WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - May 13th, 2022

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. As it happened, Sloomberg

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messier and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Hi, everyone, welcome to the weekend

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.959
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week. Tim. I gotta say it

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>was another crazy week, another ballatole week, and then we

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>had that hot inflation print that had us all thinking

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is it peak or is it not peak? Yeah, that's

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the question that remains, and we have a great group

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>of people to help really break down and help us

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>find some answers, starting with legendary investor Alan patrick Off

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>from Greycroft Carroll. He. I mean, look, it's fair to

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>say that he's seen a cycler to write early investor

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>in Apple, so he knows what's up with markets like this,

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and he had an interesting perspective on some of the

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>tech sell off that we've seen in some of those

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>well known names. Plus we're going to get a good

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>check on the consumer. The CEO of Tapestry talking about

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>our company's latest earnings, little hint they've been raising prices.

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>All of that to come. We begin, though, with a

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Big Take this week and this week's issue of

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. It's an incredible piece to view online.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>It's interactive, it's really well told visually, so I encourage

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody to check it out. It's all about exploring Japan's

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 1>front lines. It's where for millions of Japanese, the confrontation

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>between the U S and China it's already a reality.

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Here to explain Bloomberg Business Week editor Joe Weber along

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Campbell, who's Asia editor for Business Week. It's

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>actually a series of islands, um and what's interesting. I

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>think Americans would probably be most most familiar with Okinawa,

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>which is one of them, and this series of islands, uh,

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you end up closer to Shanghai and mainland

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>China than to Tokyo, which is pretty incredible when you

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>see it on a map. And I do recommend reading

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it online because the immersive experience that we built for

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>this story is pretty incredible. And what's interesting is obviously

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the tensions between US and China have been palpable and

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>if anything, have been simmering and during the trumpet aministration

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>escalated UH. And this is like a little quiet area

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that's right next to Taiwan. As we've been talking about

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and the tensions there, obviously a lot of UH

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>tai Taiwan UH interest has been peaked, I think. And

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>what's really interesting about these islands is, you know, there's

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this demographic crisis in Japan. UH don't have enough workers.

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the workers that they would have on

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>these islands have traditionally come from China, and obviously with

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>zero COVID China has not had that. That means there's

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>now tourism dollars coming from China as well. And obviously

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge American military presence there, which makes all

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of this really interest because this is this is a

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>frontline right even though there isn't an active conflict, that

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that there isn't tension and that it's all

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>rooted right in this place, and it has some really

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting and fascinating domestic implications for for Japan and geopolo

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>politics and even American foreign policy. So so, Matt, what

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was the thing, the initial thing that sparked your interest

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>about what Yoshi set out to tell him this story. Well,

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I always look for what I call small stories that

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>tell big stories of ways to go to one place

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>or one company, or one series of events, and then

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>go from there into a better understanding of big, mega trends.

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And what's cool about this story is Yoshi, fabulous reporter

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in Japan who put this together, was he found the

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>series of communities in Japan which are struggling with the

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>exact same problem that Japan as a whole has, which is,

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, economic dependence on China and in

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>fact growing economic dependence on China, but a deepening security

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>alliance with the US. And obviously there's a contradiction there. Well,

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, part of what I have to say,

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>as I was reading through it was really stark for me.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And where you said where he said, you know, should

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a war come between the US and China basically and

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>unlikely but increasingly plausible Senar scenario because what's going on

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine, Like I don't even I mean I do

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>think about it, but not and I feel like you realize, Okay,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>how vulnerable or how how this might play out ultimately, Matt, Well, indeed,

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and Japan something that that is very apparent if you

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>go back in the history a little bit, is Japan

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is deeply involved in the Taiwan issue, but Taiwan was

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese colony from until ninety Actually, in Taiwan there

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are somewhat fonder feelings about Japan than there are many

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>parts of Asia. Japanese governments have said in various terms

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that they view the security of Taiwan as a strategic interest.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So if things really kick off, Japan will absolutely be

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the story. What's happening militarily on the on

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the islands, well, there are two things happening. One is,

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Japan is an increasingly strong military power. Military spending in

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Japan has increased dramatically over the last decade or two,

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and we'll continue to do so. And the other thing

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is as the US pivots more of security strategy toward

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>containing China, a huge amount of that investment ends up

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>in Japan overall, and particularly in places like Okinawa, which

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>has something like seventy U S military bases on one island,

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>if you can imagine that. So, so really this is

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the front line of geopolitical conflict. Yeah. One of the

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>things that interests me about the story was a parallel

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with Germany, which obviously Germany has had no military spending

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>since World War Two. Now it's established that it will

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>be a big presence. One of the surprising elements to

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>me about this is Japan. It was sort of in

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a similar role, except that spending his increased as has

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>its alliance in the US. So, Matt, how has that

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>played out domestically in recent years in Japan? Well? So,

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Japan under its post war constitution, which was actually drafted

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>by the US military, has a clause that says, in

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>as many words, Japan and will not have armed forces.

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>That has never really been observed. It's always in the

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>post war era had a military. That military is now

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>growing in seemingly well funded, increasingly oriented towards containing China

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in very forceful ways should the need arise. That was

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Matt Campbell, along with Business Week editor Joe Weber,

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>coming up coach Kate Spade, Stuart Whitesman. You've heard of

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>those brands have all right, Well, they're all under the

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Tapestry umbrella and they wait in with their latest quarterly update,

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and also talked about the outlook. We're gonna get an

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>update from Tapestry's CEO. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stenoby from Bloomberg Radio. Tapestry,

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.799
<v Speaker 1>you know the brand, well, they owned Coach, Kate Spade,

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.119
<v Speaker 1>and Stuart Whitesman. They came out with their quarterly update

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>this week. They talked about prices, they talked about the outlook,

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and they also talked about China. And we got to

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>check in with the company's CEO, joe An crevoice Ran

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>and she joined us to give us her take on

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>earning season, and really, let's understand the health of the

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>American consumer in the global consumer right so important to

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>our economy. What we're seeing in our business is strength

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and momentum across our business. As you mentioned, our third

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>quarter outperformed, led by strength in North America, and we

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>drove double digit global sales growth across all of our

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>brands at Coach, at Cape Spade, and at Stuart Whitzman.

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Tapestry is a powerful combination of iconic

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>brands that offer tremendous value for consumers. And we have

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a platform that we've transformed to drive innovation and customer engagement,

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and that model is delivering results. We're seeing that in

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the strength of our digital business, increased customer acquisition and

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>pricing power across brand. So a lot of things are

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>are working and performing, and it really reflects the strategies

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've put in place over the last few years,

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>UM to stay closer to consumers and drive growth behind

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>our our powerful brands. So we want to dig deeper

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>into that. But let me ask you, if you had

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to describe the consumer in a word or a few words,

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>how would you do it? And would you say that

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the consumers back at pre pandemic levels or maybe even better,

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>are still a little bit under it. Yeah, the consumer

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is quite resilient. UM. You know, we've been driving growth

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>above pre pandemic levels for several quarters, UM. And you

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>know that's that's most apparent in our Coach brand, where

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>we've had more quarters in a row, but also true

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>at Cape Spade and its Stuart Whitzman and UM. You know,

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>our business in the third quarter reflects really the strength

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.599
<v Speaker 1>and momentum we're seeing around the world. You know, we

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about our growth in North America. We drove growth

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>in North America in the last UH in the last

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>quarter UM. But we also saw strength around the world

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in all areas except for China. So we saw strength

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in Europe UM and strong growth in rest of Asia

0:08:56.000 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>as well as in Japan. So UM business is performing UM.

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>In fact, even in China going into the quarter, we

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>saw strength and and UM. You know that business only

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>started to weekend when we saw the disruption related to

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>COVID in the market towards the end of the quarter. Joann,

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to I want to hit on the China

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>point and dig into that a little bit, because you

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>had to have in North America, you overcame pandemic related

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>weakness in China when you look at the results overall.

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But I'm but I'm wondering from a planning perspective, how

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about how long these lockdowns last and how

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>long you're going to see that weakness in China where

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>business has just dried up since this resurgence of COVID. Yeah,

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the business was disrupted, but it was disrupted in a

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>very discrete way. UM. You know, by the by the

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>impact of COVID in the market. And you know, our

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>business has been quite resilient over the last two years.

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>As I said, you know, we've been driving growth above

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic levels for some time, UM, and that shows

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the resilience of our model and the way that we're

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>able to shift. UM two changes that we're seeing in

0:09:55.440 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>demand and changes in the supply chain and supply around

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>in the world. And our latest disruption has been in China.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But as as I mentioned, we had strength in the

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>market and we've been driving strength as as China came

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the first round of lockdowns, the consumer was

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>incredibly resilient to in. There's so much stress out there.

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>It feels like certainly when we watch the financial markets,

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>right and we look at some individual names, even though

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>your stocks rallying, it's down about this year, but it's

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it's broad based selling. It feels like no market or

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>sector is immune. It certainly seems in the stocks sell off.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>You sound pretty calm, and you sound I don't know,

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is it cautiously optimistic optimistic? UM, help me understand fundamentally

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>what the outlook looks like. That might you know, I

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>think we're all trying to figure out what is the

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>outlook amid a rising rate environment and what is the

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>business environment and what's the market environment? Um becauld You

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>seem pretty calm, Yeah, well, and we are optimistic. We're

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>very confident. You know, we have such iconic brands in

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>our in our portfolio, and our focus has been on,

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, restoring the health of our brands and driving

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.599
<v Speaker 1>better and stronger engagement with consumers. And when we do that,

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the business perform. So we're really focused on fundamentals UM

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.319
<v Speaker 1>and you know when we talk about transformation, actually I

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>heard you discussing investment UM in the business in the

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in the show just prior to when I came on.

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're investing, and we're investing in digital tools

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and innovation and technology that's making us better. And as

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we focus on the fundamentals, we're seeing traction. We're engaging customers,

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>were acquiring more customers. We acquired one point four million

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>customers in the last quarter alone, and since we've embarked

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>on our transformation, we've acquired thirteen million new customers to

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>our brands over the last twenty one months. And these

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>are customers who are coming in and engaging with our brands.

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>They're shopping at higher au are higher prices than average,

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're coming back more frequently, um And the customers

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>are also increasingly younger. So as we focus on the

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals of our business, it gives us confidence because we're

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing much stronger engagement, much healthier brands, and much stronger

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>engagement with our consumers. Joann, I'm wondering about your pricing

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>power because you said that there these customers are paying

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>more than they were paying earlier. How much of that

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>has to do with inflation? Where where are you seeing

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a rise in costs right now on your production end

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and in your supply chain, And how much are you

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>absorbing of that versus passing it along to the customer,

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Because as Nil Saunders, an analyst with Global Data set

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in a note after your results, Uh, the customers that

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you have at Tapestry can cope better with inflationary impacts

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>than the average customer. Yeah. And the way we think

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>about our pricing power is really in terms of delivering

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>value to consumers um And, and that's how we've been

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking about In fact, we started this pre pandemic before

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we started to see pressure on the cost side of

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the equation, and those pressures are real. We're seeing pressure

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>on the cost side of the equation. Like others in

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the industry, UM a lot of pressure in freight related

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to the supply chain dislocations that we're seeing, but our

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>focus really on the pricing side of it, and the

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>pricing powers really driven by the value we're delivering to

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>consumers and those emotional connections that we're developing are allowing

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>us to drive pricing power, and we're seeing that across

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>our brands. You know, some of the investments we've we've

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>made and tools and technology or helping us leverage data

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>better in across our value chain, so that's making us

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>more informed on pricing decisions. It's also making us more

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>informed on our assortment decisions and our inventory management, so

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got the right inventory. We're seeing higher skew productivity

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>UM with more concentration behind more powerful items, and that

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>allows us UM to drive pricing power as well and

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to clarify our messages with consumers. So on the value

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>side of the equation, we continue to deliver unbeatable value

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>for our consumers across all of our brands, and that's

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>helping us more than offset the pricing pressure that we're

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing UM in terms of cost. In terms of our

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>expectations going forward. That was Joanne kravoice Rat, the CEO

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of Tapestry. Still ahead on Bloomberg Business Week, measuring and

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>tracking how we watch, where we watch media and apps,

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a company that does it all increasingly important, Carol, because

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>now we're talking about ads with Disney Plus and of

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>course with Netflix. We're gonna be joined by the president

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of TV squared by in event on the changing patterns

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of target consume media broadcasting from the financial capital of

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the world, Bloomberg eleven Frio in New York to Washington,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>d C. Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one oh six one

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>does San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixty to the country Sirius

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>XM Chado one nine team and around the globe the

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app and Bloomberg Radio dot com. This is

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week, alright, So how are we view and

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to media? Right? Like? I don't even know how

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it right now? Are you on your phone

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>right now listening to us? Are you on Bloomberg Radio

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>listening through tune in on? So nos, exactly right. There's

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>so many different ways, there's many options, and increasingly all

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of this is converging and our next guest gets that

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>big time. It's Joe can sella president of TV squared

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>by Innovative. This is a global measurement and attribution platform

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:25.239
<v Speaker 1>for converged TV. Essentially, it means that it measures audiences

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in a in a media world that's coming together right now,

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>so people who consume media via different platforms like smart

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>TV and set top boxes. Thank you so much for

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>having me, guys, it's great to be here. Well, I

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>just want to get your your takes before we get

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>right into the analytics here. I just want to get

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>your take on the streaming environment because we did see

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that Disney beat expectations when it came for Disney Plus subscribers,

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>shares moving higher in the after hours. Different story than Netflix.

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just wondering how you would characterize the environment

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, because it's it's interesting like this incumbent Disney

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that Netflix disrupted. Uh now Net is on the other

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>side of that with shares down, you know, more than

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy from its highs last year. Yeah, A vod is

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely the cool kid. So I think you know, Netflix

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>held out as long as it could, and you know

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>they they held off from bringing ads in for the

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>longest time, and then we saw the fluctuations with the

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>share price, and here we are. I have not had

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>any early indication as to what the Netflix offering is

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be, UM, but you know, thinking that it's

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be the same as or similar to

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>what everyone else is doing. But you asked me, Tim,

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, to describe the streaming world right now, I

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think I can use a very nice British term, which

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is bonkers um. And you know, the latest statistics that

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>were that we're seeing because TV squared by Innovid actually

0:16:54.240 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>measures linear and streaming, but streaming is actually now accounting for,

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>according to the I A B about twenty one point

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars worth of TV inventory. So it's really

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this massive transformation and shift to CTV during COVID.

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Help me out, though a number a loan doesn't always

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>give you perspective. So twenty one point two billion in

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>TV inventory, what percentage is that in terms of streaming?

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Look at it this way, Carol, It's a seventy billion

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar universe in the US. It's about two hundred billion globally,

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's small. I would say if you look at

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>local television So you think about local broadcast local cable

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in the US that is also twenty two billion, and

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>think about how old, um, that kind of industry has

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>been in existence, you know, thinking about the cable companies

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and everything else. So if you think that CTV is

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>now the same size as local broadcast on local cable,

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really come from nowhere. And at the end of

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the day, everybody is now watching TV in such a

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>different way that we're going to continue to see this

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>this huge growth in CTV. Joe, how does the technology

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>at TV squared by innovd work Because when you talk

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>about a streaming the streaming landscape, it's really fractured in

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of that end user and how the end user

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>gets that signal could be on a row who, it

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>could be on his Amazon fire Stick, it could be

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>on a smart TV by l G or Sony. So

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the data is really disparate, and I'm wondering what technology

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to be able to provide companies that are

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>looking for this data with accurate info. Yeah, it's a

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>great question, um, and one that we've tried to solve

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>tim in software. We believe that the only way that

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you can solve for the challenges of the modern day

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>advertiser is to be global um and to have a

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>solution that is software based that truly scales. And that's

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>easy to say, but it's actually harder to do. What's

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>been amazing about the recent acquisition by Innovid is that

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>we've basically been able to kind of superpower our measurement,

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>which is, think about it this way. Innovid has a

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>ad server that delivers ads for the of the top

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>two hundred advertisers. What does that mean. That means everything.

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>That means about a billion ads a day UM, and

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it means that we can take every impression that gets

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>served and pump it straight into TV squared and either

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>map it to like who did I reach, what was

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the audience demo? And did they take an action? So

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I want you to think of this as we've done

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the hard bit. We've done the stitching together of all

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of these different platforms, and because Innovid actually delivers the

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>ad we can see if it's a show that runs

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>on Peacock, on a Roku device, on a Sam's on TV,

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>we can still see that impression. Therefore, for ours, what's

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>beautiful is there's no walled gardens and we're independent. So

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're an advertiser, everyone's calling us saying, hey, wait

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a second, you can see all the way through the

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>customer journey. What happened? That's Joe can Sella, the president

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of TV squared by inn of It. You are listening

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week More to Come. You know the

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>name venture capitalist Alan patrick Of. He checked in with

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>us about today's market volatility as well as opportunity. You've

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>had a career that's bounced fifty years. This is Bloomberg.

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. All right,

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>with all the market volatility again this week. I mean

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really been the theme of market volatility. So we

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>recently caught up with a perfect guest to talk about it.

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>He has seen a lot of market cycles. Fair to

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>call him legendary Alan patrick Off an early VC. He

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>helped build and grow such companies as America Online, Office Depot,

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>a little company called Apple Audible as well. He's the

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>chairman emeritus and co founder of gray Croft. He's also

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>got a new book out, Carol. It's called no red lights.

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Reflections on life fifty years in venture capital and never

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>driving alone. You know, everybody I meet has lived for

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>such a short time relatively in this market that they

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.239
<v Speaker 1>only see everything going up. And I've lived through so

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>many cycles that to me, this was inevitable. It's going

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to come. Everybody was living in a euphoric state that

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>things are only going to go up. And I think

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you better be prepared for some kind of hiccup. And

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why it's going to happen, but that's

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>just the way the markets work. How big of a

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>hiccup and how long of a hiccup, Well, I think

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it depends on what the after fall is after the

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this initial setback. You know, well the market stabilizer is

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it gonna, you know, after a certain period of time,

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>go down again. I mean the levels that the markets

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>at has just been increasing steadily until the beginning of

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. I mean last year was dramatic. The whole

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump era was dramatic. I always follow the theory the

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>markets stone like surprises, and all we had with surprises

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>for four years and the market kept going on. So

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got an after effect of that. And uh,

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I just say one thing, This is not the time

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to sell. I think you've got to ride the rocky

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 1>periods and watch how and see how it stabilizes. Even

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a name like you know you've got Meta um uh

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you meta platforms? Right? You know? Facebook um down about

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. We were talking about Netflix before we got going.

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 1>It's down almost since April nineteen when it just freaked

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>out the markets right when it came down with a

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>lack of subscriber growth. So I don't know, how do

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>how do we make sense of some of that? Is

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity to you or is it like there's some

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>there's something wrong. Well, if I were following public markets,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd be looking very carefully for where the opportunities are

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of companies that have relatively good values in

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>relation to their revues and their profits, and which ones

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>have the balance sheets that are going to sustain themselves

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>no matter what happens to interestates. But in terms of

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Meta and Google and Apple, I think we're going through

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a period where, for finally, the Congress are now focused

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on the monopoly positions that these companies have, and there's

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>legislation pending, and I think that it's it's it's long

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.719
<v Speaker 1>been long and company really and coming. You realize that

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the old the Internet has not had any regulation. There's

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>been no regulation in twenty five years. We're living with

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>outdated monopoly laws. And I think that Europe has just

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>passed some very significant laws and the US is gonna

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>follow I think very shortly, and that is an overhang.

0:23:57.920 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Very curious about your thoughts on this does them and

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>compoly power that you argue that some of these big

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>tech companies have to what extent does that stifle innovation

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to startups? Of course it does. I mean,

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can't tell you the number of companies

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I've been on the board of where I'm going to

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>a board being and they'd say traffic was down or

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty whatever the percentages. Why Google change their algorithms? I mean,

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that's monopoly if I've ever heard it. I mean, we

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>are original monopoly lawyers were related to control of the railroads,

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the control of of of oil. UH. Now we're seeing

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of monopoly control, and that is, you know,

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>when you have ninety percent of your search going through

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>one vehicle, UH, and when people are putting their own

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>internal products and offerings ahead of other products that are

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>available that's monopoly get hurt. Yeah, ultimately, of course they are. Well,

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>let's put this way. The advertisers are getting hurt. The

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>competitive businesses are getting hurt. Uh. And I think everybody

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is mesmerized by you know, one day delivery and uh

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>getting low prices. But at the same time it's hurting

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of small businesses. Elon musk and Twitter, what

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>do you think about that it worries me? One person?

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>This is this is the major social media uh communication

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>platform all of us. Maybe not all of us, but

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us certainly use it. Uh. And to

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>have one person and this will be a private company also,

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's again another element that I would be

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>concerned about. And I think it's also going to be

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.199
<v Speaker 1>subject whatever government potential government regulation. I mean it hasn't

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't going through this process yet. I think that

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we still may see some headwinds that may slow this

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>down or prevent it. I don't think it's good for society.

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 1>So talk to us about this book. We were reminding you,

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this that when you were on last

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>with us, which was a few months um, you actually

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>leaked that you are coming out with a new book.

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So why did you write this? Yeah? I mean I

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>have been asked for a long time to write a

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>book because I've been in the business. You know, by

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>being in a business fifty years, you become, you know,

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>first year the father of venture capital. Then you're the

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>grandfather of venture capital. Then that's the legendary Alan Patrickov,

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>so you know, being a legend. I wrote it because

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for two reasons. One was I thought it might be

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>valuable and why I gave the title no Red Lights. Uh.

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I've lived a multidimensional life and I feel that that's

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a valuable idea to convey to younger people about don't

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>get lost in your own, you know, small world, be

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>open to opportunities and get involved in politics, get involved charities,

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>get involved in art. And I've done all of these

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>things and there's not much that I haven't been involved

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>in or that I'm not open to. I live a

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>very active, multidimensional life and always have. I thought that

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>spirit would be valuable to convey. Plus, I saw what

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>was happening to older people who are you know, kind

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>of checking out because of retirement ages being forced on

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>them at sixty or they sold their company, and they

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>go to Florida and they started playing golf. And I

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>was saying, as I started my first company at thirty six,

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>my second company at seventy two, and two years ago,

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I decided to start Prime Time Partners at eighty five,

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and I thought that I wanted to be a poster child.

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm now eighty seven. I thought it would

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>be kind of inspirational. I don't want to overdo it,

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>but that people who might read it say, listen to

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.239
<v Speaker 1>this guy can do it. You know, why can't I

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 1>do it? Why can't I? Maybe if I only inspire

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.959
<v Speaker 1>one person to say, you know, I'm going to follow

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that lead and take on some new challenge, go back

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in the same business I've been, only do it all

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>over again. The sub headline of the book is Reflections

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>on Life, fifty years in venture capital and Never Driving Alone.

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:11.959
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean by never driving alone? Is that

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>everything in life is cumulative, where we don't get where

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>we are by doing things by ourselves. It's I find

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very valuable to always be a partnership with people

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and whatever you do. And I follow a very collegial

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>approach to everything I've done, and I find it a

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>good practice to be open to meeting new people at

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>all stages. Uh. And as I say, life is cumulative,

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and the people you meet early on in your career,

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they come back at you again and again. And I

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that which I say in this book.

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Many of the people I met when I was very

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>young in this business are all running some of the

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>major companies in this country are certainly certainly in the city,

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but in the country. And I say to everybody, turn

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to your left and turn to your right. You just

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know where someone's going to end up. And you

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and you developed those associations and relationships, and I find

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that that that's been very helpful in my life. You know, Alan,

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I think many would argue, you know, certainly coming out

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic, and we just saw the speed of

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>change and innovation pick up so much momentum because companies

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>had to for survival, whether it's digitization or you know,

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we talked about digital medicine, like just so many different

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>things and how we shopped just so many things kind

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of just picked up so much momentum. But there was

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>many would argue a lot of innovation during what was

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a very very difficult time and I just wonder when

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you have looked at innovators over fifty years, like, what

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is it that stands out from somebody, whether it was

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>an Apple or another company, that you just knew that

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>this was somebody or an institution that was on the

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>cusp of doing something very differently. Well, you know, no

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>one uh has that much foresight that they can pick

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>when years all the time because as part of the

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>business that there are a lot of losers in the

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in the process. But you know what you'd like to

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>find is someone with who's right, got a vision and

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>who's passionate about what they do. Uh. And I think

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that is fundamental to being really successfully. I mean, you know,

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg was a perfect example who was a passionate person.

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Sergey and Larry were passionate. Steve Jobs was passionate. I

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>think that if you're driven, uh, that has a lot

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to do not just knowing the technology, but have a

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>vision of what you want to do. And I one

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that concerns me is I give a

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of lectures or courses in colleges every now and then,

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and UH, when you ask people in these business schools,

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, how many of you gonna start a business.

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, three quarters of the class raise their hand

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and they have no passion really about what they want

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. They're doing it because someone in the previous class,

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>UH started and made five million dollars and sold their company,

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and they figured if they did it, why can't I

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>do it? So as a result, they started a new

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>dog watching company or a new delivery company. And so

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of a lot of repetition and

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>not as much originality in the in the startup and

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>uh an innovation as we'd like to frankly, as i'd

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>like to see. You know, most things today are applications

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of existing technologies. That's great croft Alan Patrickov really well

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>known venture capitalists and someone who has seen so much.

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>If you missed any of the conversation, I want to

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>hear the full conversation. Just check out our podcast at

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. And that reps up the first hour

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio.

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Carol Masser and I'm tostead of coming up in

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>our next hour, Barista's Unite the unionization of Starbucks. It's

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the cover story in the magazine this Week, plus well

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>known chef Danielle Balou on the state of the restaurant industrating.

0:31:56.440 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the reporters and editors who bring you America's most trusted

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>business magazine. Plus global business, finance and tech news as

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it happened. S Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messier and

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes, Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Plenty of

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>hand our second hour of the weekend edition of Bloomberg

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, including the look at the state of the

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>restaurant industry, especially in New York City. We'll do that

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>with a claim chef Danielle Blue He's actually opening up

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a new restaurant. Plus a look at the current edition

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Pursuits. We've got art in there, We've got

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>theater in there, We've got music in there, plus the

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>books of the summer. I love that list. First up

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>this hour, though, we do want to get to the

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>cover story of Bloomberg Business Week. It's on the Starbucks revolution,

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>with a push toward unionizing baristas. We caught up with

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the editor of the magazine, Joel Webber, and the reporter

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>on the story josh Idolson, Joel, I want to start

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>with you because this is the third time that Howard

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Schultz has been at the home of Starbucks. Does the

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Starbucks that he found when he returned just about a

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>month ago as CEO. The surprise I think that probably

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>awaited him um was one that he was not probably

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>familiar with from his other stints, which was this newfound

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>power that the labor has and Starbucks, which I found

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>really surprising. The workers of Starbucks have you know, for

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>all of this talk about unionization sweeping the country right now,

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Amazon being one that we've talked about extensively, all those

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>all of those roads lead back to what has been

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>happening at Starbucks, and Starbucks have been really the workers

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of Starbucks have been galvanizing force that a lot of

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>other workers in corporate America have been inspired by. And

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and josh to his credit, saw this long ago and

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>started reporting the heck out of it and going to

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>as many states and and talking to as many workers

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>who were behind the scenes without union effort. And so

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>what you really have here is a CEO who helped

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>build this company into a global brand comes back to

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it and has found that the workers aren't buying that

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>same vision that he had laid out long ago. And

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you see this tension between the workers and Schultz and

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and it even culminates with, you know, the workers being

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>invited to the White House Um and the company sort

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of saying, hey, you know we we we got cut

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>out of this. So so Josh Um, what what do

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you know? You're somebody who follows um labor obviously very closely.

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I think Josh is like probably as good as it

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.919
<v Speaker 1>gets in terms of labor reporting in this country right now.

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And what really distinguishes the Starbucks story for a wider

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>audience here, So in recent decades in the United States,

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty much unheard of for workers to win a

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>labor board election at a company as prominent as Starbucks,

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>where there isn't a union already and there isn't some

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of deal between the union in company to play nice.

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And it is being done mainly through workers mentoring each other,

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not just workers organizing their coworkers, but workers training other

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>workers to train other workers, to train other workers to

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>organize their coworkers. And that is how, as one worker

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 1>put at, this ultimate group project has spread so quickly

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and has proven so difficult for Starbucks despite all the

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>resources at its disposal and the goodwill that it's had

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to stem this movement from growing and spreading further. There

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of directions I want to go, Josh,

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>but one question that continues to stick out to me is,

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Starbucks is as corporate is very pushing back,

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>very aggressively when it comes to these unionization efforts on

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>an individual level, even before Howard Schultz came back, remember

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>he flew to Buffalo to meet with those unionizing employees.

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>What is what? What does that stake here for Starbucks?

0:35:55.600 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>If there is widespread unionization across US stores here, to

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what extent does that affect Starbucks business? Well, there are

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>two big reasons that companies tend to resist unionization, and

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>one is money and the other is power. Of course,

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 1>for the union to prove its worth two workers, it

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to need to show that it can extract

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 1>things from Starbucks that workers one an otherwise get, and

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>some of those things are going to cost money. But

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the other reason that companies fight unions and that they

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>often are willing to spend a whole lot of money

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 1>both on anti union consultants and on making improvements to

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>try to modify people is that they don't want to

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>give up that control over how the business has run.

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>And Starbucks for years has bragged, including Howard Schultz has

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>bragged that there's an empty chair at the board meeting

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that represents workers voice. So now you have workers saying

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>why is the chair empty? Put us in the chair instead.

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And so for Starbucks is to become substantially unionized would

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>mean that Starbucks executives have less unilateral ability to just

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>decide what the business model should be, what the rules

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 1>should be. And that's part of why the stakes here

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>are so high. Josh, what happened at the company? I

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>thought this was the one where they paid their workers

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>as well, they had nice benefits. I mean, this is

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>something at Chultz kind of took pride in. As you

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:29.879
<v Speaker 1>as you report what happened two different ways, and one

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is to say it's not as dreamy as it may sound.

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Even the fifteen dollar minimum pay that the workers will

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:41.800
<v Speaker 1>be guaranteed by August is not a living wage for

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>someone with a child. In a city like Seattle, the

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>staffing issues have been egregious at times, especially during COVID

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.439
<v Speaker 1>and the handling of COVID disappointed some workers and left

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>them feeling betrayed. The other answer they would give is

0:37:56.480 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's not enough to be better than other fast companies.

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>They believe they should have more say in their working

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>conditions and therefore in their lives, and that there is

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>no one particular thing that Starbucks could solve that would

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>make them go back to being okay with the company

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>having all the control. And where does where do things

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>stand with Schultz? Because as you write, this is not

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a He's not permanently CEO right now, right He's just

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>back on an interim basis. So where where will this

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>dispute go? That's what they've said. They're supposed to be

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a permanent announcement in the fall. There are some people

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 1>hoping that Schultz stays on, but it is a fight

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>that is deeply personal for Howard Schultz. Coming up, we

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 1>catch up with the CEO of Brooks on the changing

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>landscape of running shoes and be going by someone that

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you might know. We're talking about Britishers who weren't bout there.

0:38:54.480 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovik from Bloomberg Radio.

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, so he has headed up Brooks Running for

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty years, Brooks being a century old Seattle

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>based company that makes, as you would guess, running gear. Yeah, well,

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>if you go back some twenty years ago, this was

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a company that was tinkering with bankruptcy. Also one more thing, Carol,

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a subsidiary of the standalone company of Warren Buffetts

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>and Berkshire Hathaway, along with you know, other really well

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>known brands like Sees Candies and Dairy Queen. The journey

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.240
<v Speaker 1>is all in a book by Brooks Running CEO Jim Webber,

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>his book Running with Purpose. How Brooks outpaced goliathe competitors

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to lead the pack. You know, I think there's there's

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>more uncertainty in our world, maybe than ever before for

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>business people. And you know, there's so many things you

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:55.359
<v Speaker 1>don't control. And that's such a cliche, but it's just true.

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>So we start with the fact that we're going to

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>have things that we have to navigate that we don't control.

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the key for us has been

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 1>customer focused. And I'll give you one example, Carroll. You know,

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and and when in March the pandemic hit. All the

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>lights went off all retail clothes. We had no radar

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for demand what was going to happen. And because we

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>were customer focused on the runner, once we saw them

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>starting to run and buy gear, we we sort of

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, hit the gas pedal again. So so I

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>think the key for us to navigate all these crazy

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>times is our customer focused on the runner and disadvantaged.

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we have because it's it's it's all we do.

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Jim back in, it feels like years ago at this point, Uh,

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you moved or shed much of your presence in China

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 1>this according to Reuters, and instead moved a lot of

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the shoe production to Vietnam. I think that for a

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, that looks really prescient doing that before

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>COVID even hit. But I'm wondering if that actually managed

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to help you over the last two years. Because it's

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>not just China where supply chains are are SNAr This

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>is a worldwide issue. There's no question about it. Tim

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And and you know the truth of the matter is

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that last fall, being in Vietnam, in the south of Vietnam,

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>where where many of our key production partners were was

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a tough place to be because for three months, almost

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 1>half of our our production capacity did not make one

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>shoe that was in Q three last year, and so

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we're we're short on inventory now, we're not delivering demands.

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:28.879
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it matters maybe where you are.

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the supply chain disruption and transportation and logistics

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>has impacted impacted everyone, no matter what your product is.

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think I think it's been super challenging.

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, given our history, we've been through challenging

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 1>times before, and so you know, our team rolled up

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 1>our sleeves and we just have to roll with, you know,

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the changes that have come forth and do our best

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep our customers informed, and we communicate with our

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>retail partners and runners. You know, we don't have all

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the product that they are demanding today, but you know,

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>we're doing our best help them understand why. I would

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>say though in the last several months, things have stabilized

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>for us, you know, in our industry, and that you know,

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 1>we've been pretty much running at full capacity now for

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>over four months, so we're no more normal mode. If

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>there's such a thing as normal in this supply chain. Well,

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know we're going with we're going with smaller boats

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to smaller courts. Um air air freight isn't even affordable anymore.

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>So we've just tried to navigate around, you know, the

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 1>constraints that that are out there in the supply chain

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>right now that we all have to deal with and

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>costs your up. But you know we're because you know,

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>again we're we're focused on the customers. So we just

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to do our best to navigate through that

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 1>and supply demand well. And in terms of pricing, what

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of pricing pressure leverage do you have with consumers

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>right now? And just got about forty seconds and then

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna come back, and I promise we're gonna talk

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in Yeah, I would say, we don't feel like we

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>have a lot. We've raised prices where we could modestly,

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say, And we don't raise prices every year.

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is the first pricing increases that I think

0:42:57.680 --> 0:42:59.799
<v Speaker 1>we've made on our key shoes. The adrenaline goes in

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.280
<v Speaker 1>probably three or four years, so so we have raised

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>selectively some prices up. But you know, we don't think

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the consumer can be bear everything, so we've got to

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:12.960
<v Speaker 1>navigate that. What's the first your first exposure or interaction

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>with Warren Buffett when he became interested in the company. Well,

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it goes back for me. I was reading his annual

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 1>letters when I started in the business world in the eighties,

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:23.399
<v Speaker 1>so I felt like I knew him. But we were

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 1>owned at the time by for the Loom, which was

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a Virtue Hathaway subsidiary, and we began to sell shoes

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:32.880
<v Speaker 1>at the annual meeting Expo, and so I sent him

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a note saying how much fun we had, and we

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:36.240
<v Speaker 1>met a lot of shareholders, we sold a lot of shoes,

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and he said, great, if you're ever in Omahawk, come by.

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll go have a steak. And so I went to

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>lunch with Warren. We met for three hours and and

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I knew he was going to like the Brooks story

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 1>because it's we're building a brand very uniquely and distinctively

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 1>where a challenger brand in a great category, and it's

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a great business and and we've been growing at double

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 1>digit now for literally for twenty years. So I knew

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:03.839
<v Speaker 1>he would he would be intrigued by the story. And

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it was just a wonderful meeting. And he's a sponge.

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>He's just so curious about anything in business. And and

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the conversation, the first one that we had about Brooks.

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 1>What about the conversation since I mean, how would you

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>characterize how much you're in touch with Warren Buffett? I mean,

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.720
<v Speaker 1>he even himself in the forward to your book, writes

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that Berkshire Hathaway has followed a dramatic hands off style

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in its operations, with only twenty five employees, well three

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty employees go about their jobs and the many dozens

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>of individual companies like hers. Yeah, so does he often

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>talk to him. I believe Berkshire must be one of

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the most unique corporate cultures in all the world. I

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>cut my teeth at Pillsbury, and in banking and and

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and then in in building brands like Brooks. But Berkshire

0:44:47.920 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is so unique. They never call in one sense. You know,

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they've described they have a very distinct acquisition strategy and

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:58.239
<v Speaker 1>investment strategy looking for great businesses. But once they buy

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the business, they don't. They don't require us to morph

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>our reporting around their needs. They take all of our

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:06.320
<v Speaker 1>reporting in the way we want to look at the

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>business and we share it with them. So so they

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>morphed to these hundreds some different businesses, We don't morph

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to them. And so the only require we send them

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>are quarterly reports and any report, much like any any

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>public company would do. And the only required conversation is

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 1>annual camp frankly and uh, and they they empower us

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:28.439
<v Speaker 1>to run the business. We love that we take full

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:33.399
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for everything that happens here, good and bad. And uh,

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't ask for a better home if you want

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to build a brand in It's wonderful. It's like our

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 1>lesson is we're always told like if you don't hear

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>from your bosses, that means you're doing your job and

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 1>that's good. So it's like it's when there's problems, that's

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 1>when they come. They come a knock and and they

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:50.799
<v Speaker 1>expect you to manage it and solve those problems. And

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 1>we know that, so it really works. Great. What did

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you learn in doing this book? Because it sounds like

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you know you obviously when you came to the company

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>was very different. It was, as I mentioned early, are

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 1>like on the brink of bankruptcy. A lot of different

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:07.320
<v Speaker 1>heads of companies. UM tell us about that journey. Yeah,

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason one of the reasons I wrote

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the book is Brooks is a is a fantastic challenger

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>brand story, and and we're in a great category. It's

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 1>global and running and every big platform brand some of

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the best brands in the world, from athletic footmar and apparel,

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:25.840
<v Speaker 1>from the outdoor industry, from fitness is doing running gear, shoes,

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>head to tell, and and obviously bras and jackets and

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:32.439
<v Speaker 1>everything else. So that's where we're competing. But I think

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in the world there are more challenger brands and there

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:38.719
<v Speaker 1>are leading category platform players, and so I wanted to

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 1>share this story because I think what we're doing is

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>has been a lot of fun, and it's we're building

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a great brand and a great company and uh and

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>hopefully there's other people that are involved in categories. Maybe

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 1>there are a challenger brand that will get some value

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>on it. That's Jim Weber, the CEO of Brooks Running.

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Next on our menu, Fame chef Danielle Blue on opening

0:46:57.640 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a new restaurant as the New York City restaurant See

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>opens up as well. This is Bloomberg broadcasting from the

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:11.719
<v Speaker 1>financial capital of the world, Bloomberg, Eleve and Frio in

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:16.319
<v Speaker 1>New York to Washington, d C Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:19.359
<v Speaker 1>one O six one to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine six

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to the country Sirius XM Channel one nine and around

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the globe, the Bloomberg Business and Bloomberg Radio dot Com.

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stenovan on Bloomberg Radio. The next guest

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 1>is definitely well known to our Bloomberg Business Week audience

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and community. I'm guests, and some of you have eaten

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:44.120
<v Speaker 1>at his establishments as well. We're talking about chef and

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 1>restaurant toward Danielle Bloo, owner of several restaurants in New

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>York City alone, and he's also got restaurants around the

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:54.439
<v Speaker 1>world in Singapore, Dubai also at Sea. Well, the good

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:57.280
<v Speaker 1>thing is that's the oldest spectrum of the market because

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I even a retail store like a Pistoi Bloom restaurant

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>daniel La Pabion, which is a year old Dismounts and

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Danielle is celebrating is twenty nine years. And of course

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the Grata being a distiw restaurant, as well as Babu

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Bully Suit that are also casual, more approachable. I think

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:17.439
<v Speaker 1>we have been. We have been having a very good

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 1>quarters and we are entering to a second quarter with

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:24.440
<v Speaker 1>very strong a lot of demand, a lot of private

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>dining as well. People are going out, people are spending,

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but no more than before or if they do it

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>because they really wanted to splurge on the missing things

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>they really missed. But we see the lunch coming back.

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:43.919
<v Speaker 1>The midtown business lunch are coming strong. But there's also

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that blend of business people and social people. People want

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to gather together and celebrates, and the buildings are filling

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>up more and more, and we see the activity inside.

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:58.960
<v Speaker 1>We see also in the amenity floors, so many people

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>come for lunch as much as in the restaurant. What

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:04.799
<v Speaker 1>about when it comes to finding employees, because we know

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 1>that's been so difficult for for many industries. How are

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you when it comes to staffing the restaurants? Well, that

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is um it is challenging. But we have a lot

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of young people coming to New York. A lot of

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:21.839
<v Speaker 1>people want to move back to New York, move back

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:24.959
<v Speaker 1>or move to New York because they see no opportunity

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to be part of this uh sort of new beginning again.

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>In New York and we see a lot of young

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 1>talents who maybe we aren't thinking of it and now

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 1>engaging a coming to New York. And we have also

0:49:39.000 --> 0:49:41.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of more people I think on the job

0:49:41.560 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>market coming. So it is perfect. No, we are trying

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to be very careful. It's a balance between the shift

0:49:48.920 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we operate and the amount of staff we have in

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>order to guarantee the quality of service and food. So

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you've seen a lot of cycles. And I think even

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>after nine eleven, right, people were really concerned about in

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 1>downtown New York in parts of New York and just

0:50:01.600 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it came back. And we've seen so many different cycles.

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And this wonderful grand city that is Manhattan, um in

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:11.359
<v Speaker 1>New York City, how would you put this cycle? Uh?

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:13.799
<v Speaker 1>And and then and kind of do you expect that

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 1>we get back to kind of the grand levels that

0:50:15.640 --> 0:50:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we saw pre pandemic. I think the worst part of

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the cycle is almost there. The bad part of this

0:50:24.920 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>cycle is when the RF came out and only distributed

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a third of restaurants a compensation to help them restart

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:38.759
<v Speaker 1>their business, and more than tutor that would say at

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:44.399
<v Speaker 1>one point four million restaurants never got anything and so this, uh,

0:50:44.600 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 1>this was this forced a lot of closure. This forced

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to so many business to not be able to reopen

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the business they had, it was impossible. And also you know,

0:50:57.239 --> 0:51:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the last three years to an apt year, the get

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:04.520
<v Speaker 1>good at the amount of lass that restaurant business had.

0:51:04.760 --> 0:51:07.759
<v Speaker 1>And I hope the government will do something about this

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:13.719
<v Speaker 1>very unfair sort of distribution that happened in our business. Well,

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>we talk a lot about people moving out of New

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:17.839
<v Speaker 1>York and we've also talked a lot about the way

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 1>that jobs have changed here in terms of remote and

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:24.919
<v Speaker 1>people not having to necessarily live in New York City

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:26.759
<v Speaker 1>to work here. Do you think New York City ever

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 1>comes back to levels, at least when it comes to employment,

0:51:29.680 --> 0:51:32.440
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the service industry that we saw

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a pre pandemic. Of course it will, because I think

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the transition of the home office situation will still last

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of years until there's really a settlement of balance

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:52.279
<v Speaker 1>between people's life and business necessity. But uh, and I

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:55.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of I mean, in our business,

0:51:55.160 --> 0:51:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the hospitality. If someone say about to work from home,

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna work. You're gonna have nobody's serving your meal.

0:52:01.360 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Right there are so many strains and stresses still on

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this industry, and I think about labor, certainly in labor

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>costs or just finding the workers you need, but also

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Danielle about just higher food costs. Are you able to

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:17.440
<v Speaker 1>pass all of that along to your customers. We try

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to be very very cautious on raising price as much

0:52:21.160 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>as we get hit every day with the rays of something.

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:27.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if he's not the land, the asparagus. If

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not the asparagus is the audi shows of course

0:52:29.719 --> 0:52:31.880
<v Speaker 1>they come off the show, come from California, that to

0:52:32.120 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 1>travel over the way to New York, and so we

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>get very creative and try to really work with our

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 1>local suppliers as much as possible. That's our conversation with

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:44.879
<v Speaker 1>chef Danielle Blue. Catch a full conversation. You can find

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that at business week dot com and Bloomberg dot com.

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:49.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg business Week. Coming up, what is

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:52.280
<v Speaker 1>widely considered the most important art show in the world

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and its new focus. This is the Spring Art auctions

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>get under way and Carol, they are getting price here

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 1>also getting assist from John A dive into the magazine's

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:13.239
<v Speaker 1>pursuit section. That's next This is Bloomberg. You're listening to

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. Every new Watch is like

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a new piece of arts. It has in different stories

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to tell the time. Wines as a whole really speak

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to that quintessential Need is the most powerful car made

0:53:30.440 --> 0:53:33.319
<v Speaker 1>in the US period. You get the beautiful interior, the

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>iconic design that's very cheek and posh. Even if you

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:39.879
<v Speaker 1>play for it, it's something that get. It is time

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg pursuits and joining us his arts columnist James Tarmi,

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:45.759
<v Speaker 1>who had a lot of work to do, because man,

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:48.439
<v Speaker 1>this section is all his nice job. By the way,

0:53:48.520 --> 0:53:49.839
<v Speaker 1>this is really good. I want to start with your

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>recent trip to Venice for the B and L A.

0:53:51.840 --> 0:53:56.719
<v Speaker 1>That's work. That is absolutely work, and I will continue

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to insist that it is. To whoever questions my fourth

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 1>coming expenses, What was it like being there? Because it

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:06.319
<v Speaker 1>was the first one in person since the pandemic? Right, yes,

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it was actually delayed a year, and I have to

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:12.279
<v Speaker 1>say that this was the most triumphantly successful being that

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I have been to in a decade. It was more

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:19.320
<v Speaker 1>art better art, more people than I have ever seen before.

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:23.200
<v Speaker 1>It was a real must see in a way that

0:54:23.719 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't overstate. All Right, I had never heard of it,

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>so I'm an idiot, so tell me that. Wow. All

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I could say is wow, listen, thank you for admitting that.

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me give you a brief over you

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be played over and over in a promo

0:54:38.120 --> 0:54:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and over. So so the being l is, as its

0:54:42.440 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 1>name implies, an event that occurs usually every two years.

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:47.399
<v Speaker 1>It was still late a year because of COVID, but

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:49.759
<v Speaker 1>this was the fifty nine edition of it. And what

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:52.960
<v Speaker 1>happens is there's this park on the southern tip of

0:54:53.960 --> 0:54:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the island called the Jardini and they're around thirty national

0:54:56.920 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>pavilions in thirty different countries UM put on their own

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:06.680
<v Speaker 1>contemporary art exhibitions. And it used to be a sort of,

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 1>um it sounds like an arts World fair, but anyway

0:55:09.200 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is and it's a way of kind

0:55:10.960 --> 0:55:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of stating kind of the your national identity. But it's

0:55:13.680 --> 0:55:16.560
<v Speaker 1>also a way of kind of putting forth, um, how

0:55:16.600 --> 0:55:20.560
<v Speaker 1>progressive and interesting your your country is in terms of

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the way it's it's a form of soft power effectively.

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And so then there's in conjunction with that, there is

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a colossal exhibition in two parts, one in this massive

0:55:30.400 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>pavilion in the Jardini and then the other in the Arsenale,

0:55:33.120 --> 0:55:36.480
<v Speaker 1>which was the place where Venice when it was a republic,

0:55:36.840 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 1>UH created its ships. It's a huge ship building factory. UM.

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And so there's it's I mean it's it's acres of

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:46.879
<v Speaker 1>of of space where you put art in. And then

0:55:46.960 --> 0:55:51.440
<v Speaker 1>there's also ancillary pavilions in the Arsenale, and then there's

0:55:51.680 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>literally hundreds of other exhibitions spread throughout the city. So

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you it is amazing, and so you see it all. Well,

0:55:59.239 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you need at least five days, usually six, I mean,

0:56:02.160 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 1>just to go through the main exhibition, which was curated

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 1>by New York I mean, she's Italian, but she's the

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:11.360
<v Speaker 1>she's the curator of the high Line UM to Chili Alamani.

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>She curated this time almost universally lauded, which never happens. UM,

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 1>just a real triumph. But you you need all this

0:56:22.239 --> 0:56:24.440
<v Speaker 1>time to go because you're walking through the city unless

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you're very, very rich. And then you have a private

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:31.120
<v Speaker 1>boat that you've hired for the week, which UH George

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Cluney and a Mall would definitely have their private boat.

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:36.359
<v Speaker 1>It's around two years an hour if you can get one,

0:56:36.520 --> 0:56:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and they just kind of sit outside whatever exhibition space

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you get on and take a different place

0:56:41.560 --> 0:56:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to place. But if you're spending tens of million dollars

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:46.360
<v Speaker 1>on art, then two hundred fifty years an hour is

0:56:46.400 --> 0:56:50.200
<v Speaker 1>like whatever. Yes, unfortunately I'm not and I didn't spend

0:56:50.239 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that was there was there a theme or like a takeaway?

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And maybe how different from the past. Yeah, so this

0:56:56.160 --> 0:56:58.759
<v Speaker 1>is actually what thank you for that leading, Carol, because

0:56:58.800 --> 0:57:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly whatever it might be too. I'm an idiot,

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:03.760
<v Speaker 1>but I can usually get people. I mean well, so,

0:57:03.760 --> 0:57:06.479
<v Speaker 1>so it's very very interesting to me, at least certain

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to anyone who's focused on the art market, is that

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:12.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a major preoccupation still with figured of painting,

0:57:12.600 --> 0:57:16.440
<v Speaker 1>which is say, painting of people the human form um

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and it in the contemporary market driven contemporary art market

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, it takes the form of um, figured of

0:57:25.440 --> 0:57:28.880
<v Speaker 1>painting of non white subjects. And this has been extremely

0:57:28.920 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 1>popular for let's say, the last six years in the market,

0:57:32.280 --> 0:57:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's been popular for longer kind of outside

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of that, but um, it's basically a product of people

0:57:37.920 --> 0:57:43.840
<v Speaker 1>realizing that non white, non male artists had basically been

0:57:43.920 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 1>left out of the art historical canon for centuries because

0:57:47.400 --> 0:57:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of intrinsic biases and institutions and collecting habits and so forth.

0:57:50.800 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So everyone sort of rushed to correct this. And the

0:57:53.600 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 1>easiest way of demonstrating that they are rushing to correct

0:57:56.200 --> 0:58:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it is a literal figure of the person who you're collecting. Um,

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And this bionale was a major transition away from that,

0:58:04.840 --> 0:58:06.920
<v Speaker 1>not and that it was a transition away from collecting

0:58:07.040 --> 0:58:11.520
<v Speaker 1>or emphasizing identity and the work of non white, non

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:15.240
<v Speaker 1>male artists, but a move away from figuration. People are saying, Okay,

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:18.920
<v Speaker 1>well maybe these people have more things to say about

0:58:19.520 --> 0:58:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the world than simply that they exist. And so it

0:58:22.680 --> 0:58:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is um in in many respects, and more sophisticated step forward.

0:58:27.400 --> 0:58:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And it could have major market implications. Um as the

0:58:32.680 --> 0:58:37.160
<v Speaker 1>art world can oftentimes dictate the trajectory of the art market.

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:42.200
<v Speaker 1>How did this theme manifest in gian Maria Sosati's piece

0:58:42.240 --> 0:58:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that wrote about yes, so the Italian pavilion is incredible. Uh,

0:58:46.480 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's around twenty square feet and it's this artist jem

0:58:51.760 --> 0:58:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Y to Saudi, as you say, who was said, by

0:58:54.520 --> 0:58:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, yes, practice really just trips off the tongue.

0:59:00.200 --> 0:59:03.880
<v Speaker 1>He uh sort of had could could do whatever he wanted,

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and he created the series of hunting Um industrial rooms

0:59:10.520 --> 0:59:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that were empty, so it was like a sweatshot lit

0:59:13.120 --> 0:59:16.680
<v Speaker 1>by fluorescent lights with sewing machines, just deserted. It looks freaky,

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 1>It is really freaky. And then at the end you

0:59:19.760 --> 0:59:24.040
<v Speaker 1>walk into this huge kind of warehouse and out onto

0:59:24.120 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 1>this nearly pitch black concrete pier where you then dimly

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 1>realized that you're surrounded by like black ice, cold water

0:59:32.080 --> 0:59:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and anyway. So so so it's this, there's no figuration.

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It's very very weird. So how does this sort of

0:59:39.640 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>new way I I don't necessarily want to say it's

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a new way of doing things, but on a scale

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like this, how does this translate to the market Because

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't really buy or transact in an experience like that, well,

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 1>even if you are worth billions of dollars. So that's

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a really great question. And there are ways of manifesting

0:59:59.760 --> 1:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>u conceptual ideas in in in art artistic ways that

1:00:07.280 --> 1:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't necessarily experiential. So um, there are UH artworks that

1:00:15.160 --> 1:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in very very very simplistic terms, can be

1:00:18.680 --> 1:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>abstract but have conceptual underpinnings. There are artworks which can

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>be figurative and UM have conceptual underpinnings. There are many

1:00:27.240 --> 1:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>different ways that you can create art that people can

1:00:31.560 --> 1:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>buy that isn't simply about the artists, and I think

1:00:34.760 --> 1:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that is something that we are increasingly going to be

1:00:38.760 --> 1:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing UM in the UH years ahead. I feel like

1:00:43.080 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the theme of it right will play out in works

1:00:46.000 --> 1:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of art that ultimately people will buy right like this,

1:00:48.440 --> 1:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>This this overarching theme. But it's a little grim though,

1:00:51.840 --> 1:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh it is grim. But you know, the thing is

1:00:54.200 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that some people are grim, some people are actually kind

1:00:57.480 --> 1:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of optimistic, but everyone's looking to the future. And that

1:00:59.840 --> 1:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>was what was a real change from from the art

1:01:03.720 --> 1:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>market and from years past. I have no easy segue,

1:01:06.160 --> 1:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but I gotta go there because I want to talk

1:01:07.520 --> 1:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>about the Devil Wears product, the musical, and I want

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Elton John because you have a story

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in Pursuits about this. Yes, this is wild, it is

1:01:17.000 --> 1:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's going to be heard it here first, folks.

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a major hit. So it's Elton

1:01:23.320 --> 1:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>John collaborated with Shana tab who's a lyricist and a

1:01:28.040 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>songwriter herself and um an author and a playwright, um

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and she is. She created Stuffs, which is right now

1:01:36.000 --> 1:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>at the Public Theater, which is like Hamilton's level hype

1:01:39.320 --> 1:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you just can't get a ticket tickets

1:01:41.720 --> 1:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or selling for like six hundred dollars over the price,

1:01:44.720 --> 1:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, big, big stuff. Anyway, she collaborated with all

1:01:48.880 --> 1:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>John to do Devil Wears Products the musical and um,

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the title sounds like it wouldn't be good, but you

1:01:55.040 --> 1:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>know it's going to be great. Well, I certainly hope. So.

1:01:58.280 --> 1:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>She she's a really ton haunted person. And Elton John

1:02:02.400 --> 1:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is John. He does pretty well, but he does Okay,

1:02:05.800 --> 1:02:08.439
<v Speaker 1>he does Okay, Um, so it's going to be really big.

1:02:08.480 --> 1:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>And so the whole thing is them translating the movie,

1:02:11.600 --> 1:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>which everyone has very strong feelings about, onto stage and

1:02:15.680 --> 1:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>making it feel fresh. Okay, we only have a couple

1:02:17.520 --> 1:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of They do make it fresh, but you're gonna have

1:02:18.960 --> 1:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to read it to find out. Why. I want to

1:02:20.640 --> 1:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>talk books here because it's not too early for us

1:02:22.760 --> 1:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to start thinking about summer reads. You've got some great fiction,

1:02:25.200 --> 1:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>some great nonfiction, in here. Um, David Sedaris is still

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>spinning yarns. Yeah he is, and he's got a lot

1:02:32.560 --> 1:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of houses. I had no idea he's made so much money.

1:02:34.920 --> 1:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Is really rich and frankly, you know, like if if

1:02:40.000 --> 1:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you are, if you follow his writing, Um, you know,

1:02:43.040 --> 1:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>he spent a lot of time at the beginning of

1:02:45.160 --> 1:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>his career talking about what it's like to be poor.

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Now he's just sort of kind of unabashedly uh, describing

1:02:51.800 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the Picasso that he bought it, so the bees which

1:02:54.800 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>house is he going to put it in there? Well,

1:02:56.520 --> 1:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you know that's a great question, because he did just

1:02:58.440 --> 1:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>buy a second apartment on in his Upper East Side

1:03:02.000 --> 1:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>co op. I guess, um, because he didn't want to

1:03:05.400 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>hear it's kind of convoluted. But his long term boyfriend,

1:03:08.680 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>he calls me his boyfriend, but they've been together for decades. Uh,

1:03:13.040 --> 1:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Hugh is like learning the piano, really learning the piano,

1:03:17.320 --> 1:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and one of them didn't want to be around the

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>other when they were practicing, so we just bought another

1:03:21.000 --> 1:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>apartment above him so that he could hide. Um. It's

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it's stuff like this, but you know it's still hilarious. Um.

1:03:28.160 --> 1:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of really good jokes that

1:03:30.480 --> 1:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I cannot tell you on air, um, but they are phenomenal.

1:03:34.080 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of other books, uh, covering so

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>many different topics. Thank you so much. Glad you had

1:03:38.800 --> 1:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a great trip, and I'm glad you shared it with

1:03:40.240 --> 1:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>all of it. Thank you so much for having me.

1:03:41.680 --> 1:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>All Right, that's our our columnist James Tarmy, and that

1:03:44.520 --> 1:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>are ups up the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week

1:03:46.440 --> 1:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. Thanks so much for joining us. I'm

1:03:48.600 --> 1:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and I'm Tim Stanovk. Be sure to tune

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>into Bloomberg Business Week Monday through Friday. It starts at

1:03:53.240 --> 1:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>two pm Wall Street Time on Bloomberg Radio. You can

1:03:55.600 --> 1:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>also watch your daily broadcast check it out on YouTube.

1:03:58.240 --> 1:04:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Just searched Bloomberg Global News and got our Bloomberg Business

1:04:00.960 --> 1:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Week podcast. You can find it at Bloomberg dot com, Apple,

1:04:03.520 --> 1:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcast. Bloomberg Business Week is

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>available on newsstands now at Bloomberg dot com, business Week

1:04:08.680 --> 1:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and always on the Bloomberg terminal, And you

1:04:11.000 --> 1:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>can also see me on Bloomberg Quick Take available at

1:04:13.080 --> 1:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, slash qut and streaming platforms like Roku,

1:04:16.400 --> 1:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV, Samsung TV, and more. Have a great weekend.

1:04:19.080 --> 1:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Everyone ready to buy smart Yeah, if it's you know,

1:04:22.320 --> 1:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, not too expensive budget art. Yeah, not the

1:04:25.000 --> 1:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's Incursued's all right, this is Bloomberg.