WEBVTT - Carnival Cuts Profit Outlook as Iran War Pushes Up Fuel Cost 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Coarcklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn our gaze to the cruising business. I know

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 2>nothing about the cruising business.

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 3>That will change in October when I take my first cruise.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 4>I know he's finally taking the plunge.

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Finally taking the plunge.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 2>But with the guy we have here now, our next

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 2>guest is an expert on all this stuff. Brian Eggery

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>covers all the fun stuff gaming, casinos, hotels, and cruises

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 2>for a Bloomberg Intelligence Carnival.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 3>What's going on in carnival here.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 5>So they came out with but otherwise would have been

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 5>a very good quarter in terms of bookings demand. Eighty

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 5>five percent of the year sold actually raised revenue old guidance,

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 5>but they had a cut ebit dog guidance because the

0:00:58.240 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 5>cost it from fuel due.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 6>To the war I ran.

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 5>And so the underlying demand part of the business is

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 5>quite good.

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 5>The concern would be if that warn't persists. They are

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 5>modeling in a level of fuel costs assumption for the

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 5>second half that might not be conservative enough.

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 7>The thing that people like about these cruise lines and

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 7>cruise line operators is that they have a lot of

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 7>visibility into their bookings because people book years in advance

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 7>or months in advances in the case of Paul Sweeney

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 7>and his upcoming cruise.

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 4>But that also locks in the revenue that they brought in.

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 7>Do cruise lines add a fuel surcharge later on because

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 7>you know oil prices have gone up so much, or

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 7>is it something they just have to eat?

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 5>I think the revenue youild management part of it is

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 5>always the science behind it because eighty five percent of

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 5>booking sold. If you oversell too much and demand goes up,

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 5>you're left with inventory that could have been sold at

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 5>a higher price, or you're missing inventory. You're not saying

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 5>so much in terms of fuel cost surcharge, but I

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 5>mean the reality is even with one hundred and fifty

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 5>million dollars in offsetting cost savings from efficiencies, their estimate

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 5>is that the full year impact on their adjusted income

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 5>from the fuel price increases we've seen since December could

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 5>be about five hundred million dollars, and our concern is

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 5>that assumes eighty to ninety rent in the second half,

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 5>and what if that's much higher, that's the concern.

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 2>What's what are these cruise lines saying about their underlying

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 2>demand at some point some of these inflation pressures if

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>they do remain here a little bit longer than and

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe we initially thought fuel and in particular about other

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 2>areas as well, why does that typically impact the top

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 2>line for those guys.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 5>So I think generally think speaking, cost inflation can have

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 5>an impact. The assertion of the industry would be that

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 5>they are relatively affordable as per day compared to other

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 5>forms of vacationing and travel, and so that's been a

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 5>big underpinning behind their assumption. They continue to get more

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 5>consum repenetration.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 7>And you know, people might have pre booked their cruises,

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 7>but the amount that they spend is also another big,

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 7>big revenue increase for these cruise line operators. I mean,

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 7>that's where they make up a lot of ground. How

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 7>do you expect that to play out if oil prices

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 7>stay high? I mean, people are still going to go

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 7>on their cruises, but they're not going to spend for

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 7>the all you can drink package.

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean that may be a concern. Right now,

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 5>the oield out look is quite favorable. It's still solid

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 5>wellst single digits. Over time, an increasing portion of the

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 5>overall revenuees come from either on board ticket spending or

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 5>pre cruise purchases of excursions and other amenities and all

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 5>that could be subject to vulnerability if there's a major

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 5>change in discretionary spending.

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>On fuel for these big cruises. They don't use a

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of the alternative fuels, do they. They're just burning

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 3>that big bunker funnel play stuff.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 5>It mixes over time increased more more towards LNG and

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 5>other forms of I guess more efficient fuel and clear fuel.

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 5>I think one of the cruise lines downs now it's

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 5>its first hydrogen powered ships, so they are looking at

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 5>alternative uses, and a big offset to these cost increases

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 5>has been few cost efficiencies. You know, the amount of

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 5>metric tons of fuel consumed per passenger capacity to day

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 5>has over time gone down. So they've tried to get

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 5>some offset and have gotten some offset from increased efficiencies

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 5>both from the general way they operate, but as well

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 5>as more efficient ships.

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:33.679
<v Speaker 3>Well, they knows. I'm sitting on the beach in Aruba

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>and I can see the smokestack from the.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.559
<v Speaker 2>Court there of Aruba and as it shops are docked

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 2>and it's just building the black.

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 4>And you're thinking, well, I'm going to enjoy those people one.

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Day exactly exactly, But boy, I could just say that's

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 2>just BRUI and they don't hedge they or do they?

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 5>Carnival has not hedged historically. They've had over in past

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 5>years have had some collars Norwegian and Royal Caribbean new

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 5>hedge and so you know there is a cost benefit

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 5>analysis to whether or not you put hedges in place.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because George Ferguson was just telling us that the airlines.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 7>Don't head you, well, they got messed up during the pandemic,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 7>right and they all came out worse for it.

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>So yep, all right, Brian, thanks so much, Brian Nigger

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 2>appreciate that senior gaming and logic analyst Bloomberg Intelligence joining

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 2>us live here in our Bloomberg and area.

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 4>I have a cool question hermy cruises do you go

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 4>on a year?

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 6>A year?

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 5>That's that's over time. I have gone on a number

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 5>of cruises double door Uh, well maybe. Of course, I've

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 5>been covering the sector for longer than yeah, as long

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 5>as Paul has been doing this too, So yes, long time.

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Long time.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 2>So I've been out on the Disney cruise a couple

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 2>of times when they have a new ship. We'd fly

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 2>out to l A hop in the thing. They take

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 2>us out overnight.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 7>Oh yeah, but that's that's as an analyst exactly.

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, I mean I have taken a vacation cruise

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 5>separate from my roles.

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there you go.

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Cocklay and Android

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, Listen on demand wherever

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you're anything like me, you probably feel like

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 2>you spend too much time on your phone, particularly with

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 2>the scrolling through the social media sites. New Year's resolutions

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 2>every year usually include, you know, let's spend some less

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 2>time on the personal device.

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 3>But that doesn't always work. It's tough to do.

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 2>There's actually been the subject of a lot of litigation

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 2>against some of these social media platforms, Meta, Alphabet, those

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 2>types of folks, and there's been some cases coming down

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 2>against these companies as well. So let's see what it

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 2>means for a lot of these social media companies and

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 2>tech companies in general. Matthew Sheltenham joins us here. He's

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 2>media litigation analyst Bloomberg Intelligence. Hey, Matt, it seems like

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 2>we've had a couple of court rulings come down against

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 2>some of these social media companies. Summarize what's going on

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 2>out there and does those a risk to these companies?

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So this is litigation that has been developing for

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 9>the past three to four years, and it's finally in

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 9>the first couple cases in line reached the stage of

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 9>juris making decisions. So Meta had a loss in New

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 9>Mexico State court when a jury announced a verdict of

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 9>three hundred and seventy five million dollars. We also, as

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 9>you said, had this California jury come down with a

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 9>personal injury suit on behalf of a woman who claimed

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 9>that she was harmed by the social media's features. There,

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 9>the jury came down with an initial three million dollar

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 9>award against Meta and Google's YouTube and then added three

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 9>million dollars of punitive damages. On top of that, these

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 9>are just the very tip of the iceberg. There are

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 9>a number of other cases lined up to go to

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 9>juries this year, and the whole goal here is to

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 9>try to shape a settlement. Potentially, these are bell weather

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 9>cases to try to give information about Okay, do these

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 9>cases have legs or not? And how should that how

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 9>should everyone think about trying to quantify them to settle them.

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 2>So I think pretty much if your parent out there

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>would say, boy, my kids just spend way way too

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 2>much time on their devices.

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Here, what is that? What do these companies say, I mean,

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 3>because otherwise they're just going to be in litigation forever.

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely. I mean, I think you're looking at a lot

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 9>of tough headlines here because you have a lot of

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 9>parents on these juries and maybe these these you know,

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 9>social media isn't the most popular thing right now, so

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.359
<v Speaker 9>it's going to be sort of an assault of headlines

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 9>for the companies here. Now, the companies say, look that

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 9>you know, there are lots of problems in the world.

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 3>We're not responsible for it.

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 9>In fact, we add a lot of value to the

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 9>world as well, And there are real legal problems that

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 9>the companies say with these cases. One is that the

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 9>companies say, look, we have a first amend right to

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 9>speak and to develop our product. We have a liability

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 9>shield under federal law section two thirty. All of that

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 9>sort of looms behind these jury decisions, and you can

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 9>you can guarantee that the companies are going to appeal

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 9>these initial decisions to higher courts on those tough legal questions.

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>So you know, the amounts being awarded here are immaterial

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 2>to these companies. Six million dollars here, three hundred million

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 2>dollars there through, and seventy five million dollars there. I mean,

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 2>they're just not material to the finances of these companies.

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Is there a scenario where we could get really, really

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 2>multi billion dollar type things that might get these attention

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 2>to these companies?

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 9>So these personal injury lawsuits probably not. You know, this

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 9>California case was brought by by a single person, and

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 9>there's no vehicle really to bring it as a class

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 9>action because damages are so individualized. The thing to watch

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 9>here are the state attorney's general lawsuits and also slightly

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 9>behind them, lawsuits brought by school districts, because they both

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 9>offer opportunities to pool a number of supposed victims and

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 9>to bring claims on their behalf. So I think Meta

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 9>has been sued by thirty to forty different state attorneys general,

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 9>and a number of those cases are consolidated in federal

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 9>court in California. That's a bigger ticket item, and so

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 9>that's the one to watch. I think these individual personal

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 9>injury suits are lowered down the line because of their

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 9>individualized nature. Meta made sixty billion in profit last year

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 9>and a six million dollar loss isn't a huge deal.

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Has it been a deal for the stocks at all?

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Is this an overhanged off for these stocks thinking that

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>or is it? Could it be like the tobacco industry

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 2>where investors are like, it's just it's just costed doing

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 2>business kind of thing.

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, it's been a tough couple of days

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 9>for Meta stock, and there's just been a barrage of

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 9>headlines on this, and as I said, this is just

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 9>the beginning. But there are a lot of people that

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 9>don't feel that great about social media right now and

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 9>use these decisions as an opportunity to jump on top

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 9>of it. And so in that sense, I think it's

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 9>going to be a lingering and ongoing risk that helps

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 9>drive a global settlement here to make this litigation go away.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 9>And I think that's the decision the company's going to

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 9>have to make, is do we have to make this

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 9>go away sooner rather than later, or do we test

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 9>these legal theories which might be pretty strong to make

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 9>the stuff go away, but it's going to take a

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 9>long time for those appeals to play out.

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, Listen on demand wherever

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 7>All right, let's bring in George Ferguson. He is our

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 7>senior aerospace, defense and airlines analysts. And George, there was

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 7>a headline earlier this week that got my attention, which

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 7>is Jet Blue looking to team up with someone looking

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 7>for a partner in some capacity. It was reported from Semaphore,

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 7>and Jet Blue has tried this before. It tried to

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 7>merge with Spirit Airlines or tried to buy Spirit Airlines

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 7>and it failed in that quest. What do we know

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 7>about Jet Blue's m and a ambitions.

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So I mean, we haven't heard anything out of

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 6>Jet Blue, right, but when you look at Jet Blue,

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, I think that one sort of their financial

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 6>performance hasn't been great since the pandemic, partly due to

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 6>this failed merger with Spirit Airlines, and so you could

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 6>see as they're you know, looking out at the US

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 6>market right now, or fuel prices have doubled, they probably

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 6>think of demand's going to come down pretty hard. You know,

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be hard to sort of turn around

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 6>financial improvement in that environment. And so I'm not sure

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 6>you know who sent before talk to inside, but I

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 6>don't think it's hard to see how Jet Blue would

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 6>be starting to think about what might be different permutations

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 6>of how they could get the carrier through what I

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 6>think is going to be a difficult summer for the business.

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 3>George. Typically, can airlines pass along fuel increases like we're

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 3>seeing here these huge jumps and fuel prices. Can they

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 3>pass that along to consumers or they that goes into

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 3>their bottom line?

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 6>So I think the opportunity to pass it along is

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 6>pretty good this time, and typically they do. Typically they

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 6>pass it along at a lag, and so the airlines

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 6>usually will go through a bumpy ride, you know, in

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 6>their profits for a little period of time for I

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 6>don't know, a quarter or something like that, as they're

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 6>getting ticket prices up. If you look at the US

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 6>airline business right now, now, though nobody hedges inside the

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 6>business anymore, it used to be there there was a

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 6>smattering of airlines that hedged. Southwest is one of the

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 6>bigger ones that hedged, and you might have some Alaska,

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 6>some Jet Blue edging. Nobody really hedges anymore, and that

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 6>means everybody has to increase ticket prices so that can

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 6>remain profitable. And I think that means the move to

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 6>higher ticket prices it goes faster this time.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 7>So when they increase ticket prices, is that something that's

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 7>kind of static it? You know, once it goes up,

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 7>it goes up, it doesn't come back down. Or would

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 7>any of them consider adding kind of a fuel search

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 7>charge a way a UPS or FedEx does.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, like I always think of a fuel

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 6>search charge as a way of reminding your customer that

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 6>the reason you're increasing the cost of the product that

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 6>you're delivering to them is because of fuel. And I

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 6>think always yeah, exactly, So FedEx goes Hey, look, sorry

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 6>about it. You know, the world economic environment is such

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 6>that I'm gonna have to charge you more because fuel

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 6>prices are higher. Look, I think at airlines. Airlines are

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 6>very competitive business, and so airlines see a lot of

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 6>movement up and down in ticket prices and so so

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 6>I think because of that competitiveness, yes, you could see

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 6>where they would rise here. And then you know, as

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 6>soon as you start to get decreases in the price

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 6>of fuel, we typically see some of the airlines that

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 6>want to take market share. They'll lower fares, they'll add

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 6>to the airplane, you add people to the airplane, and

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 6>then the game starts over again. Right, we start moving

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 6>the wrong direction in fairs. If you're a shareholder, George.

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 2>What are the airlines doing in terms of capacity? Are

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 2>they adding capacity to the system, are they taking down?

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 3>What are they doing?

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so we're not seeing much yet. My colleague friends

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 6>who wanted to flow put out a report this week.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 6>It's on our AI r l N dashboard. We haven't

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 6>seen much movement. And my guess is that the airlines

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 6>are probably waiting to see if this war could end quickly.

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 6>If it ends quickly, you know, maybe they don't have

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 6>to take any capacity out for summer season. Summers their

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 6>peak season. They've probably sold a lot of it already.

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 6>But I think if these higher fuel prices persist, I

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 6>think you'll you'll see as you get through summer they'll

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 6>have to start to cut capacity to keep fares fire.

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 6>And that becomes part of the risk as well. For

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 6>the companies like Jeff Blue, Spirit Frontier that are that

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, cater to the lower the lower tier the

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 6>traveling public. You know, the challenge is their customers are

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 6>probably going to be their budgets will be stretched a

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 6>little bit more. And I think you know, if you're

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 6>United and you're American, it's actually especially United in Delta

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 6>and you've got a fair amount of premium travelers flying

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 6>in your airplanes. They're going to they're they're not going

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 6>to really be bothered, right by a twenty or thirty

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 6>percent increase in their in their fair price. They're going

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 6>to keep flying. And those airlines are they're going to

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 6>continue to subsidize the back of the airplane that that

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 6>discount traveler, and it's going to make it harder to

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 6>fill airplanes. I think at the low cost carriers here

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 6>for a.

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Bit stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 4>after this.

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 7>Because it is Friday, let's just take a step away

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 7>from the market action, at least for a few minutes,

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 7>the word and Iran and talk a little bit about

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 7>the business of sports.

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Because the owners of NBA teams.

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 7>Have voted to consider expanding their league and adding franchises

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 7>in a couple of other cities. Let's bring in Randall Williams,

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 7>Our Bloomberg Business of Sports reporter on this story. And Randall,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 7>we're now looking at possibly a Las Vegas franchise, a

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 7>Seattle franchise.

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and it was always going to be those two cities.

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 10>The league was open to listening to more offers from

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 10>other cities. You think Nashville, you think Kansas City, you

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 10>think maybe Vancouver or Mexico City. But Seattle and Vegas

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 10>are proven sports towns. Seattle used to have the SuperSonics.

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 10>In Las Vegas has a bunch of different sports teams.

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 10>I would consider it this or it's capital of the

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 10>world right now. So they'll be listening to bidders over

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 10>the course of many months, and if they find the

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 10>right price, and if the bidders get the right number,

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 10>then we'll go from thirty to thirty two NBA teams.

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, If I want an NBA team, what's going

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 3>to cost me to get in the door?

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.479
<v Speaker 10>I would guesstimate it is going to cost you at

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 10>least eight billion dollars. They're saying seven to ten is

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 10>the range. I think Seattle will go for probably between

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 10>seven and eight and a half. And I think that

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 10>Vegas team could easily reach nine to ten.

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 7>And who are the obvious bidders here? Who are the

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 7>people who are right away going to be putting together packages?

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 8>Sure so.

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 10>Samantha Holloway, who is David Bonderman's daughter, is the owner

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 10>of the Seattle Kraken. She just formed this holding company

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 10>called One Roof Sports and Entertainment. She owns the arena

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 10>or that has partial ownership of the arena, which is

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 10>Climate Pledge Arena in Seattle. She's the heavy favorite in Seattle.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 10>In Vegas, you have Bill Foley, who is the Vegas

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 10>Golden Knights owner. He controls alongside MGM and aeg T

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 10>Mobile arena. And so I think if you have arena

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 10>ownership and you don't have to spend another billion and

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 10>a half to two billion dollars, then that's going to

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 10>enable you to get a bit ahead.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 8>Now there.

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 10>Who knows, maybe someone does come in and say, look,

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 10>I'll build a stadium in Las Vegas or in Seattle.

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 10>I think it would be difficult, but those two would

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 10>be my leading favorites right now.

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 3>All right, so we're just had opening day for Major

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 3>League Baseball. Let me take it down to the dark side. Oh,

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 3>are we going to get a work stopitch next year?

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Major League Baseball?

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely?

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 4>I think absolutely? I think so.

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 10>I mean, look, you think about the collective bargaining sessions

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 10>that we just finished with the WNBA. I think we

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 10>talked about it last week. Everyone that I've talked to

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 10>around sports has said that that is the prelude to

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 10>what is coming with baseball, which is really a war

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 10>of do they want to have the owners have a

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 10>salary cap or do the players who are probably going

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 10>to be negotiating for a minimum floor spending Because you

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 10>have teams that are just content with not spending any

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 10>money and being loser franchises. And then you have those

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 10>same owners complaining about how you have franchises like the Yankees,

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 10>the Dodgers, the Blue Jays who spend so much on

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 10>players that there's nothing left. So it's really going to

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 10>be an argument for the heart of.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 7>Baseball Beast or Famin in the MLB. Essentially, is there

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 7>parody in the MLB? I mean, are there changes they

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 7>can make to create more parody.

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 10>I'm in favor of having a minimum floor spending. And

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 10>the reason for that is because you think about the NFL,

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 10>and the NFL turns over playoff teams literally every single year.

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 10>That doesn't mean that that team is able to win

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 10>the Super Bowl, but we see a lot of turnover

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 10>different teams make it, and in baseball it does feel

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 10>like the same teams are winning. Now I'm in I'm

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 10>definitely rooting for the Dodgers. In terms of the dynasty effect,

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 10>I think having a franchise to chase, having a franchise

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 10>to beat then gives the hero and the villain side

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 10>of things. The city of Los Angeles thinks they're the

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 10>heroes and everybody else thinks they're the villains. At the

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 10>same time, there are other franchises out there. You think

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 10>about the Pittsburgh Pirates, you think about the Florida the

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 10>Miami Marlins, like these are franchises that no one really

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 10>talks about. And it's because of the fact that we

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 10>might not see the investment from their owners in terms

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 10>of how you know, you compare that to the Yankees

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 10>the Dodgers, and it does. Maybe they don't have the

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 10>deep pockets, but you know, you want to be competitive,

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 10>I would think, and that's not happening right now.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 8>But this will if there is a workstopage, it will

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 8>because the owners, yes, are bringing it because the owners

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 8>by and large. Is it fair to say the owners

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 8>won a floor here or do the owners are going

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 8>to take this work stop which because they want a cap.

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 3>They want a cap.

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 10>I think the players, I mean the MLB Players Association

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 10>scored probably the biggest win of any players association ever

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 10>with not having a salary cap, because that's how you

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 10>get a seven hundred million dollar deal or a five

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 10>hundred million dollar deal. Like it's not out of the ordinary.

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 10>If someone were to one day get a billion dollar contract, show,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 10>hey is going to top that right now in terms

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 10>of you know, we're not paying anyone more than show hey.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 10>But for owners like you think about the Dodgers, they

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 10>just retool every single year because they can. They don't

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 10>have a spending limit. And if you have an owner

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 10>who's willing to pay tremendously more than another owner who

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 10>might not have that, then there's going to be complaints

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 10>and be like, listen, we to get control of spending

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 10>because at the end of the day, this is going

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 10>to become a game in which if you spend the

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 10>most money, then you're going to win.

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Let me just bring this full circle.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 7>We're talking about NBA expansion to thirty two teams from

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 7>the current thirty. The NFL already has thirty two teams,

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 7>as does the NHL. Baseball has thirty teams. I mean,

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 7>are we going to potentially see expansion of MLB franchises.

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 10>I think that Baseball will consider expansion after collective bargaining

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 10>when if slash, when that ever ends. All of these

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 10>things seem very dire at the beginning because they are clashing.

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 10>You think about the conversations we were having about the WNBA.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 4>A year ago.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 10>It seemed like they were never going to come to

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 10>a deal. But the reality is they will at some pointed. Yah,

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 10>right exactly. They both have a vested interest in playing,

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 10>and I think baseball will probably expand to Nashville. I

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 10>think Nashville's could be a good baseball town. And then

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 10>I'll find another city, slash location, and they'll go from there.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal