<v Speaker 17>gigantic banks, but we kind of forget there's this layer

1:24:06.240 --> 1:24:09.280
<v Speaker 17>right underneath that we talk about private credit, private equity

1:24:09.960 --> 1:24:13.280
<v Speaker 17>that are really financing most of the businesses out there

1:24:13.320 --> 1:24:13.880
<v Speaker 17>in our commy.

1:24:13.920 --> 1:24:16.479
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's kind of interesting because we've got guests

1:24:16.520 --> 1:24:18.840
<v Speaker 2>on this week on the Weekend Show, Josh Rosner and

1:24:18.920 --> 1:24:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Gretchen Morgenson who have a new book out, and they

1:24:20.960 --> 1:24:23.679
<v Speaker 2>basically are saying that private equity is wrecking America.

1:24:23.840 --> 1:24:25.439
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I mean, I think we all have those fears.

1:24:25.439 --> 1:24:27.519
<v Speaker 17>I mean, we've seen kind of the takeover of so much,

1:24:27.560 --> 1:24:29.920
<v Speaker 17>but there's also a big question there as to if

1:24:29.920 --> 1:24:32.439
<v Speaker 17>they weren't there, who would have financed it. We talked

1:24:32.479 --> 1:24:35.160
<v Speaker 17>so much about kind of shadow banking, and it's always

1:24:35.240 --> 1:24:37.960
<v Speaker 17>used as this sort of almost an insult, right, it's

1:24:37.960 --> 1:24:41.280
<v Speaker 17>something dangerous, But you forget that shadow banking exists because

1:24:41.280 --> 1:24:43.599
<v Speaker 17>there was a void in our economy that the JP

1:24:43.680 --> 1:24:45.760
<v Speaker 17>Morgans didn't want to take. They felt like it wasn't

1:24:45.800 --> 1:24:48.000
<v Speaker 17>worth their while. They wanted to focus on something much

1:24:48.080 --> 1:24:51.320
<v Speaker 17>higher level. But you still had these middle market businesses

1:24:51.479 --> 1:24:55.160
<v Speaker 17>that needed funding, and it was private equity, private debt

1:24:55.200 --> 1:24:58.120
<v Speaker 17>markets that stepped in to actually finance them, and for

1:24:58.240 --> 1:25:00.360
<v Speaker 17>better or for worse, I don't know, maybe ends up

1:25:00.400 --> 1:25:01.920
<v Speaker 17>being our doom, but at least for right now, it's

1:25:01.960 --> 1:25:02.880
<v Speaker 17>kind of keeping us afloat.

1:25:02.880 --> 1:25:04.519
<v Speaker 2>I always think about that the flip side, right, that

1:25:04.560 --> 1:25:06.720
<v Speaker 2>middle market we talk we don't really talk about it

1:25:06.760 --> 1:25:08.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot, I feel like always at Bloomberg, but it's

1:25:08.720 --> 1:25:11.120
<v Speaker 2>such an important part of kind of the economic activity

1:25:11.120 --> 1:25:13.599
<v Speaker 2>that goes on. And you do think about those companies

1:25:13.600 --> 1:25:16.240
<v Speaker 2>that maybe couldn't access capital and would just not be

1:25:16.320 --> 1:25:18.479
<v Speaker 2>around anymore. So you do think about the role of

1:25:18.520 --> 1:25:19.120
<v Speaker 2>private equity.

1:25:19.280 --> 1:25:20.960
<v Speaker 17>Well, yeah, and there's a reason for that. I mean,

1:25:21.000 --> 1:25:22.720
<v Speaker 17>the folks you talk to a milk and these are

1:25:22.760 --> 1:25:24.720
<v Speaker 17>the people who really kind of have their hands in

1:25:24.760 --> 1:25:27.120
<v Speaker 17>the ground and the soil, so to speak. You talk about,

1:25:27.160 --> 1:25:30.040
<v Speaker 17>you know, the heads of Apollo, Mark Rowan, you talk

1:25:30.080 --> 1:25:32.679
<v Speaker 17>about Ann Walsh over at Guggenheim, You talk about Katie

1:25:32.720 --> 1:25:35.639
<v Speaker 17>Koch over at TCW. You know all of these big

1:25:35.680 --> 1:25:39.639
<v Speaker 17>firms Blue oul Aris, Capital, Cressing, Capital, b and Y Melon.

1:25:39.560 --> 1:25:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Jane Fraser of Geasure of a City Group.

1:25:43.520 --> 1:25:45.599
<v Speaker 17>You know, these are the people that, for better for worse,

1:25:45.640 --> 1:25:48.639
<v Speaker 17>are effectively kind of managing our economy to a certain extent,

1:25:48.720 --> 1:25:50.600
<v Speaker 17>or at least a certain pocket of that economy, and

1:25:50.680 --> 1:25:53.240
<v Speaker 17>you want to know what they're thinking. And one thing too,

1:25:53.240 --> 1:25:53.800
<v Speaker 17>also I like.

1:25:53.760 --> 1:25:55.519
<v Speaker 2>About this is the FED meeting while we're out there.

1:25:55.720 --> 1:25:57.400
<v Speaker 17>The FED meeting is actually going to overlap, so we're

1:25:57.439 --> 1:25:59.200
<v Speaker 17>going to get a lot of commentary on that. But

1:25:59.240 --> 1:26:01.920
<v Speaker 17>also we talk about all the sort of the money managers,

1:26:01.920 --> 1:26:04.519
<v Speaker 17>the investors, the bankers who are there. We forget there's

1:26:04.520 --> 1:26:07.360
<v Speaker 17>a whole cross section of other industries represented, CEOs from

1:26:07.400 --> 1:26:09.760
<v Speaker 17>other companies. We're gonna actually be interviewing the CEO of

1:26:09.800 --> 1:26:13.200
<v Speaker 17>Mandali's Camera is a huge chemical company. Uh, We're going

1:26:13.280 --> 1:26:15.360
<v Speaker 17>to interview a lot of folks in from the VC world.

1:26:15.600 --> 1:26:17.519
<v Speaker 17>And there's a lot of talk right now about just

1:26:17.560 --> 1:26:20.799
<v Speaker 17>the health of the California economy of the big exodus.

1:26:20.800 --> 1:26:23.519
<v Speaker 17>We've seen of certain businesses and certain residents looking for

1:26:23.960 --> 1:26:26.800
<v Speaker 17>more favorable business environment. So we're going to talk to

1:26:27.080 --> 1:26:29.439
<v Speaker 17>a lot of local officials there kind of about the

1:26:29.439 --> 1:26:30.520
<v Speaker 17>health of the economy.

1:26:30.200 --> 1:26:31.599
<v Speaker 2>There, all right, So maybe we'll talk to each other

1:26:31.600 --> 1:26:32.280
<v Speaker 2>always we might.

1:26:32.320 --> 1:26:33.640
<v Speaker 17>And you know there's a big concert too, you know,

1:26:33.800 --> 1:26:34.760
<v Speaker 17>the big headliner.

1:26:34.520 --> 1:26:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Is how do I not know about this?

1:26:37.720 --> 1:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm yeah, you.

1:26:41.360 --> 1:26:42.200
<v Speaker 17>Didn't get an invite?

1:26:42.360 --> 1:26:45.360
<v Speaker 7>Oh sorry, okay, okay, well you know what we're going

1:26:45.439 --> 1:26:49.800
<v Speaker 7>to hear? IP section are your VIP.

1:26:50.880 --> 1:26:53.240
<v Speaker 2>I got to talk to people you get there. It's

1:26:53.240 --> 1:26:54.920
<v Speaker 2>all the good stuff you talk to I'll talk to

1:26:54.920 --> 1:26:57.360
<v Speaker 2>miss ye. Yeah, thanks for that, fuddy.

1:26:57.760 --> 1:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

1:27:02.560 --> 1:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

1:27:06.080 --> 1:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>weekday starting at two pm Eastern.

1:27:08.080 --> 1:27:11.439
<v Speaker 6>On Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and

1:27:11.520 --> 1:27:12.800
<v Speaker 6>the Bloomberg Business App.

1:27:12.960 --> 1:27:15.679
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live on Bloomberg Quick Take

1:27:15.880 --> 1:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.