WEBVTT - Brad DeLong on the FTX Collapse and the South Sea Bubble

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisntal and I'm Tracy Halloway. Tracy, you know,

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the specifics of the f t X Saga disaster collapse

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>are still coming out, but one thing we do know

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, there's nothing really that new about manias.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing really new about bubbles. There's nothing really new

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>about sort of like wildcat shadow banks that implode and

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>lose a lot of money. Like in a way, the

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>story is as old as time. Well, I I broadly

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>agree with that, like every speculative bubble is going to

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>have some similarities. But I feel like, I don't know,

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like when it comes to crypto, there is

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>something about it specifically that just feels like really really

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think of the right word, maybe cynical

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>or nileistic. Like it's hard to tell how many true

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>believers are out there versus people who are basically just

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.919
<v Speaker 1>gambling on digital tokens who want to get rich quickly.

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>But I do feel like, and I wrote this after

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we recorded that episode with Sam bankman Fried and Matt

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Levin where he described yield farming as you know, the

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 1>magic money box. But it feels like people kind of

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>run two bubbles nowadays. And Lily Frankis talked to us

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>about this as well, but she was saying, people sort

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of have this compressed timeline where they just see an

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to get rich quick, and the idea is to

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>get out before everyone else. But as you say, there

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>have been bubbles throughout history where people have tried to

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>do the exact same thing. No, but I think you

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>make a really good point and homing in on this

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>idea of running two bubbles is sort of like this

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>strategy that a lot of people employ. Like I've always

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of had this theory and i don't know if

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really true because I've never looked at it empirically.

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's like just for twitter type of theory, you know,

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like I don't have to do you have any

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>other types of theory? Not really, that was mean Carmen

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>cut that. No, No, keep that and keep that in

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>people getting to hear the real, the real back and

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>forth between us. But you know, just this like idea

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of like in a period of economic procarity and so forth,

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>if you don't feel like there's like tremendous like economic

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for you, then you have to run towards bubbles,

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>because maybe a bubble will come round two or three,

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>four times in your life maybe, And if you don't

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>strike it rich on one of them, like when you're

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it. Well, this is exactly it. If you

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>don't see the possibility of getting rich or even you know,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>reasonably comfortable in your day to day job, then why

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't you look at something like crypto as basically a

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.959
<v Speaker 1>lottery ticket, right, You could get lucky if you put

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>enough money into this investment and if enough people do

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. So I think that's how a lot

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of people were viewing it, this sort of lottery ticket,

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you know. And there's another thing and you sort of

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 1>touched on this, which is that know, yes, okay, there's

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>always bubbles throughout history, but some bubbles in particular like

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>really cellvision of like changing the world. Right, So it's

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>like cryptocurrencies are like beanie babies, is I think people say,

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But I don't even think that at the very peak

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of like the beanie baby mania, that anyone actually believe

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>like they were going to change the world right, as

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>far as I know, as far as I know, I

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think. So we're going to have the beanie baby

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.119
<v Speaker 1>based economy and everyone is going to have their own

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>beanie baby wallet, and we'll have financial independence and we

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>won't have to go through you know, middlemen like the banks.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>It'll be great. We'll just trade beanie babies with each other. Yeah,

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think you're right. I think that's exactly

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>what happened. But no, like so, you know, some of

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>these manias, and the dot com one of course too

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is like the world is going to change, and they

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>were kind of right about that, because the Internet did

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>change the world. But you know, I do want to

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>understand more about not only like the history of bubbles,

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>not only what the FTX and crypto implosion is similar to,

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but like what history says also about this sort of

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like what I perceive is like this cat and mouse

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>game that regulators play with different kinds of neil banks

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of swords. I understand like neil bank might meet something else,

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>but I mean like new attempts to recreate the financial

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>system and the endless sort of chase and sort of

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>attempt to regulate them, and the hot money flows out

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of the regulated system totally. I think looking into the

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>similarities and the differences with pass bubbles is definitely something

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that we need to do. The other thing that I

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.799
<v Speaker 1>find striking about crypto and I know there have been

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, private money projects throughout history, but it does

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>feel like Crypto was almost like the apex of that effort,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Like we are going to create a financial bubble out

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of pure like money that we have created. I don't know,

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it feels like the financial like speculative mania kind of

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>reached almost its purest form when it comes to crypto,

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Like this is about making money with pretend money that

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we have created. Like that's what it feels like to me. Yeah,

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 1>we could go down to this rabbit hole. But like

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>this idea of like the complete separation of a new

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>financial system from the existing regulated legal financial system is

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like a financial fascinating angle. Anyway, you and I we

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>could chat for hours, but should we should we talk?

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Should we bring it in an action? Should we bring

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it in? Yeah? Yeah, we should, we should. Okay, So

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited about our guests. We've never had him

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on the show before, I don't think, but we have

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>been reading him forever for as long as like the

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>financial or eco blogg Is fhere and twitter sphere has existed.

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the true originals we're gonna be speaking to

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Brad DeLong. He's a professor of economics at the University

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of California at Berkeley. He's probably been two online since

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and he is the author of a new book called

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>Slouching Towards Utopia and Economic History of the twentieth Century.

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a true specialty economic history. So how does

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>FTX and crypto it into history? Brad, Thank you so

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>much for coming on the podcast. I can't believe it's

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>taken us this long to have you on. Now, thank

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you very very much for inviting me. Now, it's true

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that I actually have been in the same room when

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Joe with the past and I have actually spoken words

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>out of my mouth that have caused vibration to the

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>air that have gone into his ears, and he has

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>talked back. Although that was a decade ago, yeah, um,

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>But overwhelmingly over the past three well five years or so,

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and as long as odd Lots been running, it's been

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>very much a paras social relationship in which I listened

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to Joe and Tracy and then I argue with them

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>volubly in my shower until my wife tells them to

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.799
<v Speaker 1>shut up. And so it's great to be here, great

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to be here. Actually for reals here in the metaverse,

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>we are definitely We're glad to have you, Brad. We're

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely clipping that Kerman and putting that out as an

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>audiogram on Twitter as soon as possible. What is uh

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>if there is still a Twitter? If there is still

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a Twitter by the time this episode and comes out,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>which I hope f t X. I say those letters

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to you, and as an economic historian, what comes to

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>mind first? What are those words conjure up for you? First?

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>It conjures up the south Sea Bubble of the early

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>seventeen hundreds. You see, Great Britain had gone all in

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and its wars with France starting in six nine, and

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>had issued many, many metric f tons of debt during it.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a country of six million fighting a country

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of twenty million and winning, you know, and piling up

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>dead issue after debt issue after debt issue. But all

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of them were on different terms. None of them were tradeable.

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And along comes the south Sea Corporation with the idea

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that we are going to create a different form of money.

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>We are going to buy up all of the British

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>National debt. We are going to consolidate it. We're going

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to take all the different securities and mesh them together,

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and then we are going to sell equal identical shares

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of all of the consolidated debts. And because we're selling

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>one product, it's going to be tradeable, it's going to

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>be clear what it is, because it's just a particular

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>slice of the total debt. And the proprietors of the

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>south Sea Company said, we're going to get fabulously rich

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>here because going we're going to create this enormous liquidity

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>premium in the British National debt which is not previously unexisted,

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to skim off a third of that

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>liquidity value for us and our financers, and for you,

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Mr Member of Parliament, if you will help Greece our

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>bills go through the House of Commons so we can

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>actually do this enormous bubble followed by enormous crash. You know.

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Source of the Sir Isaac Newton quote. I can calculate

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the motions of heavenly bodies, but I cannot calculate the

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>madness of craps. So talk to us a little bit

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>more like, what exactly is the parallel here other than

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the south Sea Bubble, you know, involved creating a new

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>type of money, Like, are there other ways in the

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>way that the bubble built, in the way that people

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of marketed that idea to investors? Um, Yes, indeed, yes,

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>indeed that it's not just what the original Bitcoin and

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>ethereum people saying, we're going to have a whole new

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>form of money. It's also that you're getting in on

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the ground floor of what's going to be a truly

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>remarkable financial transformation. It's also going to be that we

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>understand how to work the political system to make it

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>work for us. And it's also a huge number of

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>copycats with all kinds of things, some of which are public,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>some of which are not, some of which are promises

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that we will have a business model at some point

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in the future, some of which are totally blue sky

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and incapable of realization in less than a century. And

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>some of them are ideas that actually worked out in

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>the very long run, right like the South Sea Bubble

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>company that wanted to send out an expedition to establish

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a trading post at the closest place where the Great

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Lakes meet the Mississippi River where you just have to

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>cut it drag a canoe across three miles. The Mississippi

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>River turned out to be important. Yes, And you know,

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>where's the place where you drag a canoe across three

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>miles to get from the Mississippi to the Great Lakes.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>You know what that's now called Chicago. I was thinking

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that was embarrassing on our part, but alas a hundred

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and sixty years too early for anyone to actually want

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to live in Chicago where the wind comes howling in

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>from Lake Michigan, and where I was last weekend, where's

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen degrees. So you know, going back to just the

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>south Sea Company like buying up all of the non

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>fungible British debt and all of these different like sort

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>of like random liquid que SIPs and turning it into

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 1>something that's liquid and fungible on every shared where it

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 1>seems like a pretty good idea. It is a very

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>good idea. In the end, it was actually executed, but

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it was executed by the Bank of England and not

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>by the south Sea Company, which is one reason why

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England still has its very large financial

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>temple on thread Needle Street, while there is no physical

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>sign of the south Sea Company anywhere in this fallen

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>sublunary sphere. M hm brad. What was the trigger for

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the south Sea bubble actually collapsing and are there any

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>parallels there with what we're seeing now in crypto? It's

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>very hard to tell what the trigger is. John Kenneth

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Galbraith used to say that there's this thing called the bezel,

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>which is the money that the early adopters who have

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>now selled out have known they've won, but the money

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that the people, the greater fools, do not yet know

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that they have lost. It looks like the trigger was

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the south Sea Company actually attempting to flex its political

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>muscles and get Parliament to push out some of its competitors,

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to rule that some of its competitors would in fact

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>be illegal, in order to concentrate demand for bubble like

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>assets in the shares of the south Sea Company, which

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>we're still trading on a win issued basis, and wanting

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to push them up to the sky um. But that

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that caused enough selling and enough loss of value elsewhere

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that people began to question the value of the south

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Sea Company's stock as well. You know, and once people

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>start saying, maybe this isn't actually as good, maybe I

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>am the greatest fool, then the thing is over. Joe,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I cannot tell you how many columns I have both

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>written and read over my lifetime in finance that start

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>with galper It's the bezel. It's like the perfect analogy

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>for so many things. It's a bit of a cliche,

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>but it also is perfect. I'm also kind of struck

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>by this politics point in because again, you know, thinking

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>about parallels. A is you had SBF who had attempted

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:05.839
<v Speaker 1>to become extremely influential within politics, and not only that

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to your point, even you know this idea of politics,

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>of the idea of like pushing out others, and literally

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>just like in the weeks before the ft X collapsed,

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>he was advocating for a certain type of defy regulation

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that many people in defy believe its targeting them. And

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>so this is actually maybe more parallels than maybe we

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>would have guessed. Yes, yes, yes, yes. And there's a

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>very nice south Sea bubble book by Tom Levinson called

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Money for Nothing, which I think everyone should read, along

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>with Sequoia capitals pieces on why we're investing so much

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and Sam Bankman read and why you should invest in

0:13:45.440 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>them too. Um that everyone should read this much so

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the things when it comes to bubbles, and

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe kind of touched on this in the intro, but

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>almost every big bubble actually does tell some sort of

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>compelling story. And obviously in hindsight you think, well, this

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>was blown completely out of proportion, or parts of this

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>were true, but not all of it, like in the

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com bubble. Like talk to us a little bit

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>more about that psychological aspect of bubbles and how do

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>people actually differentiate between you know, life world changing technology

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>versus a speculative asset. Well, mostly mostly there is a

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>story about a life changing and very profitable technology underneath there.

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, that is the end driving the thing, right

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that we are going to build a railroad from New

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>York to Chicago, and then we are going to collect

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of money because we own the railroad

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>from New York to Chicago. But then it turns out

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that there actually is a lot of money that wants

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to do this, and there is not one railroad, but

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>there are three railroads from New York to Chicago, and

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, each of them has high fixed but very

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>low variable costs, so each of them has an incentive

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to undercut the others, and so none of the railroads

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>can ever make any money because whenever anyone jacks up

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>their rates, one of the other two undercuts it, and

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>so all the railroads go smash with their equity going

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to zero and their bonds going to very steep discounts.

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>But at the end, the United States has three railroads

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>from New York to Chicago, and everyone who wants to

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>move goods or people from New York to Chicago and

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>back is enormously blessed by this, you know. Joe Stiglett

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>says something similar about the dot com bubble right that

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>m c I World Calm was saying it was making

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>huge amounts of fortunes by building out fiber everywhere it

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>was lying in its account thing. But lots of other

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>people followed it, and then we had a decade of

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>dark fiber in which transferring bits across the United States

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>was essentially free, and that nourished the growth of the Internet.

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>That is, the collective losses of investors in telecom during

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble was a social gift in terms

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that it produced a huge amount of telecommunications infrastructure that

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>all of us in the first decade of the twenty

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>first century benefited from massively. In the case of the

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>south Sea bubble, you've got the British bond mark that

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>rich British people could move their money from land to

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>commercial enterprises, into government debt and out again swiftly and easily,

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and so have more options and more peace of mind.

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But in the crypto bubble, um, what do you get right?

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to bid on the Financial Times n f

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>T M f t X Tombstone, but could not connect

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>by wall by Slanto wallet to the f T S site,

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>so I never bit on it at all. But you

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>get a particular number that says it gives you some

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of special claim on a particular picture of a

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>monkey that everyone has on their desktop. It's very unclear.

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Usually there is real money there. There is actually a

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, but

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it was never too clear what the pot of gold

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be in crypto, you know, just setting

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>aside this question of like, has any productive infrastructure been

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>laid that we will benefit from this? Because I do

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the answer it is also striking

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>your point about you know, you have the real road boom,

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>but no one can make money operating a real road.

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 1>And again kind of an interesting parallel here with crypto,

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>where you have like this insane bowl market for it's

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to find actually the entity to accrued a lot

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of profits even during the boom, you know, and especially

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>f TX, and people are like, how did you lose money?

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Is the biggest boom of the time and you were

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>trading it and you're mostly long cryptone is still you

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 1>managed to lose money. So I find that to be fascinating.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, another question I want to ask about the

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>south Sea Company. You know, whenever, whenever anyone goes bust, right,

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a question of like, well, were they fraud stirs

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning? Was it a fraud? Was it just

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.959
<v Speaker 1>a wrong way bet which can happen in finance and

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>people lose money, but it doesn't necessarily mean anything nefarious.

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>The people operating the south Sea Company, how did they

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>see it? Did they see us so we have a

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>chance to take everyone's money? Or do they really believe

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>they were building something important? Oh? They said, we have

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>bonds that are currently yielding six percent in the market.

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>We can issue consoles that will yield four percent um,

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we can earn fifty on the value of the British

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>government debt if we managed to get this deal done

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>and cream off at least a third of that from themselves.

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>They were really, really true believes um. But of course,

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 1>once they have salted the market, lots and lots and

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>lots of other people come in with other opportunities, people

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>who are significantly less true believer ish, and sufficiently more

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>people are willing to give other people money for badly

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>thought out business plans. I too, can come up with

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a badly thought out business plan, and then I'll be

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>off to France before anyone actually asks for their money back.

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>M hmm. This is a related question, but do you

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>think once once you start having those types of speculators

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>or I guess hangers on come into an industry, does

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it start to affect the behavior of like, even legitimate

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>players within that speculative industry. And the reason I ask

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>is because in the course of prepping for this episode,

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I found this quote from Vitalic Peuterin from that I

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>thought was fascinating in retrospe But the quote is in

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the case of ethereum, if somehow eight percent of Ethereum's

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>users just end up being cryptocurrency speculators. Would we then

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>have a social responsibility to start optimizing for that constituency

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>because that would end up being our constituency. Like that

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to me is interesting. Is there a reflexivity between the industry,

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the speculative industry and the speculators um? The fact you

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>mean that the existence of speculators deranges people exactly? Like

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>does it? Does it change their own behavior? So maybe

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I was growing two lips because I love two lips,

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>But now that I have all these people speculating, you know,

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>like the calculation starts to change. Yeah. The old teacher

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kimdlberger had a very nice line about this. You know,

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing that deranges you more than watching a friend

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to become rich. I like that, you know. And as

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the late Richard Blum says, after a while, if you

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>see lots of people around you who have become fabulously

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>rich by making stupid investments, you begin to think making

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>stupid investments is a good business model. You know, it

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>really does unhinge everyone, especially because economists are always wrong

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in always thinking that bubbles and such will crash before

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>they do right, And so it hangs on, and it

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>hangs on, and it hangs on far beyond the point

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>at which the sober economists have been saying, this will

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly not going to be sustained for this long, right,

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>And then there comes the point when economists began saying, well,

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe g this time it is different, at which case

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you better sell quickly. So, just on the topic of

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>bubbles actually crashing, I mean, you can get different types

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of mania crashes. So you can get relatively small ones

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>that don't seem to have a broader impact on the

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>economy or the financial system. I mean, beanie babies might

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>have been painful for some individuals, but I don't think

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it actually to like a credit crisis or anything like that.

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>But you can also have these big bubbles that crash

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and have enormous consequences for the economy. Talk to us

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>about how how those effects play out. Yeah, and I

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>was about to ask you what the key is leverage. Yes,

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble crashed. When the dot com bubble crashed,

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it took down four trillion dollars of wealth that people

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>thought they had. But because it had all been equity

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and the investors of the dot com bubble who went

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>broke weren't high. They leveraged. The unemployment rate only goes

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>up by one percentage point and comes back down fairly quickly.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>By contrast, you know, I remember March of two thousand

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and eight and we were doing our rough back of

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the envelope calculations about the subprime collapse, and we concluded

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that there was about five billion dollars of more ages

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>that weren't going to be paid off. And you know,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.479
<v Speaker 1>that's one eighth the size of the dot com crash.

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And yet that one eighth as large loss created a

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:13.239
<v Speaker 1>crisis that pushed the unemployment up by six percent, and

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it took us a full decade to get back to

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>full employment after that for lots of reasons, but the

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>huge difference was that the people who had been investing

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in subprime when they shouldn't be were the major money

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>center banks who were saying, Aha, here's a chance for

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>us to do some regulatory arbitrage. These derivatives are rated

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>triple A, so we can use them as our core reserves,

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're paying us fifteen basis points more than real

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>triple A assets are. And it was the fact that

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that was held by guys who were leveraged forty to one,

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, as their core reserves that made a simple

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>crash of an asset into an enormous, interlinked chain of

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcies were at the them. No one is sure is

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>they're they're solving because everyone has so much counterparty risk.

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>They do not understand that everyone pulls into their shells

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and sells what they can and otherwise hunkers. Now, we

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's going to happen outside the crypto sphere

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, We really do not think so. So another

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>question in a sort of how these patterns work out,

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and again it seems like one possibility with the FTX

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>story is that it started off as like a sort of, um,

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's build an online crypto futures exchange, let's

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>build a crypto hedge fund, and maybe it started out

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 1>working well and it grew, and then at some point

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>as it started to lapse, what maybe started as sort

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of like, let's attempt to build a business, and we

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and so this is you know, maybe you know,

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>edge more towards bad business practices like moving FTX customer

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>money to ALAMT or other things that someone might allege

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>his fraud or lying to the public about the safety

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of the reserves. You pointed out that, you know, in

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a boom, at a bubble, you can have this sort

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>of like the derangement of behavior. So if Tracy is

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a tulip farmer who just likes the flowers and then

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>suddenly gets into it for money, or I think baby

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>babies are cute and suddenly I'm a speculator. You know,

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>do you have a similar phenomenon where people can start

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>an entity and have sort of like genuine good faith

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>intentions of building a business, but as the as it

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>all tips over and collapses, essentially the fraud becomes the

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>attempt to keep the real business going. Well. Then first

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>there's one stage in which you think, well, g there's

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a hiccup, but we can recover, and then G that

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't work. Now the question is do we start doing

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>something that we really shouldn't thinking that we will probably

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>recover and then we can paper it over. And then

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>there comes a stage where this is going down, and

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>do we try to grab for everything we can at

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the moment in order to flee to France or to

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of position ourselves better for future negotiations, you know,

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that's rarely an immediate, once and for all decision. It's

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>something that happens gradually and then suddenly right that. I'm

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that Sam Bankman Freed did not set out to

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>steal eight billion dollars from ft X and lose some

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of it in trading in Alameda and perhaps secrete some

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>of it someplace else in places we do not know

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>since the accountants messed up. But he did start out

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking that money from f t X could be very

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:59.239
<v Speaker 1>useful in getting Alameda over this particular bad patch, and

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>then things it a snowball after that. If you want

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a rich person and live a rich life,

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>you moderate your bets according to what's called the Kelly criteria.

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Right you value. You won't take a bet that involves

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a fifty chance of losing half your money unless the

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>upside more than doubles gives you a fifty chance of

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>more than doubling your money. And the problem with Sam

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Bankman Fried and company is that they've been listening to

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>these philosophers who are telling them that they should make

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>any positive net present value value bet whatsoever. And if

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you do that, if you make much risk your bets

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>than the Kelly criterion. Then you wind up bankrupt with

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>very high probability and extraordinarily filthy rich with very low probability,

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, but still positive expected value. And then the

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>question is what do you have the moral fiber to

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>do or not do in all those cases where bankruptcy

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>is staring you in the face. You know, since you

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 1>mentioned fleet of France, is there a pretty long history

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in these stories of someone winding up in another country's

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>borders after it implodes? Is that is that a common

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>through line threat financial collaption. It's a common story. I

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>don't exactly know how common it actually is in terms

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of how much how much money actually gets taken up

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and gets wound up someplace else, relatively far away where

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>other people cannot reach you. In Britain in the eighteen

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>hundreds and before, when they actually had debtors prison, it

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was significantly more common than since. And it's not clear

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to what extent it's we're getting away with our ill

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>gotten gains and to what extent it's simply that we

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>do not want to have to spend our lives incarcerated

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Marshall Sea prison because we're never getting out

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of this. M um Brad you mentioned kindle Burger earlier,

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and of course he wrote a sort of seminal piece

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>about financial manias and bubbles. But a big part of

0:28:55.920 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>kindle Burger is talking about what should actually be when

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to bubbles, and he talks a lot about

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a lender of last resort. There are other options to

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, he talks about like maybe you can do nothing,

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>or you can declare a bank holiday or have some

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of central bank rescue that sort of thing. But

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to crypto, are any of those options

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>on the table. What should be done about a speculative

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>mania like crypto? Um, Well, the lender of last resort

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is mostly Kindleburger wearing his canesie and macro economist hat,

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's very much lend freely at a penalty rate

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>on collateral that is good in normal times to systemically

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>right to systemically important institutions in order to build a

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>firewall between what's going on in finance and you know,

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the real economy of people kind of with jobs making

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>things as to what should be actually done with the

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>speculative assets themselves, you know, I mean, the money was gone,

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the money was ever really there. In some sense, wealth

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is trust that there is going to be an enterprise

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>there in the future that is going to be doing

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>something of value, and once the crash is over, there's

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>no such thing. All you can do is hope to

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>get back whatever some of the money that the people

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>who bailed out relatively early managed to squirrel away when

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they said, I've been a fool, but here comes a

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>greater fool. Let me hand this risk off to them.

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>With things like the housing crisis of two thousand and

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>eight and two thousand and ten, there were lots of

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>things you could do in terms of settling who is

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>actually going to bear the debts, who is going to

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>eat the losses as fast as possible, so that then

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy can get going again and people don't find

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>themselves hindered by the fact that that you worry that

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>if you make a loan to them, your loan will

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>then be grabbed and given away to one of their

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>creditors and not actually be part of a bit ongoing,

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>forward looking business. You know, that is where there are

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>things to be done there. In the addition, they are

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of clearing the financial rubble away, so that you

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:10.719
<v Speaker 1>know the financial system of loaning and borrowing and enterprising

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>can start again. But as I see it, there's no

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>system of loaning and borrowing and enterprise. There's no enterprising

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>underneath the loaning and borrowing. You know, there are computer

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>programmers looking for Web three use cases, but they don't

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>really need crypto assets to do this um and it's

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>unclear how trading crypto assets helps discover those Web three

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>use cases. M what about as the speculative mania builds,

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is there something that regulators should do, Like if they

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>see something risky happening, should they immediately crack down on

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it or should they allow the free market to operate

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as long as it isn't fraud or necessarily illegal. And again,

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to crypto, we could have a whole

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>other conversation about whether or not it's legal or not.

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>But I do get the impression that regulators themselves or

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>policymakers themselves are sort of caught up in the narrative,

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>or at the very least they themselves are uncertain about

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they should believe this story about this

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>brand new technology that's going to change the world, or

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>if it's actually just a Ponzi scheme. Like there seems

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to be attention there within the minds of regulators. This

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is the the probably mythical story about what Alan Greenspan

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>told FED governed, the late FED governor, the late and

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Ed Gramleck in the early two thousands when Graham Lick

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>said you need to do something about subcrime, and green

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Span is supposed to be said, there are lenders who

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>want to lend, There are borrowers who want to borrow.

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>All of them have their congressmen on speed dial. I'm

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>going to get in the middle of them and tell

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>them you can't do this deal and then get ground

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.719
<v Speaker 1>into absolute dust up on Capitol Hill. You know, I

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. I have to sit back and then

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>try to clean up the mess afterwards, you know, and

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>hope that I can that. That's definitely a piece of it.

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:06.479
<v Speaker 1>But also regulators are likely to be um grabbed by

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the same currents of thought that makes them think this

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is the next new big thing as anyone else you know,

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and are unlikely to get in the way. But if

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you do have regulators right cutting down on leverage, making

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>leverage really difficult is I think a very important thing

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to do. And also it's nice to not be in

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the free money business, right that if someone running a

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Ponzi scheme has to show someone five of real profits

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>every year, or actually pay out five percent on values

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>every year. It's much harder to keep it going than

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>if the treasury rate is zero and you don't have

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay out anything um every year, but just send

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>them a statement saying their balance has grown. M I

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>think the problem, on the other hand, is that raising

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>interest rates puts a lot of real people out of work.

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's really important or interesting about like this

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of dilemma of regulators. And it's like, you know,

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you hear this all the time with crypto. It's like like,

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>don't don't tamp down on innovation, and it's really important

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be some innovation coming. And I said, you

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of get that, you know, that sort of conflict

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 1>among regulators, Like I don't want to be the regulator

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>who like stamped on some innovation and then it flourishes

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere and makes finance more efficient. But this idea of like, well,

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just just take care of the leverage channel and then okay,

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>do whatever you want, just hive it off, Like it

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>seems like that is like a way to think about

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like, all right, do we want to like completely

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>kill crypto because of it. I don't know, maybe maybe not,

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>but maybe it's just the better way to think about

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it is just hive it off from any entity that

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>could have like systemic leverage, like an f d C

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in shirt retail bank account, and a bunch of people

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>pointing out that, you know, if you gamble on the

0:34:56.120 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>stock market, there are actual companies you're gambling on that

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>have actual profits, and that the SNP earnings yield is

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>what four and a half percent? Now, you know, so

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>there are four and a half cents coming into the

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>system every year for each dollar that's in the system,

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to crypto, where nothing's coming in and where

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 1>there are hopes for the future. It's that someday when

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>someone actually finds a Web three use case, they're going

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to want to build their Web three use case on

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>top of this particular blockchain coin that you happen to

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>own today. And no one has ever explained to me

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>why anyone in the future would ever who has a

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Web three use case would ever want to give away

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the value to today's holders of bitcoin

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of it, or if they're that's a great point. So

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>just going back to some of our discussion UM at

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the intro, and it does feel to me like with Crypto,

0:35:56.400 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>there was a sense of nihilism about it. And I'm

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>sure some people are true believers. In fact, I know

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 1>some people are because they yell at me on Twitter

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:11.399
<v Speaker 1>all the time whenever you know, I'm sure they're out there.

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But there is they're true believers rather than butts programmed

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>by non true believers. Yes, that's a good point. I've

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>probably just been been emotionally abused by a bunch of

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>robots for the past three years. But anyway, UM, this

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 1>lottery ticket idea, I wonder if you could talk about whether,

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 1>and you know, this is kind of what your your

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>new book is all about, slouching towards utopia. This idea

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that even though we've had a great improvement in human

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>well being and lifestyle, that a lot of people still

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like they're being left behind or they feel poor

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>relative to other people. So in that environment, in an

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>environment where you're upset because it feels like you are

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 1>not getting ahead compared to your neighbor or compared to

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire, to that lend itself to more opportunities for

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>speculative manias to build um. It certainly seems to right.

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It certainly seems to situations in which people thinking they're

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>not getting what they deserve while other people around them

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>are getting much more than they deserve because they are

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>managing to work the system in some way makes people

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>think working the system somehow has got to be a

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>successful strategy because look at all these other people who

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>are managing to do it um and that makes people

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>rather easy prey for a whole bunch of social engineering projects.

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I just have a one last question. Actually, once again,

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:45.919
<v Speaker 1>I sort of want to go back to the south

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Sea bubble. But this idea of copycats, this idea that okay,

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>actually maybe there was some soundness to this idea of

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>consolidating all this British debt and creating one fungible security

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that anyone can treat. It sounds pretty good, And of

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>course copycats abound in crypto all over the place. What

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>if those copy cans do, though, what were the other

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.399
<v Speaker 1>entities that saw the south Sea bubble and they say

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>we want to get in on get in on this action.

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>What were the sort of I don't know, bastardizations, distortions whatever.

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of like that they glommed onto or that

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they that that was their approach. As the sort of

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 1>number of entities doing this sort of multiplied. Well, It's

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>called the south Sea Bubble because bo the south Sea

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Company originally was supposed to be a trading company sending

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>out ships to the South Seas, and I only switched

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 1>to their you know, bank, to their British government debt

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:40.879
<v Speaker 1>business model later on. I don't want to say it's everything, um,

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I do want to say that in the south Sea

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Bubble it's a lot of commercial and colonization enterprises as

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>rather than purely financial manipulation, although I'd say making the

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>British government debt bungible and marketable is a little bit

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>more than a financial manipulation. But yes, it's that the

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 1>south Sea Company had a story, and once it becomes

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>clear that stories attract money, then the returns to having

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a story are quite high, and lots of people will

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>say I can make up a story too, Bred DeLong,

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for coming on been uh. I

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>can't believe it's the first time we've had you, but

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely I hope to have you back at some point

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and everything should check out the book Welcome me back

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and keep doing what you're doing, because you've been an

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 1>amazingly you've been actually killing it. We didn't just have

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you on to say that what we would have had

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we know this is a condition of coming out. We

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>know you were gonna say that, would have had you

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>on much earlier. But thank you so much. Plus plus,

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I hope the listeners to Odd Thoughts can push my

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 1>book above all format sales. All right for the course

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>of the next week. We could do this go out

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>by Yeah, we can. We can make this happen, all right,

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>take care of bread. Thank you very very much. Thanks Brad.

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 1>That was great, Tracy. I love talking to Brad. I

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>think probably my favorite part was all the great things

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>he said about odd Lots. Yes, for real, I thought

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the leverage point was. I mean that stood out because

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I do think you know, a politician, I mean, you know,

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 1>we could take Eric Adams as an example, the mayor

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of New York, because he said he was gonna he

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>believed in crypto so much he was going to take

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 1>a portion of his salary in cryptocurrencies. But like a regulator,

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a politician might not be the best placed person to

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>decide whether a new industry is legitimate or not, and

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there can be a lot of confusion. And

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously regulators don't want to stamp out something new and

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>innovative just because they're unfamiliar with it and they think

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it might be risky. At the same time, you would

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>assume that they don't want to let speculative bubbles grow.

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And so it's really interesting to me this idea of

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>having them focus on the leverage channel instead, So don't

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>crack down on the thing itself, but maybe try to

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:23.280
<v Speaker 1>police the credit aspect of it, the leverage that's allowing

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 1>it to grow unreasonably quickly. Yeah, the linkages between these

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 1>entities and the financial infrastructure that it's really important to protect.

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So right like that seems to me that they write,

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>let it do what it's gonna do, but you know,

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure that city group is not providing major funding

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>two ft X or whoever else. It seems like a

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>very reasonable way to think about it, so that it's

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>not about like that, because regulators aren't equipped to know

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>what the technology of the future is, right, and there

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:56.879
<v Speaker 1>are some innovations that are going to come, and some

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>innovations that might even involve a lot of money that

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>may become extremely important. Maybe crypto is even gonna be

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>among them. I don't know. But rather than having to

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>make that decision, just like, well how do you hive

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>it off? Right? And the other thing that stood out

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to me, and I know, you know, the podcast was

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of talking about parallels with historical financial bubbles, but

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I really think like a couple of things stood out

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>about crypto, or stand out about crypto, And one is

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>this idea of the story. So every bubble has a

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 1>compelling story, but crypto and especially bitcoin didn't have just

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>one compelling story. It had like I can't even count

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 1>them all, probably dozens, and they're constantly changing, right, so

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you know it was going to change the financial system.

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be an inflation head, a store of value,

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a payment mechanism, like all these things rolled up into one.

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And that narrative flexibility, I think is probably the thing

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that's kept a lot of crypto going for a long time.

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And now I should just mention the new narrative for bitcoin,

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, is that it isn't crypto. It's the polar

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>opposite of all the coins and all the sketchy things

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and all of that. But then secondly, The other thing

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that stands out to me about crypto, and you know

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you asked this in your last question about copycats. Crypto

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is perfect for copycats, right because there's no limit on

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the amount of new digital tokens or assets that you

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:22.839
<v Speaker 1>can create. You don't even have to pretend to like

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>put together some capital to go buy some tulip bulbs

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and grow them, or go buy a bunch of beanie babies.

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>You just sort of like create them out of thin

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:33.839
<v Speaker 1>air and just put them into the ecosystem and hope

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:37.879
<v Speaker 1>that they attract inflows. Those two things, the narrative flexibility

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and the copycat potential, like that to me is probably

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>what stood out about this whole that you literally, like

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you and I could literally copy and paste the big

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>coin or ethereum source code and make the most minor tweaks,

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and some people have made a lot of money doing that.

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like I think light Coin, like that guy

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 1>made a ton of money, and I was basically that

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>like they took the bitcoin code and I think they

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:05.919
<v Speaker 1>changed the block time and that is probably like two

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers or something like that, and then that was a

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:11.919
<v Speaker 1>new coin that was created. You know. The other thing

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:14.399
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was really interesting and again like sort

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of spooky parallels with FTX specifically, is this idea of

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>like the politics and what a he was talking about

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the south Sea Company trying to become very influential politically

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 1>but also to the point of like going after political competitors.

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And it really was. It was the end of October

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that SPF was in the news a lot for pushing

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>these regulations that many in the sort of crypto defied

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:41.839
<v Speaker 1>community perceived as being harmful to them. So there really

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:43.919
<v Speaker 1>isn't much news sometimes. I mean, as you say, there's

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 1>some very crypto Hesitan novelty. But it's one of some

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of these patterns. Man, boy, did they repeat? Yeah, like

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 1>history doesn't necessarily repeat, but it definitely rhymes. It comes

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 1>close to it, does it does. But I do think

0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>there are some idiosyncrasies that kind of like make this

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>one inpecial and that just you know on this point too,

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:07.839
<v Speaker 1>And I totally feel this, which is the economists always

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone underestimates how long these things can go on. And

0:45:11.520 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>then the longer you go on, you started questioning your

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 1>own sanity because you're like, I mean totally and so

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, maybe there's something here I don't know,

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, totally can I tell you, Like, I'm

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure I've written like two obituaries on crypto, probably career.

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>You're probably one of them. There's yeah, there's like a

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin obituaries page where they where they list all of

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the failed so we we gotta go find it. But

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think that's another thing that like confused a

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of people this time around. It's just like, you know,

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you have something that people were calling a Ponzi scheme

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>as early as and it just keeps going and you're like,

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>am I the crazy one here? Like are all the

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.919
<v Speaker 1>bots yelling at me on the internet? Are they right? Like?

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:02.239
<v Speaker 1>It's the cool anyway. I do think talking about other

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>historical bubbles and sort of pulling out what's similar and

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>what's different. I find that very helpful and cathartic. Well,

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't we're not like trading like you know,

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it's thankfully we're not money managers whose job is to

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:16.280
<v Speaker 1>tell clients. But I do think in the way everyone

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>does feel like they had to take on crypto specifically,

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>they had to take a side, right or a lot

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of people felt that pressure to sort of like cast

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>their lot on one side of the other. And if

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you had this view for many years, like, I don't

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 1>really see how this sustainable. I don't see how defies

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>actually find as whatever, Like you can go a long

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>time and look really dumb and suffer for it even

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>if you hadn't like made a literal money. Bet Oh, totally.

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And it also goes back to the momentum idea, right, like,

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the way to make money and to make alpha

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is to jump on the thing that is getting a

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest and a lot of inflows. And even

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>if you think it's stupid, you just kind of ride

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with it and hope you can get out before everyone else.

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But again, as Brad pointed out, this has been a

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of defining feature of bubbles through about history. Shall

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>we leave it there? Let's leave it there, all right?

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:06.600
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Isn't Though. You can follow

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our guest Bred DeLong.

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 1>He's at DeLong on Twitter, and check out his book

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Slouching towards Utopia. Follow our producer Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 1>armand and check out all of the podcasts at Bloomberg

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 1>unto the handle at podcasts and for more Odd Lots content,

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Blogged, where we

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>post episode transcripts Tracy and I plug and we even

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 1>write a weekly newsletter on these topics that you should subscribe.

0:47:40.440 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to it. E