Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Obama is back on
Speaker 1: the campaign trail. The Democrats think he's their secret weapon.
Speaker 1: But oh guests, who steps in to neutralize him right away?
Speaker 1: The actual President United States, Donald Trump. We'll talk about
Speaker 1: how this class of the Titans went down today, and
Speaker 1: also Papadopolis has been sentenced. Even bigger joke than we
Speaker 1: thought when you look at the Russia collusion delusion. That
Speaker 1: and more coming up on The buck Sexton Show. This
Speaker 1: is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission
Speaker 1: is to decode what really matters with passionable intelligence. Make
Speaker 1: no mistake American, let me bring you're a great American again.
Speaker 1: The buck Sexton Show begins. No and he said, what
Speaker 1: do you think of President Obama's speech? And I said,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I watched it, but I fell asleep. I
Speaker 1: found he's very good, very good for sleeping. Welcome to
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show, everybody. President Trump responding today after
Speaker 1: we had a a a long dose of obamasm. Everybody,
Speaker 1: remember that, Remember when we used to have to sit there?
Speaker 1: And so I'm gonna set her, I'm gonna rid off
Speaker 1: a promper. I'm gonna talk to you him like this,
Speaker 1: I don't know what what I'm gonna say things. We're gonna
Speaker 1: be a lot of strawman. I'm gonna destroy the strawman.
Speaker 1: But you're to say that I'm brilliant, because if you
Speaker 1: don't say I'm brilliant, the media is gonna attack you.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna say that you're terrible. Oh my gosh.
Speaker 1: Obama speeches one thing I just I don't miss at all.
Speaker 1: There's not one days passed. I'm like, you know what,
Speaker 1: I could really use an Obama's speech. And it was
Speaker 1: a reminder today that Obama was effective at giving speeches
Speaker 1: to liberals that adored Obama. But you know, once you
Speaker 1: once you get a little a little blast of the past,
Speaker 1: you remember what it was like. It was terrible all
Speaker 1: the time, you know, just creating these straw men, never
Speaker 1: really engaging in the other side, all kinds of bad faith,
Speaker 1: saying things that just aren't true, and just such a
Speaker 1: such a condescension, a constant condescension, uh, across party lines.
Speaker 1: And it's just not something we missed. And here's the
Speaker 1: big thing that I took away from today. We're gonna
Speaker 1: buy the way, We're gonna dig into what Obama said
Speaker 1: because he's now supposed to be. I mean, look, the
Speaker 1: folks were in the last leg here before the mid terms.
Speaker 1: The House and the Senate are in play. You know,
Speaker 1: it could go either way with both of them. People
Speaker 1: are saying the House is a done deal for the Democrats,
Speaker 1: although I don't think that's the case. But this is
Speaker 1: important stuff. And they've brought out Obama because they obviously
Speaker 1: think that Obama is their secret weapon. You know, they
Speaker 1: know that maybe having hello, I want you to vote?
Speaker 1: Do you like my pants suit? They realize that that
Speaker 1: may not get it done. That Hillary Clinton may not
Speaker 1: be the best possible option as brand ambassador for the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. But Barack Brocket smooth brock is uh is
Speaker 1: compelling in a certain way, and you know he's he's
Speaker 1: also a winner. You got look, look, let's not let's
Speaker 1: not delude ourselves. You want twice. Hillary is a loser, Okay,
Speaker 1: Barack is a winner. So you know. But but they
Speaker 1: bring him out and they're assuming that he can help
Speaker 1: reconstitute the coalition that voted for him. But they got
Speaker 1: some problems. One is a problem of history and the
Speaker 1: other is a problem that's us. Come along. Let me
Speaker 1: first over the problem of history here. Over eight years,
Speaker 1: Obama was very successful at pushing himself. What he was
Speaker 1: not very successful in doing was promoting the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: and helping the Democrats from whether we're talking about congressional seats.
Speaker 1: Obviously the Senate was lost to the Republicans during his tenure,
Speaker 1: but the real damage was done to the state parties
Speaker 1: where you have Republican state assemblies and Republican governors just
Speaker 1: running the table against Obama for eight years, which is
Speaker 1: pretty astonishing. I mean he by the time Obama last
Speaker 1: left office, across all different elected offices, Democrats were in
Speaker 1: the weakest position they had been and I think in
Speaker 1: a hundred years, which is really saying something. So that's
Speaker 1: the problem of history that Obama has. He has not
Speaker 1: been successful at pushing other candidates. And then he got
Speaker 1: another problem of the present, one that we haven't really
Speaker 1: seen yet until now. Trump versus Obama is something that
Speaker 1: I don't think Democrats really want to play out, even
Speaker 1: in a media sense. Now. What I mean by that is,
Speaker 1: of course the left is going, you know, the Democrats,
Speaker 1: they all know Obama was scandal free, and he was
Speaker 1: so you know, so eloquent and and decent and and
Speaker 1: all that. You know that they come they're completely Obama's
Speaker 1: rewriting his own history. And we'll get into this and
Speaker 1: I'll give you a nice dose of truth as we
Speaker 1: go through it. But Trump won't play by the rules
Speaker 1: that constrained Mitt Romney, and yes, the rules that constrained
Speaker 1: John McCain, which was that you can't really go after Obama.
Speaker 1: You know, you can't make fun of him. Mitt Romney,
Speaker 1: John McKain. They never made fun of Obama. Never, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, make fun of Obama. How could you? And
Speaker 1: you all know that would have been the reaction, right,
Speaker 1: But things have changed now, you weren't a different political climate.
Speaker 1: We have a different president. He will mock Obama and
Speaker 1: I will I will tell you something. One thing about
Speaker 1: Obama that it was very apparent, was that he has
Speaker 1: no self of humor about uh, a sense of humor
Speaker 1: rather about himself. You know, he he very uh pointedly
Speaker 1: once told a bunch of reporters like there that they
Speaker 1: he was very sensitive. They couldn't make any because you know,
Speaker 1: when they do these political cartoons, they would show his
Speaker 1: ears and he was very sensitive about his ears. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: with Trump, they're making fun of you know, they're making
Speaker 1: fun of Trump's his you know, they say he's orange
Speaker 1: and he's fat, and they make fun of his genitalia
Speaker 1: in his hands, and I mean, you know, they completely
Speaker 1: they try to humiliate Trump and it doesn't really work.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter. Obama has never been exposed to that.
Speaker 1: He's never been on a big stage where somebody else
Speaker 1: can actually call him out and make fun of him,
Speaker 1: to ridicule him. And I think that Democrats don't realize
Speaker 1: what they're in for here, the same way that that
Speaker 1: Hillary became crooked Hillary and Trump just had her number
Speaker 1: the whole time and knew exactly where to go with
Speaker 1: Hillary and exactly how to how to position himself against her.
Speaker 1: If they're really gonna use Obama as the rallying cry
Speaker 1: of the Democrats and if he's gonna be the primary
Speaker 1: surrogate out there, which I would also note is I
Speaker 1: think a little uh, you know, it's it's not I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna it's not dishonorable, but it's we We would
Speaker 1: like it if presidents didn't leave office and then still
Speaker 1: act like they're the president, or still act like they're
Speaker 1: the leader of the of the party that you know
Speaker 1: that that's that's there's a message there that's not one
Speaker 1: that we want in this country. Right. We don't want
Speaker 1: a perpetual president. We don't want somebody that's always kind
Speaker 1: of at the head of government, whether they're officially there
Speaker 1: or not. George W. Bush stepped aside that was the
Speaker 1: president that he had. Now you could say that that
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that everybody else has to do it. But
Speaker 1: I think there's a wisdom in that, and clearly Obama
Speaker 1: has thrown that way out the window. But they think
Speaker 1: that Obama, the left thinks that Obama is invincible as
Speaker 1: a political figure. I think you got your first segment
Speaker 1: and your first taste today of what would happen if
Speaker 1: you really had Trump and Obama go head to head.
Speaker 1: And this is one of the reasons why I think
Speaker 1: people are so so so many of us, myself included,
Speaker 1: are so enthusiastic about Trump is because we're sick of it.
Speaker 1: We're sick of the other side, whether it's Obama or
Speaker 1: Hillary or anybody. We're sick of them being able to
Speaker 1: say any throw out any slander they want, throw out
Speaker 1: any uh, you know, any personal attack, you know, in
Speaker 1: any mockery, that they feel like they can get away with,
Speaker 1: which is basically anything. And our guy always sits to look, well,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm a boy scout and I don't really
Speaker 1: want to say anything mean. And you know, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: no more of that. You know, you you you want
Speaker 1: to play rough. We've got somebody, politically speaking, that will
Speaker 1: also play rough. Obama has never been subjected to that.
Speaker 1: Think about who think about who ran against him, folks politically,
Speaker 1: Hillary in the primary and he beat her. Of course,
Speaker 1: you know she they could go after him, but there
Speaker 1: were some limits there. Hillary wasn't. Hillary had some red
Speaker 1: lines when it came to going after Obama and she
Speaker 1: knew she's running looks she was running against the first
Speaker 1: black president if he beat her in the primary. I mean,
Speaker 1: there were sensitivities there that within her own party. She
Speaker 1: I'm not saying she totally respected them, but that she
Speaker 1: had to be aware of them. John McCain, you know,
Speaker 1: has had this whole approach of really the most important
Speaker 1: thing to John McCain was what the New York Times
Speaker 1: editorial board thought of him when all was said and done. Uh,
Speaker 1: in that in that campaign, you know that that was
Speaker 1: how that was what he really cared about and Mitt
Speaker 1: Romney it's just not a rough and tumble guy. So
Speaker 1: who has ever been up there with similar uh, you know,
Speaker 1: with with uh there's the same level of political firepower.
Speaker 1: You know who who's been out there with a megaphone
Speaker 1: to match Obama's. Who will really call him out the answers, folks,
Speaker 1: It's never happened before. And I had assumed that Obama
Speaker 1: would kind of play the elder statesman of the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: that he would, you know, play kingmaker, behind the scenes,
Speaker 1: do media stuff. He's obviously gonna be He's already fabulously wealthy,
Speaker 1: but he's gonna be worth you watch, Obama was gonna
Speaker 1: be worth a billion dollars. I mean he's you know,
Speaker 1: he's probably worth a hundred million right now. He'll be
Speaker 1: worth a billion dollars. And just give it some time
Speaker 1: because people will throw money on him to do any
Speaker 1: everything and anything. Oh, I wouldn't note that, you know,
Speaker 1: he was gonna give a speech in Denmark. I think
Speaker 1: it was that they they we're going to um, you know,
Speaker 1: the Obama speech everything. I think he's gonna have a
Speaker 1: speech in Denmark, and he threatened to pull out of
Speaker 1: the speech, if they made his contract public, I really
Speaker 1: want to see what that speech contract is like and
Speaker 1: how much you know, Obama is getting paid and all
Speaker 1: this other stuff. Anyway, Um, this is this is kind
Speaker 1: of like, folks, you know, do you really want to
Speaker 1: put your prize fighter in the ring with somebody when
Speaker 1: you know, when when you you think that you know,
Speaker 1: Obama's got an undefeated record, and if they put him
Speaker 1: out through the public stage, look, he's never gonna get
Speaker 1: to run a campaign against Trump, and and so we're
Speaker 1: never going to see that. But in the camp, in
Speaker 1: the campaign of public opinion, I don't think this is
Speaker 1: gonna go the way the left things it is. Trump
Speaker 1: is is a is a scrapper, straight up, He's a
Speaker 1: he's a puncher, he's a slugger. And they want to
Speaker 1: keep their undefeated prize fighter Obama. The Democrats should keep
Speaker 1: him out of this, don't you know, Because it's the
Speaker 1: myth of Obama's invincibility is going to go away very
Speaker 1: quickly if he starts tangling publicly with Trump. That's my prediction.
Speaker 1: And I don't think the left, because look, they've missed,
Speaker 1: they've they've underestimated, miss underestimated borrow from a bush. They've
Speaker 1: underestimated Trump at every step of the game, at every
Speaker 1: at every juncture. So we can't put it past them
Speaker 1: and do the same thing here. And that that's my
Speaker 1: that's my sense after rest. Wow, they really they really
Speaker 1: don't understand that. You know, the the Obama era rules
Speaker 1: are gone. Now Trump doesn't have to say Obama is
Speaker 1: the smartest person who've ever lived. Trump doesn't have to
Speaker 1: say that Obama is the most brilliant, elegant, ethical, amazing
Speaker 1: DEMI god do have ever run for America and has
Speaker 1: never been in an American office or run for an
Speaker 1: American office. That he doesn't have to say that he
Speaker 1: doesn't care. It's not playing by those rules. Uh, Obama
Speaker 1: is not ready for that. And now look, I I
Speaker 1: know there's a lot of other stuff that's gonna get
Speaker 1: that's already in the mix for the midterms. And you know,
Speaker 1: who knows, this may be the one and only Obama
Speaker 1: speech we see, although I doubt that. Uh. And if
Speaker 1: I were advising the Democrats, I'd say keep these races
Speaker 1: local and try to fool you know, If I were
Speaker 1: advising Democrats, I'd be like, try to convince as many
Speaker 1: voters as possible that you're not really Democrats and get
Speaker 1: people to vote for you, and then, of course, you know,
Speaker 1: do whatever Nancy Pelosi says, which you don't want. Is
Speaker 1: a reminder of what we went through for eight years.
Speaker 1: You know, you gotta look, there's there's a there's a
Speaker 1: lot here, folks. We're gonna we're gonna go We're gonna
Speaker 1: definitely work through this one together. Eight four four to
Speaker 1: eight to five eight four buck. It's like a it's
Speaker 1: like a tropical storm here in d C. The swamp
Speaker 1: is getting getting clobered with some kind of a storm
Speaker 1: around me. So hopefully we empower in the building stays on.
Speaker 1: But anyway, Uh, it's gonna be good. Folks, got a
Speaker 1: great show today. Stay with me. Two d one thousand
Speaker 1: jobs added last month. It's a big number. Positive sign.
Speaker 1: Christ and Romans are cheap. Business correspondent here with me.
Speaker 1: Look it keeps getting better and better and better. Well,
Speaker 1: this is better than economist thought. It's pretty much in
Speaker 1: line with what we've seen all year. You've got two
Speaker 1: hundred one thousand net new jobs. And when you look
Speaker 1: at the trend, you know they always say the trend
Speaker 1: is your friend. Here, and this shows more than two
Speaker 1: hundred thousand jobs on average for most of the year.
Speaker 1: That means unemployment rate is still stuck there at that
Speaker 1: three point nine percent. That is a generational low. That
Speaker 1: is what many economists consider are full employment. You have
Speaker 1: six million job openings today in America, six million job openings,
Speaker 1: and what you hear from companies is they don't have
Speaker 1: the skilled workers to fill them. So there's sort of
Speaker 1: the disconnect. Disconnect. Yeah, here's the disconnect, folks, is that
Speaker 1: we got the media trying to say that Trump is
Speaker 1: a Kremlin puppet and that he's crazy and should be
Speaker 1: removed from office on mental fitness grounds. Meanwhile, they have
Speaker 1: to run these reports like yeah, it's better than all
Speaker 1: the economist thought, and it's like the best it's been
Speaker 1: in a generation. And the economy is like completely booming,
Speaker 1: and it's weird, like things keep just getting better and
Speaker 1: better in this country. Like I don't understand, Like why,
Speaker 1: oh it begins with the T and ends with the P.
Speaker 1: They don't want to hear it though. They don't want
Speaker 1: to hear it, they don't want to believe it. I mean, like, folks, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's funny that Obama comes out today how to give
Speaker 1: a speech, and of course he he tried to to
Speaker 1: take some he tried to take credit for the current economy.
Speaker 1: So he's been out of office almost two years and
Speaker 1: he's like, yeah, it's because of me, right sure. Um. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: when you when you look at what's happened over the
Speaker 1: last year in particular, uh, and what the tax cuts
Speaker 1: have done, and what how businesses, it's businesses aren't saying,
Speaker 1: you know, we've been feeling good for years and this
Speaker 1: is there saying, Wow, what a relief. Things have gotten
Speaker 1: so much better, almost like something really important changed about
Speaker 1: eighteen months ago or so almost like that. I guess
Speaker 1: more now it's more like I don't know what the
Speaker 1: months are, but you know that's that's I think something
Speaker 1: that we all need to remember, your folks. Obama comes out,
Speaker 1: we were being told you can go back and see
Speaker 1: in the end of the Obama administration, they were editorials
Speaker 1: about how America should just expect low, slow, oh weak
Speaker 1: economic growth for the foreseeable future. Obama's economy was lower
Speaker 1: your expectations. That was the message. Lower your expectations, and
Speaker 1: you're not paying your fair share and you're not doing
Speaker 1: enough for the poor, and you have, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: way too much that's been given to you by virtue
Speaker 1: of the fact that you're working, and there are a
Speaker 1: lot of people that don't work and they need more stuff.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just it was bad, bad, bad, and
Speaker 1: now we're getting a little reminder of that. Folks. Anybody here,
Speaker 1: anybody listening to this show right now, I think that
Speaker 1: they would be better off if Obonna was running the economy.
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe there're a couple of Democrats right now
Speaker 1: listening to think that. I know, we have some some
Speaker 1: liberals who listened to the show. Probably even have some
Speaker 1: hardcore leftis who listen to this show. They're like, I
Speaker 1: don't understand. How does this guy know so much? But
Speaker 1: the Trump economy is irrefutable right now, and going into
Speaker 1: a midterm election where that is a that is a
Speaker 1: verifiable fact that the economy is in an irrefutably good,
Speaker 1: strong and growing position, should mean that the American people
Speaker 1: reward the party in power for doing such a good
Speaker 1: job on all aspects of government. To us that matter,
Speaker 1: things are actually going quite well. Um, but Obama doesn't
Speaker 1: think so. I want to I want to take a
Speaker 1: little bit of a of a tour through Obama's speech
Speaker 1: that I just because of the rewriting of history that
Speaker 1: went on there. And then we'll talk about Popadapolis he
Speaker 1: got sentenced today, and the kind of uh, last bit
Speaker 1: of the Kavanaugh hearing good news is I think Kavanaugh
Speaker 1: is getting through, folks, the done deal at this point,
Speaker 1: all that's coming up. Stay with me. He's holding the
Speaker 1: line for America. Buck Sexton his back. It should not
Speaker 1: be democratic or republican. It should not be a partisan
Speaker 1: issue to say that we do not pressure the Attorney
Speaker 1: General or the FBI to use the criminal justice system
Speaker 1: as a cudgel to punish our political opponents, or to
Speaker 1: explicitly call on the attorney general to protect members of
Speaker 1: our own party from persecution, prosecution because an election happens
Speaker 1: to be coming up. I'm not making that up. That's
Speaker 1: not hypothetical. It shouldn't be democratic or republican to say
Speaker 1: that we don't threaten the freedom of the press because
Speaker 1: they say things are published stories we don't like. Oh boy,
Speaker 1: there's so much here, folks. Obama's back. I don't think
Speaker 1: it's going to have the intended effect. I don't think
Speaker 1: Democrats really know what what this is gonna mean for
Speaker 1: them if they keep going in this direction. We're in
Speaker 1: a different world now, we're in a post Obama political environment.
Speaker 1: The rules have changed a few things. First off, when
Speaker 1: he said instead of prosecution, persecution of people in Trump's party,
Speaker 1: if there is such a thing as a Freudian slip,
Speaker 1: that certainly felt like one, because they are being persecuted.
Speaker 1: The Russia collusion investigation is persecution. Uh. And I will
Speaker 1: talk to you about the Papadoppolis sentencing that that will
Speaker 1: be probably the next hour, but we'll get to that.
Speaker 1: All these Liberalsh is sentence, Susan isn't severe enough. That's right,
Speaker 1: because anybody who's near Trump should just have their life ruined.
Speaker 1: That's there. That's the way that we're supposed to deal
Speaker 1: with this. And any anybody who's ever been in you know,
Speaker 1: been in the same room as Trump should there should
Speaker 1: be no sympathy, no mercy, no decency extended to them.
Speaker 1: That's the way the Democrats wanted. But this this idea
Speaker 1: that that Trump is interfering, you know, obstructing in d
Speaker 1: O J in ways that Obama never would. That's interesting
Speaker 1: because I seem to remember I seem to recall that
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton was under investigation by Lauretta Lynch, attorney generally
Speaker 1: United States the time worked for Barack Obama, and Barack
Speaker 1: Obama decided. Barack Obama decided that he would share his
Speaker 1: thoughts rather freely on the issue of Hillary's emails. Remember,
Speaker 1: Hillary shared Special Access program data on an unclassified server.
Speaker 1: This is some of the most sensitive stuff the US
Speaker 1: government has, folks. She just had her on our computer
Speaker 1: just you know whoop. See, she had over a hundred
Speaker 1: classified emails on her system. She did this because she
Speaker 1: was trying to evade the require firorenments under regulation to
Speaker 1: uh maintain her emails for public disclosure. She was trying
Speaker 1: to maintain control of a record. And I've always upheld
Speaker 1: that it's because she was worried that, you know, there'd
Speaker 1: be one. All it takes is one person to slip
Speaker 1: up and say, oh, you know, we've got that big
Speaker 1: Clinton Foundation donor you gotta take a meeting with her
Speaker 1: at the State Department. Now, all it takes is one
Speaker 1: email like that and the whole game would be up.
Speaker 1: So she wanted to control all the emails because she
Speaker 1: knows that if people actually knew what she was doing
Speaker 1: still running the Clinton Foundation or involved with the Clinton
Speaker 1: Foundation while she's Secretary of State, it would be obvious
Speaker 1: that it's a giant slush fund, and she was selling
Speaker 1: access and selling her office. That's why she had the
Speaker 1: private email server, folks. That is why. But Obama was
Speaker 1: very willing a numerous occasions to weigh it on this.
Speaker 1: Here's what he had to say about Hillary's emails. Play it.
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton was an outstanding Secretary of State. She would
Speaker 1: never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy. And
Speaker 1: what I also know, because I handle a lot of
Speaker 1: classified information, is that there are there's classified, and then
Speaker 1: there's classified. I continue to believe that she has not
Speaker 1: jeopardized America's national security. Now, what I've also said is
Speaker 1: that and she's acknowledged that there's there's a carelessness in
Speaker 1: terms of managing emails that she has owned and she recognizes.
Speaker 1: But I but I also think it is important to
Speaker 1: keep this in perspective, folks. That's essentially the the template
Speaker 1: of what Comey ended up saying. Obama gave marching orders
Speaker 1: to the Department of Justice and the FBI on TV
Speaker 1: about Hillary's emails. Didn't didn't didn't threaten national security, classified
Speaker 1: class fied, you know, but you know there was a
Speaker 1: bit of carelessness, extremely careless. That's what Comey said. That's
Speaker 1: exactly what Obama said. Oh you mean that this is
Speaker 1: almost like the fix was in. Yeah, it was. And
Speaker 1: this all this other notion by the way of classified
Speaker 1: classified Special Access Program data s a P is very classified.
Speaker 1: And she had that on her emails. So she's just
Speaker 1: this is a fantasy. And and liberals keep saying this,
Speaker 1: keep saying, oh, look at what Trump is doing the
Speaker 1: d o J too. No, I'm sorry, We're not gonna
Speaker 1: play this game anymore where they act like Obama was
Speaker 1: beyond reproach with came the d o J. Far from it.
Speaker 1: And on press freedom, I'm about to have a buck
Speaker 1: slap myself moment here. You've got to be kidding me.
Speaker 1: On press freedom, Obama was the worst president since FDR probably.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's the worst president we've seen in a
Speaker 1: hundred years. Here's what he said about his about about
Speaker 1: him versus Trump in terms of the press. And here's
Speaker 1: what he said about Fox News. Play it, John, I
Speaker 1: complained plenty about Fox News, but you never heard me
Speaker 1: trying to shut him down or call them enemies of
Speaker 1: the people. It shouldn't be democratic or republican to say
Speaker 1: we don't target certain groups of people based on what
Speaker 1: they look like or how they pray. We are Americans. Okay. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he didn't say shut them down per se, but he
Speaker 1: did take their phone records. He did say that Fox
Speaker 1: News was not a real news organization. He did claim
Speaker 1: that Rush Limbaugh and others were dividing the country and
Speaker 1: were dangerous to the country or a harmful to the
Speaker 1: country at least he did. I mean, you know, folks,
Speaker 1: when when you start to drill down to this, you see,
Speaker 1: you know, Obama had his Attorney general try to threaten
Speaker 1: reporters to give up their sources. Listed a Fox News reporter.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, not a big shock there, listed a Fox
Speaker 1: News reporter as an unindicted co conspirator in a in
Speaker 1: an Espionage Act indictment and use the Espionage Act more
Speaker 1: than every presidency before him combined. And the press were
Speaker 1: a bunch of whimps on it. Oh, I know. They
Speaker 1: wrote a couple of editorials. Oh, we're very we're very
Speaker 1: troubled by this, and this raises concerning concerning questions about, well,
Speaker 1: what will the future administration do now that this precedent
Speaker 1: has been set by Obama? A future administration, what's the
Speaker 1: Obama administration doing? The press debased themselves. The press gave
Speaker 1: Obama one long, eight year backrupt. It was an embarrassment.
Speaker 1: That's why we don't need to sit around and hear
Speaker 1: from now. But oh but you know, the press and
Speaker 1: we're the guardians, and we're the ones that are speaking
Speaker 1: truth to power. Everything and speak truth to power. They
Speaker 1: have power a foot massage for eight years, that's what
Speaker 1: they did. Now they want to be you know, oh yeah,
Speaker 1: we're we're all about the guardians of the republic. We're
Speaker 1: all about just the facts and making sure that you know,
Speaker 1: there's accountability in government. It's just a joke, folks, it
Speaker 1: really is. But I mean Obama and Pres Obama has
Speaker 1: zero grounds to speak about what Trump says about the press,
Speaker 1: in my opinion, zero ground because he took actions against
Speaker 1: the press. Obama just says that, you know, Acosta is
Speaker 1: a clown, and he's right. I'm sorry. Trump says the
Speaker 1: cost is a clown, not Obama. Trump says a Cost
Speaker 1: as a clown, and he's right. That's it. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, he says it's CNN is fake. There's a
Speaker 1: lot of fake news. We're SNN. It happens a lot.
Speaker 1: It's a problem. They've got a real problem over there.
Speaker 1: Trump calls it out, and then he also just get
Speaker 1: into some other stuff that Obama says. Do you say
Speaker 1: to yourself, does he think this is smart? Because what
Speaker 1: he's saying is not smart? Play sixteen. We know the
Speaker 1: climate change isn't just coming, it is here. So Democrats
Speaker 1: aren't just running on good old ideas like increasing gas
Speaker 1: mileage in our cars, which I did and which Republicans
Speaker 1: are trying to reverse, but on good new ideas like
Speaker 1: putting a price on carbon pollution. We know that in
Speaker 1: a smaller, more connected world, we can't just put technology
Speaker 1: back in the box. We can't just put walls up
Speaker 1: all around America. Walls don't keep about threats like terrorism
Speaker 1: or disease. Wrong, Walls do keep out threats like terrorism
Speaker 1: and disease. Ever been to a quarantine area, there are
Speaker 1: walls prevent the spread of disease. I mean, walls don't
Speaker 1: keep out terrorists. Speak to the Israelis about that. Pretty sure.
Speaker 1: It keeps out a lot of terrorists. But you know,
Speaker 1: Obama is so used to everyone just saying everything he
Speaker 1: says it's brilliant. Everything he says is great that I
Speaker 1: do think that he's really just he's there's really a disconnect.
Speaker 1: And when he's not the you know, he's not the
Speaker 1: president anymore. He's just another guy with an opinion, and
Speaker 1: his opinions are not very well informed. His opinions are
Speaker 1: not particularly astute. He also talked about I mean, you
Speaker 1: know what, I want to get into something because they're
Speaker 1: One of the things that really frustrated me is that
Speaker 1: everything that Republicans said about Obama's policies and their trajectory,
Speaker 1: especially on healthcare, was trip and we have confirmation of
Speaker 1: that now and we were right. And I do want
Speaker 1: to take a moment for us too, because I remember
Speaker 1: I was part of the battles back in twelve over
Speaker 1: Obamacare and in the midterms, and and there were so
Speaker 1: much stuff that was said by the same media, by
Speaker 1: the way that now is pretending that they want to be,
Speaker 1: you know, they want to be really big serious journalists.
Speaker 1: So much stuff was said that was obviously false, but
Speaker 1: they didn't care. I want to address that um and
Speaker 1: a bit more of this we come back. But I
Speaker 1: mean Obama really reminding us all why we voted for Trump.
Speaker 1: That's what today was. Wow, great reminder. Thank you, former
Speaker 1: President Obama. Why we have the president we do now.
Speaker 1: A lot of it is because the guy who has
Speaker 1: given a speech today. We'll be right back. They're not
Speaker 1: doing us a service by actively promoting the crazy stuff
Speaker 1: that's coming out of this White House and then saying
Speaker 1: don't worry, we're preventing the other ten. That's not how
Speaker 1: things are supposed to work. This is not normal. So
Speaker 1: these are extraordinary times, and they're dangerous times. But here's
Speaker 1: the good news. In two months, we have the chance,
Speaker 1: not the certainty, but the chance to restore some semblance
Speaker 1: of sanity to our politics. What's the insanity? Because I
Speaker 1: think the insanity is a Russia collusion investigation that has
Speaker 1: been a politicized which hunt from the beginning. I think
Speaker 1: it is the FBI meeting with and using opposition research
Speaker 1: and using journalists as cutouts to construe and and fabricate
Speaker 1: a narrative to make down a political candidate during a
Speaker 1: presidential campaign in this country. I think that's insane. So
Speaker 1: how are they going to restore sanity by putting those
Speaker 1: the people that that have been pushing for that and
Speaker 1: advocating that back into power. I need I need some
Speaker 1: help with that. I need someone to explain that one
Speaker 1: to me. Although don't ever say explain it to me
Speaker 1: when you're talking about Obama, because he loves to explain it,
Speaker 1: to tell you everything. You know so much, you're so smart,
Speaker 1: so much smarter than new you don't know what anything
Speaker 1: a man. And then he also he wants to he
Speaker 1: wants to mobilize the never trumpers. Of course not a surprise,
Speaker 1: but he wants to mobilize never trumpers play maintaining some
Speaker 1: phony version of civility that seems to me, by the way,
Speaker 1: the definition of savility offered by too many congressional Republicans
Speaker 1: right now. We will be polite so long as we
Speaker 1: get a percent of what we want, and you don't
Speaker 1: call us out on the very says that were sticking
Speaker 1: a people. And we'll click our tongues and issue vague
Speaker 1: statements of disappointment when the president does something outrageous, but
Speaker 1: we won't really actually do anything about it. That's not civility,
Speaker 1: that's addicating your responsibilities. But again, I digress man. That
Speaker 1: sounds I say that sometimes I gotta stop saying again,
Speaker 1: I digress. Uh, forget about civil Let's talk about something else.
Speaker 1: Servile as in the way the Democrats were for all
Speaker 1: of Obama's time in office. They did whatever he wanted
Speaker 1: them to do. They were on board with Obama all
Speaker 1: the time, every time. Obama never had to deal with
Speaker 1: any opposition from his own party. This is one of
Speaker 1: these things I tell you, folks, we have lessons to
Speaker 1: learn from the other side. One of the lessons Democrats
Speaker 1: stick together all the time, all the way we have
Speaker 1: to deal with the well. You know, I think I
Speaker 1: was if if Rubio one, I would have been Press secretary.
Speaker 1: So you know, I don't like Trump. A lot of babies,
Speaker 1: a lot of babies in the Republican Party who are
Speaker 1: unwilling to see the greater good play the long game
Speaker 1: and play the long term. You know, we don't need
Speaker 1: to be constantly reminded by by Republican strategists who would
Speaker 1: have been in the White House if a different Republican
Speaker 1: had one that, you know, sometimes Trump uses vulgar language,
Speaker 1: or that sometimes Trump, you know, says something that we
Speaker 1: don't think is great. Whatever then again, Trump is saying
Speaker 1: things that he actually thinks. Obama was saying what he
Speaker 1: thought he should say under the circumstances to benefit whatever
Speaker 1: he was trying to do. That's a different thing. Obama
Speaker 1: wasn't always telling you what he thinks. Obama was telling you.
Speaker 1: Obama was saying things so that people would go, wow,
Speaker 1: Obama is so brilliant and so wonderful, and also so
Speaker 1: that he could push through an agenda. But he wasn't
Speaker 1: being honest about what that agenda was of care for
Speaker 1: all folks. He's calling that a good idea. Now, I
Speaker 1: remember back in when to say that Obama wanted medicare
Speaker 1: for all was a slander. It was terrible. How could
Speaker 1: you he doesn't want that. It's a free market system.
Speaker 1: He's borrowing from Mitt Romney, and all the Republicans like
Speaker 1: me were saying, no, no, no, it's a trojan horse. Folks.
Speaker 1: They're they're gonna this is the camel's nose in the tent.
Speaker 1: They they want to get healthcare, that single payer and
Speaker 1: how you know that's terrible, that's a law, that's not fair.
Speaker 1: Obama would never do that. You're calling him a socialist. Now,
Speaker 1: Obama was like, Yeah, single payer is a good idea,
Speaker 1: we should do that. Because Obama always thought single payer
Speaker 1: was a good idea. It was always the plan. Obamacare
Speaker 1: was set up to fail, but it was set up
Speaker 1: to create a structure that could be built a top
Speaker 1: of with single payer. And that's what he's now openly saying.
Speaker 1: Some of us saw this coming. Some of us are
Speaker 1: not surprised at all by this is in fact what
Speaker 1: we predicted. Myself included. But I liked Obama's out there
Speaker 1: reminding us of why we voted for Trump. So that's
Speaker 1: good news. Let's speak about what Trump as I say,
Speaker 1: that's coming up next. I know you've you've stuck through
Speaker 1: a lot of Obama this hour. I promise you we've
Speaker 1: got We've got some Trump stuff. Papadopoulos got sentenced, that
Speaker 1: much more coming up. If you ever found yourself wincing
Speaker 1: at the weak sauce taste of coffee from one of
Speaker 1: those left leaning COMI corporate brands, you probably thought, I
Speaker 1: wish they spent less time on meaningless bias training, bathroom
Speaker 1: policy reform, and other things that defied common sense, and
Speaker 1: more time on their coffee. Folks, That's why you need
Speaker 1: black Rifle coffee. Every coffee drinker listening to this show
Speaker 1: needs to drink black Rifle. It is my coffee, a choice.
Speaker 1: I get it delivered every month. I've got it at
Speaker 1: the office, I've got it at home. I'm making black
Speaker 1: Rifle converts. I've got a girl in my office. He goes,
Speaker 1: I want the coffee with the guns on it. I'm like,
Speaker 1: you don't even like guns, but you love this coffee.
Speaker 1: She goes, Yes, it's the best. All right. Check it
Speaker 1: out for yourself. Visit Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash
Speaker 1: buck received fifteen percent off. Your were great deal, folks.
Speaker 1: Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash Buck for fifteen percent
Speaker 1: off again one more time. Black Rifle Coffee dot Com
Speaker 1: slash Buck. Order some for yourself and you know what,
Speaker 1: set up to have it delivered every month. Joined the
Speaker 1: coffee Club. Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck. Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Mission Decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake American, You're a great American Again. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts, No, I'll
Speaker 1: be the only president in his They'll say what a
Speaker 1: Jobby's done by the way where it featured him. Today's
Speaker 1: Democrat Party is held hostage by haters, absolute haters, left
Speaker 1: wing haters, angry mobs, deep state radicals, and their fake
Speaker 1: news allies. Those people are the best. They're the best allies.
Speaker 1: The last time Democrats weren't power, they cut Medicare by
Speaker 1: more than seven hundred billion dollars to pay for the
Speaker 1: scandalous Obamacare. Now Democrats want to steal trillions of dollars
Speaker 1: from medicare, going to ruin your medicare watch. They want
Speaker 1: to turn America into Venezuela. I don't think so. Democrats
Speaker 1: would destroy Medicare with Medicare for all. You heard that
Speaker 1: Medicare for all until they run out of money, which
Speaker 1: will be like in the third day, and then it
Speaker 1: will be Medicare for none. Nobody does messaging the way
Speaker 1: Trump does messaging. That much is for sure. Welcome back
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show. I gotta say you know that
Speaker 1: the President really I felt like he was back into
Speaker 1: his really back into his usual sweet spot last night.
Speaker 1: He's just his ability to do live performances incredible. And
Speaker 1: I just mean that as somebody who's in the media business.
Speaker 1: He is amazing. He is a is a true phenomenon
Speaker 1: and and the fact that he's out there making this
Speaker 1: case the American people, I think gives us some hope
Speaker 1: that we may keep the keep the house. And you
Speaker 1: know that doesn't solve all of our problems, folks. I'm
Speaker 1: still I've got frustrations. You know, the wall is not
Speaker 1: being built, and you know, I don't. Trump is like
Speaker 1: he's trying to sell us on that the wall will
Speaker 1: be built, and you know, you gotta give him time,
Speaker 1: right He's you know, Trump has there's a there's a
Speaker 1: bit of a showman in him and of course a
Speaker 1: bit a lot of a salesman and actually a lot
Speaker 1: of both a lot of showman and a lot of salesmen.
Speaker 1: So we understand that when he says, you know, the
Speaker 1: walls being built, well, not really, but kind of he
Speaker 1: I do think he wants to get construction on it started, though,
Speaker 1: and I think that that would be a very good
Speaker 1: thing for the country. Um, but the notion the Democrats
Speaker 1: destroying the economy, people should be told this, I mean,
Speaker 1: this should be something that we're hearing about, because it's true.
Speaker 1: If we allow Democrats back in charge of even just
Speaker 1: the House it's not just that their ideas are bad.
Speaker 1: What they're gonna do is stop the good ideas. They
Speaker 1: don't care that the economy is doing so well. In fact,
Speaker 1: it bothers them, it angers them. They don't want the
Speaker 1: continuation of what's working. They want to go back to
Speaker 1: where they get to make the decisions they're in charge.
Speaker 1: That people will suffer, that more people will struggle to
Speaker 1: pay their bills, that the there will be more people
Speaker 1: looking for work, and that doesn't matter to them because
Speaker 1: that's all a fine price to pay to having the
Speaker 1: right kind of people in charge. In their opinions, that's
Speaker 1: the progressive mentality. The results don't matter. They are dedicated
Speaker 1: to the idea that they're the people who should be
Speaker 1: in charge. That's that's a fundamental characteristic of a progressive.
Speaker 1: They think that they're the ones and the only ones,
Speaker 1: and they do all this moral posturing. But how much
Speaker 1: they care about the poor, how much they care about minorities,
Speaker 1: all this stuff is just self justifying for them as
Speaker 1: to why they should be the ones in power. And then,
Speaker 1: of course Trump did turn his ire to the media,
Speaker 1: which I always always enjoy Play seven and eight. John,
Speaker 1: You know when I won the election. The New York
Speaker 1: Times every all their subscribers were leaving. And when I'm
Speaker 1: ultimately no longer president, and hopefully about six and a
Speaker 1: half years from them, um, the New York Times will
Speaker 1: go out of business. All of them will be out
Speaker 1: of business. CNN, We'll be out of business. They're almost
Speaker 1: out of business now if you look at their radars,
Speaker 1: the club side of business. But then we had a bust.
Speaker 1: But the New York Times, you remember, it's very famous.
Speaker 1: Nobody's ever seen it before, maybe never done before. They
Speaker 1: apologized for their bad coverage of me. They apologized to
Speaker 1: their subscribers because after I won, everyone said, what the
Speaker 1: hell happened? What happened? We're reading this piece of garbage
Speaker 1: and the guy that they kill every day he won.
Speaker 1: So they wrote, does anybody remember there was a very
Speaker 1: big story. They wrote an apology to their subscribers to
Speaker 1: stop the flow of people leaving and giving up the
Speaker 1: subscription to the New York Times. New York Times still
Speaker 1: feeling pretty haughty about its decision to publicize that anonymous
Speaker 1: editorial from the hashtag resistance inside in the administration. You know,
Speaker 1: one of the reasons I think, folks that they've moved
Speaker 1: to this notion of the Amendment is now now we
Speaker 1: know that the deep state is real, which is going
Speaker 1: to embolden all of us. And I shouldn't say we know,
Speaker 1: we've always known. Now it's confirmed. Now we have we
Speaker 1: have clear, smoking gun evidence of a deep state by
Speaker 1: the deep State's own hand, no less, and the media
Speaker 1: collusion with that deep state to undermine the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: So there is no future in which those say the
Speaker 1: Deep States are stupid conspiracy. No, that's why. Now the
Speaker 1: Amendment is going to be what gets them all excited.
Speaker 1: Now it's just give us political power so we can
Speaker 1: remove Trump. The narrative keeps shifting, and I just wish
Speaker 1: that the Republicans would come out and do a better
Speaker 1: job of explaining to the American people. Look at how
Speaker 1: crazy the left is. They're calling Trump insane, They're insane.
Speaker 1: All these different theories of why he's not really president,
Speaker 1: why he shouldn't be the president, this is just crazy talk.
Speaker 1: I have to say. Rand Paul has an interesting, uh
Speaker 1: interesting idea. He says they should use lie detector tests
Speaker 1: to find the op ED writer or play twelve. I
Speaker 1: think if you have a security clearance, in the White House. Um,
Speaker 1: I think would be acceptable to use a lot of
Speaker 1: detector tests and ask people whether or not they're talking
Speaker 1: to the media against the policy of the White House.
Speaker 1: You've got a security clearance, you gotta subject yourself to
Speaker 1: a lot of detector test. Now, legally you don't meaning
Speaker 1: that you could say I'm not taking that test, but
Speaker 1: guess what then you lose your clearance, And guess what
Speaker 1: then people also think, huh, won't take a lot of
Speaker 1: detector tests. Huh, I you know that that would be
Speaker 1: Here's what I would say about it. If you polygraphed,
Speaker 1: I mean that, Look, there'd be a certain degree of
Speaker 1: people would get upset about this, right, there's no question
Speaker 1: people in the White House would get upset abou this.
Speaker 1: But if you polygraph people, which some process I've been through.
Speaker 1: I've been polygraphed by the Federal Gardment, I can tell
Speaker 1: you all about it. It is not fun. It is
Speaker 1: not an enjoyable experience. But if you polygraph all the
Speaker 1: top people who I believe, I mean they have to
Speaker 1: have high level clearances, well, actually no, Jared had an
Speaker 1: interim clearance. I don't know. I'd have to think about.
Speaker 1: But at least you you'd be able to knock off
Speaker 1: a number of them right away, because anybody who wrote
Speaker 1: this editorial, trust me, they're not gonna want to take
Speaker 1: a polly on it because it's it would be a
Speaker 1: difficult thing, I think, to beat the polygraph on and
Speaker 1: they'd be sweating it out really hard. And when if
Speaker 1: you had some people that very rapidly decided to leave
Speaker 1: the White House, well then I think you'd know that
Speaker 1: that's somebody you might want to look a little closer at.
Speaker 1: I still believe there's no way that this was a um.
Speaker 1: I still believe that as no where this was a
Speaker 1: household name, top level White House official. This is somebody
Speaker 1: who's kind of uh, you know, it could be it
Speaker 1: could be replaced tomorrow and nobody would know the difference.
Speaker 1: That's how I would describe it. I don't think The
Speaker 1: New York Times is so stupid as too egregiously overstate
Speaker 1: the seniority and power of the person who wrote the seditory,
Speaker 1: because they would I mean, they they could never recover
Speaker 1: from that from a credibility perspective, although maybe they think
Speaker 1: they could because it's an effort to uh, you know,
Speaker 1: do the hashtag resistance thing, the same reason why CNN
Speaker 1: and Washington Post have gotten some major stories wrong, but
Speaker 1: they hurt Trump in the short term, so their audience
Speaker 1: forgives them. So I I you know, I I go
Speaker 1: back and forth on whether The Times at least really
Speaker 1: believes I mean, I would, but I already don't trust
Speaker 1: the Times. You know, I already think The Times is
Speaker 1: a partisan rag and and I think it very obviously
Speaker 1: is a name who's being serious in their analysis analysis
Speaker 1: of it, what would come to the same conclusion. But Trump, Look,
Speaker 1: he's he's he's out there pitching folks. He's out there
Speaker 1: making the case. And that gives me some hope that
Speaker 1: going into these mid terms, because it's gonna be here soon.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're really you know, we've got sixty days
Speaker 1: almost of the day with fifty nine days I guess,
Speaker 1: right or something like that. Uh, we got sixty days
Speaker 1: before this election happens. If they win, if they take
Speaker 1: the House of Representatives, it is going to be NonStop hearings.
Speaker 1: Imp They're gonna they're gonna have impeachment hearings, They're gonna
Speaker 1: go through a whole investigation. They're going to dominate the
Speaker 1: news cycle with that all the time, they're gonna start
Speaker 1: subpoenaing different people than what. It's just gonna be a mess.
Speaker 1: And then Trump's not gonna be able to get his
Speaker 1: get US agenda through, which is a victory for the left,
Speaker 1: even if they can't do anything with the impeachment, even
Speaker 1: if they're not able to you know, they're certainly not
Speaker 1: gonna be able to removing from office. They're not gonna
Speaker 1: have two thirds of senators even if they were to
Speaker 1: get a majority in the Senate. But it will stop
Speaker 1: Trump's momentum and then just becomes a referendum on all that.
Speaker 1: And we haven't gotten enough of the agenda through. Trump's
Speaker 1: doing a great job, but he hasn't gotten far enough yet. Uh.
Speaker 1: And I think we already looked at and think, hold
Speaker 1: on a second. We we we need, we need these
Speaker 1: two years because what they're gonta run Kamala Harris against Trump,
Speaker 1: I don't think. So we got the end of the
Speaker 1: Kavanaugh hearings to talk about today. I wanted to get
Speaker 1: to that for a moment, So why don't we do
Speaker 1: We'll come back into that. And then I got some
Speaker 1: thoughts on the Woodword book. I want to tell you
Speaker 1: about my amor rosa interview. Today. I interviewed the I
Speaker 1: interviewed the founder of the Women's March, which is really
Speaker 1: just an anti Trump, left wing lunatic fest. They're the
Speaker 1: ones that were the uh I I don't know, I
Speaker 1: am I, I don't know if I'm allowed to say it,
Speaker 1: but uh, you know, ear muffs for any of the
Speaker 1: young ones who might be listening, but the vagina hats,
Speaker 1: they're the ones that wear them, you know, that's that's
Speaker 1: the thing that they do. I interviewed the founder today.
Speaker 1: It it was not cordial, but it was it was illuminating.
Speaker 1: It was interesting to sit so close to somebody who's
Speaker 1: so has so darkened her soul. We'll talk about that
Speaker 1: and then obviously we got road call some other things.
Speaker 1: If you want to chat eight four four to eight
Speaker 1: to five eight four Buck. Also, you can tweet at
Speaker 1: me at bucks X. And I remember, starting on Monday,
Speaker 1: we're gonna release an early podcast of the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show every day. So we're gonna start releasing and we'll
Speaker 1: try that for you know, a few months. See how
Speaker 1: it goes. Means you'll be able to hear for me
Speaker 1: all the day's headlines, all the latest analysis and thoughts.
Speaker 1: We're trying to get it done before lunchtime, is the plan.
Speaker 1: So I should be around eleven am eleven thirty am
Speaker 1: on Monday and every day thereafter that is our plan.
Speaker 1: We will put it into execution and with that, my friends,
Speaker 1: we'll be right back. You got a home security system,
Speaker 1: well you need a better one, and if you don't
Speaker 1: have one, you need one. Simply Save home security is
Speaker 1: for you, my friends. I've known these guys a long
Speaker 1: time and they protect over two million people in this country.
Speaker 1: And here's what makes them so great. Simply Safe as
Speaker 1: comprehensive protection for your home with round the clock professional
Speaker 1: monitoring and police dispatch. This will protect you from intruders, fires, leaks,
Speaker 1: and burst pipes. Simply Safe. I've got it set up here.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you, you don't even notice it. And
Speaker 1: when you do notice it, it's really easy and simple
Speaker 1: and streamlined. It looks good and it's so straightforward to
Speaker 1: use seven moniting only four a month. No contracts are hidden,
Speaker 1: fees none, all right, everything is very intuitive your cover
Speaker 1: top to bottom. Check it out. Order your Simply Safe
Speaker 1: system now. Listeners this show get free shipping and free returns.
Speaker 1: Visit simply safe dot com slash buck. That's simply safe
Speaker 1: dot com slash bucks. To protect your home simply safe
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck. So Papadopolis got sentenced to fourteen
Speaker 1: days in prison one four fourteen days. You know, he
Speaker 1: lied about his contacts with Myth, sued to the FBI,
Speaker 1: and they hit him. You know, Muller wanted six months
Speaker 1: six months? Now? Was that because it was so bad?
Speaker 1: What he didn't know? It's because Mueller wants to just
Speaker 1: get scalps. Muller wants to rack up as much punishment
Speaker 1: for as many people as he can to justify what
Speaker 1: he's doing. Anyway, Papadopolis process crime, Folks, fourteen days they've
Speaker 1: been saying, Oh, Papadopoulos lawd Flynn, Flynn, I don't even
Speaker 1: think really lied. So there's that. But papapis Laud and Flynn,
Speaker 1: Laud and metaphor. None of this is anything with Russia collusion.
Speaker 1: They're just they're just finding ways to prosecute people for crap.
Speaker 1: That's what they're doing. David and Mississippi, you've been patiently
Speaker 1: on hold that open rambling. What's up, sir, Hey Shield
Speaker 1: tide boy. Um. So you know how you've been saying
Speaker 1: for months now that sources will be blown. I've I've
Speaker 1: got I've got some I think would be some delicious
Speaker 1: revenge Trump. He should offer a one hour exclusive to
Speaker 1: the first reporter to break the identity of the the
Speaker 1: anonymous op ed and literally the deep state in the
Speaker 1: the mainstream media would literally eat themselves. They would eat
Speaker 1: their young trying to destroy whoever the anonymous opped was.
Speaker 1: I understand your premise, but I'm not sure I would
Speaker 1: agree with the outcome because the I think to press,
Speaker 1: I think, well, no, actually, m no, you know, you
Speaker 1: may be right. I'm trying to think about this, right
Speaker 1: because on the one hand, what is BuzzFeed and the
Speaker 1: Washington Post and huff Post and all these places, What
Speaker 1: do they want to out this person? Or not they
Speaker 1: do from the purpose from the perspective of getting the
Speaker 1: clicks and the attention everything else. So you're right about that,
Speaker 1: But would that be seen as a betrayal of the resistance.
Speaker 1: But then again, I think the New York Times says
Speaker 1: that they have people that within the Times that are
Speaker 1: trying to find out even though their colleagues obviously no.
Speaker 1: So you know that it's an interesting you know, David May,
Speaker 1: maybe maybe it will work. I think somebody also is
Speaker 1: offering money. I think people are really there's like a
Speaker 1: bounty out there from what I saw on Twitter last
Speaker 1: night to try to get the identity of this anonymous
Speaker 1: op ed writer. So you may you may be onto something,
Speaker 1: my friend. Okay, all right, David Chills, Hi, thank you
Speaker 1: for thank you for calling in. Uh who do we
Speaker 1: have John, our buddy Kenny up in Boston, Kenny b
Speaker 1: what's up? Hey? What's the funk? How you doing? Listen quickly?
Speaker 1: If Sessions is fired, are resigns right? Then I put
Speaker 1: Rosenstein fully in charge of the d o J. And
Speaker 1: wouldn't they try to steiny any of his future nominations approvals?
Speaker 1: And that that who I mean, it sounds like it's
Speaker 1: a bad thing to happen there, you know. And and
Speaker 1: what about this threat to the freedom of speech? And
Speaker 1: Bob Woodward poks up this book and talking cordially with
Speaker 1: Trump on the phone. I didn't hear any threatening, uh
Speaker 1: statements from Woodward saying he was threatened by Trump or
Speaker 1: anything like that. And then of course this op ed thing,
Speaker 1: So I guess they dropped that. Huh, well, yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is the thing about Trump. They keep saying, Trump
Speaker 1: is so terrible the press. Trump speaks to like Maggie
Speaker 1: Habram of the New York Times, or Trump speaking to
Speaker 1: the press all the time. He just tells them and
Speaker 1: he thinks that they're full of it, and that he
Speaker 1: thinks some of them are acting irresponsibly, and that, yeah,
Speaker 1: he's calling me. He said, the fake news the enemy
Speaker 1: they people. Yeah, false, So it is the enemy of
Speaker 1: the people. That's true, right, So they don't they're their
Speaker 1: complaints don't measure up to reality. Trump has not taken
Speaker 1: any action. Now, you know, people are saying, Buck, do
Speaker 1: you agree they've They've been asked me today to what
Speaker 1: do you agree with him trying to get the d
Speaker 1: o J involved in the anonymous I don't think so.
Speaker 1: I don't think he's got any grounds for that. I
Speaker 1: don't think you can start investigating somebody's op ed opinion.
Speaker 1: But he hasn't actually taken any action against the First Amendment,
Speaker 1: whereas Obama did. That's what I think doesn't get enough attention.
Speaker 1: Kenny from Boston, did you leave to Kenney EVAs? All right,
Speaker 1: all right, so you like it all right, good things,
Speaker 1: Kenny shield Side, thank you for calling in. Here's what
Speaker 1: that Trump said about Kavanaugh, by the way, last night,
Speaker 1: important stuff. Play it. As you all saw this week,
Speaker 1: the Senate is now considering a truly exceptional nominee for
Speaker 1: the United States Supreme Court, Judge Brett Kavanaugh. And he's
Speaker 1: doing really well. But do you believe the anger and
Speaker 1: the meanness on the other side. It's sick. The whole
Speaker 1: country has now seen his amazing intellect and his brilliant
Speaker 1: legal mind. Judge Kavanaugh deserves overwhelming bipartisan support, and I
Speaker 1: think he's going to be one of our truly great
Speaker 1: Supreme Court justices. I think so too. I think he's
Speaker 1: gonna get through. I'll talk to you more about the
Speaker 1: the insane and illogical, unfair viciousness directed toward Kavanaugh the
Speaker 1: third hour. I spoke to a leader of the Women's
Speaker 1: March who was arrested herself three times this week, folks.
Speaker 1: Three times she was arrested, disrupting that hearing. I talked
Speaker 1: to her to I'll tell you what that was like
Speaker 1: in the third hour, So I stick around for that.
Speaker 1: We have much much more show coming up. Team uh
Speaker 1: you're right back. He's back with you now, because when
Speaker 1: it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops.
Speaker 1: What's really going on here is that Bob Woodwards book,
Speaker 1: and the contents of what is in the anonymous piece
Speaker 1: in the New York Times is that those closest to
Speaker 1: the President of the United States are saying, we must
Speaker 1: save the country from the president of the United States.
Speaker 1: What we need here are, finally, I think some hearings
Speaker 1: o congressional hearings in which an executive session or open session,
Speaker 1: those around the President of the United States are questioned
Speaker 1: about the fitness of Donald Trump to be the president
Speaker 1: of the United States. I think we need to have
Speaker 1: a hearings about the fitness of anti Trump lunatics to
Speaker 1: continue pushing insane conspiracies and then using the mechanisms of
Speaker 1: government and prosecutors offices and others to try and just
Speaker 1: grind down the Trump presidency based on these insane theories.
Speaker 1: How about that? How don't we start to really look
Speaker 1: at what's going on here, folks? All this focus on
Speaker 1: the amendment, you know, would we're releasing the book before
Speaker 1: the midterms? This is all calculated. Mueller's done zo, He's
Speaker 1: got nothing. Okay, Mueller's got nothing. It's not going anywhere.
Speaker 1: He's not gonna be able to stop the president. He's
Speaker 1: not going to be able to prosecute the president. It's
Speaker 1: that whole thing. That whole thing is gone. All right,
Speaker 1: that's all that's that's all gone. It's going to continue
Speaker 1: to Peter on Felow. But I mean, the notion that
Speaker 1: Ler is going to be the white Knight who saves
Speaker 1: the left from Trump is and that's gone, all right.
Speaker 1: So now they're trying to come up with something else.
Speaker 1: We're back to this endment thing. And you've got Carl Bernstein. Sorry,
Speaker 1: I said Woodward, I think woodword Bernstein, you know Tomato, Tomato.
Speaker 1: I got Bernstein here saying, you know, the other Watergate guy,
Speaker 1: that we need to start having hearings on Trump's fitness.
Speaker 1: So we've gone from let's have hearings on Russia collusion
Speaker 1: and and all these investigations and the special counsel and
Speaker 1: all this stuff, and in the media, just the frenzy
Speaker 1: around this has been absolutely insane. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: if you've been pushing the Russia collusion delusion, the media
Speaker 1: should be ashamed of yourself. But they're not because it
Speaker 1: was useful to them. If you remember that, even though
Speaker 1: they're wrong, they don't care. Right. It's like it's like
Speaker 1: Harry Reid's Mitt Romney has never paid taxes or hasn't
Speaker 1: paid taxes in ten years. Thing. It was a lie,
Speaker 1: but it was a useful lie. So he doesn't you know,
Speaker 1: Harry Reid is said it. I don't care. Did he win? No,
Speaker 1: That's how the Democrats play the game, folks, That's how
Speaker 1: the other side acts. So we need to understand that.
Speaker 1: Now we're gonna move to hearings on Trump's fitness. Come on,
Speaker 1: we're gonna well, how is that supposed to work? Exactly?
Speaker 1: You know, I had Alma Rossa, we had we had
Speaker 1: some a lot, we had some big guests on the
Speaker 1: On the Rising Show. Today we had almar ross on
Speaker 1: and I asked her straight up, I said, is the
Speaker 1: president crazy? And she said yes? And then I said, okay,
Speaker 1: so you're telling me the president's you're telling me the
Speaker 1: president's crazy. How is it that we have a president
Speaker 1: who's crazy and the country is doing so well, and
Speaker 1: so many of the president's initiatives and so much of
Speaker 1: his decision making has been so spot on I need
Speaker 1: someone to explain that to me. And she said, oh,
Speaker 1: it's not doing so well. And I said, okay, almar
Speaker 1: Rosso and I should have probably pulled this audio again.
Speaker 1: It's on the hill dot tv slash right. I think
Speaker 1: if you want to see it, um the full interviews
Speaker 1: up there. I think it might also be on YouTube. Now,
Speaker 1: I said, all And I said, all right, amor Rossa,
Speaker 1: you know, well, hold on a second. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: let's be honest here by every and and then she
Speaker 1: went into the whole the usual thing. And you know,
Speaker 1: I looked, amorros is a very she's very engaging. She knows,
Speaker 1: you know. She it was. She's an interesting person to
Speaker 1: talk to you, no question. Okay, she's somebody that's you know,
Speaker 1: the exchange is lively. But I said, you know, you're
Speaker 1: saying he's crazy, but the country is doing so well.
Speaker 1: She says, no, the country is not doing so well.
Speaker 1: He's divisive, he's nasty, he says things that are and
Speaker 1: I said, that's all rhetoric though, and and I don't
Speaker 1: care anymore. You know, we tried Mitt Romney. We tried
Speaker 1: somebody who, yes, had all the skills and the resume,
Speaker 1: but was as as clean as could be right, as
Speaker 1: as as blameless ethically and personally as any politician you
Speaker 1: could ever find. And they trashed him, gave people cancer,
Speaker 1: binders full of women abusing dogs, the whole thing, just
Speaker 1: trashed him. Okay, so we're like, well, we're done with that.
Speaker 1: We're not We're not gonna go through that anymore. But
Speaker 1: I said, no, no, what about what happens and what matters?
Speaker 1: What about policy? What about metrics? Amorrosa? And she says, well,
Speaker 1: if you other than the economy, And I said, okay,
Speaker 1: well that's like saying, you know, other than the play,
Speaker 1: Mrs Lincoln, you know, what did you think? I mean? Like,
Speaker 1: this is the economy is? You know, if you if
Speaker 1: you include healthcare in the economy, it's everything, you know,
Speaker 1: it's what people really care about in their day to
Speaker 1: day in terms of government. You know, I don't really care.
Speaker 1: I'm not losing sleep at night based upon the carbon
Speaker 1: emission regulations and stuff. It just doesn't. I care a
Speaker 1: lot although that that affects the economy, and I know,
Speaker 1: I know. But then I said, okay, it's not just that.
Speaker 1: We're also not fighting any wars, folks, I gotta say,
Speaker 1: the Bush administration anti Trump squad is so lacking in
Speaker 1: self reflection about what they did to the country. Yes,
Speaker 1: we got hit on nine eleven. Yes, Radical Islam. Now
Speaker 1: it feels like we were always gonna win that fight,
Speaker 1: or you know, we always were in a position. But
Speaker 1: you know, we didn't know. We didn't know how many
Speaker 1: more planes were gonna hit. We don't know what else
Speaker 1: they had planned. Me. It was a scary time, it
Speaker 1: really was. We all remember it. So I give Bush
Speaker 1: credit for under you know, for bringing the country together
Speaker 1: and going into Afghanistan doing the right thing, you know Iraq,
Speaker 1: Whether you think it was the right idea to invade
Speaker 1: what we did once we got there, the strategy was
Speaker 1: was very flawed, very bad decisions were made, and we
Speaker 1: had a very costly war that you know, he looked
Speaker 1: back on a lot of people say, kind of what
Speaker 1: the Bush people have no, Yeah, no self reflection about
Speaker 1: any of that, and how that's what brought Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: to power and gave the Democrats both housing, both parts
Speaker 1: of Congress, uh and and gave of you know, Barack
Speaker 1: Obama eight years to destroy the economy. But I, I
Speaker 1: just I never get real answers from people on this,
Speaker 1: I need someone to honestly tackle So Ammer and Hammers said, oh,
Speaker 1: he is starting wars. Look at what he says about
Speaker 1: Kim Jong gunn. I'm like, that's not now, We're just
Speaker 1: this is just not serious. What do you mean, what
Speaker 1: do you mean that's that's not starting a war. And
Speaker 1: he's trying to de nuclearize at Korean peninsula, which would
Speaker 1: be the greatest foreign policy achievement if he gets there,
Speaker 1: which is not there yet, the greatest foreign policy achieving
Speaker 1: the post Cold War era. So it's a big deal.
Speaker 1: But you know that they don't They won't have a
Speaker 1: serious talk about this. How is it possible, folks? And
Speaker 1: you know Trump said it last night, you're gonna impeache
Speaker 1: somebody who is doing such a good job. I think
Speaker 1: that's actually a very valid point. You know, they hate
Speaker 1: Trump so much, but the country is doing really well.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have hearings on whether Trump is fit to
Speaker 1: be president when I'm sitting here and I'm like, he
Speaker 1: may be the best president of my adult lifetime. In fact,
Speaker 1: so far, I think he is the best president of
Speaker 1: my adult lifetime. And the proof is in the pudding.
Speaker 1: But meanwhile that they put people on TV to to
Speaker 1: to supposedly educate us about this, like like this clown
Speaker 1: over at MSNBC will actually double clown. You've got Chris
Speaker 1: Matthews and Steve Schmidt black clip too. Well, it could
Speaker 1: be the most powerful anonymous letters since American diplomat George Kent.
Speaker 1: I'm outlining the Cold War strategy, but rather attempting to
Speaker 1: contain the author in this case makes clear that the
Speaker 1: objective now is to contain the worst impulse president. So
Speaker 1: the first thing I'd like to say, as someone in
Speaker 1: the resistance on the outside, is thank you, and it
Speaker 1: is nice to hear from you, but it is not enough.
Speaker 1: We are in an hour of national emergency in this country.
Speaker 1: We know that this administration is vile, corrupt, and likely criminal.
Speaker 1: We know that this president is immral, that he is
Speaker 1: mentally and intellectually unfit for his office. And this vile,
Speaker 1: immorl corrupt, indecent, dangerous, intellectually unfit president is a danger
Speaker 1: to all of us, danger through all of duct. What
Speaker 1: the words unfit, vile, moral, corrupt, Oh gosh, I mean
Speaker 1: a danger to all of us? Well, we're all in,
Speaker 1: We're all in. Danger of of being able to pay
Speaker 1: our bills, and you know, millennials will be in danger
Speaker 1: of maybe being of the own property one day. Is
Speaker 1: that we're in danger of, because that's what it feels like.
Speaker 1: We're all in danger of not having the government just
Speaker 1: turn us upside down and empty out our pockets all
Speaker 1: the time because hashtags actual justice. Uh. You know, these
Speaker 1: people keep calling Trump a danger and then they talk
Speaker 1: about a bunch of things that don't sound dangerous at
Speaker 1: all to me. They use all these words, there's all
Speaker 1: this rhetoric, and then I say, okay, make me care.
Speaker 1: That's there were ready to me? You don't care, you know,
Speaker 1: the Nazis and twenty foot men rus the clusion man. No, No,
Speaker 1: that doesn't cut it. I'm sorry that that that is
Speaker 1: not convinced me one bit. Tell me why I need
Speaker 1: to care about all these crazy allegations you're making. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're saying we need to have hearings on Trump's fitness
Speaker 1: to be president. What does it say if he let's
Speaker 1: let's assume him for a second, he was you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know, he was suffering from some kind of
Speaker 1: you know, bipolar disorder something I don't know. He had
Speaker 1: some clinical issue. He's still doing a great job. So
Speaker 1: what does that mean. I mean, let's just say we
Speaker 1: found out that Trump has taken, you know, pretty hefty
Speaker 1: dose of prozac every day and he's you know, dealing
Speaker 1: with some mental health issue. He's doing a great job.
Speaker 1: What's the problem. I mean, the amendment is for if
Speaker 1: Trump had a stroke or if he's snial. It's not
Speaker 1: for you know, he said crass things about women twenty
Speaker 1: years ago, and people who can't understand that. I think
Speaker 1: they're the crazy ones. That's what they don't get. I
Speaker 1: think they're the ones with some big issues. Hey, it's
Speaker 1: really just folks, is just nuts, absolutely nuts, the stuff
Speaker 1: that they're saying. But we have to sit here and
Speaker 1: and act like these are the these are this is
Speaker 1: the political wise men class of the country. And for
Speaker 1: Chris Matthews. Chris Matthews, what how does this guy still
Speaker 1: have a show. He's loud, he makes dumb points, he
Speaker 1: has no expertise, He's just been around a long time
Speaker 1: and it must be friends with Andy lack Over at
Speaker 1: MSNBC doesn't know anything. This guy is not impressive. I
Speaker 1: don't want to listen to him. I don't want to
Speaker 1: hear him, you know, m hm. At least the ABC
Speaker 1: News guy is super handsome, you know, Chris Matthews. I'm like,
Speaker 1: what is this? What is it with this guy? Anyway? Um,
Speaker 1: But the good news is that Trump is still going
Speaker 1: to smack them all around, so not literally, We'll be
Speaker 1: right back. The so called resistance is angry because their
Speaker 1: horrible ideas have been rejected by the American people and
Speaker 1: it's driving them crazy crazy. They're the ones, honestly that
Speaker 1: have been driven crazy. The latest active resistance is the
Speaker 1: op ed published in the failing New York Times by
Speaker 1: an anonymous really an anonymous cutlers coward. You just look
Speaker 1: he was. Nobody knows who the hell he is or she,
Speaker 1: although they put heat but probably that's a little disguise
Speaker 1: that means that she. But for the sake of our
Speaker 1: national security, the New York Times should publish his name
Speaker 1: at once. I think they're reporters should go and investigate
Speaker 1: who it is. That would actually be a good school.
Speaker 1: So Trump, you know, was was in fuego last night
Speaker 1: out in Montana, and I just have to note this guy.
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to look I'm not a throne shiner.
Speaker 1: I don't sit here and just talk about everything Trump
Speaker 1: does is perfect. I would say a lot of things
Speaker 1: differently and deal with a lot of things differently. But
Speaker 1: you know, I I give credit where it's due and
Speaker 1: and the guy, look, the guy's a political phenomenon, and
Speaker 1: that he stands up and gives these hour and a
Speaker 1: half one. I mean, folks, what are things about Oba?
Speaker 1: I'm stepping up today to give his speech was Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, do we have to go back to this?
Speaker 1: Do we have to go back to this very sterile,
Speaker 1: haughty I don't just mean Obama, although he's really a
Speaker 1: very clear example of this, but essentially bs political talk.
Speaker 1: You know where you're you're just they're trying so hard
Speaker 1: to sound authoritative and smart and democracy and America and
Speaker 1: values and flag and you know, just just settle down,
Speaker 1: talk to us like normal people. I really mean this.
Speaker 1: I don't want to go back to a world where
Speaker 1: politicians or where this case, where where the president is
Speaker 1: going to speak to us like we're a bunch of
Speaker 1: school children that need him or her to tell us
Speaker 1: it's all gonna be okay, It's all gonna be okay.
Speaker 1: Just listen to me, and it will all be okay.
Speaker 1: I don't need that, I don't want that. I like
Speaker 1: having a president who speaks to us the way the
Speaker 1: way a human being actually speaks. And Trump is incredible.
Speaker 1: He gets up at these rallies, everybody around him is so,
Speaker 1: you know, there's so much energy, and there's so much
Speaker 1: enthusiasm and people people just love what he's doing. And
Speaker 1: he goes off the cuff. He talks about dozens and
Speaker 1: dozens of of issues off the cuff, and I don't
Speaker 1: know any other politician who can do with the way
Speaker 1: that he does. But the guy is incredible. By the way,
Speaker 1: I don't know how many of you saw, there's this
Speaker 1: plaid shirt guy. Uh is apparently a meme now because
Speaker 1: of his reactions in the background to uh two, what
Speaker 1: is he doing? Um? Interesting? Plaid shirt guy is a meme? Um?
Speaker 1: He had to move all right? Anyway, Trump is amazing.
Speaker 1: Plaid shirk. I was behind Trump at the rally. It's
Speaker 1: so I'm trying to say Trump is amazing, and and yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, I saw some people jump on it because
Speaker 1: he said a mom, a mom in this or something.
Speaker 1: You know, he stumbled on a word. I sit here,
Speaker 1: I do radio three hours every night. I will be
Speaker 1: honestly that there are very few people in the media
Speaker 1: that have greater comfort with words and speaking than me,
Speaker 1: very few of them. And I said that as somebody
Speaker 1: who had a speech impediment and had to get speech
Speaker 1: therapy and everything else. So I've trust me. I've been
Speaker 1: on both sides of this. But what Trump dries is unbelievable.
Speaker 1: And I sit here and I tell you I mess
Speaker 1: up words sometimes, and they're gonna call him out for that.
Speaker 1: They're not gonna, you know, folks, I just if nothing else,
Speaker 1: I hope that Trump has at a president now where
Speaker 1: politicians will get up and just talk to people, tell
Speaker 1: people what you think, and tell them things. Don't stick
Speaker 1: a prompter. I'm gonna be really bored. I'm gonna tell
Speaker 1: you things to prove how brilliant I am. And if
Speaker 1: you're listening to me, things will be great. If you're don't,
Speaker 1: thinkings will be terrible. We don't need that. I don't
Speaker 1: want to go back to that kind of People keep
Speaker 1: talking about Trump's rhetoric and the discourse and he's he's
Speaker 1: so coarse, give me course, but earnest, over overly polished
Speaker 1: and sterile and fake it's just fake. I don't want fake.
Speaker 1: And I want you know, the next the next Republican contender.
Speaker 1: I want him to get up there and and take
Speaker 1: the Trump approach, roll at the sleeves and talk to people.
Speaker 1: Tell them what you want to do, tell them what
Speaker 1: you stand for, tell them what you believe. Now, don't
Speaker 1: always just turn around look for the political consultants. Speaking
Speaker 1: of which we had the organizer of the Women's March
Speaker 1: on my show. I'm gonna tell you what I have
Speaker 1: to think about that in just a moment. Do you
Speaker 1: really believe in free speech? Do you want to share
Speaker 1: your thoughts and not have to worry about some left
Speaker 1: wing administrators somewhere, some so called algorithm run by a
Speaker 1: bunch of Bernie Sanders voting prius drivers, determining what you
Speaker 1: can and can't host, who you can speak to you,
Speaker 1: and what you see. If you want to enter the
Speaker 1: new world of social media, friends, snippy dot com is
Speaker 1: for you. Snippy dot com is a place where discussion
Speaker 1: is valued and your opinion matters. I'm on snippy dot com.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you there is nobody on there that's
Speaker 1: enforcing any agenda. There's no censorship ever, step out of
Speaker 1: the Facebook left wing echo chamber for a moment and
Speaker 1: check out snippy dot com today. They'll let you follow
Speaker 1: your favorite writers. You can check out the news feed
Speaker 1: and see what's trending. It's totally free to join folks
Speaker 1: snippy dot com or download the app. Let's get the
Speaker 1: discussion rolling. Let's really exchange ideas, share thoughts, and connect
Speaker 1: with like minded people without any left wing bias. Snippy
Speaker 1: dot Com. Buck Sexton Mission decoding the news and disseminating
Speaker 1: information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America. You're a
Speaker 1: great American again. This is the Bucks Sexton Show. CIA
Speaker 1: analysts and Buck Sexton. No, I'm part of the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: Poorly and women when it comes to their right to
Speaker 1: shoot the Republican parties, the Party of Life, women are
Speaker 1: using coat hangers. They killed people for a living. There.
Speaker 1: Since abortion restrictions have been passed in this country, many
Speaker 1: people are unaware of how restricted abortion has become. The
Speaker 1: legislative priority needs to be something that will stop abortions
Speaker 1: when and for women will have an abortion in their life.
Speaker 1: And when I think about how politicize this has become,
Speaker 1: I wonder how did this happen. It's the basis of
Speaker 1: democracy that you control your own body, the basis of democracy, folks.
Speaker 1: That's from a new Netflix movie. And as you know,
Speaker 1: look that net Flix is a is now increasingly becoming
Speaker 1: a left wing outfit, just like all all. You know,
Speaker 1: they have total dominance in the cultural space when it
Speaker 1: comes to Hollywood, and it's it's near complete. The left
Speaker 1: gets to control what movies are made, who who gets
Speaker 1: a platform, who gets funding, all of it. That was
Speaker 1: glorious Stein. At the end, they're saying that abortion is
Speaker 1: the basis of democracy, and and you know that's really
Speaker 1: also at the at the heart of why the anti
Speaker 1: Kavanaugh protesters were such a bunch of straight up maniacs
Speaker 1: this past week. And for those of you who uh
Speaker 1: didn't have a chance to see it, which I'm assuming
Speaker 1: is most of you today. On on on Hill TV,
Speaker 1: I think we're gonna stop calling it hill dot TV.
Speaker 1: It sounds like we're you know, not hip. You know, yes,
Speaker 1: it's Hill dot TV. That's why, Hey, you write it,
Speaker 1: but a Hill TV. We had on somebody who's her
Speaker 1: name is Bob Bland and he's one of the founders
Speaker 1: of the Women's March which is this movement that gets
Speaker 1: women to get together and they you know, they will
Speaker 1: march through the streets, and they will wear pink anatomically
Speaker 1: suggestive hats on their heads, and they dressed in handmaids
Speaker 1: costumes and all this stuff. And and you know, the
Speaker 1: Women's marches is inherently also an anti Trump march. That's
Speaker 1: how this goes. And the same media figures and news
Speaker 1: media figures and pop culture news pop culture media who
Speaker 1: were silent about Bill Clinton's sexual habits and proclivities want
Speaker 1: us to believe that all of a sudden now they've
Speaker 1: become particularly prudish when it comes to anything Donald Trump related.
Speaker 1: You know, Donald Trump is so terrible for for terrible,
Speaker 1: terrible for women. And and so I sat down and
Speaker 1: talked to Bob Bland today, and I'll be honestly, it
Speaker 1: was tough. I mean it was tough because there are
Speaker 1: certain people who I think are misguided but fundamentally decent.
Speaker 1: And then I think there are people who are just
Speaker 1: honestly damaging to the country, and people who are abortion
Speaker 1: extremists are are damaging to the country and are I
Speaker 1: think engaged in a in a great evil um And
Speaker 1: I know that there are there are areas of dispute
Speaker 1: on this issue, and there's and I you know, and
Speaker 1: I talked about this probably to my own at my
Speaker 1: own peril in the sense that people generally, especially I
Speaker 1: think late on a Friday, they don't want to hear
Speaker 1: a discussion about abortion, aren't they. They probably want to
Speaker 1: hear some guys gonna come on here and talk about,
Speaker 1: you know, the big game or something. And I'm not
Speaker 1: putting that down. People need escape. I need escape. As
Speaker 1: soon as I'm done with this show, I'm I'm gonna
Speaker 1: plum plot myself down. And I was gonna say plump
Speaker 1: myself down. I think that was Freudian. I'm gonna plot
Speaker 1: myself down and order some or are some Korean food? Actually,
Speaker 1: I think it's when I'm planning tonight and watch some Netflix.
Speaker 1: But I also think that I have an obligation to
Speaker 1: tell you about things that that really do matter. And
Speaker 1: it's it's been disheartened to see this week just how
Speaker 1: brainwashed a lot of women are. And it is mostly
Speaker 1: women that are that are the true radicals on this issue.
Speaker 1: You know, there are men who will talk about it,
Speaker 1: but they because of the the way that the feminists
Speaker 1: have positioned the issue that they've tried to silence pro
Speaker 1: life voices that are male by saying we were not
Speaker 1: allowed to have any say. And so you really have
Speaker 1: the radicals are leftist females on abortion. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: there aren't men who are radical too, but but generally
Speaker 1: the loudest voices on this are our our female And
Speaker 1: so I spoke to Bob Bland today and and she
Speaker 1: comes out and says that Kavanaugh, that that Kavanaugh. Well,
Speaker 1: first of all, before I get the Cavana part, she
Speaker 1: says that if Kavana is elected, millions of women will die.
Speaker 1: And you know, this is one of the first I
Speaker 1: I have my limits. And I'm sitting there on TV
Speaker 1: and I have a I have a very progressive co host.
Speaker 1: As you all know, it's not a It is a
Speaker 1: delicate dance that I have to do every day. No
Speaker 1: one else does this, folks, it's not And maybe there's
Speaker 1: a reason why, because it's it's almost impossible to do.
Speaker 1: No one else does what I do with Crystal every
Speaker 1: day on that show. It just doesn't exist anywhere else
Speaker 1: in media right now where you have a real conservative
Speaker 1: and a real progressive who are trying to discuss things
Speaker 1: without with the understanding that we're not gonna make fun
Speaker 1: of each other and we're not gonna try to We're
Speaker 1: gonna exchange ideas and information without attempting to win every argument,
Speaker 1: because when you attempt to win an argument over abortion
Speaker 1: at sixty seconds, you just yell at each other. It
Speaker 1: just turns into it just turns into nothing. So you know,
Speaker 1: we're we're operating on this. It's a tight rope act
Speaker 1: and in some ways, I guess it's very interesting, but
Speaker 1: in others it can be tough, and today was one
Speaker 1: of the tough days because the founder of the Women's Marching.
Speaker 1: You can go not that I'm trying to know I am,
Speaker 1: I guess pitching the show, but you can go to
Speaker 1: tow Hill dot TV, Slash Rising and watch it for yourself.
Speaker 1: I had to. I had to enforce a boundary with
Speaker 1: Bob because Bob got out of line at one point.
Speaker 1: But she said that millions of people will die, and
Speaker 1: I'm sitting here, I'm thinking this is this is really
Speaker 1: a form of evil to suggest that millions of women
Speaker 1: will die because of Brett Kavanaugh, who's as we've seen
Speaker 1: this week, brilliant, honorable, decent kind. Uh. You know, he's
Speaker 1: everything that we want in an a neighbor, in a friend,
Speaker 1: in an American and they've been trying to trash this
Speaker 1: guy in every possible way that they can. And what
Speaker 1: I see or what when she says that millions of
Speaker 1: millions of women will die, what she's saying is that
Speaker 1: because of botched abortions, they're all they're gonna die over
Speaker 1: this issue. Um one, that's a wild overstatement of the facts,
Speaker 1: meaning that even when you look at the number of
Speaker 1: women who die because of abortion, related abortion or related
Speaker 1: complications from it before it was legal, it it's you're
Speaker 1: looking at a couple. They estimate a couple of hundred
Speaker 1: a year. Uh. And I just also know it's incredibly
Speaker 1: sad that anybody would put their life in jeopardy in
Speaker 1: that way too, and another life. I mean, it's it's
Speaker 1: it's a deep the depth of that despair is really
Speaker 1: hard to fathom. Uh. But millions of people are killed
Speaker 1: because of abortion and have been killed because it's not
Speaker 1: a theoretical it's going on still and it has gone
Speaker 1: on in the past. And I have one of these
Speaker 1: moments where you know, you how do you try to
Speaker 1: be civil and and win an argument with somebody who
Speaker 1: not only is arguing in favor of murder, but in
Speaker 1: arguing in favor of murder is claiming that somebody who
Speaker 1: stopped the murder is the actual murderer. In this case,
Speaker 1: the theoretical proposition that Kavanaugh would be a part of
Speaker 1: of UH not even eliminating really abortion, just truncating it
Speaker 1: by overturning UH. It would really be planned parenthood v. Casey.
Speaker 1: But the left doesn't They don't actually read these things.
Speaker 1: They don't know anything that now was It was quite
Speaker 1: a moment, folks. I I tried not to do what
Speaker 1: I you know, I had an inclination to just say,
Speaker 1: so you're saying there's going to be murders, but you're
Speaker 1: advocating murder. But then it would have just been it
Speaker 1: would have just been like rolling a stick of dynamite
Speaker 1: out onto the table of the TV show. And I
Speaker 1: didn't want to. I didn't want to do that, and
Speaker 1: it it's I can't help but notice, I don't know
Speaker 1: if it picked up, but there's thunder and lightning going
Speaker 1: on here in d C, and that might have actually
Speaker 1: made its way over the radio waves. It's kind of
Speaker 1: fitting that lightning and under his happening as I'm talking
Speaker 1: about this. Uh so, and then and then it just
Speaker 1: devolved a little bit more from there. They said, Uh
Speaker 1: Bob Bland of the Women's March said that Kavanaugh believes
Speaker 1: that all all birth control is is abortion. And I
Speaker 1: just said, that's why he didn't see no one says that, Like,
Speaker 1: no one says that a condom is the same as
Speaker 1: an abortion. There's just I don't know. People say that
Speaker 1: it's immoral to use, but they don't say it's the
Speaker 1: same as an abortion. That's not That would be unscientific
Speaker 1: and unsound. I mean, using a condom is not the
Speaker 1: same as an abortion. Right that no one, no one
Speaker 1: that I know, makes that claim. They make Catholics don't
Speaker 1: believe in contraception. I mean, I'm familiar with the doctrine,
Speaker 1: but you know, they don't say that a condom is
Speaker 1: an abortion. Um, And and they this was the claim
Speaker 1: that the Women's March. This is all she's supposed to
Speaker 1: care about. And she made this claim and and I said,
Speaker 1: I really don't this is just not I don't know
Speaker 1: what to say to you. This is not what happened,
Speaker 1: and uh, you know, sure enough, we just kind of
Speaker 1: got into a squabble about what was really said or
Speaker 1: not said. But then I just love I asking, well,
Speaker 1: how is this guy such an extremist? When senators voted
Speaker 1: for him to be on the DC Court of Appeals,
Speaker 1: none of them had a problem with him. Then now
Speaker 1: they all have a problem with him. No answer, I
Speaker 1: mean not even not even a smidgen of an answer. Uh.
Speaker 1: And and then all this stuff about just the all
Speaker 1: this language they used about women and autonomy in the
Speaker 1: body and ring. It's like if if you really think
Speaker 1: that you are a you are a slave to the
Speaker 1: state or something. If you really think that you aren't
Speaker 1: free unless you have a medical right for what it's
Speaker 1: often a taxpayer funded crushing of a tiny fetus and
Speaker 1: dismembering of it. I don't know your your your your
Speaker 1: soul has been has been corrupted in a really profound way.
Speaker 1: And it's it's hard to you know, I'm not arguing
Speaker 1: with somebody here over the time over what the top
Speaker 1: tax rate should be that I know how to do.
Speaker 1: I'm not argue with somebody over you know, the morality
Speaker 1: of of of particular military action or you know, that's
Speaker 1: complicated too, but that I know how to do. But
Speaker 1: somebody who thinks that murder is life and life is
Speaker 1: murder is very hard to have a civil conversation with.
Speaker 1: And what having this discussion with the founder of the
Speaker 1: Women's March, what it did was just highlight this for me,
Speaker 1: and this is not a thoughtful person. This is not
Speaker 1: a kind person. This is a radical and and really
Speaker 1: the the synapses in her brain seemed to me to
Speaker 1: be similar to what you'd be dealing with with somebody who,
Speaker 1: you know, believes that, uh, you know, koufar nonbelievers should
Speaker 1: be killed, you know, in Islamic radical believes that right
Speaker 1: that your you can be, your throat can be split
Speaker 1: like cattle if you're a kufar. I mean, it's so
Speaker 1: outside your perception of what is moral and ethical and
Speaker 1: right that how do you even start to pull somebody
Speaker 1: back from that? So while I have my fair share,
Speaker 1: and I think, oh and I also said, what do
Speaker 1: you think about the people dressed as condoms and handmaid's tale, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, women and all this stuff, And she said, well,
Speaker 1: I don't know about that. So well, now you're just
Speaker 1: a lot you now You're just making a fool of yourself.
Speaker 1: You're just a liar. So enjoy your lives. Uh, be
Speaker 1: on TV. Enjoy your lives. But you know, it was
Speaker 1: I know almost it felt it felt dirty afterwards, just
Speaker 1: being the same Roman. And I've been around a lot
Speaker 1: of bad people in the media business, you know, high
Speaker 1: worked at CNN, folks. But today was was really something else.
Speaker 1: But while I mocked them and they are stupid costumes
Speaker 1: and there there are obvious political ignorance and the idiocy
Speaker 1: that's often on display, it was also um it was discouraging.
Speaker 1: It's discouraging that in this country and this time, when
Speaker 1: so much is going well and so much is going right,
Speaker 1: we have this great stain on the moral character of
Speaker 1: this country. Not only is it there, but we have
Speaker 1: people who will go to any lengths to defend it.
Speaker 1: And that is troubling because when that has been the
Speaker 1: case in the past, it has led us to very
Speaker 1: dark places. All right, we'll be right back. Strike Force
Speaker 1: Energy is Veteran owned and American made, folks. This is
Speaker 1: one of the hottest energy products on the market right now,
Speaker 1: and it was developed by veterans for one simple reason.
Speaker 1: The fight will always follow you and it waits for
Speaker 1: no one. Look, I invite you to join us this
Speaker 1: fall in giving back to Americans troops with Strike Forces help.
Speaker 1: Over the last three years, strike Force Energy has shipped
Speaker 1: millions of packets of this proven battlefield liquid to troops
Speaker 1: at home and abroad, and now they're going to bring
Speaker 1: it directly to your front door. It comes in four flavor,
Speaker 1: zero sugar, zero calories for fuel to power through your
Speaker 1: toughest fight. Just add some strike Force to sixty os
Speaker 1: of water team lemonade. Whatever you got. Go to strike
Speaker 1: Force Energy dot com and received fifty off when you
Speaker 1: used the promo code buck at checkout. For every packet
Speaker 1: you buy, we will donate a packet to military members
Speaker 1: around the globe. Strike Force Energy dot com promo code
Speaker 1: Bucket checkout. Strike Force Energy is Fuel for the fight.
Speaker 1: You know, the book isn't out, but we did read
Speaker 1: a long excerpt or a summary evident in the paper
Speaker 1: earlier this week, and it described one of the meetings
Speaker 1: that I know I was in, and it was sort
Speaker 1: of half accurate and half wrong. It described to the
Speaker 1: President being very concerned about strategy in Afghanistan and talking
Speaker 1: about going to Walter read and seeing soldiers who had
Speaker 1: lost limbs in Afghanistan, and really the President was pressing
Speaker 1: his commanders very hard, saying, what are we doing there?
Speaker 1: This is America's longest war. What are we accomplishing? Our
Speaker 1: guys are dying, They're coming home without arms, without legs.
Speaker 1: I want a very clear justification before I agree to anything. Now.
Speaker 1: The in the story that's spun as very negative as
Speaker 1: you know, the president ranting and raving. Well, I was
Speaker 1: in that meeting, and what I saw was the President
Speaker 1: asking the questions that I think every American wants their
Speaker 1: president to ask. If we're going to commit troops to battle,
Speaker 1: if we're going to risk our soldiers lives, there ought
Speaker 1: to be a very good reason. There ought to be
Speaker 1: a clear strategy. There ought to be an objective. And
Speaker 1: and you know, he was pressing his commanders to to
Speaker 1: give him that information, which I think is his job
Speaker 1: and he had every right to do it, and that's
Speaker 1: what we wanted to do. There's bs in the Woodword book, folks,
Speaker 1: not a surprise. You see. Woodword sourcing is very exact,
Speaker 1: but his sources are not very exact. What I mean
Speaker 1: by that is that he will take information that is
Speaker 1: given to him from people who have access to the
Speaker 1: information and rely on them to be the arbiter of
Speaker 1: what was said how it was said. And you have
Speaker 1: Michael Anton there who was and Sea spokesperson UM and
Speaker 1: is a is an eloquent if uh self satisfied fellow, um.
Speaker 1: But he was in that meeting and he says that
Speaker 1: it's it's not accurate with the way that War writes
Speaker 1: about that excerpt in the book. But beyond that, folks,
Speaker 1: I think this shows us once again what we're up against.
Speaker 1: The war in Afghanistan is not being one. We we
Speaker 1: are there. We were treading water, and the water is
Speaker 1: the seas are getting rougher around us all the time,
Speaker 1: and we're just trying to tread water. There is no
Speaker 1: possibility of the of a of a victory in Afghanistan
Speaker 1: defined along the terms of a self sustaining, self defensible
Speaker 1: UH pluralistic democracy in Afghanistan, which is which is really
Speaker 1: how we have defined it. I mean, they've changed it
Speaker 1: a little bit here and there. It's just not happening.
Speaker 1: And the fact that Trump comes in and says we've
Speaker 1: got people who are losing arms, We've got people who
Speaker 1: aren't even coming back at all, what are we doing there?
Speaker 1: And the media takes that as an opportunity in this case,
Speaker 1: would word, whether intentionally or just the other people relaying
Speaker 1: the information to him, take this as a moment to
Speaker 1: say that Trump is some kind of you know, he's
Speaker 1: some kind of maniac, that he can't be trusted, and
Speaker 1: that he's you know, um. The fact that he would
Speaker 1: go to that, that people would go to those lengths
Speaker 1: to try to undermine his message there just shows you that,
Speaker 1: you know, they really don't care that much about the troops, folks.
Speaker 1: You know this is something you know, Democrats put on
Speaker 1: a put on a big, big show of this recently
Speaker 1: with you know, John McCain and how much they respect
Speaker 1: his service and everything. But if it's between trashing Trump
Speaker 1: and leaving our soldiers high and dry, a lot of
Speaker 1: powerful leftists in this country go with with choice number one.
Speaker 1: A lot of Democrats in Congress go with choice number one.
Speaker 1: Do not be fooled. Do not let them mislead you
Speaker 1: on this. You know that they talked this big game,
Speaker 1: but when push comes to shove, Democrats care a whole
Speaker 1: heck of a lot about power and about in this case,
Speaker 1: getting power back in their hands. And if that means
Speaker 1: that they have to undermine a discussion that's completely valid
Speaker 1: where the commander in chief is saying, what the heck
Speaker 1: are we doing in Afghanistan. They're willing to do that,
Speaker 1: and I think that should be very that should be
Speaker 1: very troubling to all of us. And I'm gonna, well,
Speaker 1: I can't say yeah. I mean, I think I've got
Speaker 1: an interview next week where I'll be talking to somebody
Speaker 1: about Afghanistan. That will be big. We're gonna break some
Speaker 1: some serious news next week on Afghanistan. I hope talk
Speaker 1: to somebody who has a plan for fixing Afghanistan, or
Speaker 1: at least fixing our role, I should say, fixing our
Speaker 1: role in Afghanistan. I don't know if Afghanistan is fixable, um,
Speaker 1: but you know, I want our I want our troops home.
Speaker 1: And you know, my generation, those of us who either
Speaker 1: on the military or the civilian side, whether you're a
Speaker 1: you know, a door kicking marine or a state department,
Speaker 1: provincial reconstruction team guy or whatever, we've seen what it
Speaker 1: is to try to remake other countries and in the
Speaker 1: Muslim world. And you know what we've learned A lesson.
Speaker 1: We're done with it, never again, never again. All right,
Speaker 1: let's let's loosen it up. Let's get into a roll
Speaker 1: call here. I'll be right back. He's holding the line
Speaker 1: for America. Buck Sexton his back. The show ain't over yet, folks,
Speaker 1: keeping it real, It's time for roll call. Bad bad,
Speaker 1: bad bad. Hey, I hope you guys are all gonna
Speaker 1: have a great That sounded almost like I was doing
Speaker 1: a imitation of a radio show for a second. Hey,
Speaker 1: it's wild Bill on the radio, coming to you from
Speaker 1: w k K R T n T y Uh. I
Speaker 1: could do a whole show like that sometimes be kind
Speaker 1: of fun. Actually, go for all, go for all that
Speaker 1: good stuff. Um, let's get to it, shall we, Matthew.
Speaker 1: This is the roll Call Facebook dot com slash buck
Speaker 1: Sexton starting on Monday. The show is gonna be earlier, folks,
Speaker 1: in terms of podcasts, not in terms of the radio show.
Speaker 1: Radio associate. Radio show stays the same, but we're gonna
Speaker 1: get the podcast out, hopefully before lunchtime. Every day. We're
Speaker 1: gonna a daily podcast of the show in advance of
Speaker 1: the radio show, so it'll just be top line thoughts
Speaker 1: run down with the news of the day that kind
Speaker 1: of stuff. We'll see how that goes. You know, we're
Speaker 1: experimenting with the best ways to organize the Hut. Alrighty,
Speaker 1: Matthew writes Shields High brother, thank you for asking the
Speaker 1: tough questions. The interview with Bob Bland was hard to watch.
Speaker 1: Great hearing you asking the hard questions. She seems like
Speaker 1: a far left loon. Keep up the amazing work and
Speaker 1: the team at you, with the team of the Hut produce.
Speaker 1: We need you out there. Well, Matthew, thank you very much.
Speaker 1: You know it's it's hard, folks, and I've heard from
Speaker 1: a lot of you about this. I have signed up
Speaker 1: to do a show that is based upon the premise
Speaker 1: is that the left and the right can speak and
Speaker 1: not agree, but can speak about things without yelling at
Speaker 1: each other. That's the premise of the show. And um,
Speaker 1: it's not easy for me, I'm sure, and some sometimes
Speaker 1: depending on the guests. I mean, I'm always cordial and
Speaker 1: charming and fun, but depending on the guest, it's not
Speaker 1: always necessarily that easy for my co host. But as
Speaker 1: I've said, I mean, the Women's March founder was she
Speaker 1: was she was pretty crazy and and I I I
Speaker 1: would very rarely mean for me to have to take
Speaker 1: the tone that I did in that interview. And I
Speaker 1: didn't raise my voice or get well, maybe I raise
Speaker 1: your voice a little bit, but I didn't yell or
Speaker 1: get personal. But it was only in response to just
Speaker 1: I mean, it was just it was gross the whole thing.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's so much that was said that was
Speaker 1: not true. Uh no answers to very legitimate questions. And
Speaker 1: it's because the left is is overtaken by emotions on
Speaker 1: these things. And that's why they'll say insane stuff like
Speaker 1: millions of women will die if Kavanaugh is on the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. That's just that's something that's so stupid to
Speaker 1: say out loud that a person, a normal person, should
Speaker 1: be deeply embarrassed to say that. UM. And and that's
Speaker 1: you know I did. I did as well as I
Speaker 1: could today with the Bob Bland interview. Bob is a
Speaker 1: woman of those who don't know Bob Bland interview, UM,
Speaker 1: under the circumstances. And I appreciate that you write in
Speaker 1: about it, Matthew, because it wasn't it felt gross to
Speaker 1: have to sit there and listen to some of that stuff.
Speaker 1: And if I you know, some of you probably see Buck,
Speaker 1: why don't you just you know, own the lib, crush
Speaker 1: the enemy, all that stuff. You know, then my co
Speaker 1: host is gonna be She's gonna feel like she has
Speaker 1: to defend the person, and it's gonna I'm working within
Speaker 1: a different dynamic there. That's why I tell you all,
Speaker 1: you know, listen to this radio. This is me. This
Speaker 1: is where I just get to tell you whatever I want.
Speaker 1: I don't have to worry about being polite here with
Speaker 1: the Hill. I have to maintain a certain decorum because
Speaker 1: it's that is the agreement of the show. Right. It's
Speaker 1: kind of like I'm sitting at a debate and we've
Speaker 1: agreed to equal time. Well, if we've agreed to equal time,
Speaker 1: I can't you know, run rough shot on the other
Speaker 1: person and interrupt them and all that stuff, even if
Speaker 1: they're lying or saying stuff that I don't like, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean. That's kind of where it is,
Speaker 1: all right, Joe, are rights? Um? What else? Did you wait?
Speaker 1: Hold on a second? Two things? I'm a couple of
Speaker 1: days behind, so I'm sure somebody has answered. The grave
Speaker 1: danger is a few good men? Correct jar to you
Speaker 1: said you're gonna start throwing out quotes and just seeing
Speaker 1: if people catch them. Saying there's a quote for you
Speaker 1: doesn't allow that. I think that the fact that you
Speaker 1: changed your inflection and gave two lines should have been
Speaker 1: more than enough to uh tip the hat that there
Speaker 1: was a quote to be called on shields high. Okay, Jar,
Speaker 1: All right, buddy, you know you want you and the
Speaker 1: rest of the team gonna put on their big boy
Speaker 1: pants when it comes to quotes. Well, we'll see how
Speaker 1: this goes. Then I'm just gonna start slipping Him'm not
Speaker 1: gonna say that was a movie quote. You might just
Speaker 1: be like, why did you say that weird thing? Or
Speaker 1: maybe you don't notice it at all. You got Okay,
Speaker 1: we're taking the training wheels off now. The quotes are
Speaker 1: just gonna get slipped into the show and we'll see.
Speaker 1: We'll see who can pick it up pick it out?
Speaker 1: All right? You you asked for Joe, you want it.
Speaker 1: You're gonna get it. You want it, You're gonna get it.
Speaker 1: Let's get amy. Who rights question? When do the actions
Speaker 1: of the deep state rise to the level of sedition?
Speaker 1: What is the difference between sedition and treason? Do either
Speaker 1: apply in the case of our governmental situation. I don't
Speaker 1: think I can hear about John Kerry getting shot in
Speaker 1: the butt again. He needs to retire. Um. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: sedition has actually a very, uh a very dark history
Speaker 1: in our country in the sense that it is it
Speaker 1: is technically conduct that or speech that would bring people
Speaker 1: to rebel against the state. Uh. So it's you know,
Speaker 1: if you try to conspiracy to overthrow the government would
Speaker 1: still be a crime. But but sedition in our history
Speaker 1: goes back to the Alien and Sedition Acts, and people,
Speaker 1: people forget this in this country. Folks in the early
Speaker 1: eighteen hundreds, there were some folks who are who were
Speaker 1: locked up just for having policies that were unpopular journalists,
Speaker 1: we're locked up for having policies that were unpopular with
Speaker 1: the government at the time because of the Alien and
Speaker 1: Sedition Acts. Uh. And and that was let's just say that,
Speaker 1: we we have veered from the First Amendment and pretty
Speaker 1: dramatic fashion it numerous times in our past, and the
Speaker 1: Alien and Sedition Acts are certainly an example of that. So, uh,
Speaker 1: sedition isn't something that anyone's gonna get in trouble for
Speaker 1: right now. I don't even think sedition. I'd have to check.
Speaker 1: I don't think sedition is part of the Federal Criminal Code.
Speaker 1: I think that Yeah, I don't think that it is.
Speaker 1: So there's that. Let's see what we have next here
Speaker 1: in roll call actually went hold on, let me let
Speaker 1: me check that. I don't I don't want to tell
Speaker 1: you guys bad information. Uh. Is sedition a crime in
Speaker 1: the US? You know I can do this in real time.
Speaker 1: Brandenburg v. Ohio Supreme Court case maintains its seditious speech,
Speaker 1: including yeah, no, it's not a crime. There you go,
Speaker 1: but you eighteen US Code Chapter Tree Treason, sedition, and
Speaker 1: subversive activities. Well, uh, seditious conspiracy? Uh? Okay, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: it depends on how you define sedition, folks. Seditious conspiracy
Speaker 1: under eighteen USC. Two three eight four if two or
Speaker 1: more persons in any state or territory conspiet Yeah, this
Speaker 1: is what I said, conspire to overthrow, put down, or
Speaker 1: destroyed by force the government of the United States, or
Speaker 1: to levy war against them. Uh, then that seditious conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Twenty years in prison. Yeah, that's so so seditious conspiracy.
Speaker 1: If you're if you're conspiring to take action, to take
Speaker 1: action against the government, that can be a crime. But
Speaker 1: just to say you hate the government, I think, and
Speaker 1: just to say that you wish the government would collapse,
Speaker 1: I do not think that. I don't. I don't think
Speaker 1: you're gonna you know, you're allowed to say that, uh
Speaker 1: Brandon burg O High of Ohio. The seditious seditious speech
Speaker 1: is allowed, so that that was interesting. Actually, I don't
Speaker 1: think we're gonna get so deep into that one. And
Speaker 1: we and we did we uh, we did dive into
Speaker 1: that one quite a bit. Bart, Buddy Bart from South Carolina.
Speaker 1: He's always he's not afraid of Bart and afraid of
Speaker 1: no ghost uh buck. The type of hysteria that sprung
Speaker 1: up because the anonymous op ed and calling for is
Speaker 1: well known to me personally. Circ ninety one, I was
Speaker 1: a high school delegate to a regional model u N
Speaker 1: representing the United States on the Security Council. After a
Speaker 1: long heated debate, well we're talking about your un security counts,
Speaker 1: I mean your U N model U N think. Uh, okay,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna let this one go for now, Bart, Bart, Bart,
Speaker 1: this got a little long, and I'm gonna read it,
Speaker 1: but I don't have to have to read it. All
Speaker 1: their Larry writes Buck Shields. Hi, I am a political
Speaker 1: junkie and subscribed to several podcasts, but yours is still
Speaker 1: my favorite. Larry, You're my favorite. I have noticed that
Speaker 1: the volume on your podcast has gotten lower recently. Could
Speaker 1: you please check on that? Is that right? John? Or
Speaker 1: our podcast volumes lower? What's going on? John? Did did
Speaker 1: you order the code? Read? Also? One little nitpick, you
Speaker 1: frequently refer to the Democratic Party when technically it is
Speaker 1: the Democrat Uh, the Democrat Party. Keep up the good work, Larry. Well, Larry,
Speaker 1: Actually I'll tell you something, buddy. Uh, technically it's the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. It's I actually try to call it the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party as a little shorthand a little bit of
Speaker 1: a an extended solitary finger, if you will. But they
Speaker 1: call themselves the it is the Democratic Party. It is
Speaker 1: not actually called the Democrat Party. So I thought it
Speaker 1: was worth addressing that one. I don't know if you
Speaker 1: got John, are you here? I mean, we have a
Speaker 1: super loud New York, New York truck driving past the
Speaker 1: building right now. I have no idea what that's all about.
Speaker 1: I mean, are they really can you hear that? Okay?
Speaker 1: I mean New York New York and the whole thing. Right,
Speaker 1: I can hear it's coming through this. It's coming from
Speaker 1: to come through the studio here. But anyway, Uh, they're
Speaker 1: trying to get me all excited about New York. I
Speaker 1: won't you won't break me. I've been I'm in the
Speaker 1: swamp for now. New York. I miss you. You stay alive.
Speaker 1: No matter what occurs, I will find you New York,
Speaker 1: no matter how long it takes, no matter how far. Alright,
Speaker 1: we're gonna hit a quick break. We'll be right back,
Speaker 1: Team Buck. It's time for roll call, more roll call.
Speaker 1: We have adam rights. Lived by the store or die
Speaker 1: by the sword is biblical Matthew twenty six fifty two.
Speaker 1: I mean I thought it must be biblical, but I
Speaker 1: was not. Uh, let me see what it says here
Speaker 1: Bible Gateway. I didn't. John, did you know that for
Speaker 1: all who draw the sword will die by the sword? Okay,
Speaker 1: I mean it's close, it's not exactly so it's not
Speaker 1: an exact one. But yeah, put your sword back in
Speaker 1: its place. Jesus said to him, for all who draw
Speaker 1: the sword will die by the sword. Um, so it's
Speaker 1: a kind of it's a close approximation. You're you're correct, Adam. Uh,
Speaker 1: Brian writes l O l on Rising. Well done, sir,
Speaker 1: he's such an extremist. I want to know why I
Speaker 1: can't answer that Women's March leader. Thanks Brian. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: it got, it got. It got pretty wild in there.
Speaker 1: Um it was. It was not good from from the
Speaker 1: that's folks. It was the co founder of the Women's March,
Speaker 1: with the thousands and hundreds of thousands of people and
Speaker 1: the and the you know, the women's genitalia hats and
Speaker 1: all that stuff. We had her in studio. I asked
Speaker 1: her very straightforward, very I mean when I say fair,
Speaker 1: we're you know, legit questions, not got your questions. It
Speaker 1: was okay, you're saying crazy stuff. Explained to me the
Speaker 1: crazy that you're saying. Uh, but yeah, you know, he's
Speaker 1: such an extremist. I learn know why I can't answer that. Yeah. Uh,
Speaker 1: that's that's right. I think she it was. It was
Speaker 1: if you folks, if you haven't seen it, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's kind of hard to watch because it's it's so
Speaker 1: there's also a lot of there's a whole As I
Speaker 1: was saying, the old dishonest premise that gets thrown in
Speaker 1: the middle, and I'm being told something that's just flatly
Speaker 1: not true, and I'm kind of thrown off by how
Speaker 1: wrong it is. And Jason writes, heard the podcast Slam
Speaker 1: of the Firebird ouch, I got an eighty nine A
Speaker 1: lot of on if you don't mind rolling without airbags?
Speaker 1: Are most of the electronics? Did I make fun of
Speaker 1: firebirds on the podcast? I don't remember that. Somebody must have.
Speaker 1: Judy writes Buck, What happened your web page right now?
Speaker 1: I'm getting an error message, Judy. We are doing maintenancetance
Speaker 1: to work on bucks x and dot com because we're
Speaker 1: gonna make it better than ever. It's coming back. So
Speaker 1: sorry about that, but we're on it. We are on it.
Speaker 1: Um Rob says, great call about Bloomenthal being a human.
Speaker 1: Funeral home director shields, I you know what I mean, guys,
Speaker 1: he really does seem like, do you what to purchase
Speaker 1: a musoleum er? Perhaps three of our finest burial plats,
Speaker 1: And he's just so like, he's so gross. Bloom Who
Speaker 1: votes for that guy? Who votes for that guy? That's
Speaker 1: what I want to know. U. Karen writes Buck, I
Speaker 1: think you should have called your new show buck Naked. Uh.
Speaker 1: I don't know about that, Karen. I feel like that
Speaker 1: might be false advertising because there's no nudity, so how
Speaker 1: can I call it right? And I don't think John
Speaker 1: wants to work on a show called buck Naked, right, producer, John?
Speaker 1: That's John likes it all right? There you go. That's
Speaker 1: because you know me. But I feel like if we
Speaker 1: were hiring you and it's like you're gonna work at
Speaker 1: a show called buck naked. Uh? Actually no, that does
Speaker 1: sound fun. Not to think about it, you know, it's
Speaker 1: definitely worth checking out. Um, so what do we have here?
Speaker 1: Next up we have Dale, who writes, uh, movie quote
Speaker 1: you ever look across the lake and wonder what's buried
Speaker 1: beneath it? That's about as buried as you can get. Dale,
Speaker 1: I have no idea what that movie is. Action movie quote.
Speaker 1: Do you ever look over a lake and think about something? Quote?
Speaker 1: That's it? Wait, that's the same quote. Oh it repeated?
Speaker 1: Sorry I think you said. I think you double sent
Speaker 1: your message there, buddy. Uh, But yeah, I still don't
Speaker 1: know the quote, so you got me. Yeah. I don't
Speaker 1: think that doesn't sound like an actually movie To me,
Speaker 1: it sounds like a movie with a bunch of British
Speaker 1: people sitting around rearranging matches. Oh is that right? I'm
Speaker 1: arranging matches? Hello, you guys remembered Eddie Izzard is a
Speaker 1: weird dude, but he actually had a pretty some pretty
Speaker 1: funny things. I actually did some pretty funny comedy back
Speaker 1: in the day. Michael writes, no, please don't cover Russia
Speaker 1: gate more can't stand to hear it until something happens
Speaker 1: like McCabe today. Alright, Michael, that's good to know. And
Speaker 1: I definitely want more. I want more folks to weigh
Speaker 1: in on content that they either want more of or
Speaker 1: that they could do with less of on the show.
Speaker 1: Just understand that. You know, if if if I get
Speaker 1: one person writes me that says I want less Russia
Speaker 1: and ten that say they want more, you know, the
Speaker 1: freedom hud is is is a well, I guess it's
Speaker 1: actually a republic, right because I'm kind of elected to
Speaker 1: run the show. But you all, you all get a vote,
Speaker 1: but no one person in the vote process gets to determined.
Speaker 1: It just be because sometimes people send me things. I
Speaker 1: told you about this, I said, yeah, but you know
Speaker 1: you don't like the accents. But a hundred other people do,
Speaker 1: so I'm trying to. I'm trying to keep the maximum
Speaker 1: number of the team happy. Here. Uh Justin Rights, Oh
Speaker 1: my god, Buck, you've never seen Smokey in the bandit.
Speaker 1: You must watch it or we're going to have to
Speaker 1: temporarily suspend your man card. Alright, Justin, Alright, Smoky in
Speaker 1: the band and I'm on it. I'm on it. Um.
Speaker 1: I know I should have seen that one. Andrew writes,
Speaker 1: your show really shook the pillars of heaven, Oss, but
Speaker 1: the first time messenger caller amazing show. Thank you so much, Andrew.
Speaker 1: I wanted to give a shout out to a problem
Speaker 1: you caused me recently. The other day, I received an
Speaker 1: almost full notification on my iPhone ten. I was curious
Speaker 1: because I don't download a lot of stuff, and then
Speaker 1: I realized I've got fifteen gigs of Buck Sexton podcast downloaded.
Speaker 1: I listened every day. Keep up the good work. It's
Speaker 1: all in the reflexes, Andrew. Well, Andrew, your super oss,
Speaker 1: my man and your phone just can't handle all this
Speaker 1: awesome baby, So thank you so much for writing guys,
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for hanging out. Great to be
Speaker 1: with you. I'll see you on Monday shields Hot. If
Speaker 1: you're a business and you're hiring folks, you want to
Speaker 1: make sure that people you're bringing in are representing themselves accurately,
Speaker 1: that you don't have any liabilities or any problems because
Speaker 1: of people with a record that they falsified criminal record
Speaker 1: even possibly. You need people you can trust who are efficient,
Speaker 1: who will do the background checks and investigating for you.
Speaker 1: That's Global Verification Network. I can personally vouch for the CEO,
Speaker 1: Mark Buckman. Global Verification is his company and his team
Speaker 1: of risk mitigation experts are the best in the business.
Speaker 1: Whenever I've got a problem folks, I'm like, hey, Mark,
Speaker 1: you gotta be the guy that can answer this. And
Speaker 1: he gives fantastic advice. He knows this business backwards and forwards.
Speaker 1: He's the guy you want to go to the work
Speaker 1: with startups all the way to fortune one companies. No
Speaker 1: data or client information they take is ever offshore. Call
Speaker 1: eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine.
Speaker 1: Tell him buck Sex and Cents you eight seven seven
Speaker 1: six nine five one one seven nine, or go to
Speaker 1: my g VN dot com. That's my g VN dot com.