WEBVTT - The War of Testosterone

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. Welvandi gives a press

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>conference and people start battling it out over whether he

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>did say quid pro quos happened in Ukraine. Also Maddis

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>mox Trump, a major shootout with Mexican drug cartels, and

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the war on testosterone ATAM more coming up on The

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show where

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the mission or mission is to decode what really matters

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American. Ready, you're a

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>great American. Again, the buck Sexton Show begins. He's a

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>great guy. Now, welcome to the buck Sexton Show. Everybody.

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Wonderful Friday here in NYC, mid late October really probably

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>my favorite time of year in this town. The weather's great,

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>good things happening here. So very much pleased that you

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>can be joining us. For people like me who don't

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>like the super hot weather, this is better. You know,

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I get too sweaty, you know what I mean? Producer Brandon,

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>producer branded in the house today for producer Mark who

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>what is he in like Tahiti or something? Pre is

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>he on pre honeymoon scouting? Is that or Tahiti? Pittsburgh

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's all. It's all the same. It's all the same,

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>all right. So we've got some important stuff to get

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to today. Oh, a little bit of testimony that comes

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>out that a State Department official told Congress that he

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>thought that hunter Biden's Ukraine dealings. This is back in

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen. We're a little shady, maybe, but they were ignored.

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course they were shady. We'll get it. We'll get

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>into that for sure. Also, we have a ceasefire between

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Turkey and the Syrian Kurds. We've got General Maddis out

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>there mocking Trump, which look, Trump mocks Maddis. Maddis can

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>mock Trump. We're all I expect everyone to be big

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>boys in this world, and that's just the way it is.

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk perhaps about that. We'll have our friend Andy

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy joining us later on to talk about impeachment stuff,

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and my man Yone Grillo from down in Mexico where

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>he's been one of the best international journalists covering the cartels,

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he'll tell us about I mean, there's video out there

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that's just it's jaw dropping of cartel members with fifty

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>caliber rifles getting into gun battles with Mexican police and

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>federalis and it's all about the arrest of a major

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>cartel member anyway. So there's twelve police officers have been

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>ambushed and the last and murdered in the last forty

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>eight hours alone in one incident in Mexico. So some

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff happening there. So you've got a Friday. We're going

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>to cover a lot of ground. But I wanted to

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>start with something that is a little bit of a

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>departure from what is at the top of the news

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>cycle right now, because we'll get into that. Sure, you

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>listen to the show, so you know that I will

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>cover the most important news stories of the day every day.

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 1>But I wanted to switch the switch to the script

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>also because yesterday I had said to you that I

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>was going to cover this topic, and then I did

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>not cover this topic. So here's I just forgot. Because

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we're in the midst of rocking and rolling with the show.

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>It just seemed to me like I had so many

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>other things that I had to get to. The war

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>on testosterone. I think yesterday I referred to it as

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>whether testosterone has an effect on or has any connection

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to masculinity. Harvard University Press put out a tweet I

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>think since deleted that raised the question does testosterone have

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a connection to masculinity in any way, shape or form.

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people looked at this and thought, yes,

0:03:54.880 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it does. And it's in reference though to a book,

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>but a book that's part of a much larger effort.

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>The book is written by a woman from I think

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn College, Katrina car Kazis, and she has written a

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>book that is about testosterone, the Myths of Testosterone, and

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>she was interviewed in GQ magazine. Remember the basic myth

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and we'll go through some of the details here, is

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that testosterone has anything to do with masculinity. That's really

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>the myth that they're trying to tackle. And this is

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>how the interview in GQ magazine published this week went,

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>how do you think the idea that masculinity is rooted

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in biology impacts the ways that our society view gender?

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>And the author writes, as me too was heating up.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>There was a conversation between writers Roth Dolfin and Rebecca Treyster.

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>She asked him what's the root of this and he

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>said testosterone. I think he was joking, but people believe

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that and if we accept that gender hierarchies are tied

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to evolution in biology, then it seems impos able to change.

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's just understand. This is establishing right away what

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of this book is that gender characteristics are

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>not only not only are they not deeply rooted in

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>us at the cellular level, that there's really no biological

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:19.679
<v Speaker 1>basis for gender differences sex differences. They will say, of course,

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a physical difference between a male and a

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>female body, but gender difference is intrinsic to the body,

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and therefore, in our psychology that is to be rejected.

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>And now this is the recurring effort. It's not the

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>first time this has happened. And I'll get into that,

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to pretend that science backs up this idea that there

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is no such thing as a genetic gender difference. Okay,

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and she continues on to this. Remember this isn't GQ magazine.

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>There's trying to put this out there for people in

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the pop culture world who don't know very much, not

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>even about science. Very few of us, let's let's be honest,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>very few of us have a science background very much

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>about including really this author. By the way of the book,

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll deal with that This is another moment that when

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you look at the bio the background of someone who's

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>being held up as a visionary in the field, like

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Bill Nye, the science guy. Hey, Bill Nye, the science guy,

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>better deal with climate change. I'm a scientist. Man. Turns

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>out Bill now the science guy. You know what, he

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>has an undergraduate degree, Producer Brandon, in mechanical engineering. But

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that means he's a climate expert. Undergrad degree, not even

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>a master's mechanical engineering. So you got that going for you,

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Bill Nye the science Guy. This author Katrina carkazis who

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>who has written a book here on whether testosterone has

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>any effect on gender. She is a cultural anthropologist. And

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I will admit to you now it probably shouldn't admit

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>this on this show. I once took a class and

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>called a cultural anthropology in college, and it was the

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 1>ultimate what we called class like joke class. It was

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a class that you took if you knew you were

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be hungover on Friday's. This was the class

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that you took because what are you really? What are

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we re learning in cultural anthropology? It's really sociology as

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>applied to history. So it's just a big it's just

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>all a big left wing scan. Really. I'm sure there's

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>some relevance, just like there's some stuff in sociology that's

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting or relevant, but it has become a discipline that

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is dominated by the left. Cultural anthropology is entirely dominated

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>by the left. So she has a PhD in that

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>no medical science background, a social science background that's made

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to sound a little bit like it's more sciency, and

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>then we go on here. In this interview in GQ magazine,

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>author has asked again about the testoster industry. She writes

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that testosterone often gives men a pass for their negative

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>behavior and a pass for their success. With Titans of

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, for example, testosterone didn't have anything to do

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>with those men reaching the highest level in their field.

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>There are other structures that elevated men and suppressed women.

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>If biology and testosterone aren't the explanation, then we have

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>much harder work to do of addressing the social causes.

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>This is very straightforward, folks. The scientific community, which unfortunately

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>now is riddled with activists all over the place, and

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly the social sciences, soft science is posing as real science.

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>That's even worse, they are trying to undo what we

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>already know about biology and science and gender. Then is asked, so,

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>if we move away from the idea that biology explains

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the behavior we associate with gender, how could we open

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the definition of masculinity a little wider in our culture?

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope that she responds that we can stop attaching

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>so many behaviors to masculinity as though they're exclusively the

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 1>province of men, because they often happen to be things

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that are valued, like risk taking or athleticism. Conversely, I

0:08:57.960 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>think we're reaching a point where we can shove more

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>under the umbrella of masculinity, men staying home and parenting

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>their children, or addressing their feelings in public in ways

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that are currently understood as non masculine. There are many

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>things that are shared human behavior, et cetera. Folks, This

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.599
<v Speaker 1>is all about writing a book, which is part of

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 1>a broader movement, by the way, as you know, the

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>movement right now, the obsession of the progressive left is

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to undo what we already know about gender and gender

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>roles and to say that it's a spectrum and it's fluid.

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I would argue this woman probably has a

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>PhD in gender fluidity, which is really what this is

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the active is cause there are men and women are

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>not distinct in any meaningful way. It's always a social construct. Well,

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>if it's a social construct, that means that we can

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>reconstruct that part of our society and nothing will stop that.

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Boys aren't a little bit more rambunctious and aggressive in

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the sandbox and don't want to play with dinosaurs and

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>dump trucks because they're boys, it's because we make them.

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And girls don't like dresses and don't like things that

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit more associated with the feminine and

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to know, bake cupcakes or whatever in the

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>easy bake of it. They don't do that because the

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>women's because we make them do it. Unfortunately, thousands of

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>years of human history and who knows how long we

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>could go back in our evolutionary history, prove that to

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>be untrue. And science, which has xx and x y

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>chromosome in every single cell of the human body differentiating

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>between male and female, also proves that to be untrue.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is not the first time this movement of

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>erasing genders has been trying to appropriate science for what

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>is clearly a social cause. By the way the erasing

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of gender does a lot of things. It's it's part

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of radical equality. It often translates this was the Soviet

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Union is very interested in in erasing traditional gender roles.

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Gotta have women, Gotta have women in the factories too.

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>The state will take care of your babies. This state

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>will take who does that sound like? By the way, wow,

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have you universal child care for everybody? And only the

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>rich people will pay for it? The senator from Massachusetts. So,

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>gender roles are under attacked by the left for very power,

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>very important, very powerful reasons. This is not just an

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>intellectual exercise and that which starts in the academy and

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>starts with somewhat fringe books or publications like this. Although

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>GQ is certainly relatively mainstream, it's very left wing. By

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the way. I've picked it up occasional in the airport,

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, it should be g Kami boom.

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But the good news is that there are actual, real

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>scientists out there, like Heather Heying. I will address her

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>criticisms of this book, of this denial of biological reality

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that is at the heart of so much progressive gender

0:11:54.160 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>neutrality stuff. I'll base it off of some of her work.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we're talking about testosterone. An unauthorized biography

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a new book that's out there right now which sounds

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>like it could be a book with schwartzon egg on

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the cova and he's he's doing the flexing and he's like, hey,

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to Why are you looking at me

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like I'm crazy? I'm saying it could You don't know

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>what the book's about until you write you must be

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>using all the testosterone for the muscle growth. But it

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>turns out that's not what the books about it all.

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>The book is written by a left wing PhD academic

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>who's trying to tell you that there's no link between

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>testosterone and what we think of as male behavior or

0:12:53.520 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>male male tendencies. And the basic argument that is leveled

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>for this is that because women have testosterone as well,

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it can't be that testosterone causes these things because women

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>have it too. Well, that's a stupid argument because men

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>also have estrogen as well as testosterone. So it's about

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the biochemical balance in one system and cellular structure and

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>things that, quite honesty, science is really just beginning to

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>fully understand or research in any capacity. But it's much

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>easier to just say, well, testosterone has nothing to do

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>with gender roles, has nothing to do with As I said,

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what why are are men more aggressive than women in general?

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at look at statistics about assaults over

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent. I think it's over ninety five percent. Might

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't be over ninety nine percent, but it's definitely over

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent of violent assaults in this country are committed

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>by men. All right, So I guess I'm I'm gender

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>bashing my own gender right now. We are We are

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>more violent than the ladies out there than than females.

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that social construct or? Is that just because men

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>are different than women? It's a very interesting, very interesting question,

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? Also? Why are men generally larger, heavier, physically

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>stronger these sorts than women? Is that a social constructors?

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Because men and women? Now you might say, buck, this

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is such a this is ridiculous. We all know these things. Ah, yes,

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But the true radical progressives subverts that which you know

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to be true and forces you to bend the knee.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter how obvious the truth is. In fact,

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it is an exercise of their power to make you

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>abandoned things that could not be more intuitive, more obvious,

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>more based, in reason and rationality. If they can make

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you say men and women are the same, they can

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>make you say anything. Ah. Now it all starts to

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>make sense as a means of remaking society, doesn't it.

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned to you that there fortunately is still some

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sanity out there in the science world. And this from

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>an actual biologist named Heather Heying, who has come under

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attack from the left for a bunch

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of reasons, probably because she still bases things in biology

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and science. So she wrote today in a thread, I

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't read the book in question, Testosterone and Unauthorized Biography,

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>but it claims to debunk the idea that testosterone and

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>masculinity are connected. It is full of confirmation bias. If

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>this is true, it has zero evidence of evolutionary or

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>statistical thinking. Then she goes on into some further detail here. Luckily,

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in a biology department in the mid nineties, declaring that

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>females and males behave differently and are assumed to have

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>asymmetrical interest was not yet a cancellable offense. See, this

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is all part of cancel culture too. Cancel culture extends

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to science. Say something people don't like, and you have

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to get fired. You can't be a scientist anymore, even

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>if it's rooted in scientific fact. The truth can be

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>too dangerous to society. In fact, scientific truth can be

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>too dangerous to society the left believe. Heather goes on,

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>here we are in twenty nineteen with an esteemed university press,

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Harvard publishing garbage pseudo research, and glossy magazines jumping on

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the let's hate on all that men are and might

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>be bandwagon. If this subset of women really thinks that

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>female dominated leadership and ways of being are the right

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>move into the future, how about they model awesomeness in

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that realm. Instead, what we get from these radical left

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>feminists is a mix of hateful, uninvestigative, juvenile, snarky pap.

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>She says that she looked into this question in the

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties specifically, and guess what testosterone is very much

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>responsible for, not just physical changes right deeper voice, beard,

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey beard, there we go, producer Brandon, or your beard

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is way more masculine than mine, body hair, all these things.

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You see this as a teenager. We know these things

0:16:56.120 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>from just living that testosterone is real and changes things,

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>but that also has a change in behavior. They researched this.

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Back in the nineteen nineties, there was this movement to say, oh,

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>testosterona and shirt. Here we are again being told that

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this is not there's no connection at all, and it's

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a denial of reality. And that's what so much of

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>left wing based science turns into very quickly, whether it's

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>climate change or this or people that there's you know

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about when life begins. There's all these

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>different areas where the science is rejected by the left,

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but on gender specifically, they are aggressive about it. The

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>left is aggressive about to nine gender, as I told you,

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>because if you can eradicate gender roles, you can completely

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>remake society in a pure Marxist authoritarian mold. That's really

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I know it sounds crazy, but it's the eradication of

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>the family because family roles entirely change the state raises children.

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>That is the goal here, and they're trying to leverage

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>pseudoscience to do it. Oh, so what do we have

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>coming up? I'm glad we talked about the war on testosterone,

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>which some people might just say the war on testosterone

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>is vox dot com, but you know, there's there's a

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>war on testosterone that's going on out there in the

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>scientific community. I want to talk to you about the

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>ceasefire in Turkey, will hop though into the latest impeachment

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.719
<v Speaker 1>RUCKUS as well, and this situation in Mexico is just

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a reminder that we have a deeply corrupt, unstable, violent

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>neighbor to our south in Mexico, and there's not a

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of media coverage of it. And I'd like

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to address why that is. He's back with you now,

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>because when it comes to the fight for truth, the

0:18:53.119 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>fuck never stops. We started to negotiate, and I think

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that obviously the sanctions and tarifts who are going to

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.479
<v Speaker 1>be very biting. I'm glad we don't have to do it.

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll be taking them off very quickly as soon as

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this is finalized. But this is an incredible outcome. This

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>outcome is something they've been trying to get for ten years, everybody,

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and they couldn't get it other administrations, and they never

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>would have been able to get it unless you went

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhat unconventional. I guess I'm an unconventional person. So there's

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a ceasefire that the President his team, really it was

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Pence and Pompeo negotiated for Turkey and the Kurds and

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the President. They're touting it as a huge, a huge victory. Unfortunately,

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>shelling is reportedly already underway once again, so there's still

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>some fighting between Turkish and Syrian forces. The President says,

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>though this is a I'm sorry Turkish and Kurdish forces,

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Kurdish Syrian forces, and President says that this is a

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>good thing. And to that I would just I would

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>say that the amount of outrage that I've seen generated

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>on the left and the right over what would really

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>be a couple of days of fighting. Now, granted it

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is between a NATO ally and an ally of ours

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, the Kurdish YPG militia, the Syrian Defense Forces,

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>but the amount of outrage and the effort to try

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to make it seem that President Trump is responsible for

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>all of what's gone on in Syria, that this civil

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>war that's killed the half a million people, stretching back

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to twenty eleven, twenty twelve, that Trump, who's been in

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>office only for a few years, and during that time

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the violence has been considerably less in the Syrian Civil

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>War than it was in the latter part of the

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration or even in the really the second Obama

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>terms when most of the heavy fighting was going on there,

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and everything is Trump's fault somehow. The situation of Syria,

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>which has been unstable. I mean, go back and look,

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>you'll see that the French were bombing Syria at one point.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>The amount of fighting that I mean I'm talking about

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 1>back now, and the I think was the nineteen it

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>was after the First World War in nineteen twenties. Maybe.

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's been fighting going on in this part

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of the world for a very long time. These factions

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>on the ground are going after each other and have

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>been for as long as they've been around. It is

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>just a place where you're going to see continued instability

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and violence. There's just no way around that. We promised

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the Kurds their own state, or I mean the international

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>community I should say, promised the Kurds their own state

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, in the time of Woodrow Wilson.

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Never actually happened. The Kurds or the largest stateless people

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>in the world. So there are anywhere from twenty to

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>forty million people of Kurdish ethnicity and depending on which

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>number you take, but they're still the largest non stated

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>or non state minority in the world, and they are

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>spread out really along Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran. That's

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>where the Kurdish population is mostly found. And we wanted

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to give them a state, but we don't have a

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>state for them, and it's not going to happen anytime soon.

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And so the situation now is we've told the Turks

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>back off, and there might still be some shelling and

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>some fighting here and there, but it sounds like or

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>at least there's the possibility that they may really indeed

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>back off, and the Kurds are building some kind of

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>alliance with the Assad regime in Syria, which would be

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>helpful not just for pushing back on Turkish incursions into

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Syria in territory, by the way, but also against the

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Islamic state. What is a better circumstance that we have.

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, it was fifty soldiers we're talking

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>about moving. People really have been reporting on this like

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>like it was Pearl Harbor or nine to eleven, it

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>was some catastrophic event that would change an era. It

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>was some fighting in a place where there's been basically

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>endless fighting stretching back now seven or eight years with

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of people killed. So why the focus

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on this as such a horrific event. And I might look,

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>all all war is bad, every casualty is a tragedy.

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>This is it's a nasty situation of there's no question

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>about it. And for the US Special Forces soldiers who

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>were embedded with these Kurds to have to leave them

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in this way unexpectedly, I can understand why they feel

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>very upset about that. But the commander in chief, the

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>President United States, is trying to make a decision that

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>will get us out of a mission creep situation in Syria.

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, I remember when it was considered wise

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to avoid any US boots on the ground in Syria.

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I remember when that was the conventional wisdom. And now

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we have boots in the ground in Syria and we're

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>being told, well, they won't stay there that long and

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>and there won't be much of an escalation. Really do

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>you trust that? Should any of us trust that? I

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>think we all know the answer. You know, Rand Paul

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is saying we should get out of there. Trump is

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>saying we should get out of there. The Democrats would

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>be saying we should get out of there. Except it's

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>more important to them to have a few news cycles

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>where they can bash Trump than to make a decision

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>for national security that could and very likely would save

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of US lines down the line. It's just

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>more it's that's the truth. That's more important to them

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to bash Trump than to do what is and what

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>they believed until Trump was president was in the interest

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>of US national security. And then they're also just lying

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>about things and saying things that are really stupid in

0:24:55.680 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>this process. Here's Nancy Pelosi play clip twice to the

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>subject of conversation. Yet, as you know, that was the

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>subject of conversation yesterday at the White House. I also

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>pointed out to the President I had concerns that then

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>l roads seemed to lead to putin. The Russians had

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>been trying to get a foothold in the Middle East

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time, unsuccessfully, and now the President

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>has given them opportunity. That is blather. That is a

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>completely nonsense, garbage, factually untrue statement that Nancy Pelosi, Speaker

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of the House, most powerful democrat in the country, just

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>said on national TV in front of everybody. Because it

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>was useful to the goal of bashing the president of

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States. The Russians have been trying to get

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a foothold unsuccessfully until Trump. I don't know if Nancy

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is a moron, or if she's just never looked at

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a map or doesn't know any history, or all of

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the above. The Russians have had a ba in Tartus

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Mediterranean for well since nineteen seventy one, over

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>forty years Russians have had a base there, So I'm

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure a military base that can accept all Russian

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>nuclear sobs and Russian battleships and whatever else they've got.

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Pretty sure that's a foothold when you have a base

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>on the Mediterranean that you've had for over forty years.

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But then add to that the notion that unsuccessfully the

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Russians all roads lead to Putin. This is part of

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the Putin's puppet narrative, the Nancy plosa. This is why

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you can't trust these people. And they talk about national

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>security because it's all about political advantage for them. They

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>have no real interest in doing what is best for

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 1>the country, and their criticism is rooted in hatred of

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump more than it is hatred of the enemy. This

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is just the truth. The Russians, the Iranians. They flooded

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in in spet SNAs Russian Special Forces, Iranian IRGC Revolutionary

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Guard Corps. They showed Hezbulla fighters backed by the Iranians

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>flooding in from Lebanon. I was in the Syrian refugee

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>camps and talking to you and representatives there right after

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Hezbulla fighters from Lebanon had just gone in and essentially

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>just eradicated a whole town on behalf of the regime.

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And we're now being told by Nancy Pelosi that until

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump came along, the Russians didn't have a foothold there

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is That is idiocy, that's an It's an indefensible statement,

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>not only because of the base, but because the Russians

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>went into Syria and turned the tide of that war

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Assad regime. While Obama was like, let's not

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>get too involved, let's not do anything here. Don't want

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to be Bush. Can't be Bush. That was the sum

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>total of the thinking of the foreign piles. It was

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>really two things. Actually, can't be Bush and the Obama

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>administration wanted to make sure that whatever they were doing,

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 1>whatever we try to do in Syria, wouldn't upset the

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Iranians too much. Remember, the Iranians back the Assad regime.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>The Russians are tied to the Iranians. The Russians back

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the Assad regime, and the Iranians back Lebanese Hezbollah next

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>door to Syria that also backs the Assad regime. And

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>really Lebanon's a client state of Syria. But that's a

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>whole other discussion. But with all of that, the storyline

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>here is that Trump gave the opening. It wasn't the

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Russian bombing of Aleppo, for example, which was indiscriminate and

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>vicious on behalf of the regime. It wasn't. That wasn't

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a foothold or Russian paramilitaries and intelligence officers on the ground.

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:49.719
<v Speaker 1>We blew up the Trump administration. President Trump as Commander

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Chief blew up two hundred Russian paramilitaries in the desert

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in eastern Syria who are on their way to attack

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>our Kurdish allies. That's a pretty heavy day of losses,

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Oh and those are Russians. They were not

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>officially Russian military, but they're Russian paramilitary. And now, as

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about this, not only Nancy Pelosi lying about it,

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>but who really thinks that we're going to be able

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to figure this mess out better than Iraq, better than Afghanistan.

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>What evidence is there that the political settlement that people

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about now as though that's just going to happen.

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like a people talk about a negotiated

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>settlement with the Taliban. I'm sitting here waving my hand saying, hey, guys,

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I would look, I spent a lot of time in

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Afghanistan about ten years ago. We're here in the same

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>thing then that we're here, and now the security situation

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>was just as bad, really actually worse now than it

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>was then. It's the same story all over you. Oh,

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we can't leave until we have a negotiated seliment with

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the talent. We're not going to negotiate it seling with

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the Taliban. I mean, nothing that's worth the paper that

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it's printed on. So do we want to do? We

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>want to live in reality before we're talking about people

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>using pseudoscience to justify the eradication of gender roles, and

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just a denial of reality. Are we going to

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>deny reality in the Middle East too? I'm hearing all

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>these voices of people who sound like, oh, we could

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>we could never have been okay, when could we? At

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>what point would it be safe to quote abandon the courage?

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember we still have a thousand troops there and we're

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>going around leveling sanctions against a NATO ally to get

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>them to stop attacking the Kurds. A that's a pretty

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>big deal. When would it be safe for us to

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>leave when Syria's stable? When Syria's stable, but not because

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the Assad regime has taken over these areas. This is absurd.

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Who's the government of Syria? We don't want to say it.

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>And there was a whole regime change mantra under the

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration. Who's the government of Syria? Here's the answer?

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>The Assad regime. Doesn't feel good to say it. It's

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>not right. Shouldn't be the case, guys, A butcher. What's

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the alternative? Who what's the other answer? When you look

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>at this, when you put the chess pieces on the

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>board and look at things as they are and not

0:30:57.840 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>as we either wish them to be or and don't

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>get alinded by all this anti Trump criticism or this

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump is the worst person ever, worst commander in chief ever,

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>not fit for the office. Look at what's really going

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 1>on what were you supposed to do, Get a negotiated

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>settlement with what? In what? That's better than we have

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>right now in what way? Now there's this buffer zone

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that Turkey's talking about thirty kilometers along the Turkish Syrian border.

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But the Assad regime working with the Kurds and having

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>an alliance with the Kurds that will be useful for

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>suppressing the Islamic State. I'm not saying Asad wouldn't be

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:36.479
<v Speaker 1>willing to use the radicals for his own purpose at

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>some point in the future, But you know, alliance has

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>changed the middle of least all the time up to

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this point, the Jihadis of the Islamic State have wanted

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to kill Assad and his whole family and everybody who

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>works for him and take over. So Assad and the

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Kurds can box in Isis and keep it from being resurgent.

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>That's much better than what we've been dealing with. We

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>help the Kurds in their own territory, by the way,

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>defend themselves and then go and eradicate the Islamic States.

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So they've gotten a big benefit out of this too.

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>They lived there, We didn't air drop them in from nowhere.

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>We're like, hey, can you go do this fighting first

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in a country you've never been to. We were helping

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the courage protect their villages, their towns, their lives. But

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, this is a simple issue. Trump

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is evil. Trump is basically worse than Hitler, and everything

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>he does is terrible. That's the subtexts of a lot

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of the foreign policy criticism that I'm seeing. And you

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>can say, how could we abandon the Kurds? I keep

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>pointing out, what were we supposed to do? Yeah? Should

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we have given them more warning? Absolutely? Should the President

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>have gone about this as quickly as he did and

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what seemed like a somewhat haphazard fashion. Probably not. But

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is he right on these strategic importance of not allowing

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>us to get drawn deeper into this conflict. Let the

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Russians and the Turks and the Kurds and the Syrians

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Iranians, let them figure this out. It's really

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>not our problem. And people don't seem to want to

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>hear that for some reason, as they so they want

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>as though they want another generation of Americans from you know, everywhere,

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>from from coast to coast, showing up and fighting over

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>there for people who in many cases don't want us there,

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>aren't grateful we're there, are attacking us, and even if

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>we do stabilize our country for them, they'll say, you know,

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks and kick us in the butts on the way out.

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Get out. No done, Let other people do this. Would

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I go fight? I'll ask you what I go? Or

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>how about this? Because I never saw the military serve

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in the CIA. Would I joined up in the agency

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and and go deploy and go try to help out things?

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now? To patrol the streets of Rocca. I would

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>want to do that, Not that I'd be patrolling the streets,

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I wouldn't want to have that be

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>something yeah, counterterrorism, things like that, But we don't need

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to have a major military presence in Syria to do that,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and we shouldn't. Yeah, but this is where we are, folks.

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>It's all it's really just all about attacking Trump. That's

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>what this is all about. I do stand before you,

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>as was noted here, really having a chief greatness. I mean,

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not just an overrated general. I am the greatest,

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the world's most overrated. And this is no small part.

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I would tell you I owe New York, I owe

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>New York for this because Senator Schumer have I thank

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you for bringing my name up in a rather contentious

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>meeting in Washington where this grew out of. So I

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>would just tell you too that I'm honored to be

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>considered that by by Donald Trump. Because he also called

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Meryl Streep an overrated actress. So I guess I'm the

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Meryl Streep of generals, and frank you, that sounds pretty

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>good to me. Look, General Maddis, I've heard from some

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of you who served under him and know him. You

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>guys say that he's great. I don't know him, and

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you know the guy. You can't question the depth and

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>duration of what he did for his country. So and

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>he's allowed. He's allowed to Trump is going to poke

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>at him, He's allowed to poke back, no question about it.

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Meryl Streep is kind of overrated. I was

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, why is you the best actress of all time?

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Who says so? I don't know. So maybe maybe I'm

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in the minority here, but I just think that calling

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>him the Meryl Streep of actress of generals rather, I

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>do think she's overrated. So there's that. I mean, not

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>as overrated as Bruce Springsteen, for example, as a musician,

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>where are you on Bruce Springsteen? Brandon? A little overrated?

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>He's all right, but I'm not over rated. Let's just

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>be honest about it. But a little over it. I'll

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>take that one from me. At least you're not a

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Springsteen super fan. Not a super fan. Plus I

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>don't hate them, but yeah, you know whatever. Global Verification

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Network the only duals certified, veteran owned background investigation and

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>vetting company. Global Verification Network is headquartered in Chicago, but

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>they can handle your background checks anywhere across the country.

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And as you know, background checks are absolutely essential to

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>your hiring process and to the health and future of

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>your business. So you need people that you can trust,

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>who don't outsource the work, who don't subcontract it out

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to foreign entities, and also maintain control of the servers

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and all data that you give them at all times.

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Global Verification Network works with startups all the way up

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to Fortune one hundred companies, and all their employees are

0:36:56.600 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>located here in the United States. A veteran owned, all

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>American background check company. Global Verification Network for all your

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>background check needs, any size company, any industry, anywhere in

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the country call eight seven seven six nine, five one

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>one seven nine. Again that's Global Verification Network at eight

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>seven seven six nine five eleven seventy nine. Buck Sexton remission,

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence Magno mistake,

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>American bring You're a great American Again, this is the

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton Show activated former CIA analysts remember at buck Sexton.

0:37:38.040 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>No that he also mentioned to me in the past

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the corruption related to the d NC server. Absolutely, no

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>question about Dan. But that's it, and that's why we

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>held up the money. Now there was a report demand

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>for an investigation to the Democrats was part of the

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>reason that he it was on the to withhold funding

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to the look back to what happened in twenty sixteen

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly was part of the thing that he was worried

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about in corruption with that nation. And that is absolutely

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in the funding. Yeah, to be clear, you just described

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>as a quid pro quo. It is funding will not

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>flow unless the investigation into the into the Democratic server,

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Uh happened as well? We do. We do that all

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.919
<v Speaker 1>the time with foreign policy. We were holding up money

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>at the same time for what was it the Northern

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Triagal countries. We're holding up eight at the Northern triagal

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 1>And countries so that they so that they would change

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>their policies on immigration. And I have news for everybody.

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Get over it. There's going to be political influence in

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy. I'm talking to mister Carl. That is going

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Elections have consequences, and foreign policy is going

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to change from the Obama administration to the Trump administration.

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>The quid pro quo. Oh my gosh, they've got him now.

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 1>They finally managed to get the why House cheapest to

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have Mulvaney to say this stuff. My friends. There was

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a flurry on media yesterday. Oh, people were all just

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>so up in arms about the whole thing. There was

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a flurry of folks out there who were all saying that,

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.919
<v Speaker 1>ah see, Adam Schiff, it's been made so much worse.

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Now they've admitted it. They've admitted it. Okay, let's look

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>at what he actually said. Mick mulvaney is telling this

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>press conference of rapidly anti Trump reporters, almost all of them,

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that yes, there was a consideration of continuing military aid

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>to Ukraine. There was a consideration about whether that would

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 1>happen based on, in part, whether they would tell us

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened with the DNC server in twenty sixteen CrowdStrike.

0:40:57.000 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 1>CrowdStrike was funded by Ukrainians. There's this strange twenty sixteen

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>election Ukrainian connection, and there's also concerns about corruption and

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they wanted that to be looked at. That is not

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the same thing as telling the Ukrainians, hey, you have

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to investigate Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, or

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>else we are going to withhold military funds from your country.

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That is not the same they're gonna say it is.

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not the same thing. And then Mulvani's talking about

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>how there are quid pro quos and foreign policy all

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the time. Of course there are, of course there are.

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Whether he mentioned the Northern Triangle countries Honduras, El Salvador

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and Guatemala being told, look, you guys got to help

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>us more on some of these immigration issues, and we're

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop sending you checks courtesy of the American taxpayer.

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, think about it this way, it would be absurd.

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:02.240
<v Speaker 1>You could very clearly argue it would be somewhat insane

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>for there not to be a quid pro quo in

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 1>aspects of foreign policy. The question is just is there

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate reason for the quid on our side? Is

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>there some basis for it, whether it's help and foreign policy.

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>So now we have to get do is it a

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>legitimate line of inquiry for the President of the United

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>States to push the Ukrainians or for his foreign policy

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and to push the Ukrainians to look at possible hacking

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>involving the DNC servers and Ukrainian CrowdStrike and who looked

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>at what and what they found out and Russia collusion

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>origins stretching by the twenty sixteen, which the dj is

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.760
<v Speaker 1>actively investigating now. In fact, Durham Up in Connecticut, the

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.919
<v Speaker 1>US Attorney is looking at exactly that issue. And there's

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>some interesting meeting in Italy and looks like we might

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>be finding out some more about mister mif Sued pretty

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:02.280
<v Speaker 1>soon here. Remember mif Sued was part of the getting

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Papadopolis to tell Downer, the Australian diplomat, that he had

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>heard something about Hillary's emails in the hands of the Russians.

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Remember that guy miff Sued. Who is he? Why do

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we know so little about him? And we know more

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the journals do more to find out about somebody who

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>posts an anti CNN video meme online than they do

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>about mith Sued who may be the point man for

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 1>an entrapment scheme to begin the entire Russia collusion farce

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>against President Trump. But is it illegitimate to look into

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:38.840
<v Speaker 1>corruption Ukraine? Is it illegitimate to try to find answers

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>to these questions? Of course not so if there's a

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>legitimate purpose that it would also be bad for Democrats

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and benefit Trump. Does not make it illegal for sure,

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:52.799
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't make it unethical, makes it too bad for

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. And that's really what mulvanny was saying there,

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:57.280
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, first of all, quid pro quos.

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Foreign policy is largely based on that you do this

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>for me, I'll do this for you. You pay us

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:05.719
<v Speaker 1>this money, we'll give you this trade deal. You know,

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you help us on this foreign nation stabilization mission, and

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll give you this check for aid, you know, whatever

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 1>it may be. It happens all the time. People are

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 1>using this term quid pro quo like like it's some

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of in itself a smoking gun. Oh you did

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>something for someone and they did something for you. And

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy that must be bad. But this is what happened,

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the Trump's arrangement syndrome. It fries the synapses of people's brains.

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>They can't really, they can't really function anymore in the

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:39.480
<v Speaker 1>normal plane of human reason and understanding the quid pro quo. Oh,

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>we found the quid pro quo. Move then he's like, yeah,

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we found the quid pro quo. But now he's everyone's

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to say, oh, and he's got to walk it

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:48.680
<v Speaker 1>back because it's unclear, and he made this situation worse. Well,

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>it's because they've created this frenzy around that term, so

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:52.839
<v Speaker 1>that when he says, yeah, there is a quid pro quo,

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>let's they see he's admitted, but he's not admitting to

0:44:55.320 --> 0:45:00.280
<v Speaker 1>what they're saying. He's admitting to the Ukrainians did can't

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 1>even know that the aid was under review. How can

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you have something that's it quit pro quo when you

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what is being offered and what the

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:14.439
<v Speaker 1>exchange is The answers you can't. But there's still Look,

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they think the future of the country is at stake here,

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:18.799
<v Speaker 1>and if you have to lie, if you have to

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>go along with a flimsy story. But you think that

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the future of the country is really at risk. Is

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that the right thing to do? I think the Democrats

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly believe that it is. I think that they think

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever they have to do at this point in order

0:45:36.920 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to go after Trump is just fine. By the way,

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the reality here is that impeachment is an anti democratic process.

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Impeachment is elected officials deciding for political reasons to get

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 1>rid of a or start the process of removing a

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>president from power and from office. That we are even

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:04.360
<v Speaker 1>considering this in the year twenty nineteen going into the

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:07.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty election, or rather that the Democrats are offering

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this up as a necessary corrective, just goes to show

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you how corrupted their mentality has become with regard to democracy,

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 1>our system of government, our sacred institutions. I don't care

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>about any of it. This is just a pure power play.

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:30.760
<v Speaker 1>It is malice wrapped in revenge, or perhaps revenge wrapped

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in malice. That's what this is. A Nancy Pelosi more

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>or less admitted as much that this is not about

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:41.280
<v Speaker 1>really what the voters want, although I'm seeing these polls

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that say fifty two percent fifty two percent of American

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 1>people want Trump want the impeachment inquiry to continue. Well,

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:49.799
<v Speaker 1>first of all, that's because the way they've set it up,

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:53.399
<v Speaker 1>this is what's all propaganda, folks, it's all it's all

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:56.759
<v Speaker 1>a game. It's all wrong. And if I were analyzing this,

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>if we're back in the CI and analyzing this as

0:46:58.440 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>though I was looking in a foreign country, I'd say, oh,

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>this is quite clear. What they're doing is calling it

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>an impeachment inquiry and just the very term. And the

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrats can set their own rules here what is the process,

0:47:08.880 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're supposed to respect the processes of the past

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:15.799
<v Speaker 1>and impeachment. They're not doing that, of course, but by

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>calling it an inquiry, it make it sound like it's

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>an investigation. Of course, you want the answers in an investigation,

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 1>just like the Muller probe. Right, how could you not

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:24.400
<v Speaker 1>want the Muller probe to be completed? Don't we want answers?

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>How could you want the impeachment inquiry to not be completed?

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Don't you want answers? Oh? I guess yeah, I want

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to answer sure. Ah. So, therefore, the public supports the

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:39.839
<v Speaker 1>impeachment inquiry, and very very soon that will morph into well,

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the public must support impeachment then, because why else would

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 1>you have an impeachment inquiry is it's all dishonesty. It's

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 1>all just meant to mislead people, to mobilize the anti

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump left and to give the Democrats a political weapon

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>against him. Oh but here's what Pelosi play clip six.

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Please keep saying that people, impeachment is about the truth

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and the constitution of the United States, any other issues

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that you have, disapproving of the way the president has

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:15.359
<v Speaker 1>dealt with Syria, whatever this subject is, reluctance, cowardice to

0:48:15.400 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>do something about gun violence, the cruelty of not wanting

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to help our dreamers and transgender people, the denial about

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a climate crisis that we face. The list goes on.

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>That's about the election. That has nothing to do with

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>what is happening in terms of our oath of office

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to protect and defend the Constitution and the facts that

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>might support And we don't know where this path will

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:44.399
<v Speaker 1>take us, but could take us down a further path.

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:49.399
<v Speaker 1>But these two are completely separate. But if we say,

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:52.359
<v Speaker 1>let's let the voters decide, who said that, I'm saying,

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:55.360
<v Speaker 1>at what point might you say, let's just no, no,

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we the voters are not going to decide whether we

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:59.360
<v Speaker 1>honor our oath of office. They already decided that in

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the last Voters aren't going to decide this. Pelosi's coming

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 1>out and saying that, of course, and we know that

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that's true. But I would also note that that list

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 1>that she rattled off about cowardice to do something on

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 1>gun violence, cruelty to trans people, climate change crisis, all

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>these things, that is actually what is pushing the impeachment,

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff about process. They hate him because of

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the policies, and they hate him because of who he is.

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And then they've tried desperately to find some failure within

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 1>his conduct of the presidency to create the pretext or

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:39.320
<v Speaker 1>remove him. But they hate him for all these other reasons.

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:44.360
<v Speaker 1>They would find something in the process, but it's the

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 1>substance of Trump that they object to so much. It's

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the substance of this president that they cannot abide by,

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that they cannot accept. That's, my friends, that's what's really happening,

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>which is why Nancy Pelosi feels the need to tell us, Oh,

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not about policy, that's for voters. This is about

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 1>something more than that. Oh yeah, like what violating his

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>oath of office to uphold and defend the constitution. How

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 1>has he done that? Exactly? Where's the constitutional violation? Where's

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the oath of office violation? Conducting foreign policy? What? What

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is the what's the problem here? But they just say

0:50:22.600 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 1>these things and people believe it all. I guess you

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:26.840
<v Speaker 1>must have violated his oath of office. That's really that

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:32.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds really serious. Can have this guy around anymore? It's absurd.

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But the Democrats are really an increasingly absurd bunch. I

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 1>wish we could go back to the mean. I wish

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we could go back to some sense of Democrat political

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 1>normalcy for what I used to think of as a

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Democratic party in the past, which was one that you

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>knew that these impulses were all under the surface for

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:58.720
<v Speaker 1>totalitarian cancel culture and open borders and modern monetary theories.

0:50:58.760 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Spend all the money you want, does matter. The rich

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>will pay for it. Even if they can't. We'll figure

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:04.359
<v Speaker 1>it out. I all these you knew that it was there,

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but they used to go through the motions of trying

0:51:06.080 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to convince us that wasn't really what they're all about.

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 1>The Democratic Party today, it doesn't even try to hide

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the crazy. The crazies dancing around the streets yelling we're

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:18.919
<v Speaker 1>going strinkang. And with that, it's time we jump into

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:22.839
<v Speaker 1>our segment, the Black Rifle Coffee Wake Up Call. Oh

0:51:22.880 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 1>how do you wake up every day? I gotta tell

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you I do it with a cup of Black Rifle Coffee.

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 1>They have incredible varieties, different blends, delicious coffee, roast to order,

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:34.759
<v Speaker 1>small back. So if you're somebody that's really into your

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 1>coffee like I am, I drinking a few times every day,

0:51:37.239 --> 0:51:39.759
<v Speaker 1>and you also want to support a great veteran owned

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and operated company, please give my friends at Black Rifle

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Coffee your coffee business. It's the best way you can

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:49.399
<v Speaker 1>possibly go. They'll deliver it to your door every month

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>if you joined the coffee club, or you can just

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:52.719
<v Speaker 1>buy one off to try it, but I think go

0:51:52.800 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Coffee club right away. Black Rifle Coffee supports veterans and

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 1>first responders. Give them a ring. You'll see yourself. Get

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 1>your wake up call with Black Rifle Coffee. Visit Black

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck and get twenty percent

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 1>off your first purchase. That's Black Riflecoffee dot Com slash

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:14.840
<v Speaker 1>buck for twenty percent off your first purchase Black Riflecoffee,

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:38.239
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, slash buck. To date, every single witness, every

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 1>single fact has not supported any aid, uh pause or

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 1>or hold up in foreign aid being attached to any conditions.

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:56.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's been consistent with every witness that we've heard

0:52:56.800 --> 0:53:00.879
<v Speaker 1>from so far. Mark Meadows telling us, Look, the quid

0:53:00.880 --> 0:53:03.399
<v Speaker 1>pro quo has not been established behind closed doors either.

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:06.319
<v Speaker 1>The fact that Democrats are even having these hearing behind

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>closed doors just tells you all you need to know

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:11.279
<v Speaker 1>about whether this is really an issue of transparency and

0:53:11.280 --> 0:53:15.359
<v Speaker 1>accountability for government or if it's just dirty politics, which

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:17.239
<v Speaker 1>of the Democrats are excelling at and have for a

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>long time, dirty politics. Look, the president's out there saying

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>straight up they're going to look into what happened in

0:53:23.760 --> 0:53:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the twenty sixteen election. Why is it the Democrats got

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:28.399
<v Speaker 1>to run the Special Council, got to do all these things,

0:53:28.480 --> 0:53:31.799
<v Speaker 1>all these leftists, all these trumpeters, they got to have

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 1>their version of twenty sixteen, used the government to do it,

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:38.160
<v Speaker 1>media beating the drums all along. This is what needs

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Why can't there be an investigation of the

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:45.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen election and the presentation of facts from it.

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Based on the people who are duly constituted in office

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:52.120
<v Speaker 1>right now with those powers. Here is our president talking

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 1>about this. Our country is looking into the corruption of

0:53:55.000 --> 0:53:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the twenty sixteen election. It was a corrupt election. Whether

0:53:58.320 --> 0:54:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it's Coomy or McCabe or Struck or his lover Lisa

0:54:02.360 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Page and two great lovers, there was a lot of corruption.

0:54:05.760 --> 0:54:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it goes right up to President Obama. I happen

0:54:09.200 --> 0:54:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to think it does. What if that's true, By the way,

0:54:14.800 --> 0:54:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it does too. I don't know. I always

0:54:18.760 --> 0:54:21.320
<v Speaker 1>tell you what I know and don't know, but be

0:54:21.480 --> 0:54:26.520
<v Speaker 1>prepared for this possibility. We've been all along because of

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:29.640
<v Speaker 1>what has been put out there, and obviously this is

0:54:29.680 --> 0:54:32.320
<v Speaker 1>always you're always swimming upstream trying to get answers about

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the absurd theory that was used to destroy careers and lives.

0:54:38.239 --> 0:54:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's really just a rejection of the twenty sixteen

0:54:40.320 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>election results by crazy Democrats. But the theory that the

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>president worked with the Russians left no trail, worked with

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the Russians to defeat Hillary Clinton in twenty sixteen. I mean,

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the basis of all this, the Russia collusion conspiracy stuff.

0:54:55.520 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You look at all this and we know that Struck

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and Page and McCabe, these very powerful figures within the

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:07.440
<v Speaker 1>government hated Trump and abuse their powers against And that's now,

0:55:07.560 --> 0:55:10.799
<v Speaker 1>that's a matter of record, a matter of fact. What

0:55:10.960 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't know and it will be very hard to

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:15.720
<v Speaker 1>find out, and they will start to claim executive privilege,

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and who knows how much other records already been destroyed.

0:55:19.080 --> 0:55:22.879
<v Speaker 1>We don't know is when did Obama know that there

0:55:22.920 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 1>was an investigation of the Trump campaign? Who briefed President

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Obama on the efforts, let's say, to entrap Papadopolis or

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to have Fiza on Carter page? Is it credible? Let's

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:39.440
<v Speaker 1>just start with things that whether it's credible or not credible.

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Is it believable that James Come at the FBI would

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:50.840
<v Speaker 1>not have briefed Obama on an ongoing surveillance of not

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:55.719
<v Speaker 1>one but two Trump campaign associates while there were also

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:59.480
<v Speaker 1>concerns about Russian interference in the twenty upcoming twenty sixteen election.

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that plausa? And what if it then becomes clear

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that Obama knew that this was going on, At what

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 1>point do we take the next step of was he

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:13.520
<v Speaker 1>encouraging it? Did you think that this is something that

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 1>should have gotten even further resources and attention. And what

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:21.880
<v Speaker 1>would the media that now pretends to care so much

0:56:21.920 --> 0:56:24.719
<v Speaker 1>about truth transparency in the American way, how will they

0:56:24.760 --> 0:56:26.560
<v Speaker 1>react if, in fact, we ever get to the point

0:56:26.560 --> 0:56:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's clear President Obama himself knew. I mean, remember

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:33.360
<v Speaker 1>all the unmasking requests. We've talked about the US persons

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:37.400
<v Speaker 1>getting unmasked by very senior Obama administration officials. There was

0:56:37.400 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff. We've never gotten answers about why were

0:56:40.400 --> 0:56:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they doing that? And you look back at the denials.

0:56:43.880 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Then we didn't know quite as much about Brennan and

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Komi and Clapper. I mean, these guys are loons, self

0:56:51.239 --> 0:56:56.799
<v Speaker 1>obsessed loons who hate Trump, and we're willing to do

0:56:57.040 --> 0:57:02.480
<v Speaker 1>very shady, abusive, unethical things. Wow, director of the CIA,

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:06.480
<v Speaker 1>while the director of the FBI, I mean, really scary stuff.

0:57:17.520 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 1>He's holding the line for America buck sex in his back.

0:57:44.360 --> 0:57:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So I do think it is helpful to Democrats, in

0:57:48.480 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of their electoral prospects, to as much as possible

0:57:51.800 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>focus on slogans about Trump being a traitor and being

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:59.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy and on all these things, and avoid, for avoid

0:58:00.200 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 1>discussion of their actual policy choices, because not only are

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 1>their policy choices bad, they can't even really explain them.

0:58:07.000 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 1>They cannot answer very important, straightforward questions on the point

0:58:09.720 --> 0:58:12.840
<v Speaker 1>about how crazy though they think Trump is. I mean,

0:58:12.880 --> 0:58:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this is just a great example of anonymous source out

0:58:16.680 --> 0:58:20.360
<v Speaker 1>there telling us, oh, my gosh, Trump is a madman.

0:58:20.640 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>We can't handle him. What are we gonna do? What

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna do? Play clip twenty three. My good man,

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 1>We've spoken to a Republican source who is in the room,

0:58:32.520 --> 0:58:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm told that they were alarmed at his demeanor.

0:58:38.080 --> 0:58:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Quote everyone left completely shaken, shell shocked. He is not

0:58:43.600 --> 0:58:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in control of himself. It is all yelling and screaming.

0:58:48.880 --> 0:58:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And I asked the source, you know who's been in

0:58:51.800 --> 0:58:55.160
<v Speaker 1>many meetings with them, has it changed? Is it worse?

0:58:55.280 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Because every week we talk about is it getting worse?

0:58:58.000 --> 0:59:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And the source said percent. I asked, are you worried

0:59:02.800 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 1>about his stability? And the source said yes. And the

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:11.360
<v Speaker 1>source went on to talk to other senior Republicans who

0:59:11.360 --> 0:59:14.440
<v Speaker 1>were in the meeting. They were also shaken up. One

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:18.400
<v Speaker 1>used the word sickened. And also they got a sense

0:59:18.520 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Pentagon the generals who were there, and they

0:59:22.640 --> 0:59:27.880
<v Speaker 1>were very upset and the same thing that this, this

0:59:28.600 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond, this is just enough enough enough, all right?

0:59:33.280 --> 0:59:35.960
<v Speaker 1>This is how many times do we go through this cycle?

0:59:36.040 --> 0:59:38.720
<v Speaker 1>This is its own new cycle. Trump is crazy. I

0:59:38.800 --> 0:59:40.640
<v Speaker 1>think we didn't move on to the twenty fourth Amendment

0:59:40.680 --> 0:59:44.320
<v Speaker 1>because he's crazy. They did this before, the year ago,

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 1>year before that. To this CNN reporter talking about her source,

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 1>if I were in the room with the President of

0:59:54.160 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and I truly believed, beyond any reasonable

0:59:59.360 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>doubt that the president was having the equivalent of a

1:00:02.440 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>mental breakdown, the president had lost his mind and was

1:00:05.000 --> 1:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a danger. The things that they say are danger to

1:00:07.320 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the republic. If you believe that and you do not

1:00:11.880 --> 1:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have the courage and the basic patriotism to step forward,

1:00:16.840 --> 1:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what your job is, I don't care

1:00:18.840 --> 1:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>what your role is in this White House or what

1:00:20.560 --> 1:00:24.959
<v Speaker 1>elected official or whatever, and speak about that the American people,

1:00:24.960 --> 1:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you're a coward. Wait, people who are putting on the

1:00:30.200 --> 1:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>uniform overseas getting shot at. We got people that have

1:00:33.320 --> 1:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>lost limbs fighting for this country. People have died for

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>this country, stretching back for our entire history. You're in

1:00:39.280 --> 1:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a position of authority, in power, you're going to tell

1:00:41.360 --> 1:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this reporter, Oh, I'm scared of the President's crazy. But

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you won't come forward and say why an anonymous source here, Oh,

1:00:49.680 --> 1:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>because it'd be so terrible for this person to speak that.

1:00:51.880 --> 1:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding me? They get a book, They get

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a book deal and an MSNBC contributorship in like five minutes. Oh,

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it's so scary to stand up in Trump. No, it's not.

1:01:02.120 --> 1:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the money, the fame, the people thinking you're amazing,

1:01:06.480 --> 1:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that's all on the anti Trump side. You want to

1:01:09.880 --> 1:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>be you want to be somebody that's that's marked. Try

1:01:13.000 --> 1:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a Trump supporter in public. Try to be

1:01:15.440 --> 1:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in public life and say that I think that President

1:01:17.760 --> 1:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump is great. You know, there are a few places,

1:01:20.320 --> 1:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>there are a few places in American society where you

1:01:22.480 --> 1:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>can do it. You can do it, you know, as

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a you can do it at Fox News, you can

1:01:25.880 --> 1:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>do it on talk radio. A few places where it's

1:01:27.920 --> 1:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a safe space to say that you like President Trump.

1:01:30.840 --> 1:01:37.479
<v Speaker 1>But in the broader American society, culture, academia, entertainment media.

1:01:37.720 --> 1:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Go to any major city, walk around with a Maga

1:01:39.920 --> 1:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>hat on and see how much fun that is. Any

1:01:41.880 --> 1:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>major city of the United States yeah, some people will

1:01:44.320 --> 1:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>be fine with it, but some people won't, and they'll

1:01:46.080 --> 1:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>let you know. But why can't this person, why can't

1:01:50.280 --> 1:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the expect expectation be that if there's really such a

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>need that the president of United States that is so

1:01:56.840 --> 1:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>scary and crazy that this person wouldn't come for and

1:02:00.200 --> 1:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>say something. No, another anonymous report about how the president's crazy.

1:02:05.400 --> 1:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>If you think the president's crazy, you don't tell a

1:02:08.520 --> 1:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>CNN propagandist to go and tell the American people that

1:02:11.680 --> 1:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the president's crazy. You stand forward, you say it yourself,

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't, you're a coward. That's it. And

1:02:17.040 --> 1:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you do it while you're there, by the way, while

1:02:18.560 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you're in office. You don't do it a year later

1:02:20.160 --> 1:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to You don't pull the mooch where

1:02:22.760 --> 1:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the mooch was. Anything Trump did was amazing until all

1:02:25.640 --> 1:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden he's not in Trump's good graces, and

1:02:27.480 --> 1:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>now you know everything Trumps does is terrible and he's

1:02:29.720 --> 1:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>crazy and he's gross. No, no credibility whatsoever. You can't

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>do that. It's not allowed to anybody who's going to

1:02:37.800 --> 1:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>be reasonable and rational. But so they want to talk

1:02:41.920 --> 1:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>about how Trump is crazy. But then there's some other

1:02:43.800 --> 1:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>problems that they have because occasionally even left wing Democrats

1:02:48.240 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>want to have some idea among different Democrat choices of

1:02:51.280 --> 1:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>what they're signing on for. Right, and this Medicare for

1:02:54.200 --> 1:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>all plan, which has been rightly pointed out by somebody

1:02:57.760 --> 1:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>on Team Buck yesterday who wrote in that it's not

1:02:59.440 --> 1:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>really Medicare for all. That's not the true description of

1:03:02.360 --> 1:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the program. It's single payer. Is really a much more

1:03:05.000 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>accurate description of what the Democrats want. The government pays

1:03:07.600 --> 1:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>for all your healthcare. Problem with that is, as we've

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>been discussing, single payer is really expensive. Here is a

1:03:13.120 --> 1:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>fantastic montage Elizabeth Warren, who I think is now the

1:03:18.080 --> 1:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>standard bearer for single payer healthcare because look, Bernie's too

1:03:24.240 --> 1:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>old and it's not going to happen for him this cycle.

1:03:27.000 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I just don't. I don't think it's going to happen.

1:03:28.960 --> 1:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm wrong, maybe he'll win, who knows, But how

1:03:32.360 --> 1:03:35.919
<v Speaker 1>often am I really wrong? Elizabeth Warren is now picking

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>up steam as the as the progressive favorite. She's the

1:03:40.440 --> 1:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>more adept spokesperson for Medicare for all. Here is what

1:03:46.320 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>happens when you ask her Will this is very straightforward.

1:03:50.280 --> 1:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Will taxes go up on the middle class in America

1:03:53.400 --> 1:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>if Medicare for All happens. Please play clip twenty two.

1:03:58.920 --> 1:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Will you raise taxes on the middle class for paper

1:04:02.760 --> 1:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to pay for it? Yes or noes? Costs will go

1:04:05.360 --> 1:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>up for the wealthy and for big corporations, and for

1:04:08.760 --> 1:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>hard working middle class families, costs will go down. Hardworking

1:04:14.960 --> 1:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>middle class families are going to see their costs go

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>down and bold their taxes go up. Well, but here's

1:04:20.640 --> 1:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing. But here's the thing. I've listened to these

1:04:22.960 --> 1:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>answers a few times before. Will middle class taxes go up?

1:04:26.160 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Will private insurance be eliminated? Look, what families have to

1:04:29.640 --> 1:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>deal with is cost, total cost. That's what they have

1:04:33.880 --> 1:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it. How much are your costs going

1:04:36.400 --> 1:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to go? Different questions? How much will your tax it's

1:04:39.720 --> 1:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>how much are your costs different? How much? It's how

1:04:42.720 --> 1:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>much families end up an argument, but will you pay

1:04:45.680 --> 1:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>more in taxes? But why don't you want to answer

1:04:48.320 --> 1:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that question? Because because it's a republican it's not a

1:04:52.680 --> 1:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>republican talk because different question. It's a question about where

1:04:56.520 --> 1:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>people are going to come out economically. Looks question cross

1:05:03.480 --> 1:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>will go down on the middle class, No low down. Hm.

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Notice how she's talking about costs. Interesting that she wants

1:05:12.200 --> 1:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to go there because she won't tell you what's true,

1:05:13.800 --> 1:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>which is that to even begin to pay for this,

1:05:16.240 --> 1:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>which the what the Urban Institute says will cost and

1:05:18.760 --> 1:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>which is left wing, cost about thirty four trillion dollars

1:05:21.520 --> 1:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>in the next ten years. So you could spend almost

1:05:25.960 --> 1:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>every tax dollar currently taken by the federal government. We

1:05:28.560 --> 1:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>are pretty heavily taxed, Take every dollar, and you would

1:05:33.440 --> 1:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>basically spend it all on this program. Okay, so then

1:05:37.640 --> 1:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>let's look at her. Her dodge here of the question,

1:05:41.760 --> 1:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>but she dodged over and over and over again. We

1:05:44.160 --> 1:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>will taxes go up? Yes, or answer me that. You

1:05:46.800 --> 1:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>can tell us how it's going to be wonderful and

1:05:49.040 --> 1:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, candy canes and unicorns and chocolate syrup rivers

1:05:53.120 --> 1:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and whatever else you want to tell us. You can

1:05:54.640 --> 1:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>do that, but first you have to tell us that

1:05:56.640 --> 1:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the taxes are gonna go up in the middle class.

1:05:58.040 --> 1:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>We can make an informed decision. Oh you know who

1:05:59.600 --> 1:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't let us make an informed decision about the last

1:06:01.680 --> 1:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>healthcare overhaul, Barack Obama when he lied to the American

1:06:06.400 --> 1:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>people by saying if you like your healthcare plan, you

1:06:08.400 --> 1:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>can keep it. Millions of people were knocked off their plans.

1:06:11.480 --> 1:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Most of them were then transferred onto Obamacare plans that

1:06:15.200 --> 1:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>were far inferior to what they were getting before. Then

1:06:19.800 --> 1:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>some people got on Obamacare plans that were subsidized, and

1:06:22.440 --> 1:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>they're a little bit better off. But a lot of

1:06:23.680 --> 1:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>people lost their plan, lost their doctor. And as I

1:06:27.080 --> 1:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>find more and more as I get old, of the

1:06:28.480 --> 1:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>practitioner matters. Just getting to od doctor is not good

1:06:34.280 --> 1:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>enough unless you just have a ear infection or something.

1:06:37.040 --> 1:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you have any kind of problem that

1:06:38.600 --> 1:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>requires real ongoing care, a difficult diagnosis, and any number

1:06:45.160 --> 1:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of issues that we all deal with in the healthcare system.

1:06:48.280 --> 1:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The doctor matters. You know, they like this one size

1:06:52.120 --> 1:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>fits all. Oh, but you know it's gonna be Medicare

1:06:54.200 --> 1:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for all, but it's gonna be government paying for it.

1:06:56.040 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>The governments can tell you who you can see and

1:06:57.760 --> 1:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>what they're allowed to charge. And central planning. This is

1:07:02.080 --> 1:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>all central planning. It always fails. It does not work.

1:07:08.400 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't work the way they say, well, yeah, sure,

1:07:10.120 --> 1:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they'll be uulously some doctors. And you look at foreign

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>countries that have a single payer system, there's some healthcare there,

1:07:16.200 --> 1:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>But go speak to British people about how much how

1:07:18.680 --> 1:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>many wealthy Brits for heart surgery go to Thailand. Now,

1:07:23.320 --> 1:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>medical tourism from these European states that have free healthcare,

1:07:25.760 --> 1:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Why is medical tourism such a big thing booming industry

1:07:29.040 --> 1:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in India and Thailand? Seems kind of strange, doesn't it?

1:07:33.800 --> 1:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Because those countries have these burgeoning medical systems where people

1:07:38.040 --> 1:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>pay cash and people pay for the services, knowing that

1:07:41.600 --> 1:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it's very expensive here in America to have any of

1:07:43.560 --> 1:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>those procedures done because of the system we have in

1:07:45.400 --> 1:07:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the way that health insurance companies allocate capital. But back

1:07:51.480 --> 1:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to the issue of costs. Costs is also a very

1:07:54.560 --> 1:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>broad term for her to tell you what you're caught,

1:07:57.640 --> 1:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>what a cost would be for middle class family, she

1:08:00.400 --> 1:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>would have to know what your expenses would be, what

1:08:03.160 --> 1:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>your healthcare expenses would be. And the end she has

1:08:05.080 --> 1:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>no idea, she has no idea what the expenses will

1:08:07.920 --> 1:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be from this press, absolutely know whatsoever. But the promise

1:08:11.040 --> 1:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is that, well, you spend this amount on healthcare right now,

1:08:14.000 --> 1:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you're going to spend less because we're going to siphon

1:08:17.000 --> 1:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>money from the wealthy and from corporations into your healthcare plan.

1:08:20.240 --> 1:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>We're going to do it so efficiently. We're going to

1:08:22.320 --> 1:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>allocate this capital so intelligently that you know you're going

1:08:26.280 --> 1:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to have more money in your bank account at the

1:08:27.880 --> 1:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>end of the year as a middle class family under

1:08:30.240 --> 1:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>an Elizabeth Warren plan, that's just not going to happen, folks,

1:08:35.439 --> 1:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>just not going to happen. You're going to have to

1:08:38.120 --> 1:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>have taxes raised. And even with taxes raised, you're going

1:08:41.400 --> 1:08:45.839
<v Speaker 1>to have tremendous structural, deep structural inefficiencies in the system,

1:08:46.439 --> 1:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>rationing long wait times. This is your healthcare future if

1:08:51.160 --> 1:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren gets her way. We need to understand that.

1:08:54.040 --> 1:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>We need to be clear about that. She's not even

1:08:56.760 --> 1:08:58.479
<v Speaker 1>clear about it, though, because she can't answer the basic

1:08:58.560 --> 1:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>question of how are you how are you going to

1:09:01.200 --> 1:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>pay for this? Wow tax it's costs to go down.

1:09:07.040 --> 1:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>For the middle class, they'll go down. But for the

1:09:11.520 --> 1:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>wealthy and for corporations, No, it's not just gonna be

1:09:16.560 --> 1:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the It's never just the wealthy. There's not enough money.

1:09:19.280 --> 1:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>There's not enough money from the wealthy and the corporations

1:09:21.280 --> 1:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay for this. They couldn't do it. And then

1:09:24.400 --> 1:09:26.599
<v Speaker 1>think about what that would also do to the broader economy.

1:09:27.000 --> 1:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Who invests, who starts new companies, who creates jobs for

1:09:30.360 --> 1:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>other people, People with capital concentrations of it, and they

1:09:34.560 --> 1:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>are more efficient with it in the government will ever

1:09:36.479 --> 1:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>be We already know this, But this is the dream.

1:09:39.800 --> 1:09:42.519
<v Speaker 1>This has been the dream of progressives and socialists, that's right,

1:09:42.640 --> 1:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>socialists in America for over one hundred years. That's how

1:09:45.960 --> 1:09:48.519
<v Speaker 1>close we should probably remind ourselves of this. That's how

1:09:48.560 --> 1:09:50.639
<v Speaker 1>close they are at this point when they say, oh,

1:09:50.640 --> 1:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not socialism, Well, this is what the socialists have

1:09:52.800 --> 1:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted since the beginning of the twentieth century in America.

1:09:56.560 --> 1:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>This is what the socialists have wanted since the progressives

1:09:59.479 --> 1:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>of whist Nson. We're first trying to take ideas from

1:10:02.439 --> 1:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the European continent and apply them here status authoritarian ideas

1:10:07.280 --> 1:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>at that of redistribution, of class warfare, of Marxism. But

1:10:11.920 --> 1:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>we're just I hope we don't have to learn the

1:10:13.640 --> 1:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>hard way, because Democrats will want us to learn the

1:10:15.600 --> 1:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>hard way, and they still they won't even learn the

1:10:17.520 --> 1:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>lesson when it is hard. Every single Democrat candidate for

1:10:41.080 --> 1:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>president raise their hand in favor of giving free healthcare

1:10:45.240 --> 1:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to all illegal aliots. They want to give more to

1:10:49.000 --> 1:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>illegal aliens than they give to American citizens. You see that.

1:10:53.680 --> 1:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>As president, I will never allow the Democrats to take

1:10:57.120 --> 1:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>away your healthcare dollars and give them to people that

1:11:01.200 --> 1:11:06.519
<v Speaker 1>are in our country illegally. I think that that's going

1:11:06.600 --> 1:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>to come back to haunt the Democrats. I thought it along.

1:11:08.880 --> 1:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I said it on the Bill Marshaw back in August,

1:11:12.040 --> 1:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that every Democrat. It was a two night debate, so

1:11:14.439 --> 1:11:16.519
<v Speaker 1>technically there were some Democrats who weren't on the stage,

1:11:16.560 --> 1:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>who were still in the race, but one night, every

1:11:19.080 --> 1:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrat at the debate said they all raised their hands,

1:11:24.920 --> 1:11:27.599
<v Speaker 1>they all made it clear that they wanted to give

1:11:27.640 --> 1:11:32.479
<v Speaker 1>healthcare to illegal aliens. I just want to think about

1:11:32.520 --> 1:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this for beyond the fact that that's absurd, it's insane,

1:11:35.240 --> 1:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and that any Democrat would ever think that that was feasible,

1:11:40.280 --> 1:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just because how would you implement this. Does that

1:11:44.880 --> 1:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>mean that if somebody shows up in this country, someone

1:11:46.800 --> 1:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>crosses the border and says, hey, I need open heart surgery.

1:11:50.000 --> 1:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I know I just ran across the border, but I

1:11:52.080 --> 1:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>need open heart surgery. We just say, okay, we're going

1:11:55.760 --> 1:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to keep you in the country. We're not. We can't

1:11:57.160 --> 1:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>kick you out, because, of course, illegal aliens are the

1:12:00.040 --> 1:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>they are the foundation upon which this country is built,

1:12:02.120 --> 1:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats believe. So you get to stay, and then

1:12:05.360 --> 1:12:07.719
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have a procedure that will cost taxpayers

1:12:07.760 --> 1:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>about a million dollars. Why would anybody in the third world,

1:12:12.160 --> 1:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>why would anybody in developing countries not just come to

1:12:15.600 --> 1:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>America and demand world class medical treatment. It's worth it,

1:12:20.120 --> 1:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it might be something that changes or saves

1:12:23.160 --> 1:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>your life. Right, So where do you do? You have

1:12:26.760 --> 1:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>to be an illegal that's here for a certain amount

1:12:28.600 --> 1:12:31.519
<v Speaker 1>of time for this to to qualify for this, you

1:12:31.520 --> 1:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>have to be an a legal alien who falls into

1:12:33.920 --> 1:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a specific category of certain nations for you to get

1:12:38.400 --> 1:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>these healthcare benefits that they've promised you. I have to say,

1:12:42.160 --> 1:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>it is just it is remarkable to me how extreme

1:12:46.680 --> 1:12:49.519
<v Speaker 1>and unworkable many of these Democrat ideas and proposals are.

1:12:49.680 --> 1:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And that may be why may Or Pete for example,

1:12:54.040 --> 1:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>recognizes that as much as all these polls and all

1:12:57.400 --> 1:12:59.799
<v Speaker 1>these people in the media are telling you that anybody

1:12:59.800 --> 1:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>can beat Trump, and Trump's a paper tiger and Trump

1:13:02.400 --> 1:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>King and all this stuff, he was a little more

1:13:05.479 --> 1:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Circumspect when he was asked about whether every single Democrat

1:13:08.960 --> 1:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>in the field right now would be able to beat

1:13:11.880 --> 1:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for President Trump. Do you really believe that everybody on

1:13:15.040 --> 1:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that stage can beat President Trump. I'm not so sure,

1:13:17.880 --> 1:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think that in order to win, and in

1:13:20.439 --> 1:13:23.519
<v Speaker 1>order to deserve to win, we've got to answer the

1:13:23.560 --> 1:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>fundamental problems that Donald Trump took advantage of to take

1:13:26.920 --> 1:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>over the Republican Party and get elected. And we got

1:13:29.040 --> 1:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to do it that people can

1:13:30.200 --> 1:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>see where they fit and that unites the country. Look,

1:13:32.479 --> 1:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>we're never going to win everybody over, but I think

1:13:34.560 --> 1:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it means a lot that with incredibly progressive proposals, I'm

1:13:38.400 --> 1:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>also getting Republicans saying that they would support me because

1:13:41.040 --> 1:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they're so disgusted with what's happening in the Trump Way.

1:13:44.160 --> 1:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't need a Republican I know a lot of Republicans.

1:13:46.200 --> 1:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know any Republicans who are jumping on the

1:13:48.080 --> 1:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Pete vandwagon. I don't know any of I don't

1:13:50.800 --> 1:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>know any of those. I do know some that like Tulsey,

1:13:53.560 --> 1:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>not the only one. I'm just putting that out there,

1:13:56.800 --> 1:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but he understands Mayor Pete understands that some of these

1:14:00.560 --> 1:14:02.479
<v Speaker 1>are a disaster for the Termocratic party, and really the

1:14:02.880 --> 1:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>disastrous one the most disasters would be Bernie Sanders because

1:14:06.880 --> 1:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that he would want to do, it's never

1:14:08.280 --> 1:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. It can't get done. He can't defend that.

1:14:10.280 --> 1:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make sense. But it sounds good to people

1:14:13.479 --> 1:14:16.559
<v Speaker 1>who will believe in fairy tales. What Bernie tells them

1:14:16.800 --> 1:14:20.439
<v Speaker 1>sounds good that they believe in the magic of the

1:14:20.439 --> 1:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>federal government that can provide better healthcare, more healthcare, more

1:14:24.280 --> 1:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>cheaply to people, as if the government is in the

1:14:27.320 --> 1:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in the business of business and is a creative force

1:14:31.200 --> 1:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and not generally a restrictive and destructive force. This is

1:14:33.960 --> 1:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>where you have the baseline philosophical differences between or a

1:14:36.680 --> 1:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>right and left. Showing them seats Bernie Sanders, though, just

1:14:40.479 --> 1:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>highlights it in a way that even Democrats, I think

1:14:42.920 --> 1:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>are starting to figure out. Oh that guy's crazy. Buck

1:14:46.880 --> 1:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Sexton remission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence,

1:14:54.760 --> 1:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Make no mistake, you're a great American again. This is

1:14:59.160 --> 1:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the buck st didn't show formless CIA analysts remember at

1:15:03.120 --> 1:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the ANIMI v. D. Bock Sexton it didn't, Buck Sexton. No,

1:16:15.080 --> 1:16:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Paul Ryan would never issue a subpoena. I don't say

1:16:17.600 --> 1:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>right or wrong. He wouldn't do it. He had too

1:16:19.800 --> 1:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>much respect for our country. Nancy Pelosi hands him out

1:16:23.280 --> 1:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>like cookies. Everybody. I don't even know these people for

1:16:26.640 --> 1:16:28.599
<v Speaker 1>the most part, people like that at destim I don't

1:16:28.600 --> 1:16:30.599
<v Speaker 1>even know who they are. I've never even heard of

1:16:30.640 --> 1:16:35.799
<v Speaker 1>some of them, most of them weaponizing the process against

1:16:35.800 --> 1:16:38.559
<v Speaker 1>President Trump, against this White House? Is that really what

1:16:38.640 --> 1:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi is doing? And what can Trump you to

1:16:40.920 --> 1:16:44.519
<v Speaker 1>fight back? Our friend Annie McCartney is back in the house.

1:16:44.600 --> 1:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>He is Fox Is contributor, author, also senior editor National Review.

1:16:49.439 --> 1:16:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Any great to have you back, sir, fuck always great?

1:16:52.479 --> 1:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, So, so how is this impeachment inquiry proceeding

1:16:57.640 --> 1:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>thus far? I mean, from the procedurals standpoint, what is

1:17:01.760 --> 1:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of okay? What's dirty? And what are the Democrats

1:17:04.600 --> 1:17:09.519
<v Speaker 1>really doing? Well? The Democrats from the beginning, Buck, have

1:17:10.160 --> 1:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>decided that the president's not fit for office. So they've

1:17:13.840 --> 1:17:17.799
<v Speaker 1>already kind of made their decision, and they've been looking

1:17:17.880 --> 1:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>for a hook that they could hang it on in

1:17:21.160 --> 1:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the way of impeachable offenses. But you know, the Muller

1:17:24.240 --> 1:17:28.559
<v Speaker 1>investigation came up dry. So now they're onto the Ukraine thing.

1:17:29.200 --> 1:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this is unusual and irregular in the

1:17:32.960 --> 1:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>sense that what generally happens, not that we have that

1:17:36.880 --> 1:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>much experience with impeachment, is that the president commits misconduct

1:17:42.080 --> 1:17:45.439
<v Speaker 1>and we deduce from the misconduct whether it's so serious

1:17:45.520 --> 1:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>that impeachment is warranted. Here, instead, we have a situation

1:17:49.960 --> 1:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>where the Democrats decided ahead of time, before he ever

1:17:53.320 --> 1:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>stepped into the oval office, that Trump was unfit and

1:17:56.320 --> 1:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>they've been looking for something to sort of hang that

1:18:00.280 --> 1:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>conclusion on from the beginning. So this is what we like.

1:18:04.040 --> 1:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>What we now have is the Ukrainian episode in this effort. Now, Andy,

1:18:10.040 --> 1:18:13.759
<v Speaker 1>what about the claims that the White House is making

1:18:13.800 --> 1:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're not going to comply. How does that duel

1:18:18.040 --> 1:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>between the executive branch and the Democrat controlled House pushing

1:18:23.160 --> 1:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>forward on this impeachment inquiry? You know, where does that go?

1:18:27.120 --> 1:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And what's the White House arguing about who does or

1:18:29.600 --> 1:18:32.559
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to testify? And what is the Democrat House

1:18:32.640 --> 1:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>majority going to say or Democrat led by Nancy Pelosi

1:18:35.360 --> 1:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>going to say? Yeah? But the important thing to remember

1:18:38.680 --> 1:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what these kind of contests between the executive and the

1:18:42.080 --> 1:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>legislative branches is that they are political in nature. Impeachment

1:18:46.600 --> 1:18:50.479
<v Speaker 1>is political in nature. It's not a legal process for

1:18:50.920 --> 1:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>assessing guilt. It's a political process for stripping political authority.

1:18:56.000 --> 1:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>So what the President is trying to do is demonstrate

1:19:00.920 --> 1:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that the or demonstrate to the public, which is the

1:19:05.160 --> 1:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>court that matters here, that the impeachment inquiry is illegitimate

1:19:09.800 --> 1:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>because the House the Constitution commits the authority to impeach

1:19:14.760 --> 1:19:17.479
<v Speaker 1>the whole of it to the House of Representatives, not

1:19:17.560 --> 1:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Speaker, and not to a cabal of partisan

1:19:22.400 --> 1:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>committee chairman. And because the House acts as an institution

1:19:27.479 --> 1:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>only when it votes, and the House has never voted

1:19:30.960 --> 1:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to have an impeachment inquiry. The President is arguing that

1:19:34.400 --> 1:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment inquiry is illegitimate and he doesn't need to

1:19:37.640 --> 1:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>cooperate with it. Plus, he has a lot of privileges

1:19:41.040 --> 1:19:46.719
<v Speaker 1>against cooperation, like executive privilege, most prominently, which is only

1:19:46.760 --> 1:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be pierced by something that's in the nature

1:19:50.920 --> 1:19:54.559
<v Speaker 1>of serious misconduct, and which he shouldn't be asked to

1:19:55.880 --> 1:20:00.120
<v Speaker 1>give up unless the House, as an institution, votes to

1:20:00.160 --> 1:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have an impeachment inquiry. So that's their position. The Houses

1:20:04.439 --> 1:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>position is that there's nothing in the Constitution that requires

1:20:08.160 --> 1:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it to have a vote in order to inquire, that

1:20:11.120 --> 1:20:14.559
<v Speaker 1>it has the standing committees that have authority, so they

1:20:14.560 --> 1:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>can conduct an impeachment inquiry through the offices of those

1:20:18.120 --> 1:20:21.479
<v Speaker 1>committees without having to have a vote, and that their

1:20:21.560 --> 1:20:26.400
<v Speaker 1>subpoenas are perfectly legitimate and the administration should honor them

1:20:26.400 --> 1:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>because Congress has oversight power whether it's conducting an impeachment

1:20:30.320 --> 1:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>inquiry or not. And the political hammer that they hold

1:20:35.800 --> 1:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in the equation is that if the president doesn't cooperate,

1:20:40.479 --> 1:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they can always add an article of impeachment about failing

1:20:45.080 --> 1:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to cooperate with legitimate demands for information by Congress. So

1:20:49.720 --> 1:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>this is the political battle that takes place, and it

1:20:53.240 --> 1:20:56.559
<v Speaker 1>really depends on what the public thinks of all this.

1:20:56.800 --> 1:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>My own view of it, for what it's worth, is

1:20:59.760 --> 1:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>that the underlying conduct here related to Ukraine. I think

1:21:05.640 --> 1:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of things to criticize the president about

1:21:08.880 --> 1:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>in it, but I don't think any of it rises

1:21:11.479 --> 1:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to the level of impeachable offenses. Do you well, I mean,

1:21:14.920 --> 1:21:17.719
<v Speaker 1>would you describe it as as ugly politics by the president?

1:21:17.720 --> 1:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do you how do you gauge, how

1:21:19.640 --> 1:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>do you assess the whole Ukraine situation? Where where is

1:21:23.600 --> 1:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the president vulnerable? And what's a fair way of framing it.

1:21:27.920 --> 1:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's unsavory conduct in the sense that

1:21:33.320 --> 1:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the Congress voted for aid for Ukraine, the President signed

1:21:39.720 --> 1:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>off on the legislation. He should have just given the

1:21:43.840 --> 1:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>aid to Ukraine. There's nothing wrong in principle with a

1:21:49.040 --> 1:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>president asking a foreign government for help in an American

1:21:55.680 --> 1:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department investigation. But the Justice Department didn't ask the

1:21:58.880 --> 1:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>President to lean on Ukraine for help. So the fact

1:22:02.320 --> 1:22:04.519
<v Speaker 1>that he did it without you know, usually when these

1:22:04.560 --> 1:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>things happened buck in the Justice Department, it's because the

1:22:07.760 --> 1:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department is doing an investigation, it realizes it needs

1:22:10.720 --> 1:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>assistant from assistance from a foreign government, and if the

1:22:13.800 --> 1:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>foreign government doesn't cooperate, like for example, the Saudis didn't

1:22:16.960 --> 1:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>cooperate with us in connection with the Kobar Towers bombing

1:22:20.880 --> 1:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in the mid nineties, you asked the president to lean

1:22:24.000 --> 1:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on the other government to help you here. There was

1:22:28.080 --> 1:22:31.839
<v Speaker 1>no discussion apparently between Attorney General Barr and the president,

1:22:32.080 --> 1:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and the president kind of unsolicited not only asked his

1:22:36.280 --> 1:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian counterpart to help Bar. He simultaneously asked him to

1:22:41.320 --> 1:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>help Giuliani, Rudy Giuliani, who was the President's private lawyer

1:22:46.160 --> 1:22:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and is conducting research in Ukraine that might be helpful

1:22:50.800 --> 1:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to Trump's twenty twenty campaign to the extent it's damaging

1:22:54.280 --> 1:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>to Biden. So what what Trump risked doing is exactly

1:22:59.720 --> 1:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>what Justice Department doesn't want done, which is the sense

1:23:04.000 --> 1:23:07.479
<v Speaker 1>that it's investigation of the twenty sixteen, you know, the

1:23:07.880 --> 1:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>abuses of power in connection with twenty sixteen, that that

1:23:11.120 --> 1:23:14.759
<v Speaker 1>is political, rather than what the Attorney General has stressed

1:23:14.800 --> 1:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>up until now, which is that it's the Justice Department's

1:23:17.040 --> 1:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>obligation to look back at this kind of misbehavior and

1:23:20.800 --> 1:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>see if any crimes were committed and if any procedures

1:23:23.520 --> 1:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have to be changed. So I think, you know, the

1:23:25.880 --> 1:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>way the President handled this, he potentially brings discredit and

1:23:31.280 --> 1:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>delegitimizes the Justice Department's investigation and bounds it up with

1:23:36.160 --> 1:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>his own twenty twenty reelection effort, which is exactly the

1:23:39.760 --> 1:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>way the Democrats have tried to portray the bar investigation

1:23:42.600 --> 1:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning. So I think those things are all

1:23:47.120 --> 1:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>ways that I think you can legitimately say the President

1:23:50.920 --> 1:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>did not This was not perfect as the President as

1:23:54.240 --> 1:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>likes to say. On the other hand, buck, we have

1:23:57.360 --> 1:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to like take a step back and realized Ukraine did

1:24:00.920 --> 1:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>get the aid, it never really did get hold held

1:24:05.120 --> 1:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>up in any way that was meaningful or harmful, And

1:24:09.360 --> 1:24:13.559
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department was never in communication with the White

1:24:13.560 --> 1:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>House or with the Ukrainian authority, so it didn't really

1:24:16.680 --> 1:24:20.719
<v Speaker 1>affect the Justice Department's investigation. So the atmospherics are bad.

1:24:20.760 --> 1:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at this and say, well, what

1:24:22.479 --> 1:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>harm actually happened doesn't appear to be any So to

1:24:27.280 --> 1:24:29.799
<v Speaker 1>talk about it in the sense of an impeachable offense,

1:24:29.840 --> 1:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>which is supposed to be reserved for really egregious misconduct

1:24:34.560 --> 1:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that does real harm, is really I think overwrought. What

1:24:39.160 --> 1:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is the argument that you know, I keep hearing from

1:24:41.040 --> 1:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi and others he violated his oath of office to

1:24:43.920 --> 1:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution. Do they just is that just a general

1:24:47.680 --> 1:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>thing to say or is there some specific way they

1:24:49.680 --> 1:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>try to tie they said, I keep wondering what is

1:24:51.840 --> 1:24:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the what is the alleged if not even crime, the

1:24:55.439 --> 1:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>alleged political crime that they think comes up in Ukraine,

1:24:58.400 --> 1:25:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Because I mean when you're pointing out, Yeah, there's some

1:25:00.680 --> 1:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>procedural uh, you know, some procedural missteps. It looks it

1:25:04.640 --> 1:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>looks a little sloppy the way the president did it. Sure,

1:25:07.600 --> 1:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>but what is the real I mean, because initially Andy,

1:25:09.760 --> 1:25:13.719
<v Speaker 1>they were saying there's a possible campaign finance criminal violation,

1:25:13.760 --> 1:25:15.519
<v Speaker 1>and that just that just faded away because that was

1:25:15.560 --> 1:25:17.559
<v Speaker 1>too absurd to even hang their hats on. So what

1:25:17.680 --> 1:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is it now? Yeah, So I think there's two things, buck,

1:25:21.120 --> 1:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and both of them are pretty weak. One is that

1:25:25.439 --> 1:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the president is supposed to take care that the laws

1:25:28.320 --> 1:25:35.759
<v Speaker 1>be faithfully executed, and the Congress voted aid for Ukraine,

1:25:35.800 --> 1:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>which the President slow walk rather than delivering it to

1:25:39.000 --> 1:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine on schedule. So that's outside the statute as the

1:25:44.760 --> 1:25:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Congress enacted it and that the President signed off on.

1:25:47.880 --> 1:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, the president has almost cleanary

1:25:52.160 --> 1:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>authority under the Constitution to conduct foreign relations, and while

1:25:56.479 --> 1:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>he shouldn't delay aid for any but very good reasons,

1:26:01.160 --> 1:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>he's got the authority to do that. So I think

1:26:02.960 --> 1:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty weak argument. The other one that's even weaker,

1:26:06.439 --> 1:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, is this new thing they're floating, which is

1:26:09.320 --> 1:26:13.640
<v Speaker 1>about extortion and the idea that the president pressured the

1:26:13.760 --> 1:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians in order to get accommodations from them, including some

1:26:17.960 --> 1:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>that might have helped him politically. The problem with that

1:26:21.720 --> 1:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>book is that extortion is a domestic crime. It is

1:26:27.840 --> 1:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>not applicable to foreign relations, where we actually want the

1:26:32.680 --> 1:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>president to be able to squeeze foreign governments and put

1:26:36.439 --> 1:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure on them in the service. This

1:26:39.400 --> 1:26:42.479
<v Speaker 1>is what mulvanny was basically trying to say, perhaps in ourfully,

1:26:42.600 --> 1:26:44.679
<v Speaker 1>He's like, we do quid pro quos the foreign governments

1:26:44.680 --> 1:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>all the time. That's very true, exactly right. So you know,

1:26:48.560 --> 1:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing is apples, or what they're doing is

1:26:52.280 --> 1:26:56.599
<v Speaker 1>apples and oranges. You know, Yes, there are situations where

1:26:57.120 --> 1:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>when somebody pressures another person, you know, threatening them with

1:27:01.920 --> 1:27:04.519
<v Speaker 1>economic harm or other kinds of harm in order to

1:27:04.520 --> 1:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>get them to do something, that's extortion. And then so

1:27:06.840 --> 1:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a federal crime, and it's a crime in most states.

1:27:09.439 --> 1:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>In foreign relations where we're not under the rule of

1:27:13.040 --> 1:27:16.519
<v Speaker 1>law and we're not all dealing, you know, we're not

1:27:16.600 --> 1:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>all just like citizens under the same sovereign countries pressure

1:27:21.680 --> 1:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or other countries in order to get them to do things.

1:27:24.080 --> 1:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes that pressure gets to the point of war,

1:27:27.800 --> 1:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it's it's not domestic law enforcement. And again,

1:27:33.640 --> 1:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>can you imagine what would be the point of having

1:27:36.000 --> 1:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>a president of the United States if the president could

1:27:39.760 --> 1:27:44.920
<v Speaker 1>not use whatever was available to him to pressure governments,

1:27:44.960 --> 1:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>which are often rogue governments that are anti American, to

1:27:49.240 --> 1:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>do things that we want them to do in the

1:27:51.080 --> 1:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>interest of American security and global stability. Yeah. I'm pretty

1:27:54.880 --> 1:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>sure that George W. Bush said, you know, handover bin

1:27:57.960 --> 1:28:00.360
<v Speaker 1>lad in Taliban or else, We're coming for you with

1:28:00.400 --> 1:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>everything we got. So and they were technically the government

1:28:04.040 --> 1:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to Aphanison at the time, folks, So there was that. Yeah.

1:28:06.280 --> 1:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think the Justice Department investigated Bush for extortion. Yeah,

1:28:10.840 --> 1:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>I would certainly hope not any McCarthy everybody the one

1:28:13.439 --> 1:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and only. Check out his latest on nash review dot com.

1:28:15.800 --> 1:28:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Also great editorialist week in The New York Post on impeachment. Annie,

1:28:20.080 --> 1:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us or we'll talk to you soon. Thanks,

1:28:22.200 --> 1:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but welcome back team. A massive gun battle in Kulia Khan,

1:28:47.439 --> 1:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>northwest of Mexico City, down in Mexico, involving one of

1:28:51.040 --> 1:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the well the son of the most notorious cartel leader

1:28:55.080 --> 1:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps of all time, maybe only second to Pablo Escobar

1:28:58.800 --> 1:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>El Chapooman. His son was captured in Kuliya Khan. His

1:29:04.720 --> 1:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>son's name is Video Guzman Lopez. So he's a son

1:29:09.840 --> 1:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of Joaquin Guzman Loeiro, who is known as El Chapo,

1:29:14.080 --> 1:29:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the Sinaloa cartel leaders currently serving a life sentence plus

1:29:18.840 --> 1:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty years. The Mexican police managed to find this son

1:29:27.280 --> 1:29:30.479
<v Speaker 1>of El Chappo, and you would think that this would

1:29:30.520 --> 1:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>be a cause for celebration, but then the entire city erupted,

1:29:36.240 --> 1:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>erupted in chaos, gun battles. There were cartel sicarios, their

1:29:41.439 --> 1:29:46.439
<v Speaker 1>assassins deployed in the streets with fifty caliber rifles. There

1:29:46.439 --> 1:29:51.479
<v Speaker 1>were cartel members who had mounted machine guns. There's video

1:29:51.680 --> 1:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>all over the internet now social media of just gun

1:29:54.840 --> 1:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>battles raging. It sounds like Fulujah circa two thousand and five,

1:30:01.240 --> 1:30:04.479
<v Speaker 1>just machine gun fire all over the place, smoke billowing

1:30:04.520 --> 1:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>into the air. And what was truly stunning is the

1:30:09.080 --> 1:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Mexican authorities released, oh, Video Guzman Lopez released El Chapo's

1:30:16.160 --> 1:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>son because they were afraid of further bloodshed. That's right,

1:30:21.000 --> 1:30:25.919
<v Speaker 1>my friends, a notorious cartel boss is captured and then

1:30:26.360 --> 1:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>released because the cartels can put so much firepower on

1:30:29.960 --> 1:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the streets they can effectively take an entire city in

1:30:34.280 --> 1:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Mexico hostage. They outgunned Mexican police and federal police units

1:30:42.880 --> 1:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>outgunned them. They were calling in for reinforcements, and the cartel,

1:30:47.080 --> 1:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the cartel hitmen were able to just bring too much

1:30:50.160 --> 1:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>fire under their locations. They had to withdraw, stunning. We

1:30:54.400 --> 1:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>were gonna have my friend yone Grillo join us, Deady

1:30:56.360 --> 1:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>from Mexico City, but actually having trouble getting thrown the

1:30:59.280 --> 1:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>phone lines there. Will have to have you own back

1:31:02.960 --> 1:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>next week to tell us what's going on. So sorry

1:31:05.320 --> 1:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>about the the guest lineup changeup, but we'll have you

1:31:08.400 --> 1:31:11.639
<v Speaker 1>own joining us when we can. And I just would

1:31:11.720 --> 1:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>note that Mexico had last year one I can't remember

1:31:17.040 --> 1:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>if twenty seventeen or twenty eighteen. It was one of

1:31:19.160 --> 1:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>those years, the worst year in the history of that

1:31:22.320 --> 1:31:27.559
<v Speaker 1>country for murders. We have an opioid epidemic. Yes, I know,

1:31:27.600 --> 1:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>there's billions and billions of dollars that are going to

1:31:29.360 --> 1:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>be paid out now by drug companies that did have

1:31:32.720 --> 1:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a very egregious hand in the opioid epidemic. But you know,

1:31:38.640 --> 1:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what else has a big has a big part of

1:31:40.000 --> 1:31:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the opiated epidemic. The car tells that are flooding this

1:31:42.520 --> 1:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>country with it, and the Mexican government while we think

1:31:46.400 --> 1:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of it as somewhat in control of the situation, or

1:31:49.439 --> 1:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I should say, we don't hear much about it, so

1:31:51.880 --> 1:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>people assume it can't be that bad. It's really bad.

1:31:55.040 --> 1:31:57.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what does it mean. Imagine for a moment

1:31:57.640 --> 1:32:00.519
<v Speaker 1>that there was a gang member in the United States

1:32:00.520 --> 1:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>who was seized in let's say Boston, you know, a

1:32:04.479 --> 1:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>good sized American city, and that gang member was able

1:32:09.000 --> 1:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to put out the call that all of his hitmen

1:32:12.680 --> 1:32:15.799
<v Speaker 1>needed to start attacking police units all across the city.

1:32:16.360 --> 1:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And then the authorities in Boston were like, well, we

1:32:20.120 --> 1:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>can't handle all this heat, so we're just gonna let

1:32:22.000 --> 1:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>this guy go. What a sad day for the country

1:32:27.160 --> 1:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of Mexico. That's the that's the response. You allow a

1:32:31.960 --> 1:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>cartel member to take a city hostage, you release him.

1:32:35.720 --> 1:32:39.559
<v Speaker 1>What message does that send going forward? Anytime any member

1:32:39.560 --> 1:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of the cartel who's senior enough gets picked up by

1:32:41.920 --> 1:32:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Mexican marines and the federales or whomever, they're just gonna say, Okay,

1:32:46.600 --> 1:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>well now we're gonna we're gonna wire up a school

1:32:50.280 --> 1:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>with C four unless you let me free. You know,

1:32:54.280 --> 1:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>this is negotiating with terrorists in the worst possible way,

1:32:57.040 --> 1:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>with Narco terrorists. And it's just a big indicator of

1:33:00.760 --> 1:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>how deeply not just corrupt, but really unstable Mexico is.

1:33:06.880 --> 1:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>It's stable in so far as the cartels are able

1:33:09.040 --> 1:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to keep poisoning American cities and killing tens of thousands

1:33:12.360 --> 1:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of our American of our fellow Americans, making billions and

1:33:16.160 --> 1:33:18.559
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars in the process, also making hundreds of

1:33:18.560 --> 1:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>millions off of human smuggling at our southern border. You know,

1:33:21.240 --> 1:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>kids in cages, they yelled, Yeah, but the cartels are

1:33:24.400 --> 1:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>making a lot of money in that whole process. By

1:33:26.320 --> 1:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, he's back with you now, because when it

1:33:40.000 --> 1:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. Now, team,

1:34:00.840 --> 1:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I promise we're not going to do a daily Tulsie

1:34:04.120 --> 1:34:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Gabbert defense here. Okay, We're not going to just have

1:34:07.600 --> 1:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>bucks it here every day and say that Tulsie. And

1:34:09.680 --> 1:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>when you wrote in that Tulsie's married, I know she's married. Okay,

1:34:13.040 --> 1:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not this show. This show is not some audio

1:34:16.200 --> 1:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>bouquet of flowers sent to Tulsie Gabbert on a regular

1:34:18.920 --> 1:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>basis in the hopes that she'll notice and perhaps come

1:34:20.960 --> 1:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in for a lengthy interview that would clearly go viral

1:34:24.000 --> 1:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and be fantastic. But I'm just I try to find

1:34:28.080 --> 1:34:30.479
<v Speaker 1>the good in the Democrats that I can where I can,

1:34:31.280 --> 1:34:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I also like to point out the

1:34:33.320 --> 1:34:37.479
<v Speaker 1>really really bad Democrats, which reminds me of Hillary Clinton. Hello,

1:34:38.400 --> 1:34:43.280
<v Speaker 1>what happened? She's back? Never going away. She will haunt

1:34:43.360 --> 1:34:46.559
<v Speaker 1>your dreams. She's never going away, folks, she will always

1:34:46.560 --> 1:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>be around. She said something today in an interview, or

1:34:50.400 --> 1:34:52.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was yesterday. Who cares, but she said the

1:34:52.920 --> 1:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>following about Tulsie Gabbert quote. They're also going to do

1:34:57.760 --> 1:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>third party again. I'm not making any predictions. That's means

1:35:02.120 --> 1:35:04.320
<v Speaker 1>she is, but I think they've got their eye on

1:35:04.360 --> 1:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>someone who's currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming

1:35:08.120 --> 1:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>her to be the third party candidate. She's the favorite

1:35:11.760 --> 1:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and

1:35:14.280 --> 1:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>bots and other ways of supporting her so far, And

1:35:17.960 --> 1:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that's assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she

1:35:21.280 --> 1:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>might not because she's also a Russian asset. Yeah, she's

1:35:26.240 --> 1:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a Russian asset. I mean totally. They know they can't

1:35:30.280 --> 1:35:33.280
<v Speaker 1>win without a third party candidate. So I don't know

1:35:33.320 --> 1:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>who it's going to be, but I will guarantee you

1:35:36.040 --> 1:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they will have a third, vigorous third party challenge in

1:35:39.200 --> 1:35:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the key states that they most needed. Okay, first of all,

1:35:42.800 --> 1:35:45.559
<v Speaker 1>it's in an amazing that Hillary Clinton says that she's

1:35:45.600 --> 1:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>not going to make a prediction, and then she goes

1:35:47.920 --> 1:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>on to make a prediction that she about the election,

1:35:51.240 --> 1:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>where she says, I guarantee you. So it's not even

1:35:54.200 --> 1:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>like a little bit of a prediction. This is a

1:35:57.400 --> 1:36:02.320
<v Speaker 1>very very intense prediction from Hillary Clinton. But beyond that,

1:36:02.439 --> 1:36:10.639
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, they hate Tulsea Gabbert because she is in

1:36:10.680 --> 1:36:14.280
<v Speaker 1>some ways too nice to the opposition for their taste,

1:36:14.280 --> 1:36:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and she hates Trump and she trashes Trump all the time.

1:36:17.000 --> 1:36:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But she does not approach Republicans as though they are

1:36:21.360 --> 1:36:29.240
<v Speaker 1>some evil, diseased, an unworthy group of people. She doesn't

1:36:29.240 --> 1:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>take the approach that they're just automatically to be dismissed.

1:36:32.720 --> 1:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And what you find is that the Democratic Party today,

1:36:37.560 --> 1:36:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party today rejects that they want a total

1:36:42.560 --> 1:36:47.639
<v Speaker 1>war scenario of politics where you either take the approach

1:36:47.800 --> 1:36:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that Republicans are horrible people, that they're discussing, they're disgraceful

1:36:51.280 --> 1:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and you shouldn't and anyone, I mean, I had a

1:36:53.680 --> 1:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>friend told me recently that you know that he was

1:36:55.640 --> 1:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>told by in a group chat of people for a

1:36:59.600 --> 1:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>business issue that anyone who voted for Trump is racist.

1:37:03.680 --> 1:37:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And people challenge this guy on this and said, come

1:37:05.880 --> 1:37:07.679
<v Speaker 1>on that. Can you know that's first of all, there

1:37:07.880 --> 1:37:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of black and Hispanic voters who voted

1:37:11.280 --> 1:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>for Trump. I mean not as a percentage of the population,

1:37:13.360 --> 1:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>but there are still a lot of them across the country.

1:37:16.160 --> 1:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>To say anyone who voted for Trump is racist is

1:37:18.040 --> 1:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>such a and this guy doubled. Oh, note, it's true,

1:37:20.080 --> 1:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>anyone who voted for Trump is racist. And we've had

1:37:22.439 --> 1:37:26.800
<v Speaker 1>different points in the process here where Democrats their official

1:37:26.880 --> 1:37:29.760
<v Speaker 1>line from their biggest spokespersons has been you are complicit

1:37:30.160 --> 1:37:33.519
<v Speaker 1>in Trump's racism, in his treason and his all these

1:37:33.560 --> 1:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>things if you vote for him. Trying so hard to

1:37:37.640 --> 1:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>really just force us to force people listening to believe

1:37:42.200 --> 1:37:44.519
<v Speaker 1>that it's not even a choice anymore to vote for Trump,

1:37:44.560 --> 1:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>because if you do, you're a bad person, So you

1:37:46.280 --> 1:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>must then support his opponents, you must support the other side.

1:37:50.760 --> 1:37:54.599
<v Speaker 1>Tulsie Gabber doesn't do that, at least not that I've heard.

1:37:55.479 --> 1:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But to call her a Russian asset, I just wonder

1:37:58.120 --> 1:38:01.720
<v Speaker 1>does anyone the Democratic Party have any scruples anymore? And

1:38:01.800 --> 1:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to say Telsea Gabert is a veteran,

1:38:05.520 --> 1:38:11.599
<v Speaker 1>she is a member of Congress. What basis is there

1:38:11.640 --> 1:38:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that she's a This is even worse than the assad

1:38:14.320 --> 1:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>apologist stuff that used to say about her. Now they're

1:38:17.000 --> 1:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that she's a she's a traitor, she's a tool

1:38:19.120 --> 1:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Russian government, something they say about Trump too.

1:38:22.560 --> 1:38:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that interesting? Isn't it also fascinating to watch people

1:38:26.439 --> 1:38:29.559
<v Speaker 1>make allegations like this that are so flimsy and so

1:38:29.640 --> 1:38:34.479
<v Speaker 1>without any any evidence whatsoever. But this becomes a tool

1:38:34.800 --> 1:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>because once you create the perception that there are Russian

1:38:37.240 --> 1:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>assets floating around who are doing whatever is opposed to

1:38:40.960 --> 1:38:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party at any point in time, then that

1:38:43.360 --> 1:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>becomes a weaponient of itself. It just becomes a smear

1:38:46.240 --> 1:38:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to be deployed at the whim of Democrats, including against

1:38:49.160 --> 1:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a fellow Democrat in this case Telsey, Like soft butter

1:39:02.920 --> 1:39:06.719
<v Speaker 1>on warm toast. Time to spread some freedom coast to coast.

1:39:15.439 --> 1:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>It's time for roll call. Roll call time, everybody, you

1:39:22.479 --> 1:39:24.439
<v Speaker 1>know what time it is? Time for the roll call.

1:39:24.840 --> 1:39:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton. If you want to

1:39:28.439 --> 1:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>do it that way, you can also kick it a

1:39:30.080 --> 1:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>little old school. Send us an email, team Buck at

1:39:34.000 --> 1:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>iHeartMedia dot com. That's right, producer Brennan, we have an email.

1:39:37.120 --> 1:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Now we're fancy up in the freedom hunt. You know. Congratulations. Yeah,

1:39:41.439 --> 1:39:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we should start like smoking pipes and wearing ascots and

1:39:45.600 --> 1:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about talking about THEATA, not theater, THEATA with a

1:39:50.280 --> 1:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>monocle of how else would one watch theater with a

1:39:54.200 --> 1:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>top hat? Maybe two? That's how I roll. Although you

1:39:57.040 --> 1:39:59.840
<v Speaker 1>need a giant top hat from my head, I don't know,

1:40:00.600 --> 1:40:04.479
<v Speaker 1>like slash ooh, yeah, there you go. He's he's like,

1:40:04.760 --> 1:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he's probably the most famous top hat wearer of the

1:40:07.040 --> 1:40:12.320
<v Speaker 1>last several generations other than mister Peanut. I guess, yeah,

1:40:12.360 --> 1:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it's probably true, mister peanut. All right, here we go, Mitch, right, oh,

1:40:20.200 --> 1:40:22.240
<v Speaker 1>here we go, Hey, Buck. I love your show. I

1:40:22.400 --> 1:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>drive over the road for a big company. I work nights.

1:40:25.040 --> 1:40:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I listen every night. Thank you so much, Mitch. Also,

1:40:28.640 --> 1:40:31.800
<v Speaker 1>why haven't the climate freaks mentioned the fact that carbonated

1:40:31.840 --> 1:40:35.640
<v Speaker 1>beverages are carbonated with CO two? Are they willing to

1:40:35.680 --> 1:40:38.400
<v Speaker 1>force soft drink makers, beer brewers, and champagne makers out

1:40:38.439 --> 1:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of business? I'm guessing that we be many many billions

1:40:41.120 --> 1:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of dollars removed from the economy and many tens of

1:40:43.040 --> 1:40:47.240
<v Speaker 1>thousands of jobs lost. Surely, soft drinks, et cetera contribute

1:40:47.240 --> 1:40:51.360
<v Speaker 1>way more CO two to the atmosphere than cows. Well, Mitch,

1:40:51.439 --> 1:40:54.679
<v Speaker 1>my man, it's methane from the cows that's the problem.

1:40:54.720 --> 1:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not the CO two that gets them so upset. Anyway,

1:40:58.080 --> 1:41:01.639
<v Speaker 1>love your show, brother, Shield's High. Thank you appreciated, my man.

1:41:01.640 --> 1:41:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad to keep you safe and warm on the

1:41:03.439 --> 1:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>road when you're driving around the country engaged in commerce

1:41:07.920 --> 1:41:13.679
<v Speaker 1>and capitalism for America. How in this week's Democrat debate,

1:41:13.720 --> 1:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>how many candidates and how many times did they say

1:41:16.040 --> 1:41:18.479
<v Speaker 1>that I am too ignorant to know how to spend

1:41:18.560 --> 1:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>my own money? And who and how many times a

1:41:22.280 --> 1:41:23.760
<v Speaker 1>day did they say they knew how to spend my

1:41:23.800 --> 1:41:26.559
<v Speaker 1>money better than me. Instead of adding to my government expense,

1:41:26.600 --> 1:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>They're free to raise charity money for any cause they

1:41:28.640 --> 1:41:31.840
<v Speaker 1>are passionate about. They are all very good at raising

1:41:31.840 --> 1:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>money for a cause. Why not apply that skill to

1:41:34.960 --> 1:41:37.599
<v Speaker 1>fund charity from those that agree with them and allow

1:41:37.680 --> 1:41:42.320
<v Speaker 1>me to decide how to spend my money. Donald Trump

1:41:42.320 --> 1:41:45.160
<v Speaker 1>may not be the most diplomatic person, but he understands

1:41:45.200 --> 1:41:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this simple concept built on freedom. Yeah. Man, they want

1:41:50.760 --> 1:41:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to take your money. They think that they can spend

1:41:52.320 --> 1:41:56.599
<v Speaker 1>it better than you. They're more qualified to make those

1:41:56.680 --> 1:42:01.479
<v Speaker 1>determinations about capital allocation fancy way to say spending. So yeah,

1:42:01.560 --> 1:42:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you're you're picking up You're picking up what they're putting down.

1:42:03.840 --> 1:42:06.360
<v Speaker 1>How and they want to pick up a lot more

1:42:06.400 --> 1:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of your money too, which is not good. Kristen Rights

1:42:11.160 --> 1:42:14.280
<v Speaker 1>trained to busan is amazing. You have to see it. Well,

1:42:14.320 --> 1:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>let's produce your branded pick over here. So what are

1:42:16.960 --> 1:42:19.799
<v Speaker 1>we thinking? It's great. I've just seen so many zombie

1:42:19.800 --> 1:42:24.360
<v Speaker 1>movies over the last you know, my lifetime whatever, but

1:42:24.479 --> 1:42:27.679
<v Speaker 1>this one was very creative. It just was was special.

1:42:28.439 --> 1:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>You think the whole genre was used up, but they

1:42:31.600 --> 1:42:33.400
<v Speaker 1>they found a new way to do it. So I

1:42:33.439 --> 1:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>think I'm gonna see the Joker movie today. By the way, Oh,

1:42:35.720 --> 1:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably get to see that tomorrow. Yeah, I'm I'm,

1:42:38.600 --> 1:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm so, I'd just like to go check it out.

1:42:40.200 --> 1:42:43.519
<v Speaker 1>I gotta know what's going on with the joker. And

1:42:43.560 --> 1:42:46.599
<v Speaker 1>then we got TJ. See a joker. But I am

1:42:46.640 --> 1:42:53.720
<v Speaker 1>not a Midnight Tooker. Steve Miller, Right, yes, yeah, I

1:42:53.840 --> 1:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>play my music in the sun. Though. Are we gonna

1:42:56.479 --> 1:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>keep doing this? No, I'm gonna stop, all right, t J.

1:42:59.640 --> 1:43:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Buck If impeachment goes through, how much obligation do senators

1:43:03.280 --> 1:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>have to be in DC for the entirety of the

1:43:05.280 --> 1:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>hearings in the Senate? And how long do you think

1:43:07.200 --> 1:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>McConnell could drag it out? I only ask because this

1:43:09.880 --> 1:43:12.240
<v Speaker 1>could be a major thorn in the side for several

1:43:12.280 --> 1:43:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Democrat presidential campaigns, Warren Sanders, Klobuchar, Harris Booker. They're going

1:43:16.360 --> 1:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to punish us with process. Should we not be obligated

1:43:18.920 --> 1:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to return the favor? TJ? TJ. The problem with trying

1:43:23.960 --> 1:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to punish Democrats with the processes, it's like throwing mudded pigs.

1:43:28.320 --> 1:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>They love the process, they love wallowing in the bureaucracy.

1:43:33.479 --> 1:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>So I just don't think that that's going to work out.

1:43:38.240 --> 1:43:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I wish that we had the same mentality of abusing

1:43:41.920 --> 1:43:45.519
<v Speaker 1>the various processes out there, but we just don't. Actually,

1:43:45.560 --> 1:43:47.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't wish we had that mentality. I just it

1:43:47.479 --> 1:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>would be nice if we could fight fire with fire

1:43:49.200 --> 1:43:51.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better. But that's kind of where we are,

1:43:51.760 --> 1:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and I honestly don't I mean impeachment. The thing is,

1:43:53.640 --> 1:43:57.160
<v Speaker 1>no one really knows how this will play out as

1:43:57.200 --> 1:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a process because the Democrats are making it up as

1:43:59.400 --> 1:44:01.439
<v Speaker 1>they go along. So unless you can get in the

1:44:01.479 --> 1:44:03.920
<v Speaker 1>mind of Nancy Pelosi and know what her next move is,

1:44:03.920 --> 1:44:08.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be tough to know what's going on. Jonathan Buck,

1:44:09.040 --> 1:44:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I think your best impression is your Pelosi. It always

1:44:12.800 --> 1:44:16.920
<v Speaker 1>makes me laugh. I've been falling through with Pelosi for

1:44:16.920 --> 1:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a while anyway, Thank you, Jonathan. I appreciate that. He

1:44:20.000 --> 1:44:22.280
<v Speaker 1>also writes, I'm looking at the withdrawal from Syria and

1:44:22.280 --> 1:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>think it should be noted the Syrian Kurds, YPG and

1:44:25.240 --> 1:44:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Iranian Kurds are not all the same. Tobarrow a Lord

1:44:29.760 --> 1:44:32.679
<v Speaker 1>of the Rings analogy. It's like comparing the Woodland elves

1:44:32.720 --> 1:44:37.439
<v Speaker 1>to the river Dale ones. Riverdale ones, isn't it? No?

1:44:37.600 --> 1:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Is ver is the Riverdale Elves? No, that's Riverdale's a

1:44:41.680 --> 1:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>place in New York is in Riverdale like from Dawson's

1:44:45.120 --> 1:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Creek or something isn't like River End or River River

1:44:47.520 --> 1:44:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Run or something like that. I've actually never seen. Riverdale

1:44:50.920 --> 1:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is also a show, That's what I'm thinking of. Yeah,

1:44:53.200 --> 1:44:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a show. It's a it's a kind of a

1:44:54.880 --> 1:44:58.439
<v Speaker 1>teen drama e show, right, but it's also a wealthy

1:44:58.920 --> 1:45:03.280
<v Speaker 1>enclave leave a wealthy encliff technically of the Bronx. Yes,

1:45:04.479 --> 1:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a bit of geography on the show today for the

1:45:06.160 --> 1:45:10.519
<v Speaker 1>Buck section show. Um, but yeah, I don't know enough

1:45:10.560 --> 1:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>about the comparison you're making your job with him. But

1:45:13.960 --> 1:45:15.559
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, my friend for listening to show.

1:45:15.560 --> 1:45:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad, Oh gay you like Pa Polsi. Pelosi's gonna

1:45:19.640 --> 1:45:23.559
<v Speaker 1>send you a big hug over the weekend. Okay, President

1:45:23.560 --> 1:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump is a total lunatic, uh Greg, Greg rats, Hey Buck,

1:45:29.280 --> 1:45:32.600
<v Speaker 1>longtime listener here. You've long been at the top of

1:45:32.600 --> 1:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>my list for clear, concise and comprehensive analysis without wasting

1:45:37.160 --> 1:45:39.880
<v Speaker 1>time repeating the same points or puffing yourself up in

1:45:39.880 --> 1:45:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the process. Thank you Greg for noticing that I do.

1:45:42.560 --> 1:45:45.519
<v Speaker 1>I do note that there's some some hosts out there.

1:45:45.600 --> 1:45:47.360
<v Speaker 1>There's only one who I think has earned the right

1:45:47.400 --> 1:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to always talk about how awesome he is, and we

1:45:48.960 --> 1:45:50.720
<v Speaker 1>all know who that is, and that's because he is

1:45:50.720 --> 1:45:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the man. But there are some other hosts out there,

1:45:53.560 --> 1:45:56.360
<v Speaker 1>who are you. I'm the best, I'm amazing, I'm the smartest.

1:45:57.320 --> 1:45:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I I leave that to the people listening to determine

1:45:59.400 --> 1:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>how good or not good this show is. You know,

1:46:01.439 --> 1:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to tell everybody how good the show is,

1:46:03.240 --> 1:46:05.320
<v Speaker 1>because anybody who's smarter listens to the show knows it's

1:46:05.320 --> 1:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>really good. So here we go. Greg writes, in regard

1:46:10.400 --> 1:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to assault rifles, my preferred term is modern sporting rifle.

1:46:16.400 --> 1:46:21.280
<v Speaker 1>This term has been used widely among the Second Amendment community,

1:46:21.280 --> 1:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and a couple years ago the Washington Examine or had

1:46:23.160 --> 1:46:25.240
<v Speaker 1>an op ed and why this is the term that

1:46:25.280 --> 1:46:27.800
<v Speaker 1>our side should adopt. I've included a link. Keep up

1:46:27.800 --> 1:46:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the good work, best wishes, shields high Greg. Greg, thank you.

1:46:31.920 --> 1:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can see what you're saying, and I

1:46:34.000 --> 1:46:37.839
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the desire to use the term modern sporting rifle.

1:46:38.080 --> 1:46:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't think that the other side will

1:46:41.720 --> 1:46:44.240
<v Speaker 1>play along or that one so we could just use

1:46:44.280 --> 1:46:47.960
<v Speaker 1>different terms for the same thing. And m I don't

1:46:48.280 --> 1:46:51.679
<v Speaker 1>really know where that ends up. Where that goes Sean.

1:46:52.680 --> 1:46:55.479
<v Speaker 1>The Joker is not a superhero or super villain movie.

1:46:56.080 --> 1:46:59.720
<v Speaker 1>It's dry for a drama and weak as a horror film.

1:47:00.000 --> 1:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>If you watch it expecting anything like a superhero movie,

1:47:03.160 --> 1:47:06.799
<v Speaker 1>you will be severely disappointed. It is literally a boring

1:47:07.040 --> 1:47:10.680
<v Speaker 1>backstory movie. The only thing making it worthwhile is when

1:47:10.720 --> 1:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>he is when he takes Robert de Niro out. Have

1:47:16.200 --> 1:47:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you heard this that it's boring from anybody? This is

1:47:18.120 --> 1:47:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the first someone doesn't like the Joker movie. That might

1:47:21.479 --> 1:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>be the first, I think. I think that's somebody from

1:47:24.720 --> 1:47:30.320
<v Speaker 1>people just don't like certain things. Why so serious? Heath

1:47:30.360 --> 1:47:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Ledger's Joker was really scary and really good at the

1:47:33.360 --> 1:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>same time. I still like Jack Nicholson's what It's just

1:47:37.000 --> 1:47:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He was special. That's the one I

1:47:38.800 --> 1:47:40.720
<v Speaker 1>grew up on, so I always have a place in

1:47:40.760 --> 1:47:44.320
<v Speaker 1>my heart. You just don't like it at all or

1:47:44.400 --> 1:47:46.880
<v Speaker 1>just not above Heath Ledger. I mean he did a

1:47:46.880 --> 1:47:48.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty good job, I guess for what it was. I

1:47:48.760 --> 1:47:51.599
<v Speaker 1>mean that original Tim Burton Batman was pretty cool at

1:47:51.600 --> 1:47:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the time. It holds up reasonably well. Some of the

1:47:55.280 --> 1:47:58.760
<v Speaker 1>action sequences are really pretty lame, but it holds up reasonably. Well,

1:47:58.800 --> 1:48:03.639
<v Speaker 1>i'd say, um, yeah, I don't know. Yeah, that's maybe.

1:48:04.920 --> 1:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish I can remember the actor's name from the

1:48:07.560 --> 1:48:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Adam West. Remember I think he's holding Kim basic or

1:48:10.360 --> 1:48:12.080
<v Speaker 1>at one point and he's like, if anybody else calls

1:48:12.080 --> 1:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you beast, I'll rip their lungs out. Remember remember that line? Classic.

1:48:17.240 --> 1:48:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So someone just said that I spoiled Well, I just

1:48:20.080 --> 1:48:23.799
<v Speaker 1>spoiled Jo. How could I spoil Joker and spoiled Joker?

1:48:24.240 --> 1:48:26.439
<v Speaker 1>It's one of our other producers is writing inybody telling

1:48:26.439 --> 1:48:29.439
<v Speaker 1>me this is nonsense. That's nonsense. I don't even know

1:48:29.479 --> 1:48:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the end. How could I spoil it under the ending?

1:48:32.600 --> 1:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Good point? So anyway, it is what it is? All right? Um,

1:48:38.560 --> 1:48:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll Ali rights or is it Ali Ali? Ali? Could

1:48:42.840 --> 1:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be other? Your last thought is right? The Democrats using

1:48:47.040 --> 1:48:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East to line their pockets is that they

1:48:50.040 --> 1:48:52.639
<v Speaker 1>cause global chaos. There was gun running, all right? Cool,

1:48:53.520 --> 1:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that, Sammy Number one. I love your show. I

1:48:57.240 --> 1:48:59.559
<v Speaker 1>listened to you on the iHeartRadio app. And the news

1:48:59.560 --> 1:49:02.760
<v Speaker 1>breaks comes through the NBC fakes news though. I hope

1:49:02.760 --> 1:49:05.080
<v Speaker 1>there's something you can do about that. No, Unfortunately I

1:49:05.080 --> 1:49:07.760
<v Speaker 1>don't news breaks. I don't get to control number two.

1:49:07.760 --> 1:49:10.799
<v Speaker 1>I heard this morning there are seven million unfulfilled jobs

1:49:10.880 --> 1:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>or unfilled jobs in the US. Trump should give the

1:49:13.720 --> 1:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>worthless govern employees a pink slip, tell them their jobs

1:49:16.000 --> 1:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting for them in the private sector. Sammy, it'd be

1:49:19.160 --> 1:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>nice if we could do that, but it's not going

1:49:20.280 --> 1:49:23.479
<v Speaker 1>to happen because people tend to think that any shrinking

1:49:23.479 --> 1:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of government jobs is a terrible thing and really really bad.

1:49:26.960 --> 1:49:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's just sort of where it is. So I

1:49:29.800 --> 1:49:34.439
<v Speaker 1>wish it were true, and there you have it, or

1:49:34.439 --> 1:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I wish that were feasible. I should say, and there

1:49:36.040 --> 1:49:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you have it. Ah, here you go. Jeremy, your joker

1:49:40.360 --> 1:49:42.400
<v Speaker 1>sounds a lot like you're Elizabeth Warren. I guess they're

1:49:42.400 --> 1:49:47.760
<v Speaker 1>similar in personality shields high. I don't know. I don't

1:49:47.760 --> 1:49:50.120
<v Speaker 1>know about that. I don't know. I'm gonna I'm not

1:49:50.120 --> 1:49:52.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna say I'm gonna sign off for that one, meaning

1:49:52.439 --> 1:49:54.519
<v Speaker 1>that my impersonations is the same. You can say whatever

1:49:54.560 --> 1:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you want on Elizabeth Warren's personality where J's really gonna

1:49:58.960 --> 1:50:02.519
<v Speaker 1>just restore all the greatness of America's middle class by

1:50:02.720 --> 1:50:05.479
<v Speaker 1>just taxingly, you know what, out of the rich people.

1:50:06.640 --> 1:50:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, my daddy, My daddy always told me that

1:50:10.320 --> 1:50:14.360
<v Speaker 1>if you take two flying pigs and you throw them

1:50:14.360 --> 1:50:17.760
<v Speaker 1>through the back door of an oldsmobile, you're just gonna

1:50:17.800 --> 1:50:22.960
<v Speaker 1>have a pig sandwich. Makes no sense, but who cares,

1:50:23.000 --> 1:50:25.280
<v Speaker 1>because you know, Elizabeth Warren just makes stuff up as

1:50:25.280 --> 1:50:29.519
<v Speaker 1>she goes along. Yeah, there we have. It just doesn't

1:50:29.520 --> 1:50:32.880
<v Speaker 1>sound like Heath Ledger the joker. Everyone's a critic only person.

1:50:32.880 --> 1:50:34.759
<v Speaker 1>That's all right. So we gotta close up to Freedom

1:50:34.840 --> 1:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Hut this episode. This time, you have a couple of

1:50:37.600 --> 1:50:39.040
<v Speaker 1>days here over the weekend, not just to listen to

1:50:39.040 --> 1:50:40.599
<v Speaker 1>the show and catch up on old shows, but also

1:50:40.720 --> 1:50:42.760
<v Speaker 1>be like, Hey, if you're at a dinner party and

1:50:42.800 --> 1:50:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the conversation's lagging, if you're hanging out with a friend

1:50:45.000 --> 1:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and you've got nothing to say, if you're on a

1:50:46.479 --> 1:50:49.840
<v Speaker 1>date and the lady or the guy is just not

1:50:49.920 --> 1:50:52.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting enough for you, just be like, So, there's this

1:50:52.680 --> 1:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>thing called The Buck Sexton Show. It's on iTunes or

1:50:55.000 --> 1:50:57.519
<v Speaker 1>the iHeart app or anywhere you listen to podcasts, download

1:50:57.560 --> 1:50:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and listen to it. That would be an early Christ's

1:51:00.040 --> 1:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>present and Birthday present for me. So please check that

1:51:02.000 --> 1:51:04.759
<v Speaker 1>out and we will talk to you all on Monday.

1:51:05.439 --> 1:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>She'll tie