WEBVTT - NFL Week 15 Picks & Best Bets + Against the Spread Selections (Ep. 406)

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It is me Joey P. Joe P's a PN.

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's week fifteen in the NFL. We continue to cook

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>here over at Betting Pros to help us look through

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the favorite lines. The favorite sides for this week in

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, of course, is Andrew Erickson, the undertaker himself,

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and of course our good pal Scott Bogman, our man

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>about town when it comes to bowl season. By the way, Bogs,

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>how are you managing all the bowls this year in

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the college football space? How many have you bet on

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>so far?

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, just a couple. I like to do them

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 2>as they come up. I mean, he can't. I find

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.919
<v Speaker 2>it hard to bet this far out because of the

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>transfer portal and the opt outs and all that stuff.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 3>So I like to get a little closer to kickoff.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 3>So just a couple for this weekend, A couple for

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 3>this week A couple of tickets. Yeah.

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Now the real question is Andrew Erickson. I know that

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you will be following some of the college football content

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>here on the channel. I know throughout the year you've

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>placed some of those bets. Anything already popping for you

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in bowl season. I know we're talking in college on

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFL show, but still it's fun.

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 3>It's football.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 5>The only things I have tickets for are Michigan to

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 5>win the National Championship. I also have a ticket on

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 5>Texas because I had a ticket on Oklahoma State do

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 5>win the Big twelve, so I hedged against that in Texas.

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 5>So I got Texas and Michigan. So we'll see where

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 5>that plays out.

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Beautiful when hedging pays off, you gotta love it, everybody,

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>all right now, if you want a chance to win

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a one year free premium upgrade to Betting Pros, the

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>best betting tools on the planet, drop your comments below,

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the YouTube channel. That's it, That's all you

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>gotta do. We gave away one last week to our

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 1>good pal Curtis so Curtis can graduate the big winner,

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Brooks. But we want to give one to you.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So drop your comments below. Tell us what you're in

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on this week, your favorite picks of the week. You

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>just might win yourself a free premium upgrade which is

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>going to pay for itself. Well, it's free, so it

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>already pays for itself. But it's gonna be a nice thing,

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>trust me, nice things for everybody. That's what the holidays

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>are all about. Gentlemen. Let's kick things off here, Scott, Bobby,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and why don't you take us through your first pick

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of the week for Week fifteen.

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's lay the points for Atlanta minus three at Carolina.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 2>And these are two of the worst teams against the

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 2>spread in the league, but they did play in Week one.

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 2>That was one of only four games that the Falcons

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 2>have covered this season, and look, just in this game.

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>They have way more to play for after dropping that

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 2>game against Tampa at home last week. And while they

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 2>may have lost, they showed an ability to move the

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 2>ball vertically, as Ritter had three hundred and forty seven yards,

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 2>a season high and only his second game with forty

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 2>or more attempts. I wouldn't usually care because the Bucks

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 2>defense is a mess. Right, So it's like, Okay, well,

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta threw, but it was against Tampa Bay. But it's

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 2>not like Carolina is in any better. They've been bad

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 2>all year. The Panthers' stats against the runner, okay, but

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 2>they grade out twenty eighth against the run on PFF

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty ninth in tackling could be a big day for

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Beijon and Algier, and the fact that they moved the

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>ball vertically last week makes me think this team on

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 2>offense is going to put up some points against his

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 2>bad Carolina d And I just don't Carolina can score.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 2>So give me the incentive for the Carolina other wanted

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 2>to win this game, but not only that, No.

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Shit, they want to win. But there's no incentive for

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>me to bet Carolina on an upset because I'm only

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>getting plus one fifteen. That's the best number right now

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>betting Groys I can get, you know, give me two

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to one, three to one even now. I'm like, all right, well,

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll make some money on this. But this was

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>actually number ten on my list this week for the

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>same last week.

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>They're not going to give you the odds this week.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>You know what it is? Box, I feel like I

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>look at it and I say to myself, look, do

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to copy and paste Ritter's performance? No from

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>last week, especially on the road. But at the same time,

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>do I think they can win this game by three

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>against Caroline Panthers. I think the answer is yes. It's

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of unspectacular, unsexy but it makes a lot of sense.

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>You just kind of take the money and run with

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this one. Speaking of taking the runny and running, Andrew Rickson,

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>what are you taking this week? In Week fifteen?

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Give me the Giants? Giants too.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>This week?

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Boys again, if you don't want to go on the

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 5>money line, that's fine, but Giants plus six. Like I

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 5>hate the Saints so much, Like this team is so overrated,

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 5>and this is my special stat right, the Saints have

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 5>covered three games this year. Tommy DeVito has covered three

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.839
<v Speaker 5>games in his last three starts. Like, the Saints are

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 5>just one of these teams. They've benefited from the easy

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 5>schedule they've had all year long, and yet they've taken

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 5>zero advantage of it. With Derek Carr, let's see what

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 5>they've done. They're on a seven game streak of fin

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 5>to cover the spread after they've won a game, so

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 5>they're a good team to bet on against after they win.

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 5>They failed to cover the spread in seven of the

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 5>last home games, seven to the last eight home games,

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 5>so they don't there's no home field advantage for them

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 5>playing in New Orleans. They fail to cover the spread

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 5>in eleven of the last thirteen games as a favorite, Like,

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 5>this team is so bad all over round in terms

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 5>of the expectation that they come out with. So I've

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 5>been waiting for them to just take on a team

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 5>that not named the Panthers where I can feel somewhat

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 5>confident about like backing them against the Saints. And the

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 5>Saints barely covered last week against the Carolina Panthers, one

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 5>of the two teams they've actually give been a to

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 5>cover against this season. So for me looking at more

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 5>of a matchup kind of based analysis, the Saints have

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 5>been really bad against the run of the last couple

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 5>of weeks, allowing the most rushing cards to running backs

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 5>over the last four weeks. Who is the Giants best

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 5>player on offense, Sae Kwon Barkley. They are able to

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 5>run the football against the New Orleans Saints defense. And

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:20.799
<v Speaker 5>what's the other thing. The Saints are really bad against

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 5>mobile quarterbacks. What do we see Tommy DeVito do last week?

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 5>Ran the ball with his legs. So not only are

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 5>all the trends pointing to fading the Saints, but the

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 5>matchup on paper from a football standpoint is that the

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 5>Giants offense can actually move the ball against this defense,

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 5>and when it comes to the Giants defense against the

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 5>Saints offense. I have zero fear whatsoever of Derek Carr,

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 5>and we've seen this Giants defense give better offenses fits

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 5>at times this season. Blitz heavy. I think Derek Carr

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 5>is gonna crumble. Look, I think Giants plus six is

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 5>the best bet. But Giants on the money line, I

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 5>also don't. I've already bet it, so just be transparent.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>No, that's as if I and another one from my

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>top ten bets. Somebody's been watching videos. I feel like

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the guys are watching the videos.

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 4>A little bit here, but just copy.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 6>Here.

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Listen, bro.

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Joe picked his cousin to win a game.

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Pick your family, and then what are you gonna do?

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna look? Come on, by the way,

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>my Tommy DeVito TikTok about his agent viral. It's all

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>up there, thousands and thousands of views. It's very funny.

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Go check it out. Fantasy pro Joe on the TikTok.

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But seriously, like I'm with you, erics one hundred, Like,

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>do I think that the Saints, you know, are gonna

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>win this game? Outright?

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I really don't. I mean the Giants on the money

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>line plus two twenty five is very tempting, but I

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's six is just like a lock and give it.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 5>Saints were out gained by one hundred yards against the

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 5>Panthers last week.

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Therek Carr. I know they're not good less than one

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 4>hundred yards before the fourth quarter.

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 2>I believe Jamis has not come in like, I know

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna turn the ball over, but let him law

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 2>down field for God's sake.

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Come on, and.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Bogin's gonna laugh. But you know, Bogs. A couple years ago,

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you remember, I was like, I like this Veto kid

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 1>over in Syracuse. I think he's a pretty good quarterback,

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, shut up, you would he You just

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>like him because his name ends in a vowel.

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Here he is playing for the Giants doing things. Is

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>there a quarterback controversy in New York? Boggs, No, Daniel

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Jones is still your dude.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they have a quarterbacks though.

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I think I think Erickson is more right

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 3>than that. But they pay They paid Danny dimes.

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>They're not gonna not They're not gonna let Tommy DeVito

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>uh take this job.

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Ye, quarterbacks maybe somebody's knocking.

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 5>To the door for Johnson to change his last name

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 5>to DeVito and then he'll get the gianty DeVito.

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Right there you go. It's all he needs, all right, Boggs,

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to you for another pick for week fifteen.

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you have?

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, I can eat crow when it's uh, when

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 2>it's right in front of me, and I have to.

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 2>And we had the Dolphins uh minus the points last week.

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I did.

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>And look in the fourth quarter they got to a

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 2>fourteen point or a thirteen point lead in this game.

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Fourteen point lead because Tennessee went for two after they

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 2>scored that first one. But Will Levis turned it on

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>and finally showed what he can do. And this was

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the Will Levis that we saw in twenty twenty one

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 2>with Kentucky and was pushing him to be a very

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 2>high draft pick in the draft. Then in twenty twenty

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 2>two he kind of hid behind his line, he opted

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 2>out of some games. He just didn't look the same

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 2>and he hasn't looked the same since until whatever clicked

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 2>correctly in that game against the Dolphins. And they are

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 2>playing with momentum now and Houston, we may not have CJ.

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Stroud.

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 2>He's still in proto, so there's a good chance that

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 2>he comes out. But even if he does, the Texans

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 2>are still questionable about Nico Collins, who doesn't seem like

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna play. Blake Cashman, Will Anderson and Laramie Tonsell

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and Tavierre Thomas all starters on this team. The Titans

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>did also have a lot of guys misspractice yesterday as well,

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 2>but they played on Monday, so it's more likely that

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 2>you know those guys are going to be able.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 3>To come back.

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>The Texans had been winning close games. They had a

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 2>gold line stand against Denver to win. They stopped Houston.

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 2>They stopped I'm sorry a couple of weeks ago. I

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 2>think it was something I wrote Houston on here. Obviously

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 2>they are Houston, but they saw somebody on a fourth

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 2>down late. They kicked to walk off field goals. Sometimes

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I just I'm my own worst enemy. They kicked a

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>field goal against since he to walk off and win.

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>The Titans can't sustain drives. If they can sustain drives

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 2>and pass the ball, Derrick Henry becomes unstoppable. You unlock

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 2>a new Derrick Henry level. If you can pass the

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 2>ball and they're getting the ball to Hopkins, who looks great. Look, man,

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't like the Titans. They haven't played well this year.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I think the roster is kind of thin. But Rabel

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is one of the best coaches in the NFL. These

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 2>teams are going in an opposite direction of each other

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 2>right now. Houston is, you know, kind of fading down

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 2>here in the stretch that they are young team. They're

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 2>very good, but I don't think they're putting it together

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 2>right now. So gimme Will Levis and give me the

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Titans on a heater, and I think they're gonna win

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 2>this one, possibly going away, especially if CJ doesn't play boys.

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>We are three for three so far. This also made

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the best bets. I mean it's look, man, I think

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>we're all in lockstet But we know where we are

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point. We know it's.

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Just Sackson and I watching your videos.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, I think we know which teams are you know,

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>are really here. They're struggling towards the end. I think

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans, I don't want to say they ran

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>out of gas a little bit, but it feels like

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 1>they got a little bit exposed when they started to

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>face some of the better teams out there a little

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>bit as well.

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 3>It's not the Cardinals, that's who it was.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Yeah, there you go. I knew you'd

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>find it eventually. I believe in you. Box. Also, don't

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>forget as you're trying to track all these games, make

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>sure you're downloading the Betting Pros app, especially if you

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have iOS. You get three free days of premium. But

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we also have that game notifications feature, so you can

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>look at all the line alerts and the movements going

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for some of these games. So keep a close eye

0:10:58.000 --> 0:10:59.599
<v Speaker 1>on that because this is one in particular where you

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>might get at you know, Strout comes back, this line

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>could move a little bit. I am not as optimistic

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that he is going to return for this one. We'll see.

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>The quarterbacks have been getting cleared. I feel like a

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit easier than some of the position players. I

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be tinfoil hot lately, but it's still

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent chance, you know, in the same week

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that a guy comes back. We had that statistic earlier

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>on another podcast from Fantasy Pros last week. All right, Eric,

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>so let's bounce back to you here for week fifteen.

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Give me another pick.

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, No, I'm just going to continue to ride the

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 5>Tennessee Titans because guys, they're playing at home. Like if

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 5>you guys didn't know this, Like the Titans play better

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 5>at home than they do on the road.

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Four and one overall straight up in New York City.

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 5>They've covered the spread and for the last five home

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 5>games at Nissan Stadium, and the only time I failed

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 5>to cover was their overtime loss against the Colts, which

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 5>they were winning by three points in overtime. So essentially

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 5>they've been in every single game to cover the spread

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 5>while playing in Tennessee. Their top ten scoring offense at home.

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 5>So again, I think that the Titans are in a

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 5>position where they've been profitable to back at home. And

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 5>you look at the Texans, they've just been a team

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 5>that's been overvalued by the market all year long. Yeah,

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 5>Like once the Stroud like had a big game, it

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 5>was like everyone was obsessed with c J. Stroud is

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 5>backing CJ. Stroud because as good as the season they've

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 5>had that they've had, there's six and five against the spread,

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 5>Like they haven't really been like this team. It's like,

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 5>oh yeah, they always cover you know they're really good

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 5>as underdogs or his favorites like that not has not

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 5>been the case. So I really think the move now

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 5>is to wait, hope that Stroud does clear and then

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 5>take the better number on the Titans, because if that's

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 5>ultimately how the lines are going to move, just based

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 5>on what we've seen from the market, the market loves Stroud,

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 5>So if Stroud is gonna play in this game, you're

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 5>gonna see money come in on the Texans, even though

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 5>I would be going in the other direction.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Gonna be in those Powder Blues too. That's it's weird

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 2>to me that they wear the oilers unis to play

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the Texans when they're in.

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 4>It's like rubbing salt in the wound.

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's kind of obnoxious. I do love those old

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Powder b lose though they love the Gold Blues. I

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>mean the days of Heywood, Jefferies and Warren Moon. Those

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>are fun times back in childhood. Do you know that

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is Eric's in?

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, let's continue on here. J Let's go

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>back to Scott Bobin for another pick. And I know

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this one probably rubbs you the wrong way, but you

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>can't and I right now the Baltimore Ravens are kind

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:19.199
<v Speaker 1>of arguably the class of the AFC. I'm gonna say

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>arguably in air quotes. But certainly it seems like no

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>one else wants to step up.

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 3>You know what I like more than I hate the

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Ravens Money. I like money.

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say hi, but yeah, well look at

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 2>me also, yeah, so absolutely I do.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 3>I do like you.

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>You're a pie guy with the end. You know, hate

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>guy doesn't matter.

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Look at me, Joe. I'm both come on, you know,

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm both.

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>You, but I if I have if they're both there,

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to cake, especially the chocolate.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 2>But these are you know, when I think I'm with you.

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 2>So unless it's key Lime Pie, then key Li Pie wins.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 2>But look, I'm not gonna hate you over the head.

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 2>With stats, Baltimore minus three against Jacksonville. Jacksonville is miss

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 2>through a bowl right now. They cannot stop any sort

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 2>of a passing game, even one that is a little

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 2>weaker than it usually is without Mark Andrews. We saw

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Lamar toss the ball all over the field last week.

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville is bad. They're going in the wrong direction. They

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 2>can't put up any rushing yards right now, so you're

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna go to a gimpie Trevor Lawrence and the Ravens

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 2>are gonna run his ass down. I don't think this

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be a very fun game at all for Jacksonville.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I think Baltimore is going to wipe them out. I

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 2>think Jacksonville is going in the wrong direction right now.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I do think this team is good, but I think

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>that their coverage is so bad that it doesn't matter

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 2>that Josh Allen has thirteen and a half sacks. It

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter that they're getting constant pressure on the quarterback,

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 2>especially against a guy like Lamar who can scramble out

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 2>of those sacks and run around. I think this is

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 2>a huge mismatch defensively for the Jaguars, and not many

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 2>teams are scoring against Baltimore right now. So I don't

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 2>know why this line is only three. It must be

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 2>because it's in Jacksonville. I think Baltimore runs.

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Away because it's in Jacksonville, but also because at home

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>last week the Rams took them to overtime, and I

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think a lot of people saw that coming. So

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>people get and understandably, so people get a little cautious

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the Ravens, whether they believe wholeheartedly.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I would actually be looking at the Jags on this

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>side of the game, but they're not at full strength.

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence is not a full strength and don't have Kirk them.

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>It's in some other pieces.

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 2>The running game has been one dimensional and that's a

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 2>good secondary for Baltimore.

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 3>So he's had.

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Health issues too. It's just it's a bad spot. You

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I said, normally this would be that perfect. You know,

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Ravens are favored by three. Let's go take the Jags

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>here when they go play in Jacksonville, because you know

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that happen to the Ravens before many times.

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But in this one, I'm with you.

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I think on that run, the Ravens aren't a dominant team.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I'll say that, but I do think they're the best team.

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Is there a dominant team in the AFC?

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't think there is.

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Rams are a dominant team.

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens aren't because they look the Rams took them

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to overtime last week. That's why, like, the Rams come

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.359
<v Speaker 1>into town and I respect Matthew Staffords in all but American.

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 5>And then you watch the Ravens beat themselves against the Steelers.

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's okay there, okay, guy dominant. They beat themselves, but

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the good teams don't do that.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 5>So the good teams show up against the other good teams,

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 5>which the Ravens always do.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, Jacks aren't a good team. So we'll see.

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Are you here? We are we in disagreement.

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean the Jaguars have a good record, so that

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 4>they're a good team. In my eyes, they are.

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 2>They are a good team, but the way that secondary

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>has been playing is miserable right now.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they can stop anybody.

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 4>Lamar Jackson overs Yeah, Erickson.

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's only one dominant team in football right now.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the forty nine ers, to be honest

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>with you, like I think, and that's why I put

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>money in and I talked about it again on the

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>video this week. I'm like, look, now is the time

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to go win on the forty nine ers. It's it's

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it's as good as it's gonna get, probably if they

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>keep winning games and they have that one seed and

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they have the two home games to get to the

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl. Like, I don't see anybody the NFC beating

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>them in that scenario, which is the scenario that it's

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>trending towards that, and then on the flip side, I

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>really see a true contender. Maybe the next couple weeks

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody will emerge and get hot in the AFC and

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that becomes a very dangerous thing. But whoever that team is,

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not only do they have to be hot, then they

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>have to carry it all the way through the playoffs

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and then against the forty nine Ers, which I think

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is a lot to ask. I think it's very different.

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Give me the Ravens.

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 5>Ravens will lose against the forty Nineers of the regular season,

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 5>they'll beat them in the super Bowl.

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>The stranger things have happened, all right, Let's get to

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>some strange things, because you have some feelings about this

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers game, and Bobby and you might have to

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have ear must for this one.

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm taking the taking the Colts minus one and

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 5>a half against the Steelers. They're playing at home. Colts

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 5>have won for the last five games. And I think

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 5>that I noticed the most about the Colts is there

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 5>hundred percent against the spread as a favorite. So I

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 5>was wrongly on them last week as I opened as

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 5>a favorite against the Bengals, and I continue to powd

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 5>my chest for the Colts, and then they became underdogs

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 5>and I should have jumped off the bandwagon, but I

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 5>did not, and that was bad. So not making them

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 5>the same mistake twice because they're still favorites here against

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 5>the Steelers even though TJ. Watt has cleared the concussion protocol.

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 5>The line actually moved after that was announced from mis

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 5>two and a half to minus one and a half,

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 5>which makes sense because what is one of the guys

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 5>that actually does impact a defense in a game's outcome

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 5>because of how impactful he is as a defensive player.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 5>But I still just like the Colts Moore at home,

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 5>I had four and oh straight up and against the

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 5>spread as a favorite, like Shane Steichen is going to

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 5>run circles around Mike Tomlin. Like from the two coaching perspectives,

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 5>again we talked about it from the Jack or the

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 5>Titans and Texans teams going in opposite directions. This Colts team,

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 5>I think is surging with their coaching staff, with Shane

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:32.959
<v Speaker 5>Stikeen or Mike Tomlin.

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 4>I think that.

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 5>After losing back to back games against teams with two

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 5>wins like there are question marks there's blame being thrown around.

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 4>The receivers are complaining.

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 5>I just don't like the juju around the Steelers right now,

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 5>and I want to back to the Colts at home.

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 5>So give me Indianapolish bogs.

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>You agree with that statement that he just laid out

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>there that Shane Steikeen is the superior football coach to

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike Tomlin.

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, right now, he probably is. I don't think

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 2>it matters, though. I mean, if you're going, if you're

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 2>going with momentum, the Colts have it and the Steelers don't,

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 2>so I completely understand this pick.

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Look, watching the Steelers for forty years, I will tell

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 2>you that this is a Steelers devil magic game where

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 2>for no reason, they get two turnovers, just like they

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 2>did against the Browns earlier this year. They had two

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 2>defensive touchdowns ended up winning that game. I said this

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.479
<v Speaker 2>about the Rams game as well, and they ended up

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 2>winning that. I kind of think this one is one

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 2>where the Steelers, out of nowhere, for no reason, win it.

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 3>It's just dumb.

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 2>It's what happens with this team, and that's why they're

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 2>always over five hundred and at the end of the year.

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 2>People go This team is bad, but they won some

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 2>of these surprising games. This could be one of them.

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 2>You know it should be. At all they look miserable,

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 2>like Ericson just said.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>They just lost two miserables.

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 3>They've been blueprinted.

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 2>The blueprint is throw the ball over the middle against

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>them Trey McBride, Hunter Henry and then you have Josh

0:19:57.880 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Downs plus all the good tight ends with the Colts.

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 2>It seems fairly easy. But I'm telling you Steelers devil Magic.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 2>We'll see if it works.

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Steelers' best number on betting pros is plus one ten

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>over at Caesars. That's the best one I'm seeing on

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the money line. If you're into the Devil Magic Bogs,

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you're into the Devil Magic. Let's talk about San fran Arizona.

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a big number. How do you feel about it?

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is there any way that the Niners don't

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 2>put up thirty five against the Cardinals defense. I don't

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 2>see how they couldn't, you know. So what we're asking, shocked,

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 2>what we're asking in this game is that the Cardinals

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 2>score twice or the Niners score a six touchdown, which

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be that surprising. But so let's say the Niners

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 2>put up thirty five, two touchdowns, and since Kyler came back,

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 2>they have scored at least fourteen points in all four

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 2>games they played, and they're averaging just to shade under twenty.

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 2>The Niners are banged up on defense. They had a

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of DMPs on Wednesday. Armstead, Green Law, Hardgrave, Shavarious Ward,

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Andrey Thomas, five starters all did not practice, so they're

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 2>probably going to be coming in there at less than

0:20:58.840 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 3>The Cardinals are dead last and.

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Overall defensive grade on PFF and run grade. They are

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 2>twenty ninth in pass rush, bottom ten in coverage. I

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 2>think the Niners put up at least thirty five. They

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 2>scored thirty or more points in eight of eleven games

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 2>this year, or eight of thirteen games this year, so

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 2>this is a team that is since that bye week.

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 2>They are on a heater Brock party cannot miss. I

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 2>think they're going to roll a bunch of points here.

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 2>We're just asking the Cardinals to put up a couple.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of injuries for the Niners, so I

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 2>think this one is an easy cover. So give me

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 2>the over forty seven and a half in San Francisco

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 2>and Arizona.

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I see that number you can get on fandle

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 1>right near minus one ten right now, And I'm with

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you on that one as well. Now, Erickson, you're in

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on this game too, but from a different perspective, what

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>is it?

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 4>I do like the over as well.

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 5>The Pardners are six and oho towards the over at

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 5>home this season, So all these games are shooting out,

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 5>and it's the potential shootout environment that makes me think, like.

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Twelve and a half points.

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 5>We just saw that the forty nine ers not cover

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 5>a thirteen point spread against the Drew lock led Seahawks

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 5>at home, Like what are we doing here?

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 4>Like this opened up.

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 5>At fourteen and I'm like, guys, it's not Josh Dobbs,

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 5>that's the quarterback.

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 4>It's Kyler Murray. Like fourteen point.

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 5>Dog at home, Like that's ridiculous, Like for a team

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 5>that literally just did not cover double digit spread against

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 5>Drew Locke in the Seattle Seahawks. Like this is a

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 5>divisional game. The Cardinals are coming off of bye week,

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 5>and I just talked about how the Cardinals' offense scores

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 5>points at home. So yes, I think that this is

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 5>going to be points scored if forty nineers are going

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 5>to win this game, but just to lock in that

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 5>they're gonna win by two touchdowns, like, no, that's not

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 5>gonna happen. The Cardinals are four and two against the

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 5>spread at home this season, like they've played significantly better

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 5>in front of their home crowd coming off a bye week.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 5>It's Kyler Murray, Like this isn't some like bad quarterback

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 5>or some backup, like he's an all pro quarterback. Like

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 5>so I didn't understand this line one came out. I'll

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.719
<v Speaker 5>always take double digits at home for underdogs, especially in

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 5>the division, especially when it's Kyler Murray, especially the team

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 5>coming off of bye week. So this is just a

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 5>process play for me. And I found that at least

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 5>in the last couple of weeks that backing underdogs in

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 5>shootouts has really been more profitable than not because when

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 5>teams are when no offense can be stopped, like the

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 5>game is not gonna be a blowout in one way

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 5>or the other, Like it's gonna be high scoring in

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 5>more or less a close game.

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 4>So I like the Cardinals plus twelve and a half.

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not comfortable with the twelve and a half either

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>way necessarily, So I'm just sticking with the over on

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>this one. But you make a really good case of

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.719
<v Speaker 1>anything I'm leading towards you too, which is them covering this,

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>especially on the road there for San Francisco forty nine

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ers that the twelve is a little, it's it's a lot.

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot for them to have.

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 5>To Yeah, it doesn't get It's like more of like

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 5>a principal play of anything. It's like if you're gonna

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 5>give me twelve and a half points at home, and.

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Look, we're gonna be a football team. So I get it.

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not saying the line is wrong. I'm

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>saying it's not tempting enough to me. And it's so

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>close to I gif it was a fourteen, I'd be right,

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and a half transparency.

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 4>I jumped on it when it was at fourteen.

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, and when it was fourteen and a half or

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.479
<v Speaker 1>fourteen like that to me, yes, all the way on Arizona.

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Now that's twelve and a half. It's right on that borderline.

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think Toboggan's point that over is really interesting.

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's do one more from both of the boys here

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>before we close out. Today's action, Bogs, You've got a

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>fun one for us, and I like this. So this

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a little three way action you got going on.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 2>That's right, It's okay if it's in a three way

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 2>and this is a three way team alt line parlay.

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 2>This is you're moving this Denver line to six and

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 2>a half plus six and a half at Detroit, the Giants,

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 2>plus seven and a half against the Saints San Atlanta,

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 2>minus one at Carolina. All of those games will give

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 2>you a plus three thirty three juice. You're gonna triple

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 2>up your money. You're expanding those lines a little bit.

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 2>You're getting plus money on two of those away teams.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 2>So I like this line a lot. And I believe

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 2>my last three team, oh my last three away team

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.959
<v Speaker 2>alt line prop on this show hit as well. So well,

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 2>let's ride that momentum, let's go with that one.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's ride baby, as long as the Giants are involved

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in this, Like, I'm all about it, all about the

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Giants this week. I'm eating the cutlets. All right. Let's

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>go to you ericson close us out. You got one

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>more to go? What is it?

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, we've got a game at Ford Field, folks means oh, Iday.

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 4>We're going over over at Ford Field. Look for the

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 4>last line for the Lions.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 5>Last five games have gone over teams have averaged between

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 5>Denver and the Lions of average forty eight points scored.

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 5>Lions last fifteen home games average total has been fifty

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 5>five points. Eighty seven percent of the games of those

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 5>fifteen home games have scored at least fifty one points.

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 5>And I know that the Lions defense kind of looked

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 5>like they were gonna be a thing in the beginning

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 5>of season. Well that's gone like that, that's totally gone.

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 5>Like they reverted back to.

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Who's secondary is worse ericson Jacksonville or Detroit right now.

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 4>It's it's both pretty bad.

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 5>I think Jackson's had more injuries, but yeah, no, they're

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 5>both pretty horrible.

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's funny all of a sudden that Week one

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>matchup with perspective. Now, I mean, you know, you remember

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the opening night there with the Kansay Chiefs lost, and

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.239
<v Speaker 1>everyone was like, oh my goodness, so look at how

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>good the lines are. Maybe the Chiefs aren't that good

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs.

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 5>The Chiefs also didn't have to Travis Kelsey in that

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 5>game either in the line one. But yeah, I just

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 5>like the over in this spot, especially looking at Denver.

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 5>Denver has played. Now this will be the third straight

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 5>game in a dome, so I think that we're going

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 5>to see them have more success. They're coming off their

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 5>best the ardage total since Week seven. You're starting to

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.239
<v Speaker 5>see Russ cook a little bit more. And I think

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 5>that this is a particular matchup where the Denver Broncos

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.959
<v Speaker 5>are kind of forced to pass the Baltimore because De

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 5>Troy can score points at home. So I like the

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 5>over in this game, and I think that you could

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 5>see even a big spot from like Jerry Judy, who

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 5>kind of let us down last week and Sun can't

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 5>be stopped.

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 4>He got the touchdown.

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy is a walking, living letdown. Let's just be honest.

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>What he Island the many Court Sutton, That's who the

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>man is. That's all about the Cortland Sutton, you know.

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>And besides the over, the forty seven and a half

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>for Detroit Denver, Erickson's also in the Arizona plus twelve

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half against San fran Indie minus one and

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:15.959
<v Speaker 1>a half, Tennessee minus two and a half against Houston,

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Giants plus six over at New Orleans. Then

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 1>you've got on Bogman's side Atlanta minus three against Carolina

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>in Carolina Tennessee two and a half. Just like Erickson,

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they're both in on that one Baltimore and the three

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>against Jacksonville San fran Arizona over forty seven and a half,

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and it Bogs has that very tasty away team altline parlay.

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Whenever we do the allt lines, I think we have

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to put our flannel shirts. I'll remember it's the mid

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>nineties here. Whenever we do the alternative stuff tenver plus

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>six and a half, New York Giants plus seven and

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>a half and Atlanta minus one at CAROLINEA. You put

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>them all together, you get three to one basically, So

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>go take care of that. Also, download the Betting Pros app,

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>make sure you drop your comments below and subscribe to

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>our YouTube channel because you just might win yourself a

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>one free premium upgrade to the best betting tools on

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the planet to start betting smarter and not harder over

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>here at Betting Pros. But more to the point, we

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>like to hear from all of you, so drop those comments.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what your favorite play of the week is.

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to know. We all bet together. That's what

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we do here at Betting Pros. That'll do it for us,

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>but the story of the game goes on for Scott

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Bogman and Andrew Erickson. I'm Joey P. We'll see you

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>next time. Kids.

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 6>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 6>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 6>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 6>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 6>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.