WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: September 5th, 2025

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amerie Hordert. Join us each day

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. President Donald Trump signing

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 2>an executive order putting his trade deal with Japan into place.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 2>The agreement will apply a baseline fifteen percent off on

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>nearly all Japanese imports entering the US, including automobiles. The

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 2>government of Japan has also agreed to invest five hundred

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 2>and fifty billion dollars in the United States.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Joining us.

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'm very pleased to say, is the United States

0:00:56.000 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of Commas, Howard Lutner. Mister Secretary, Welcome to the programs.

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I know you wanted to talk about Japan, so let's

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 2>do that. I want you to share with us the

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 2>terms of this five hundred and fifty billion dollar investment fund,

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 2>a collpitarive course of the negotiations that you've been helping

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 2>to lead with the Japanese. Can you share with us

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the details this morning, sir.

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 5>So this is a completely different kind of trade deal

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 5>that anyone's ever seen before. So the idea is, the

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 5>Japanese government will give five hundred and fifty billion dollars

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 5>to Donald Trump to invest as the United States and

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump sees fit in America. So the Japanese will

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.919
<v Speaker 5>get back their money and ninety percent of the profits

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 5>will go to the American citizens, the American taxpayer. So

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump, I'll give you an example. We buy all

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 5>of our antibiotics, generic antibiotics in China. So Donald Trump

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 5>can say, let's go build generic pharmaceuticals in America. Let's

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 5>build those antibiotics in America. The Japanese will fund it,

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 5>and then we will have generic antibiotics in America, will

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 5>no longer be reliant on China. So it's in his

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 5>hands to invest. This is not ordinary foreign companies investing.

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 5>This is not Mitsubishi building a plant in America. This

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 5>is five hundred and fifty billion dollars by the Japanese

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.239
<v Speaker 5>government put in the hands of Donald Trump that he

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 5>can then invest in America. It's amazing. I mean, it's

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 5>the thing I am most proud of it. It's the

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 5>most proud of ever been on a business deal I've

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 5>ever done.

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>So it sounds amazing. Do the Japanese think it's amazing?

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 2>And have they codified this agreement?

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 5>They have so yesterday it was all signed. So the

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 5>President signed the EO, I signed the MoU with Minister

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 5>A Kazawa in the Commerce Department. This is signed, it

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 5>is written. So what happens is Donald Trump can select

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 5>the project that he wants. We put a capital call

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 5>into the Japanese, they send in the money, and we

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 5>build the project in America. So if you think about this,

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 5>five hundred and fifty billion dollars invested during Donald Trump's

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 5>term is a half a point of GDP given to

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 5>the United States of America's president by the Japanese government.

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this is amazing.

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 5>In order to have a fifteen percent tariff and so

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.519
<v Speaker 5>they can keep making their cars in Japan.

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's just down the details, mister secretary. So the timeline

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 2>you talked about the rest of the president's term, is

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>the reclear timeline here, and what's the enforcement mechanism to

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 2>make sure it happens.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, two things.

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 5>Number One, they've committed that they will meet the Capitol call.

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 5>So when we're building a project, they will fund the

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 5>project's building during the term this investment lasts through, meaning

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 5>they will put out the money through the rest of

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump's term. So January twenty twenty nine, and let's

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 5>say halfway through and they've invested two hundred and fifty

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars, they stop.

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Saying, I don't want to send you any more money.

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 4>The tariffs pack, you know, pop right back up.

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 5>And they no longer receive the cash flow from these projects.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 5>They would all just stay with the United States of America.

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 5>So there is just no way they're going to not

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 5>fund these projects. And Donald Trump is going to deliver

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 5>to the American people.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 4>And this deal is really it's.

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 5>If you think about it, five hundred and fifty billion

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 5>dollars of Japanese government's money in order to buy down

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 5>their tariff in Donald Trump's hands for his availability to

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 5>invest and build in America. Alaska pipeline scale fifty billion,

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 5>one hundred billion.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump wants.

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 5>To unleash the Alaska pipelines. The Japanese will finance it,

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 5>and it's great for America.

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 4>It's fantastic.

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 2>It's the Secretary to appreciate. We've got a number of

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 2>topics to get through with you in a short amount

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 2>of time, so I wanted to turn to one of

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 2>the issues in India. This came from the present this

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.239
<v Speaker 2>morning on social media. It looks like we've lost India

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>and Russia for that matter, to deepest darkest China. May

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 2>they have a long and prosperous future together. This relationship

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 2>between the US and India has clearly soured.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 5>You.

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Your South said earlier this year that India rubbed the

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 2>US the wrong way. There's an understandable tension that continues

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 2>to build. But they're not the only ones buying Russian energy.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 2>The Chinese are buying Russian energy, and for that matter,

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 2>the Europeans too. And I think there's a sense from

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the Indian side, mister Secretary, that they feel singled out,

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 2>perhaps unfairly. What's your comment, your message for them this morning?

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 5>Well, remember before the Russian conflict, the Indians bought less

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 5>than two percent of their oil from Russia. Less than

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 5>two percent and now they're buying forty percent.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Of their oil from Russia.

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 5>What they're doing is because the oil is sanctioned, it's

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 5>really really cheap because the Russia trying to find people

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 5>to buy it, and so the Indians have just decided, ah,

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 5>the heck with it, let's buy cheap and make a

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 5>ton of money.

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 4>But you know what, that is just plain wrong.

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 5>It's ridiculous, and they either need to decide which side they.

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Want to be on. You know what's funny is I

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 4>remember the Chinese.

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 5>Sell the Chinese, Well, we're always willing to talk. The

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 5>Chinese sell to us, the Indians sell to us. They're

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 5>not going to be able to sell to each other.

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 5>We are the consumer of the world. People have to

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 5>remember it's our thirty trillion dollar economy that is the

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 5>consumer of the world. So eventually they all have to

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 5>come back to the customer, because we all know eventually

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 5>the customer is always right.

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 1>When you are talking with India, mister Secretary, I know

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies in the US have shifted manufacturing

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to India from China's there's a real interest in this

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their costs. How much do you feel

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>like you've lost leverage as a result of the court

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>case that came out fairly recently.

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 5>We haven't lost any thing with respect to the court case.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 4>If you look at the.

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 5>Descent right, it was seven to four. Read the descent cheat.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 5>The current Chief Justice sided with President Trump, the former

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 5>Chief Justice sided with President Trump, and the incoming Chief

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 5>Justice sided with President Trump. And the smartest guy on

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 5>the bench, which is well known who the smartest guy.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 4>On the bench is, he sided with Donald Trump.

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 5>So I think you are going to see the Supreme

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 5>Court side with Donald Trump. And I don't think we've

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 5>lost leverage. What we've lost is that India doesn't yet

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 5>want to open their market. Stop buying Russian oil, right,

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 5>and stop being a part of bricks right. They're the

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 5>vowel between Russia and China. If that's who you want

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 5>to be, go be it. But either support the dollar,

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 5>support the United States of America, support your biggest client,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 5>who was the American consumer, or I guess you're going

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 5>to be a fifty percent tariff and let's see how

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 5>long this lasts.

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>It seems like there's been a hardening of the line,

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>both with President Trump as well as Mody, and a

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.559
<v Speaker 1>sense that there isn't really a coming together. In fact,

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that meeting with Jujenpang and Vladimir Putin and FRIM Minister

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Mody seemed to indicate a coalescing of the bricks.

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Do you see anywhere in.

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>The next month two months any type of deal or

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>backing down to a lower rate with India.

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 4>I would expect.

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 5>You saw it in Canada, right the Carney got elected

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 5>with this term elbows up, meaning let's fight with America.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 5>They put on retaliatory tariffs. They were all bravado, and

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 5>what happened? Their GDP negative one point six percent, unemployment

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 5>rocketing towards eight percent, and what did Carney just do?

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 5>He just finally finally dropped his retaliatory tariffs. So I

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 5>think what happens is it's all bravado because you think

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 5>it feels good to fight with the biggest client in

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 5>the world. But eventually your businesses are going to say,

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 5>you've got to stop this and go make your deal

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 5>with America. So I think, yes, in a month or

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 5>two months, I think India is going to be at

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 5>the table and they're going to say they're sorry, and

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 5>they're going to try to make a deal with Donald Trump.

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 5>And it will be on Donald Trump's desk how he

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 5>wants to deal with Mody and we leave that to him.

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 4>That's why he's the president.

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of making a deal. I understand the Swiss are

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 2>in town, just tearing that the Swiss Vice president has

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 2>turned up in the Nat of Stice again. Is there

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 2>a meeting on the agenda to today going into the weekend.

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so I'm going to meet with the Swiss delegation.

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 5>They're coming in to make a new proposal, and the

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Trump administration is.

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 4>Always willing to listen.

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 5>But you have to remember, you know, the Swiss like

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 5>to say they're a small country of only nine million people,

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 5>a small rich country.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 4>And how do they become so rich?

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 5>They sell us pharmacuit articles like it's going out of style,

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 5>all right. They make so much money off of America.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 5>That's why they're rich. So let's hear what they have

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 5>to say. We'll discuss it with the president. You know,

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm not optimistic, but I'm always willing to listen, and

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump is always.

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Why are you not optimistic? Traditionally there's been a decent relationship.

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Then the president's first term relied on the Swiss a

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 2>lot when it came to foreign policy and developments in

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>places like Iran. What's happened this time?

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you.

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 5>Just consider trade, right, you know, the European Union, right,

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 5>they open their market four hundred and fifty million people,

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 5>twenty trillion dollar economy, and they say, well, take our

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 5>tariffs down to zero. You the American exporters can sell

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 5>us everything.

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 4>I mean, how fantastic is that?

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 5>And they say we'll pay you fifteen percent and you

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 5>pay us nothing. I mean, that is really really attractive.

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 5>Now you go to Switzerland, nine million people. I mean,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 5>they're going to offer the American exporter as compared to

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 5>the size and scale by which they export and earn

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 5>money off of us. So the idea is we need

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 5>balanced in fair trade. And that's a difficult thing. Now

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 5>you saw the Japanese. They decided to take a completely

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 5>different path, and what they said is we will give

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump the power to invest five hundred and fifty

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars as he at his direction, for the benefit

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 5>of America.

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Now that's a different way of thinking.

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 5>Now, if the Swiss come out of the box with

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 5>a whole new way of thinking, I'm open minded. But

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 5>if they just say our rich companies are going to

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 5>buy more of America. I mean, that's what Donald Trump

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 5>is complaining about. You realized in nineteen eighty five, we

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 5>America owned more of the rest of the world. We

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 5>owned one hundred and just about one hundred and fifty

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 5>billion of the rest of the world. And you know,

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty five, when Donald Trump takes office, the

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:00.079
<v Speaker 5>rest of the world owns.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Twenty six trillion more.

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 5>Of us because they just use all the money they

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 5>make off of us to buy us, and sooner or

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 5>later they're just going to own us. And Donald Trump

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 5>has said enough of this, We are going to own

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 5>ourselves going forward.

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Mister Secretary, I know you're your own boss on your

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 2>own time, but your team is telling us we've got

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 2>to go shortly, so I'm gonna squeeze out a few

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 2>more minutes if I can. At a thirty Eastern time.

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 2>We're meant to get a job's number. This is what

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 2>we heard from the BLS just moments ago that the

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Bureau of Labor Statistics says it's experiencing a technical problem

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and data retrieval tools are currently not available on the website. Sir,

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>are we going to see a number in ten minutes time.

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if we're gonna see the number, but

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 5>I tell you it makes it crystal clear. You should

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 5>have fired the person who was running that group right.

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Because it didn't fire them two weeks ago, you sure

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 5>at heck would be firing them today. So they need

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 5>new leadership in BLS, that's for sure.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 4>They need new tech and BLS, that's for sure.

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 5>And Donald Trump needs to rely upon the numbers. America

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 5>needs to rely upon the numbers. You can't have these

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 5>bent former administration people who have a view and who

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 5>want to harm the president. We need accurate numbers coming

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 5>from BLS and finally we'll have new leadership.

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 4>To deliver it.

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Mister secretary, you're also going to promise new resources for

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>them to increase their collection and increase some of their

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>staff to go out and make this data accurate.

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 5>Can you imagine they had people calling around. I mean,

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 5>come on, computers, computers, Wow, it's twenty twenty five and

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 5>a half. Computers, new resources, new technology, wildly better information.

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 5>That's what America demands. That's what Donald Trump's going to

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 5>give them. And you just need to change leadership every

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 5>once in a while and make sure we get it right.

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm excited about what's coming. Of course, you fire the person,

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 5>what do you learn? You learn that their technology is

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 5>just voet.

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 4>But we'll fix it. We'll fix it.

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this.

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Payrolls report did drop on time four minutes ago twenty

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 2>two thousand downside surprise seventy five was the estimate. You're

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 2>looking at a three month average now for payrolls of

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>just twenty nine thousand captured in the bond market, with

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 2>lower yields in the FX market, with a week of

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 2>dollar inequities, equities still positive on the session by a

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 2>quarter of one percent on the S and P five hundred,

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the NASNAK sell up nicely by zero point seven. The russell,

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 2>after a seven percent surge in August, up again this morning.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>This idea that this could lead to a reignition of

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the cycle, and it goes back to the question that

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you asked yesterday. Is this a FED that will be

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>cutting into something of a reacceleration or that will cut

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and spur that reacceleration. Right now, the market, based on

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the market activity, seems to think that raycut could be

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>very helpful. In allowing the reignition of cycle.

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 2>We've got a fantastic lineup for the next twenty five

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 2>minutes or so. We can kick it off with Stephanie

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Roth of Wolf Research. Stephanie Gimonic. No morning, you've had

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 2>five minutes to go over this, so what's your first take?

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 6>First take is another week summer employment report. Immigration seems

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 6>to be having another impact on the data. When you

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 6>look at the household survey, the foreign worm population was

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 6>again sort of the weaker part of it. Looking ahead,

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 6>we expect that you'll have one more piece of negative news.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 6>So September ninth, once we get the annual preliminary benchmark revisions,

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 6>that's going to be revised down to the tune of

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 6>something like six hundred thousand. That's going to be another

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 6>really bad negative headline. Then beyond that, we think that

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 6>the signs will look a little bit better. So we

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 6>have another couple of weeks of this. It should be

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 6>a dubbsh September FMC, And then beyond that we think

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 6>that the tides could turn up a little bit, and

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 6>then you'll start to see the economy start to pick

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 6>up cyclically. You'll have a bit of a trough and

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 6>then the dynamics could look.

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 3>A bit different.

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 2>The first thing you went to, though, was population growth.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Do you think there's still a big supply side story

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 2>that's under appreciated in these numbers.

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I do. I think that's a large part of

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 6>what's going on. Of course, it's hard to sort of

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 6>decipher months a month, but if you look at the

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 6>household survey, foreign born employment was down three hundred and

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 6>forty two thousand, when native born was up four hundred

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 6>and fifty one thousand. The label force participation rate for

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 6>foreign born take down again, So it does look like

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 6>you're seeing some continued weakness out.

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Of the immigration.

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 6>That's helps explain why PARA growth was negative. In June,

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 6>we had five hundred thousand people from the HNV program

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 6>whose visas got expired overnight from May to June.

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>If that's the case, why aren't we seeing faster wage growth?

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Why are we seeing the underemployment rate going up? Why

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing the average number of hours worked in

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a week kind of stay stagnant or even go down. Right,

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>These are the sides of weakness that people look at

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>on the corners and say, wait a second, there is

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>something here that speaks to the demand side as much

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>as there is this also supply side story.

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean the wages were fine zo point three percent,

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 6>which is an okay number, not a number that you

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 6>would expect if the belid market is really falling apart.

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 6>So what we're seeing is a combination of supplying demand.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 6>It's certainly not just a supply side story. The band

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 6>is also softened, but when you look at for the

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 6>months ahead, that demand should start to pick up as

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 6>the tarif uncertainty starts to fade. So we had a

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 6>lot of things, largely policy driven, that hit the economy

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 6>over the summer that should go the other way later

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 6>this year. But right now it's a combination of a

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 6>supply side shock and also some significant hits to the

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 6>demand side as well.

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Mam McKay standing by Mike, you've got some moll Yeah.

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 7>John, to the issue you're just talking about now, I'm

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 7>not sure it holds a lot of water. Because the

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 7>civilian labor force grew by four hundred and thirty six

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 7>thousand during the month, which is the biggest since April,

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 7>and April was when the month that we saw the

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 7>market the labor data start to weaken. The participation rate

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 7>actually ticked up, and at this point it doesn't look

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 7>like immigration played a big role.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 3>I have to mention here.

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 7>That the BLS cautions on its website and in its

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 7>literature not to use the foreign board native born population

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 7>statistics to just tell you what happened this month, because

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 7>there are statistical reasons that they don't. It's complicated. I

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 7>won't go into it on the air, but I'm not

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 7>sure that gives us a whole lot of information. It's

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 7>been a talking point used by administrations from both parties,

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 7>but I'm not sure that that makes a lot of difference.

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 7>The biggest thing that we saw in the numbers here

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 7>quickly is that leisure and hospitality, and also education and

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 7>health are the only two categories that really show any

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 7>growth at all. Education and health about forty six thousand,

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 7>leisure hospitality twenty eight thousand. There are an awful lot

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 7>of categories that lost jobs.

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 3>During the month.

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 7>I will point out that construction jobs were down by

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 7>seven thousand, ADP had them up by sixteen thousand. And

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 7>in that strange comment the President made last night about

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:56.199
<v Speaker 7>the payroll report, which suggested he already knew what the

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 7>numbers were He said, it's all construction now, but it

0:18:58.840 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 7>doesn't seem.

0:18:59.320 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 3>To be construction.

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 2>Mike McKay with Elysis might thank you, Stephanie. You were

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 2>following that explanation. Please I want to give you some

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 2>time to respond.

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, I mean, I think it's fair.

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 6>The data are certainly volid a month a month, but

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 6>if you look at the foreign born statistics out of

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 6>the household survey, it's been fairly weak for the past

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 6>couple of months. So it to the extent that, of

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 6>course it's not a perfect picture, but we do know

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 6>that there's significant crackdown from an immigration perspective that is

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 6>likely having some impact. Although it's very difficult to get

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 6>a clean read out of the data. You saw the

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 6>foreign born employment fall threeinge of forty two thousand in

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 6>August four and sixteen in July. It's hard to say

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 6>that there's no impact from an immigration perspective. Of course,

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 6>it's difficult to get the exact precise numbers out of

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.479
<v Speaker 6>the household survey because it is notoriously validile as might

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 6>just mention, yeah, but it's hard to say that there's

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 6>no impact from immigrate Getting a range.

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Of responses already this morning. This from nil Data of Renmak.

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 2>The Hawks have lost on their own terms. Employment growth

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 2>is still calling and the unemployment rate is rising.

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>You have right now one hundred percent chance of a

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>rate cut baked in for later this month. So it

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>seems like they are agreeing with his assessment and that

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on their own terms this would warrant a rate cut.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Key question to me is what is the depth of

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the weakness. And I keep going to, yes, the bond

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>market response, but that's actually less interesting to me than

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the stock market response to the fact that there is

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this belief that this is not great, but it's not

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>so bad that our curtails the cyclical tilt that we've seen,

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and that to me is really the big question.

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn to Jeff Rosenberg on that he joined us

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 2>from Blackrock. Jeff, welcome to the program, Sir. What do

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>we always say the first move isn't always the right move,

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 2>and let's see if this sticks. But the first move

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 2>is stocks higher. What's your take?

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, the first move is stocks higher, and this is

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 8>bad news. Is good news for the stock market, because

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 8>the Fed's going to ride to the rescue and cut

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 8>rates and the economy is not going to fall off

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 8>a cliff. Financial conditions will help that. It's a little

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 8>bit circular, but if the FED is going to underwrite

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 8>the risk rally, then financial conditions will hold up confidence

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 8>even if you're having a little bit of a slow

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 8>down here on the demand side.

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 3>So look, that's the initial read.

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 8>You know, Russell two thousand, nasdak out performance is really

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 8>quite notable. People piling into what has already been working.

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Because the FED is going to be behind that.

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 8>And I think that, you know, on top of what

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 8>Stephanie and you all were just talking about. Yeah, it's

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 8>a weaker report, but it's a weaker report that solidifies

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 8>twenty five. But it's really about and I think is

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 8>where Lisa was about to go, you know, what's the

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 8>path from here? Does this put October on the table?

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 8>Does this put fifty on the table? But what it

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 8>really puts on the table is a FED that gets

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 8>back in motion for cutting rates. And if the economy

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 8>is not falling off a cliff, that's a pretty good.

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Combination for risk assets.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 8>And that's why you're seeing, at least in this initial reaction,

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 8>bad news is good news.

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>You said something really important there Jeff that this is

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>an indication that the FED is going to underwrite risk

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>assets at a time when there is enough weakness in

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>labor markets to justify that. We'll give you confidence that

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the weakness that we're seeing is fixable or addressable by

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a couple of rate cuts this year by the Federal Reserve.

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 8>Well, I wouldn't overstate that and say that it is.

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 8>But the confidence piece of that is really the primacy

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 8>of financial conditions. And so you know, while we're worried

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 8>about a lot of things, one of the things we're

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 8>not worried about is financial conditions, and they are exceptionally easy.

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 8>And this is what I've said on the program many times.

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 8>You know, we focus on the economy, and it's this

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.239
<v Speaker 8>kind of debate, does the stock market worry about the

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 8>economy or does the economy worry about the stock market?

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 8>And I think it's more the latter, that it's about

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 8>financial conditions, and the stock market is less about the

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 8>economy and much more about AI and technology, and that

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 8>boost to wealth is supporting consumption and that's what drives

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 8>the economy much more than anything else. And so I

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 8>think that's what kind of eases the concern here around

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 8>the slowing in the in the jobs market that we're

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 8>seeing out of today's data.

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>If we've seen the hawks throw in their hawkish tilt

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>and become more dubbish on the fresher reserve and start

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>cutting rates, does data like this, Jeff, make you think

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that maybe you have to price in steeper cuts over

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the remainder of next year, especially with the changing of

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the guard, that maybe this market is underappreciating the risk

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>of more significant easing.

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a really good question.

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 8>I think it's one that will turn our attention increasingly

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 8>towards which is okay to what end Waller, you know,

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 8>gave a little hint in that in his interview earlier

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 8>this week. One hundred to one hundred and fifty basis

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 8>points that seems to be what most consensus use around

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 8>Taylor rule implies. You know, so that amount is kind

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 8>of priced in. I think the uncertainty that you're alluding

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 8>to is, you know, will that be enough and you know,

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 8>d end up pricing in you know more than that,

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 8>you know right now, the kind of standard economic analysis,

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 8>the tailor rules are arguing for a path of cuts,

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 8>but it's a shallow path because policy is only moderately,

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 8>moderately restrictive. And yes, the delta and the change here

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 8>is to the downside, the deceleration on the demand side.

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 3>But its powerless. How highlighted.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 4>Excuse me?

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 8>You know this is also still a labor market that is,

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 8>you know, not tremendously out of balance. These are small increases,

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 8>yes they're increases in the unemployment rate, but the supply

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 8>side and the demand side are both easing at the

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 8>same time. And you see it in the strength in

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 8>the wages, the persistent you know, one thing that didn't

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 8>happen here is a big slowdown in the work week.

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 3>Something will keep an eye on and and so that

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 3>will hold up. How deep does this path have to get.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 2>It's quiet end of the curve, Jeff, Just to keep

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 2>you up to speed on things if you haven't got

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the bloomberg in front of you. But down nine basis

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 2>points at the front end of the curve now trading

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 2>at three forty three forty nine, so into the three

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 2>forties now, which is something we haven't seen all year.

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 2>Tens are at about four point zero nine percent, so

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 2>we've broken down through four point one thirty's are way

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 2>off away from five percent of the moment. At about

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 2>four eighty one, we're down four basis points on the session. So, Jeff,

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about the shape of the curve. There is

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 2>a fear had by some, not all, but some that

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 2>we'd see a repeat of last year, that we'd see

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 2>some week jobs day to the Fed would come out

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 2>of the gates aggressively and what you'd see is the

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 2>frontend come down, with the long end would actually sell off,

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 2>years would rise, and maybe we'd get the same kind

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 2>of move that we saw last year.

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 3>Jeff, do you see things lining.

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 2>Up for a repeat of twenty four or is this

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 2>different this time?

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's certainly different this time.

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 8>And you know, the day's focus is on the labor

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 8>markets and it's a premiere data point for the growth

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 8>side of the equation. But next week other data will

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 8>come out and we'll focus again on the other side,

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 8>which is the inflationary side.

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.880
<v Speaker 3>And so this is really the tension that you see.

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 8>Within the curve that if the FED is cutting and

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 8>they're telling us, and Powell was pretty clear coming out

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 8>of Jackson Hole, there's a primacy of within the dual mandate,

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 8>the growth side, the maximum employment side of that mandate,

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 8>but it's happening at a time, and this is where

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 8>the hawks have you know, kind of been you know,

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 8>squawking a little bit that, hey, you know, the inflation

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 8>piece hasn't really been solved and the uncertainty of the

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 8>pass through of tariff inflation is still in front of us.

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 8>Plus all the other things that go into the back

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 8>end of the curve, the demands supply, the fiscal the deficits.

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 8>It raises the potential here and you're seeing it in

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 8>the curve this morning that you just lag the declines

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 8>from what the Fed is doing in policy rates to

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 8>the back end of the curve. And that view is

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 8>you know, pretty consensus in terms of the expectations of deepening,

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 8>and we've had a lot of that put into the

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 8>curve already, so you know, that may get a little

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 8>bit tired.

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 3>And you've got some technical positioning.

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 8>Everybody's on the same side of the boat, so that

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 8>can have an unwind. But the fundamentals behind a steepening

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 8>curve outlook cutting interest rates in the face of still

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 8>sticky inflation on top of all the fiscal concerns, you know,

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 8>do argue that the pass through from policy in the

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 8>short end to the back end won't be as strong

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 8>as we would historically expect. Absent, you know, the big

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 8>shock of an economy that really discelerates and brings back

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 8>a specter of not inflation but deflation. That's how you

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 8>get the back end to really outperform.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us, multpleinpex. Savanna's coming up off to this.

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 2>Michael Nathansen of Muffett Nathansen has a by raising a

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 2>two thirty price talk on Alphabet Chas and writes the following,

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 2>this outcome is a home run for the status quo,

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 2>and the status quo has been very favorable to Google.

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Michael joins us. Now for Michael, welks to the programs.

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Just your reflections on what happened early this week, and

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 2>then we can get to whether the runsom competitors that

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 2>can really break up this status quote.

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, good morning, Jonathan. That was the best outcome, obviously possible.

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 9>The market had been really fearful of what the courts

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 9>could have done here, and it could have hurt Apple

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 9>deeply and Alphabet deeply. And you look at this and say,

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 9>to your point, the court was smart to say change

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 9>is coming anyway, Why are we going to accelerate whatever's happening.

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:46.719
<v Speaker 9>Let's let the markets decide the future of search. So

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 9>I was really pleased as a Google bull Alphabet bull,

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 9>but I thought it was a really smart decision by

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 9>the judge to step back and say, this is going

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 9>to change anyway.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's see where technology moves us.

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 2>So, Michael, how do you think it's going to change?

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 2>And why stay constructive on this name?

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, good question.

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 9>So what's going to happen is search as we know

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 9>it has changed already, right, Search is moving from links

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 9>to answers. Do you use open AI, Chat, Chipetia or

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 9>even the new AI mode at Google. You're seeing a

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 9>different type of search that is mostly happening in informational queries,

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 9>not commercial queries. Right, So our view is it's going

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 9>to take a long time for commercial queries. You'll find

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 9>me the best hotel in Boston, find me, you know,

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 9>a new dog food for my dog. Those searches are

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 9>still happening more traditionally, and I think what's going to

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 9>happen is as less queries, you know, basically, more queries

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 9>will stop at the you know, the head end of

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 9>an AI mode. The queries that remain questions that remain

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 9>will be more valuable the people who are selling answers.

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Does that make sense to you, Johnathan?

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 9>So our view is that the price of the traffic

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 9>to people's websites will only go up because they'll be

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 9>less graphic one of people's websites as more answers are

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 9>headed off at people like an open ai or AI

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 9>mode at Google.

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's consolidating all of the attention on a smaller

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>group of names. So it's a more valuable proposition. Do

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you think that Google needs to really now ramp up

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>any type of open ai competitor, any kind of chatbot,

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence induced search result in the next two to

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>three months. They have a time on them, a clock

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>on them to sort of show their metal in their

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>competition with open Ai.

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 9>So it's interesting. I would say to you if you

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 9>had me on two years ago, a year ago, I'd

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 9>be very nervous about their speed to market and their

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 9>ability to change. They've been changing the past couple months

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 9>pretty aggressively. They had an event called io back in May.

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 9>They launched a bunch of new products. If you look,

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 9>if you look at what's happening in real time at

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.479
<v Speaker 9>you know, AI mode on Google Search, you're seeing tremendous change,

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 9>So I think the ramping is happening in the current timeframe.

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 9>I am less worried than I was a year ago

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 9>about their ability to change. I think they've realized our

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 9>job is to deliver consumer satisfaction. Our job is not

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 9>to hold onto business models that have been great to us.

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 9>We need to basically look at what consumers want and

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 9>give it to them. And if you dig into what

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 9>Google is now providing, it's really massively changed. So I

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 9>think you will see in the next six months or a

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 9>year even more change, and it's going to be multimodive.

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 9>You'll see change when it comes to video search and

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 9>you know, an image search. They're really moving quickly to

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 9>create you know, a three sixty view of search that's

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 9>just more than texts. So I'm pretty bullish on their

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 9>product roadmap and what we've seen so far. I think

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 9>that's the big change that the market has woken up

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 9>and said they're not dead.

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 4>They're not sleeping at you at the wheel.

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 9>They see the challenge from Catch and then taking it

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 9>on pretty aggressively.

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Apple and that they also benefited from that,

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder a lot of people waking up to

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Apple's not dead as well in the

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>past couple of days at least by virtue of their

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>share price. Were you comforted by the fact that Tim

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Cook was at that meeting yesterday and it seemed like

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the president seemed a lot more amenable to him, calling

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>out some of the investments and even giving him a

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>nod with their India presence.

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so, Craig, my partner Carver's Apple. We had to

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 9>sell on Apple heading into the court. You know the

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 9>court findings. We're really worried that they would lose twenty

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 9>billion plus of payments from Alphabet, which was pretty much

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 9>all profit. John Hint's point that the status quo remaining,

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 9>it is incredibly positive for Apple that they can work

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 9>with Google, maybe they build a new seri product that's

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 9>been rumored. They don't have to lose twenty billion plus

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 9>the payments. And then to your point on this administration,

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 9>the administration had been very, very positive and they could

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 9>have been a lot more aggressive pushing Apple to move

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 9>production to more expensive markets. So I think it's a

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 9>massive win win for Apple. Tomb Cook has played his

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 9>cards perfectly here and then he got the benefit of

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 9>Judge Meta allowing him to kind of maintain that relationship

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 9>with Alphabet. So you had in a matter of week

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 9>two stocks Google, Alphabet and Apple that were really underweighted

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 9>by a lot of investors come back to the forefront.

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 9>And that's why the market's been so strong. It's been

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 9>a great outcome for these guys.

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Michael, just before you go, do you pay much attention

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 2>to seating plans and who gets to seat next to

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the president? Do you read anything between the lines?

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Probably?

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 9>I probably do, right, John, I did not see the

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 9>seating plans last night. I apologize too, bitch of Washing

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 9>two bite Washington.

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg was the first person next to him.

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 3>I'll give you that cheat sheet, thank you so much.

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 9>Well, look how much marks we're spending right now out

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 9>of nowhere and Capex right they've just massively ramped up

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 9>their investment in the US on data centers right in

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 9>Ohio and Louisiana. So he's spending spending is Dana White

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 9>on his board? Now he's done more than anyone. I

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 9>can think I can get back into the good races

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 9>of this administration.

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg surveillance podcast, bringing you the best

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, and geopolitics. You can watch the show

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on the

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.