WEBVTT - Where to Go If You Need a CEO

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>General Electric. GE made headlines back in twenty twenty two

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>when it decided to close Crotonville, it storied corporate campus

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 2>in New York's Hudson Valley. In its heyday, GE was

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>known for making well almost everything, from trains to microwaves.

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>It also had a reputation for making good managers who

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>took classes in leadership at that Crotonville office park, and

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 2>many of them eventually left GE to run other companies.

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 3>GE for years was the training ground, the original CEO factory.

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Matt Boyle covers work and management for Bloomberg, and he

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>says Crotonville was legendary.

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>It was just sort of the sprawling facility upstate, just

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 3>not far from the city where you would go and

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>it wouldn't just be like a one day leadership seminar

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 3>like a lot of companies would do where you might

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 3>get a guest speaker from Harvard Business.

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>School to a trust fall.

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you would stay there. You would stay there for

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>days and days, and you know, you would of course

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 3>also learn the ins and outs of like some of gees,

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, like their six sigma black belts, you know,

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 3>management techniques, then you would hear from management professor.

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 2>If you're a fan of the sitcom Thirty Rock, all

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 2>of this may sound familiar. One of the main characters,

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Jack Doneghie, the brassy network boss played by Alec Baldwin,

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>had climbed to the top of GE's corporate ladder. I'm

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 2>giving the keynote address of the company's six Sigma Retreat

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>to Move Forward in Croton On Hudson.

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Oh, is that like a corporate retreat?

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 2>Doneghie is so nervous about that speech. He makes Liz Lemon,

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Tina Fey's character, go with him.

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Lemon.

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>The Retreat to Move Forward is a global meeting of

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>GE's best and brightest.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Careers are made there.

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 2>It's no wonder Jack Doneghie was anxious. GE's training center

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>was where the company put managers through their paces.

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Your weaknesses would be identified, they would be worked on,

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, really hammering home if your weakness was in

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 3>financial statements or on the finance side, if your weakness

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 3>was on marketing, they would work on those and they

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>would just churn through hundreds of people.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 2>That rigorous training made those GE managers attractive to other

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 2>companies when they were looking for new leadership and by

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 2>virtue of how big GE was and how much it did,

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 2>those trainees had broad experience.

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 3>They were conglomerates, so you could work in you know,

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 3>jet engines, you could work in GE Capital, you could

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 3>work making refrigerators, and if you were the head of

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 3>that business unit, you're basically the CEO of a fortune

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 3>one thousand company that did a lot for their global

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 3>stature to be Like, if you learn how to be

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 3>a CEO at GE, you can run anything.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>So Matt says it was the end of an era

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 2>when GE closed Crotonville and sold it, raising questions about

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 2>where the next generation of executives would come from and

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 2>what values they'd learn along the way.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Just three dozen companies accounted for preponderance of SMP fifteen

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 3>hundred CEOs over the years, so we knew these factories

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 3>always existed. What we didn't know, though, was how they

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 3>were changing. So I said, well, if GE's not the

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 3>pre eminent CEO factory anymore.

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Who is.

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm David Gera and this is the big take from

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News today on the show, the next generation of

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 2>CEO factories, the new pipeline for executive talent where tomorrow's

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 2>CEOs are learning to lead and what that says about

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>global business. For years, GE's management training program was the

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>gold standard, according to Bloomberg's Matt Boyle, and other companies

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 2>sought to emulate GE's approach.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 3>So that model was replicated, not perfectly, but look at

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 3>a Procter and Gamble, where if you were running Pampers

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 3>or something, you know, you were basic the CEO of

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 3>a global company, or even abroad at Semens, the German conglomerate,

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Honeywell IBM. You know, this was replicated. Johnson and Johnson

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>is another one. So you have these sort of other

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 3>CEO factories coming up. But traditionally GE was the be

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 3>all end all. So if you went through Crotonville, whether

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 3>you only spent you know, a few days there or

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 3>a few months, you're really seen as sort of this

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 3>management material.

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 2>I know they sold it off in twenty twenty four,

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 2>so there's a delicious metaphor there. But what led to

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 2>the end of GE's reign as a factory for s

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot.

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Of it, you know, the end of GE as sort

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 3>of the paragon of American business. It's fall from grace

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 3>has been well chronicled by Bloomberg and by other outlets, certainly,

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 3>But once you get broken up, once the bloom is

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 3>off the rows in terms of the CEOs you are

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 3>producing and sending out into the world, not exactly distinguishing themselves.

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 3>As you've saw some of the people, especially more recently

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 3>the GE alums who have gone to run Boeing to

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 3>the ground basically yeah, barb no daily at home depot,

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 3>some of them not really setting the world on fire,

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>and so it sort of just ceased to be the

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 3>factory that it was still churning out very talented business executives,

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 3>of course, but once you got past that period in

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 3>the nineties and the aughts where it was, you know,

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 3>in a pedestal. But I think GE, since they were

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 3>so high up, had the furthest to fall.

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 2>And as that happened, as GE struggled to find its

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 2>footing and broke up, we saw big tech continue to rise.

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 2>But replicating the kind of leadership that sets those companies

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 2>apart isn't easy. We had Mark Kerman on the show,

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 2>our colleague at Bloombergoo covers Apple, and he was talking

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 2>about the uniqueness of that company that they've tried to

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 2>bring in outside executives, and it's failed time and time again.

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 2>There's something about Apple's culture that can't be replicated. It's

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>hard to get somebody to come in and recognize what

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 2>it is or how to operate in that world. How

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 2>much of an outlier is it as you see it?

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Are there still major companies today in tech or other

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>sectors that are just kind of by virtue of the

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 2>way they're built or they've evolved, kind of resistant to

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 2>having somebody come in from the outside to run them.

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think what mark set is totally true.

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Another supporting point there is how hard it is to

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.799
<v Speaker 3>come out of those big tech firms and be successful

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 3>as a CEO elsewhere.

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>That was happening a lot now that was a big

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>head scratcher.

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Matt worked with a data research group called Live Data Technologies.

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 3>I said, okay, well, can you just tell us where

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 3>every public company CEO over the past twenty years has

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 3>come from, or where have they ever worked, what's on

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 3>their resume? And so we generated this data set that

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 3>showed over three five year periods, how the factories to speak,

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 3>have risen and fallen. When so, when these rankings came

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 3>in and we're looking down the list of the top

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 3>CEO factories. First thing we said was, Where's Apple, Where's Meta,

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Where's Amazon? Where are all these tech titans that are

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 3>these days the sort of paragons of business whatever they do,

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 3>whether it's their return to office policy or their approach

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 3>to try you know, companies model themselves on big tech

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 3>these days, and so we said, well, where are they?

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 3>And we realize there's a couple of reasons why you

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 3>don't see a lot of the big tech firms outside

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 3>of IBM. One reason is positive to us, is that

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 3>when you leave big tech, you often go into the

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 3>world of venture capital. You want to invest. You want

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 3>to invest in the next Meta or the next Google,

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 3>So that kind of takes them out of their running

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 3>to be a corporate CEO. Another reason is that they're

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 3>often very skilled and being what's called like a product

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>CEO rather than a general management CEO. So their skills

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>are really applicable to launching the next iPhone or launching

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 3>some sort of you know, software as a service type

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 3>of thing. But they're very concerned to tech, and you

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 3>can't just take them out of tech and then send

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 3>them to some other company and be like, okay, now

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 3>go sell refrigerators, so you don't have that GE model

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>that you used to. And the third reason is they're

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 3>just young. They don't have enough of a track record.

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Metta only went public twenty twelve, which is just like

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 3>halfway through the time period we were looking at here.

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 3>So there's just not enough executives that they've hired to

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 3>go off into the wilderness and become CEOs elsewhere. So

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 3>that might change, we might see some more CEOs in

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>corporate America or the corporate world at large who have

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>that big tech pedigree, but for now not as many.

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 2>So there was the underrepresentation of big tech. And another

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 2>trend emerged in the data.

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 3>And it just hit me over the head immediately as

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 3>soon as I saw the chronological breakdown of how the

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 3>professional services firms and the consulting firms were just slowly,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 3>steadily and then all of a sudden, you know, occupying

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 3>nearly the entire top ten. In our top ten, we

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 3>have McKinsey, Accenture, the A Deco Group, Ey, Deloitte, and PwC.

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 3>And so you start to think, well, where's where's IBM,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, where's GE. They're still there, but much further down,

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 3>so they've been knocked from their perch, and I think

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 3>this is the first sort of story that really takes

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 3>a look at here is the case and here's why.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 2>So how did large consulting firms become the new CEO pipeline?

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 2>And how is that changing business?

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 4>That's next pop quiz.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 2>What do Sundar Pichai, Sheryl Sandberg and James Gorman have

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 2>in common? They all used to work at McKenzie. My

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 2>colleague Matt Boyle has been reporting on this trend that

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the new pipeline for executive talent runs from consulting firms

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>to C suites and he's been thinking a lot about

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 2>what's required of a modern day executive. So it's twenty

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty five.

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 1>What are the.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Qualities or assets in a good CEO today? I imagine

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 2>that definition has changed in recent day.

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It really has.

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he speaks to the evolution of the role

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 3>of the CEO. One big thing I came acro is adaptability.

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 3>You have to be able to adapt quickly to an

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 3>ever changing role. Then if you talk about ever changing

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 3>world today is a perfect example in terms of the

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 3>word uncertainty being used what ten million times over the

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 3>past three months on earnings calls and the estimate, yes, exact,

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 3>probably it's low balling it. But you need that ability

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 3>to anticipate. And if you can't anticipate because you don't

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 3>know what, let's say, President Trump's going to do with

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 3>tariffs next week, you have to at least be able

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 3>to adapt quickly. And that's where consultants are pretty strong.

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Their whole job is to go in blind to a company,

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 3>assess it very quickly, and then figure out what to do.

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>So adaptability is one another one is just a sort

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 3>of a facility with digits and data, let's call it,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, a tech savviness. They also have a good

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 3>understanding of corporate cultures because again they have to come

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 3>in fly in parachute, in blind, get to read on

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 3>a corporate culture quickly and sort of suss that, okay,

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 3>what's going to be possible, you know, within the scope

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 3>of of this engagement. And they are usually pretty good

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 3>at selling themselves. These are consultants, you know, that's sort

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 3>of if you're not good at selling yourself and your vision,

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to last very long at McKinsey, a

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Bane or a BCG. And so that is a huge

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 3>part of these days of a CEO's job.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 2>So this new pipeline runs from the accentures and the

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>PWC's and the McKinsey's of the world to these C suites.

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Let me pose to you an age old question, and

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>that is what do consultants actually do?

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.599
<v Speaker 1>Well? What are they so fast? Side? That is the

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>age old question.

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Certainly, what consultants do, I think is a little bit

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 3>different than what a lot of Americans think consultants do.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 3>They might just think of a consultant as you know,

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 3>someone who jets in first class, comes to the company

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 3>and has a quick look around and then delivers, you know,

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 3>a presentation. This is what you should do, you know,

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 3>lay off twenty percent of your people, you know, go

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 3>into China, you know, launch a new product, and then

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 3>they get skidattle, they're gone. While that is one element

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 3>of what some consultants do usually more on this strategy side,

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 3>what I learned in the course of reporting this story

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 3>is that that is not what most consultants are doing today.

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 3>The big difference being that they are often sticking around

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 3>and making sure that you know, whatever they recommend, whether

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 3>it's a new technology, a new way of management, they

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 3>stick and make sure it's actually working. So they're kind

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 3>of they're getting their hands dirty in a way that

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't think a lot of people recognize that consultants

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 3>normally do.

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>We were talking about the kind of training apparatus that

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 2>these old industrial companies built up, if that was a

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 2>corporate campus or just a program, a training program. Do

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 2>you see the same thing playing out at these consulting firms.

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Do They have very rigorous training programs of their own

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 2>with the goal of, yes, building their ranks, but getting

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 2>exactly to the head of HRT accentsure. They spend as

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 2>much on training what they call learning and development, as

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 2>GE used to spend on all of its Crotonville apparats.

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>That said accentre has hundreds of thousands of employees, so

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 2>there is a lot of training that needs to be done.

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 2>But I've talked to other firms as well, and they're

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>just getting a lot more rigorous about creating putting some

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 2>structure behind this, which is a good thing.

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Certainly.

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Now we all laugh and joke about, oh I got

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 3>to sit through with stupid you webinar, or there's some

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 3>course from hr I have to take, But these companies

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 3>really take it super seriously and they know if you're

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 3>actually paying attention in some of this training. And granted

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 3>it shouldn't all just be boring webinars. It should be

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 3>one on one learning with senior leaders, you know, in

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 3>person stuff, stuff that you're not just going to do

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 3>over a zoom call. But the point is, whether it's

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Accenture or the Swiss Staffing firm a deco group, you

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 3>talk to the heads of HR there, you really learn

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 3>that they really have realized, wait a minute, we've got

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 3>to put some more structure and rigor into this training.

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 3>So it's not just something you tick a box and

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 3>do on a random Friday in the summer. It's something

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 3>that you want to actual we spend time on. You know,

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 3>it's going to make you a better employee and then

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 3>a more employable executive hopefully down the line.

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Is the most common path to go from being a

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 2>partner at one of these firms directly to becoming a

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 2>CEO or their other stops along the way to them.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 3>It should never be a direct path actually from partner

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 3>at Accenture right into the C suite. That is kind

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 3>of actually a recipe for disaster. Some of the advisors

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 3>I talked to for this story. Had really said you

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 3>have to allow them to make all the predictable mistakes

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 3>in one or two let's say lower level corporate jobs.

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 3>So usually if you're coming out of consulting and you

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 3>get a corporate job, you should maybe work as an

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 3>operations chief or a strategy chief is a very common one.

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Walmart and other companies have hired being consultants as heads

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 3>of strategy, so then you get the feel for the

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 3>company and the culture and you're really immersed in it

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 3>without having to be the sort of the be all,

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 3>end all decision maker before you're elevated right into the

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 3>CEO position.

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you about times when this has

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 2>worked out well, drawing from the world of consulting, putting

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>folks from there into the c suite, and times when

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 2>it hasn't.

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean a good example. And this is a

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 3>CEO I talked to as a CEO of Ranstad. Now

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 3>this is company not a lot of Americans know about

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 3>staffing company. Staffing company. They do a lot of you know,

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 3>staffing solutions. If you've got a workforce issue, you'll call

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 3>him in to fix it. They also own the job

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 3>site Monster dot com. So some of us might know

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 3>them that way.

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, their CEO is this Dutch guy.

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 3>They're based in the Netherlands, and he had run two

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 3>massive units of Accenture. He'd actually been there so long

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 3>he was there when it used to be called Anderson

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Consulting in.

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>The old days.

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 3>But the point is, having talked to him, he got

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 3>to know just about every industry under the sun, from

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 3>retails to autos to utilities. So he had the industry

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 3>knowledge of just about any industry, which is very helpful

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 3>now that his clients are across industries. But he also

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 3>was very good at deploying experts to fix whatever problems

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 3>issues their clients were having in his years and Axcenture.

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And he's also just like he's a personable guy too.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 3>He's not this robotic consultant who just speaks like he's

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 3>a PowerPoint in human form, which I think goes a

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 3>long way as well. So when he missed out on

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 3>the job of running Accenture, he was on everyone short

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 3>list to get a global CEO job and he took

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the job at Ranstad. So he's a great example sort

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 3>of a consultant made good. Now, how about a couple

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 3>examples when this hasn't worked out. Yes, the recent poster

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 3>child for a consultant who did not turn out well

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 3>in the c suite was John Donahoe at Nike, a

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 3>longtime Bain and Co. Consultant, did very well there. He

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 3>also had some other corporate roles before he was at eBay,

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 3>did extremely well there. So he was following like the

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 3>proper path, you know, a couple of corporate roles in

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 3>c suite seasoning. But then he goes Intoni, which you

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 3>know is a challenging culture, a very challenging culture to

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 3>come into from the outside, and it was a flame out.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 3>Now it wasn't just because he was a consultant that

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 3>it didn't work, but it's sure as heck didn't help

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 3>that he was trying to bring some of his bin

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 3>teachings into a culture and sometimes these corporate cultures will

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 3>just reject it out a hand and say, no, that's

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 3>not how it's done here, this is not you know,

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 3>this is not the Nike way. And you know, financial

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 3>performance COVID on top of it. A lot of things

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 3>contributed to his downfall. But another one is the former

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Starbucks, who's Mackenzie Alum. There you have a

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 3>case of a founder, Howard Schultz, who just never.

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Really seems to go away.

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and maybe you know, he didn't have as much

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 3>of a runway as he needed to do some of

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 3>the things to turn Starbucks around, but there was not

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 3>much patience given to him, and so he was out after.

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Just over a year.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I want to end with a philosophical question, and that is,

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 2>what do we gain or lose by hoving a pipeline

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 2>like this, having this kind of mold of who the

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 2>ideal CEO is? What does it mean that we're kind

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 2>of restricting I don't know, a diversity of opinion or

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 2>perspective on what that job entails or could entail.

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's a really good point, and we

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 3>are probably constraining and constricting ourselves a little bit to

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 3>say that, Okay, well now we don't need to hire

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 3>and the CEO doesn't have to be from ge but

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 3>he now has to be from Accenture. So okay, you're

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 3>not getting someone from this box. You're getting someone from

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 3>a different box. Whereas, especially these days in the world

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 3>of business, we really need to be hiring people who

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 3>are not in a box at all, or at least

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 3>willing to look up outside the box and have a

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 3>peek around. But I think it's the job of corporations, though,

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 3>when they are figuring out who's going to be leading

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 3>us into this wilderness that we're into right now, to

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 3>be hopefully looking across the board at not just the

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 3>people from let's say Central Casting, whether Central Casting is

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 3>ge or now it's Accenture and McKinsey and saying or

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 3>at least filling up the senior management roles with enough

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 3>people who are willing to challenge orthodoxy, have a sense

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 3>of you know, is this really the way we should

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 3>be doing things guys? And I think there's a lot

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 3>to be said for maybe taking a chance at least

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 3>on someone who's in a non traditional type and you know,

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 3>roll the dice there and see what happens.

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 2>This is the Big Take from Bloomberg News.

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Gerra.

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 2>To get more from The Big Take and unlimited access

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 2>to all of Bloomberg dot com, subscribe today at Bloomberg

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash podcast offer. If you like this episode,

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 2>make sure to follow and review The Big Take wherever

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 2>you listen to podcasts. It helps people find the show.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.