WEBVTT - Eli Lilly, Morphic Deal, Delta Earnings

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 3>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big business

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>stories impacting Wall Street and the global marketings.

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at why Microsoft and Apple have dropped

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>plans to take board seats at OpenAI.

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Plus, we'll discuss research from bloom Intelligence on ten companies

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 3>to watch during the third.

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 2>Quarter, But first we dive into the pharmaceutical space. This week,

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Eli Lilly reread to buy US gut drug maker Morphic

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>for about three point two billion dollars.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Lily will pay fifty seven dollars a share in cash,

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>and this comes as eli Lilly's CEO, Dave Riggs, has

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 3>promised more early stage deals to acquire new technologies.

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 2>For more on all of this, we were joined by

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Sam Fazzelli, Bloomberg Intelligence, Director of Research for Global Industries

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 2>and Senior Pharmaceuticals.

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Sam about his thoughts on this deal.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 4>This deal is about adding to their immunology franchise. Of course,

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 4>everybody knows Lily for the endless the headlines that are

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 4>related to GLP ones and obesity and cancer. Today we

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 4>have apparently ten cancers that are not cured but risk

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 4>is reduced with those types of drugs. But the reality

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 4>is there's a lot more to this company before the

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 4>GLP one business ballooned with regards to obesity. And one

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 4>of the areas they're in is immunology or otherwise known

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 4>as immunology and inflammation or inflammation and immunology I and

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 4>I and I and I is also a very attractive

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 4>area because these are areas where we all have issues

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:15.399
<v Speaker 4>with arthritis, psoriasis, Crow's disease, if elamentary bowel disease. All

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 4>these things are stuff that we have been suffering from

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 4>for years. Obsitly probably increases the risk too. So there've

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 4>been a very active company in that space with three

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 4>drugs four drugs on the market already and they've been

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 4>doing deals adding to it.

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 2>SAM three point two billion dollars is not a big,

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 2>big deal for Lily, But is this typical of what

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>we see at a big pharmer companies in terms of

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 2>if they see a therapeutic or just a piece of

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 2>science as interesting to them, it's better to buy than develop.

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 4>Internally, I would say they're around thirty to forty percent

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 4>of pharmaceutical companies pipelines comes from this type of interaction, either.

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 5>An m and a deal. I e.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Bought the whole thing lock stock and Barrel I license

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 4>a specific product in this case.

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 5>So I'm looking at Lily. We have a database.

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 4>Of of course, we have the MAA function in the

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg terminal, but we've taken that and dissected a little

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 4>bit more and added on the BI dashboard and detail

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 4>about the types of drugs that are in those deals,

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 4>and MNA is one of that.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 5>So I'm looking at twelve deals that Lily has done

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 5>in the.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Past five years, and I'd say that only like three

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 4>of them are in the cardiovascular metabolic space, I either

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 4>of diabetes obesity. The rest are oncology CNS, and of

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 4>course two are inflammation and immunology, and this is one

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 4>of them.

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 5>So now it becomes three, right because that's not quite

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 5>updated yet. And they're all in that sort of range

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 5>eight billion for lockso one point one eight hundred eighty million,

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 5>two point four billion, So we've got a good bunch

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 5>of deals and they're all in that level which the

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 5>farmer company is called Bolton Acquisitions, and that's their sweet

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 5>spot of M and A.

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 2>See how everybody thinks that the smart people in bi

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 2>pharma healthcare researcher guys people like Sam faz Elliot, that's

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>not really the case. It's this young lady named Grace

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 2>and she's crazy and she maintains a world class model

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 2>that tracks the millions of drugs that are in various

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 2>stages of you know, reviews around the world, and clients

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 2>put huge value on that work that she does, and

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 2>that allows Sam and some of the other animals to

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 2>go out there and talk about these drugs. So Grace,

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>great job.

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 3>As always, we love the Paul shout out.

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 4>That was awesome, so true, and he needs this particular

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.559
<v Speaker 4>shout out goes to another great lady who's called Mila

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Mila ban who's also part of our team.

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 5>But nobody matches up to Grace. Of course, Grace has

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 5>been in the catlist.

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Calendar that should I don't match up to her, nobody matches.

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 5>On to her.

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So based on that, what are some of the

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 3>cool things that are out there, like cool drugs that

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 3>we should be talking about. We never get to talk

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 3>to you when there's no crisis, really, so what are

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 3>some cool things out there?

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So obviously the OBC space, there's there's breakneck evolution

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 4>of different modalities being combined, trying to make it much

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 4>more focused on fat, preserving some muscle, making it work

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 4>better for the liver part of the disease. And that's

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 4>all going to come to fruition over the next two

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 4>or three years. Oncology, as have been saying all along,

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 4>is seeing amazing developments. You know, we're developing these disease hubs,

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 4>as you might know, and just for lung cancer, we're

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 4>developing almost thirteen different subgroupings of lung cancer, and it

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 4>just shows you where treatment.

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 5>Of these diseases have got to.

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 4>And the same applies in inflammation and immunology, and in

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 4>that space we're dealing with technology that is really cool.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 4>This particular acquisition and the one that they recently did

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 4>almost exactly a year ago, called dice therapeutics are all

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 4>about dealing with proteins that are very intractable to inhibition

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 4>and normal drug discovery, and these two companies have developed

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 4>oral drugs, small molecules that interact with these targets.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 5>The beauty of this, of course, is you remember all

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 5>that worry that what.

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 4>People were having about what happens with the IRA inflection

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 4>reduction actions and its impact on small molecule development, because

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 4>it specifically puts them out saying after nine years, irrespective

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 4>of your patterns, we're going to come back in and

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 4>negotiate prices. Well, here's Lily who's done two deals that

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 4>are specifically small molecule deals. When the biology is interesting,

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 4>when the drugs are interesting, I think the deals happen. Now,

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 4>whether these will get to market or not, who knows.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 4>I mean, pharma isn't infallible when it comes.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 5>To these deals.

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 4>But at this shows that when they they see something interesting,

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 4>they go for it, irrespective of small or big.

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Molecule sam People are, for better or worse, are living

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>longer and longer lives. Which makes every family seems like

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 2>it's dealing with some type of dementia, Alzheimer's and things

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>like that. How does the farmer industry, healthcare austry, how

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 2>do they think about that? How are they kind of

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 2>getting ready for that?

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so you know the beginnings. Can I just give

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 5>you an example.

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 4>An analogue for Alzheimer's disease is obesity.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 5>We've been at this obesity.

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 4>Game for a year, ten years, fifteen years, twenty years.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 4>I remember one of the old drugs from Rush Pharmaceuticals

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 4>that's still around, called ally that reduced the amount of

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 4>fat you absorb as you eat. Of course, what does

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 4>that create? Fat left in your stomach, lubrication. I'm going

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 4>to leave the rest of it to your imagination, right, So,

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 4>that was the idea that was going to be helping

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 4>you lose weight maybe three percent, four percent, five percent.

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 4>And then it took a lot of time before somebody

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 4>started discovering these things saying, oh, gosh, we can get

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 4>to fifteen twenty percent. If you're a two hundred and

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 4>fifty pound person, we can help you drop seventy pounds.

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 5>That happened in obesity.

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm hopeful that the same happens in dementia and neurodegeneratic diseases.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 5>It's very much tougher.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, all biology is tough, but CNS is tougher

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 4>because it's a black box. It's a disease that evolves

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 4>over twenty years, thirty years, and by the time you

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 4>your disease manifests, you've already had a lot of organic

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 4>change to your brain. But there is the first products

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 4>that are approved. With the first products approved, you do

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 4>get a bit more incentive to develop the next one.

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Go better, go another mile further. And that's where I'm hoping.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 4>At the very least in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's, we're

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 4>going to be going there.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 5>Other diseases are a bit tougher.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Still, do you think that we'll ever have a preventative

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 3>drug for Alzheimer's or just a treatment to.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Delay well, I think it's very tough to prevent because

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 4>how do you know who's going to get it? That

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 4>means you and I especially I, because you guys are

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 4>much longer than me. Paul is he's just coming out

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 4>of school, right, So at what point do you start

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 4>taking these drugs?

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 5>Right? How do I do that? So that becomes difficult?

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 5>Who pays for it?

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 4>And if they're preventative, how long do I have to

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 4>take them before I know?

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean, how do you even do a trial there?

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 4>So don't forget though in Alzheimer's disease, you can go

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 4>into the early mild dementia and try and slow down

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 4>the disease. But step at the time, at a step

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 4>at the time, and I think we'll have something. Might

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 4>take a decade or two, but hopefully we'll have them.

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Is this something if we see announcements on this front,

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>will likely be, you know, the big farmer companies that

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 2>you cover, making and acquisitions of some of these smaller

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 2>companies that are just focused on this one particular thing.

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Probably, and don't forget that also, the large farmer companies.

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, then the two drugs that we have on

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 4>the market today, let can be and I forget what

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 4>the nanamaps call. It has just been approved, so I

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 4>can't remember his A branded name I'm sorry, Illily. They

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 4>both came from within either the farmer company or the

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 4>a Japanese partner. However, in the case of the can

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 4>be that came from a Scandinavian biotech So both of

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 4>these are true. The question is who's got the firepower,

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 4>the money to spend the billions required to develop these

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 4>That's often ends up being a farmer company.

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 5>It's the large farmer companies.

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you feel like, no matter who gets to be

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 3>president in here in November, here in the US, are

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 3>we going to see massive drug pushback? Like I realized

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 3>it's probably a campaign tactic. But President Biden coming out

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 3>last week and talking about how all the things were

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 3>so expensive and really blaming like Novo Nordous. He wrote

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 3>an app that with Bernie Sanders in USA today, what

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 3>do you.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Think I think this is a hot potato. I don't

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 4>think they are aiming their guns at the right group

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 4>of companies. I think you could always argue that drug

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 4>pricing because it's the easiest thing. It's a drug that

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 4>people have to buy, and it says Lily on it right, is.

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 5>Difficult for some people. A lot of people can't afford them.

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 4>But there's a lot of middlemen that need to be

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 4>looked at to where the increasing cost comes from. And

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 4>you know what, the best way to entice people to

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 4>develop obcity drugs, to bring down the price, to bring

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 4>up competition is to allow the market to do his job.

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 4>The market will do it already. These things are not

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 4>costing tenth one thousand dollars a month.

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 5>We're more. You're closer to five hundred net.

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 4>Let the market to the job, bring more drugs on

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 4>the volume goes up, you can drop the price.

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Sam Fazzelli, Bloomberg Intelligence, director of Research

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>for Global Industries and senior pharmaceuticals analysts.

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we're going to break down Delta airline earnings

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and what they mean for summer travel.

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 2>We're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 2>their research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 2>b I go on the terminal on Paul Sweeney.

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 3>And I am Alex Steel and this is Bloomberg.

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Car Playing and

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or just live on YouTube.

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 3>We moved now to big tech. This week we heard

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 3>that Microsoft and Apple drop plans to take board roles

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 3>at open Ai.

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a surprise decision that comes as regulators in the

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 2>US and Europe have expressed concerns about microsoft sway over

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 2>open Ai.

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 3>For more, we were joined by man Deep saying Bloomberg

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence and your tech industry analysts. We first asked man

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Deep for some more context on the story.

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 6>I mean, if you roll back to last year when

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 6>we had the open Ai drama, you know, the board

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 6>firing Sam Altman and then open Ai adding four new members,

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 6>and I think everyone so far has been just sort

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 6>of interested in how open ai has evolved since then

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 6>in the sense that they have even though they have

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 6>added independent board members. Microsoft, you know, and now Apple

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 6>probably would have joined the board. It doesn't make sense,

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 6>like when you have vested interests. In the case of

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 6>Micro they have a forty nine percent stake in open

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 6>ai and they're the primary cloud provider for open Ai.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 6>How can you do a good job of being an

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 6>independent board member and That's where you know the regulatory

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 6>scrutiny comes into play, because the regulators obviously are concerned

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 6>about how Microsoft bought inflection Ai, even though it wasn't

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 6>an acquisition, they got all the employees of inflection Ai.

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Breakdown for me again, what the relationship is now with

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 3>open ai and Apple versus open Ai and Microsoft.

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 6>So Microsoft has a forty nine percent stake in open Ai.

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 6>They made a ten billion dollar investment, and so you

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 6>could argue, if you're an investor in a company, you

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 6>should get a board set as a Sequoia and some

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 6>other private investors that open Ai has. Apple, on the

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 6>other hand, just partnered with open ai, which is going

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 6>to be one of the providers of Genai model on

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 6>their iOS and other devices, and so it's more of

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 6>a custustomer supplier relationship if you want to call it

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 6>that way. That Apple is using open ee as a supplier,

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 6>why were they getting a board seat. Well, you could

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 6>argue they could be an independent board member like Fijisimo

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 6>is one of the board members for open Ei. She's

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 6>the CEO of Instacart. Now, I think that's where the

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 6>fact that these technologies are so intertwined in terms of

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 6>AI being deployed on Apple devices, you could argue the

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 6>independence of the board comes into question, and given how

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 6>important AI ethics and guardrails and all the things that

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 6>regulators care about that everyone cares about, frankly, I think

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 6>the independence of the board was questionable and these companies

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 6>decided to proactively not join the board, which I think

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 6>is good for optics.

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>So Microsoft is under scrutiny in Europe and by US

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 2>regulators into I guess, their alleged dominance of AI. What's

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the view on the street about that risk to Microsoft?

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know because at some point maybe Apple

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 2>one on it, but certainly Microsoft.

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the best way to look at it is

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 6>these companies require a lot of compute for training their models,

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 6>whether it's open ai and Tropic, any of the independent

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 6>GENI model providers, they need a lot of compute. Now,

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 6>in the case of Microsoft, the arrangement is really you know,

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 6>full of their interest because open ai ends up using

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 6>Microsoft Compute for training their models.

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean? What is compute?

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 6>So think of all the Nvidia GPUs that open ai needs,

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 6>but it's deployed on Microsoft Cloud. So if I need

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 6>compute to train the models. I'm not setting up my

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 6>data center and tropic open ai. They're not setting up

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 6>data centers. They're using Microsoft data centers to get access

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 6>to that compute. And that's where they could have gone

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 6>to Amazon or Google to get that compute. The reason

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 6>they're going to Microsoft is because of the you know,

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 6>the stake they have and the board seed And so

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 6>if you are open ai and Microsoft is sitting in

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 6>that board, are you really going to pick any of

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 6>the alternative cloud providers for training your models? Probably not.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Do you feel like open ai will ever go public

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.479
<v Speaker 3>or be bought by Microsoft? Like, how does that situation

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 3>play out?

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean, everyone knows their antitrust concerns around bit tech

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 6>buying any of these companies, So the acquisition is definitely

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 6>out of the window. And that's why the way Microsoft

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 6>got all the employees of Inflection Ai, it was a

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 6>pseudo acquisition. You get all of the employees, you pay

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 6>six hundred million dollars, and you're not calling it an acquisition.

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 6>So in the case of OpenAI, obviously that's not going

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 6>to happen, but they Microsoft does have a forty nine

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 6>percent stake. Google bought DeepMind for six hundred million. Now

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 6>they bought it, you know, a few years back. But

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 6>it just goes to show how, you know, these companies

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 6>positioned themselves for the future and they end up buying

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the startups. So I don't see an

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 6>acquisition on the cards. But my open ai is unique

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.479
<v Speaker 6>in the sense it's a nonprofit and then they are

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 6>looking to build a business out of it. So their

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 6>structure was sort of very weird to begin with. And

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 6>now they had that board trouble where it was a

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 6>three percent board that fired their CEO. Now they're expanding

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 6>with independent board members. So I don't think they've got

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 6>it right still, but at least, you know, not having

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 6>Microsoft and Apple on the board is good in terms

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 6>of optics. And that's what I can conclude here.

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to man Deep Sing, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Tech industry.

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Analyst, we moved next to the airline industry. This week.

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Delta Airlines reported worse than expected quarterly results, and the

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 3>airline also said that domestic carriers are struggling to fill

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 3>planes during the summer travel See in.

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.479
<v Speaker 2>For more on this. We were joined by George Ferguson,

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.719
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior aerospace, defense, and airlines generalists.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 3>We first asked George for his take on Delta's recent

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 3>earnings report.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 7>What we do know is that the weakest part of

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 7>the business right now appears to be sort of basic

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 7>economy or those economy classes, and that's weighing it down.

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 7>So actually, I expect that Delta's earnings report will be

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 7>better than most this quarter. So I think it'll get

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 7>worse and worse as you get into the low costs

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 7>and ultra low cost carriers, because again that's I think

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 7>where the majority of the pain is in fairs.

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because you know, going through the quarter, like corporate

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 3>travel rose thirteen percent for Delta in the second quarter.

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Revenue from international passengers also increased, and premium products just

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 3>ten percent. So basically, business people are traveling, we're going

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 3>overseas and we're buying business class or first class, So

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 3>like is no one going to Idaho and economy people

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 3>are going.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 7>They're just they're going for lower fares right there. Load

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 7>factors were great on Delta, right they were like a

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 7>eighty seven percent, So they're filling airplanes as well as

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 7>they filled the year prior. I think, you know, Delta

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 7>will get a bit of a tailwind as business comes back.

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 7>That you know, that tailwin applies that Delta United American,

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 7>the big business airlines management always paints a really nice

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 7>picture of how everything is going. But every market but

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 7>Atlantic showed lower yields year of a year and yields

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 7>the price of the customer pace per mile they fly.

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 7>So to me, that's synonymous with fares. So what I

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 7>saw was weaker fares that were really bad. Into Latin

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 7>America down I think it was twelve percent or something

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 7>like that. They're down a couple percent for the domestic market.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 7>Into Europe it was up up one percent. But if

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 7>you do it on a unit revenue basis, I don't

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 7>want to get too complicated about how that works, but

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 7>let's just say that factors in load factors there it

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 7>was down. And so what that's telling me is that

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 7>they're having a harder time filling airplanes going across to

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 7>Europe at the price point they want to fill. So

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 7>they notched back a little bit how full those airplanes were.

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 7>So I generally think, you know, from a revenue standpoint,

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 7>not boting well at all for the rest of the

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 7>airlines they're going to report. I didn't see any sort

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 7>of silver lining, you know, for three Q. I just

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 7>it looks like a weakening market to me.

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 2>So talk to us about capacity out there, George. I

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 2>thought that there's some capacity constraints out there which might

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 2>push fares higher because maybe Boeing wasn't delivering as many

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 2>aircraft that they want, maybe even airbus as well, So

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 2>the airlines didn't have as many aircraft as they really needed.

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 2>What is the capacity of the industry these days?

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So I think that's a narrative that's definitely been

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 7>going around the street, and I think that's pushed you know,

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 7>some investment in airlines. So we just really we haven't

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 7>seen that, right. I think there's a there's a couple

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 7>of things that are kind of working against that, and

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 7>I think one, I think US airlines in particular have

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 7>been taking plenty of deliveries they are prioritized by by Boeing. Right,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 7>Boeing sort of lost business in China. China has been

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 7>so I don't even know if China needs as many

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 7>airplanes as Boeing used to send to them, but they

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, they went around and got a bunch of

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 7>orders from Southwest, United Alaska and Boeing had been feeding

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 7>them airplanes before we had the you know that some

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 7>of the problems earlier this year with the Alaska you know.

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Flight you know.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 7>So that means most of the US airlines had the

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 7>airplanes they expected. We saw Delta. They added I think

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 7>five percent more seats and available seat miles they added

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 7>eight percent. When we look at this market, we see

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 7>in both two Q and three Q additions kind of

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 7>in that five five percent, six percent, seven percent range

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 7>for seats and domestics, seats in Latin America, seats going

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 7>into Europe, and that's well above GDP growth rates. And

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 7>so what I think also is going on here is

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 7>if you were an airline and you thought this bounce

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.959
<v Speaker 7>back travel post pandemic, Hey, there's all this pent up demand,

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 7>they're all going to fly this summer and it's going

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 7>to be growth greater than GDP. I think you were wrong. Right.

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 7>We're basically saying we think growth in travel is recoupling

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 7>with GDP like it was prior to the pandemic. And

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 7>you can't add five percent seats to this market. The

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 7>US market isn't growing that fast.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 3>What part of any of this? And you kind of

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of answered it. It's just also tough comps because

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 3>we were expecting the scenario that you just lined out.

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean, another thing we've put together recently, it's on

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 7>the Bloomberg terminal under a bi space AI r LN

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 7>dashboard and EROG dashboard. We looked at return on invested capital.

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 7>We looked at margins at US and global airlines and

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 7>you know they did you know, they did better last year,

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 7>but if you look at last year, those margins weren't

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 7>pre pandemic margins. I mean, Delta is a bit of

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 7>a standout. Their returns in invested capital are doing better

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 7>than a lot of their competitors, and at Bastian called

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 7>that out a bunch of times today on the call,

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 7>of course, but most airlines in the US market are

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 7>not getting returns in invested capitol or margins like they

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 7>were in you know, prior to the pandemic. So it

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 7>is a tougher copy that's coming out of the pandemic.

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 7>But this is not the airline industry we saw in

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 7>the past decade. And that's because we got record revenues.

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 7>But those pilots took a big chunk right when they

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 7>got their twenty percent increases and the airlines aren't pricing

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 7>to get that back our.

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to George ferguson Bloomberg Intelligence, senior aerospace, defense and

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 2>airlines analysts.

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on the program, we take a deep dive

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 3>into hydrogen and why it's important as we move towards

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 3>the green future.

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 2>They're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 2>b I go on the terminal upfull Sweening.

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Alex Steel and this is Bloomberg.

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am staring on applecar Play and Android

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence recently put out research on ten companies to

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 3>watch for in the third quarter of twenty twenty four,

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 3>and for more on the list. We were joined by

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Tim craighead Bloomberg Intelligence, a global Chief Content officer.

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Who first asked Tim about a couple of the companies

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 2>we should be watching for it in three Q.

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 8>I'll give you a smidge of a backdrop on this,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 8>if that's okay to put it into context. These are

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 8>all part of what we call our focus ideas, which

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 8>is a list of companies that we have a strong

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 8>point of view on fundamentally that we think is different

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 8>from what the market currently believes, and there's catalysts ahead

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 8>to hopefully turn the market towards our view. The thing

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 8>that sets these ten off is that they all have

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 8>catalysts coming up in the third quarter. A lot the

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 8>ten companies to watch for this quarter, and I guess

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 8>the first group that you have to start. It seems

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 8>like with any conversation these days is AI, and there's

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 8>certainly a couple of AI related ideas here, even though

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 8>Nvidia is not on the list. Corning.

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 5>Oh interesting, visit fiber optic cable.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 8>You can't have AI going through all of these data

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 8>centers if you can't connect the data centers together. And interestingly,

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 8>with fiber optic cable, there was actually a down cycle

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 8>over the course of the past year where there was

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 8>excess inventory and this, that and the other, with some

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 8>telco build related to five G that sort of has

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 8>worked its way through, and we expect data center build

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 8>out to really drive demand for fiber optic cables going forward,

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 8>allah the potential for positive surprise. There's another one called THCHK.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 8>My guess is you've never heard of this one. It's

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 8>a machinery company out at Japan and they have a

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 8>fifty percent share in something called, now I'm going to

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 8>make sure I pronounce it correctly, linear motion guide rails.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 8>And you're saying, what, Yeah, if if you think about

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 8>how you picture semiconductors being manufactured, there's the equipment that

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 8>buzzes across and etches these patterns into silicon. The rails

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 8>that they run on are these things, and they have

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.679
<v Speaker 8>a fifty share, So.

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 3>It's it's like the things.

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so you know these are things that you can't

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 8>do AI unless you have these things. So we're looking

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 8>for those types of opportunities. You could you could draw

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.199
<v Speaker 8>a little bit of a further sort of second or

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 8>third degree connection with Sandvik. This is another machinery company

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 8>based in Scandinavia. Fifty percent of their business is mining related,

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 8>and you're saying, what, well, the current hot topics these days,

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 8>and mining, among others is copper, and we're seeing a

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 8>capex cycle in copper. You can't dig and mine copper

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 8>without Sandi's stuff, so it's another adjunct play on AI.

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 5>So those are a couple of things.

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 2>I like this. I mean that that's I like the

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 2>way you guys are thinking about this, you know, kind

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 2>of by the you know, kind of the tools of

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 2>AI as supposed to be, you know, kind of the

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 2>direct plays here. Another one is that I think about

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the Olympics in Paris this summer, and I think it's

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 2>going to be just just a monster monster event. Fingers crossed.

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 2>Everything goes well, but that's good for all the companies

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 2>associated with the Olympics. You've got one here, Nike. Talk

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 2>to us about that.

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So Nike's interesting. You've got the Olympics coming up.

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 8>They've got new product that's going to be displayed there

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 8>and promoted there with all the advertisement and visibility that

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 8>happens running shoes like the new pegasusts.

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 5>There's other products as well.

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 8>They've lagged for two years in innovation, and Puma and

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 8>Adidas have taken share. You might remember we've talked about

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 8>Adidas before where we had a focus idea that Puna

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 8>mcgoyl was behind. She since closed that shifted gears towards

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 8>Nike because she sees market share recovery with Nike because

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 8>they finally got on board with some new innovation. So

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 8>interesting story there, and I would say similarly, you could

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 8>kind of throw into the same bucket Galaxy, which is

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 8>one of the big casino operators in Macau who think

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 8>about innovation and new product. They opened a big new

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 8>phase of their Cotai based resort and they're starting to

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 8>gain market share and summer is the big season for

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 8>travel China. Travel is back up, and there's a big

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 8>story there that again revolves around new product innovation, right time,

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 8>right place.

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 3>What do you also have on the list which is

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 3>interesting is our age? This is restoration hardware? Is that

0:28:58.600 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 3>what this is?

0:28:59.800 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, because the corn wasn't that good, right, and like

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 3>their stuff is so expensive but in a downturn, that

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 3>feels a little hard to.

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Swallow a discount. You can't get a sales.

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, even the outlets store at Industry City, which is

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 3>they've outlet stores in Brooklyn and stuff is just insanely expensive.

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 3>You can get something for good quality that's not going

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 3>to be like eight grand for like a table. I

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, so you're playing into the idea here, Alex, and

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 8>I am going to date myself. I remember being an

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.479
<v Speaker 8>equity research salesperson back at Goldman on the day and

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 8>we were doing the IPO for restoration hardware, and I

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 8>remember traveling around with management. But that's another story. RH

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 8>is one of our cautious ideas, along with HCA, the

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 8>big US hospital company, as well as Nintendo the gaming

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 8>software electronics company. We do have negative focus ideas as

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 8>well as positive focus ideas. And the thing with RH

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 8>management guidance and still consensus is guiding for a recovery

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 8>from what you're just talking about. But now, withstanding the

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 8>resilient US consumer, we still expect the recovery that's anticipated

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 8>to disappoint, you know, for int, your sales last year,

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 8>we're disappointing, notwithstanding the consumer, and we think a recovery

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 8>is going to be delayed and expectations are going to

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 8>be cut again.

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 5>So that's that one.

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 2>That's on the cautious side, right Yeah, Okay.

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:33.479
<v Speaker 8>Yes, indeed, I would throw out similarly in terms of

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 8>we think overly optimistic expectations. And Nintendo obviously totally different story,

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 8>but we all know game Boy and Switch and.

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 6>Things like that.

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 8>Boy yeah, yeah, going back in the day. But you

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 8>know their current console is the Switch and there is

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 8>a new console coming out called Switch too. And Paul,

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 8>you know from your background these console stories are big deals,

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 8>whether it be for Nintendo or Microsoft or what have you.

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 8>This one is sort of like waiting for Goodough.

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 5>We hit that point. We thought.

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 8>We've been thinking they were going to announce a date,

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 8>but it still is yet to come, and we think

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 8>it causes room for disappointment relative to where consensus expectations

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 8>are still setting our.

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Tim Craig at Bloomberg Intelligence, Chief Global Content Officer,

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 2>we have something here.

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 3>At Bloomberg called Bloomberg New Energy Finance. The idea behind

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 3>it is to provide data on commodities, power, transport, industries,

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 3>buildings and agricultural plus new technology.

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 2>This week we looked at hydrogen and why it's important

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 2>as we move towards a green future.

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 3>For more. We were joined by Martin Tangler Bloomberg, THENEF

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 3>head of hydrogen Research, and we asked him first to

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 3>break down what green hydrogen.

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 9>Is green hydrogen is one way of producing hydrogen via electrolysis.

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 9>So that's splitting water into oxygen and hydrogen using green electricity.

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 9>So that's what green hydrogen is.

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 2>So explain to us where the technology green hydrogen? Where

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 2>are we in terms of the development of this technology.

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so this is a really it's an old technology.

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 9>At its core. We've used it for more than one

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.959
<v Speaker 9>hundred years. We've done electrolysis of breaking up water molecules

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 9>into hydrogen oxygen. What's new, though, is that this time

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 9>we want to use green electricity in order to reduce

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 9>the emissions from the production of what's called gray hydrogen.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 9>Gray hydrogen being hydrogen made from fossil fuels without any

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 9>capturing of the resulting CO two, which is how we

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 9>might make the vast majority of the hydrogen today, and

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 9>many countries, many governments have been incentivizing the production of

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 9>green and sometimes also so called blue hydrogen that's gray

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 9>with carbon capture and storage attached to that, so that

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 9>we can decarbonize a deproduction of the gray hydrogen that

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 9>we already produced today one hundred millions. It's a lot

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.959
<v Speaker 9>of hydrogen we make. And also to use hydrogen in

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 9>some other sectors to decarbonize things like steel production for example,

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 9>or shipping where it's really hard to do electrification.

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Why do we want hydrogen? It is very expensive to split.

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 3>It is more expensive if you are going to split

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 3>a hydrogen and oxygen using renewable energy. So why do

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 3>we want it? What's the end product? So awesome?

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so we want it, as I've said, in order

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 9>to reduce emissions. That's the only reason honestly. Today, making

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 9>green hydrogen, as you said, Alex, is more expensive than

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 9>making gray hydrogen, and in turn, making gray hydrogen is

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 9>more expensive than using fossil fuels because hydrogen is made

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 9>gray hydroen is made from those fossil fuels. So we

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 9>only use hydrogen in sectors where it is required for

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 9>the chemical properties of it today, so that's production of fertilizers,

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 9>things like ammonia NH three. You cannot make NH three

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 9>without putting H in there. Right, same goes for all refining.

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 9>You need hydrogen and for future as I've said, we're

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 9>going to need it for sectors that are going to

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 9>be really hard to decarbonize using electrification. For example, it's

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 9>really hard to run a ship that runs across half

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 9>the world on batteries, you just don't have enough batteries.

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 9>Batteries are too heavy, they take up too much space.

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 9>We need something denser, and one way we could do that,

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 9>for example, is to combine hydrogen and nitrogen into ammonia

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 9>or hydrogen carbon and oxygen into methanol and use those

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 9>to power the ship instead as a more energy dense fuel.

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.919
<v Speaker 2>Martin Which countries or which parts of the world are

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 2>leading in this green hydrogen move.

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 9>This is a really hard one to say. If you

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 9>ask people five years ago, they tell you it's totally

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 9>Japan that's leading. Japan is the first country that had

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 9>a hydrogen strategy way back when, in twenty fourteen, when

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 9>nobody has even thought about hydrogen to the extent that

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 9>many people are today. But now we could say the

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 9>real leaders are the US and European Union and its

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 9>member states. In the US, as you're probably aware, the

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 9>Inflation Reduction Act was passed back in August twenty twenty two.

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.720
<v Speaker 9>There were some pretty generous tax credits for the production

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 9>of green and blue hydrogen, and we're seeing especially the

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 9>blue hydrogen projects in the US now coming through because

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 9>the economics could actually work out on green It's a

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 9>bit more difficult because companies are still waiting on guidance

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:34.280
<v Speaker 9>as to the rules under which they could claim these credits.

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 9>In Europe, there's a lot of excitement. Europe is the

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 9>one place since probably the most sincere desire to decarbonize

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 9>and the strongest policies to do that. We have carbon prices,

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 9>we have mandates to use hydrogen. There's very few other

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 9>places where we have actual mandates that require use of

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 9>hydrogen for for example, shipping or aviation. That's what we're

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 9>seeing in Europe.

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Martin Tangler. Bloomberg be any Head of Hydrogen

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Research is.

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>The Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on apples, Spotify, and anywhere

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday ten

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:12.720
<v Speaker 1>am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, Beheartradio app,

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal.