WEBVTT - The Mark Moss Show Jan 14, 2022

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, welcome back to another episode of the Markmas

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Show where we are talking about bitcoin, We're talking about cryptocurrencies,

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we are talking about the decentralized revolution, each and every

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>week bringing you the latest news, the education and some

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest, brightest guests in the space, so you

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>can have all the information that you need in order

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to be prepared. Now, Uh, things happen fast. Sometimes things

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>happen fast, sometimes things happens slow. But uh, right now,

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we have seen a lot of things, and unfortunately the

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>price of bitcoin is a little bit down. Um, it's

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>off its peak. It was as high as sixty nine

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>thou dollars and sitting and sitting now trying to kind

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>of recoil and grab some energy in the fifty thousand

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>ish range as we speak right now. But don't fret,

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>don't fret, just a little break. I mean, we were

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>literally a year ago at thirty thousand, and today we're

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>consolidating around fifty thousand, which seems like a pretty good

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>increase to me. To go from thirties thousand to fifty

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand in a year, I'll take it. It's better than

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>any other markets have done. Now did go up aside

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine thousand, and it's down own. But you're focusing

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>on the wrong thing. Are you a are you a

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>glass half full or a glass half empty kind of person? Right?

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So think about that. Um. Now, if you need any

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>bid hope, let me just give you a piece of

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>news that broke this week and then we're going to

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>dive into something that I'm gonna have one of my

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>good friends, Nick bodia On, he's a USC adjunct professor,

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and he wrote something that says, the price is truth,

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the price is always the truth. Now, well, if you

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>don't like the price where it's at today, maybe you

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>don't like the truth, but let's talk about where the

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>price could potentially go. So, um, If you, you know,

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to money at all, chances are you probably

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>heard of Goldman Sacks, Golden raise your hand. If you

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>heard of Golden sac well, I can't see you raising

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>your hands though, never mind, but Goldman Sacks. Unless you've

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>been living under rock, you know who Goldman Sacks are.

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>They are the UH financial affirment in the United States

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and really in the world. You've either worked at Goldman

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Sachs and then the government and the government and the

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Golden Sacks in your base of the same and uh,

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you basically kind of run the world at this point.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's just kind of saying like that. Goldman Sacks came

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>out with an article this week just the other day

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that said, despite bitcoin's ebbs and flows, they believe bitcoin

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>could reach a hundred thousand dollars Wow. As it's as

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>they say, it's steadily pushing out gold's place in the

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>store of value market. Mm hmm. They said. After topping

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>out nearly at seventy November, then bitcoin decided to decline.

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>As we talked about that, but bitcoin's Goldman Sacks puts

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>bitcoins float adjusted market capitalization at just below seven hundred

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>billion store of value market assets that gain or stay

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>stable over time. Gold is presently at two point six trillions.

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So what they're saying is that, um, the gold market

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>is really it's it's a lot more than that. Um.

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But but they're talking about the percentage of gold that

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>people use. And typically people would move to gold to

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>what I call a chaos hedge. So whenever there's chaos

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in the markets, whether there's massive inflation, deflation, or whatever

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>type of chaos is going on, then people would turn

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to gold. Historically. What they're saying is Goldman Sachs, not me,

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>although I agree what Goldman Sachs is saying that they

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>are seeing bitcoin taking up that store of value market

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that retail would typically go to UM and now it's

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>going into bitcoin. UM. They say that it's about you know,

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of people, the percents of of the market

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>gap that people would go to for the store value

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>markets about two point six trillion and uh. They said

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that in the next five years bitcoin making up as

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>much as fifty percent of the entire store of value market.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So right now, UM, the amount of bitcoin or the

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is being used as a store value. What does

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that mean store of value? Well, when I earned my money,

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm storing my energy to be used at another point

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in time. So, for example, to break this down to

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of the first principles level, if I was saying

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>digging a hole and I'm expending so I I consume calories,

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I eat food, that's calories. Those calories are energy in

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>my body. I expend those calories that energy by digging

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a hole. Let's say I have to dig a hole

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>for four hours in a day to earn enough to

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>give me my food and shelter that I need to survive.

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>But let's say that then I decided to work an

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>extra four hours. Well, i've worked an extra four hours,

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>expend an extra four hours of energy. Now I need

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to store that energy in a way

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that I could use at a later in time. So

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>now I could use that energy for tomorrow and I

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have to work all right, So I'm storing my wealth,

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>storing my energy, storing my value to be used at

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a later in time. Now, typically people do that with money.

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So you earn money, you don't spend all your money.

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>You store some of it. But money currency dollars are

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the worst. Are a horrible store of It's a horrible

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>place to store your value because that that value leaks,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It loses value very quickly. And so most people realize this,

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>which is why they're scrambling to buy anything they can

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>as fast as they can, including homes, including cars, including stocks,

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>including bitcoin, or mountain bikes or kayaks or whatever it

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>else is that you want to buy. Toilet paper, Some

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>people are stocking up on toilet paper. So what they're

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>saying is the store of value market typically historically has

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>been gold, but now bitcoin is overtaking that, and they

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>believe that over the next five years that store of

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>value market that gold is you know, pretty much dominated,

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to be UM. More people are moving to bitcoin,

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and they think over the next five years, as much

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>as fifty percent of the store of value market would

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>go into that, and they would put the value of

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin at around a hundred thousand dollars on an annual

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>return of about that's pretty damn good. I'll take a return,

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>especially when you have averaged out over over that time,

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>especially when you look at gold, which has dropped three

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>point six percent in UM as part of the biggest

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>annual decline since heen. So while gold has dropped three

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>point six p during one of the most chaotic periods

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in history, UM one of the highest. As a matter

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 1>of fact, we hit the highest inflation level that we've

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>seen in forty years, in four decades the most inflation,

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and gold lost value. So it's not hard to understand

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>why people would rather store their value in something else.

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>They want to say that golden crypto. When you start

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to think about them, there's a lot of the same attributes. UM.

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You said that there's a finite supply, there's only twenty

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>one million, they say in this article crypto coins. Uh,

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the only twenty one million crypto coins can be made,

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So you've got this finite supply, just like you do

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>with gold. That is not accurate. I'm going to call

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>them out. There's a lot more than twenty one million

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>crypto coins. There's only twenty one million bit coins. So,

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>as I like to say, bitcoin not crypto h I

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>said in a previous set, meant that just like gold

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>has certain attributes and properties, and there's lots of other

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>metals palladium and platinum and silver and rhodium and grow

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>molley and steel and aluminum, blah blah blah, um, only

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>one has the attributes that gold has. And just like bitcoin, Um,

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>there's about, I don't know, fifteen thousand cryptocurrencies, but only

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>one has the attributes Open border list permission listens as

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a resistant, immutable, et cetera. And so to his point,

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>his finite supply, bitcoin only has twenty one million. Other

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>cryptos have more. But that's the same as gold. Right.

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>In order for something to hold value, it has to

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>be scarce. All the all the basics of economics all

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is based off of scarcity, which, of course we all

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>only have twenty four hours in the day, and so

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>our time is based off of scarcity, and everything that

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>we do in order to push our lives forward is

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>based off of that scarcity of time. And there's more

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>people than there are resources. Resources are finite, which means

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we have scared city and resources which means that we're

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>all competing for more resources. UM. And so when you

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>have an unlimited money supply, when they can literally push

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a button on a keyboard and print up trillions of

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>more dollars, it messes up this whole system. But that's

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>why gold has worked good for five thousand years because

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of a finite supply. Now there is new gold coming

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the ground on a regular basis. But Bitcoin

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is programmed to never have more than twenty one million coins. Now,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>some people say, yeah, but can't that be changed UM Theoretically,

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it could. Theoretically, realistically probably not UM. In

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>order to get that changed, it would it would take

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>UM basically an attack on the network. It would go

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>through probably a year of battle, and if that happened,

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it would probably destroy the network. But we would know

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>well in advance if that was ever going to happen Uh,

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and we'd have plenty of time to figure that out.

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>Of course, like I said, that's theoretically realistically probably not um,

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but that's the price. Now. Like I said, we're gonna

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>have Nick Body coming on as USC professor and he's

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>going to talk to us about the price being truth.

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And then we're gonna talk about um something that I'm

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>super interested in, which is is the bitcoin e t

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.199
<v Speaker 1>F and the paper supply of bitcoin going to artificially

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>suppress the price of bitcoin something I'm worried about. I'm

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be right back with Nick in just a second, uh,

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about prices, truth and what's happening with the bitcoin

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>e t F. So don't go away, all right, Welcome back.

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Mark Mo Show, and we

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>are talking about bitcoin, and we're talking about this decentralized revolution.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.719
<v Speaker 1>And I am joined in the studio now by one

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of my good friends, Nick Botia. You can find him

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at time Value of BTC that stands for

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin time value of BTC and um. Nick is um

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>On the author of a book called The Layered Money,

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>which is an amazing read. I think, uh was I

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>think Preston pistaid it was like one of his top

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>books of the year. I think that was. That's pretty amazing.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>He reads like hundreds of books a year, So a

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>good job on that, Nick. Um. And Nick, you're also

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a adjunct professor I think of economics at US see

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is that right? That's right at USC Marshall School of Business. Yeah,

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>so you are somebody very credential to talk about this.

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So thanks for joining me today. Nick. Of course, good

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to be with you. Mark. So, Um, something I want

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, I know you talk about price is truth.

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>There's all the price takes into consideration, all of the

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>data that's out there. And something that I've been concerned

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>with for a couple of years is these et f

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>s coming into the market. Um. Caitlyn Long has been

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about this, and Um, you have a little bit

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>of a country and view to this. Now. My fear

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with this with this bitcoin market is I believe that

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's too simple, but price moves off supply and demand.

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So uh, if there's more some you know whatever, more

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>demand and lets than supply, then the price goes up.

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And so if I was an institution or hedge fund

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and I want to put a billion dollars into bitcoin,

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I have to buy a billion dollars, take a billion

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars off the market. I take supply off the market.

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting demand into the market. The prices should rise.

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But if there's a paper market for e t f

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>s like we have now, there's no it's all it's

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>all uh spot right, there's or there's no it's there's

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>no cash settled. I'm sorry, it's cash not physically settled.

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So all I'm doing is betting on the price of bitcoin.

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not actually buying bitcoin the way I understand it.

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And so that means instead of putting my billion dollars

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and taking a billion dollars a bitcoin off the market

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>and and messing with the supplied tomand metrics, now I

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>can just put a billion dollars betting on that and

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it artificially, um, it gives them artificial bitcoin. It doesn't

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>affect the supplied demand metrics. But you don't necessarily agree

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>with that. Give us your take on that. So yeah,

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that bitcoin is very unique in that it

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>trades across all these exchanges around the world. Now, we

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we do have paper products, derivative products, et F products

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>call it, you know, let's call them all paper products. Okay, uh,

0:11:55.600 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>these are bitcoin substitutes, not bitcoin, right. Bitcoin itself trades

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on coin based pro bitfin x, cracking, all these exchanges

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and these exchanges, these large, reputable exchanges,

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>have longstanding reputations of being able to satisfy withdrawals no

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>matter what the sizes, and for that reason, the price

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that we see on those exchanges is the real bitcoin price.

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>The fact that ETFs and futures all trade, and even

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin futures on exchanges like Finance, all those prices trade

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>along with let's say, the coin base and cracking price.

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>That means that the market of bitcoin is efficient across

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>multitude of platforms. You can have small arbitrage and people

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're all there are strategies that are dedicated to

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>arbitraging the price just between exchanges, because you can, you know,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>find ten dollar differences and go long and short and

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>arbitrage that trade. But the fact that these large bitcoin

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>exchanges have satisfied withdrawals for years and years means that

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>those prices are the real bitcoin price. And whatever. You know,

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and I respect Caitlin a lot, and she's a friend.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>What what she's saying is that they are all these

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:41.239
<v Speaker 1>paper products, and you can have you know, unlimited, theoretically

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>unlimited leverage to short bitcoin through these paper products. While

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe that, you know, that is in theory possible,

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that what the price that we observe

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is not the real price. And that's what we're saying

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>when price is truth here. The price does actor in

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>everything that we know about bitcoin, including that there are

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>paper products and people can go naked short through derivatives

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>that aren't you know, backed by any real bitcoin. But

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the exchanges, if people withdraw and the

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is there at the price that's given to them

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on the screen, then that's what the bitcoin prices. Okay,

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like maybe there's two different conversations going

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on here. So you're saying that whatever, whatever is happening

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>through all these exchanges and paper markets, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera,

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the price is the truth. The price summarizes everything that's

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>going on out there, which which obviously is obvious. Yes,

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that is the truth. And I get that. I think

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>what she's saying, and not to put words in her

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>mouth where I guess I'll say what what I have

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a concern of is, while the price maybe truth and

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>actually I say the price is truth, I agree with

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you on that, that doesn't mean that the price isn't

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>suppressed being the truth. So the price is the truth,

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but but the but the price could be manipulated because

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>now we've inflated the supply through fake paper market. So

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>even though the price is the truth, couldn't it still

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>be artificially suppressed? Of course, And you know that's the

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>other side of it is I'm not even arguing that

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it can't be suppressed or that you know, it could

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.239
<v Speaker 1>be higher if it wasn't wasn't absent for these instruments.

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>But that's not something that we can do anything about.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not something that we can change. Um, the financial

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>powers that be if that's their strategy to suppress the

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>price of bitcoin, or some you know, large whale trader

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that's their strategy to suppress the price of bitcoin over

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the long term, it's not something that we can change.

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And um, it's not I think, you know, we get

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of background in contact from this from the

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>gold price suppression scheme and the London bullion trade and

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and how that's worked over the last several decades and

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that does energize some of this conversation. So I do

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>want to acknowledge the work done by data and the

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>discoveries that were made in how paper markets are used

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to suppress the gold price and have been for years, um,

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>but gold has also risen in price despite that, Gold

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>has taken a geopolitical you know, importance in the last

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years since the oh seven or eight financial prices

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>because of that. Russia China are you know, making huge

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical moves because of gold still despite whatever London price

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>suppression scheme is going on, and so bitcoin will also

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>charge on in the face. I just my point is

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not really concerned about whether or not the

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin prices being suppressed to these instruments, because it is

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a market that has a transparent settlement mechanism, very transparent,

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the most transparent of all time. So we should celebrate that,

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, it's it's just not a concern

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>to me. Okay, I want to I want to dig

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>into a couple of those things that you talked about

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>there that I think are a couple of good points.

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>The questions that I have while talking about that you're

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Mark MOA show. We're talking about bitcoin

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and the decentralized revolution. I'm in the studio with Nick

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>body up Um. You can find them on Twitter at

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>time Value of btc. We're talking about bitcoin, the prices truth.

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about this this new E t F paper

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>market and the possibility of its suppressing the price. We're

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna dig into more about that and some of the risks, UM.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So don't go away. We were back, all right, welcome back.

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Markma Show. We're talking about bitcoin,

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about this decentralized revolution, and today we're

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>digging into a little bit deeper into the inner workings

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>of this financial system. I'm in the studio with Nick Bodia.

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>You can find them on Twitter at time Value of

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>btc um. He also writes a newsletter. He's an adjunct

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>professor at usc UM and he also writes a newsletter

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that I've been reading and if you're interested in these topics,

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you should subscribe Nick. What's the name of that newsletter.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It's called the Bitcoin Layer on sub Stack, The Bitcoin

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Layer on sub Stack. I recommend each of you to

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>go out and subscribe to that. It's so much information Uh,

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it's too cheap. Nick. I'm talking to you about that later.

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, UM, back to what we were talking about,

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>which is, um, you know, the price being truth and

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the e t F market. Now to your point, Um,

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you you went in and kind of talked about the

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>gold market, and you know, in the gold market, Uh,

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, estimates are there's potentially five hundred paper ounces

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>for everyone physical ounce that's being traded. Um. You know,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>massive manipulation with naked spoofing and naked shorting and things

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>like that. You know, we've seen JP Morgan to pay

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>out massive fines for things like that. Um, And so

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you know there's no doubt that that's that's being done. Now,

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I get that with bitcoin that even if you manipulate

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the price, it doesn't affect the network. It's still borderless,

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>permission list, censorship, resisting, immutable, blah blah blah. Um. But

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I would, in my opinion, maybe one of the greatest

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>risks to bitcoin isn't that Probably the two biggest risk

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion are one that the nodes will become

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>centralized if people don't run nodes, and then you know,

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>coin bases and exchanges get too much power that's that's

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>probably one. But the second one is that the price

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>could be so artificially manipulated that people would lose interest

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.959
<v Speaker 1>and then countries, let like take take action like Al

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Savador for example, If the price gets dropped in half

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>when they've put their whole money into it, other countries

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna follow suit. So I think there is a risk

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>there in my opinion. And so I see this possibility

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate the supply demand, manipulate the price could have

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of an effect. And I know you said it kind

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>of is what it is, um, but I guess it

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is what is. But do you see that as being

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a risk? I mean, do you see that if they

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>build up this paper market enough that they could that

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>they could use that to artificially suppress the price over

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>long term. So another aspect of the whole prices truth

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>thing is that, uh, the price tells a story through time.

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So I look at I used price charts to tell

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>me what's happening through time, and I look at Bitcoin's

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>price chart, and I'd like to use realized value as

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>realized market cap as one of my metrics that anchors

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>how I'm looking at the price and the realized you know,

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>realized value of bitcoin is um in the thirties, right,

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what that's the the m v r V. Yeah,

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>so that's the ratio between the market value and the

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>realized value. So right now we're you know, at about

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. And what that means means is

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that word about you know, premium to what the realized

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>value is. The realized value is a snapshot of where

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin price was when bitcoin transaction transacted on the

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>chain itself, not necessarily on exchanges, and so it is

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a slower moving um target of what bitcoins let's say

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>fair value. I don't explicitly want to call it a

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>fairy value, but it is a valuation metric. Realized price

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is a valuation metric that we can use to think

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin over a longer time horizon. Just like we

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>use two hundred day or fifty week moving averages to

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>smooth price through time, realized values a way to do that.

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So weird about one and a half times realized value today.

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So and for much of two thousand and twenty one,

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>we've been approaching or touching up against these levels that

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>are three plus, so a very extended valuation. When you

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>start to get to you know, quote unquote bubble territory

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for for for bitcoin. So in the last twelve months,

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>what can we observe from the price we've we we

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>observed that the price has gotten very hot at times

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and has cooled off to a point where it's still

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>above this long term fundamental metric. So where's the price suppression?

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest, it's not. To me, I don't observe it.

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>You could say if the ratio of market value to

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>realize value was less than one for a sustained period

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of time and was exhibiting some random behavior, but it's not.

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin has seen huge rallies which are very characteristic of bitcoin,

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>followed by huge liquidations due to leverage. And we can

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>actually see an interest in the futures market. Collapse means

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>contracts that were naked long go away when the price dumps,

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and all very normal and healthy market activity. So where's

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the price suppression? I don't think that it's an argument

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>we have to get into when we're you know, looking

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>about you know, and to Caitlin's point and credit, her

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>job is as a banker to make sure she offers

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a product that can you know, she's a big advocate

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of proof of keys, which means I have a bitcoin product.

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I've signed this transaction to the Bitcoin Ledger where you

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>can see I have the bitcoin for real, and so

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>you can invest in my product with confidence. She's a banker,

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what she's trying to do and market. So that's

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>her talking her book that we have to, you know,

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>have these products that have proof of keys and not

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>fake potentially fake bitcoin, and good on her for trying

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to do that. It's not my concern. I'm you know,

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>hold your own keys. If you're really interested in protecting

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>your own bitcoin, and if you're not going to hold

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>your own keys, demand that your custodians have proof of keys.

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you're not going to do that, then understand

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the risks of potentially paper bitcoin being practionally reserved. Now, um,

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>real quick, if you could give us the short version

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of what you mean by the real the market value

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>versus the realized value. So the realized value is kind

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>of the price point that people have received it at

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>versus where the market value is today. So the majority

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin holders are actually in profit is that something

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>like you're talking about? Yeah, So the majority of bitcoin

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>holders are in profit based on where what we observe

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>from bitcoin's blockchain, so separate in your mind that people

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>trade on exchanges, but then they actually transact using bitcoin

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>when they, for example, withdraw from an exchange. So those

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>on chain bitcoin transactions, when those happen, we strike the

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>price and measure bitcoins market capitalization on a realized basis,

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>meaning what the on chain activity reflects. And then we

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>have a market price, which is where bitcoin trades on exchanges,

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and we can use the market price and the realized

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>price in a ratio to give us context. It It

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that the ratio should be one. It doesn't

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>mean that it can never get to five. That's it's

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>just like we use price to earnings ratio in equities. Right,

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>we have the price, which is what the market trades,

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>We have the earnings, which is the real number that

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the company publishes, and we have a ratio between them,

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and we can use that ratio to give us context

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and to make investment decisions sometimes or to guide us

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>or to give us some story or say all about

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. So I'd like to use and I've written

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>about that at the Bitcoin Layer. The article was called

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the four year Cycle is dead, long live bitcoin, because UM,

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that the four year cycle is muting itself

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>in a way, and we can observe that, observe that

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>with ratios like m v r V. Yeah, I want

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to I want to dig into that article that you're

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>at the four year cycle is dead. We'll talk about that, UM,

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>because bitcoin moves on these four year having cycles. Every

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>four years, the amount of bitcoin being produced on a

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>daily basis by the miners gets cut in half. And

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>typically people have looked at these four year having cycles

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and then said, well, approximately eighteen months after you know, having,

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the market peaks, But like, really, we don't have enough

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:47.719
<v Speaker 1>data to back that app. So I want to dig

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>into that with you. UM. In a minute, you're listening

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to Mark Moss talking about bitcoin in the studio with

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Nick Bodia. You can find them on Twitter at time.

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Value of BTC is also the author of the book

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>called Layered Money, which I've read and I love it. UM.

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I've referenced it quite a bit, So checked out that book.

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And he also writes a newsletter, the Bitcoin Layer dot

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>sub stack dot com, so check those out as well.

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.479
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking about UM the price of bitcoin, UM,

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the market value of bitcoin versus the realized value of bitcoin,

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and then the potential for these paper bitcoins, these e

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>t F to potentially suppress for manipulated price. We're gonna

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>come back in a minute and talk about the end

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>of the four year cycle. Don't go away, hey, welcome back.

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Markma Show where we're talking about

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and talking about the decentralized revolution each and every week,

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to bring you the most up to date information,

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the education and special guests to give you even more

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>insight into the market. Understanding bitcoin isn't easy. There's a

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of things going on, but it's worth the time.

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.479
<v Speaker 1>It's worth your time, it's worth your attention to put

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 1>into it. I'm in the studio with Nick body Up.

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 1>You can find him on Twitter at time Value of BTC.

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>He's the author of the book called Layered Money, and

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>he writes a awesome newsletter called the Bitcoin Layer at

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>sub Stack. Check out those options. Um now, Nick Um,

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you wrote an article recently. I subscribed to your newsletter

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and everybody else should as well if you care about

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>these subjects, which you do. If you're listening, um, and

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you wrote one called the four Year cycle is dead

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>and I and I said before the break, right, we

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>know that bitcoin has these four year having cycles UM

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and people have been trying to guess where the top

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>is in the market based off of where we are

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>having cycle. You said the four year cycle is dead.

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Yeah, so bitcoin has uh in

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and thirteen and two thousand and seventeen had

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>these massive run ups and parabolic increases in price, and

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they correlated perfectly with uh lag. After the havings, which

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are when you know, every four years or so when

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>bitcoins supply increase has um and you know, stays that

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>way for the next four years. And it does make

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>sense that as bitcoin becomes more scarce UM and it's

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>demand is still increasing on a on an exponential adoption curve,

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that we could have these supply shocks and massive run

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>ups in price. And it's been the theory for a

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>long time across bitcoin in general that havings lead to

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>these parabolic increases in price. We would have another crash

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>after that and you know, this big winter bear market.

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>But what we saw in is Bitcoin's behavior change a

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and it didn't. It didn't resemble over Bitcoin

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>had a nice increase. It was a less than increase UM,

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but it had this long mini bear market during the

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>summer and um, it just it didn't follow that exact

0:29:56.400 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>four year pattern that it had been showing. So for

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that reason, I think the four your cycle is dead

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean bitcoin won't respond in price to havings anymore. Um.

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>But the point of the article was to show that

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>with much more sophisticated hedging tools, miners and market other

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>market participants that respond to the supply shock of the

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>having itself can spread out their risk over products and

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>over time. The time aspect is really key here. It's

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>not just that you can hedge using the options market

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>or the futures market. It's that there's a whole risk curve,

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>an option curve, and you know, six to eighteen months

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>out options and futures products that you can engage in

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to mitigate your future price risk if you are a

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>physical user of bitcoin itself. And that sophistication of the

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>hedging market reduces volatility around the having events even if

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>measured on a four year period, and so having still

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>might have a huge effect on price. But this whole

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that every four years we're going to have a

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>massive bubble and a massive crash might be over UM,

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>but still expect you know, large volatility from bitcoin for

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the time being. Well, I think, um, you know, in

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.479
<v Speaker 1>the past, we've seen you know, huge draw downs, drawns,

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>draw downs, and we've always expected I think most people

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>have expected that as bitcoin continues to get bigger and bigger,

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that the volatility goes down, down, down, And so we've

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>gone from draw downs, apes and draw downs. In this year,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got a draw down. I mean, it wasn't small, right,

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and so maybe that was the maybe that was the

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>big crash that we were expecting a draw down was

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I said, that that's that's nothing small.

0:31:57.800 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that I was thinking that when as you

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>were talking and and you're talking about these these supply

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>demand UM metrics kind of changing, and some of that

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>based off of these products that are available for them

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to hedge their bets, which you know, a lot of

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>these future markets actually got their start from farming, where

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they did have to hedge their bets, right, they didn't

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>want to have a bad croppy or something like that. UM.

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>But also something that I've been noticing specifically in the

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>miners that are mostly affected by this this this supply

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>demand is that um, you know, just in the last

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>several months, we've seen six or eight different mining companies

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>go public and raise hundreds of millions of not billions

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, and so they're raising basically almost free money,

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>free debt um and they're going into mining and their

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>goals are they don't they don't need to sell that

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin anymore. So they have the products to hedge on

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>one side, but on the other side, they've also used

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the market and the low low rates to raise this

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>debt where they don't have to sell the bitcoin either,

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and so that's got to dramatically change the markup. And

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>then you have that that dynamic as well as the

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>institutional players that have come in and you know, the

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sailor being the kind of main archetype there and

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>he's like, I'm never selling. And when you have these

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>institutional players, you know, Warren Buffett's own Coca Cola for

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>like sixty years, right, Like, they don't come in to

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>just buy and sell real quickly. So I guess the

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>makeup of the buyers, the change in the mining, and

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the products being available, like you said, probably all play

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>into just change in the dynamics of that completely. Yeah,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we we have a new market structure in than we

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>did in it's just different players. The size is unlike

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>anything we saw five years ago. We have public companies.

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Sailor. He did a great long interview with

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Peter McCormick, who I know that you just went on

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>UM and they talked about the I p o s

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of mining companies and it really, um it shifted my

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it a little bit, where uh, basically the

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>importance of these publicly traded mining companies the prospect that

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>they may never sell and the prospect that as public

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:17.240
<v Speaker 1>companies they're also financial engines and therefore can turn debt.

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, they can print their own money in the

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 1>form of stock, they can print dollars in the form

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of debt, and by mining equipment hoard bitcoin. It it

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>does bring this whole new dynamic to the bitcoin market.

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>UM where it's we're institutionalizing this idea of courting bitcoin

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and storing it as digital energy and um it's it's

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a very exciting time. And the four year cycle is

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that we're not going to have bowl markets.

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:54.320
<v Speaker 1>It just means that the nature of bitcoins price is

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>going to it's not going to be the same as

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>ever again, it's going to be some thing different. It

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>might have been accelerated from four to three years, like

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you said, like three and a quarter years, because we

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>had that draw down pretty early on in and um,

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how it behaves, you know, in the next having.

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know that's why we're here watching bitcoin

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>every day. Yeah, Michael Sailor's I think it was Michael

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Taylor said all your models are broken, like every everything's changed, right,

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I love that. I constantly say that the

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>world we're going into is not the same as the

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>world that we're that that we've left behind. Um, you know,

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we're we're in a in a different market cycle. We

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 1>have the FED you know, driving policy, and um, different

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>different stores of value like bitcoin coming out, and so

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.359
<v Speaker 1>anybody who's using you know, fifty sixty eight year old

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>history to try to kind of project where we're going

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>it's different and same with bitcoin, right, I mean, it's

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>too new and things are changing too fast to constantly say, well,

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen exactly the same way. Um. I

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was just before the secondment, before you came on I

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>was reading an article of Goldman Sachs him out and

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>said that they expect gold to continue to steal the

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.839
<v Speaker 1>store of value portion from gold, and they think over

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the next five years you can capture fifty of the

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>store value that gold has, and they put it up

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred thousand dollars in five years, which I

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.359
<v Speaker 1>think is very low in my opinion. But I don't

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>have a crystal ball, so I'm not trying to put

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>any predictions out there. Um, do you have any predictions?

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Real quick? Before we got to wrap it up. I

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>think bitcoin is headed to a million dollars over a

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>decade decade time horizon, and that that's the way that

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I think about it. So hundred thousand is in the cards.

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>So is half a million, So is a million. It's

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 1>just it's a matter of time, and it's just going

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to take a long time. Got it, Got it all right?

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think a million in ten years is good too.

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the studio with Nick Bodia at time Value

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:53.959
<v Speaker 1>of BTC. Check out his newsletter Bitcoin The Bitcoin Layer

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>on sub stack, his book Layered Money. Thanks for listening

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Mark Moss Show. Catch you next time.