WEBVTT - Jenny Johnson Talks Investment Landscape

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>We begin this now with stockslower as investors away clarity

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>on trade talks. Jenny Johnson, the CEO of Franklin Sempleson,

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 2>one of the world's largest investment managers, joined us now

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 2>for more.

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Jenny's good to see you. It's great to be here.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me.

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Things have changed a lot since we caught up with

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>you in Davos, Switzerland. It's a lot of optimism. You

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>remember everyone was charged as exceptionalism. Well, strowth, lots of

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>hiring markets are great. Things have changed a lot. Have

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 2>they changed for you?

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I actually we talked about it at

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 3>the time. You know, I think that you have to

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 3>think through kind of where the president is, right, He's

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 3>come in with a plan.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>It's been very clear, right, it's.

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Taxes, immigration, tariffs, government efficiency and deregulation, right and so,

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 3>and he has about a year and a half to

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 3>get those things done before the midterms come in. And so,

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, from the tariff standpoint, again, he's a deal maker.

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 3>So when you are trying to make a deal, you

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 3>need to show that you are in the position of strength, right.

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 3>So a lot of this blistering is around. I'm in

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>a position of strength and you're going to have to

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 3>bow to my will. I think the challenge has been

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 3>There are some unintended consequences of that. I was talking

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 3>to somebody yesterday about Canadians. They're so they're not upset

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>about the terroifts, they're upset about the fifty first state comment,

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 3>and that Airbnbs in Rhode Island are down because the

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Canadians say, I'm not going to come visit the US.

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 3>So those are the undertendant consequences.

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>The other piece of this is.

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 3>He needs the tax revenues identified in tariffs to help

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 3>fund his tax cuts, which, by the way, are not

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 3>tax cuts really, they're extensions. And if we don't get

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 3>that extension, there is a massive tax increase that happens,

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 3>which really becomes an issue around the economy.

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Can you describe how you and the same thing the

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 2>endgame looks like? What do you think it looks like?

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Because some people have described the last few weeks as madness.

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Is there a method to it?

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 3>So I think what we hope to see, you'd like

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 3>to see a couple of deals done right to show

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 3>that he's willing to come to the table and make

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 3>a deal.

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, so we can see a deal.

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 3>With Japan or Vietnam or you know somewhere to show no, no, no,

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 3>he's playing his deals.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>You'd like to know who is responsible.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Remember it was Paul Ryan who ushered the first tax

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 3>cuts through, Like who's responsible for ushering that legislation through

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 3>and champion that that'll be very important because he's got

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 3>to get those done. And the question is how quickly

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 3>can he get it done? To calm the markets, because

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 3>what we've seen is, you know, look at you when

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 3>you suddenly have CEOs who say I can't give guidance

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 3>because there's so much uncertainty. That uncertainty makes them fear,

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 3>and then they stop making investments. If you stop making investments,

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 3>it slows down the economy. Right, So I think what

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 3>we need to see in the next ninety days is

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 3>some clarity in the meantime uncertainty.

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 4>It leads to a lot of conspiracy theories and lots

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 4>of other types of speculation. As someone who oversees one

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 4>and a half trillion dollars of assets, how much of

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 4>a material shift have you seen with customers consumers shifting

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 4>just slightly away from US assets to insulate from some

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 4>of the whip side and the uncertainty.

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 3>You definitely see, you know, non Americans reducing on the

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 3>institutional side some of their exposure to US equities.

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we've seen that a bit.

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 3>But on your hand, you know, you sort of you

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 3>if you are in the market now, this is not

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 3>the time to get out of the market, right.

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>You need to play this out.

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 3>And if you hadn't made the trade to being in

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 3>more defensive stocks, then there's no point in doing that now,

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 3>right because you've already sort of missed it.

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the reality is AI.

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.119
<v Speaker 3>I actually played around this weekend with an app called

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 3>replet where you can just use natural language processing to

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 3>have it code and generate an app for you. Like

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 3>the efficiencies are income from AI, we haven't seen those

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of productivity gains yet. The productivity gains that we're

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 3>seeing are coming from technologies that came out twenty years ago,

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 3>and so as those things play into companies, I think

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 3>you'll see real opportunity.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, one thing that I hear from you, and

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 4>I heard from Mike Wilson of mart and Stanley earlier

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 4>this morning, was that corporate America has a lot of

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 4>good about it in terms of strength, in terms of resilience,

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 4>in terms of technological progress. It's the question about other

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 4>dollar denominated assets, and I'm talking about treasuries, I'm talking

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 4>about government debt, especially given some of what you were

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 4>talking about with respect to who is driving some of

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 4>these bunch of proposals through Congress.

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>That really is the issue. How much have you seen.

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 4>That bid get called into question as institutions, particularly foreign

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 4>ones move away.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think there's a question of you know, how

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 3>much are you know, foreign governments pulling away from treasuries?

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 3>And you know, is that is that what we're seeing

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 3>the treasury market? Or are we seeing the unwinding of

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the basis point? They are the basis trade and so

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 3>you know, Look, then the question falls into will is

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 3>the reserve?

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>US is the reserve currency? At question? Look, is not

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>where else she going to go?

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:48.559
<v Speaker 3>The US is going to be the reserve currency. People

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 3>will say, well, China trade has gone up to two percent. Yeah,

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 3>it's come from four to six percent of trade. Right,

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, it'll chip away at it, but we are

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:57.679
<v Speaker 3>still going to continue to be the reserve currency.

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 5>You mentioned a lot of non US and ves there

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 5>is pulling back from the United States. Morning Star had

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 5>research out this week that said some of that is

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 5>actually patriotic rebalancing from capital from America to Europe. Do

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 5>you think it's that emotional for some of these.

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 3>People, Well, you know, just again talking to folks from

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 3>Canada who are so fundamentally offended by the comment of

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 3>you know, the fifty first state.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's emotional, right. They kind of get it on.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 3>The trade and tariffs and we can deal and you

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 3>want help on immigration.

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But a comment like.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 3>That has obviously you had that kind of nationalists response.

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 5>What are the long term impacts of feelings like that?

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, who's at a dinner last night, we're you know,

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 3>debating does that push Europe to China?

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it, you know, obviously.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 3>I think what it does is there's the joke of

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's not Mega, it's Mega make Europe great again, right,

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 3>It forces Europe to do things like more defense independence,

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 3>more energy independence. Look, there's been a lot of brilliant

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 3>talent in Europe. Why are we not seeing these unicorn

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 3>companies from a technological and a lot of people say

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 3>it's the regulation and it's some of the policies that

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 3>they have in Europe. And so if this forces Europe

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 3>to be more resilient on its own, that's actually a

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 3>good thing for Europe. I don't think it necessarily they

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>don't suddenly trust China much. We're we're already trading with China.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 3>But it forces them to say, you know what, we

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 3>have to stand on our own a little bit more.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 2>It's why we're seeing some investors rebalance towards Europe since

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 2>the start of the year. I wanted to build on

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 2>some of Lisa's questions, and I think this is an

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 2>important line of questioning. At the moment, some investors aren't

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 2>drawing a distinction between risk assets in America and the

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 2>safe haven asset in America. It's trading as one bucket

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 2>dollar denominated assets. And I wonder, from your perspective, when

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 2>that a dynamic starts to take hold of the country,

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 2>whether that's a risk you need to actively manage or

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>a dislocation you take advantage of.

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Which one is it at the moment?

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think anytime that it becomes a risk on,

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 3>risk off in a big block, and yet you know

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the underlying fundamentals are different in kind of an investment

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 3>that's that actually becomes a great investment opportunity. So I

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>think you have to look at it and unpack those Do.

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 2>You think that's what this is right now and it's

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity in stocks or bonds With that.

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 3>In mind, I think you know right now it's it's

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 3>it's almost a market reacting to just a headline statement, right,

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 3>and so it's it's really sort of on and off.

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a risk on, risk off. I think that from a.

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, the dollar was was someone would say overvalued,

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 3>who knows, right, and it's come down a fair bit.

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 3>I think there are a lot of people that were

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 3>the US uh the debt and the deficit, you know,

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 3>thought that it was overvalued, and so probably in this

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 3>there's a little bit of that coming, you know, some

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 3>of that frothy ness coming off.

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 2>What's your advice to people right now who were part

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 2>of that dollar bit. They've built up that massive dollar

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>long over the period of a decade across asset classes,

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>in both equities and fixed income, and they're nervous about

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 2>the policy in Washington and looking to reallocate. What do

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 2>you suggesting they do.

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it depends on where you're if you if

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>you're a dollar based economy, I think that's okay. You

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 3>don't have to worry about that. If you're not a

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 3>dollar based economy, you have to understand how that's going

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 3>to impact your investments.

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Certainly been something that the Europeans about to think about over

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the last few months, that's for sure. Jenny, it's good

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>to see you lost to talk about. I can't imagine

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 2>how much has changed the next time we spoke speak

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Jennie Johnson there the Franklin Templeton CEO, on the latest

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 2>in this market.