1
00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:06,800
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

2
00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:15,480
Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

3
00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:18,720
Speaker 2: with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

4
00:00:18,760 --> 00:00:22,280
Speaker 2: for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

5
00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:24,880
Speaker 2: from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

6
00:00:24,960 --> 00:00:27,680
Speaker 2: live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

7
00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:31,319
Speaker 2: am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

8
00:00:31,360 --> 00:00:33,960
Speaker 2: anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

9
00:00:34,040 --> 00:00:37,360
Speaker 2: Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. So here's the latest

10
00:00:37,360 --> 00:00:40,120
Speaker 2: the dollar weeker. As investors' reprice bets on a second

11
00:00:40,120 --> 00:00:44,400
Speaker 2: Trump presidency. Kitchooks assault writing a Trump clean sweep and

12
00:00:44,440 --> 00:00:47,080
Speaker 2: a Harris win without a clean sweep remains the two

13
00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:50,880
Speaker 2: most likely outcomes in our view, and equally likely, these

14
00:00:50,880 --> 00:00:54,560
Speaker 2: are the most bullish and most bearerush outcomes to the dollar, respectively.

15
00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:56,720
Speaker 2: Kit joined us now for more so, Kit, I've known

16
00:00:56,760 --> 00:00:58,640
Speaker 2: you long enough to say unhelpful.

17
00:00:58,920 --> 00:00:59,960
Speaker 3: What are you telling people to do?

18
00:01:02,440 --> 00:01:02,720
Speaker 4: You know?

19
00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:05,280
Speaker 5: I was thinking about it. It's a bit like the

20
00:01:05,319 --> 00:01:07,959
Speaker 5: sort of the Brexit story in terms of whether we're

21
00:01:07,959 --> 00:01:10,319
Speaker 5: going to have a hard Brexit or not back in

22
00:01:10,360 --> 00:01:14,280
Speaker 5: twenty twenty, when you know, you really have to be

23
00:01:14,440 --> 00:01:17,560
Speaker 5: careful about where to go. I think, look, I think

24
00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:19,280
Speaker 5: we have to be sort of conscious of the fact

25
00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:21,760
Speaker 5: that at the moment what we're doing is seeing bets

26
00:01:21,800 --> 00:01:24,280
Speaker 5: get taken off. The market got excited about the possibility

27
00:01:24,319 --> 00:01:28,920
Speaker 5: of Trump victory, and the treasury market sold off, the

28
00:01:29,000 --> 00:01:33,720
Speaker 5: dollar rallied. We're giving up back some of that, I

29
00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:36,280
Speaker 5: think in terms of the places where the market has

30
00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:40,960
Speaker 5: skew in its pricing, I think, if Trump doesn't win,

31
00:01:41,360 --> 00:01:43,880
Speaker 5: or if by some chance he didn't get a clean sweep,

32
00:01:43,920 --> 00:01:47,000
Speaker 5: because that's very important as well, then currencies like the

33
00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:50,440
Speaker 5: Australian dollar where they decided not to cut rates this

34
00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:53,680
Speaker 5: morning and where are they don't look like cutting rates

35
00:01:53,760 --> 00:01:57,280
Speaker 5: this year? You know, that looks like an undervalued currency

36
00:01:57,800 --> 00:02:01,440
Speaker 5: on any scenario other than kind of you know, the

37
00:02:01,480 --> 00:02:05,520
Speaker 5: most aggressive Trumpian Trumpian one in terms of fiscal expansion

38
00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:09,320
Speaker 5: in the United States, tariffs on China, and maybe even

39
00:02:09,440 --> 00:02:12,360
Speaker 5: only a modest Chinese policy response to that. So the

40
00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:14,799
Speaker 5: Australian dollar might be the outlier. But if you said

41
00:02:14,880 --> 00:02:17,760
Speaker 5: that the yen is going to follow where bond yields

42
00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:21,280
Speaker 5: are going to go almost regardless. Then frankly, Trump wins

43
00:02:21,280 --> 00:02:22,760
Speaker 5: with a clean sweep, dolly En might be at one

44
00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:25,840
Speaker 5: hundred and sixty and Trump a dozen Harris wins without

45
00:02:25,840 --> 00:02:27,760
Speaker 5: a clean sweep, dolly En might be breaking towards one

46
00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:31,040
Speaker 5: hundred and forty. So it's just a massive gamble that's

47
00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:33,400
Speaker 5: very hard for people to cope with, and they have

48
00:02:33,480 --> 00:02:36,640
Speaker 5: to hold tight until we see if we're going to

49
00:02:36,639 --> 00:02:37,920
Speaker 5: get a result tomorrow morning, but.

50
00:02:38,040 --> 00:02:40,919
Speaker 1: Kit long term, if it isn't Trump win or potentially

51
00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:43,600
Speaker 1: this clean sweep scenario where Congress going red as well.

52
00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:45,800
Speaker 1: Trump has talked about the fact that he wants a

53
00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:46,600
Speaker 1: week or dollar.

54
00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:47,639
Speaker 4: How do you.

55
00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:50,440
Speaker 6: Be able to measure.

56
00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:52,919
Speaker 1: Both of these basically conflicting results.

57
00:02:53,960 --> 00:02:56,880
Speaker 5: No, you know, the dollars strong because the United States

58
00:02:56,880 --> 00:02:59,760
Speaker 5: has had exceptional fiscal policy because the US can as

59
00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:01,799
Speaker 5: it's a lot of bonds, and bondy oards have been higher.

60
00:03:01,960 --> 00:03:04,440
Speaker 5: And of the strength of the fiscal stance in the

61
00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:07,120
Speaker 5: US compared to everything we've done in Europe is that

62
00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:09,960
Speaker 5: it has helped the economy outgrow the rest of the

63
00:03:09,960 --> 00:03:13,399
Speaker 5: world spectacularly. Trump wants more growth. He wants to put

64
00:03:13,400 --> 00:03:16,480
Speaker 5: taris in place to get more people into manufacturing jobs

65
00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:19,000
Speaker 5: in the United States. Okay, at a starting point of

66
00:03:19,160 --> 00:03:24,000
Speaker 5: pretty low unemployment already, he can't have that much cake

67
00:03:24,040 --> 00:03:26,240
Speaker 5: and eat it in terms of an economy that's going

68
00:03:26,280 --> 00:03:29,880
Speaker 5: to be even stronger with fiscal policy continuing to be

69
00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:35,360
Speaker 5: accommodative and have a weak currency because in the end,

70
00:03:35,400 --> 00:03:37,560
Speaker 5: his biggest the biggest threat Trump is going to be

71
00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:40,360
Speaker 5: inflation on what we've heard so far, so we'd have

72
00:03:40,400 --> 00:03:42,160
Speaker 5: to change some of his policies if he wanted a

73
00:03:42,160 --> 00:03:44,840
Speaker 5: week a dollar you We'll see how it plays out.

74
00:03:44,920 --> 00:03:48,040
Speaker 5: But you get the currency your policies give you, not

75
00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:49,240
Speaker 5: the currencies you want.

76
00:03:49,280 --> 00:03:49,360
Speaker 4: It.

77
00:03:49,880 --> 00:03:50,600
Speaker 3: Kid, when you.

78
00:03:50,520 --> 00:03:53,680
Speaker 1: Look at why the financial markets changed, was it because

79
00:03:53,720 --> 00:03:56,040
Speaker 1: of the pulling out of Iowa? Or is because they're

80
00:03:56,320 --> 00:03:59,040
Speaker 1: basically a little bit nervous that they got two over

81
00:03:59,080 --> 00:04:04,520
Speaker 1: their skis. When it comes to the Trump trade.

82
00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:05,400
Speaker 5: I think that if you looked at the dollar index

83
00:04:05,480 --> 00:04:09,440
Speaker 5: and you plotted it against the betting odds from real

84
00:04:09,520 --> 00:04:13,120
Speaker 5: clear politics and how they were going in favor of Trump,

85
00:04:13,320 --> 00:04:19,359
Speaker 5: they moved very closely together. So the betting odds have

86
00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:22,280
Speaker 5: moved back in line with the opinion polls in the

87
00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:26,799
Speaker 5: last week less than a week really, and Iowa played

88
00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:29,120
Speaker 5: a part of that, and I think that's certainly seen

89
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:32,360
Speaker 5: people taking not his beds off, perhaps in the betting space,

90
00:04:32,400 --> 00:04:35,200
Speaker 5: but taking some of those trades off. And so when

91
00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:39,000
Speaker 5: we look today as if we're closer to a market

92
00:04:39,040 --> 00:04:42,320
Speaker 5: that genuinely doesn't know what's going to happen, and maybe

93
00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:43,520
Speaker 5: that's the right place for it to be.

94
00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:46,160
Speaker 4: Which raises this question kit how violent could the reaction

95
00:04:46,279 --> 00:04:48,640
Speaker 4: be in markets after we get some sort of results,

96
00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:50,600
Speaker 4: given that everyone's going to be racing to it, no

97
00:04:50,640 --> 00:04:53,120
Speaker 4: one really had an edge. Yesterday Mike Wilson of Morgan

98
00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:55,359
Speaker 4: Stanley was talking about how he sees a clearing event

99
00:04:56,000 --> 00:04:58,800
Speaker 4: coming after we get the results from this, and the clearing.

100
00:04:58,520 --> 00:05:00,480
Speaker 6: Event could last a month.

101
00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:02,760
Speaker 4: How violent of a clearing event could it be if

102
00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:07,080
Speaker 4: we get a decisive response results one way or another

103
00:05:07,120 --> 00:05:10,159
Speaker 4: in the base cases that you laid out, No.

104
00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:13,640
Speaker 5: You know, just if you just tracked from the poles,

105
00:05:13,640 --> 00:05:17,920
Speaker 5: so from Harris entering the poles and then Trump sort

106
00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:20,840
Speaker 5: of coming back, and then where we are now we're

107
00:05:20,839 --> 00:05:22,359
Speaker 5: sort of one o seven one oh one in the

108
00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:25,440
Speaker 5: dollar index. I imagine that a sudden sort of you know,

109
00:05:25,480 --> 00:05:29,680
Speaker 5: when you're not sure you get through those levels that

110
00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:32,440
Speaker 5: seems to me most likely outcome. So it's pretty fun

111
00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:34,240
Speaker 5: again if I look at dolly En in terms of that,

112
00:05:34,520 --> 00:05:36,760
Speaker 5: you know, the violence of a dolly In move depends

113
00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:39,240
Speaker 5: on how much treasury yields can move.

114
00:05:39,640 --> 00:05:41,480
Speaker 3: But we've had a big.

115
00:05:41,279 --> 00:05:43,360
Speaker 5: Sell off at the long end of the treasury market

116
00:05:43,760 --> 00:05:48,320
Speaker 5: on concerns about more accommodative fiscal policy, increased bond supply,

117
00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:52,560
Speaker 5: and some inflation worries. If you if you had a

118
00:05:52,600 --> 00:05:57,080
Speaker 5: scenario where those melt away, you know, the treasury market's

119
00:05:57,120 --> 00:05:59,359
Speaker 5: pretty bearish at the moment in terms of sentiments. So

120
00:05:59,600 --> 00:06:02,000
Speaker 5: a snap back rally there, what that could do, what

121
00:06:02,040 --> 00:06:04,240
Speaker 5: that could do to the end is very striking. So

122
00:06:04,600 --> 00:06:07,440
Speaker 5: right the way across the piece, we're not you know,

123
00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:11,480
Speaker 5: I don't think we can avoid having a pretty violent reaction.

124
00:06:11,560 --> 00:06:14,680
Speaker 5: And history says, you know, we sometimes overshoot and then

125
00:06:14,720 --> 00:06:17,400
Speaker 5: come back and settle down and decide that we'll have

126
00:06:17,440 --> 00:06:19,640
Speaker 5: a look because there'll be so many more questions. I mean,

127
00:06:19,920 --> 00:06:21,800
Speaker 5: we have to sort of put in sort of minor

128
00:06:21,839 --> 00:06:24,320
Speaker 5: adjustments in the sense of, you know, whether someone has

129
00:06:24,320 --> 00:06:27,800
Speaker 5: a clean sweep or not is very important how it looks,

130
00:06:27,839 --> 00:06:30,360
Speaker 5: and then we're going to work out whether either president

131
00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:35,720
Speaker 5: can get what they want through Congress, irrespective of what

132
00:06:35,760 --> 00:06:38,080
Speaker 5: that looks like, so that there'll be lots more questions.

133
00:06:38,080 --> 00:06:42,120
Speaker 5: But I think the initial reaction is likely to be

134
00:06:42,160 --> 00:06:45,400
Speaker 5: pretty big really, just because we're caught where we are.

135
00:06:45,600 --> 00:06:48,000
Speaker 4: Kid, Are you watching the election from Mexico City?

136
00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:53,040
Speaker 5: I am not watching the election from Mexico City. No,

137
00:06:53,160 --> 00:06:55,880
Speaker 5: that would be that would be too exciting. But yes,

138
00:06:55,920 --> 00:06:59,400
Speaker 5: you know, you look at the impact on the end,

139
00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:02,440
Speaker 5: on the Australian dollar, on the Mexican play, so on

140
00:07:02,520 --> 00:07:06,640
Speaker 5: all of Latin America really, you know, in fact, for once,

141
00:07:07,760 --> 00:07:13,520
Speaker 5: Europe is likely to be less affected I think than

142
00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:15,800
Speaker 5: the rest of the world. That doesn't mean it doesn't

143
00:07:15,840 --> 00:07:19,720
Speaker 5: have an impact yet. But the big story is Asia

144
00:07:19,840 --> 00:07:20,920
Speaker 5: and Latin America.

145
00:07:21,040 --> 00:07:34,360
Speaker 2: Interesting kit afreciateitsor kit chooks of such chin. We begin

146
00:07:34,400 --> 00:07:36,080
Speaker 2: this out with stocks on hold and the last they're

147
00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:38,960
Speaker 2: voting in America. Cameron Dawson of New Edge right to

148
00:07:39,040 --> 00:07:41,600
Speaker 2: the following. Given how tight poles and odds are, we

149
00:07:41,640 --> 00:07:44,200
Speaker 2: see the election as a source of near term volatility.

150
00:07:44,480 --> 00:07:45,760
Speaker 3: Regardless of the result.

151
00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:49,960
Speaker 2: Each side has boogeyman that could spook markets. Cameron joins

152
00:07:50,040 --> 00:07:52,480
Speaker 2: us now to talk about those men. Cameron, who are

153
00:07:52,520 --> 00:07:53,920
Speaker 2: those men?

154
00:07:54,200 --> 00:07:57,200
Speaker 7: All those men certainly are things like hired deficits, higher

155
00:07:57,240 --> 00:08:01,480
Speaker 7: corporate taxes, tariffs and immigration. And I think Amory's point

156
00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:03,520
Speaker 7: was really important is that if we think of the

157
00:08:03,560 --> 00:08:06,680
Speaker 7: tariffs line of things, it doesn't necessarily matter about the

158
00:08:06,720 --> 00:08:09,320
Speaker 7: makeup of Congress that we could see them if Trump

159
00:08:09,400 --> 00:08:12,240
Speaker 7: is elected, which is certainly some of the questions that

160
00:08:12,280 --> 00:08:15,720
Speaker 7: you've seen raised by the bond market and considering potentially

161
00:08:15,840 --> 00:08:20,000
Speaker 7: stickier inflation. So we think regardless of who wins tonight

162
00:08:20,080 --> 00:08:23,320
Speaker 7: or whenever we get those results, it effectively is going

163
00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:26,440
Speaker 7: to be a surprise because those polls are so very tight,

164
00:08:26,800 --> 00:08:28,360
Speaker 7: which means that it could be a.

165
00:08:28,400 --> 00:08:29,960
Speaker 6: Volatility inducing event.

166
00:08:30,360 --> 00:08:32,559
Speaker 7: I think it's important to note though, that markets aren't

167
00:08:32,600 --> 00:08:36,800
Speaker 7: necessarily primed for volatility to continue. You've seen a huge

168
00:08:36,920 --> 00:08:40,320
Speaker 7: buying of put options for the vicks, effectively people betting

169
00:08:40,360 --> 00:08:44,360
Speaker 7: on volatility collapsing post the election. So again, this could

170
00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:47,079
Speaker 7: simply be a surprise, and it could cause that higher

171
00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:50,760
Speaker 7: volatility given the fact that people aren't necessarily positioned for it.

172
00:08:50,800 --> 00:08:52,320
Speaker 4: I want to pick up on that point because you

173
00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:55,240
Speaker 4: see this across a range of different volatility metrics. Basically

174
00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:59,440
Speaker 4: people expect volatility, price swings to really peak tomorrow and

175
00:08:59,480 --> 00:09:02,680
Speaker 4: then appsolutely fade off as we get results and go

176
00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:05,360
Speaker 4: back to some sort of status quo. From your advantage point,

177
00:09:05,840 --> 00:09:09,080
Speaker 4: how much are you looking to actually take advantage of

178
00:09:09,120 --> 00:09:11,560
Speaker 4: something that could be more significant? How off sides would

179
00:09:11,559 --> 00:09:13,640
Speaker 4: this market be, and what would you do with that?

180
00:09:15,080 --> 00:09:18,480
Speaker 7: We always try to see volatility as opportunity, and i'd

181
00:09:18,559 --> 00:09:20,600
Speaker 7: raise the question of if we would be seeing this

182
00:09:20,720 --> 00:09:24,520
Speaker 7: volatility even if this wasn't election day. If you look

183
00:09:24,520 --> 00:09:28,080
Speaker 7: at things like S and P five hundred, momentum and breadth,

184
00:09:28,120 --> 00:09:30,839
Speaker 7: they've all been deteriorating over the last month.

185
00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:34,640
Speaker 6: You've also seen a deterioration in forward earnings estimates.

186
00:09:34,640 --> 00:09:37,120
Speaker 7: You've seen estimates for four Q as well as twenty

187
00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:39,040
Speaker 7: twenty five get cut and trimmed.

188
00:09:39,480 --> 00:09:42,000
Speaker 6: So I would raise the question of if we could

189
00:09:42,000 --> 00:09:42,319
Speaker 6: have this.

190
00:09:42,360 --> 00:09:46,080
Speaker 7: Volatility even if this was not election day, simply because

191
00:09:46,080 --> 00:09:48,880
Speaker 7: you have a lot of digestion of the strong gains

192
00:09:48,880 --> 00:09:51,280
Speaker 7: that we've had here to date and kind of putting

193
00:09:51,320 --> 00:09:54,600
Speaker 7: some of the seasonality aside. Given that deterioration and breadth

194
00:09:54,640 --> 00:09:57,360
Speaker 7: and momentum, that just sets you up for a little

195
00:09:57,400 --> 00:09:58,320
Speaker 7: bit more churn.

196
00:09:58,640 --> 00:10:01,160
Speaker 4: At this point, Cameron, you have to understand. I have

197
00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:03,719
Speaker 4: to understand and I don't understand exactly how much we've

198
00:10:03,760 --> 00:10:06,280
Speaker 4: already priced in some of these trades, what these trades

199
00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:08,480
Speaker 4: actually are, and thinking in particular in the bond market,

200
00:10:08,480 --> 00:10:11,360
Speaker 4: people have been wondering, you strip out the political influence,

201
00:10:11,520 --> 00:10:13,040
Speaker 4: what does a ten year yield look like?

202
00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:14,080
Speaker 3: Do you have a sense of that.

203
00:10:15,600 --> 00:10:18,360
Speaker 7: Well, we do know that there has been a relationship,

204
00:10:18,400 --> 00:10:21,920
Speaker 7: whether it's correlation causation is up for debate between Trump's

205
00:10:21,960 --> 00:10:24,480
Speaker 7: ogs of winning and the tenure treasury yield over the

206
00:10:24,559 --> 00:10:28,000
Speaker 7: last three months or so. That certainly broke down at

207
00:10:28,040 --> 00:10:30,800
Speaker 7: the end of last week, where Trump's betting ods started

208
00:10:30,840 --> 00:10:33,319
Speaker 7: to fall and you still saw the tenure treasury yield

209
00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:36,240
Speaker 7: moving higher. We think the source of that ten yere

210
00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:39,880
Speaker 7: treasury yield moving higher really comes down to the bond

211
00:10:39,920 --> 00:10:43,240
Speaker 7: market digesting the fact that you have a relatively resilient

212
00:10:43,320 --> 00:10:47,480
Speaker 7: economy that is supported by higher deficit spending at the

213
00:10:47,559 --> 00:10:50,080
Speaker 7: same time as you have a FED that's talking about

214
00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:53,600
Speaker 7: potentially hundreds of basis points of cuts to get to

215
00:10:53,679 --> 00:10:56,920
Speaker 7: their idea of neutral, which could have the potential of

216
00:10:56,960 --> 00:11:00,319
Speaker 7: effectively throwing lighter fluid on some of this tightness within

217
00:11:00,360 --> 00:11:03,880
Speaker 7: the economy, the fact that you still have overall easy

218
00:11:03,920 --> 00:11:07,080
Speaker 7: financial conditions as well, and that seems to be the

219
00:11:07,120 --> 00:11:09,640
Speaker 7: reason why you're seeing these bond yields move higher.

220
00:11:09,800 --> 00:11:12,480
Speaker 6: Not necessarily the election or just the election.

221
00:11:12,720 --> 00:11:14,120
Speaker 3: The wise important, Cameron.

222
00:11:14,240 --> 00:11:16,400
Speaker 2: The wy is important because I think it dictates how

223
00:11:16,440 --> 00:11:18,760
Speaker 2: to trid equity to some extent at least. Would you

224
00:11:18,800 --> 00:11:21,160
Speaker 2: say yields have been rising then for good reasons and

225
00:11:21,240 --> 00:11:24,520
Speaker 2: not bad, and is a reason to stay long equity markets.

226
00:11:25,559 --> 00:11:28,600
Speaker 6: I think the answer to that is in high yield spreads.

227
00:11:29,080 --> 00:11:32,040
Speaker 7: If yields were rising for bad reasons, that the FED

228
00:11:32,240 --> 00:11:35,040
Speaker 7: was tightening policy and it would eventually result in much

229
00:11:35,040 --> 00:11:38,000
Speaker 7: weaker growth, you would see high yield spreads widening out.

230
00:11:38,360 --> 00:11:41,480
Speaker 7: But they continue to remain very contained and actually making

231
00:11:41,559 --> 00:11:44,040
Speaker 7: new year to date lows, which says to us, this

232
00:11:44,120 --> 00:11:47,559
Speaker 7: is not a market that is necessarily in fear of growth.

233
00:11:47,800 --> 00:11:49,760
Speaker 6: It's not priced for a growth slowdown.

234
00:11:49,960 --> 00:11:51,800
Speaker 7: Now you could see that as a risk going into

235
00:11:51,840 --> 00:11:55,280
Speaker 7: twenty twenty five if you start to see a deterioration.

236
00:11:54,720 --> 00:11:56,240
Speaker 6: In economic fundamentals.

237
00:11:56,520 --> 00:11:59,800
Speaker 7: But effectively, the credit market is telling you that yields

238
00:11:59,840 --> 00:12:03,120
Speaker 7: are rising because growth is resilient, So watch those hygyield

239
00:12:03,120 --> 00:12:04,160
Speaker 7: spreads very closely.

240
00:12:04,280 --> 00:12:06,200
Speaker 2: Would you expect you to remain that way even if

241
00:12:06,200 --> 00:12:08,040
Speaker 2: we got a sweep from the GOP in the next

242
00:12:08,080 --> 00:12:09,119
Speaker 2: twenty four hours.

243
00:12:10,280 --> 00:12:13,080
Speaker 7: I don't necessarily know if any of the of the

244
00:12:13,120 --> 00:12:16,240
Speaker 7: policies that would be enacted by a GEOP sweep would

245
00:12:16,280 --> 00:12:20,160
Speaker 7: necessarily affect growth in twenty twenty five. Let's put tariffs

246
00:12:20,160 --> 00:12:22,840
Speaker 7: and potentially emigration to a side, because that is certainly

247
00:12:22,880 --> 00:12:24,760
Speaker 7: something we could see without.

248
00:12:24,320 --> 00:12:25,440
Speaker 6: A GEOP sweep.

249
00:12:25,800 --> 00:12:28,560
Speaker 7: But the question and the risk for a GOP sweep

250
00:12:28,640 --> 00:12:31,600
Speaker 7: really is something that's contemplated later in twenty five and

251
00:12:31,640 --> 00:12:34,680
Speaker 7: into twenty six, where we will be negotiating those four

252
00:12:34,760 --> 00:12:38,040
Speaker 7: trillion dollars of tax cuts, potentially adding a lot to

253
00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:41,400
Speaker 7: the deficit, which is certainly something that the bond markets

254
00:12:41,480 --> 00:12:45,040
Speaker 7: might push back on. But that's not necessarily something that

255
00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:47,160
Speaker 7: we deal with in the next couple of months.

256
00:12:47,280 --> 00:12:47,600
Speaker 3: Cameron.

257
00:12:47,600 --> 00:12:49,760
Speaker 4: A couple of months ago, people came on this show

258
00:12:49,800 --> 00:12:52,280
Speaker 4: talked a lot about how this could be a transformative event,

259
00:12:52,600 --> 00:12:55,079
Speaker 4: how this could mark the difference in an economic cycle

260
00:12:55,160 --> 00:12:58,400
Speaker 4: with respect to inflation, with respect to growth. As we've

261
00:12:58,440 --> 00:13:01,360
Speaker 4: gotten closer to the event, we'll advise, have you suddenly

262
00:13:01,360 --> 00:13:03,640
Speaker 4: people are saying, actually, we just need to get past

263
00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:06,200
Speaker 4: it and whatever the results, things will keep on going

264
00:13:06,240 --> 00:13:07,520
Speaker 4: on the way they were before.

265
00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:08,800
Speaker 6: Where do you fall on that?

266
00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:12,800
Speaker 7: The best news that we always try to bring clients

267
00:13:12,800 --> 00:13:15,640
Speaker 7: back to is that if you look historically that the

268
00:13:15,760 --> 00:13:18,720
Speaker 7: S and P. Five hundred, regardless of the power balance

269
00:13:18,760 --> 00:13:21,880
Speaker 7: within DC, has been able to do what it does

270
00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:24,679
Speaker 7: despite of or in spite of what goes on in DC.

271
00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:29,480
Speaker 7: And that's really good news, which just means that overall

272
00:13:29,520 --> 00:13:33,000
Speaker 7: corporate earnings have been able to operate in times regardless

273
00:13:33,000 --> 00:13:36,479
Speaker 7: of uncertainty and pressures of what's going on within policy.

274
00:13:36,760 --> 00:13:39,280
Speaker 7: And it's something that we always try to remind clients

275
00:13:39,320 --> 00:13:41,880
Speaker 7: of just so that the way that they don't respond

276
00:13:41,920 --> 00:13:44,960
Speaker 7: too emotionally to what is for many people a very

277
00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:46,400
Speaker 7: emotional election day.

278
00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:48,920
Speaker 1: Kener, We know the markets like certainty, what if it

279
00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:51,520
Speaker 1: is a contested election, what's going to be the impact?

280
00:13:53,200 --> 00:13:56,800
Speaker 7: Certainly that would be potentially a source of volatility. It's

281
00:13:56,800 --> 00:13:59,840
Speaker 7: not necessarily volatility that would last for a long time.

282
00:14:00,080 --> 00:14:02,640
Speaker 7: So it gets back to Jonathan's first question. If you

283
00:14:02,760 --> 00:14:06,120
Speaker 7: do see volatility, is it biable? We think the answer

284
00:14:06,200 --> 00:14:09,160
Speaker 7: is yes, that as you start to digest some of this,

285
00:14:09,400 --> 00:14:12,520
Speaker 7: these deteriorations and breadth and momentum that could be happening

286
00:14:12,559 --> 00:14:15,840
Speaker 7: regardless of the election. You get the narrative of uncertainty

287
00:14:15,920 --> 00:14:18,760
Speaker 7: behind it. Then you set up for effectively a great

288
00:14:18,840 --> 00:14:22,320
Speaker 7: buying opportunity into year end with that potential Santa Claus

289
00:14:22,440 --> 00:14:25,359
Speaker 7: rally and year in chase. So a source of volatility,

290
00:14:25,480 --> 00:14:28,200
Speaker 7: not necessarily a source of investment decision.

291
00:14:27,920 --> 00:14:30,120
Speaker 2: A good framework for thinking about this market into your

292
00:14:30,240 --> 00:14:32,960
Speaker 2: end and beyond. Cameron, Thank you, Cameron Dawson of New

293
00:14:33,080 --> 00:14:45,720
Speaker 2: Edge Wealth. Among big donors at the final stages of

294
00:14:45,760 --> 00:14:48,880
Speaker 2: the campaign, one wealthy individual supporting cameras is Mark Cuban,

295
00:14:49,120 --> 00:14:51,400
Speaker 2: the minority owner of the Dallas Mavericks. And I'm pleased

296
00:14:51,400 --> 00:14:53,120
Speaker 2: to say that Mark joined us now. Mark, welcome to

297
00:14:53,120 --> 00:14:55,680
Speaker 2: the program. We spoke to a Trump campaign advisor a

298
00:14:55,680 --> 00:14:57,560
Speaker 2: little bit earlier this morning, and I want to start

299
00:14:57,560 --> 00:14:59,800
Speaker 2: with you in a similar way that I started with him,

300
00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:02,080
Speaker 2: which is basically, I'm waking up this morning, I'm a

301
00:15:02,080 --> 00:15:05,720
Speaker 2: Swings state votes, I'm in Pennsylvania State, and i still

302
00:15:05,760 --> 00:15:07,840
Speaker 2: haven't decided who I'm going to vote for. And I'm

303
00:15:07,840 --> 00:15:10,840
Speaker 2: thinking back to how Harris talked about in twenty nineteen

304
00:15:10,920 --> 00:15:13,400
Speaker 2: that she wanted to Ben Franking. I understand she's changed

305
00:15:13,400 --> 00:15:14,840
Speaker 2: her mind, but I'm worried that she's a bit of

306
00:15:14,880 --> 00:15:17,040
Speaker 2: a shape shift, that she gets back into power and

307
00:15:17,080 --> 00:15:18,200
Speaker 2: she'll change her mind again.

308
00:15:18,440 --> 00:15:19,800
Speaker 3: How do you settle those concerns?

309
00:15:20,880 --> 00:15:23,440
Speaker 8: The world has changed since twenty nineteen. She's open minded,

310
00:15:23,560 --> 00:15:25,680
Speaker 8: she's talked openly about the fact that she wants to

311
00:15:25,680 --> 00:15:28,760
Speaker 8: give dessending opinions a place at the table with her.

312
00:15:29,080 --> 00:15:32,280
Speaker 8: She's not dogmatic, that's how you explain it. And she's

313
00:15:32,320 --> 00:15:34,840
Speaker 8: looking to put together the best policy. She's said in

314
00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:37,960
Speaker 8: twenty twenty that she supported fracking, So I think that's

315
00:15:37,960 --> 00:15:40,240
Speaker 8: a non issue. And in terms of you know, is

316
00:15:40,280 --> 00:15:43,200
Speaker 8: she just an extension of Biden? Just look at Biden's

317
00:15:44,000 --> 00:15:48,360
Speaker 8: budget proposal versus what Kamala Harris has actually proposed. Biden

318
00:15:48,400 --> 00:15:50,920
Speaker 8: wanted much higher taxes. Kamala Harris came in twenty eight

319
00:15:50,920 --> 00:15:53,840
Speaker 8: percent for tax rate for cap gains in twenty eight

320
00:15:53,840 --> 00:15:56,800
Speaker 8: percent for corporation and did not say a word and

321
00:15:56,800 --> 00:15:59,200
Speaker 8: will not say a word about unrealized capital gains. And

322
00:15:59,240 --> 00:16:02,840
Speaker 8: so I think she's completely different. She's not a shape

323
00:16:02,840 --> 00:16:03,880
Speaker 8: shift in the least bit.

324
00:16:04,400 --> 00:16:07,000
Speaker 1: Well, that individual we were speaking to Scott Bessant, this

325
00:16:07,200 --> 00:16:10,560
Speaker 1: key economic policy advisor to the Trump campaign, says that

326
00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:14,040
Speaker 1: Harris what he hears from a lot of Wall Street journals,

327
00:16:14,040 --> 00:16:17,480
Speaker 1: that she would be moderated by a Republican Senate, and

328
00:16:17,520 --> 00:16:19,920
Speaker 1: that's why Wallstreet would be willing to vote for her,

329
00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:22,960
Speaker 1: because of that moderating effect that she would get from

330
00:16:22,960 --> 00:16:23,720
Speaker 1: a red Senate.

331
00:16:23,960 --> 00:16:26,280
Speaker 6: Is there any truth to that, Yeah, of course.

332
00:16:26,360 --> 00:16:29,880
Speaker 8: I mean balance is not a bad thing necessarily. I'm

333
00:16:29,920 --> 00:16:33,520
Speaker 8: not opposed to a divide in Congress, you know. But

334
00:16:33,600 --> 00:16:35,800
Speaker 8: the bottom line is what will Kamala Harris do? And

335
00:16:35,840 --> 00:16:38,320
Speaker 8: I think she's better for the economy in so many ways.

336
00:16:38,480 --> 00:16:40,520
Speaker 8: You know, there's three hundred and thirty five million people

337
00:16:40,560 --> 00:16:43,520
Speaker 8: in this country. Four million make four hundred thousand dollars

338
00:16:43,600 --> 00:16:46,440
Speaker 8: or more. The other three hundred and thirty million make less.

339
00:16:46,440 --> 00:16:48,800
Speaker 8: Is she has been very specific that if you make

340
00:16:48,840 --> 00:16:51,600
Speaker 8: four hundred thousand dollars or less, your taxes aren't going up.

341
00:16:51,840 --> 00:16:54,320
Speaker 8: In fact, for one hundred million people, they're going down.

342
00:16:54,520 --> 00:16:57,760
Speaker 8: The other big expense that every household is fearful of

343
00:16:58,120 --> 00:17:01,200
Speaker 8: is healthcare expenses. Donald Trump said he has a concept

344
00:17:01,200 --> 00:17:04,119
Speaker 8: of a plan. Kamala Harris has been very specific on

345
00:17:04,160 --> 00:17:07,880
Speaker 8: the pharmaceutical side, saying she's going after the pharmacy benefit managers,

346
00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:10,720
Speaker 8: the middlemen, and she'll introduce transparency. I know from my

347
00:17:10,760 --> 00:17:14,040
Speaker 8: own personal experiences with costplus drugs that'll lead to a

348
00:17:14,119 --> 00:17:16,679
Speaker 8: twenty thirty percent or more deduction in the cost of

349
00:17:16,760 --> 00:17:21,000
Speaker 8: medications for households and businesses. And then you've got terriffs.

350
00:17:21,040 --> 00:17:23,600
Speaker 8: As Michael I think it was said earlier, tariffs are

351
00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:26,680
Speaker 8: a bad idea. I mean, it's so bad.

352
00:17:26,720 --> 00:17:29,360
Speaker 1: Then why did Biden and Kamala Harris keep them?

353
00:17:29,440 --> 00:17:30,399
Speaker 3: They keep the trouble.

354
00:17:30,480 --> 00:17:33,360
Speaker 8: Let's talk about that, right, because that's not completely that's

355
00:17:33,400 --> 00:17:36,760
Speaker 8: not completely accurate. First look at the EU. They Biden

356
00:17:36,840 --> 00:17:38,959
Speaker 8: sided the deal saying that there would be no terriffs

357
00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:42,040
Speaker 8: between the two EU and the United States for the

358
00:17:42,040 --> 00:17:44,760
Speaker 8: next five years. So those tariffs are gone. And then

359
00:17:44,840 --> 00:17:47,600
Speaker 8: you look at what Trump tried to introduce. He had

360
00:17:47,600 --> 00:17:50,199
Speaker 8: four years to try to implement teriffs that work, and

361
00:17:50,240 --> 00:17:53,320
Speaker 8: he got his butt kicked by China. The retaliatory terriffs

362
00:17:53,359 --> 00:17:56,199
Speaker 8: almost destroyed the soybean in the farming industry, and he

363
00:17:56,280 --> 00:17:58,199
Speaker 8: had to pay out twenty million dollars. But as it

364
00:17:58,200 --> 00:18:01,520
Speaker 8: applies to households. Right, he's talking about a sixty percent

365
00:18:01,560 --> 00:18:05,199
Speaker 8: across the board terras for Chinese imports. China makes just

366
00:18:05,200 --> 00:18:07,560
Speaker 8: about every Christmas present that we buy for a kid,

367
00:18:07,640 --> 00:18:10,439
Speaker 8: So families would be looking at a sixty percent or

368
00:18:10,440 --> 00:18:13,000
Speaker 8: more increase and what they'd spend on Christmas, and the

369
00:18:13,080 --> 00:18:16,280
Speaker 8: downstream impact of that would be significant to small and

370
00:18:16,400 --> 00:18:17,240
Speaker 8: large businesses.

371
00:18:17,600 --> 00:18:19,600
Speaker 1: Mark, Let's talk about something you've been very vocal on.

372
00:18:19,680 --> 00:18:20,600
Speaker 6: This is regulation.

373
00:18:21,000 --> 00:18:23,520
Speaker 1: You've said that you don't think Harry should keep Lena

374
00:18:23,600 --> 00:18:26,480
Speaker 1: Khan at the head of the FTC. On and Alexandro

375
00:18:26,640 --> 00:18:30,240
Speaker 1: Cassio Cortez, the congresswoman from New York, went to Twitter

376
00:18:30,280 --> 00:18:33,040
Speaker 1: and she said, billionaires like you, Mark are trying to

377
00:18:33,040 --> 00:18:35,080
Speaker 1: play foot seat with the ticket. If anyone goes near

378
00:18:36,080 --> 00:18:38,719
Speaker 1: Lena Kahn, there will be quote an out and out brawl.

379
00:18:39,200 --> 00:18:42,480
Speaker 1: Where is Harris when it comes to things like the FTC.

380
00:18:43,400 --> 00:18:45,800
Speaker 8: I don't know. I haven't talked about personnel with her

381
00:18:45,880 --> 00:18:49,600
Speaker 8: or her team. I have no intention about talking about personnel.

382
00:18:49,920 --> 00:18:50,119
Speaker 6: You know.

383
00:18:50,359 --> 00:18:53,080
Speaker 8: I was asking a question about what I thought about

384
00:18:53,080 --> 00:18:56,520
Speaker 8: the FTC, and I thought that, you know, the possibility

385
00:18:56,520 --> 00:18:59,399
Speaker 8: of breaking up the big technology companies would be a

386
00:18:59,440 --> 00:19:02,240
Speaker 8: negative because I think, you know, winning the AI battle

387
00:19:02,240 --> 00:19:05,359
Speaker 8: for the United States is paramount from military in and

388
00:19:05,440 --> 00:19:08,239
Speaker 8: economic perspective. So I voiced my opinion, but I'm not

389
00:19:08,280 --> 00:19:09,880
Speaker 8: involved in those conversations at all.

390
00:19:09,920 --> 00:19:12,760
Speaker 4: But it really raises this ultimate question, which is what

391
00:19:12,960 --> 00:19:16,400
Speaker 4: policies will she follow. She's been engaging with AOC quite

392
00:19:16,440 --> 00:19:19,040
Speaker 4: a bit in terms of the campaign trail, and there's

393
00:19:19,040 --> 00:19:21,160
Speaker 4: a real question of how much there will be an

394
00:19:21,160 --> 00:19:24,439
Speaker 4: effort to cater to the further left sides of the

395
00:19:24,440 --> 00:19:28,040
Speaker 4: Democratic wing versus the sort of centrist appeal that she's

396
00:19:28,080 --> 00:19:30,879
Speaker 4: been trying to have. How much are you actually getting

397
00:19:30,920 --> 00:19:34,560
Speaker 4: confidence that she's going to have business executives in cabinet

398
00:19:34,600 --> 00:19:38,520
Speaker 4: positions in top areas where she really is listening to

399
00:19:38,560 --> 00:19:39,399
Speaker 4: what they have to say.

400
00:19:40,160 --> 00:19:42,239
Speaker 8: I talked to her campaign almost every day. I'm one

401
00:19:42,280 --> 00:19:45,240
Speaker 8: hundred percent certain. I'm much as confident. I'm certain that

402
00:19:45,240 --> 00:19:46,639
Speaker 8: that's what they're going to do. I've been on the

403
00:19:46,680 --> 00:19:49,680
Speaker 8: trail with Doug Amhoff, who, as part of his presentation,

404
00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:52,440
Speaker 8: talks about what a capitalist she is. She's talked about,

405
00:19:52,480 --> 00:19:55,240
Speaker 8: you know, wanting to create twenty five million new businesses.

406
00:19:55,240 --> 00:19:58,199
Speaker 8: That's not a reflection of anything far left. One of

407
00:19:58,240 --> 00:20:01,000
Speaker 8: the first things she did was introduced a tax deduction

408
00:20:01,560 --> 00:20:04,080
Speaker 8: or increase the tax deduction for startup cost of fifty

409
00:20:04,119 --> 00:20:08,840
Speaker 8: thousand dollars. That's very important. She recognizes that if the

410
00:20:08,920 --> 00:20:12,240
Speaker 8: thirty three million companies in this country, ninety nine percent

411
00:20:12,280 --> 00:20:14,680
Speaker 8: are passed through, ninety nine percent are run by people

412
00:20:14,720 --> 00:20:17,879
Speaker 8: making four hundred k or less. Those small businesses are

413
00:20:17,920 --> 00:20:20,400
Speaker 8: what drive the economy. They create most of the new

414
00:20:20,480 --> 00:20:25,280
Speaker 8: jobs every single year. So she's focused on an opportunity economy.

415
00:20:25,320 --> 00:20:27,160
Speaker 8: I don't think she can be any more clear.

416
00:20:27,600 --> 00:20:30,560
Speaker 4: Mark, do you think that this campaign for Kamala Harris

417
00:20:30,560 --> 00:20:32,960
Speaker 4: could have done more to reach out to the mail voter.

418
00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:35,840
Speaker 4: This seems to be an election that is unique in

419
00:20:35,960 --> 00:20:38,520
Speaker 4: just how bifurcated the mail and the female vote really

420
00:20:38,560 --> 00:20:41,280
Speaker 4: has been. There were some questions around Joe Rogan and

421
00:20:41,320 --> 00:20:44,040
Speaker 4: how to appeal to the mail vote and how to

422
00:20:44,359 --> 00:20:48,240
Speaker 4: really bring the genders together. What's your take on this

423
00:20:48,359 --> 00:20:49,920
Speaker 4: campaign's approach to that.

424
00:20:51,000 --> 00:20:52,879
Speaker 8: I think it was very data driven. I mean, women

425
00:20:52,960 --> 00:20:56,120
Speaker 8: have a high propensity of voting, and you know, with

426
00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:59,720
Speaker 8: all with reproductive rights and other issues that were gear

427
00:20:59,760 --> 00:21:02,720
Speaker 8: towards women, I think she did a great job of

428
00:21:02,760 --> 00:21:05,760
Speaker 8: connecting to them. You know, maybe she didn't. She didn't

429
00:21:05,800 --> 00:21:08,000
Speaker 8: do everything she could have with men, but that's okay

430
00:21:08,040 --> 00:21:09,679
Speaker 8: because she went to the people who are going to

431
00:21:09,720 --> 00:21:11,920
Speaker 8: vote more. You go, you know, as a business person,

432
00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:14,080
Speaker 8: you go to the people you have the best opportunity

433
00:21:14,119 --> 00:21:16,320
Speaker 8: to sell to, who's going to buy your product, who's

434
00:21:16,320 --> 00:21:18,399
Speaker 8: going to vote for you. In this particular case, and

435
00:21:18,440 --> 00:21:20,639
Speaker 8: the fact that she's only been in the race fourteen

436
00:21:20,720 --> 00:21:23,520
Speaker 8: weeks and she's caught up completely and now I believe

437
00:21:23,560 --> 00:21:25,919
Speaker 8: Pastor and will win today, I think she's done the

438
00:21:25,960 --> 00:21:26,800
Speaker 8: exact right thing.

439
00:21:27,480 --> 00:21:29,680
Speaker 2: Speaking of business and product, there's a famous quo from

440
00:21:29,680 --> 00:21:32,479
Speaker 2: Michael Jordan, which I'm sure you know well, Republicans by

441
00:21:32,520 --> 00:21:35,320
Speaker 2: sneakers too, and raise the question about you. And I

442
00:21:35,359 --> 00:21:37,600
Speaker 2: wanted to ask you about this from Mann, who's got

443
00:21:37,640 --> 00:21:39,760
Speaker 2: a line of businesses, why was this important to you

444
00:21:40,240 --> 00:21:42,760
Speaker 2: to put your name and reputation on the line and

445
00:21:42,880 --> 00:21:46,880
Speaker 2: really get deep into politics when ultimately Republicans by sneakers too.

446
00:21:47,840 --> 00:21:49,720
Speaker 8: So I'm not going to get deep into politics, but

447
00:21:49,800 --> 00:21:52,040
Speaker 8: I think this, You know, this is a close election

448
00:21:52,119 --> 00:21:54,080
Speaker 8: for a reason, and I think Kamala Harris will be

449
00:21:54,200 --> 00:21:58,159
Speaker 8: the best president and is a better choice than Donald Trump.

450
00:21:58,320 --> 00:22:01,080
Speaker 8: It's that simple. I mean, I love this country. I'm

451
00:22:01,080 --> 00:22:03,800
Speaker 8: in this position because of everything this country has given me.

452
00:22:04,480 --> 00:22:07,280
Speaker 8: I'm blasted and I thought, you know, I truly believe

453
00:22:07,320 --> 00:22:09,880
Speaker 8: that she will be the better president for the United

454
00:22:09,920 --> 00:22:12,639
Speaker 8: States of America. And that's the only reason I'm doing this.

455
00:22:12,840 --> 00:22:13,000
Speaker 3: Well.

456
00:22:13,040 --> 00:22:14,800
Speaker 2: Thanks for sharing your time with us this morning. We

457
00:22:14,840 --> 00:22:16,960
Speaker 2: appreciate it, Mark, and hopefully we can share it again soon.

458
00:22:17,240 --> 00:22:20,000
Speaker 2: Mark Cuban there on the latest campaign effort from the

459
00:22:20,000 --> 00:22:24,520
Speaker 2: Harris campaign. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, bringing you

460
00:22:24,800 --> 00:22:27,959
Speaker 2: the best in markets, economics, an gio politics. You can

461
00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:30,760
Speaker 2: watch the show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from

462
00:22:30,800 --> 00:22:34,080
Speaker 2: six am to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast

463
00:22:34,119 --> 00:22:37,280
Speaker 2: on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen, and as

464
00:22:37,320 --> 00:22:40,200
Speaker 2: always on the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business Out