Speaker 1: All right, Happy Friday, Glad you are with us eight
Speaker 1: hundred nine for one sewn you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. By the way, I want to
Speaker 1: say thanks to Rush. Last night it was his thirty
Speaker 1: first anniversary and he was on Hannity. I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: getting the early numbers were massive in terms of viewership,
Speaker 1: but more importantly, you know, I said it last night
Speaker 1: when he started Linda, we know less than two hundred
Speaker 1: talk stations. Talk and news talk is the number one
Speaker 1: format in all of radio, and a lot of it.
Speaker 1: He's all, you know what I do stand. I said
Speaker 1: this last night. I said, I do seek similarities with
Speaker 1: Trump and Russian in this regard, and Rushi kind of
Speaker 1: dismissed it. We don't. We don't need to get elected.
Speaker 1: We don't need fifty percent of people to for us
Speaker 1: to be successful. And he's right about that. But being
Speaker 1: a conservative M on radio, TV and the qualities that
Speaker 1: I want now more than ever, and I don't see
Speaker 1: in Republicans enough is I want people that say what
Speaker 1: they mean, mean what they say, and I want people
Speaker 1: that you gotta be able. If you're gonna jump in
Speaker 1: this arena, you have to be able to take a
Speaker 1: hard punch. You just do. If you can't, you're in
Speaker 1: the wrong business. And so many I'm just gonna stick
Speaker 1: with Republicans with Democrats are just as bad. They just
Speaker 1: they get to Washington, maybe with the greatest intentions and
Speaker 1: all the great promises, and then they get hit the
Speaker 1: first time and it's like they submit that tapping out
Speaker 1: and I'm like, what happened to you? You know? We
Speaker 1: know what a perfect example of that is is Sassy
Speaker 1: ass over in Nebraska. That guy had so much promise
Speaker 1: and look at what a jerky's turned out to be.
Speaker 1: And frankly, we went to bat for him, and I'm
Speaker 1: embarrassed I went to bat for that guy after what
Speaker 1: he's done. And the similarities with Russian Trump are they
Speaker 1: both have absorbed many, many, many punches and rushing the
Speaker 1: early years and talk rad it just took them all
Speaker 1: and it made it easier for guys like me to follow,
Speaker 1: and Mark the great one, Mark Levin and others, and
Speaker 1: there's so many local guys lars and I can't mention
Speaker 1: that Joe Paggs. If I don't mention everybody, people get
Speaker 1: mad at me. I love you all, and even people
Speaker 1: that hate me. There's some people in this business. They
Speaker 1: can't get over to the competitive nature of the business.
Speaker 1: They just hate They just whatever. I want them to succeed,
Speaker 1: if they're if they're gonna be a spoken the wheel
Speaker 1: that advances conservatism, I'm in. I don't care what you
Speaker 1: say about me. I'm not about me. It's about the country,
Speaker 1: it's about us, it's about you know the Have you
Speaker 1: ever seen have you ever witnessed somebody get hit as
Speaker 1: hard as often as Donald Trump? Well that was Russian
Speaker 1: the early days. But the thing is Trump just fights
Speaker 1: hard every single day. He gives one hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: percent every single day. The thing I would say to
Speaker 1: my kids when they were young and playing sports is
Speaker 1: I never said you have to win. That never came
Speaker 1: out of my mouth. But I always wanted two things.
Speaker 1: I wanted effort. I wanted a full effort and a
Speaker 1: good attitude about it, win or lose. And you know
Speaker 1: it's sports is mirror's life in a lot of ways,
Speaker 1: especially individual sports, and you're gonna learn from your mistakes,
Speaker 1: and you learn probably more from losses than you do
Speaker 1: from wins. Look at the life of Abraham Lincoln and
Speaker 1: I just want the Republican Party to stop being so
Speaker 1: afraid to take a hit. You got you can't You
Speaker 1: can't lead if you can't take a punch. And then
Speaker 1: I want you to put one hundred percent in to
Speaker 1: fight every day to fulfill your promises. Now, the people
Speaker 1: that I see in Washington that consistently do that are
Speaker 1: the Freedom Caucus guys. And guess who gets attacked the most.
Speaker 1: The Freedom Caucus guys. They can take a punch and
Speaker 1: they just keep going. You know, we're on the radio
Speaker 1: three hours a day, on TV once a night. Thanks
Speaker 1: to all of you, we have the number one again
Speaker 1: Cable show and all of cable news by a lot,
Speaker 1: you know, which is now a few years A kid
Speaker 1: with O'Reilly sometimes when he's on the show, I'm like,
Speaker 1: all right, you go back to Cable. I'll give you
Speaker 1: the number one slot back. You can take all the
Speaker 1: crap that goes along with it, because there's a lot
Speaker 1: of crap that goes along with being, you know, in
Speaker 1: that position. I don't misunderstand me. I am honored, I
Speaker 1: am blessed beyond measure. Rush brought this up last night,
Speaker 1: and we're very lucky to be able to do what
Speaker 1: we do. And we only can do this because of
Speaker 1: all of you in the audience. But I just want
Speaker 1: to acknowledge thirty one years of being in an arena
Speaker 1: and getting hit and getting punched and taking on all
Speaker 1: comers and just keep pushing on. You know. It's like
Speaker 1: Rocky with his son, It's not about how hard you
Speaker 1: get hit. It's about how hard you can get hit
Speaker 1: and keep moving on, keep pushing forward. It's true in life.
Speaker 1: Why has Rocky touched so many hearts and souls? That
Speaker 1: franchise is phenomenal? Go back? Why if you haven't watched it,
Speaker 1: watched it? Watch it? You know if you can. You
Speaker 1: know I've now trained. I think what is a year?
Speaker 1: I think since I was fifty or fifty one, I
Speaker 1: think of my seventh year training mixed martial arts, and
Speaker 1: I talk about it. Everyone on my team makes fun
Speaker 1: of me for it, and it's a It's an eclectic
Speaker 1: blend of different arts. It's crabmac good, it's it's kempo,
Speaker 1: it's Brazilian jiu jitsu, it's boxing, it's blades, firearms, sticks,
Speaker 1: it's basically situational street fighting. And we have certain designated days.
Speaker 1: I do it for five days a week, depending on
Speaker 1: what my schedules like. But I try to do it
Speaker 1: an hour, fifteen minutes, hour and a half every day.
Speaker 1: And we do have something called pain date. And the
Speaker 1: guy that teaches me my sense, we don't like to
Speaker 1: give his real name out. We just refer to him
Speaker 1: his sense and and this is he listened. He has
Speaker 1: black belts in so many varying arts. He is a killer,
Speaker 1: this guy with his bare hands, I'm telling you beyond
Speaker 1: anything you've ever seen. And he's my age, and he's strong,
Speaker 1: and he's dance. In all these years, I built muscle
Speaker 1: I never had in my life. Remember when Reagan got
Speaker 1: shot and he said, I started working on I never
Speaker 1: thought I could build muscles. I can. And you know
Speaker 1: between the core building and the and you know, two
Speaker 1: hundred push ups a day, two hundred sit ups at
Speaker 1: et cetera. But we do pain day. And what's pain day?
Speaker 1: Pain day is I literally stand there, tighten up my gut,
Speaker 1: and he hits me, and he always drops me on
Speaker 1: the fifth shot. Why you know? Then I put my
Speaker 1: arms straight out and he pounds them for calcification and density.
Speaker 1: There's all sorts of reasons and why does he do it?
Speaker 1: Because if I can't take a punch in practice, I'm
Speaker 1: not going to be able to take a punch if
Speaker 1: something ever happens. You can't be in a street fight
Speaker 1: and get hit and just collapse and have any chance
Speaker 1: of winning. I'm not looking for street fights, but doing
Speaker 1: more for exercise than anything else. Anyway, back to that,
Speaker 1: glad you with us, by the way, President Trump, fake fraud, medium,
Speaker 1: mob race painting overdrive. Trump is a racist. Trump is
Speaker 1: a racist because he told the truth about Baltimore. Well,
Speaker 1: the President getting himself involved in this guy, what's his name,
Speaker 1: Rocky the rapper, I don't even know who he is,
Speaker 1: Asap Rocky, Asap Rocky. He's been released from Swedish custody
Speaker 1: and as we wait for a verdict in his trial,
Speaker 1: sounds like he won't ever be around to hear the
Speaker 1: verdict because the President tweeted earlier today asap Rocky released
Speaker 1: from prison on his way home to the US from Sweden.
Speaker 1: So get him home as quick as possible. Just don't
Speaker 1: go back. I want to start with good news today.
Speaker 1: What is good news? Well, we've got a record number
Speaker 1: of Americans working the remember of the statistics that threw
Speaker 1: out still use them. People accuse me of being repetitive.
Speaker 1: I do it very strategically. It's a tactical thing. If
Speaker 1: I'm in an election year, I want everybody to be
Speaker 1: able to repeat my list. Thirteen million more Americans on
Speaker 1: food stamps, eight million more in poverty, the lowest labor
Speaker 1: participation rate since the seventies. Remember I said that all
Speaker 1: through twenty sixteen. Yeah, we now have set a record
Speaker 1: this month of Americans. The number of people employed in
Speaker 1: this country hit a record one hundred and fifty seven million,
Speaker 1: two hundred and eighty eight thousand in July. Now here's
Speaker 1: an even better story. Well, we find out that the
Speaker 1: president created sixteen thousand new manufacturing jobs just in the
Speaker 1: last month, the best number in manufacturing since January. Here's
Speaker 1: another great statistic. Black employment in this country African Americans
Speaker 1: in July nineteen million, four hundred and eighty one thousand.
Speaker 1: That is the highest number ever recorded since they started
Speaker 1: tallying the data in nineteen seventy two. Now, I know
Speaker 1: that the president gets attacked, and you know the President's no,
Speaker 1: the President's not racist. Why is it that during the
Speaker 1: compassionate years where liberals are in charge of the economy
Speaker 1: and everything else. And they have a monopoly of compassion
Speaker 1: for every demographic group out there, African Americans, Asian Americans,
Speaker 1: Hispanic Americans, women in the workplace, youth, unemployment. Why is
Speaker 1: it their policies lead to poverty? Why is it that
Speaker 1: we add thirteen million Americans to food stamps and another
Speaker 1: eight million Americans into poverty? How is it Trump creates
Speaker 1: seven million new jobs in all of those demographics. We
Speaker 1: have record high, record setting employment, seven million fewer people
Speaker 1: now on food stamps, seven million jobs have been created,
Speaker 1: and we have seven and a half million jobs available
Speaker 1: right now. That means jobs to be filled by Americans.
Speaker 1: And we haven't even touched You want to talk about
Speaker 1: raising the standard of living of every American, wait till
Speaker 1: we get rolling with energy. I keep telling you it's
Speaker 1: going to be It's gonna be like a gold rush
Speaker 1: for the United States if we do this right. And
Speaker 1: you know how common Manufacturing is coming back. Manufacturing is
Speaker 1: coming back in Ohio and Michigan and Wisconsin, in Pennsylvania, Yeah,
Speaker 1: the four key states that will determine who's the next president.
Speaker 1: Why is it coming back? Why did Joe's jobs go away? Well,
Speaker 1: you can argue unions on one level in Detroit and
Speaker 1: an auto manufacturer, but put that aside. The other is
Speaker 1: the standards that were set by bureaucrats in Washington, in
Speaker 1: other words, the burdensome regulation. Every time they pass the regulation, well,
Speaker 1: the car companies now have to pay that much more
Speaker 1: to produce their products and makes them less competitive. And
Speaker 1: then the next step is and they tax them into oblivion.
Speaker 1: To the point they say, the how with this. We
Speaker 1: don't have these regulations in Mexico. We don't have these
Speaker 1: regulations in Central America. We don't have these regulations else where.
Speaker 1: We don't have these taxes else where we can make
Speaker 1: a bigger profit. We'd rather have the jobs. And we
Speaker 1: don't want to mothball this huge, beautiful factory that's been
Speaker 1: an existence since the Model T. But we're gonna have to.
Speaker 1: That's what Trump has done. And who's benefiting, well, the
Speaker 1: working man and women. What do we call them in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, the forgotten men and women of this country?
Speaker 1: What is that painting in my studio that I look
Speaker 1: at every day, gootten Man by John McNaughton. He's a
Speaker 1: painter McNaughton. That's what I said, and he's a he's
Speaker 1: an artist, and I want that because I kind of
Speaker 1: identified with the forgotten man that was my whole life.
Speaker 1: Never grew up with a silver spoon in my mouth.
Speaker 1: I had to work for everything and financially independence. And
Speaker 1: I'm ten. And when I dropped out of school because
Speaker 1: I had no more money, my parents were furious, screaming,
Speaker 1: want it. I'm going to work. I'll make money and
Speaker 1: then I'll go back, which I did and I ran
Speaker 1: out of money again and and didn't finish. But they
Speaker 1: were furious. They said, we'll get you the money. They
Speaker 1: didn't have the money. I wasn't going to take their
Speaker 1: retirement money. I'm like, no freaking way, I'm not taking
Speaker 1: your money. And that's what they were getting at, and
Speaker 1: I'm like, no, I'm not doing it. So, you know,
Speaker 1: I went to work, and you know, I think being
Speaker 1: a blue collar worker for twenty years of my life,
Speaker 1: it made me until the person I am. Best thing
Speaker 1: that ever happened. All right, as we were all along
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity Show, A right, So we got record numbers
Speaker 1: of Americans employed, another record set for African American unemployment,
Speaker 1: and we you know, we got an opportunity is and
Speaker 1: we'll get into this later in the show. You know
Speaker 1: this concentration camp talking point analogy about the detention centers.
Speaker 1: We sent cameras down there in Fox What do we see.
Speaker 1: We saw cots, blankets, pillows, We saw food, water shelter,
Speaker 1: We saw soccer fields, we saw recreation facilities, we saw telephones,
Speaker 1: we saw TVs, we saw medical attention, we saw baby formula, diapers,
Speaker 1: all of which is being distributed, to the best of
Speaker 1: our ability, and again to people that didn't respect our laws, borders, sovereignty,
Speaker 1: and constitution. And yet so many false, lying narratives, comparisons
Speaker 1: to Auschwitz concentration camps. So this then evolves into something
Speaker 1: that we've been following, and we've sent our correspondent and friend,
Speaker 1: Lawrence Jones to let's see Nancy Pelosi's district. We showed
Speaker 1: you all the needles and the feces and the defecation,
Speaker 1: the and the urinating and drug use going on. Then
Speaker 1: the new the homeless encampments in La We've been to
Speaker 1: Acasio Cortez's district to talk about her. And now we're
Speaker 1: seeing and we're bringing into focus what is the disaster
Speaker 1: of Baltimore Baltimore. And what are all these cities have
Speaker 1: in common? Baltimore ranked the most dangerous big city by
Speaker 1: USA Today in twenty eighteen. What do we see about?
Speaker 1: Why is it these cities again? Democrats claim a monopoly
Speaker 1: of compassion for all of these minority groups. They run
Speaker 1: these big cities for decades. Often elections, race cards are played.
Speaker 1: And what do we see. We got Baltimore, We got
Speaker 1: people's garbage, mounting violence, seventeen thousand empty homes. It's the
Speaker 1: least say city in America, almost twice the number of
Speaker 1: murders on a per capita basis than even Chicago, the
Speaker 1: most dangerous city in America. More people murdered in Baltimore
Speaker 1: than ever before. Twenty eighteen, more people murdered in Baltimore,
Speaker 1: their rate higher than the country of Honduras, and Baltimore's
Speaker 1: murder rate rising again, a sixteen percent increase from last year,
Speaker 1: and a twenty eight percent increase of non fatal shootings.
Speaker 1: Seventeen thousand abandoned structures. Zero students in Baltimore high schools,
Speaker 1: thirteen of them zero proficient in math. Five schools high
Speaker 1: schools zero kids proficient in math and English. Even the
Speaker 1: unemployment rate is the third highest of any city in America,
Speaker 1: poverty twenty two percent. Exposing left wing media bias, No
Speaker 1: stone left unturned at the Sean Hannity Show is back
Speaker 1: on the air, all right, twenty five to the top
Speaker 1: of the art. Well, I just think every once in
Speaker 1: a while, it's kind of a good thing to say,
Speaker 1: you know, wow, some good news. We have a record
Speaker 1: number of Americans employed. We have the best creation of
Speaker 1: manufacturing job sixteen thousand. That's the best number since January
Speaker 1: manufact Why the manufacturing leave Ohio and Detroit and other
Speaker 1: places of Michigan and Wisconsin, in Pennsylvania. Why burdensome regulation,
Speaker 1: confiscatory taxation, the exact model that the New Green Deal
Speaker 1: would offer you, and you know, to the President's his policies,
Speaker 1: there is a direct correlation. There's a reason Obama went
Speaker 1: and and you know Celindra and the stimulus package and
Speaker 1: government intervention and higher taxes, and you didn't build that
Speaker 1: and spread the wealth around. And by the way, now Democrats,
Speaker 1: they're just trashing Obama. I mean, you've got the media
Speaker 1: rushing to defend Obama after the attacks this week in
Speaker 1: the Democratic debates, and even Ram Rambo, Deadfish and other
Speaker 1: Clinton nights like Begala, they're beside themselves that the Democrats
Speaker 1: have gone this far nuts to the left, even though
Speaker 1: they really believe it, except they're just smarter, smarter and
Speaker 1: as much politically. They just don't say it, but these
Speaker 1: are the policies they want, and dead Fish claiming, well
Speaker 1: it's nuts for Democrats to attack Obama at a primary debate,
Speaker 1: and Begala sat Democrats setting themselves up to lose to
Speaker 1: Trump by running far to the left. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: look at sleepy, creepy, crazy uncle Joe. I mean, he's
Speaker 1: he's flipped and flopped and flailed on everything, and then
Speaker 1: Begala even saying Biden has a long voting record, he
Speaker 1: voted for the War of eighteen twelve. Explain to me
Speaker 1: how then any of Biden's opponents can effectively because that's
Speaker 1: how this all came about, right, any of Biden's opponents
Speaker 1: can effectively take on Joe Biden, whose resume includes being
Speaker 1: Obama's vice president, without taking on his time being vice president.
Speaker 1: That's a fair point, and you have to be careful
Speaker 1: about takes some art. These are brilliant people on its
Speaker 1: eight stage. I watched them. Also, it turns out, and
Speaker 1: I know this because I'm a trained professional, Joe Biden
Speaker 1: has a record long before he joined the Obama administration,
Speaker 1: he voted for the war against eighteen of eighteen twelve.
Speaker 1: Okay's Joe Biden says, none of that. His opposition vote,
Speaker 1: his votefore the war of eighteen twelve should be under
Speaker 1: consideration because it lacks context. Now, look, I think axel
Speaker 1: Rod nailed it. And I will say this, I do
Speaker 1: have a respect for Axelrod. I think he's smart. I
Speaker 1: don't like his politics, but I think he's a smart strategist.
Speaker 1: And um, you know this is probably he said the
Speaker 1: best you're gonna get out of sleepy, creepy, crazy uncle Jude.
Speaker 1: He's just it's not in him. And the President was
Speaker 1: all over it last night. He sees it. He sendses
Speaker 1: the weakness, he's he's grant at this. You know. President
Speaker 1: Trump is a fighter. President Trump goes to play. I
Speaker 1: wish Republicans would learn from him. I wish they can
Speaker 1: take a punch, and I wish they'd fight with the
Speaker 1: intensity that Trump fights for his agenda, for the promises
Speaker 1: he made. You listen, it's good politics. You get reelected
Speaker 1: if you keep your promises. You want to be reelected,
Speaker 1: keep your promises, fight hard for the things you said
Speaker 1: you're gonna fight for. You know, look at the moment,
Speaker 1: nobody can figure out even still three oz three three
Speaker 1: zo what does this mean? And the funny thing is
Speaker 1: another Democratic candidate took actually registered the number to get
Speaker 1: the donations. But what is Biden saying here? You got
Speaker 1: that this is the United States of America. We've acted together,
Speaker 1: we have never never, never, but unable to overcome whatever
Speaker 1: the problem was. If you agree with me, go to
Speaker 1: Joe three oh three three oh and help me in
Speaker 1: this fight. Thank you very much. Nobody knew what it
Speaker 1: was and which which one of the Democratic hopeful. No,
Speaker 1: the problem is is that he thought it was a website.
Speaker 1: It's not a website. It's like that would be a text.
Speaker 1: That's what happened. And so that Andrew Yang very smhatly
Speaker 1: had team outright by the website. He's sure, I'll take
Speaker 1: your donation for brilliance. It was a great jiu jitsu move.
Speaker 1: And I'm watching the president last night. Now you think
Speaker 1: of the crowds the president has, he's got people are
Speaker 1: appreciating his fight. Now, how much of the president? All right,
Speaker 1: three simple questions? Are we better off than we were
Speaker 1: before Donald Trump was elected president? Okay, speaks for itself.
Speaker 1: Record is there? Did he keep his promises? Records are there?
Speaker 1: Is the president gonna lose? Is he losing enthusiasm among
Speaker 1: the people that that passionately went out and voted for
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, in Ohio and North Carolina and Florida. No,
Speaker 1: I don't see that at all. And he does he
Speaker 1: have a shot. Maybe can he make the case that
Speaker 1: in spite of their rhetoric and the predictable use of
Speaker 1: the race card, that the policies of the president and conservatism, deregulation,
Speaker 1: lower taxes, controlling the borders that it is and energy
Speaker 1: independence for the first time in seventy five years, that
Speaker 1: that's resulting, and a rising tide lifting all boats. And
Speaker 1: now we got a record number of Americans employed, demographically
Speaker 1: African Americans, another new record a set today, Hispanic Americans,
Speaker 1: Asian Americans, women in the workplace. I mean, does he
Speaker 1: get credit for that at all? And he rightly said
Speaker 1: and pointed out the Democratic Parties now being led by
Speaker 1: Ford left wing radical extremists, and every Democratic candidate is
Speaker 1: sucking up to them. But those policies will bankrupt us.
Speaker 1: And Trump was right the wasted money on inner cities
Speaker 1: one point eight billion Obama stimulus dollars. I mean, what
Speaker 1: did Baltimore get for that? Oh, I was just reading
Speaker 1: you the statistics before we went to the break. Nothing.
Speaker 1: The president's policies are rebuilding the Midwest, and it's piece
Speaker 1: by piece. The jobs Obama said are never coming back
Speaker 1: or coming back. That's great. And as a blue collar
Speaker 1: guy myself, I'm like, this is great energy jobs to
Speaker 1: pay the train and pay truck drivers eighty grand a
Speaker 1: year to start, I'm all for it. You know that
Speaker 1: the lies about concentration camps. Look at that boomerangs back
Speaker 1: on Democrats because now the president starts talking about Baltimore,
Speaker 1: and what do we know about Baltimore? How is it
Speaker 1: even possible these numbers with the amounts of money that
Speaker 1: are spent in Baltimore. And then it wasn't just Trump.
Speaker 1: Then we find out, well, the mayor said it about
Speaker 1: the rats, and Obama said it, and Bernie Sanders said it,
Speaker 1: and Trump says it, and it must be racism. No,
Speaker 1: if I had a choice. Now, nobody wants to be
Speaker 1: in a detention facility, but it did have soccer fields,
Speaker 1: recreational activities, medical attention, medicines, food, water cots, blankets, pillows,
Speaker 1: baby formula, diapers, it's all there. Nobody's being it's safe,
Speaker 1: it's safe for them. Baltimore. I'd rather stay where are
Speaker 1: you going to stay in Baltimore in these areas or
Speaker 1: that we're talking about? Or you would you rather be
Speaker 1: in a detention Center's our horrible choice. You want your freedom.
Speaker 1: How is it possible that we have allowed such deterioration
Speaker 1: in these cities run for decades by the most compassionate
Speaker 1: liberal Democrats. How is it possible? A mile away from
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi's gated community in one direction and her office
Speaker 1: in the other direction, you've got what is the equivalent
Speaker 1: of needle Park, with use needles all over the place,
Speaker 1: the smell of feces everywhere in the air, people urinating
Speaker 1: and defecating, and shooting up right there in broad daylight
Speaker 1: every day. A mile in each direction, there's Nancy Pelosi's place.
Speaker 1: How does that happen? How do you allow piles of
Speaker 1: garbage and rats and you don't do anything about it.
Speaker 1: You know, where's the squad taking on the squalor in
Speaker 1: these big cities run by their friends, their liberal Democrats,
Speaker 1: the very things they want to now impose on us.
Speaker 1: How do you how is it possible? The amount of
Speaker 1: violence that is taking place, the murder rate higher in
Speaker 1: Baltimore than in the country of Honduras. How does that happen?
Speaker 1: How does it happen? Now? I know we're busy in
Speaker 1: our daily lives, but when you stop and reflect and
Speaker 1: you see that there are thirteen high schools we're not
Speaker 1: a single kid is proficient in math, not one. And
Speaker 1: you got five high schools where you're not a single
Speaker 1: kid is proficient in math or English. You got a
Speaker 1: median household income of eleven thousand dollars, less than the
Speaker 1: national average twenty two percent poverty rate. And it's not
Speaker 1: just Baltimore, it's pretty it's look at Chicago. All due
Speaker 1: respect to Rombo Deadfish, and he didn't do anything to
Speaker 1: stop the violence and the poverty in his city. Elijah
Speaker 1: Cummings has to confirm that his house was burglarized while
Speaker 1: he was in Sight, and why is he criticizing the
Speaker 1: non concentration camps that aren't. Look at his own, look
Speaker 1: at He even said about the poverty in his own
Speaker 1: twenty years ago nineteen ninety ninety, said it. This morning,
Speaker 1: I left my community of Baltimore, a drug infested area
Speaker 1: where a lot of the drugs that we're talking about
Speaker 1: today have already taken the lives of so many children,
Speaker 1: The same children that I watched fourteen or fifteen years
Speaker 1: ago as they grew up now walking around like zombies.
Speaker 1: He's saying it. He is saying it himself, just like
Speaker 1: the African American mayor, just like oh, Bernie Sanders. Trump
Speaker 1: says it must be racist. You know, the President's right
Speaker 1: to just zero win on this failure, because now this
Speaker 1: is where they want to take the country. This is
Speaker 1: the New Green Deal. This is it. But which we
Speaker 1: now find from the Competitive Enterprise Institute study this week,
Speaker 1: let's see, if the New Green Deal is implemented, it
Speaker 1: will cost the average household at least seventy thousand dollars
Speaker 1: an increased costs for electricity, vehicle upgrades, housing in the
Speaker 1: first year of implementation alone. AOC says, Oh, you know,
Speaker 1: why are we talking about how to pay for it?
Speaker 1: We all have ten years. You know what about the
Speaker 1: guy in the debate, whoever it was that said we
Speaker 1: bet ahead to hire Crown now because of all this,
Speaker 1: the chief of staff of AOC admitting, this isn't about
Speaker 1: climate change. It's never been about climate changed. Okay, but
Speaker 1: we're gonna eliminate all oil and gas in ten years,
Speaker 1: the lifeblood of our economy at the point where we
Speaker 1: are now for the first time in seventy five years,
Speaker 1: energy independent. We're gonna take the greatest source of wealth creation,
Speaker 1: what could be a national gold rush financially and raise
Speaker 1: the standard of living of every American. We're just gonna
Speaker 1: throw it down the drain. But we're gonna support let's
Speaker 1: see jobs, and you know, well for everybody at a
Speaker 1: certain sustaining wage, all family, medical, lead vacations, retro fit everything, house.
Speaker 1: Who's gonna pay for that. We're gonna have pre K education,
Speaker 1: We're gonna have college, We're gonna have trade schools, free free, free,
Speaker 1: guaranteed clean air and water, guaranteed healthy food, guaranteed high
Speaker 1: quality healthcare. How did Obamacare workout for you? Guaranteed safe,
Speaker 1: affordable quit housing, what about economic environment, free of monopolies?
Speaker 1: All of this Okay, how are you going to pay
Speaker 1: for any of this? Well, the Lazio said, we're going
Speaker 1: to tax the hell out of the rich. All right.
Speaker 1: That means we're gonna steal from them and we're gonna
Speaker 1: give to another group. How does this party, as I've chronicled,
Speaker 1: every two four years and now it's almost every day,
Speaker 1: get away. They play the race card. Look at their
Speaker 1: track record. I did see the Washington Post New York
Speaker 1: Times opbed's actually blasting all the top presidential contenders for
Speaker 1: rallying to Al Sharpton's defense. You know, well, finally, I mean,
Speaker 1: we've been playing those Sharpton tapes for years and they
Speaker 1: still you know, go and meet Al Sharpton, kissed the ring,
Speaker 1: begged for his endorsement. All right, we got other news
Speaker 1: I want to get to too. So we have everything
Speaker 1: that we've been telling you about the deep state. The
Speaker 1: DJ Inspector General referring Jim Comey for possible prosecution. I
Speaker 1: know many of you are upset that the Attorney General
Speaker 1: has not acted yet on this, and he as of
Speaker 1: now has declined prosecution. And I was clear violations of
Speaker 1: the espionage Acts. He had the government documents. They were
Speaker 1: classified they wore in his home. We didn't know, but
Speaker 1: now we know thanks to Tom Fitt and Judicial Watch
Speaker 1: that in fact, the FBI went to Komi's home a
Speaker 1: month after he was fired. They got the documents back
Speaker 1: and they interrogated him. I'm watching what's happening. I'm checking
Speaker 1: with every source I have, and he's saying, you know,
Speaker 1: he said to lou Dobbs, and Dobbs is asking a
Speaker 1: good question for any reason for me, everyone watching, for
Speaker 1: you and Victoria to think we're actually going to see
Speaker 1: these scoundrels who made up the leadership of the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice, those who abuse power. The Genivan says, yes,
Speaker 1: and by any traditional standard, this thing is moving in
Speaker 1: a lightning speed, and he said in a very short
Speaker 1: period of time, Durham has interviewed to understand dozens of
Speaker 1: potential witnesses and moved into setting up a grand jury.
Speaker 1: Often you don't know when gren juries are set up,
Speaker 1: adding that people need to be reasonable in their expectations.
Speaker 1: I agree with the Jennifer. When we get to the
Speaker 1: truth and we get to the bottom of all of this,
Speaker 1: it will blow even the fake news media. The mob
Speaker 1: are going to have to admit everything we said about
Speaker 1: a rigged Hillary investigation, premeditated fraud against the FISA courts,
Speaker 1: spying on well, denying the constitutional rights of many, any
Speaker 1: basically anyone who was in the Trump campaign, lying to
Speaker 1: get Warrens to spy on the campaign, trying to disseminate
Speaker 1: the dirty dossier, which they determined ninety plus percent of
Speaker 1: it was just totally false. Hillary paid for it. Interesting,
Speaker 1: the New York Times admits that it was probably from
Speaker 1: the get go it was Russian disinformation. That would mean
Speaker 1: Putin knew. That would mean Putin knew that Hillary was
Speaker 1: going to use it. I would mean that Putin was
Speaker 1: probably trying to help Hillary. Oh, I wonder if the
Speaker 1: media will admit that mistake. But of all of these abuses,
Speaker 1: all of the spying abroad, the outsourcing of intelligence methods
Speaker 1: that would be illegal in the US. So we give
Speaker 1: them to our allies and say will you do this
Speaker 1: for me, I'll do this for you. And then of
Speaker 1: course having spy rings, you know, Stephan Helper and Professor
Speaker 1: Misfit and others, you know, going after Papadopolis, Clovis and
Speaker 1: Carter Page all the name of finding Russia, and they
Speaker 1: withheld all the exculpatory info. It's gonna blow. I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: I can't. You couldn't stop it if you wanted to.
Speaker 1: The radical Democrats even support deadly sanctuary cities, which release
Speaker 1: dangerous criminals onto our streets. Sanctuary cities and many of
Speaker 1: the places that have sanctuary cities, and many of the
Speaker 1: people that live there, they don't want them. They don't
Speaker 1: want them. They're dangerous, they're not good here. Or just
Speaker 1: a few examples. In San Francisco, and a legal alien
Speaker 1: was arrested no fewer than ten times in the span
Speaker 1: of less than one year for numerous counts of burglary
Speaker 1: and theft. Yet each time San Francisco defied federal authorities
Speaker 1: and set him free, and bad thieves happened when they
Speaker 1: set him free. A sanctuary jurisdiction in California recently release
Speaker 1: a criminal alien from jail. The very next month, the
Speaker 1: same individual was arrested for rape, and then, beyond anything
Speaker 1: you would even believe, a horrible thing happened, but yet
Speaker 1: again he was released back into your community. After a
Speaker 1: sanctuary city in New Jersey released an alien charged with
Speaker 1: domestic violence, he was arrested in Missouri for the murders
Speaker 1: of three people in the bizarre worldview of the third
Speaker 1: and heard left, they have no problem destroying the lives
Speaker 1: of innocent Americans for a single politically incorrect thought. But
Speaker 1: they want to virtually and you know this, you know this.
Speaker 1: They want virtual immunity for illegal aliens who have committed
Speaker 1: horrible crimes and murder, horrible crimes. And Republicans believe our
Speaker 1: cities should be a sanctuary for law abiding Americans, not
Speaker 1: criminal aliens. Our laws prevent us from holding people more
Speaker 1: than twenty days, and because we can't get the information,
Speaker 1: we're probably releasing even sooner than that in many cases. Correct,
Speaker 1: that's absolutely correct. With respective family units. Since March of
Speaker 1: this year, United States Border Patrol has been releasing family
Speaker 1: units directly, so in some cases they're being released one
Speaker 1: hundred forty eight hours into the interior United States. The
Speaker 1: big scam of the whole address was that there's a crisis.
Speaker 1: There's not a crisis, folks. The president has manufactured one
Speaker 1: heck of a political crisis for himself, Donald trum is
Speaker 1: manufacturing a national security crisis. Will hear them say is
Speaker 1: that this is a manufactured crisis. It's not a national
Speaker 1: security crisis. It remains a Seinfeld shutdown, all about all
Speaker 1: about nothing. What happens when there is a real crisis,
Speaker 1: when there is a real emergency, Does he take to
Speaker 1: the airways? Do we give him the airways? Do we
Speaker 1: believe him? Some question if there is a crisis at all,
Speaker 1: as the President has claimed, there is not a crisis
Speaker 1: at the border. It's a manufactured crisis for the president
Speaker 1: to get a political when the crisis can have, as
Speaker 1: we see now, a very elastic definition, and he's determined
Speaker 1: to convince you there is a crisis at the border,
Speaker 1: even though an intelligence official tell sin and quote. No
Speaker 1: one is saying this is a crisis except them. Nobody's
Speaker 1: saying a crisis except that, Well, the crisis is obvious.
Speaker 1: But it's also obvious where people stand on the issue
Speaker 1: of the border. You know, if we have not learned
Speaker 1: anything over the course of the last couple of nights
Speaker 1: and the debates and where the left is in this country,
Speaker 1: and we don't just listen to them. They don't want
Speaker 1: to solve this problem, they don't see it as a problem,
Speaker 1: and they don't seem to care the impact that has
Speaker 1: on we, the American people. The taxpayers that have to
Speaker 1: put all this money down and yes, pay for their healthcare,
Speaker 1: pay for their housing. After all, it's concentration camps we're
Speaker 1: putting people in. None of that is true anyway. Joining
Speaker 1: US Representative Mark Green, Tennessee, Andy Biggs, Arizona. Both members,
Speaker 1: Thank god we have that Freedom Caucus. Both back from
Speaker 1: a border trip hosted by Representative Green. Congressman Green is
Speaker 1: also a pediatrician, wanted to see firsthand what was happening.
Speaker 1: Welcome back, both of you. I want to I want
Speaker 1: to start with one thing, and I'll start with you,
Speaker 1: doctor Green. And that's it's real simple. You know. Griff
Speaker 1: Jenkins went down there for Fox News and I saw
Speaker 1: the facilities and the soccer fields and the recreation areas.
Speaker 1: I saw the medical attention being given to the detainees.
Speaker 1: I see the food, the water, the medicine, the medical care,
Speaker 1: the blankets, the diapers, the baby formula, the cots, the blankets,
Speaker 1: the pillows. It's not Auschwitz, and it's I granted it's
Speaker 1: not ideal, but these people did not obey our laws
Speaker 1: and respect our sovereignty. Did they No, No, they didn't.
Speaker 1: And Sean, let me just say first thanks for having
Speaker 1: us on the show and to Andy actually set this
Speaker 1: trip up. Andy Biggs set the trip up. But you're
Speaker 1: absolutely right, nothing, nothing could be further from the truth
Speaker 1: what the Democrats are saying is going on down there.
Speaker 1: They actually record when an individual needs a shower, they
Speaker 1: go to them and say, hey, it's your turn to
Speaker 1: get a shower. You know, this notion that they're they're
Speaker 1: not getting showers, they're not being taken food at the
Speaker 1: Ice detention facility. They're actually using the same dietitian and
Speaker 1: the same menu that our men and women in Fortless,
Speaker 1: Texas are using. So the same food that is being
Speaker 1: fed to our soldiers is being fed to them, and
Speaker 1: they are three hearts every day. So this notion that
Speaker 1: it's some kind of concentration camp is a blatant and
Speaker 1: disturbing falsehood. You know, It's it's amazing how this has
Speaker 1: evolved as a national conversation, especially when the President brought
Speaker 1: up Elijah Cummings District again. He was, you know, like
Speaker 1: all Democrats talking points about the border that are not accurate,
Speaker 1: not true, And I watch all of this and I'm
Speaker 1: like wow, and then I give out all the statistics
Speaker 1: about Baltimore and the violence, the poverty, the rat infestation,
Speaker 1: the seventeen thousand empty homes that exist there, the drug problem.
Speaker 1: And then we see Obama address those issues, and then
Speaker 1: the former mayor address those issues, and even Elijah Cummings
Speaker 1: address those issues and others, and it only becomes an issue.
Speaker 1: And he begs, if Donald Trump makes the same observations
Speaker 1: as they did, then it's racist. Yeah, that's right, because
Speaker 1: there's that's their talking point. They don't have any policy
Speaker 1: prescriptions to make this country better. They think the country's
Speaker 1: crappy and terrible. Donald Trump is positive and he connects
Speaker 1: with the people, he leads, He leads the country in
Speaker 1: a positive way, and he calls out people who aren't
Speaker 1: doing it and not helping us. And so the Democrats
Speaker 1: jump all over him. And they don't jump all over
Speaker 1: him and say, well, you know what, it's really better
Speaker 1: than you're saying. They say he's a racist. When the
Speaker 1: Democrats tell lies about the border and the border patrol,
Speaker 1: we come in, We show him data, we tell him stories,
Speaker 1: We give them the facts to undercut and undermine their lives.
Speaker 1: And you know, I'm just sick and tired of this
Speaker 1: double standard of the Democrats. It's ridiculous, it's gotten out
Speaker 1: of hand. It's either true or it's not true. Are
Speaker 1: the children being taken care of now? Border patrol Ice, Yeah,
Speaker 1: they've they have had had difficulty distinguishing real families from
Speaker 1: fake families. That's just a fact. But from what I
Speaker 1: understand and the people I've talked to and the people
Speaker 1: that I've interviewed, they're doing their very best to ascertain
Speaker 1: the truth of every situation. And thirty percent of families
Speaker 1: crossing the border are fraudulent, meaning that adults have kidnapped,
Speaker 1: will quote, rented a child to illegally get into this
Speaker 1: country with a reduced threat of prosecution. Is that Is
Speaker 1: that a fact? I'll ask you both. Yeah. Absolutely, Sean
Speaker 1: that the numbers that I like to tell people are
Speaker 1: thirty sixty ninety thirty percent of the families that show
Speaker 1: up are fraudulent families, meaning that they were they're either
Speaker 1: renting a child or they've captured a child. It doesn't
Speaker 1: belong to that family thirty percent. And that means they
Speaker 1: instantly get a visa into the United States if they
Speaker 1: you know, if there is a family. So let's say
Speaker 1: they do the calculations and they do the DNA and
Speaker 1: they say, okay, this is a family. They immediately go
Speaker 1: into the United States. They they're not holding them for
Speaker 1: the twenty days CBPS, just releasing them into the countries.
Speaker 1: Of those individuals, sixty percent show up for the actual
Speaker 1: court date. Three years later, well of those will be
Speaker 1: found that they need to leave the country. So it's
Speaker 1: it's it's it's a crazy system. So a couple of decisions, though,
Speaker 1: have been made here. That the reallocation when the president
Speaker 1: declared the emergency of the border, which past presidents have
Speaker 1: done on many issues. And we do know that legislatively,
Speaker 1: the president has the authority to build borders. I've cited
Speaker 1: to build many times on this program, and constitutionally, you know,
Speaker 1: when there are drug carders, as commander in chief, as
Speaker 1: the constitutional duty, never mind authority, an absolute duty to
Speaker 1: protect the country from the drugs flowing in. And but
Speaker 1: the president now has been able to reallocate defense funds
Speaker 1: on top of the money that was appropriated by Congress.
Speaker 1: I know one of the Washington papers suggesting that there
Speaker 1: hasn't been any new wall built at all. The administration
Speaker 1: fighting back and actually sending out videos look at the
Speaker 1: new wall and look at the repaired wall. Where are
Speaker 1: we in terms of miles Andy bigs because this is
Speaker 1: where you're from. Yeah, well you're seeing there's been about
Speaker 1: one hundred miles. And what's happening is they say there's
Speaker 1: no new fences because they think a normandy barrier, which
Speaker 1: is just a metal spike basically that anybody can crawl over,
Speaker 1: walk under. There are places there's no none at all.
Speaker 1: They're replacing those with a ballard fencing eighteen to thirty
Speaker 1: feet high, which is going to be a great deterrent.
Speaker 1: That's what the President's done. And with this new money
Speaker 1: that's coming in Arizona is going to get somewhere in
Speaker 1: neighborhood of forty fifty miles that we need desperately. And
Speaker 1: you know when I was, when we were now Passo,
Speaker 1: we saw how the fence works. You got a fence
Speaker 1: and the people aren't going over it, they're walking around
Speaker 1: it because what you know, you know what, you need
Speaker 1: more fence. You need more fence. And so where are
Speaker 1: we in how many more miles of fence need to
Speaker 1: be built with the reallocated defense billions and the appropriated
Speaker 1: billions one point three to five in from Congress. Where
Speaker 1: are we in terms of the money. Miles need to
Speaker 1: be built, repairs need to be made. Where are we? Well,
Speaker 1: the court has actually go ahead and no, no, Glad Mark, Well,
Speaker 1: the court is actually, you know, the Supreme Court has
Speaker 1: allowed the present to go forward with the utilization of
Speaker 1: the money that he got from unspent dollars from DoD,
Speaker 1: so that that has been the stay has been lifted
Speaker 1: to the presidents moving forward. I know, as Andy mentioned,
Speaker 1: there's been about one hundred miles built in this with
Speaker 1: this calendar budget and that should that extra money from
Speaker 1: DoD is going to significantly increase that number. Well, okay,
Speaker 1: now how are we actually is there any area of detention?
Speaker 1: And I know, by the way, the squad didn't vote
Speaker 1: for the money for the detention upgrades and facility upgrades,
Speaker 1: which would have been nice considering they're griping the loudest
Speaker 1: and making these Nazi comparisons with pure abandoned media mob
Speaker 1: doesn't care. Um, But do you see any of the
Speaker 1: facilities that maybe need an upgrade? There maybe need that
Speaker 1: there aren't there is a need for more appropriations. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, Sean, what they need is they just need
Speaker 1: some more soft sided um um facilities for people to
Speaker 1: stay at um while they're there um and right now,
Speaker 1: because of President Trump's policies in Mexico helping out and
Speaker 1: his threat to de poor people, you've actually seen a
Speaker 1: slowdown in the numbers, but you still have about three
Speaker 1: thousand a day that are being apprehended. So it's the
Speaker 1: facilities are there, they're they're actually calmed down the numbers.
Speaker 1: They're easily handle handleable now. But we expect another surge
Speaker 1: should Mexico say okay, you know the deployment's over, you're done.
Speaker 1: We expect another surge when the weather gets a little
Speaker 1: bit cooler. And so I think you need some more
Speaker 1: soft sided facilities. But Jelsey need more judges. You need
Speaker 1: more either technical or physical courtrooms to deal with it
Speaker 1: to the of the flux. And I'm just telling you
Speaker 1: we have to change Caress has to change the laws too,
Speaker 1: like the Floors ruling, So that has to be changed. Yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's the laws that are driving the incentives and that's
Speaker 1: the most important that and it means that Congress has
Speaker 1: been the one that's really failed the nation. Here all right,
Speaker 1: quick freak, we'll come back. We'll have more with Mark
Speaker 1: Green of Tennessee, Carressman Green and Congressman Andy Biggs of
Speaker 1: Arizona on the other side. All right, as we continue
Speaker 1: with Congressman Mark Green at Tennessee he's actually a medical doctor,
Speaker 1: and Andy Biggs of Arizona, who just got back from
Speaker 1: the border. I mean, at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: I think the president and what I like about the president,
Speaker 1: if he can't get it one way, he's going to
Speaker 1: go the other way. And I know a lot of
Speaker 1: people conservatives at the time were critical his choice of
Speaker 1: not going at it legislatively and saying now I'm going
Speaker 1: to use emergency powers and make an emergency declaration, and
Speaker 1: then he had to go through congressional votes on it.
Speaker 1: They weren't able to override his veto and in fact,
Speaker 1: now the quart has ruled that it is appropriate at
Speaker 1: least it's been deemed appropriate to reappropriate the funds as
Speaker 1: has been done and bypass administrations. But I don't know
Speaker 1: if you're ever going to get any of these Democrats
Speaker 1: ever to give the money that's needed to fully protect
Speaker 1: the border. And by the way, I support immigration, I'm
Speaker 1: just asking people that want to come here to do
Speaker 1: it legally. So we can vet you so we can
Speaker 1: make sure you're capable of taking care of yourself and
Speaker 1: you want no harm to any American. It's not that
Speaker 1: hard to do or ask for, Sean, You're exactly right.
Speaker 1: We bring in over a million people legally every year,
Speaker 1: and this year we're going to have another million illegally
Speaker 1: come in. And Congress has got a step. The Democrats
Speaker 1: are never going to give us the money. They're not
Speaker 1: going to help us out, and so we have to
Speaker 1: just get in there and fight to fight. And that's
Speaker 1: why I like Prisident Trump. I'm with you John on
Speaker 1: that Prisident Trump needed to do what he needed to do,
Speaker 1: which is to take extraordinary measures to clear the emergency,
Speaker 1: access the statutes and go forward. But you saw it
Speaker 1: even then, the radical courts at the lower level all
Speaker 1: stepped and said, oh no, he can't do this. Thank
Speaker 1: goodness for the Supreme Court coming and saying yes. And
Speaker 1: I think I'm glad he's pressing forward with that, and
Speaker 1: it's pressed forward where Congress has been feckless. Great job,
Speaker 1: both of you. I love when actually people go down
Speaker 1: look for themselves, make real conclusions based on real conditions
Speaker 1: on the ground. Both of you deserve credit, although it
Speaker 1: wasn't that big a deal for Andy Biggs considering he
Speaker 1: lives there, so look, I don't want to give him
Speaker 1: too much credit. Congressman Green, Sean, I actually did a
Speaker 1: ride along at night with the CDP guys. I felt
Speaker 1: like I was back in the army and it was
Speaker 1: It's awesome. I've done it. It's pretty cool, right, yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, I got a roll, guys, Mark Green, Congressman,
Speaker 1: Thank you, Tennessee. Andy Biggs, Arizona, eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: four one Sean toll free telephone number. You're gonna love
Speaker 1: our next guest. And then we have our wide open
Speaker 1: news round up Information Friday Overload. Will have some fun
Speaker 1: on Friday, and get to your calls straight ahead. We
Speaker 1: find a way, can't always find a way. Just this week,
Speaker 1: she refused to condemn the Antifa. These are bad people,
Speaker 1: do you notice. Do you notice they always attack people
Speaker 1: that really have never been attacked before they attack. And
Speaker 1: I don't want to be disrespectful to people that have
Speaker 1: taken a lot of shots to the face, but they
Speaker 1: wouldn't attack some of these people in this room. They're
Speaker 1: not attacking bikers for Trump. They're not attacking construction workers
Speaker 1: for Trump. They're not attacking law enforcement or military for Trump.
Speaker 1: They're they're attacking a single man standing there with a
Speaker 1: camera who never got hit and never hit back before
Speaker 1: in his life. They don't attack the people that we
Speaker 1: wish they attacked. That wouldn't be a pretty picture, that
Speaker 1: wouldn't look that wouldn't look too good for them. But
Speaker 1: they don't. It's very very sad Antifa. These are bad people.
Speaker 1: These are sick, bad people. Remember that He's are bad people.
Speaker 1: These are bad people Antifa. They don't get the bad press.
Speaker 1: The press doesn't want to talk to them. They are
Speaker 1: very evil. They're hitting people over the head with sticks,
Speaker 1: and I mean sticks, I mean bats. Even they're whacking
Speaker 1: people with bats. They're very brave. They always show up
Speaker 1: with a mask and they're covered because then they go
Speaker 1: home to mom and dad. They don't want mom and
Speaker 1: dad to know where they were. But they always attack
Speaker 1: people that really can't defend themselves very well. Right, they're
Speaker 1: not attacking this group, they're not attacking North Carolina. We
Speaker 1: are asking people what they would do if President Trump
Speaker 1: were to show up at this march. Some of the
Speaker 1: answers have been pretty stunning. Uh here they are. Would
Speaker 1: you do a dumb Trump shout about the Trump m
Speaker 1: murder them for the people? How about you, man, I'll
Speaker 1: play Trump to get on the floor. Is scruff those
Speaker 1: toilets himself? Because you don't know how to clean. He
Speaker 1: needs to learn. He needs to learn how to clean
Speaker 1: scrupp some toilets. I mean, yo, he's America's Caesar, except
Speaker 1: so I gotta take him down Trump Trump. If it
Speaker 1: came down to it and it was a group effort,
Speaker 1: we'd have to do him like a die, like a docky. Yeah,
Speaker 1: what would you do? Dom? Trump showed up? No, I'm
Speaker 1: a while out. I'm gonna bole out. Yeah, yeah, you
Speaker 1: come up? Yeah, I get a tattood. I wouldn't do that.
Speaker 1: What's that? I get a tattoo? Come up? I would
Speaker 1: come up. You wouldn't. Yeah, how about you? What would
Speaker 1: you do? I was just smack him, smack him? Yes,
Speaker 1: I will select the like through. Yeah all right, how
Speaker 1: about you, sir? I a smack on too. It'd be
Speaker 1: like a pimp stock got aim stop. If the president
Speaker 1: show up this march, what would you do, sir? Beat
Speaker 1: his ass? Trump showed up today? What would you do, sir,
Speaker 1: I throw bell at him? You throw a bell at him?
Speaker 1: Why not? All right? What would you say? Tell him off?
Speaker 1: All right? What's that shirt say? Coming on his leg?
Speaker 1: But that I piss on his legs? Out here? I
Speaker 1: would tell his wife could go home, and for him
Speaker 1: to get on his jay and get out of here. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and Monia to get out of here too, Yeah, because
Speaker 1: he hates everybody, but he forgets his way his own
Speaker 1: immigrant too. I wouldn't say anything because if you don't
Speaker 1: have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.
Speaker 1: Now we just plenty eight. By the way, gladual with
Speaker 1: us twenty three now until the top of the hour.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred nine for one sean is our number. That's
Speaker 1: two straight minutes of ANTIFA protesters threatening to kill or
Speaker 1: to harm President Trump. Now we've heard it from Hollywood stars.
Speaker 1: Let's see Madonna, I think an awful lot about blowing
Speaker 1: up the White House. Johnny Depp, whe's the lost time
Speaker 1: and actor has killed the president. It goes on from there.
Speaker 1: I mean real threats against the real president made by
Speaker 1: real people. Oh and let me show you Kathy Griffin
Speaker 1: a severed head of the president of the United States.
Speaker 1: But that's not a threat in any way. I wonder,
Speaker 1: you know, if you if you take some of these
Speaker 1: words and you have a Democrat president, let's say it's
Speaker 1: Barack Obama, how do you think the country the medium
Speaker 1: mob reacts then how do you think they what do
Speaker 1: they do at that moment? Now, what's fascinating about this
Speaker 1: is the President's been willing to take on Antifa, and
Speaker 1: we have played you know, for example, Black Lives Matter,
Speaker 1: what do we want dead cops? Why do we want
Speaker 1: them now? And what it pigs in a blanket, fry
Speaker 1: him like bacon, all coming from the left and a
Speaker 1: lot of anger coming from the left a lot of days. Now.
Speaker 1: It's interesting because we've been spending a lot of time
Speaker 1: on the FBI and and this is not related to
Speaker 1: what the deep state is about, but in a way
Speaker 1: it is because now we have Congressman Jim Banks who's
Speaker 1: going to join us here in a second. He's prepared
Speaker 1: a letter to the FBI requesting that they create a
Speaker 1: new subsection of extremist ideologies entitled anti First Amendment Extremists
Speaker 1: and add Antifa to the list. Now, Jim Banks is
Speaker 1: from Indiana. He's asking the FBI to add a new
Speaker 1: subsection to its list of extremist ideologies that would include Antifa,
Speaker 1: according to a letter to the FBI Director Chris Ray
Speaker 1: that was provided to The Hill and John Solomon. And
Speaker 1: while the FBI declines to keep public or an official
Speaker 1: list of domestic terrorist organizations, it does outline extremist ideologies.
Speaker 1: And I read, actually it was pretty interesting that Christopher
Speaker 1: Ray apparently has added to those conspiracy theorists. Well, that
Speaker 1: would be pretty much everybody that works over a conspiracy TV, Roswell,
Speaker 1: Rachel Mattawan Company, and MSDNC, and that pretty much includes
Speaker 1: all of the media anyway joining us. Now, as Congressman
Speaker 1: Banks of Indiana, Sir, I read your letter, I'm interested
Speaker 1: in your letter. What has the reaction been? It was
Speaker 1: so far a waiting for the FBI to get back
Speaker 1: with as seanomy. As you've said, it's really unbelievable that
Speaker 1: the FBI hasn't done this already. If they act like terrorists,
Speaker 1: if they dress like terrorists, if they use the same
Speaker 1: tactics as terrorists, then we should treat them as terrorists.
Speaker 1: And as you said, my letter is simple. Oh it
Speaker 1: does is calls on the FBI to do something that
Speaker 1: they should have done long ago, and create a separate
Speaker 1: subsection for anti First Amendment extremists, list Antifa and the
Speaker 1: type of tactics that they use to that list, and
Speaker 1: then treat get more scrutiny and treat Antifa like what
Speaker 1: they are, which is a domestic terrorist organization. Now, what
Speaker 1: about specific acts of violence. Have you chronicled those? Well?
Speaker 1: We have. Hey, listen, let's be honest here. Words are
Speaker 1: one thing, and it really does get into very difficult
Speaker 1: constitutional intellectual argument and threading needles here. And I know
Speaker 1: we all have an understanding you can't fire in a
Speaker 1: crowded theater. But for the most part, people, even radicals
Speaker 1: and even extremists have the right to say horrible, evil, dumb,
Speaker 1: stupid things. And although there are laws I guess against
Speaker 1: making terroristic threats against individuals that I know exists, right, Well,
Speaker 1: that's right. I mean, if you go to the FBI website,
Speaker 1: it says very specifically, quote, it is legal to have
Speaker 1: hateful or extremist beliefs as long as you don't commit
Speaker 1: crimes of violence based on those beliefs. Quote. It's clear
Speaker 1: that Antifa has violated the spirit of that law. We
Speaker 1: should list their tactics on this website, to provide the
Speaker 1: FBI link, to provide more scrutiny to their activities. That's
Speaker 1: what I'm calling on them to do. It's unbelievable they
Speaker 1: haven't done that already. And when we look at these
Speaker 1: different individual terrorist groups, for example the Southern Poverty Law Center,
Speaker 1: they just seem to think that anybody that is a
Speaker 1: conservative is a hate group. Have they gotten money from
Speaker 1: the government, Well, I don't know that that show. But
Speaker 1: really the hypocrisy on the left is unbelievable. In this case.
Speaker 1: There is not a single Democrat official or even a
Speaker 1: figure on the left who has called out the tactics
Speaker 1: of Antifa. I've been in touch with Andy now. You've
Speaker 1: well documented the circumstance of his beating by Antifa and Portland,
Speaker 1: Oregon just weeks ago. He was on Capitol Hill last week.
Speaker 1: But just last night he messaged me and said that
Speaker 1: not a single public official in his home state in
Speaker 1: the Oregon has called out these activities. I think partly
Speaker 1: that's because they're freight too. Antifa has been effective at
Speaker 1: at diminishing the free speech and the freedom of the
Speaker 1: press in places where they're active. To call out their activities.
Speaker 1: But that needs to be done. That's why I'm That's
Speaker 1: why I've written this letter. Letter. Other Republicans on Capitol Hill,
Speaker 1: like Senator Ted Cruz, have drawn attention to this circumstance.
Speaker 1: But the FBI can take a simple step in this
Speaker 1: case to list these types of activities on their extremist
Speaker 1: Ideology list and provide greater a greater level of scrutiny
Speaker 1: to those activities. And I hope that they will. All Right,
Speaker 1: Cossman Banks keep us updated on the issue. All the
Speaker 1: best to you and our friends in Indiana. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine four one. Shan is on number. All right, gotta
Speaker 1: take a break, we'll come back. We'll hit the phones.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred nine four one, Sean if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, News round Up, Information
Speaker 1: Overload at the top of the hour. All right, let's
Speaker 1: get to our busy telephones. Eight hundred nine four one Seawn,
Speaker 1: News round Up, Information Overload. Next. I want to say
Speaker 1: hi to Eric, he's in Vegas on k Dawn Radio. Eric, Hi,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called? Sir? Happy Friday? Happy Friday, Sean,
Speaker 1: and thanks for taking my call. I appreciate it. Thank you, sir.
Speaker 1: I'm honored that you did call. Well. I would just
Speaker 1: like to talk about the Attorney General Barr and his
Speaker 1: decision on why he did not decide to prosecute Jim
Speaker 1: Comey at this time. I understand and that there's probably
Speaker 1: other crimes and more deeper issues that are at stake. However,
Speaker 1: I know that you can charge someone and then rebook
Speaker 1: them on different charges at a later date. Is there
Speaker 1: any reason why he's all true? It's so funny because
Speaker 1: initially I was right where you are. I really was,
Speaker 1: and then I started asking other questions. As you know. Look,
Speaker 1: we've covered this now, and it's amazing that we're finally
Speaker 1: getting to that point. And what you're referring to form
Speaker 1: people that may just be joining us. Michael Harrowitz recommendation
Speaker 1: that there could be criminal prosecution against Jim Comey two
Speaker 1: specific issues. One violating the Espionage Act in all related
Speaker 1: matters government documents on his private property. We didn't know
Speaker 1: that a month after Comey was fired that the FBI
Speaker 1: actually went and interrogated him, which really raises bizarre questions
Speaker 1: about his behavior, but it clearly is a violation of
Speaker 1: eighteen USC. Seven ninety three and the other the other
Speaker 1: violations that I've discussed in detail. And why I shifted
Speaker 1: my thinking is I just I've gotten enough pieces of
Speaker 1: information that I'm putting together, and I remember, they're not
Speaker 1: going to tell me everything. So I talked to one source,
Speaker 1: then I talked to another source, then I talked to
Speaker 1: another source, and then a story begins to emerge, and
Speaker 1: a theory begins to emerge in my mind. And so
Speaker 1: far we've gotten it, thank God, right, because if we
Speaker 1: get it wrong, we're going to be a big trouble.
Speaker 1: But what I've concluded here is is that that is
Speaker 1: the low hanging fruit. That's just that that's off to
Speaker 1: the side at the moment. The Attorney General is going
Speaker 1: to pay much more attention to much bigger issues, not
Speaker 1: to I don't want to make or render insignificant the
Speaker 1: Espionage Act, or having confidential top secret information in one's
Speaker 1: possession outside of the government offices, which is a clear
Speaker 1: violation of the law, or his lack of candor you know, Papadopolis,
Speaker 1: Michael Comb, Paul Manafort, General Flynn, they're all experiencing what
Speaker 1: Coomy is being alleged to have committed here. But I
Speaker 1: think when we get to the bottom of the warnings
Speaker 1: about FISA, him signing the first FISA warrant, him not
Speaker 1: knowing and being warned it was unverifiable. And then I
Speaker 1: think we go off into this whole other section where
Speaker 1: the intelligence community coomy involved or not. Brannan Clapper certainly
Speaker 1: have to be. But the other venue that they went
Speaker 1: to use to spy on the Trump campaign, transition and
Speaker 1: then presidency, and that would be, you know, the outsourcing
Speaker 1: of illegal intelligence gathering against Americans and literally hiring outside
Speaker 1: spies abroad again to circumvent US laws for the purpose
Speaker 1: of creating this false narrative insurance policy. I think that's
Speaker 1: where it's going to lead to, and I'm pretty confident
Speaker 1: that's where it's headed, and I'm I'm willing to be
Speaker 1: patient on it. Is my conclusion to be patient on
Speaker 1: it too, Sean. But you know you touched on the
Speaker 1: intelligence agency. The Democratic Party has used our government to
Speaker 1: weaponize against political party and the people. The Tea Party
Speaker 1: was shut down by the end right, the taxes, everything,
Speaker 1: and it all comes out to be true after you're right.
Speaker 1: But I am going to tell you I just have
Speaker 1: a a certain piece and a confidence about all this
Speaker 1: that it's Scott is going to be gotten to the
Speaker 1: bottom of I know information, I'm putting information together. I
Speaker 1: don't want to. I know it's heading in the direction
Speaker 1: that I've always believed it would head. And you know,
Speaker 1: it's hard for me to tell people all the time.
Speaker 1: I'd be patient it's happening, but you can see it's
Speaker 1: you now know what's happening. I mean, this was a big,
Speaker 1: big revelation this week recommending or sending recommendations for possible
Speaker 1: prosecution of Jim Comey. But that's the smallest of all
Speaker 1: the issues we're talking about. So my advice is hang on,
Speaker 1: be patient. The wheels of justice move slowly at times,
Speaker 1: but I do believe we're gonna get equal justice. I
Speaker 1: feel very confident about it. Um, thank you, So I
Speaker 1: have a great weekend. Eight saun is a number one
Speaker 1: coming up. Max's our final news round up and Information
Speaker 1: Overload hour. You're gonna be so proud of your country
Speaker 1: if I get in, You're gonna be so proud of
Speaker 1: your president. And I don't care about that, but you
Speaker 1: are gonna be so proud of your country because we're
Speaker 1: gonna turn it around and we're gonna start winning again.
Speaker 1: We're gonna win so much. We're gonna win at every level.
Speaker 1: We're gonna win economically. We're gonna win with the economy.
Speaker 1: We're gonna win with military, We're gonna win with healthcare,
Speaker 1: and for our veterans. We're gonna win with every single facet.
Speaker 1: We're gonna win so much. You may even get tired
Speaker 1: of winning, and you'll say, please, please, it's too much winning.
Speaker 1: We can't take it anymore, mister President, It's too much.
Speaker 1: And I'll say, no, it isn't. We have to keep winning.
Speaker 1: We have to win more. We're gonna win more. We're
Speaker 1: gonna win so much. These politicians ran for office pledging
Speaker 1: to crack down on unfair foreign trade, only to get elected,
Speaker 1: get into office, and then do absolutely nothing except let
Speaker 1: our country get ripped off. But I'm not like other politicians.
Speaker 1: I've never been a politician before. I only started two
Speaker 1: and a half years ago and I became president. How
Speaker 1: am I doing okay? But I keep my promises, and
Speaker 1: I keep my promises to your industry, and I keep
Speaker 1: my promises to the workers of this country. Write an
Speaker 1: amazing speech by the President last night in Cincinnati, The
Speaker 1: all important city of Cincinnati. So Bill Cunninghama was one
Speaker 1: of those yesterday letter he's talking about seven o'clock in
Speaker 1: the morning, you got thousands and thousands and thousands of
Speaker 1: people lined up to see Donald Trump. A phenomenon. Now
Speaker 1: the people stand outside in the pouring rain, in the cold,
Speaker 1: lineup out there, tailgating for hours. Now, that happens in
Speaker 1: football games, happens for some really big musicians and other people.
Speaker 1: I don't see anybody in the Democratic side. We got
Speaker 1: a real, real, great sampling of what the Democrats are
Speaker 1: offering this country, and I gotta tell you it doesn't
Speaker 1: seem inspiring. I mean, the fact that they went out
Speaker 1: of their way this week to so distance themselves from
Speaker 1: anything even remotely connected to even I think he's pretty
Speaker 1: radical himself. Even Barack Obama is somewhat stunning and shocking
Speaker 1: to me. And the President, you know, obviously loves this.
Speaker 1: Look at this record we have today. You know, maybe
Speaker 1: you don't. Maybe you're one of those people. You don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't know the President's style. He's too combative. Actually,
Speaker 1: I think America's kind of picked up on understands and
Speaker 1: embraces the fact that they elected a there that's not
Speaker 1: gonna stop fighting, And how do you win if you're
Speaker 1: not in the fight. And I think that that fearlessness
Speaker 1: is now becoming an admiration of people that maybe even
Speaker 1: didn't vote for Donald Trump the last time. Look at this,
Speaker 1: a record number, one hundred and fifty seven million, two
Speaker 1: hundred and eighty eight thousand Americans now employed. The best
Speaker 1: number we get today has to do with manufacturing. Well
Speaker 1: what about manufactural manufacturing. The number of people employed in
Speaker 1: the US today has now hit a record. This wasn't
Speaker 1: happening in the Biden Obama years, you know, Bureau of
Speaker 1: Labor statistics, one hundred and fifty seven million, two hundred
Speaker 1: and eighty eight thousand. Well, that means also revenues to
Speaker 1: the federal government will go up because people work, they
Speaker 1: pay taxes. That means the seven plus million new jobs
Speaker 1: that are created. Oh, that's taking people off of food stamps,
Speaker 1: out of poverty, giving them a purpose in their lives.
Speaker 1: They get to contribute. That is good for everybody's for
Speaker 1: everybody's been a you know, if you add, if we
Speaker 1: start adding the energy jobs that I predict we can add,
Speaker 1: and we have a way of getting our gas, oil,
Speaker 1: energy over to our Western European allies and over to Asia.
Speaker 1: And we can do it better and faster than Vladimir Putin.
Speaker 1: Guess what happens to Russia, by the way, the same
Speaker 1: Russia that even the New York Times when they say
Speaker 1: it was knowingly it was from the get go. It
Speaker 1: was disinformation from the Russians from the beginning. Well, they
Speaker 1: knew Hillary was buying the dirty dossier. Maybe this whole
Speaker 1: narrative that you've heard for two and a half years
Speaker 1: that the Russians are helping to elect Trump, well, if
Speaker 1: they knew the dirty dossier was disinformation. We now have
Speaker 1: the FBI spreadsheet saying ninety some odd percent of it
Speaker 1: is untrue. Like we told you from the get go.
Speaker 1: If you if you actually read the dossier, you can
Speaker 1: just laugh at it. You know it's not true. And
Speaker 1: we're you know, part of a few that actually told
Speaker 1: you that and took the time to read it. It's
Speaker 1: actually amusing worth your time if you have some spare
Speaker 1: time over the weekend. But the reality is, we want
Speaker 1: to bring Putin to his knees. It's gonna be energy.
Speaker 1: You know, the unemployment rate three point seven percent, I mean,
Speaker 1: you look at these manufacturing jobs, the biggest number since January.
Speaker 1: That to me is the biggest gain over the weekend.
Speaker 1: And who's benefiting the people that were hurt the most
Speaker 1: under Biden Obama policies, every demographic group that Democrats claim
Speaker 1: to have a monopoly of compassion for African Americans, Hispanic Americans,
Speaker 1: Asian Americans, women in the workplace, youth, unemployment, that's where
Speaker 1: the benefit is most felt. Those jobs, manufacturing jobs, they
Speaker 1: didn't just go away because because because they were regulated
Speaker 1: out of business oftentimes. You know this this extreme new,
Speaker 1: radical green New Deal agenda, Well that there's been some
Speaker 1: implementation of that, you know, decisively, it's incrementally rammed down
Speaker 1: our throat over the year, and now they're just saying
Speaker 1: it more openly, believing it more openly. And as we
Speaker 1: discussed in days past, even Acasio Cortez's own chief of
Speaker 1: staff said, the Cree New Deal was never about climate change,
Speaker 1: just worked out that way. Now it's about a new philosophy,
Speaker 1: it's about socialism. What did Comrade Dablasio say, We're gonna
Speaker 1: tax the living hell out of the rich. Okay, we're
Speaker 1: gonna give the money back Congresswoman to leib says, we're
Speaker 1: gonna give the money back to the people who really
Speaker 1: deserve it, the ones that earned it, taken from the
Speaker 1: They're gonna take it from the people that earned it.
Speaker 1: All this hatred, there's two factors in play here. Hatred
Speaker 1: of people that have been given the freedom and worked hard,
Speaker 1: took advantage of the opportunity and have been successful. Let's
Speaker 1: punish that success. And on the other side of it,
Speaker 1: we're gonna punish that success by telling maybe a larger
Speaker 1: group of people, hey, elect us, empower us. We'll take
Speaker 1: their money and we'll build in every bit of safety,
Speaker 1: security from rado to grave into your life, and you
Speaker 1: can count on us, and you'll keep your doctor and
Speaker 1: your plan and you'll say, no, I guess not. That
Speaker 1: didn't work out. But that's what they want, all right.
Speaker 1: Joining us now to literally shed more light on why
Speaker 1: this phenomenon is what it is. Now, this book is
Speaker 1: going to do very well. It's called Winning over three
Speaker 1: hundred Trump administration accomplishments. The media refuses to discuss. Jason
Speaker 1: Hoyte is with us, you know. And by the way,
Speaker 1: you have a website, President Trump Winning dot Com, which
Speaker 1: the President was talking about we'll get sick of winning.
Speaker 1: Why do you think the media can never give any
Speaker 1: credit to anything that he's done? And look at the
Speaker 1: records set again today on the economy. Well, it's just
Speaker 1: the fact that they it goes completely against their agenda.
Speaker 1: You know, if you remember President Obama said, what's you
Speaker 1: going to do? Negotiate a better deal? What's he going
Speaker 1: to do? Waighs his magic wand and here we are
Speaker 1: with manufacturing numbers of unemployment numbers, deregulation, doing exactly the
Speaker 1: thing that he promised in the campaign, which went against
Speaker 1: everything Obama promoted. And who are we promoted? And here
Speaker 1: we are with more and more winning. So my question is,
Speaker 1: as you and I look, I obviously can't give every
Speaker 1: all three hundred accomplishments. We have actually done something that
Speaker 1: no other TV show has done, and we've done it
Speaker 1: on this radio program, and that is we've actually listed
Speaker 1: them to the extent you can list them and not
Speaker 1: bore people to death, but on TV we actually scroll
Speaker 1: them along with my monologue some nights and I'm looking
Speaker 1: at this list of accomplishments that I'm saying, wow, you know,
Speaker 1: think about that. Now, compare that to the time the
Speaker 1: media mob spends on let's see Robert Mueller, the witch hunt, Russia, Russia, Russia,
Speaker 1: stormy stormy sshole racist, racist. They don't give any time
Speaker 1: to the success do they No, not at all. And
Speaker 1: I think that one of the greatest successes is beyond
Speaker 1: the economic numbers for President Trump is just what you
Speaker 1: talked about with Russia. Limbaugh in your interview is finally
Speaker 1: we have someone who is taking on the media, not
Speaker 1: trying to be on media darling and hope they like
Speaker 1: these piece playing them like a fiddle. I think Rush
Speaker 1: a couple of years ago said that Twitter is Trump's
Speaker 1: laser pointer and the media are cats. Finally we have
Speaker 1: a guy who is in office controlling the media and
Speaker 1: seating the narrative, even though they're not giving him any
Speaker 1: credit for any of his success in the winning. Well,
Speaker 1: the thing is is, you know, I am the forgotten man.
Speaker 1: That was my life for a good part of my life.
Speaker 1: I didn't have money in the bank, I didn't have
Speaker 1: any insurance, I didn't have hope of having any insurance.
Speaker 1: And the only thing I had was my you know,
Speaker 1: two good hands, halfway decent brain, and a work ethic
Speaker 1: that was instilled to me by my parents and grandparents,
Speaker 1: and that work ethic literally saved my life and living
Speaker 1: in the greatest country God gave man absolutely. I mean,
Speaker 1: you think about even a last year, last July, I
Speaker 1: believe Trump signed an executive order setting up the National
Speaker 1: Council for the American Worker. How many times have you
Speaker 1: heard that discussed. They're talking about more education for manufacturing,
Speaker 1: and I think that that's what a lot of these
Speaker 1: the manufacturing that that blue color side, if you will,
Speaker 1: that you talked about, there's much more confidence. There's a
Speaker 1: lot of investment in that area. And there they've finally
Speaker 1: got a guy on board who you remember President Obama
Speaker 1: during that same town hall said well, we're just gonna
Speaker 1: have to retrain them to do something else. Those jobs
Speaker 1: aren't coming back. Well, we got a new guy here,
Speaker 1: new sheriff in town, and the jobs aren't coming back. Well.
Speaker 1: I want to ask this because when you see the
Speaker 1: manufacturing jobs, as I was saying, those jobs didn't just disappear.
Speaker 1: They were legislated out of business. There was they were.
Speaker 1: The regulations drove them out of business. The high taxation
Speaker 1: drove them out of business. And that's why companies is
Speaker 1: it true or not true? They decide they can't make
Speaker 1: a profit if they produce an America, so they go abroad.
Speaker 1: How much of a factor was that? It's a huge factor.
Speaker 1: And in fact, the candidate Trump promised to remove two
Speaker 1: regulations for every new one regulation implemented, and in twenty eighteen,
Speaker 1: I believe he removed the ratio of twelve to one,
Speaker 1: way above what he promised. In twenty seventeen, he started
Speaker 1: off with twenty two to one. And so I think
Speaker 1: that what he's doing is he's returning the free market
Speaker 1: to the people instead of a government run economy where
Speaker 1: these agencies picking shoes who wins in the economy and
Speaker 1: who loses. He's returning by reducing regulation and returning the
Speaker 1: economy to the people. All Right, I gotta take a break.
Speaker 1: We'll come back. This book is amazing. We put it
Speaker 1: on Hannity dot com. It's called winning over three hundred
Speaker 1: Trump Administration accomplishments. The media mob refuses to discuss. Right
Speaker 1: as we continue, the author of the book, Jason Hoyte,
Speaker 1: is with us winning over three hundred Trump administration accomplishments.
Speaker 1: Why is this president setting these employment records? And do
Speaker 1: you see a correlation. For example, Black unemployment another huge record,
Speaker 1: which is awesome for this country. Why what is it
Speaker 1: specifically that is, why are his policies impacting the communities
Speaker 1: that I would argue were disproportionately negatively impacted by Biden Obama,
Speaker 1: the people that claim to have a monopoly of compassion
Speaker 1: for every separate demographic group in the country. I think
Speaker 1: that especially when you look at the walk Away movement,
Speaker 1: which isn't being discussed by the rest of the media.
Speaker 1: The walk away movement, people who are walking away from
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party. They're seeing the light, they're seeing the
Speaker 1: opportunity out there, and when you reduced the regulation for example.
Speaker 1: And I don't think that he has specific policies that
Speaker 1: I'm going to target the black community only because it's
Speaker 1: not just the black community, it's just banics, it's women,
Speaker 1: it's there's record numbers across the board. Unfortunately, we've got
Speaker 1: a mentality of breaking them, breaking everybody into classes and
Speaker 1: segmentations and categories. But across the board, we're all winning
Speaker 1: in this economy. So I don't think he's actually targeting
Speaker 1: specific areas and saying I'm going to help them, only
Speaker 1: helping all of us. Do you agree with me that
Speaker 1: the biggest opportunity for everybody's wealth to rise? In other words,
Speaker 1: if we want everybody's standard of living to rise, which
Speaker 1: we do. I see, if we're gonna train truck drivers
Speaker 1: in the energy spect sphere, and we're gonna train him
Speaker 1: and they're gonna make eighty grand starting out after training
Speaker 1: in one hundred grand easy, if they do a little overtime,
Speaker 1: in one hundred and twenty five grand, if they do
Speaker 1: a lot of overtime, and then more as the years
Speaker 1: go on. Those are real career, high paying jobs, and
Speaker 1: to me, there's probably millions of them that will be created.
Speaker 1: Do you agree with me that is the biggest potential
Speaker 1: growth possibility, rising tide, possibility of success for most Americans?
Speaker 1: I absolutely do. And again it's that deregulation side. Even
Speaker 1: without the help of Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat Congress,
Speaker 1: he's reducing these regulations in businesses feel optimistic. There's less
Speaker 1: barriers to entry. More and more people can be entrepreneurial
Speaker 1: and start a small business, or they can get that
Speaker 1: training which which he's talked about, which he talked about
Speaker 1: a National conselt for the American Worker last year. I
Speaker 1: see tremendous opportunity across the board, and people are optimistic
Speaker 1: and taking advantage of all that. All right, listen, we
Speaker 1: put your book. I think this is going to do
Speaker 1: very well. Congratulations on it winning it's called You've got
Speaker 1: a great cover on the book. Over three hundred Trump
Speaker 1: administration accomplishments. The media mob. Why don't you put the
Speaker 1: word mob in there? You don't listen to the showing
Speaker 1: off of the media mob. I'm adding the word mob
Speaker 1: refuses to discuss. Well. I refer to this book as
Speaker 1: a conversation starter. We have to reach I believe, with
Speaker 1: personal conversations with our friends and family, those that are
Speaker 1: still buying into the narrative of the of the leftist media.
Speaker 1: We have to reach them with personal conversation, sit them
Speaker 1: down and say, look, this is going on. This is
Speaker 1: the real news about what's going on, not the fake news.
Speaker 1: Do some research at the conversation starter. So no, I
Speaker 1: didn't put mob on there. I didn't want to get
Speaker 1: them too triggered at the outset and the cover. All right,
Speaker 1: thank you so much, Jason, We wish you well. It's
Speaker 1: up on Hannity dot com, Amazon dot com. Winning over
Speaker 1: three hundred Trump administration accomplishments. The media mob refuses to
Speaker 1: discuss eight hundred and nine f one SEAWAN is our
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number. If you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program, you're doing something. I just announced
Speaker 1: what you're doing. Do you mind? I gathful. So we
Speaker 1: told the story that Linda went down to Leavenworth. Now
Speaker 1: we followed the Eddie Gallagher story. I actually met Eddie
Speaker 1: Gallagher the other night in studio. I'm not allowed to
Speaker 1: talk a lot about it. He was the one that
Speaker 1: was cleared thanks to Mark mckayzy, Bernie Carrick, Rudy Giuliani
Speaker 1: and the President got involved. Remember, they had him in
Speaker 1: the worst prison conditions and he had not been found
Speaker 1: guilty of anything, and he was alleged to have killed
Speaker 1: the terrorist. And it turns out nothing of that sort
Speaker 1: ever happened. And and by the way, now they're trying
Speaker 1: to steal this poor guy's retirement, which is unconscionable. We
Speaker 1: have been following the case of Clint Lorentz for a
Speaker 1: long time on this program. We've had his family on
Speaker 1: this program, just like we followed the case to Christian
Speaker 1: Saucia and we can't follow everyone's case. But in the
Speaker 1: case of Clint Lrentz, he became a new platoon member.
Speaker 1: What year was he serving at that time? It was
Speaker 1: the incident was He took over the platoon on July first,
Speaker 1: twenty twelve, and the incident occurred on July second. This
Speaker 1: in Afghanistan, all right, So Clint Lorentz takes over a
Speaker 1: platoon that in the in the two weeks prior had
Speaker 1: lost platoon members in their platoon leader to guys on
Speaker 1: motorcycles with IEDs. So he is the brand new leader
Speaker 1: of that platoon after they've just been through this. Was
Speaker 1: it his first second well was the first week in
Speaker 1: his job. It was the second day. The second day,
Speaker 1: what does he see? He's sees two motorcycles that bust
Speaker 1: through a checkpoint. He's got to make a split second decision.
Speaker 1: He knows what has happened to this platoon just ten
Speaker 1: days earlier. He's got to decide. And it ends up
Speaker 1: that they defended themselves. They assumed the worst. Now they
Speaker 1: in this particular case, the two guys on motorcycles did
Speaker 1: not have IEDs, which doesn't explain why they would run
Speaker 1: past a checkpoint. But that's a different story now, since
Speaker 1: then they're putting this guy in jail for thirty plus years,
Speaker 1: and they say that's a war crime, right, So his
Speaker 1: sentence was reduced to twenty years, and then they took
Speaker 1: another year off the time served. But here's the problem.
Speaker 1: The two guys on the motorcycles, their DNA was found
Speaker 1: in the interim since this conviction, and their DNA was
Speaker 1: on ied explosives. They're very DNA, meaning they were terrorists.
Speaker 1: And the question is if we're gonna send and again,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm all for the next generation of military weaponry
Speaker 1: so we don't ever have to send kids door to
Speaker 1: door like we did in Iraq or the way we
Speaker 1: fought in Afghanistan. I want to fight wars having the
Speaker 1: most sophisticated advanced technology defensive and offensive, where we have
Speaker 1: guys that can see from overhead. We see what drones
Speaker 1: are capable of. But the next generation of sophisticated weaponry,
Speaker 1: and we just push buttons like we kind of did
Speaker 1: in beating back Isis and Syria, and we win the
Speaker 1: wars that way. Anyway, you went down to Leavenworth, you
Speaker 1: met with Clinton Lorance's family and other people. You were
Speaker 1: very touched by it all. It was a very emotional
Speaker 1: day for you, and now you've decided to write about
Speaker 1: it and put it up on Hannity dot com. So yeah,
Speaker 1: and thank you so for all you're doing, because it's
Speaker 1: you know, it takes it really does take a village
Speaker 1: to get the truth out. Really, do we have to
Speaker 1: quote Hillary at the beginning of this? Really, I'm giving
Speaker 1: your props and your quote Hillary. You start out quoting Hillary,
Speaker 1: I go ahead, anyhow? Any anyhow, So, Clint, you know,
Speaker 1: one of the things that we're really trying to bring
Speaker 1: to light, and we're so fortunate to have really good
Speaker 1: people joining on board, which we're going to be announcing
Speaker 1: next week as they're reviewing the case now. But one
Speaker 1: of the things that I'm writing about in this article
Speaker 1: that a lot of people don't know is that not
Speaker 1: only is Clint completely innocent, and not only does the
Speaker 1: biometric evidence completely exonerate him of any guilt or faultier
Speaker 1: and what he did was completely with him the right
Speaker 1: to protect his platoon, but there is a brigadier general
Speaker 1: who is the highest judge that would oversee and has
Speaker 1: been overseeing his case, and he went out last March
Speaker 1: of twenty eighteen and gave a speech at CSIS, which
Speaker 1: is a big conservative thing tank, and told the audience
Speaker 1: there in the middle of talking about one of the
Speaker 1: greatest military tragedies in our history, comparing Clint Lorentz to
Speaker 1: this story and saying that Clint Lorantz was guilty of
Speaker 1: charges that he had actually been exonerated on and acquitted
Speaker 1: on by jory of his peers. So Don Brown and
Speaker 1: John Maher, who are the two part of his legal team,
Speaker 1: they're the two guys sort of at the Helm, and
Speaker 1: so they reach out to the Brigadier general and they say,
Speaker 1: you know, General Burger, who want to let you know
Speaker 1: that you misspoke about Clint Lrantz, whose case is still
Speaker 1: under review. He can still be completely acquitted of everything.
Speaker 1: The exculpatory evidence can be included. And by you saying
Speaker 1: something like this on a main stage in a respected forum,
Speaker 1: by you know, a group of your peers and people
Speaker 1: that are going to hear this about Clint Lrantz, you're
Speaker 1: really making this very difficult for us. And so, you know,
Speaker 1: they took it upon themselves to assume that his actions
Speaker 1: were not nefarious and that he did not mean to
Speaker 1: do this and yet at first he was like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'll have a meeting with you guys. Look over the evidence.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe I misspoke, YadA YadA, And then all
Speaker 1: of a sudden he goes quiet. He's never retracted his comments,
Speaker 1: he's never said that he was wrong, he's never looked
Speaker 1: at the documentation. And all of this is written proof.
Speaker 1: I mean, Clint had to go before a court, he
Speaker 1: was held before a jury and acquitted on all of
Speaker 1: these rules of engagement and fractions that were supposedly that
Speaker 1: he had committed that he did not. So then this
Speaker 1: general goes and lies about him, willfully lies about him,
Speaker 1: and continues to lie about him, and perpetuates a lie,
Speaker 1: making sure that it's getting around so that this man
Speaker 1: cannot be acquitted. And we're not looking for a pardon
Speaker 1: for Clint. Be very clear on that we are not
Speaker 1: looking for a pardon. A pardon means that you are guilty.
Speaker 1: We are looking for no. We are looking for a
Speaker 1: disapproval of findings, a disapproval of findings. And just today
Speaker 1: we're seeing this rapper what do they call him, asap
Speaker 1: Rocky World. So now this guy's coming home from Sweden.
Speaker 1: So if we can get a rapper home from Sweden.
Speaker 1: We can get Clint Laurance at a fort level worth
Speaker 1: as far as I'm concerned, Well, I'm going to write
Speaker 1: an article. It's up there now. Please take a look,
Speaker 1: get involved, everybody. The problem is, it's not just Clint
Speaker 1: the rules of mc goldstein, it's Hatley. There's a whole
Speaker 1: bunch of them. Look at Derek Miller. Forget about it. Sorry,
Speaker 1: I'm on a roll. I apologize. Don't apologize. I mean
Speaker 1: it is the rules of engagement. We can't do this anymore.
Speaker 1: We can't ask our kids to go fight in Vietnam, Iraq,
Speaker 1: Afghanistan and put handcuffs on them and then if they
Speaker 1: make an imperfect decision in the moment, How easy must
Speaker 1: it be, you know, for people in the comfort of
Speaker 1: some military barracks in Washington, DC somewhere, and they're big
Speaker 1: offices to make decisions, life and death decisions when they're
Speaker 1: not there. And that's why it's just another reason we
Speaker 1: politicize wars after we lose tens of thousands of brave
Speaker 1: our national treasure, and then we say never mind, or
Speaker 1: we end up saying, well, you shouldn't have made that decision,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, what do you mean you can't second
Speaker 1: guess a platoon leader in combat in a moment like that,
Speaker 1: And that's what they did. And then when the evidence
Speaker 1: that showed that the two motorcycle guys were in fact
Speaker 1: terrorists with DNA evidence and they were match their bomb
Speaker 1: makers and the road, then this is a road that
Speaker 1: is used and controlled only by the Taliban exactly, and
Speaker 1: they and they ran the checkpoint. What else do you
Speaker 1: what are you supposed to think in that moment? The
Speaker 1: problem is now, if you're second guessing, you got this
Speaker 1: other group of kids behind you that are younger than you,
Speaker 1: that look up to you, and you're in charge of
Speaker 1: making a decision about whether they're gonna their parents are
Speaker 1: gonna get a call in the next twenty four hours
Speaker 1: that they're either dead, they've had their legs blown off,
Speaker 1: or they're barely hanging on to life and they're gonna
Speaker 1: be disfigured the rest of their life. It's unbelievable that
Speaker 1: we even have to discuss this. Every one of those
Speaker 1: cases needs to be brought up and revisited now that
Speaker 1: Obama is out of office. Um, all right, let's go,
Speaker 1: let's say hi, oh big time AJ Houston, Texas. What's
Speaker 1: going on? Baby? How are you big time, big time?
Speaker 1: Sharon Hannity, Why you're client today? How are you? I'm
Speaker 1: in I'm in the bank. So I'm going in the
Speaker 1: bank day quiet. You don't don't what they're gonna think.
Speaker 1: If you're in the bank talking quietly, They're gonna think
Speaker 1: that you're planning a robbery. That's what they're gonna think.
Speaker 1: They're gonna think that you and I are plot Now
Speaker 1: I'm just teasing. What's going on? My friend, Oh, just
Speaker 1: shaking to make Hey, Trump was in my hometown instance,
Speaker 1: and then before I went to the truck and uh boy,
Speaker 1: shocking statement. That man is a fan man. And what's
Speaker 1: so good about it is my uncle say, I'm coming
Speaker 1: out to bank. Now I can really talk. Now. Hey,
Speaker 1: my uncles say, well, there ain't gonna be no black
Speaker 1: boat there because there's a k K State. I say, well,
Speaker 1: I got a plenty school. You're gonna be wrong. And boy,
Speaker 1: what happened? You tuck them off that end up looking
Speaker 1: at all the black boat that was at that place.
Speaker 1: It was so funny. But hey, this ain't about black
Speaker 1: This ain't about what this is about the American people.
Speaker 1: The man done a fabulous job. Aren't we like one America?
Speaker 1: One family? I mean in the sense that I don't
Speaker 1: get it. Hey, well, you know to the Democrats and Liberals,
Speaker 1: it's always gonna be about read this, what's gonna happen,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna lose again. It's like James Brown said,
Speaker 1: Trump opened up the dough and we go get it ourselves.
Speaker 1: It ain't like Obama. He did oh government and never
Speaker 1: showed up. Black folks, wake up, white folks, wake up.
Speaker 1: Everybody was fashion. You know, it's amazing how this crystallized
Speaker 1: this week. And big Time, we love you. You're the best.
Speaker 1: Go do your banking. Tell everybody. Uh in Houston, we
Speaker 1: say hi. When we got to meet big Time, that
Speaker 1: was like the honor of our life. And when he
Speaker 1: met Linda was like, oh my god, it was It
Speaker 1: was a fun day. It was a fun Yeah, it
Speaker 1: was a fun moment um all right, eight hundred nine
Speaker 1: four one hump. But I gotta tell you something, the
Speaker 1: end of the day, you look at the records we
Speaker 1: now have. The Democrats are so stupid. They went so
Speaker 1: far on this issue of concentration camps that then the
Speaker 1: President brings up Baltimore, and he tells the truth. And
Speaker 1: this has happened. We've been highlighting La San Francisco, Chicago, Baltimore.
Speaker 1: Baltimore happens to be the worst in terms of the
Speaker 1: violence that has taken place in the streets. I've given
Speaker 1: you all these numbers repeatedly, you know. And it is
Speaker 1: these problems in these cities that for decades have been
Speaker 1: run by big spending liberals. The poverty, the misery, the mayhem.
Speaker 1: One point eight billion dollars to Baltimore and the stimulus bill.
Speaker 1: What did they do with it? How do you waste
Speaker 1: that much money? It's unbelievable. All right, let's get all right, Tom,
Speaker 1: And Florida's down on this Friday. We can't have people
Speaker 1: down on Friday. What's up, Tom? How are you? Hey? John?
Speaker 1: I am doing good. Once I marine uh now a
Speaker 1: current truck driver in the sunny Sasha a marine perfectell
Speaker 1: was my friend. Well, thank you very much. Um. Yeah,
Speaker 1: like I I called you, uh called uh told you
Speaker 1: call screener um yesterday. I got livid, as I'm sure
Speaker 1: many of your listeners got livid, you know, And and
Speaker 1: and I sort of felt like there was a lot
Speaker 1: of ponification going on with your guests yesterday about possible
Speaker 1: uh non indictments, and uh, I only got a couple
Speaker 1: of questions for you, because I mean, I all right,
Speaker 1: let's what you got. Well, why are you down? What
Speaker 1: do I need? Let not your heart be trouble? What's
Speaker 1: on your mind? Well? And uh, you know, being a
Speaker 1: former marine, I I I don't let my heart get troubled.
Speaker 1: I just want to see justice, as I'm sure that
Speaker 1: you do. We've heard, uh, we've heard you talk about
Speaker 1: this now for the last two years. And when I
Speaker 1: heard what I heard yesterday, uh, you know, it just
Speaker 1: got me down. Uh. The only the only upside to
Speaker 1: that was was you know that you know the you
Speaker 1: know there might be some possible indictments coming down the road.
Speaker 1: Do we all feel that Comey should be indicted on
Speaker 1: the leaks? Absolutely? But let me ask you this. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna shock you what I say. Just remember this. I've
Speaker 1: always been recommended for prosecution, but you know he deserves
Speaker 1: due process, presumption of innocence. I think the evidence is
Speaker 1: pretty overwhelming when they got the documents that you took
Speaker 1: that you shouldn't have taken, that are classified. But go
Speaker 1: ahead in your heart of hearts, and we're not just
Speaker 1: talking about mister Coomy. In your heart of hearts. Do
Speaker 1: you think there's going to be any any indictments? And
Speaker 1: are you worried at the end of the day that
Speaker 1: there's not going to be any adictments at all? Through
Speaker 1: this whole process. I always worry that the swamp protects
Speaker 1: the swamp. You gotta worry about that. I mean, and
Speaker 1: Christopher Rays, you know, John Solomon's column really was disappointing
Speaker 1: to me this week. You always have to worry about that.
Speaker 1: But do I believe there's going to be indictments for
Speaker 1: the abuse of power? The corruption fis abuse rigging, an investigation,
Speaker 1: and an illegal circumvention of American intelligence gathering and outsourcing it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think I do believe there will be indictments of
Speaker 1: some very big name people. I believe that with all
Speaker 1: my heart. And if it doesn't happen, I will say
Speaker 1: that what we call our constitutional republic equal justice, equal
Speaker 1: application of our laws, or in jeopardy for all of us.
Speaker 1: We can't have a two tier justice system. I'm pretty
Speaker 1: confident though, wait and see, Hey have a great Friday,
Speaker 1: by the way, and weekend rats up today. I am
Speaker 1: what a week this has been. I want to just
Speaker 1: address because too many callers now and too many people writing,
Speaker 1: and so many of you concerned. Ah, what about bar
Speaker 1: Why didn't Bard decide to You know, we've had the
Speaker 1: DOJ Inspector General referred to call me for possible prosecution
Speaker 1: on two things and by the way, not being honest
Speaker 1: one of them. And the espionage. Why didn't he act?
Speaker 1: Why did he do? I'm just telling you it's not
Speaker 1: the way it's gonna work in this case. They're not
Speaker 1: gonna go for the low hanging fruit first. It's too important.
Speaker 1: And all the pressure that the Trump people felt the
Speaker 1: last two and a half years, oh, they're feeling it now,
Speaker 1: which is why they all hate me so much. Anyway,
Speaker 1: have a great weekend, barbecue, have fun with your family
Speaker 1: and your friends. We live in the greatest country God
Speaker 1: gave man. Thank you for this microphone and camera. Every
Speaker 1: day and celebrate freedom and fun because it's a gift.
Speaker 1: See you back here Monday. Have a great weekend.