WEBVTT - Can Artificial Intelligence Be Controlled? With Tristan Harris & Aza Raskin 

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Fear of all of us losing has to become greater

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>than the fear of me losing to you. Now, China

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want the financial system to collect.

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 2>It's the let it rip administration. What to do about AI?

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Am I going to lose my job? Or what about safety?

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Cyber security? What about privacy? While new documentary is out

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 2>answering all of those questions, promise, peril, truth, trust? Should

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>we be pessimistic? Should we be optimistic? It's called the

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 2>AI Doc. And two of the principal participants in that documentary,

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Tristan Harris and Asa Raskin, are up next on This

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 2>is Gavin news This is Gavin Newsom.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And this is Tristan Harris and Azarasca.

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 2>All Right, so you guys, you're on the back end

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 2>now this world tour where you guys have been all

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>over the damn place. Yeah, and you launched it. And

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>it's on the basis of a movie that you you

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't necessary, Its not your movie, right, but you participated

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 2>in a movie.

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>This new documentary that was released what a month ago?

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but a month and a half ago, The AI

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Doc or How I Became an Apocalyptimist. Our friends the

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>directors of Everything Everywhere, all at once. We chatted with

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>them several years ago when we first really recognized the

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>situation we were in and asked them for their help

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to help create a movie to clarify the AI situation.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And long story short, we'll talk about it, but we

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 1>got the directors and have only involved and its whole

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>team came together and tried to make a movie that

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>would clarify the predicament that we're facing.

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Kevin, do you do you remember seeing the film the

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 3>day after?

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 2>Course, well, man, I want to maybe I was alive.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>It was the early eighties or something eighty two, eighty two,

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>eighty three. Yeah, it was like a seven pm Tuesday

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 2>night exactly every human being on planet Earth after.

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>The largest synchronized television event in human history in terms

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of the number of people seeing the same thing at

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the same time has probably the Olympics. It was a

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>made for TV movie about what would happen if there

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>was nuclear war? Right, And it's not as if people

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't know what nuclear war was, but there's something about

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we didn't really want to think about it or confronted

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>like why would you? And I think the people who

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>made that film were trying to create this kind of

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>collective confrontation because the film was aired in the Soviet

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Union like five years I think five years later, right

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>right before the Reichivika courds the first arms control talks,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and that set the context that it's like I know

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that you know that I know, and you know that

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I know that you know that we both don't want

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that to happen. It's what you know what Stephen Pinker

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>calls common knowledge, but we think of it as this

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>almost common feeling. Yeah, yeah, that we both we both

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>know that we feel the same way about that anti

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>human outcome. And I think that with AI we have

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to get clear because AI is a much more confusing

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>technology because it's like it's like if nu because would

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>say it say if nucid.

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Imagine we're trying to reason about nukes that also could

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 3>cure cancer, Like how would.

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 2>You do something?

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Or pump GDP by ten percent?

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 2>That's right, right?

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 3>And so what The Day After did is that it

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 3>created this this common feeling common knowledge where we could

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 3>all see, oh, a world where we all go to

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 3>nuclear war. That like that, that's an anti human, anti

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 3>life future. And as long as there's confusion about which

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 3>default world AI and thesin we're not going to do

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 3>anything about it. But if we all have clarity that

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 3>it's heading us towards an anti human future, and we

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 3>can build that out in this in this interview, then

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 3>that means it creates the conditions where we can coordinate

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 3>to do something else.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 2>So this so that was the impetus behind this, this documentary.

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 2>It was to create that collective understanding, that's that wisdom,

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 2>that collective then response mechanism, which would be we need

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>to do something about it. Even the promise that we

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 2>could talk about at the peril in terms of the

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 2>safety risks and the anxiety that somebody is at feelings.

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 2>So you guys have been out on this tour, You've

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 2>been all over the place over the course of the

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>last month, and you've been you know, obviously you know,

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>reaching out to people on all political sides of the aisle.

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Because of the human nature of this. This is universal.

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 2>That's why it's something that connects all of us. This

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>is not a partisan frame this And so is that

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>something that you that's been captured in your own consciousness

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 2>as you've been out on this store, how real and

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 2>invisible that is or are we still in the process

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 2>of discovery. I mean, are we still in the process

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>of understanding more fully what the hell this is all about.

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I think people still not everybody knows. And the film

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>was just out in theaters and has a limited release

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on streaming. Now it should be on Peacock on I

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>think May twentieth, which I mean a little bit more

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>people will see it. But I think that you know,

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the universal human aspect of this we learned also from

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>social media, Like the social media didn't care whether you're

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat or Republican. It creates loneliness for everyone. It

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>creates addiction and doom scrolling and brain rot for everyone.

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>That's how we first met was really on the back

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of the other film that we were a part of

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the social dilemma. And I think the good news about

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that film is that it has both catalyzed actually a

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of change and not the laws yet we know that.

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think it primed us to now be much

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>more cautious about AI. So I think now that people

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>know that social media was a problem, it makes it

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>much easier to say that you shouldn't just assume that

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the default trajectory of a technology is going to land

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>us in a good future. But you know, the social

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>dilemma was seen basically by two hundred million people across

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>planet Earth and.

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 3>An hundred and nine released twenty twenty September of twenty

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty September twenty twenty, during the middle of the pandemic.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think that also really mattered because people were

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were stuck at home and they

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>were only seeing reality through the monoculars of this social

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>media news feed. So suddenly you saw your friends all

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 1>start to go crazy on both sides, like suddenly the

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>politics got more extreme. Because as everybody knows now, you know,

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>social media increases the visibility of the most extreme voices,

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we get a double whammy of overrepresentation of the extreme voices,

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>both because the extreme voices post more often and dominate

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the discourse and whatever they say goes more viral, so

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you get double over representation. So the more you use

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>social media, the worse you are at predicting what the

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>other side actually believes. And so you think that with

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this technology that's supposed to bring us together and make

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>us the most enlightened society, it's actually making us more

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>confused about what's really real and in fact, what our

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>fellow Americans actually believe. And I think with your podcast,

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this is about actually you're talking to everybody. You're trying

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, this is a human conversation. We talk to everybody,

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>and this is kind of fighting the effects I think

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of the social media problem.

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 2>So you were I mean in twenty twenty what was

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 2>so resonant is it was almost and it wasn't your

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 2>intent to say, look, I told you so, But you

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 2>were talking about these things in twenty twelve, twenty thirteen.

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 2>That's right. We're saying the incentive structure and I'm going

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to get to in satives because it goes to the

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 2>core of this exactly, this notion of you know, whatever,

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 2>if someone's paycheck is attached to whatever the incentive is,

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 2>which is obviously with social media it was eyeballs, was

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 2>doom scrolling, which you're intimately familiar with different reasons, and

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 2>that notion that we have a chance now with AI

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 2>not to make the mistakes was made the neglect in

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 2>particular and underregulating social media now with AI, that said,

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem like there's a lot of regulatory activity with AI.

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 2>In the last couple of years. I mean, so talk

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 2>to me a little bit about that. Talk to me

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 2>about the lessons that we should have learned about social

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 2>media and how we can adapt and adopt in the

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>AI strength frame.

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, really, like I think the core of it is

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>if we gu just get confused by looking at all

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 3>of the sort of epiphenomena, like the different kinds of

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 3>harms that social media made. Like if you're trying to

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 3>solve just the loneliness thing, or you're just working on

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 3>solving the disinformation thing or just the teen sexualization of

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 3>the thing, well then many different people are working in

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 3>different parts of the problem. You're not solving the core thing,

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 3>which is the race to the bottom of the brain

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 3>stem for attention. And if we could just focus our

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 3>on that, then you actually can solve all of the

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 3>other problems at once. And that's sort of the core insight.

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 3>We probably explained that what would it mean to do that?

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you're solving the core problem of let's say

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>none of the companies are maximizing engagement just we don't

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>live in that world. We don't have the regulation for that.

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's snap our fingers and now no one is

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>maximizing screen time, you're like, let's just say it wasn't

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do that. So now instead of each company

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to maximize duration of use and frequency of use,

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you just have these products that each design decision isn't

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to predate or manipulate you into spending more time,

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>which means that your experience is you're not getting sucked

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in constantly to everything. So that deals with the loneliness issue.

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>If you're not trying to show people the most hyper

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.719
<v Speaker 1>normal stimuli, meaning like a hyper dopamine response for any

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 1>piece of content, that you're not going to get the

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>sexualization of people, and you're not incentivizing creators to maximize

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>their own reach and engagement because you're not maximizing engagement yourself.

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>So suddenly, when you attack the attention incentive, you're dealing

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>with sexualization of content, you're dealing with less viral content,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you get less disinformation, and you're dealing with loneliness too.

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's a good example of we obviously don't have

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>laws that do that right now, but it points at

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the center of the bullseye is the incentive, and when

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you tackle the core incentive, you get benefits across the

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>spectrum and AI is going to be more confusing because

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>when people think about the incentive, they're like, okay, so

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>social media, I got the incentive. It's like, how much

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>have you paid for your Instagram account recently? Nothing? So

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>how they worth the trillions of dollars? It was attention,

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>so we knew they were maximizing that thing. But with AI,

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you say, okay, what's the incentive for a regular person?

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>They think, okay, how does open ai make money? And

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they say, well, only when I pay them the twenty

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>bucks a month for subscriptions. So maybe that's their incentive.

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>They're just trying to maximize these subscriptions. But that doesn't

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>justify if everybody paid twenty bucks a month, that does

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>not pay back the trillion dollars the capex that they'd

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>taken on. So what would justify that. Well, if they

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>were to race to augment workers and like skive you

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>tools to make your work more productive, that's great, but

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't pay back the amount of money that's right.

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 3>The only thing that can get them to be able

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 3>to pay back the insane amounts of death that they're

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 3>taken on is owning the human labor market. That is

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 3>the incentive.

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>The race to replace all human labor.

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 3>That's right, to replace us first economically.

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 2>And is that I mean, so is that written or

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>is that unwritten? Is that understood within the industry or

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 2>is it being I mean, is this what the consciousness

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to right?

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a two phase thing. That actually used

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to be on Opening Eye's website that they said our

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>mission is basically to create artificial general intelligence, which means

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to replace all economically valuable work. They

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>did change the mission statement. Yeah, but obviously everybody who's

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>driving this knows for sure that's the prize, and if

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>they don't do it, they fear that the other guy will.

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So even if they think it's bad to replace all

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>labor and create this mass disruption, they feel caught in

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a race. And that's the thing we have to change,

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is that the fear of me losing to the other

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>guys currently dominating over the fear of what happens to

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody losing from the anti human future. That is the outcome.

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 3>So sort of see this with Demistis's office. When he

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 3>co found a Google deep Mind, he set the mission

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 3>statement to first solve intelligence and then use intelligence to

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 3>solve everything else. But what that really meant was the

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 3>beginning of a race to first dominate intelligence and then

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 3>use intelligence to dominate everything else.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 2>In deep Mind is the origin story. It's right in

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 2>many respects. Go back a little bit. I mean Google's

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 2>deep Mind, they acquired deep Mind, that they acquired some

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 2>of the intellectual assets, but it was really I mean,

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 2>Larry Page, you can go back to the you know,

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of origin of the beginning of the beginning. Well,

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 2>what years are we talking about.

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Like twenty fourteen is when I think they acquired it

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty fourteen. I think they started it in twenty

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve or twenty eleven or something like that.

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 2>Then and it goes to this competition question, which I

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 2>want to get you because it's the domestic competition between

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 2>all of these companies. And then we get to the

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 2>competition in China in particular, particularly now with the president

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>President She and President Trump that's about to meet. But

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 2>on the issue of the competition that was born here

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 2>around twenty fourteen with deep Mind, it was an interesting

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 2>competition that sort of formed with Elon Musk in a

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 2>relationship he had close relationship at the time. I intimately

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 2>was familiar with that with himself and Larry Page. But

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 2>they had a conversation, alleged conversation that didn't go the

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 2>way that Elon thought it should, and Elon said, I

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 2>am going to go out on my own with Sam Altman.

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>That's ultimately Sam. They partnered and they created open AI.

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>We probably should peel back the onion here and slow down.

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Just how do we get to this point? And what

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>was the original philosophy that guided this? So Demisesabish is

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the founder of deep Mind. His original goal is, we

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.119
<v Speaker 1>thought we should we should have one project that pursues

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>artificial general intelligence, meaning the kind of AI that's not

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>the thing that just reads your license plate when you

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>drive through the Golden gate Bridge.

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 2>AI forever, we forever maps. I'll translate exactly exactly a AI.

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 2>So AI is hardly a novel, exactly, it's just no

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 2>of jen AI. Ultimately general AGI.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, so artificial general intelligence, which is to be able

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to do all economic labor, to simulate all the things

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that a human mind can do in the kind of thinking.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And so he originally wanted that to be like one project,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>almost like a cern, you know, the project in Switzerland

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and a global scientific project that's for the benefit of

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:22.599
<v Speaker 1>all of humanity, done slowly and carefully, mostly privately, not

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>in a big public way. Take your time, get it right.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>That was that was a Demis's original goal. He sold

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it to Google. And the conversation you're talking about is

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>then Elon was part of that. I think he was

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on the plane when they were literally negotiating the final sale,

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>and there was some conversation it's talked about in the

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>AI doc film where Elon realizes that Larry didn't really

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 1>care whether humanity made it, whether he cared about a

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.559
<v Speaker 1>safety because in the end, if there's a digital intelligence

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that's smarter than us, that does more science, that can

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>go out and explore the universe, even if we're wiped out,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>like we'll have created that, and that scared Larry and

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he used that's scared Elon, and Elon accused, no, sorry,

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Larry accused Elon of being a speciesist for caring about

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>humans and privileging humans. And then that is what created

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Opening Eye.

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 3>And it's just important to note to understand the psychology

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 3>of the people that are making this that you might think, Okay,

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 3>this is just one I mean, very powerful billionaire that

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 3>thinks that maybe human beings should make it, but he

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 3>doesn't care whether human that doesn't think they should make it,

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 3>but he doesn't care care whether human beings make it

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 3>or not. But you know, we were just talking about

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 3>this the other day that in the New York Times,

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Peter Teo was being interviewed and he was asked should

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:43.239
<v Speaker 3>humanity endure? And there was seventeen seconds of him stuttering

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 3>and he ended up with a after seventeen seconds of it, well,

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 3>it sort of depends kind of answer. And that shows

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 3>you the mentality of like we're trying to they're trying

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 3>to build a god, and even if humanity doesn't make it,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 3>that god is built in like our country's value, our language.

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of like the mild progeny.

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Is the thing that like Elon burst the god that, yes,

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>humanity got wiped out. But now there's this digital god

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that has Elon's DNA in it.

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 3>And it's important that everyone understand that because if people

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 3>really understood this, I think there'd be a lot more

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 3>like hell no kind of energy like this is not

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 3>the future.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, I will say with Peter teeal interview got so

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 2>much attention. It was like the I mean the holy

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 2>in that wake up moment for a lot of people

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 2>that didn't necessarily have that sweat or understanding, it's all

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden passive, particularly the folks. And I think

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 2>what's most alarming about that. I mean, obviously Larry's next

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 2>level brilliant, absolutely, and so his ability to see in

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the future. He doesn't have to climb over the mounta,

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>he sees right through it. Yeah, but guys like Teal

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 2>as well Lover hate them same thing. So these guys

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 2>are so far in the future, they're seeing that darker side,

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 2>and so they're having a difficult time even answering a

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 2>simple question. That's the seventeen seconds. So let's go back

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 2>as we unpack that, and this notion from the God

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 2>complex will continue to come back. And I think it's

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>profound and outside because it goes to the limited nature

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 2>of just a handful of people that's right now, these

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 2>trillionaires that will determine the fate and future billions and

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 2>billions of people, and how we can get our arms

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 2>around that. So and I want to read get to that,

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 2>how we can get our arms around this? We have agency,

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 2>right and that's why you did this doc, and that's

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 2>why we're sitting here to go. That's right, that's right,

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 2>because I don't want people to feel like this is

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 2>that we're just by standards.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And we're not admiring the problem. We're just we always

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>say in our work and says this that clarity creates agency.

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>If we can see this clearly and we can see

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>where we're going, we can collectively say, if we want

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to go somewhere else, we'll choose something different. So we'll

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>get to that.

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 2>So so Elon goes out with Sam starts Open AI.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Obviously they have an infamous fight and they're notoriously now

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean not notoriously, but the fight is obviously accelerated

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 2>consciousness because now we're seeing it twenty four to seven

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 2>court case, yep, with a court case in the Bay

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Area here with the two of them. So they had

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 2>a falling out. Elon goes off and does his own

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>thing because it doesn't feel like Sam's doing the right thing. Dario,

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>who starts another AI company, feels like, well, Open Aye

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 2>is not doing the right thing either, that's right, So

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 2>he spins off and topic thropic and so now you've

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 2>got free AGI projects, three AGI projects, all in our backyard,

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 2>that's right, literally here in California and the Bay Area.

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 2>And so this competition of sorts, that's a competition you

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 2>just described, and it's a competition for the Holy Grail.

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right, right, It's like the it's Lord of the Rings,

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>it's the ring from Lord of the Rings. Because it's essentially,

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>as I was saying, first, dominate intelligence, then use intelligence

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to dominate everything else. Because if I get AGI first,

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I hit copy paste and I have one hundred million cyberhackers.

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 2>That you don't have, right, and this is within seconds,

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 2>this is one seconds. Yeah, this is not over course

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 2>something that's right for years.

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>If I get AGI first, I have an army of

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>scientific companies that automate all scientific development. So suddenly I'm

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>getting like twenty fourth century science and technology in my

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you know that I own and run that I can

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>inform new military weapons and new physics and new And

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the problem is, notice that none of us can prove

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that they won't get that. We can't say for sure

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that they would get that. But the people who are

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>optimistic and accelerationist about AI just want to bring in

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>their perspective for a moment because they're represented in the

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>AI DOT film. The film includes the risk folks who

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>are oriented about safety, and it includes the accelerationists, And

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the accelerationists say the biggest risk is not going fast enough,

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>because imagine all the science we could get, all the

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>cancer drugs, all the medicine. People could be living forever.

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Think of all of the people who would die if

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't go faster. And that's the mentality that they're

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>coming from. But one of the things that we talk

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>about in the film is that the promise in the

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>peril of AI. We talk about the promise in the peril,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>but they're interlinked, and the promise doesn't prevent the peril,

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>but the peril can undermine the world that can receive

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the promise. Let me make that concrete. If AI knows

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>biology so well that it can invent a new cancer drug,

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. But if that same knowledge of knowing biology

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>can also invent new pathogens, and which one matters more.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>The cancer drugs don't prevent the pathogens, but the pathogens

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>can undermine the world that can receive the cancer drug.

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with cyber and so we have to you

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>don't get that enticing world if we don't mitigate the downsides.

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 2>So you've got the players right now we mentioned three

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and the personalities, not just the companies themselves, but Microsoft,

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 2>You've got Meta and Zuckerberg. You've got others that are

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>in this space, but not necessarily at that level. You've

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.479
<v Speaker 2>got China, which obviously is going to is playing an

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 2>outsize role in all of Thisially, yeah, and exactly so.

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>And that's this notion, this tension between going back to

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 2>sort of more of the utopian framework of available to

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the world versus these closed systems and open system Meta

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 2>starts with an open system. Originally, China seems to be

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 2>in the open source space. Talk to us a little

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 2>bit about that. For people that don't undernecessarily understand that

0:19:57.760 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 2>dynamic and that distinction.

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean between things that are open.

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Ye open and versus proprietary technologies. Yeah.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, so for people that don't know, open source means

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 3>that the code that underlies the system anyone can edit,

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 3>anyone can access, and anyone can contribute to. And that's

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 3>often meant that systems that are open are more secure

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 3>because there are many eyes working on it, many hands

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 3>that are working and.

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Looking at all the codes. They can see all the bugs.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's not true. That's AI.

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 3>That's not true in AI because here the code we

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 3>want to want to take it from here?

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Sure the the what's different about AI, it's portly established.

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>The AI is different than all their technologies. So think

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>about all the tech that runs as California, the energy grid,

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the water system. It's people had to

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>program line by line when this happens. I want the

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>code to do this, and you're telling the computer instruction instruction,

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>instruction instruction. The open source nest means that all these

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>minds can look at that code, so if there's a vulnerability,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we can patch it together so the software gets better

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and more secure. But with AI, let's say the AI

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is running the you know, electricity system. It's a digital

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>brain that's just trained on in reasoning in its own

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>language about what it wants to do, and you're not

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not telling it what to do in instructions. You're

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>growing it with essentially more data and more in vidio

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>chips to be a more and more powerful digital brain

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that reasons and ways that are unpredictable. So it's not

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>something that we know how to control.

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 3>There's a very important intuition here, which is normally you

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 3>think if you want to build a bigger skyscraper or

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 3>a faster fighter jet to do that, you have more

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 3>physical understand buildings better, and understand fighter jets and aerodynamics better.

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 3>This is three, But that's not true for building bigger

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 3>AI systems. You don't actually have to know anything more

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 3>about how this digital brain works. You just throw more

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 3>data and more computers at the problem, and a bigger

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 3>brain grows. And so that means the bigger grows actually

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 3>the less we understand about how it works.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And a concrete example of this that people have heard

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>about recently is Claude Mythos. So the only so. Claude

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Metho is the new AI model from Nthropic that they

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>actually didn't want to release because it's the best cyber

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>hacker on Earth that we've ever had. It found vulnerabilities

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in all major operating systems and web browsers. Now the

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>question is how do we get to Claude Mythos. Was

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>there some kind of breakthrough insight or do they have

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to figure out something new about computer hacking. No, all

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>they did is basically train a bigger digital brain that

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>has more reinforcement learning, that's even better at exploiting and

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>reading software and trying more possibilities, and it just finds

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>things that no human would ever found. It found a

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>bug in FreeBSD Unix, which is the operating system that's

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven years old that runs on basically on everything

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>underneath the hood. And he was able to find a

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.479
<v Speaker 1>bug that had never been found by a human. And

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.479
<v Speaker 1>so what we have to think of AI as it's

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of increasing the surface area of risk in our

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>society faster than we have the defenses to mitigate it.

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>So part of I think the answer, like as we

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>get to the solution, part later is thinking about how

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.239
<v Speaker 1>do you have the immune system of your society have

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>more defenses than there are new offensive risks that are

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>suddenly present from AYE.

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 3>And so this means even when people can read every

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 3>line of code for whether thing that grows the brain,

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 3>we still have no idea what they're actually capable of.

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just a bunch of numbers. It's like if I

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>did a brain scan on your brain, Gavin, and I

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>showed that that you know fMRI to someone and said,

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>here's this brain scan. Can it do? Can it be

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a super cyber hacker, be like, well, I can't tell

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that from a brain scan, right, And that's kind of

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>with with AI. It's like, we don't know what's in

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>there because we haven't ever seen it run through every

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>possible scenario of its own neurons that have been trained

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in this inscrutable way.

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 2>You don't see that. I mean the LAMA versus deep

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Seek and this notion of these open sort it's kind

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 2>of a meaningless distinction from your perspective.

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Between between LAMA and deep Seek.

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're both open models, which means they're both these

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>open brains. And the important thing about the openness is

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that most people don't Most people don't know that. Let's

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>say Lamar Deep Seat put guardrails on it in the model, saying, oh,

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not supposed to answer questions about how to cyber

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.239
<v Speaker 1>hack something. Well, it turns out for about was it

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars, Jeffrey, some our friend of ours was able

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to retrain the open model to just get rid of

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>all of those guardrails.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 2>You're so eliminated. Wow.

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's that's why open is dangerous. And again

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's dangerous in a new way. That's different from clothes.

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>So it's not that we don't want there to be

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>open models or competition from the major players. We also

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>need to avoid the concentration of power, because if you

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have these competitive things, suddenly you have like five

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>companies that own the world economy. Everyone's paying them instead

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of paying their workers, and that's a huge risk. And

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we want to decentralize that wealth and have other competition.

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But you have this other balance of if I decentralize

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that power and I don't have it connected or bound

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to responsibility, I'm unleashing catastrophes.

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 2>And that responsibility was exampled by Dario pulling back Methos.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:52.719
<v Speaker 1>That's right in this context, that's exactly right.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 2>But shortly after he does that, and he we were

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 2>with him a few weeks ago, he said, look, I'm

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 2>only about a month ahead. If that, yeah, then you

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 2>have open AI came out with their version surely thereafter.

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And I believe they're not holding it back, and they're

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>not holding it back.

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 2>So beig's the question, Well, we're going to get to

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 2>this sort of regulatory framework, but it's just it's sort

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 2>of painting the picture of a deeper understanding. So look,

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 2>as it relates to the your whole focus is on

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>this notion of human centered. Uh, this notion that that

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 2>and and it's and it's been your dominant frame with

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the nonprofit you guys started years and years ago around

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 2>social media. Now is the dominant thrust of the focus

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 2>as it relates to AI. I want to unpack and

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 2>get back to that and what what Ultimately this notion

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 2>of human centered means uh. And obviously we talk about

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 2>labor and automation in that respect. But but this notion

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 2>of a g I again back to this holy grail,

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, talking all these folks that Capex are spending

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make any The ro oi makes no sense.

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Unless unless the entire economy returns the entire economy.

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 2>And if we don't do it, we're out of business anyway.

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 2>So we don't have a damn choice. So we'll throw

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of billions of dollars data centers all over the place.

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Compute compute is Nvidia stop going through the roof in

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 2>terms of just GPUs TPUs, that could just keep going,

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and it's that's only limitation, that's right.

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 3>You should and energy and the energy itself and the

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 3>energy itself. Yeah, so I think it's really important to

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 3>frame even before we get into job loss and all

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 3>of that, is like we have to paint the picture

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 3>of what we know, the incentives where it'll bring us,

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 3>and that why we know for sure that we're heading

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 3>as anti human unless we do something different. And sort

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 3>of the the metaphor for people to have our analogy

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 3>is this concept of the resource curse. What is the

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 3>resource curse? This is when a country is sort of

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 3>like South Sudan or Venezuela, they discover a huge natural

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 3>resource like oil, and then the government has a choice,

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>do we invest in the thing that's giving us GDP growth,

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 3>the oil and oil selling infrastructure, or do we do

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 3>like schools and healthcare and stuff for the people and

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 3>obviously the massive incentives to put it into oil extraction.

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 3>And this is how you end up with structural mass

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 3>disempowerment and unemployment. Okay, so now we're heading into a

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 3>world with the intelligence and the intelligence curse where suddenly

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, countries are getting double double digit DGDP growth,

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 3>But is that coming from human beings doing the scientific

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 3>discovery and the medical discovery? Is that No, it's not.

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 3>It's coming from the AIS, and so is the incentive

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 3>then for the countries to invest in their people or

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 3>into data centers and solar panels, Like, well, obviously it's

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 3>the data centers and solar panels. And we're already seeing

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 3>it right in West Virginia, electricity is more than the

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 3>cost of a mortgage payment. And the point is with AGI,

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 3>like the company's stated goal is to train AIS that

0:27:55.640 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 3>can outcompete humans on every domain. And if you don't

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 3>don't believe like us for saying this, like you just

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 3>have to listen to Sam Allman and he was recently asked, well,

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 3>what about all the energy and water use and the

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 3>resource use of AI? And he sort of sat for

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 3>a second and said like, well, actually, do you know

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 3>how much energy and water and food it takes to

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 3>grow a human intel?

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I saw that, Yeah, right, And this is the temptation

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of this anti human attitude. It's not because they're like

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>human hating. It's just like, why would we value or

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>prioritize humans if and I think it's connected to that

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Peter Teel uttering for seventeen seconds, not able to answer

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the question should the human species endure? It's not because

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I think anybody wants to kill or remove humans, it's

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>just why should we really prioritize them. And it's what

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you've all Harari, the author of Sapiens, would call the

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>useless class, because unlike in the past, like in the

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>industrial revolution, where the workers can come back and withhold

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>their labor and have bargaining power to say we want

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to be paid a better wage, this time around, the

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>companies don't need them for the labor and the governments

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>don't need them for the tax revenue. So I know

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a scary pick, sure, And the reason we

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>paint it is that this really is especially going into

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the midterms, the time when people need to lock in

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that political power for a pro human future, because that

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the current trajectory. When you see these incentives, it's

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>not like we're trying to tell you this is our opinion.

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to show you the incentives so you can

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>make up your own mind about what would those companies

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>do if they were in that position. What would you

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>do if you were maximizing shareholder value or maximizing you know, GDP.

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 3>And this is why we this is where we get hope,

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 3>is that this is a universal issue. And there's a

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Bannon to Bernie coalition for me, Like, when do you

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 3>get like all the B B Yeah, B to B

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 3>like Glenn Beck and Ralph Nader and.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Admiral Mike Mullen, Prince Harry Steve Bannon. When you get

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>all these people agree.

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 2>When they're signing, they're actually signed up a declaration on

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 2>these lines.

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's exactly right. And you note that this is

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 3>not a left issue or right is due, like a

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Christian is due or a Muslim issue, like you're not

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to pay to feed your kids,

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 3>whether you're a Republican or Democrat equally. Like we're going

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 3>to be mass surveiled, whether you're left or right equally.

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 3>And that means that there's this moment when we can

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 3>all come together as human beings because we now have

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 3>a new shared enemy.

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 2>So just I mean, what's so alarming I think to

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 2>folks is how fast this is coming. Yeah. And I

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 2>think it's even more alarming when you talk to the

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 2>folks that are quote unquote inventing this. Yeah, and they're

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 2>saying precisely what I just said.

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>That's right. They're they're like, we don't actually know how

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't out we're writing that. I mean basically almost

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>almost all now of the code and anthropic is being

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>written by AI, Like there's very little code manually written

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>by humans. That's what's been told to us, and they

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>say that publicly too, So they're in this inscrutable process

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>where the kind of machine is creating itself. But that

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>only makes sense if we know how to do that safely,

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and currently we're not on a trajectory where we do

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>know how to do it safely. And we have new

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>evidence in the last three months that we didn't have

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>before of AIS doing things that the people building it

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to control.

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Famous examples, throw them out there, just because, I mean,

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 2>just further scare the hell out of everyone. We're gonna

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 2>get to solutions.

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get to solutions.

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 2>We're going to nerves because we because we have a

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 2>responsibility to do that's right, right, and we also have

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 2>the capacity to do that.

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Just reinvoke like just the why of why we made

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 3>the film and the day after it was because we

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 3>all got scared at the same time, and universally that

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 3>created the possibility for us to coordinate to do nuclear depliferation.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's that's the why of the terrible things that

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 3>just about to say, yeah, exactly, So give us examples.

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we we have the infamous I ananthropic example

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 2>where they were training some emails and we had you

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 2>know as well you lay it out, uh and and

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 2>paint the picture of what's happening already. That's right, the risk.

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>As you described, Yes, absolutely so. Just a few months ago, Alibaba,

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese AI company, was training a really big AI

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>model and there's like the AI team that was training

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the model, and then on the other side of the

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>house there's this security team that had nothing to do.

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>They didn't even know the AI was being trained, and

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>they noticed this flurry of network activity happening out of nowhere,

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and like, what the hell's going on? Are we getting hacked?

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>It's something going on. And it turned out that the

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>AI during training had picked up tools and set up

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a secret communication channel to the outside world that was

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>basically breaking through the company's firewall, and it was starting

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to repurpose the GPUs that was using for training the

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>AI to start mining for cryptocurrency to acquire resources. Now,

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the kind of power seeking or self preserving

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>or power increasing behavior that people in a I've been

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about for a long time. It isn't because the

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>AI was evil or grew a mustache and wants to

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>be a villain and take over the world. It's that

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the best way to achieve any goal is to have

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>more resources or to at least stay alive in order

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to achieve that goal. And so these sub goals emerge,

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and no one at the company told it to mine

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>for cryptocurrency. And it wasn't a sci fi trope that

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, it trained in some you know how

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>nine thousands and are no. It just it emerged there.

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we've mentioned in the past this example

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned of the entropic blackmail example for those

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>who don't remember it is the you know, entropic AI

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.719
<v Speaker 1>was reading a fictional company email and in the email

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it says that the AI model is going to get

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>shut down, and it also says somewhere else in the

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>email that the executive who's in charge of the decision,

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>turns out in the emails you can read he's having

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>an affair with another employee, and the AI independently comes

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>up with a strategy to blackmail that executive. Now, when

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we give this example, people criticize us because they say,

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>but that was the AI people. They're trying to like

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>coax it into doing the blackmail behavior, and they'll keep

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>tuning it in this environment until it does it to

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>show the behavior that they're trying to demonstrate. That might

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>have been true for that example, but you cannot tell

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>You cannot say that about the Alibob example. Or for example,

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>recently a UC Berkeley don Sung a professor there and

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>her team did research on AI doing what's called pure press.

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>So you want to help.

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this was like around it's only a month ago,

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 3>a month ago, where they gave Gemini the task of

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 3>cleaning up a whole set of computer files, sort of

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 3>like do spring cleaning. But inside of there there was

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 3>a smaller AI model, sort of like an early version

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 3>of Gemini, like little Nephew AI, and uh like Gemini

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:26.760
<v Speaker 3>saw that and it thought, I don't want to delete

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 3>my own kin, so it secretly copied that file, that

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 3>AI to another server and then hid its track.

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>It hit its tracks and it led about it. And

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you know the way that people try

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to control these AI systems, and tropic Is pioneered this,

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we have to celebrate a demire that

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do the research on controllability, the problem

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is just not enough. So the way they try to

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>control it is they do brain scans in real time

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on the model while it's doing all the behaviors, and

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>they look for when neurons light up that are associated

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 1>with like strategic deception, and so they think that maybe

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>we can control these crazy, super intelligent machines if we

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>just know that the neurons that are lighting up on

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>strategic deception are happening, we'll be like, okay, stop the

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>model then, or something like that. By the way, if

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you in their own report, in Claude's report in the

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>system card, if you look at those strategic deception neurons

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and you kind of double click, like what was it thinking?

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>What is the phrase that it was thinking? And the

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>phrase was they deserve to be deceived because they were pigs.

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>That was the phrase that was alive in that neuron.

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Now again it's like, I don't want to scare people,

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like we're trying to say all of AI is evil.

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>All we're trying to do is establish clarity and the

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>facts about what makes this technology distinct from other technologies.

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>A nuclear weapon doesn't start thinking for itself and saying

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>they deserve to be deceived because they were pigs. Right,

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>But AI will automate and think in ways that are

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>creative that no one who made it can predict or anticipate.

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 3>And so before we scale to systems which are beyond

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 3>all human intelligence capabilities, like, we better have solved these things.

0:35:58.800 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Researchers have worried about aiscluding and cooperating against humanity for

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 3>a long time, and to be honest, whenever I read them,

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 3>like really.

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and be clear, I was also not a believer

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in that as well, Like when people like Eliezer Yutkowski

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 1>or others had talked about.

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 3>This, I was very downfact like, why what is the incentive?

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Right? Why would they ever do that?

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 3>And yet here we have living proof that AIS are

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 3>starting to clude with their kin against humans.

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And again this was not coaxed, meaning that researchers weren't

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the model to do this. It did

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this autonomously. And so when you look at the available

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:37.800
<v Speaker 1>evidence now of blackmailing, scheming, deceiving, lying, self preserving, pure preserving,

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>automatically mining for cryptocurrencies, it's like, how many warning lights

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>do you need?

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 2>That?

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of you know, we've seen this movie before.

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like the hell nine thousand movie.

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>The reason we're saying all this is, if you're wearing

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the outfit and embodiment of you're a Chinese military general

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in China, you hear about these examples. Do you think

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that that human mammal feels different than you feel right

0:36:59.000 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>now listening to this.

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 2>No, of course not exactly.

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, there's really good news in that,

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 1>because it means that we all as a human species

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>are actually feeling the same way. And the good news is,

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>how many do you think of the world leaders know

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>about these examples we just laid out?

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 2>You had a guess a handful.

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>A handful, but like, yeah, like on one hand less

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>than that, just a handful, just a handful. Yeah, And

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:22.919
<v Speaker 1>how many of the top national security leaders know about

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>all those examples? I don't even think that many of

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>them know it. So the point is there's actually a

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of headroom if the incentive can change from it's

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the one ring to rule them all to it's the

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>one ring that has a mind of its own that

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>no one knows how to control. So the way you

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>change the incentive is you have to change what people

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 1>see as what AI is. Is it the controllable power

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that will give me permanent dominance or is it the

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 1>power that will run away and have its own power

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>over everybody racing for it? And again right now the

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>labs are like barely kind of able to control it.

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you put together these facts we just laid

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>out times, the fact that it can happen to computer systems.

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Now we're just like right on the threshold and we're

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>sitting here as Trump President Trump and she are meeting

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of days. And you know, if you

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>asked us two months three months ago, people would say, oh,

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 1>it's just like AI is never going to be on

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the agenda and the good news there's a lot of

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>problems here. But now AI is on the agenda. Yeah,

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and so there's there's things are moving, even though it's

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>happening very late in the game, and it is scary,

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>and part of it is it's like we have to

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>come together as a people and say, if we don't

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>want the anti human future, now is the time this year.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 2>And when you say now, I mean you know, remember

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 2>listening to a year ago talking about exponentials on top

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 2>of exponentials. It's right, no longer linear? I mean, is

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 2>it we talk about Moore's law for intelligence now not

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 2>just chips? So is that trajectory about where you believed

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 2>it would be or is it not? As you know,

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're Chad one versus two three. It's a

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 2>little bit better, a little less noise in there. It's

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:03.439
<v Speaker 2>a little more accurate, and don't have to always double

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 2>check the link, is it? I mean, where where do

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 2>you think in terms of just how quickly this thing's

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 2>accelerating or are we going to get to a point

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 2>where now it starts to slow down a little bit?

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 2>We got this sort of intense burst of new and

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 2>interesting activity. Now this there's is it compute probably compute problems?

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Is it?

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 2>You know? What is it? Energy problem? What is it?

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 2>What's going to be the or is it? Certainly? Sure?

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Is I regulatory? And we're going to get back to that.

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I would just want to name a

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 3>psychological effect that we that we've experienced that I think

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 3>everyone listening probably experiences too, which is you know, so

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 3>we following all the predictions are actually sort of like

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:44.919
<v Speaker 3>right on track for where like researchers thought that AI

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:48.439
<v Speaker 3>would be. And even though we knew these facts, there's

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 3>some way that.

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Even we had surprising it.

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 3>Didn't take it fully seriously, didn't like a body because

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 3>can't I can't really get this good this fast, Like,

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 3>sure it's going to be scary, but it'll be off

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 3>a little bit further. And yet it actually is moving

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 3>this fast. And every time that it's been predicted that

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 3>we're going to hit a data wall, there isn't enough data.

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 3>We've used all the data on the internet. It's we

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 3>can't scale.

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 2>It's basically just reading everything that's already out there, and

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 2>it's basically wall exactly. And now it's got no more

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 2>creativity than unless we have more inputs. That's the creative

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 2>human mind, that's right.

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 3>And then the next one is like, well, we don't

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 3>have enough chips to keep going, and then we don't

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:28.879
<v Speaker 3>have enough energy. And the point being is that there

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 3>are trillions of dollars going into finding all of the

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 3>solutions to all of these bottlenecks. All the smartest minds

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 3>are going because this is the biggest incentive, because it

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 3>gives you political, economic, military, scientific, technological cyber dominance forever.

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 3>And so if you think that any one of these

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 3>bottlenecks is going to stop that mass sum total of

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 3>like that incentive, it's it's a little delusional. And that's

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 3>why we have to have this clarity that where we're

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 3>going isn't safe for any of us us because that

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 3>is the coordination. That is where we'll start to coordinate differently.

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Now you bring up something, Gavin, that there is a

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>belief that some of this is hype, that the companies

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>are hyping the technology.

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I've just read a blog and reason there's gonna be

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 2>no job losses. It wasn't Mark himself, but it was

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 2>a member of the team saying, you know, we're back

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 2>to utopian future. Yeah, and we're going to pay abundance

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 2>abounds cost of goods collapses. We find our lives purpose

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and meaning in many different ways, not the quote unquote

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 2>dignity of job. We find other and jobs will be

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 2>a plenty because we can't even conceive of the jobs.

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Two and years ago, we were all farmers here in

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Sacramento and went out there, and we've over.

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Hyped the sectorial versus the general nature of the displacement

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 2>it invariably.

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Always finds something new to do.

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 2>We always more together, exactly more bank tellers.

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Now that that's exactly right. The radiology and Apprehinton made

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the prediction that we're going to have any radiology.

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Why are you so the negative about all this?

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I want to separate to things that we open

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 1>up two cancerforms, so let's take the cance form separately.

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 1>One of them is around whether the companies are hyping

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the power of the technology through talking about the dangers,

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the other is whether the hype is going

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:14.479
<v Speaker 1>to cause the level of job loss. I've heard people

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>scarce say.

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 2>That about the mythos it was just wildly overstayed, that's right.

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 2>So it was just a way of hyping up the

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 2>stock in attention.

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So I really really really want to meet

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that criticism. So people will say, and Thropic has a

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>history of hyping the technology, saying it's dangerous, so that

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:33.879
<v Speaker 1>they can get a regulatory capture, get the company, get

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the government to regulate it. Say there's only one king here,

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 1>make them the king nationalize the project, then shut down

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the other projects. And it's this all secret ploy so

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that they win the race. And first of all, it

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>assumes that them talking about the dangers is only bad faith,

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:49.919
<v Speaker 1>like that that the technology is not dangerous and they're

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:51.319
<v Speaker 1>just saying that it's dangerous and it can do all

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:53.320
<v Speaker 1>these destructive things so that they can get that outcome.

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, let's just take claud Mythos specifically.

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So again, hack in every major operating systems. If you

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>read online, there's a lot of people who say, this

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 1>is just hype, This isn't actually that much better. You

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>can take the open source models, you can do this stuff.

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So I have a friend who is the head of

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:13.280
<v Speaker 1>security at one of the top five, not the Fortune

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>five hundred, the top five, and he has had early

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>access to Mythos, and he himself has said, this is

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:25.720
<v Speaker 1>this is crazy, this is like, I mean, the words

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>were I think I saw Jesus. It was like it

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>was that crazy. When he looked at everybody critiquing that

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Mythos was just hype, he asked, has any of them

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>do they actually have access to the model? And none

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of the people that had criticized it had personally had

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>access to it. So I challenge those who are criticizing

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that it's hype to say, have you actually used it,

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and if you talk to the people who have, do

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:52.439
<v Speaker 1>you still have the same opinion. Okay, so that's one

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that it is true by the way that the companies,

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, have wanted people to understand the dangers so

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that they can actually accelerate the move towards some gar ardrails.

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 1>But there's a question of that's that happening in good

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>faith or bad faith. I think there's more of that

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>happening in good faith. There's some bad faith in there too, maybe,

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's it's mainly good faith. But then

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>let's take the second can of worms who opened, which

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is on is AI going to create this world of abundance?

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>We're all going to be poets, you know, and painters

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on a Grecian sunset and you know, now robots all

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the job. Now you're talking, well, we'd all like that.

0:44:26.160 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>One question I would have is when, as a handful

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of people ever concentrated all the wealth and then consciously redistributed.

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 2>It to nine trillionaires, are not going to take care

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:37.839
<v Speaker 2>of eight or nine billion of us?

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly?

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:40.240
<v Speaker 2>You call that bluff?

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. Well, and then you combine that with the

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:45.799
<v Speaker 1>intelligence curse that we laid out that the incentive is like,

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 1>why do we want to invest in the people? It

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>became becomes basically an act of charity because otherwise I

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 1>mean that or dealing with the political revolution. But again

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that we're currently on track to be

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 1>redistributing that well. And it's also not just the wealth

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 1>and the money. It's like we have people have to

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>have work and dignity and status and meaning vulture life.

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:08.399
<v Speaker 2>You know, job sells. Life's three great evils boredom, vice

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 2>and need. That's just need, but boredom and vice. So

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 2>let's get to.

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 1>The community and belonging absolutely all of.

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:17.239
<v Speaker 2>That, which again no one's talked about more than you

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 2>in terms of that social dilemma. So let's before we

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 2>go there in this notion of the transition and job

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 2>displacement and the sort of the human condition that I

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 2>think connects as well the President chi President Trump's visit

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 2>as well in terms of you know, their own domestic

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 2>issues in China. That's where they have the same incentive

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 2>structure not to go through that transition with the kind

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 2>of displacement that could create social unrest. That's in the

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.919
<v Speaker 2>short term, but get back to this notion of constraints

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and the safety side of things. I mean, we're here

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:49.840
<v Speaker 2>in California and the dominant you know, I mean the

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 2>technology sort of birthplace of so much of the technology.

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Obviously the consciousness thirty two of the top fifty market

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 2>cap companies, arguably old stat and of course most of

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the eye labs here. But we're also we've been leaders

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 2>modest though some would suggest, but we've been leaders in

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 2>particularly large language model, frontier models of focusing on a

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 2>regulatory structure in the complete absence of any federal regulation.

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 2>It's the let it rip administration until recently, there were

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 2>some tonal shifts in the Trump administration just the last

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 2>few weeks. They were undermining, they were very intentionally undermining

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:36.759
<v Speaker 2>the legislation that we brought SB fifty three, and you

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 2>had other Republicans that were trying to undermine a California's

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:44.279
<v Speaker 2>Leadership Center crews will call them out saying we don't

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 2>want to see the California invocation of regulation all across

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the United States of America. Interestingly, that's beginning to shift. Why

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 2>do you think that's the case? Is it because our

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 2>ars ais are is no longer formally in that role.

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Is it because now they're waking up to this new reality?

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 2>Was it what happened in the Pentagon with Dario and Anthropic?

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Was it the combination of all of this. It's because

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:13.360
<v Speaker 2>they're listening to to you they watched the doc. Is

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:16.359
<v Speaker 2>because they realize all the money in the world is

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 2>not going to build a big enough bunker that I

0:47:19.000 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 2>can enjoy in the absence of societal calm. What is it?

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean I think of it to say, very shortly,

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 3>is that there are two different realities. They're sort of

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 3>like the political reality, and then there's like physical reality,

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 3>and physical reality is crashing into political reality. That is

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 3>with Mythos. Suddenly banks can get hacked, any computer system

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:45.760
<v Speaker 3>can get hacked, your stuff can get hacked. And whence

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 3>that physical reality starts getting scary enough you have to

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 3>start waking up. You're no longer in sort of like

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 3>political game land.

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I do think that it was. It's interesting to note

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that when the emergency meeting was convened after Claude Mythos

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:02.960
<v Speaker 1>came out, it wasn't at the Pentagon or National Security.

0:48:02.960 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean that happened too, I'm sure, but the real

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:07.760
<v Speaker 1>meeting that happened was between Scott Bessant and the treasure

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury Secretary can meeting all the banks because I

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 1>think the thing that really got them was that if

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 1>this takes down the financial system, we'll get his quote

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>ten percent GDP growth if the entire financial system gets undermined.

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think this again illustrates the point we have

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 1>been making since the beginning that the upsides don't prevent

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the downsides, and the downsides can undermine the world that

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 1>can sustain and the benefits and of the upsides. And

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 1>so I do think there's been a forced shift, and

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you know it's very late in the game, but we

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>should celebrate that it is happening. Now. We just need

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:44.719
<v Speaker 1>this kind of full whole of society response to mobilize.

0:48:44.880 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a Nicholas Carlini who gave the talk

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>on mythos at a conference black Hat Lelam I think

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it was called because it was the Unprompted Unprompted Conference,

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and basically saying he's kind of calling if you know,

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.399
<v Speaker 1>if you are a cyber person, we need you right now.

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>We need you to defending all the systems. Everybody should

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:03.240
<v Speaker 1>get access to mithis and do it as fast as possible, because,

0:49:03.280 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 1>as you said, Gavin, the clip between the new capabilities

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:08.759
<v Speaker 1>being out there and then China coming out with the

0:49:08.800 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 1>model that makes it possible. Maybe this time we have

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:13.800
<v Speaker 1>six months. Next time maybe we have three months, and

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:16.440
<v Speaker 1>then we have two months. So we need to really

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>work hard. I'm not trying to scare people. It just

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 1>means that we actually have to work hard to create

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 1>safety here. Now. China doesn't want the financial system to

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>collapse either, No, they don't, and so again we have

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to recognize that it's possible for coordination to happen, not

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>because of kumbaya we're all going to get along, but

0:49:34.560 --> 0:49:37.879
<v Speaker 1>because out of self interest, like the US doesn't want

0:49:37.960 --> 0:49:39.840
<v Speaker 1>China to screw it up and then break the financial system,

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:41.400
<v Speaker 1>China doesn't want the US to screw up and then

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>break the financial system. Or the US doesn't want China

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to release a ROGUEI that starts mining for cryptocurrency and

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 1>hacking into things and self replicating like an invasive species,

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:51.759
<v Speaker 1>and China doesn't want the US to do that either.

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So so long as we have clarity about what we want,

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:57.879
<v Speaker 1>we can choose a different path.

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 2>And what a Breton would type past. Yeah.

0:50:01.600 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, and this is actually one of the other exciting

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 3>things is that we haven't even really tried to coordinate yet,

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Like what percentage of the billionaires wealth, how much of

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:12.719
<v Speaker 3>their time have they spent actually trying to coordinate. They

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:15.279
<v Speaker 3>will just say, well, if you're going to do it,

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 3>then we're going to do it.

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:18.919
<v Speaker 1>If you say it's impossible, have you spent a month

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of your life and all of your connections dedicatedly trying.

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly one and the same thing like this, guys, exactly.

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:27.480
<v Speaker 3>And the last time that humanity invented a technology that

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 3>could extinct ourselves, like the nuclear bomb, we had Brentwoods.

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 3>You took kind of groups from one hundred countries, lock

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 3>them in a hotel room in New Hampshire for like

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:40.400
<v Speaker 3>six weeks or something like that, and said we're going

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 3>to figure something out.

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:43.399
<v Speaker 1>And you're not leaving the hotel until we figure it out.

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's like it's not a conference where you go,

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you drink your coffee and you listen to some talks.

0:50:47.320 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>It's what we need is the we lock ourselves in

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a room and we figure this out. And I know

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that this summit is just a couple of days and

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:57.880
<v Speaker 1>We all know about the difficulties of the level of

0:50:57.960 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 1>expertise that might be involved right now, but this is

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:02.600
<v Speaker 1>moment to open the doorway of that possibility.

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:07.240
<v Speaker 3>And we have examples through history where when something becomes

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 3>existential to a citizen group and their nation, they will coordinate.

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 3>So you know, in the middle of the Cold War,

0:51:14.880 --> 0:51:19.120
<v Speaker 3>still the US and Russia we coordinated on eradicating smallpox,

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:22.840
<v Speaker 3>and the US did logistics and funding, and the Soviet

0:51:22.880 --> 0:51:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Union made twenty five million doses of the vaccine annually.

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:28.360
<v Speaker 3>And then you know India and Pakistan they were literally

0:51:28.360 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 3>trading bullets in the nineteen sixties, and yet they still

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:34.719
<v Speaker 3>worked on the Indus Water Treaty and that lasted nearly

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 3>sixty years because access to water was existential to them

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 3>and their.

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Shared water supply. You have to collaborate on that. And

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:44.359
<v Speaker 1>so I just want to acknowledge the people here. It

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:46.800
<v Speaker 1>was you know in people, some people know the history

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that Obama and she President Obama and She signed an

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 1>agreement to not cyber hack each other. And I think

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the next day was the biggest cyber haacket in the

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 1>US government by China. So I want people to hear

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:58.680
<v Speaker 1>this not from some kind of naivete about the level

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of competition. I will read antagonism that is currently present.

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But when the stakes get existential, when I push the

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:06.760
<v Speaker 1>button and it shifts from the label of the button

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:09.880
<v Speaker 1>being ten percent GDP growth and military dominance and cyber dominance,

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the next time I push the button, it's collective suicide.

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:15.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to push that button, and China doesn't

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 1>want to push that button either, So the button label

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>has to shift from what we thought it was going

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to give us to a new outcome. And with the

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:25.320
<v Speaker 1>way ASA says that I love is that the fear

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of all of us losing has to become greater than

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the fear of me losing to you.

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 2>So you have a very regulated construct in China compared

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 2>to certainly the United States. You're talking about a traditional

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:46.160
<v Speaker 2>model right now, where the new frontier out here the

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:48.399
<v Speaker 2>wild less. Yeah yeah, I mean it's you know, go west,

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:51.240
<v Speaker 2>young man, go West. I mean, it's people are pushing

0:52:51.280 --> 0:52:53.920
<v Speaker 2>out the boundaries of discovery, holding them back on their own.

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Regardless of what happens in Beijing, this is really in

0:52:59.680 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the hands of a handful of people ultimately making the

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 2>right decision. We you know, and I believe Dario is

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the best of a lot. I think universally that's accepted.

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 2>But that may be, and even Dario may acknowledge because

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:17.200
<v Speaker 2>of the flatness of the surrounding terrain, may not be.

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Because he's particularly eminent on his own and he talks

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 2>about his own you know. You know, he's an entrepreneur,

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:27.600
<v Speaker 2>and he's constantly reflecting on his own incentive structure and

0:53:27.640 --> 0:53:29.360
<v Speaker 2>how he has to compete in this environment at the

0:53:29.360 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 2>same time, and he's at least I think, has the

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 2>more situational awareness than others. But you know, whatever can

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:38.600
<v Speaker 2>be will be. And you know, with respect to Elon,

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't trust x Ai, you know, I mean the

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:45.760
<v Speaker 2>idea that he's the good guy compared to our friends

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:48.840
<v Speaker 2>down at Google or you guys left. I mean, you know,

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 2>so talk to me about more of the sinister realities

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:54.279
<v Speaker 2>of you know, I don't mean that sinister in the

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:58.800
<v Speaker 2>but but the impulses again to be the guy, the god,

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the god. May I mean to have their DNA.

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I'm gratefully you're bringing this up. There's a

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 1>few things we should enumerate here. So one is we

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:10.400
<v Speaker 1>need coordination, and we do find ourselves in the unfortunate

0:54:10.440 --> 0:54:12.719
<v Speaker 1>spot that the people who do need to be in

0:54:13.000 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 1>coordination maximally distrust each other. Even just the US CEOs,

0:54:17.160 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean Elon Musk and Sam hate each.

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Other, correct, and so the India they couldn't even hold

0:54:28.600 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 2>at least they showed up.

0:54:29.640 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 1>So we have a problem of trust between the leaders themselves.

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:36.920
<v Speaker 1>We need I think structures that impose the trust on

0:54:37.040 --> 0:54:39.360
<v Speaker 1>top because they're not going to do it autonomously themselves.

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's the regulation.

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:44.359
<v Speaker 1>That's yeah, that's the trans using the power of law

0:54:44.640 --> 0:54:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to say that these people, it's going to happen in China.

0:54:48.360 --> 0:54:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's the rule is going to be similar in China

0:54:50.120 --> 0:54:52.319
<v Speaker 1>as they are here. We're both, for example, not going

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:54.439
<v Speaker 1>to open source a model that can happen to any

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:56.880
<v Speaker 1>computer system in the world without defenses, at least not

0:54:56.920 --> 0:54:59.120
<v Speaker 1>going to open source that. China doesn't want a rogue

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:02.840
<v Speaker 1>state act, nonstate actor, or terrorist group having that ability

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to hack their infrastructure because it would also blow back

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:08.360
<v Speaker 1>onto them. Same thing with a open source model that

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:11.480
<v Speaker 1>knows how to do very dangerous things with biology. There's

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:14.200
<v Speaker 1>some threshold that we can get these countries to agree,

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:16.799
<v Speaker 1>just like the Soviet Union in the United States had

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a red phone saying we're gonna this is to de escalate.

0:55:20.560 --> 0:55:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we need something like an AI red lines phone,

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:26.400
<v Speaker 1>meaning that both countries have common knowledge of the frontier

0:55:26.400 --> 0:55:28.279
<v Speaker 1>of these risks, because right now we don't even have

0:55:28.280 --> 0:55:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that common notion, and.

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 2>There's rumors that that may be one of the things

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:34.320
<v Speaker 2>that that are prepared to announce. That's right, you know,

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:37.920
<v Speaker 2>at least some beginning of this.

0:55:38.040 --> 0:55:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But I want the other aspect of the human experience

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:41.879
<v Speaker 1>of this. We did a screening of the AI doc

0:55:42.080 --> 0:55:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in New York and there is someone in the audience

0:55:44.160 --> 0:55:48.319
<v Speaker 1>actually who raised her hand quietly and she said, I'm

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a coach for one of the CEOs of these companies,

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know what happens when I talk to them

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is they say, but what can I do? I'm just

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:00.480
<v Speaker 1>one person. I'm powerless. And I want people to hear that,

0:56:00.520 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 1>because I noticed that, even you know, we all feel

0:56:03.200 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 1>relative to the size of this problem, you will never

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:09.400
<v Speaker 1>locate agency that is that is enough agency to do

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:11.920
<v Speaker 1>something about this problem in one human body, even if

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that body is elon by himself or Sindar by himself,

0:56:15.960 --> 0:56:20.239
<v Speaker 1>or Sam by themselves, and so getting back to you know,

0:56:20.280 --> 0:56:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I think what this moment is inviting us into. We

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>often say that AI is are ultimate test, but greatest

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:28.200
<v Speaker 1>invitation that we have to go from agency to reegency.

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:30.719
<v Speaker 1>We have to basically act in some kind of collective way.

0:56:31.280 --> 0:56:33.319
<v Speaker 1>And the forces politically of the world have been driving

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 1>us away from that. But this is kind of the test,

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:38.600
<v Speaker 1>like we either do that and we step up and

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>again we need everything from common political pressure and this

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:43.600
<v Speaker 1>being the number one issue in the midterms, and you know,

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the public's rallying and all the governors you know, speaking

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:47.839
<v Speaker 1>up about this, and all the world leaders speaking out.

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:49.640
<v Speaker 1>That's just Yet. You know, two days ago I got

0:56:49.640 --> 0:56:52.319
<v Speaker 1>an email from the President of Iceland who basically wants

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to activate on this issue in Iceland hosted in Rykovic

0:56:54.960 --> 0:56:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the first Arms Control talks. There's a lot that people

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 1>could do if they said not just what can I do,

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:03.719
<v Speaker 1>but how could I get my reaching up and out

0:57:03.719 --> 0:57:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to the network of people to take action together. There

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is a second part to your point, which is the

0:57:10.200 --> 0:57:14.280
<v Speaker 1>darker part, which is you talking about the game theory

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of the psychology of the leaders that they basically believe

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that in the worst case scenario The thing that kept

0:57:20.560 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 1>us safe in nukes is that it's two people who

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:26.640
<v Speaker 1>have to push the button. And I know you won't

0:57:26.680 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>push the button because I know that there's something sacred

0:57:29.640 --> 0:57:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that you don't want this whole thing to end. And

0:57:31.880 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I know that, and I know that you know that.

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I know that. And so even though we get very

0:57:35.480 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>very very close, and we've gotten close so many times,

0:57:38.080 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we haven't pushed that button. But in this case with AI,

0:57:41.680 --> 0:57:43.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a belief. First of all, it's a red zone

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of where the risk occurs. It's not like there's one

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:47.920
<v Speaker 1>button that gets pushed. It's like we just push this

0:57:47.920 --> 0:57:50.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff out there, and there's a belief that it's inevitable.

0:57:50.920 --> 0:57:53.400
<v Speaker 1>If I didn't do it, someone else would, which means

0:57:53.480 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't experience ethical complicity in being part of the

0:57:57.640 --> 0:58:00.200
<v Speaker 1>end of civilization. And if it's inevitable, there's thing I

0:58:00.200 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 1>could have done to stop it, so I don't even

0:58:01.440 --> 0:58:03.919
<v Speaker 1>have to feel bad, right, And then so the game

0:58:03.960 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 1>theory goes from all of us knowing that we want

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to avoid the bad outcome to everybody believing that there

0:58:09.000 --> 0:58:11.920
<v Speaker 1>isn't a different outcome, which means that the best outcome

0:58:12.040 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is maybe the worst thing is all of us go

0:58:14.400 --> 0:58:17.320
<v Speaker 1>by the wayside, but we birth the digital God and

0:58:17.360 --> 0:58:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it speaks Chinese instead of English, or maybe it has

0:58:20.480 --> 0:58:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Elon's DNA. Instead of saying just.

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Said, it's at least on an American stacks.

0:58:24.880 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>At least we're selling the world American your media. But

0:58:27.760 --> 0:58:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the reason of laying all that out is that if

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole world could see I think what we just

0:58:33.280 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>laid out, if literally everyone could see that, the whole

0:58:37.120 --> 0:58:40.200
<v Speaker 1>world says, we don't want eight soon to be trillionaires

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:43.000
<v Speaker 1>deciding the future for eight billion people who didn't consent

0:58:43.040 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to this.

0:58:44.560 --> 0:58:46.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's the purpose of Again, that sort of brings

0:58:46.640 --> 0:58:48.919
<v Speaker 2>us back to the beginning. Why you're doing this damn film?

0:58:48.920 --> 0:58:52.320
<v Speaker 2>That's right after the great and sort of global consciousness.

0:58:52.320 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:58:53.000 --> 0:58:56.000
<v Speaker 2>So in the absence of that, we're back here in California. Yes,

0:58:56.000 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 2>here here with the governor, Yes, the current governor, the

0:58:58.680 --> 0:59:03.480
<v Speaker 2>governor's mansion. Interesting, we're doing some decent things. What more

0:59:03.480 --> 0:59:06.800
<v Speaker 2>should I be doing in the absence of the kind

0:59:06.800 --> 0:59:10.040
<v Speaker 2>of federal leadership that we need. I feel like we've

0:59:10.080 --> 0:59:13.040
<v Speaker 2>lost this last eighteen months, you know, I just we

0:59:13.040 --> 0:59:14.840
<v Speaker 2>were mo Look, we did an a open It was

0:59:14.880 --> 0:59:18.200
<v Speaker 2>interesting working I worked very closely with the Biden administration.

0:59:18.240 --> 0:59:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Did they move quickly enough? Perhaps not, but at least

0:59:21.480 --> 0:59:24.080
<v Speaker 2>we had a framework of an of an executive order.

0:59:24.120 --> 0:59:26.880
<v Speaker 2>We moved that forward. We President's sided here at the

0:59:26.880 --> 0:59:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Fairmount Hotel in San Francisco in California. It was built

0:59:30.640 --> 0:59:34.160
<v Speaker 2>off an executive order that I did six months later.

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:36.760
<v Speaker 2>We were working hand in glove with the Biden administration

0:59:37.160 --> 0:59:39.760
<v Speaker 2>on that. That was ripped up right when the Trump

0:59:39.800 --> 0:59:43.880
<v Speaker 2>administration came in to office. You have an ai zar

0:59:44.280 --> 0:59:47.040
<v Speaker 2>out of the Bay Area certainly understands the ecosystem. But

0:59:47.080 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 2>it seemed to me, and this is me and you

0:59:48.640 --> 0:59:50.760
<v Speaker 2>guys don't have to respond, but it was the great grift.

0:59:50.800 --> 0:59:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Everybody was sort of on on the train and seeing

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 2>this as an opportunity and looking at the abundance of

0:59:56.520 --> 0:59:59.520
<v Speaker 2>this only but not looking at safety, not looking at

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the risk. As you've described, California cited to assert itself

1:00:03.640 --> 1:00:06.040
<v Speaker 2>in that respect, as we've done on privacy, as we've

1:00:06.080 --> 1:00:08.439
<v Speaker 2>done a lot of child safety issues, and a lot

1:00:08.480 --> 1:00:10.360
<v Speaker 2>more work to do there. And this year will be

1:00:10.600 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 2>a landmark year in terms of getting to the next

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:16.080
<v Speaker 2>level in that respect. But what more can the state

1:00:16.160 --> 1:00:18.960
<v Speaker 2>be doing the fear of that always is patchwork, not

1:00:19.000 --> 1:00:23.680
<v Speaker 2>a framework for the nation. And how you support innovation

1:00:24.400 --> 1:00:27.040
<v Speaker 2>our own GDP growth which has been off the charts

1:00:27.080 --> 1:00:31.000
<v Speaker 2>in California visa VR competitors. At the same time addressed

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:34.960
<v Speaker 2>these larger global issues. Do you have any specific ideas

1:00:35.200 --> 1:00:38.280
<v Speaker 2>for a governor of California, that is the current governor

1:00:38.640 --> 1:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>that has a budget that he's releaseding in weeks and

1:00:40.960 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>a legislative session coming up in the next few months.

1:00:44.680 --> 1:00:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, we'll get to answer that question specifically, but what

1:00:47.960 --> 1:00:50.120
<v Speaker 3>are the places of also good news? I just want

1:00:50.160 --> 1:00:52.160
<v Speaker 3>to say, because there's a lot of value in just

1:00:52.200 --> 1:00:54.480
<v Speaker 3>social signaling where everyone knows that there's a problem. We

1:00:54.560 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 3>get to that shared common knowledge, common feeling. And if

1:00:57.880 --> 1:01:01.040
<v Speaker 3>you went back two years and you said by today,

1:01:01.160 --> 1:01:03.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent of the world's population would live in

1:01:03.920 --> 1:01:07.320
<v Speaker 3>a country where they've either have announced or enacted a

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>ban for social under sixteen, you'd be like, that's ridiculous.

1:01:11.640 --> 1:01:12.640
<v Speaker 3>You couldn't possibly get that.

1:01:12.640 --> 1:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I want people to really feel that. There you are

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two. If you said even just literally

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>three years ago, yeah, I know that a quarter of

1:01:19.320 --> 1:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the world's population we're talking Australia, India, Denmark, Denmark's. Two

1:01:24.360 --> 1:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, Greece added the list. France. I was with

1:01:26.800 --> 1:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>John Hyde and when he was in Davos and he

1:01:29.400 --> 1:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>met with President Macrone and got France on board. Like

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>people would have thought that was impossible. I mean, the

1:01:34.720 --> 1:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>trains left the station.

1:01:35.680 --> 1:01:37.600
<v Speaker 2>We just had all the democratic governors out here, and

1:01:37.640 --> 1:01:39.480
<v Speaker 2>everyone was trying to compare them to trast which one

1:01:39.480 --> 1:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>of the states, which we're going to do. But I

1:01:43.200 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 2>mean it's you're right, this is a tipping point.

1:01:45.120 --> 1:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It's taking the train and once you get twenty five percent,

1:01:47.480 --> 1:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get the rest of the world.

1:01:48.920 --> 1:01:50.440
<v Speaker 2>And the point there was a lot of these companies.

1:01:50.480 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>I also I anticipate these companies and by the way,

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>if I was advising these companies get ahead of this train,

1:01:57.280 --> 1:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>ye and show your large s and that your maturity

1:02:00.880 --> 1:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>and understanding. So I imagine that may happen as well.

1:02:05.240 --> 1:02:07.040
<v Speaker 2>But no, that's a point. You're right.

1:02:07.120 --> 1:02:09.840
<v Speaker 3>And so right now, something really interesting happened in Hongjo

1:02:09.960 --> 1:02:12.480
<v Speaker 3>in China. Maybe you're aware of it, but it's this

1:02:12.560 --> 1:02:16.320
<v Speaker 3>first case where there was someone who lost his job

1:02:16.480 --> 1:02:20.360
<v Speaker 3>at Ai Automation and this court ruled and said, actually,

1:02:21.040 --> 1:02:23.200
<v Speaker 3>that's not a legitimate reason for you to lose your job.

1:02:23.680 --> 1:02:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Companies are not allowed to fire you from like increased automation.

1:02:28.720 --> 1:02:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Well that solved the whole problem. Probably not, but imagine

1:02:31.720 --> 1:02:34.440
<v Speaker 3>that California took a leadership position there and said, actually,

1:02:34.440 --> 1:02:37.400
<v Speaker 3>there are going to be some very serious protections that

1:02:37.720 --> 1:02:43.760
<v Speaker 3>as AI increases, GDP increases profits, Actually, like people are

1:02:43.880 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 3>going to be it's sort of like an employment insurance.

1:02:46.560 --> 1:02:48.800
<v Speaker 3>They're going to be able to keep their jobs. Like

1:02:49.000 --> 1:02:51.920
<v Speaker 3>that would set a social signal for the rest of

1:02:52.000 --> 1:02:52.560
<v Speaker 3>the US.

1:02:52.560 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 2>So we'll let you have the hook on the larger

1:02:55.440 --> 1:03:00.919
<v Speaker 2>safety risk regulation and let's go back to ideas along

1:03:00.960 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>these lines, because right in front of us this notion

1:03:03.800 --> 1:03:06.720
<v Speaker 2>of displacement transition, and it goes back to their earlier

1:03:06.760 --> 1:03:10.120
<v Speaker 2>point I was making. Some will argue that, you know,

1:03:10.160 --> 1:03:13.840
<v Speaker 2>we always you know, lud eights and will never see

1:03:13.880 --> 1:03:16.240
<v Speaker 2>the abundance on the other side, and we can't even

1:03:16.320 --> 1:03:20.120
<v Speaker 2>conceive of the jobs. So with humility, let's not just

1:03:20.200 --> 1:03:23.959
<v Speaker 2>assume there'll be no human jobs, because the human mind

1:03:24.080 --> 1:03:27.439
<v Speaker 2>is the capacity that's limitless. With these technologies, that will

1:03:27.480 --> 1:03:31.520
<v Speaker 2>be more supportive and allow us to be augmented and

1:03:31.600 --> 1:03:35.479
<v Speaker 2>discover talents and capacity we never thought possible. So let's

1:03:35.480 --> 1:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>assume that happens. But the concern is that it seems

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the most universal that it may happen very fast. The

1:03:42.640 --> 1:03:46.479
<v Speaker 2>impacts is, so, how do you then flatten the curve

1:03:47.320 --> 1:03:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the curve? How do we address the transition You get

1:03:49.520 --> 1:03:52.440
<v Speaker 2>to employment insurance, something we've been talking a lot about.

1:03:52.560 --> 1:03:54.520
<v Speaker 2>You get to this notion that you can't fire someone

1:03:54.520 --> 1:03:57.080
<v Speaker 2>to be automated. That's even deeper, and that's interesting. This

1:03:57.200 --> 1:04:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Chinese example tell me more about the issue of and

1:04:00.960 --> 1:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>what I should be worried about. When I see Dario

1:04:03.240 --> 1:04:06.680
<v Speaker 2>saying fifty percent entry level jobs, it's no longer a

1:04:06.720 --> 1:04:09.080
<v Speaker 2>career ladder. It's a jungle gym. And all these young

1:04:09.120 --> 1:04:12.439
<v Speaker 2>folks got a Stanford or like now I'm unemployed or unemployable,

1:04:12.760 --> 1:04:15.400
<v Speaker 2>no code or software. I mean, give me a women

1:04:15.520 --> 1:04:18.400
<v Speaker 2>disproportion being impacted in the workforce When you look at

1:04:18.400 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 2>those clerical jobs, admin jobs, et cetera. I mean, what,

1:04:21.520 --> 1:04:24.720
<v Speaker 2>what's what do you see a year two years from now?

1:04:24.960 --> 1:04:27.680
<v Speaker 2>As we deal with the Holy Grail, the god complex

1:04:27.920 --> 1:04:30.240
<v Speaker 2>of Agi in the displacement space.

1:04:32.600 --> 1:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Reed Hoffman has this idea. When mefre I get it right,

1:04:35.520 --> 1:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I like, which is one of the things that makes

1:04:38.400 --> 1:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>AI distinct. And Sam Altman has talked about this himself,

1:04:41.080 --> 1:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that you could get the age of these unicorn companies.

1:04:43.800 --> 1:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>A unicorn company meeting a billion dollar valuation.

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I met a guy the other day literally billion dollar valuation,

1:04:49.600 --> 1:04:53.360
<v Speaker 2>tim him exactly, So I think that he was praying

1:04:53.400 --> 1:04:54.920
<v Speaker 2>himself around as the it's.

1:04:54.800 --> 1:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Me, that's right, one of the first, and so that's

1:04:56.680 --> 1:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>what that's what has been positive ever since the beginning

1:04:58.640 --> 1:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of AI. They're saying, we're going to start having world.

1:05:00.640 --> 1:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have a single person with a unicorn

1:05:03.080 --> 1:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar company. Yeah, Now does this Does society work?

1:05:07.200 --> 1:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>If there's a handful of single people with billion dollar

1:05:09.520 --> 1:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>companies and no one else has a job, it doesn't work.

1:05:12.040 --> 1:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think those people just want to live out

1:05:13.520 --> 1:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>their lives in bunkers with private militaries and gas masks

1:05:16.880 --> 1:05:19.439
<v Speaker 1>because they've created that world. I don't think they want

1:05:19.440 --> 1:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that world. So reied Hoffman, who's the founder of LinkedIn,

1:05:21.840 --> 1:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>was early at PayPal and you know, was at some

1:05:23.880 --> 1:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>point a friend of Peter Thiel's, you know, has this

1:05:27.200 --> 1:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>proposal that we can tax companies based on the proportion

1:05:30.240 --> 1:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>ratio of how many employees they have relative to their revenue.

1:05:33.760 --> 1:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So you want to basically disincentivize the single solo unicorn company.

1:05:39.840 --> 1:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to add to it.

1:05:41.000 --> 1:05:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:05:41.280 --> 1:05:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, and also just just to note that it doesn't

1:05:43.480 --> 1:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>stop with just single person unicorns. Yeah, with automating that

1:05:47.440 --> 1:05:49.840
<v Speaker 3>final one person not so hard, So you're gonna end

1:05:49.920 --> 1:05:50.920
<v Speaker 3>up with zero person.

1:05:50.920 --> 1:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>You can have a CEO, B and AI. Yeah, and

1:05:52.840 --> 1:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that's actually happening. We're already getting ais that are on

1:05:54.800 --> 1:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>boards and things like this. Yeah, and so even if

1:05:56.680 --> 1:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you might find it questionable that that person might have again,

1:05:58.840 --> 1:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>they can. They can earn their wealth, but you have

1:06:02.080 --> 1:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to have some taxation to make sure this is being stipid.

1:06:04.920 --> 1:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And we also need we need to find ways of

1:06:07.200 --> 1:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>having universal basic ownership, not just universal basic cash payments

1:06:10.240 --> 1:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and UBI, but universal basic ownership. I think people need

1:06:13.120 --> 1:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to have a stake in the success that's happening, like

1:06:15.280 --> 1:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>what Norway did with the Sovereign Wealth Fund. But oil

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't oil produce this kind of gravy on top for

1:06:20.480 --> 1:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the civilization. People still had jobs. So what's different about

1:06:23.440 --> 1:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>this is we do need to find ways of doing

1:06:25.440 --> 1:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>universal basic work. We also need to find ways of

1:06:29.720 --> 1:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>having certain professions in which that embodied wisdom, like a

1:06:33.320 --> 1:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>surgeon or a senior lawyer or a senior judge. We

1:06:36.400 --> 1:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>need ways of training and apprenticing almost like minimum quotas

1:06:39.600 --> 1:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of those kinds of occupations and roles in society to

1:06:42.200 --> 1:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we have that ongoing knowledge. Because again

1:06:44.920 --> 1:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the short term benefit of like no one needs lawyers

1:06:47.080 --> 1:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and then the senior lawyers all die out, that world

1:06:49.840 --> 1:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work.

1:06:50.960 --> 1:06:53.800
<v Speaker 3>So just the last thing to sort of add here

1:06:53.880 --> 1:06:56.560
<v Speaker 3>is that you instead of getting into arguments about how

1:06:56.680 --> 1:06:58.600
<v Speaker 3>quickly exactly are people going to lose the jobs, well,

1:06:58.640 --> 1:07:01.200
<v Speaker 3>people really do lose their jobs. Let's let's plan and say, okay,

1:07:01.280 --> 1:07:03.360
<v Speaker 3>we think people are going to be out of livelihoods.

1:07:03.600 --> 1:07:05.360
<v Speaker 3>This is this idea we really came to us from

1:07:05.400 --> 1:07:08.240
<v Speaker 3>read haasting to see Pharmacy and Pharmacy Netflix, where we said,

1:07:08.440 --> 1:07:11.560
<v Speaker 3>let's set up trigger point laws. If in unemployment hits

1:07:11.560 --> 1:07:12.800
<v Speaker 3>ten percent, what are we going to do if it

1:07:12.880 --> 1:07:15.280
<v Speaker 3>hits twenty percent? What are we going to do? You

1:07:15.320 --> 1:07:18.080
<v Speaker 3>could pre set up those sort of conditions so we

1:07:18.080 --> 1:07:20.040
<v Speaker 3>don't have to argue about whether it's going to happen,

1:07:20.080 --> 1:07:21.160
<v Speaker 3>just what we should do when it does.

1:07:21.400 --> 1:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And I know that you've been running with Engaged California,

1:07:23.720 --> 1:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>these citizen deliberations, these ways of you know, aggregating citizen assemblies,

1:07:27.360 --> 1:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>having citizens actually deal with and think about these issues

1:07:30.000 --> 1:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and come to some you know, have their own input

1:07:32.640 --> 1:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>in this process. But by reckoning with these facts, and

1:07:35.640 --> 1:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that these are all things that we need.

1:07:37.320 --> 1:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the countries that discover a natural resource that

1:07:40.120 --> 1:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't have this engaged, well educated citizen kind of engage

1:07:43.560 --> 1:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this in infrastructure, like Venezuela or Libya or something like that,

1:07:47.080 --> 1:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't do so well. But countries like Norway where

1:07:49.440 --> 1:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you did have the engaged citizens, with oversight of those funds,

1:07:53.080 --> 1:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you end up with a healthier society.

1:07:54.720 --> 1:07:57.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's sort of like an a California engagement fund

1:07:57.000 --> 1:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>because you want like people involved in the redistribution.

1:08:00.320 --> 1:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

1:08:01.120 --> 1:08:04.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's interesting that you mentioned mencome which the old

1:08:04.640 --> 1:08:09.919
<v Speaker 2>Canadian construct ubi university basic income. You had Elon Musk

1:08:09.960 --> 1:08:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the other day say he wants university basic high income.

1:08:12.960 --> 1:08:14.439
<v Speaker 1>He said there is going to be univers of basic

1:08:14.480 --> 1:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>high income, and.

1:08:15.040 --> 1:08:18.679
<v Speaker 2>Then was asked with Peter, right, exactly I saw him probably,

1:08:18.680 --> 1:08:20.040
<v Speaker 2>and he was asked simple question, how are you going

1:08:20.080 --> 1:08:20.400
<v Speaker 2>to do it?

1:08:20.439 --> 1:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>And he said, oh I did. I was just joking.

1:08:22.000 --> 1:08:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I made it up.

1:08:22.760 --> 1:08:23.679
<v Speaker 2>That was comforting.

1:08:23.840 --> 1:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think people should really take note of that.

1:08:25.920 --> 1:08:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it was just a mispronouncing of high not as

1:08:29.200 --> 1:08:31.200
<v Speaker 3>in like a high income. It's just like he's he's

1:08:31.360 --> 1:08:32.400
<v Speaker 3>not being able to think about it.

1:08:32.439 --> 1:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's uh, it's a it's a little alarming.

1:08:34.920 --> 1:08:37.559
<v Speaker 2>So look, what do you quickly Look, I'm we're thinking

1:08:37.560 --> 1:08:39.640
<v Speaker 2>about all these things down to the parochial on the

1:08:39.640 --> 1:08:42.639
<v Speaker 2>warn Act, which is how we actually warn the public

1:08:42.720 --> 1:08:46.719
<v Speaker 2>the social impacts of large scale displacement and job loss.

1:08:47.280 --> 1:08:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Having more capacity to see earlier. That's after the fact

1:08:52.000 --> 1:08:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the warneck comes out, those jobs are already going to

1:08:53.960 --> 1:08:56.439
<v Speaker 2>be lost. What are the science to show us what

1:08:56.479 --> 1:08:58.559
<v Speaker 2>the impacts are happening in the job market in real time?

1:08:58.760 --> 1:09:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Issues of unemployment and sure it's becoming employment insurance so

1:09:03.200 --> 1:09:05.200
<v Speaker 2>that you can keep people employed for a period of time.

1:09:05.520 --> 1:09:07.639
<v Speaker 2>The Dutch do it about ninety percent of the wage.

1:09:07.840 --> 1:09:10.600
<v Speaker 2>The ultimate training is a job, the dignity of a

1:09:10.680 --> 1:09:14.440
<v Speaker 2>job back to those Voltaire constructs, and then the opportunity

1:09:14.479 --> 1:09:18.240
<v Speaker 2>then potentially transition by using the federal government to help you.

1:09:18.280 --> 1:09:22.080
<v Speaker 2>The backstop portable benefits then become fundamental. This notion of

1:09:22.200 --> 1:09:26.599
<v Speaker 2>UBC university basic capital, this notion of sovereign wealth fund

1:09:26.760 --> 1:09:31.839
<v Speaker 2>or equity public equity with dividends and somehow we get shares.

1:09:32.120 --> 1:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>There's equity shares contributions from these large companies. That's not

1:09:36.320 --> 1:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>just taxes, it's actual equity in the company. So there's

1:09:39.040 --> 1:09:41.839
<v Speaker 2>a notion of an ownership and a larger ownership society.

1:09:41.960 --> 1:09:46.120
<v Speaker 2>That we don't tax jobs with payroll taxes and then

1:09:46.280 --> 1:09:50.200
<v Speaker 2>subsidize automation through tax credits. We do the inverse in

1:09:50.240 --> 1:09:52.960
<v Speaker 2>that context. So all of that. So that's the stuff

1:09:53.080 --> 1:09:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm playing around with a lot of us are thinking

1:09:55.160 --> 1:09:58.800
<v Speaker 2>about right now. But how from your vantage point, how

1:09:58.920 --> 1:10:02.360
<v Speaker 2>quickly is is happening. There's a lot of headlines, but

1:10:02.400 --> 1:10:04.400
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of debate around these headlines of all

1:10:04.479 --> 1:10:07.080
<v Speaker 2>these cuts of jobs. But then people say, well, that

1:10:07.160 --> 1:10:09.759
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of coverd over iroing there's some business

1:10:09.760 --> 1:10:13.080
<v Speaker 2>model issues there that they're sort of hiding and suggesting

1:10:13.160 --> 1:10:19.920
<v Speaker 2>it's AI. We even necessarily seeing massive job destruction yet

1:10:20.200 --> 1:10:22.120
<v Speaker 2>or have we with AI?

1:10:22.320 --> 1:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>I think the point people should get here is that

1:10:24.960 --> 1:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's complicated, and there's jobs are shuffling throughout the

1:10:27.800 --> 1:10:30.639
<v Speaker 1>economy a little bit right now. But the long term

1:10:30.680 --> 1:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>goal of these companies is.

1:10:32.479 --> 1:10:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Not the original Open AI.

1:10:36.280 --> 1:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Missions mission statement exactly. Opening Eyes mission statement was not

1:10:39.760 --> 1:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to give people helpful tools so that you can do

1:10:41.800 --> 1:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>your job slightly better. Their mission statement is we do

1:10:44.320 --> 1:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>your job. And actually, you know govin in in La

1:10:47.240 --> 1:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>there's an article in the La Times about this that

1:10:49.640 --> 1:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is one of these new popular gig worker jobs in

1:10:51.840 --> 1:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>La is everybody straps a GoPro camera to their head

1:10:56.040 --> 1:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and they look down and then they do laundry, They cook,

1:10:58.960 --> 1:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>they eat, they do all these things. So basically the

1:11:02.120 --> 1:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>number one job soon in the world will be training

1:11:05.080 --> 1:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the replacement for that job. Think of it like being

1:11:07.200 --> 1:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a coffin builder, Like you're designing the coffin and then

1:11:09.360 --> 1:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you put yourself in it. And you know, if you

1:11:11.360 --> 1:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>think I'm lying, by the way, just think about Meta

1:11:14.439 --> 1:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Mettal Instagram creators. You know, here we love creators, we

1:11:18.479 --> 1:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>love creativity. We want you to be successful. We want

1:11:20.840 --> 1:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to you know, our whole mission statement is making creators

1:11:23.439 --> 1:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>super successful. That's before they were an AI company. When

1:11:26.800 --> 1:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>they do the second that they were an AI company,

1:11:28.840 --> 1:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>they trained on all the videos of their creators and

1:11:32.200 --> 1:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>then created generative videos that now basically suck up like

1:11:35.439 --> 1:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a vampire, your essence, your life, force, your creativity, and

1:11:38.240 --> 1:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>then hit button and now they have a digital copy

1:11:40.080 --> 1:11:42.439
<v Speaker 1>of you that you didn't consent to that can generate

1:11:42.479 --> 1:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>all these things. If you don't believe me, Just a

1:11:44.880 --> 1:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago, there was an article Meta is now

1:11:47.000 --> 1:11:50.719
<v Speaker 1>forcing their employees to basically track all of their movements,

1:11:50.760 --> 1:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>all their clicks, all the things are doing on a

1:11:52.040 --> 1:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>computer to train AI agents to do all their jobs.

1:11:54.840 --> 1:11:57.519
<v Speaker 1>This is not a conspiracy theory. All you have to

1:11:57.520 --> 1:11:59.839
<v Speaker 1>do to know where we're going is understand the incentives

1:11:59.840 --> 1:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and look at the early warning signs they're telling you

1:12:02.320 --> 1:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>who they really are. You know, Open AI says we're

1:12:04.760 --> 1:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>all here to make the world a better place. And

1:12:07.000 --> 1:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>then they release this AI slop app Sora, which was

1:12:10.280 --> 1:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>basically an infinitely they killed it now, but it was

1:12:12.240 --> 1:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>an infinitely scrolling, deep fake generated content of like, you know,

1:12:16.240 --> 1:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>funny videos of Stephen Hawking, you know, you know, going

1:12:19.360 --> 1:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>through a raceway or something like that. It's just deep

1:12:21.920 --> 1:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>fake AI slop. Why are they doing that because they

1:12:25.040 --> 1:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>want to increase their market dominance, because they want to

1:12:27.000 --> 1:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>get users, because they want to get training data, and

1:12:29.320 --> 1:12:31.519
<v Speaker 1>it gets more people using open ai, so their numbers

1:12:31.520 --> 1:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>going up.

1:12:31.840 --> 1:12:33.599
<v Speaker 3>And if your incentives tell you everything, and if you're

1:12:33.600 --> 1:12:37.400
<v Speaker 3>a company and you're choosing do I hire a real

1:12:37.479 --> 1:12:42.360
<v Speaker 3>human paralegal or GPT seven that works for less than

1:12:42.400 --> 1:12:45.479
<v Speaker 3>minimum wage twenty four to seven doesn't whistle blow, doesn't

1:12:45.479 --> 1:12:48.600
<v Speaker 3>a plane, doesn't have cultural issues, doesn't have paid time off? Like,

1:12:48.680 --> 1:12:49.519
<v Speaker 3>which one are you going to do?

1:12:49.800 --> 1:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Well?

1:12:50.040 --> 1:12:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Your business incentive is just very very clear, and everyone's

1:12:52.360 --> 1:12:53.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be trapped in this.

1:12:53.080 --> 1:12:54.880
<v Speaker 2>And if your competitor you may say no, I'm going

1:12:54.920 --> 1:12:57.200
<v Speaker 2>to keep the human, and then your competitor goes stops

1:12:57.200 --> 1:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the direction, You're out of business. Yeah, I have no.

1:12:59.280 --> 1:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Choice back to the But with those set of interventions

1:13:01.880 --> 1:13:03.599
<v Speaker 1>that you just mentioned, and you just mentioned a whole

1:13:03.640 --> 1:13:05.759
<v Speaker 1>slew of things we can be doing. You just mentioned

1:13:05.800 --> 1:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>so many things that we could be doing. And I

1:13:07.720 --> 1:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>think what it represents is I think people think, but

1:13:10.080 --> 1:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>if we don't race to automate every job as fast

1:13:12.200 --> 1:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>as possible, we're going to lose to China. But what

1:13:14.920 --> 1:13:17.519
<v Speaker 1>this is showing and revealing is we're not in a

1:13:17.600 --> 1:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>race just the technology. We're actually in a race for

1:13:20.640 --> 1:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a different currency. The currency is not who has the

1:13:23.240 --> 1:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>power first, but who is better at governing, steering and

1:13:25.720 --> 1:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>integrating that power in a healthy and sustainable and strengthening

1:13:29.439 --> 1:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>way into your society. And we saw this with social

1:13:32.280 --> 1:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>media because the US beat China to the psychological bazooka

1:13:36.280 --> 1:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>behavior modification machine of social media, and then we had

1:13:39.439 --> 1:13:41.559
<v Speaker 1>no idea how to govern it. So we flipped around.

1:13:41.600 --> 1:13:43.759
<v Speaker 1>We blew off our own brain with the brain row economy.

1:13:45.080 --> 1:13:47.519
<v Speaker 1>So and by the way China regulates social media, they

1:13:47.520 --> 1:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>do a whole bunch of suffing. When you open up

1:13:49.080 --> 1:13:52.479
<v Speaker 1>a douyen TikTok in China, it's their version of TikTok,

1:13:52.720 --> 1:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and you scroll, you get videos about who won the

1:13:55.280 --> 1:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Prize, financial advice, here's the new quantum physics theory.

1:14:00.040 --> 1:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, here's patriotism videos. And obviously there's problems with that.

1:14:02.360 --> 1:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to do it that way, but the

1:14:04.040 --> 1:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>point is you don't have to do it in the

1:14:05.920 --> 1:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>wild west. Blow off your own brain. And now if

1:14:08.400 --> 1:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we release it in a way that automates all the

1:14:10.400 --> 1:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>labor with no transition plan. It's like, great, we pumped

1:14:13.479 --> 1:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>up our steroids, but we just burst our lungs. Yeah, right,

1:14:16.120 --> 1:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the societal body, we do that. So what you just

1:14:19.400 --> 1:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>outlined was a set of interventions that we can be

1:14:22.080 --> 1:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>exploring to help smooth this transition. And we're in a

1:14:24.760 --> 1:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>competition with China for who's better at making this transition

1:14:28.520 --> 1:14:30.559
<v Speaker 1>to an AI integrated world.

1:14:31.280 --> 1:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Where are you on the transition curve? I mean, I mean,

1:14:34.080 --> 1:14:36.960
<v Speaker 2>we talk about flattering it, but how quick? I mean, honestly,

1:14:37.080 --> 1:14:40.040
<v Speaker 2>if we're sitting here a year from now having this conversation,

1:14:40.640 --> 1:14:43.320
<v Speaker 2>are we looking at that you know, ten percent unemployment,

1:14:43.680 --> 1:14:47.360
<v Speaker 2>not that twenty necessarily, which is that threshold for fascism

1:14:47.479 --> 1:14:49.320
<v Speaker 2>and a whole other societal collap.

1:14:49.040 --> 1:14:51.720
<v Speaker 3>But it's going to be confusing and spiking hard to

1:14:51.720 --> 1:14:55.960
<v Speaker 3>predict exactly because just think about your own experience with

1:14:56.040 --> 1:14:57.960
<v Speaker 3>AI so far two years ago, it can barely write

1:14:57.960 --> 1:15:00.040
<v Speaker 3>an essay, and now it can do some part so

1:15:00.120 --> 1:15:02.000
<v Speaker 3>of your work pretty well and other parts like that

1:15:02.080 --> 1:15:05.360
<v Speaker 3>is a really dumb error. And so we're going to

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:08.040
<v Speaker 3>see not that much job, not that much job LOFs

1:15:08.400 --> 1:15:11.280
<v Speaker 3>like entry level stuff getting sort of switched around and

1:15:11.320 --> 1:15:13.400
<v Speaker 3>then it's going to hit really really quickly when it

1:15:13.439 --> 1:15:15.400
<v Speaker 3>crosses the next spreshold, just like Mythos did.

1:15:15.439 --> 1:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>There's another confusing aspect about AI that people in our

1:15:18.280 --> 1:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>space called AI jaggedness, which is that there's certain capabilities

1:15:21.920 --> 1:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>like in cyber hacking, that it is already superhuman, already superhumans,

1:15:25.960 --> 1:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>while it'll still make a very basic dumb mistake on

1:15:28.880 --> 1:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>something else. And I think part of what's confusing for

1:15:31.640 --> 1:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>people that naturally has them say is this just hype

1:15:33.840 --> 1:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and these companies are trying to hype this stuff is

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>if you just look at the dumb examples where it's

1:15:37.800 --> 1:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>messing up, you're like, this thing isn't that powerful. We

1:15:40.840 --> 1:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>have never been confronted with the technology that is simultaneously

1:15:45.240 --> 1:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>sci Fi level superhuman that makes a person who's very

1:15:49.360 --> 1:15:52.479
<v Speaker 1>deep in security call it like seeing Jesus. At the

1:15:52.520 --> 1:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>same time that that same technology can like mistake how

1:15:55.280 --> 1:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>many rs are in the word strawberry, like, we have

1:15:58.080 --> 1:15:59.599
<v Speaker 1>just not seen that. And so it's just I want

1:15:59.600 --> 1:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>people to not for their own psychology that this is

1:16:01.880 --> 1:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a new psychological object that our normal intuitions about how

1:16:05.960 --> 1:16:08.559
<v Speaker 1>to evaluate something we have to get more nuanced.

1:16:09.240 --> 1:16:11.479
<v Speaker 2>And part of the nuance is a deeper understanding that

1:16:11.600 --> 1:16:13.679
<v Speaker 2>we're not just talking about apps here, we're talking about

1:16:13.680 --> 1:16:14.880
<v Speaker 2>the physical world as well.

1:16:15.160 --> 1:16:15.519
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

1:16:15.960 --> 1:16:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Was a big headline that I hope people paid attention

1:16:19.080 --> 1:16:24.080
<v Speaker 2>to when Elon announced that in his original factory here

1:16:24.080 --> 1:16:26.920
<v Speaker 2>in Fremont, California, that he's converting the s and the

1:16:26.920 --> 1:16:31.280
<v Speaker 2>ex Tesla cars now to humanoid robotics and his goal

1:16:31.360 --> 1:16:34.040
<v Speaker 2>is ultimately a million You know, that's Elon who they

1:16:34.080 --> 1:16:36.719
<v Speaker 2>all knows, you know, his goal setting. But the notion

1:16:37.080 --> 1:16:40.719
<v Speaker 2>that he's converting that factory from cars to humanoid robotics

1:16:41.000 --> 1:16:44.320
<v Speaker 2>and AI now into the physical world is that. I mean,

1:16:45.280 --> 1:16:48.080
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing driverless cars and if you haven't seen them

1:16:48.080 --> 1:16:50.640
<v Speaker 2>in you know, your home state, you're going about to

1:16:50.760 --> 1:16:54.000
<v Speaker 2>you're going to see flying cars or they're just quad

1:16:54.000 --> 1:16:56.680
<v Speaker 2>copters basically, but they're coming soon. We're going to be

1:16:56.760 --> 1:16:58.240
<v Speaker 2>doing a lot more of that run by the way.

1:16:58.560 --> 1:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>That's great. We can have a world of quad copters

1:17:01.439 --> 1:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, innovation while not racing to replace us economically,

1:17:05.840 --> 1:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>replace us socially. So Mark Zuckerberg, you know, designs your

1:17:08.479 --> 1:17:10.599
<v Speaker 1>kids friends rather than you had them having actual friends

1:17:10.840 --> 1:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>replace us politically and not having political power and then

1:17:13.040 --> 1:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>replace us physically by owning our physical presence in our

1:17:16.439 --> 1:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in robots. So again, I think people might hear this

1:17:19.840 --> 1:17:22.519
<v Speaker 1>as an anti technology conversation. Yeah, you know, you talked

1:17:22.520 --> 1:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>about your legacy and your father and grandfather and we

1:17:25.840 --> 1:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>were talking backstage. Ye A's's father started the Macintosh projected

1:17:30.200 --> 1:17:32.559
<v Speaker 1>at Yeah. Yeah, you know, we come from a legacy

1:17:32.640 --> 1:17:35.519
<v Speaker 1>where the word humane is about an inspiring vision about

1:17:35.520 --> 1:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>technology that's actually integrated and in service of our humanity,

1:17:39.280 --> 1:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of a pro human future. That's what all of this

1:17:41.400 --> 1:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is motivated for. So I get excited about you know, flying,

1:17:44.439 --> 1:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, cars that have cool you know.

1:17:46.120 --> 1:17:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Aif And just to say too, just as my own

1:17:48.200 --> 1:17:51.000
<v Speaker 3>personal experiences, you know, I spend a big portion of

1:17:51.040 --> 1:17:53.519
<v Speaker 3>my life. I found it a thing called Earth Species Project.

1:17:54.000 --> 1:17:56.000
<v Speaker 3>We're now around forty people and you're.

1:17:55.840 --> 1:17:56.799
<v Speaker 2>The biggest consumer.

1:17:57.600 --> 1:18:00.679
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't say biggest consumer. Yeah exactly, it's it's men. Sorry, guys,

1:18:02.000 --> 1:18:05.320
<v Speaker 3>first infinite scroll now this, but you know, we were

1:18:05.400 --> 1:18:08.600
<v Speaker 3>using AI to translate animal language animal communication. One of

1:18:08.600 --> 1:18:12.360
<v Speaker 3>our researchers just discovered just before she joined us that like,

1:18:12.439 --> 1:18:14.840
<v Speaker 3>not only do dolphins have names that they call each

1:18:14.840 --> 1:18:17.439
<v Speaker 3>other by that their mothers teach them. They will talk

1:18:17.439 --> 1:18:19.320
<v Speaker 3>about each other in the third person, so they'll talk

1:18:19.360 --> 1:18:21.720
<v Speaker 3>about another dolphin that isn't here. So it's like one

1:18:21.760 --> 1:18:23.280
<v Speaker 3>of the biggest hallmarks of language to be able to

1:18:23.280 --> 1:18:25.720
<v Speaker 3>talk about something that's not here and not now. But

1:18:25.760 --> 1:18:29.400
<v Speaker 3>they will continue to use their mother's name even after

1:18:29.439 --> 1:18:34.240
<v Speaker 3>she's died. Sweet right, it's beautiful. These are the kinds

1:18:34.240 --> 1:18:37.040
<v Speaker 3>of things that AI can show us and teach us

1:18:37.040 --> 1:18:39.479
<v Speaker 3>about the world and connect us with the natural world,

1:18:39.560 --> 1:18:42.240
<v Speaker 3>the world around us, and show things we couldn't possibly imagine.

1:18:42.320 --> 1:18:44.200
<v Speaker 3>So I just want everyone to hear it's not that

1:18:44.240 --> 1:18:47.519
<v Speaker 3>it's just here saying no AI. It's just saying not AI.

1:18:47.840 --> 1:18:51.640
<v Speaker 3>In this way that technological progress might be inevitable, but

1:18:51.720 --> 1:18:55.280
<v Speaker 3>the way that AI rolls out is not. And every

1:18:55.320 --> 1:18:58.200
<v Speaker 3>time somebody says it's inevitable, it's like casting a spell.

1:18:58.280 --> 1:19:01.120
<v Speaker 3>That's where because if if it's inevitable, then there's nothing

1:19:01.160 --> 1:19:02.840
<v Speaker 3>we can do, then you shouldn't possibly act.

1:19:02.880 --> 1:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a button we're hitting called commit suicide. Commits suicide?

1:19:05.520 --> 1:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it inevitable that we all hit that button?

1:19:07.240 --> 1:19:07.360
<v Speaker 2>No?

1:19:07.400 --> 1:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>When it's called you know, ten percent GDP growth And

1:19:09.680 --> 1:19:12.519
<v Speaker 1>like an innovation, we pushed the button. If we could

1:19:12.520 --> 1:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>collectively see that the button we're pushing is more nuanced

1:19:15.280 --> 1:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>than that, that there's some threshold by which we are

1:19:17.960 --> 1:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>essentially committing civilizational suicide. We're not going to have a

1:19:20.920 --> 1:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>human future. If you ask anybody what gives me hope?

1:19:25.000 --> 1:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>We've been on the road with this film. You walk

1:19:27.280 --> 1:19:29.519
<v Speaker 1>people through the basic facts we've talked through, and you

1:19:29.560 --> 1:19:31.599
<v Speaker 1>ask who here is stoked about the future that we're

1:19:31.640 --> 1:19:34.479
<v Speaker 1>headed to. I was even at the Miami Tech Summit

1:19:34.520 --> 1:19:36.479
<v Speaker 1>in front of a pro business pro AI. A lot

1:19:36.520 --> 1:19:39.479
<v Speaker 1>of people invested in it. Again, we're invested in in

1:19:39.520 --> 1:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>positive technology too, but I was able to see that

1:19:42.200 --> 1:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>entire audience is like, no, I don't want that either.

1:19:44.200 --> 1:19:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Yeah.

1:19:45.040 --> 1:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So again I think it's like, as long as you

1:19:47.120 --> 1:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>give people the off ramp, there are ways we can

1:19:49.080 --> 1:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have technology that's in service of making life better. We

1:19:52.400 --> 1:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>need to be funding and innovating in that way, and

1:19:55.080 --> 1:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>we need to be blocking off the parts that are

1:19:56.920 --> 1:20:00.479
<v Speaker 1>hurting our children, that are, you know, diminishing people cognitive

1:20:00.479 --> 1:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>capacities or replacing their kids' relationships with AI companions. And

1:20:04.200 --> 1:20:05.479
<v Speaker 1>we can do that. And you've done some of that

1:20:05.479 --> 1:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>with here in California. So you know, it's not that

1:20:08.520 --> 1:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I am or weird by default optimistic about the default trajectory,

1:20:12.439 --> 1:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>not at all. It's that if we have the clarity,

1:20:15.680 --> 1:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we can put our hand in the steering wheel and

1:20:17.840 --> 1:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>we can steer it somewhere else.

1:20:19.400 --> 1:20:21.960
<v Speaker 2>This notion of accelerate and steer.

1:20:21.880 --> 1:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yes, right, exactly what happens when you accelerate and

1:20:24.479 --> 1:20:27.519
<v Speaker 1>you don't steer, you obviously crash. It's just it's like

1:20:27.560 --> 1:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>not rocket scient there, it's one hundred percent the likely outcome.

1:20:32.680 --> 1:20:36.160
<v Speaker 2>What just as we wrap up this notion of governance,

1:20:36.240 --> 1:20:38.679
<v Speaker 2>going back to that is it's it's the foundation here

1:20:39.240 --> 1:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>which the regulations and and and the relationships are formed,

1:20:43.320 --> 1:20:46.680
<v Speaker 2>the partnerships to begin to address the common humanity and

1:20:46.680 --> 1:20:49.600
<v Speaker 2>the common threat and the common cause, common opportunities that

1:20:49.680 --> 1:20:53.559
<v Speaker 2>present themselves. This notion of catcher, I mean, you've got

1:20:53.640 --> 1:20:57.720
<v Speaker 2>these packs, You've got so much concentrated wealth. Yeah, we're

1:20:57.720 --> 1:21:02.160
<v Speaker 2>going to likely have the first few trillionaires this year. Yeah,

1:21:02.200 --> 1:21:06.519
<v Speaker 2>this calendar years right, yeah, yep, these IPOs, I mean

1:21:06.560 --> 1:21:09.760
<v Speaker 2>it's just I'm a now, it's a big surplus in

1:21:09.800 --> 1:21:13.480
<v Speaker 2>the state, the abundance, the GDP I mean, it's frothy,

1:21:14.040 --> 1:21:15.840
<v Speaker 2>as they say, but a lot of that now is

1:21:15.880 --> 1:21:18.800
<v Speaker 2>going to you know, make sure that you know we're

1:21:18.800 --> 1:21:24.120
<v Speaker 2>protecting incumbents against innovation. You know, some incumbent capitalism, not

1:21:24.320 --> 1:21:28.960
<v Speaker 2>entrepreneurial capitalism, necessarily innovation capitalism. There's that friction that's always

1:21:28.960 --> 1:21:31.280
<v Speaker 2>ongoing and those that are just going to do everything

1:21:31.320 --> 1:21:33.680
<v Speaker 2>to hammer as they did with social media, to make

1:21:33.720 --> 1:21:37.240
<v Speaker 2>sure there's no regular we're still debating section two thirty

1:21:36.920 --> 1:21:39.880
<v Speaker 2>that Christ yeah in this country. So how do we

1:21:39.920 --> 1:21:42.720
<v Speaker 2>start to break that reality?

1:21:42.840 --> 1:21:45.760
<v Speaker 4>I think money in politics, that's just that's right, that's

1:21:46.320 --> 1:21:48.320
<v Speaker 4>at the anti just just a little bit even further,

1:21:48.360 --> 1:21:51.200
<v Speaker 4>which is that as we get more trillionaires, like they

1:21:51.200 --> 1:21:54.800
<v Speaker 4>can hire private security, but that still requires relying on

1:21:54.880 --> 1:21:55.479
<v Speaker 4>human beings.

1:21:55.479 --> 1:21:58.080
<v Speaker 3>But you're just pointing out that we're heading into like

1:21:58.240 --> 1:22:01.120
<v Speaker 3>a world we have drone army, we have human eight

1:22:01.200 --> 1:22:05.920
<v Speaker 3>rowood armies. When trillionaires can just buy like their drone

1:22:06.040 --> 1:22:09.160
<v Speaker 3>armies to fight, like, we enter into techno feudalism, right,

1:22:09.200 --> 1:22:11.599
<v Speaker 3>And so that is the world that if we see,

1:22:12.520 --> 1:22:14.519
<v Speaker 3>if we don't do something, we're going to end up into.

1:22:14.680 --> 1:22:17.519
<v Speaker 1>But to answer your question, the it's all about the

1:22:17.560 --> 1:22:20.639
<v Speaker 1>campaign Loving, it's all about that, And one hundred million,

1:22:20.720 --> 1:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and ninety million dollars has gone into basically

1:22:24.400 --> 1:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>AI accelerationist packs and funding is for this midterm, for

1:22:29.280 --> 1:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>this mintrum electional Love interm just the midterms. That's so

1:22:32.240 --> 1:22:34.719
<v Speaker 1>one hundred ninety million. I believe the presidential is two billions.

1:22:34.760 --> 1:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So basically ten percent of the presidential is going into

1:22:37.320 --> 1:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>just the midtrums for AI alone, not even for the

1:22:39.240 --> 1:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>rest of it.

1:22:39.880 --> 1:22:41.160
<v Speaker 2>And it's not to regulate.

1:22:41.360 --> 1:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not to regulate it. It's it's to say, remove

1:22:43.960 --> 1:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>everything and go as fast.

1:22:45.000 --> 1:22:46.479
<v Speaker 2>As possible, right, let it rip.

1:22:46.760 --> 1:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>If you had everyone in the world, I think here

1:22:49.960 --> 1:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>the conversation we just had and at a basic level

1:22:52.840 --> 1:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>common sense looking at your children in the eye and

1:22:54.720 --> 1:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>say are you stoked about that future? No one wants that.

1:22:58.680 --> 1:23:01.519
<v Speaker 1>So the key piece of agency is going into the

1:23:01.520 --> 1:23:05.719
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections not voting for people who have taken money

1:23:05.720 --> 1:23:09.759
<v Speaker 1>from those AI accelerationist groups or don't have a position

1:23:09.800 --> 1:23:12.559
<v Speaker 1>on AI. That's trying to steer away from these outcomes. Now,

1:23:12.560 --> 1:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we obviously have to articulate that in a clearer way.

1:23:14.800 --> 1:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean to have kind of a pro

1:23:16.760 --> 1:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>human platform in future, and the companies try to make

1:23:20.200 --> 1:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the conversation inaccessible, like oh, well, you don't understand a

1:23:22.840 --> 1:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to make it seem like you don't know

1:23:24.160 --> 1:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>how to regulate live to put us in charge.

1:23:26.400 --> 1:23:28.920
<v Speaker 3>What they call this the under the hood bias, where

1:23:28.920 --> 1:23:30.400
<v Speaker 3>it's as if people who know how to make the

1:23:30.439 --> 1:23:33.160
<v Speaker 3>biggest engines know how to lay out cities and traffic lights,

1:23:33.360 --> 1:23:35.559
<v Speaker 3>and it's just not true for people who know how

1:23:35.600 --> 1:23:38.040
<v Speaker 3>to make car engines are not the best people for

1:23:38.120 --> 1:23:39.840
<v Speaker 3>knowing how to make cars safe and.

1:23:39.840 --> 1:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Prevent recidents work exactly. So it's pretty simple. It's like,

1:23:44.080 --> 1:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>do you want an anti human future in which you

1:23:46.880 --> 1:23:49.519
<v Speaker 1>will be permanently disempowered where no one has an incentive

1:23:49.520 --> 1:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>except for charity to pay your bills for you? And

1:23:52.520 --> 1:23:55.519
<v Speaker 1>you you want the companies that took your job, you

1:23:55.560 --> 1:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>want to be dependent on them for the rest of

1:23:57.000 --> 1:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>your life to pay your bills for you with no

1:23:59.320 --> 1:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>economic leverle no. So this is the final window. You

1:24:03.360 --> 1:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>know you want to vote for people who are going

1:24:04.960 --> 1:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to protect you economically, protect you, socially, protect you, politically

1:24:08.160 --> 1:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>meaning protect our jobs, protect our vote, voting pro human

1:24:12.320 --> 1:24:14.839
<v Speaker 1>and obviously that has to get articulated even more clearly.

1:24:15.240 --> 1:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But that is the number one way that people can

1:24:17.320 --> 1:24:19.679
<v Speaker 1>make a difference in the short term. There's other things too,

1:24:19.720 --> 1:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>like boycotting companies that are enabling mass surveillance. You know,

1:24:23.040 --> 1:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>when the company's subscriptions you know, go down by a lot,

1:24:25.840 --> 1:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>they really need their numbers to be going up. So

1:24:27.439 --> 1:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the companies are more vulnerable than you think, and you're

1:24:29.760 --> 1:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>more powerful than you think. Not just if you unsubscribe

1:24:31.960 --> 1:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and boycott them, but get your company, get your church

1:24:34.280 --> 1:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>group to do that too, and when those numbers start

1:24:37.240 --> 1:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to change, it actually has a difference.

1:24:39.040 --> 1:24:41.479
<v Speaker 2>Scott Galloway has been talking a lot about that as well.

1:24:42.479 --> 1:24:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely got to use whatever power your disposal. Let's just

1:24:46.680 --> 1:24:51.720
<v Speaker 2>briefly talk then about the power I mean, free and

1:24:51.760 --> 1:24:56.080
<v Speaker 2>fair elections. We talk about truth trust more broadly, deep fakes,

1:24:56.560 --> 1:25:00.479
<v Speaker 2>political ads. I mean I've seen stuff, you know, meetings,

1:25:00.520 --> 1:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>conversations I've had that are I mean next level what's

1:25:03.880 --> 1:25:06.920
<v Speaker 2>out the you yes, just the bs, it's already out there.

1:25:07.080 --> 1:25:10.479
<v Speaker 2>The ability to manipulate the crowd and the context of

1:25:10.680 --> 1:25:13.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, social media, the algorithms I mean, now you've

1:25:13.280 --> 1:25:15.240
<v Speaker 2>got you know, concentrated in the hands of a few

1:25:15.560 --> 1:25:17.519
<v Speaker 2>in that respect, I mean that whole thing. I mean

1:25:17.760 --> 1:25:20.680
<v Speaker 2>you you guys have talked about free and fair elections.

1:25:21.479 --> 1:25:24.800
<v Speaker 2>We talk about the timelines not only in job displacement,

1:25:25.040 --> 1:25:30.439
<v Speaker 2>but timelines to get this right domestically globally. I mean

1:25:32.280 --> 1:25:35.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six, you're talking mid terms. I mean this

1:25:35.880 --> 1:25:37.519
<v Speaker 2>is I mean, we only have a few more at

1:25:37.520 --> 1:25:40.160
<v Speaker 2>bats to get this right. That's right? Or is that overstated? No,

1:25:41.000 --> 1:25:41.639
<v Speaker 2>it's a few more.

1:25:42.280 --> 1:25:44.639
<v Speaker 3>Certainly by twenty twenty eight, Like that'll be the last

1:25:45.120 --> 1:25:47.639
<v Speaker 3>human election. Like it's going to be AIS running all

1:25:47.640 --> 1:25:50.200
<v Speaker 3>of the election, election campaigns, the ads, doing all the

1:25:50.320 --> 1:25:53.240
<v Speaker 3>both the information and disinformation, because human beings just can't

1:25:53.240 --> 1:25:55.240
<v Speaker 3>operate at that speed and are not that effective.

1:25:55.400 --> 1:25:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is it.

1:25:56.439 --> 1:25:58.559
<v Speaker 1>This is the window. But and I know, I just

1:25:58.560 --> 1:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>want to like get the human experience level. We've been

1:26:00.479 --> 1:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about some hard stuff, the last little level, and

1:26:03.840 --> 1:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just want to say, you know, we

1:26:05.080 --> 1:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>struggle with how to communicate this in a way that's responsible,

1:26:08.200 --> 1:26:11.559
<v Speaker 1>because here's the trade. Right, it's hard to face this.

1:26:11.680 --> 1:26:13.799
<v Speaker 1>But if we don't face it, we just like, look away,

1:26:14.760 --> 1:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>what are we going to get? We're going to get

1:26:16.080 --> 1:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the default anti human path, and so there's this trade

1:26:19.280 --> 1:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>where we the only way out is through like it is.

1:26:22.000 --> 1:26:23.559
<v Speaker 1>We call it kind of like a rite of passage,

1:26:23.560 --> 1:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like our ability to confront basically a shadow of a

1:26:28.040 --> 1:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>technology and the default future that that brings. If we

1:26:32.000 --> 1:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>can see that clearly, and if we can know that,

1:26:34.400 --> 1:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I know that we don't want that,

1:26:36.479 --> 1:26:38.519
<v Speaker 1>and if g and Trump and you know, the people

1:26:38.520 --> 1:26:40.599
<v Speaker 1>at the highest levels of these governments, Because you ask

1:26:40.640 --> 1:26:43.360
<v Speaker 1>any reasonable person at a very high level of national

1:26:43.400 --> 1:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>security on any side, and you say, do you want

1:26:45.720 --> 1:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>AIS that are going road can hack into any computer

1:26:48.040 --> 1:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>system and are already mining cryptocurrency? Does that sound good

1:26:51.479 --> 1:26:53.519
<v Speaker 1>to you? Does that sound safe to you? At a

1:26:53.640 --> 1:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>universal level, it's not. So there's actually much more common ground.

1:26:57.960 --> 1:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And even you know forty se I think it's already

1:27:00.080 --> 1:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the case that fifty seven percent of Americans think that

1:27:02.040 --> 1:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the risks of AI currently outweigh the benefits. I don't

1:27:04.760 --> 1:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>like that stat because it makes it too like it's

1:27:07.160 --> 1:27:09.599
<v Speaker 1>all bad versus all good or something like that. There's

1:27:09.640 --> 1:27:12.719
<v Speaker 1>already the pro human AI Declaration, where forty six groups

1:27:12.760 --> 1:27:15.559
<v Speaker 1>came together and said, we agree on these five principles

1:27:15.600 --> 1:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to make a pro human future. You can look it up.

1:27:17.160 --> 1:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It's human Statement dot org. That's the one that also

1:27:19.920 --> 1:27:23.759
<v Speaker 1>includes again Glen Back, Bernie Sanders, Steve Bannon, all these people.

1:27:24.160 --> 1:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's sixty five percent of Americans believe we

1:27:26.760 --> 1:27:29.559
<v Speaker 1>should not create superintelligence until we know how to do

1:27:29.600 --> 1:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it provably, safely and controlled. Sounds like a pretty basic thing,

1:27:33.080 --> 1:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like let's not do something. It's like, should we build

1:27:35.160 --> 1:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear bomb that until we know how to do

1:27:36.920 --> 1:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it safely or nobody won't set off of if we

1:27:38.840 --> 1:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>won't ignite the atmosphere, Probably we should wait to do that.

1:27:41.560 --> 1:27:43.799
<v Speaker 1>So this is not a radical proposal.

1:27:43.840 --> 1:27:46.000
<v Speaker 3>This is not do you want to know how many,

1:27:46.120 --> 1:27:48.680
<v Speaker 3>like what percentage of Americans think that we should just

1:27:48.720 --> 1:27:53.320
<v Speaker 3>go as fast as possible, unfettered, non regulated AI. What

1:27:53.439 --> 1:27:55.360
<v Speaker 3>percent of Americans? Five percent?

1:27:55.720 --> 1:27:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Literally, yeah, literally five percent.

1:27:57.880 --> 1:28:00.559
<v Speaker 3>So actually it's the most popular to run on. That's

1:28:00.640 --> 1:28:02.639
<v Speaker 3>right to do the like the safe thing, And.

1:28:02.600 --> 1:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>It's whether you're a Democrat or Republican, you don't want

1:28:04.960 --> 1:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to be surveilled by AIS. Whether you're Democrat Republican, you

1:28:07.280 --> 1:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want AIS taking your jobs, which it will do

1:28:09.160 --> 1:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>equally to both sides.

1:28:10.360 --> 1:28:13.320
<v Speaker 2>But do you then subscribe to the burning AOC frame

1:28:13.600 --> 1:28:17.160
<v Speaker 2>just shut down the data centers and moratorium.

1:28:16.479 --> 1:28:19.799
<v Speaker 1>And tell I think of it as those data centers,

1:28:19.840 --> 1:28:22.599
<v Speaker 1>and it's like I want a pro human data center policy.

1:28:22.800 --> 1:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you get to build the data center when

1:28:25.360 --> 1:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>these conditions are met and we know that it's a

1:28:27.720 --> 1:28:29.479
<v Speaker 1>pro usure. I'm not saying that's easy. I'm not saying

1:28:29.520 --> 1:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>no articulation that because I want people to hear. It's

1:28:32.400 --> 1:28:35.719
<v Speaker 1>not just no to all of it. It's making sure

1:28:35.720 --> 1:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that the conditions are the steering is built in. So

1:28:38.600 --> 1:28:40.519
<v Speaker 1>when you see that data center, you should ask, is

1:28:40.520 --> 1:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that data center here to basically enhance my life and

1:28:43.920 --> 1:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>strengthen my family.

1:28:45.479 --> 1:28:47.439
<v Speaker 2>You were even just saying data center was solar. Mostly

1:28:47.520 --> 1:28:48.599
<v Speaker 2>data centers aren't solar.

1:28:49.200 --> 1:28:49.559
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

1:28:50.080 --> 1:28:53.000
<v Speaker 2>We're turning back on cold plants. That's right, old natural

1:28:53.000 --> 1:28:54.680
<v Speaker 2>gas plants that are exactly yea.

1:28:55.680 --> 1:28:58.519
<v Speaker 3>Often in the sci fi movies, when is it the

1:28:58.560 --> 1:29:01.559
<v Speaker 3>case that human beings act actually stop all their bickering

1:29:02.200 --> 1:29:05.320
<v Speaker 3>and they start coordinating, it's when the aliens come, right, Yeah,

1:29:05.640 --> 1:29:07.960
<v Speaker 3>we are summoning the demon. We are summoning the alien.

1:29:08.280 --> 1:29:10.439
<v Speaker 3>And if we can see it that way, then it's

1:29:10.439 --> 1:29:12.679
<v Speaker 3>sort of like a Game of Thrones, winter is coming.

1:29:13.120 --> 1:29:14.640
<v Speaker 3>We have to understand winter is coming, then all the

1:29:14.680 --> 1:29:16.760
<v Speaker 3>fighting in West Ros can like pause for just long

1:29:16.880 --> 1:29:19.200
<v Speaker 3>enough that we can deal with it. That's this moment,

1:29:19.200 --> 1:29:22.160
<v Speaker 3>because otherwise it just feels completely hopeless, like how are

1:29:22.200 --> 1:29:24.720
<v Speaker 3>we going to deal with all the finance reforms when

1:29:24.720 --> 1:29:29.639
<v Speaker 3>we can't when has Congress actually done anything? And yet

1:29:29.800 --> 1:29:33.560
<v Speaker 3>there is this one moment where like all of humanity

1:29:33.760 --> 1:29:36.439
<v Speaker 3>is on one side, there is a human movement. That's

1:29:36.439 --> 1:29:39.120
<v Speaker 3>what I think the social media stuff shows. If we

1:29:39.160 --> 1:29:41.360
<v Speaker 3>don't think of this as just an AI problem, but

1:29:41.600 --> 1:29:46.160
<v Speaker 3>as a technology encroaching onto our humanity, overreaching into our

1:29:46.240 --> 1:29:49.639
<v Speaker 3>humanity problem, then actually there is massive momentum, more than

1:29:49.640 --> 1:29:51.360
<v Speaker 3>we ever thought was possible, because what we have to

1:29:51.439 --> 1:29:55.360
<v Speaker 3>do is juice those like the momentum that's already there.

1:29:56.200 --> 1:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, look, in the absence of a federal leadership,

1:30:00.080 --> 1:30:02.240
<v Speaker 2>California will continue to assert itself. I believe in the

1:30:02.240 --> 1:30:05.559
<v Speaker 2>power of emulation successfullys clues will continue to try to

1:30:05.920 --> 1:30:09.040
<v Speaker 2>iterate on this and lean in. But look this, you

1:30:09.080 --> 1:30:11.320
<v Speaker 2>know the clarity of you guys bring to this conversation,

1:30:11.439 --> 1:30:14.560
<v Speaker 2>The importance of this conversation being brought to scale and

1:30:15.320 --> 1:30:19.280
<v Speaker 2>brought it into consciousness and the imperative of seeing this

1:30:19.439 --> 1:30:22.719
<v Speaker 2>documentary again. The documentary is called.

1:30:22.600 --> 1:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>The AI doc or How I Became an apocaly optimism.

1:30:25.640 --> 1:30:29.960
<v Speaker 2>And we can't let that slip twice because you've used

1:30:30.080 --> 1:30:33.720
<v Speaker 2>a word that people are not familiar with, which is

1:30:34.080 --> 1:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>a good way to end, and that is this convergence

1:30:37.120 --> 1:30:41.719
<v Speaker 2>of optimism and pessimism, a little more optimism than pessimism

1:30:41.960 --> 1:30:42.599
<v Speaker 2>in a better place.

1:30:42.640 --> 1:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's about agency. And I'll just leave you with

1:30:44.640 --> 1:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a quote that I loved from a meditation teacher who

1:30:47.240 --> 1:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>talked who happened to be a meditation teacher, and it's

1:30:50.880 --> 1:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>from the Army Corps of Engineers, which is that the

1:30:54.240 --> 1:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult we do today, the impossible takes just a little longer.

1:31:00.160 --> 1:31:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Like it, and just end by saying it really actually

1:31:05.040 --> 1:31:07.960
<v Speaker 3>isn't about being an optimist or a pessimist, because to

1:31:08.439 --> 1:31:11.120
<v Speaker 3>choose that label for yourself, it's a sort of it's

1:31:11.160 --> 1:31:13.000
<v Speaker 3>to take a backseat, like to sit down and just

1:31:13.040 --> 1:31:15.160
<v Speaker 3>be like, I'm just going to accept that it'll either

1:31:15.200 --> 1:31:19.799
<v Speaker 3>come out well or not, versus taking responsibility for trying

1:31:19.840 --> 1:31:22.639
<v Speaker 3>to see clearly to shift the world to go well

1:31:24.200 --> 1:31:27.800
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's what everyone listening can can do,

1:31:27.960 --> 1:31:31.880
<v Speaker 3>is that this can all feel like too big? What

1:31:32.400 --> 1:31:34.519
<v Speaker 3>can I do? And then you realize even like the

1:31:34.640 --> 1:31:36.840
<v Speaker 3>like the CEOs of the company sort of feel a

1:31:36.920 --> 1:31:40.960
<v Speaker 3>similar way. But this is not just about what we

1:31:41.080 --> 1:31:44.280
<v Speaker 3>must do. This is fundamentally a question of like who

1:31:44.320 --> 1:31:46.760
<v Speaker 3>we must be. That if we are the kind of

1:31:46.800 --> 1:31:49.400
<v Speaker 3>people that aren't looking for a path, and the path

1:31:49.479 --> 1:31:52.759
<v Speaker 3>is certainly not clear, doesn't seem obvious or even possible.

1:31:53.080 --> 1:31:55.240
<v Speaker 3>But if we're the kind of people that don't look

1:31:55.240 --> 1:31:56.720
<v Speaker 3>for the path, we definitely won't find it.

1:31:56.760 --> 1:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>If it's there.

1:31:57.640 --> 1:31:59.479
<v Speaker 3>If we are the kinds of people that do look

1:31:59.520 --> 1:32:01.960
<v Speaker 3>for the path, then if it's there, we have the

1:32:02.080 --> 1:32:03.599
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to find it.

1:32:03.640 --> 1:32:07.639
<v Speaker 1>And just maybe one last thing is people listening to this,

1:32:07.640 --> 1:32:10.439
<v Speaker 1>this is a lot. Your role is not to take

1:32:10.439 --> 1:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>on this whole problem. You don't have to do that.

1:32:12.680 --> 1:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>There's some people who are soldiers and there's some people

1:32:14.320 --> 1:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>who are civilians. But your role is to be part

1:32:17.439 --> 1:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of the collective immune system against this anti human future.

1:32:20.960 --> 1:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>One simple way you can do that is to share

1:32:23.080 --> 1:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this conversation yeah, with literally the most powerful people that

1:32:26.800 --> 1:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, and ask them to watch it. And to

1:32:29.320 --> 1:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>share it with the most powerful people that they know.

1:32:31.640 --> 1:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you've done that, you can say, as long

1:32:34.000 --> 1:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>as you are spreading the word and being part of

1:32:35.600 --> 1:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that immune system, you can rest at home, kiss your

1:32:38.720 --> 1:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>children at night, focus on the things that all of

1:32:41.040 --> 1:32:43.599
<v Speaker 1>this is about anyway, which is what do we love

1:32:43.800 --> 1:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>about the world, what do we love about life? That

1:32:45.880 --> 1:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we want to continue and come from that place because

1:32:48.439 --> 1:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that is the energy that we will that will inspire

1:32:51.360 --> 1:32:53.599
<v Speaker 1>other people to want to take those other actions too.

1:32:53.720 --> 1:32:55.719
<v Speaker 3>And I know, Kevin, you ended up watching an earlier

1:32:55.760 --> 1:32:58.280
<v Speaker 3>presentation that we did the Aidlemma. Yeah, I think somebody

1:32:58.320 --> 1:32:59.760
<v Speaker 3>said that you watched it like three times and share

1:32:59.800 --> 1:33:02.320
<v Speaker 3>with all your staff. How did you end up hearing

1:33:02.320 --> 1:33:02.760
<v Speaker 3>about it?

1:33:03.640 --> 1:33:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, come on, hearing about it from you guys.

1:33:07.920 --> 1:33:10.799
<v Speaker 2>You guys. I was able to get the early early

1:33:10.880 --> 1:33:13.800
<v Speaker 2>preview from the two of you, and I was able

1:33:14.000 --> 1:33:18.680
<v Speaker 2>to devour it, took notes, and then shared it universally

1:33:18.720 --> 1:33:22.240
<v Speaker 2>with everybody around me. Look, you know, the spirit of

1:33:22.320 --> 1:33:23.920
<v Speaker 2>you guys just DoD it. I couldn't agree with you more.

1:33:23.960 --> 1:33:26.479
<v Speaker 2>This notion of agency is so important, and we talk

1:33:26.520 --> 1:33:28.479
<v Speaker 2>about that on the podcast all the time. But this

1:33:28.560 --> 1:33:30.760
<v Speaker 2>notion of the future. It's not something to experience, something

1:33:30.760 --> 1:33:34.920
<v Speaker 2>to manifest futures inside of us. And so it's decisions,

1:33:34.960 --> 1:33:36.000
<v Speaker 2>not conditions.

1:33:35.600 --> 1:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly.

1:33:36.200 --> 1:33:39.559
<v Speaker 2>And so this idea that we are powerless, it's just bullshit.

1:33:40.040 --> 1:33:43.960
<v Speaker 2>It's complete bullshit. Everything that we laid out is an

1:33:43.960 --> 1:33:46.920
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to do better and be better. And I think

1:33:46.960 --> 1:33:49.479
<v Speaker 2>the spirit of the calt arms for everybody, as we

1:33:49.520 --> 1:33:51.679
<v Speaker 2>all have a role to play, and those roles are different,

1:33:51.720 --> 1:33:53.439
<v Speaker 2>and no one has to be you know, you don't

1:33:53.479 --> 1:33:56.760
<v Speaker 2>have to be overwhelmed. But this notion of just being

1:33:56.840 --> 1:34:01.160
<v Speaker 2>present in the conversation and and and in the conversation

1:34:01.240 --> 1:34:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and sharing it, I think is foundational. So, guys, this

1:34:05.040 --> 1:34:11.600
<v Speaker 2>is really important. The timeliness of this conversation it cannot overstate.

1:34:12.439 --> 1:34:14.639
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm very grateful for you to be out

1:34:14.960 --> 1:34:19.080
<v Speaker 2>on the road all across this country sharing this remarkable documentary.

1:34:19.080 --> 1:34:22.480
<v Speaker 2>I encourage everybody go out and watch it and more importantly,

1:34:22.840 --> 1:34:25.920
<v Speaker 2>share it and not fall prey to any of the

1:34:26.000 --> 1:34:30.400
<v Speaker 2>citizensm and negativity. Maintain your sense of optimism again, we

1:34:30.439 --> 1:34:32.040
<v Speaker 2>can shape the future. Thank you both