WEBVTT - Intel Is About to Relinquish Its Chipmaking Crown to Samsung

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg clovel News. The fort annual JPMorgan Healthcare

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Conference underway. Virtually it's the event where it comes. It's

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>the event where really anything in the healthcare space and

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved in the healthcare space typically gather on an

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>annual basis. As we mentioned, it's virtual this year, and

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the companies participating is our upcoming guest. Jeff

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Jonas is Chief Innovation Officer on on the board of

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>directors of Stage Therapeutics. Jeff joins us on the phone

0:00:55.160 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>from Florida. Jeff, how are you, You're You're all well

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and thanks for having me. Yeah, thanks so much for

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>joining us. First, first off, an update from you know

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing right now at the JP Morgan Healthcare Conference.

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I know that you're attending it virtually as of now,

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>as everybody is doing, but give us an update on

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>on on really what the red is. Well, you know,

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a funny time. This has been a funny conference,

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's been, as you've mentioned, a standard get together

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>conclay for biotech and pharma for decades, and this is

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the second year has been virtual. That said, I've been

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>attending virtually. Um, there's some interesting news in the Cristoper space,

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>some M and A, but it's still not the same

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>as you know, being packed like sardines and Union Square.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you which right now. We're glad not

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to be packed like sardines. Hey, Jeff. One thing though, UM,

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I do think about the pandemic and how it's affected

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the medical community and all of us overall, the questions,

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the information we've learned as we've watched vaccines being raid

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and understanding you know the process if you will. And

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I also think the world at large, the importance of

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>mental wellness. We're talking about it like we've never before.

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>How how how do you see the pandemic kind of

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>impacting that world? In your world specifically, Well, you know,

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm a psychiatrist by training or recovering psychiatrists, and it's

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>if you look at what's happened, I think, as you've

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, UM, we've seen a vast increase in the

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>diagnosis of people suffering from mental health disorders, anxiety disorders,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.679
<v Speaker 1>and really across the economic and age spectrum. It's not

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>focusing on any particular segment. It's really all of us.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's there's actually some really good data

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 1>around this. UM. And without belaboring this, if you look

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>just for example, the economic costs are in the US

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>just for depressive disorders in the year two thousand, year talking,

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it was about three billion, which was very substantial. In

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>one the estimate of the cost of depress and is

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>almost eight hundred billions, more than two and a half

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>fold what we saw in the in the year two

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand and the same has been true that kind of

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>increased for neurological disorders. So I think we all know

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>that our lives are different. People are under stress. Um,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a paucity of of availability of mental health practitioners,

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>people are isolating more so it really is a perfect swarm.

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But Jeff, you know, I hear the data from one

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and I asked myself, is that actually measuring the effect

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic? Because here we are two and we're

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>entering your three of the pandemic. So I'm wondering to

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>what extent you can actually attribute that increase in depression

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and anxiety to the pandemic versus what we won't see

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for years. Succomb Oh, I think that's exactly right. Remember,

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>these are all instantaneous numbers or incidents as it were,

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the sequali or the after effects of what we're going

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>through now. I think many of these things are still

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>yet to be counted. So, if you know, I think

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that's why we're seeing, you know, this, this negative impact

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>on brain health and the increasing diagnosis of ment of

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>depression and anxieties sorts across the board. Hey what about

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to Jeff? You know, we talked so much here in

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg about data collection, Right, the better the pros and

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>cons of data collection, Right, But I do think about

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the data that's being collected during the pandemic about mental wellness,

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>how that might help us in terms of figuring out

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>more productive, more constructive strategies to really help all of

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>us with our mental well being. Well, I think that's

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a really important point. And mental health has not been

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on the forefront of people's minds, you know, over the

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>last decade, even though it is almost a crisis in

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>our ability to deliver beneficial care. And I think the

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 1>data we're acquiring now are really pointing out to the

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>area that we have significant unmet medical need. We don't

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>have enough practitioners. There hasn't been a lot of innovation

0:04:55.920 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and mental health medication and treatments over the last twenty years,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>so there's been a posse of that sort of innovation

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. So our hope is and and again the

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>data are still coming in that with with better data

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and more information, we'll be able to craft better therapies

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that are really more tailored to individuals versus the sort

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of one size fits all that's really predominated, especially in

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>psychiatry over the last twenty years. So what does that

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>actually look like on a practical level, Well, the first

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>thing we have to do is start looking at people's

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>individual problems, and you know, and the socioeconomic issues, but

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, to make accurate diagnoses and to provide therapies

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as possible. If you think about this from

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a medical standpoint, if you had a broken leg, you

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't wait around, you know too, you know, two months

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to get better or to see a doctor.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And yet we don't treat mental health with the same urgency.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>And these are life threatening conditions that we do with

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>other medical conditions. So if you need to see a psychiatrist,

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you may have to wait, you know, several weeks or

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>if not months, or psychlotherapist. And so the kind of

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>data that we need and what we're seeing is that

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is really demonstrating not only the economic loss but the

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>personal cost of delaying therapy and not having better access

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to mental health across the board. All right, we've got

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to run. Hey, Jeff Um come back anytime. We'd love

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to continue this conversation. Jeff Jonas, his Chief Innovation Officer,

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Board of Directors member, former CEO of Stage Therapeutics, joining

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Florida. I do think the

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>increased conversation we're having about mental wellness, it's really important. Yeah,

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think his point about you know, what this

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like in a few years really stands because we

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know the effects. Yeah, exactly in personalization, right, individualization.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>That makes a lot of sense to me. Medicine increasingly

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>moving in that direction. This is Bloomberg Business Week, and

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned, a lot coming this week on the

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>US economy, Fitch J. Powell up on Capitol Hill for

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>his confirmation hearing, and a lot is on the terminal

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and at Bloomberg dot com about interest rates and inflation.

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>New York Fed President Bill Dudley winging Goldman Sacks also

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>with some comments both writing about you know, Tim, more

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>aggressive FED tightening cycles. Are all looking at the economy

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking the Fed has to play catch up. We'll do that,

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>howevery that's the question, because we're also seeing some major

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>disruptions as a result of a Macron. A great story

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Terminal by Sean Donnan and other of

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Economics colleagues. Here Sean Donn and his senior

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>economics writer for Bloomberg News, He joins us on the

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>phone from Maryland. Sean, I was having a conversation with

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a friend earlier this morning over text because we were

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about the disruptions happening at our kids nursery school,

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and she wrote that short staffing because of COVID is

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the new supply chain And I said, oh, my god,

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. You hit it the nail on the head.

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>What have you found about the economic effects of all

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of these workers calling out sick? Well, I mean, that's

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a great way of thinking about it. This is I mean,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>if you remember back that supply chain crisis that hit

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>us all last skier starting to hit the tail end

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of that's something that we weren't really expecting in terms

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of UH an economic impact. And as we were going

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>into this O Macron variant, we had kind of gotten

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>into a groove and how we deal with surges the

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>economy and businesses have become pretty good at adapting UH

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to new conditions. And then all of a sudden, we've

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>got this new condition UH in the economy, which is

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>just we've got a lot of people outsick in America

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>right now because we're getting all of these positive tests

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and people may not be getting as sick in the

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>broadly as as as they were beforehand, but they still

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>have to stay at home in quarantine for five days

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 1>ten days, depending on the business that you work for. UH,

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that may affect their family members who may be forced

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to stay home because of rules as well. And at

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a certain point, when you start talking to businesses, they're saying, actually,

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it's having a material impact on our ability to do business.

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So I talked Toledo Pizza, which is a pizza chain

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>down here, and the CEO, James Beale, it's a family company,

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>they've been around since you've never seen anything like this.

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>He's literally having the shut stores because they don't have

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>enough people, and they don't have enough people, not because

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>they can't hire enough people, which was a lot of

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the impact last year, but because it got too many

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>people calling in sake right now, right and we've seen

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we've all been places where we see signs that they

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>just you know, closed because they just don't have enough workers.

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>The other thing, though, Sean I'm thinking about, is the

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.599
<v Speaker 1>markets have this great ability to look through things, and

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we've had a lot of guests coming on like we

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>have to look through this period of a macron and

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>just get to the other side of the economy. Uh

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and and things start to bounce back pretty quickly. Um,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>why shouldn't we just be doing that here, like we

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>understand what's going on, and why won't it just be

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.599
<v Speaker 1>maybe a few week thing where we'll explain away in

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the data points what was going on and look forward.

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure, I mean look absolutely could be a question

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of just a few weeks. Uh. And we've seen that

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people point to what happened in South Africa,

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what's been happening in the UK. Already some science possibly

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>out of New York that the omicron cases are are

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>peaking there. But really we've also got to think about

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the scale of the impact and how that kind of

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>flows through the through the economy right now. As an

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>economist I like called Nick Bunker, he's the chief economist

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that indeed the job site we're all familiar with, um.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And he grew up in the Boston area, and he says,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>this is a lot like the Blizzarders seventy eight, which

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is this legendary blizzard that hit uh, New England in

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy eight, which up to four feet of snow

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>get dropped on the economy and for a few weeks

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there you have this huge disruption in the economy, there's

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a huge clean up operation, there's a big bounce back.

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>But you've got to think about this as not just

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 1>a regional economic event. This is like the blizzard or

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight kind of hit everywhere in the US at

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the same time right now in terms of workers staying home,

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and that is um that's all. It may not be

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as big a deal as what we saw in March

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and April when we had these lockdowns in place and

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic was very new. We've adapted. We're all working

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>from home, or a lot of us are working from home.

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>We're finding new ways to to work and and and

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>do our jobs. But it could be pretty short and sharp,

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and that could flow through as well into supply chains.

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>What if that brings us back to a place where,

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, those parts shortages that we were seeing last

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>year that we're pretty acute again, those get extended further

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>into this year and that starts affecting GDP. And that's

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons we've seen economists UH downgrade their

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>growth forecast for for the first quarter. And you know

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the quarter we're in. Now, we can look at

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>what's happened now, we can expect good things on the horizon,

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it pays to pay attention to what's

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>happening around us now as well. Hey, Sean, what's the

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>best what's the most important piece of data that you're

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be watching for are in the coming weeks to

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>help us understand what actually happens with the omicron variant

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in regard to technomic impact. I think there's there's there's

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. One is what really happens to

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the big industrial companies like the automakers and

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 1>how many people do they have outsick? And does that

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>really then again flow through into the economy. And remember

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that story about car prices that we were all telling

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>last year and inflation. Uh so what do we see

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in kind of heavy industry like that? Uh. The other

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>one is one that's kind of harder to get a

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>handle on, and that's I wish we had to take

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>her on the on the terminal for how many Americans

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>are outsick on any given day, because in some ways

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that would be the best economic barometer you could have

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. Sickco I'm one of our programmers are listening. Hey.

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>One thing I do think about though, and highly recommended

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty minutes at a great piece about kind of what's

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>going on in the US labor force right now. I

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>do wonder too, um sean for companies who are like man,

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to ever be in a position where

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>we might go through something like this and where my

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, reliance on workers, um just really makes me

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>so vulnerable. I want to automate as much as I can.

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much automation is going on that's going

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to stay with us forever in certain industries that will

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>impact the labor force for years to come. I think

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt that one of the long term I'm

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna call it a scar here, but it's a change,

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and some we'll see it as a positive change. Uh,

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in this economy is going to be more automation. I'm

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring us back to Ledo Pizza here in the

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>DC area, and they've got a hundred and ten stores.

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty thriving pizza chain here here. Locally, they

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>have thirteen fewer people that they employ today than they

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>did before the pandemic. And that's not about being outsick.

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>That's just fewer staff that they need. And what they've done,

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>according to the CEO, James Biel, was you know, part

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of that was driven by by shortages in the labor market,

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the hard the hard times they were having finding workers.

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But they've adapted. And one of the ways they've adapted

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is they've automated their ordering down their menu. You just

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>don't need to deal with as many people as you

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>used to get a pizza pizza, and that's a scar

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in this economy. Gotta runch on. It's a great story,

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Sean Donn, and he's seen your economics writer at Bloomberg

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>News ruining us on the phone from Maryland. You're listening

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week and this is Bloomberg. You're listening

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stenovic

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. This week, Bloomberg Business Week's magazine, it's

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>all about the your head issue, those things to keep

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>on your radar in two and Tim. That includes, of course,

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductor space big story. Last year, it's going to

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>contin knew to be so this year innovation disruptors and

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>just plain old competition playing its way out. Yeah. The

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>big question is who reigned supreme? And how about the

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>long time you know, Kings of chip making or King

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of chip making? Does it remain king? We have our

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>own king of chipmaking too, it's in King. He's US

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Semiconductor and Networking reporter at Bloomberg News. He joins the

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>slide from the San Francisco studio and it's always great

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to have you on the program. Let's talk a little

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>bit about Intel, because the company is on the brink

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of losing its status as the world's largest chipmaker. I

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>thought that girl Singer came back to Intel to prevent

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>this from happening. Yeah, no, that that's what he's been

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about. He's very, very focused on basically restoring Intel

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to its dominance. You remember when he left in two

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nine. Until it was at the peak of

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>its powers, it was the largest chip maker by market value,

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the largest chip maker by revenue, the leader in terms

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of technology, the best plants, the best profit margins. You know,

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it really was a leader, and now it's not. It's

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>arguably going to lose the last of those titles, which

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is the one by revenue in two thousand for two

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty one. And really everything that he said

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>since he took over last year is look, I'm going

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to get Intel back. I'm going to put Intel back

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>where it belongs. So hey, Ian, it's still going to

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>be a dominant player Intel that is. But what's the

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>significance of you know, Intel and the history of what

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it has done in terms of chipmaking and just really

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley. How is that just kind of remarkable in

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of this shift. Yeah, I mean Intel basically taught

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the industry that, you know, these are the economics that matter,

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Moore's law that everybody quotes good and more, the founder

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of Intel. It's about economics, It's about scale, it's about speed.

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Intel has always had the most capital to deploy. It's

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>always moved faster. It's always made it difficult for the

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>opposition to keep up. Now it's facing and we talked

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>about some song in the story, but also t SMC

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in Taiwan. Companies that have as much access to capital,

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>that are deploying as much capital, that are running just

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>as fast as Intel, and they're enabling lots of other

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>companies who they manufacture for to compete and to take

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>market share away from Intel. Clearly that's not good for Intel.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>As you say, it's it's still a huge company. It's

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy billion dollars of revenue is not to be sniffed at.

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But that kind of lead that ability to say, hey,

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>here we are. You need to come chase me, and

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the pain that is involved in chasing me.

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>That's gone away. What do we always say about Intel's

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>ability or packed Elsinger's ability to to pull this off. Yeah,

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's Initially when he came, you know, back

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to Intel last February, said all the right things, said, look,

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>this isn't good enough, this is not Intel. These you know,

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>mismanagement that's been going on while I've been away. I'm

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>going to reverse that. Intel is back, you know, very much,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>beating his fist on his chest and using a lot

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of the throwbacks to Intel's prior leadership in terms of messaging.

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But then what became clear as Intel reported earnings averaged

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a seven percent decline on the day after every earnings

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>was released because those earnings were showing margins narrowing and

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>guess what, We're going to spend a lot of money

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to get us back. And so what what's really going

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>on is saying the right things, making the right decisions arguably,

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time showing what the cost is

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and the amount of time it might take to get

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Intel back to leadership. Hey, in in a world where

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>so much of the global economy is all about services,

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and certainly for the United States, we don't make a

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff anymore. But the opportunity with a company

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>like Intel where we actually make something, how important is

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that to the United States? And I think about you know,

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>government intervention or government assistance here in making sure that

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>we're still you know, making something in this global economy. Yeah,

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean if if you know, if you ought to

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>view it from a nation centric point of view, and

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Gelsing are certainly one of those that does suit. So

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the chip industry is enormously important. It's a it's a

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>fundamental piece of technology that underpins everything UM and the US.

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You know that the ability to manufacture that is really

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>centered in only Intel and a bit in Micron. Everybody

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>else kind of doesn't do it anymore. It's done by

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Sam song it's done by t SMC. Those are arguably

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the leaders right now. And what Girl Singer has argued,

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's you know, gained some traction with politicians who

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>are listening to him, saying, look, if we don't have this,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we we lose that ability. It's not something you can

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>just get back, you know. It's it's based on knowledge,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it's based on experience, and if that's going away, maybe

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>it's gone for good. So he's really trying to do

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>something about that. And you're not unprecedented, right, go back

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to is it the seventies right where the US you know,

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>there was a consortium to really help develop the U

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>S semiconductor sector. So it's not unprecedented, No, it's it's

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>it's not unprecedented if you look at the numbers. You know,

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Intel became the world's largest chipmaker in ninety two. Up

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>until nineteen ninety is you know, the US was responsible

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>for sort of a third of production worldwide, Europe almost

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>as much. You know, Asia was just a third. Now

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that's massively changed and that's a lot of money, and

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's nohow I think that people are much

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>more concerned about that once you lose that. Know how,

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>once you lose that experience, once that's gone, it's very

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>hard to get back. And do you get the sense

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>from your reporting that policymakers understand the importance of the

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>chip industry to the United States? Do they understand what

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know is does Intel and do my crime? Do

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they get what they're what they want from the US

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>government in terms of actual help. I think there's two

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>ways to look at this. You have an unprecedented piece

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>of industrial policy, which is something that the US just

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do before Congress. Right now, the Chips Acts fifty

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars sounds like a lot of money on

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the flip side hasn't been funded yet. It's still stalled,

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's causing frustration amongst the chip industries like Okay,

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>so you finally woken up, you finally get it, but

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>there's not enough money and be you haven't even funded that.

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So yes and no, I think is the answer to that? Hey,

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think about you know, investors who are into

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>your conversation here and what you're saying, Um, I'm just

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>look an outward. Intel was up about three point four

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>percent last year. I mean, the SAX has been on

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a tear. So what do they need to keep in

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>mind when they think about investing in or not investing

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>in Intel. Well, you know, it's a very good question.

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Intel is the best performing chip stock this year. That's

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a very small sample size. We've had what six trading days.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>That's based upon what Intel has said at CS new

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>products were coming back to leadership, We're going to do well,

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna start taking back market share. Maybe there's a

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>chance that people are getting behind Intel's story, that they're

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>looking over the horizon and saying, hey, maybe Intel's back

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>on the flip side. We've got earnings coming later this quarter.

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>The numbers there don't look good, you know, the numbers

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>look for revenue down again, look for profit margins under

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>um you know, under threat again. So it's a it's

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a do you believe in the future? Do you believe

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in this management? Do you believe that they're not just

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>saying the right things, but they're putting the company in

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a position to exceed because short term it's not looking good. Yeah.

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Intel actually one of my gainers. We talked about the

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>markets a little bit later on. It's one of the

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>few stocks, uh in a lot of the selling that

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing today. That's actually a standout, uh Ian. I

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>know I say it a lot, but I really mean it.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And we do your must read always when it comes

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to anything in the semi space in King U, semiconductor

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>networking reporter at Bloomberg News from our San Francisco studio.

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>His story in the new issue upcoming issue the year

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Ahead issue of Bloomberg Business Week on newsstands later this week,

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>online and always on the Bloomberg terminal. Check it out.

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Well, a macron has flared in a

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Chinese sports city that borders Beijing and spread inland. See

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the variant on the doorstep of the nation's capital, less

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>than one month before the Winter Olympics in Beijing begin,

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and we know Tim pulling off safe games will be

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a big test for President. G Andy Brown is editorial

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>director at Bloomberg New Economy. He joins us on the

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>phone from New York City over the weekend, and you

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>had a column out that was titled China's Betting on

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Olympic victory over COVID. This was New Economy Saturday. Since then, though,

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>we've learned more about community spread in China. What do

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we know about how on then is spreading in the

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in the country and give us an update on COVID

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>zero policy. Well, what we know is that there are

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>forty cases in Tensin, is Beijing's ports city. It's less

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred miles from the Chinese capital, half an

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>hour on the train. Um that outbreak UM has leaked

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 1>into Honan Province to the south. Hanan is right now

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>battling a delta outbreak. Both Tenjin and Honan um press

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>up against Hubei Province, which is where many of the

0:23:55.800 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Winter Olympic ski and skating competition and lose competitions are

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>taking place. This is really Beijing's nightmare. I mean, it

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>has profound implications for the Chinese economy, for global supply chains,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and indeed for domestic Chinese politics. This is an incredibly

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>sensitive year when President Jijimping at the end of the

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>year is seeking a twenty third term in office at

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth Party Congress. And you know China's success, his

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>success in defeating COVID um has been is a is

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a big part of of his program this year. I

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 1>mean basically, Andy, you write that his political credibility and

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>China's political credibility really at stake here. Yeah. So you

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>know they've presented the and and look, China, China defeat

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>it Delta. It was, it's it's an extraordinary victory. Um.

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, they talked, they talked about a people's war, um.

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And they've compared and contrasted their success against COVID with

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>America's failures. So they say, you know, propaganda, sort of

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>nationalistic chess stumping propaganda. Look, the American democratic system is

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>completely failed. Eight hundred thousand people, you know, died in

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States. It proves the superiority of the socialist system.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.479
<v Speaker 1>And look, you know here it is UH in China.

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And if they can't contain this, and it looks it's

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be a really difficult job for them to

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>hold to hold to their zero COVID policy. Given that

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Omicron is by some accounts seventy times more infectious UH

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>than than Delta. It really seems that this is this

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is a this is an uphill battle for them. Yeah,

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing to be able to do this if

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>borders are closed and you're not holding an event that

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>attracts people from all over the world. Still, though, they

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>are putting into place some huge restrictions when it comes

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>to the Olympics. How are they trying to prevent this

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>becoming a super spreader event? And indeed even one case

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it's too many for the Chinese government. Yes, so the

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Olympics is going to be held in the bubble. Um.

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually going, and I'm gonna be part of a

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>part of that bubble, so we won't be allowed out

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of the venues, and that they're allowed to wander around.

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I ken indy um uh. But you know, it seems

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to me, and I'm not in any way medical special,

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>but it seems to me almost a certainty that you're

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna get omikron outbreaks. Uh in the Olympic village among

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the athletes. It could well knock out individual athletes. It

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>could even knock out whole teams. Um it really, it

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>really does. Um. You know, Uh, foretell some some chaos

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.719
<v Speaker 1>during the games. Yeah, you do think about Andy, you know,

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>fingers crossed things improve and and and everybody who goes,

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>including yourself. You know are safe, uh, and that the

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>numbers go in a different direction. But you do wonder

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't go well, you know, what could be

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the implications, I mean, what could be the longer term

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>implications for President g going forward if if things don't

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>go well, Well, there's the economy that he has to

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>think about. So, you know, to keep to defeat COVID,

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they've had these rolling lockdowns and travel restrictions. Uh, it's

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>disrupted ports UM, it's closed down factories, it's dampened domestic

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>consumption UM, and growth is slowing. And economists, even before

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>there's omicron I'll break, the economists have been downgrading Chinese

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>growth forecasts UM for next year and or rather for

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this year, and of course with a knock on impact

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the global economy through supply chain, many of which reports

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>run through China. I do wonder, though, what has more

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of an effect on supply chains, you know, the closing

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of of something because of COVID, or you know, just

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>people not showing up work because they are sick andy.

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's like you it's really it's hard to imagine

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where where this doesn't have an economic effect,

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>because even a COVID zero policy that includes lockdowns, mass testing,

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and school being canceled. That is serious economic implications. Absolutely.

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, China, China did very well in two thousand

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and twenty and two thousand and twenty one when rich

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>countries were all in lockdown and what people weren't buying services,

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>they weren't going out to eat, they weren't traveling, They

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>were buying goods, and these goods were made in China. Well,

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>if only krone turns out to be as mild as

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we think we hope it will be, that situation could

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>reverse within implications for China's exports right at the time

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>when domestic consumption falls. This is really the worst of

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>all worlds for China. God, it's so tricky, all right, Andy,

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Bloomberg New Economy Editorial Director. You

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>can sign up for the New Economy daily newsletter at

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash New hyphen Economy. This is Bloomberg

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Chart of the day coming up right here

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the drive to the close. At New

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>gagar Is with US global investment strategist for Commonwealth Financial Network.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>She joins us once again on the phone in Waltham, Massachusetts,

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and new great to have you here with us. Happy

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>New Year. What a year it's already been in two,

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of funny for us to talk about this.

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>How much how much do you pay attention to what's

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>happened in these first five six trading days of two?

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked about the first five days indicator

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and some market watchers watch that pretty closely, do you. Oh,

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Carol Kim, Happy New Year to you as well, and

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for having he here. Uh so

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the thing goes ast Jane. Where he goes,

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>so goes the year, know, um, you know to that

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>extent of course, you know we're watching markets every day,

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>but of course we're not really um making any predictions

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.719
<v Speaker 1>on you know, a one day move or a ten

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>day move, so to speak. Um. But yeah, you pointed

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to the market reactions today, What a day. Who would

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>have thought when we started the day this morning that

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the NASACT composite would actually be one of the best

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>book forming major composites and major indexes to end the day.

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So what happened here, which is it's really funny. I mean,

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>we're on the NASDAC. They're barely down four tens of

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>not even down four tens of one percent, and we're

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>down more than two percent earlier. Yeah, so it looks

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>like there is some technical buying coming in by you know,

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the buy the dip sort of traders. But really the

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>equity sell off today and in the first ten days

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of twenty two and two is just a market reaction

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to the f O m C meeting minutes. So that

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>reinforce the FEDS resolve of a hawkish pivots armicron or not.

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The fit is on a path to tapering. And now

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the debate is whether it is three rate hikes next

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>year or four or more and the speed of balance

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is run off. You know. The thing is, it's just

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>at this point, even if we get what three or

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>four rate increases, it speaks to a growing economy. It

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>speaks to earnings growth. Gina Martin Adams reminding us of

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg intelligence team that they're looking at s and

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth. Uh, this year, that's significant. You know, we

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>might get some recalibration of multiples out of that because

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the run up that we've already seen, but nonetheless

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's still growth. How do you see this maybe recalibration

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in the equity trade playing out this year. How do

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you make the bets at this point or do you

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>wait a little bit? Well, overall, I think we riskonssts

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>are still resilient as liquid liquidity conditions remain easy and

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>economic growth. As your point, it is also a tailor

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>um and when starting from such low rates, higher interest

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>rates are not successfully negative for equities, and equities could

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>prove to be an inflation hedge to an extent. But

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of course higher interest rates doom pressure profitability and evaluation

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple for it to use the spending power. So I

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>am expecting a more bumpier right in twenty twenty two

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and lower returns well for the last two years lights

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>out performance that may not necessarily be alarming, right exactly

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>like perspective everybody, it's interesting, there's a great chart. I'm

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about it. I didn't want to give

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it away, but I think I'm gonna do it with

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>our team. I've been dying to talk about it all day. Um,

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we've got it right through on the markets and it.

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It cites some h new some research from Strategious Securities,

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and they say, in the past three decades, there have

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>been four distinct periods of rate high cycles by the

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>FED on average technology, which has been under pressure as

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we know in this first week too, UM is among

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the best performing sectors during those FED rate hikes cycles. So,

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, what are your thoughts about that? And that's

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>according to their research. Yeah, well, if you think about Carl,

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>what what has really been driving technology sveteran the product

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>market in the last few years, It's really been those

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>very big large cap growth names still you know, you

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>call them fang or fan, Meg, whatever it is. But

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>UM most of these companies that they tend to have UM,

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, better visibility in their in their earning. They

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't have quite as much leverage. So even that

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates, we talk about how it can impact

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>higher duration stock. Those are stocks that either have higher

0:33:55.320 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>leverage or they have earnings coming way into the future.

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So those are not these lune cap growth names. So okay,

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 1>so raises the question and what we should be keep

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>an eye on right now and and and here's here's

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.240
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting. I'm playing around on the Bloomberg, and I'm

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at Arcum, Cathy Woods, arc Investment Management, right, the

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Ark Innovation ETF, a lot of the high flying stocks,

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and I like to check that out when we do

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>see some broad selling off in the NASDAC, because the

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>companies that she has in that are are those ones

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that she calls disruptive technology stocks. This was down more

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>than five earlier in the day, it's it's now flat

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>on the day today. What gives? Yeah, that's right. So,

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>as I said, there is a lot of buying coming

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:48.399
<v Speaker 1>in from all the you know, technical pressures. A lot

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of stocks are hitting those fifty day or two hundred

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>day moving averages and getting some buying, uh come support

0:34:55.239 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>coming in at those levels. So not surprising because those

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 1>higher flying stocks, of course, they bought a lot of

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the brunt in the early days, so not surprising for

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>them to find a at least momentary bottom. So where

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>would you be allocating new money at this point? Oh? Well,

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I I would be more diversified at this point because,

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of course it's not a surprise that we are expecting

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates. So in a higher interest rate environment, financials,

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:34.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly banks, tend to do better. So that is certainly

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>an area that I do find attractive. But also of

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the large tap tech names that have declined with the

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 1>rest of the market and those higher flying names, I

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.720
<v Speaker 1>think they can get quite attractive as well. M okay,

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So help us think about where else our audience should

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about in terms of where they're putting their

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>money and asset allocation. For me too, Um, we haven't

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>talked much about fixed income, and I'm wondering if you

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>see a place for that in a portfolio. Still. Yeah,

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>so fixed income it's even trickier, you know, with expectations

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of rates rising. Certainly don't want to be in those

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.760
<v Speaker 1>very high duration uh fixed incomes. So I would still

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 1>keep it to keep it mostly shorter duration at this point.

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 1>M So short. I'm sorry you said you should have

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>exposure to shorter duration. That's right, Yeah, you know, what's

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the what's the surprise that you think my catch

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>investors off guard, especially when it comes to fixed income

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and we've already seen a big move up in yields

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>at this point, it's safe to say that we've been

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 1>recalibrating in terms of the expectations about FED policy. Could

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>are you anticipating that the FED is a lot more

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>aggressive than everybody is anticipating. That is quite likely. Uh,

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, the FED start to get aggressive, and especially

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>if it starts to become clearer that the Feds behind

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the cove, well and we start to get more than

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>start to see indications that the FED might actually hid

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>more than four times, I might let the banda sheet

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>run off much quicker and start much quicker on balance

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>sheet run off. All right, We're gonna leave it on

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that note. Um, and thank you so much, really appreciated.

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 1>A new Gagard Global Investment Strategies, a Commonwealth Financial Network

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Waltham, Massachusetts. Thanks for listening to

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. And you can also listen to our

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News