WEBVTT - GoodFellas Review, Lurker, The Roses

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a show you guys.

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Putting on here today?

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You're not interested in art?

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>No, look, we're going to do this thing. We're going

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:11.079
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation.

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>From Chicago. This is Film Spotting celebrating our twentieth year.

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Adam Kempenar and I'm Josh Larson.

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>To me, being a gangster was better than being President

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 2>of the United States.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Never right on your friends, and always keep in mind

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>shut go by.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I meant being somebody in the neighborhood that was full

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>of nobody's Jimmy, Tommy, Henry Pauley, the whole gang is

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>here for our Pantheon Project review of Goodfellas, which came

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>to theaters thirty five years ago.

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 4>This month, plus I caught up with the Roses and

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 4>the intriguing new indie Lurker. All that and a new

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 4>deeply flawed Film Spotting Paul Ahead on Film Spotting, you.

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Were treated like movie stars with muscle.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>We had it all just for the asking else on

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I belong.

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Film Spotting, the first international edition of the show. Josh.

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 2>You are coming to us from the City of Saint Andrew's, County, Fife, Scotland.

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever felt less like a gangster.

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 4>I have not run into any gangsters. There's got to

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 4>be a CD underbelly to this place, though, Adam. I mean,

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 4>for one thing, there's way too much golf going on here,

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 4>and that is that's never a good sign.

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 2>You got to pick up the sticks.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't think that's going to happen. I'll try

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 4>to investigate and see if I can find that underbelly,

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 4>because right now I got to tell you this is

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 4>ridiculously picturesque here on the coast of the North Sea.

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 4>So it can't always be like this. I hope it is,

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 4>but probably not.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>This week you played catch up on some new Ish

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 2>releases Olivia Coleman and Benedict Cumberbatch in The Roses. Also

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 2>lurker at Dark Tale about pop music fandom. We've also

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>got results from the Pixar versus studio Jubilip and a

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>new deeply flawed film spotting Pool, asking you to choose

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 2>one musical from the nineteen sixties. The Hills are Alive,

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 2>or so I've been told.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 4>But first Goodfellas at thirty five. Goodfellas came to theatres

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 4>September twenty one, nineteen ninety. It ended up making forty

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 4>six million dollars in change at the box office. That

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 4>was enough to put it ahead of the Stevens Sagal

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 4>starring Marked for Death. I don't know if you remember

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 4>that one.

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 2>Adam robbed of the Best Picture nomination.

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 4>However, Goodfellows was just behind the Sagal starring Hard to

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Kill Now Hard to Sounds familiar. I completely blanked on

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 4>Marked for Death.

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm afraid.

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Goodfellows was nominated for six Oscars, including Best Picture and Director.

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Also nominated that year gangster movie Royalty, Brancis Ford Coppola's

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Godfather Part three, also the De Niro starring Awakenings and Ghost.

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 4>The Best Picture went, however, to Kevin Hostner's Dances with Wolves.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Thirty five years later.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 4>We're not going to be talking about any of those films.

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 4>We are talking about Goodfellas.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Here's a scene. Take it away, Mama Scarcese.

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 2>And he's mad.

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:14.399
<v Speaker 5>You don't talk too much.

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Quiet for me.

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 5>You don't eat much, you don't talk much.

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just listening tomorrow.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 5>You remind me of when we were kids, com paris

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 5>just to visit one another, and there was this man.

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 5>He would never talk. He would just sit there all

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 5>night and not say a word. So they says to him,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 5>what's American Paris? Don't you talk? Don't you say anything?

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 5>He says, what am I going to say that? My

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 5>wife two times me, so she says to him, shut up,

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 5>you're always talking. But in Italian it sounds much nice.

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Josh. One thing I don't remind you of enough is

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 2>that you're a year and a half older than me.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It's true.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Why is that relevant? We've never really parsed the details,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 2>but I think we may have had our cinephile awakenings

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>at roughly the same ages, just not at the same times.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's jump into the DeLorean destination circa September twenty first,

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety. I'm going to run through a quick list.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 2>You tell me how many boxes you check off. Number one,

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>saw Goodfellas in the theater, number two, number two, I'm

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna get through all of them.

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Here.

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 2>You tell me your account. Number two watched at the movies,

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>double thumbs up review. Number three Red ciskeles you were

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 2>a trib house after all, and or Ebert's review where

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 2>you would have scanned this high praise. No finer film

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 2>has ever been made about organized crime, not even The Godfather.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Although the two works are not really comparable, both critics

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 2>would name it their number one film of the year.

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Number four understood that after opening the eighties with a

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 2>masterpiece in Raging Bowl, Scorsese looked to be starting the

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 2>nineties with another. I'll also accept in some sense that

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 2>there was prestige attached to a Martin Scorsese film. Where

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>are you at with those four?

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 4>I definitely hit all of those your The last question

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 4>made me think, had I seen Raging Bowl yet at

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 4>that point?

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 4>Possibly I have, but definitely aware of its.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Stature for sure.

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, I needed another eighteen to twenty four months.

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:27.679
<v Speaker 2>I went, oh for four. It's entirely possible. Goodfellows played

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 2>at my hometown cinema, the one i'd eventually be a

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 2>projectionist and usher at, But it wouldn't have mattered because

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't on my radar at all. I didn't catch

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Ciskel and Eberts at the movies takes, nor was I

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 2>reading the Sun Times or Tribune in Iowa in print,

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 2>nor could I contemplate Scorsese's legacy. I didn't finally see

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Goodfellows until a full year later, after renting it from

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>one of my local video stores, I distinctly remember being

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 2>drawn to that VHS case, or the top half of it. Anyway,

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I still don't know what's happening in the bottom half.

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 2>De Niro's prominence may have had something to do with it.

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 2>I was familiar with him, but I think it's how

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>he's position as the centerpiece of that sinister besuited triumvirate,

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 2>with Leoda and Peshi angled to the sides, all three

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 2>emerging evocatively out of the pure darkness. It felt timeless, somehow,

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 2>already a classic, which was appropriate since I'm almost certain

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I was under the impression that it was several years old.

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 2>The box alone suggested the movie was momentous, and when

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 2>I watched it, despite not being equipped with the vocabulary

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 2>to articulate it, I recognized that it was. Was it

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 2>the kinetic dynamism of Michael Balhaus's camera, combined with Thelma

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Shoemaker's cutting, the intoxicating allure of the gangster life as

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Henry sees it, welcome back to that, the sweep of

0:06:55.880 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 2>it covering parts of four decades, and Henry's rags to

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>to housecoat and egg noodles with ketchup tail. Maybe there

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 2>was a guy at school who I thought deserved a

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 2>good pistol whipping. You know, this really isn't about me,

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 2>It's about you, Josh. What made Goodfellas feel momentous back

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 2>in ninety and what makes it feel momentous still?

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, not only at that point had I caught the movie,

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 4>bug I was passing it on and inflicting it on Debbie,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 4>who we had probably just started dating, maybe six ten

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:36.679
<v Speaker 4>months before Goodfella's Fall nineteen ninety release. And thankfully, maybe

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 4>this is one of the reasons we started dating. Found

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 4>out she loved mob movies, and what a year. Maybe

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 4>this is what brought us together, Adam, we've already talked

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 4>about a few of these, Godfather Part three and Goodfellas.

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 4>You realize Miller's Crossing came out in October, so we

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 4>were averaging if you consider Godfather Part three was a

0:07:55.800 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 4>December release, we were averaging almost a let's say, key

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 4>mobster movie, if not a masterful mobster movie a month

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 4>one a month in that fall and early winter.

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, what.

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 4>A time to be alive, What a time to be

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 4>coming into love with films? So it was the thrill

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 4>of it. That's what was momentous for me that first

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 4>time I saw it. Your phrase kinetic dynamism, Yeah, that's

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 4>what it was. Just we've talked about this in terms

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 4>of Miller's Crossing, is coming to realize the choices that

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 4>filmmakers are making in terms of the camera movement or

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 4>the editing and all the things we're going to dig into.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Goodfellas had that right there for you to eat up

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 4>on the screen, like I would argue something like Miller's

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Crossing does, And so yeah, that's that's what it was.

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Then.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 4>Now what feels momentous about it. I think for me

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 4>it's the movie's moral weight. And I had a little

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 4>advance work done on this film because I saw it

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 4>maybe a couple of years ago.

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 4>I wrote a piece for Think Christian looking at Martin

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Scorsese's mob movies in particular, with the thesis that they

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 4>were just as religious as something like Last Temptation of

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Christ or Silence. Maybe not explicitly so, but if you

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 4>take them all together, from Mean Streets to the Irishmen

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 4>and everything in between, including Goodfellas, you see that these

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 4>movies depict organized crime as a religion that is full

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 4>of these laws you must follow ritual, yeah, that's it,

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 4>but key devoid of mercy and grace. And so when

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 4>I looked at Goodfellas through this lens, it was fascinating

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 4>to me how it fitted to a tea as all

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 4>of his did, and depicted these guys who are beholden

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 4>to this code. That is, they think they're above the law,

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 4>but they've chosen adherence to a code that is more

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 4>unforgiving than any legal system could be. And it's also

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 4>a world that has no benevolence again, no mercy to it.

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 4>They're subject to greater suffering than the schnooks, as Henry

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 4>Hill would.

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Say in the end.

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 4>And so it's just these movies and Goodfellas particularly, I

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 4>think they're sinners who freed themselves from the law, but

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 4>they've only shackled themselves into chains of their own making.

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 4>And to bring this to Goodfellas, And a particular scene

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 4>where this clarifies for me, both when I watched a

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 4>few years ago and just now, I think in his

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Mob movie canon the Christmas party scene after the heist

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 4>that has gone down successfully and Jimmy is throwing a

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 4>party at the bar to celebrate. I think it's the

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 4>defining scene theologically speaking, because yes, it's Christmas, right, But

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 4>what do you have here? You have Jimmy making all

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 4>of these rules, and when they're broken, there is hell

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 4>to pay.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 3>Am I say?

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:08.599
<v Speaker 4>Enough to go buy anything for a while.

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a wedding gift, Jimmy, it's.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 5>From my mother.

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>It's on the name. I just gone out.

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 3>I loved that car.

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure's being valued for just a second. I just

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>gone out. Johnny, you got your nuts?

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 5>What are you get excited for?

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Jay?

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 4>What am I get excited for?

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 2>You?

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Are you stupid?

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 6>We've got a million feebles out there, everybody's watching this,

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 6>and you get a called I love this name.

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a wedding gift, a fool's name. It's so now,

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you stupid? O'd What did you hear what I said?

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 6>Don't buy anything, don't get anything, nothing big than you?

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>What I said? What's the matter with you? What are

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you getting excited for? Am I get excited about? Because

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get us all fur pinched? That's why?

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 4>What are you stupid?

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>It's matter with you? I apologize? What's the matter with you?

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Sorry?

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>The is the matter with you?

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 4>This should be a celebration of victory, of triumph, of

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 4>beating the Schnooks, but instead with we get these guys

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 4>who are under the burden of a law that is

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 4>even heavy. And the great irony of this taking place

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 4>in a Christmas setting. You know, if theologically you think

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 4>about the Christmas gift and and this gift gift of

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 4>grace and forgiveness and freedom from the law, good laws

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 4>and bad laws. I'll stop there and save the rest

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 4>for that. This isn't the thing Christian podcast. So but yeah,

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 4>that is the thing that struck me watching Goodfellas this

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 4>last time, which was just you know, of course kicked

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 4>off by that deeper study I did a few years ago.

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm smiling and kind of laughing to myself, even just

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 2>because I love de Niro. How could you not love

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 2>d Naro throughout this entire film as Jimmy Conway, but

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 2>especially in that sequence, just starting with the camee you,

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 2>and he's so happy, he's so excited to see Henry,

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 2>to see ray Leota, and then it just goes downhill

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 2>once that pink Cadillac shows up outside, right, And what

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I keep thinking about, I wasn't going to initially start

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 2>with this. I had this like third on my list,

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 2>and I wasn't very familiar with what you had previously

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 2>written about this, but I knew or had a feeling

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 2>we would go here. And I was a little bit hesitant, Josh,

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 2>because this is this is your corner, and we're talking

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 2>about a mob movie. So if I if I go

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 2>to quickly down this path, or I spend too long

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 2>on this corner, I mean, I might get whacked right,

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know if I if I should tread

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>into your your territory.

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>It's all.

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Especially when you think about a movie like Mean Streets,

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 2>where we meet de Niro as an actor in a

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Scorsese film, and there's there's a fair amount of crossover

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 2>between the two films. When I think about those movies,

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 2>and we're going to talk a little bit about even

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the use of color red. When I think about the

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 2>two movies, and I think they're used in a very

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 2>pointed and similar way, there is a key to diference

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 2>for me. And there's a key difference here for me

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 2>between a lot of other Scorsese films, not just the

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:11.479
<v Speaker 2>gangster films, and that is this is not a revelation

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>to anyone. Obviously, a lot of Scorsese's films are preoccupied

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 2>with the notion of sin and the notion of redemption,

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 2>and you have characters who are very torn and conflicted

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 2>between these two worlds, the moral world and the world

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 2>of the flesh, and their corporeal desires and money and

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the worldly things that they want to occupy themselves with,

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 2>and and again they often are seeking some kind of

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 2>absolution for their sins. And there is nothing like that

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 2>whatsoever in our hero here.

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 2>It's simply completely absent. And why that strikes me is

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 2>because it feels to me this is based on true material.

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Henry Hill is a real character. I've never read the book.

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, and I don't care for the purposes

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>of our conversation how true it is to that story.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 2>But it's interesting to me that it feels like Scorsese

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 2>wasn't concerned in this case with imposing that absolution storyline

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 2>onto Henry Hill, and he was content to have a

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 2>character who from the very beginning, as we meet him,

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 2>and actually as we meet him and we're going to

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about the prolog, I'm definitely going to talk about

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the prolog as we meet him later in the story,

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 2>and then as we meet him as a teenage boy

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 2>making his decision, he has decided what path he's going

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 2>to take. He has chosen the path of sin, and

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 2>he stays on that path completely until the very end,

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 2>and he never has any doubt about that path. Unlike

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 2>most of the Scorsese heroes that we might think about

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 2>the Scorsese conflicted protagonist, he never has any doubt about that.

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>He constantly chooses what serves his worldly desires at every turn.

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 2>He never is thinking about redemption. He is in the hell,

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the hell of his making from the very beginning of

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 2>this film, and he's happy to be there. And when

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 2>you look at Henry Hill as a character, he is, yes, less.

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to use a technical term because I

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>don't really necessarily know all the distinctions in terms of

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the actual scientific definitions or psychological definitions. But he's less

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 2>psychopathic than Tommy, and he's not as crazy as Jimmy, right,

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>But that doesn't mean he's a better guy. I mean,

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe he's a slightly better guy. He doesn't want Maury

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 2>to die, but I think that's just because it kind

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 2>of just means a little more stress for him because

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Maury's wife is going to be hanging around the house.

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't actually really care that much more about Maury.

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 2>He's not actually a more compassionate human being. He is

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>always just looking out for himself. So it's it. I'll

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 2>just use the word interesting again. It's interesting to me

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 2>that in this movie, and in this gangster movie Milieu,

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 2>where we've seen him so many other times, have characters

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 2>that are really struggling with this notion of sin. We

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 2>have a character here who is not struggling at all.

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, completely agree, and that is a distinction of something

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 4>like Goodfellas. Think about even The Irishman, where, to my mind,

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 4>where we end up in that nursing home with the

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 4>DeNiro character, and he is at least if he's not

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 4>sorry or regretful, he's pondering the weight of his actions.

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think Henry Hill ever does that. He

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 4>is completely the way you were talking about him, psychologically,

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 4>he is a moral right, there's just a disinterest in

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 4>the morality.

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Of any situation, good way to put it.

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 4>And this connects with Leota's performance, which you know, it's

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 4>that box, the VHS box. When you're describing it. It instantly

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 4>comes back to me, and my first thought as you

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 4>started describing it is how bizarre. I get the marketing reason,

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 4>but how bizarre that Leota isn't in the center right

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 4>instead of because the way he drives this entire film.

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 4>And the one thing that stood out to me that

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.719
<v Speaker 4>was completely fresh on this most recent viewing Adam, was

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 4>the quality of his The definitive quality of Leota's performance,

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 4>to me, connects with what we're talking about. Eagerness. Henry

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 4>is so eager to be a part of this lifestyle.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't give a second thought to the repercussions for

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 4>his family, for his education, for anything when he's a boy,

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 4>when he's a teenager, this is Think about the smile

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 4>on and I think it's Christopher Cerone playing the young

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 4>Henry at this point. What a great match for Lioda

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 4>as an adult too, just physically, but also the way

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 4>he carries himself, the way he has that eagerness. He

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 4>has this beaming smile while he's watching these guys get

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 4>away with this, and it just gets bigger once they

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 4>bring him into the fold, and.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>That carries through every scene.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 4>I think that Liota is in even the famous Joe

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 4>peshe you think I'm a clown scene. Notice how hard

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Henry Hill is laughing at those jokes.

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 2>He says, no, you're going to tell me something today,

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>tough guy.

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 5>I said, all right, I'll tell you something.

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 7>Give mother.

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 6>To pay for a.

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm coming around, you know, I start to come

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 2>out of it.

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 6>Oh, I see in front of me this big brick again.

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 2>He says, Oh, what do you want to tell me now?

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Tough guy?

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 5>I said, dang, what do I thought to tell you?

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 5>To go?

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Mother?

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 4>He is so eager to be in that group laughing

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 4>at him in a in a supportive way, you know,

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 4>I know that's what they get to an argument about.

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 4>He's also he's eager for the violence too. You brought

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 4>up Maury that moment when Jimmy wraps the cord around

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 4>Maury's neck. Henry's there laughing.

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 4>He does, eventually, I think, try to count things down,

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 4>but his immediate instinct is to laugh. He's eager for

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 4>the violence. He even takes a slap in the face

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 4>from Polly, one of those affectionate slaps. He receives that eagerly.

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 4>It's like, slap me again, Polly, because that means I'm

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 4>in and so that was a distinctive quality to this

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 4>great Rali out of performance that stood out to me

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 4>that I think connects exactly with what you're talking about,

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 4>this amorality of the character.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 2>And it could have something to do with the fact,

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:44.239
<v Speaker 2>like Jimmy, he is Irish, he is not Italian, so

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 2>he's an outsider. He is someone who may have to exhibit,

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 2>or at least early on exhibited some of that eagerness

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 2>and it just sort of stuck. He has to ingratiate

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>himself into this world because he is not the same

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 2>as everyone else around him. I'm gonna go back. Let's

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 2>see if i can say it twice. We can say

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 2>it for a third time in the show Kinetic Dynamism.

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 2>The pantheon may need a pantheon for the movies that

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 2>seem to scene, moment to moment deliver the most thrilling filmmaking.

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 2>I didn't go through the list, but do the right

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Thing would be in it, and Goodfellas, goodfellas would be

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 2>in it. That's how good every scene is and how

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 2>good every choice is. And unlike some of our recent revisits,

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 2>we've had a bunch of sacred cows and Pantheon Project

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>reviews recently. It hasn't been twenty or thirty years since

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 2>I've seen Goodfellas, so I really was a little nervous,

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 2>and I didn't know what to expect from this conversation.

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the last time I watched it in

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 2>one sitting, but I'll borrow a phrase from Billy Bean

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 2>and Moneyball the movie. Anyway, I've certainly recreated it in

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 2>the aggregate. I don't know how many countless times I've

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 2>watched scenes from it or picked up, you know where,

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 2>whatever it was on TV. I know this movie well.

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 2>But even if there weren't going to be or I

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>didn't expect there to be any Capital R revelations, there

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 2>did still end up being aspects to discuss that I

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 2>hadn't strongly considered before. And you used a word earlier,

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>just a short time ago, talking about Liota. You said, watching,

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 2>and I said, in my setup, the intoxicating allure of

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the gangster life as Henry sees it. And there's two

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 2>parts there. We may talk about the intoxicating allure of

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 2>the gangster life part, but for me, the more important

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 2>part is is as Henry sees it. Because if we

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 2>go back to and we consider the opening with Billy

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Bats in the trunk as a sort of prologue, and

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 2>that's how I'm going to refer to it. How does

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 2>that culminate? It culminates with that incredible it feels to

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 2>me just like John Wayne in Stage Coach like introduction,

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 2>the rushing tracking shot that stops in a freeze frame

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 2>on Leota's face in close up, his eyes looking past

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the camera, and that's where we get the famous line

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 2>as far back as I can remember, right, And if

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't for the credits in between, it would be

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 2>almost a match cut from that close up on his eyes,

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 2>those piercing Rayliota eyes two Henry Young, Henry's eyes looking

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 2>at the gangsters across the way from from his apartment,

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 2>looking at them down on the stoop, and that great shot,

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the cinematography, the beam, the reflection beaming in the iris

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 2>of his eye.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 2>So, yes, of course he's the narrator. This is his

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 2>telling his tale, the retelling of events. But I had

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 2>never fully paid attention to just how much Scorsese leans

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 2>into that point of view. How often we watch Henry, who,

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 2>as I said, is an Italian, isn't born into the mob.

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 2>How often we watch him watching, like when he's worried

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 2>about Maury getting whacked, He's watching the dynamic the entire time.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 2>A bunch of examples of that, right, or more directly,

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 2>you take a shot like the steady Kim introductions the

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 2>classic you know, I'm gonna go get the papers, Get

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the papers, when he introduces us at the restaurant to everybody,

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's amazing. And if you, I guess, if you

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 2>wanted to somehow take a shot at Scorsese for just

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 2>showing off, you'd be like, well, that's what he's doing there,

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 2>But actually that's Henry's point of view, walking through that restaurant,

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 2>introducing us to those characters as if we're seeing it

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 2>through Henry's eyes. Or how about the other great scene

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 2>where he wakes up to find Karen pointing the gun

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 2>right at him slash us. Or one of my new

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 2>favorite shots that I just never appreciated before, which is

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 2>when he gets out of jail. Think about how simple

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 2>this is, Josh, Like, how subtle this is? Because I

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 2>think it's so easy to miss. Again, I don't know

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 2>how many times I've seen Goodfellows, but I just never

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 2>thought about it in these terms before, and it's not

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 2>a bravura camera moment, but I still think it's ingenious

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 2>and it's a choice. It's still a choice that's being made,

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>and it's an atypical filmmaking choice. When he gets out

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 2>of jail and he goes back to the apartment or

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 2>whatever space Karen has the kids currently.

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Living there with the bunk beds, and there.

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 2>The bunk beds, and I believe it's it's a single

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 2>shot and you hear a door open, and you hear

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the kids say something like what do you think, Daddy?

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 2>You know I made that picture or something. The camera

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 2>is looking at the room, we are seeing the camera.

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like it does a three point sixty turn

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 2>about the room, and then as it scans across the room,

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 2>it finally ends ultimately on Henry and he says like, Karen,

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 2>get everything packed. Yeah, we're getting out of here, right.

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 2>So it doesn't it doesn't start on the door. Any

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 2>other filmmaker or a lot of other filmmakers would have

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 2>started that sequence with the door opening and Henry walking

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 2>in and then cut to him seeing the room and

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 2>then cut back to his reaction shot. Scorsese in one

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 2>shot doesn't show us that it's his point of view,

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 2>in fact, allows it to be our point of view,

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the audience's point of view. First, we get to process

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the room almost as if we're seeing it before Henry does.

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 2>We have to take in the relative squalor of the conditions.

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 2>We get to react with our eyes before he even does.

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like we're seeing it through his eyes,

0:26:57.920 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 2>but we're also in a way it feels like we're

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 2>seeing it before he does. So it's it's not just

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 2>a POV shot, it's our perspective in a way, aligning

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 2>or superseding his perspective. And then Josh the capper to that.

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 2>For me from the point of view perspective, here, what

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 2>really just blew me away this time watching it is

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 2>then you get to something like the Kopa, the famous

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 2>steadycam shot there where Scorsese is graciously allowing us to

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 2>experience in real time the rewards of Henry's chosen profession,

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 2>the access, the glamour, though it's mostly what Karen is experiencing,

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 2>because for Henry we have to assume it's old hat,

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 2>but for Karen it's new. It's exhilarating and I always

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 2>just thought about it. In those terms, we get to

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 2>follow them in and we get to follow them in

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 2>real time. It's a literal film school textbook version of

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 2>how to use the steadycam. And I say literal because

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 2>yesterday in class I used it right even before it

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 2>was just coincidence that we were talking about Goodfellows this week.

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 2>I used it last fall too. It's the textbook example

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 2>of how to use the steady cam shot. But until

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 2>I watched it this time for our discussion and was

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 2>really thinking about how he was using point of view,

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I didn't fully pick up on the fact that the

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 2>real genius is in how the sequence ends. We stay

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 2>tethered to them the entire time. We are following them

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:30.239
<v Speaker 2>the entire time, except at the very end where we

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 2>see the staff bring the table out, and then what happens.

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Henry and Karen actually step slightly to the right out

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 2>of the frame, and the camera I think, moves forward

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit as the table gets placed down, and

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, Henry and Karen they're going to take their

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 2>seats in a second, but just for a moment, that

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 2>table has been placed down just for us. So it's

0:28:53.800 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 2>another moment where our point of view is both aligning

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>with but also again for lack of a better word, superseding,

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Henry's point of view. And that's the perspective that we

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>feel throughout the entire movie as we relive this, this

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 2>gangster life, this saga that Henry is experienced.

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the point of view thing brings up an interesting

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 4>question I'll ask you in just a second. But as

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 4>far as that copa cabana shot, the thing that stood

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 4>out to me on this viewing is related to the

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 4>religious ritual. I had never noticed that table being lifted

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 4>up in the air, and you're right, we suddenly focus

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 4>on it rather than them, and it has a white

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 4>table cloth, and it's moving briskly through the crowd, back

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 4>and forth. It's almost like some sort of robe that

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:51.479
<v Speaker 4>is flowing, or there's this angelic sense to it that

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 4>is you could you could envision something like that going

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 4>down a church aisle, right and being placed down as

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 4>some sort of sacred object, which is the that the

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 4>camera is giving it. So, yeah, as far as the

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 4>point of view thing goes, you're right, this movie is

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 4>interestingly aligned with Henry Hill's point of view, though not

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 4>technically the same way all the time.

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's absolutely his story.

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 4>And so what did you make on this viewing of

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 4>the choice to allow Karen's narration to have some space

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 4>in this narrative.

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.239
<v Speaker 3>We always did everything together and we always were in

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 3>the same crowd. Anniversaries, Christenings, we only went to each

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 3>other's houses. The women played cards, and when the kids

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 3>were born, Mickey and Jimmy were always the first at

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 3>the hospital. And when we went to the Islands of

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Vegas for vacation, we always went together, no outsiders. Ever,

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 3>it got to be normal. It got to where I

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 3>was even proud that I had the kind of husband

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 3>who was willing to go out and risk his neck

0:30:58.360 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 3>just to get us the little.

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Extras fluring Brocco here as Karen, and I think, oh man,

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 4>I should have marked this down. There are maybe three

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 4>sections dedicated to her in terms of voiceover, but I

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 4>think the performance is dynamic enough that she also brings

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 4>a presence and makes it her story when she's not

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 4>delivering a voiceover. But it is a break from this

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 4>very specific choice to align us in the movie with

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Henry Hill. So how did that play.

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Out for you on this viewing, Well, it made sense

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 2>because there are certain things that obviously only Henry can

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 2>know and have seen and experienced, and those are the

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 2>things we see only through his point of view. But

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 2>there are things that she was witnessed to, and those

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 2>are the things that she gets to articulate that she

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 2>was part of. It worked for me, Josh, because not

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 2>only that, but this whole sense that it is a memory,

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that is something he is retelling it. It feels like

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 2>it's going back into the past until we get caught

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 2>up to the quote unquote present day, and where we

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 2>know we're in the present day officially, I think anyway,

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>is when they're having the conversation with the FBI guy

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 2>about whether or not they're going to go into the

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 2>witness protection program. That for me is the moment where

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the story has now caught up. And so I I

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 2>think that the dual voiceovers, how I reconcile that is

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 2>it's as if they are both putting their stories on

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the page. Rather they're on the record, whether it's for

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 2>the FBI or it's for some other some of the storyteller. Nevertheless,

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 2>it's it's in the present day. It's it's officially on

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 2>the record. And and then and she now is is

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 2>entering that part of the story officially through that through

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 2>that route. So I love that we get her perspective.

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 2>And I love the rain Brocos performance.

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh. Yeah.

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean I've always I've always been favorable on it.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 4>It's just interesting to think about it as the years

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 4>go by, and in Contexte what you were talking about.

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 4>I think for me, it's definitely justified practically in the

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 4>ways you describe, but also it is I mean, the

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 4>performance justifies it, the way it's written, the material that

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 4>she's given justifies it. And right from the first instance

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 4>we see her. How about the line she delivers this

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 4>is on their double date, the first thing she says

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 4>to them, have some coffee, it'll wake you up. She

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 4>is not no matter she doesn't really know who this

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 4>guy is yet. But still, you know, you have to

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 4>imagine that is that's not the demure way to approach

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 4>a first date, even if it's you know, someone who

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 4>you're not really that interested in.

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And what is really interesting.

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 4>About Karen I think, and this again has been you know,

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't necessarily a revelation, but how entirely complicit she

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 4>is in all this. I think that's fascinating and more

0:33:56.160 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 4>interesting than making her a victim. This clarified eyes and

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 4>to me in a new way, perhaps with the scene

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 4>where he does take his gun and with the butt

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 4>of it beat her neighbor nearly to death. For from

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 4>what we understand, the neighbor has assaulted Karen and he

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 4>just says hide this. We get an insert shot, so

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.319
<v Speaker 4>many crucial key insert shots in this movie, close ups

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 4>of the bloody gun and she grabs it.

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I know there are women like my best friends who

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 3>would have gotten out of there the minute their boyfriend

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 3>gave them a gun to hide. Well, I didn't. I

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 3>gotta admit the truth. It turned me on.

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 4>And I think what that moment shows to me is

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 4>that in that voiceover, I think once or twice she

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 4>talks about how sexy he is and turn, which is

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 4>one ingredient. Sure, that's that's interesting, But this scene with

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 4>the hide this and the gun shows that it's not

0:34:56.200 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 4>just his sexiness. It's not even necessarily his connections for

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 4>the you know, the favors they can get. It's that

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 4>he can be a protector. That's part of what appeals

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 4>to her about Henry. And in a way, Henry offers

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Karen the same sort of quote unquote protection that Paul

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 4>offering the neighborhood, right.

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 2>He describes that that's that's what the mom's really doing, right.

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Yeah, and he describes it as, you know, a

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 4>positive thing, right, yes, but all we see are the

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 4>costs of that.

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 4>And and Karen is in a similar position to where

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.280
<v Speaker 4>she makes a deal and is in some ways coerced,

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 4>but she makes the choice to pursue that protection and

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 4>it costs her as well. And yeah, and Broco just

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, with the dynamism and the ferocity that she

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 4>has from beginning to end, is the performance earns this

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 4>diversion from the single point.

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Of view that we otherwise we're getting, and she is

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 2>all those things you describe, And then to show the

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:04.280
<v Speaker 2>complexity of the character in Broco's range, maybe my favorite

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 2>single word reading of hers watching it this time is

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 2>that night where right after they're just married, Henry stays

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 2>out too late and she's sticking up, She's standing up

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 2>for herself and Henry to her mom right, sounding like

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 2>the independent woman, I don't care what Henry does, stay

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 2>out of it, mom, all those things. But then after

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 2>he comes back and then turns around and goes back out.

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 2>She says Dad, like she sounds just like a child,

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 2>like she needs dad's help with mom. But also maybe

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Dad can give some advice about Henry. And it's just

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 2>perfect that little that little girl is still inside her

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 2>at the same time. Right, even though she is all

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 2>those things, she's not this demurror girl, but she also

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 2>still kind of is. And I wanted to talk about

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 2>this because I think you set this up nicely, and

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to create any straw men here, so

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 2>you can tell me if I'm heading down the wrong path.

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I haven't read any detailed arguments along these lines, but

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 2>you like me, and I'm sure most people listening have

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:14.800
<v Speaker 2>certainly seen tweets and different arguments come up on social

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 2>media here and there about people taking shots of Scorsese

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 2>for romanticizing. This goes back to the intoxicating a lower

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 2>part romanticizing this type of lifestyle, or at least romanticizing

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 2>or glorifying a certain type of toxic masculinity that we

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 2>often see in these types of gangster characters. And I

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 2>have to imagine that Goodfellas is an exhibit in that case.

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 2>And I here, Josh, I don't want to this isn't

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:51.280
<v Speaker 2>just me disagreeing with it. I honestly, watching it this time,

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 2>I really don't see any basis for it at all.

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not trying to be obtuse about it, because

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 2>I've seen this movie enough. As I said that, I

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't expect any major surprises, and I would say overall,

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I didn't have any huge shocks. But if you had

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 2>asked me before rewatching it, how Goodfellas began? How does

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 2>a Goodfellows start? I think I would have mistakenly said, well,

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 2>it starts as far back as I can remember. I

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 2>always wanted to be a gangster. It starts with Henry

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 2>in the past saying I wanted to be a gangster,

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 2>and it starts in the fifties. I would have bypassed

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 2>the prolog. I forgot about the prolog. But you can't

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 2>bypass the prolog. Scorsese doesn't bypass the prolog. Why does

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.879
<v Speaker 2>he open the film the way he does, with the

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 2>first sound we're hearing and the first images we're hearing

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 2>being the car rolling down the road, the highway, the

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 2>early hours of the morning, two guys, two mobsters sleeping

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 2>in the car, Henry barely awake, right they've just done

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 2>something really wrong, really bad. We don't know that yet,

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Viewers don't know that yet, but the guy's in the

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.879
<v Speaker 2>car do certainly the driver knows. And what's happening. We're

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 2>about to find out that there's a guy who should

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 2>be dead, bleeding profusely in the trunk of the car.

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 2>And when they open it, that's when we get That's

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 2>when we get the hellscape. That's when we get that

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 2>color red coming out from the trunk. And so this

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 2>is all within like the first ninety seconds of the movie, Josh,

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 2>We're going to watch Joe Peshy take a gigantic knife

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 2>and stab into Billy Batts and the blood is going

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:39.280
<v Speaker 2>to start gurgling out of him right so, right away,

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 2>right away, we get a sense of what this life

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 2>is like. And even though even though we're going to

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 2>then get that shot, we're going to get that wonderful,

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 2>editing moment of him closing the trunk and on that

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 2>action and sound that heroic. It is heroic. I think

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Scorsese he is being deliberately ironic here. It's a heroic

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 2>stagecoach Ringo like shot where it tracks forward in a

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 2>hurry and it stops on him. But it's ironic because

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 2>nothing we've seen up to that tracking shot is heroic,

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 2>and the look on Raleiota's face that it freezes on,

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:21.879
<v Speaker 2>nothing about his face suggests heroism. He looks scared as

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 2>hell actually in that moment, right, And everything about the

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 2>red is telling us whether we know anything about Martin

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Scorsese these other films or not, the color red is

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 2>making us very very uneasy. I actually think I was

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 2>looking at this Josh, and I don't know if he

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 2>did something technique wise or superimposing it over it, But

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 2>there's a moment when that trunk opens where it actually

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 2>looks like they do something almost like a technique out

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 2>of Vertigo, where the color red seems to impose over

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 2>the white sheet. It feels for a second like red

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 2>just kind of starts to absorb over the body. It

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 2>gets even bloodier for a second. And everything about that

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 2>suggests that there's nothing heroic going on. So when he

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 2>actually says, as far back as I can remember, I

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 2>always wanted to be a gangster, and the music and

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the horn start, you could actually you could you could

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 2>just immediately burst out laughing. It's that it's that funny, right,

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 2>so I think that's intended to be that hilarious, and

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 2>he is saying, and as we watch the film, even

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 2>if you take the even if you take the Kopa,

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that might be the only real moment, and even that's

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 2>a performance, Even that's a performance for Karen. Ask yourself,

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 2>how many moments in the film you genuinely feel like

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:46.479
<v Speaker 2>you would want to trade places with Henry Hill, even

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 2>for a moment or even that you feel a vicarious,

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 2>a rush of adrenaline. I don't know that I could

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 2>come up with with one or two. And look, I'm

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 2>not a saint. I think you have to acknowledge, and

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I think Martin Scorsese understands that there is an element

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 2>within all of us where we are like Karen, we

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 2>can get turned on by bad behavior. I still say

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 2>you can't count the number of moments on maybe more

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 2>than two fingers. If you're lucky where you really feel

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 2>that they mostly have here and you were getting it

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 2>this earlier. Henry and the mob characters there mostly just

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 2>have power and they maintain their power through force, and

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 2>with that comes a lot of ugliness. And it's just

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 2>the power that he's drawn to. But that power isn't

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 2>romantic and it's not sexy really. Ever in this.

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Film, by the time we get to the helicopter sequence,

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 4>which I don't think we've touched on yet, now that

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 4>is where it's absolutely clear this guy is living a

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 4>nightmare and he's got it worse off than any schnook

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 4>he's putting in. Forget nine to five, he's putting in

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:56.800
<v Speaker 4>twenty two hour days, and he's paranoid for every second

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 4>of them. I read the film the same way you do,

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 4>but I will also say this is a conversation that's

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 4>worth having. And I think Scorsese, throughout his career has

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 4>tiptoed along these lines of being deliberately ironic. And you know,

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 4>this is part, not entirely, but part of our split

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 4>on The Wolf of Wall Street. I do question sometimes

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, how much fun are are you going to

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 4>have before you tell the audience this isn't fun even

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 4>if you're being deliberately ironic. And in the case of Goodfellas,

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 4>I find him to be walking that line quite convincingly

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 4>and with dexterity and a moral clarity, a tone management.

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:48.919
<v Speaker 4>You know, this is where he is doing that at

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 4>his best. For me, yes, at least.

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Am saying, if you want to have that argument, I

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 2>think it's tough to include Goodfellas in that argument.

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's yeah, I didn't hold it up as

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 4>an exhibit either. But when you use the word heroic

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:09.439
<v Speaker 4>for that push in to Henry, that's completely apt. It's

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 4>also purposeful. I think that is a clear choice that

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 4>he is making to be deliberately ironic that does not

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 4>negate its heroic effect. And this brings to mind that

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 4>prologue has another kinetic element that I don't think I'd

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 4>noticed before that adds to this sense of excitement and

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 4>counters that shot of them where they're sleeping and bored,

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 4>and it is the way the car when we first

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:40.439
<v Speaker 4>it might be the first shot of the film, the car,

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 4>the cameras behind the car zooming down the freeway, and

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:47.279
<v Speaker 4>the camera all of a sudden revs up, swings to

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:51.280
<v Speaker 4>the next to the car that Henry's driving and almost

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 4>passes it. And it's it's as if Scorsese is saying, let's.

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Go for a ride.

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 2>H I actually and I got a difference.

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Around them and and pulls ahead of them. And this

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:04.359
<v Speaker 4>is what I loved about it, Adam. The credits that

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 4>come on the screen right they're moving and if I'm

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 4>remember it correctly, they appear they almost rev up and

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 4>move into.

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>The same direction across.

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 4>The screen from right to left. All of that is

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 4>it's that word we keep using. It's kinetic, it's exciting,

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:25.880
<v Speaker 4>it's sexy, it's it's heroic. And so I am not

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 4>saying that I read the movie any differently than you are, right,

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:34.720
<v Speaker 4>but these are these are the deliberately ironic or how

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 4>how high are we meant to be getting? This is

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 4>always the question with we meant to be getting in

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 4>moments like this. Now I agree with you. I don't

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 4>think Goodfellas is, you know, ultimately a movie that you

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 4>could use as an argument for that. I have others

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 4>that I've used, But it's there. It's there again.

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Just think about most scenes in this film, sitting around

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 2>at a restaurant getting yelled at by Tommy. What, getting

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 2>a few free drinks? Like most of their life is

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 2>pretty banal, right, Like it's not, it's really not alluring.

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 2>They get to they hang out on the corner in

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 2>a pizza joint, like great, they get to take whatever

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 2>they want, Like that's not actually that that exciting? Ultimately,

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 2>what you see in this film. And even I was

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.279
<v Speaker 2>gonna say how nuanced the beginning is. You're right, the

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:23.359
<v Speaker 2>way the credits move, how it moves in sync, even

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the sound with the car. But my feeling watching the

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 2>car because of how the car is kind of moving

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 2>at a steady speed and you get the sense you

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 2>see the guys and the way they're sleeping, and how

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the car is moving. It's not a very fast pace.

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 2>It suggests to me that everybody's drowsy, and it's almost

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 2>like the car could go off the road at any minute.

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Like it doesn't feel it doesn't feel thrilling to me,

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 2>but the but the way the credits are in sync

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 2>with it almost feels like it is right. So there

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 2>there are these opposing forces at play. But that's that's

0:46:57.239 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 2>what that's what makes the film making exciting.

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:01.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he loves a play. He loves to play in

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 4>that tension. And yeah, as you're describing, you know how

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 4>banal their lives are. This comes back to the supposed

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 4>freedom they've found by being above the law, right when

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 4>actually they've trapped themselves in this bubble that constricts them

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 4>more than if they were a schnook.

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 2>Exactly it's a great point. So just a few other things.

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you had a list of other

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 2>things or other items that you wanted to touch on,

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 2>But I love what I think is intentional humor anyway

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:33.840
<v Speaker 2>of We'll go back to Maury, the fact that we

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 2>get the commercial. We see that entire commercial. You know,

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Maury's wigs stay on, right, you can jump in the water,

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 2>the wind, there could be a storm, right, Maury's wigs

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 2>never come off. But what happens then in the very

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 2>next scene, turns out the wigs can handle everything but

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Conway. Of course, you know, like that feels like

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 2>a great joke embedded in there, because as soon as

0:47:56.560 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Conway gets his hands on Maury, the whigs are

0:48:00.160 --> 0:48:01.320
<v Speaker 2>to come off, doesn't.

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 4>It isn't it Jimmy watching the commercial, like discuss.

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.520
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like you know, he's been thinking about it.

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna get I'm gonna get that.

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Off, Chuck as Maury.

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 2>By the way, those those editing touches, the the the

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 2>way we allied moments the and here, some of them

0:48:23.120 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 2>are thrilling to But we've already seen the prologue, so

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 2>that we don't have to relive moments and revisit them again.

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 2>When we leave the house, we actually get what is

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:39.840
<v Speaker 2>essentially a match cut on sound as there as the

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:43.839
<v Speaker 2>camera is in the house, we see the car in

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 2>the background, we hear bats in the trunk. In the

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 2>very next shot, they're out on the road, and it's

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 2>as if, well, did the did the sound come from

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the previous shot when he was in the driveway, or

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 2>is the shot is the sound from the road. It

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:04.759
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really matter. They're from the same moment. But that's

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 2>how he bridges that gap in time, right, it brings

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:12.759
<v Speaker 2>us there. There are such wonderful little moments like that.

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:17.879
<v Speaker 2>Another example of that is the time where I think

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:22.920
<v Speaker 2>he's fighting with Karen. Henry's fighting with Karen and she

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it's right after she pulls the gun on him,

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 2>and she goes into the closet and she yanks the clothes.

0:49:29.560 --> 0:49:32.840
<v Speaker 2>So again action and sound combined. Right, she yanks and

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:35.720
<v Speaker 2>at the same time she yanks, you think she's yelling

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 2>in anger, and maybe she is. But on the next frame,

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the next cut, he's out with the guys or something,

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 2>and it's a cut to his face and he's yelling,

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:50.760
<v Speaker 2>right so is he screaming? Is she screaming? Those cuts

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 2>are cut together in that moment as if they are

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:57.759
<v Speaker 2>one moment that is happening together. There are so many examples. Oh,

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 2>I got to give you one more. It is the

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 2>same kind of thing here, but not with sound, with

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 2>with movement in editing. It's when Karen is complaining about

0:50:05.600 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 2>that first date and how the moment he was you know,

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:10.880
<v Speaker 2>he was pushing me into the car and then he

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 2>was pulling me out, and so then we see that

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:16.919
<v Speaker 2>enacted in the editing where just with one cut, it's

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.719
<v Speaker 2>as if, in one fluid motion, it's like she was

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 2>pushed in and then literally taken out. It's just that's

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 2>how that's how fluid the editing in this movie.

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Is well, and it creates this cohesive, coherent experience where

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 4>the two and almost two and a half hours, you know, all.

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Feel of a piece.

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 4>They're propulsives, because that's it. There's movements like that from

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 4>one moment to the other. Just yeah, a couple of

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:42.799
<v Speaker 4>last quick things. I'll say, we probably haven't talked about

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Joe Pesci much at all because it's such an iconic performance.

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 4>What's left to say?

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Real quick?

0:50:48.800 --> 0:50:51.880
<v Speaker 4>When I notice here, You know, the little things you

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 4>notice when it's the umpteenth viewing and everyone's talked about

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 4>this and impersonated it to death. When Billy Bats insults

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:02.839
<v Speaker 4>him by talking about the shoe shine story, he's it's

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 4>not just that Tommy gets psychotically mad. Peshi gives us

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 4>a few beats where he is genuinely hurt. He can

0:51:09.640 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 4>tell he's a real human being who is feeling like, Hey,

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:17.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm here, I'm almost a made guy, and I still

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:18.640
<v Speaker 4>don't have their respect.

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 6>Hey, Tommy, if I'm gonna break your ball that day,

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 6>to go home and get your shine box.

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:25.759
<v Speaker 1>This Kidis kid was great.

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.240
<v Speaker 6>I used to call him spit shine Comy. I swear

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 6>to God, how you make your shoes look like mirrors?

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 6>Excuse me my language.

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:34.759
<v Speaker 1>He was terrific. He was the best.

0:51:35.200 --> 0:51:38.280
<v Speaker 6>He made a lot of money too. So hello Tommy,

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 6>one more shines, Billy, what I said, no more shines?

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 6>Maybe you didn't hear about it.

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:44.480
<v Speaker 2>You've been away a long time. They didn't go up

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:46.760
<v Speaker 2>there and tell you I don't shine shoes anymore.

0:51:47.800 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 6>Relax, Well, your flock crow, what's what's got into you?

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm breaking your balls a little bit.

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:51.920
<v Speaker 5>That's all.

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to kid with you.

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:54.919
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes you don't sound like you're kidding.

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:56.440
<v Speaker 6>You know, there's a lot of people right I mean,

0:51:56.440 --> 0:51:58.400
<v Speaker 6>I'm only kidding with you having a party. I mean

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:00.160
<v Speaker 6>I just came home. I haven't seen you in a

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 6>long time, and I'm breaking your balls and away you're

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 6>getting fish.

0:52:03.120 --> 0:52:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry.

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:04.719
<v Speaker 6>I don't know my offend you.

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:05.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry too.

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:14.200
<v Speaker 6>It's okay, noo, I'll go home and get your shine box.

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:17.880
<v Speaker 4>And the fact that you know this Pesci isn't just

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:20.320
<v Speaker 4>doing the you know below your top moments here. This

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:23.719
<v Speaker 4>is a really good performance de Niro. I love how

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:27.440
<v Speaker 4>comfortable he is just to be mostly in the background.

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 4>I know Jimmy comes into the focus a little more

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:32.520
<v Speaker 4>in the final third, but I almost like the beginning better,

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:37.720
<v Speaker 4>where you're watching this dynamic scene of violence or yelling

0:52:37.920 --> 0:52:40.800
<v Speaker 4>or talking and and de Niro's kind of like the

0:52:40.920 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 4>fourth guy in the scene, and he's just kind of

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, chuckling or grinning or doing something with his

0:52:46.640 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 4>hands that's on point and brilliant, and he's so relaxed

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:53.000
<v Speaker 4>here you can just feel like there's no weight to

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 4>carry this whole movie, and so he's just having as

0:52:55.640 --> 0:52:59.080
<v Speaker 4>much fun as he can in the corners. And then

0:52:59.120 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 4>the last thing is a little are technical, but that

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 4>famous dolly zoom shot at breakfast the diner, at the

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:10.240
<v Speaker 4>diner with Jimmy and Henry, where it realizes he's gonna

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 4>set him up. Yeah, it's I think it appears to

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 4>be zooming in on them while dining welling out right,

0:53:16.680 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 4>So you're so things are a little unsteady. What I

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:22.480
<v Speaker 4>noticed this time about it. I think that's the first

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 4>time we realize Jimmy, who's older now, has these giant

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:31.279
<v Speaker 4>the glass nineteen eighties thick glasses which are comical and

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of undercut him as a threatening figure. But also

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 4>in that scene they have a similar effect to the

0:53:37.239 --> 0:53:40.440
<v Speaker 4>dolly zoom where you're like, you're a little disoriented by

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 4>the thickness of him and his eyes are a little blurry.

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 4>So that's just, yeah, one of those brilliant little flares

0:53:47.120 --> 0:53:49.320
<v Speaker 4>of techniques. Scar says he puts in here that that

0:53:49.440 --> 0:53:51.920
<v Speaker 4>works thematically as well. They all work thematically. It's not

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 4>none of this is showing off.

0:53:54.040 --> 0:53:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll say this about Tommy and the famous scene. You

0:53:58.239 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 2>think I'm funny is I had never really thought about

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:05.320
<v Speaker 2>the fact that even though we have met Tommy before,

0:54:05.600 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 2>we've met that character before, we haven't really gotten to

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:12.719
<v Speaker 2>know him, and we don't know yet that he's a psychopath.

0:54:13.640 --> 0:54:18.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's our introduction to the real Tommy, And in

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:23.040
<v Speaker 2>that scene he actually is. He's not playing a psychopath, right,

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:26.680
<v Speaker 2>or he is acting like a psychopath, but it turns

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:29.880
<v Speaker 2>out he's being good natured. It's a joke, he's pretending,

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 2>but that is setting up. We get enough of a

0:54:33.719 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 2>glimpse of how scary he really is in the performance

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:41.640
<v Speaker 2>within a performance, right that we do know, We do

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:43.680
<v Speaker 2>know or have enough of a sense of who he

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:47.800
<v Speaker 2>really is underneath that once we start to see his

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:51.759
<v Speaker 2>actions later, we see how he really does behave in

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:54.799
<v Speaker 2>some of these situations. Later, we're not surprised at all

0:54:55.239 --> 0:54:58.400
<v Speaker 2>because we've seen the crazy come out. We've seen the

0:54:58.440 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 2>crazy come out, even though it was a situation and

0:55:01.239 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 2>he was performing.

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:03.120
<v Speaker 7>What do you mean funny?

0:55:03.200 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Funny?

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:03.640
<v Speaker 5>How?

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 2>How am I funny? Just do you know how you

0:55:09.040 --> 0:55:12.560
<v Speaker 2>tell a story? No? No, I don't know you said it?

0:55:13.040 --> 0:55:14.600
<v Speaker 7>How do I know you said I'm funny?

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:16.240
<v Speaker 2>How do my funny?

0:55:16.320 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 7>What the is so funny about me?

0:55:18.440 --> 0:55:19.880
<v Speaker 6>Tell me, tell me what's funny?

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Get me?

0:55:31.440 --> 0:55:34.880
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's it's the archetype for the you know,

0:55:35.040 --> 0:55:38.879
<v Speaker 4>the gangster, hothead, psychotic. This is a very familiar type.

0:55:38.960 --> 0:55:41.879
<v Speaker 4>But how she gives it all these layers we're talking about,

0:55:41.920 --> 0:55:44.839
<v Speaker 4>which why it's why it makes it like the piece

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:47.480
<v Speaker 4>de resistance of this particular figure.

0:55:48.400 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Here's my closing question, the thing I I do. I

0:55:52.200 --> 0:55:54.200
<v Speaker 2>do want listeners to come in and give me an answer.

0:55:54.280 --> 0:56:01.279
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's in the book. Presumably all of the men

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:06.400
<v Speaker 2>who were part of the Luftanza heist, like Henry. I

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:08.879
<v Speaker 2>don't really know enough about the dynamics to say whether

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:12.520
<v Speaker 2>or not Jimmy definitely reports to Paulie or not as

0:56:12.600 --> 0:56:15.920
<v Speaker 2>part of his crew, but Henry certainly does, don't. All

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:19.440
<v Speaker 2>of these guys probably belong to Paully's crew. So when

0:56:19.520 --> 0:56:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy just starts whacking everybody doesn't, doesn't Paulie maybe say, Hey,

0:56:25.640 --> 0:56:27.880
<v Speaker 2>what's what's happening to all my guys all of a sudden,

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 2>I've got no muscle anymore.

0:56:29.440 --> 0:56:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm curious. A good question.

0:56:30.800 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Jimmy seems to be operating on his own towards the

0:56:33.719 --> 0:56:36.880
<v Speaker 4>end there, but even Henry, even says at one point, like,

0:56:37.080 --> 0:56:39.440
<v Speaker 4>we can't touch those guys. That's part of them not

0:56:39.719 --> 0:56:43.520
<v Speaker 4>being one hundred percent Italian, right, is that they can't

0:56:45.000 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 4>with the wrong guy if but he also kind of

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:51.320
<v Speaker 4>says like, you know, we're we're held back. So so

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:54.440
<v Speaker 4>it's a good question. It also opens up has like

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:56.600
<v Speaker 4>how rogue has Jimmy gone, Like.

0:56:56.840 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 2>That's what that's kind of what I'm saying is like

0:56:58.760 --> 0:57:01.719
<v Speaker 2>at that point, I don't know. Yeah, I'm curious about that.

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Maybe someone has the answer. It was fun talking about Goodfellas.

0:57:06.640 --> 0:57:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Goodfellas is currently available vod and via quotes in your

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:13.400
<v Speaker 2>group chat. If you agree or disagree with anything we

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:15.560
<v Speaker 2>had to say, or you have any other thoughts about

0:57:15.560 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 2>our show, you can email us feedback at filmspotting dot net.

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:22.240
<v Speaker 7>This episode is brought to you by Peloton. Break through

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:24.720
<v Speaker 7>the busiest time of year with the brand new Peloton

0:57:24.800 --> 0:57:28.439
<v Speaker 7>Cross Training tread Plus powered by Peloton Iq. With real

0:57:28.520 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 7>time guidance and endless ways to move, you can personalize

0:57:31.600 --> 0:57:34.800
<v Speaker 7>your workouts and train with confidence, helping you reach your

0:57:34.840 --> 0:57:38.920
<v Speaker 7>goals in less time. Let yourself run, lift, sculpt, push

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 7>and go. Explore the new Peloton Cross Training Tread plus

0:57:42.480 --> 0:57:43.840
<v Speaker 7>at oneploton dot com.

0:57:44.600 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Listening is the number one thing you can do to

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:50.440
<v Speaker 4>support an independently produced show like ours. A couple more

0:57:50.480 --> 0:57:52.160
<v Speaker 4>things you can do. Take a minute to give us

0:57:52.200 --> 0:57:55.160
<v Speaker 4>a rating or a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:57.320
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't matter if you're brand new or have been

0:57:57.400 --> 0:57:59.840
<v Speaker 4>around for twenty years. Every new review helps us reach

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 4>new listeners. The most substantial way to support us, however,

0:58:03.440 --> 0:58:06.120
<v Speaker 4>is to join the Film Spotting Family, and you can

0:58:06.200 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 4>do that at Film Spottingfamily dot com. Thank you very

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 4>much to Family plus member Wyatt Espeland from hiawassee Georgia

0:58:14.480 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Wyatt's letterbox handle if you want to follow him.

0:58:17.160 --> 0:58:18.360
<v Speaker 2>There is w E.

0:58:18.720 --> 0:58:21.439
<v Speaker 1>S p A l i n seventy five.

0:58:22.040 --> 0:58:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it looks like Wes Palin seventy five. Wyatt writes.

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I toured the country performing as a singer, songwriter and

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 2>always in a vehicle. I discovered Film Spotting during the

0:58:31.360 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Christopher Nolan UVRA View or UVRA Reviews and have been

0:58:36.280 --> 0:58:38.720
<v Speaker 2>listening ever since. I became a member for the nineteen

0:58:38.840 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine draft as that was the peak of my

0:58:41.280 --> 0:58:44.600
<v Speaker 2>movie watching years. That was Bonus show number fifty three

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 2>last July I had to hear if any of you

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 2>would pick Boys Don't Cry or The Green Mile, two

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:52.200
<v Speaker 2>of my favorites from that year, we did not. I'm

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:55.080
<v Speaker 2>also happy that I can listen to archive episodes. Currently

0:58:55.160 --> 0:58:57.600
<v Speaker 2>enjoying your revisit of Silence of the Lambs for its

0:58:57.720 --> 0:59:02.120
<v Speaker 2>thirtieth a favorite review segment. I love the Year End

0:59:02.280 --> 0:59:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and Oscar episodes, and I was all in on the

0:59:04.960 --> 0:59:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Jane Campion Oove review marathon. I love Josh's comments on

0:59:08.680 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 2>The Piano, which is one of my favorite movies of

0:59:10.920 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 2>all time. I love all the rankings of directors films,

0:59:14.000 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 2>and I like it when Josh and Adam catch up

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:18.080
<v Speaker 2>on some of their blind spots. I don't like it

0:59:18.160 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 2>when they disagree and the tension can be felt. It

0:59:21.480 --> 0:59:23.720
<v Speaker 2>broke my heart when I found out Siskel and Ebert

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 2>never really seem to like one another. Lol. Okay, I

0:59:27.160 --> 0:59:30.200
<v Speaker 2>do confess I like the tension a little bit. Missus Miniver,

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:33.680
<v Speaker 2>anyone I hoped to hang out one day at a

0:59:33.720 --> 0:59:40.760
<v Speaker 2>live event of all the movies? Yeah, Missus Miniver, what

0:59:40.920 --> 0:59:44.240
<v Speaker 2>a wonderfully entertaining show, most of the time more entertaining

0:59:44.280 --> 0:59:47.800
<v Speaker 2>than the films being reviewed. Thanks for having me letterbox

0:59:47.880 --> 0:59:51.320
<v Speaker 2>top four mostly representing my favorite directors, The color Purple,

0:59:51.480 --> 0:59:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Hannah and Her Sisters, Once upon a Time in Hollywood,

0:59:53.920 --> 0:59:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and Nixon. That's got to be the first Nixon appearing

0:59:57.760 --> 0:59:58.520
<v Speaker 2>in a letterbox.

0:59:58.640 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I think so more.

1:00:00.360 --> 1:00:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Oliver Stone favorite movie he revisited recently, Why It's His

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Natural Born Killers. A random film that he loves is

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:11.200
<v Speaker 2>The Butcher Boy from Neil Jordan, a movie he credits

1:00:11.240 --> 1:00:13.919
<v Speaker 2>with becoming a cinophile. How about this when I watched

1:00:13.960 --> 1:00:16.960
<v Speaker 2>my first Scorsese at fifteen years old, Goodfellas and The

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Last Temptation of Christ in the same week. There you go,

1:00:20.520 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 2>a book about movies or movie making. I have all

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:26.959
<v Speaker 2>of Roger Ebert's review books. We think Wyatt for joining

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the family and all those years of listening. In addition

1:00:29.560 --> 1:00:31.520
<v Speaker 2>to keeping us doing what we're doing, your support comes

1:00:31.560 --> 1:00:34.000
<v Speaker 2>with perks. You get to listen early in ad Free,

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:37.040
<v Speaker 2>You get our weekly newsletter. You get exclusive opportunities like

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>being part of the so thoughtful Film Spotting Family Discord,

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:46.200
<v Speaker 2>and monthly bonus shows. We did just talk about Akira

1:00:46.320 --> 1:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Kurosawa's Stray Dog. Guess what pretty great movie. This month

1:00:51.600 --> 1:00:54.640
<v Speaker 2>we will be having another edition of Trivia Spotting and

1:00:55.120 --> 1:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>we love playing that fun little game with all of

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:03.000
<v Speaker 2>our Film Spotting Family members. There are still slots available.

1:01:03.160 --> 1:01:04.760
<v Speaker 2>We will put a link in the notes for this

1:01:04.880 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>show and the Film Spotting Family episode. Anyway, if you

1:01:07.880 --> 1:01:11.560
<v Speaker 2>would like to sign up and be part of Trivia Spotting,

1:01:11.680 --> 1:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Can I actually can I just brag real quick on

1:01:14.000 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the trivia front Josh our discord folks may have seen this,

1:01:17.720 --> 1:01:19.360
<v Speaker 2>but can I brag for a second?

1:01:19.440 --> 1:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, go for it.

1:01:20.400 --> 1:01:27.439
<v Speaker 2>So it was an anniversary for Sarah and me last week,

1:01:27.600 --> 1:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>and so we decided it was a Wednesday night, we

1:01:30.200 --> 1:01:33.400
<v Speaker 2>decided to have a drink, so we went to just

1:01:33.480 --> 1:01:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the nearest bar to us to sneak out and have

1:01:36.600 --> 1:01:39.959
<v Speaker 2>a drink. Turns out it was trivia night. We didn't

1:01:39.960 --> 1:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>even know this place had a trivia night. It was

1:01:41.560 --> 1:01:46.200
<v Speaker 2>trivia night, pub trivia night, only like maybe five teams playing,

1:01:46.960 --> 1:01:53.320
<v Speaker 2>and we show up. Round four is about to start.

1:01:53.440 --> 1:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how many rounds there are. I just

1:01:55.080 --> 1:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>know round four is about to start. So obviously we've

1:01:57.640 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 2>missed a good part of the game. But they say

1:02:00.360 --> 1:02:04.320
<v Speaker 2>it's the entertainment round, and so we're not gonna play

1:02:04.320 --> 1:02:05.920
<v Speaker 2>because we missed most of the game. But then they

1:02:05.920 --> 1:02:07.800
<v Speaker 2>asked the first question and I know the answer, so

1:02:07.880 --> 1:02:10.400
<v Speaker 2>it's like, okay, it's on. I'm gonna go get I'm

1:02:10.400 --> 1:02:12.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna go get a sheet, and we're gonna play. And

1:02:12.440 --> 1:02:15.720
<v Speaker 2>so we start playing, and there were nine questions and

1:02:17.080 --> 1:02:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I knew all nine of them. Sarah may

1:02:20.120 --> 1:02:22.360
<v Speaker 2>not have been a lot of help on entertainment, but

1:02:22.480 --> 1:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>I knew all nine of them and we and we

1:02:25.280 --> 1:02:28.280
<v Speaker 2>got them right. So we had a good round. So

1:02:28.400 --> 1:02:31.400
<v Speaker 2>then we're in turns out there are seven rounds, right,

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>So between Sarah and I, we have two very different

1:02:36.360 --> 1:02:39.920
<v Speaker 2>backgrounds educationally in interest. So we end up being a

1:02:39.960 --> 1:02:45.640
<v Speaker 2>pretty good team. And in the end, with only having

1:02:45.720 --> 1:02:48.920
<v Speaker 2>played four rounds and missing the first three, we only

1:02:49.000 --> 1:02:52.640
<v Speaker 2>ended up losing. We ended up finishing second, and we

1:02:52.760 --> 1:02:56.360
<v Speaker 2>only lost by four points. Hey, I know what you're

1:02:56.400 --> 1:02:59.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna be doing next Wednesday night exactly. It's penciled into

1:02:59.600 --> 1:03:02.040
<v Speaker 2>our you're gonna mount here now. And and the thing

1:03:02.200 --> 1:03:05.520
<v Speaker 2>is the team that the team that won, they were

1:03:05.680 --> 1:03:11.720
<v Speaker 2>like these like really inebriated bros who I think were

1:03:11.880 --> 1:03:16.480
<v Speaker 2>totally oblivious to the fact that we joined in round

1:03:16.640 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 2>four and only lost by four points and they were

1:03:19.040 --> 1:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>like over celebrating and it was just like, so, you

1:03:24.080 --> 1:03:25.520
<v Speaker 2>know what, We're definitely coming back.

1:03:27.520 --> 1:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>This is a rivalry, this is my story.

1:03:31.000 --> 1:03:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Could be Sharks and Jets. I hope they ask a

1:03:33.440 --> 1:03:36.120
<v Speaker 2>question about West Side Story. I think we'll get it,

1:03:36.200 --> 1:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>and they weren't. I could be wrong. Hey, this is

1:03:39.000 --> 1:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>about the film Spotting Family, though not my trivia prowess.

1:03:42.360 --> 1:03:44.520
<v Speaker 2>You can learn more about the film Spotting Family at

1:03:44.520 --> 1:03:46.200
<v Speaker 2>film spotting Family dot com.

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:53.959
<v Speaker 6>Where you find you at greet or something.

1:03:54.680 --> 1:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>No, he came into the store. I work at.

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Music.

1:04:01.240 --> 1:04:04.120
<v Speaker 2>See yeah, sometimes, bro, you should come to the show.

1:04:04.160 --> 1:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Tell us.

1:04:07.600 --> 1:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>That's from Lurker, a debut feature from director Alex Russell.

1:04:11.880 --> 1:04:15.240
<v Speaker 2>As the title suggests, the innocuous sounding encounter between a

1:04:15.320 --> 1:04:18.520
<v Speaker 2>musician and a fan takes a turn for the worse.

1:04:18.640 --> 1:04:21.560
<v Speaker 2>But just how bad does it get? Josh, you caught

1:04:21.640 --> 1:04:23.840
<v Speaker 2>up with this one and you are nominating it for

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:26.959
<v Speaker 2>the Golden Brick, which we award to our favorite film

1:04:27.000 --> 1:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>of the year by a new or emerging filmmaker. Tell

1:04:30.560 --> 1:04:32.360
<v Speaker 2>us what you liked about Lurker.

1:04:32.960 --> 1:04:36.120
<v Speaker 4>It does get dark. I think maybe what I liked

1:04:36.280 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 4>less was the direction it goes at the end. It

1:04:38.880 --> 1:04:43.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of spins in different directions, and the darkness is

1:04:43.640 --> 1:04:45.480
<v Speaker 4>part of that. But man, is this a movie that

1:04:45.560 --> 1:04:47.800
<v Speaker 4>hooks you with its opening scene. I'm not going to

1:04:47.880 --> 1:04:51.520
<v Speaker 4>describe it in detail, but this is where the sales

1:04:51.600 --> 1:04:55.840
<v Speaker 4>clerk Matthew played by Theodor Pellerin encounters this pop star

1:04:56.000 --> 1:05:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Oliver played by Archie Medekui and and again won't give

1:05:00.600 --> 1:05:02.800
<v Speaker 4>it away, but the way he entraps him and the

1:05:02.840 --> 1:05:07.120
<v Speaker 4>way his eyes lock on him like he's prey, you realize, oh,

1:05:07.280 --> 1:05:13.040
<v Speaker 4>we're dealing with someone really nefarious here. And the performance

1:05:13.320 --> 1:05:17.240
<v Speaker 4>from Pellerin digs into that and is consistently to the

1:05:17.520 --> 1:05:20.120
<v Speaker 4>end fascinating and unnerving.

1:05:20.520 --> 1:05:21.040
<v Speaker 5>He is.

1:05:22.040 --> 1:05:25.960
<v Speaker 4>There's just a desperation to this, a neediness to the

1:05:26.040 --> 1:05:31.320
<v Speaker 4>performance that is electric in a strange way. It is

1:05:31.560 --> 1:05:34.080
<v Speaker 4>very talented mister Ripley. There are definitely shades of that.

1:05:34.320 --> 1:05:38.040
<v Speaker 4>But I think the writer director here, Alex Russell make

1:05:38.160 --> 1:05:41.800
<v Speaker 4>their debut, is he's also doing a character study that

1:05:42.520 --> 1:05:46.320
<v Speaker 4>serves as a meditation on celebrity in some ways that

1:05:46.480 --> 1:05:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Ripley didn't and authenticity, I think in some interesting ways

1:05:51.520 --> 1:05:55.080
<v Speaker 4>that's what I really latched into, are the questions where

1:05:55.120 --> 1:05:59.600
<v Speaker 4>it explores authenticity It's something that comes up in terms

1:05:59.640 --> 1:06:02.000
<v Speaker 4>of Ouiver's music and who he wants to be as

1:06:02.000 --> 1:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>an artist. What is authentic? So it's not just about

1:06:06.360 --> 1:06:09.640
<v Speaker 4>the Matthew character, the sales clerk character. So there are

1:06:09.640 --> 1:06:12.160
<v Speaker 4>a lot of interesting layers here. The last thing I'll

1:06:12.200 --> 1:06:15.800
<v Speaker 4>quickly mention that I think makes it interesting as a

1:06:15.840 --> 1:06:17.840
<v Speaker 4>golden brick too. You know, we're looking for a strong

1:06:18.000 --> 1:06:23.760
<v Speaker 4>vision here, interesting choices. It is the music, Oliver's music.

1:06:24.200 --> 1:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference between love and obsession? I don't know,

1:06:29.640 --> 1:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but I know I want you.

1:06:32.560 --> 1:06:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Kenneth bloom I Guess also known as Kenny Beats, composed

1:06:36.080 --> 1:06:38.800
<v Speaker 4>the score but also worked with a variety of artists

1:06:39.040 --> 1:06:43.200
<v Speaker 4>to bring out these songs. I would say Oliver is

1:06:43.280 --> 1:06:45.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of a weekend like figure. To me, the music

1:06:45.880 --> 1:06:49.480
<v Speaker 4>sounded like that. There's these sleepy, seductive songs that he performs.

1:06:50.160 --> 1:06:53.200
<v Speaker 4>They really grab you and fit the character well and

1:06:53.280 --> 1:06:57.680
<v Speaker 4>what the character is exploring again this authenticity question, and

1:06:58.440 --> 1:07:02.280
<v Speaker 4>Medekue perform then brilliantly. You know, this is a really believable,

1:07:02.360 --> 1:07:05.520
<v Speaker 4>convincing rising pop star you've got here. So the use

1:07:05.560 --> 1:07:09.000
<v Speaker 4>of music is something that makes Lurker stand out as well.

1:07:09.080 --> 1:07:11.200
<v Speaker 4>I'll leave it there so I don't spoil anymore.

1:07:11.840 --> 1:07:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Lurker is out now. I think just playing in

1:07:16.040 --> 1:07:19.760
<v Speaker 2>limited release. In wider release you can see the roses

1:07:19.920 --> 1:07:23.280
<v Speaker 2>which you did. This stars Olivia Coleman and Benedict Cumberbatch

1:07:23.320 --> 1:07:26.439
<v Speaker 2>as a well off married couple whose marriage goes bad.

1:07:26.520 --> 1:07:30.439
<v Speaker 2>But it's comedy, so it's either going to go hilariously bad.

1:07:31.040 --> 1:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Well that's the idea. It should go hilariously bad. SNL

1:07:33.920 --> 1:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>alums Kate McKinnon Andy Samberg are also in the film.

1:07:37.360 --> 1:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Jay Roach of Austin Powers and Meet the Parents' Fame directs.

1:07:42.080 --> 1:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>How was it, Josh?

1:07:44.000 --> 1:07:45.720
<v Speaker 4>I imagine most folks are going to go see this

1:07:45.880 --> 1:07:50.240
<v Speaker 4>because they're interested in Coleman and Cumberbatch. That was our situation,

1:07:50.680 --> 1:07:54.640
<v Speaker 4>and we weren't disappointed. They're brilliant together. I could have

1:07:54.760 --> 1:07:57.720
<v Speaker 4>just taken a movie of only the two of them together,

1:07:57.880 --> 1:08:00.560
<v Speaker 4>whether they're you know, deeply in love at the front

1:08:00.800 --> 1:08:03.600
<v Speaker 4>or you know, deeply into test near the end of

1:08:03.640 --> 1:08:07.360
<v Speaker 4>the film. The repartee here it's they're just zipping along

1:08:07.600 --> 1:08:11.280
<v Speaker 4>and you're kind of you're dazzled, even when they're being

1:08:11.360 --> 1:08:12.680
<v Speaker 4>horrible to each other.

1:08:14.280 --> 1:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>One I would rather live with her than a wolf.

1:08:19.920 --> 1:08:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Did you see Wolf?

1:08:22.000 --> 1:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1:08:22.560 --> 1:08:29.639
<v Speaker 5>Well one he has arms. Well I saw a documentary

1:08:29.680 --> 1:08:31.640
<v Speaker 5>Wants about a man without arms, and it looked like

1:08:31.720 --> 1:08:33.639
<v Speaker 5>a difficult life, particularly for the partner.

1:08:33.760 --> 1:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So I like that he has arms.

1:08:36.360 --> 1:08:41.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, They're almost too good for this movie, because I

1:08:41.200 --> 1:08:43.760
<v Speaker 4>don't remember much about the War of the Roses the

1:08:43.840 --> 1:08:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Turner Kathleen Turner and Michael Douglas one, but I remember

1:08:47.040 --> 1:08:49.519
<v Speaker 4>them pretty much being at each other other's throats the

1:08:49.560 --> 1:08:53.280
<v Speaker 4>whole time. And a good part of The Roses is

1:08:53.320 --> 1:08:57.400
<v Speaker 4>about the romance of these two characters, and there's more

1:08:57.479 --> 1:09:01.200
<v Speaker 4>back and forth from you know, they disappoint each other,

1:09:01.360 --> 1:09:04.760
<v Speaker 4>they get back together. And Cumberbatch and Coleman are so

1:09:04.880 --> 1:09:08.479
<v Speaker 4>good at these elements, these dramatic elements, that they make

1:09:08.560 --> 1:09:11.960
<v Speaker 4>this more serious of a movie than I think Jay

1:09:12.080 --> 1:09:14.880
<v Speaker 4>Roach possibly wanted it to be. So there is a

1:09:14.960 --> 1:09:18.160
<v Speaker 4>little bit of tension there that isn't always worked out.

1:09:18.320 --> 1:09:21.920
<v Speaker 4>But again, Cumberbatch and Coleman are so good that if

1:09:21.960 --> 1:09:23.400
<v Speaker 4>you're a fan, even if you're just a fan of

1:09:23.439 --> 1:09:25.720
<v Speaker 4>one of them, I'm probably more of a fan of

1:09:25.800 --> 1:09:27.120
<v Speaker 4>Coleman than Cumberbatch.

1:09:28.040 --> 1:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, you'll still be glad that you saw The Roses.

1:09:31.600 --> 1:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay The Roses currently out in wide release again Lurker

1:09:35.520 --> 1:09:38.960
<v Speaker 2>out limited. If you see either film have thoughts, you

1:09:39.040 --> 1:09:42.559
<v Speaker 2>can email us feedback at film spotting dot net.

1:09:43.200 --> 1:09:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Quick note about our sister podcast, The Next Picture Show,

1:09:45.960 --> 1:09:49.759
<v Speaker 4>looking at cinema's present via its past. Their new pairing

1:09:49.920 --> 1:09:51.760
<v Speaker 4>is one that yet they had to do. I can't

1:09:51.800 --> 1:09:54.400
<v Speaker 4>wait to hear this Spike Lee's highest flowest and of

1:09:54.520 --> 1:09:59.160
<v Speaker 4>course nineteen sixty three's High and Low from as Spike

1:09:59.200 --> 1:10:01.559
<v Speaker 4>put it in the credit to his movie The Master

1:10:02.040 --> 1:10:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Filmmaker Akira Kurosawa. So yeah, they'll look at High and

1:10:05.680 --> 1:10:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Low first, then move on to Spike's film. New episodes

1:10:09.320 --> 1:10:11.720
<v Speaker 4>of The Next Picture Show drop every Tuesday, and you

1:10:11.760 --> 1:10:14.160
<v Speaker 4>can find them wherever you get your podcasts.

1:10:15.560 --> 1:10:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Vultures Movies. Fantasy League is back for season five. Josh

1:10:21.000 --> 1:10:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Catch the Excitement. Sign Ups are open now through Thursday,

1:10:25.360 --> 1:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>September twenty fourth. I mean I am excited. I say

1:10:28.240 --> 1:10:30.840
<v Speaker 2>that because I know you have no idea what I'm

1:10:30.880 --> 1:10:34.240
<v Speaker 2>talking about. Here's the deal. You get to draft eight

1:10:34.640 --> 1:10:39.439
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five movies. You earn points based on their

1:10:39.520 --> 1:10:43.960
<v Speaker 2>box office performance, critical reception, and awards. Season haul Now

1:10:44.040 --> 1:10:48.559
<v Speaker 2>if that sounds complicated or you think it sounds simple,

1:10:48.600 --> 1:10:50.519
<v Speaker 2>but you still don't really know how it all works.

1:10:50.640 --> 1:10:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know either. I just know that if it

1:10:53.400 --> 1:10:56.519
<v Speaker 2>gets good reviews, if it wins some awards, and if

1:10:56.560 --> 1:10:59.080
<v Speaker 2>it does well at the box office, whatever the formula is,

1:11:00.080 --> 1:11:03.720
<v Speaker 2>then the movie did well and you'll do well. But

1:11:04.120 --> 1:11:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I've played this two years in a row and I

1:11:06.320 --> 1:11:10.960
<v Speaker 2>have done terribly, so clearly I don't know what I'm doing.

1:11:11.320 --> 1:11:14.240
<v Speaker 2>It's still fun, though, because we get to have our

1:11:14.280 --> 1:11:17.320
<v Speaker 2>own film Spotters League, so we get to compete against

1:11:17.320 --> 1:11:20.280
<v Speaker 2>each other and all the other film spotting listeners who

1:11:20.280 --> 1:11:21.960
<v Speaker 2>want to be part of our league. But then we're

1:11:22.000 --> 1:11:26.600
<v Speaker 2>competing against the wider movie loving public as well, and

1:11:26.920 --> 1:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>there are prizes involved. So Sam and I are part

1:11:31.000 --> 1:11:33.599
<v Speaker 2>of it. We're part of the Creators League. And last

1:11:33.680 --> 1:11:36.000
<v Speaker 2>year Sam, he didn't know what he was doing, but

1:11:36.080 --> 1:11:39.960
<v Speaker 2>guess what he finished tenth in the Creative Yeah. So,

1:11:41.800 --> 1:11:44.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you've had any experience in fantasy sports,

1:11:44.640 --> 1:11:47.640
<v Speaker 2>this might make sense to you. If you haven't, maybe not.

1:11:47.880 --> 1:11:50.439
<v Speaker 2>But if you like movies, just just give it a try.

1:11:50.600 --> 1:11:53.080
<v Speaker 2>They give you all the films that have come out

1:11:53.120 --> 1:11:54.800
<v Speaker 2>this year and all the films that are coming out,

1:11:54.880 --> 1:11:57.479
<v Speaker 2>and obviously if it's already come out, you can pick it,

1:11:57.760 --> 1:12:00.559
<v Speaker 2>but you're not going to earn points for are how

1:12:00.600 --> 1:12:02.519
<v Speaker 2>it did at the box office, because you already know

1:12:02.600 --> 1:12:04.320
<v Speaker 2>how it did at the box office. So you're taking

1:12:04.360 --> 1:12:07.560
<v Speaker 2>a risk there if you go with that film, but

1:12:07.640 --> 1:12:11.360
<v Speaker 2>you could still earn points based on the awards season

1:12:11.479 --> 1:12:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Hall effectively, right, So that's part of your calculation. But

1:12:16.200 --> 1:12:19.720
<v Speaker 2>the competition is obviously everyone who signs up, and you

1:12:19.800 --> 1:12:22.040
<v Speaker 2>can compete in our Film Spotting Mini League. All you

1:12:22.120 --> 1:12:25.960
<v Speaker 2>have to do is enter Film Spotters in the league

1:12:26.240 --> 1:12:29.680
<v Speaker 2>name field when you sign up. We've got a lot

1:12:29.760 --> 1:12:32.800
<v Speaker 2>of people already there. It would be fun to have

1:12:33.439 --> 1:12:37.519
<v Speaker 2>more involved, so we will put the fantasy league's sign

1:12:37.600 --> 1:12:41.120
<v Speaker 2>up in the notes for this episode. Or you can

1:12:41.200 --> 1:12:45.559
<v Speaker 2>go to movie Game dot vulture dot com, Movie Game

1:12:46.120 --> 1:12:49.880
<v Speaker 2>dot vulture dot com, Josh. There are two deadlines to play.

1:12:50.520 --> 1:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>September twenty fourth, that's the last day to sign up

1:12:52.920 --> 1:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>before the contest starts. You can also sign up through

1:12:56.000 --> 1:12:58.560
<v Speaker 2>the end of December. That catch though, of course, is

1:12:58.600 --> 1:13:00.120
<v Speaker 2>that you won't be able to draft any films that

1:13:00.160 --> 1:13:02.640
<v Speaker 2>have already started earning points. I don't know why you

1:13:02.680 --> 1:13:05.639
<v Speaker 2>would wait until December. I mean the deadline September twenty fourth.

1:13:06.400 --> 1:13:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Sign up by then and have some fun.

1:13:09.840 --> 1:13:11.519
<v Speaker 1>All the best to you film spotters.

1:13:11.560 --> 1:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Good luck, But Josh says good luck, he is a

1:13:14.920 --> 1:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>no go.

1:13:15.960 --> 1:13:20.559
<v Speaker 4>My therapist has told me no activities that involve spreadsheets.

1:13:22.000 --> 1:13:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Next week. Okay, here's what your therapist should be warning

1:13:24.960 --> 1:13:28.800
<v Speaker 2>you against ideas top fives. They are the brainchild of

1:13:28.880 --> 1:13:29.559
<v Speaker 2>producers Sam.

1:13:30.760 --> 1:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I came around the house. I came around some house

1:13:33.200 --> 1:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I know you did, and I think I.

1:13:34.680 --> 1:13:37.320
<v Speaker 4>Realized it didn't involve a spreadsheet. Well, I won't involve one.

1:13:37.880 --> 1:13:38.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you.

1:13:39.040 --> 1:13:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it might for me. That's the problem. I think

1:13:41.439 --> 1:13:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I even tried to talk you into it, and now

1:13:43.280 --> 1:13:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm the one who is struggling to actually fulfill it.

1:13:48.840 --> 1:13:51.960
<v Speaker 2>This is the brainchild of producer Sam. He is calling

1:13:52.080 --> 1:13:54.880
<v Speaker 2>this top five that's not really a top five, even

1:13:54.920 --> 1:13:57.320
<v Speaker 2>though it has two fives in it. He's calling it

1:13:58.640 --> 1:14:03.560
<v Speaker 2>five years movies. So what you have to do is

1:14:04.320 --> 1:14:07.839
<v Speaker 2>select a five year period. This is a little misleading.

1:14:07.880 --> 1:14:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Here's how Sam has written it. You have to choose

1:14:10.000 --> 1:14:12.760
<v Speaker 2>a five year period like say nineteen seventy one, to

1:14:12.840 --> 1:14:16.839
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy five, and it's important to note not nineteen

1:14:17.080 --> 1:14:19.720
<v Speaker 2>seventy to nineteen seventy five, because that would be his

1:14:19.960 --> 1:14:21.519
<v Speaker 2>sixth year period.

1:14:22.080 --> 1:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Josh, now you laugh, but I need that.

1:14:24.960 --> 1:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean that seems likely that directed comment.

1:14:27.520 --> 1:14:30.439
<v Speaker 4>Josh, I think, hey, hey, I think it actually came

1:14:30.560 --> 1:14:34.640
<v Speaker 4>up in the discord for film family members where this

1:14:34.760 --> 1:14:37.560
<v Speaker 4>has been a trial run, and I was looking at that.

1:14:37.680 --> 1:14:39.880
<v Speaker 4>I think a family member had a list that was

1:14:39.960 --> 1:14:43.479
<v Speaker 4>seventy to seventy five, and so I would have done

1:14:43.520 --> 1:14:45.479
<v Speaker 4>that as well. So I'm just glad we were getting

1:14:45.479 --> 1:14:46.200
<v Speaker 4>this out of the way.

1:14:46.080 --> 1:14:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, Okay, So then it says, once you have selected

1:14:50.080 --> 1:14:52.759
<v Speaker 2>your five year period from all possible five year periods

1:14:52.800 --> 1:14:54.720
<v Speaker 2>in the history of film, you next need to pick

1:14:54.800 --> 1:14:57.519
<v Speaker 2>five movies that were released during that five year period,

1:14:57.560 --> 1:15:00.519
<v Speaker 2>and these are the movies you get madness and narrator

1:15:00.600 --> 1:15:04.400
<v Speaker 2>rules activated. Now that all seems fine, but the instructions

1:15:04.479 --> 1:15:07.120
<v Speaker 2>don't actually make sense because the goal here is to

1:15:07.280 --> 1:15:12.240
<v Speaker 2>not randomly pick or even selectively pick a five year

1:15:12.320 --> 1:15:15.360
<v Speaker 2>period and then pick the five films from that period.

1:15:15.680 --> 1:15:20.360
<v Speaker 2>The goal is to pick five films. It's actually reversed.

1:15:20.600 --> 1:15:22.880
<v Speaker 2>You have to pick the films and then and then

1:15:22.960 --> 1:15:26.240
<v Speaker 2>in reverse land on a five year period. Yeah, I

1:15:26.280 --> 1:15:32.320
<v Speaker 2>mean I think that's the process. But someone instructions are confusing, Well,

1:15:32.560 --> 1:15:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I got it. I mean that's because you know what

1:15:35.880 --> 1:15:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the goal is. I'm just saying, if if you literally

1:15:37.960 --> 1:15:40.040
<v Speaker 2>put this in front of someone who didn't know, it

1:15:40.080 --> 1:15:42.200
<v Speaker 2>would be confusing. You're not. You're not starting with a

1:15:42.240 --> 1:15:45.160
<v Speaker 2>five year period. The goal is to come up with Basically,

1:15:45.920 --> 1:15:49.719
<v Speaker 2>you're saying that you have to land on five films,

1:15:49.880 --> 1:15:53.800
<v Speaker 2>like if you would be left with only five films. Ever,

1:15:54.320 --> 1:15:57.720
<v Speaker 2>these are the five films that you you would only

1:15:57.800 --> 1:16:01.720
<v Speaker 2>have these five films to watch for the rest of time, right,

1:16:01.840 --> 1:16:04.360
<v Speaker 2>And the hook is is that they have to come

1:16:04.760 --> 1:16:07.320
<v Speaker 2>from the same year period, right, Yeah.

1:16:07.200 --> 1:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Now they could two of them could come from the

1:16:09.880 --> 1:16:10.439
<v Speaker 1>same year.

1:16:11.000 --> 1:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>They could. It doesn't have to be all like consecutive years,

1:16:14.280 --> 1:16:17.439
<v Speaker 2>right exactly. Okay, Yeah, okay, so now we're good.

1:16:17.840 --> 1:16:20.679
<v Speaker 1>We're on the same Okay.

1:16:21.240 --> 1:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>So if you do understand the ground rules as I've

1:16:24.280 --> 1:16:27.400
<v Speaker 2>explained them, not how Sam has explained them, then we

1:16:27.439 --> 1:16:29.559
<v Speaker 2>would love for you to submit your picks and your

1:16:29.640 --> 1:16:33.160
<v Speaker 2>reasoning feedback and film spotting dot net. We may share

1:16:33.240 --> 1:16:35.920
<v Speaker 2>some of your picks along with ours next week. I

1:16:36.040 --> 1:16:41.800
<v Speaker 2>think it's diabolical diabra it.

1:16:42.439 --> 1:16:45.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, I'll explain next week how I wrap my

1:16:45.920 --> 1:16:47.080
<v Speaker 4>mind around this grant.

1:16:47.200 --> 1:16:51.160
<v Speaker 2>What arbitrary criterion did you come up with to get

1:16:51.200 --> 1:16:52.360
<v Speaker 2>yourself through this? Josh?

1:16:52.760 --> 1:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Next week I will share.

1:16:55.680 --> 1:16:58.000
<v Speaker 2>So that you could you could spend as minimal amount

1:16:58.040 --> 1:17:01.160
<v Speaker 2>of time worrying about this. But did you come up right?

1:17:02.360 --> 1:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the non spreadsheet strategy. Okay.

1:17:05.960 --> 1:17:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Also, next week I'm told that we are going to

1:17:08.920 --> 1:17:12.120
<v Speaker 2>have a report. Michael Phillips will be back on the show.

1:17:12.520 --> 1:17:15.879
<v Speaker 2>He is going to report on the Venice Film Festival.

1:17:17.080 --> 1:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>That should be wonderful. He'll talk to us about the

1:17:20.479 --> 1:17:22.680
<v Speaker 2>top prize winner, the Golden Lion that went to Jim

1:17:22.760 --> 1:17:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Jarmish's latest father, mother, sister, brother, Adam Driver, Kate Blanchett,

1:17:27.439 --> 1:17:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Vicky Creps and Tom Waits in that one that scheduled

1:17:30.080 --> 1:17:32.880
<v Speaker 2>to come to theaters in December. We'll hear all about

1:17:32.960 --> 1:17:37.400
<v Speaker 2>what Michael Phillips has been up to for our current

1:17:37.479 --> 1:17:43.439
<v Speaker 2>show schedule and more. Visit Filmspotting dot Net Slash episodes. Honey, look,

1:17:43.680 --> 1:17:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I can see daylight. We're gonna be okay.

1:17:49.520 --> 1:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's daylight.

1:17:56.120 --> 1:18:00.519
<v Speaker 2>All right. It is time for deeply flawed Holm spotting

1:18:00.560 --> 1:18:03.479
<v Speaker 2>poll results and a new poll. A couple of weeks ago,

1:18:03.520 --> 1:18:05.360
<v Speaker 2>we asked you two is one and only one animation,

1:18:05.560 --> 1:18:12.479
<v Speaker 2>Studio Pixar or Studio Gibilie. It wasn't daylight for Woody

1:18:12.560 --> 1:18:14.360
<v Speaker 2>and the Gang and Toy Story three, and there was

1:18:14.439 --> 1:18:18.880
<v Speaker 2>no daylight for Pixar in this poll either. Josh, how

1:18:18.920 --> 1:18:19.519
<v Speaker 2>did it come out?

1:18:20.120 --> 1:18:24.439
<v Speaker 4>Studio Gibili took it, surprisingly to me, with sixty four

1:18:24.600 --> 1:18:28.879
<v Speaker 4>percent of the vote Adam thirty seven percent going to Pixar.

1:18:29.160 --> 1:18:33.720
<v Speaker 4>I may have guessed Gibilie would win, but I really

1:18:33.760 --> 1:18:35.400
<v Speaker 4>would have thought it was going to be closer than this.

1:18:36.280 --> 1:18:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to correct the map there slightly. I guess

1:18:38.920 --> 1:18:42.679
<v Speaker 2>that must be sixty four and thirty six percent. Yeah,

1:18:43.120 --> 1:18:45.040
<v Speaker 2>work got a little better. Yeah, that work out a

1:18:45.040 --> 1:18:49.200
<v Speaker 2>little better. But yes, Studio Ghibli handily won the poll.

1:18:49.800 --> 1:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Daniel says, wait, I didn't realize we were talking incinerator here,

1:18:54.479 --> 1:18:57.040
<v Speaker 2>much like the climax of Toy Story three. I'm going

1:18:57.120 --> 1:18:58.759
<v Speaker 2>to have to change my mind at the last second

1:18:58.800 --> 1:19:01.519
<v Speaker 2>and switch my vote from jib Lee to Pixar. Jibili

1:19:01.600 --> 1:19:04.200
<v Speaker 2>has probably been more consistent. The Pixar movies were literally

1:19:04.280 --> 1:19:06.640
<v Speaker 2>made for me. I'm gen Z. My first movie I

1:19:06.680 --> 1:19:08.519
<v Speaker 2>saw in the theater was a Bugs Life, and we

1:19:08.600 --> 1:19:11.560
<v Speaker 2>had those early Pixar movies on constant replay. Not that

1:19:11.680 --> 1:19:14.040
<v Speaker 2>we didn't also enjoy Jiblie Castle in the Sky as

1:19:14.040 --> 1:19:16.759
<v Speaker 2>one of my earliest movie memories as well, But Pixar

1:19:16.880 --> 1:19:19.080
<v Speaker 2>is just a little closer to the heart for me.

1:19:19.760 --> 1:19:23.519
<v Speaker 4>Fair enough, Daniel, vote with the heart. Here's Frederick from Norway.

1:19:23.800 --> 1:19:26.280
<v Speaker 4>First of all, your latest poll question is just cruel.

1:19:26.520 --> 1:19:29.360
<v Speaker 4>If given the choice between throwing the entire filmography of

1:19:29.439 --> 1:19:32.679
<v Speaker 4>Pixar or Jiblie into the incinerator, I may just jump

1:19:32.760 --> 1:19:35.840
<v Speaker 4>in myself. Bit of backstory. I'm a huge animation buff

1:19:36.000 --> 1:19:38.280
<v Speaker 4>growing up in the nineties. My entry into the world

1:19:38.320 --> 1:19:41.520
<v Speaker 4>of cinema was in large part through the Disney animated classics.

1:19:41.800 --> 1:19:44.800
<v Speaker 4>The Little Mermaid, Aladdin, Beauty and the Beast, and particularly

1:19:44.880 --> 1:19:47.479
<v Speaker 4>The Lion King were my favorites, and they led me

1:19:47.600 --> 1:19:50.479
<v Speaker 4>to seek out older classics like Snow White, Bambi, Sleeping

1:19:50.520 --> 1:19:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Beauty and others. That, of course led to a devout

1:19:53.439 --> 1:19:57.080
<v Speaker 4>following of Pixar. Their streak from finding Nemo through the

1:19:57.160 --> 1:19:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Incredibles right atue, while the end up was such a

1:20:00.080 --> 1:20:02.720
<v Speaker 4>sustained period of excellence that it should be enough to

1:20:02.760 --> 1:20:05.639
<v Speaker 4>make this poll question a no brainer. From two thousand

1:20:05.640 --> 1:20:07.320
<v Speaker 4>and four to two thousand and seven, I completed a

1:20:07.360 --> 1:20:12.160
<v Speaker 4>bachelor's degree in animation, and the Pixar versus jibilee was

1:20:12.320 --> 1:20:15.960
<v Speaker 4>a frequent topic of debate. Things could get heated, and

1:20:16.040 --> 1:20:18.560
<v Speaker 4>while it never came to fisticuff, some bad language was

1:20:18.640 --> 1:20:20.600
<v Speaker 4>thrown around, and I usually cowered in the corner, not

1:20:20.680 --> 1:20:22.920
<v Speaker 4>wanting to take sides while mommy and daddy were fighting.

1:20:23.479 --> 1:20:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Since then, both studios have only added more masterpieces to

1:20:27.160 --> 1:20:29.600
<v Speaker 4>their resume. Pitting The wind Rises or The Boy and

1:20:29.600 --> 1:20:33.000
<v Speaker 4>the Heron against Coco or Inside Out is equally impossible.

1:20:33.600 --> 1:20:36.680
<v Speaker 4>All that being said, I eventually came down on the

1:20:36.760 --> 1:20:40.200
<v Speaker 4>side of Pixar. My reasoning Pixar has a movie I

1:20:40.280 --> 1:20:43.800
<v Speaker 4>could pop on regardless of the mood I'm in. I

1:20:43.880 --> 1:20:46.720
<v Speaker 4>want to laugh Toy Story two, I want to cry up.

1:20:47.120 --> 1:20:49.840
<v Speaker 4>I want some great action the Incredibles. I want to

1:20:49.880 --> 1:20:52.639
<v Speaker 4>be amazed by visual flare and fantastic music.

1:20:52.760 --> 1:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Coco.

1:20:53.439 --> 1:20:55.120
<v Speaker 4>I want to watch something with my kids that may

1:20:55.160 --> 1:20:58.760
<v Speaker 4>help them emotionally. Inside Out and perhaps the thing that

1:20:58.920 --> 1:21:01.920
<v Speaker 4>finally tip the scale for me. Can you name any

1:21:02.000 --> 1:21:05.360
<v Speaker 4>other studio that could successfully have the climax of their

1:21:05.439 --> 1:21:08.640
<v Speaker 4>movie center around a fruit critic eating a stew and

1:21:08.760 --> 1:21:13.360
<v Speaker 4>not only make it work, but also make it emotionally resonant. Man,

1:21:13.520 --> 1:21:15.679
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if Frederick, Now you're making me second

1:21:15.720 --> 1:21:16.519
<v Speaker 4>guess my choice.

1:21:17.000 --> 1:21:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, here's Bob Mchughe. I watched the most regarded works

1:21:20.320 --> 1:21:23.840
<v Speaker 2>of each studio as a teenager and thought they were fine.

1:21:24.720 --> 1:21:27.120
<v Speaker 2>It's only now watching them with fresh eyes as a parent,

1:21:27.200 --> 1:21:29.640
<v Speaker 2>nearly two decades later, I've realized that I had it

1:21:29.680 --> 1:21:32.040
<v Speaker 2>all wrong. I was too young to truly understand or

1:21:32.120 --> 1:21:36.800
<v Speaker 2>appreciate them. Unfortunately, that reevaluation applies wholly to jibli but

1:21:36.920 --> 1:21:39.960
<v Speaker 2>only for Pixar's golden age. The worst Jiblie films still

1:21:40.000 --> 1:21:42.960
<v Speaker 2>feel like an artist following their muse. The worst Pixar

1:21:43.040 --> 1:21:46.320
<v Speaker 2>films barely feel like films at all, their craven products.

1:21:46.720 --> 1:21:49.160
<v Speaker 2>When a studio's decisions about what stories they tell have

1:21:49.280 --> 1:21:53.040
<v Speaker 2>more to do with branding and title contingency, what hope

1:21:53.360 --> 1:21:53.760
<v Speaker 2>is there?

1:21:54.560 --> 1:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>See?

1:21:54.800 --> 1:21:56.759
<v Speaker 4>And this is where I wish I was a Jibili

1:21:56.920 --> 1:21:59.719
<v Speaker 4>completist as I am for Pixar. You know, I wonder

1:22:00.240 --> 1:22:03.759
<v Speaker 4>are there titles that are a little that leave viewers

1:22:03.800 --> 1:22:05.400
<v Speaker 4>wanting from the Jupilee catalog.

1:22:05.439 --> 1:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe listeners who are complete.

1:22:07.040 --> 1:22:09.960
<v Speaker 2>As one can tell us perhaps, But did they feel

1:22:10.040 --> 1:22:11.160
<v Speaker 2>like craven products? That?

1:22:11.400 --> 1:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? That was well that too.

1:22:12.560 --> 1:22:15.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm just curious, you know, from their vast catalog,

1:22:15.520 --> 1:22:18.120
<v Speaker 4>you know what sort of what sort of range there is?

1:22:18.960 --> 1:22:22.800
<v Speaker 4>We also heard from Jeffrey Overstreet. You asked a complicated question,

1:22:23.000 --> 1:22:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Here comes a complicated answer. Pixar's Golden Age was a

1:22:26.160 --> 1:22:30.479
<v Speaker 4>remarkable run of all ages storytelling with groundbreaking animation. Those

1:22:30.560 --> 1:22:33.600
<v Speaker 4>films are to cinema what books like Charlotte's Web and

1:22:33.720 --> 1:22:36.400
<v Speaker 4>the Secret of Nim and The Phantom Tollbooth our, two

1:22:36.520 --> 1:22:39.760
<v Speaker 4>children's literature works that reward the parents reading to their

1:22:39.840 --> 1:22:43.080
<v Speaker 4>children as much as they reward the children themselves. Having

1:22:43.160 --> 1:22:46.320
<v Speaker 4>said that, Pixar films came to seem somewhat formulaic and

1:22:46.439 --> 1:22:49.519
<v Speaker 4>predictable fairly quickly, I was always bracing for what would

1:22:49.520 --> 1:22:53.679
<v Speaker 4>become a frenzied action, hysterical finale, probably involving a crazed

1:22:53.760 --> 1:22:57.839
<v Speaker 4>pursuit Miyazaki. However, isn't even playing the same sport Miyazaki

1:22:58.080 --> 1:23:01.760
<v Speaker 4>is in Tolkien territory, world building such rich mythologies that

1:23:01.840 --> 1:23:04.479
<v Speaker 4>I believe all kinds of other stories are unfolding just

1:23:04.640 --> 1:23:07.920
<v Speaker 4>off screen while showing remarkable restraints, so that the stories

1:23:08.040 --> 1:23:11.680
<v Speaker 4>and their finales emerge from characters in environments and less

1:23:11.800 --> 1:23:15.120
<v Speaker 4>from an abvi's drive to provoke emotional responses and stir

1:23:15.240 --> 1:23:18.840
<v Speaker 4>things into a frantic finale. I encourage everyone to read

1:23:18.840 --> 1:23:22.479
<v Speaker 4>the essay Towards a True Children's Cinema on My Neighbor

1:23:22.560 --> 1:23:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Todoro by Lauren Wilford, published by bright Wall dark Room,

1:23:26.520 --> 1:23:28.800
<v Speaker 4>and then, because it is so great, republished in a

1:23:28.840 --> 1:23:32.760
<v Speaker 4>booklet that comes with a thirtieth anniversary Disney Blu Ray edition.

1:23:33.280 --> 1:23:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Wilford writes more insightfully than anyone else I've read about

1:23:36.200 --> 1:23:40.320
<v Speaker 4>what makes Miyazaki's storytelling for children so distinctive. Almost all

1:23:40.320 --> 1:23:43.479
<v Speaker 4>of Gible's films, and all of those by Miyazaki himself,

1:23:43.520 --> 1:23:47.040
<v Speaker 4>are gifts that keep on giving, inviting us into new questions, mysteries,

1:23:47.080 --> 1:23:49.920
<v Speaker 4>and revelations every single time. And I'm so grateful to

1:23:49.960 --> 1:23:53.439
<v Speaker 4>the geniuses at Pixar who appreciated studio Ghiblie enough to

1:23:53.520 --> 1:23:56.439
<v Speaker 4>invest in bringing that work to big screens in America.

1:23:57.080 --> 1:23:59.040
<v Speaker 4>My life is so much richer for the work of

1:23:59.160 --> 1:23:59.840
<v Speaker 4>both greats.

1:24:00.800 --> 1:24:05.639
<v Speaker 2>We are getting some very passionate, very thoughtful responses here.

1:24:06.000 --> 1:24:07.840
<v Speaker 2>We have a couple more for you, This one from

1:24:07.920 --> 1:24:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Mark Friedman a testament to the passionate subjectivity of our

1:24:11.439 --> 1:24:14.639
<v Speaker 2>individual connections with art and entertainment. My slap on forehead

1:24:14.680 --> 1:24:17.479
<v Speaker 2>response to this pool as Pixar no contest. Now I

1:24:17.560 --> 1:24:20.080
<v Speaker 2>read these comments from my film spotting family siblings and

1:24:20.120 --> 1:24:23.479
<v Speaker 2>find the exact opposite sentiments in favor of Jibili.

1:24:24.439 --> 1:24:27.960
<v Speaker 4>Let's close out with this from Andy Bukti. Sounds like

1:24:28.000 --> 1:24:31.640
<v Speaker 4>we need an animation march madness to rightfully settle this,

1:24:32.080 --> 1:24:34.479
<v Speaker 4>not just to determine champion, but to see who's better

1:24:34.560 --> 1:24:37.960
<v Speaker 4>represented in the Sweet sixteen, Elite eight, et cetera. There

1:24:38.000 --> 1:24:40.640
<v Speaker 4>could be some amazing and heart wrenching matchups, plus some

1:24:40.720 --> 1:24:44.080
<v Speaker 4>bonus link later Tim Burton and Wes Anderson. Who wouldn't

1:24:44.400 --> 1:24:47.479
<v Speaker 4>enjoy that? And that's that's been on the table for

1:24:47.560 --> 1:24:49.080
<v Speaker 4>film spots on the table.

1:24:49.160 --> 1:24:53.320
<v Speaker 2>It's been discussed. I think I think that Sam and

1:24:53.439 --> 1:24:56.160
<v Speaker 2>myself the selection committee might have I don't know if

1:24:56.200 --> 1:24:58.519
<v Speaker 2>we said this out loud or not, we definitely thought it.

1:24:59.160 --> 1:25:03.720
<v Speaker 2>We're not the most passionate generally animation fans compared to

1:25:04.320 --> 1:25:07.160
<v Speaker 2>some of the folks I think, compared to you, Josh,

1:25:07.240 --> 1:25:09.840
<v Speaker 2>and also compared to all the people who have written

1:25:09.880 --> 1:25:13.880
<v Speaker 2>into this pole, So it wasn't maybe as inspiring for

1:25:14.320 --> 1:25:16.840
<v Speaker 2>us as a madness topic. But I think we also

1:25:16.960 --> 1:25:20.000
<v Speaker 2>just worried about the number of titles and how much

1:25:20.080 --> 1:25:24.440
<v Speaker 2>passion it would inspire in the largest number of participants.

1:25:24.920 --> 1:25:28.800
<v Speaker 2>But I'm intrigued and seeing how passionate everybody was about

1:25:28.840 --> 1:25:32.160
<v Speaker 2>this pole, I wonder if it is something that could

1:25:32.200 --> 1:25:34.920
<v Speaker 2>be settled with madness. And so I'm going to throw

1:25:35.000 --> 1:25:38.000
<v Speaker 2>this out to Andy and maybe some of the other

1:25:38.320 --> 1:25:42.680
<v Speaker 2>commenters put together a bracket. Let me see what your

1:25:42.720 --> 1:25:45.200
<v Speaker 2>bracket would look like. I will I will take a

1:25:45.240 --> 1:25:47.840
<v Speaker 2>look at it, Sam, and I will review it. We'll

1:25:47.840 --> 1:25:50.360
<v Speaker 2>see if you can make your case. Okay. Feedback at

1:25:50.400 --> 1:25:54.400
<v Speaker 2>filmspotting dot Net. Now a new deeply flawed film spotting pole,

1:25:54.560 --> 1:25:57.840
<v Speaker 2>A new one. We're asking about sixties musicals because The

1:25:57.920 --> 1:26:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Sound of Music is back in theaters for its sixtieth anniversary,

1:26:00.960 --> 1:26:03.800
<v Speaker 2>and of course, Josh, literally everyone in the world has

1:26:03.840 --> 1:26:07.080
<v Speaker 2>seen this movie literally, so you've you've seen it now

1:26:07.840 --> 1:26:11.360
<v Speaker 2>literally everyone has seen this movie. Let's let's move on

1:26:11.439 --> 1:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>to the options. The options are that Sam is giving

1:26:15.160 --> 1:26:18.720
<v Speaker 2>you producer Sam Funny Girl and then I'll turn it

1:26:18.760 --> 1:26:21.400
<v Speaker 2>over to you with Barbis streisand directed by William Wyler.

1:26:21.680 --> 1:26:25.280
<v Speaker 2>That was part of last year's Wiler Marathon. What else

1:26:25.320 --> 1:26:26.639
<v Speaker 2>are we letting them consider?

1:26:27.680 --> 1:26:31.639
<v Speaker 4>Mary Poppins, of course, the other Julie Andrews sixties musical

1:26:31.720 --> 1:26:33.719
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, Adam, If you know this, Julie Andrews

1:26:33.800 --> 1:26:36.800
<v Speaker 4>is in the Sound of Music. My Fair Lady is

1:26:36.840 --> 1:26:40.439
<v Speaker 4>an option. That one with Audrey Hepburn and Rex Harrison

1:26:40.479 --> 1:26:43.720
<v Speaker 4>directed by George Kuker. The Sound of Music is an option.

1:26:43.920 --> 1:26:47.840
<v Speaker 4>Jacques Dimese The Umbrellas of Sherbour is another and our

1:26:47.920 --> 1:26:51.800
<v Speaker 4>last choice West Side Story. Of course, you can also

1:26:51.960 --> 1:26:54.920
<v Speaker 4>vote other If I don't know, you prefer demis The

1:26:54.960 --> 1:26:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Young Girls of Rochefort or Best Picture winner Oliver the

1:26:59.320 --> 1:27:02.599
<v Speaker 4>Music Man, Bye Bye Birdie, Sweet Charity. That's one I'm

1:27:02.680 --> 1:27:06.280
<v Speaker 4>unfamiliar with. I'm also unfamiliar with Doctor Doolittle, the nineteen

1:27:06.400 --> 1:27:08.360
<v Speaker 4>sixty eight Best Picture nominee, But.

1:27:08.479 --> 1:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You don't need that worry yourself. I can skip that one.

1:27:11.280 --> 1:27:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, No one's voting for doctor Doolittle. Well see, you know,

1:27:16.120 --> 1:27:19.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm an Iowan, so of course the music Man is

1:27:19.520 --> 1:27:22.280
<v Speaker 2>one I should be considering. And and I of course

1:27:22.360 --> 1:27:24.680
<v Speaker 2>have seen the sound of music, so I am I

1:27:24.760 --> 1:27:28.439
<v Speaker 2>am strongly considering that for my Okay, I'm strongly considering

1:27:28.479 --> 1:27:31.839
<v Speaker 2>it from my pick, Josh, I know the the correct

1:27:32.000 --> 1:27:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Sinophile answer, the one you're gonna say, the one Sam's

1:27:35.479 --> 1:27:41.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna say, is the umbrellas of sure Boar. But I'm

1:27:41.200 --> 1:27:43.120
<v Speaker 2>still in the bag for West Side Story, and it's

1:27:43.160 --> 1:27:43.439
<v Speaker 2>my pick.

1:27:44.040 --> 1:27:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Okay, fair enough. I think you'll have plenty of people

1:27:46.360 --> 1:27:49.320
<v Speaker 4>with you. Yeah, I just think you know, none of

1:27:49.400 --> 1:27:51.200
<v Speaker 4>these are in the league of Shareboor. When we did

1:27:51.400 --> 1:27:53.599
<v Speaker 4>our top ten of all time, our Sitan sound lists,

1:27:54.120 --> 1:27:56.560
<v Speaker 4>I think in twenty twelve I did have it on

1:27:56.720 --> 1:27:59.040
<v Speaker 4>that list. We did it again in twenty twenty two,

1:27:59.080 --> 1:28:01.280
<v Speaker 4>and I think it got bummed. But I forget for

1:28:01.439 --> 1:28:04.400
<v Speaker 4>what but to the you know, eleven to fifteen range,

1:28:04.479 --> 1:28:06.760
<v Speaker 4>But it's it is an all timer to me, so

1:28:07.280 --> 1:28:11.200
<v Speaker 4>an easy, easy film spotting poll this time around for me.

1:28:11.880 --> 1:28:15.559
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we would love to get your pick and possibly

1:28:15.640 --> 1:28:18.680
<v Speaker 2>read your comments. You can participate in the poll at

1:28:18.800 --> 1:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>film spotting dot net. We will share the results and

1:28:22.080 --> 1:28:25.840
<v Speaker 2>your feedback in a couple of weeks. Josh, that's our show.

1:28:26.080 --> 1:28:29.880
<v Speaker 4>You can find Adam and the show on Instagram, Facebook, letterbox,

1:28:30.080 --> 1:28:33.599
<v Speaker 4>and YouTube all at film Spotting. I'm at those places

1:28:33.760 --> 1:28:37.519
<v Speaker 4>as well as Larsen on film. We are independently produced

1:28:37.560 --> 1:28:40.320
<v Speaker 4>and listener supported. You can support the show by joining

1:28:40.400 --> 1:28:43.360
<v Speaker 4>the film Spotting Family at film Spotting family dot com.

1:28:43.760 --> 1:28:45.720
<v Speaker 4>You can listen early and ad free. You'll get a

1:28:45.760 --> 1:28:49.639
<v Speaker 4>weekly newsletter, monthly bonus episodes, and access to the entire

1:28:49.800 --> 1:28:53.000
<v Speaker 4>show archive. For show t shirts and other merch you

1:28:53.080 --> 1:28:55.719
<v Speaker 4>can go to film spotting dot net slash shop.

1:28:56.720 --> 1:28:59.480
<v Speaker 2>In that film Spotting archive, you can find our conversations

1:28:59.520 --> 1:29:03.160
<v Speaker 2>about of the Flower Moon for Martin Scorsese episode nine

1:29:03.280 --> 1:29:06.280
<v Speaker 2>forty two plus. We did a little Scorsese ranked even

1:29:06.320 --> 1:29:09.400
<v Speaker 2>though I'm sure we acknowledge that we were not at

1:29:09.439 --> 1:29:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the time, nor are we both now. Scorsese ight no,

1:29:14.240 --> 1:29:18.439
<v Speaker 2>and we've we've talked about doing a marathon of our

1:29:18.520 --> 1:29:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Scorsese blind spots. We share some we don't share some others.

1:29:22.200 --> 1:29:24.439
<v Speaker 2>It makes it a little tough, but I know, I

1:29:24.520 --> 1:29:27.040
<v Speaker 2>know some listeners really hope we do that one, and

1:29:27.120 --> 1:29:27.600
<v Speaker 2>I hope we do.

1:29:27.760 --> 1:29:29.519
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to do it at some point for sure.

1:29:29.760 --> 1:29:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The Irishman was episode seven to fifty one. The

1:29:32.640 --> 1:29:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Wolf of Wall Street Boy that was. That was a

1:29:35.720 --> 1:29:37.800
<v Speaker 2>tense one episode four seventy four US.

1:29:38.280 --> 1:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>That's for sure.

1:29:39.840 --> 1:29:43.559
<v Speaker 2>Shutter Island episode two ninety three, The Stones Concert film,

1:29:43.680 --> 1:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Shine a Light episode two oh five, The Departed episode

1:29:47.280 --> 1:29:52.480
<v Speaker 2>one twenty nine out in limited release. The Baltim Morons,

1:29:52.520 --> 1:29:57.000
<v Speaker 2>directed by Jay Duplus in wide release Code three. Rain

1:29:57.080 --> 1:29:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Wilson is a burned out paramedic trying to survive his

1:29:59.439 --> 1:30:01.720
<v Speaker 2>last twenty four hours on the job while training a

1:30:01.840 --> 1:30:06.200
<v Speaker 2>new recruit. Sam. Maybe just catering to you, Josh says,

1:30:06.560 --> 1:30:08.360
<v Speaker 2>think bringing out the dead but funny.

1:30:08.960 --> 1:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I don't know if that's gonna sell me on it,

1:30:11.120 --> 1:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>but good try.

1:30:12.840 --> 1:30:16.839
<v Speaker 2>Also Downton Abbey, the Grand Finale. I know you cannot

1:30:16.880 --> 1:30:20.000
<v Speaker 2>wait for that. The Long Walk, based on the nineteen

1:30:20.040 --> 1:30:24.400
<v Speaker 2>seventy nine Stephen King novella Walk or Die, Simple Enough

1:30:24.640 --> 1:30:27.960
<v Speaker 2>with Cooper Hoffman and Charlie Plummer. Good Cast, directed by

1:30:28.000 --> 1:30:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Francis Lawrence of The Hunger Games, Catching Fire and mocking Jay.

1:30:32.720 --> 1:30:37.160
<v Speaker 2>How about Spinal Tap two? The end continues the Sound

1:30:37.240 --> 1:30:41.160
<v Speaker 2>of Music. Yes, sixtieth anniversary re release and Toy Story

1:30:41.760 --> 1:30:46.320
<v Speaker 2>thirtieth anniversary re release. We are next week hoping to

1:30:46.439 --> 1:30:51.360
<v Speaker 2>have the Michael Phillips Fest update. I'm hoping I'll get

1:30:51.400 --> 1:30:54.000
<v Speaker 2>to Spinal Tap two at minimum and be able to

1:30:54.040 --> 1:30:58.720
<v Speaker 2>talk about that next week. And Yes, the Diabolical five

1:30:58.800 --> 1:31:02.960
<v Speaker 2>years five movies. I'm somehow going to wrap my head

1:31:03.000 --> 1:31:06.400
<v Speaker 2>around what that is before our next show.

1:31:06.720 --> 1:31:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Better start working on it right now. Film Spotting is

1:31:09.680 --> 1:31:12.639
<v Speaker 4>produced by Golden Joe Desso and Sam van Holgren. Without

1:31:12.680 --> 1:31:15.519
<v Speaker 4>Sam and Golden Joe, this show wouldn't go. Our production

1:31:15.600 --> 1:31:20.400
<v Speaker 4>assistant is Sophie Kempinar. Special thanks to everyone at WBEAZ Chicago.

1:31:20.560 --> 1:31:25.240
<v Speaker 4>More information is available at wbez dot org. For film Spotting,

1:31:25.320 --> 1:31:25.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm Josh.

1:31:25.880 --> 1:31:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Larson and I'm Adam Kempinar. Thanks for listening.

1:31:28.880 --> 1:31:31.799
<v Speaker 5>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

1:31:32.720 --> 1:31:33.400
<v Speaker 3>The burn.

1:31:49.720 --> 1:31:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Film Spotting is listeners supported. Join the film Spotting Family

1:31:52.760 --> 1:31:55.599
<v Speaker 2>at film Spottingfamily dot com and get access to ad

1:31:55.680 --> 1:31:59.080
<v Speaker 2>free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and for

1:31:59.160 --> 1:32:01.800
<v Speaker 2>the first time, all to one place. The entire film

1:32:01.840 --> 1:32:04.479
<v Speaker 2>spotting archive going back to two thousand and five. That's

1:32:04.520 --> 1:32:06.280
<v Speaker 2>a film spotting family dot com

1:32:09.240 --> 1:32:09.719
<v Speaker 3>Panically