WEBVTT - Prospects You Need in 2024 (EP. 754)

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Chulcome in, everybody to Fantasy Pros. This is the Fantasy

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Podcast. It is me, Joey b Joe Pisapia, that

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of course is the Welsh and it's you, and we're

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>hanging out today talking about the prospects that you need

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>you must have your twenty twenty four leagues. And I

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>know we've already talked about a few prospects, so we're

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna touch on some of the big ones that everybody's

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about, but we're gonna do a deeper

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>dive in some other guys at Welsh is really excited

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>about for twenty twenty four. And don't forget make sure

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to our YouTube channel because it's very important.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the only way you're gonna survive all one hundred

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and sixty two games of the Fantasy Baseball season. So

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>do that. Subscribe, ring the bell, click it till it

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>goes ding. And of course you'll know every time a

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:45.639
<v Speaker 1>piece of content drops here on the channel, because we've

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of stuff here. We've got the podcast,

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:49.959
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have live streams, we're gonna have draft coverage,

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and Welsh the Draft Wizard is open for business, so

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you can already start going and creating all the different

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>mock drafts and areas you possibly can handle right now.

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>It's available over at Fantasy Pros, so check out Draft

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Wizard again for MLB. And if you subscribe to the

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros MLB YouTube channel and you comment below on

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this video with your favorite prospect or how much you

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>like Welsh's beard because it's coming in very well, you

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>could win a free premium upgrade to Fantasy Pros Premium,

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>which is a big deal because if you're looking for

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>custom mock drafts, the salary Cap draft tool that's going

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on now for those of you in the salary cap leagues,

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>or even just in death analysis for your own fantasy

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>teams performance, Fantasy Pros Premium has the tools to help

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>you win and unlock the most powerful tools at all

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the industry, so don't wait for the giveaway. You could

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>sign up today at fantasypros dot com slash Premium and

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>start playing smarter, not harder, or you could throw your

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>hat in the ring for free and see if you

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>can get it, so you might as well do both.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, maybe you get lucky,

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>but Welsh we talk about it all the time. Just

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to manage all your leagues, the Fantasy Pros premium, just

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to set all your lineups, just on the Fantasy Pros app.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>That alone is worth downloading and sinking all your leagues,

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>don't you think?

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think you have a realization until you

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>go in and you check it. How powerful and what

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 2>you can do.

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>You wand know.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 2>One cool thing I was doing today, I clicked on

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't do a ton of auction leagues. Auctions are

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the bane of my existence because of how long they take.

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 2>But you know what I love about auction stuff is

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the calculators because you can go and you can check

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 2>actual pricing. I was in the salary cap estimator I

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 2>think that we have. I think that's the title of it.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.119
<v Speaker 2>It's a salary cap value calculator. And I was going

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 2>in and I was changing all the different formats, fifteen

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 2>adding positions, watching the dollars change, and sometimes it's a

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 2>really good barometer just to talk about actual values, even

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.839
<v Speaker 2>if you're not in salary cap leagues. If you want

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 2>to see the worth of players based on projections to money,

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I do that all the time. There's some great spaces

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>that have done that in the past, and we do

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 2>that here, So go and check that out amongst all

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 2>the great tools here at Fantasy Pros.

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Now, speaking of great tools, Welsh and I are going

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>to talk some prospects. Now. That's right, because we're the

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>two biggest tools around these parts. So let's talk about it.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about the obvious guys, the guys that we

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>already kind of touched on the last show. So if

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you miss that, I go back and watch and listen

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to it. Wyatt Langford obviously a big one too. You know,

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the Texas Rangers right now kind of an embarrassment of riches.

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>They win the World Series. You know, a couple of

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 1>years ago, they're overpaying for some guys, some contracts a

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of us were rolling our eyes about, but turned

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>out to be the right situation. And clearly things are

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>going well and they've already got a good young pipeline

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of players. Jackson Churio, the young infielder for the Milwaukee Brewers,

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>who is very exciting. They've already extended him in Milwaukee.

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>We touched on him too. We expect him to break

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>with the club. I want to say he's going to

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>still be less than twenty by the time that would

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>happen in spring. I believe I gotta check the birthday.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think actually I think I just looked at

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the other day. I actually think it's March eleventh that

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 2>he knew it was a round there. I feel like

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 2>he wouldn't he'll turn twenty for the season.

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Still can't drink, but we won't tell if Jackson has

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a champagne to celebrate that contract, because

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>goodness knows, Welsh and I would have at least a

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>bottle or two. Evan Carter also another piece for that

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Rangers team that's very exciting, and Junior Camenaro a piece

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we think is going to get a

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunity this year in Tampa. Now, Kemonaro is

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>my guy. I think he's the guy they can step in.

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>The need is going to be there. I think he's

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>going to come in right away be very productive. I

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to think there's gonna be too much pressure

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>on Turio is spectacular, but again, he is very young,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of pressure when you're that guy

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and you come up at that age. It's going back

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to the days of Alex Rodriguez right in Seattle where

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>he comes up and he's twenty years old, and you

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>know the pressure that was on him, and he had

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of star power around him. I don't know

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>if he's got that same kind of situation in Milwaukee

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that a Rod had in Seattle. We can talk about that.

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>But of these four, which is the guy that you

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>can see yourself having the most shares of, depending upon

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>ADP or depending upon what you think really is worth

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.559
<v Speaker 1>the premium, or maybe the guy that has the best

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>path to playing the most time.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 2>So this elite tier, and you kind of mentioned at

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the top, I just want to point out again this

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 2>is not really even in our group of the prospects

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 2>you have to have, because you should already have these guys.

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 2>So these are the most obvious of targets. Now I'll

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 2>tell you this. I have Wyatt Langford higher than anybody here,

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>but I would say Langford is in the bottom two

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 2>of sustain of like feeling comfortable that you're going to

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 2>have him on opening day at this moment. Evan Carter's

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the safest we know. He has a spot. Guy was

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 2>hitting three in the World Series. He's locked into a

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 2>roster spot. You can draft him and know Churio with

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the contract, leads us to believe he's going to be

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 2>able to play the whole season. What you love about

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 2>those two, by the way, are the stolen bases. I

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 2>have questions about Carter's power. I'm probably actually least interested

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:18.559
<v Speaker 2>in Carter even though he's safe.

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>That's you know, it's funny. I'm least interested in him too.

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Why are you least interested just out of curiousity?

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, I don't love the lefty bat. I

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 2>know a lot of people are making a big thing

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 2>about it, but I believe between the miners and the majors,

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 2>he had one extra base hit against lefties the entire year.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 2>Struggled even in the majors against lefties, So if you

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 2>get into splits, that's a question. Plus, he is the

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 2>lowest power projection of any of these players, so he's

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 2>at the bottom. Churio is the most electric of all

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 2>those and he has this contract to get him in there.

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 2>He's actually going number one of all these players in

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>current redraft NFBC leagues, But Wyatt Langford is my guy.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 2>We'll also saying Camonaro. Cannaro is the best value of

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 2>every single player that's two hundred. Yeah, well, but he

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 2>has the least. He has the least probability at this moment,

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 2>even though there's kind of open spots, this team has

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 2>to move Estock Parides. If they move estoc Parides jump

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 2>quickly on Junior Camenero. But right now there's no path.

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So we'll go back to why that's happening, which is

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>why I want to be ahead of the curve and

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>take him in the early drafts or were the best

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>ball drafts were talking to. And you know, Cherio is

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be probably the most expensive of these guys,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously and rightfully, so I think we can all agree

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>on that. But it's funny because you mentioned that Carter's

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>the guy for you that you also struggle with. To me,

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the frame. I'm just concerned that he golds up

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>over a long season. I think he's got a long

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>way to go in terms of growing into the size

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and the body type.

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>But what's so tough about that is two of these

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 2>obvious guys play on the same team then, so you've

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 2>got Carter and Wyatt Langford. So for all intentsive purposes,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I've talked about this Wyatt length. They're going to give

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>why at Langford the opportunity he got all the way

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 2>up to Triple A. He was in legit discussions for

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 2>a playoff run. There was legit discussions when I was

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 2>actually at that game at the World Cherias when Adully

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Scarcia got hurt, there was discussions about putting him on

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 2>the active roster when it happened. They're going to give

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 2>him a shot. This team could do some if there's

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 2>a weird split issue, there could be a platoon and

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 2>these guys could maybe hurt each other. But I think

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>that DH spot is open for Langford. They can put

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>him in the outfield. He's got a good ADP. I

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>want to be invested in him. I have him higher

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>than any guy on my redraft ranks this year, So

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Langford I want to be in the most business of

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Camonaro is the best value. So both of those guys

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 2>are gonna end up on a lot of teams. I

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 2>have not been able to pull the trigger on Surreio

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 2>just yet or Evan Carter.

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's jump to the list. Now the other

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>guys that you're gonna have to have at some point

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even draft, depending on the depth of your league,

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're an start with Baltimore Orioles, who are going

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to be embarrassment of riches when it comes to young players.

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Holliday yet another one. Now Welsh I described him,

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, in my opinion, he's a left handed version

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of Craig Bigio. Spreads the ball, round, makes good contact

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. We'll see if the power you

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>know develops. Last year, this is a guy who went

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>from A to High A to Double A all the

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>way Triple A. Only played eighteen games in Triple A.

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Hitch just two sixty seven, but he's still that three

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety six obps. So the on base skills are still there.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>The guy takes a ton of walks. He's got really

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>good pitch recognition skills. Obviously, you know the pedigree of

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>being the son of a may form major leaguer. So

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Holliday, your thoughts and how aggressive people should be

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>on him in twenty four So this.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Is the one I want to be hyper aggressive on,

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 2>but I'm I'm playing it a little bit cautious right now.

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 2>If you go to roster resource as we are doing

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 2>this video, he is currently set up as their shortstop,

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>but we don't have any confirmation. If Jackson Holiday is

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 2>confirmed that he is the starting shortstop for the season,

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a top one hundred guid to draft

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>in redraft leagues because, like, this is one of the

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>things I like about Langford. Of all those guys we

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 2>talked about, you know, kemn Arrow doesn't have the stolen bases,

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 2>but big power Churio. I worry there might be some

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 2>off speed struggles as far as like maybe getting going

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>through some ups and downs. Langford has got this floor

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 2>with his OBP. That's what Jackson Holiday does. Jackson Hollidy

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 2>had over one hundred walks in the minor leagues this

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 2>past year. Absolutely hits the ball hard, he can run.

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I think he could be closer to like an Oh

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Witt type of guy. Like I think he is

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>a twenty homer is not even in question for me.

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 2>I think the guy can steal thirty to forty bases.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 2>He walks a decent amount, doesn't strike out a lot,

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 2>makes great contact. If he is anointed the guy, he

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 2>will be drafted inside the top one hundred. I guarantee

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 2>it come draft time. Right now, you can get him

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 2>late because there's a little bit of a question mark.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>He's around that Camonaro range, but people feel more comfortable

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 2>that camon Aro is going to be able to start sooner.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 2>So that's why I think the prospects that you have

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 2>to have the true top ten list here. Jackson Holiday

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 2>is one that you should be drafting in your league's

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>post two hundred every single time, just off of the

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 2>shoot that he does do it. If he doesn't right

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 2>off the gates, it still might be within the first month.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think he presents such a good floor. This

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 2>is exactly the type of prospect that you want to

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>invest in in in redraft league, you know. I mean

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I love him in Dynasty as well, that's not even question.

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 2>He's my number one prospect. But redraft this is the guy,

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 2>great young player. You're a little more bullish on the

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 2>power than I am. I don't know if it's gonna

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 2>translate right away. I think it's gonna take a little

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>bit more time.

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Next guy on our list is nuelve Marte, who is

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a player that you know if you've been following or

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>eve been playing Dynacay baseball for a while. I miss

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the guy that I drafted. I think four years ago

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>when he was probably still a teenager when he was

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with Seattle. And what I love most about Marte at

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this juncture too, when you watch the tape on him,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is he's really done a good job of staying balanced,

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>staying back, he waits on that ball, and he really

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is using you know, that leverage that he gets with

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>his legs and that balance that he's had in his swing.

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 1>He's got a little bit of a leg kick now too,

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>which is something that he's added. You didn't quite have

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that when he was younger, twite to the extent that

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he's got it now. So you're seeing a little bit

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 1>more power and I think that's why you're seeing some

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of these balls jump up there with Marte. But I

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>guess the big question with Marte is where does he

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>play at this point too? Right? It's such a logjam there.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>What is your answer to that question? Because I think

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that's something we all look at and we're all trying

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to figure out the answer.

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I think the question is third base. So okay,

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 2>I think some people could probably be like, hey, this

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 2>guy belongs in that little elite tier.

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>You talk, where does na Strando if he goes to third.

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's the big question, right.

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't think in karnassion Strand is a third

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 2>base option for this team. I think that is out.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think defensively they've liked him there. He is

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 2>a first base guy, so I think you know you

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 2>getting and they've already moved Steer to the outfield. So

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>I think the roster construction at this time is Ellie

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 2>at short, McClain is at second, and Noelvie is at third,

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 2>with Strand at first, Steers in the outfield, and it

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 2>could move around. Here's the problem and why we put

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 2>him in this tier and I have Jackson Holiday above him.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Is there still is a question mark because this team

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 2>is so talented. They could have McClain be short. Ellie,

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 2>they've talked about playing some third, and they still have

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan India. Jonathan India could be playing some second base,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 2>so there's a possibility that Noelvie starts in the minors.

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>I also think the upside in my mind is bigger

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 2>with Jackson Holiday, and that's why I have him as

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 2>the number one guy to own. There's some question marks here,

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 2>but Listen is fantastic in his pro debut, hit the

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 2>ball hard, six dolen bases in a little over one

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 2>hundred at bats, he had three homers, he hit over

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 2>three hundred. I don't think they're gonna push him off,

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 2>but he costs a lot more than guys like Camonaro

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 2>and Jackson Holiday. But he's still prospect eligible. There still

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 2>is a very viable path for him to break camp

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 2>with the team. And categorically, if he does what he

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 2>did last year and it translates back over, Okay, I'll

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 2>be wrong. He should have been the number one guy

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 2>that he's probably a twenty thirty guy.

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'll be honest, I don't care if he breaks

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 1>or not. He's playing more than one hundred games for

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the Reds this year. There's no way I think they

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>can keep that. So if anything, you might get a discount.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>In April or March, I should say on this guy,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>if they say, well, we're gonna give a little bit

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>more time, maybe we're gonna try some other things. First

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>teams love to do that, and then may first rolls around.

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Next thing, you know, the guy's back, So take advantage

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>if that should happen with Marte, because I'm telling you,

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>watching the evolution of this kid who really came on

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>strong in this Seattle organization and then got traded there

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and then watching what he did this year and again

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>when you watch the tape on him, very impressive. The

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>balance in that guy as a hitter is really impressive,

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's the power is legit. I want to get

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>him in that ballpark as soon as possible. Let's go

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to the manchild, Kyle Manzardo, who was once a Tampa

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Bay prospect now with the Cleveland Guardians. Manzardo is interesting

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>because he's got what I call the coil swing Welsh,

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>which is something that you know, there's different versions of this.

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>You see these guys with that front side where they'll

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>turn that front heel inward kind of you know, trying

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to stay back, trying to stay back as much. Again,

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it's something the Pooholes used to do. But then you

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>have some other guys that really coil and the left

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>handed guy that he reminds me of when he really coils.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>The coil guy of all time is Don Mattingley, who

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>was a smaller guy who used to get so much

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>out of his swing with that coil that he used

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to do. He used to turn his whole body in

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and all that power come from that explosiveness of that coil.

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of what Manzardo does now. Obviously, you know,

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a difference in terms of size potentially, you know,

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Manzardo six feet tall, not so much with don Mattingley.

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what his official measurements might be, but

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Donny Baseball was six tall last time

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I joined. So, but Manzardo interesting guy because Cleveland is

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I think a team that desperately could use some help

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>here on the offensive side. He's coming off a pretty

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>good Fall League two seventy two, three forty five, sixty

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>five slash with a nine oh five ops. So what's

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the future look like in twenty four for Manzarto.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I talked with Manzardo in the ouseeason. I

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 2>have an interview posted out people can find. I spent

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time talking with him, and he's a

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 2>really fascinating.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Where can everybody find that interview?

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you want, you can go to my Prospect

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 2>one podcast and you can see I did some AFL

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>player interviews and Cole Manzardo was one of those, and

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>you know I talked about he had one of the

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 2>farthest balls I've ever seen hit in the AFL. It

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 2>was like, I think it was measured around like four

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 2>to eighty or just some absurd number. He almost one

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 2>bounced out of the stadium, and I was talking about

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 2>just how locked in he is and his approach. I

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 2>had noticed guys want to pitch him low. He's absolutely

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>destroying it, but everybody was pitching at him high. And

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 2>he had said that he's completely comfortable with the lower

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 2>half of the zone, which some power hitters struggle. It's

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 2>actually something I noted with Spencer Torkelsen some years ago,

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 2>is you would see guys going off speed low, not

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Cole Manzardo. It was high stuff. So he was getting

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 2>attacked higher in the zone in the AFL, and he

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 2>had said in the miners that the coaches said, don't

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 2>worry about it, because he wasn't getting pitched in the

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 2>upper half of the zone. What does this all mean

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 2>to me? What this means is the expansion of learning

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>to be an even better hitter. He's already got that

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 2>bottom half of the zone which a lot of power

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 2>hitters can struggle with. So now if you can come

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 2>in and you can attack with incredible bats, speed, the

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 2>upper parts of the zone, you can succeed. Nolan Gorman

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 2>is one of those guys. I think you can see

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 2>another Nolan Gorman like season out of Manzardo. But I

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 2>think the main question is are they going to let

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 2>him go from the shoot. He missed time last year

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 2>hit two thirty six in a struggle, but he still

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>had seventeen homers over twenty if you count the AFL

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the extra at bats. I think he's ready. I think

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 2>this team should consider because they would have prospect eligibility

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 2>for the extra pick. If they do it, can go

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 2>play DH. You're putting a little bit of risk in.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 2>But my point here is I think Cole Manzardo is

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 2>a huge power hitter that can put twenty five plus

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 2>up if he's up within the first month. And that's

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 2>why I put him up there so high because I

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 2>think defensively they like him. I think he's an advanced hitter,

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 2>he understands this process. He's actually pretty athletic as well.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 2>And they sent two of their big prospects to the

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 2>AFL that I think both guys are going to be

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 2>potentially up this season, Manzardo and Chase a Lotter, who

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 2>did not make this list, but I'm very bullish on

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Manzarto and do want to draft him if I miss

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 2>any of those big early core guys.

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Next guy on the list is Mason Miller from the Oakland.

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>A's a guy that I know has a lot of

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>strikeout potential. Everybody loves the arm. Question is the durability,

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's my big concern it comes to

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Mason Miller. I think a lot of people will be

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>on him, but he could be a guy who ends

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>up in the bullpen. He would be end up a closer,

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and that would significantly change his value depending on what

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>fantasy format you're playing in. I think that's probably more

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>likely for that, and I think that's more like when

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I watch him again, you could take this comp or

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever he is trying to comp these guys for those

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>people who are you know still maybe you don't play

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Dynasty, play a lot of Redraft and

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know these guys. When I watch him pitch, I

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>see what could be the next Joe Nathan. Like Joe

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Nathan was a guy who ended up being one of

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the best closers in baseball for ten years. People weren't

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>sure at first what to do with him, And you

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>know what, he found his way into the bullpen and

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>he ended up saving what thirty plus games nine out

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>of ten seasons in a row. That's pretty good. Now.

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Miller's gonna have that kind of

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a career, but watching him pitch, a's who he reminds

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>me of if he ends up taking that role, And

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I honestly think he is more likely to be in

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen than making starts this year. We your thoughts.

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 2>It's already been announced that is happening. He is going

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 2>to be done with bullpeny Yeah, yeah, No. They what

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 2>they said is they aren't. They will not move him

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 2>back into a rotation until they have gotten a season

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 2>out of him because injuries have been his problem. One

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 2>of the wackiest things was he was in the AFL

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 2>two years ago. He like no innings, came in, played

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 2>a couple of games, was hitting like one oh one.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>He was a talk of the AFL two years ago.

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Then with like thirty pro career innings, he's up in

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the majors with this team and he's pitching, and then

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 2>they brought him back down injury. Blah blah blah, so

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 2>what they've decided with this guy, and this is why

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 2>he's on this list. I'm not the biggest Mason Miller

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 2>fan on the planet.

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Because as of the Winter meetings, that hadn't been decided yet.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>In December, it was just as MS. Yeah, because I

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>heard all the gms talking about the winter meetings. They

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>have the oclad A's GM and they were talking about

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>what to do with him and uh and they were

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>still kind of debating that topic and going through there.

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>So that is recent news that's happening.

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 2>The expectation is he will not be a starter at

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 2>all this year. He will be in the bullpen. And

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 2>if he's in the bullpen, he's a closer. I don't know,

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's not from day one, but the guy hits

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 2>a hundred, he's got a power breaking ball with a

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 2>huge fastball, and they've had like Trevor may being the

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 2>so but reasonly.

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You're too Welsh because you don't want to do that

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>same thing where you where you have a guy get

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>up and down a million times who's got army issues.

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>You want to have him go out there, get his routine,

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>get a clean three outs, get a clean inning, and

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>then get ready for tomorrow if you need him and

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>then be able to say, Okay, he's not available after

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 1>two days or three days in a row, you can

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>manage the concerns about the health of that arm. If

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>he is the closer.

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And the only reason to not put him in

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 2>a closer role is if you don't want to build

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 2>him up in that spot where you're gonna then take

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 2>him out into the following year. So that's a possibility.

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 2>So why he's high on this list and we're talking

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.719
<v Speaker 2>about twenty twenty four prospects that you have to have

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 2>is because he might be a closer out the gates

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 2>or at least three fourths of the season. It's the

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 2>A's they stink, how many opportunities. But this is a

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>guy that you can get cheap, cheap saves while people

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 2>are not necessarily projecting or him being projected as a closer.

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 2>I think he will be the entire year. He's locked

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 2>into the bullpen. That's why are we usually chasing this. No,

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 2>but this is the best option of a young prospect

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 2>that could be closing the entire season. So he makes

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 2>this list. You should own him. Get some cheap saves

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 2>when you can.

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you this too. Like in Dynasty Leagues, I

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>think this is just going to be his future. I

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>did too. I don't think he's going to be a

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher. I just don't see that in his future. Again,

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Electric the velocity is real. We all know that. But

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you know he is only valuable if you can get

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>innings out of him. And it's better to get the

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>sixty five innings out of the closer role than it

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is to try to push him to one hundred and

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty and end up getting zero at the end of

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the day.

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Anybody, the only argument will be like, you don't want

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 2>to You don't want to monopolize all of your really

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 2>great talented pitchers immediately into that. But I think there's

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 2>a longer track over. The Diamondbacks did this with Archie Bradley.

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 2>They just kept fighting and fighting and then it was like,

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 2>can't stay healthy, he can't go multiple innings. And I

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 2>think that that might be what we're coming to terms with.

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 2>This team is coming to terms with is get this

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 2>big future closer, but just be weary that The last

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 2>resort many many times for teams is to make that

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 2>transition so they can't be like you want these guys

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 2>to be starters. The best value is that they are

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 2>a starter. But if they making this move, in my mind,

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 2>this tells me like, oh, they don't believe that he

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>can hold up over one hundred innings based on his

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 2>arm and what he does, and that's why we want

0:20:58.320 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to invest, and that's why I think he can be

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 2>a closer for the majority of the year.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Next on our list, number five Kyle Harrison, starting pitcher

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of the San Francisco Giants. Now, Harrison got thirty four

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>innings last year at the age of twenty one. Struck

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>out thirty five guys just eleven walks in thirty four innings.

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>He had the FIP of five point five to three

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and a whip of one point one five So obviously

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>some wacky things going on there. Era was about four

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in change, But again it's first thirty four innings. Which

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you like about Harrison, you know, is he is kind

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>of like an old school drop and drive pitcher, you know,

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>really using the legs. You see a lot of these

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>guys with these big arm actions and things like that.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>This is not Kyle Harrison. Kyle Harrison to me, when

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you watch him, it's really strong in the lower half,

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is the kind of guy that

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>long term is going to have a lot of good

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>durability because that is an old style of pitching that

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>you saw more in the sixties and seventies even in

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>through the eighties of that drop and drive Nolan Ryan

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>style kind of thing where they're using that lower half,

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is a great thing to see

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>here out of this young man, and I think that

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>bodes well for him making more starts than you might realize,

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>not just in twenty four but also beyond. What are

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on Harrison and the contributions he can make

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>not only to the Giants but the fantasy rotations this year.

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the big key here is that, like

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the you have, you have the ability to be a

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 2>starter and maybe for the majority of the year, because

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, they also they made trades for like Robbie Ray,

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 2>who's gonna probably not come into like the back half

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 2>of the season. There's a lot of injuries that are

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 2>going to go on there, and Kyle Harrison was a

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 2>guy that they kind of thrust into that role on

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 2>the back half of last year. The results weren't incredible,

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>but he still had an almost twenty four percent K percentage.

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I've never been the biggest, biggest fan because you know,

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 2>he had similarities to Brandon Fought in the miners when

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 2>they were both there. They were both like really really

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>high K guys, and Fought has a sweeper where it's

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 2>designated as like a slurve type of slider for Kyle Harrison,

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 2>and Fots was a lot better. Kyle Harrison had massive

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 2>walk issues, but huge stuff plus numbers because the fastball

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 2>plays even though it didn't absolutely fly here. It was

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 2>right around ninety four miles poor, but had a really

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 2>good wifth percentage around twenty five percent, which is very

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 2>high for a fastball. It's going to be the secondaries

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 2>and really just the command locking in. But here's the

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 2>key high strikeout pitcher on a team that is going

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 2>to give him the innings to be a starter. So

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 2>if you want to chase some strikeouts, this is why

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 2>you do that move. You can have that translation of

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, logan web kind of rubbing off. Giants have

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 2>always done really well with getting the most out of

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 2>their pitchers, So I think this is a strikeout chase play.

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 2>We're moving down the list, but this is a prospect

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 2>that you should have in your rotation, especially if you've

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 2>missed out on strikeouts. Hell, if you went safe and

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 2>you got the George Kirby's and Logan web Let's say,

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 2>and you've got this huge floor of pitchers that lack strikeouts,

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 2>you should chase some strikeouts. He's one of the better

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 2>strikeout chasers to go for in the lower lower rounds.

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 2>And this is a prospect that you should, you know,

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 2>probably get just to He might end up being a

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 2>streamer at the end of the day, but if they

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 2>are giving him the full bore, you might have a

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 2>ten you know, a ten K per nine high K

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 2>percentage type of player out of him. That can help you, know,

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 2>some of your ratios.

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this too. You know some of those lefties,

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they take a little bit longer in the cooker, you

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>know that just that's just the nature of the beast,

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes just the mechanics of it. But I just really

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>like his style of pitching. I like Harrison a lot.

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be one of those guys.

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned you the Giants have a good track

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>record with these guys and good positive ballpark factor for

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:22.959
<v Speaker 1>him as well. So a lot of things I think

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to like there, especially those deeper leagues where you're desert

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for pitching.

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 2>And you know what great point talking about the ballpark factor,

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 2>because it is it is a friendly environment. And the

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>thing to remember about a lot of his minor league

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 2>stats was that he was pitching in the PCL and

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 2>the PCL is a known disaster, and that was actually

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons to love Brandon Fought was because

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 2>he was so dominant in the PCL. Kyle Harrison got

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 2>beat around. But you're now going in and you're now

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 2>going into a great pitcher environment. Which one other thing

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 2>I want to point out, he's the only lefty currently

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 2>locked into the rotation according to roster resource, so he's

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 2>not going anywhere. The only thing that's going to hold

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 2>him back is maybe some type of innings cap. But

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:58.479
<v Speaker 2>you're going to get one hundred and thirty hundred and

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 2>forty plus out of Harrison with really good strikeout. So yeah,

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 2>this is a good chase. And there's not a lot

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 2>of great prospect pitchers to chase in redraft leagues. He

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 2>is one of them, though.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>All Right, if you like players that play with their

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>hair on fire, then I give you Pete Crow Armstrong.

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>That's that's that guy. He's a very excitable guy. I

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>like that about him. A lot of energy, gives you

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>some power, gives you some speed, gives you too many

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts for my liking. Personally, I think that's something he's

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>got to work on. But he's just gonna be twenty

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>two years old. Chicago Cubs have certainly an energetic player.

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a player that would be extremely

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>popular as the Chicago Cub fan base gets a little

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a taste of him. Like I said,

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>plays hard, that's what you love. Still very young, I think,

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>still a little rough around the edges for me. But

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the Cubs are a team that proved last year. They

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>are starting to get back into relevance. So how much

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>of a role is Crow Armstrong going to play in

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the cubs twenty twenty four season.

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Well see that Okay here, that's a big question, and

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 2>that's why we have I think a little bit more

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 2>of a marker in him. In the minors, Pete Crow

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 2>was fantastic. Twenty homers, almost forty stolen bases, attempted forty seven.

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 2>He ended up taking down thirty seven hit two eighty

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 2>three in Double A, he hit two eighty nine. In

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Triple A he hit two seventy one. Pretty good OBP

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 2>as well, not quite one hundred points, but around seventy

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 2>to ninety.

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Great defenders a plus defender too, So that's something I

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 1>think that helps you get more opportunities.

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Should I say plus defender? Right now? This team has

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Mike Takman locked in on roster resource as their center fielder. Nope,

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 2>not going to happen. Bigger question is if Cody Bellinger

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 2>signs back, where do they put him. I think they

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 2>put him at first, which moves Michael Bush and Christopher

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Morel if he doesn't get moved into a split rotational

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 2>DH spot and it puts Piekrow Armstrong in center field.

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the contact skills are there. He clearly can run,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 2>he can hit a bit. Even if things come back down,

0:26:57.880 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 2>I would not be shocked if you're looking at a

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 2>fifth teen twenty season out of him. Maybe it's ten

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty five or something like that. If he's hitting lower

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 2>in the order, it's not the best thing in the world,

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 2>but he's a power speed combo going near the back

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 2>end of drafts, and one of the things holding him

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 2>back is just people are a little bit unsure. But again,

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Mike Takman is the guy. And I also don't think

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 2>if Bellinger were to resign and they put Bellinger in centerfield,

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 2>which is a possibility, that Michael Bush is going to

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 2>be the reason that Pete Crow Armstrong isn't up. Michael

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Bush is a good bat, but the play here Bellinger

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>at first, Bush at DH, Pete Crow Armstrong in center field.

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 2>That's how you play it. And that is a cheap, outfield,

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 2>stolen based semi power option that you can get in

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 2>drafts this year. And I think people just kind of

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 2>sleep on Pete Crow and I wouldn't.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>No, I wouldn't either, And it is gonna be interesting.

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe we're still here. We don't have Cody

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Bellinger stuff yet. It's the sixteenth of January, folks, What

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>are we doing here?

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Again? Maybe and maybe he's signed by the time you

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 2>guys are listening to this, you guys know the answer

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 1>We say this and then we'll have more clarity. But regardless,

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you're assessment is correct. And I think Morell

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of value to other teams because of

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>his versatility. So I think some other team will be

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>happy to take him off the Cub's hands, and I

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>think that all works out for everybody involved, including Morel,

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cubs Bellinger, which again it just makes sense for

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>him to go back there. Let's go to Jordan Lawler,

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>another one of your guys here, well, Arizona diamondback last

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>year got fourteen games with the big club, hitches the

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>buck twenty nine, So you gotta go a little bit deeper.

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Last year he did play one hundred and five games

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>between double and triple A, twenty homer, sixty seven ribby's,

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he had to say, seventy eight batting average, eight seventy

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>four ops. So what's your assessment of Lawler? And do

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you believe that this guy is ready to take a

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>step here and after getting a little cup of coffee

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>with the big club last year, starting to look like

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe he belongs in twenty twenty four.

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I believe in deeper dynasty prospects because we're talking,

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, like this year prospects you guys want to

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 2>own for twenty twenty four, re draft leagues and stuff

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 2>like that, Deeper leagues buying Jordan Lawler. Prospect fatigue is

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:05.239
<v Speaker 2>in he made his debut, didn't do anything, didn't really

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 2>get an opportunity. Even though he was on the playoff roster.

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 2>We never saw anything out of him. And people are like, Oh,

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 2>he's just not that good and he hit like nothing,

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 2>he's struck. Blah blah blah. You're forgetting like the total

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 2>package and also just the bounce back that these guys have.

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 2>It means nothing to me. Thirty one at bats in

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the majors means absolutely nothing to me. He had twenty

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 2>homers with thirty six stolen bases in the miners. Two

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 2>seventy batting average this past year is very similar to

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Pete crow Armstrong. He hit two sixty three in double

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 2>A PCL. Things get inflated, he hit three p fifty eight.

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 2>I believe there is more power potential with Jordan Lawler.

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I believe there is more stolen base potential with Jordan

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Lawler versus Pete crow Armstrong. By the way, I wasn't

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 2>making that clear power speed better combo with Jordan Lawler.

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 2>The question is do the Diamondbacks unleash him. They signed

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Johenio Suarez, and that creates a wrinkle because some people

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 2>thought he might be the third Baseman Lawler. They've got Perdomo,

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 2>who was an All Star last year. Hitting metrics absolutely stink.

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Expected numbers look like they're gonna go like that, but

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 2>he was still an All Star, so he looks blocked.

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Think people are gonna get this wrong this year. And

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the only reason I have him behind Pete Crow Armstrong

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 2>is I think the path is harder for him to

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 2>produce this year, but I think it is very much

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:19.719
<v Speaker 2>in the realm of possibility that they get him four

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 2>hundred plus at bats. They could move Suarez to DH

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 2>at times, they can let him play short and third.

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I think they're going to get those at bats for

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Lawa this year, and I think we're going to see

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 2>a bounce back. He's a super smart hitter, crazy aggressive.

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 2>He can be aggressive as far as like strikeouts go,

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 2>but he's aggressive on the base paths. He's got twenty

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 2>plus power, and I think you can get four hundred

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 2>plus at bats and he is dirt cheap because no

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 2>one sees a job for him, so Redraft, I'm not

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 2>going nuts, but I do think he's gonna get more

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 2>at bats than you think. And in Dynasty, I am

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 2>buying on Jordan Lawler because prospect fatigue is the realest

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 2>thing ever in dynasty leagues. And people don't care about

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Lawla right now. They don't care about Pete Crow Armstrong

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 2>because they didn't produce. Everyone loves Noelvie Welvy is the

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 2>new biggest thing ever. But watch Jordan Lawler out produced

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So young still, I mean they're both. I mean we're

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about early twenties here. I mean, have we learned

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing of looking at some of these guys that it's

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.239
<v Speaker 1>taken just a little bit longer for and they end

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>up having really good careers. It happens all the time.

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>The patience is lacking because, as you said, the hype

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is just so much on these guys so early that

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we feel like, look, we've been talking I even mentioned

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>about Marte. Well that's a guy I've been talking about

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>for four or five years now. Well you know, like

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's he's still a kid. He's still just

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a kid. So keep that in mind with some of

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>these guys. Patience pays off. A lot of people had

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>patients with Spencer Torkelsen paid off last year. There's a

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>perfect example of a guy.

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Who I think another one of those.

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, next guy, Colt Keith of the Detroit Tigers infielder here. Now,

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Keith is an interesting guy too, left handed batu The

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>swing reminds me of Jim Edmonds a little bit. The

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>follow through just if you kind of did like a

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>little copy and paste there, a little job there in

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the sillo. I think it reminds you a lot about him.

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Keith obviously last year played at Double A, Triple A.

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>They combined one hundred and twenty six games, hit three

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>zero six a, three eighty OBP of five fifty two,

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>slugging everything you're looking for, had twenty seven homers, drove

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in one hundred and one runs. Really solid there. Yeah,

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>he strikes out, you know, one hundred and twenty one

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>k's and one hundred and twenty six games. That's you know,

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>about what you're looking at most of these sluggers nowadays.

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>But this is a bat that I feel like the

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Tigers could desperately need. They need more help in

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that offense, and they need it now. It can't just

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>be Torklesen. There's opportunity there, and they've got a couple

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of these guys there. Riley Green, like all these guys

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>were waiting on here. Torklesen finally delivered. Now it's time

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of these guys to come through. Is

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Keith the next guy to come through?

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 2>He was one of those guys that a lot of

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 2>us that paid attention to prospects were kind of screaming

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 2>about last year. Why wasn't he up? Why did they

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 2>not let him have a little bit of a run.

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 2>I'll say I saw him a couple of years in

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the AFL a couple of years ago. There's some video

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:54.479
<v Speaker 2>if you guys want to search my Twitter at as

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 2>it the Wels, you can watch a couple homers and

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that. It's a beautiful swing, it's a beautiful approach.

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 2>There's power. It was kind of breakout campaign. And then

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 2>this past year obviously two straight years now of hitting

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 2>over three hundred. He almost hit thirty homers this year,

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 2>but defensively he struggled. When he was out here in

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the AFL, they had him playing third base and that

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 2>could be a home for him, though I thought he

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of stunk there. They bought him play first base.

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 2>You're not gonna play there with Torkosen, but second base

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 2>is another thing. Currently, roster resource has Matt Vierling as

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the third baseman and Zach McKinstry as the second baseman.

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think either one of those necessarily are going

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 2>to block Colt Keith. Now, if they want it to

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 2>and they want to manipulate service time and stuff like that, sure,

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 2>okay they could. But there's a path on both sides

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of those. And here's the other thing. Colt Keith does

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 2>have versatility. His arm isn't great, but he could play third,

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 2>he could play second, he could play first. That's what

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 2>mckinstrey does, that's what Virlin can do. So if the

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 2>team wants to make the commitment, maybe take a shot

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 2>at that player pool extra player pool money. If he

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 2>were to win Rookie of the Year. I think so.

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 2>And he's a big power bat that has good batting average.

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 2>He's a big force to this lineup, and I think

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 2>they want to try to win. If they want to

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 2>commit to winning, I think they give Colt Keith a shot.

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 2>So pay attention to him in spring, take him at

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 2>the end of drafts because it's a good power bet

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 2>with solid batting average. And imagine if he's hitting like

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 2>five or six behind Torque and Rightley Green. I mean

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 2>that's a pretty good front end that this team is

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 2>put together. So I'm interested in Colt Keith, and I

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:23.399
<v Speaker 2>think you should be too.

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm very interested in our next guy. I can't believe

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:27.439
<v Speaker 1>he's number nine on this list. This is absurd. He's

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>my one hestin Kirstad of the Baltimore Orioles. I love

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>this guy. I love this swing. It is beautiful, it

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is easy, the power is easy. There's times where it

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>almost has a Will Clark sort of vibe about it

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>because he's kind of got that little front side that

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>he does a little bit where the elbow's really relaxed

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in the front, and then the contact is so easy.

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>The lift is so easy, the power so easy. It's

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>all there for this guy. Last year, in one hundred

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and twenty two games, be being double and triple A,

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>he had a three to zero three batting average, a

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>three seventy six OEP and a five twenty eight slugging

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a lead stuff, folks. Nine oh four ops just

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty one homers there. Look to me, this is the guy.

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Like I mean, as much as everybody is really excited

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>about Jackson Holiday, and they should be, I think kirs

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Dad's the guy that can help you in fantasy now,

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>and I think that the Orioles are going to just

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>be a really fun team to watch for the next

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>few years. But it starts year in twenty four. I

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>know he got a cup of coffee with the big

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>club last year, but this is my guy, Welsh. So

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what your thoughts are because I'm going to

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive on Kiers Dad. Should I be Should I

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>pump the brakes? What do you think?

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I love Heston Kurstad again, I'll just throw out there's

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 2>another one of those. I know I do this a lot,

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 2>but I saw him in AFL two years ago. He

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 2>was hearing that cult Keith run and he's actually surprisingly

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 2>good athlete. He had inside the park home run that

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 2>was out here. Him and cal Conley actually hit them

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 2>in the same game, and it was like the only

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 2>second time in the history of miners in baseball whatever

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 2>that's ever happened. He's got just huge, huge power, big

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.720
<v Speaker 2>hard hit numbers. His swing can get a little bit loopy,

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and that's something he's had to work on.

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Yet he's like three Clark.

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it can get like up loopy, but that's also

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 2>why he absolutely destroys baseball twenty one homers while hitting

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 2>over three hundred is great. Here's the deal though, breaking news.

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 2>The next guy's are An Oriole. There's three Orioles on

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 2>this top ten list. The Orioles are a team to

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.959
<v Speaker 2>watch because we just they got to make a move.

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 2>When they make that pitching move, I think it's going

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 2>to create a lot more clarity. We're currently looking at

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 2>a situation where Jackson Holiday, Heshton Kurstad and the next

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 2>guy don't have space to play. Because Ryan O'Hearn, as

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 2>much as it's Ryan O'Hearn, played pretty well last year.

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 2>If they like him, they got Ryan Mountcastle Jordan Westburg,

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:38.280
<v Speaker 2>so they've got to consolidate. If Kurstad were to be moved,

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 2>or they were to move like a west maybe not Westburg,

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 2>but like a right mount Castle, and he had playing time.

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's good. My worries about Kurstod is he

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 2>gets into bad months and bad streaks of striking out

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 2>and whipping through, and he almost becomes like Colton Kowser,

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 2>another one of those guys where they just move him

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 2>in and out. But the skill set is there for

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 2>huge power. He could lead this team in home run.

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 2>If he were given six hundred plus at bats and

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 2>he was on his thing, he could lead this team

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 2>in homers. So that's why you get excited. Maybe he

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 2>is a little bit too low on this list, but

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 2>I do think there's just so many questions at this

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 2>moment about the Baltimore Orioles and what they're going to do.

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 2>But the point of all of these guys are these

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 2>are the guys that should be on your radar prospect

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 2>wise because there is up and down movement, sure, especially

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 2>with this team. If they start they start consolidating some

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 2>of these players.

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And you talked about, you know, having Harrison as a

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>stash earlier on the show about strike outs, Well, herst

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>chirstads that guy to stash for power like this guy's.

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I said, I'm very excited to see the

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>evolution of that player. Kobe Mayo, the last guy we're

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about again as well, said the Orioles kind of

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.839
<v Speaker 1>loaded right now, so it's kind of tough to figure

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>out where he lands. My thing about Mayo when I

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:48.839
<v Speaker 1>watch the tape on him, it's, look, you throw him

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>low and inside, he's going to hit it. If you

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>there's ways to pitch to him that I've seen so far.

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>There's ways to not pitch to him, and it's low

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>and inside. He's going to eat you alive if you

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball anywhere there and you know, good on him.

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a strong suit. Likes to pull a lot of

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>balls too. So he is my least impressive guys on

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>this list, I think in terms of twenty twenty four capability.

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think, as you mentioned, all of a sudden,

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>if he gets trained to another team, that could change

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the dynamic very quickly for his twenty four season.

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 2>So there were so many players that could have gone

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 2>on this part. Chased a lotter who I mentioned with

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the Guardians, fantastic AFL, incredibly patient, good hitter, totally like

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 2>the Guardians, type of player they love. He could have

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 2>done Victor Scott. I think he's so blocked. But Victor

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Scott has such an immense stolen based potential with really

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.959
<v Speaker 2>good average. Those two guys jump out to me as

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 2>like you could have put them there. Here's the reason

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.399
<v Speaker 2>I put Kobe Mayom. He's one of the younger guys

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 2>on this list, twenty one years old. I think, yeah,

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:48.879
<v Speaker 2>just hit twenty two led them all of miners last

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:52.280
<v Speaker 2>year in doubles, forty five doubles with big power numbers

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 2>in triple A. We have some stat cast out of

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 2>from triple A. He had a one to twelve max,

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 2>which we're looking for above one ten and average ninety

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 2>one point six miles per hour average exit velocity. On hits,

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 2>he had a fifty one and a half percent hard

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 2>hit rate and an almost ten percent barrel rate. I'm

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 2>looking for double digit barrel rates. I'm looking for big

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 2>hard hit numbers. That is what he does. And he

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 2>hit triple A, which means we're on the clock. I

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 2>think there's a possibility when the Orioles start making moves,

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Kobe Mayo's not one of the guys that gets moved,

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 2>and if they make a move, they're getting pictures that

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 2>might vault him into his situation to play if he

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 2>is the core piece, which I would imagine if a team,

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 2>let's just hypothetically say the Orioles go and get Dylan Cees,

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I would think they would want Kobe Mayo, And if

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 2>he were put into a spot where he's starting right off,

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I think this is easy thirty plus homer power. I

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 2>personally love Kobe Mayo and triple A makes me think

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna get playing time. But you might be having

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 2>some better bets on guys like Chase De Lauder Victor

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Scott who are going much higher in NFBC drafts. But

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna put Kobe Mayo in your guys's head while

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 2>we see what the Orioles do. Because he is one

0:39:57.440 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 2>of the elite power hitters in the minor leagues.

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>He's got elite power. I don't think he's ready to

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:04.879
<v Speaker 1>hit for thirty home runs on the big league level,

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 1>even if he got one hundred and fifty games this year.

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that's going to translate quite yet.

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some holes there in terms of what

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 1>he does well and what he doesn't. And again, they

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 1>find you out real quick, and they see what your

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>weaknesses are. And you watch a table on him, it's

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, low and inside. Boom Ball goes out,

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 1>pitch them away, pitch them is on the spots all

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, a little bit more of a struggle

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 1>bus there from what I've seen, at least in the

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:28.439
<v Speaker 1>samples that I've watched of him. But again, these are

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>just samples of players that can help you in twenty

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty four redraft leagues. They're going to influence some of

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>your dynasty drafts as well, obviously, so make sure you're

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to these guys. Make sure you're following us

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>on social media Fantasy Pros MLB, but also make sure

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to our channel again. Drop the comments below

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and you can win a one year free premium upgrade

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Pros MLB Premium. The Fantasy Pros Premium product

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is incredible. Help you manage your leagues, get all your

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>guys for the draft that you need draft, get your

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 1>draft software linked up to your league at Yahoo or

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>at EA, ESPN or at CBS, wherever you play. It

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>really is unbelievable. So we're trying to help you get

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the best team you possibly can have so you can

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>dominate all your leagues. That's what Welsh and I are

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 1>here to do, to help you dominate. We like to

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We like to dominate. That's that's what we're all about.

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But again, that'll do it for us, But the story

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of the game goes on for the Welsh. I'm Joey P.

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time. Kids. Enjoy them process