WEBVTT - George Conway Explains it All (to Here’s the Thing)

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Alec Baldwin and you're listening to Hear's the

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>thing from iHeart Radio. Almost exactly nine years ago, Donald

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump descended the escalator at his Fifth Avenue residence to

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:20.639
<v Speaker 1>announce his candidacy for president. Since that infamous moment, the

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 1>political discourse in the United States has disintegrated. We have

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>never been more angry, indignant, and divided than we are

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>today in the post Trump world. However, one voice that

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>cuts clearly through the noise is that of my guest today.

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>George Conway, the lawyer and commentator, has become a leading

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>voice in the conservative movement. He was originally a supporter

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.959
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump campaign, but soon stood firmly against the president,

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>all while being married to Trump's senior counselor, Kelly Ann Conway.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>George Conway is one of the founders of the Lincoln Project,

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a super pac formed in twenty nineteen whose core mission

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>is to defeat Donald Trump. He's also a contributing writer

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>at The Atlantic and host of the podcast George Conway

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Explains It All. Conway is so committed to the anti

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump cause he recently donated more than nine hundred and

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine thousand dollars to the Biden Victory Fund. Growing up,

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Conway's father worked for defense contractor Raytheon. I was curious

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to learn how his upbringing affected him politically.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 2>He tested missile defense systems on ships and so he would,

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, they would install them and test them and

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 2>calibrate them, and he traveled a lot to go to

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>various ports to do that.

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>You go to Harvard in eighty four biochemical sciences and

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you graduate magna cum launde. Why that?

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Why the switch? Why? I don't know. I mean, I

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 2>think it.

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Was because what was the original plan.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>My original plan was probably the major in economics and

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>then go to law school. But my parents kind of

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 2>was thinking, oh man, people lawyers not making any money.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 2>You should become a doctor. And I had all these

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 2>friends who were pre mets, and I decided, okay, well

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 2>let me go. It was a mess, but I figured

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 2>it out.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It was a pass.

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 2>It was a second pass. And then I realized that,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is not what I wanted to do,

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 2>and I'd go back to plan A. But it was

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>too late to really change majors again. So I went

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 2>back to So I just finished off the biochemistry, just

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>applied to law school, and it kind of worked. It

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>was helpful because you know, there weren't that many biochem

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>majors applying to law school, so it was actually probably

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 2>advantageous to me.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 1>So I know, it just worked out. Now, your your

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>parents they were from where originally.

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 2>My mother was from the Philippines and my father's from me.

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>What was his educational background? Like, are you the golden

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>boy when you're going to Harvard and yeah, law.

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 2>School, I guess you could say that. I mean she

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>had My mother had a master's in chemistry and a

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 2>master's in computer science. Your dad, my dad, I think

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 2>had an sociate's degree and something. He joined the Navy

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 2>at like eighteen or nineteen learned learned on the job

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>that way. Sure.

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And when you were going to Harvard and then you

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>go on to Yale Law School, you then of course

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>become the editor of the Yale Law chan editor one

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of many. Well while you're an editor, I'm sorry, and

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>then the president of the school's chapter of the Federalist Society, Yes,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>were your parent Was your household a conservative household? No,

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I you know that's planting a flag, I would say,

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the Federalist Society.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it wasn't much. It wasn't really that much

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 2>of a flag back then in a way because it

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 2>wasn't I mean, the Federal Society didn't have all the

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 2>connotations it had today. It was much smaller, and it

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 2>was just sort of like it was where anybody who

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>was basically center or right could basically have a political discussion.

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 2>And those were different times, I think.

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>No, So it was not you were sitting there saying

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this is like.

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 2>This was basically it was basically like you know, people

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 2>who was provoted for Reagan.

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Essentially, what was the campus of Yale when you're there

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>for law school or either one? What was the campus

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>life in the eighties there?

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>It was very nice, It was very peaceful, It wasn't

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the only real controversy on the campus at that point

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 2>in time was there were these series of cafeteria workers

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 2>strikes which tended to divide people, and in one of

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>people that want to cross picket lines and come into

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 2>the law school and some people, you know, said, look,

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 2>we're paying twish we got to come into law school,

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 2>and and it was a little bit divisive to that extent,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 2>and it was it was disruptive of campus life, but

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 2>it didn't last very long.

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So the Vietnam thing in the seventies.

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 2>There wasn't nothing. There was a contract. Now there was,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 2>and then there were there were these very these encamped,

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 2>very small encampments by today's standard, pushing for divestment of

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 2>companies that did business in South Africa. But it wasn't

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>the kind of environment you Yeah, I mean it was,

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 2>it was. It wasn't a big deal. What did you

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 2>think of Reagan? I liked Reagan. I mean I I

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 2>grew up in the seventies and eighties, and I grew

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 2>up in the seventies basically, which was the shadow of

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the sixties, where you still had a lot of people

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 2>thinking that if you just passed the right law and

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 2>came up with the right scheme, you could create nirvana

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 2>in society, and that could be very expensive. And I

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 2>came to the conclusion that people were overdoing it, that

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, you kind of have to let things fall

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 2>where they may, and that the free market was sometimes.

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Often there are winners and losers, that.

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 2>There are winners and losers, and that you can't you

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 2>can't manipulate every outcome in society and try to make

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 2>it perfect, because if when you try to do that,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 2>you basically end up squelching creativity and squelching the economy.

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 2>And I, you know, I became kind of a free marketeer,

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 2>and that's what, you know, I was persuaded. That's how

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I became a Republican.

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Really, But I would assume that your your leaning as

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a free marketeer would include the people played by the rules.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Too, absolutely, power being absolutely obey regulation. Absolutely, And if

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 2>you would if I had come of political age in

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy five, I would have, you know, I consider

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 2>my Actually, when I was in high school, I considered

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 2>myself a Scoop Jackson Democrat because at that point I

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 2>was anti Republican because of Nixon. I thought Nixon. My

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 2>first political memories were ten or eleven years old watching

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 2>the Watergate hearings, and you know, I found I found Nixon.

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I found Nixon deeply offensive, and I found you know,

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 2>and that sort of I mean, I've I've hated corrupt

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 2>politicians ever since. But then the Republican Party kind of

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 2>cleaned up its act, in my view, and then when

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 2>they do that, it seemed like the late seventies and

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 2>it just seemed they, you know, once Nixon was gone,

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 2>things were better, but I felt, you know, I mean,

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 2>it was the era of stagflation and Ted Kennedy was

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 2>pushing wage and price controls, which I thought was absolutely insane.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>You can't regulate the economy that way. And I kind

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 2>of drove me, drove me a little to the right.

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 2>And plus, you know, I grew up in Massachusetts, and

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 2>and you know, it's just you get kind of fed

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 2>up with the Liberals at a certain point growing up.

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 2>So I've always been a bit of a contrary and

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 2>you put me in one group, I kind of kind

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 2>of rebel against it and push back on things. And

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 2>that's I guess that's part of the party to me.

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I would love, I said to myself periodically, not often,

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>but I said periodically, because because I'm not some crazy

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>progressive in one sense, there's things I think there are.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>There are conservative thoughts I think are admirable and practical.

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>But I mean I've always thought to myself, you know,

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>give me a Republican I could vote for in terms

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of who they are as a person, and then of

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>course what their policies are. I can't hand in hand.

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>And I always viewed, you know, Reagan and then Bush

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Junior as this guy that was like the guy you

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>brought with you to get you into the party. He

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>knew Jeff well that he was the front man they opened,

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>got the door open for you. Meaning I had zero

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>respects for Reagan as a person. Everybody and I know said,

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I just said to you before, what do you think

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of Reagan? And you said the same thing. Everybody I've

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>ever spoken to about Reagan said, they go, I like Reagan.

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>You know the likability fact. They like Reagan. And I

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>have many friends who worked for Reagan, where as I

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>got out of college. But my thing was Reagan and

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Bush Junior. I thought to myself, these guys just have

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>no right to be president the United States. It's none.

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>They are hood ornaments on a vehicle and under the

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>hood of that car, or all the other people writing

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the policy, creating the policy, explaining to him the policy.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>He was a host of a show. And I thought

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. For Bush Junior, I thought he would

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>go again eight more years of a guy who's I

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>go on the street and find a guy or a

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>woman started to be president United States right now rather

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:50.839
<v Speaker 1>than him. These guys are all functionaries. Am I offending you?

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not agreeing with you because you're I actually

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 2>thought Reagan had some good instincts. I would prefer more

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 2>intellect actual presidents, There's no question about that. But you

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 2>have to take what you can get. And you know,

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I thought I thought Reagan's overall direction was good. I

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 2>thought George W. Bush I had mixed feelings about because

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I was very much against the Iraq War, although I

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 2>liked him personally.

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>How did you feel in twenty sixteen when Trump won

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and of course Hillary lost. Was Hillary's Clinton someone who

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>troubled you?

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 2>She did? I mean, I didn't like the ethos of

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 2>the Clinton administration. I kind of learned not to like them,

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>and I would vote her for her today over Trump,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 2>knowing what I know today. But you know, at the time,

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I thought that he would not be quite normal, but

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was like the best we were going

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>to be able to do. When I thought that the

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 2>institutions and the people around him would cabin him and

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of teach him how to get by. And I

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 2>thought that a normal person would, you know, even if

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 2>they were eccentric, would adapt their behavior to make it

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 2>functional for the job so that they would be remembered well.

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 2>And what happened as I watched that in twenty seventeen,

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 2>is like, this isn't happening. What is wrong with this guy?

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 2>And that's sort of what got me thinking about, well,

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, the guy's psychological condition and whether or not

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>he was good for the country, and drew some negative

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>conclusions after that after watching him. He's worse. Basically everything

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 2>is about him. That's the thing that I thought makes

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the difference with politicians who become present and is they

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 2>realize how much the office is greater than they are

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 2>and how much responsibility they have, and it chastens them

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 2>and it makes them more humble in a way. And

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 2>with Trump, there's nothing. Because Trump is the most narcissistic

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 2>human being you could ever imagine, and it's all about him.

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Everything is about him. Pathologically, hath alot, He's no, He's

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 2>absolutely is narcissistic personality disorder. He's also antisocial, has an

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 2>antisocial personality disorder. I mean, he's a very very disturbed

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 2>human being. And that's why he could never adapt. He can't.

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 2>He can only he can only get worse, he can't

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>get better.

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, the thing about him also is that when he

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>wins and Hillary loses, I thought to myself, for most

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>let's say Republicans were even undecided, even Independence was voting

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>against Hillary because of policies that she expounded, or was

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>it about her being a woman?

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean the country will ever vote for a woman. Oh, absolutely,

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the country could vote for a woman. I mean,

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I think there are some women I think would be

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 2>great presidents. I think, I mean, I don't. I'd want

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 2>to see them more of them in action, like an

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Abigail Spamberger or I think there are some very very

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 2>good women in politics. I think Nikki Haley actually if

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean there are things I don't like about her

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 2>and the way she conducted the campaign, there are things

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 2>I loved about her that in the way she conducted

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 2>a campaign, I think she actually would be potentially a

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 2>very good president. And I think that I think that

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 2>if she had gotten the nomination, which was never going

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 2>to happen, I think there's a good chance she could

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 2>have been resident. So, you know, I don't I don't think.

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think there's certain, no doubt there is

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 2>a certain element of the population that might not vote

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 2>for a woman for you know, because of that she's

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 2>a because she's a woman. But then there's gonna be

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 2>a portion of the population that will vote for a

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 2>woman because she's a woman, and maybe that cancels out.

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I'd leave that to a you know,

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 2>a very highly sent highly a large sample of a poll.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 2>And then I think there are you know, the people

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 2>who would not vote for a woman are going to

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 2>be people who a probably not going to vote a

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Democrat anyway. So it's I don't, I don't I think

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 2>at this point, I think, you know, a woman comes

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 2>along who is the place, in the right moment, at

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 2>the right time, could easily win the presidency. I mean, like,

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 2>look at these three women and who are basically running

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 2>the state of Michigan. Terrific, terrific, terrific politicians, terrific, very smart.

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 2>You know that That's the reason why it's it's good

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 2>to sort of let people percolate because then you can

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 2>see how they conduct themselves in different situations. But you

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 2>know that trifecta they have in Michigan. I mean, they're

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>a little to the left of me, but but I

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 2>just think like they are excellent public servants. Benson the

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of State, and Dana Nessel. These are the type

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 2>of people. We need more of these people in politics,

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I wish we had some on the

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Republican side that you know, don't let me see.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me just say this. I was on vacation with

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>my family. We wanted to son dance. We're there at

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 1>stein ericson the lodge and there's Romney and he comes

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in with his family and have brunch or something. And

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>he's there by himself of reading the paper waiting for somebody.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>He sees me and I wave high and he stands

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>up and shakes my hands. He goes, he goes, don't

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>stand here for very long as that I want my

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>picture taken with you. And we both laughed and and

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, and I chatted with him for like three minutes.

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>When I walked away and talked to friends of mine

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and said, the guy's so much more three dimensional than

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>they packaged him during the campaigns. He had the worst

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>fucking campaign staff you could imagine. And I think to myself,

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>why does this party, what is the lure and the

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>fascination with Trump? When why not Romney someone like him?

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>It's beyond my comprehension.

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 2>And you know, but I think it's I think your

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 2>observation is true about about people that they don't always

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 2>project what they are in private publicly. And I you know,

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why that is. Maybe maybe he was

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 2>an actor could explain that a little better to me.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 2>But I mean Romney was that way. Bob Dole was

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>that way. People said, you know, people who talked to

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Bob Dole and met him privately said he was funny, warm, relaxed.

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 2>And on television he always was a high school gym teacher.

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 2>He always came off a stiff. So they, you know,

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 2>remember the Saturday Night Live impressions, they used to do

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 2>it him and exactly Bob Dole talking about Bob Dole

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>again and and and you know it was just and

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 2>then and and same was true of you know, I've

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 2>become friendly with a lot of people who worked for Hillary.

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 2>And I was friendly with my law partner who passed

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 2>away me rest in peace, Bernie Nusbaum, who is very

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 2>very close to missus Clinton. And you know, basically the

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>description age when you is that she is just the

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 2>warmest and just lovely, this person you could just sit

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 2>and have a chat with. But I don't know that

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 2>all of that, that all of that projected on television

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 2>as well. But that said, the attraction of Trump I've

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 2>always found mystifying. He doesn't say anything that's particularly intelligent.

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't. He can be nasty, he can be funny,

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 2>he can actually be funny, but I don't think he

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 2>actually has a sense of humor in the sense that

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>normal people have a sense of humor. I think he

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 2>knows that if he says some things that people will laugh,

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think he has a sense of irony.

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I think his sense of humor what he thinks is

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 2>funny is mocking people, and that sometimes gets laughter. But

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't think he has aol of comedy.

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 2>We Well Rickles, though there would there be, there would

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 2>be twists to it, there was a there was funny,

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 2>actually funny, and and Trump Trump is is funny, but

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 2>he actually doesn't mean to be. At times he has

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 2>no idea why he's making people laugh. And and I

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 2>just don't the attraction of him. I think there's an

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>authority terrian streak among a lot of people that they

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>basically like him because he is all about himself. He

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>projects something that they want to be, which is the

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>worst in themselves. He brings out the worst in people

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 2>because they look at him and he doesn't have to

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 2>follow the rules. He just basically says, fuck the rules.

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 2>But he's also.

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Capable of burrowing into and finding his way toward a

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>place where he has the least resistance. In his life.

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump is someone who he just gets up every day

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's no one there to say no.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, There's no one there to say no, because if

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 2>you say no, they're banished. Right, And that's been his

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 2>entire life. And you know, he has two modes of

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 2>operation to get what he wants. He can be extremely flattering,

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 2>but then he can be an incredible bully, and nobody

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 2>wants to deal with the bully, so they just give in.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's part of how he gets what he wants.

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think, you know, for example, when his trial downtown,

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 2>he gets he got what he wants in certain ways

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 2>that may end up having bit him. But the other

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 2>thing is, I think part of his appeal is that

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 2>he creates a permission structure for people to be their

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 2>worst cells because you can let out your anger. These

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 2>people are bad, yeah, fuck them, And he brings out

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:13.479
<v Speaker 2>the worst in people.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>George Conway, if you enjoy conversations with leading political voices.

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Check out my episode with California Representative Adam Schiff.

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I felt during the Obama administration and during the first

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Obama campaign that a lot of young people were inspired

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the same way Democrats have been inspired by Kennedy and

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 3>Republicans have been inspired by Reagan.

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 2>Now I think that.

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 3>They're you know, the vast reaction is just revulsion at

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 3>what they see going on. The one positive that comes

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 3>out of it, though, is that people have recognized that

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 3>they can no longer sit on the sideline. So I

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 3>can't tell you how many people have told me over

0:17:57.840 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of years that they have never been

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 3>politically involved before, but now they realize they have to be.

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>To hear more of my conversation with Adam Schiff, go

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to Here's the Thing dot org. After the break, George

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Conway shares the ways in which he agrees with a

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>position of the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg. I'm Alec Baldwin

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and you're listening to Here's the Thing. Early in the

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration, George Conway was vocal about what he saw

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>as instability and chaos within the White House. He was

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>instrumental in forming the group Checks and Balances to combat

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration's betrayals of bedrock legal norms. Czechs and

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Balances eventually became the Society for the Rule of Law,

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and Conway is its board president.

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 2>This was a group that I formed in twenty eighteen

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 2>because I thought that the Federal Society and other conservative

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 2>legal groups weren't really taking seriously the threats to the

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 2>rule of law that Donald Trump presented. Remember this is

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>pre insurrection, pre January sixth, and the real threat there

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 2>was that, you know, his attacks on his own attorney

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 2>general and his attacks on courts. And so we formed

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 2>this group to basically speak out about these issues because

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 2>we didn't think that the you know, I mean, the

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:40.719
<v Speaker 2>mainstream conservative legal organizations were too much trying to not

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 2>tick off Trump and were busy worrying about placing people

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.719
<v Speaker 2>on the judiciary or placing people in the government. So

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 2>we were actually the opposite of that, and we were

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 2>basically we consisted mainly a lot of them were older

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 2>guys who worked in the Reagan administration where they basically said, well,

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 2>this is the conservatism that we had back in the day,

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 2>and then some younger people. So we weren't really into

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 2>judicial appointments. But now we have morphed that group into

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 2>a new group called the Society for the Rule of

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Law Institute, and we've revamped it and we're you know,

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 2>we're totally talking about exactly the threat that we see

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 2>to the rule of law and to democracy that trump Ism,

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 2>the movement, and the way the direction of the conservative

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 2>movement is bringing us.

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>When you see what Trump and his minions have wrought

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in terms of judicial policy, Roe v. Wade is the

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>obvious example. Were you indifferent or do you consider the

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Roe v. Wade the situation decision of victory?

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Neither. My thing about Roe v. Wade was, Look, if

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 2>I were a state legislator in nineteen seventy three, the

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 2>year that Roe was adopted, I would probably have adopted

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, I probably would have voted for a statue

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 2>that was not dissimilar to what Roe came up with.

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 2>The problem with Roe was that it wasn't judging. It

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>was basically the creation of a statutory scheme, and it

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 2>was beyond the can of judges to do and the

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 2>ability of judges to do. And you know, there was

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 2>no there's no clear guidance in the Constitution or even

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 2>a warrant in the Constitution to do it. So I

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 2>always thought that Roe was wrongly decided that said, the

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 2>time to overrule it would have been in the years

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 2>immediately following that, And I think the Court missed its

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 2>last chance to do that in the nineteen eighties, and

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>the notion of overruling something forty nine years later was

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 2>insane and was destined to, you know, create as many

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 2>problems as had been created by the original that basically settled. Yeah,

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, I mean, I think that there

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 2>was room for sort of cutting back a little bit,

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 2>cutting back what cutting back the scope of the abortion

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 2>and privacy right to what is more typical, say in

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 2>a Western European country, because Row is much more permissive

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 2>than what I think a legislative the natural legislative solutions

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>would have ended up to be. But then you know

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 2>what we have now are these states going completely insane

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 2>five ten weeks just which is absolutely crazy. It's just

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 2>not something that can be regulated with bright lines, frankly,

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 2>because of all of the complications that can occur, And

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 2>it was just something that you know, it was damaging

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 2>to the court to get into it, and damaging of

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the court to extract itself out of it. So suddenly

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I believe in incarnalism. Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg had issues

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 2>with Roe v. Wade. Not that she didn't think there

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be a right to an abortion that's protected, but

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 2>she believed that Roe, by basically setting forth this a

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 2>detailed scheme, went too far, and what they should have

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 2>done struck down the more extreme statutes and let the

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 2>legislative process take care of itself after that. And I

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 2>always thought she was right because if they've done it

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 2>that way, abortion would never have become the political issue

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 2>that it became, and the courts would have never become

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the political football that they became, and we would be

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 2>better off today. That's all water under the bridge. They

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 2>did what they did, and they did at both times,

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 2>and I think the courts have been damaged by it.

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Now you tilt slightly in that discussion, and you look

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>at the court now itself, and I'm you know, I

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>view obviously, I'm fully I'm completely enthralled by how Alito

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 1>and Thomas have real liabilities in their marriage. But I wonder,

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about that? What do you think

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 1>about a guy and his wife hanging in the flag upside.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:32.719
<v Speaker 2>I think it's insane.

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And the other one's wife is a big you know,

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump's support and everything, and he's and he and both

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of them getting whacked about all this.

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I would separate them because I think

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 2>they're dissimilar in certain ways. I think you have to

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 2>take each case separately. In the case of Alito, I

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 2>understand that it can be difficult for a conservative judge.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Judges are isolated to begin with. There's a limit to

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 2>what they can say, the limit to who they can

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 2>talk to, limit to who they can hang around with publicly,

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 2>and they can become very isolated any judge. But it's

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 2>particularly true of the conservatives and the Republicans, because you know,

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Washington's basically much a liberal town. And I think that

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 2>there is this sort of persecution complex that sometimes takes

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 2>hold of the conservative mind of people who serve in

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 2>government in Washington, in particular in the judicial branch. And

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what happened. I think that just got

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 2>out of hand here where people who were you know,

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 2>upset about Trump or putting up signs, and Missus Alito

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 2>or and maybe Justice Alito tolerated it basically sought to

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 2>give the finger to everybody by putting a flag upside it,

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 2>which is just absolutely better if she didn't, even better

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 2>if she didn't. It's just yeah, I mean you would.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't do that if I were if I held

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 2>no public position, you just you know, But to basically

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 2>do that and people knowing that you're that the family

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 2>member is on the Supreme Court, it's just I cannot

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 2>fathom it.

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, this hearkens back to when I said emboldened people

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to say whatever they want. Little did he realize it

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>would include the spouses of Supreme Court jell Yes.

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 2>And and the Thomas thing is is a bit different. I mean,

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I think so, well, because he's committed actual financial and

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 2>ethical breaches there that you know, whether or not they're

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>strictly prohibited by well, there's no judicial ethics rules that

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 2>apply to Supreme Court justices. I think, you know, these

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 2>filings that he made are completely false, and I think

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 2>a case could be made and has been made by

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 2>some people, but I don't think it'll ever be brought that.

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, those those filings were criminal, you know, even

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 2>making false statements of the government's violation of eighteen USC.

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 2>One thousand and one and those you know, if and

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 2>if he didn't pay for to give one of the

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 2>number of examples, you know, they had this guy he

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 2>borrowed money for an r V, a two hundred and

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand dollars r V, and then didn't got the

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 2>that the loan forgiven, that's taxable income. If he didn't

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 2>report that, that's you know, that's tax fraud. And there

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 2>are just some real issues there with Thomas that I found,

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, and as someone who has a hired him

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 2>in the past, I just find that just extremely, extremely disturbing.

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 2>The stuff with the wife. On January sixth, I with Ginny.

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Ginny has all, you know, everybody in the

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>conservative move kind of knew that she's a little bit

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 2>out there and has to say the least, you know,

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 2>they could. They kind of discounted her. I mean, I

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 2>think the press on the left tend to overstate her importance.

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 2>She's not that important, you know, her sending emails to

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 2>people and so on and so forth. The thing that

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 2>really bothers me about Justice Thomas is the financial stuff.

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 2>It's really really very troublesome. And if you remember, you

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 2>go back to the the late sixties, early right in

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixty nine, I think, or nineteen sixty nine, ers

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy, I mean Justice Fortis Abe for Abe Forest

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Abe fortis right, and he, you know, he accepted some

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 2>money for I think it was like an honorarium. It

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 2>wasn't even that much money. Even if you if you,

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 2>if you, even if you scale it up by inflation,

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it would get you a two hundred

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 2>and fifty thousand dollars RV today. Maybe it would, I

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.239
<v Speaker 2>don't know, but you know, the Nixon administration went to

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Chief Justice Warren and said we're going to prosecute this.

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 2>And Earl Warren and his colleagues went to Fordest saying

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 2>you need to resign, and they made him resign. And

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 2>there was who was who appointed him, Fortis Fortest was

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 2>a Johnson appointee and he was eventually he actually I

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 2>think it was a yeah, he was. It was a

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Johnson appointee, and you know, in close to President Johnson,

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 2>and and you know, Nixon and his people saw an

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to get a seat on the court, and at

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 2>that point in time, it was not tolerable for a

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 2>justice to take that kind of take money from somebody

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 2>who had a case in a lower court somewhere. It

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 2>wasn't even there wasn't even a direct conflict. And you know,

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 2>if you applied the fordest standard today, Thomas would be gone.

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>George Conway, if you're enjoying this conversation, tell a friend

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and be sure to follow. Here's the thing on the

0:27:55.920 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. When

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>we come back, George Conway shares why he made a

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>rather large donation to the Biden victory Fund. I'm Alec

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Baldwin and you're listening to Here's the thing. I spoke

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>with George Conway just days before Trump's hush money trial

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York City reached a verdict. Conway's opinions hold

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>significant weight from many conservatives. I wanted to know if

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>there was ever anyone He provided his stamp of approval

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>for that.

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 2>He later regretted Donald Trump. Okay, I mean you know, judiciary, No,

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I don't think so, I don't. I mean

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 2>I never you know, I don't. I don't think you

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 2>know when you don't know exactly how it's reading tea

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 2>leaves And I think I've supported most of all of

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 2>the Republican nominees, and I don't really have issues with

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that I have issues with Democratic nominees either.

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 2>I would I would be you know, my view would

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 2>be if if the person's qualified and selected by the president,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 2>unless they have views that are so extreme that they

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 2>can't be acceptable in the normal course of of what

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 2>we see in constitutional discussion, I would vote for you know,

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I would have voted for Ruth Bader Ginsberg. I would

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 2>have voted for Sonya Soto my R. I don't think

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 2>there are any of these people who have been nominated.

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>The only one I ever opposed was Harriet not that,

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 2>not that you know, not that my seal of endorsement matters.

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 2>I was just a guy, you know, practicing law in

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 2>New York. But the one time I ever I did

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 2>think that someone was not qualified to be on the

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court was when President George W. Bush nominated Harriet

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Myers to become a Supreme Court justice. She was his

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 2>White House counsel. And there was just no evidence that

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 2>she knew anything, you know, that she had any while

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, she was a member of the bar, she

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 2>was a member of a big law firm in Dallas,

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 2>you know. But when you looked up at things she

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 2>had written, it was shocking that she could not really

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 2>express herself. She hadn't really litigated, as far as I

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 2>could tell that much. And she it turned out that

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 2>they withdrew her, not because of the opposition among conservatives

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and others to her nomination. She couldn't be prepped. She

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 2>could hold a lot of jobs, but being on the

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court, she was not qualified for that.

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>As we learned when I was at GW study in

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>political science with one of our professors said they were

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>very kind and respectful toward each other. So the worst

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>thing you could say is the Senator would say, I

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>have the least amount of higher regard from my colleague

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>from Virginia. And now, in the time we have left,

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to obviously go into the Carville Madelon nature

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of your life and so you're in that rarefied sphere.

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And where did you meet her? Where did you first meet?

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 2>We met it out in the Hampton's one time. God

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 2>it was doomed. No, we had twenty good years.

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, I'm well aware of how many kids. You

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>guys have four four kids, that's great, that's great now.

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>But when you're there and you're going through that process,

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and I see this to you, and I don't know you,

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>but I mean i've actually I see you on TV

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and what I was really intrigued about

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you is a is your evolution. You've evolved over time,

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And no.

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't really think I've evolved that much. I think

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 2>that everyone else kind of evolved in a bad direction.

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think. I don't think my views on substantive

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 2>issues or my temperament has changed really for a very

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 2>long time. I just think that what I react to

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>is what I would have reacted to if it happened

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 2>ten years ago or twenty years ago, I'd be where

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I am.

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But these two points go hand in hand to me,

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>which is that a while ago, we talked about Trump

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and his nature and I thought to myself, how does

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump maintain his support? And they are key business people,

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>billionaires with no obstructions to their giving, and they can

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>just pump all the money and they can buy Trump

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the White House, and they want Trump in there because

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>unlike other conservative or Republican presidential administrations, they look like

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>what Trump will provide them is beyond their wildest dreams.

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 2>But I think they're mistaken, and I make this point regularly.

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that the reason why the United States of

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 2>America has as strong an economy as it still has

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 2>is its stability. It's political stability and the rule of law.

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think that these people who think that well,

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Trump is good for them because they might get capital

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 2>gains taxes are being very very short sighted. They're being

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 2>morally they're morally bereft, but they're all so being very

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 2>economically and politically shortsighted because I think that Trump, if

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 2>he's elected, will create political disorder. I think the country

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 2>will become ungovernable, ungovernable and vulnerable to you know, I

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 2>mean capital flight and human capital and financial capital flight.

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think that's good for the economy. And

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 2>that's I think people underestimate that.

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever think you could be you? You could find

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it in your soul to donate money. You give a

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>very large donation to who was the nine hundred and

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty two thousand dollars donations is coming out of my kids.

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Drust nine and twenty nine thousand, six hundred. But who's

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 2>counting to the Biden Victory Fund, which is is an

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 2>amalgamation of the Biden campaign and various the National Democrats.

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Ate supporting that kind of work. I maybe not him personally.

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean no, I support I Look, I mean

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I disagree with him on many issues. I think if

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 2>you gave me a policy menu, checklist, and where I

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 2>come out would be different on a lot of things,

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.719
<v Speaker 2>although frankly in foreign policy, I think he's actually done

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 2>a pretty good job. But the different that the thing

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 2>about it is is that the difference is between the

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 2>danger that I think is presented by his opponent is

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 2>is so great that I think there's there there's it's

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a binary choice between those two, and I think there's

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 2>there's only one choice for the survival of the of

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 2>this democracy.

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 1>You're excellent to law school, Yes, yeah, so I g

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>w yes.

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>My my joke is that your kids who are in

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the other room reading and doing their homework, and you

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and she are at the kitchen table arguing, and you're

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 1>whipping out all these law books to each other.

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 2>No, No, it was never like that. We agree. You know,

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 2>if on a lot of things we agree and we

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 2>still agree, it's just that I I just think that

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I just think that Trump has drawn people off course

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 2>and and and that's not you know that, that's not

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to get into the personal stuff. But

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 2>that's not that's not that's not what that story is about.

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Maybe she feels that I don't know on substance issues,

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that we disagree that much. And I

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 2>don't understand how people who I otherwise might agree with

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>can justify supporting someone who tried to overturn the Constitution

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 2>of the United States, to give one minor example. But again,

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 2>that's just I think that a lot of Republicans just

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 2>went off the rails and they're just forgetting first principles

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and and they're just they've they've allowed partisanship to basically

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 2>consume them. And I was, you know, I was a

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Republican because Republicans. Republicans tended to support things they've they

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 2>more closely approximated my views. Okay, And that's why you

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.720
<v Speaker 2>vote for candidates. So you try to figure out who's

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 2>going to do what you think most likely comports with

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 2>where you are, and you may change your mind because

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 2>you don't know everything and these people actually know more

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 2>than you. But that's what that's what you do. But

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 2>then when you have also you know, there's just how

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 2>can you support some somebody who's just so bad because

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 2>that you being bad morally affects how you govern. And

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 2>that's another aspect of Trump is it's just I don't

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 2>know how you know, people with the complete lack of

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 2>moral character of Donald Trump should not be in public life, period.

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 2>And that's my view, and I don't care, you know,

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I'd say that of a Democrat. I'd say that of anybody.

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Listen, Being a Democrat is not an easy road to

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>hoe these days, because it's like, if Biden wins, which

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is looking dicey, but if Biden wins, then he drops

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:37.760
<v Speaker 1>out mid term. I mean, I know a lot of people,

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>let's cut the bullshit. I know a lot of people

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>who are terrified by the idea of Harris becoming the president.

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>They don't think she's ready for that at all, and

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>they're worried that with the Biden things, they don't want

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to vote for Biden because if it doesn't make it

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>all the way she becomes president. This is very nervous

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about that. Does that make any sense to you without

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>any of you making any assessments about her.

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:00.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to make an assessment about her, I think.

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>But you see how people feel that way.

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 2>I think it's nuts you do, right, because basically anybody

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 2>is going to be better than Donald Trump. Right, I'd

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 2>vote for you over over Donald Trump. I mean that

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 2>enough money in it? There's not enough money. I got

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 2>I need a lot of money.

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing I want to ask you that

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>if we're getting off to think about your wife and everything,

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is that So here we are in late May of

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the election year. How are things looking right now? I'm

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>not saying you have to call it, but the election. Yeah, well,

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm fully confident. I've been saying this.

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 2>This is not something I just pulling out at one

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 2>fifty eight pm today as I think Trump's going to

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 2>blow it. I think the way that the Biden people

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 2>will beat Trump is to make him the issue. And

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump cannot help but make himself the issue. And basically

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a feedback loop where you just basically you point

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 2>out this man is nuts, he's psycho, and you point

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 2>out the crazy things that he does that makes him mad,

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 2>and it makes him say and do crazier things. And

0:37:57.480 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 2>then you point that out and I think that's actually

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 2>what what they're going to try to do in this

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 2>debate that they've agreed to at the end of June.

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 2>I think that Biden people completely get the psychology of

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump, and I think they have not. They are beginning.

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 2>You can see signs of what they're doing. It's going

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:15.879
<v Speaker 2>to be I think the way you beat Donald Donald

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Trump is basically conduct the campaign as a syop, and

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 2>he manipulate his brain and he's very He's so manipulable.

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 2>He's uncontrollable, but he is manipulable as his own people

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 2>find out. They try to manipulate them, but they can't

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 2>control them. And so what you do is you can

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 2>manipulate him into being out of control.

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So with the Supreme Court basically punting the January sixth trials,

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>or at least for them, think the Supreme Court wants

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>him to be president, obviously, No, I think.

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people are overreading what the Supreme Court

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 2>did there. I don't think that's what they're doing. I

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 2>think I would have preferred them to have taken a

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 2>different course, namely not to have taken this case. But

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I think they really do. They really are looking at

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.839
<v Speaker 2>this in sort of an apt academic way, and they're saying, okay, well,

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 2>there are some things obviously that a president can be

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 2>prosecuted for, but there have to be limits, because what

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.399
<v Speaker 2>if I don't know, what if a Republican Congress were

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 2>elected and along with President Biden reelected, and the Republican

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Congress pas some bill and somehow managed to get it

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 2>over the president's veto. This is a wild hypothetical. It

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 2>would never happen. Where it said that if the president

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 2>didn't propose a balanced budget by January one every year,

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm just making something up. You know, he shall go

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 2>to jail, you know after his term. You know, there

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 2>are just some things that you could you could just

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 2>see crazy laws that would be that could be passed,

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 2>and crazy the applications of existing laws that could have

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 2>had that would that would impinge upon the Article two duties.

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>What hush hush money.

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh he's going down, you think, so, yeah, he's going down?

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 2>Really yeah?

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:54.479
<v Speaker 3>Wrong.

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But you can get people in here who were so

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying this to flatter you. You can get

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 1>people here who are less influential than you are, and

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>they're so cagy.

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:04.839
<v Speaker 2>They're like, well, you know, look, I look, I mean,

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I'm not saying when I say that, I

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 2>accept the risk that you can't predict what twelve you're

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Michael are going to do in a room. But to

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 2>unpack my I think he's going down is I just

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 2>think it's highly likely that they're going to be a

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 2>conviction on some are all of the thirty four counts.

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 2>And I think there's only a small possibility but not

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 2>non zero, I mean ten twenty percent maybe that that

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 2>there could be a hung jury. I don't think there

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 2>is any chance that there would be all out acquittal, right, Okay,

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 2>So that's what I mean when I say you know

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:40.799
<v Speaker 2>he's going down, I think it's like, Okay, I think

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 2>that you know. I'm going to the Rangers game tonight.

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 2>I think the Rangers are going to win, but you

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 2>know who.

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Knows my Thanks to George Conway. Here's the Thing is

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>recorded at CDM Studios. This episode was produced by Kathleen Russo,

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Zach MacNeice, and Maureen Hoban. Our engineer is Frank Imperial.

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Our social media manager is Daniel Gingrich. Hi'm Alec Baldwin.

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's the Thing is brought to you by iHeart Radio.